Skip to main content

Full text of "Bulletin of the Brooklyn Entomological Society"

See other formats


\ 


Brooklyn  Entomological 
Society 


NEW  SERIES 


Vol.  XXIV 


1929 


EDITED  (IN  SUCCESSION)  BY 

F.  G.  SCHAUPP  JOHN  B.  SMITH  GEO.  H.  HULST 

CHAS.  LOUIS  POLLARD  R.  P.  DOW 

J.  R.  de  la  TORRE-BUENO 


PUBLICATION  COMMITTEE 

J.  R.  de  la  TORRE-BUENO,  Editor 
G.  P.  ENGELHARDT 


E.  L.  BELL 


THE  SCIENCE  PRESS 
PRINTING  COMPANY 
LANCASTER.  PA. 


f 


Vol.  XXIV  FEBRUARY,  1929  No.  1 

BULLETIN 

OF  THE 

Brooklyn  Entomological 
Society 


NEW  SERIES 


PUBLICATION  COMMITTEE 

J.  R.  de  la  TORRE-BUENO,  Editor 

E.  L.  BELL  GEO.  P.  ENGELHARDT 

Published  for  the  Society  by  the 

Science  Press  Printing  Co., 

Lime  and  Green  Sts.,  Lancaster,  Pa., 

Price,  60  cents  Subscription,  $2.50  per  year 

Mailed  March  9,  1929 

Entered  as  second-class  matter  January  21,  1919,  at  the  post  office  at  Lancaster,  Pa., 
under  the  Act  of  March  3,  1879 


The  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society 

Meetings  are  held  on  the  second  Thursday  after  the  first  Tuesday  of  each 
fnonth  from  October  to  June,  inclusive,  at  the  Central  Museum,  Eastern 
Parkway  and  Washington  Ave.,  Brooklyn.  The  annual  dues  are  $2.00. 


OFFICERS,  1927 


Honorary  President 


CHARLES 

President 

W.  T.  DAVIS 

Vice-President 

J.  R.  DE  LA  TORRE-BUENO 
Becording  Secretary 

E.  L.  BELL 
Corresponding  Secretary 
HOWARD  NOTMAN 


. LEJSTG 

Treasurer 

G . P.  ENGELHARDT 
Central  Museum 
Eastern  Parkway 
Librarian 

DR.  JOSEPH  BEQUAERT 
Curator 

F.  M.  SCHOTT 


Delegate  to  Council  of  New  York 
Academy  of  Sciences 

G.  P.  ENGELHARDT 


CONTENTS 


NEW  SPECIES  OP  NEOBOBUS  AND  XENOBOBUS,  Harry  H. 

Knight  1 

WHAT  ATTRACTION?  C.  A.  Frost  11 

AN  ABERRANT  BUTTERFLY— JUNONIA  COENA,  Wm.  T.  Davis 12 

INFORMATION  WANTED,  C.  A.  Frost  12 

PEDILUS  PARVICOLLIS  NOT  A DENDROIDES,  H.  C.  Fill 13 

RARE  BEETLE,  RARER  LUCK,  C.  A.  Frost  14 

EDITING,  EDITORS,  CONTRIBUTORS  AND  READERS,  J.  R.  de  la 

Torre-Bueno  15 

NOTES  ON  NORTH  AMERICAN  LEPIDOPTERA,  F.  H.  Chermock 20 

THE  CRANE  FLIES  OF  NEW  YORK : THIRD  SUPPLEMENTARY 

LIST,  Charles  P.  Alexander  . 22 

PROTECTIVE  ADAPTATIONS  AMONG  AQUATIC  HEMIPTERA, 

J.  R.  de  la  Torre-Bueno  30 

THE  HONEY  ANT,  MYRMECOCYSTUS  MELLIGER  AT  SAN  AN- 
TONIO, TEXAS,  H.  B.  Parks  .J , 32 

UNCOMMON  COLEOPTERA,  C.  A.  Frost  34 

SOME  TINGITOIDEA  FROM  CENTRAL  AND  SOUTH  AMERICA, 

Carl  J.  Drake  35 

NORTH  AMERICAN  SPECIES  OF  PARANDRA,  Chas.  Schaeffer 38 

EDITORIALS:  ON  ENTOMOLOGISTS  AND  ENTOMOLOGY, 

J K T -B  41 

“FIT  TO  PRINT,”  J.  R.  T.-B II.. Ill'll'.'!  42 

BOOK  NOTES:  “POND  PROBLEMS,”  J.  R.  T.-B 43 

PROCEEDINGS  OF  THE  SOCIETY,  E.  L.  Bell  and  C.  L.  Pollard 47 


Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society 

Published  in 

February,  April,  June,  October  and  December  of  each  year 


BULLETIN 

OF  THE 

BROOKLYN  ENTOMOLOGICAL  SOCIETY 


Vol.  XXIV  March,  1929  No.  1 


NEW  SPECIES  OF  NEOBORUS  AND  XENOBORUS 
(HEMIPTERA,  MIRIDAE). 

By  Harry  H.  Knight,  Ames,  Iowa.1 
Neoborus  wileyae  n.  sp. 

Distinguished  by  the  short,  robust  form,  black  color  and 
prominent,  sericeous,  recumbent  silvery  white  pubescence. 

J1.  Length  3.4  mm.,  width  1.8  mm.  Head:  width  1 mm., 
vertex  .47  mm. ; yellowish  brown,,  tylus  black.  Rostrum, 
length  1.2  mm.,  reaching  posterior  margins  of  hind  coxae, 
dark  brown  to  blackish.  Antennae:  segment  I,  length  .31 
mm.;  II,  1.12  mm.;  Ill,  broken;  black.  Pronotum:  length 
.83  mm.,  width  at  base  1.49  mm.;  basal  margin  sinuate  at 
middle  and  between  there  and  basal  angles ; lateral  margins 
nearly  straight,  roughly  carinate. 

Black,  the  dorsum  in  part  dark  brownish  black;  head  ex- 
cept tylus,  propleura,  anterior  third  of  disk  surrounding  the 
black  calli,  yellowish  brown ; ostiolar  peritreme  white,  tips  of 
coxae  somewhat  brownish,  otherwise  the  legs  uniformly 
black ; membrane  black.  Dorsum  rather  uniformly,  coarsely 
and  rather  closely  punctate ; clothed  with  prominent,  seri- 
ceous, recumbent  silvery  white  pubescence.  Embolar  mar- 
gins moderately  arcuate,  the  edge  finely  but  distinctly  cari- 
nate. 

2.  Length  4.4  mm.,  width  2.1  mm.;  embolar  margins 
strongly  arcuate.  Head:  width  1.1  mm.,  vertex  .56  mm. 
Antennae : segment  I,  length  .30  mm. ; II,  .96  mm. ; III,  .38 
mm. ; IV,  .27  mm. ; black.  Pronotum : length  .90  mm.,  width 
at  base  1.64  mm.  More  robust  and  embolar  margins  more 
arcuate  than  in  the  male,  but  very  similar  in  coloration, 
pubescence  and  puncturation. 

1 Contribution  from  the  Department  of  Zoology  and  Ento- 
mology, Iowa  State  College,  Ames,  Iowa. 

1 


9 


Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


Holotype:  §,  April  20,  1921,  Eastland  Co.,  Texas  (Grace  O. 
Wiley)  ; author’s  collection.  Allotype : same  data  as  the  type, 
Paratypes : 15  J taken  with  the  types  “on  Hawthorn  blossoms” 
according  to  Mrs.  Wiley’s  records.  It  is  not  positive  that  this 
species  breeds  on  hawthorn  ( Crataegus ) but  the  record  is  very 
suggestive.  I take  pleasure  in  naming  this  interesting  species 
after  the  collector,  Mrs.  Grace  O.  Wiley,  who  collected  this  and 
other  interesting  species  of  Mirids  for  me. 

Neoborus  atratus  n.  sp. 

Allied  to  wileyae  but  distinguished  by  the  shorter  rostrum 
and  pale  marks  on  the  scutellum. 

J1.  Length  3.2  mm.,  width  1.6  mm.  Head : width  .96  mm., 
vertex  .42  mm.  Rostrum,  length  1.05  mm.,  reaching  to  mid- 
dle of  hind  coxae,  brownish  black.  Antennae:  segment  I, 
length  .29  mm. ; II,  1.02  mm. ; III,  broken ; black.  Pronotum : 
length  .75  mm.,  width  at  base  1.45  mm.;  basal  margin  only 
very  slightly  sinuate  at  middle ; lateral  margins  slightly  sinu- 
ate, roughly,  unevenly  carinate. 

Color  black;  head  yellowish  to  brownish  black,  tylus  and 
basal  carina  black,  a brownish  black  circle  on  frons  joining 
below  with  tylus ; pronotum  black,  basal  edge,  median  line, 
collar,  and  ray  behind  outer  margin  of  each  callus,  yellowish  ; 
scutellum  with  basal  angles,  apex,  and  fine  median  line  pale 
to  yellow.  Clothed  with  sericeous,  recumbent,  silvery  pu- 
bescence. Pronotum  and  scutellum  coarsely  and  closely 
punctate,  more  finely  so  on  hemelytra.  Membrane  uniformly 
brownish  black. 

Holotype:  <£,  June  7-17,  1916,  Jemez  Springs,  New  Mexico 
(J.  Woodgate)  ; author’s  collection. 

Neoborus  adeliae  n.  sp. 

Runs  to  palmeri  Reut.  in  my  key  (Hem.  Conn.,  1923,  p. 
561)  but  differs  in  several  respects;  the  black  clavus,  median 
vitta  on  scutellum,  and  broad  black  rays  on  pronotum  will 
distinguish  it.  Coloration  suggestive  of  illitus  Van  D.  but 
the  long  first  antennal  segment  will  distinguish  this  species. 

($.  Length  4.3  mm.,  width  1.9  mm.  Head:  width  1.03 
mm.,  vertex  .46  mm. ; vertex  and  frons  sharply  declivent ; yel- 
lowish, tylus  black,  frons  more  or  less  brownish  black.  Ros- 
trum, length  1.03  mm.,  reaching  upon  intermediate  coxae, 
yellowish,  apex  black.  Antennae : segment  I,  length  .62  mm., 
black,  sometimes  yellowish  beneath;  II,  1.9  mm.,  black;  III, 


Feb.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society 


3 


.68  mm.,  black;  IV,  .35  mm.,  black.  Pronotum:  length  .96 
mm.,  width  at  base  1.7  mm.;  lateral  margins  straight,  angu- 
late,  but  scarcely  carinate. 

Dorsal  surface  nearly  glabrous,  a minute  short  hair  aris- 
ing on  anterior  edge  of  each  puncture ; punctate  nearly  as  in 
palmeri,  but  calli  less  convex.  Coloration  pale  to  yellowish 
and  marked  with  black ; calli,  wedge-shaped  ray  behind  each 
callus  extending  to  basal  margin  of  disk,  median  vitta  on 
scutellum,  clavus,  embolium  and  apical  area  of  corium,  apex 
of  cuneus,  two  subapical  bands  on  hind  femora,  band  near 
base  and  on  middle  of  hind  tibiae,  black.  Venter  and  pleura 
dark  brownish.  Membrane  and  veins  rather  uniformly  black- 
ish. 

J.  Length  4.7  mm.,  width  2.4  mm.  Head:  width  1.11 
mm.,  vertex  .58  mm.  Antennae:  segment  I,  length  .53  mm.; 
II,  1.27  mm.;  Ill,  .62  mm.;  IV,  .38  mm.;  brownish  black. 
Pronotum : length  1.09  mm.,  width  at  base  1.98  mm.  Slightly 
more  robust  than  the  male  but  very  similar  in  coloration,  pu- 
bescence and  puncturation. 

Holotype:  <$,  April  17,  1928,  College  Station,  Texas  (H.  G. 
Johnston);  author’s  collection.  Allotype:  taken  with  the  type; 
returned  to  Mr.  Johnston.  Paratypes:  §,  April  12,  40  J1 

April  17,  taken  with  the  types  on  swamp  privet  ( Adelia  parvi- 
folia ) where  Mr.  Johnston  found  the  species  breeding,  but  only 
in  shaded  situations. 

Neoborus  adustus  n.  sp. 

Allied  to  glaber  Kngt.,  but  distinguished  by  the  more 
prominent  pubescence,  different  color,  and  by  the  shorter 
first  antennal  segment  which  in  length  (J')  does  not  exceed 
width  of  vertex. 

Length  3.9  mm.,  width  1.66  mm.  Head:  width  .98 
mm.,  vertex  .40  mm. ; brownish  yellow,  tylus  except  base,  and 
spot  above  base  of  antenna,  blackish.  Rostrum,  length  1.06 
mm.,  reaching  to  middle  of  intermediate  coxae.  Antennae: 
segment  I,  length  .34  mm.,  yellowish  brown,  blackish  on  an- 
terior aspect;  II,  1.09  mm.,  brownish  black,  III,  .38  mm., 
black ; IV,  .37  mm.,  black.  Pronotum : length  .80  mm.,  width 
at  base  1.46  mm.;  coarsely  and  more  sparsely  punctate  than 
glaber,  especially  on  anterior  half  of  disk ; lateral  margins  of 
disk  slightly  sulcate,  rounded  and  obsoletely  carinate,  the 
carinate  line  bordered  by  closely  set  coarse  punctures ; yel- 
lowish to  brownish,  dark  brown  on  propleura,  basal  half  of 


4 Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  VoI.XXIV 


disk,  and  on  inner  half  of  calli.  Scutellum  slightly  convex, 
coarsely  and  unevenly  punctate ; dull  yellowish,  a brow  area 
each  side  of  median  line  which  contrasts  only  very  slightly 
with  the  paler  yellowish  color  on  basal  angles,  apex  and 
median  line. 

Dorsum  clothed  with  fine,  short,  sericeous  pubescence 
although  obsolete  on  the  pronotum ; moderately  shining. 
Color  yellowish  to  brownish,  darker  brown  on  clavus  and 
corium ; cuneus  uniformly  pale  yellowish  translucent.  Mem- 
brane and  veins  pale,  tinged  with  brownish,  a fuscous  spot 
behind  apex  of  cuneus  and  on  middle  of  larger  areole.  Legs 
light  yellowish  brown,  coxae  pale  yellowish,  hind  femora 
with  two  subapical  dark  brown  marks,  sometimes  obsolete, 
tips  of  tarsi  fuscous. 

J.  Length  4.1  mm.,  width  1.9  mm.  Head:  width  1.02 
mm.,  vertex  .52  mm.  Antennae : segment  I,  length  .35  mm. ; 
II,  1.03  mm.,  Ill,  .40  mm.;  IV,  .36  mm.  Pronotum:  length 
.86  mm.,  width  at  base  1.6  mm.  Very  similar  to  the  male  in 
pubescence,  puncturation  and  coloration,  although  usually 
slightly  paler  and  more  uniformly  colored. 

Holotype:  July  15,  1915,  Springfield,  Missouri  (H.  H. 

Knight)  ; author’s  collection.  Allotype:  taken  with  the  type. 

Paratypes:  26  $ §,  taken  with  the  types  on  ash  ( Fraxinus  sp.) 

5 c?  2>  July  18,  1915,  topotypic.  3 2 $>,  April  12,  1928,  College 

Station,  Texas  (H.  G.  Johnston),  on  Fraxinus  americana. 

Neoborus  populi  n.  sp. 

Runs  to  canadensis  Van  D.  in  my  key  (Hem.  Conn.,  1923, 
p.  561),  but  looks  more  like  puhescens  Kngt. ; distinguished 
from  the  latter  by  the  longer  pubescence  and  black 
antennae. 

J1.  Length  4.2  mm.,  width  1.7  mm.  Head : width  1.05  mm., 
vertex  .40  mm. ; frons  and  tylus  rather  prominent ; yellowish, 
tylus,  spot  above  each  antennal  socket,  and  mark  each  side 
of  median  line  on  frons,  black.  Rostrum,  length  1.06  mm., 
nearly  attaining  hind  margin  of  sternum,  yellowish,  apex 
black.  Antennae : segment  I,  length  .63  mm.,  black,  some- 
what paler  on  base;  II,  1.75  mm.,  black ; III,  .92  mm.,  brown- 
ish ; IV,  .32  mm.,  yellowish.  Pronotum : length  .92  mm., 
width  at  base  1.5  mm.;  calli  prominent,  black,  surrounded  by 
yellowish,  becoming  black  on  posterior  half  of  disk  but  not 
joining  with  black  on  calli ; lateral  margins  of  disk  slightly 
sinuate,  not  distinctly  carinate. 


Feb.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society 


o 


Clothed  with  prominent,  erect,  pale  pubescence,  longer 
and  more  prominent  than  in  pubescens.  Coloration  pale  to 
yellowish  and  shaded  with  black,  scutellum  yellow,  without 
indication  of  any  vitta;  calli,  posterior  half  of  pronotal  disk 
but  usually  paler  on  median  line,  mesoscutum,  inner  half  of 
clavus  although  paler  basally,  embolium  except  apex,  outer 
margin  of  corium  exterior  to  radial  vein  and  extending 
obliquely  across  apical  area  of  corium  to  inner  angles,  pleura 
and  sternum,  black.  Cuneus  clear,  membrane  and  veins 
blackish.  Legs  yellowish,  apical  half  of  hind  femora  and 
base  of  tibiae  becoming  blackish. 

Length  4.6  mm.,  width  1.9  mm.  Head:  width  1.02 
mm.,  vertex  .49  mm.  Antennae : segment  I,  length  .53  mm., 
blackish,  paler  on  one  side;  II,  1.35  mm.,  black,  paler  beneath 
on  basal  half ; III,  .90  mm.,  yellowish ; IV,  .38  mm.,  pale. 
Pronotum:  length  .95  mm.,  width  at  base  1.75  mm.  Very 
similar  to  the  male  in  pubescence  and  coloration' except  the 
areas  of  black  somewhat  reduced ; hind  femora  with  two  in- 
complete, subapical  black  annuli ; membrane  fuscous  to 
blackish. 

Holotype:  July  19,  1926,  Brownfield,  Illinois  (Vera  G. 

Smith)  ; author’s  collection.  Allotype : same  date  as  type.  Para- 
types:  4^1$,  July  20,  Urbana,  Illinois:  “ on  cottonwood.” 

Neoborus  vittifrons  n.  sp. 

Allied  to  adustus  but  distinguished  by  the  narrower  calli 
with  black  cephalic  margins  and  the  more  closely  punctate 
pronotal  disk. 

J'.  Length  3.9  mm.,  width  1.6  mm.  Head:  width  .98 
mm.,  vertex  .36  mm. ; median  line  of  and  arcuate  line  around 
frons,  and  vertex  except  smooth  spot  next  to  the  eye,  with 
coarse  closely  set  punctures,  yellow ; tylus  and  median  line  of 
frons  blackish.  Rostrum,  length  1.12  mm.,  nearly  attaining 
hind  margins  of  middle  coxae,  yellowish,  apex  black. 
Antennae : segment  I,  length  .34  mm.,  blackish,  yellowish  be- 
neath; II,  1.06  mm.;  Ill,  .34  mm.;  IV,  (broken);  black. 
Pronotum:  length  .82  mm.,  width  at  base  1.42  mm.;  disk 
coarsely  and  closely  punctate,  more  closely  about  calli  than  in 
adustus,  also  the  calli  narrower  with  cephalic  margins  black, 
more  broadly  black  at  inner  angles ; yellowish,  basal  half  of 
disk  more  brownish,  basal  edge  and  collar  white.  Scutellum 
slightly  convex,  flat  on  apex,  coarsely  punctate ; pale  yellow- 
ish, basal  half  more  brownish  each  side  of  median  line. 


6 Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


Dorsum  clothed  with  fine,  short,  sericeous  pale  pubescence. 
Color  uniformly  pale  yellowish  and  tinged  with  brown ; 
cuneus  and  outer  half  of  corium  yellowish  translucent. 
Membrane  pale,  veins  blackish,  anal  area  and  transverse  mark 
behind  apex  of  cuneus,  fuscous;  an  opaque,  pale  callus 
bordering  apex  of  larger  areole.  Legs  pale  to  yellowish, 
knees  and  tips  of  tarsi  fuscous. 

J.  Length  4.2  mm.,  width  1 mm.  Head:  width  1.02  mm., 
vertex  .49  mm.  Antennae : segment  I,  length  .34  mm.,  yel- 
lowish, blackish  line  above;  II,  .92  mm.,  yellowish  brown  to 
black,  darker  apically;  III,  .38  mm.,  black;  IV,  .34  mm., 
black.  Pronotum:  length  .86  mm.,  width  at  base  1.6  mm. 
Very  similar  to  the  male  in  pubescence,  puncturation,  and 
coloration,  but  black  marks  on  frons  and  calli  frequently  re- 
duced to  dark  brown. 

Holotype:  J',  April  26,  1926,  Santa  Catalina  Mts.,  alt.  3,200  ft., 
Arizona  (A.  A.  Nichol)  ; author’s  collection.  Allotype:  same 
data  as  the  type.  Paratypes:  2^2},  taken  with  the  types  on 
Fraxinus  arizonicus  by  Mr.  Nichol.  10  $ 5,  April  19,  5 £ 5,  May 
31,  2(f  1 June  7,  1924,  Tucson,  Arizona  (A.  A.  Nichol),  taken 
on  Fraxinus  arizonicus.  2A,  July  20,  1917,  Texas  Pass,  Arizona 
(H.  H.  Knight). 

Neoborus  vittifrons  umbratus  n.  subsp. 

Structurally  very  similar  to  vittifrons  but  the  dorsum  and 
body  largely  brownish  black. 

($.  Length  4.4  mm.,  width  1.7  mm.  Head:  width  .99 
mm.,  vertex  .40  mm.  Rostrum,  length  1.09  mm.,  nearly  at- 
taining hind  margins  of  middle  coxae.  Antennae : segment 
I,  length  .33  mm.;  II,  1.03  mm.;  Ill,  .31  mm.;  IV,  .29  mm.; 
black,  first  segment  brownish  on  one  side.  Pronotum : length 
,83  mm.,  width  at  base  1.51  mm. 

Color  dark  brownish  black,  more  black  on  basal  half  of 
pronotum  and  inner  half  of  corium ; each  side  of  vertex 
bordering  eye,  arcuate  spot  each  side  of  frons,  and  juga 
bordering  tylus,  yellowish ; collar  and  basal  edge  of  pronotum 
whitish,  outer  half  of  calli  except  cephalic  edge  and  extend- 
ing as  a short  ray  just  behind,  narrow  median  line  of  disk, 
dorsal  and  ventral  margins  of  propleura,  yellowish ; scutellum 
dark  fuscous  brown,  narrow  median  line,  apex,  basal  angles 
and  extending  along  lateral  margins,  pale  or  whitish ; 
hemelytra  dark  brownish  black,  an  elongate  area  on  outer 
half  of  corium,  a similar  area  on  middle  of  clavus,  and  the 


Fel.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society 


7 


cuneus,  yellowish  translucent ; cuneus  becoming  dark  brown- 
ish bordering  smaller  areole.  Membrane  pale,  anal  area  and 
veins  fuscous ; disk  of  larger  areoles  and  spot  behind  cuneus, 
pale  fuscous.  Sternum,  pleura,  and  sides  of  venter,  dark 
brownish  to  black,  genital  segment  dark  brown.  Legs  pale 
to  yellowish,  femora  with  apical  half  dark  brownish,  bian- 
nulate  with  pale  at  apex ; tibiae  yellowish,  a dark  brown  line 
at  base  on  dorsal  aspect,  tips  of  tarsi  fuscous. 

Holotype .1  <$,  June  1,  1926,  Chiricahua  Mts.,  alt.  6,000  ft., 
Arizona  (A.  A.  Nichol)  ; author’s  collection.  Paratype:  taken 

with  the  type. 

Neoborus  rufivenosus  n.  sp. 

Distinguished  by  the  short  rostrum,  blackish  hemelytra, 
yellow  scutellum,  reddish  cuneus  and  red  veins  in  the  mem- 
brane. 

Length  4.7  mm.,  width  1.8  mm.  Head:  width  .99 
mm.,  vertex  .415  mm.;  reddish  brown,  frons  yellowish, 
coarsely  punctate  on  vertex,  sides  and  median  line  of  frons, 
a small  smooth  spot  each  side  of  vertex  bordering  the  eye. 
Rostrum,  length  .98  mm.,  extending  somewhat  behind  mid- 
dle of  sternum,  yellowish,  apex  blackish.  Antennae : seg- 
ment I,  length  .45  mm.,  brownish  black;  II,  1.36  mm.,  brown- 
ish, becoming  blackish  apically;  III,  .45  mm.,  black;  IV, 
(broken).  Pronotum:  length  .87  mm.,  width  at  base  1.57 
mm. ; disk  coarsely  but  not  closely  punctate ; brownish  black, 
collar  and  basal  edge  pale,  calli  yellowish  and  darkened  more 
or  less  with  brown,  before  and  behind  more  yellowish. 
Scutellum  yellow,  rather  coarsely  and  irregularly  punctate. 

Dorsum  clothed  with  rather  prominent,  sericeous,  whitish 
pubescence,  longer  and  thicker  on  hemelytra.  Hemelytra 
uniformly  dark  brownish  black,  with  a tinge  of  red  distally ; 
cuneus  pale  translucent,  becoming  more  or  less  pigmented 
with  red.  Membrane  pale,  veins  red,  anal  area,  disk  of 
areoles,  and  transverse  area  behind  cuneus,  fuscous.  Body 
beneath  yellowish  to  dark  brown,  ,.sides  of  sternum,  pleura, 
sides  of  venter  and  genital  segment  becoming  dark  brown. 
Legs  uniformly  pale  yellowish,  tips  of  tarsi  fuscous. 

Length  4.2  mm.,  width  2 mm.  Head:  width  1.03  mm., 
vertex  .55  mm.  Antennae:  segment  I,  length  .40  mm.,  yel- 
lowish; II,  1.09  mm.,  yellowish;  III,  .47  mm.,  fuscous;  IV, 
.38  mm.,  fuscous.  Pronotum : length  .90  mm.,  width  at  base 
1.66  mm.  Very  similar  to  the  male  in  pubescence  and 
puncturation,  but  coloration  more  uniformly  yellowish ; 


8 Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXlV 


dorsum  yellowish  to  brown,  subbasal  area  of  pronotal  disk 
and  the  pleura,  dark  brownish.  Cuneus  and  veins  only  tinged 
with  reddish. 

Holotype:  June  7-17,  1916,  Jemez  Springs,  alt.  6,400  ft., 

Arizona  (J.  Woodgate)  ; author’s  collection.  Allotype:  same  data 
as  the  type.  Paratypes:  18  $ J,  taken  with  the  types. 

Neoborus  fasciolus  n.  sp. 

Allied  to  vittifrons  but  larger,  distinguished  by  the  black 
bands  on  tibiae  and  the  uniformly  yellowish  frons. 

Length  4.7  mm.,  width  1.98  mm.  Head:  width  1.04 
mm.,  vertex  .445  mm. ; yellow,  distal  half  of  tylus,  basal  half 
of  juga  and  lora,  and  spot  on  dorsal  margin  of  antennal 
socket,  black.  Rostrum,  length  1.24  mm.,  reaching  to  near 
hind  margins  of  middle  coxae,  yellowish,  apex  blackish. 
Antennae:  segment  I,  length  .39  mm.,  black;  II,  1.15  mm.; 
Ill,  .42  mm. ; IV,  .30  mm. ; black.  Pronotum : length  .95  mm., 
width  at  base  1.67  mm. ; coarsely  punctate,  basal  margin  more 
strongly  sinuate  near  basal  angles  than  at  middle,  lateral 
margins  slightly  sinuate,  carina  obsolete;  brownish  black, 
calli  and  anterior  half  of  disk  yellow,  inner  half  of  calli  black. 
Scutellum  very  slightly  convex,  coarsely  and  rugosely  punc- 
tate ; yellow,  a brown  spot;  each  side  of  middle. 

Dorsum  clothed  with  moderately  prominent,  sericeous, 
silvery  white  pubescence,  shorter  on  scutellum  and  pronotum. 
Hemelytra  rather  uniformly  brownish  black,  embolium  and 
outer  half  of  corium  somewhat  translucent ; cuneus  pale  yel- 
lowish translucent,  a fuscous  spot  on  margin  by  apex  of 
areole.  Membrane  pale,  anal  area  fuscous,  veins  brownish 
to  dusky ; a pale  fuscous  area  behind  cuneus  and  within  distal 
half  of  areoles.  Venter  blackish,  margins  of  segments  yel- 
lowish along  middle  third,  basal  half  of  genital  segment 
yellowish.  Pleura  dark  brown  to  black,  sternum  yellowish 
brown.  Legs  pale  yellowish,  femora  with  two  incomplete 
subapical  black  bands;  tibial  knees  black,  with  two  inter- 
rupted black  bands,  one  on  middle  and  the  other  near  base ; 
apical  segment  of  tarsi  fuscous. 

5-  Length  4.8  mm.,  width  2.2  mm.  Head:  width  1.08 
mm.,  vertex  .49  mm.  Antennae : segment  I,  length  .32  mm., 
yellowish  brown,  black  above;  II,  1.21  mm.,  black,  more  or 
less  yellowish  on  basal  half ; III,  .45  mm.,  black ; IV, 
(broken).  Pronotum:  length  .98  mm.,  width  at  base  1.85 
mm.  Very  similar  to  the  male  in  pubescence  and  coloration, 
but  the  dorsum  becoming  paler ; however,  the  black  on  calli, 
head,  and  legs  is  equally  distinct. 


Feb.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society 


9 


Holotype:  <$,  April  27,  1915,  Arboretum  near  cactus  garden, 
Stanford  University,  California  (Harold  Morrison)  ; author’s 
collection.  Allotype:  same  data  as  the  type.  Paratypes:  12  J1  J, 
taken  with  the  types. 

Neoborus  flaviceps  n.  sp. 

Suggestive  of  paci ficus  Van  D.,  but  frons  more  convex 
and  with  a blackish  line  above  on  first  antennal  segment; 
differs  from  fasciolus  in  the  more  convex  frons  and  the  uni- 
formly pale  yellowish  legs. 

Length  4.3  mm.,  width  1.8  mm.  Head:  width  1.03 
mm.,  vertex  .47  mm. ; frons  distinctly  convex  median  line, 
sides,  and  middle  of  vertex  with  moderately  coarse  punc- 
tures. Rostrum,  length  1.23  mm.,  reaching  do  near  hind 
margins  of  middle  coxae,  yellowish,  apex  black.  Antennae: 
segment  I,  length  .40  mm.,  yellowish,  with  blackish  line 
above;  II,  1.21  mm.,  brown  to  fuscous,  blackish  apically ; III, 
.38  mm.,  black;  IV.,  .30  mm.,  black.  Pronotum:  length  .90 
mm.,  width  at  base  1.63  mm.;  coarsely  punctate,  calli  prom- 
inent; lateral  margins  slightly  sulcate,  slightly  rounded  and 
obsoletely  carinate.  Scutellum  slightly  convex,  coarsely 
punctate. 

Clothed  with  fine,  short,  yellowish  pubescence,  only  slightly 
sericeous.  Color  uniformly  yellowish,  calli  with  black  spot 
on  inner  angles,  corium  with  a brownish  , cloud  on  apical 
field ; cuneus,  outer  half  of  corium,  and  the  embolium,  yel- 
lowish translucent ; collar  and  basal  edge  of  pronotum  whit- 
ish; scutellum  whitish  s and  tinged  with  yellow.  Membrane 
pale  fumate,  veins  scarcely  darker  but  edges  indicated  by 
fuscous.  Legs  uniformly  yellowish,  tips  of  tarsi  fuscous. 

Holotype:  cJl,  June  1,  1926,  Chiricahua  Mts.,  alt.  6,000  ft.,  Ari- 
zona (A.  A.  Nichol)  ; author’s  collection. 

Neoborus  amoenus  floridanus  n.  subsp. 

Differs  from  typical  amoenus  Reuter  in  the  larger  eyes, 
narrower  vertex,  and  shorter  rostrum;  coloration  suggestive 
of  variety  scutellaris  Reut.,  but  the  structural  characters 
mentioned  will  separate  the  forms. 

Length  4.4  mm.,  width  2.2  mm.  Head:  width  1.06 
mm.,  vertex  .32  mm.,  not  equal  to  one-third  the  width  of 
head ; black,  lower  half  of  face  pale,  basal  half  of  juga  black. 
Rostrum,  length  1.06  mm.,  not  attaining  hind  margin  of 
sternum,  length  just  equal  to  width  of  head  across  eyes. 


10  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXI-V 


Antennae:  segment  I,  length  .66  mm.,  brownish;  II,  1.57 
mm.,  pale,  apex  black;  III,  .50  mm.,  pale;  IV,  (broken). 
Pronotum:  length  .95  mm.,  width  at  base  1.76  mm.;  calli 
prominent,  subconfluent,  lateral  carina  of  disk  distinct,  white ; 
shining  black,  lower  margin  of  the  propleura  pale.  Scutellum 
convex,  sparsely  punctate,  yellow,  median  line  and  basal 
margin  black,  mesoscutum  also  black. 

Hemelytra  black,  spot  near  middle  of  corium,  embolium, 
and  cuneus,  pale  translucent ; membrane  and  veins  pale,  anal 
area  black.  Ventral  surface  pale,  pleura,  sides  of  sternum, 
and  obsoletely  on  sides  of  venter,  blackish.  Legs  pale,  apical 
fourth  of  hind  femora  reddish,  tips  of  tarsi  brownish. 

Holotype:  J1,  April  29,  1928,  Ocala,  Florida  (E.  D.  Ball)  ; 
author’s  collection. 

Neoborus  amoenus  atriscutis  n.  var. 

Length  5 mm.  Structurally  very  similar  to  typical 
amoenus  Reut.,  but  differs  in  the  uniformly  black  color  in- 
cluding the  scutellum.  Differs  from  geminus  Say  in  the 
clear  membrane,  veins,  and  cuneus ; anal  area  and  basal  angle 
of  larger  areole  only  infuscated. 

Black,  collar,  obsolete  dashes  behind  calli,  frons  except 
median  line,  antennae  except  apex  of  second  segment,  and  the 
legs,  pale ; hind  femora  with  subapical  reddish  band. 

Holotype:  July  13,  1924,  Rainy  River  District,  Ontario, 

Canada  (J.  F.  Brimley)  ; author’s  collection.  Paratypes:  2 J*, 
June  14,  1920,  Ottawa,  Ontario  (J.  McDunnough). 

Xenoborus  selectus  n.  sp. 

Allied  to  pettiti  Reuter,  but  differs  in  the  narrower  vertex 
and  the  longer  second  antennal  segment  which  exceeds  the 
width  of  pronotum  at  base ; coloration  suggestive  of 
neglectus  Kngt.,  but  the  genital  claspers  are  more  nearly  the 
form  of  pettiti. 

<$.  Length  4.9  mm.,  width  2.2  mm.  Head:  width  1.12 
mm.,  vertex  .34  mm. ; the  width  of  vertex  less  than  one-third 
the  width  of  head.  Rostrum,  length  1.12  mm.,  not  attaining 
hind  margin  of  sternum,  yellowish,  apex  blackish.  Antennae  : 
segment  I,  length  .92  mm.,  black,  pale  at  base;  II,  1.98  mm.; 
Ill,  .95  mm. ; IV,  .48  mm. ; black.  Pronotum : length  .95 
mm.,  width  at  base  1.72  mm.;  calli  prominent,  subconfluent, 
lateral  margins  of  disk  slightly  sulcate,  rounded,  ecarinate; 
coarsely  punctate,  scutellum  with  finer  punctures. 


Feb.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  11 


Color  pale  to  yellow  with  black ; head  yellowish,  tylus  and 
frons  black;  pronotum  yellowish,  a triangular  black  area 
each  side  on  basal  half  of  disk;  scutellum  yellow,  mesoscutum 
fuscous ; hemelytra  black,  cuneus,  embolium,  basal  half  of 
corium  except  bordering  clavus  and  outer  margin  on  apical 
fie^d,  clear  to  pale  yellowish ; membrane  and  veins  fuscous 
black ; venter  and  pleura  blackish,  sternum  yellowish  brown ; 
legs  pale  yellowish,  femora  with  two  blackish  subapical 
bands,  tibiae  and  tarsi  fuscous.  Dorsum  clothed  with  prom- 
inent, suberect,  pale  pubescence. 

Holotype:  <£ , May  30,  1916,  Charleston,  Missouri  (E.  H.  Gib- 
son) ; author’s  collection. 


What  Attraction? — From  the  Framingham  sewage  filter 
beds  a small  odoriferous  stream  runs  between  two  hillocks  on  its 
way  to  the  Sudbury  River.  Along  this  stream  I found  small  piles 
of  partly  dried  grass  and  weeds  left  by  the  workmen.  Though  it 
was  October  12  the  sun  beat  down  his  rays  into  this  little  valley 
with  such  fervor  that  I had  removed  both  my  coat  and  vest  while 
shaking  the  piles  of  hay  over  my  sifting  cloth  and  picking  up  the 
numerous  beetles  that  ran  about  in  all  directions.  Presently  I 
heard  a humming  about  me  but  attributed  it  to  large  flies  which 
are  often  attracted  to  sifting  operations.  Then  I saw  a small 
black  moth  alight  on  my  white  shirt,  then  another  fluttered  down 
to  me,  while  a third  flew  around  my  head.  After  many  attempts  I 
managed  to  bottle  two  of  the  elusive  but  persistent  little  fellows 
and  the  third  escaped;  I saw  no  more  during  the  three  hours  I 
was  there.  On  comparison  with  the  two  specimens  in  the  collec- 
tion of  the  Boston  Society  of  Natural  History  (one  of  which  I 
took  in  Sherborn,  Mass.)  it  proved  to  be  Pseudanaphora  arcanella 
Clem. — C.  A.  Frost,  Framingham,  Mass. 


12  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


AN  ABERRANT  BUTTERFLY— JUNONIA  COENIA. 

By  Wm.  T.  Davis,  Staten  Island,  N.  Y. 

On  August  13,  1927,  while  walking  along  the  railroad  near  the 
home  of  Col.  Wirt  Robinson  at  Wingina,  Va.,  I noticed  a Junonia 
coenia  that  showed  more  white  on  the  fore  wings  than  usual.  It 
was  captured  and  I was  then  surprised  to  discover  that  the  hind 
wings  were  without  the  usual  eyed-spots.  The  specimen,  which 
is  here  figured  together  with  a normal  individual,  is  a male,  and 
the  covering  of  scales  on  the  wings  is  not  as  complete  as  usual. 

Other  interesting  facts  concerning  Junonia  coenia  observed 
while  at  Wingina  were  the  capture  of  a specimen  by  a house 
wren  while  it  was  flying  near  a building,  also  on  August  13,  and 
the  finding  of  a sleeping  individual  while  looking  for  insects  with 
a lantern  on  August  15,  with  its  wings  tightly  closed  over  its  back, 
its  head  pointed  downward  and  its  antennae  held  straight  out. 

While  this  butterfly  is  often  quite  common  in  open  places  as  far 
north  as  Staten  Island,  how  it  spends  the  winter  is  not  surely 
known.  In  parts  of  the  South  it  is  active  or  hibernates  during  the 
winter  and  probably  all  of  the  Staten  Island  and  Long  Island 
specimens  in  the  spring  have  come  from  the  South. 

In  the  Bulletin  of  the  Southern  California  Academy  of  Sci- 
ences for  1926,  pp.  77-82  there  is  a paper  on  “Inbreeding  of 
Junonia  Coenia  through  Thirty-five  Successive  Generations,”  by 
Wilhelm  Schrader,  where  much  information  about  the  species  is 
recorded,  and  illustrations  given  of  some  variations  in  bred  indi- 
viduals. 


Information  Wanted. — What  is  the  food  plant  of  Oherea 
schaumi  Lee.  ? My  only  record  for  the  capture  of  this  species  was 
made  on  July  31,  1916,  when  I removed  a fine  specimen  from  the 
helmet  of  one  of  Framingham’s  “ Finest  ” as  he  stood  on  the  curb 
and  majestically  surveyed  the  scenery.  He  looked  at  me  a mo- 
ment with  obvious  pity  in  his  eyes  but  allowed  me  to  escape  with 
my  prize. — C.  A.  Frost,  Framingham,  Mass. 


Junonia  coenia  from  Virginia. 


Feb.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  13 


PEDILUS  PARVICOLLIS  NOT  A DENDROIDES. 

By  H.  C.  Fall,  Tyngsboro,  Mass. 

In  the  December,  1928,  number  of  this  Journal,  p.  260,  Dr. 
Van  Dyke  states  his  conviction  that  my  Pedilus  parvicollis  is  a 
Dendroides,  as  evidenced  by  the  shape  of  the  head,  prothorax, 
and  elytral  features,  and  that  the  generic  and  family  characters 
are  those  of  the  latter  genus  and  not  of  Pedilus. 

I have  been  aware  for  some  time  of  this  particular  obsession  of 
the  Doctor’s  and  he  and  I in  a friendly  way  have  threshed  it  over 
at  some  length  in  correspondence. 

Let  it  be  granted  at  once  that  P.  parvicollis  is  not  a typical 
Pedilus.  The  flabellate  male  antennae,  the  narrowing  of  the  head 
immediately  behind  the  eyes,  the  smaller  somewhat  differently 
shaped  thorax  and  a certain  lankiness  of  form  give  it  an  appre- 
ciably different  appearance.  It  must  be  remembered,  however, 
that  there  are  other  aberrant  species  within  the  genus  Pedilus. 
First  to  break  the  uniformity  came  P.  crotchi  with  its  pectinate 
male  antennae  though  otherwise  typical  in  aspect.  Somewhat 
later  Horn  described  P.  flabellatus.  In  this  there  is  a further  di- 
vergence from  the  usual  type  in  that  the  antennae  are  truly 
flabellate,  the  thorax  is  smaller  and  of  modified  form,  and  the 
tempora  are  distinctly  shorter,  less  prominent  and  a little  oblique. 
Now  parvicollis  is  practically  identical  with  flabellatus  in  antennal 
formation,  and  in  shape  of  thorax  agrees  even  better  with  the 
latter  than  it  does  with  Dendroides.  Because  of  the  lack  of  tempora 
the  shape  of  the  head  in  parvicollis  is  much  the  same  as  in  Den- 
droides but  here  the  head  resemblance  ends ; the  extremely  large 
eyes,  nearly  or  quite  contiguous  in  the  males,  and  the  very  long 
flexible  branches  of  the  plumose  antennae,  both  characteristic 
features  of  Dendroides,  are  wholly  unlike  those  of  P.  parvicollis. 

I cannot  agree  with  Dr.  Van  Dyke  that  the  generic  and  family 
characters  of  P.  parvicollis  are  those  of  Dendroides  rather  than 
Pedilus.  As  a matter  of  fact  there  is  no  appreciable  error  in  say- 
ing that  reliable  differences  of  family  rank  between  Dendroides 
and  Pedilus  are  non-existent.  LeConte  and  Horn  in  their  family 
diagnoses  give  only  a single  distinguishing  character,  viz.,  the 
greater  prominence  of  the  hind  coxae  in  the  Pyrochroidae  as 
compared  with  the  Anthicidae,  in  which  family  they  included 
Pedilus.  Without  going  into  details  I wish  to  assert  that  so  far  as 


14  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


Pedilus  is  concerned  the  character  is  for  several  reasons  a falla- 
cious one  and  is  so  little  impressive  that  in  the  standard  European 
Catalogue  of  Heyden,  Reitter  and  Weise,  Dendroides  and  Pedilus 
are  placed  close  together  in  the  same  family,  the  Pyrochroidae. 

The  consideration  of  subordinate  or  generic  characters  shows 
fairly  clearly  that  parvicollis  has  diverged  from  typical  Pedilus 
in  the  direction  of  Dendroides,  but  that  as  indicated  above  it  is 
certainly  still  nearer  to  flabellatus  (an  accepted  Pedilus ) than  to 
any  Dendroides.  Furthermore,  the  male  genitalia  of  parvicollis 
show  a closer  relationship  with  Pedilus  than  with  Dendroides.  A 
new  genus  might  with  reason  be  erected  for  parvicollis,  but  in  that 
case  one  must  decide  what  to  do  with  P.  flabellatus.  In  any  case 
parvicollis  is  emphatically  not  a Dendroides. 


Rare  Beetle,  Rarer  Luck. — Strangalia  ( Leptura ) deleta  Lee. 
is  a species  rarely  taken  in  spite  of  the  saying,  “ no  species  is  rare 
if  you  know  where  to  look  for  it.”  I certainly  know  that  I have 
found  specimens  on  a certain  bunch  of  Spiraea  flowers  in  a 
meadow  by  a brook  in  Sherborn  near  a fine  grove  of  white  pines 
in  August  on  several  different  years.  I make  it  a point  to  visit 
this  bush  and  all  the  others  along  the  thousand  feet  of  meadow 
several  times  during  the  summer  but  it  has  been  many  years  since 
I took  the  last  specimen.  One  was  taken  in  Wareham,  Mass.,  on 
Solidago  flowers  on  August  21,  1921,  and  I have  seen  one  speci- 
men in  the  collection  of  Mr.  E.  J.  Smith  of  that  town ; I have  also 
seen  it  from  Isle  of  Springs,  Me.,  and  another  locality  in  that 
state.  I have  found  that  the  species  was  not  represented  in  many 
of  the  collections  of  the  country  to  which  fact  my  two  lonesome 
specimens!  bear  witness.  So  much  for  its  rarity. 

One  day  in  late  summer  I was  collecting  (mostly  Hymenop- 
tera)  on  some  late  Ceanotlms  flowers  that  still  showed  their  white 
heads  amid  their  dead  and  brown  companions,  when  I dropped 
my  open  cyanide  jar.  WhatT  said  as  it  landed  bottom  up  amid 
the  thick  bushes  has  no  place  on  this  page.  On  all  fours  I sought 
to  salvage  the  scattered  insects  and  the  first  thing  I saw  was  the 
perfectly  preserved  and  dried  body  of  a fine  male  deleta  lying 
right  beside  my  jar. — C.  A.  Frost,  Framingham,  Mass. 


Fed.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  15 


EDITING,  EDITORS,  CONTRIBUTORS  AND 
READERS. 

By  J.  R.  de  la  Torre-Bueno,  White  Plains,  N.  Y. 

The  life  of  an  editor  is  full  of  problems,  particularly  if  he  is 
an  entomological  editor.  Contributors,  being  a more  privileged 
class,  are  alien  to  these  problems ; and  readers  see  only  the  finished 
product,  which  appeals — or  doesn’t. 

To,  writers,  an  editor  seems  to  be  a cross  between  the  Judge  in 
the  black  cap,  the  executioner  with  his  sharp  axe  of  office,  and 
the  Old  Boy  Himself!  Well,  they  are  wrong:  the  editor  is  a 
compound  of  the  fellow  in  the  dock,  the  gentleman  with  his  head 
on  the  block,  and  the  damned  on  the  grill. 

And  here  is  how  it  is.  All  editors  have  one  problem:  to 
appeal  to  their  readers.  But  this  problem  is  extremely  acute 
with  editors  of  special  and  technical  publications,  whose  con- 
stituency of  readers  is  necessarily  limited  to  the  members  of  the 
esoteric  brotherhood  to  whom  their  journals  appeal.  And  here 
it  is  that  editors  must  exercise  judgment  in  selecting  what  will 
appeal  to  their  readers.  It  must  not  only  be  of  the  nature  called 
for  by  the  readers,  but  it  must  also  conform  with  the  general 
policy  of  the  journal.  This  publication — the  Bulletin  of  the 
Brooklyn  Entomological  Society — for  instance,  is  specifically 
for  the  publication  of  articles  on  insects,  but,  above  all,  these 
articles  cannot  be  popular  in  the  ordinary  sense  of  many  fancy 
words  about  nothing — and  mostly  wrong  where  they  deal  with 
facts,  at  that.  Our  articles  have  to  be  of  scientific  value,  even 
though  they  be  but  brief,  non-technical  notes.  Then,  again,  they 
must  refer  to  North  American  insects  principally,  preference 
being  given  to  the  insects  of  New  York,  and  particularly  of  Long 
Island.  Of  course,  good  articles  are  never  rejected,  if  there  is. 
room  available  for  them. 

Once  these  conditions  are  met,  the  editor  must  consider  just 
how  much  space  to  allot  to  any  particular  group  and  how  promptly 
an  article  should  appear.  And  here  the  editor  is  tied  down  by 
what  he  receives  and  by  space  limitations,  which  will  be  referred 
to  further  on. 

As  a general  rule,  this  journal  does  not  wish,  as  a matter  of 
general  policy,  to  allot  space  to  descriptions  of  varieties,  forms 
or  aberrations,  except  if  they  come  in  the  general  discussion  of 
the  species  of  a group.  Our  fauna  does  not  seem  to  us  to  be. 


16  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


sufficiently  well  worked  (as  the  European  fauna  is),  to  make 
desirable  such  taxonomic  refinements  without  ample  supporting 
data. 

When  articles  are  accepted  for  publication,  then  comes  the  live 
question  of  the  proper  balance  to  be  preserved  in  the  publication; 
and  the  order  in  which  to  arrange  such  articles  as  are  to  appear. 
Here,  policy  and  space  limitations  rule  about  equally.  A leading 
article  imposes  itself  by  its  length  or  by  its  importance,  which 
generally  go  together.  Other  articles  are  placed  partly  according 
to  space  and  partly  so  as  to  vary  the  contents  of  any  given  num- 
ber. Our  general  desire  is  to  preserve  (if  we  can),  a balance 
between  the  highly  technical  and  special  and  the  simpler  and  more 
general  articles.  But  we  have  to  publish  what  we  get.  If  our 
journal  at  times  seems  too  abundant  in  technical  and  heavy  mat- 
ter, it  is  because  we  have  no  other. 

One  policy  the  Bulletin  has  rigidly  adhered  to ; and  the 
present  management  is  little  likely  to  depart  from  it.  That  policy 
is  the  publication  of  articles  exactly  as  received  from  the  authors, 
with  no  other  change  or  correction  than  obvious  errors  of  typing 
or  of  punctuation.  We  go  on  the  principle  that  an  author  knows 
what  he  wants  to  say  better  than  we  or  any  other  more  heaven- 
inspired  editor.  And  we  do  not  propose  to  improve  on  an  article 
or  change  it  in  any  way.  If  an  article  appears  on  the  face  of  it 
to  be  erroneous,  we  simply  do  not  publish  it ; if  some  change 
might  make  it  available,  we  put  the  making  of  the  change  up  to 
the  author.  But  all  articles  represent  the  views  and  manner  of 
presentation  of  the  author  (including  this  one),  and  in  no  way 
represent  editorial  opinion.  Hence,  the  responsibility  for  all 
statements  appearing  in  our  two  publications  lies  exclusively  with 
the  authors.  Of  course,  while  controversial  articles  may  be  pub- 
lished by  us,  neither  this  journal  nor  any  other  journal,  can  give 
publicity  and  circulation  to  personal  attacks  impugning  the 
motives  or  the  character  of  any  one.  “ It  isn’t  cricket,”  or — more 
properly — it  is  not  scientific.  On  the  other  hand,  every  writer 
who  presents  his  views  to  the  public  must  expect  some  kind  of 
a reaction  to  them;  and  just  as  he  gladly  welcomes  warm  praise, 
so  should  he  philosophically  accept  cold  criticism  and  adverse 
comment.  After  all,  the  ultimate  goal  of  all  scientific  workers 
is  fact  and  truth.  What  is  true  on  to-day’s  known  facts,  tomor- 
row may  be  shown  to  be  romance,  in  the  presence  of  later  factual 
knowledge.  And  all  should  be  prepared  for  and  welcome  that 
eternal  change  which  is  life.  But  it  is  not  necessary  to  establish 


Feb.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  17 


or  promote  this  flow  of  ideas  by  vituperation  or  dubious  personal 
remarks. 

Having  thus  far  set  forth  certain  principles  which  lie  at  the 
base  of  all  class  publications,  such  as  are  the  entomological  jour- 
nals, let  us  consider  now  the  mechanical  side  of  editing. 

At  the  very  start,  an  editor  must  first  read  an  article  to  appraise 
it  according  to  the  standards  of  his  publication.  That  first  step 
being  successfully  surmounted  by  an  article,  it  is  then  scanned  for 
such  corrections  as  may  be  required  from  the  purely  mechanical 
side  and  marked  for  setting  up  by  the  printer — or,  rather,  com- 
positor. 

All  publications  have  a set  style  of  make  up,  partly  from 
mechanical,  partly  from  artistic,  partly  from  editorial  considera- 
tions of  one  kind  or  another.  At  the  very  start,  the  size  of  the 
page  of  eacfi  journal  is  fixed — that  is  to  say,  its  length  and  width 
are  standard.  Next  in  order  is  the  size  and  style  of  type,  which 
governs  the  number  of  lines  to  the  page  when  set  up.  Once  the 
style  and  size  of  type  are  determined  upon,  they  are  never  varied. 
Hence,  it  is  a waste  of  labor  for  authors  to  indicate  such  details 
on  the  MSS.  If  they  agree  with  the  publication’s  style,  well  and 
good,  but  unnecessary;  if  they  differ,  the  editor  simply  runs  the 
famous  blue-pencil  through  them  and  marks  the  articles  up  in  the 
standard  form.  The  style  of  type  (and  the  size)  are  ruled  by  legi- 
bility, economy  of  space  and  cost.  Most  journals  are  printed 
in  io-point  type,  generally  with  lines  spaced  far  apart,  which  is 
very  wasteful  of  space  and  comparatively  uneconomical.  Print- 
ing experience  and  practice  show  that  io-point  type  on  n -point 
body  is  by  far  the  most  economical  of  space  while  extremely 
legible.  The  small  size  type  frequently  seen  in  journals  is  8-point. 
This  is  not  only  expensive,  but  also  hard  to  read — a very  bad  size 
for  journals  which  have  to  be  conned  intensely  in  use.  Another 
matter  is  the  arrangement  of  headings,  new  species,  species  named 
in  the  body  of  an  article,  etc.  Here  the  editor  has  again  to  be 
ruled  by  practical  considerations.  New  species  must  stand  out, 
so  we  employ  bold  face  type  of  the  same  size  as  the  body  type. 
Species  in  the  text  must  also  be  indicated,  largely  for  the  benefit 
of  indexers  (including  the  editor)  and  of  abstractors,  as  well  as 
to  make  them  more  evident  to  the  general  reader. 

Paragraphs  and  section  heads  must  also  be  indicated,  as  well 
as  the  indentation  of  lines  or  paragraphs  or  sections,  to  set  them 
off  noticeably. 

These  all  being  done,  the  MS  goes  to  the  printer  to  be  set  up 


18  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  VoI.XXIV 


as  indicated  in  the  MS,  which  now  has  the  name  of  copy.  Print- 
ers are  bound  to  follow  copy,  out  of  the  window  if  necessary,  as 
they  put  it  in  their  quaint  dialect.  Therefore,  every  punctuation 
mark,  every  capital,  every  paragraph,  every  spelling,  right  or 
wrong,  comes  back  to  the  editor  as  it  was  in  the  copy,  in  the  first 
proof,  or  galley  so-called.  Here  the  editor  (if  he  can)  catches 
some  more  errors  of  typography  or  what-not,  and  corrects  them. 
If  the  editor  has  not  been  keenly  on  the  job,  he  has  to  rephrase 
sentences  and  paragraphs ; he  adds  here,  he  takes  out  there ; and 
then  returns  the  corrected  galley  proof  to  the  printer  for  further 
correction.  This  particular  editor,  being  wary,  makes  no  changes 
in  the  matter — they  cost  money,  at  the  rate  of  $2.50  per  hour  for 
resetting  and  rearranging.  And  all  these  author’s  corrections, 
so-called,  always  take  hours  and  hours  and  hours.  It  is  rela- 
tively easy  to  spend  on  a small  40  to  50  page  magazine  from  $15 
to  $20  for  such  corrections.  Our  own  practice  is  to  send  first 
galley  proof  to  our  authors ; and  if  they  are  tempted  to  improve 
on  what  is  already  in  type,  they  may  to  their  heart’s  content,  pro- 
vided they  are  willing  to  pay  the  printer’s  extra  charge  for  the 
work.  It  is  a very  helpful  practice  to  have  authors  read  the 
galley  proofs  of  their  articles.  It  not  only  enables  them  to  catch 
any  errors  in  the  article  itself — more  likely  than  not  in  matters 
beyond  the  editor’s  omniscience — but  it  also  acts  as  a check  on 
typographical  errors.  And  further,  it  affords  authors  an  oppor- 
tunity to  unburden  themselves  of  anything  not  to  their  liking  in 
the  article  as  set  up;  and  it  also  commits  them  irrevocably  to  it 
in  final  form.  This  is  altogether  a reciprocally  and  mutually 
profitable  arrangement  from  every  point  of  view. 

The  final  galley  proof  being  corrected,  it  is  now  cut  up  suitably 
into  pages ; the  pages  assembled  and  numbered  consecutively ; and 
a table  of  contents  for  the  number  prepared.  It  goes  again  to  the 
printer  in  this  shape.  He  cuts  up  the  type  matter  into  pages; 
places  the  figures,  if  any ; puts  the  running  head — the  name  of  the 
journal,  date  and  issue — at  the  top  of  each  page;  and  before  lock- 
ing up  and  starting  to  print  he  draws  off  page  proofs.  These 
go  to  the  editor  with  the  dummy,  as  the  first  arrangement  of  the 
cut  up  galleys  is  called.  The  editor  then  checks  up  with  the 
dummy  to  see  that  all  corrections  and  changes  are  incorporated 
in  the  page  proof.  Then,  if  he  is  wise,  he  very  carefully  rereads 
the  page  proof  to  see  that  no  errors  have  crept  in  during  the 
manipulations  of  making  the  galley  type  into  pages.  And  finally, 
the  whole  make  up  and  general  appearance  of  the  number  in  hand 


Fed.,  192.9  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  19 


is  gone  over.  In  these  processes,  all  changes  and  corrections 
have  been  noted  on  the  pages  as  they  are  checked  up;  and  the 
page  proof  with  all  these  notations  once  more  travels  to  the 
printer.  Some  editors  call  for  a second  corrected  page  proof 
and  o.k.  on  that  for  printing.  Where  the  printer  is  reliable  and 
habituated  to  the  magazine,  such  a corrected  proof  is  time-wast- 
ing and  unnecessary.  The  capable  proof-readers  in  the  printing 
establishment  can,  and  do,  check  back  page  proofs.  Thus,  the 
editor  may  give  the  order  to  print,  on  approval  of  only  one — the 
first — set  of  page  proofs,  with  the  assurance  that  the  magazine 
will  appear  in  good  form  and  in  good  time. 

Magazines  are  most  economically  printed  in  multiples  of  1 6 
pages,  technically  called  a form,  which  explains  why  journals  run 
16,  32,  48,  64,  and  so  on,  pages  to  the  number.  The  necessary 
handling  and  running  of  the  presses  is  the  same  for  all  forms 
under  16  pages,  so  this  handling  makes  the  page  price  higher  the 
smaller  the  form,  quite  a consideration  in  non-profitable  technical 
journals  such  as  ours. 

And  all  these  details  being  settled  well  and  carefully,  the  presses 
start  and  soon  the  edition  is  ready  for  the  folder,  the  binder,  the 
trimmer  and  the  mailer.  Very  soon  readers  have  it  in  their 
hands ; and  authors  wonder  what  made  them  say  such  nonsense, 
and  lay  it,  of  course,  to  the  editor.  And  he,  if  careful,  points  to 
the  galley  proof  with  the  author’s  own  corrections  on  it;  and  says 
nothing. 

The  general  reader  further  notices  how  few  are  the  articles  on 
Coleoptera,  how  unimportant  the  lepidopterological  remarks. 
But,  ah!  how  full  the  pages  on  Ctenopsylla  cheopis;  or  on  the 
inwards  of  dipterous  taxonomy!  Very  unseemly  and,  of  course, 
very  poor  editing. 

And  here  we  are,  back  again  where  we  started  from,  like  the 
symbolic  snake,  ever  swallowing  its  tail  and  never  quite  succeed- 
ing in  getting  a full  meal,  but  rolling  along  like  a hoop  over  the 
bumps. 

And  so  it  may  readily  be  seen  that  not  only  do  editors  get  what 
they  deserve,  but  that  they  likewise  deserve  what  they  get,  in  full 
measure,  brimming  over,  darn  ’em ! 

All  authors  should  serve  a penal  term  as  editors,  then  they’ll 
be  less  inclined  to  let  stark  justice  take  its  course  with  and  among 
editors. 

We  offer  our  gratitude  in  conclusion,  to  all  faithful  readers 
who  have  followed  us,  profitably,  we  hope,  to  this  bitter  end. 


20  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


NOTES  ON  NORTH  AMERICAN  LEPIDOPTERA. 

By  F.  H.  Chermock,  Pittsburgh,  Pa. 

Plebeus  lupini  ab.  immaculata  ab.  nov. 

This  aberration  is  like  the  typical  lupini  except  that  it  lacks  all 
markings  on  the  lower  surface  of  the  secondaries,  but  has  the 
usual  row  of  marginal  spots.  The  submarginal  row  is  totally  ob- 
literated. 

Holotype,  July  14,  1921 ; Topoparatype,  July  14,  1921 ; Gold 
Lake  district,  Sierra  Co.,  Calif. 

This  aberration  resembles  P.  acmon  var.  cotteli  ab.  labecula  and 
bears  the  same  relationship  to  lupini  as  labecula  does  to  cotteli.  I 
have  several  transitional  specimens  of  lupini  to  immaculata,  but 
do  not  consider  them  worthy  of  a name. 

Glaucopsychc  xcrces  var.  intermedia  var.  nov. 

This  variety  is  probably  the  connecting  link  between  G.  xerccs 
and  its  forms.  G.  xcrces  has  the  spots  on  the  undersurface  solid 
white,  while  all  of  its  forms  and  aberrations  have  white  spots  with 
black  centers,  in  some  cases  the  white  almost  lacking.  This  new 
variety  does  not  differ  much  from  polyphemus  as  to  size  of  mark- 
ings except  that  the  two  spots  in  the  discal  area  are  fused  into 
one  elongate  white  marking.  The  other  spots  differ  in  that  they 
are  white  and  have  the  centers  the  same  color  as  the  general 
ground  color  of  the  wings  below.  The  ground  color  is  the  same 
and  typical  G.  xerces. 

Holotype,  March  17,  1926;  Allotype,  March  21,  1925;  Lone 
Mountain,  San  Francisco,  Calif. 

I have  had  in  my  possession  about  200  specimens  of  G.  xcrces 
and  varieties  and  forms  and  I am  of  the  opinion  that  this  variety 
is  the  connecting  link,  therefore  I call  it  ' intermedia ! 

Fentonia  marthesia  ab.  nigra.,  ab.  nov. 

This  aberration  is  the  same  as  typical  F.  marthesia,  except  that 
the  primaries  are  totally  black  above.  The  secondaries  have  a 
broad  black  marginal  band,  with  white  fringe  above.  The  entire 
underside  of  both  wings  is  darker  than  normal  specimens.  The 
thorax  is  a dark  olive  green,  the  body  black  above,  below  normal. 

Holotype,  August  15,  1924;  Pittsburgh,  Pa. 

I reared  this  aberration  along  with  several  typical  specimens. 


Feb.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  21 


Cercyonis  ( Satyrus ) pegala  race  borealis. 

This  race  is  like  typical  pegala  except  that  it  almost  totally 
lacks  the  yellow  patch  on  the  primaries  above.  Below  the  patch 
is  restricted  to  rings  around  the  spots. 

The  male  has  one  spot  on  the  primaries  which  will  facilitate 
the  separating  of  it  from  its  close  ally.  S.  alope  var.  nephele  is 
much  smaller  than  borealis. 

Holotype,  VII-10-1920;  Allotype,  VII-4-1920;  Trumball  Co., 
Ohio. 

Eurymus  eurytheme  f.  eriphyle  var.  nigricosta,  var.  nov. 

This  variation  of  eriphyle  occurs  in  the  female  sex  only.  It  is 
the  same  as  typical  eriphyle,  except  that  the  yellow  spots  in  the 
marginal  band  are  lacking  in  both  wings.  It  bears  the  same  re- 
lationship to  eriphyle  as  plicaudula  does  to  philodice. 

Holotype,  VIII-1-1924;  Topoparatype,  VIII-1-1924;  Ed- 
mondton,  Alberta,  Canada. 

Eurymus  eurytheme  f.  eriphyle  ab.  laurae. 

This  fine  aberration  is  the  same  as  typical  eriphyle  female,  ex- 
cept that  the  yellow  is  replaced  by  white.  The  secondaries  above 
are  clouded  with  black. 

I took  this  specimen  with  a male  of  typical  eriphyle  and  con- 
sidered it  a very  unusual  capture. 

Holotype,  VIII-1-1924;  Edmondton,  Alberta,  Canada. 

Eurymus  philodice  var.  serrata. 

This  peculiar  variation  which  occurs  in  the  male  sex  only,  as 
far  as  I can  see,  differs  from  typical  philodice  in  that  the  inner 
margin  of  the  marginal  band  is  serrate  or  dentate.  These  teeth- 
like markings  occur  between  the  veins.  Out  of  at  least  two  or 
three  thousand  specimens  I have  taken  about  eight  or  nine  of  this 
variety.  At  present  I have  six,  all  collected  at  Rossgrove,  near 
Aspinwall,  Pa.  This  locality  is  noted  for  peculiar  specimens  due 
to  its  very  odd  topography.  There  are  arid  spots  and  swamps  in 
this  bowl  and  this  probably  accounts  for  the  unusual  specimens. 

Holotype,  VIII-8-1926;  paratypes,  No.  1,  VIII-8-1926;  Nos. 
2,  3,  4,  VIII-10-1926 ; No.  5,  VIII-12-1926 ; Rossgrove,  near 
Aspinwall,  Pa. 


22  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


THE  CRANE-FLIES  OF  NEW  YORK:  THIRD 
SUPPLEMENTARY  LIST. 

By  Charles  P.  Alexander,  Amherst,  Mass. 

The  preliminary  list  of  crane-flies,  including  the  families  Tany- 
deridae,  Ptychopteridae,  Trichoceridae,  Anisopodidae  and  Tipu- 
lidae,  totalled  267  species.1  The  first  supplementary  list2  brought 
this  number  to  277  species.  The  second  supplementary  list3 
added  five  species,  bringing  the  total  number  to  282.  In  the  ac- 
companying list,  24  additional  species  are  recorded,  bringing  the 
total  number  of  species  to  306,  of  which  295  belong  to  the  family 
Tipulidae.  A few  of  the  species  recorded  at  this  time  were  in- 
cluded in  the  New  York  list4  but  the  majority  have  not  before 
been  recorded  from  the  State. 

The  additions  to  the  list  of  New  York  crane-flies  are  as 
follows : 

283  Tipula  angulata  Loew. 

Essex  County:  Foot  of  Hurricane  Mt.,  June  12,  1927  (C. 
P.  Alexander). 

284  Tipula  entomophthorae  Alexander. 

Essex  County:  Wilmington  Notch,  June  13,  1927  (C.  P. 
Alexander). 

285  Tipula  platymera  Walker  (= labradorica  Alexander). 

Essex  County : Mt.  Skylight,  4800-4920  feet,  July  22,  1920. 

286  Tipula  septentrionalis  Loew. 

Warren  County:  Warrensburg,  June  11,  1927  (C.  P. 
Alexander) . 

287  Limonia  ( Limonia ) hudsonica  Osten  Sacken. 

Warren  County:  Warrensburg,  June  11,  1927  (C.  P. 
Alexander). 


1 Alexander,  C.  P.  The  crane-flies  of  New  York.  Part  I. 
Cornell  University,  Agr.  Expt.  Sta.  Mem.  25 : 787-826 ; 1919. 

2 Alexander,  C.  P.  The  crane-flies  of  New  York:  First  sup- 
plementary list.  Bull.  Brooklyn  Ent.  Soc.,  17:  58-62;  1922. 

3 Alexander,  C.  P.  The  crane-flies  of  New  York;  Second  sup- 
plementary list.  Bull.  Brooklyn  Ent.  Soc.,  19:  57-64;  1924. 

4 Leonard,  M.  D.  A list  of  the  insects  of  New  York.  Cornell 
University,  Agr.  Expt.  Sta.  Mem.  101 : 688-701 ; 1928. 


Fed.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  23 


288  Limonia  ( Limonia ) novae-angliae  Alexander. 

Orange  County:  Tuxedo  Park,  August  27-28,  1928  (F. 
W.  Edwards). 

289  Limonia  ( Dicranomyia ) profunda  Alexander. 

Fulton  County:  Sphagnum  bog,  near  Canada  Lake,  1700 
feet,  June  25,  1928  (C.  P.  Alexander). 

290  Limonia  ( Dicranomyia ) sphagnicola  Alexander. 

Fulton  County:  Gloversville,  900  feet,  June  24,  1916,  June 
27,  1928  (C.  P.  Alexander). 

291  Limonia  ( Dicranomyia ) uliginosa  sp.  n. 

Hamilton  County:  Lake  Pleasant,  1750  feet,  in  sphagnum 
bog,  June  18-20,  1926  (C.  P.  Alexander). 

292  Dicranoptycha  elsa  sp.  n. 

Cattaraugus  County:  Tunesassa,  August  19,  1926  (W.  P. 
Alexander) . 

293  Dicranota  currani  Alexander. 

Essex  County:  Keene  Valley,  May  26,  1920  (H.  Notman). 

294  Limnophila  harperi  Alexander. 

Essex  County:  Summit  of  Hurricane  Mt.,  June  12,  1927 
(C.  P.  Alexander). 

This  interesting  crane-fly  was  described  from  Alberta  and  its 
occurrence  in  New  York  is  of  exceptional  interest.  The  flies 
were  found  on  the  western  side  of  the  mountain,  close  to  the 
summit,  where  there  are  low  cliffs  continually  moist  with  dripping 
water.  They  rest  on  these  exposures,  quite  in  the  manner  of 
Dactylolahis  montana.  Several  pairs  were  in  copula,  resting 
end-to-end  on  the  vertical  rock  faces,  the  wings  of  both  sexes 
outspread.  Detached  males  are  very  active. 

295  Limnophila  ( Ephelia ) solstitialis  Alexander. 

Chenango  County:  Lower  Cincinnatus,  July  21,  1916  (C. 
P.  Alexander). 

Cortland  County:  Taylor,  July  20,  1916  (C.  P.  Alexander). 
Fulton  County:  Mountain  Lake,  1550  feet,  June  15-July  7, 
1914  (C.fP.  Alexander). 

Hamilton  County:  Wells,  July  29  (D.  B.  Young). 

296  Limnophila  ( Phylidorea ) auripennis  Alexander. 

Essex  County:  Keene  Valley,  August  20,  1920  (H.  Not- 
man). / 

Rensselaer  County:  Brookview,  June,  1923  (C.  P.  Alex- 
ander) . 


24  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXIV 


Tompkins  County:  Fall  Creek,  Ithaca,  May  29,  1916  (C. 
P.  Alexander). 

297  Limnophila  ( Phylidorea ) caudifera  Alexander. 

Hamilton  County:  Lake  Pleasant,  1750  feet,  June  17-21, 
1926  (C.  P.  Alexander). 

298  Limnophila  ( Phylidorea ) fumidicosta  Alexander. 

Tompkins  County:  Bools  Backwater,  Ithaca,  June  13,  1917 
(C.  P.  Alexander). 

299  Limnophila  ( Phylidorea ) luteola  Alexander. 

Hamilton  County:  Lake  Pleasant,  1800  feet,  in  Iris  swamp, 
June  18-21,  1926  (C.  P.  Alexander). 

300  Limnophila  ( Phylidorea ) neadusta  Alexander. 

Essex  County:  Keene  Valley,  July  14,  1920  (H.  Notman). 

301  Limnophila  ( Phylidorea ) platyphallus  Alexander. 

Fulton  County:  Masten’s  Woods,  Gloversville,  900 'feet, 
June  12,  1926  (C.  P.  Alexander). 

Hamilton  County:  Lake  Pleasant,  1700  feet,  June  17-20, 
1926  (C.  P.  Alexander). 

302  Gonomyia  ( Gonomyia ) hidentata  Alexander. 

Fulton  County:  Sacandaga  Park,  August  28,  1925  (C.  P. 
Alexander)  ; Masten’s  Woods,  Gloversville,  900  feet, 
August  31,  1925  (C.  P.  Alexander). 

Essex  County:  Ausable  Chasm,  August  15,  1925  (G.  C. 
Crampton). 

303  Gonomyia  ( Gonomyia ) currani  Alexander. 

Rensselaer  County:  iBrookview,  June  25,  1923  (C.  P. 
Alexander) . 

The  wings  are  more  strongly  suffused  with  yellow,  with  an 
evident  stigma,  and  there  are  slight  differences  in 'the  structure 
of  the  apex  of  the  aedeagus,  but  still  insufficient  to  separate  the 
present  material  from  typical  currani. 

304  Erioptera  ( Erioptera ) ehenina  Alexander. 

Fulton  County:  Masten’s  Woods,  Gloversville,  900  feet, 
June  16,  1924  (C.  P.  Alexander)  ; same  locality,  June 
27,  1928  (C.  P.  Alexander). 

305  Ormosia  ithacana  sp.  n. 

Tompkins  County:  Ithaca,  April  26-May  5,  1913  (C.  P. 
Alexander) . 

306  Ormosia  luteola  Dietz. 

Fulton  County : Masten’s  Woods,  Gloversville,  900  feet, 
August  31-September  i,/i925  (C.  P.  Alexander). 


Feb.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  25 


Crane-flies  Taken  at  Lake  Pleasant,  Hamilton  County, 
New  York,  June  17-23,  1926,  by  C.  P.  and 
1 M.  M.  Alexander 

The  following  record  of  Tipulidae  that  .•  were  secured  at  Lake 
Pleasant  in  June  is  given  as  a contribution  to  our  scanty  knowl- 
edge of  the  insects  of  the  southern  Adirondacks.  Most  of  the 
species  iwere  secured  near  the  lake,  altitude  1700  feet,  a few, 
indicated  in  the  list  by  the  words,  “Hamilton  Mt.”  being  from 
the  slopes  of  Hamilton  Mt.,  a few  miles  from  the  lake,  on 
June  19th. 

Tipula  ( Trichotipula ) oropezoides  Johnson. 

Tipula  dorsimacula  Walker  (=  angustipennis  Loew). 

Tipula  caloptera  Loew*. 

Tipula  cayuga  Alexander. 

Tipula  hermannia  Alexander. 

Tipula  hinei  Alexander,  Hamilton  Mt.,  2,500  feet.  > 

Tipula  iroquois  Alexander,  Hamilton  Mt.,  2,500  feet. 

Tipula  monticola  Alexander. 

Tipula  penohscot  Alexander,  Hamilton  Mt.,  2,500  feet. 

Tipula  senega  Alexander. 

Tipida  serta\  Loew. 

Tipula  strepens  Loew. 

Tipula  tephrocephala  Loew. 

Tipula  trivittata  Say  (=  simulata  Walker). 

Nephrotoma  euceroides  Alexander. 

Nephrotoma  ferruginea  (Fabricius). 

Nephrotoma  incurva  (Loew). 

Nephrotoma  lugens  (Loew). 

Dolichopeza  americana  Needham. 

Oropeza  venosa  Johnson.  1 

Liogma  nodicornis  (Osten  Sacken). 

Phalacrocera  tipulina  Osten  Sacken.  1 
Limonia  ( Limonia ) indigena  (Osten  Sacken). 

Limonia  {Limonia)  puhipennis  (Osten  Sacken). 

Limonia  ( Limonia ) triocellata  (Osten  Sacken). 

Limonia  .>  (Rhipidia)  fidelis  (Osten  Sacken). 

Limonia  ( Dicranomyia ) liberta  (Osten  Sacken). 

Limonia  ( Dicranomyia ) longipennis  (Schummel). 

Limonia  ( Dicranomyia ) pudica  (Osten  Sacken). 

Limonia  ( Dicranomyia ) uliginosa  sp.  n. 


26  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  VoLXXIV 


Limonia  ( Geranomyia ) canadensis  (Westwood). 

Limonia  ( Geranomyia ) rostrata  (Say). 

Helius  flavipes  (Macquart). 

Tricyphona  calcar  (Osten  Sacken). 

Tricyphona  inconstans  (Osten  Sacken). 

Tricyphona  paludicola  Alexander.  i 
Tricyphona  vernalis  (Osten  Sacken). 

Amalopina  flaveola  (Osten  Sacken). 

Rhaphidolahis  ( Plectromyia ) confusa  Alexander. 
Rhaphidolahis  ( Rhaphidolahis ) tenuipes  Osten  Sacken. 
Adelphomyia  minuta  Alexander. 

Ula  paupera  Osten  Sacken.  i 

Epiphragma  fascipennis  (Say). 

Dactylolahis  montana  (Osten  Sacken). 

Pseudolimnophila  inornata  (Osten  Sacken). 

Pseudolimnophila  toxoneura  (Osten  Sacken). 

Limnophila  ( Lasiomastix ) macrocera  (Say). 

Limnophila  ( Lasiomastix ) tenuicornis  Osten  Sacken. 
Limnophila  > {Phylidorea)  adusta  Osten  Sacken. 

Limnophila  ( Phylidorea ) caudifera  Alexander. 

Limnophila  ( Phylidorea ) lutea  Doane. 

Limnophila  ( Phylidorea ) luteola  Alexander. 

Limnophila  ( Phylidorea ) platy phallus  Alexander. 

Limnophila  ( Prionolabis ) rufibasis  Osten  Sacken. 

Limnophila  ( Dicranophragma ) fuscovaria  Osten  Sacken. 
Limnophila  areolata  Osten  Sacken. 

Limnophila  brevifurca  Osten  Sacken. 

Limnophila  subcostata  Alexander. 

Pilaria  quadrata  (Osten  Sacken). 

Pilaria  recondita  (Osten  Sacken).  * 

Pilaria  stanwoodae  (Alexander)  ; very  abundant  in  bogs. 
Shannonomyia  lenta  (Osten  Sacken). 

Eriocera  cinerea  Alexander. 

Elephantomyia  westwoodi  Osten  Sacken. 

Gonomyia  ( Gonomyia ) subcinerea  (Osten  Sacken). 

Gonomyia  ( Gonomyia ) sulphurella'>  ( Osten  Sacken). 

Helobia  hybrida  (Meigen). 

Ormosia  dentifera  Alexander,  Hamilton  Mt.,  2,500-3,000  feet. 
Ormosia  deviata  Dietz.  I 

Ormosia  mesocera  Alexander,  Hamilton  Mt.,  2,200  feet. 
Ormosia  nigripila  (Osten  Sacken). 


Feb.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  27 


Ormosa  nubila\ Osten  Sacken). 

Erioptera  ( Erioptera ) septemtrionis  Osten  Sacken. 

Erioptera  ( Erioptera ) vespertina  Osten  Sacken. 

Erioptera  ( Hoplolabis ) armata  Osten  Sacken. 

Erioptera  ( Mesocyphona ) caloptera  (Say). 

Erioptera  ( Mesocyphona ) needhami  Alexander. 

Erioptera  ( Empeda ) stigmatica  (Osten  Sacken). 

Erioptera  ( Gonempeda ) nyctops  Alexander,  very  abundant. 

Molophilus  forcipulus  (Osten  Sacken). 

Molophilus  hirtipennis  (Osten  Sacken). 

Molophilus  pubipennis  (Osten  Sacken). 

Limonia  (Dicranomyia)  uliginosa  sp.  n. 

General  coloration  gray,  the  praescutum  with  four  narrow 
brown  stripes;  antennae  dark  throughout;  halteres  of  mod- 
erate length,  yellow,  the  knobs  brown;  wings  with  a faint 
brownish  tinge,  the  stigma  large ; male  hypopygium  with  the 
lobes  of  the,  ninth  tergite  conspicuous,  darkened,  setiferous. 

Male. — Length  about  5.5  mm. ; wing,  6.2  mm. 

Female. — Length  about  7.5  mm. ; wing,  8 mm. 

Rostrum  dark  reddish  brown ; palpi  dark  brown.  An- 
tennae dark  throughout ; basal  flagellar  segments  subglobular, 
the  outer  segments  passing  into  oval.  Head  dark  brownish 
gray,  the  center  of  the  vertex  broadly  darker  brown. 

Pronotum  gray.  Mesonotal  praescutum  brownish  gray, 
with  four  narrow  brown  stripes,  the  long  intermediate  pair 
almost  confluent,  the  lateral  pair  less  distinct,  the  lateral  mar- 
gins of  the  sclerite  clearer  gray;  scutum,  scutellum  and  post- 
notum  dark,  heavily  gray  pruinose.  Pleura  clear  light  gray. 
Halteres  of  moderate  length,  yellow,  the  knobs  dark  brown. 
Legs  with  the  fore  and  middle  coxae  dark  brown,  the  pos- 
terior coxae  paler;  trochanters  testaceous  yellow;  legs  long, 
the  femora  obscure  brownish  yellow,  brighter  basally,  the 
tips  rather  narrowly  dark  brown ; tibiae  pale  brown,  the  tips 
narrowly  brownish  black ; tarsi  brownish  black.  Wings  with 
a faint  brown  tinge,  the  stigma  large,  darker  brown ; a brown 
seam  along  vein  Cux,  chiefly  in  cell  M ; veins  dark  brown,  the 
prearcular  region  more  yellowish.  Venation:  Sc  relatively 
short,  Sc1  ending  shortly  beyond  the  origin  of  Rs,  Sc2  shortly 
before  this  origin,  vSV-l  alone  being  more  than  one-half  m-cu ; 
Rs  a little  less  than  twice  the  length  of  the  basal  deflection  of 
R±  + 5 ; cell  1st  M2  closed,  relatively  large,  its  inner  end  more 
or  less  arcuated,  the  veins  issuing  from  it  relatively  short, 
the  longest  about  equal  to  the  cell;  m-cu  close  to  the  fork 
of  M. 


28  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


. Abdomen  dark  brown,  sparsely  pruinose,  the  hypopygium 
somewhat  brighter.  Male  hypopygium  with  the  ninth  tergite 
large  and  conspicuous,  each  lateral  lobe  darkened,  rounded 
and  densely  setiferous.  Basistyle  relatively  short  and  stout, 
the  ventro-mesal  lobe  stout,  terminating  in  a truncated  lobe, 
that  bears  three  conspicuous  curved  setae.  Dorsal  dististyle 
a short  powerful,  strongly  curved  rod,  the  tip  narrowed  into 
an  acute  blackened  spine.  Ventral  dististyle  a large  fleshy 
lobe,  the  rostral  prolongation  relatively  short  and  stout,  the 
two  spines  slightly  unequal,  the  inner  being  a little  longer, 
the  distance  between  the  two  less  than  one-fourth  the  length 
of  the  shortest;  tip  of  prolongation  beyond  the  spines  rela- 
tively short,  less  than  the  length  of  the  shortest  spine. 

Habitat:  New  York  and  New  England. 

Holotype,  J1,  Lake  Pleasant,  Hamilton  Co.,  New  York,  in  a 
sphagnum  bog,  altitude  1,75°  ^eeb  June  2Q,  1926  (C.  P.  Alex- 
ander) . 

Allotopotype,  §,  June  18,  1926. 

Paratypes,  2 5$,  Foot  of  Mt.  Mansfield,  Vermont,  near  Stowe, 
in  a sphagnum  bog,  altitude  1,000  feet,  June  22-24,  1927  (C.  P. 
Alexander).  Types  in  the  author’s  collection. 

In  its  general  appearance,  L.  uliginosa  most  closely  resembles 
L.  liberta  (Osten  Sacken)  but  is  a very  different  fly. 

The  types  were  taken  in  association  with  other  characteristic 
bog-inhabiting  crane-flies,  as  Phalacrocera  tipulina  Osten  Sacken, 
Pilaria  stanwoodae  (Alexander)  and  others. 

Dicranoptycha  elsa  sp.  n. 

Male. — Length  about  9 mm. ; wing,  9 mm. 

Female. — Length  about  10  mm. ; wing,  9.5  mm. 

Described  from  alcoholic  specimens. 

Allied  to  D.  septemtrionis  Alexander  in  the  short  costal 
fringe  of  the  male  and  general  coloration  and  venation,  dif- 
fering conspicuously  in  the  structure  of  the  male  hypo- 
pygium, which  is  unlike  any  of  the  rather  numerous  species 
now  known  to  occur  in  Eastern  North  America. 

Wings  with  cell  1st  M2  relatively  very  long  and  narrow, 
Rs  being  correspondingly  reduced;  m-cu  at  from  one-third 
to  one-half  the  length  of  cell  1st  M2.  Male  hypopygium  with 
the  two  dististyles  united  basally,  the  outer  relatively  slender, 
narrow,  terminating  in  a long  acute  blackened  spine;  distal 
half  of  the  style  roughened  on  all  surfaces,  on  the  outer  face 
these  roughenings  taking  the  form  of  acute  appressed  spines ; 


Feb.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  29 


basal  half  of  style  with  short  erect  setae.  Inner  style  broad 
at  base,  angularly  bent,  the  distal  half  with  long  conspicuous 
setae,  the  expanded  basal  half  with  only  a few  setae.  Lat- 
eral process  pale,  narrowed  near  midlength,  the  outer  end  a 
little  expanded,  the  tip  truncated.  Aedeagus  small,  subtended 
by  large  flattened  blades  of  entirely  distinct  form  from  that 
of  D.  sobrina  Osten  Sacken  or  D.  megaphallus  Alexander; 
apex  of  structure  deeply  split  by  an  acute  V-shaped  notch, 
the  lateral  blades  very  extensive,  their  edges  nearly  hyaline. 

Habitat:  New  York. 

Holotype,  alcoholic  male,  Tunesassa,  Cattaraugus  Co.,  August 
19,  1926  (W.  P.  Alexander). 

Allotopotype,  §. 

Types  in  the  author’s  collection. 

I takei  great  pleasure  in  naming  this  crane-fly  in  honor  of  Mrs. 
Elsa  Muller  Alexander.  There  is  a bare  possibility  that  the  pres- 
ent fly  may  represent  D.  sororcula  Osten  Sacken,  a name  that  was 
sunk  by  Osten  Sacken  in  the  synonymy  of  sobrina. 

Grrnosia  ithacana  sp.  n. 

Male. — Length  about  3. 8-4.2  mm. ; wing,  5-5.5  mm. 

Very  closely  allied  to  O.  meigenii  (Osten  Sacken),  from 
which  it  differs  chiefly  in  the  details  of  structure  of  the  male 
hypopygium.  Flagellar  segments  a trifle  longer.  General 
coloration  dark  gray,  the  lateral  pretergites  light  yellow. 
Legs  longer,  especially  the  posterior  femora  and  tibiae. 
Wings  with  the  pattern  paler.  Venation:  Veins  R3  and  R 4 
with  their  tips  directed  slightly  cephalad,  especially  the 
former;  m-cu  some  distance  before  the  fork  of  M.  Male 
hypopygium  with  the  inner  dististyle  a broadly  dilated  blade, 
the  apex  suddenly  narrowed  into  an  acute  black  spine  that 
lies  in  the  plane  of  the  longitudinal  axis  of  the  style;  in  some 
specimens,  a second  spine  on  outer  margin  of  style  near  mid- 
length of  the  blade.  Longest  gonapophysis  with  the  base 
widely  dilated,  the  tip  directed  strongly  laterad.  Shorter 
gonapophysis  sinuous,  gradually  narrowed  to  the  slender 
acute  apex,  the  outer  margin  before  the  apex  with  a few  mi- 
croscopic denticles.  The  laterally  expanded  bases  of  the 
longer  gonapophyses  are  very  conspicuous. 

Habitat:  New  York. 

Holotype,  J1,  Ithaca,  May  3,  1913  (C.  P.  Alexander). 

Paratopotypes,  2 , April  26-May  5,  1913  (C.  P.  Alexander). 

Types  in  the  author’s  collection. 


30  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol • XXIV 


PROTECTIVE  ADAPTATIONS  AMONG  AQUATIC 
HEMIPTERA. 

By  J.  R.  de  la  Torre-Bueno,  White  Plains,  N.  Y. 

Size,  form,  color,  position  and  behavior  are  closely  linked  with 
the  other  three  protective  adaptations  among  the  waterbugs ; in 
fact  color  at  times  depends  on  behavior  for  its  protective  efficacy. 

The  Aquatic  Hemiptera  naturally  divide  themselves  into  the  two 
empirical  groups — Cryptocerata  and  Gymnocerata.  The  latter 
may  be  dismissed  briefly  as  they  do  not  appear  to  any  great  extent 
as  prey,  but  preeminently  as  predators.  Their  size,  habits  and 
great  agility  are  sufficient  protection.  It  is  possible,  however, 
that  the  smaller  forms  at  least  produce  repulsive  odors.  At  any 
rate,  in  aquaria  I have  noted  larger  waterstriders  seize  Microveliae 
and  promptly  release  them  uninjured.  Hydrometra , owing  to  its 
inconspicuous  form  and  to  its  habit  of  standing  on  stems  rising 
out  of  the  water,  seems  also  to  be  safe  from  enemies. 

It  is  in  the  Cryptocerata,  mainly  deep  water  dwellers,  except 
Ochteridae  and  Gelastocoridae,  that  we  find  the  few  real  pro- 
tective adaptations. 

Takahashi  has  pointed  out,  what  I also  have  repeatedly  ob- 
served in  nature  in  Ochterus  banksi,  that  the  nymph  of  O.  for- 
mosanus  carries  on  its  back  little  grains  of  sand.  O.  banksi 
seems  to  acquire  more  or  less  of  a muddy  coat.  In  consequence, 
when  these  nymphs  squat  in  little  holes  on  the  muddy  or  sandy 
surfaces  on  which  they  congregate,  they  immediately  merge  into 
their  surroundings.  O.  banksi  seems  to  be  a denizen  of  black 
marshes  where  its  own  black  coat  makes  it  invisible  on  the  dull 
surface  of  the  black  mud,  where  it  crouches  motionless  in  some 
little  pit.  Gelastocoris,  on  the  other  hand,  seems  to  be  a denizen 
of  sandy  or  pebbly  beaches.  All  the  known  species  have  the  same 
peculiar  mottled  shagreened.  effect.  On  a sandy  flat  or  beach 
they  merge  at  once  into  the  surrounding  soil.  They  are  so  still 
they  look  like  an  inconspicuous  lump  of  sand.  Hungerford 
gives  an  excellent  illustration  of  a concealed  Gelastocoris  in  his 
Biology  of  Aquatic  Hemiptera.  The  other  members  of  the  fam- 
ily Gelastocoridae — Mononyx,  Matinus,  Nerthra,  Peltopterus — 
are  either  more  or  less  granulose  and  variegated,  or  dull  and 
muddy  looking.  It  has  been  reported  that  some  have  been  taken 
concealed  in  mud,  which  they  quite  resemble  in  color  and  with 
which  at  times  we  find  specimens  covered. 


Feb.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  31 


The  Belostomatidae  and  Naucoridae  in  general  are  of  sober 
dull  brown-greens  which  must  harmonize  with  the  underwater 
aspect  of  the  vegetation,  dead  leaves,  trash  and  mud  among  which 
they  hide.  Belostoma  flumineum  has  been  studied  by  Dr.  H.  H. 
Severin  who  found  it  exhibited  marked  death-feigning  or  cata- 
leptic ability.  I have  never  been  able  to  quite  convince  myself 
that  this  is  a protective  tropism,  since  the  insect  is  small,  an  active 
swimmer,  very  ferocious  and  given  to  concealment;  so  outside 
of  its  own  kind  it  would  seem  to  have  nothing  to  fear.  But  its 
own  would  take  little  account  of  trance,  catalepsy  or  death-feign- 
ing, but  would  indeed  profit  by  it  to  at  least  start  their  meal 
without  a struggle.  The  larger  ones  are  fierce,  strong  and  active, 
and  endeavor  to  escape  by  main  force  or  by  attack  or  threat  of 
attack.  In  fact,  so  far  as  one  may  judge  by  aquarium  observa- 
tions, if  in  danger,  Belostomatids  seem  to  place  reliance  on  speed 
as  a means  of  escape. 

Corixidae  are  generally  protectively  colored  or  patterned,  so  as 
to  be  inconspicuous  on  the  bottoms  to  which  they  cling  by  prefer- 
ence. As  to  Notonectidae,  the  majority  of  the  species  are  suffi- 
ciently large  and  brightly  colored  to  be  quite  conspicuous.  The 
sole  exceptions  are  in  the  subfamily  Pleinae  in  which  the  average 
run  of  species  does  not  quite  equal  3 mm.  in  length,  one  Helo- 
trephes  being  barely  over  1 mm.  These  little  species  crawl  about 
aquatic  vegetation,  hiding  among  the  leafage  or  in  the  crotches 
of  shoots  from  the  main  stem,  or  elsewhere  on  the  plant.  In 
such  situations  they  are  quite  inconspicuous. 

Finally,  we  come  to  the  only  truly  mimetic  group  in  the  aquatic 
Hemiptera,  the  Nepidae.  Nepa  and  its  allies  conceal  themselves 
in  mud  or  under  water.  Ranatra,  on  the  other  hand,  has  certain 
protective  resemblances  to  little  twigs.  Its  color  is  generally  an 
inconspicuous  brown  or  grey  (which  looks  dark  when  wet),  its 
form  is  narrow  and  twiglike  in  effect.  Its  motions  under  water 
are  slow  and  deliberate  to  a degree.  When  stalking  prey  it  seems 
scarcely  to  move.  But  it  is  as  quick  as  light  when  it  strikes.  It 
generally  lies  concealed  among  grasses  rising  out  of  the  water, 
in  places  in  which  there  are  twigs.  When  seized,  or  taken  out 
of  its  element,  it  goes  into  a death-feint,  its  stiff,  ungainly  long 
legs  crooked  and  pointing  every  which  way.  It  is  hard  to  detect 
among  the  rubbish  with  which  it  comes  into  the  net. 

But  always  I ask  myself  the  question — What  do  these  sub- 
aquatic  dwellers  look  like  to  each  other,  and  to  the  great  fishes, 
their  gigantic  enemies?  Though,  be  it  said,  none  except  Corixi- 
dae become  fish  food  to  anything  more  than  a most  limited  degree. 


32  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


THE  HONEY  ANT  MYRMECOCYSTUS  MELLIGER  AT 
SAN  ANTONIO,  TEXAS. 

By  H.  B.  Parks,  State  Apicultural  Research  Laboratory,  San 
Antonio,  Texas. 

As  the  majority  of  papers  relative  to  the  honey  ant  ( Myrme - 
cocystus  horti-deorum ) describe  a species  which  is  common  to 
the  Mountainous  Regions  of  the  Southern  Rockies  it  was  rather 
interesting  to  find  honey  ants  very  common  all  over  the  Rio 
Grande  Plain  of  Southwest  Texas.  Neither  Wheeler  or  McCook 
mention  M.  horti-deorum  as  being  found  in  Texas  and  Wheeler  in 
speaking  of  eight  sub-species  of  M.  melliger  does  not  mention  the 
finding  of  repletes  in  their  nests.  Some  five  years  ago  a nest  was 
discovered  in  a gravel-pit  near  this  Laboratory.  A cave-in  ex- 
posed a section  of  wall  some  twelve  feet  in  height.  The  split  re- 
vealed a longitudinal  section  of  a large  nest  of  honey  ants.  The 
ants  entered  a hole  in  the  loose  gravel  near  the  tap-root  of  a 
Brazil  bush  ( Condalia  ohovata  Hook)  and  their  tunnel  followed 
the  tap  root  downward  for  about  four  feet.  At  this  point  they 
had  a number  of  galleries  containing  ants  in  all  stages  of  develop- 
ment. There  were  no  indications  of  stores  in  this  part  of  the  nest. 
From  the  lower  part  of  this  system  of  galleries  a tunnel  continued 
downward  in  as  nearly  a straight  line  as  the  large  gravels  would 
permit.  At  ten  feet  there  were  a few  galleries  and  at  twelve 
feet  the  tunnel  entered  a layer  of  soft  yellow  sand.  Here  was  a 
space  of  about  four  or  five  cubic  feet  which  was  filled  with  gal- 
leries containing  repletes  in  all  stages  of  fullness.  These  galler- 
ies were  hemispherical  in  form  both  of  ceiling  and  floor.  The 
diameter  of  the  hemisphere  was  about  four  inches,  the  distance 
between  the  ceiling  and  floor  being  about  three-eighths  of  an  inch. 
This  enabled  the  worker  ants  standing  on  the  floor  to  care  for  the 
repletes  which  hung  from  the  ceiling.  Each  gallery  contained 
about  fifty  repletes.  No  sooner  had  the  discovery  been  made  than 
the  Mexicans  who  were  loading  sand  and  gravel  took  charge  of 
things  and  it  was  with  difficulty  that  I obtained  a sufficient  number 
of  repletes  to  prove  the  discovery  of  honey  ants  at  San  Antonio. 
It  was  rather  comical  to  see  the  Mexican  laborers  standing  around, 
each  one  with  a handful  of  repletes  and  eating  them  very  much 
as  one  would  eat  strawberries.  They  would  place  the  abdomen 
of  the  honey  ant  in  their  mouths,  bite  off  the  head  and  thorax 


Feb.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  33 


which  was  then  discarded.  I believe  the  total  number  of  repletes 
taken  from  this  nest  would  have  been  close  to  a gallon.  The  re- 
pletes were  filled  with  a thick  dark  amber  honey  which  very  much 
resembled  the  Brazil  honey  stored  by  honey  bees.  Having  become 
familiar  with  this  ant  a close  lookout  was  made  for  the  nests  and 
they  were  found  in  abundance.  In  fact,  this  ant  is  one  of  the 
common  species  from  the  Edwards  Escarpment  to  the  Rio  Grande 
River.  It  is  found  wherever  Brazil  ( Condalia  obovata  Hook), 
Lote  ( Zizyphus  obtusifolia  Gray)  and  Colubrina  ( Colubrina 
texensis  Gray)  are  found.  The  nests  are  located  in  almost  any 
kind  of  a place.  Near  San  Antonio  they  are  found  in  the  chalk 
hills  among  the  rocks,  on  the  flat  land  in  soft  dirt,  and  in  the  tim- 
ber under  the  roots  of  trees.  A very  close  watch  has  been  made 
of  this  ant  during  the  past  five  years  and  we  have  found  that  it 
obtains  its  honey, almost  altogether  from  the  shrubs  mentioned 
above.  It  could  not  obtain  the  honey  from  the  galls  of  oak  as  in 
many  places  the  nests  are  miles  from  the  nearest  oak  trees.  The 
insects  work  on  the  cloudy  days  so  one  has  an  ample  opportunity 
of  studying  their  honey  gathering  ability.  When  the  shrubs  men- 
tioned are  in  bloom  the  plants  will  be  very  heavily  infested  with 
these  ants,  each  one  at  work  on  the  exposed  nectaries.  It  is  to 
be  said  that  in  digging  out  nests  of  this  species  that  very  often 
cavities  are  found  which  are  completely  filled  with  grass  seeds  and 
quite  often  the  ants  are  seen  carrying  the  seed  of  Colorado  grass 
into  their  nests. 

Mr.  A.  K.  Boyles,  taxidermist  of  the  Witte  Memorial  Museum 
of  San  Antonio  has  succeeded  in  transferring  the  honey  ants  to 
formicaries  with  glass  fronts.  These  were  placed  on  exhibit  in 
the  Museum.  As  the  ants  placed  in  the  boxes  contained  no  re- 
pletes he  placed  a dish  containing  a mixture  of  sugar  and  water 
in  the  box.  In  three  days  he  had  a number  of  completely  filled 
repletes.  The  replete  filled  with  the  clear  liquid  made  a very 
curious  appearance  as  the  abdomen  walls  were  so  thin  that  one 
could  not  see  them  and  it  appared  as  though  the  head  and  thorax 
of  the  replete  was  standing  out  by  itself.  The  sugar  and  water 
solution  evidently  did  not  agree  with  the  honey  ants  as  three  of 
them  burst  without  any  apparent  .reason.  Honey  in  its  natural 
condition  was  substituted  for  the  sugar  syrup.  The  ants  continued 
to  make  repletes  and  have  done  so  until  the  number  of  repletes 
outnumber  the  workers.  Any  form  of  the  worker  will  become  a 
replete.  In  this  cage  there  are  numbers  of  various  sizes  of  re- 


34  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Voi.  XXIV 


pletes,  all  of  them  full  fed.  As  nearly  as  can  be  determined  with- 
out material  for  comparison  this  species  is  Myrmecocystus  mel- 
liger.1 

There  is  a relationship  between  the  honey  ant  and  the  coyote 
( Cams  nebrascensis  texensis  Bailey)  which  appears  to  be  con- 
stant and  to  be  well  known  throughout  Southwest  Texas.  This 
relationship  may  be  stated  as  follows : The  coyote  either  digs 

out  the  nest  of  the  honey  ant  for  the  repletes  and  afterwards  uses 
the  hole  as  a den  or  the  honey  ants  find  the  abundant  dens  of 
coyotes  and  occupy  them  during  the  summer  period  because  of  the 
softness  of  the  dirt  which  has  been  washed  in  and  fills  the  cavity 
in  the  hard  soil  made  by  a former  occupant  of  the  den.  The 
actually  observed  facts  are  as  follows : Any  new  excavation  made 
by  coyotes  will  be  found  to  follow  the  excavation  made  by  honey 
ants.  Honey  ants’  nests  are  frequently  found  in  deserted  coyote 
dens.  As  it  seemed  improbable  that  an  animal  of  ^the  wolf  tribe 
would  be  attracted  by  the  sugar  syrup  of  the  repletes,  the  work 
of  digging  out  the  honey  ant  nests  jwas  first  attributed  to  arma- 
dillos. A very  careful  watch  has  proven  that  the  work  was  done 
by  the  coyotes. 


Uncommon  Coleoptera. — On  October  12,  1928,  while  shak- 
ing out  piles  of  partly  dried  grass  and  weeds  over  the  sifting 
cloth  in  Framingham,  Mass.,  I took  three  specimens  of  Xestipyge 
geminatum  Lee.  I had  never  seen  but  one  specimen  of  this 
before;  it  was  taken  by  Mr.  S.  A.  Shaw  at  Hampton,  N.  H.,  on 
April  13,  1924. 

Under  these  same  piles  of  grass  I took  three  specimens  of  Cor- 
ticaria  varicolor  Fall.  The  identity  was  established  through  the 
kindness  of  the  describer,  Mr.  H.  C.  Fall,  who  stated  that  he  had 
taken  the  species  on  Nantucket  Island,  and  had  not  previously 
seen  the  species  from  Massachusetts.  A single  specimen  was  re- 
cently found  in  material  taken  by  sifting  at  Nantucket  by  Mr.  J. 
H.  Emerton  in  May,  1928. — C.  A.  Frost,  Framingham,  Mass. 

1 Determined  by  Dr.  W.  M.  Wheeler  as  Myrmecocystus  melliger 
subsp.  orbiceps  Wheeler. 


Feb.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  35 


SOME  TINGITOIDEA  FROM  CENTRAL  AND  SOUTH 

AMERICA. 

By  Carl  J.  Drake,  Ames,  Iowa 
In  the  course  of  the  study  of  the  lace-bugs  of  Central  and 
South  America,  two  new  secies  and  several  interesting  records 
were  found  in  a small  collection  kindly  sent  to  the  writer  by  Dr. 
Edward  Wagner,  of  the  Zoologische  Staatsinstitut  and  Zoologische 
Museum,  Hamburg,  Germany.  The  new  species  and  the  distri- 
butional records  are  given  below. 

Piesma  cinerea  Say,  var.  inornata  McAtee. 

Male,  San  Jose,  Costa  Rica,  1911-1912. 

Monanthia  monotropidia  Stab 

Male,  San  Jose,  Costa  Rica,  H.  Schmidt. 

Monanthia  C-nigrum  Champion. 

Female,  San  Jose,  Costa  Rica,  H.  Schmidt. 

Teleonemia  prolixa  Stal. 

Several  examples  of  var.  a Champion;  Santos  and  Pernambuco, 
Brazil;  Paramaribo,  Dutch  Guiana;  Ecuador. 

Teleonemia  lantana  Distant. 

Male,  San  Jose,  Costa  Rica,  H.  Schmidt. 

Teleonemia  validicornis  Stal. 

Male,  Paramaribo,  Dutch  Guiana. 

Teleonemia  hrevipennis  Champion. 

Male,  Marcapata,  Peru. 

Teleonemia  albomarginata  Champion. 

Male,  Paramaribo,  Dutch  Guiana,  C.  Heller. 

Sphaerocysta  glohifera  Stal. 

Male,  Santos,  Brazil,  Jan.  1,  1904,  Dr.  H.  Brauns. 

Tingis  colombiana  n.  sp.  (Fig.  1.) 

Broadly  ovate,  clothed  with  very  fine,  decumbent,  incon- 
spicuous pile ; brownish  testaceous,  the  head  and  calli  brown- 
ish black.  Antennae  moderately  stout,  rather  short,  beset 
with  bristly  hairs,  brownish;  segment  I short,  stout,  a little 
stouter  and  longer  than  two ; III  slenderest,  less  than  twice 
as  long  as  four;  IV  strongly  enlarged  towards  tip,  blackish. 


36  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


Fig.  i,  Tingis  colombiana  n.  sp.  (type). 

Head  very  broad,  short,  with  five  moderately  long,  somewhat 
decumbent,  testaceous  spines.  Rostral  channel  widening  pos- 
teriorly, open  behind,  the  rostrum  extending  to  the  posterior 
margin  of  anterior  coxae.  Bucculae  brown,  contiguous  in 
front.  Legs  rather  short,  brown,  the  tarsi  black. 

Pronotum  broad,  strongly  swollen  through  disc,  coarsely 
pitted,  tricarinate ; lateral  carinae  diverging  anteriorly  and 
extending  to  the  calli,  indistinctly  reticulate,  the  median 
slightly  more  elevated ; collum  very  distinct,  reticulate,  some- 
what raised  in  the  middle,  there  faintly  projecting  anteriorly. 
Paranota  narrbw,  faintly  reflexed,  biseriate  in  front,  uni- 
seriate  along  humeri.  Elytra  broad,  considerably  longer  than 
abdomen,  rounded  behind  (both  taken  together)  ; costal  area 
broad,  irregularly  bi-  to  triseriate ; subcostal  area  triseriate ; 
discoidal  area  long,  broad,  extending  to  the  apical  fourth  of 
elytra,  the  outer  margin  arcuate,  composed  of  five  rows  of 
areolae  at  its  widest  part,  narrowest  at'  both  base  and  apex. 

Length,  2.02  mm.;  width,  1.21  mm. 


Feb.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  37 


Holotype,  male,  Sabanilla,  Colombia,  S.  A.,  in  Zoologische 
Staatsinstitut  and  Zoologische  Museum,  Hamburg,  Germany. 

General  appearance  similar  to  T.  americana  Drake,  but  differ- 
ing in  having  a shorter  antennae  and  much  smaller  areolae  of 
elytra  and  paranota.  T.  corubiana  Drake  is  more  elongate — ovate 
and  very  closely  reticulated ; the  antennae  are  also  much  longer 
and  thicker  and  rather  indistinctly  pilose. 

Corythucha  fuscomaculata  Stal. 

6 specimens,  Rio  de  Janeiro  and  Sao  Paulo,  Brazil. 

Corythucha  palmatis  n.  sp. 

Brownish  testaceous,  a few  of  the  nervelets  of  paranota, 
median  carina  and  sutural  area,  and  a narrow  transverse 
band  near  the  base  and  a more  or  less  indistinct  oblique  band 
(nervelets  only)  near  the  apex  of  elytra  brownish.  Areolae 
hyaline.  Hood  moderately  large,  strongly  inflated  behind,  its 
length  twice  its  height,  with  a few  short,  black-tipped  spines 
on  the  side.  Antennae  moderately  long,  clothed  with  numer- 
ous long  bristly  hairs,  pale  brown,  segments  III  and  IV  tes- 
taceous. Rostral  laminae  widely  separated  on  meso-  and 
metathorax,  contiguous  behind ; rostrum  brownish  testa- 
ceous, the  apical  segment  fuscous,  reaching  between  inter- 
mediate coxae. 

Pronotum  considerably  swollen,  smooth,  polished,  finely 
punctured,  indistinctly  reticulated  behind ; lateral  carinae 
short,  strongly  curved,  rounded  above,  widely  separated  from 
hood,  each  composed  of  three  areolae;  median  carina  not 
strongly  raised,  uniseriate,  at  its  highest  place  about  one- 
fourth  as  high  as  hood,  distinctly  shorter  than  hood.  Para- 
nota long,  broad,  the  outer  margins  beset  with  numerous, 
moderately  long  spines.  Elytra  with  large  prominent  tumid 
elevation ; costal  area  wide,  mostly  triseriate,  with  short 
spines  along  the  basal  two-thirds  of  outer  margin,  the  are- 
olae smaller  and  irregularly  quadriseriate  at  base.  Body 
black ; legs  testaceous.  Wings  a little  longer  than  abdomen. 
Male  clasper  brownish,  strongly  curved.  Length,  3.24  mm. ; 
width,  1.76  mm. 

Holotype  (male)  and  allotype  (female)  San  Jose,  Costa  Rica, 
Central  America,  H.  Schmidt,  in  Zoologische  Staatsinstitut  and 
Zoologische  Museum,  Hamburg.  Paratypes,  2 specimens,  taken 
with  types,  in  writer’s  collection.  This  species  resembles  to  some 
extent  C.  mcelfreshi  Drake,  C.  decens  Stal,  C.  baccharidis  Drake, 
but  may  be  distinguished  from  them  by  the  much  smaller  and  less 
inflated  hood. 


38  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiV 


THE  NORTH  AMERICAN  SPECIES  OF  PARANDRA 
(COL.  CERAMBYCIDAE). 

By  Chas.  Schaeffer,  Brooklyn  Museum,  Brooklyn,  N.  Y. 

The  two  species,  ampliceps  and  gravidula,  described  by  the  late 
Colonel  Casey  are  omitted  from  the  following  table  as  I was  un- 
able to  identify  with  certainty  either  one  in  my  material,  and  re- 
marks on  them  will  be  found  below. 

Key  to  Parandra. 

1.  Onychium  distinct,  with  two  setae  (paronychia),  one  on  each 

side  of  apex;  anterior  intercoxal  process  straight  between 
the  coxae,  feebly  arcuate  and  distinctly  prolonged  behind; 
eyes  not  emarginate  internally;  anterior  margin  of  pro- 
thorax strongly  oblique  on  each  side  near  anterior  angles; 
form  relatively  narrow  and  depressed ; prothorax  and  elytra 

rather  sparsely  and  finely  punctate polita 

Onychium  absent;  intercoxal  process  distinctly  arcuate  and  not 
prolonged  behind  the  coxae ; eyes  emarginate  internally ; 
anterior  margin  of  prothorax  almost  straight  to  the  angles. 
Form  broader  and  more  convex;  punctuation  of  prothorax 
and  elytra  variable 2 

2.  Punctuation  of  elytra  exceedingly  fine  and  sparse,  almost  in- 

visible, punctures  on  prothorax  distinct,  moderately  large, 

sparse  on  the  disk  but  more  numerous  at  sides 4 

Punctuation  of  elytra  distinct,  equal  or  subequal  to  that  on  the 
prothorax 3 

3.  Subapical  transverse  impression  of  prothorax  absent  in  the 

male,  but  very  distinct  and  not  interrupted  at  middle  in 

female  . brunnea 

Subapical  impression  of  prothorax  distinct  but  interrupted  at 
middle  in  the  male ; larger  with  relatively  finer  punctuation 
of  prothorax  and  elytra  but  mandibles  more  coarsely  and 
closely  punctate  than  in  brunnea;  female  unknown. 

marginicollis 

4.  Subapical  impression  of  prothorax  in  the  male  distinct  but 

narrowly  interrupted  at  middle;  mandibles  of  male  rather 
sparsely  punctate  with  moderate  punctures.  Subapical  im- 
pression of  prothorax  in  the  female  absent  at  middle  but 
distinct  and  generally  deeply  impressed  on  each  side  for 
about  one-third  the  width  of  the  margin punctillata 

Parandra  polita  Say. 

This  species,  which  is  more  elongate  and  less  convex  than 


Feb.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  39 


hrunnea,  will  be  readily  known  by  the  characters  given  in  the 
table. 

It  was  described  by  Say  from  Indiana  and  is  recorded  in  the 
Leng  catalogue  from  the  Southern  States,  Texas  and  Arizona.  It 
occurs  also  in  different  localities  in  Mexico  and  Central  America. 

Parandra  hrunnea  Fab. 

Our  well-known  and  common  species  is  a variable  insect,  espe- 
cially in  regard  to  the  form  of  prothorax  and  head,  and  it  also 
varies  greatly  in  size.  Thomson  in  Physics,  1867,  pp.  114-116, 
described  five  species  based  mainly  on  the  form  of  prothorax  and 
two  of  these  from  single  females.  They  are  nothing  else  than  in- 
dividual variation  and  are  properly  placed  as  synonyms  of  hrun- 
nea in  our  lists.  The  mandibles  of  the  males  generally  have  three 
more  or  less  distinct  teeth  on  the  inner  edge,  one  near  apex,  one 
near  middle  and  one  a little  below  base,  the  last  two  are  occasion- 
ally more  or  less  confluent.  Two  large  males,  however,  one  from 
Wisconsin  and  the  other  from  Ithaca,  N.  Y.,  have  the  mandibles 
more  slender  and  relatively  longer,  bidentate  only,  the  upper  tooth 
entirely  wanting  but  as  they  do  not  possess  any  other  distinctive 
character,  I consider  them  at  present  as  aberrations  of  hrunnea. 

It  is  apparently  a widely  distributed  species  if  all  the  localities 
given  in  the  Leng  catalogue  are  correct,  though  I have  before  me 
two  specimens  from  the  Nat.  Museum  collection,  kindly  loaned 
by  Mr.  Fisher,  which  are  labelled  “ Ariz.” 

Parandra  ampliceps  Casey. 

The  main  characters  separating  this  species  from  hrunnea,  as 
given  by  its  describer,  are  the  larger  eyes  and  the  carina  along  the 
anterior  face  of  the  hind  tibiae  much  nearer  the  inner  than  the 
outer  edge.  This  latter  character  is  apparently  not  only  variable 
but  also  varies  in  the  same  specimen  if  viewed  from  different 
angles.  The  subapical  transverse  impression  of  prothorax  is 
absent  in  the  male  and  distinct  but  interrupted  at  middle  in  the 
females  in  the  types,  also  in  gravidula  as  Mr.  Fisher  kindly  in- 
formed me,  and  therefore  both  would  go  with  hrunnea  in  my  table. 

I have  two  males,  one  from  North  Carolina  and  one  from  Long 
Island,  N.  Y.,  and  also  several  females,  which  I place  here  with 
a little  doubt.  It  seems  to  me  that  ampliceps  is  a more  strongly 
developed  form  of  hrunnea  and  would  perhaps  be  better  placed  as 
a variety  of  the  latter  than  as  a distinct  species. 

Parandra  gravidula  Casey. 

This  species  is  differentiated  by  its  describer  from  hrunnea 


40  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiV 


by  the  stouter  form,  the  antennae  not  quite  so  long  as  the  width 
of  the  head — much  longer  than  the  width  of  the  head  in  brunnea 
— margin  of  epistoma  abruptly  dentiform  at  the  middle. — gradu- 
ally and  feebly  anteriorly  prominent  medially  in  brunnea. 

Casey’s  specimens  were  from  Pennsylvania  and  westward  and 
he  says  that  it  is  abundant,  while  he  apparently  had  only  one  male 
from  New  York  of  what  he  determined  as  Fabricius’  brunnea. 
In  my  material  I could  not  find  a single  specimen  in  which  the  an- 
tennae are  shorter  than  the  width  of  the  head.  The  prominent  or 
dentiform  process  at  middle  of  anterior  margin  of  epistoma, 
however,  is  variable  and  if  Casey  was  correct  in  the  measurement 
of  the  antennae,  gravidula  should  be  considered  a variety  of 
brunnea,  otherwise  as  a synonym. 

Parandra  marginicollis  n.  sp. 

Form  and  color  as  in  brunnea  but  generally  larger  than 
that  species,  prothorax  at  anterior  margin  with  a more  or  less 
distinct  transverse  impression,  deeply  impressed  laterally  but 
gradually  becoming  shallower  toward  middle,  where  it  is  ob- 
solete ; punctuation  of  head,  prothorax  and  elytra  much  finer 
than  in  brunnea.  Length,  mandibles  excluded,  14-22  mm. 

Two  specimens  from  Los  Angeles  Co.,  Calif.,  in  the  Dietz  col- 
lection of  which  the  largest  one  (22  mm.)  is  considered  the  type 
and  two  specimens  in  the  National  Museum  collection,  one  from 
Los  Angeles  Co.,  Calif.  (Coquilett),  the  other  from  S.  Bernadino 
Mts.,  Calif.  (C.  C.  Zeus),  paratypes. 

Only  males  have  been  seen. 

Parandra  punctillata  n.  sp. 

Form  and  color  of  brunnea,  but  with  very  fine  sparse, 
nearly  invisible,  small  punctuation  of  elytra  which  is  more 
evident  at  sides ; prothorax  more  distinctly  punctate  with 
larger  punctures. 

Male:  Prothorax  near  anterior  margin  with  a shallow 
transverse  impression,  which  is  more  or  less  interrupted  at 
middle. 

Female:  The  transverse  anterior  impression  of  prothorax 
distinct  at  sides  but  broadly  interrupted  at  middle.  Length, 
mandibles  excluded,  15-20  mm. 

Male  type  and  female  allotype  from  Sta,  Catalina  Mts.,  Arizona 
(Christman  coll.),  in  the  National  Museum;  paratypes  from 
Prescott,  Arizona,  in  the  Brooklyn  Museum. 

Described  from  three  males  and  three  females,  two  of  the  latter 
have  the  interrupted  transverse  impression  of  prothorax  very 
deep  at  sides,  in  the  other  specimen  the  impression  is  more  faint. 


Feb.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  41 


EDITORIALS. 

ON  ENTOMOLOGISTS  AND  ENTOMOLOGY. 

One  eminent  human  trait  seems  to  be  to  consider  one’s  self  a 
second  (and  better)  Michael  Angelo  or  Homer  or  Alexander; 
and  so,  able  to  essay  anything  and  get  away  with  it.  Another 
trait,  no  less  eminent,  is  contrariwise.  Knowing  one’s  self  to  be 
no  M.A.,  H.  or  A.,  one  therefore  is  capable  of  nothing. 

There  is  always  a middle  way.  Without  nursing  any  precon- 
ceived (and  probably  grandiose)  idea  about  one’s  capability — 
'try  anything  once.  The  heroes  of  old  simply  did  things — and  lo ! 
they  became  epic  figures  ! 

We  have  put  our  exemplars  back  into  the  dim  and  legendary 
ages;  and  selected  them  with  careful  purpose  far  from  the  lines 
of  modern  endeavor  to  make  it  impossible  for  any  of  our  readers 
to  imagine  he  recognizes  himself  to  be  singled  out  for  dissection. 

And  these  minor  premises  being  established,  let  us  now  con- 
sider the  writing  of  entomological  articles. 

A great  and  noticeable  lack  in  our  entomological  journals  is 
short  notes  on  flying  observations.  These  notes  are  frequently  of 
great  value ; and  always  of  general  interest.  But  the  hopeful 
Homers  cannot  spare  the  time  from  the  magnum  opus  to  pen 
them ; and  the  abased  Alexanders  ieel  themselves  unworthy  to 
burst  into  authorship. 

Now,  entomologists  are  human  beings;  and  each  in  his  way 
can  bring  his  mite  to  the  collection  of  data  which  goes  to  make 
up  the  fulness  of  the  science.  Almost  any  random  minor  note 
may  be  the  starting-point  for  a valuable  piece  of  research.  And 
any  entomologist  who  goes  into  the  field  has  seen  many  things  of 
great  interest;  or  at  least  novel  to  him.  Consider,  for  interest, 
the  historical  value  of  the  first  note  on  the  Japanese  beetle  in  the 
United  States ; or  on  the  spread  of  the  cotton-boll  weevil ; or  on 
the  extinction  of  chinch  bugs  by  fungi.  And  yet  similar  things 
come  under  our  observation;  and  the  mighty  minded  consider 
them  useless  to  note  and  unworthy  of  their  powers;  and  the 
humble  minded  hesitate  to  burst  into  print  in  the  presence  of  the 
great,  with  what  is  nothing  but  an  irrelevant  trifle — or  so  they 
think. 

Imagine,  if  you  can,  a great  artist  painting  a pastoral  scene  of 
:sheep  and  shepherd  without  a background ! And  that  is  precisely 


42  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vo1-  XXIV 


the  effect  of  minor  observations — the  background  which  har- 
monizes the  great  facts. 

So  we  ask  our  friends  entomological  to  send  us  many  minor 
notes.  We  can  use  them.  And  if  they  should  not  be  usable  or  the 
facts  already  known ; we  can  return  them  with  polite  regrets. — 
J.  R.  T.  B. 


“ FIT  TO  PRINT.” 

Of  course,  all  matter  in  entomological  journals  is  fit  to  print — 
not  the  bitterest  moralist  could  object  to  their  content.  But  while 
fit  to  print,  should  some  things  be  printed?  (This  query  is  in  the 
universal  interest.)  Now,  we  have  with  us  at  all  times  those  good 
men  who  go  into  perfect  orgies  of  describing  varieties,  forms, 
aberrations  and  even,minuter  subdivisions  of  species,  isolated  and 
alone.  While  the  argument  that  such  descriptions  are  needed,  for 
they  may  reveal  the  course  of  the  evolutionary  flow  of  a species, 
is  perfectly  valid,  it- nevertheless  may  be  pointed  out  that  such 
descriptions  when  alone  have  no  striking  taxonomic  value. 

While  we  have  on  occasion  published  such  descriptions  of 
minor  divisions  of  species,  we  have  decided  to  publish  in  the 
future  only  such  as  occur  in  general  work,  monographic  work  or 
discussions  of  interrelationships  of  species  and  forms/ — -J.  R.  T.  B. 


Feb.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  43 


BOOK  NOTES. 

Pond  Problems,  by  Ernest  E.  Unwin.  Pp.  i-xvi+1-117,  figs. 

1-47.  (The  Cambridge  Nature  Study  Series,  The  Macmillan 

Co.,  New  York.  $1.20.) 

Any  of  our  readers  who  feel  that  way  inclined  may  believe  me 
pro-British,  for  certainly,  I shall  always  maintain  that  in  the 
popular,  non-technical  presentation  of  science  to  amateurs,-  the 
English  far  outdistance  us.  They  never  sacrifice  scientific  ac- 
curacy to  imagination;  nor,  on  the  other  hand,  do  they  set  forth 
dry  fact  in  an  unembellished  and  Gradgrind  fashion.  Perhaps 
this  is  a matter  of  tradition  and  taste  with  them ; or  perhaps  it  is 
a cultural  background  of  the  classics  and  all  that  goes  to  consti- 
tute a liberal  education.  Even  those  who  from  social  limitations 
have  not  been  able  to  afford  a university  training,  appear  to  ab- 
sorb and  make  their  own  the  general  atmosphere  of  taste  and  the 
art  of  expression  in  facile  English.  This  felicity  in  phrasing 
popular  works,  of  course,  also  holds  for  the  French  and  other 
Continental  nations,  within  their  own  ways.  But  I lay  stress  on 
the  English,  for  they  , are  at  least  our  cultural  forebears,  however 
much  we  as  Americans  may  be  racially  mixed  or  hybridized. 
What  the  English  can  do,  we  also  can,  but  seemingly  do  not  essay, 
with  a few  shining  exceptions.  It  is  true  we  have  produced  some 
popular  science,  a little  of  it  good.  But  the  rest  is  either  so  ob- 
viously written  down;  or  else,  while  compressed,  it  continues  to 
be  abstruse  and  couched  in  the  esoteric  language  of  the  pro- 
fessors ; or  perhaps  it  is  written  by  some  one  with  a flow  of  words 
in  inverse  ratio  to  sufficient  knowledge,  an  unrestrained  and  an- 
thropomorphic imagination,  and  a sweet  independence  from  the 
few  facts  he  (more  generally,  she)  may  have  culled  from  some 
outdated  presentation  of  the  subject  under  treatment.  On  this 
subject  Professor  East  has  said:  “ Of  some  fifty  books  for  the 
general  public  purporting  to  be  psychology  that  I have  recently 
examined,  two-thirds  appear  to  have  been  written  by  voodoo  wor- 
shippers. From  a still  larger  number  of  volumes  on  biology, 
chemistry,  physics,  and  their  applications,  I find  less  than  half  a 
dozen  which  give  the  impression  that  the  authors  are  acquainted 
with  their  subjects.  Yet  if  one  were  to  believe  the  high  voltage 
“ blurbs  ” written  by  the  publishers,  this  scrivening  is  serious 
stuff,  indited  by  the  world’s  most  celebrated  thinkers.” 


44  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


All  entomologists  are  familiar. with  the  remark  “ Of  course  you 

have  read ’s  ‘ Beetles  of  the  Timbercoast?  ’ Isn’t  she  just 

wonderful!  And  aren’t  the  bugs  just  too  funny  for  anything!” 
If  you  confess  you  haven’t,  ,you  at  once  reveal  your  crass  un- 
familiarity with  your  subject.  If  you  deprecatingly  admit  know- 
ing something  about  the  opus,  but  aver  it  is  scarcely  to  be  taken 
as  scientific,  you  at  once  get  the  utmost  credit  for  scientific  jeal- 
ousy. And  if  you  mildly  say  that  it  is  full  of  commonplaces  and 
very  wordy,  you  at  once  are  set  down  (invidiously)  as  a second 
Darwin  in  respect  to  a complete  loss  of  appreciation  of  the  finer 
things  of  art  and  literature,  of  which  this  book  is  a splendid  ex- 
ample, destined  to  live  long  in  the  annals  of  American  literature. 
This  pap  is  what  is  believed  to  be  a proper  popularization  of  sci- 
ence, to  bring  it  down  to  the  level  of  the  educable  masses,  as  it 
were. 

“ Pond  Problems,”  the  little  book  that  is  the  motive  of  the  com- 
mentary just  ended,  is  such  a work  as  we  should  have  in  this  vast 
and  great  country  of  ours,  a land  avid  for  knowledge  of  the 
truths  of  nature.  Rife  about  us  are  false  values  and  false  views 
of  living,  its  art,  purpose  and  joy.  In  the  study  of  nature — nay, 
in  the  intimacy  with  nature  in  its  day  by  day  life — we  have  the 
corrective  to  these,  the  truth  that  shall  make  us  free;  that  shall 
give  us  a perspective  and  a course  to  follow  in  the  stress  and  tur- 
moil of  the  modern  world. 

(lPond  Problems  ” was  originally  printed  in  England  in  1914; 
before  me  is  the  1928 preprinting.  It  is  to-day  as  informing  and 
useful  as  it  was  fourteen  years  ago. 

Professor  Unwin,  the  author,  is  now  headmaster  of  the 
Friend’s  School,  at  Hobart,  Tasmania.  Before  this,  he  had  been 
demonstrator  in  zoology  at  Leeds  University,  under  the  noted 
Professor  Miall ; and  later  science  piaster  at  three  English 
schools.  His  experience  in  shaping  young  minds  is  shown  by  the 
illustrations  of  healthy  English  lads  he  has  photographed  at  their 
collecting;  and  particularly  by  the  arrangement  and  presentation 
of  the  matter  of  this  book. 

Obviously,  this  work  is  designed  for  the  upper  school  grades, 
even  into  high  school — that  is,  for  young  people  from  about  10 
years  of  age  to  16  or  over.  Equally  obviously,  it  aims  to  get  at 
exact  (and  known)  facts  through  the  efforts  of  the  students 
themselves,  under  the  guidance  of  more  competent  heads — in 
other  words,  to  educate  them  in  a given  section  of  biology,  in  the 


Feb.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  45 


primitive  meaning  of  that  much  misused  word.  Equally,  though 
less  avowedly,  this  little  book  is  a text  on  the  scientific  method  of 
arriving  at  facts  by  rigorous  experimentation.  For  those  that 
have  the  taste,  of  any  age,  this  is  an  excellent  guide  to  the  study 
of  the  insect  life  of  ponds;  the  many  suggestions,  questions,  ex- 
periments, and  problems  set  forth  guide  the  student  to  the  known 
facts,  from  which,  by  careful  observation,  it  is  possible  to  proceed 
to  others  still  undiscovered. 

Hence,  as  it  stands,  it  is  one  of  those  books  which  ought  to  be 
in  every  summer  camp  for  boys  and  girls ; and  it  should  be  used 
by  both  Girl  and  Boy  Scouts  as  a part  of  the  nature  requirements. 
For  through  the  use  of  this  small  book  it  is  possible  to  study  many 
of  the  , universal  problems  of  biology — development,  physiology, 
adaptations — in  a relatively  brief  time  and  with  living  beings  that 
flourish  in  captivity  and  are  simple  to  confine  and  control  under 
natural  conditions. 

Professor  Unwin’s  opening  sentence,  “ The  study  of  environ- 
ment and  its  effect  upon  living  things  is  one  of  the  most  interest- 
ing branches, of  the  science  of  life,”  is  the  key  to  the  purpose  of 
the  book.  Not  all  the  study  of  all  the  dry  and  pickled  specimens 
in  the  world  is  going  to  show  how  living  things  live.  Nor  can  we 
study  life  at  a laboratory  table  from  the  dissection  of  a pickled 
grasshopper  or  of  an  embalmed  cat.  We  must  go  to  life  to  ques- 
tion life ! 

“ How  to  obtain  Specimens  ” is  the  first  chapter,  which  ranges 
from  the  ponds,  their  inhabitants  and  how  to  catch  them,  to  the 
instruments  and  apparatus  needed  and  the  proper  preparation  of 
aquaria.  The  next  chapter  studies  the  reply  to  the  question 
“What  Is  an  Insect?  ” and  gives  eighteen  numbered  suggestions 
for  experiments  and  studies.  In  chapter  III  is  a statement  of  the 
problems  presented  to  insects  (and  solved  by  them)  incident  to 
life  in  the  water,  an  alien  and  hostile  element  to  air  breathers,  as 
insects  are.  The  chapter  following  takes  up  breathing  and  gives 
thirty-six  suggestions  for  study.  The  surface  film  of  water  is 
the  subject  of  chapter  V,  with  twenty-nine  problems  and  queries; 
and  in  the  next  chapter  the  diving-tubes  and  diving-bells  of  insects 
are  considered  and  thirty-eight  problems  are  set.  Gill  breathing 
is  studied  in  the  following  chapter,  where  sixty-one  problems  are 
set  forth.  Chapter  VIII  presents  105  subjects  on  methods  of 
locomotion;  and j chapter  IX  tells  of  the  ways  in  which  mature 
insects  whose  young  live  in  the  water  escape  that  deadly  element 


46  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


when  they  come  to  maturity,  to  soar  freely  in  the  air  as  adults, 
with  sixty-four  suggestions  for  study.  The  “ Life  Stories.  From 
Egg  to  Imago  ” form  chapter  X,  where  they  are  elucidated  by 
means  of  fifty-five  experiments.  The  Appendices  give  the  meth- 
ods of  securing  material,  names  of  dealers,  apparatus,  the  use  of 
the  microscope,  and  the  names  of  books  on  the  subject  of  aquatic 
and  insect  life,  all,  of  course,  from  the  English  standpoint ; and 
equally,  of  course,  as  relates  to  books  and  dealers,  not  of  great 
use  to  us  in  this  country. 

The  insects  treated  of  in  this  little  work  are  naturally  of  the 
same  orders  and  families  as  with  us — Odonata,  Ephemerida,  Per- 
lidae,  Dytiscidae,  Gerridae,  Culicidae,  and  others.  With  some 
few  exceptions,  the  genera  are  the  same  as  ours.  Naturally,  the 
species  are  different.  The  general  problems,  however,  are  the 
same,  even  though  in  some  details  ours  may  differ. 

This  is  easily  a book  which  can  be  recommended  to  any  one  in- 
terested in  insects  and  their  ways  of  living.  In  a way,  it  comple- 
ments Needham’s  just  published  “Elementary  Lessons  on  In- 
sects.” But  few  changes  in  this  little  work  would  adapt  it  exactly 
to  American  conditions.  Even  as  it  is,  it  is  very  helpful.  And 
its  low  price  makes  it  more  widely  available  than  the  usual  run  of 
books  for  amateurs  that  make  the  least  pretense  to  scientific 
accuracy. — J.  R.  T.  B. 


Feb.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  47 


PROCEEDINGS  OF  THE  SOCIETY. 

Meeting  of  May  io,  1928. 

A regular  meeting  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  was 
held  at  the  Brooklyn  Museum,  on  Thursday  evening,  May  10, 
1928,  at  8.21  p.  m. 

President  Davis  in  the  Chair  and  12  members  present,  viz. : 
Messrs.  Bell,  Bromley,  Chapin,  Engelhardt,  Rau,  Schaeffer, 
Schiffer,  Sever,  Shoemaker,  Siepmann,  Torre-Bueno  and  Willis, 
and  two  visitors,  Mr.  Pollard  and  Mr.  Abbot. 

Minutes  of  the  previous  meeting  read  and  approved. 

Mr.  Engelhardt  presented  the  report  of  the  Treasurer,  and  re- 
marked that  though  the  cash  balance  on  hand  seemed  to  be  very 
large,  there  were  many  bills  to  be  paid  before  the  first  meeting  in 
the  fall,  when  his  report  will  probably  show  some  reduction  in  the 
cash  balance.  Mr.  Engelhardt’s  report  was  received  with  thanks. 

Mr.  Torre-Bueno  reported  for  the  Publication  Committee,  the 
April  number  of  the  Bulletin  was  delayed  because  the  galley- 
proof  had  been  lost  in  the  mail,  but  that  the  issue  would  appear 
shortly. 

Mr.  Engelhardt  read  a circular  letter  from  Dr.  A.  F.  Satter- 
thwait,  Associate  Entomologist,  in  Charge,  U.  S.  Entomological 
Laboratory,  Webster  Groves,  Mo.,  offering  to  pay  ten  cents  apiece 
for  adult  specimens  of  Calendra  (bill-bugs)  if  delivered  at  his 
station  by  May  10,  which  date  may  be  extended,  the  eggs  of  which 
are  to  be  used  to  propagate  Anaphoidea  calendrae  Gahan,  a My- 
marid  infesting  the  eggs  of  Calendra  species ; these  parasites  are 
to  be  used  by  the  Hawaiian  Sugar  Experiment  Station  to  aid  in 
the  control  of  the  Hawaiian  sugar-cane  borer,  Rhabdocnemis  ob- 
scurus.  Mr.  Engelhardt  exhibited  a box  containing  four  species 
of  bill-bugs. 

Mr.  Pollard  announced  the  receipt  by  the  Museum  of  the  col- 
lection of  insects  of  the  late  A.  C.  Weeks  and  said  that  most  of 
them  were  in  good  condition  but  that  Dermestes  had  attacked 
some  boxes  5 he  exhibited  a box  of  specimens  of  Hamadryas 
antiopa  Linne  which  were  beautifully  spread. 

Mr.  Davis  exhibited  a copy  of  “ Biological  and  Taxonomic  In- 
vestigations in  the  Mutillid  Wasps,”  by  Dr.  Clarence  E.  Mickel, 
a book  of  351  pages  and  5 plates.  This  useful  publication,  known 
as  “ Bulletin  143,  U.  S.  National  Museum,”  contains  numerous 


48  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


records!  of  specimens  from  Long  Island.  Mr.  Davis  also  ex- 
hibited, as  an  addition  to  the  New  York  State  List  of  Insects,  the 
butterfly  Thecla  cecrops  Fabricius  collected  by  Mr.  Roy  Latham, 
August  14,  1912,  at  East  Marion,  Long  Island.  Mr.  Latham  also 
collected  a second  example  of  this  species  on  the  same  date.  This 
southern  butterfly  has  been  recorded  in  the  List  of  New  Jersey 
Insects  from  “ Manasquan,  June  29  (Brehme)  ; one  male  only.” 
Mr.  Davis  also  exhibited  some  pupae  of  the  Seventeen-year  Ci- 
cada which  had  been  dug  up  on  Staten  Island ; he  also  commented 
on  the  fine  plates  in  Johnson’s  paper  on  the  “ Cicadas  of  New 
England  ” and  showed  circular  no.  97  issued  by  the  State  of  New 
Jersey  on  the  “ Cicadas  of  New  Jersey,”  by  W.  T.  Davis. 

Mr.  Engelhardt  reported  that  the  check  of  the  Society  for  $100 
had  been  sent  to  Dr.  Crosby,  representing  the  donation  of  the 
Society  to  the  fund  to  help  defray  the  expenses  of  the  foreign 
visitors  to  the  International  Congress;  he  said  that  the  visitors 
would  arrive  in  New  York,  from  August  8 to  xi,  and  that  a re- 
ception was  to  be  tendered  to  them,  probably  at  the  Pennsylvania 
Hotel,  and  that  he  thought  that  the  Society  should  be  represented 
on  the  Committee  designated  to  welcome  them,  and  moved : 

“ That  a committee  of  three  (3)  be  appointed  by  the  Chair,  to 
be  among  those  to  receive  the  foreign  entomologists  to  arrive  in 
August  to  attend  the  Entomological  Congress  to  be  held  at 
Ithaca,  N.  Y.”  This  motion  was  duly  seconded  and  approved, 
whereupon  Pres.  Davis  appointed  the  following  to  serve  on  that 
committee:  Messrs.  G.  P.  Engelhardt,  J.  R.  de  la  Torre-Bueno 
and  Charles  Schaeffer. 

Mr.  C.  L.  Pollard  presented  his  paper  on  “ Mimicry  and  Tau- 
topsis,”  saying  that  the  word  “ mimicry  ” was  too  indefinite  and 
proposed  the  new  term  “ tautopsis  ” to  take  its  place  when  re- 
ferring to  insects  which  resemble  each  other  in  superficial  ap- 
pearance, tautopsis  being  derived  from  two  Greek  words  meaning 
“ the  same  appearance  ” ; he  also  proposed  the  word  “cryptopsis,” 
meaning  ‘‘concealed  appearance,”  for  insects  which  resembled 
their  surroundings ; the  division  tautopsis  he  further  separated 
into  three  divisions : Protective  tautopsis,  including  the  clear-wing 
moths,  certain  larvae  which  try  to  frighten  their  enemies  by  a 
terrifying  appearance  and  other  instances  where  the  similarity 
of  appearance  is  for  protection;  aggressive  tautopsis,  as  in  the 
case  of  asilid  flies,  spiders  that  look  like  ants,  etc. ; and  Sematic 
tautopsis,  in  the  case  of  unprotected  butterflies  which  resemble 


Feb.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  49 


other  distasteful  species ;. cryptopsis  he  divided  into  two  divisions: 
anticryptic  or  aggressive  cryptopsis,  as  in  the  case  of  spiders  re- 
sembling part  of  the  flowers  upon  which  they  await  their  prey, 
and  procryptic  or  protective  cryptopsis,  as  in  the  case  of  Cato- 
calae,  Geometridae  and  certain  larvae  which  simulate  their  sur- 
roundings ; he  said  that  tautoptic  species  occur  in  the  same  area 
and  occupy  the  same  station  as  the  models,  are  always  more  de- 
fenseless, are  always  less  numerous  as  individuals  and  differ  from 
the  bulk  of  their  allies,  and  that  tautopsis  is  external  and  visible 
only;  he  mentioned  the  case  of  an  African  butterfly  which  has  a 
wide  distribution,  which  has  several  forms  of  the  female  occur- 
ring in  various  parts  of  its  range,  and  which  resemble  others  of 
distasteful  species  occurring  in  the  regions  where  found.  Mr. 
Pollard  expects  to  publish  his  paper  in  full.  Mr.  Pollard  ex- 
hibited a box  of  butterflies  and  a chart  to  illustrate  his  remarks. 

Mr.  Pollard’s  paper  was  discussed  at  length  by  the  members. 

Mr.  Shoemaker  exhibited  five  boxes  of  specimens  and  related 
his  early  experiences  collecting  around  Brooklyn  with  the  late 
Mr.  A.  C.  Weeks  from  1898  to  1904. 

Mr.  Engelhardt  briefly  related  his  experience  on  a five  weeks' 
trip,  just  completed,  on  which  he  visited  experiment  stations  and 
colleges  at  Tallulah,  La.;  College  Station,  Austin,  Texas;  San 
Antonio,  Brownsville,  Dallas,  Iowa  Park,  Texas;  Norman  and 
Stillwater,  Oklahoma ; Manhattan  and  Lawrence,  Kansas,  and 
Columbia,  Missouri. 

A more  detailed  report  on  his  investigations  and  collections  will 
be  made  at  a fall  meeting. 

It  was  decided  to  omit  the  June  meeting. 

Adjourned  at  11.00  p.  m. 

E.  L.  Bell, 
Secretary. 

Meeting  of  October  ii,  1928. 

A regular  meeting  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  was 
held  at  the  Brooklyn  Museum,  on  Thursday  evening,  October  11, 
1928,  at  8.15  p.  m. 

President  Davis  in  the  Chair  and  the  following  members  pres- 
ent: Messrs.  Bromley,  Chapin,  Engelhardt,  Nelson,  Rau,  Schaef- 
fer and  Siepmann,  also  three  visitors,  Messrs.  C.  L.  Pollard,  Hans 
L.  Stetcher  and  C.  F.  Burke. 

In  the  absence  of  the  Secretary,  Mr.  Pollard  acted  as  Secre- 
tary pro  tem. 


50  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


Minutes  of  the  previous  meeting-  read  and  approved.  Mr. 
Engelhardt  presented  the  report  of  the  Treasurer  showing  a cash 
balance  of  $1,679.53.  The  report  was  received  with  thanks  and 
ordered  placed  on  file. 

Mr.  Engelhardt  also  reported  for  the  Publication  Committee 
that  the  current  issues  of  the  publications  had  been  delayed,  but 
would  be  brought  up  to  date. 

The  Secretary  pro  tem  read  a letter  addressed  to  the  Society 
from  J.  J.  White,  Bananera,  Guatemala,  offering  to  collect  speci- 
mens for  sale ; also  one  from  O.  M.  Butler,  Executive  Secretary 
of  the  American  Forestry  Association,  asking  for  the  member- 
ship list  of  the  Society  in  order  that  informative  literature  might 
be  sent.  The  Secretary  pro  tem  was  directed  to  suggest  that  ap- 
plication be  made  to  the  New  York  Academy  of  Sciences  for  its 
directory. 

The  following  were  proposed  for  membership  by  Mr.  Engel- 
hardt : 

Herbert  Ruckes,  167-11  33d  Street,  Flushing,  New  York. 

Dr.  W.  J.  Holland,  Carnegie  Museum,  Pittsburgh,  Pa. 

These  names  were  laid  over  until  the  next  meeting,  under  the 
rules. 

Mr.  Engelhardt  exhibited  a specimen  of  the  introduced  Man- 
tid  Paratenodera  sinensis,  taken  on  the  49th  story  of  the  Wool- 
worth  Building  and  commented  on  the  abundance  of  this  insect 
throughout  the  city.  (See  December  Bulletin.) 

Mr.  Engelhardt  then  spoke  of  a recent  visit  with  his  friends, 
H.  P.  Loding  and  Thomas  Van  Aller,  at  Mobile,  Ala.,  from  which 
he  returned  only  on  October  6.  As  usual  his  special  desiderata 
were  the  Aegeriidae,  or  clear-winged  moths,  of  which  fine  series 
of  a number  of  species  were  obtained.  But  insect  life  in  other 
families  and  orders  proved  so  abundant  that  the  temptation  to 
collect  at  least  a small  representation  of  the  commoner  things  to 
show  at  the  entomological  meeting  could  not  be  resisted.  Showy 
butterflies  such  as  Dione  vanillae,  Catopsilia  euhule,  Papilio  pala- 
medes,  philenor,  cresphontes,  glaucus  and  turnus,  Junonia  coenia, 
Anosia  berenice,  Meganostorma  caesonia,  Terias  nicippe  and  lisa 
were  so  numerous  as  to  actually  add  color  to  the  landscape.  The 
fall  season  along  the  Gulf  Coast  apparently  fully  repeats  the 
abundance  of  insects  to  be  found  there  in  May  and  early  June. 
The  city  square  in  Mobile,  which  is  shaded  by  fine  old  live  oak 
trees,  resounded  with  the  chorus  of  a large  colony  of  giant  Ci- 


Teb.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  51 


cadas  ( Tibicen  auletes).  The  park  loungers  were  not  at  all  dis- 
turbed thereby,  but  a newcomer  could  not  escape  feeling  restless. 
The  chorus  begins  at  eight  in  the  morning  and  continues  uninter- 
ruptedly until  shortly  before  sunset.  Sufficient  specimens,  dead 
or  dying,  could  be  picked  up  under  the  trees.  Several  examples 
of  Catocala  viduata  were  observed  resting  on  the  trunks  in  the 
park  on  October  i,  which  seems  rather  late  in  the  season  as  the 
same  species  has  been  collected  at  Mobile  during  May.  Possibly 
it  is  two  brooded  in  the  South. 

The  return  journey  was  made  by  auto  buses  over  mostly  excel- 
lent roads  as  far  as  Savannah,  Ga.,  with  stop-overs  at  Pensacola, 
Tallahassee,  Lake  City  and  Jacksonville,  Fla.  This  gave  oppor- 
tunity to  get  acquainted  with  the  towns  and  the  topography  of  the 
country,  but  not  much  time  for  collecting,  although  everywhere 
insect  life  was  abundant.  From  Savannah  a brief  visit  was  made 
to  Tybee  Island  with  good  collecting  back  of  the  beach  among 
sand  dunes  and  marsh  meadows.  The  most  interesting  capture 
here  proved  a species  of  mantis,  Brunneria  borealis  Scudder,  so 
much  resembling  the  common  walking  stick  that  its  identity  would 
not  have  been  discovered  except  for  the  fluttering  attempts  of  a 
butterfly  to  escape  from  the  grasping  front  legs  of  the  mantis, 
which  led  to  the  taking  of  three  specimens. 

Mr.  Engelhardt  also  exhibited  live  pupae  of  the  butterflies 
Dione  vanillae,  Junonia  coenia  and  Catopsilia  eubule. 

Mr.  Chapin  reported  that  he  had  done  some  collecting  in 
Oneida  County,  N.  Y.,  and  referred  to  the  abundance  of  Donacia 
sp.  at  Echo  Lake.  Later  in  the  season  he  visited  Litchfield, 
Conn.,  where  he  obtained  two  specimens  of  the  rare  Cicindela 
harrisii.  Near  Ridgewood,  N.  J.,  he  found  a large  brood  of  the 
moth  Utetheisa  bella,  showing  great  variation. 

Mr.  Bromley  spent  two  weeks  at  Webster  Lake,  Mass.,  and  ob- 
served for  the  first  time  a living  specimen  of  the  rabbit  bot  fly, 
Cuterebra  buccata.  He  also  collected  specimens  of  one  of  the 
robber  fly,  Promachus  fitcliii,  which  feeds  on  the  larvae  of  phy- 
tophagous beetles.  He  observed  that  this  lake  was  an  exception- 
ally fine  locality  for  dragon  flies.  At  Tuxedo,  N.  Y.,  Mr.  Brom- 
ley found  a curious  abnormal  specimen  of  Belvosia  bifasciata,  a 
large  tachinid  fly. 

Mr.  Siepmann  spent  some  time  at  Roanoke,  Va.,  where  he  col- 
lected chiefly  Coleoptera. 


52  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


Mr.  Pollard  commented  on  the  favorable  season  for  Lepidop- 
tera,  especially  Noctuidae,  at  Harrison,  Maine,  where  he  spent 
the  summer. 

Mr.  Wm.  T.  Davis  showed  a living  male  and  a female  of 
Melanoplus  differentialis  (Thomas)  from  the  colony  on  the  filled- 
in  land  near  Lawrence  Creek,  Arlington,  Staten  Island,  on  the 
Old  Place  meadows  and  stated  that  there  were  many  more  grass- 
hoppers there  this  year  than  in  1924  and  1925.  They  were  found 
to  have  spread  over  a considerable  area  and  on  October  3,  when 
the  present  specimens  were  collected,  a female  was  seen  to  be 
laying  eggs  near  one  of  the  ties  of  the  railroad.  These  eggs  were 
dug  up  and  were  also  shown.  It  is  possible  that  the  species  may 
become  of  some  local  economic  importance  as  it  is  destructive  at 
times  in  the  western  states. 

References  were  made  to  the  Bulletin  of  this  Society  for  De- 
cember, 1925,  p.  199,  and  to  the  Journal,  N.  Y.  Entomological 
Society  for  December,  1925,  and  September,  1927,  where  addi- 
tional observations  on  the  Staten  Island  colony  of  differentialis 
are  recorded. 

The  Society  adjourned  at  10  p.  m. 

Charles  L.  Pollard, 
Secretary  pro  tem. 

PUBLICATIONS  OF  THE  BROOKLYN  ENTOMO- 
LOGICAL SOCIETY. 

Explanation  of  all  Technical  Terms  Used  in  Entomology. 

By  John  B.  Smith,  Sc.D.  (The  Glossary)  Cloth $3.00 

Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  (un- 
bound), vols.  4-8  (per  vol.) 1.75 

Vols.  9-14 1.25 

Yols.  15  to  date 1.50 

Entomologica  Americana,  vols.  1-6,  each 2.50 

vol.  7 (new  series) 4.00 

Papilio,  vols.  1 and  4,  each 3.00 

Monograph  of  Plusia,  Ottolengui 50 

Orders  for  publications  must  be  sent  with  remittance  to  Li- 
brarian, Brooklyn  Entomological  Society,  c/o  Central  Museum, 
Eastern  Parkway,  Brooklyn,  N.  Y. 


Vol.  XXIV 


APRIL,  1929 

BULLETIN 


No.  2 


OF  THE 

Brooklyn  Entomological 
Society 


PUBLICATION  COMMITTEE 

J.  R.  de  la  T ORRE-BUEN O,  Editor 

E.  L.  BELL  GEO.  P.  ENGELHARDT 

Published  for  the  Society  by  the 

Science  Press  Printing  Co., 

Lime  and  Green  Sts.,  Lancaster,  Pa., 

Price,  60  cents  Subscription,  $2.50  per  year 

Mailed  April  30,  1929 

Entered  as  second-class  matter  January  21,  1919,  at  the  post  office  at  Lancaster,  Pa., 
under  the  Act  of  March  3,  1879 


The  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society 

Meetings  are  held  on  the  second  Thursday  after  the  first  Tuesday  of  each 
month  from  October  to  June,  inclusive,  at  the  Central  Museum,  Eastern 
Parkway  and  Washington  Ave.,  Brooklyn.  The  annual  dues  are  $2.00. 


OFFICERS,  1927 

Honorary  President 
CHARLES  W.  LENG 


President 
W.  T.  DAVIS 


Treasurer 

G.  P.  ENGELHARDT 


Vice-President 

J.  R.  de  la  TORRE-BUENO 


Central  Museum 
Eastern  Parkway 


Recording  Secretary 
E.  L.  BELL 

Corresponding  Secretary 
HOWARD  NOTMAN 


Librarian 

DR.  JOSEPH  BEQUAERT 

Curator 

J.  M.  SHERIDAN 


Delegate  to  Council  of  New  Yorlc 
Academy  of  Sciences 


G.  P.  ENGELHARDT 


CONTENTS 

CLASSIFICATION  OF  BEETLES  ACCORDING  TO  LARVAL 

CHARACTERS,  Boving  55 

PRESENT  TRENDS  IN  SYSTEMATIC  ENTOMOLOGY,  Bequaert. 98 

FOOD  PLANT  OF  CHRYSOPHANUS  HELOIDES,  Ritchie 103 

CORRECTION  TO  PODABRUS,  Fall  103 

JACOB  DOLL,  Engelhardt  I. ......... J.' 104 

CHANGE  OF  ADDRESS  g | Jj 109 

ON  PHYLLOPHAGA  DEBILIS,  WITH  THREE  NEW  SPECIES, 

Fall  110 

EDWIN  EDDY  CALDER,  Engelhardt  115 

INTEGUMENT  OF  THE  LARVA  OF  THE  ALDER  FLEA  BEETLE, 

Woods  I 116 


Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society 

Published  in 

February,  April,  June,  October  and  December  of  each  year 


BULLETIN 

OF  THE 

BROOKLYN  ENTOMOLOGICAL  SOCIETY 


Vol.  XXIV  April,  1929  No.  2 


ON  THE  CLASSIFICATION  OF  BEETLES  ACCORD- 
ING TO  LARVAL  CHARACTERS  * 

By  Adam  G.  Boving,  Ph.D.,  Bureau  of  Entomology, 
Washington,  D.  C. 

The  study  of  the  immature  stages  of  the  beetles  is  still  in  a pre- 
paratory or  pioneer  state.  Much  has  been  written  about  the 
larvae;  the  older  synoptic  works  by  Erickson,  Schi0dte,  Perris, 
and  others  are  of  the  greatest  value,  and  so  are  the  papers  of 
many  contemporary  entomologists  from  different  countries ; but 
no  complete  classification  of  the  coleopterous  larvae  has  been 
published.  Nevertheless,  it  is  unquestionable  that  the  study  of  the 
larval  stages  has  brought  to  light  important  facts  bearing  upon 
the  discussion  of  the  phylogeny  of  the  families  and  their  proper 
classification.  Quoting  from  the  impartial  and  weighty  paper  by 
Dr.  C.  J.  Gahan  in  “ The  Entomologist,”  1911 : 

“ Conclusions  that  may  be  drawn  from  a study  of  the  ex- 
ternal morphology  of  the  imagines  alone  are  sometimes  apt 
to  be  upset,  or  at  least  not  completely  borne  out  by  a study  of 
the  corresponding  larval  forms.  Certainly  it  is  sometimes 
very  surprising  to  see  what  great  differences  there  are  be- 
tween the  larvae  of  certain  families  which  otherwise  would 
be  considered  to  be  very  nearly  related.” 

This  assertion  of  Dr.  Gahan  I shall  try  to  exemplify. 

According  to  Leng’s  Catalogue  of  North  American  Coleoptera, 
1920,  the  series  Dryopoidea  includes  five  families,  namely,  (1) 
the  Psephenidae,  (2)  the  Dryopidae  with  genera  like  Lara,  P ar- 
nus  and  Helichus,  (3)  the  Helmidae,  (4)  the  Heteroceridae  and 
(5)  the  Georyssidae;  and  according  to  the  same  catalogue  the 

* An  address  delivered  at  the  Fourth  International  Congress  of 
Entomology  at  Ithaca,  N.  Y. 


56  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXlY 


series  Dascilloidea  includes  three  families,  namely,  (i)  the  Das- 
cillidae  with  the  subfamilies  Dascillinae,  Eubriinae  and  Eucine- 
tinae,  (2)  the  Etelodidae  with  Helodinae  and  Ptilodactylinae  and 
(3)  the  Chelonariidae. 

Commenting  on  this  classification,  Dr.  Leng  writes  (on  p.  32) 
in  the  introduction  to  the  Catalogue:  “The  series  Dryopoidea 
seems  to  be  naturally  defined — its  elements  are  not  greatly 
disputed,  but  forms,  like  Placonycha,  can  only  be  placed  with  cer- 
tainty by  knowing  the  larvae,”  and  on  the  next  page : “ Some  gen- 
era now  included  in  Dascillidae  may  have  to  be  removed  there- 
from when  the  larvae  are  better  known.”  The  classification  and 
the  comments  of  this  catalogue,  certainly  America’s  most  valu- 
able contribution  of  the  present  epoch  to  the  taxonomy  of  Cole- 
optera,  I propose  to  use  as  a sort  of  background  for  a brief  review 
of  the  bearing  that  the  characters  of  the  larvae  may  have  upon  the 
phylogeny  and  taxonomy  of  the  two  series. 

Some  of  these  larvae,  which  have  been  little  or  not  known  in 
the  past,  not  only  evince  as  you  will  see  a relationship  to  exist 
between  the  Dryopoidea  and  Dascilloidea,  but  they  also  suggest  a 
systematic  rearrangement  of  the  forms  in  each  series,  and  a po- 
tential shifting  of  genera  from  the  one  series  to  the  other,  as  sur- 
mised by  Leng.  Moreover,  we  are  confronted  with  the  possibility 
that  it  is  from  types  belonging  to  the  Dryopoid-Dascilloid  series 
that  other  series,  particularly  the  Elateroidea  and  the  Scaraboidea, 
may  have  departed.  Finally  the  larva  of  Eucinetus  indicates  that 
this  genus  may  have  to  be  segregated  from  the  Dryopoid-Dascil- 
loid series  and  placed  near  the  Derodontidae,  or  Cryptophagidae, 
or  other  Cucujoid  families  affiliated  with  these. 

Lara  ( avara  Le  Conte?).  (Plate  I.) 

On  the  accompanying  plate  the  general  appearance  and  the  ana- 
tomical details  are  shown  of  a larva  from  Portland,  Oregon.  By 
elimination  and  according  to  locality  it  has  been  determined  as 
Lara  avara  Leconte  (?).  (The  correct  determination  is  for  our 
present  purpose  really  of  minor  consideration,  and  for  the  sake  of 
expediency  I will  risk  the  assumption  that  the  determination  is 
correct ; the  larva  will  from  now  on  be  referred  to  simply  as  the 
“ Lara  larva.”) 

The  general  appearance  of  the  Lara  larva  is  that  of  a typical 
Parnus  or  Helmis  larva.  The  form  of  the  legs,  the  development 
of  the  segments,  the  number  and  location  of  the  spiracles  are 


April,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  57 


similar  and  the  spiracles  are  bifore.  The  larvae  furthermore  con- 
cur in  lacking  a maxillary  articulating  area  between  the  maxillae 
and  submentum,  a characteristic  morphological  reduction  which 
is  of  great  taxonomic  importance.  However,  unlike  the  larvae  of 
Parnids  and  Helmids,  the  Lara  larva  possesses  six  distinct  ocelli 
on  each  side,  and  the  mandible  has  two  distal  teeth  and  a short 
retinaculum.  The  flat  ventral  side  of  the  tenth  abdominal  seg- 
ment is  continued  into  a flat,  longitudinally  bisected  component 
part  that  carries  a pair  of  long  terminal  hooks.  With  the  under- 
side of  the  prolonged  tergal  region  of  the  ninth  abdominal  seg- 
ment, this  tenth  abdominal  segment  forms  a sort  of  cloacal  cham- 
ber, but  it  has  no  operculum  and  there  are  no  gills  inside  of  the 
chamber. 

Limnius  troglodytes  Gyllenhal  and  Helichus  sp.  (Plate  II.) 

In  general  shape  the  larva  of  Limnius  looks  much  like  Lara. 
The  larva  of  Helichus  is  broader,  flatter  and  shorter,  has  the  head 
completely  hidden  below  the  prothoracic  shield,  the  body  segments 
laterally  prolonged,  the  ninth  abdominal  segment  only  slightly 
longer  than  wide,  and  all  the  spiracles  absent  except  on  the  eighth 
abdominal  segment  where  they  are  located  at  the  ends  of  the  lat- 
eral prolongations.  However,  in  all  anatomical  details  of  taxo- 
nomic importance  Helichus  and  Limnius  agree,  and  these  details 
can  therefore  be  described  collectively. 

In  accordance  with  the  development  of  the  same  anatomical 
features  in  the  Lara  larva,  the  larvae  of  Limnius  and  Helichus 
have  elongate  antennae,  their  mandibles  have  no  molar  part,  the 
maxillae  project  into  a distinct  lacinia  and  a distinct  free  galea, 
ligula  is  broad,  mentum  and  submentum  broad. 

Together  they  differ  from  Lara  in  the  following  cardinal 
points : there  is  only  a single  but  large  ocellus  on  each  side,  the 
mandible  has  a simple  apex  and  vestigial  or  no  retinaculum,  and 
the  ventral  part  of  the  tenth  abdominal  segment  forms  a movable 
lid  or  “ operculum  ” that  acts  against  and  fits  into  a trough-shaped 
concavity  in  the  underside  of  the  tergal  shield  of  the  preceding 
segment.  On  top  of  the  operculum  (figs.  M and  N)  is  a soft  pad 
with  two  minute  spines  which  are  homologous  with  the  strong 
hooks  of  Lara.  Both  the  pad  and  the  spines  are  hidden  in  the 
cloacal  chamber,  and  this  contains  in  addition  to  the  spines  three 
well-developed  tassel-like  projectile  or  retractile  gills. 


58  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXlV 


Amphicyrta  chrysomelina  Erickson  and  other  Byrrhid  larvae. 

(Plate  III.) 

To  explain  the  taxonomic  position  of  the  Lara  and  the  Helmid- 
Dryopid  larvae  a brief  discussion  of  some  of  the  Byrrhid  larvae 
is  necessary. 

Byrrhid  larvae  differ  from  the  larvae  of  Lara  and  the  Helmid- 
Dryopid  by  having  a large  maxillary  articulating  area  (a  figs.  K 
and  R)  and  this  is  in  fact  the  only  essential  character  by  which 
they  can  be  separated.  To  be  sure,  the  development  of  the  ninth 
and  tenth  abdominal  segments  in  the  Byrrhids  conforms  more 
with  the  normal  development  of  these  segments  in  beetle  larvae  in 
general  than  does  that  of  Lara  and  the  Dryopids.  However,  the 
tenth  is  unusually  large  in  Byrrhids  and  the  ventral  portion  below 
anus  somewhat  protrudes,  and  is  in  Amphicyrta  divided  into  a 
proximal  portion  and  a distal  portion  which  terminates  in  a spine 
(fig.  L).  Thus  the  actual  dissimilarity  between  these  features  in 
Amphicyrta  and  in  Lara  depends  solely  on  a variation  in  degree 
and  not  in  substance,  the  features  are  homologous.  It  is  also  true 
that  no  Byrrhid  larva  possesses  a cloacal  chamber  even  of  the  im- 
perfect type  in  Lara,  but  neither  is  a cloacal  chamber  found  in  all 
larvae  belonging  to  the  Dryopoidea,  as  we  shall  see  later  on. 

The  Byrrhid  larvae  have,  just  as  the  Lara  larva,  six  ocelli  on 
each  side  and  nine  pair  of  lateral  and  bifore  spiracles.  In  the 
larvae  of  Amphicyrta  and  Lioon  the  mandible  (figs.  T and  Q)  is 
distally  multidentate,  but  in  Cytilus  (fig.  A)  and  Byrrhus  it  is  bi- 
dentate  with  a short  retinaculum  as  in  Lara.  However,  it  should 
be  noted  that  all  Byrrhid  larvae  have  a long  series  of  hairs  in  the 
posterior  part  of  the  inner  mandibular  margin. 

Taking  one  thing  with  another,  the  logic  of  the  presented  facts 
bears  out  that  the  Helmid-Dryopid  larvae  have  developed  from 
Byrrhoid  ancestors,  probably  with  Lara-like  larvae  as  connecting 
links. 

Byrrhus  fasciatus  Forster.  (Plate  IV.) 

The  setose  posterior  portion  of  the  mandible  (figs.  B and  E), 
just  said  to  be  characteristic  for  all  true  Byrrhid  larvae,  projects 
conspicuously  in  Byrrhus  fasciatus  and  is  markedly  set  off  from 
the  rest  of  the  mandible.  It  suggests  a rudimental  molar  part 
and  confronts  us  with  a morphological  differentiation  of  impor- 
tance for  the  understanding  of  the  complicated  mandibles  which 
are  found  in  the  larvae  of  the  genera  Hetero cents,  Dascillus,  No- 
sodendron,  and  Cyphon,  together  with  other  Helodinae. 


April,  1939  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  59 


At  the  same  time  our  attention  is  given  to  the  changes  in  the 
form  of  the  mandible,  it  is  pertinent  to  mention  that  a corre- 
sponding transformation  takes  place  in  the  hypopharyngeal  region. 
For,  while  hypopharyngeal  chitinizations  are  absent  (figs.  T and 
K)  in  all  true  Byrrhid  larvae  as  well  as  in  the  Lara  larva  and  the 
Dryopid-Helmid  larvae  like  Limnius  and  Helichus,  they  are  pres- 
ent and  as  a rule  highly  specialized  in  the  four  above-named 
larvae  with  complicated  mandibles. 

Psephenus  lecontei  Le  Conte  and  Euhrianax  edwardsi  Le  Conte. 

(Plate  V.) 

In  the  discussion  of  the  value  of  the  cloacal  chamber  as  a po- 
tential character  to  separate  the  larvae  of  the  Dryopidae  from 
the  larvae  of  the  Byrrhidae,  I remarked  that  this  organ  does  not 
•occur  in  the  larvae  of  all  the  genera  which  have  been  placed  in  the 
Dryopoid  series  and  had  in  mind  the  larva  of  Psephenus  and  also 
the  closely  related  larva  of  the  genus  Euhrianax,  which  cus- 
tomarily is  placed  in  the  series  Dascilloidea. 

The  differences  between  the  Psephenus  larva  and  the  Euhri- 
anax larva  are  slight  and  immaterial  from  a taxonomic  view- 
point ; the  two  larvae  can  mainly  be  distinguished  by  the  different 
form  of  their  second  thoracic  tergite,  by  the  existence  or  con- 
versely the  repression  of  the  lateral  prolongations  from  the  eighth 
abdominal  segment  and  by  a small  dissimilarity  in  the  location  of 
their  spiracles. 

Their  coccid-like  body  is  not  very  different  from  the  body  form 
of  Helichus  and  almost  identical  with  that  of  the  larva  of  Psephe- 
noides,  another  genus  of  the  family  Dryopidae.1  Their  antennae, 
mouthparts,  the  presence  of  a single  large  ocellus  on  each  side, 
and  the  reduction  of  most  of  the  spiracles  are  also  characters 
which  they  have  in  common  with  the  two  Dryopid  genera.  How- 
ever, by  a further  comparison  of  the  taxonomic  characters  the 
following  two  fundamental  differences  are  found  between  the 
larvae  of  the  Psephenidae  and  the  Dryopidae : In  the  first  place 
the  larvae  of  the  Psephenidae  (meaning  the  genera  Psephenus 
and  Euhrianax ) possess  below  the  first  to  fifth  abdominal  seg- 
ments freely  exposed  gills  which  are  absent  in  the  Dryopidae;  in 
the  second  place  no  terminal  cloacal  chamber  with  three  feather- 

1 See  Adam  G.  Boving : The  Immature  Stages  of  Psephenoides 
gahani  Champ.  (Trans.  Ent.  Soc.  London,  vol.  74,  1926,  pp.  381- 
388,  plates  89  and  90.) 


60  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXIV 


or  tassel-like  gills  is  found  in  the  Psephenidae,  but  it  always  de- 
veloped in  the  Dryopidae. 

The  usual  taxonomic  arrangement  of  the  family  Psephenidae 
close  to  the  Dryopidae  (including  the  Helmidae)  is  substantiated 
by  their  larvae,  but  this  does  not  mean  that  the  Psephenidae  can 
be  considered  as  directly  outgrown  from  the  Dryopidae.  They 
are  in  most  of  the  characters  as  close  to  the  larvae  of  the  genera 
Anchy tarsus,  Ptilodactylus  and  Eurypogon  as  they  are  to  the 
Dryopidae,  and  in  the  two  essential  characters,  namely,  the  pres- 
ence of  ventral  gills  and  the  absence  of  a cloacal  chamber,  they 
are  hardly  as  far  remote  from  these  three  genera  as  they  are  from 
the  Dryopidae.la 

Ptilodactyla  serricollis  Say  and  Anchy  tarsus  bicolor  Melsheimer. 

(Plate  VI  and  Plate  VII.) 

The  larvae  of  Ptilodactyla  and  Anchytarsus  are  similar  in 
form,  namely,  elongate  cylindrical  with  a large,  thick  and  fleshy 
tenth  abdominal  segment  protruding  from  below  the  ninth  tergite; 
the  spiracles  are  typically  bifore  and  there  are  nine  pairs  present, 
all  laterally  located.  Thus  these  larvae  appear  rather  isomor- 
phous  with  the  Byrrhus  larva. 

However,  unlike  this  larva,  they  have  only  one  ocellus,  or  two, 
very  close  together,  on  each  side ; the  mandibles  are  simple  with  a 
stylus-like  prostheca  but  without  a long  series  of  hair  from  a rudi- 
mental  molar  part,  and  above  all,  a maxillary  articulating  area  is 
absent.  In  all  of  these  important  characters  the  larvae  of  Ptilo- 
dactyla and  Anchytarsus  agree  with  the  Dryopidae  and  with  the 
Psephenidae. 

The  diagnostic  characters  that  separate  them  from  both  the 
Byrrhidae  and  the  Dryopidae  and  Psephenidae  are  rendered  by 
special  features  on  the  tenth  abdominal  segment,  namely,  a pair 

la  After  the  completion  of  the  present  paper  the  U.  S.  National 
Museum  has  received  from  Professor  James  G.  Needham  the 
very  valuable  gift  of  a larva  taken  by  him  in  Hang-chow,  China, 
which  in  the  general  shape  and  the  details  is  near  to  the  larva  of 
Eurypogon  but  possesses  like  the  Psephenidae  larva  ventral  gills 
below  most  of  the  abdominal  segments.  A second  larva  of  the 
same  unknown  genus  has  also  been  received  through  the  courtesy 
of  Dr.  Hugh  M.  Smith  from  Nakon,  Sutamaret,  Siam.  This  lar- 
val form  thus  sustains  the  above  expressed  opinion  that  the 
Psephenidae  are  more  closely  related  to  the  Anchytarsus  - Ptilo- 
dactyla^ Eurypogon  group  than  to  the  Dryopidae. 


April,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  61 


of  cleft  diverticles  whose  inner  lobes  are  either  simple  and  hairy 
as  in  Ptilodactyla  (fig.  H,  plate  VI)  or  carry  a bunch  of  finger- 
shaped  gills  as  in  Anchytarsus  (fig.  f,  plate  VII). 

The  jugular  skin  of  these  larvae  (fig.  F,  plate  VI)  can  be  dis- 
tended and  puffed  up  by  blood  pressure,  a remarkable  display 
which  is  not  seen  in  other  beetle  larvae  except  in  those  of  the 
Cebrionidae  (including  the  former  family  Plastoceridae).2  In 
Ptilodactyla  there  are  behind  the  spiracles  of  the  mesothorax  and 
the  eighth  abdominal  segment  small,  normally  retractile  sacs, 
which  also  can  become  turgid  and  extended;  in  Anchytarsus  no 
similar  organs  are  found. 

Eurypogon  niger  Melsheimer.  (Plate  VIII.) 

The  genus  Euryopogon  is  in  our  present  system  placed  next  to 
Anchytarsus.  Certainly  its  larva  is  close  to  the  larva  of  this 
genus,  but  not  as  close  as  the  larva  of  Ptilodactyla  is  to  the  one  of 
Anchytarsus.  Principally  there  are  no  diverticles  extending  from 
the  tenth  segment,  which  is  completely  bare  (fig.  F,  plate  VIII). 
Besides,  the  clypeus  is  fused  with  frons,  labrum  is  short,  and  the 
antennae  and  the  mentum  are  somewhat  different  from  those  of 
Anchytarsus  and  Ptilodactyla.  In  all  of  these  characters  the 
larva  of  Eurypogon  agrees  with  the  larva  of  the  Cebrionidae. 

The  larvae  we  have  discussed  so  far  have  rather  few  characters 
in  common  with  the  larvae  of  the  following  genera,  Heterocerus, 
Dascillus,  all  the  Helodinae-genera,  and  Nosodendron.  These 
constitute  together  a natural,  but  isolated  group,  that  we  shall 
come  to  presently,  but  first  it  will  be  expedient  to  consider  the 
larva  of  the  family  Chelonariidae,  customarily  placed  in  the  series 
Dascilloidae. 

Chelonarium  lecontei  Thomson.  (Plate  IX.) 

The  larva  of  Chelonarium  lecontei,  reared  and  preserved  in  the 
U.  S.  National  Museum,  at  the  first  sight  appears  as  closely  ap- 
proaching the  Dryopidae  larvae.  It  looks  like  a plump  Helmis 
or  Dryops  larva  beset  with  spinose  hairs  of  the  same  type  as  in 
the  Dermestidae.  There  is  only  one  large  ocellus  on  each  side, 
and  the  ninth  and  tenth  abdominal  segments  form  a cloacal  cham- 
ber, with  the  ventral  surface  of  the  tenth  shaped  and  acting  as  a 
well  fitting  operculum. 

2 J.  A.  Hyslop  : The  present  status  of  the  Plastoceridae.  (Proc. 
Ent.  Soc.  Wash.,  vol.  25,  1923,  pp.  156-160,  one  plate.) 


62  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXlv 


However,  a careful  examination  of  the  anatomical  details  will 
show  characters  such  as  the  presence  of  multidentate  mandibles, 
maxillae  with  distinctly  two- jointed  galea,  short  antennae  and  a 
cloacal  chamber  with  a pair  of  bilobed  diverticles  (fig.  J)  and  an 
unpaired  tripartite  soft  appendix,  but  no  real  gills,  whereby  the 
Chelonarium  larva  comes  as  near  to  the  Byrrhoid  stock  as  do  the 
larvae  of  Ptilodactyla  and  Anchytarsus. 

Finally  a very  remarkable  and  unique  shape  of  its  spiracles 
(figs.  A,  D and  H)  may  establish  a transitory  form  between  the 
ordinary  bifore  spiracles  found  both  in  the  Byrrhoids  and  most 
of  the  Dryopoids,  and  the  cribriform  spiracles  typical  for  the 
larvae  of  Heterocerus  and  Dascillus. 

The  spiracles  of  Chelonarium  are  present  in  the  normal  number 
of  nine  pairs ; they  are  moderately  large  and  placed  on  the  under- 
side of  projecting  tubercles  situated  laterally  on  the  mesothorax 
and  the  first  seven  abdominal  segments,  but  dorsally  and  para- 
medianly  on  the  eighth.  Unquestionably  they  are  bifore,  but  the 
airtubes  are  bent  to  each  side,  in  a line,  and  with  winding  serpen- 
tine slits ; the  spiracular  opening  is  small  and  circular. 

Heterocerus  ventralis  Melsheimer.  (Plate  X.) 

The  larva  of  Heterocerus  is  allied  to  the  Lara  and  Chelonarium 
larvae  but  also  to  the  more  common  type  of  coleopterous  larvae 
found  in  the  Byrrhidae.  It  has  five  ocelli  on  each  side,  the  ter- 
gite  on  the  ninth  abdominal  segment  is  large  but  not  excavated 
below,  there  is  no  operculum,  and  no  cloacal  chamber.  Anus 
(fig.  F)  is  located  in  the  upper  part  of  the  tenth  abdominal  seg- 
ment immediately  below  the  ninth  abdominal  tergite  and,  as  in 
Ampliicyrta,  the  rest  of  the  segment  is  prolonged  into  an  unpaired, 
digitiform  and  two- jointed  projection.  This  projection  is  rather 
large,  capable  of  protrusion  and  retraction,  and  its  terminal  por- 
tion is  completely  softskinned,  carrying  neither  a single  spine  as 
in  Ampliicyrta  nor  two  hooks  as  in  Lara.  There  are  no  branchial 
filaments.  The  antenna  is  short  and  the  distal  joint  minute,  but 
the  apical  tactile  appendix  is  comparatively  large  and  balloon- 
shaped. The  prothoracic  episterna  (h  p fig.  K)  are  strong  and 
triangular  with  projecting  front  angles  overlapping  the  basal  cor- 
ners of  the  cranium. 

The  development  both  of  the  antennae  and  the  episterna  is  un- 
usual, but  the  characters  or  rather  combination  of  characters  by 
which  this  genus  is  segregated  taxonomically  from  the  larvae 


April,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  63 


hitherto  considered  are  the  possession  of  cribriform  spiracles, 
(fig.  M),  mandibles  (figs.  H and  J)  with  a strong  projecting 
molar  part  and  a strong  accessory  ventral  condyle  fitting  into  a 
hypopharynx  (hx  fig.  L)  provided  with  a transverse  chitiniza- 
tion  against  which  the  molar  parts  work. 

Dascillus  davidsoni  LeConte.  (Plate  XI.) 

The  same  combination  of  principal  characters  which  distinguish 
the  larva  of  Heterocerus  is  also  found  in  Dascillus,  but  of  course 
each  character  in  the  combination  differs  to  a certain  degree  ac- 
cording to  the  different  environmental  and  biological  conditions  to 
which  the  two  larvae  are  subjected.  Thus  in  Dascillus  the  mandi- 
bles have  stronger  molar  parts  (figs.  E and  F),  the  hypo- 
pharyngeal  chitinizations  (he  fig.  I)  are  more  differentiated  and 
both  the  mandibles  and  the  hypopharyngeal  chitinizations  are 
asymmetrical,  the  cribriform  spiracles  (fig.  G)  are  larger  and  the 
pores  in  the  spiracular  plate  more  distinct  and  regularly  arranged. 

The  general  appearance  of  the  two  larvae  is  not  particularly 
different  and  both  have  somewhat  chitinized,  not  plicate  tergites. 
The  ninth  abdominal  tergite  of  Dascillus  is  similar  to  that  of 
Heterocerus  but  the  tenth  is  much  smaller,  almost  rudimental, 
and  without  a terminal  soft  prolongation.  Also  in  other  details, 
but  all  of  minor  taxonomic  importance,  the  Dascillus  larva  is  dis- 
tinguished from  the  Heterocerus  larva:  The  labrum  (fig.  A)  is 
short,  clypeus  large,  fused  with  frons,  both  labrum  and  clypeus 
asymmetrical,  antennae  (fig.  H)  long,  ocelli  absent,  a distinct 
maxillary  articulating  area  (a  fig.  D)  is  present,  both  lacinia  and 
galea  long  and  slender,  ligula  different  in  size  and  form. 

The  larvae  of  Heterocerus  and  Dascillus  are  closely  related 
taxonomically  and  both  are  decidedly  different  from  all  the  larvae 
hitherto  discussed,  but,  like  these,  derived  from  the  Byrrhidae. 
The  appearance  of  a rudimental  molar  part  in  the  Byrrhus  larva 
is  particularly  significant,  as  is  the  maxillary  articulating  area 
occurring  both  in  the  Byrrhids  and  Dascillus.  The  cribriform 
■spiracles  of  Heterocerus  and  Dascillus  may  have  developed 
through  an  intermediate  spiracular  type  corresponding  to  the  one 
found  in  Chelonarium. 

Nosodendron  calif ornicus  Horn  and  Nosodendron  unicolor  Say. 

(Plate  XXII.) 

The  affinities  of  Nosodendron  have  not  yet  been  definitely  estab- 
lished for  the  imaginal  form  of  the  genus.  By  some  authors  it 


64  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


has  been  placed  near  the  Ostomidae  and  by  others,  for  instance 
Leng  in  his  Catalogue,  as  a subfamily  of  the  Byrrhidae.  Judging 
from  the  larva  of  Nosodendron,  Leng  is  more  nearly  correct  than 
the  other  authors,  for  there  is  hardly  any  connection  between  the 
Nosodendron  larva  and  the  Ostomid  larva  but  unquestionably  a 
rather  close  relationship  between  it  and  the  Byrrhid  larva.  Thus 
the  Nosodendron  larva  possesses  six  ocelli  and  a maxillary  articu- 
lating area  (a  figs.  G and  O)  just  like  the  Byrrhid  larva  does. 
However,  the  Heterocerus  larva  has  also  six  ocelli  and  both  the 
Heterocerus  and  Dascillus  larvae  have  a maxillary  articulating 
area.  Furthermore  an  inquiry  into  the  finer  anatomical  details  of 
the  larva  of  Nosodendron  reveals  characters  of  fundamental 
taxonomic  importance  which  are  identical  with  the  ones  found  in 
the  Heterocerus  and  Dascillus  larvae  but  not  in  the  true  Byrrhid 
larvae,  namely,  mandibles  (fig.  K)  with  a strong  molar  part  and 
a strong  accessory  ventral  condyle,  and  a hypopharynx  (figs.  P 
and  Q)  with  conspicuous  hypopharyngeal  chitinizations.  There- 
fore, according  to  the  mentioned  larvae,  it  is  more  consistent  to 
place  Nosodendron  in  the  same  series  as  Heterocerus  and  Dascil- 
lus rather  than  with  the  Byrrhidae. 

This  suggestion  is  supported  by  the  presence  in  Nosodendron 
of  characters  not  found  in  the  Byrrhidae,  and  also  to  be  sure  not 
in  Heterocerus  or  Dascillus,  but  in  the  larvae  of  the  Helodinae 
which  according  to  both  imagines  and  larvae  belong  to  the  same 
series  as  Dascillus.  These  characters  are:  a broad  ligula  (li  fig. 
O),  a reduction  almost  to  obliteration  of  the  ninth  and  tenth 
abdominal  segments  (figs.  A and  I),  and  a location  of  a pair  of 
large,  well  developed  spiracles  (figs.  A and  B)  close  together 
at  the  end  of  a particularly  big  and  complete  eighth  abdominal 
segment  that  caps  the  end  of  the  body.  The  other  spiracles  are 
also  present  and  well  developed  but  placed  laterally  in  their 
tergites.  All  the  spiracles  are  bifore  and  conform  in  this  respect 
with  the  spiracles  of  the  Byrrhidae  and  not  with  the  cribriform 
spiracles  of  Heterocerus  and  Dascillus.  In  the  Helodinae  larvae 
the  terminal  spiracles  are  annualr  and  the  other  rudimental. 

Prionocyphon  discoideus  Say.  (Plate  XIII.) 

The  larva  of  Prionocyphon  which  belongs  to  the  Helodinae  has, 
like  the  larvae  of  Dascillus,  Heterocerus  and  Nosodendron,  man- 
dibles (fig.  H)  with  a strong  molar  part  and  accessory  ventral 
condyles  (ac  fig.  H),  and  complete  and  well  developed  hypo- 


April,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  65 


pharyngeal  chitinizations  (he  fig.  F).  Furthermore,  it  possesses 
a broad  ligula,  a large  and  terminal  eighth  abdominal  segment 
(fig.  E),  very  small,  retractible  and  concealed  ninth  and  tenth 
abdominal  segments,  and  rudimental  spiracles,  except  the  eighth 
abdominal  spiracles  (8  Sp  fig.  D)  which  as  mentioned  are  large 
and  situated  closely  together  below  the  end  of  the  tergite  to  which 
they  belong. 

Other  structures  of  interest,  but  of  minor  taxonomic  im- 
portance, are  the  long,  multiarticulate  antennae  (figs.  B and  E) 
which,  however,  according  to  Peyerimhoff3  are  organs  of  incon- 
stant nature  and  apt  to  change  into  short,  normally  built  anten- 
nae when  the  larvae  are  exposed  to  dry  environments.  There  are 
five  or  six  minute  ocelli  placed  so  closely  together  that  they  vir- 
tually are  united  into  a single  large  eye  on  each  side,  and  from 
the  rudimental  tenth  segment,  extending  from  above  the  anus, 
are  three  tassels  of  feather  shaped  gills  (fig.  C),  which  can  be 
withdrawn  into  a pocket  formed  by  the  small  terminal  segments 
and  situated  inside  of  the  eighth  abdominal  segment;  but  there  is 
no  cloacal  chamber  with  a movable  operculum  as  in  the  Dryopidae. 

Eucinetus  morio  LeConte  (?).  (Plate  XIV.) 

The  genus  Eucinetus  is  according  to  the  imagines  placed  as  a 
subfamily  of  the  Dascillidae,  but  judging  from  the  larva  the  genus 
can  not  be  placed  with  either  the  Dascilloidea  or  Dryopoidea. 
Unfortunately,  the  material  on  hand  in  the  National  Museum 
consists  only  of  several  cast  larval  skins,  but  the  determination 
and  probably  also  the  rearing  has  been  made  by  the  very  cautious 
and  outstanding  entomologist,  the  late  Mr.  H.  G.  Hubbard. 
Nevertheless,  it  should  be  emphasized  that  no  definite  record 
exists  that  imagines  actually  have  been  reared  by  him  from  the 
larval  material  preserved.  Moreover,  the  old  description  and 
figures  by  Perris  of  Eucinetus  meridionalis  (Ann.  Soc.  Ent. 
France,  series  2,  vol.  9,  1851,  pp.  48-53,  pi.  2)  do  not  agree  with 
it.  The  association  of  the  Hubbard  larval  material  with  the 
genus  Eucinetus  and  the  taxonomic  discussion  based  on  it  should 
therefore  be  considered  with  proper  reservation.  The  mandibles 
(figs.  D and  F)  of  this  supposed  Eucinetus  larva  have  a molar 
part  with  a grinding  surface  of  the  type  found  in  many  Silphid 
larvae  and  also  in  many  larvae  of  the  Cucujoid  type ; the  prostheca 

3 P.  De  Peyerimhoff;  Le  double  type  larvaire  de  Prionocyphon 
serricornis  Mull.  Bull.  Soc.  Ent.  France,  1913,  pp.  148-151.) 


66  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXlV 


is  large,  the  distal  part  of  the  mandible  is  simple  and  narrow,  the 
basal  part  broad.  There  are  hypopharyngeal  chitinizations  (hx 
fig.  H).  The  maxilla  is  very  similar  to  that  of  Derodontus  and 
has  a mala  only  slightly  divided  (figs.  B and  G)  into  a low,  soft, 
broad  and  indistinct  galea  and  a pointed  lacinia.  The  ninth  and 
tenth  abdominal  segments  (fig.  E)  are  very  simple,  not  different 
from  the  corresponding  segments  in  many  Cucujoid  larvae,  but 
entirely  different  from  these  segments  in  any  of  the  Byrrhoid, 
Dryopid  or  Dascilloid  larvae  discussed. 

In  summarizing  the  taxonomic  and  phylogenetic  results  of  our 
reasoning  concerning  the  affinities  of  the  genera  which  customarily 
have  been  placed  in  one  of  the  two  series  Dascilloidea  and 
Dryopoidea,  we  can  now  draw  the  conclusion  that  the  larvae  of 
these  two  series  are  derived  from  Byrrhoid  ancestors.  In  com- 
mon, the  three  series  have  the  maxillary  mala  divided  into  a well 
defined  lacinia  and  galea,  and  the  galea  is  free,  usually  digitiform 
and  often  two-jointed.  To  be  sure,  these  characters  are  not  suf- 
ficent  to  separate  them  from  the  other  series  of  beetle  families,  for 
instance  from  the  Caraboidea,  Staphylinoidea,  Cucujoidea,  etc.  A 
diagnosis  for  this  purpose,  however,  could  readily  be  given,  but 
to  do  so  would  be  aside  from  our  present  plan. 

The  Byrrhoidea  as  here  limited  includes  the  subfamilies  listed 
by  Leng  in  the  family  Byrrhidae  with  exception  of  the  Nosoden- 
drinae.  The  larvae  of  the  Byrrhoidea  have  a soft  hypopharynx 
without  chitinizations,  a comparatively  simple  mandible  without 
distinct  molar  part  and  with  a long  series  of  hairs  at  base,  the 
maxillary  articulating  area  is  large,  the  spiracles  bifore,  the  ocelli 
five  or  six  on  each  side,  and  a cloacal  chamber  is  absent. 

The  first  of  the  two  series  derived  from  the  Byrrhoidea  includes 
the  families  Heteroceridae,  Dascillidae,  Nosodendridae  and  Helo- 
didae.  Of  these  families  the  Heteroceridae  are  according  to  the 
imagines  listed  in  the  Dryopoidea,  the  Nosodendridae  in  the 
Byrrhoidea  and  the  Dascillidae  and  Helodidae  in  the  Dascilloidea. 
Consequently  the  serial  name  “Dascilloidea”  acquires  a double 
meaning  dependent  upon  whether  we  deal  with  larvae  or  imagines, 
but'  for  the  present  it  is  deemed  expedient  to  retain  the  old  name. 

In  the  series  Dascilloidea  the  larvae  possess  a hypopharynx  with 
distinct  and  strong  chitinizations,  the  mandible  has  a large  molar 
part,  a maxillary  articulating  area  is  present.  The  families  have 
either  cribriform  spiracles,  all  lateral,  an  eighth  abdominal  seg- 
ment of  normal  form,  and  a large  ninth  abdominal  segment,  or, 


April,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  67 


they  have  spiracles  which  are  not  cribriform,  spiracles  on  the 
eighth  abdominal  segment  which  are  terminal  and  close  together, 
an  eighth  abdominal  segment  which  is  large  and  terminal  and  a 
rudimental  ninth  abdominal  segment.  The  ocelli  are,  on  each  side 
six,  one  or  none.  A cloacal  chamber  with  movable  operculum  is 
absent. 

The  second  series  derived  from  the  Byrrhoidea  includes  five 
families,  namely  the  Chelonariidae,  Lariidae,  Ptilodactylidae, 
Dryopidae  and  Psephenidae.  Of  these  families  the  Chelodariidae 
have  been  listed  according  to  the  imagines  in  the  Dascilloidea, 
the  Lariidae  in  the  Dryopoidea,  the  Ptilodactylidae  in  the  Dascil- 
loidea, the  Dryopidae  in  the  Drypopoidea,  and  one  genus  of  the 
Psephenidae,  namely  Psephenus,  in  the  'Dryopoidea,  another 
genus,  Eubrianax,  in  the  Dascilloidea.  This  series  conforms  no 
more  than  the  former  with  the  series  named  Dryopoidea  in  the 
classification  of  the  imagines,  but  the  old  name  will  also  be  re- 
tained in  the  present  case. 

The  larvae  of  the  Dryopoidea  have  a hypopharynx  without 
chitinizations,  the  mandible  is  simple,  without  molar  part  and 
without  a long  series  of  hairs  at  base,  the  maxillary  articulating 
area  is  absent,  the  spiracles  are-  bifore  (exceptionally  annular 
and  then  with  most  spiracles  vestigial),  there  is  only  one  ocellus 
on  each  side  (except  in  Lara  which  has  six  ocelli ),  a cloacal 
chamber  with  movable  operculum  is  present  or  absent. 

Each  of  the  five  families  of  the  Dryopoidea  is  characterized 
as  follows : 

The  Chelonariidae  have  a very  deviating  type  of  bifore  spira- 
cles, the  cloacal  chamber  is  imperfect,  no  true  gills,  one  ocellus. 

The  Lariidae  have  normal  bifore  spiracles,  cloacal  chamber  im- 
perfect, no  gills,  six  ocelli. 

The  Ptilodactylidae,  with  three  genera,  Ptilodactyla,  Anchy- 
tarsus,  Eurypogon,  formerly  placed  in  the  Dascilloidea,  have  bi- 
fore spiracles,  no  cloacal  chamber,  gills  are  present  or  absent,  one 
ocellus. 

The  Dryopidae,  with  the  genera  Pelonomus,  Dryops,  Helichus, 
Psephenoides,  Stenelmis,  Latelmis,  Helmis,  Limnius,  Macrony- 
chus,  Ancyronyx,  all  placed  formerly  either  in  the  Dryopidae  or 
Helmidae,  have  bifore  or  annular  spiracles,  the  cloacal  chamber 
well  developed,  provided  with  operculum,  gills  present  inside  of 
the  cloacal  chamber,  and  one  ocellus  on  each  side. 

The  Psephenidae  with  Psephenus  and  Eubrianax  (=  Plac- 
onycha ) have  spiracles  annular,  cloacal  chamber  absent,  gills  pre- 


68  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXlV 


sent  below  first  to  fifth  abdominal  segments,  one  ocellus  on  each 
side. 

The  affinities  existing  between  the  Eurypogon  larva  and  the 
larvae  of  the  Cebrionidae  have  already  been  mentioned.  There 
are  Dryopoid  characters  also  in  the  larvae  of  the  Rhipiceridae 
and  the  Cardiophoridae,  and  it  seems  altogether  plausible  that 
the  ancestors  of  the  Elateridae  are  of  Dryopoid  stock.  However, 
some  phylogenetic  connection  may  exist,  some  collateral  deriva- 
tion may  be  traced,  between  the  Elateridae  and  the  Ostomidae. 

As  a mere  passing  remark  it  may  be  indicated  here  that  the 
larvae  of  the  Cantharidae  also  have  a double  phylogenetic  affili- 
ation, namely  with  the  Dryopoidea  and  the  Melyridae. 

The  discovery  of  Verhoeff4  that  the  larvae  of  the  Lamelli- 
cornia  have  the  essential  systematic  characters  in  common  with 
the  larva  of  Dascillus,  is  so  well  known  that  it  only  needs  to  be 
mentioned  here.  The  isolation  of  the  Lamellicornia,  distinct  in 
the  imagines,  is  not  apparent  in  the  larvae  and  according  to  these 
the  origin  of  the  Lamellicornia  from  Dascilloid  ancestors  seems 
fairly  definitely  settled. 

The  Buprestidae  are  more  logically  derived  directly  from  Byr- 
rhoid-Dascilloid  stock  than  indirectly  through  the  Elateridae. 
The  larva  of  Rhaeboscelis,  discovered  by  Weiss  and  Nicolay  and 
supposed  (vide  Leng’s  catalogue,  p.  32)  to  be  intermediate  be- 
tween the  Elateridae  and  Buprestidae,  is  in  every  respect  a true 
Buprestid  larva. 

The  close  affinities  existing  between  the  Byrrhoidea  and  the 
Cleroidea  (including  the  Dermestidae,  Melyridae,  Cleridae  and 
Ostomidae)  have  been  discussed  in  Boving  and  Champlain’s  paper 
on  North  American  Clerid  larvae.5 

It  would  be  impossible  in  this  address  to  give  even  a very  brief 
account  of  the  unpublished  investigations  made  by  my  friend  Dr. 
F.  C.  Craighead  and  myself  of  the  bearing  which  the  larvae  have 
on  the  whole  classification  of  the  beetle  families ; but  before  I 
conclude  I would  like  to  present  from  this  joint  paper  another 
example  to  prove  the  wisdom  of  Dr.  Gahan’s  assertion  that  our 
final  ideas  about  the  classification  of  the  Coleoptera  will  be  in- 
fluenced materially  by  the  study  of  the  larvae. 

4 Beitrage  zur  Kenntnis  der  Coleopteren-Larven  mit  besonderer 
Beriicksichtigung  der  Clavicornia  von  K.  W.  Verhoeff  (Archiv. 
fur  Naturgeschichte,  vol.  89,  1923,  part  A,  pp.  48-63,  figs.  72-86). 

5 In  Proc.  U.  S.  Nat.  Mus.,  vol.  57,  pp.  588-591,  1920. 


April,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  69 


We  all  know  that  the  taxonomic  positions  of  the  Rhysodidae 
and  the  Cupedidae  have  been  much  discussed  but  without  any 
final  result.  Lameere  considered  the  Cupedidae  as  Adephaga  of 
the  most  primitive  type.  Ganglbauer,  de  Peyerimhofif  and 
d’Orchymont  placed  both  the  Rhysodidae  and  Cupedidae  in  the 
Adephaga.  Kolbe  (1908)  placed  the  Rhysodidae  in  the  Adephaga 
and  included  the  Cupedidae  as  an  isolated  main  division,  named 
“ Symphyogastra,”  in  the  suborder  Polyphaga.  Sharp  and  Muir 
placed  the  Rhysodidae  in  the  Adephaga  as  a characteristic  cara- 
boid  type  and  approximated  the  Cupedidae  to  the  Byrrhoidea. 
Leng  places  with  question  mark  the  Rhysodidae  as  the  first  series 
of  the  Clavicornia,  but  adds,  that  he  believes  that  the  Rhysodidae 
is  one  of  the  nearly  extinct  branches  of  the  primitive  Coleoptera 
that  originated  while  they  still  possessed  characters  now  shared 
by  the  Adephaga ; the  Cupedidae  he  considers  as  modified  sur- 
vivors of  an  old  polyphagous  series  and  places  them  as  a series, 
the  Cupedoidea,  close  to  the  Lymexylonoidea.  Imms  in  his  “Gen- 
eral Textbook  of  Entomology  ” ( 1924)  follows  Ganglbauer,  de 
Peyerimhoff  and  d’Orchymont  and  considers  both  the  Rhysodidae 
and  the  Cupedidae  as  separate  families  in  the  suborder  Adephaga, 
so  does  Essig  in  “ Insects  of  Western  North  America”  (1926), 
and  Tillyard  in  “ Insects  of  Australia  and  New  Zealand  ” (1926) 
raises  the  two  groups  to  superfamily  rank  in  the  suborder  Ade- 
phaga. Lastly  Wm.  T.  M.  Forbes  in  his  paper  on  wing  folding 
patterns  of  the  Coleoptera  (Journ.  New  York  Ent.  Soc.,  vol.  34, 
1926)  regards  the  Rhysodidae  as  a superfamily  of  Adephaga,  the 
Rhysodoidea,  and  the  Cupedidae  and  Micromalthidae  as  a sub- 
order of  Coleoptera,  the  Archostemata. 

Clinidium  sculptile  Newman.  (Plate  XV.) 

The  larvae  of  the  Adephaga  are  diagnosed  by  the  following 
combination  of  characters:  “Legs  with  tibia  and  tarsus  separate, 
tarsus  carrying  one  or  two  claws ; labrum  and  clypeus  fused  to- 
gether and  with  the  frons  to  form  a nasale ; mandible  without 
molar  part ; cardo  small ; hypopharynx  without  chitinizations ; 
spiracles  normally  both  present  and  annular.”  The  larva  of  Clin- 
idium, a genus  of  the  Rhysodidae,  agrees  in  full  with  this  diag- 
nosis and  can  without  reservation  be  placed  in  the  suborder 
Adephaga.  However,  it  also  possesses  features  which  are  par- 
ticularly characteristic  for  it  and  definitely  separate  it  from 
the  larvae  of  all  other  adephagous  families,  namely,  the  presence 


70  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXlV 


of  a prolonged  epipharynx  extending  in  front  of  nasale,  partly 
retracted  ventral  mouthparts,  maxilla  with  a rudimental  lacinia 
only  indicated  by  a long  series  of  hairs  and  no  galea,  rudimental 
partly  fused  labial  palpi,  and  a large  spear-shaped  gular  plate. 
Combined,  these  characters  define  an  adephagous  series,  the 
Rhysodoidea,  that  judging  from  their  larvae  is  as  distinct  as  the 
two  other  adephagous  series,  the  Caraboidea  and  the  Gyrinoidea, 
and  constitutes  a more  typical  adephagous  series  than  the  fourth 
series,  the  Paussoidea.  The  absence  in  Clinidium  of  ocelli  and  of 
urogomphi  (=  cerci  auct.)  is  of  slight  taxonomic  importance  and 
are  eliminations  to  be  seen  even  in  atypical  larvae  of  the  series 
Caraboidea. 

Cupes  concolor  Westwood.  (Plate  XVI.)6 

Cupes  cannot  be  included  in  the  suborder  Adephaga  according 
to  the  larva,  nor  does  it  ally  with  any  of  the  Polyphaga,  but  it  dis- 
plays a combination  of  some  characters  only  found  in  the  larvae 
of  the  Adephaga,  and  some  characters  only  found  in  the  larvae 
of  the  Polyphaga.  Thus  the  Cupes  larva  has  legs  with  a separate 
tibia,  tarsus,  and  claws,  which  is  typical  for  all  the  Adephaga 
larvae.  On  the  other  hand,  the  Cupes  larva  has  free  labrum  and 
clypeus,  mandibles  with  a strong  molar  part,  hypopharynx  with 
heavy  chitinizations,  a large  maxillary  articulating  area,  a promi- 
nent and  large  lacinia  and  a free  digitate  galea,  all  characters 
which  do  not  occur  in  the  Adephaga  but  are  present  in  many 
Polyphaga. 

Features  special  for  Cupes  are  a very  projecting,  broad  and 
strongly  chitinized  ligula  and  an  oval,  cushioned  lobe  on  each 
side  of  anus.  The  larva  is  blind,  its  body  orthosomatic,  fleshy, 
with  dorsal  and  ventral  ampullae,  the  tergum  of  ninth  abdominal 
segment  terminates  with  a conical,  chitinized  process,  and  the 
ninth  sternum  is  small.  All  the  spiracles  are  lateral  and  annular. 


6 The  larva  of  Cupes  concolor  described  and  figured  first  time, 
by  T.  E.  Snyder  (Proc.  Ent.  Soc.  Wash.,  vol.  XV,  1913,  pp.  30- 
31,  plate  I.) 


April,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  71 


Micromalthus  debilis  LeConte.  (Plate  XVII.)7 

The  cerambycoid  second  and  third  stage  larvae  of  Micromal- 
thus possess  all  the  diagnostic  characters  of  Cupes  except  the 
taxonomically  most  important  one,  the  mature  Micromalthus 
larva  being  legless. 

However,  in  the  caraboid  first  larval  stage  Micromalthus 
possesses  six-jointed  legs  each  with  distinct  tibia,  distinct  tarsus 
and  two  claws.  The  tarsus  moreover  is  much  longer  and  slen- 
derer than  in  Cupes.  Both  in  the  first  stage  larva  and  in  the  sec- 
ond and  third  stage  larvae  the  end  of  the  tergum  of  the  ninth  ab- 
dominal segment  is  prolonged,  chitinized  and  bent  down,  and  the 
ninth  sternum  is  similarly  prolonged  but  bent  up  so  as  to  meet 
the  tip  of  the  tergum.  In  these  stages  the  Micromalthus  larva  is 
very  close  to  the  Cupes  larva ; and  together  they  form  a group  of 
very  ancient  and  very  specialized  larval  types.  I can  not  see 
how  we  can  escape  giving  to  this  group  the  rank  of  a suborder, 
the  Archostemata  Kolbe,  as  it  can  be  joined  neither  with  the 
Adephaga  nor  with  the  Polyphaga.  It  is  noteworthy  that  Wm. 
T.  M.  Forbes  in  his  above-mentioned  important  paper  comes  to 
the  same  conclusion  from  his  investigation  of  the  wing  folding 
patterns  of  the  imagines. 

The  larvae  of  the  Lymexylonidae  are  nearer  to  the  Archo- 
stemata larvae  than  to  any  other  beetle  larvae  and  may  possibly 
have  developed  from  a common  ancestor. 

7 H.  S.  Barber:  Observations  on  the  life  history  of  Micromal- 
thus debilis  LeC.  (Proc.  Ent.  Soc.  Wash.,  vol.  XV,  1913,  pp. 
31-38,  plates  II  and  III.) 

H.  S.  Barber:  The  remarkable  life  history  of  a new  family 
(Micromaltidae)  of  beetles.  (Proc.  Biol.  Soc.  Wash.,  vol. 
XXVI,  1913,  pp.  185-190,  plate  IV.) 


72  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXIV 


Fig.  A. 
Fig.  B. 
Fig.  C. 
Fig.  D. 
Fig.  E. 
Fig.  F. 


Fig.  A. 
Fig.  B. 
Fig.  C. 
Fig.  D. 
Fig.  E. 


Fig.  F. 
Fig.  G. 
Fig.  H. 
Fig.  I. 
Fig.  J. 
Fig.  K. 

Fig.  L. 
Fig.  M. 
Fig.  N. 


Fig.  O. 


Fig.  A. 


Explanation  of  Plates8 
Plate  I 

Lara  avara  LeConte  (?) 

Dorsal  view  of  larva. 

Lateral  view  of  larva. 

Ventral  view  of  larva. 

Left  maxilla,  dorsal  view. 

Spiracle. 

Right  mandible. 

Plate  II 

Figs.  A— E Limnius  troglodytes  Gyll. 

Ventral  view  of  larva. 

Dorsal  view  of  part  of  head. 

Left  mandible. 

Right  mandible — old  and  worn  apically ; lm,  prostheca. 
Ends  of  right  maxilla  and  labium ; ga,  galea ; lac,  lacinia ; 
li,  ligula. 

Figs.  F-O  Helichus  sp. 

Lateral  view  of  larva. 

Right  mandible. 

Dorsal  view  of  larva. 

Dorsal  view  of  head. 

Leg. 

Ventral  view  of  head;  li,  ligula,  m,  mentum;  sm,  sub- 
mentum ; ta,  tentorium. 

Ends  of  lacinia  and  galea  viewed  from  buccal  cavity. 
Ventral  view  of  end  of  abdomen,  operculum  removed. 
Same  as  fig.  M,  with  seventh  abdominal  segment  and 
both  operculum  and  tergum  of  ninth  abdominal  seg- 
ment removed. 

Ventral  view  of  end  of  abdomen. 

Plate  III 

Figs.  A-G  Cytilus  alternatus  Say 
Left  mandible. 


8 All  figures  drawn  by  Adam  G.  Boving  with  exception  of  the 
figures  D,  E,  G,  and  J on  plate  VI  and  all  the  figures  on  plate  VII 
and  plate  VIII,  which  have  been  made  by  J.  A.  Hyslop. 


April,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  73 


Fig.  B. 

Fig.  C. 
Fig.  D. 
Fig.  E. 
Fig.  F. 
Fig.  G. 


Fig.  H. 
Fig.  I. 
Fig.  J. 


Fig.  K. 


Fig.  L. 


Fig.  M. 
Fig.  N. 


Fig.  O. 
Fig.  P. 

Fig-  Q. 
Fig.  R. 


Fig.  A. 
Fig.  B. 
Fig.  C. 
Fig.  D. 
Fig.  E. 


Right  maxilla,  ventral  view ; ca,  cardo ; mpf,  maxillary 
palpifer. 

Spiracle. 

Antenna. 

Labial  palpi. 

End  of  leg;  ti,  tibia. 

Oblique  ventral  view  of  larva. 

Figs.  H-L  Amphicyrta  chrysomelina  Erichson. 

Lateral  view  of  head. 

Left  mandible,  ventral  side. 

Mouthparts  viewed  from  the  inside  of  the  mouth ; epx, 
epipharynx  ; hx,  hypopharynx  ; Is,  labium  (=  premen- 
tum)  ; ma,  maxilla;  oe,  oesophagus. 

Ventral  view  of  ventral  mouthparts;  a maxillary  articu- 
lating area;  g,  gula;  Is,  labium  (=  prementum)  ; m, 
mentum;  sm,  submentum. 

Lateral  view  of  ninth  and  tenth  abdominal  segments. 

Figs.  M-R  Lioon  simplicipes  Mann. 

Dorsal  view  of  anterior  portion  of  head. 

Mouthparts  viewed  from  the  inside  of  the  mouth ; epx, 
epipharynx ; hr,  hypopharyngeal  rod ; hx,  hypo- 
pharynx  ; li,  ligula ; lp,  labial  palpus ; Is,  labium  (=  pre- 
mentum) ; m,  mentum ; sm,  submentum ; st,  maxillary 
stipes. 

Spiracle. 

Lateral  view  of  larva ; mst,  mesotergum ; prt,  protergum ; 
sp,  spiracle. 

Left  mandible,  ventral  view. 

Ventral  view  of  ventral  mouthparts;  a,  maxillary  articu- 
lating area;  gu,  gula;  Is,  labium  (=  prementum)  ; m, 
mentum ; sm,  submentum. 

Plate  IV 

Byrrhus  fasciatus  Forst. 

Lateral  view  of  larva. 

Right  mandible,  ventral  side. 

Inner  view  of  anterior  part  of  head. 

Antenna. 

Right  mandible,  dorsal  side. 


74  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXIV 


Fig.  F. 


Fig.  G. 
Fig.  H. 


Fig.  I. 


Fig.  J. 
Fig.  K. 


Fig.  L. 


Fig.  A. 
Fig.  B. 

Fig.  C. 


Fig.  D. 
Fig.  E. 
Fig.  F. 


Fig.  G. 

Fig.  H. 
Fig.  I. 
Fig.  J. 


Ventral  view  of  ventral  mouthparts;  a,  maxillary  articu- 
lating area;  gu,  gula;  li,  ligula;  Is,  labium  (=premen- 
tum)  ; m,  mentum;  sm,  submentum;  tb,  tentorial 
bridge. 

Dorsal  view  of  head. 

Innerside  of  head  with  ventral  mouthparts  in  dorsal 
view ; ecr,  epicranium ; hb,  hypopharyngeal  transverse 
bracon;  nc,  superior  ganglion  of  head;  tb,  tentorial 
bridge. 

Lateral  view  of  part  of  head  from  the  outside;  ecr, 
epicranium ; hb,  hypopharyngeal  transverse  bracon ; 
hr,  hypopharyngeal  rod ; hx,  hypopharynx ; li,  ligula ; 
lp,  labial  palp ; m,  mala  (=  lacinia  and  galea)  ; mxp, 
maxillary  palpiger ; oe,  oesophagus ; st,  maxillary 
stipes. 

Left  maxilla  in  dorsal  view. 

Lateral  view  of  part  of  head  from  the  outside,  same  as 
fig.  I,  but  with  maxilla  removed ; gu,  gula  ; m,  mentum ; 
nc,  superior  ganglion  of  head ; sm,  submentum. 

Left  maxilla  in  ventral  view;  a,  maxillary  articulating 
area ; ga,  galea  ; la,  lacinia. 

Plate  V. 

Figs.  A-F  Eubrianax  edwardsi  Lee. 

Dorsal  view  of  larva. 

Right  maxilla,  ventral  view ; c,  cardo ; ga,  galea ; lac, 
lacinia ; st,  maxillary  stipes. 

Ventral  view  of  part  of  head;  c,  cardo;  lab,  labrum ; li, 
ligula;  Is,  labium  (=  prementum)  ; m,  mentum;  ma, 
mala;  st,  maxillary  stipes. 

Left  mandible,  ventral  view. 

Left  mandible,  dorsal  view. 

Ventral  view  of  larva. 

Figs.  G-O  Psephenus  lecontei  LeC. 

Ventral  view  of  head;  li,  ligula;  Is,  labium  (=  premen- 
tum) ; m,  mentum;  sm,  submentum. 

Dorsal  view  of  head. 

Epipharynx ; epr,  epipharyngeal  rod ; o,  eye  from  inside. 

Maxilla  and  bottom  of  mouth  cavity;  li,  ligula;  pgn, 
paragnaths  (=  maxillulae) . 


April,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  75 


Fig.  K. 
Fig.  L. 
Fig.  M. 
Fig.  N. 
Fig.  O. 


Fig.  A. 
Fig.  B. 


Fig.  C. 
Fig.  D. 
Fig.  E. 
Fig.  F. 
Fig.  G. 
Fig.  H. 
Fig.  I. 
Fig.  J. 


Fig.  A. 
Fig.  B. 
Fig.  C. 
Fig.  D. 
Fig.  E. 
Fig.  F. 
Fig.  G. 
Fig.  H. 


Fig.  A. 
Fig.  B. 
Fig.  C. 
Fig.  D. 
Fig.  E. 
Fig.  F. 
Fig.  G. 
Fig.  H. 


Right  maxilla. 

Dorsal  view  of  larva. 

Left  mandible,  dorsal  view. 

Left  mandible,  ventral  view. 

Ventral  view  of  larva. 

Plate  VI 

Ptilodactyla  serricollis  Say 
Dorsal  view  of  head. 

Ventral  view  of  head;  c,  cardo ; gs,  gular  suture;  Is, 
labium  (=  prementum)  ; m,  mentum ; sm,  submentum ; 
st,  maxillary  stipes. 

Right  mandible,  dorsal  view. 

Right  maxilla,  dorsal  view. 

Right  maxilla,  ventral  view. 

Lateral  view  of  anterior  part  of  larva. 

Spiracle. 

Tenth  abdominal  segment,  dorsal  view. 

Lateral  view  of  larva. 

Ninth  abdominal  segment,  dorsal  view. 

Plate  VII 

Anchytarsus  bicolor  Melsh. 

Lateral  view  of  head. 

Front  view  of  head. 

Ventral  view  of  head. 

Lateral  view  of  end  of  abdomen. 

Spiracle. 

Dorsal  view  of  larva. 

Leg. 

End  of  abdomen,  ventral  view. 

Plate  VIII 

Eurypogon  niger  Melsh. 

Antenna. 

Lateral  view  of  head. 

Mandibles. 

Ventral  view  of  head. 

Dorsal  view  of  head. 

End  of  abdomen,  lateral  view. 

Dorsal  view  of  larva. 

Spiracle. 


76  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXir 


Fig.  A. 
Fig.  B. 
Fig.  C. 
Fig.  D. 
Fig.  E. 
Fig.  F. 
Fig.  G. 
Fig.  H. 
Fig.  I. 
Fig.  J. 


Fig.  K. 
Fig.  L. 
Fig.  M. 
Fig.  N. 
Fig.  O. 
Fig.  P. 
Fig-  Q- 


Fig.  A. 
Fig.  B. 
Fig.  C. 
Fig.  D. 
Fig.  E. 
Fig.  F. 

Fig.  G. 

Fig.  H. 
Fig.  I. 
Fig.  J. 


Plate  IX 

Figs.  AXT  Chelonarium  sp. 

Spiracle  of  mesothorax. 

Dorsal  view  of  anterior  part  of  head. 

Left  mandible. 

Spiracle  of  second  abdominal  segment. 

Spiracular  trachea  and  spiracle,  from  inside. 

Ventral  view  of  ventral  mouthparts. 

Lateral  view  of  larva. 

Spiracle  of  eighth  abdominal  segment. 

End  of  ninth  abdominal  segment,  dorsal  view. 

Tenth  abdominal  segment,  operculum  with  appendices 
on  dorsal  side. 

Figs.  K-N  Ancyronyx  variegatus  Germar  (?) 

Lateral  view  of  larva. 

Spiracles  of  mesothorax  and  of  first  abdominal  segment. 
Lateral  view  of  head. 

Leg. 

Helmis  busilla  LeC.  Dorsal  view  of  larva. 

Helmis  aeneus  Muller.  Dorsal  view  of  larva. 

Dryops  auriculatus  Geoffr.  Lateral  view  of  larva. 

Plate  X. 

Heterocerus  ventralis  Melsh. 

Lateral  view  of  larva. 

Dorsal  view  of  head. 

Dorsal  view  of  larva. 

Antenna. 

Epipharynx. 

Tenth  abdominal  segment.  Sagittal  section  to  show 
anus  and  muscle  inside  of  appendix. 

Lateral  view  of  anterior  part  of  larva ; hp,  episternum 
of  prothorax. 

Left  mandible,  ventral  view. 

Left  mandible,  oblique  dorsal  view. 

Ventral  view  of  anterior  part  of  larva;  c,  cardo;  est, 
eusternum  of  prothorax;  gu,  gula;  hp,  episternum  of 
prothorax ; m,  mentum ; sm,  submentum ; stl, 
sternellum. 


April,  19,29  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  77 


Fig.  K. 


Fig.  L. 
Fig.  M. 


Fig.  A. 
Fig.  B. 
Fig.  C. 
Fig.  D. 


Fig.  E. 
Fig.  F. 

Fig.  G. 
Fig.  H. 
Fig.  I. 


Fig.  A. 
Fig.  B. 
Fig.  C. 
Fig.  D. 

Fig.  E. 


Fig.  F. 
Fig.  G. 


Ventral  mouthparts,  viewed  from  the  buccal  cavity;  c, 
cardo ; ga,  galea ; h,  hypopharynx ; lac,  lacinia ; st, 
maxillary  stipes. 

Tip  of  lacinia. 

Spiracle. 

Plate  XI 

Dascillus  davidsoni  LeC. 

Dorsal  view  of  head. 

Dorsal  view  of  tergite  of  ninth  abdominal  segment. 

Trochanter  from  below. 

Ventral  view  of  ventral  side  of  head;  a,  maxillary 
articulating  area ; ca,  cardo ; gu,  gula ; hp,  hypo- 
pleurum  (=  episternum  and  epimerum)  ; li,  ligula;  Is, 
labium  (=  prementum)  ; m,  mentum ; sm,  submentum ; 
st,  maxillary  stipes. 

Left  mandible,  buccal  face. 

Left  mandible,  ventral  view ; ac,  accessory  ventral 
condyle. 

Spiracle. 

Lateral  view  of  larva. 

Head  of  larva,  pulled  to  pieces  to  show  mouthparts ; ant, 
antenna ; ca,  cardo ; epx,  epipharynx  with  its  chitini- 
zations ; he,  hypopharyngeal  chitinizations ; hp,  hypo- 
pleurum ; hx,  hypopharynx ; lab,  labrum ; li,  ligula ; lp, 
labial  palpi ; Is,  labium  (=  prementum)  ; m,  mentum ; 
ma,  mala ; md,  mandible ; pan,  hypopharyngeal  trans- 
verse bracon;  sm,  submentum;  st,  maxillary  stipes. 

Plate  XII 

Figs.  A-E  Nosodendron  calif ornicum  Horn 

Dorsal  view  of  eighth  abdominal  segment. 

Spiracles  of  eighth  abdominal  segment. 

Spiracle  of  second  abdominal  segment. 

Lateral  view  of  anterior  part  of  larva  (notice  position 
of  spiracle  as  compared  with  Fig.  I.) 

Ventral  view  of  end  of  abdomen. 

Figs.  F-Q  Nosodendron  unicolor  Say 

Ventral  view  of  right  mandible. 

Ventral  view  of  right  maxilla;  a,  maxillary  articulating 
area;  ga,  galea;  lac,  lacinia. 


78  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXlV 


Fig.  H. 
Fig.  I. 
Fig.  J. 
Fig.  K. 
Fig.  L. 


Fig.  M. 
Fig.  N. 
Fig.  O. 


Fig.  P. 

Fig-  Q- 


Fig.  A. 
Fig.  B. 
Fig.  C. 
Fig.  D. 

Fig.  E. 
Fig.  !F. 


Fig.  G. 
Fig.  H. 


Fig.  A. 
Fig.  B. 


Fig.  C. 
Fig.  D. 


Base  of  mandible  from  below. 

Dorsal  view  of  larva. 

Ventral  view  of  anterior  part  of  larva. 

Ventral  view  of  right  mandible  and  epipharynx. 

Hypopharynx  and  ligula,  lateral  view ; hb,  hypo- 
pharyngeal  bracon ; he,  hypopharyngeal  transverse 
chitinizations ; hx,  hypopharyngeal  soft  part ; li,  ligula ; 
oe,  oesophagus;  pgn,  paragnath  (=  maxillula) . 

Hypopharynx  and  ligula  (legend  as  in  figure  N). 

Right  mandible,  dorsal  view. 

Ventral  mouthparts,  ventral  view;  a,  maxillary  articu- 
lating area ; c,  cardo ; ga,  galea ; lac,  lacinia ; li,  ligula ; 
Is,  labium  (=  prementum)  ; m,  mentum;  sm,  sub- 
mentum;  st,  stipes;  ta,  tentorium. 

Innerside  of  hypopharyngeal  chitinizations. 

Dorsal  view  of  part  of  head. 

Plate  XIII 

Prionocyphon  discoideas  Say 

End  of  abdomen,  ventral  view. 

Lateral  view  of  larva. 

Tassels  of  gills. 

End  of  abdomen,  lateral  view,  diagram ; ac,  alimentary 
canal;  8 sp,  spiracle  of  eighth  abdominal  segment. 

Dorsal  view  of  larva. 

Innerside  of  mouth ; ga,  galea ; hb,  hypopharyngeal 
transverse  bracon ; he,  hypopharyngeal  chitinizations ; 
hx,  hypopharyngeal  soft  part ; la,  lacinia ; li,  ligula ; 
pgn,  paragnaths  (=  maxillulae) . 

Ventral  mouthparts,  ventral  view. 

Mandible  and  epipharynx ; ac,  accessory  ventral  condyle. 

Plate  XIV 

( Eucinetus  morio  LeC.?) 

Dorsal  view  of  head. 

Ventral  view  of  head;  a,  maxillary  articulating  area;  c, 
cardo ; li,  ligula ; m,  mentum ; sm,  submentum ; st, 
stipes. 

Lateral  view  of  head. 

Right  mandible,  ventral  view ; ac,  accessory  ventral 
condyle ; mo,  molar  part ; vc,  ventral  condyle. 


April,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  79 


Fig.  E. 
Fig.  F. 

Fig.  G. 
Fig.  H. 


Fig.  A. 
Fig.  B. 
Fig.  C. 
Fig.  D. 


Fig.  E. 
Fig.  F. 


Fig.  G. 
Fig.  H. 


Fig.  I. 
Fig.  J. 


Fig.  A. 
Fig.  B. 
Fig.  C. 
Fig.  D. 
Fig.  E. 


Lateral  view  of  body  of  larva,  cast  skin. 

Ventral  view  of  left  mandible;  ac,  accessory  ventral 
condyle. 

Tip  of  lacinia  and  galea. 

Hyp°pharynx ; hb,  hypopharyngeal  bracon ; hx,  hypo- 
pharyngeal  chitinization ; pgn,  paragnaths  (=  maxil- 
lulae). 

Plate  XV 

Clinidium  sculp  tile  Newm. 

Dorsal  view  of  head;  epx,  protruding  epipharynx. 

Right  mandible,  ventral  view. 

Right  mandible,  dorsal  view. 

Ventral  side  of  head;  a,  maxillary  articulating  area  with 
a sclerite;  am,  basal  membrane  of  antenna;  c,  cardo ; 
gu,  gular  plate ; hy,  hypostoma ; li,  ligula ; Is,  labium 
(=prementum)  ; m,  mentum ; pst,  presternum  of  pro- 
thorax ; st,  stipes  maxillae ; tp,  tentorial  pit. 

Lateral  view  of  larva. 

Ventral  mouthparts,  dorsal  view;  a,  maxillary  articu- 
lating area ; c,  cardo ; ecr,  epicranium ; laci,  lacinia  in- 
dicated by  a row  of  hairs ; li,  ligula  fused  with  rudi- 
mental  labial  palpi ; md,  socket  for  mandible ; oe, 
oesophagus;  st,  stipes;  ta,  tentorial  arm;  tp,  tentorial 
pit. 

Dorsal  view  of  part  of  abdominal  tergum. 

Leg ; c,  coxa ; cl,  claw ; fe,  femur ; hp,  hypopleurum 
(=  episternum  and  epimerum)  ; t,  tarsus;  tr,  tro- 
chanter. 

Ventral  view  of  anterior  part  of  larva;  post,  poststernel- 
lum ; pst  i,  presternum  of  prothorax ; pst  2,  presternum 
of  mesothorax. 

Spiracle. 

Plate  XVI 

Cupes  concolor  Westw. 

Dorsal  view  of  head. 

Mandible  with  strong  molar  part. 

Dorsal  view  of  lower  part  of  head  with  mouthparts. 

Spiracle. 

Lateral  view  of  larva. 


80  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXIV 


Fig.  F.  Ventral  view  of  end  of  abdomen;  stern  8,  sternum  of 
eighth  abdominal  segment. 

Fig.  G.  Ventral  view  of  anterior  part  of  larva;  cl,  claw;  f, 
femur ; ta,  tarsus ; ti,  tibia. 

Plate  XVII 

Micromalthus  debilis  LeC. 

Figs.  A-H  Cerambycoid,  legless  second  stage  larva. 

Fig.  A.  Dorsal  view  of  head. 

Fig.  B.  Ventral  view  of  right  maxilla;  a,  maxillary  articulating 
area ; c,  cardo ; ga,  galea ; lac,  lacinia ; mpf,  maxillary 
palpifer. 

Fig.  C.  Ventral  view  of  head;  hb,  hypopharyngeal  bracon;  li, 
ligula. 

Fig.  D.  Right  mandible;  mo,  molar  part. 

Fig.  E.  Hypopharynx  and  ligula  in  dorsal  view;  hb,  hypo- 
pharyngeal bracon ; hx,  hypopharyngeal  chitinization ; 
li,  ligula. 

Fig.  F.  Hypopharynx  and  labium,  lateral  view. 

Fig.  G.  Lateral  view  of  legless,  second  larva;  ur,  urogomphus 
(—  cerci  auct) . 

Fig.  H.  Ventral  view  of  end  of  abdomen. 

Fig.  I.  Spiracle. 

Fig.  J.  Caraboid,  legged  first  stage  larva. 

Leg;  cl,  claw;  ta,  tarsus;  ti,  tibia. 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  XXIV,  No.  2 


Plate  I 


^/hyr-a.  a/wcura.  ? 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  XXIY,  No.  2 


Plate  II 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  XXIV,  No. 


Plate  III 


<2? -J£ 

J/Jft  J&wi 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  XXIV,  No.  2 


Plate  IV 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  XXIV,  No.  2 


Plate  Y 


L 


O 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  XXIV,  No.  2 


Plate  VI 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  XXIV,  No.  2 


Plate  VII 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  XXIV,  No.  2 


Plate  VIII 


. .. 

WA^ny-fic^ocrn  tu, 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  XXIV,  No.  2 


Plate  X 


jtU*i 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  XXIY,  No.  2 


Plate  XI 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  XXIV,  No.  2 


Plate  XII 


XU 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  XXIY,  No.  2 


Plate  XIII 


cl^catd^c<)  o/& 


Cl 


O'O 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  XXIY,  No.  2 


Plate  XIY 


(/merurJlc 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  XXIV,  No.  2 


Plate  XV 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  XXIV,  No.  2 


Plate  XVI 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  XXIV,  No.  2 


Plate  XYII 


98  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXlV 


PRESENT  TRENDS  IN  SYSTEMATIC  ENTO- 
MOLOGY.— DESCRIPTIONS  * 

By  J.  Bequaert,  Department  of  Tropical  Medicine,  Harvard 

Medical  School. 

If  a layman  were  at  any  time  to  enter  the  inner  sanctum  of 
the  entomologist,  most  likely  he  would  find  him  poring  over  some 
highly  technical  printed  matter,  trying  to  fit  its  contents  to  some 
enigmatic  insect ; or  maybe  he  would  find  him  struggling  enthusi- 
astically with  the  description  of  a much-prized  “new  species.”  In 
either  case  the  layman  would  be  strengthened  in  his  estimate  of 
the  entomologist  as  a poor  human  absorbed  in  trivialities  and  to 
whom  the  broader  aspects  of  the  Universe  are  of  no  moment. 
For  the  amount  of  time  the  earnest  student  of  insects  devotes 
to  “descriptions”  is  truly  amazing  and,  I may  add,  rather  dis- 
maying to  many  serious  minds.  It  behooves  us  then  to  drop  our 
books  and  collections  at  times  and  turn  our  thoughts  to  the  why 
and  how  of  descriptive  Entomology. 

Is  Descriptive  Work  Worthwhile? 

To  most  of  those  present  here  this  query  must  seem  pre- 
posterous. However,  we  all  know  the  Biologist  with  the  superior 
air  who  dumps  upon  us  boxes  of  insects,  as  a rule  poorly  collected, 
with  the  request  that  we  “name”  them  for  one  of  his  own  “im- 
portant” papers ; — but  gives  no  thought  for  the  time  it  may  take 
to  thus  assist  him  nor  appreciation  for  the  knowledge  it  requires 
from  the  entomologist.  Yet,  if  he  stopped  to  think,  our  Biologist 
could  readily  see  that  the  ultimate  value  of  his  own  work  will  in 
many  cases  depend  upon  the  correct  identification  of  his  speci- 
mens. Even  some  of  the  laboratory-bred  anatomists  are  no  longer 
satisfied  with  studying  the  embryology  of  “the  wasp”  or  “the  ant.” 
They  have  found  out  that  it  may  matter  which  particular  species, 
or  even  race,  they  happen  to  have  under  the  microtome. 

Whether  we  like  it  or  not,  the  progress  of  Biology  as  a whole 
remains  closely  correlated  with  the  condition — either  satisfactory 
or  wretched — of  descriptive  taxonomy.  Nevertheless,  if  descrip- 
tions had  no  further  purpose  than  to  define  correctly  the  names  of 
animals  and  plants,  for  use  in  other  lines  of  biological  work,  I 

* Read  as  part  of  a symposium  at  the  New  York  meeting  of  the 
Entomological  Society  of  America,  December  27,  1928. 


April,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  99 


for  one  would  not  care  to  devote  my  time  to  reading  and  writing 
descriptions,  however  much  this  occupation  might  cater  to  the 
collector’s  mania  that  lurks  in  every  one  of  us.  I do  not  regard 
the  drawing  up  of  what  Huxley  has  called  “handy  reference  cata- 
logues” as  per  se  a justification  of  purely  descriptive  work.  Let 
us  look  at  the  additional  reasons  why  descriptive  taxonomy  should 
rightly  be  regarded  as  one  of  the  most  important  branches  of 
Biology. 

The  foremost  <(raison  d’etre,”  or  purpose,  of  descriptive 
Biology,  viz.  that  of  serving  as  a solid  base  to  a natural  classifica- 
tion, or  what  Professor  W.  E.  Ritter  has  called  a synoptic  classi- 
fication, I can  only  allude  to.  For  it  is  a vast  and  intricate  sub- 
ject that  I could  not  do  justice  to  in  the  few  minutes  at  my  dis- 
posal. I was  somewhat  surprised  to  see  that  “classification”  was 
not  chosen  as  one  of  the  main  topics  for  this  discussion  of  the 
present  trends  in  systematic  Entomology.  Perhaps  the  promoters 
of  the  Symposium  felt,  wisely,  that  it  was  too  vast  an  undertaking. 
I must  then  be  contented  with  reminding  you  that  unless  accurate 
and  exhaustive  descriptions  of  most  of  the  species  are  available, 
no  satisfactory  natural  classification  of  any  group  of  insects  can 
be  hoped  for. 

While  a natural  classification,  of  course,  aims  at  expressing  the 
genetic  relationship  as  shown  by  the  structure  of  the  several 
species,  it  must  also  take  into  account  the  available  facts  of  geo- 
graphical distribtution  and  of  paleontology.  The  importance  of 
thorough  descriptive  work  for  the  recognition  of  true  relation- 
ship, for  the  solving  of  problems  of  distribution,  and  for  the 
correct  interpretation  of  fossil  insects  is  obvious  enough. 

I prefer  to  dwell  more  at  length  upon  a side  of  the  question 
too  often  overlooked  by  taxonomists  and  teachers,  viz.  the  didactic 
and  heuristic  value  of  descriptive  taxonomy.  It  is  a truism  that 
all  real  Natural  History  is  based  upon  unbiased  observation.  This 
requires  an  impersonal,  or  dispassionate,  attitude  of  the  mind 
which,  I believe,  is  most  easily  acquired  by  describing  animals  and 
plants.  Especially  if  the  description  is  aided  by  drawing,  the 
student  is  forced  to  focus  his  attention  upon  the  object.  He  will 
be  astounded  to  discover  how  many  details  can  escape  a cursory 
examination.  While  sharpening  his  powers  of  observation,  he 
will  learn  to  distrust  his  eyes  and  even  at  times  to  call  in  outside 
help  to  ascertain  whether  or  not  his  senses  are  deceiving  him.  It 
is  my  conviction  that  every  young  entomologist,  whatever  his 


100  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  F ol.  XXIV 


future  line  of  interest  may  be,  would  profit  immensely  by  includ- 
ing some  earnest  descriptive  work  in  his  training. 

Desiderata  of  Descriptive  Work. 

I frankly  confess  that  I am  by  no  means  satisfied  with  the 
present  trend  of  descriptive  Entomology.  The  prevailing  tendency 
is  obvisously  toward  mass  production  rather  than  quality.  One 
could  readily  mention  groups  of  insects  that  are  the  despair  of 
the  student  because  certain  leading  specialists  have  developed 
the  habit  of  describing  so  many  new  species  a day.  Two  main 
motives  seem  to  prompt  the  species-mongers.  There  is  first  the 
belief  that  every  variation,  ever  so  slight,  that  comes  into  their 
hands  must  be  tagged  with  a name.  In  order  to  give  the  name  a 
“standing”  in  nomenclature,  it  must  as  quickly  as  possible  be 
published  with  a few  supposedly  descriptive  phrases.  It  is  so 
much  easier,  anyway,  to  describe  an  insect  as  new  than  to  attempt 
to  recognize  it  among  the  published  descriptions.  The  second 
cause  of  slovenly  work  is  the  idolatry  of  type  specimens  to  which 
so  many  of  us  have  subjected  ourselves.  Specialists  who  are  in 
charge  of  extensive  collections — or  who  own  them  privately — 
sometimes  feel  that  descriptions  matter  little  since  they  themselves 
can  at  any  time  compare  their  types.  I have  a suspicion  that  some 
specialists  never  read  their  own  descriptions. 

But  there  is  little  inspiration  or  profit  in  deploring  the  low 
standard  set  by  so  much  of  descriptive  Entomology.  Let  us 
rather  cast  about  for  some  descriptions  that  may  be  held  up  as 
examples  to  emulate.  In  order  to  avoid  invidious  comparisons,  I 
shall  choose  these  models  from  the  work  of  two  entomologists 
no  longer  living.  The  first  is  the  German  dipterist  Christian 
Rudolph  Wilhelm  Wiedemann,  whose  two  volumes  on  exotic 
Diptera  appeared  just  one  hundred  years  ago  (1828).  I have 
often  marveled  at  the  correct  and  adequate  descriptions  contained 
in  this  work,  which  was  written  with  very  little  comparative 
material  and  without  the  mechanical  devices  that  now  seem  to  us 
indispensable.  A few  weeks  ago  I received  from  South  Africa 
a nemestrinid  fly  that  turned  out  to  be  a species  described  by 
Wiedemann  and  never  seen  since.  I had  no  difficulty  whatever 
in  recognizing  it  from  the  description.  For  my  second  illustra- 
tion I return  to  more  recent  times,  calling  attention  to  the  beauti- 
ful papers  on  Hymenoptera  written  by  the  Austrian  entomologist 
Franz  Friderich  Kohl,  who  died  four  years  ago  (1924).  With 


April,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  101 


many  other  hymenopterists  I regard  Kohl’s  work — which  was 
entirely  taxonomic — as  the  very  best  that  has  been  produced  in 
descriptive  Entomology.  His  method  should  be  studied  by  every 
young  entomologist,  for  it  enables  one  to  describe  a species  with- 
out ambiguity,  so  that  it  can  be  recognized  by  others  from  the 
description  alone  and  without  the  help  of  the  type. 

What  Then  are  the  Requisites  of  a Good  Description? 

In  the  first  place  the  description  should  be  reasonably  complete. 
It  should  not  merely  contain  a few  of  the  characters  that  in  the 
author’s  opinion  separate  it  from  some  of  the  other  species  with 
which  he  is  acquainted.  Quite  to  the  contrary,  it  should  present 
a complete  account  of  all  peculiarities  that  may  be  required  by 
future  workers.  I have  found  in  my  own  work  that  the  majority 
of  published  descriptions  are  too  short,  not  including  characters 
of  prime  importance.  Even  the  absence  of  certain  peculiarities 
should  be  expressly  mentioned. 

In  the  second  place,  descriptions  should  be  both  accurate  and 
clear.  The  complexity  of  insect  morphology,  of  course,  makes 
technicalities  unavoidable.  Yet  there  is  an  unfortunate  tendency 
among  entomologists  to  coin  new  terms  for  structures  that  have 
been  defined  by  their  predecessors.  We  even  have  had  attempts 
at  using  well-established  technical  words  with  an  entirely  new 
meaning.  The  widespread  fad  of  calling  old  things  by  new  names 
should  be  kept  out  of  Entomology.  It  is  perhaps  in  the  nomen- 
clature of  the  wings  of  insects  that  these  perpetual  changes  have 
done  most  harm.  In  the  Diptera,  for  instance,  we  are  slowly 
coming  to  the  point  where  every  author  has  his  own  terminology 
for  cells  and  veins,  so  that  too  often  his  descriptions  are  puzzles  to 
his  fellow-workers.  In  the  Hymenoptera  conditions  are  not  quite 
as  bad  and,  moreover,  we  have  for  this  order  an  excellent  paper 
by  Rohwer  and  Gahan  condensing  and  defining  the  names  of 
cells  and  veins  used  by  various  authors.  I also  wish  to  protest 
against  the  abuse  of  abbreviations,  which  tends  to  become  a serious 
menace.  Some  people  evidently  believe  that  typographical  imita- 
tion of  mathematical  formulae  will  automatically  give  mathe- 
matical precision  to  their  descriptions.  All  of  us  who  inflict 
descriptions  upon  our  colleagues  should  remember  Dr.  F.  E. 
Lutz’s  saying  that  “type  is  cheaper  than  time.” 

Finally,  descriptions  should  be  comparative  or  analytic.  At 
the  first  International  Entomological  Congress,  held  at  Brussels 


102  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXIV 


in  1910,  Professor  A.  Lameere  said:  “Isolated  descriptions  that 
are  not  comparative,  should  be  absolutely  forbidden : the  time  has 
come  for  coordination. ” I endorse  this  statement  without  reserva- 
tions. The  prevailing  practice  of  describing  specimens  merely 
because  they  cannot  be  given  a valid  name  in  the  collection,  should 
be  discouraged.  It  is  greatly  to  be  regretted  that  this  frivolous 
type  of  taxonomic  work  is  often  sponsored  by  large  museums, 
where  monographic  revisons  of  permanent  value  could  be  more 
easily  carried  out  and  published  than  anywhere  else. 

In  conclusion,  I should  like  to  warn  all  young  entomologists 
who  engage  in  descriptive  work,  to  go  slowly  and  to  resist  any 
urge  to  get  into  print  in  the  shortest  possible  time.  Let  them 
beware  of  following  the  example  of  some  of  their  elders,  who 
are  being  carried  away  by  “writer’s  itch.”  They  should  remem- 
ber the  saying  of  an  obscure  French  poet  that  “time  respects  not 
that  which  one  attempts  to  do  without  it.” 


April,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  103 


FOOD-PLANT  OF  CHRYSOPHANUS  HELLOIDES 
BDR.  (LEPIDOPTERA). 

By  John  D.  Ritchie,  Earl  Grey,  Saskatchewan,  Can. 

Perhaps  the  commonest  species  of  the  larger  Lycaeniids  in  this 
district  is  Chrysophanus  helloides  Bois.  This  insect  is  on  the 
wing  from  the  latter  part  of  July  until  the  middle  of  September. 

On  September  13,  1924,  while  cutting  wheat,  I noticed  several 
of  the  adults  flying  around  in  the  vicinity  of  a slough  and  made 
up  my  mind  to  try  and  locate  their  food-plant.  Accordingly,  on 
the  following  Sunday  I visited  this  place  and  after  watching  for 
some  time  perceived  one  specimen  glide  down  among  some  tall 
grass  and  light  on  the  leaf  of  a plant.  On  examining  these  plants 
I found  several  empty  chrysalids  on  the  under  sides  of  the  leaves 
and  on  further  searching  was  fortunate  in  finding  six  chrysalids, 
which  had  not  yet  emerged  and  also  one  larva  in  the  act  of  pu- 
pating. They  proved  on  emergence  to  be  the  above  species. 
Later  I found  a few  more  unemerged  chrysalids  and  forwarded 
them,  along  with  the  food-plant,  to  Mr.  J.  J.  De  Gryse,  at  the 
Entomological  Laboratory  at  Indian  Head,  Sask.  Mr.  De  Gryse 
was  unable  to  get  the  plant  determined,  on  account  of  the  absence 
of  flowers.  The  plant  is  a Polygonum.  As  to  the  exact  species  I 
am  uncertain  but  believe  it  to  be  P.  Hartwrightii  Gray. 

Every  year  since  1914  I have  reared  these  insects  from  the 
larvae  and  so  far  have  been  unable  to  find  any  other  plant  on 
which  the  larvae  feed,  although  there  are  two  other  species  of 
Polygonum  growing  here ; the  caterpillars  refuse  to  accept  them 
as  food.  Perhaps  the  particular  plant  above  mentioned  will  prove 
to  be  this  insect’s  exclusive  food-plant. 

The  males  of  this  species  outnumber  the  females  ten  to  one  and 
are  much  smaller  than  the  females.  Holland,  in  his  Butterfly- 
book,  has  very  aptly  described  both  sexes.  The  female  is  well 
illustrated  on  Plate  XXVIII,  but  the  male  is  much  too  light 
colored. 


Correction  to  a Revision  of  Podabrus. — On  page  80,  Vol. 
VIII,  No.  2,  of  Entomologica  Americana,  two  species  are  de- 
scribed under  the  title  Podabrus  nothoides  Lee.  The  second  title 
should  read  Podabrus  basilaris  Say. — H.  C.  Fall. 


104  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


JACOB  DOLL. 

The  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  records  with  deepest  re- 
gret thd  death  of  its  Honorary  Member,  Jacob  Doll,  on  February 
io,  1929,  at  the  age  of  82. 

An  active  member  since  1880,  Mr.  Doll  has  been  regular  in  his 
attendance  at  the  meetings  and  always  could  be  depended  upon 
for  interesting  contributions  to  the  scientific  discussions,  based  on 
his  experiences  and  recollections  of  so  long  a life.  Mr.  Doll  also 
has  been  an  Honorary  Member  of  the  Newark  Entomological 
Society  and  an  Active  Member  of  the  New  York  Entomological 
Society. 

He  served  as  Curator  of  Lepidoptera  in  the  Brooklyn  Museum 
from  1898  to  his  retirement  in  1927.  He  was  a veteran  of  the 
Civil  War  and  a member  of  Hamilton  Tost,  G.  A.  R.,  of  Brooklyn. 

Not  of  a scientific  turn  of  mind  himself,  Mr.  Doll,  neverthe- 
less, has  contributed  much  to  our  knowledge  of  entomology. 
Again  and  again  his  name  appears  in  the  publications  of  early 
writers,  applied  to  species  of  Lepidoptera,  of  which  he  was  the 
discoverer.  His  chief  influence,  however,  has  been  among  his 
large  circle  of  friends  and  acquaintances  who  have  profited  by 
his  example  as  an  indefatigable  collector,  unrivaled  in  his  skill  as 
a preparator.  Many  of  our  present-day  workers,  of  acknowl- 
edged proficiency,  owe  their  inspiration  and  initial  start  to  him. 

We  reprint  a brief  outline  of  Mr.  Doll’s  career  from  the  Brook- 
lyn Museum  Quarterly  of  October,  1925. 

Chapters  from  the  Long  Life  of  a Butterfly  Collector. 

The  saying,  “ A naturalist  is  not  made  but  is  born  a naturalist,” 
is  well  exemplified  in  the  person  of  Jacob  Doll,  our  veteran  Cur- 
ator of  Lepidoptera,  who  at  the  approaching  age  of  eighty  is  about 
to  retire  from  active  museum  service  in  order  to  continue  at  his 
own  leisure  his  life-long  hobby — the  collecting  of  butterflies  and 
moths. 

In  this  age  of  specialization  the  ranks  of  the  old-fashioned  nat- 
uralists, to  which  Mr.  Doll  belongs,  are  fast  thinning  out.  Like 
so  many  of  the  men  of  this  type,  his  interest  in  entomology  is  not 
that  of  the  scientific  investigator,  but  rather  that  of  the  preparator 
and  collector.  From  early  childhood  on,  he  felt  the  irresistible 
impulse  to  roam  afield  and  to  observe  nature  at  first  hand.  Neg- 
lected school  work,  or,  later  in  life,  the  meager  returns  from  a 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  XXIV,  No.  2 


Plate  XVIII 


JACOB  DOLL. 

1847-1929. 


April,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  105 


vocation,  distasteful  and  indifferently  performed — what  did  they 
matter  compared  with  the  joy  of  days  out  of  doors  and  with  the 
gratification  of  new  treasures  added  to  a growing  collection.  He 
did  not  concern  himself  much  with  taxonomic  details,  such  as 
studying  the  scales  on  the  wings  or  counting  the  spines  on  the 
legs  of  an  insect,  nor  did  he  trouble  to  record  in  writing  his  varied 
experiences  and  discoveries.  Endowed  with  a tenacious  memory 
and  a keen  eyesight,  it  sufficed  his  purpose  that  he  could  name 
at  a glance  any  of  the  thousands  of  species  which  had  ever  come 
to  hand  and  recall  instantly  all  of  the  circumstances  connected 
with  each  acquisition.  In  this  spirit  and  at  the  cost  of  great  hard- 
ships and  privations  some  of  the  most  notable  collections  now  in 
Museums  have  been  assembled,  but  many  others,  perhaps  equally 
important,  have  been  scattered  or  destroyed  and  of  the  owners 
and  their  lives  little  or  nothing  is  known  to-day. 

To  Mr.  Doll’s  credit  there  is  a long  list  of  moths  all  bearing 
the  specific  name  of  “ dolli  ” in  his  honor  as  the  first  discoverer  of 
the  species.  Many  of  these  were  collected  by  him  during  pioneer 
days  out  west.  Of  his  exploits  and  the  incidents  connected  with 
the  capture  of  these  insects,  he  is  wont  to  talk  freely  at  times  of 
relaxation  among  his  entomological  freinds  and  it  is  to  be  hoped 
that  he  may  yet  be  induced  to  put  these  narratives  in  writing. 
How  much  more  would  it  mean  to  students  in  future  generations 
if  with  his  name  they  also  could  associate  something  of  the  per- 
sonality of  the  collector.  For  the  present  only  a brief  sketch  of 
Mr.  Doll’s  life  and  activities,  is  available. 

Born  on  May  8,  1847,  the  son  of  a baker,  in  the  little  town 
of  Edenkoben,  Rhine  Palatinate,  Germany,  Mr.  Doll  recalls  most 
vividly  the  days  of  his  boyhood  rambles  over  the  forest  and  vine- 
clad  hills  of  his  homeland  to  which  he  gave  full  indulgence,  ex- 
cepting as  interfered  with  by  the  compulsory  attendance  at  the 
public  school.  From  these  excursions  he  always  returned  with 
something  to  add  to  his  collections  and  living  pets.  A closet  in 
his  bedroom  was  filled  with  boxes  of  insects,  killed  cruelly,  but 
expeditiously,  by  piercing  with  the  red-hot  point  of  a pin.  All 
through  the  house  there  were  cages  with  finches,  thrushes,  night- 
ingales and  other  songsters  captured  by  the  use  of  bird  lime  or 
by  robbing  nests.  From  the  woodshed  could  be  heard  the  cawing 
of  a brood  of  young  crows  transferred  from  their  roost  in  the 
crumbling  tower  of  the  robber  knight  castle  on  the  precipice  over- 
looking the  town.  Tethered  to  the  wellsweep,  a red  fox  was  tug- 


106  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXlV 


ging  and  snarling;  while  in  the  barnyard  with  the  fowl,  a stork 
with  a crippled  wing  stalked  about  sedately.  As  a youngster, 
Mr.  Doll  must  have  been  a severe  trial  to  the  forebearance  of  his 
parents. 

At  the  age  of  thirteen  he  was  apprenticed  to  learn  the  trade 
of  his  father.  Then  followed  troublesome  years  of  war  and  revo- 
lution. Austrian,  Prussian,  and  French  armies  in  turn  invaded 
the  province  and  with  soldiers  constantly  billeted  in  the  homes  of 
the  inhabitants,  the  spirit  of  restlessness  became  general.  A sturdy 
and  well-grown  lad  at  fifteen,  young  Doll  and  several  of  his  com- 
panions were  easily  persuaded  by  a recruiting  officer  to  join  the 
foreign  legion  of  the  French  army.  A gulden  or  two  placed  in 
their  hands  to  bind  the  bargain,  they  were  started  off  by  rail  to 
report  at  the  garrison  in  Strassburg,  where  they  arrived  in  the 
midst  of  the  celebration  of  a country  fair.  With  money  burning 
in  their  pockets,  how  could  they  resist  such  a temptation  ? Soon 
they  were  mingling  and  jostling  in  the  merry  crowd.  A friendly 
soldier  from  their  own  town  warned  them  of  the  dangers  and  of 
the  horrible  life  in  Algiers,  their  ultimate  destination.  So  when 
night  came  on,  their  money  gone  and  also  their  lust  for  adven- 
ture, they  sneaked  past  the  sentries,  gained  the  open  country  and 
after  several  days  of  wandering,  reached  home  again  foot-sore 
and  hungry. 

A full-fledged  journeyman  at  seventeen  and  becoming  appre- 
hensive of  conscription  in  his  unhappy  homeland,  we  next  find 
the  young  man  seeking  refuge  across  the  sea,  only  to  be  caught 
in  the  turmoil  of  another  war  when  he  landed  in  New  York  in 
1864.  After  several  months  of  haphazard  occupations,  he  en- 
listed in  the  Union  Army  to  serve  with  the  45th  Regiment  sta- 
tioned at  Nashville,  Tenn.  Of  the  noisy,  boisterous  lot  of  men 
who  crowded  into  the  train,  only  he  and  a few  more  recruits  were 
left  when  they  had  passed  through  the  tunnel  leading  to  the  New 
Jersey  meadows.  All  the  others,  mostly  substitutes  for  drafted 
men,  had  deserted.  lionorably  discharged  and  returned  to  New 
York  at  the  conclusion  of  hostilities  in  1865,  he  moved  to  Brook- 
lyn, following  his  trade  as  a baker  or  various  other  callings  as 
long  as  they  afforded  a simple  living  and  time  to  spare  for  ram- 
bles in  fields  and  woods.  Very  soon  he  knew  all  the  best  places 
for  collecting,  not  only  in  the  vicinity  of  Brooklyn,  but  out  on 
Long  Island  and  in  New  Jersey  as  well.  This  naturally  brought 
him  in  contact  with  men  of  a likewise  roving  bent — hunters,  fish- 


April,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  107 


ermen  and  particularly  insect  collectors,  who  admired  his  neatness 
and  skill  in  the  preservation  and  mounting  of  specimens.  One 
of  the  men  he  met  was  Max  Demuth,  a glass  blower  and  some- 
what of  a taxidermist,  who  was  employed  by  P.  T.  Barnum,  of 
museum  and  circus  fame.  In  1871,  they  formed  a partnership 
on  an  expedition  to  Florida ; Demuth  to  collect  mammals  and 
birds  and  Doll,  insects.  At  Hogarth  Landing  on  the  St.  John’s 
River,  reached  from  Jacksonville  by  rowboat,  they  built  a cabin 
and  lived  on  fish  and  game.  Demuth,  taken  sick  with  fever, 
sought  relief  from  his  aches  and  pains  by  drinking  whiskey  and  in 
his  drunken  stupor,  never  saved  a skin  out  of  the  hundreds  of 
birds  and  mammals  killed.  Doll,  after  nine  months  in  the  South, 
returned  with  a large  collection  of  butterflies  and  moths,  including 
a number  of  species  new  to  science.  This  led  to  his  acquaintance 
with  some  of  the  more  noted  entomologists,  among  them,  George 
Franck,  founder  of  the  American  Entomological  Society,  E.  L. 
Graef,  William  Stadelmeier,  Rev.  Dr.  George  Hulst,  William 
Schaup  and  Berthold  Neumoegen,  all  of  whom  he  survives. 

Mr.  Neumoegen,  a well-to-do  banker  and  the  owner  of  one 
of  the  largest  collections  of  Lepidoptera  in  this  country,  was  so 
impressed  with  Mr.  Doll’s  ability  as  a preparator  that  he  engaged 
him  to  take  care  of  his  collection,  in  which  service  he  continued 
until  the  death  of  his  employer  in  1896.  Mr.  Neumoegen  had  a 
wide  circle  of  correspondents  in  many  parts  of  the  world  from 
whom  he  received  large  shipments  of  specimens,  all  of  which 
passed  through  Doll’s  hands  for  sorting  and  mounting.  This  con- 
stant handling  of  specimens  no  doubt  gave  him  his  remarkable 
faculty  for  recognizing  species  at  a glance  and  for  remembering 
their  names.  Moreover,  he  was  privileged  to  retain  duplicates 
for  himself,  thereby  laying  the  foundation  for  his  own  collection, 
which  in  time  became  widely  known  for  the  beauty  and  perfect 
preservation  of  the  specimens  contained  therein.  In  fact,  the 
perfect  condition  and  correct  mounting  of  a butterfly  always  has 
been  an  obsession  with  Mr.  Doll.  Torn  specimens  had  no  place 
in  his  collection.  Often,  however,  they  could  be  saved  by  mend- 
ing and  patching,  a subterfuge  in  which  he  acquired  such  skill 
as  to  defy  detection.  A moth  submitted  by  him  to  a scientist  in 
Washington  proved  so  puzzling  that  it  was  given  a new  generic 
as  well  as  specific  name.  Then,  when  placed  in  a moistening  jar, 
its  head  fell  off,  disclosing  a substitution  from  another  species. 


108  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXIV 


In  1880,  Mr.  Doll  accompanied  his  employer  on  a collecting 
trip  to  Colorado,  where  they  stopped  at  various  places  along  the 
Rio  Grande  Railroad,  whenever  collecting  conditions  seemed  fa- 
vorable. At  Almosa,  then  the  railroad  terminal,  they  found  a 
stage  waiting  to  take  them  to  Gunnison.  Inside  and  outside  of  the 
coach  a number  of  men  were  posted,  all  carrying  loaded  rifles. 
When  Neumoegen  learned  that  this  was  a necessary  precaution  to 
ward  off  attacks  by  the  Ute  Indians,  he  decided  not  to  take  a 
chance  at  losing  his  scalp  and  returned  home.  Doll  remained 
until  frost  came  in  October.  Mr.  Neumoegen,  however,  was  so 
pleased  with  the  collecting  results  in  Colorado  that  he  sent  Mr. 
Doll  on  another  expedition  the  following  year.  This  time  Mr. 
Doll  traveled  to  the  railroad’s  end  at  Tucson,  Arizona,  and  from 
there  by  stage  to  Phoenix  and  Prescott,  where  he  made  the  ac- 
quaintance of  Gus  Milow,  an  ex-soldier  who  had  lived  through 
the  Indian  campaign  and  knew  everybody,  reputable,  disreputable, 
outlaw  and  Indian.  His  pride  was  a spanking  pair  of  horses  with 
which  he  had  twice  crossed  the  continent,  driving  from  Newark, 
N.  J.,  to  Arizona  and  back  again.  When  he  was  sober,  these 
horses  received  his  most  affectionate  attention,  but  when  drunk, 
which  happened  whenever  there  was  money  to  spend,  he  treated 
them  cruelly.  At  any  rate,  Milow  became  Mr.  Doll’s  guide  and 
carried  him  safely  through  wild  and  inhospitable  places.  This 
turned  out  to  be  one  of  the  most  successful  collecting  trips  ever 
undertaken. 

After  Mr.  Neumoegen’s  death  in  1896,  the  late  Prof.  Franklin 
W.  Hooper,  recognizing  the  importance  of  the  Neumoegen  col- 
lection, with  his  usual  forethought,  brought  about  its  purchase  for 
the  Museum  by  Mr.  Frank  S.  Jones,  a member  of  the  Board  of 
Trustees.  With  its  transfer  in  1897,  the  appointment  of  Mr.  Doll 
as  Curator  of  Lepidoptera  also  was  effected.  The  acquisition  of 
this  collection  and  its  supervision  by  a custodian  so  experienced 
in  entomological  ways  at  once  established  the  Brooklyn  Museum 
as  a headquarters  for  students  of  butterflies  and  moths.  Exten- 
sive additions  through  gifts  and  by  exchanges  followed  rapidly. 
The  E.  L.  Graef  collection,  second  in  importance  only  to  the  Neu- 
moegen collection,  was  presented  to  the  Museum  in  1900.  Other 
valuable  gifts  received  at  about  the  same  time  were  the  Stephen 
Caverly,  George  Hulst  and  Charles  S.  McKnight  collections. 

To  this  good  beginning  Mr.  Doll  has  added  largely  by  field 
work.  Aside  from  his  out-of-door  activities  on  Long  Island  and 


April,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  109 


near-by  localities  he  has  collected  in  the  Adirondacks,  the  White 
Mountains  and  in  the  North  Woods  of  Maine.  He  has  also  been 
a member  of  Museum  Expeditions  sent  to  southeastern  Texas  in 
1903  and  to  southwestern  Utah  in  1904 'and  1917;  all  of  which 
proved  very  productive.  His  skill  in  the  preparation  of  Museum 
exhibits  is  shown  by  the  very  attractive  series  of  life  histories  of 
butterflies  and  moths  common  in  the  vicinity  of  Brooklyn.  The 
outstanding  feature,  however,  of  Mr.  Doll’s  work  has  been  and 
will  always  be  his  conscientious  and  painstaking  attention  to  the 
collections  entrusted  to  his  care.  During  the  long  term  of  his 
incumbency  there  has  never  been  the  slightest  trouble  due  to  the 
ravages  of  dermestes  beetles  or  other  Museum  pests. 

Geo.  P.  Engelhardt, 
Brooklyn  Museum. 


NOTICE. 

Change  of  Address. 

On  and  after  June  1st,  the  editor’s  address  will  be  34  De  Kalb 
Avenue,  White  Plains,  N.  Y. 


J.  R.  DE  LA  TORRE-BUENO. 


110  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


ON  PHYLLOPHAGA  DEBILIS  LECONTE,  WITH  DE- 
SCRIPTIONS OF  THREE  NEW  SPECIES. 

By  H.  C.  Fall,  Tyngsboro,  Mass. 

Students  of  our  species  of  Phyllophaga  will  recall  that  LeConte 
in  1856  in  his  Synopsis  of  the  Melolonthidae  described  a small 
species  under  the  name  Gynnis  debilis,  the  locality  of  the  unique 
type  being  given  as  Philadelphia.  In  his  Revision  of  1887  Horn 
referred  debilis  as  a synonym  of  dispar  Burm.  (erroneously  as  it 
proved),  and  expressed  a serious  doubt  as  to  the  correctness  of 
LeConte’s  locality,  all  specimens  known  to  him  coming  from 
Florida. 

Some  weeks  ago  I received  from  Mr.  Chas.  Liebeck,  of  Phila- 
delphia, four  specimens  bearing  label  Atlantic  City,  N.  J.,  to- 
gether with  four  others  from  Mobile,  Ala.,  with  the  request  that 
I compare  these  with  the  type  of  debilis  and  with  each  other.  It 
was  Mr.  Liebeck’s  belief  that  the  New  Jersey  specimens  would 
prove  to  be  the  true  debilis,  and  on  comparison  I did  indeed  find 
them  to  agree  with  the  type  in  every  particular, 

Mr.  Liebeck  writes  me  that — “These  four  examples  are  all  that 
I have  now  though  there  must  have  been  more  in  a pint  bottle  of 
specimens  picked  up  in  the  beach  drift  at  Atlantic  City  some  forty 
years  ago.  The  alcohol  evaporated,  the  specimens  dried  and 
became  gradually  broken  and  as  there  were  some  P.  gracilis  in  the 
bottle,  supposed  they  were  all  one  species  and  threw  them  away.” 
These  Atlantic  City  specimens,  and  others  taken  by  Wenzel  in 
Camden  and  Gloucester  Co.,  N.  J.  (according  to  the  New  Jersey 
State  List)  of  course  abundantly  substantiate  the  correctness  of 
LeConte’s  original  type  locality,  and  it  now  becomes  pertinent  to 
inquire  as  to  the  relationship  of  the  New  Jersey  form  to  that 
occurring  in  the  Gulf  States.  A careful  comparison  of  the  New 
Jersey  examples  with  Mr.  Liebeck’s  Mobile  specimens  and  others 
in  my  own  collection  from  Florida  and  Mississippi  inclines 
me  to  the  belief  that  though  very  closely  related  they  are  not 
specifically  identical,  and  I therefore  propose  the  following  name 
for  the  Southern  form. 

Phyllophaga  austricolia  n.  sp. 

Very  similar  in  size,  color,  and  general  appearance  to  the 
true  debilis  of  LeConte,  from  which  it  differs  by  the  per- 
ceptibly shorter  and  more  transverse  prothorax  and  notably 


April,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  111 


by  the  larger  head,  especially  in  the  male.  The  ventral  sexual 
characters  are  nearly  the  same,  but  the  genitalia  differ 
appreciably,  the  lobes  of  the  symmetrical  claspers  which  in 
debilis  are  short  and  bluntly  rounded  are  here  longer  and 
narrowly  rounded  or  subangulate  (See  fig.  15,  pi.  XLIX,  of 
Smith’s  1888  paper). 

The  type  is  a male  labelled  “Perkinston,  Miss.  6-22-22,” 
collected  from  cypress  and  sent  me  by  Mr.  J.  M.  Langston. 

The  three  following  evidently  undescribed  species  have  stood 
in  my  collection  for  many  years  and  I take  this  opportunity  to 
make  them  known. 

Phyllophaga  mariana  n.  sp. 

Rather  stout  oblong-oval,  moderately  convex,  ferruginous 
brown,  scarcely  shining,  thinly  clothed  with  short  grey  decum- 
bent pubescence  with  intermixed  slightly  longer  erect  hairs 
on  the  head,  thorax,  and  base  of  elytra.  Clypeus  with  a 
moderate  obtusely  cuspiform  emargination,  punctures  of 
clypeus  and  head  subequal,  not  very  coarse,  separated  by 
from  one-half  to  about  their  own  diameters. 

Prothorax  not  distinctly  angulate  at  sides,  margins  feebly 
subcrenulate ; surface  rather  finely  and  sparsely  punctate, 
the  punctures  subequal  to  or  slightly  finer  than  those  of  the 
head  and  separated  by  one  to  two  times  their  own  diameters, 
not  denser  laterally.  Elytral  punctuation  slightly  coarser 
and  sparser  than  that  of  the  thorax ; sutural  costa  moderate, 
the  others  weak. 

Pygidium  feebly  convex,  finely  not  densely  punctate, 
pubescence  short,- -recumbent ; margin  rather  strongly  reflexed 
at  apex.  Metasternum  with  long  hair ; abdomen  with  short 
apressed  hairs,  first  three  ventral  segments  finely  closely 
punctate  in  apical  half,  almost  smooth  in  basal  half.  Length 
19  mm. ; width  10.2  mm. 

Male  characters — Antennal  club  a little  longer  than  the 
funicle,  but  distinctly  shorter  than  the  entire  stem;  spurs  of 
hind  tibiae  and  ungual  teeth  nearly  as  in  parvidens.  Third 
ventral  segment  obtusely  tumid  at  middle  along  the  rear 
margin ; fourth  broadly  feebly  impressed  at  middle,  this  area 
covered  with  flattened  granules  and  limited  anteriorly  by  an 
oblique  roughened  tumidity  which  extends  backward  and 
outward  terminating  in  a smooth  acute  ridge  parallel  with 
the  rear  margin  and  about  two-fifths  the  length  of  the  seg- 
ment therefrom ; hind  margin  obtusely  subangularly  prom- 
inent at  middle ; fifth  ventral  with  an  abrubt  ridge  along  the 


112  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXIV 


basal  margin  in  middle  third,  and  a slight  median  longitudinal 
impression. 

Florida  (Lake  Mary),  a single  male  specimen. 

This  species  is  allied  to  rubiginosa,  parvidens  and  pygidialis 
but  differs  from  all  of  them,  including  the  var.  hesteropyga  Davis, 
in  the  ventral  sexual  characters.  The  more  flattened  pygidium 
with  strongly  reflexed  elytral  margin  still  further  excludes  rubi- 
ginosa and  arvidens,  but  should  be  nearly  as  in  pygidialis  which 
I have  not  seen ; the  form  broader  behind,  shining  surface  and 
punctuation  of  the  latter  as  described  do  not  at  all  agree  with  the 
present  species. 

Phyllophaga  iroides  n.  sp. 

Subcylindrical,  slightly  wider  behind,  dark  reddish-brown 
or  rufopiceous,  surface  distinctly  iridescent  sericeous  and 
dull. 

Head  nearly  black,  somewhat  shining ; clypeus  emarginate, 
rather  strongly  and  densely  punctate,  the  punctures  however 
not  in  mutual  contact ; front  less  closely  punctured. 

Prothorax  narrowed  in  front,  sides  parallel  in  posterior 
half,  margin  finely  somewhat  irregularly  crenulate ; punc- 
tuation rather  fine  and  evenly  distributed,  lightly  impressed, 
punctures  distant  from  one  to  two  times  their  own  width. 

Elytral  punctures  but  little  larger  than  those  of  the  thorax 
though  more  vague;  all  the  costae  very  feebly  indicated. 
Pygidium  broadly  convex,  sericeous,  very  finely  sparsely 
shallowly  punctate,  each  puncture  bearing  a minute  hair. 

Metasternum  finely  not  closely  punctate  with  short  hair ; 
abdomen  convex,  sericeous,  with  sparse  minute  punctures 
bearing  exceedingly  fine  short  hairs ; claws  with  a moderate 
intramedian  tooth. 

Length  17  mm.;  width  8.75-9  mm- 

Male  characters. — Antennal  club  scarcely  longer  than  the 
basal  joint  and  much  shorter  than  the  funicle.  Penultimate 
ventral  segment  with  a small  shallow  subparabolic  concavity 
which  is  shining  and  densely  punctate  posteriorly. 

Described  from  two  males  bearing  label  Huachuca  Mts.,  Ari- 
zona, VIII-16-10. 

This  species  possesses  the  characters  of  Horn’s  Group  XIII, 
and  because  of  its  iridescent  surface  is  to  be  associated  with  sub- 
mucida.  In  this  latter  the  punctuation  is  stronger,  the  elytral 
costae  more  distinct,  the  antennal  club  of  the  male  very  much 
longer,  and  the  male  ventral  characters  wholly  different. 


April,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  113 


Phyllophaga  microdon  n.  sp. 

Oblong,  cylindrical,  moderately  robust,  castaneous,  shin- 
ing, above  glabrous.  Head  three-fifths  as  wide  as  the  thorax, 
densely  punctate  throughout ; clypeus  narrowly  reflexed,  very 
feebly  to  scarcely  perceptibly  sinuate  at  middle. 

Thorax  widest  at  middle,  the  sides  there  strongly  rounded, 
thence  subrectilinearly  convergent  in  both  directions,  the 
hind  angles  obtuse,  margin  feebly  flatly  crenulated  by  the 
short  sparse  ciliae ; surface  sparsely  finely  evenly  punctate. 

Elytra  not  very  much  wider  than  the  thorax  (less  than 
one-fifth  in  the  type)  and  similarly  sparsely  finely  punctate, 
the  punctures  separated  as  a rule  by  three  or  four  times  their 
own  diameters ; sutural  costa  not  strong,  the  others  nearly 
obliterated. 

Pygidium  shining,  nearly  flat,  with  a few  very  fine  scat- 
tered punctures.  Metasternum  finely  sparsely  punctate  and 
shining,  very  thinly  pubescent.  Abdomen  shining,  almost  im- 
punctate  except  remotely  near  the  sides.  Last  joint  of  max- 
illary palpi  fusiform,  flattened  on  the  outer  face.  Claws  with 
a very  small  basal  tooth. 

Length  16.5-17  mm. ; width  8.3-9  mm- 

Male  characters. — Antennal  club,  distinctly  longer  than  the 
funicle  but  not  so  long  as  the  entire  stem.  Ventral  segments 
flattened  and  a little  concave  at  middle  but  without  other 
sexual  characters  except  for  a small  shallow  median  concav- 
ity on  the  last  segment. 

Three  specimens  of  this  remarkably  distinct  species  are  before 
me,  the  type  in  my  own  collection  and  two  paratypes  from  Mr. 
Liebeck’s  collection.  All  bear  the  label  “ Hackberry  Creek,  Bo- 
quillas  Road,  Brewster  Co.,  Texas,  Sept.  2,  1912,  R & H.”  Mr. 
Liebeck  writes  me  there  are  four  other  examples  in  the  Philadel- 
phia Academy  Collection,  two  of  these  from  the  above-named 
locality,  one  from  Persimmon  Gap,  Santiago  Mts.,  the  other  from 
Dog  Canon,  both  in  Brewster  Co.  All  of  the  specimens  were  col- 
lected by  Rehn  and  Hebard. 

This  species  must  be  referred  to  Group  XIII  of  Horn’s  Revi- 
sion where  it  may  precede  glahricula.  It  does  not  at  all  resemble 
any  of  the  four  species  there  included  ; indeed  the  finely  sparsely 
punctate  upper  surface,  thorax  widest  at  middle  with  obtuse  hind 
angles,  almost  glabrous  metasternum,  tarsal  claws  with  a very 
small  tooth  at  the  extreme  base,  and  the  absence  of  ventral  sexual 
characters  aside  from  the  flattening  of  the  segments,  form  a com- 
bination of  characters  not  approached  by  any  other  known  species 


114  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXIV 


of  our  fauna.  The  tooth  of  the  tarsal  claws  is  actually  as  small  as 
in  maculicollis  although  this  latter  is  a much  smaller  species. 

The  male  genitalia  of  the  three  species  above  described  have 
been  extracted  and  prove  in  every  case  to  be  abundantly  distinct 
from  any  previously  figured.  The  following  simple  outline 
sketches  of  the  male  claspers  while  not  strictly  drawn  to  scale  are 
sufficiently  accurate  for  comparative  purposes.  The  shorter 
branch  of  the  terminal  fork  of  the  long  median  process  in  mariana 
is  quite  likely  a malformation,  the  organ  being  otherwise  entirely 
symmetrical.  In  both  iroides  and  microdon  the  claspers  are  also 
symmetrical  and  fused  together  beneath  so  that  the  caudal  open- 
ing is  completely  inclosed  except  for  the  horizontal  notch  in 
iroides. 


Fig.  i.  P.  mariana  a.  caudal;  b.  lateral;  c.  caudc-lateral  aspect. 
Fig.  2.  P.  iroides ; same  lettering. 

Fig.  3.  j P.  microdon ; same  lettering. 


April,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  115 


EDWIN  EDDY  CALDER. 

Prof.  E.  E.  Calder,  Dean  of  the  Rhode  Island  College  of  Phar- 
macy and  Allied  Sciences,  died  in  Deaconess  Hospital,  Boston, 
on  January  15,  1929,  in  his  76th  year.  Prof.  Calder  has  been  an 
active  member  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  since  1918. 
His  entomological  interests  were  concerned  with  the  Coleoptera 
and  in  this  order  especially  with  the  Cicindelidae,  of  which  his 
collection  had  few  rivals  in  North  America.  A number  of  types 
of  species  described  by  him  are  included. 

Prof.  Calder  was  born  in  Providence,  R.  I.,  March  17,  1853, 
the  son  of  John  Lewis  and  Julia  F.  Calder.  He  specialized  in  the 
sciences  with  particular  reference  to  chemistry.  He  was  assistant 
instructor  in  analytical  chemistry  at  Brown  University  from  1874 
until  1882,  when  he  became  professor  of  chemistry  at  the  Boston 
University  of  Medicine,  where  he  continued  until  1906,  at  the 
same  time  being  actively  associated  with  the  Rhode  Island  College 
of  Pharmacy.  He  received  the  honorary  degree  of  A.M.  from 
Brown  University  and  later  the  honorary  degree  of  Ph.C.  and 
Ph.D.  from  the  Rhode  Island  College  of  Pharmacy  and  Allied 
Sciences.  In  addition  to  his  educational  duties  he  conducted  a 
private  analytical  chemistry  business  as  a member  of  the  firm  of 
Calder  and  Strickland  in  Providence. 

On  December  23,  1875,  Prof.  Calder  married  Ella  A.  T.  Els- 
bree,  who  died  several  years  ago.  He  is  survived  by  one  daugh- 
ter, Frances  W.  Calder,  of  Longmeadow,  R.  I. 

Prof.  Calder’s  residence  in  Providence  limited  his  attendance  at 
the  meetings  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  to  “ occa- 
sional events,”  but  he  was  a loyal  member,  always  on  the  lookout 
to  get  support  for  the  publications  of  the  Society. 

We  are  advised  that  Prof.  Calder’s  collection  of  Coleoptera  and 
his  extensive  library  are  for  sale.  This  would  be  a valuable  ac- 
quisition to  any  institution  or  collector.  We  hope  both  will  be 
acquired  by  the  Park  Museum  of  Providence,  R.  I.,  in  commemo- 
ration of  a faithful  member  and  an  honored  citizen. 

George  P.  Engelhardt, 

Brooklyn  Museum. 


116  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXlV 


THE  INTEGUMENT  OF  THE  LARVA  OF  THE  ALDER 
FLEA  BEETLE. 

By  William  Colcord  Woods,  Kent  School,  Kent,  Conn. 

Summary. 

As  in  insects  generally,  the  body  wall  of  the  larva  of  the  alder 
flea  beetle  ( Altica  himarginata  Say:  Coleoptera,  Chrysomelidae) 
is  composed  of  three  layers:  (i)  a cuticula,  secreted  by  (2)  an 
underlying  hypo  dermis,  which  rests  upon  (3)  a structureless 
basement  membrane.  Three  sorts  of  glands  are  differentiated  in 
the  hypodermal  layer : molting  fluid  glands,  glands  connected  with 
the  trichogens,  and  “ prothoracic  glands.” 

The  Cuticula. 

The  cuticula  of  the  body  wall  consists  of  three  layers : a very 
thin  faintly  staining  epicuticula  (the  “ Grenzhautchen”  of  Ger- 
man authors),  a deeply  pigmented  primary  cuticula  which  does 
not  stain  with  an  eosin-haematoxylin  combination,  and  a non- 
pigmented  secondary  cuticula  which  does  stain.  This  staining 
reaction  has  'probably  little  significance : i.e.,  in  another  chry- 
somelid  larva  ( Deloyala  clavata  Fabr.)  under  similar  conditions 
the  primary  cuticula  stains  violet,  and  the  secondary  pinkish. 

The  cuticula  is  covered  with  conspicuous  nodules  which  lie 
thickly  scattered  between  the  setiferous  tubercles ; their  appear- 
ance in  a caustic  potash  preparation  is  shown  in  figure  1 and  in 
cross  section  in  figure  2.  Together  with  the  tubercles  these 
nodules  are  by  far  the  most  deeply  pigmented  portions  of  the 
cuticula,  although  pigment  granules  occur  in  other  parts.  The 
nodule,  most  of  which  is  primary  cuticula,  is  covered  by  a com- 
paratively thick  cap  of  epicuticula  which  is  very  deeply  pigmented. 

The  writer  has  made  no  chemical  tests  and  does  not  know  the 
extent  of  chitinization  in  the  cuticula.  The  primary  layer  is  prob- 
ably the  only  sclerotized  portion : ( 1 ) the  cuticula  of  a newly 

molted  larva  is  devoid  of  pigment ; sclerotization  after  ecdysis  is 
correlated  with  pigmentation,  and  with  the  exception  noted  above, 
pigment  is  restricted  to  the  primary  cuticula;  (2)  the  secondary 
cuticula  increases  in  thickness  during  the  instar,  whereas  scleroti- 
zation is  complete  two  or  three  hours  subsequent  to  the  molt. 

Even  the  primary  cuticula  must  be  somewhat  elastic  since  the 
integument  stretches  considerably  during  the  instar;  the  cuticula 


April,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  117 


nodules  lie  much  closer  together  just  after  the  molt  than  they  do 
a few  days  later.  This  is  a generalization  true  of  this  type  of 
chrysomelid  larvae.  In  all  those  studied,  the  internodular  cuticula 
is  sufficiently  transparent  to  allow  the  fat  body  to  show  through 
so  as  to  determine  the  general  body  color  of  the  larva;  in  most 
species,  it  is  yellow  or  orange  as  in  bimarginata,  but  in  A.  corni 
Woods,  for  example,  it  is  white.  In  each  species  the  color  of  the 
eggs  and  of  the  pupae  is  correlated  with  that  of  the  fat  body, 
which  is  constant  in  color  throughout  all  the  stages. 

The  body  wall  is  of  course  continuous  with  the  lining  of  the 
fore-intestine,  the  hind-intestine,  the  spiracular  invaginations  and 
those  of  the  salivary  glands.  Primary  and  secondary  intima  may 
be  traced  in  the  fore-  and  hind-intestines,  and  at  the  very  begin- 
ning of  the  spiracular  invaginations.  The  writer  cannot  detect 
any  such  differentiation  in  the  tracheae  or  in  the  salivary  glands 
(even  at  the  point  of  invagination),  and  there  is  apparently  no 
“epi-intima”  developed  anywhere,  the  epicuticula  ceasing  at  the 
point  of  invagination. 

The  Hypodermis. 

The  hypodermis  consists  of  cuboidal  or  rectangular  cells,  some- 
what variable  in  size  and  shape,  which  present  as  such  no  special 
modifications  in  the  larva,  Late  in  the  prepupal  period,  the  cells 
become  greatly  attenuated,  a condition  quite  different  from  the 
typical  columnar  epithelium  of  the  larva  and  one  which  persists 
through  most  of  the  pupal  instar.  Except  in  the  region  of  the 
imaginal  discs,  the  hypodermis  is  but  a single  layer  of  cells  in 
thickness. 

The  Basement  Membrane. 

The  basement  membrane  is  a delicate  structureless  limiting 
membrane  developed  at  the  base  of  the  hypodermal  cells.  In  well 
fixed  material,  its  presence  is  always  clear,  but  the  writer  has 
never  detected  any  trace  of  nuclei  in  it. 

The  Molting  Fluid  Glands 

The  molting  fluid  glands  are  the  most  conspicuous  of  the  hypo- 
dermal  glands.  They  are  large  unicellular  glands,  occurring  in  all 
parts  of  the  body  apparently  without  regular  arrangement,  not  in- 
frequent in  sections,  but  not  developed  in  great  numbers.  The 
writer  prefers  to  treat  them  as  unicellular  glands,  although  strictly 


118  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  VoI.XXIV 


each  gland  consists  of  three  cells,  two  small  cells  which  serve  as 
neck  or  guard  cells,  and  a much  larger  secreting  cell. 

In  larvae  sectioned  immediately  after  ecdysis,  the  glands  are  not 
charged  with  secretion  vacuoles,  and  the  canaliculi  through  which 
the  gland  empties  may  be  seen  plainly.  (The  writer  has  no  data 
as  to  whether  or  not  these  canaliculi  are  chitinized.)  The  course 
of  this  canal  is  quite  variable.  It  is  always  somewhat  convoluted, 
and  apparently  is  always  two  branched,  the  forking  occurring 
usually  close  to  the  cuticula  as  in  figure  4,  but  sometimes  farther 
back  as  in  figure  3.  (As  the  portions  of  the  canal  lie  at  different 
levels,  these  figures  are  necessarily  reconstructions  from  several 
successive  serial  sections.) 

Both  figure  3 and  figure  4 are  drawn  from  a larva  fixed  during 
ecdysis.  The  molting  fluid  is  elaborated  during  the  instar  and  the 
gland  gradually  becomes  charged  with  secretion  vacuoles.  During 
this  process  the  glands  become  somewhat  but  not  very  greatly 
enlarged.  An  enlarged  and  vacuolar  gland,  drawn  from  a two 
day  prepupa,  is  shown  in  figure  5.  Typically  the  discharge  of  the 
molting  fluid  takes  place  on  this  day,  for  sections  of  three  day 
prepupae  usually  show  the  glands  somewhat  reduced  in  size  and 
without  secretion  vacuoles,  a very  faint  trace  of  the  forming 
pupal  cuticula,  and  a coagulum  between  the  hypodermis  and  the 
now  separated  larval  cuticula. 

Since  well  formed  molting  fluid  glands  are  to  be  found  in  sec- 
tions of  larvae  fixed  at  eclosion  or  just  after  ecdysis,  and  since 
there  is  no  appearance  of  “incipient”  glands  in  a larva  just  ready 
to  molt,  the  writer  believes  that  each  gland  is  persistent  from 
embryonic  life  up  to  the  pupal  stadium,  and  functions  several 
times.  (The  cells  do  increase  in  actual  size,  but  the  increase  is 
proportional  with  those  of  the  hypodermis  and  epithelium.) 
These  glands  persist  through  the  prepupal  period  (after  their 
functioning  on  the  second  day)  in  a sort  of  resting  condition,  and 
the  writer  has  found  them  in  sections  of  pupae  up  to  the  fifth 
day  of  pupal  life.  He  is  unable  to  state  definitely  when  and  how 
they  disappear. 

That  the  molting  fluid  complex  is  entirely  surrounded  by  the 
basement  membrane  is  always  clear  in  well  fixed  material.  The 
writer  has  already  suggested  his  interpretation  of  the  three  cells 
of  this  complex.  The  two  upper  cells,  much  smaller  than  the 
lower,  are  protecting  neck  cells.  Frequently  if  not  typically  the 
nucleus  of  one  cells  is  decidedly  smaller  than  that  of  the  other. 


April,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  119 


The  cell  divisions,  always  difficult  to  make  out,  were  in  no  case 
examined  so  sharply  defined  as  in  the  figures.  In  some  series 
only  one  of  the  neck  cell  nuclei  is  apparent  (as  in  figure  4),  but 
the  writer  does  not  consider  this  a normal  condition  even  though 
careful  search  has  failed  to  reveal  the  missing  nucleus.  The 
lowermost  cell  is  the  secreting  cell,  but  the  canaliculi  go  without 
break  through  the  neck  cells. 

The  writer  does  not  believe  that  the  canaliculi  ever  open  by  a 
cuticular  pore  to  the  outside,  as  has  been  figured  for  certain 
species.  He  has  found  no  evidence  of  such  a pore,  and  apparently 
the  molting  fluid  is  poured  out  when  the  new  cuticula  is  just  form- 
ing, before  it  has  covered  over  the  hypodermis  at  the  base  of  the 
gland.  Were  the  canaliculi  to  penetrate  through  special  pores, 
it  is  evident  that  new  glands  would  have  to  be  formed  at  each 
ecdysis,  which  is  almost  certainly  not  the  case. 

In  caustic  potash  preparations,  what  seems  to  be  cuticular 
pores  appear  rarely  in  the  setiferous  tubercles.  These  pores  are 
really  trichopores,  and  usually  a tiny  seta  may  be  found  con- 
nected with  them.  In  figure  1,  such  a trichopore  with  a tiny  seta 
is  shown  on  the  left  of  the  tubercle,  and  on  the  right  is  a tricho- 
pore where  the  seta  has  entirely  failed  to  develop.  These  pores 
have  nothing  to  do  with  the  molting  fluid ; they  are  vestiges  which 
indicate  (as  comparative  studies  make  abundantly  clear)  that  the 
evolution  of  the  setal  pattern  in  Altica  has  been  a process  of 
reduction. 

As  one  would  naturally  expect,  the  molting  fluid  glands  of 
Altica  are  almost  exactly  similar  to  those  of  Galerucella,  which 
Poyarkoff  (1910,  p.  31-40,  fig.  12)  has  described  as  the  “glandes 
a trois  noyaux  ” of  the  larva,  save  that  in  the  elm  leaf  beetle  the 
neck  is  somewhat  more  drawn  out,  and  the  cell  divisions  are  even 
less  apparent  than  in  Altica. 

The  Trichogen  Cells. 

The  setae  of  the  larvae  are  hollow  and  each  one  is  connected 
with  two  cells,  the  seta  forming,  or  trichogen  cell  proper,  and  an 
associated  gland  cell.  The  hair  is  slightly  enlarged  at  the  tip, 
where  there  is  a pore  to  permit  the  exit  of  the  secretion  of  the 
gland  (see  figure  1).  The  secretion  is  odorless  and  is  not  put 
forth  in  droplets  when  the  larva  is  disturbed.  It  certainly  is  not 
of  a repugnatorial  nature.  Since  the  integument  sheds  water 
easily,  and  since  minute  particles  easily  adhere  to  the  more  or 


120  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


less  sticky  skin,  the  secretion  is  perhaps  of  a waxy  nature.  The 
writer  interprets  the  setae  as  primarily  sense  hairs,  with  which  a 
glandular  secretion  (perhaps,  as  the  larvae  feed  exposed  on  the 
upper  surface  of  the  leaf,  concerned  with  making  the  integument 
waterproof,  so  as  to  shed  rain  and  to  check  evaporation)  is  sec- 
ondarily and  incidentally  associated. 

In  a larva  fixed  and  sectioned  immediately  after  a molt,  the 
gland  cell  extends  some  little  distance  up  into  the  seta  (see  figure 
6)  but  glandular  activity  is  indicated  by  the  appearance  of  a 
lumen  which  becomes  progressively  larger  during  the  instar.  This 
condition  is  shown  in  figure  7,  from  a full  fed  larva.  A very  thin 
protoplasmic  film  which  encloses  the  secretion  droplet,  running 
about  half  way  up  the  seta,  is  not  shown  in  the  figure. 

Trichogen  cells  may  be  found  in  larvae  sectioned  immediately 
after  their  hatching,  and  the  same  trichogen  cells  function 
throughout  larval  life,  merely  showing,  as  do  the  molting  fluid 
glands  also,  an  increase  in  size  proportional  to  that  of  the  other 
cells.  The  trichogen  cells  of  the  pupa  are  of  a very  different  type, 
and  are  similar  to  those  figured  by  Poyarkoff  (1910,  fig.  10)  for 
Galerucella.  What  the  writer  interprets  as  the  trichogen  cell 
proper  is  a large  elongate  cell  extending  up  into  the  seta,  and 
the  gland  cell  beside  it  is  relatively  small  (the  “cellule  compagne” 
of  Poyarkoff) . The  writer  believes  that  during  the  prepupal  period 
most  of  the  larval  trichogens  are  destroyed,  and  that  the  others 
are  converted  into  trichogens  of  the  pupal  type.  Not  only  the 
pupal  setae  fewer  in  number  but  they  are  of  a very  different  type. 
They  are  solid,  not  hollow,  and  have  no  glandular  function ; they 
support  the  pupa  from  contact  with  the  pupal  cell  and  are  there- 
fore practically  confined  to  the  back,  as  the  pupa  always  lies  with 
the  ventral  aspect  uppermost.  They  are  probably  not  even  sense 
hairs ; at  least,  the  writer  has  never  detected  any  innervation. 

In  some  sections  of  larvae  the  nervous  connection  is  apparent, 
and  it  is  shown  in  both  trichogens  figured.  Two  or  three  of  the 
nerve  nuclei  of  the  complex  are  always  larger  than  the  others,  and 
these  large  cells  are  confined  to  the  region  just  below  the 
trichogen.  As  indicated  in  the  figures,  the  trichogen  and  gland 
cells  are  always  sharply  distinct  from  the  nerve  tissue.  The 
writer  has  no  material  properly  stained  to  study  the  detailed  in- 
nervation. In  nearly  all  cases,  as  in  figure  6,  one  can  detect  only 
the  nuclei,  but  one  section  shows  clearly  the  joining  of  several 
of  these  nuclei  as  illustrated  in  figure  7.  The  nerve  nuclei 


April,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  121 


resemble  the  “Sinneszellgruppe”  of  Korschelt  (1924,  p.  218)  and 
are  likewise  divisible  into  larger  nuclei  (Sinneszellkerne)  near  the 
seta  and  smaller  nuclei  (Neurilemmkerne)  which  may  occur  any- 
where along  the  nerve.  The  writer  does  however  hesitate  to 
call  the  smaller  nuclei  in  Altica  “neurilemma  nuclei”  since  in  all 
his  sections  the  neurilemma  seems  to  be  a very  thin  structureless 
membrane  devoid  of  nuclei,  and,  as  shown  in  figures  6 and  7,  is  in 
all  cases  plainly  continuous  with  the  basement  membrane  of  the 
hypodermis  which  is  certainly  non-nucleated.  (The  basement 
membrane  is  also  apparently  continuous  with  the  sarcolemmata 
of  the  muscles  as  they  attach  to  the  cuticula  through  the  hypo- 
dermal  tendons.)  As  shown  by  figure  7,  the  trichogen  nerve  arises 
from  the  subhypodermal  plexus,  but  the  writer  has  not  been  able 
to  trace  the  nerve  in  his  sections  much  farther  than  is  designated 
in  the  figure. 

Aside  from  the  innervation  which  is  not  discussed  in  the  papers 
referred  to  below,  conditions  are  very  similar  to  the  poison  setae 
of  Hemerocampa,  Apatela  and  Euchaetias  figured  by  Gilmer 
(1925,  p.  210)  ; there  is  however  no  tendency  for  the  trichogen 
cell  proper  to  degenerate  as  in  Euchaetias,  and  the  hairs  are  not 
crowded  together  in  tufts  as  in  lepidopterous  larvae.  The  setae 
also  resemble  those  figured  by  Matheson  (1923,  p.  55)  as  type 
IV  of  Pseudococcus,  except  that  in  Altica  the  trichogen  complex 
is  made  up  of  two  cells  instead  of  three.  Most  of  all  naturally 
they  resemble  the  trichogen  cells  of  Galerucella  (Poyarkoff  1910, 
p.  27-31,  fig.  8).  Poyarkoff  figures  two  nuclei  in  his  drawing  of 
the  trichogen  complex,  but  he  does  not  distinguish  between  the 
gland  cell  and  the  trichogen  proper  in  his  text. 

The  Prothoracic  Glands. 

The  head  of  the  Altica  larva  is  somewhat  retracted  under  the 
prothoracic  shield,  with  which  it  is  connected  by  a non-sclerotized 
fold  of  the  cuticula.  The  hypodermis  of  this  membranous  fold  is 
very  glandular,  and  probably  secretes  a lubricating  fluid.  These 
glandular  cells  are  several  times  as  large  as  the  ordinary  cells,  and 
show  secretion  vacuoles. 

The  cells  were  noted  by  Poyarkoff  (1910,  p.  33)  in  Galerucella 
larvae,  and  called  by  him  “les  glandes  prothoraciques.”  In  that 
species,  each  gland  is  remarkable  in  possessing  from  five  to  twelve 
separate  canaliculi.  One  would  expect  to  find  a similar  condition 
in  Altica,  but  the  writer  has  not  been  able  to  detect  such  canaliculi 
in  his  sections. 


122  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vo1-  XXIV 


The  Rectal  Glands. 

The  writer  has  already  described  (Woods,  1918,  p.  305)  unicel- 
lular glands  in  the  rectal  epithelium  of  this  larva,  which  are  in- 
terpreted as  the  molting  fluid  glands  of  the  hind  intestine.  In 
structure  and  staining  reactions  they  are  entirely  unlike  the  molt- 
ing fluid  glands  of  the  hypodermis.  These  glands  may  occur  in 
the  otherwise  unmodified  hypodermis  at  some  little  distance  from 
the  point  of  the  rectal  invagination. 

The  glands  are  of  course  totally  unlike  the  so-called  rectal 
glands  of  certain  insects,  which  are  more  properly  termed 
“pygidial  glands.” 


The  Eversible  Glands. 

Segmentally  arranged  eversible  glands  such  as  were  described 
in  detail  by  Garb  (1915)  for  Melasoma  lapponica  are  totally 
wanting  in  Altica,  and  so  far  as  the  writer  knows  in  all  alticine 
and  galerucine  larvae.  They  are  probably  confined  to  and  char- 
acteristic of  the  tribes  Phaedonini  and  Phyllodectini  of  the  sub- 
family Chrysomelini.  The  writer  has  found  these  eversible  glands 
in  all  larvae  of  these  two  tribes  which  he  has  been  able  to 
examine : Plagiodera  versicolor  Laich.,  Gastroidea  polygoni  L., 
Lina  interrupta  Fab.,  Lina  scripta  Fab.  and  Phyllodecta  americana 
Schaef.  lie  has  sectioned  larvae  of  only  the  last  named  species 
but  in  it  conditions  are  exactly  similar  to  those  described  so 
clearly  and  carefully  by  Garb. 

Bibliography. 

Garb,  Gerson.  1915.  The  eversible  glands  of  a chrysomelid 
larva,  Melasoma  lapponica.  Journ.  of  Ent.  and  Zool.,  1915, 
7 : 88-97. 

Hilton,  William  A.  1902.  The  body  sense  hairs  of  lepidopter- 
ous  larvae.  Amer.  Nat.,  1902,  v.  36:  561-578. 

Gilmer,  Paul  M.  1925.  A comparative  study  of  the  poison 
apparatus  of  certain  lepidopterous  larvae.  Annals  Ent.  Soc. 
Amer.,  1925,  v.  18 : 203-239. 

Korschelt,  E.  1924.  Der  Gelbrand.  Erster  Band,  Kapitel  3 
(Chitinskelett),  Kapitel  4 (Die  Driisen),  and  Kapitel  5 (Die 
Hautsinnesorgane) . 

Matheson,  Robert.  1923.  The  wax  secreting  glands  of  Pseudo- 
coccus citri  Risso.  Annals  Ent.  Soc.  Amer.,  1923,  v.  16: 

51-56. 


April,  19 £9  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  123 


Poyarkoff,  Eraste.  1910.  Recherches  histologiques  sur  la 
metamorphose  d’un  coleoptere  (la  galeruque  de  Tonne). 
These  a Paris.  (Also,  Arch,  d’anat.  micr.,  1910,  t.  2:  334- 
474 ; for  this  reference  add  333  to  the  page  number  given  in 
this  paper.) 

Tower,  W.  L.  1906.  Observations  on  the  changes  in  the  hypo- 
dermis  and  cuticula  of  Coleoptera  during  Ecdysis.  Biol.  Bull., 
1906,  v.  10:  176-192. 

Woods,  William  Colcord.  1918.  The  alimentary  canal  of  the 
larva  of  Altica  himarginata  Say  (Col.).  Annals  Ent.  Soc. 
Amer.,  1918,  v.  11  : 283-313. 

Explanation  of  Figures.  Plate  XIX. 

Figure  1.  Caustic  potash  preparation  of  integument,  showing 
seta  with  pore,  setiferous  tubercle  with  very  small  trichopore 
and  seta  (left)  and  very  small  trichopore  without  seta 
(right)  ; a few  of  the  cuticular  nodules  are  shown  above  the 
tubercle. 

Figure  2.  Section  of  the  integument,  showing  the  nodules  in 
cross  section.  E is  epicuticula;  P is  primary  cuticula;  S is 
secondary  cuticula;  H is  hypodermis;  BM  is  basement  mem- 
brane. 

Figure  3.  Molting  fluid  gland,  from  larva  fixed  during  the  molt 
to  the  third  instar,  showing  the  two  neck  cells  and  the 
canaliculi ; the  forking  is  not  usually  so  far  back  in  the  cell. 

Figure  4.  Molting  fluid  gland,  from  larva  fixed  during  the  molt 
to  the  third  instar,  showing  typical  arrangement  of  canaliculi. 
This  particular  gland  showed  only  one  neck  cell  nucleus'. 

Figure  5.  Molting  fluid  gland,  charged  with  secretion  vacuoles, 
from  two  day  prepupa.  The  neck  cells  do  not  show  up  as  dis- 
tinctly in  this  section,  but  are  nevertheless  present. 

Figure  6.  Trichogen  complex  showing  innervation  and  extent 
of  gland  cell  from  larva  fixed  during  the  molt  to  the  third 
instar. 

Figure  7.  Trichogen  complex  showing  detailed  innervation  and 
secretion  vacuole  developed  late  in  the  third  instar. 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  XXIV,  No.  2 Plate  XIX 


Vol.  XXIV 


JUNE,  1929 

BULLETIN 


OF  THE 


No.  3 


SfP-Q 

y /S!?« 


Brooklyn  Entomological 
Society 


MUSEO? 


E.  L.  BELL 


NEW  SERIES 


PUBLICATION  COMMITTEE 
J.  R.  de  la  TORRE-BUENO,  Editor 

GEO.  P.  ENGELHARD  T 
Published  for  the  Society  by  the 

Science  Press  Printing  Co., 

Lime  and  Green  Sts.,  Lancaster,  Pa., 


Price,  oO  cents 


Subscription,  $2.50  per  year 


/ / 


Mailed  September  6,  1929 


Entei^cLBs  second-class  matter  January  21,  1919,  at  the  post  office  at  Lancaster,  Pa., 
under  the  Act  of  March  3,  1879 


The  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society 

Meetings  are  held  on  the  second  Thursday  after  the  first  Tuesday  of  each 
month  from  October  to  June,  inclusive,  at  the  Central  Museum,  Eastern 
Parkway  and  Washington  Ave.,  Brooklyn.  The  annual  dues  are  $2.00. 

OFFICERS,  1929 


Honorary  President 
CHARLES  W.  LENG 


President 
W.  T.  DAVIS 
Vice-President 

J.  R.  DE  LA  TORRE-BUENO 
j Recording  Secretary 
E.  L.  BELL 
Corresponding  Secretary 
HOWARD  NOTMAN 


Treasurer 

G.  P.  ENGELHARDT 
Central  Museum 
Eastern  Parkway 
Librarian 

DR.  JOSEPH  BEQUAERT 
Curator 

J.  M.  SHERIDAN 


Delegate  to  Council  of  New  YorTc 
Academy  of  Sciences 
G.  P.  ENGELHARDT 


CONTENTS 

NEW  SPECIES  OF  MELOIDAE,  Van  Dyke  127 

THE  GENUS  ANTEOS  HUBNER,  Klots  134 

RECTIFICATIONS  FOR  BLATCHLEY'S  “ HETEROPTERA,  ” AND 

A NEW  SPECIES,  Knight  i ,... 143 

AN  EARLY  CERAMBYCID,  Frost  1 , 154 

NOTES  ON  GYRINUS  MARGINELLUS,  Chamberlain  155 

RARITY  VS.  SECRECY,  Frost  156 

ON  ME  T ROB  A TE  S HESPERIUS,  Parshley  157 

ETIOLOGY  OF  A MALFORMATION  IN  THE  EARWIG  ANISO- 

LABIS  MARI  TIMA,  D.  & D.  Nakahara  161 

LEPID OP TEROL O GICAL  CONTRIBUTIONS,  Barnes  & Benjamin  ......  164 

UNDESCRIBED  LIMNOPHILA  FROM  E.  N.  A.,  Alexander  187 

TWO  MOTHS,  Eisenhardt  !..' h.J..... 192 

PROCEEDINGS  OF  THE  SOCIETY,  Schaeffer  193 

BOOK  NOTES:  DRAGONFLIES  OF  N.  A.,  Davis  Hp 200 


Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society 

Published  in 

February,  April,  June,  October  and  December  of  each  year 

Subscription  price,  domestic,  $2.50  per  year;  foreign,  $2.75  in  advance; 
single  copies,  60  cents.  Advertising  rates  on  application.  Short  articles, 
notes  and  observations  of  interest  to  entomologists  are  solicited.  Authors 
will  receive  25  reprints  free  if  ordered  in  advance  of  publication.  Address 
subscriptions  and  all  communications  to 

J.  B.  de  la  TOBBE -BUENOS,  Editor, 

38  De  Kalb  Avenue,  White  Plains,  N.  Y. 


BULLETIN 

OF  THE 

BROOKLYN  ENTOMOLOGICAL  SOCIETY 


Vol.  XXIV  June,  1929  No.  3 


NEW  SPECIES  OF  MELOIDAE  (COLEOPTERA). 

By  Edwin  C.  Van  Dyke,  University  of  California,  Berkeley, 

California. 

Tetraonyx  albipilosa  n.  sp. 

Of  the  size,  form  and  general  appearance  of  a small  Tetra- 
onyx fulva  Lee. ; ochre  colored,  the  antennae,  apices  of  the 
femora  and  tibiae,  tarsi  and  underside  of  the  body  black; 
densely  clothed  above  with  fine,  erect,  white  pile.  Head  dis- 
tinctly triangular,  front  finely  and  sparsely  punctured,  eyes 
prominent,  antennae  extending  slightly  behind  hind  margins 
of  prothorax.  Prothorax  three-fifths  as  long  as  broad,  finely 
and  rather  sparsely  punctured,  transversely  impressed  in 
front  of  scutellum,  hind  angles  somewhat  obtuse  and  blunt  at 
apex.  Elytra  two-sevenths  longer  than  broad,  broadest  be- 
hind middle,  finely,  rather  closely  and  distinctly  punctured. 
Length  9 mm.  (from  vertex  of  head  to  apices  of  elytra), 
breadth  4.5  mm. 

Holotype  (No.  2599,  Mus.  Calif.  Acad.  Sci.),  a unique  in  the 
museum  of  the  California  Academy  of  Sciences,  collected  by  Mr. 
J.  O.  Martin  at  Pecos,  Tex.,  May  15,  1927. 

This  species  which  rather  closely  resembles  fulva  Lee.  may  al- 
ways be  distinguished  by  its  ochre  color  and  white  pile,  fulva  Lee. 
and  femoralis  Duges  being  orange  colored  and  with  orange  pile. 
Tetraonyx  frontalis  Chevr.  and  femoralis  Duges  also  differ  by 
having  black  faces  and  very  dense  punctuation  and  frontalis  in  ad- 
dition by  having  entirely  black  legs.  No  described  Mexican  spe- 
cies could  be  confused  with  it. 

Epicauta  foxi  n.  sp. 

Rather  small  and  short,  black  with  exception  of  small  linear 
orange  patch  on  front  of  head,  disk  of  pronotum  and  elytra 

127 


128  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


rather  sparsely  furnished  with  very  short  and  inconspicuous 
black  hair,  sides  of  head,  sides,  basal  margin  and  triangular 
area  at  apex  of  prothorax,  suture,  lateral  and  apical  margin 
of  elytra,  entire  underside  and  basal  three-fourths  of  femora 
clothed  with  rather  long  and  conspicuous  cinereous  pile. 
Head  quadrate,  rather  coarsely  and  sparsely  punctured  on 
front,  more  finely  and  closely  near  the  eyes,  somewhat  shin- 
ing, median  longitudinal  impression  notched  at  vertex,  finely 
impressed  on  front  and  triangularly  impressed  in  front ; eyes 
not  prominent,  long  and  narrow  and  with  head  deeply  im- 
pressed along  posterior  margin  ; antennae  rather  short,  ex- 
tending backwards  three  segments  beyond  hind  margin  of 
prothorax,  segments  closely  articulated  and  but  slightly  nar- 
rowed apically.  Prothorax  somewhat  quadrate,  broader 
than  long,  sides  straight  and  parallel  behind,  broadly  rounded 
in  front,  disk  somewhat  flattened,  rather  finely  and  closely 
punctured,  very  finely  and  closely  so  in  triangular  area  in 
front,  median  longitudinal  impression  quite  deep  at  center, 
vague  impressions  at  sides.  Elytra  over  twice  as  long  as 
broad,  surface  finely  granulate,  the  punctuation  fine,  hardly 
observable  between  the  granules.  Beneath  rather  finely  and 
closely  punctured.  Length  io  mm.,  breadth  3 mm. 

Holotype  (No.  2600,  Mus.  Calif.  Acad.  Sci.)  and  three  para- 
types  in  the  museum  of  the  California  Academy  of  Sciences,  col- 
lected at  Jacumba,  San  Diego  Co.,  Calif.,  Oct.  3,  1295,  by  Mr.  J. 
D.  Guilder  and  presented  to  the  Academy  by  the  late  C.  L.  Fox, 
after  whom  I take  great  pleasure  in  naming  it. 

The  species  like  impressifrons  Van  Dyke,  previously  described 
in  this  journal,  belongs  in  that  peculiar  and  small  group  of 
Epicauta  which  includes  besides  these  two,  caviceps  Horn,  rileyi 
Horn  and  straba  Horn,  all  characterized  by  being  rather  short 
and  with  the  antennae  scarcely  more  slender  to  tip,  the  segments 
cylindrical,  the  eyes  narrow,  emarginate  in  front,  not  over  prom- 
inent and  the  vertex  always  definitely  sulcate  or  at  least  notched. 
In  color  pattern,  it  resembles  alphonsii  Horn  but  the  latter  has  the 
antennae  more  narrowed  apically,  the  eyes  broad,  and  the  pro- 
thorax longer  than  wide  and  but  sparsely  punctured,  placing  it  in 
a different  group. 

The  following  key  will  enable  the  members  of  the  caviceps 
group  to  be  separated. 


June,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  129 


I.  Upper  surface  densely  clothed  with  cinereous  or  slightly 


ochraceous  colored  pile 2 

Upper  surface  black  or  with  but  the  margins  cinereous 4 


2.  Vertex  and  front  of  head  deeply  sulcate,  the  pronotum  im- 

pressed near  hind  angles,  suture  of  elytra  somewhat  elevated 

in  front  of  middle.  S.  Ariz caviceps  Horn 

Vertex  only  notched,  the  front  but  finely  grooved  at  most.  .3 

3.  Pronotum  evidently  impressed  on  either  side,  elytral  suture 

distinctly  elevated  at  middle.  S.  Ariz rileyi  Horn 

Pronotum  evenly  convex,  elytral  suture  normally  straight. 
Palm  Springs,  Calif impressifrons  Van  Dyke 

4.  Entirely  black,  vertex  notched,  pronotum  shallowly  canalicu- 

late but  with  large  and  rather  deep  impressions  on  either 

side.  S.  Calif straha  Horn 

Black  with  cinereous  hair  margining  prothorax  and  elytra  as 
well  as  clothing  the  underside,  vertex  notched,  pronotum 
with  well  marked  longitudinal  impression  at  middle  and  with 
but  vague  impressions  at  sides.  Jacumba,  Calif,  .foxi  n.  sp. 

Lytta  nigrocyanea  n.  sp. 

Of  large  or  moderate  size,  quite  robust,  subopaque,  a deep 
indigo  blue  color,  the  antennae  black,  the  legs  bluish  black, 
and  a small  spot  on  the  front  orange;  head,  prothorax  and 
basal  margin  of  elytra  clothed  with  erect  black  hair.  Head 
quadrate,  rather  coarsely  punctured  on  the  front,  more  finely 
and  closely  on  the  vertex  and  posterior  angles,  the  vertex 
faintly  notched  at  center ; eyes  slightly  emarginate  anteriorly ; 
antennae  extending  several  segments  beyond  base  of  pro- 
thorax, intermediate  segments  markedly  unilaterally  clubbed 
in  males,  less  so  in  females,  the  seventh  and  eighth  segments 
the  largest  in  males.  Prothorax  broader  than  long  and  gen- 
erally broader  than  head,  broadest  in  front  of  middle,  sides 
arcuate ; disk  slightly  convex  or  flattened,  with  median  longi- 
tudinal line  well  impressed  at  middle  and  at  base,  often  with 
shallow  lateral  impressions,  and  moderately  punctured  at 
center  and  finely,  closely  punctured  at  sides.  Elytra  consid- 
erably broader  than  prothorax,  two  and  a half  times  as  long 
as  broad,  the  surface  deeply,  more  or  less  confluently  punc- 
tate and  cribrate,  more  finely  so  at  sides.  Beneath  finely  and 
moderately  closely  punctate,  anteriorly  clothed  with'  fine, 
erect  black  pile.  Outer  spur  of  hind  tibiae  broad  and  con- 
cave, inner  of  equal  length  but  spiniform.  Length  15-20 
mm.,  breadth  4-6.5  mm.,  average  length  16  mm.  and  breadth 
5 mm. 

Males  with  pygidium  broadly  rounded  at  apex,  fifth  ventral 
triangularly  emarginate  at  apex,  front  tibia  with  but  one  very 


130  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXIV 


long  and  curved  spine  at  apex,  and  hind  trochanters  with  an 
acute  spine.  The  antennae  are  longer  and  the  intermediate 
segments  slightly  more  enlarged  than  in  the  female. 

Holotype  male  (No.  1601,  Mus.  Calif.  Acad.  Sci.)  and  several 
designated  paratypes  from  a series  of  seven  specimens  collected 
at  Palisade,  Colo.,  May  7,  1901,  and’ submitted  to  me  by  the  Colo- 
rado Agricultural  College  at  Fort  Collins,  Colo.  Through  the 
kindness  of  Dr.  Gillette,  the  Holotype  and  one  paratype  will  be 
deposited  in  the  museum  of  the  California  Academy  of  Sciences. 
The  remainder  will  be  found  in  the  collection  of  the  Colorado 
Agricultural  College. 

This  species  according  to  Fall’s  key1  would  run  close  to  nuttalli 
Say  and  cyanipennis  Lee.,  which  it  resembles  in  general  size  and 
appearance,  but  differs  in  color,  being  of  a uniform  deep  indigo 
blue,  has  the  elytra  much  more  evidently  sculptured,  and  the  front 
tibiae  of  the  males  with  but  one  spine  at  apex  whereas  in  the 
others  there  are  two. 

Lytta  maculicollis  n.  sp. 

Large  and  more  or  less  cylindrical,  somewhat  shining; 
black,  apical  area  of  prothorax  reddish  orange,  the  markings 
generally  in  the  shape  of  an  inverted  U,  and  an,  orange  spot 
on  the  front  of  the  head;  quite  glabrous  above.  Head  well 
rounded  in  outline,  rather  finely,  not  closely  punctured,  the 
vertex  faintly  notched;  eyes  slightly  emarginate • in  front; 
antennae  robust,  distinctly  moniliform,  extending  three  seg- 
ments beyond  base  of  prothorax,  segments  gradually  nar- 
rower outwardly.  Prothorax  slightly  longer  than  broad, 
narrower  than  head,  the  sides  straight  and  somewhat  con- 
vergent posteriorly,  well  rounded  apically,  disk  barely  con- 
vex, with  median  longitudinal  line  vaguely  impressed  if  at  all, 
and  finely,  irregularly  and  sparsely  punctured.  Elytra  con- 
siderably broader  than  head,  about  two  and  a half  times  as 
broad,  the  surface  finely  reticulate.  Beneath  finely,  moder- 
ately closely  punctured  in  front,  more  sparsely  on  abdomen 
and  clothed  with  fine  pubescence  in  front.  Outer  spur  of 
hind  tibia  stout,  cylindrical,  obliquely  truncate  at  apex,  the 
inner  shorter  and  spinous.  Length  14-22  mm.,  breadth  4-7 
mm.,  average  length  18  mm.  and  breadth  6 mm. 

Males  with  pygidium  truncate  at  apex,  fifth  ventral  deeply 
triangularly  emarginate  at  apex,  front  tibia  with  the  usual 


1 Tr.  Am.  Entom.  Soc.,  Vol.  XXVII  (1901),  pp.  295-300. 


June,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  131 


pair  of  rather  short  spines  at  apex,  and  hind  trochanters  ellip- 
tical and  without  spines.  The  antennae  of  the  males  are 
longer  than  those  of  the  female,  with  the  segments  4-10 
elongate  elliptical,  whereas  they  are  shorter  and  more  tri- 
angular in  the  females. 

Holotype  male,  allotype  female  (Nos.  2602  and  2603,  Mus. 
Calif.  Acad.  Sci.)  and  several  designated  paratypes  in  my  collec- 
tion from  a series  of  thirty-eight  specimens  taken  by  myself  from 
lupine  near  Panoche  Creek  in  western  Fresno  Co.,  Calif.,  April 
29,  1922.  A paratype  will  be  deposited  in  the  U.  S.  National 
Museum  at  Washington. 

This  species,  I had  confused  for  some  time  with  Lytta  molesta 
Horn,  a species  to  which  it  is  rather  closely  related  and  which 
superficially  resembles  it  and  which  moreover  is  to  be  found  in 
its  territory.  Lytta  molesta  Horn  is  generally  broader  and  more 
robust ; with  the  head  more  quadrate ; the  prothorax  much 
broader,  flatter,  subangulate  at  sides,  the  orange  markings  lateral ; 
and  the  males  with  the  hind  trochanters  definitely  spined.  The 
orange  markings  of  maculicollis  are  quite  variable.  In  a few 
specimens  the  apical  two-thirds  of  the  prothorax  is  orange,  in 
most  an  inverted  U-shaped  spot  is  to  be  found,  in  others  there  are 
only  lateral  spots  while  in  a few  specimens,  the  prothorax  is  en- 
tirely black.  These  last  might  be  confused  with  Lytta  insperata 
Horn  which  they  simulate  but  the  spined  hind  trochanters  of  the 
males  of  the  latter  will  separate  them.  Lytta  hoppingi  Wellm., 
another  species  of  the  safne  general  territory,  with  bicolored  pro- 
thorax, is  narrower,  with  the  prothorax  more  cylindrical  and  the 
orange  spots  of  the  same  always  lateral,  as  well  as  with  the  entire 
upper  surface  sparsely  pilose. 

Lytta  auriculata  Horn 

This  species  is  represented  in  the  arid  parts  of  the  western  San 
Joaquin  Valley  by  a phase  which  is  entirely  unicolorous,  also 
somewhat  more  of  a bottle  green  than  the  more  typical  southern 
specimens. 

Lytta  lecontei  Heyden 

This  name  should  replace  that  of  Lytta  dichroa  (Lee.).  Le- 
Conte  named  his  species  in  1853,  but  Fischer  used  the  same  name 
in  1823  for  a species  from  southern  Russia.  Heyden  in  1890 


132  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


detected  the  duplication  and  suggested  the  name  lecontei  for  Le- 
Conte’s  species. 

Colospasta  elegans  (Lee.)  and  Colospasta  perpulchra  Horn 
Upon  critically  examining  my  series  of  these  two  so-called  spe- 
cies, I find  that  each  not  only  varies  considerably  as  to  color  but 
also  as  to  sculpture  and  that  they  grade  into  each  other  in  inter- 
mediate territory.  Typical  specimens  of  perpulchra  as  stated  by 
Horn2  have  the  head  and  prothorax  quite  smooth  but  others  found 
with  typical  specimens  have  the  same  parts  as  evidently  punctured 
as  they  normally  are  in  elegans.  There  being  no  other  good  char- 
acters to  separate  them,  I would  in  consequence  class  them  as 
but  one  species.  In  the  hills  bordering  the  southwestern  part  of 
the  San  Joaquin  Valley,  there  occurs  an  entirely  blue  phase.  This, 
I would  call  the  subspecies  cyanea  and  designate  as  the  Holotype 
(No.  2604,  Mus.  Calif.  Acad.  Sci.),  a specimen  collected  on  Mt. 
Pinos,  eastern  Kern  Co.,  Calif.,  June  18,  1904,  by  Mr.  Fordyce 
Grinnell.  The  head  and  prothorax  in  the  three  specimens  which 
I possess  are  quite  smooth  as  in  perpulchra.  I would  indicate 
the  various  named  phases  of  elegans  as  follows : 

Colospasta  elegans  (Lee.) 
var.  humeralis  Horn 
subsp.  perpulchra  Horn 
subsp.  cyanea  n.  subsp. 

Zonitis  arizonica  n.  sp. 

Narrow  and  elongate,  subopaque,  finely  pubescent;  testace- 
ous, eyes,  apices  of  mandibles,  terminal  segments  of  palpi, 
apices  of  femora  and  tibiae,  greater  portion  of  tarsi  and 
abdomen  black  or  piceous.  Head  triangular,  tempora  prom- 
inent, front  rather  coarsely,  closely  punctured ; eyes  large  and 
convex,  slightly  emarginate  in  front,  separated  anteriorly  by 
a distance  equal  to  their  width,  beneath  by  only  the  narrow 
gula ; antennae  slender  and  long,  two  thirds  the  length  of  the 
body,  segment  two  three  fourths  length  of  three,  fourth  but 
one  fourth  longer  than  three  and  subequal  to  fifth,  sixth 
slightly  longer  and  narrower,  the  following  gradually  shorter. 
Prothorax  about  as  long  as  broad,  flattened  on  disk  sub- 


2 Notes  on  Coleoptera  by  George  H.  Horn,  Proc.  Am.  Phil. 
Soc.,  Vol.  XXIX  (1891),  pp.  99-102. 


June,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  133 


campanulate,  broadest  at  base,  sides  sinuate  just  in  front, 
thence  almost  parallel  to  beyond  middle  and  oblique  and 
slightly  rounded  to  apex,  densely  rather  coarsely  punctured, 
with  median  longitudinal  line  vaguely  impressed.  Scutellum 
densely,  finely  punctured.  Elytra  about  three  times  as  long 
as  broad,  very  densely,  rather  coarsely  and  more  or  less  con- 
fluently  punctured.  Beneath  slightly  more  shining,  rather 
closely  and  finely  punctured.  Hind  tibial  spurs  short,  stout, 
concave  and  subequal.  Length  n mm.,  breadth  3.25  mm. 

Male  with  fifth  ventral  impressed  at  apex,  the  sixth  deeply 
triangularly  emarginate. 

Holotype  (No.  2605,  Mus.  Calif.  Acad.  Sci.)  and  one  parotype 
in  the  museum  of  the  California  Academy  of  Sciences,  the  first 
from  six  miles  south  of  Florence,  Ariz.,  July  23,  1924,  the  second 
from  near  Tucson,  Ariz.,  Aug.  11,  1924,  both  collected  by  Mr.  E. 
P.  Van  Duzee. 

This  species  is  in  color,  size  and  physical  characters  probably 
quite  close  to  Zonitis  megalops3  Champ,  from  Guatemala,  but  it 
differs  in  several  ways.  In  the  latter,  there  is  a vague  median 
vitta  on  the  prothorax  and  scutellum,  the  antennae  are  somewhat 
annulated,  and  the  femora  are  barred  at  the  middle ; in  the 
antennae  the  second  and  third  segments  are  subequal,  fourth 
nearly  twice  the  length  of  the  third  and  the  fourth  to  the  sixth 
subequal ; the  prothorax  longer  than  broad  and  finely  punctured ; 
and  the  elytra  very  densely  and  finely  punctured.  From  the  lighter 
phases  of  the  two  large  eyed  species  of  our  own  country  which 
belong  in  the  same  group  with  it,  it  can  be  readily  separated, 
uittipennis  Horn  having  the  prothorax  and  elytra  very  sparsely 
punctured  and  longicornis  Horn,  the  elytra  proportionally  shorter 
and  broader  as  well  as  much  more  finely  punctured  and  the  inter- 
mediate antennal  segments  shorter.  Typical  specimens  of  the 
two  last  can  of  course  always  be  separated  by  their  vittate  mark- 
ings. 

3 Biol.  Centr.-Amer.,  Coleopt.,  vol.  IV,  pt.  2 (Feb.,  1892),  pp. 
.386-387. 


134  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiV 


THE  GENUS  ANTEOS  HUBNER  (LEPIDOPTERA, 
PIERIDAE). 

Generic  Status  and  Relationships,  and  Male  Genitalia,  with  a 
Description  of  a New  Structure  in  the  Rhodocerini. 

By  Alex.  B.  Klots,  Ithaca,  N.  Y. 

As  pointed  out  by  Godman  and  Salvin  (i)  the  New  World 
species  generally  placed  in  the  Old  World  genus  Gonepteryx 
Leach  are  worthy  of  generic  distinction.  To  these  the  generic 
name  Anteos  Hubner  applies  (2).  Rober  (3)  along  with  other 
authors  has  advocated  placing  these  species  under  Amynthia 
Swainson  (4),  but  this  name  is  of  later  date  than  Anteos  and 
therefore  a synonym.  In  spite  of  his  own  suggestion  Rober  places 
them  in  Gonepteryx. 

Three  very  distinct  species  are  known,  maerula  Fabricius,  clo- 
rinde  Godart  and  menippe  Hubner.  Maerula  is  the  type  of  the 
genus,  having  been  so  designated  by  Godman  and  Salvin  ( 1 ) . 

Menippe  was  tentatively  placed  in  Catopsilia  by  Forbes  (5)  on 
the  basis  of  the  rounded  secondaries  and  the  rudimentary  hair- 
pencil  on  the  primaries.  Although  menippe  does  indeed  differ 
from  maerula  and  clorinde  in  various  characters  in  which  it 
more  or  less  resembles  Catopsilia,  these  characters  seem  insig- 
nificant compared  with  its  striking  similarity  to  maerula  and 
clorinde  in  the  male  genitalia. 

In  making  any  comparison  with  Catopsilia,  however,  we  must 
first  define  Catopsilia,  inasmuch  as  structurally  the  Old  World 
species  of  Catopsilia  are  exceedingly  distinct  from  the  New 
World  species.  This  difference  is  so  marked  that  the  writer  pro- 
poses to  treat  of  it  in  a later  paper.  For  the  present  purposes  of 
comparison  the  Old  World  and  the  New  World  Catopsilia  have 
been  treated  as  distinct  groups,  with  C.  florella  as  representative 
of  the  Old  World  group  and  C.  statira  and  rurina  for  the  New 
World. 


Description  of  Terms  Used. 

Male  genitalia. 

Basal  Prong  of  Uncus.  (See  Figs.  9 and  10.) — A small  lobe 
located  dorsally  near  base  of  uncus.  Note  that  the  presence  of 


June,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  135 


this  structure  is  correlated  with  the  presence  of  the  basal  prong 
of  the  penis. 

Harpe  and  its  Lobes. — In  A.  menippe  (Fig.  9)  only  one  dorsal 
lobe  is  present,  but  in  A.  maerula  and  clorinde  (Figs.  11  and  12) 
and  in  Old  World  Catopsilia  (Fig.  10)  two  are  present.  The 
more  basal  I have  designated  “dorsal  lobe  a.”  Dorsal  lobe  a is 
evidently  a thickened  portion  of  the  infolded  edge  of  the  harpe, 
and  bears  strong  setae  distally.  Dorsal  lobe  b is  in  Anteos  and 
Old  World  Catopsilia  a more  or  less  trough  shaped  structure, 
heavily  chitinized  along  its  distal  edge.  In  Gonepteryx  (Fig.  2) 
it  is  merely  a pointed  heavily  chitinized  lobe,  while  in  New  World 
Catopsilia  it  shows  high  development  (Figs.  1 and  4). 

The  distal  process  is  comparatively  simple  in  all  the  groups 
except  New  World  Catopsilia  where  it  often  shows  some  evidence 
of  bifurcation  and  bears  heavily  chitinized  teeth  (Fig.  1). 

Ventral  lobe  a arises,  as  does,  dorsal  lobe  a,  from  the  infolding 
of  the  edge  of  the  harpe,  is  rounded  and  bears  strong  setae.  It 
is  absent  in  the  New  World  Catopsilia  (except  statira  where  it 
is  exceedingly  weak)  and  in  Gonepteryx.  It  is  small,  fairly 
heavily  chitinized,  and  probably  arises  from  the  distal  process  as 
was  postulated  by  the  writer  for  an  homologous  lobe  in  New 
World  Eurema  (6). 

Penis.  The  basal  prong  of  the  penis  appears  to  be  present 
always  when  the  basal  prong  of  the  uncus  is  present.  The 
variously  heavily  chitinized  teeth  on  the  penis  are  relatively  con- 
stant in  presence  and  position.  In  Anteos  they  furnish  characters 
for  differentiation  of  the  species.  (See  Figs.  9,  11,  12.) 

The  Raised  Line  (See  Figs.  3,  5-8). 

This  curious  structure,  if  I may  call  it  a structure,  has  not,  as 
far  as  can  be  determined,  hitherto  been  noticed  or  used  in  classifi- 
cation. It  consists  of  a narrow  line  on  the  primaries  above, 
formed  by  a double  or  triple  row  of  scales  which  are  raised  up 
more  or  less  on  end.  Needless  to  say  it  is  rather  hard  to  see 
and  does  not  show  on  rubbed  specimens  nor  on  those  in  which 
the  wings  have  been  pressed  down  hard  by  glass  on  the  mounting 
board.  It  is  best  seen  by  examining  the  wing  with  a strong  light 
striking  it  at  a very  acute  angle. 

I should  hesitate  to  make  use  of  so  minute  and  evanescent  a 
character  were  it  not  for  the  fact  that  examination  of  a large 
series  of  specimens  has  shown  it  to  be  constant  in  position  and  to 


136  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


correlate  well  with  structural  characters  of  undoubted  value.  It 
has  been  noted  on  species  of  all  the  groups  of  Eurymus  ( Colias ) 
and  Meganostoma,  on  Teriocolias,  Dercas  and  Eurema,  on 
Gonepteryx,  Anteos,  Nathalis,  Kricogonia,  and  on  both  New  and 
Old  World  Catopsilia.  In  all  of  these  its  position  is  definite.  In 
some  cases  specific  differences  are  shown,  in  other  cases  generic 
differences.  The  structure  seems  to  be  limited  to  the  Rhodocerini. 

The  origin  of  the  raised  line  is  hard  to  state,  especially  at  this 
early  date.  A guess,  which  may  prove  to  be  correct,  is  that  it  is 
caused  by  the  silk  band  or  thread  around  the  pupa. 

The  line  is  most  easily  seen  in  Gonepteryx  where  it  appears  to 
point  out  a specific  difference  between  rhamni  and  cleopatra. 

Comparison  of  Anteos  with  Catopsilia  and  Gonepteryx. 
As  the  data  do  not  readily  lend  themselves  to  a tabular  arrange- 
ment the  groups  under  consideration  are  compared  structure  by 
structure  as  follows : 

Apex  of  Primary: 

Anteos — 

a.  menippe — rounded,  slightly  falcate. 

b.  maerula  and  clorinde — bluntly  pointed,  strongly  falcate. 
Old  World  Catopsilia— rounded,  not  falcate  or  very  slightly  so. 
New  World  Catopsilia — 

a.  avellanada— rounded,  slightly  falcate. 

b.  other  species — rounded,  not  falcate. 

Gonepteryx— acute,  slightly  to  strongly  falcate. 

Outer  Margin  of  Secondary : 

Anteos — - 

a.  menippe — rounded,  slightly  scalloped  between  veins; 

b.  maerula  and  clorinde — acutely  tailed  at  M3  (cf.  Gonep- 

teryx) . 

Old  World  Catopsilia — rounded,  slightly  scalloped  between 
veins. 

New  World  Catopsilia — 

a.  majority  of  species— rounded,  slightly  scalloped  between 

veins. 

b.  neocipris — a rounded  tail  at  2d  A. 

Gonepteryx — acutely  tailed  at  Cu^ 

Venation  of  Primary: 

Anteos — 

a.  menippe — M4  stalked  on  R3  + R4+5  very  slightly  more  than 
half  way  out  from  cell  to  base  of  R4+5 ; distance  from 


June,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  137 


base  of  R2  to  end  of  cell  very  slightly  greater  than 
length  of  middle  discocellular. 

b.  maerula  and  clorinde — M1  stalked  on  R3  + R4+5  consider- 
ably more  than  half  way  out  from  cell  to  base  of  R4+5 ; 
distance  from  R2  to  end  of  cell  very  slightly  less  than 
length  of  middle  discocellular. 

Old  World  Catopsilia — M4  stalked  on  R3  + R4+5  about  half  way 
out  from  cell  to  base  of  R4+5 ; distance  from  R2  to  end  of  cell 
less  than  length  of  middle  discocellular. 

New  World  Catopsilia — M4  stalked  on  R3  + R4+5  from  1/3  to 
1/2  way  out  from  cell  to  base  of  R4+5 ; distance  from  R2  to 
end  of  cell  averaging  equal  to  length  of  middle  discocellular. 
Gonepteryx — M4  stalked  on  R3  + R4+5  from  1/3  to  slightly  less 
than  1/2  way  out  from  cell  to  base  of  R4+5;  distance  from 
R2  to  end  of  cell  from  2 to  3 times  the  length  of  the  middle 
discocellular. 

Scent  Patches  and  Hair  Pencils  on  Males: 

Anteos — present  in  all  species. 

Old  World  Catopsilia — present  in  all  species. 

New  World  Catopsilia — absent  in  a number  of  species. 

Gonep  teryx — absent . 

Raised  Line: 

Anteos — indistinct,  running  from  inner  margin  into  cell  at  or 
slightly  above  base  of  Cu2. 

Old  World  Catopsilia — indistinct,  running  from  inner  margin 
into  cell  at  or  slightly  above  base  of  Cu2. 

New  World  Catopsilia — 

a.  majority  of  species — runs  from  inner  margin  distad  of 

cell,  cutting  M3  distad  of  cell. 

b.  agarithe  and  trite — runs  from  inner  margin  into  cell  about 

base  of  Cu4. 

Gonepteryx — very  distinct,  running  from  inner  margin  distad 
of  cell,  cutting  M3  distad  of  the  cell  a distance  equal  to  the 
length  of  the  lower  discocellular  in  rhamni  and  twice  the 
length  of  the  lower  discocellular  in  cleopatra. 

Harpe: 

Anteos — wider  than  long. 

Old  World  Catopsilia — wider  than  long. 

New  World  Catopsilia— longer  than  wide. 

Gonepteryx — longer  than  wide. 

Dorsal  Lobe  a of  Harpe: 

Anteos — 

a.  menippe — absent  or  very  weak. 


138  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXlV 


b.  maerula  and  clorinde — present,  fairly  strong,  rounded, 
setiferous. 

Old  World  Catopsilia — present,  strong,  rounded,  setiferous. 
New  World  Catopsilia — usually  absent,  very  weak  if  present. 
Gonepteryx — absent. 

Dorsal  Lobe  b of  Harpe: 

Anteos — present. 

Old  World  Catopsilia — present. 

New  World  Catopsilia — present,  very  highly  developed. 
Gonepteryx — present,  very  simple. 

Ventral  Lobe  a of  Harpe: 

Anteos — present,  well  developed,  rounded,  setiferous. 

Old  World  Catopsilia — present,  well  developed,  rounded, 
setiferous. 

New  World  Catopsilia — very  weak,  seldom  present. 
Gonepteryx — absent. 

Ventral  Lobe  b of  Harpe: 

Anteos — absent. 

Old  World  Catopsilia — absent. 

New  World  Catopsilia — absent. 

Gonepteryx — present,  small. 

Basal  Prong  of  Uncus: 

Anteos — present. 

Old  World  Catopsilia — present. 

New  World  Catopsilia — absent. 

Gonepteryx — absent. 

Basal  Prong  of  Penis: 

Anteos — present. 

Old  World  Catopsilia — present. 

New  World  Catopsilia — absent. 

Gonepteryx — absent. 

Chitinous  Teeth  on  Penis: 

Anteos — present. 

Old  World  Catopsilia — present,  sometimes  reduced. 

New  World  Catopsilia — absent. 

Gonepteryx — absent. 

Sac c us: 

Anteos — short,  thick,  less  than  half  the  length  of  the  vinculum. 
Old  World  Catopsilia — short,  thick,  less  than  half  the  length  of 
the  vinculum. 

New  World  Catopsilia — long,  slender,  more  than  3/4  the  length 
of  the  vinculum. 


J wie,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  139 


Gonepteryx — long,  slender,  more  than  3/4  the  length  of  the 
vinculum. 

Distal  Process  of  Harpe: 

Anteos — short,  curved  (rounded  in  maerula). 

Old  World  Catopsilia — short,  rounded. 

New  World  Catopsilia — long,  strongly  developed. 

Gonepteryx — long,  curved. 

Summary  and  Conclusions. 

A study  of  the  foregoing  data  shows  that  Anteos  is  undoubt- 
edly closely  related  to  the  Old  World  species  of  Catopsilia , while 
in  almost  every  character  it  shows  strong  differences  from 
Gonepteryx.  Leaving  aside  the  relationships  of  Catopsilia,  which 
will  be  covered  in  a later  paper,  the  writer  postulates  the  follow- 
ing conclusions : 

(1)  Anteos  Hiibner  is  generically  exceedingly  distinct  from 
Gonepteryx  Leach. 

(2)  Anteos  is  closely  related  to  the  Old  World  species  of 
Catopsilia  and  more  distantly  related  to  the  New  World  species 
of  Catopsilia. 

(3)  The  species  menippe  Hiibner  should  be  placed  in  Anteos, 
where  it  forms  a connecting  link  between  the  other  two  species 
and  Old  World  Catopsilia. 

Generic  Characters,  Anteos  Hubner. 

Size  very  large,  averaging  from  80-90  mm.  Primaries 
above  with  a large  brownish  black  discocellular  dot.  Males 
with  a hair  pencil  on  base  of  inner  margin  of  primaries  and 
a patch  of  scent  scales  on  base  of  secondaries  above  Rs. 
Apex  of  primaries  rounded,  more  or  less  falcate.  R4  and 
R5  anastomosed,  stalked  with  Rs.  M4  stalked  on  R3  + R4  + 5 
more  than  half  way  from  cell  to  base  of  R4+5.  Middle 
discocellular  of  both  wings  at  least  two-thirds  as  long 
as  lower  discocellular.  Raised  line  on  primaries  above 
running  from  inner  margin  into  cell  at  or  slightly  above  base 
of  Cu2.  Uncus  with  a basal  prong.  Saccus  short,  thick, 
less  than  half  the  length  of  the  vinculum.  Harpe  short  and 
wide  with  a short  distal  process,  at  least  one  dorsal  lobe 
which  is  strongly  chitinized  along  one  edge,  and  a short 
rounded  ventral  lobe  which  bears  strong  setae.  Penis  with 
a strong  basal  prong  and  two  or  more  strongly  chitinized 
teeth  distally. 


140  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXlY 


Key  to  Species,  Males.  ( Superficial  characters.) 

1.  Primaries  above  with  a narrow  black  apical  border  and  an 

apical  orange  patch ; apex  of  primaries  not  strongly  falcate ; 
secondaries  not  strongly  tailed  at  Mt ; scent  patch  extending 
from  Rs  to  Sc  + Ra  basally  and  apically  along  Rs  past  end 
of  cell,  brownish ; inner  margin  of  primary  strongly  bowed 
down  at  about  middle;  costa  of  primary  lightly  serrate. 

menippe  Hiibner. 

Primaries  above  with  no  apical  markings ; apex  of  primaries 
strongly  falcate ; secondaries  strongly  tailed  at  M1 ; scent 
patch  whitish  or  not  reaching  Sc  + Rx ; inner  margin  of 
primary  slightly  bowed  downward ; costa  of  primary 
strongly  serrate 2 

2.  Wings  above  yellow,  no  discocellular  dot  on  secondaries 

above ; scent  patch  large,  extending  basally  from  Rs  to 
Sc  + R-l  and  distally  along  Rs  beyond  cell,  whitish. 

maerula  Fabricius. 

Wings  above  white  with  a transverse  yellow-orange  patch  ex- 
tending from  costa  of  primaries  across  end  of  cell,  and  a 
brownish  black  discocellular  dot  on  secondaries  surrounded 
by  a deep  orange  spot ; scent  patch  small,  not  reaching  half 
way  from  Rs  to  Sc  + R^  brownish clorinde  Godart. 

Key  to  Species,  Males.  ( Structural  characters.) 

1.  Distal  process  of  harpe  long  and  pointed  ; dorsal  lobe  a absent ; 

dorsal  lobe  h longer  than  basal  prong  of  penis ; basal  prong 
of  penis  short  and  rounded  at  the  tip  with  no  areas  of 
heavier  chitinization ; penis  with  two  large  heavily  chitin- 

ized  teeth  at  tip menippe 

Distal  process  of  harpe  shorter,  rounded  or  pointed;  dorsal 
lobe  a present ; dorsal  lobe  h shorter  than  basal  prong  of 
penis ; basal  prong  of  penis  long,  with  the  tip  either  pointed 
or  with  a more  heavily  chitinized  cap ; penis  with  a number 
of  small  heavily  chitinized  teeth  on  distal  half 2 

2.  Distal  process  of  harpe  pointed ; both  dorsal  lobe  a and  ventral 

lobe  narrow,  well  differentiated  from  infolding  of  edge  of 
harpe ; penis  with  a more  heavily  chitinized  cap  on  both  tip 
of  basal  prong  of  penis  and  of  penis  itself ; teeth  on  penis 

small,  limited  to  distal  quarter clorinde 

Distal  process  of  harpe  blunt ; both  dorsal  lobe  a and  ventral 
lobe  hardly  differentiated  from  infolding  of  edge  of  harpe 
except  by  setiferous  area ; basal  prong  of  penis  and  penis 
itself  with  no  more  heavily  chitinized  cap  on  tip ; teeth  on 
penis  larger,  not  limited  to  distal  third maerula 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  XXIV,  No.  3 


Plate  XX 


142  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  V 61.  XXIV 


Bibliography. 

(1)  Godman  & Salvin,  Biol.  Centr.  Amer.  Lep.  Rhop.  II,  148, 

1889. 

(2)  Htibner,  Verz.  bek.  Schmett.  99,  circa  1821. 

(3)  Rober  in  Seitz,  Macrolep.  V,  88,  1910. 

(4)  Swainson,  Zool.  111.  II,  65,  1832-33. 

(5)  Forbes,  Ann.  Ent.  Soc.  Amer.  XX,  no.  4,  474,  Dec.,  1927. 

(6)  Klots,  Journ.  N.  Y.  Ent.  Soc.  XXXVI,  61,  March,  1928. 


Explanation  of  Figures. 

Fig.  1.  Lateral  aspect  $ genitalia  Catopsilia  rurina  Felder,  left 
harpe  removed  showing  ental  aspect  of  right  harpe. 

Fig.  ia.  Enlarged  drawing  of  inner  lobe  of  above. 

Fig.  2.  Lateral  aspect  $ genitalia  Gonepteryx  rhamni  L.,  left 
harpe  removed  showing  ental  aspect  of  right  harpe. 

Fig-  3-  Venation  of  primary,  Catopsilia  philea  L.,  showing  posi- 
tion of  raised  line. 

Fig.  4.  Lateral  aspect  J'  genitalia  Catopsilia  statira  Cramer,  left 
harpe  removed  showing  ental  aspect  of  right  harpe. 

Fig.  4a.  Enlarged  drawing  of  dorsal  lobe  b of  above. 

Fig-  5-  Venation  of  primary,  Gonepteryx  rhamni  L.,  showing 
position  of  raised  line. 

Fig.  6.  Venation  of  primary,  Catopsilia  argante  Fabricius, 
showing  position  of  raised  line. 

Fig.  7.  Venation  of  primary,  Catopsilia  florella  Fabricius, 
showing  position  of  raised  line. 

Fig.  8.  Venation  of  primary,  Anteos  clorinde  Godart,  showing 
position  of  raised  line. 

Fig.  9.  Lateral  aspect  J'  genitalia  Anteos  menippe  Hubner,  left 
harpe  removed  showing  ental  aspect  of  right  harpe. 

Fig.  10.  Lateral  aspect  J'  genitalia  Catopsilia  florella  Fabricius, 
left  harpe  removed  showing  ental  aspect  of  right 
harpe. 

Fig.  11.  Ental  aspect  of  right  harpe  and  lateral  aspect  of  penis, 
Anteos  clorinde. 

Fig.  12.  Ental  aspect  of  right  harpe  and  lateral  aspect  of  penis, 
Anteos  maerula  Fabricius. 


List  of  Symbols. 


bar  = chitinized  bar  of  harpe. 

b.p.p.  = basal  prong  of  penis. 

b.p.u.  = basal  prong  of  uncus. 

d.l.a.  = dorsal  lobe  a. 

d.l .b.  = dorsal  lobe  b. 

d.p.  = distal  process  of  harpe. 

gn.  = gnathos. 


h.  = harpe. 

i. l.  33?  inner  lobe, 

s.  = saccus. 

u.  = uncus. 

v.  = vinculum. 

v.l.a.  = ventral  lobe  a of  harpe. 
v.l.fr.  = ventral  lobe  b of  harpe. 


June,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  143 


RECTIFICATIONS  FOR  BLATCHLEY’S  “ HETEROP- 
TERA  ” WITH  THE  DESCRIPTION  OF  A 
NEW  SPECIES  (HEMIPTERA). 

By  Harry  H.  Knight,  Ames,  Iowa. 

In  a recent  number  of  this  journal,1  Dr.  W.  S.  Blatchley  has 
published  an  article  entitled  “ Quit-claim  specialists  vs.  the  mak- 
ing of  manuals.”  Among  sundry  items  he  has  made  statements 
concerning  the  status  of  certain  species  of  Miridae  which  require 
further  comment. 

Blatchley  refers  to  my  paper  (Ent.  News,  xxxvii,  1926  (Oct.), 
pp.  258-262)  in  which  new  varieties  of  Paracalocoris  externus 
(H.  S.)  are  described,  as  “ issued  Dec.  20,  1926.”  He  is  mis- 
taken in  this  since  the  October  number  of  Entomological  News 
(1926)  was  issued  October  15,  1926.  Such  being  the  case  Dr. 
Blatchley  is  not  obliged  to  assume  authorship  of  these  color  varie- 
ties which  he  names  “ spotted-dogs.” 

Eustictus  filicornis  (Walker). 

1873  Capsus  filicornis  Walker,  Cat.  Heter.,  vi,  p.  96. 

1886  Megacoelum  filicornis  Uhler,  Check  List,  p.  18. 

1887  Megacoelum  grossum  Uhler,  Ent.  Amer.,  iii,  p.  70. 

1904  Creontiades  filicornis  Distant,  Ann.  Mag.  Nat.  Hist. 

(ser.  7),  xiii,  p.  106. 

1909  Eustictus  grossus  Reuter,  Acta  Soc.  JSci.  Fenn.,  xxxvi, 

No.  2,  p.  35. 

1917  Cimatlan  grossum  Van  Duzee,  Cat.  Hemiptera,  p.  352. 

1923  Eustictus  grossus  Knight,  Hem.  Conn.,  p.  484. 

1926  Creontiades  filicornis  Blatchley,  Het.  E.  N.  Amer.,  p. 
733- 

1926  Eustictus  grossus  Blatchley,  Het.  E.  N.  Amer.,  p.  884. 

1927  Eustictus  filicornis  Knight,  Bui.  Brook.  Ent.  Soc.,  xxii, 

p.  101. 

1928  Creontiades  filicornis  Blatchley,  Bui.  Brook.  Ent.  Soc., 

xxiii,  p.  16. 

1928  Eustictus  filicornis  Blatchley,  Jl.  N.  Y.  Ent.  Soc., 

xxxvi,  p.  11. 

In  commenting  on  this  species  I wrote  ( 1927)  as  follows : 
“ Mr.  W.  E.  China  writes  me  that  the  type  filicornis  Walk,  runs 
in  my  keys  (Hemiptera  of  Connecticut)  to  Eustictus  grossus 


Bui.  Brook.  Ent.  Soc.,  XXIII,  1928,  pp.  10-18. 


144  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  V 61.  XXIV 


Uhler.  Since  this  species  is  such  a distinct  form  there  could 
scarcely  be  any  mistake  in  placing  it  in  the  keys.  It  is  regrettable 
that  Uhler’s  distinctive  name  should  pass  into  synonymy  but  the 
evidence  seems  rather  conclusive.”  In  referring  to  this  species, 
Dr.  Blatchley  (1928,  p.  16)  asks  this  question:  “ If  Knight  thinks 
that  ftlicornis  is  ‘ such  a distinct  form  that  there  could  scarcely  be 
any  mistake  in  placing  it  in  the  keys,’  why  did  he  not  place  it  in 
his  ‘ Monograph  of  Deraeocoris  ’ and  in  the  Hemiptera  of  Con- 
necticut? ” 

Since  the  above  (1927)  was  written  I have  sent  a specimen  of 
grossus  Uhl.  to  Mr.  China  at  the  British  Museum  for  comparison 
with  the  type  of  filicornis  Walker  and  he  reports  that  the  speci- 
mens undoubtedly  belong  to  the  same  species. 

Labops  hirtus  Knight. 

1922  Labops  hirtus  Knight,  Can.  Ent.,  liv,  p.  258. 

1923  Labops  hirtus  Knight,  Hem.  Conn.,  p.  501. 

1926  f Labops  hesperius  Blatchley,  Het.  E.  N.  Amer.,  p.  797. 

1927  Labops  hirtus  Knight,  Bui.  Brook.  Ent.  Soc.,  xxii,  p. 

101. 

1928  f Labops  hesperius  Blatchley,  Bui.  Brook.  Ent.  Soc., 

xxiii,  p.  16. 

In  my  last  reference  to  this  species  (1927),  I took  space  to 
again  point  out  the  differences  between  hesperius  Uhl.  and  hirtus 
Kngt.,  distinctions  which  are  plainly  evident  to  all  students  who 
have  compared  the  two  species.  I am  pleased  to  say  that  in  Sep- 
tember, 1928,  Mr.  Van  Duzee  visited  with  us  at  Ames,  when  I 
had  opportunity  to  have  him  compare  types  of  hirtus  Kngt.  with 
specimens  of  hesperius  Uhl.  that  had  been  compared  with  the  type 
in  the  U.  S.  N.  M.  Mr.  Van  Duzee  was  free  to  admit  that  the 
two  species  are  certainly  distinct,  and  that  he  evidently  did  not 
have  the  true  hesperius  Uhl.  until  I sent  him  specimens. 

Barberiella  apicalis  Knight. 

1923  Barberiella  apicalis  Knight,  Hem.  Connecticut,  p.  657. 

1926  Pilophorus  brimleyi  Blatchley,  Ent.  News,  xxxvii,  p. 

.i65- 

1926  Pilophorus  brimleyi,  Blatchley,  Het.  N.  E.  Amer.,  p. 

808.  _ 

1927  Barberiella  apicalis  Knight,  Bui.  Brook.  Ent.  Soc.,  xxii, 

p.  102. 

1928  Barberiella  brimleyi  Blatchley,  Bui.  Brook.  Ent.  Soc., 

xxiii,  p.  17. 


June,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  145 


1928  Barberiella  brimleyi  Blatchley,  Jl.  N.  Y.  Ent.  Soc., 
xxxvi,  p.  12. 

Through  the  kindness  of  Mr.  C.  S.  Brimley,  I was  able  to  ex- 
amine the  type  of  Pilophorus  brimleyi  Blatchley  while  passing 
through  Raleigh,  N.  C.,  in  September,  1926.  At  that  time  I told 
Mr.  Brimley  that  the  type  was  the  same  as  my  Barberiella  apicalis 
or  a closely  allied  form,  but  I did  not  wish  to  commit  myself  posi- 
tively until  I returned  home  to  examine  the  type  of  apicalis  Kngt. 
Arriving  home  I examined  the  type  of  apicalis  and  became  con- 
vinced that  brimleyi  Blat.  is  identical.  Not  satisfied  with  this,  Dr. 
Blatchley  (1928)  states  his  opinion  that  his  brimleyi  remains  dis- 
tinct until  the  types  are  compared  side  by  side.  Such  a compari- 
son was  entirely  agreeable  to  me,  thus  I suggested  to  Mr.  Brimley 
that  we  send  our  types  to  the  U.  S.  National  Museum  where  vari- 
ous specialists  could  check  the  comparison.  Mr.  Brimley  very 
kindly  sent  his  type  for  this  purpose  so  we  were  able  to  get  an 
“ official  verdict.” 

Concerning  this  comparison  of  the  types,  Dr.  Harold  Morrison 
wrote  as  follows : “ I have  finally  gotten  through  with  what  I con- 
sider to  be  a critical  comparison  of  your  holotype  of  Barberiella 
apicalis  and  the  type  of  Pilophorus  brimleyi  Blatchley.  As  a re- 
sult of  this  examination  it  is  my  opinion  that  the  two  specimens 
represent  the  same  species.”  Further : “ Mr.  McAtee  has  exam- 
ined the  two  specimens  and  has  expressed  to  me  his  belief  that 
they  represent  the  same  species.” 

A few  days  later  Dr.  C.  J.  Drake  visited  Washington  and  made 
comparison  of  the  types.  He  also  reported  that  the  type  speci- 
mens undoubtedly  belong  to  the  same  species. 

Pilophorus  strobicola  Knight. 

1923  f Pilophorus  amoenus  Drake,  N.  Y.  St.  Col.  For.,  Tech. 
Pub.  16  (1922),  p.  78,  fig.  31. 

1923  f Pilophorus  crassipes  Knight,  Hem.  Connecticut,  p. 
S42- 

1926  Pilophorus  strobicola  Knight,  Bui.  Brook.  Ent.  Soc., 
xxi,  p.  19. 

1926  f Pilophorus  amoenus  Blatchley,  Het.  N.  E.  Amer.,  p. 
812,  fig.  179. 

As  yet  I have  been  unable  h>  find  that  I ever  made  the  mistake 
of  labeling  this  species  as  amoenus  Uhler.  In  Dr.  Drake’s  col- 
lection I find  a specimen  of  this  species  bearing  the  label  “ Pilo- 
phorus amoenus  ” but  not  in  the  hand  of  the  present  writer.  I 


146  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


examined  the  type  of  amoenus  Uhler  first  in  1915  and  have  had 
compared  specimens  in  my  collection  ever  since.  In  the  “ Hem- 
iptera  of  Connecticut  ” I considered  this  species  to  represent 
crassipes  Popp.,  but  later,  after  examining  Poppius’s  type  speci- 
mens, I found  the  species  to  be  still  undescribed,  hence  the  name 
Pilophorus  strobicola  Knight  (1926). 

Dicyphus  vestitus  Uhler. 

1895  Dicyphus  vestitus  Uhler,  Hem.  Colorado,  p.  46. 

1917  Dicyphus  vestitus  Van  Duzee,  Cat.  Hemiptera,  p.  371. 

1922  Dicyphus  notatus  Parshley,  S.  Dak.  St.  College,  Tech. 

Bui.  2,  p.  16. 

1926  Dicyphus  notatus  Blatchley,  Het.  N.  E.  Amer.,  p.  909. 

1927  Dicyphus  vestitus  Knight,  Bui.  Brook.  Ent.  Soc.,  xxii, 

p.  104. 

1928  Dicyphus  vestitus  Walley,  Can.  Ent.,  lx,  p.  119. 

When  Mr.  Van  Duzee  visited  Ames  last  fall  (1928),  we  looked 

over  the  species  of  Dicyphus,  and  I am  glad  to  say  that  we  both 
agree  on  the  identity  of  vestitus  Uhl.  In  his  Manual,  Dr.  Blatch- 
ley placed  gracilentus  Parshley  as  a synonym  of  vestitus  Uhler, 
but  I find  in  checking  his  description  of  vestitus,  it  actually  ap- 
plies to  gracilentus  Parsh.  Dr.  Blatchley  states  (1928)  that  he 
“ sent  in  exchange  specimens  of  what  I determined  as  D.  graci- 
lentus Parshley  to  E.  P.  Van  Duzee  ” who  determined  the  same  as 
vestitus  Uhler.  Is  it  not  possible  that  Mr.  Blatchley  actually  sent 
vestitus  Uhler  to  Mr.  Van  Duzee,  but  under  the  name  of  graci- 
lentus Parshley? 

Dicyphus  vestitus  Uhler  does  occur  in  Illinois,  Indiana,  and 
Ohio,  as  there  are  such  specimens  in  my  collection.  For  a key  to 
species  of  Dicyphus  which  is  based  on  authentic  material,  see  the 
paper  by  Mr.  G.  S.  Walley  (Can.  Ent.,  lx,  1928,  p.  119). 

Dicyphus  gracilentus  Parshley. 

1923  Dicyphus  gracilentus  Parshley,  Ent.  News,  xxxiv,  p.  21. 

1926  f Dicyphus  vestitus  Blatchley,  Het.  N.  E.  Amer.,  p.  910. 

1927  Dicyphus  gracilentus  Knight,  Bui.  Brook.  Ent.  Soc., 

xxii,  p.  104. 

1928  Dicyphus  gracilentus  Walley,  Can.  Ent.,  lx,  p.  119. 

I have  pointed  out  above  how  Dr.  Blatchley’s  description  under 
the  name  Dicyphus  vestitus  Uhler  actually  refers  to  gracilentus 
Parshley.  In  a previous  paper  (1927)  I pointed  out  some  of  the 
differences  between  gracilentus  Parsh.  and  vestitus  Uhler  which 
need  not  be  repeated  here.  For  a key  to  the  eastern  species  of 
Dicyphus  see  the  paper  by  Walley  (1928). 


June,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  147 


The  writer  published  a key  to  the  species  of  Macrolophus  (Ent. 
News,  xxxvii,  1926,  pp.  313-316)  describing  two  new  species. 
While  this  paper  was  in  press  the  description  of  M.  tenuicornis 
Blatchley  appeared,  and  I expect  it  may  prove  to  be  the  same  as 
my  longicornis.  However,  Dr.  Blatchley  describes  his  tenuicornis 
thus : “ joint  1 yellow,  the  extreme  tip  and  base  blackish,  more 
than  twice  as  long  as  width  of  vertex.”  Also:  “joint  2,  three 
times  as  long  as  1.”  These  relative  lengths,  if  correct,  should 
separate  my  longicornis  from  tenuicornis  Blat.  But  these  dis- 
crepancies may  arise  from  the  more  accurate  measurements  with 
a micrometer.  In  longicornis  Kngt.  antennal  segment  I (.51 
mm.)  is  scarcely  equal  to  twice  the  width  of  vertex,  black  in  color 
with  a suggestion  of  paler  at  middle;  segment  II  (1.32  mm.)  is 
only  2.6  times  the  length  of  segment  I. 

Unfortunately,  two  printers’  errors  occur  in  my  paper  on  Ma- 
crolophus. One  error  in  the  key  where  “ not  ” was  left  out  of  the 
first  line  was  corrected  by  the  editor  in  the  following  number  of 
Ent.  News.  The  other  I find  in  the  description  of  antennal  seg- 
ments I and  II  of  longicornis.  It  should  read  thus : antennal  seg- 
ment I,  length  .51  mm.,  black,  slightly  paler  on  middle;  II,  1.32 
mm.,  pale,  apex  blackish. 

The  writer  pointed  out  in  an  earlier  paper  (1927)  the  incom- 
plete and  misleading  records  for  specimens  redescribed  by  Dr. 
Blatchley  in  his  Manual.  Accordingly,  I made  a list  of  the  records 
from  Dr.  Blatchley’s  book  which  I knew  to  be  material  collected 
and  determined  by  myself,  and  in  a few  cases  specimens  collected 
by  others  but  determined  by  me  and  placed  in  the  Minnesota  Uni- 
versity collection.  I sent  a list  of  60  species  of  Miridae,  which 
Dr.  Blatchley  designates  “(Minn.  Univ.  Coll.)”  following  the 
month  and  day  which  he  cites,  to  Dr.  C.  E.  Mickel  now  in  charge 
of  the  Minnesota  collection,  with  the  request  that  he  fill  in  the 
missing  data  just  as  he  finds  it  on  the  pin  labels.  Dr.  Mickel  very 
kindly  complied  with  this  request  thus  I present  the  records  as 
returned  to  me.  The  name  of  the  species  is  given  first,  after  that 
the  month  and  day  as  recorded  by  Dr.  Blatchley,  and  following 
that  in  brackets  is  the  data  supplied  by  Dr.  Mickel,  indicating  the 
collector.  Specimens  bearing  paratype  labels  are  also  indicated. 
Many  of  these  specimens  represent  first  records  for  the  state  of 
Minnesota  and  as  such  I wish  to  have  them  recorded  with  com- 
plete data. 


148  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Veil.  XXIV 


1.  Psallus  piceicola  Kngt.  Canby,  Minn.,  June  24  [H.  H. 

Knight] . 

2.  Psallus  parshleyi  Kngt.  Hennepin  Co.,  Minn.,  Aug.  2 [H. 

H.  Knight,  paratype]. 

3.  Psallus  morrisoni  Kngt.  Cramer,  Minn.,  Aug.  10  [H.  H. 

Knight] . 

Lake  Co.,  Minn.,  Aug.  15  [H.  H.  Knight]. 

4.  Psallus  alnicenatus  Kngt.  Ithaca,  New  York,  July  26  [H. 

H.  Knight,  paratype] . 

5.  Psallus  strobicola  Kngt.  St.  Anthony  Pk.,  Minn.,  July  14 

[H.  H.  Knight]. 

6.  Campylomma  verbasci  Mey.  Le  Sueur  Co.,  Minn.,  Sept.  13 

[no  collector  named]. 

7.  Chlamydatus  pulicarius  (Fall.).  Rock  City,  New  York,  July 

4 [H.  H.  Knight]. 

8.  Microsynamma  bohemanni  Fall.  Honeoye  Falls,  N.  Y.,  June 

27  [H.  H.  Knight]. 

9.  Plagiognathus  caryae  Kngt.  Ithaca,  N.  Y.,  June  22  [H.  H. 

Knight,  paratype]. 

10.  Plagiognathus  delicatus  Uhl.  Batavia,  N.  Y.,  June  25  [H.  H. 

Knight] . 

11.  Plagiognathus  chrysanthemi  (Wolff).  Ithaca,  N.'Y.,  June 

30  [no  collector]. 

12.  Plagiognathus  punctatipes  Kngt.  Ithaca,  N.  Y.,  June  27 

[H.  H.  Knight,  paratype]. 

13.  Plagiognathus  alboradialis  Kngt.  Cranberry  Lake,  N.  Y. 

[C.  J.  Drake,  paratype]. 

14.  Plagiognathus  laricicola  Kngt.  Ithaca,  N.  Y.,  June  27  [H. 

H.  Knight,  paratype]. 

15.  Plagiognathus  repetitus  Kngt.  Whiteface,  Mt.,  N.  Y.,  Aug. 

22  [H.  H.  Knight,  paratype]. 

16.  Micro phylellus  tsugae  Kngt.  Tompkins  Co.,  N.  Y.,  July  3 

[H.  H.  Knight,  paratype]. 

17.  Micro  phylellus  nigricornis  Kngt.  Ithaca,  N.  Y.,  July  7 [H. 

H.  Knight,  paratype]. 

18.  Micro  phylellus  maculipennis  Kngt.  St.  Anthony  Pk.,  Minn.,. 

June  10  [H.  H.  Knight,  paratype]. 
iq.  Macrotylus  sex-quttatus  Prov.  Cook  Co.,  Minn.,  Aug.  14 
[H.  H.  Knight]. 

20.  Eustictus  satiric oFa  Kngt.  New  Ulm,  Minn.,  June  20  [H. 
H.  Knight,  paratype]. 

St.  Paul,  Minn.,  July  18  [H.  H.  Knight,  paratype]. 


June,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  149 


21.  Noctuocoris  fumidus  V.  D.  St.  Anthony  Pk.,  Minn.,  June 

25  [W.  E.  Hoffmann]. 

22.  Orthotylus  modestus  V.D.  Batavia,  N.  Y.,  July  19  [H.  H. 

Knight] . 

23.  Orthotylus  alni  Kngt.  Beaver  Bay,  Minn.,  Aug.  20  [H.  H. 

Knight] . 

24.  Orthotylus  serus  V.  D.  Batavia,  N.  Y.,  July  5 [H.  H. 

Knight]. 

25.  Orthotylus  submarginatus  Say.  Ithaca,  N.  Y.,  July  7 [H. 

H.  Knight]. 

26.  Orthotylus  necopinus  V.  D.  Fairbault,  Minn.,  June  12  [H. 

H.  Knight]. 

27.  Orthotylus  candidatus  V.  D.  Two  Harbors,  Minn.,  Aug.  9 

[H.  H.  Knight]. 

28.  Diaphnidia  capitata  V.  D.  Cloquet,  Minn.,  Aug.  1 [A.  A. 

Nichol] . 

29.  Diaphnidia  provancheri  (Burque).  St.  Anthony  Pk.,  June 

18  [H.  H.  Knight]. 

30.  Lopidea  salicis  Kngt.  Ramsey  Co.,  Minn.,  June  27  [H.  H. 

Knight] . 

31.  Lopidea  cuneata  V.  D.  Gray  Cloud  Is.,  Minn.,  July  12 

[H.  H.  Knight]. 

Ramsey  Co.,  Minn.,  July  20  [H.  H.  Knight]. 

32.  Ilnacora  divisa  Reut.  Ft.  Snelling,  Minn.,  July  12  [A.  T. 

Hertig] . 

33.  Lopidea  marginalis  Reut.  Willow  River,  Minn.,  Aug.  7 [H. 

H.  Knight]. 

34.  Ceratocapsus  incisus  Kngt.  Ithaca,  N.  Y.,  July  26  [H.  H. 

Knight,  paratype]. 

35.  Ceratocapsus  fuscinus  Kngt.  Batavia,  N.  Y.,  Aug.  10  [H. 

H.  Knight,  paratype]. 

Ramsey  Co.,  Minn.,  July  11  [H.  H.  Knight]. 

36.  Ceratocapsus  nigrocephalus  Kngt.  St.  Anthony  Pk.,  Minn., 

July  5-6  [H.  H.  Knight]. 

37.  Pilophorus  juniperi  Kngt.  Gray  Cloud  Is.,  Minn.,  July  20 

[H.  H.  Knight,  paratype]. 

38.  Pilophorus  uhleri  Kngt.  Batavia,  N.  Y.,  July  14  [H.  H. 

Knight,  paratype] . 

Olivia,  Minn.,  June  28  [H.  H.  Knight,  autotype]. 

39.  Xenoborus  pettiti  Reut.  Ramsey  Co.,  Minn.,  June  15  [H. 

H.  Knight]. 


150  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXIV 


40.  Xenoborus  plagifer  Reut.  Carlton  Co.,  Minn.,  Aug.  18  [H. 

H.  Knight]. 

41.  Neoborus  rufusculus  Kngt.  Lakeland,  Minn.,  June  14  [H. 

H.  Knight].  • 

42.  Neoborus  glaber  Kngt.  St.  Anthony  'Pk.,  Minn.,  June  6 

[H.  H.  Knight]. 

43.  Lygus  alni  Kngt.  Beaver  Bay,  Minn.,  Aug.  20  [H.  H. 

Knight]. 

44.  Lygus  approximatus  Stal.  Whiteface  Mt.,  N.  Y.,  Aug.  22 

[H.  H.  Knight]. 

45. '  Lopidea  lathyri  Kngt.  Anoka  Co.,  Minn.,  July  6 [H.  H. 

Knight,  paratype]. 

46.  Platylygus  luridus  Reut.  Ithaca,  N.  Y.,  July  13  [H.  H. 

Knight] . 

47.  Lygidea  obscura  Reut.  Honeoye  Falls,  N.  Y.,  June  27  [H. 

H.  Knight] . 

48.  Lygidea  viburni  Kngt.  Batavia,  N.  Y.,  June  24  [H.  H. 

Knight,  paratype], 

49.  Dichrooscytus  viridicans  Kngt.  New  Ulm,  Minn.,  June  20 

[H.  H.  Knight]. 

50.  Phytocoris  depictus  Kngt.  St.  Anthony  Pk.,  Minn.,  Aug.  11. 

[There  is  a series  of  specimens  (paratypes)  of  this 
date,  collector  H.  H.  Knight ; there  is  also  one  spec- 
imen of  this  date,  no  collector  label.  I do  not  know 
‘ which  one  I sent.] 

51.  Phytocoris  erectus  V.  D.  Norman  Co.,  Minn.,  July  17  [A. 

A.  Nichol] . 

52.  Phytocoris  spicatus  Kngt.  Norman  Co.,  Minn.,  June  25  [A. 

A.  Nichol]. 

53.  Phytocoris  pinicola  Kngt.  Ithaca,  N.  Y.,  July  11  [H.  H. 

Knight] . 

54.  Phytocoris  diver sus  Kngt.  Carlton  Co.,  Minn.,  Aug.  18 

[H.  H.  Knight]. 

S5-  Phytocoris  sulcatus  Kngt.  St.  Anthony  Pk.,  Minn.,  Aug.  5 
[H.  H.  Knight]. 

56.  Phytocoris  corticevivens  Kngt.  Ramsey  Co.,  Minn.,  June  2 

[no  such  specimen  in  our  collection]. 

57.  Phytocoris  conspurcatus  Kngt.  St.  Anthony  Pk.,  Minn., 

Aug.  5 [H.  H.  Knight]. 

58.  Parac  aloe  oris  heidemanni  Reut.  LeRoy,  Alabama,  June  12 

[H.  H.  Knight]. 


June,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  151 


59.  Platytylellus  borealis  Kngt.  Morrison  Co.,  Minn.,  July  10 

[A.  A.  Nichol] . 

60.  Platytylellus  rubellicollis  Kngt.  St.  Anthony  Pk.,  Minn., 

June  2.  [There  are  specimens  dated  July  2 and 
June  21,  both  collected  (H.  H.  Knight),  but  no 
specimen  of  June  2 in  our  collection.] 

A good  many  species  credited  to  Mr.  Gerhard  in  Blatchley’s 
Manual  were  collected,  named  and  presented  to  Mr.  Gerhard  by 
myself.  Accordingly,  I made  up  a list  of  21  species  and  sent  to 
Mr.  Gerhard  with  request  for  complete  record  of  data  on  the 
labels.  Mr.  Gerhard  very  kindly  complied  with  this  request,  thus 
I present  the  data  in  brackets. 

1.  Phytocoris  fulvus  Kngt.  Wanakena,  N.  Y.,  Aug.  1—7  [Col. 

by  C.  J.  Drake,  det.  by  H.  H.  Knight ; paratype] . 

2.  Lygus  belfragii  Reut.  Batavia,  N.  Y.,  July  31  [H.  H. 

Knight,  det.  H.  H.  Knight;  2 paratypes]. 

3.  Lygus  tiliae  Kngt.  Portage,  N.  Y.,  June  27  [Col.  H.  H. 

Knight,  det.  H.  H.  Knight;  2 paratypes]. 

4.  Lygus  viburni  Kngt.  Batavia,  N.  Y.,  June  15  [Col.  H.  H. 

Knight,  det.  H.  H.  Knight;  2 paratypes]. 
y Lyqus  atritylus  Kngt.  Wanakena,  N.  Y.,  July  is  [Col.  C.  J. 
Drake,  det.  H.  H.  Knight]. 

6.  Lygus  ostryae  Kngt.  Portage,  N.  Y.,  June  27  [Col.  H.  H. 

Knight,  det.  H.  H.  Knight;  paratype]. 

Parry  Sound,  Ont.,  Aug.  7 [Col.  H.  S.  Parish,  det.  H. 
H.  Knight;  paratype]. 

7.  Lygus  geneseensis  Kngt.  Portage,  N.  Y.,  June  22  [Col.  H. 

H.  Knight,  det.  H.  H.  Knight;  paratype]. 

8.  Lygus  johnsoni  Kngt.  McLean,  N.  Y.,  July  27  [Col.  H.  H. 

Knight,  det.  H.  H.  Knight;  paratype]. 

Ithaca,  N.  Y.,  June  20  [Col.  H.  H.  Knight,  det.  H.  H. 
Knight;  compared  with  type]. 

9.  Lygus  communis  Kngt.  Batavia,  N.  Y.,  Aug.  - — [Col.  H. 

H.  Knight,  det.  H.  H.  Knight;  4 paratypes]. 

10.  Lygus  univittatus  Kngt.  Ithaca,  N.  Y.,  June  23  [Col.  H.  H. 

Knight,  det.  H.  H.  Knight ; compared  with  type] . 

11.  Lygus  laureae  Kngt.  Rock  City,  N.  Y.,  July  4 [Col.  H.  H. 

Knight,  det.  H.  H.  Knight;  2 paratypes]. 

12.  Lopidea  lathyri  Kngt.  Anoka  Co.,  Minn.,  July  6 [Col.  H.  H. 

Knight,  det.  H.  H.  Knight;  paratype]. 


152  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXlv 


13.  Lopidea  amorpliae  Kngt.  Ramsey  Co.,  Minn.,  July  8,  18 

[Col.  H.  H.  Knight,  det.  H.  H.  Knight;  paratype]. 

14.  Orthotylus  knighti  V.  D.  Attica,  N.  Y.,  July  6 [Col.  H.  H. 

Knight,  det.  H.  H.  Knight;  compared  with  type]. 

15.  Orthotylus  ornatus  V.  D.  Honeoye  Falls,  N.  Y.,  June  27 

[Col.  H.  H.  Knight,  det.  H.  H.  Knight;  compared 
with  type] . 

16.  Deraeocoris  betidae  Kngt.  Ithaca,  N.  Y.,  July  2 [Col.  H.  H. 

Knight,  det.  H.  H.  Knight;  2 paratypes]. 

17.  Deraeocoris  alnicola  Kngt.  McLean  Bogs,  Tompkins  Co., 

N.  Y.,  July  3 [Col.  H.  H.  Knight,  det.  H.  H. 
Knight ; 2 paratypes] . 

18.  Deraeocoris  aphidiphagus  Kngt.  Twin  Lake,  Minn.,  July  3 

(June  29)  [Col.  H.  H.  Knight,  det.  H.  H.  Knight; 
paratype] . 

19.  Deraeocoris  nitenatus  Kngt.  St.  Anthony  Pk.,  Minn.,  Aug.  5 

[Col.  H.  H.  Knight;  compared  with  type]. 

20.  Deraeocoris  laricicola  Kngt.  Ithaca,  N.  Y.,  June  27  [Col.  H. 

H.  Knight,  det.  H.  H.  Knight;  2 paratypes]. 

21.  Deraeocoris  pinicola  Kngt.  Ithaca,  N.  Y.,  July  13  [Col.  H. 

H.  Knight,  det.  H.  H.  Knight;  2 paratypes]. 

A synonym  occurs  in  the  paper  published  by  Dr.  Blatchley 
(Ent.  News,  xxxvii,  1926,  pp.  163-169),  in  which  he  describes 
six  species  of  Miridae.  Three  of  these  are  synonyms  and  now 
Sixeonotus  albicornis  Blat.  is  shown  to  be  identical  with  Sixeo- 
notus  insignis  Reuter  (1876).  For  some  time  I have  been  con- 
vinced that  a southern  species  of  Sixeonotus  which  I have  from 
Texas,  Mississippi,  and  Florida,  represents  insignis  Reut.  de- 
scribed from  Texas  in  1876,  while  the  more  northern  species  from 
Maryland,  District  of  Columbia,  and  North  Carolina  which 
Reuter  (1909)  determined  as  his  insignis,  is  in  fact  an  unnamed 
species. 

During  the  past  year  I have  been  favored  with  the  much  appre- 
ciated services  of  Dr.  H.  B.  Hungerford  in  making  some  com- 
parisons with  Reuter’s  types  of  1876  which  are  still  preserved  in 
the  National  Museum  at  Stockholm.  The  essential  facts  concern- 
ing the  comparison  of  specimens  with  the  type  of  Sixeonotus  in- 
signis Reuter,  I quote  from  Dr.  Hungerford’s  letter  as  follows : 
“ Sixeonotus  insignis  Reut.,  7 specimens,  3J1,  3 J,  and  one  pasted 
so  I can  not  tell ; a J'  is  marked  type  and  each  specimen  bears  the 


June,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  153 


two  labels : ‘ Texas/  ‘ Belfrage.’  At  London,  using  Blatchley’s 
book,  we  had  determined  the  Florida  specimens  to  be  Sixeonotus 
albicornis  Blatch.  and  the  N.  C.  specimens  as  S.  insignis  Reut., 
and  so  reported  to  you.  In  comparing  these  two  species  of  yours 
I find  that  S.  insignis  Reuter  is  like  the  Florida  specimens. 
Therefore  what  China  and  I reported  to  you  as  S.  albicornis 
Blatch.  is  Reuter’s  S.  insignis,  and  the  N.  C.  species  is  something 
else.  After  I had  come  to  this  conclusion  I noticed  that  I could 
see  the  claspers  in  one  of  the  type  specimens,  and  then  relaxed 
and  brought  to  view  the  claspers  in  your  insects  which  confirmed 
my  decision.  So  there  you  are ! ” 

The  results  of  this  comparison  are  very  interesting  in  view  of 
the  fact  that  I sent  Dr.  Hungerford  two  species  of  Sixeonotus 
without  indicating  any  names,  and  merely  asked  him  to  compare 
the  specimens  with  the  type  of  Sixeonotus  insignis  Reuter  (1876) 
and  let  me  know  if  any  of  my  specimens  proved  identical.  Dr. 
Hungerford’s  findings  agree  exactly  with  the  conclusions  I had 
reached  after  a study  of  original  descriptions  and  the  known  dis- 
tribution of  the  species  concerned.  A description  of  the  unnamed 
species  follows : 

Sixeonotus  recurvatus  n.  sp. 

Allied  to  insignis  Reut.,  but  distinguished  by  structure  of 
the  genital  claspers,  larger  and  broader  form,  and  by  the 
longer  and  more  prominent  pubescence  on  the  hemelytra. 

<?.  Length  3.6  mm.,  width  1.8  mm.  Head:  width  .72  mm., 
vertex  .47  mm.  Rostrum,  length  .83  mm.,  reaching  to  near 
hind  margin  of  sternum,  pale.  Antennae : segment  I,  length 
.32  mm. ; II,  .65  mm.,  Ill,  .56  mm. ; IV,  .74  mm. ; pale,  last 
two  segments  becoming  fuscous.  Pronotum : length  .98  mm., 
width  at  base  1.5  mm. ; basal  margin  strongly  sinuate  on  mid- 
dle, covering  base  of  scutellum;  disk  more  strongly  inflated 
and  coarsely  punctate,  and  lateral  margins  more  concavely 
angulated  than  in  insignis. 

Black,  shining,  hemelytra  only  slightly  shining;  legs,  ros- 
trum, and  ostiolar  peritreme,  tips  of  tarsi  and  the  claws  fus- 
cous, lora  and  sutures  of  juga  somewhat  pale.  Membrane 
and  veins  black,  apical  half  beyond  the  veins,  pale.  Clothed 
with  rather  prominent  pale  pubescence,  distinctly  longer  and 
more  erect  on  hemelytra  than  in  insignis.  Genital  characters 
distinctive ; left  clasper  with  the  slender  distal  arm  recurved 
away  from  the  triangular  base. 

J.  Length  3.2  mm.,  width  1.7  mm.  Head:  width  .74  mm., 
vertex  .49  mm.  Antennae : segment  I,  length  .27  mm. ; II, 


154  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXlV 


.56  mm. ; III,  .49  mm. ; IV,  .72  mm.  Pronotum : length  .87 
mm.,  width  at  base  1.4  mm.  Very  similar  to  the  male  in 
coloration,  pubescence  and  puncturation. 

Holotype:  lCJ,  July  12,  1926,  Washington,  D.  C.  (H.  H. 
Knight)  ; author’s  collection.  Allotype:  same  data  as  the  type. 
Paratype:  J',  taken  with  the  type  on  Pale  Indian  Plantain  ( Ca - 
calia  atriplicifolia) . $ $?,  June  8,  1905,  Plummer’s  Island,  Md. 

(O.  Heidemann).  12  $ $,  June  15  to  July  13,  1912,  Black  Moun- 
tains, N.  C.  (Beutenmuller) . 

The  generic  name  Sixeonotus  Reuter  is  misspelled  in  all  cases 
in  the  Manual  as  well  as  in  a previous  article  (Ent.  News,  1926, 
pp.  167-168). 

Blatchley’s  description  of  Paracalocoris  heidemanni  is  based 
on  specimens  which  I collected  at  LeRoy,  Alabama,  June  12,  1917, 
and  left  determined  in  the  Minnesota  University  collection  as 
heidemanni  Reut.  Since  that  time  I have  found  the  Alabama 
specimens  represent  another  species  and  therefore  described  the 
same  as  Paracalocoris  breviatus  Knight  (Ann.  Ent.  Soc.  Am.,  xix, 
1926,  p.  372). 


An  Early  Cerambycid. — On  March  10,  1929,  while  walking 
home  about  noon  on  the  main  street  of  Framingham  a specimen 
of  Hylotrupes  ligneus  Fab.  alighted  on  my  vest.  The  tempera- 
ture m the  shade  was  at  62  degrees  F.  I have  never  before  taken 
this  orange-colored  form  in  this  locality  but  I have  a specimen 
from  Worcester,  Mass.,  taken  April  20,  1915,  one  from  Malcolm, 
Neb.,  dated  May  12,  1909,  and  one  from  “ 3-Rivieres,  Can.,” 
dated  April  13,  1916.  A specimen  from  the  same  place  and  with 
the  same  date  as  the  last  mentioned  answers  very  well  to  the  de- 
scription of  H.  nicolas  White  as  given  by  Casey  in  his  1912 
Memoir  on  page  274.  Two  other  specimens  of  this  genus  were 
taken  here  in  wash-up  on  May  14,  1909,  and  May  3,  1912;  they 
are  entirely  brownish-black  and  until  a careful  study  of  the  genus 
is  made  it  is  useless  to  attempt  to  place  them  specifically.  I use 
the  old  generic  name  Hylotrupes  in  preference  to  making  annual 
changes  in  my  labels  in  trying  to  follow  taxonomic  flip-flops. — 
C.  A.  Frost,  Framingham,  Mass. 


June,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  155 


NOTES  ON  GYRINUS  MARGINELLUS  FALL. 

By  K.  F.  Chamberlain,  Assistant  Entomologist,  New  York 
State  Museum. 

There  ise  an  old  saying  among  entomologists  that:  “ No  species 
is  rare  if  you  know  where  to  look  for  it.”  The  following  experi- 
ences seem  to  bear  witness  to  the  truth  of  this  statement. 

Up  to  the  present  time  Gyrinus  marginellus  Fall  has  been  ex- 
ceedingly scarce  in  collections.  Mr.  Fall,  the  describer,  informs 
me  that  his  type  series  contained  only  three  specimens  and  no 
additional  material  came  to  light  until  the  writer  discovered  this 
species  under  rather  unusual  conditions  at  Cornwall,  Connecticut, 
the  latter  part  of  August,  1925.  On  this  occasion  I went  out  one 
afternoon  to  secure  some  specimens  of  Hydroporus  mellitus  Lee. 
for  a correspondent  and  proceeded  directly  to  a rather  large,  slug- 
gish stream  where  I had  previously  found  this  little  Dytiscid  in 
some  numbers.  The  method  of  securing  the  Hydroporus  con- 
sisted of  wading  the  stream  and  dredging,  with  a long-handle 
coffee-strainer  net,  in  the  deep  cavities  under  the  banks  which 
had  been  excavated  by  the  water  in  time  of  floods.  These  mini- 
ature caves  were  usually  to  be  found  at  points  where  the  brook 
swept  around  broad  curves.  The  stream  flowed  through  a large 
meadow ; the  banks  were  several  feet  high  and  the  long  grass  had 
become  matted  down  and,  trailing  in  the  water,  formed  a sort  of 
curtain  or  screen  in  front  of  the  excavations.  Here,  among  the 
grass  and  a sparse  growth  of  aquatic  vegetation,  the  little  Hy- 
droporus mellitus  were  usually  to  be  found  together  with  H. 
spurius  Lee.,  Deronectes  depressus  Fab.,  Bidessus  affinis  Say,  in- 
teresting little  Helmidae  and  other  aquatic  forms.  After  secur- 
ing a number  of  H.  mellitus  by  dredging  in  these  situations  I 
moved  on  to  a particularly  inviting  looking  spot  where  I was  able 
to  thrust  the  net  back  under  the  banks  several  feet.  Almost  at 
once  I began  to  get  specimens  of  a small  species  of  Gyrinus  and 
after  securing  a sample  of  these,  ignored  the  rest  in  favor  of 
other  supposedly  more  interesting  things.  When  I returned  home, 
mounted  and  examined  these,  my  surprise  and  pleasure  can  read- 
ily be  imagined  when  I discovered  that  they  were  Gyrinus  mar- 
ginellus Fall — a species  supposedly  rare  and  entirely  new  to  my 
collection.  Within  a few  days,  as  soon  as  time  would  permit,  I 
again  visited  this  spot  and  before  disturbing  it  examined  the  sur- 


156  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


face  of  the  water  carefully  for  Gyrinus.  None  was  visible. 
Upon  dredging  as  before,  however,  they  soon  appeared  in  my  net 
and  a hundred  or  more  were  captured  in  a short  time.  Repeated 
invasions  with  the  net  drove  some  of  them  out  into  open  water 
where  they  gyrated  ynadly  for  a few  moments  and  then  gradually 
disappeared,  returning,  perhaps,  to  their  strange  dwelling  place. 
Back  of, the  grass  “ curtain”  it  was  dim  twilight  and  the  banks 
arched  high  enough  to  permit  a large  school  of  Gyrinus  to  occupy 
the  placid  surface.  N 

Some1  eight  months  later,  on  May  2nd,  1926,  to  be  exact,  I was 
collecting  at  Montvale,  New  Jersey,  when  I came  upon  a stream 
very  similar  to  the  one  described  above  although  not  nearly  as 
wide.  Upon  approaching  close  to  the  edge  I noticed  that  the  bank 
sagged  under  my  weight,  indicating  a cavity  beneath.  There  were 
a few  Dineutes  vittatus  Germ,  swimming  in  the  main  stream  but 
I noticed  no  Gyrinus.  With  the  purpose  of  investigating  what 
might  lie  beneath  the  bank  I pushed  the  whole  section  upon  which 
I stood  down  into  the  water.  Almost  immediately  a number  of 
small  Gyrinus  appeared  on  the  muddy  surface.  These  were 
quickly  netted  and  upon  examination  the  following  day  proved  to 
be  Gyrinus  marginellus.  Here,  then,  is  the  same  species  living 
under  precisely  similar  conditions  in  two  widely  separated  locali- 
ties. Does  Gyrinus  marginellus  habitually  seek  out  and  spend  its 
life  in  the  dark  cavities  beneath  the  banks  of  running  streams? 
The  meagre  evidence  at  hand  points  that  way,  the  scarcity  of  the 
species  in  collections  helps  to  confirm  it,  yet  it  still  remains  a 
matter  for  careful  investigation. 


Rarity  versus  Secrecy. — My  second  specimen  of  Coxelus  gut- 
tulatus  Lee.  has  turned  up  after  an  interval  of  nearly  eight  years. 
On  April  28th  I found  a specimen  cunningly  hidden  beneath  the 
bark  of  a dead  pitch  pine  in  Natick,  Mass.  The  first  one  I ever 
saw  was  found  under  the  bark  of  a pine  stump  in  Framingham  on 
September  5,  1921.  It  was  even  less  conspicuous  in  its  hiding 
place  than  the  second  one. — C.  A.  Frost,  Framingham,  Mass. 


June,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  157 


OBSERVATIONS  ON  METROBATES  HESPERIUS 
UHLER  (HEMIPTERA-GERRIDAE). 

I.  Pterygopolymorphism.1 

By  H.  M.  Parshley. 

For  some  years  I have  felt  a special  interest  in  Metrobates 
hesperius  Uhler,  and  now  I propose  to  add  from  time  to  time  to 
the  little  that  is  known  about  the  species.  It  belongs  to  the  Halo- 
batinae,  and  is  thus  related  to  the  sea-going  water-striders  of  the 
genus  Halobates,  which  it  resembles  in  size  and  shape.  Our  spe- 
cies, however,  lives  inland,  on  bodies  of  fresh  water,  being  found 
near  the  shores  of  large  lakes  and  also  on  the  pools  that  form 
below  rapids  and  waterfalls.  It  is  by  no  means  uncommon,  but  it 
is  decidedly  local  in  occurrence,  most  collectors  knowing  of  only 
one  or  two  places  where  it  can  be  taken.  I have  found  it  ex- 
tremely abundant  on  the  series  of  lakes  at  Cold  Spring  Harbor, 
on  Long  Island. 

Like  many  other  Gerridae,  M.  hesperius  presents  diverse  adult 
forms  with  respect  to  wing  development ; and  it  is  this  phenome- 
non of  pterygopolymorphism  that  forms  the  subject  of  the  present 
paper.  Two  forms  exist  in  this  species : the  macropterous,  or 
fully  winged,  and  the  apterous,  or  wingless.  It  has  been  the  al- 
most universal  experience  of  collectors  to  find  the  macropterous 
form  extremely  rare,  even  in  localities  where  the  apterous  is 
abundant  enough  to  populate  the  surface  thickly  over  considerable 
areas,  just  as  in  other  gerroid  species  the  fully  winged  form,  the 
short  winged,  or  the  wingless  may  predominate.  Why  these 
various  relations  should  obtain  in  closely  allied  species  under 
similar  environmental  conditions  is  a question  that  remains  un- 
answered, though  a good  deal  of  attention  has  been  paid  to  it. 

On  July  22,  1926,  at  Cold  Spring  Harbor  I found  the  species 
abundant  as  usual,  and,  sweeping  up  a few  according  to  custom 
to  look  for  winged  examples,  I saw  that  half  the  number  in  the 
net  were  macropterous.  Here  in  a moment  I had  caught  more 
specimens  of  the  rare  form  than  in  all  my  previous  experience. 
In  fact,  I had  never  collected  it,  save  from  the  cabinets  of  gen- 
erous colleagues.  So  I gathered  up  a great  many,  adults  and 

1 Contributions  from  the  Department  of  Zoology,  Smith  Col- 
lege, No.  156. 


158  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


nymphs,  and  took  them  into  the  laboratory  for  counting.  Of  the 
503  adults,  234  were  wingless  and  269  were  winged.  Never  be- 
fore or  since  have  I found  a winged  individual  in  that  spot,  and 
only  one  or  two  elsewhere.  Among  the  last  stage  nymphs  many 
indicated  by  the  possession  of  wing-pads  that  they  were  about  to 
develop  into  macropterous  adults,  but  the  younger  generation 
already  showed  a great  falling  off  in  the  ratio  of  winged  to  wing- 
less individuals.  I preserved  about  40,  those  which  were  alate 
among  several  hundred  examined,  but  I failed  to  make  an  exact 
count. 

This  extraordinary  occurrence  surely  merits  record,  although 
there  is  no  known  explanation  to  be  offered.  The  weather  seemed 
ordinary,  the  ponds  contained  the  usual  amount  of  water,  no 
special  migration  seemed  imminent  and  none  was  observed.  How- 
ever, a favorable  opportunity  was  afforded  to  make  some  study  of 
the  winged  types,  and  so  the  figures  on  Plate  XXI  have  been 
drawn  in  commemoration.  While  the  primary  purpose  of  these 
figures  is  to  illustrate  the  rare  winged  form  as  adult  and  nymph 
(figs.  1 and  3),  attention  may  be  called  here  to  several  other 
points,  some  of  which  I hope  to  discuss  more  fully  at  another 
time. 

The  species  exhibits  a special  degree  of  sexual  dimorphism, 
wholly  uncorrelated  with  the  pterygopolymorphism.  As  will  be 
seen  in  fig.  1,  the  male  has  thickened  antennae,  set  with  bristles, 
while  the  female  (fig.  5)  has  slender  antennae  without  the  bristles. 
The  mesothoracic  legs  of  the  male  are  likewise  provided  with  a 
fringe,  which  is  lacking  in  the  female.  The  sexual  difference  in 
antennal  shape  can  be  faintly  seen  in  the  older  nymphs. 

In  the  winged  forms  the  visible  portion  of  the  thorax,  as  seen 
from  above,  is  all  pronotum,  composed  of  anterior  and  posterior 
lobes,  while  in  the  wingless  adult  (fig.  2)  the  largest  segment  of 
this  region  is  the  mesothorax.  The  detailed  anatomy  of  adult 
and  nymph  is  being  worked  out  for  later  report. 

The  alate  nymph  (fig.  3)  differs  from  the  apterous  (fig.  4) 
largely  in  the  possession  of  wing-pads  and  in  some  correlated  de- 
tails of  thoracic  structure.  The  evident  difference  in  outline  is 
due  largely  to  accidents  of  preservation,  I think,  although  to  judge 
from  both  dry  and  alcoholic  material,  there  is  a real  differentia- 
tion in  the  shape  of  the  thorax. 

Both  adults  and  nymphs  are  black  or  very  deep  brown  in  color, 
with  some  shading  of  lighter  brown  in  places,  and,  in  the  adults, 


"■Wwiiw 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  XXIV,  No.  3 


Plate  XXI 


METROBATES  HESPERIUS  Uhler 

1 Alate  adult  $ ; 2 Apterous  adult  $ ; 3 Alate  nympli;  4 Apterous  nymph; 
5 Antenna  of  adult  $ . x9 — Parshley. 


160  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


faint  bluish  areas  of  of  variable  development  on  thorax  and  abdo- 
men, most  noticeable  in  the  apterous  specimens.  The  nymphs 
have  a bright  yellow  pattern,  indicated  in  figs.  3 and  4 by  white 
spots.  Of  this  the  adults  retain  only  the  small  anterior  yellow  spot 
on  the  pronotum  and,  in  the  wingless  form,  a broad,  faint  bluish 
stripe  on  the  mesonotum. 

Only  prolonged  breeding  experiments  can  determine  the  exact 
hereditary  basis  of  the  pterygopolymorphism  exhibited  by  M. 
hesperius  and  similar  species,  but  it  seems  reasonable  to  suppose 
that  Mendelian  factors,  so  distributed  in  the  germplasm  of  the 
species  as  to  produce  special  recombinations  on  occasion,  might 
well  be  postulated  as  a working  hypothesis.  Of  all  the  alate  ex- 
amples studied  in  this  experience,  none  showed  any  signs  of  the 
broken  hemielytra  long  since  described  in  this  subfamily  by  de  la 
Torre-Bueno,  although  reproduction  was  in  full  swing. 


June,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  161 


AN  OBSERVATION  ON  THE  ETIOLOGY  OF  A CER- 
TAIN MALFORMATION  IN  THE  EARWIG, 
ANISOLABIS  MARITIMA  (GENE) 
(DERMAPTERA). 

By  Waro  Nakahara  and  Dorothy  Nakahara,  Tokyo,  Japan. 

The  occurrence  of  various  malformations  in  insects  is  of  com- 
mon observation,  but  little  seems  to  be  known  concerning  their 
etiology.  Some  of  the  malformations  are  known  to  be  congenital 
and  hereditary,  and  several  noteworthy  types  in  Drosophila  have 
been  closely  investigated  by  Morgan  and  his  school.  A great 
majority  of  the  malformations  recorded  in  entomological  litera- 
ture is  of  unknown  etiology.  Many  larval  and  nymphal  mal- 
formations have  been  referred  to  as  being  due  to  the  supposed 
developmental  disturbance  (Entwicklungsstorung)  in  embryonic 
stage,  but  the  nature  of  the  disturbance  is  far  from  being  under- 
stood. Apart  from  these,  no  small  number  of  malformations  as- 
sumed to  be  due  to  abnormal  regeneration  of  the  mutilated  part 
of  the  body  have  been  described. 

In  the  course  of  our  observation  on  the  life  history  and  habits 
of  the  earwig  during  the  last  summer  and  fall  (1928)  we  had  an 
opportunity  to  observe  a case  of  the  malformation  of  the  forceps, 
which  can  be  most  conclusively  attributed  to  the  incomplete  re- 
generation of  the  mutilated  part.  This  we  propose  to  report  in 
the  present  note. 

The  earwig  in  question  is  a common  species  in  Tokyo.  We 
found  it  plentifully  in  our  back  yard,  under  flower  pots,  stones, 
etc.  It  goes  under  the  name  of  Anisolahis  maritima  (Gene)  in 
vernacular  entomological  handbooks,  and  we  tentatively  refer  it 
to  that  species. 

On  August  23,  a batch  of  eggs,  some  50  in  number,  were  col- 
lected along  with  the  brooding  female.  The  eggs  were  apparently 
fully  mature,  as  they  all  began  hatching  the  same  day.  The  first 
molting  took  place  during  September  6 and  7,  and  the  second  one 
during  September  15  and  16.  All  the  3rd  instar  specimens  were 
normal  at  this  time.  On  September  27  one  specimen  again 
molted,  while  others  followed  it  one  by  one  until  on  October  2 all 
but  a single  specimen  were  in  the  4th  instar. 

This  slow-growing  3rd  instar  specimen  had  lost  the  left  half  of 
its  forceps  sometime  previously,  presumably  in  a fight  with  its 


162  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


comrades.  Fights  are  very  frequent  among  young  earwigs  kept 
in  a small  space,  and  the  forceps  are  freely  used  as  weapons  on 
such  occasions.  For  fear  that  other  earwigs  might  kill  this  speci- 
men, now  reduced  in  its  fighting  capacity,  we  isolated  it  into  a 
separate  jar,  and  kept  careful  watch  on  it.  The  specimen  finally 
molted  on  October  n,  and  it  was  found  that  the  mutilated  half  of 
the  forceps  had  regenerated  but  only  in  half  its  natural  size.  It 
died  on  October  14  and  was  pickled  in  alcohol. 

Figure  1,  drawn  from  the  cast  skin  saved  at  the  time  of  molt- 
ing, represents  the  state  of  mutilation.  It  will  be  seem  that  the 
entire  left  side  of  the  forceps  is  cut  off  including  the  adjacent 
part  of  the  last  abdominal  segment.  The  length  of  the  intact  side 
of  the  forceps  is  2 mm. 

Figure  2 is  drawn  from  the  alcoholic  specimen  above  mentioned, 
and  it  illustrates  the  forceps  after  the  molting.  As  may  be  seen 
from  this  figure,  the  regeneration  of  the  mutilated  parts  was  in- 
complete, and  gave  rise  to  an  obvious  malformation.  The  length 
of  the  normal  side  of  the  forceps  is  2.5  mm.,  and  that  of  the  re- 
generated small  side  about  1 mm.  The  color  of  the  regenerated 
side  is  pale  yellow,  not  reddish  brown  as  in  the  normal  structure. 
The  last  abdominal  segment  is  also  deformed,  and  is  shortened  on 
the  left  side. 

Normal  forceps  of  a 4th  instar  earwig  are  shown  in  Figure  3 for 
comparison.  The  length  of  the  forceps  here  is  about  2.5  mm. 

It  is  well  known  that  a considerable  individual  variation  occurs 
in  the  size  and  shape  of  the  forceps  in  many  species  of  earwigs, 
especially  Forficula  auricularia  L.  In  Anisolabis  maritima,  how- 
ever, the  morphology  of  the  forceps  is  remarkably  stable,  and 
apart  from  the  constant  sexual  difference,  the  variation  in  the  for- 
ceps seems  to  be  very  slight. 

The  life  history  and  habits  of  Anisolabis  maritima  have  been 
studied  in  America  by  Bennett  (Psyche,  Vol.  XI,  p.  41,  1904)  and 
in  Formosa  by  Takahashi  (Zool.  Magaz.  Tokyo,  Vol.  XXXVIII, 
p.  412,  1926).  Our  observation,  as  far  as  it  extended,  confirms 
the  statements  of  these  authors,  with  a single  exception,  namely: 
our  series  of  specimens  show  the  antenna  of  the  second  instar  to 
be  15  jointed,  not  14  jointed  as  stated  by  Takahashi.  Our  obser- 
vations on  the  use  of  the  forceps  concur  entirely  with  the  account 
given  for  Anisolabis  annulipes  by  Pallister  in  this  Bulletin,  Vol. 
XXII,  P,  254,  1927. 


June,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  163 


Figure  i.  The  mutilation  of  the  left  side  of  the  forceps. 

Figure  2.  The  forceps  malformation  due  to  the  incomplete  re- 
generation. 

Figure  3.  Normal  forceps.  All  the  figures  are  drawn  to  the 
scale,  and  are  of  the  dorsal  aspect. 


164  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  V 61.  XXIV 


LEPIDOPTEROLOGICAL  CONTRIBUTIONS. 

By  William  Barnes  & Foster  H.  Benjamin,  Decatur,  Illinois. 

When  Mr.  F.  H.  Benjamin  recently  visited  the  senior  author  at 
Decatur  he  pointed  out  that  a considerable  quantity  of  manu- 
script represented  by  changed  names  in  the  latter’s  collection,  or 
by  manuscript  types,  remained  unpublished.  It  is,  therefore,  now 
published  in  order  to  balance  the  names  in  the  collection  with  pub- 
lished work. 

I. 

Three  New  Species  of  Phal^enhle  from  the  New  Jersey 
y/  Pine  Barrens. 

Feltia  buchholzi  sp.  nov. 

Frons  with  a slightly  raised  but  not  roughened  projection. 
Antennae  serrate  and  fasciculate.  Palpi  blackish  laterally. 
Head  rufous.  Collar  with  a slight  black  band.  Thorax  and 
fore  wing  purplish  gray  slightly  tinged  with  rufous  and 
irrorated  with  black ; basal  line  indistinct ; t.  a.  line  black, 
excurved  in  the  submedian  fold  and  below  vein  i,  claviform 
distinctly  black  outlined,  more  or  less  connected  to  base  of 
wing  by  a slight  black  streak ; orbicular  ovate,  pale,  black 
outlined  and  with  blackish  center;  reniform  similar  in  colora- 
tion, short ; a median  diffuse  black  shade  passes  between  the 
ordinary  spots  where  it  is  intensified  into  a black  cell  filling, 
thence  outwardly  oblique  to  inner  margin;  t.  p.  line  strongly 
dentate,  bent  outward  below  costa,  excurved  to  about  vein  4, 
then  incurved ; s.  t.  line  represented  by  a faint  blackish  shade 
with  only  traces  of  any  black  dashes  between  the  veins,  which 
of  themselves  are  more  or  less  black  marked;  a narrow  black 
terminal  line ; fringe  pale  at  base  with  darker  interline  and 
dusky  tips.  Hind  wing  whitish,  heavily  tinged  with  fuscous, 
and  appearing  rather  dark;  no  discal  mark;  fringes  pale  at 
base,  with  darker  interline  and  dusky  tips.  Underside 
whitish,  the  fore  wing,  costal — outer  margins  and  veins  of 
hind  wing  so  irrorated  with  fuscous  as  to  appear  quite  dark ; 
a dusky  common  band  across  all  wings. 

Expanse : 28  mm. 

More  like  the  western  gravis  than  any  other  species  known  to 
us.  Besides  the  eastern  locality,  the  practical  lack  of  an  s.  t.  line, 
plus  darker  hind  wing  with  lack  of  discal  mark  on  upperside, 
should  distinguish  it.  Type  locality:  Lakehurst,  N.  J. 


June,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  165 


Number  and  sexes  of  types:  Holotype  allotype  $,  Barnes 
Coll.  Paratypes  2 J',  Lemmer  Coll. 

PEpipsilia  heinrichi  sp.  nov. 

All  tibiae  spined,  fore  tarsi  with  rather  longer  spines  than 
normal,  the  spines  at  the  distal  ends  of  the  segments  appear- 
ing almost  claw-like.  Head  and  thorax  clothed  with  fine 
hair-like  scales  and  rough  hair,  venation  normal  Agrotid, 
frons  smooth  and  somewhat  rounded  out;  palpi  hairy  below, 
dark  at  sides  pale  at  tips.  Frons  pale;  vertex,  collar,  and 
thorax  concolorously  dull  purple  brown;  abdomen  tinged 
with  rufous.  Fore  wing  purple,  suffused  with  violaceous 
gray  and  rufous,  and  irrorated  with  black;  basal  line  from 
costa  to  median  vein  narrow,  black ; t.  a.  line  faintly  double, 
inner  part  suffused,  included  space  of  ground  color,  outer 
part  distinct,  black,  waved ; claviform  obsolescent ; orbicular 
irregular,  pale,  outlined  faintly  by  black,  with  a central  filling 
of  ground  color;  reniform  irregular,  mottled,  tending  to  be 
inwardly  extended  along  median  vein,  and  with  a black  spot 
in  its  lower  part ; t.  p.  line  oblique  on  costa,  strongly  excurved 
around  cell,  dentate  on  the  veins;  s.  t.  line  pale,  obsolescent, 
mesially  marked  by  a blackish  spot  on  costa ; a faint  terminal 
series  of  black  spots  between  the  veins.  Hind  wing  fuscous, 
somewhat  paler  basally.  Beneath : pale,  sordid,  irrorated 
with  fuscous,  with  faint  discal  spots  and  common  band.  Ex- 
panse : 35  mm. 

Type  locality:  Lakehurst,  N.  T.  Number  and  sexes  of  types: 
Holotype  “ IV--26.”"" 

We  know  of  no  closely  allied  species.  This  insect  will  prob- 
ably ultimately  become  the  type  of  a new  genus.  It  is  a connect- 
ing link  between  “Agrotis”  in  the  sense  of  Hampson  and  Epipsilia, 
besides  possessing  characters  not  possessed  by  typical  species  of 
either  genus. 

\ v 

Graptolitha  lemmeri  sp.  nov. 

Allied  to  the  European  Graptolitha  lapidea1  to  which  it  will 
run  in  Hampson’s  keys  (1906,  Cat.  Lep.  Phal.  B.  M.,  VI,  247, 
249).  Differs  from  the  European  species  by  the  stronger 
nature  of  the  markings,  the  t.  a.  and  t.  p.  lines  produced  to 

1 For  the  loan  of  this  specimen,  and  many  other  courtesies  in- 
cluding comparisons  of  various  genotypes,  we  are  indebted  to  Dr. 
William  Schaus  of  the  National  Museum. 


166  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


longer  and  sharper  points,  more  red  at  the.  base  of  the  reni- 
form,  fore  wing  with  costal  and  inner  margins  more  nearly 
parallel,  and  all  wings  darker,  the  hind  wings  nearly  evenly 
fuscous.  Beneath  the  discal  spots  are  much  better  marked, 
as  are  the  lines  on  the  tibiae.  We  have  no  male  of  lapidea 
available  for  dissection,  but  from  a superficial  examination 
of  the  male  genitalia  of  a single  specimen  of  the  European 
species  which  was  loaned  to  us,  the  structure  termed  ampulla 
by  Pierce  extends  nearly  as  far  caudad  as  the  valve  tip,  mak- 
ing the  valve  look  almost  bifurcate,  while  lemmeri  has  the 
same  structure  much  smaller  and  blunter.  There  is  a large 
amount  of  difference  in  the  valves,  those  of  lapidea  more 
evenly  drawn  out  and  narrower  than  those  of  the  new  spe- 
cies. A single  specimen  of  the  species  has  long  been  in  the 
Barnes  Collection  and  was  labeled  by  Dr.  McDunnough, 
“This  is  possibly  lapidea  Hbn.  from  Europe.” 

The  most  closely  allied  North  American  species  appears  to  be 
longior  Sm.,  from  which  lemmeri  differs  by  being  about  5 mm. 
greater  in  expanse,  fore  wing  with  the  costa  and  inner  margin 
more  nearly  parallel,  possessing  a more  purplish  cast  and  more 
contrasting  maculation.  Expanse  42  mm. 

Type  localities  and  number  and  sexes  of  types:  Holotype  J', 
Nov.  16;  Allotype  J1,  Nov.  14,  in  Barnes  Coll.  22  Paratypes, 
Nov.  7-22;  all  of  the  above  taken  by  Mr.  Frederick  Lemmer,  at 
Lakehurst,  N.  J.  1 J1  Paratype,  Ivoryton,  Conn.,  X-14.  8 Para- 

types  in’  Barnes  Coll.,  balance  in  Lemmer  Coll. 

II. 

Generic  Nojes  (Phal^nid®) 

Eviridemas  gen.  nov. 

Type  Viridemas  minuta  B.  & McD. 

Proboscis  aborted,  minute,  scarcely  visible;  palpi  aborted, 
not  as  long  as  the  width  of  the  eye,  roughly  clothed  with  hair 
and  hair-like  scales;  frons  narrow,  less  than  the  width  of  the 
eye,  not  bulging  but  rather  depressed  in  the  vicinity  of  the 
eyes,  very  slightly  roughened,  with  a very  slight  horizontal 
ridge  below  the  middle  because  the  ventral  part  is  strongly 
bent  inward,  a slight  corneous  plate  below  it ; eyes  large, 
round,  naked,  unciliated  save  for  a few  white  hairs  from  be- 
hind; ocelli  present;  antennae  of  male  peculiar,  appearing 
slightly  pectinate,  in  reality  with  the  under  side  of  each  joint 
drawn  out  into  a strong  lamellation,  from  each  disto-lateral 


June,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  167 


angle  of  these  lamellations  there  arises  a strong  serration  or 
small  pectination;  a ridge  of  scales  between  bases  of  anten- 
nae ; thorax  clothed  almost  entirely  with  broad  scales,  a very 
few  hairs  and  hair-like  scales  intermixed;  (no  trace  of  a 
prothoracic  crest  on  four  examples  but  a slight  rubbing  of 
some  and  improper  pinning  of  others  prohibits  definite  state- 
ment that  a crest  does  not  exist)  ; patagia  very  short;  meta- 
thorax with  a mass  of  scales  forming  a large  tuft  rather  than 
a crest;  all  tibiae  unarmed,  but  fringed  with  very  long  hair 
and  hair-like  scales,  the  normal  spurs  not  long  but  not  very 
conspicuously  shortened;  tarsi  not  obviously  modified,  un- 
armed save  for  the  usual  spines  which  are  rather  small ; ab- 
domen practically  uncrested,  three  or  four  scales  at  base 
tending  to  form  a very  slight  crest ; frenulum  of  male  normal, 
single;  retinaculum  of  male  normal,  not  bar-shaped.  Fore 
wing  with  the  apex  rounded,  the  termen  rather  obliquely 
curved  and  not  crenulate,  oblique  enough  to  make  the  apex 
seem  more  acute  than  it  really  is ; veins  3,  5 from  near  angle 
of  cell;  6 from  somewhat  below  upper  angle;  9 from  10 
anastomosing  with  8 to  form  the  areole  which  is  not  large ; 7 
from  areole;  11  from  cell.  Hind  wing  with  veins  3 from 
angle  of  cell;  4 from  above  angle;  5 obsolescent  from  slightly 
below  middle  of  discocellulars ; 6,  7 stalked  from  upper  angle, 
the  length  of  the  stalk  somewhat  variable  but  (in  four  ex- 
amples) not  short;  8 anastomosing  with  cell  near  the  base 
only. 

We  have  given  a rather  lengthy  description  because  the  genus  is 
a very  peculiar  one,  including  characters  which  will  separate  it 
from  the  Arctiidse.  It  has  little  to  do  with  Viridemas  Sm.,  type 
galena  Sm.  That  genus  has  the  frons  produced  to  a strong  and 
rather  pointed  prominence  with  the  point  connected  to  the  vertex 
by  a strong  ridge,  it  is  also  a much  heavier  insect  agreeing  with 
niinuta  mainly  in  the  short  tongue  and  a general  lack  of  characters. 
The  palpi  are  quite  short,  but  not  really  aborted  and  so  excep- 
tionally short  as  in  miuta  which  possesses  the  smallest  palpi  of  any 
Phalsenid  we  have  studied.  Our  only  specimen  of  galena,  and 
which  has  been  compared  with  the  type,  is  too  rubbed  to  be  sure 
about  the  abdominal  characters,  but  we  suspect  that  fresh  speci- 
mens will  show  a crest  on  the  third  abdominal  segment,  contrary 
to  the  original  description.  The  eyes  of  galena  are  strongly 
ciliated  from  behind,  and  very  likely  also  from  in  front,  so  that 
the  genus  Viridemas  may  ultimately  go  into  the  Cuculliinse.  We 
do  not  make  this  transfer,  pending  examination  of  fresh  material. 


168  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


Hemistilbia  gen.  nov. 

Type  Stilbia  apposita  B.  & McD. 

Proboscis  fully  developed ; palpi  rather  short,  upturned, 
when  closely  appressed  the  second  joint  nearly  reaching  the 
middle  of  the  frons,  moderately  fringed  with  scales,  the  third 
joint  short,  porrect;  frons  smooth  and  scarcely  bulging,  with 
clypeal  plate  below  it ; eyes  large  round,  naked ; antennae 
simple,  ciliated,  in  both  sexes ; thorax  mainly  clothed  with 
broad  scales,  a few  hairs  intermixed ; tegulae  produced  into 
a slight  hood,  the  prothorax  otherwise  uncrested ; meta- 
thorax with  a large  tuft-like  crest;  tibiae  unarmed,  the  mid 
and  hind  tibiae  moderately  fringed  with  hair;  abdomen  with- 
out dorsal  or  lateral  crests.  Fore  wing  not  broad,  the  apex 
rounded,  the  termen  evenly  curved  and  not  crenulate ; veins  3, 
5 from  near  angle  of  cell ; 6 from  below  upper  angle ; 9 from 
10  anastomosing  with  8 to  form  the  areole,  7 variable,  some- 
times connate  from  areole  with  8 and  9,  sometimes  stalked 
with  8 and  9 ; 1 1 from  cell.  Hind  wing  with  veins  3,  4 from 
angle  of  cell ; 5 almost  obsolete  from  somewhat  below  middle 
of  discocellulars ; 6 variable,  sometimes  stalked  with  7,  some- 
times connate  with  7 from  upper  angle,  sometimes  from 
slightly  below  upper  angle ; 8 anastomosing  with  cell  for 
about  one  third  the  length. 

The  present  genus  is  allied  to  the  European  genera  of  the 
Stilbia  group,  which  have  vein  7 of  the  hind  wing  fused  with 
the  cell  for  a considerable  distance.  The  European  Stilbia 
anomala  Haw.  (genotype  of  Stilbia)  probably  also  varies  in  vena- 
tion, contrary  to  recent  European  publications,  as  a specimen  be- 
fore us  has  veins  3 and  4 of  the  hind  wing  stalked,  as  well  as  6 
and  7. 

Hemistilbia  has  shorter  wings,  less  bulging  frons,  longer  palpi, 
shorter  areole,  and  vein  8 of  the  hind  wing  less  fused  with  the  cell, 
than  in  Stilbia. 


Anvcteola  gen.  nov. 

Type  Stilbia  fotelloides  B.  & McD. 

Proboscis  fully  developed,  unsealed ; palpi  upturned,  short, 
the,  second  joint  not  reaching  middle  of  frons,  its  vestiture 
compressed  and  of  scales  only,  the  third  joint  short,  not  por- 
rect ; frons  smooth,  not  bulging,  narrow,  scarcely  more  than 
half  the  width  of  the  eye,  the  usual  clypeal  plate  not  visible ; 
ocelli  present ; eyes  large,  round,  naked,  unciliated ; antennae 


June,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  169 


simple,  the  shaft  scarcely  ciliated  in  both  sexes,  the  scape  with 
a peculiar  fan-shaped  tuft  of  spatulate  hair-like  scales  re- 
sembling the  eye-cap  of  certain  Tineid  genera  ( Bucculatrix , 
etc.)  ; thorax  clothed  entirely  with  broad,  and  only  slightly 
dentate,  scales,  save  for  a few  fine  hairs  on  the  patagia ; the 
prothorax  without  visible  crest;  patagia  with  tips  upcurved 
forming  a pseudo-crest,  this  being  amplified  by  raised  scales 
on  the  mesothorax  forming  a strong  mesothoracic  crest;  a 
strong  metathoracic  crest  in  the  form  of  a tuft ; tibiae  un- 
armed, the  usual  epiphysis  on  fore  tibia,  the  mid  tibia  with 
the  usual  single  pair  of  spurs  and  some  hair;  the  hind  tibia 
with  the  usual  two  pair  of  spurs  and  some  hair,  the  distal 
spurs  somewhat  shorter  than  normal ; abdomen  with  a slight 
dorsal  crest  at  base  only ; frenulum  simple  in  the  male,  triple 
in  the  female ; retinaculum  of  male  normal,  not  bar-shaped. 
Fore  wing  with  the  apex  somewhat  rounded,  the  termen  quite 
obliquely  curved,  the  normal  transverse  lines  picked  out  by 
black  raised  scales;  vein  3 from  lower  angle;  4 from  well 
above  angle ; 5 from  about  one  third  below  middle  of  dis- 
cocellulars;  6 from  well  below  upper  angle;  7 variable,  from 
the  areole,  or  connate  with  the  stem  of  8 and  9 from  the  end 
of  the  areole;  9 from  10  anastomosing  with  8 to  form  the 
areole  which  is  rather  small,  the  stem  of  8 and  9 rather  short ; 
11  free.  Hind  wing  with  veins  3,  4 from  angle  of  cell;  5 
practically  obsolete  from  slightly  below  middle  of  discocel- 
lulars ; 6,  7 rather  long  stalked  from  upper  angle ; 8 anasto- 
mosing with  the  cell  for  about  one  third  the  length,  the  base 
of  vein  8 appearing  to  be  individually  variable  but  usually 
free. 

The  present  genus  is  a very  peculiar  one.  Aside  from  the 
nature  of  vein  8 of  the  hind  wing  and  a general  lack  of  many 
characters,  Anycteola  seems  to  have  little  to  do  with  Stilbia.  We 
think  it  belongs  to  the  Phalsenidse  (“Noctuidae”),  although  it  may 
be  a queer  offshoot  of  some  Bombycid  stem.  In  some  respects 
it  is  rather  like  Afrida  Moesch.  which  possesses  a rather  similar 
structure  from  the  antennal  scape.  We  suspect  Afrida  may  be 
a peculiar  Phalsenid,  lacking  ocelli,  and  with  bar-shaped  retina- 
culum, as  vein  8 of  the  hind  wing  does  not  fuse  with  the  cell 
except  toward  the  base.  However  because  of  lack  of  ocelli  plus 
the  bar  shaped  retinaculum  we  leave  Afrida  tentatively  in  the 
Lithosiinae.  Anycteola  possesses  ocelli  which  would  necessitate 
its  placement  in  the  Arctiinse  if  an  Arctiid.  Here  it  would  have 
to  fall  into  the  group  with  cubitus  of  the  hind  wing  trifid  and  the 


170  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXIV 


fore  wing  with  an  areole.  Few  Arctiids  possess  such  a venation, 
and  those  which  have  it  appear  to  have  a very  long  and  narrow 
areole,  also  the  bar-shaped  retinaculum,  and  rather  pointed  wings. 
We  cannot  be  absolutely  certain  that  vein  5 of  the  hind  wing  is 
obsolescent.  Possibly  what  we  consider  vein  5 is  only  a fold,  and 
it  may  be  that  veins  3 and  4 have  completely  fused  and  that  5 is 
in  reality  from  the  lower  angle  of  the  cell.  Such  a condition  takes 
place  in  some  of  the  “Sarrothripinae,”  and  some  species  of  that 
subfamily  have  a very  similar  habitus  to  Anycteola,  as  may  be 
judged  from  the  name.  They  also  agree  in  possessing  raised 
scales  on  the  wings.  But  they  disagree  by  possessing  a bar-shaped 
retinaculum  in  the  males,  similar  to  the  Arctiidae. 

Phoenicophanta  Hamp. 

Type  Phoenicophanta  flavifera  Hamp. 

1910,  Hampson,  Cat.  Lep.  Phal.  B.  M.,  X,  653,  flavifera  sole 
species  and  designated  type. 

This  is  a very  peculiar  genus  which  might  well  be  placed  with 
some  of  the  aberrant  Apatelinae  (“Acronyctinae”)  rather  than  in 
the  Acontiinae  (“Erastriinae”) .?  Hampson’s  diagnosis  conveys 
rather  a wrong  impression.  The  proboscis  is  short,  but  nearly 
twice  the  length  of  the  head.  The  frons  is  strongly  produced, 
rather  truncate,  and  appears  armed  with  a number  of  minute 
spine-like  granulations.  There  appears  to  be  a slight  clypeal 
plate  closely  appressed  to  the  frontal  prominence.  Vein  5 of  the 

2 Those  workers  who  wish  to  reject  the  Hiibnerian  Tentamen 
names  Apatela  and  Erastria  ( 1806)  ; to  adopt  the  names  Acronicta 
Ochs.  (1816),  or  Acronycta  Treit.  (1825),  Erastria  Ochs.  (1816) 
or  Treit.  (1826)  ; and  hence  to  use  the  family  names  “Acronyc- 
tinae”  (recte  Acronictinae)  and  Erastriinae;  find  themselves  con- 
fronted with  a peculiar  puzzle  of  nomenclature.  See  B.  & Benj., 
Bull.  B’klyn  Ent.  Soc.,  XXI,  p.  183.  Since  this  latter  was  writ- 
ten (1926),  Dr.  W.  T.  M.  Forbes  informed  us  of  a published 
“Prospectus”  by  Hubner  on  file  in  the  library  of  Cornell  Univer- 
sity which  actually  offers  for  sale  the  Hiibnerian  plate  of  Erastria 
immista  Dissimilaria  (Samml.  exot.  Schmett.,  pi.  CCIII).  This 
prospectus  is  dated  1814,  and  even  with  the  rejection  of  the  Tenta- 
men would  make  Erastria  Hbn.  a monotypic  generic  name  in  the 
Geometridae.  There  is  also  an  indication  that  certain  American 
species  of  the  Ziitrage,  including  Tricena  tritona  Hbn.,  were  pub- 
lished by  1814,  Tricena  thus  having  priority  over  Acronicta  and 
Acronycta. 


June,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  171 


hind  wing  is  from  close  to  the  middle  of  the  discocellulars  and 
very  obsolescent.  Veins  6 and  7 appear  stalked  from  the  upper 
angle  of  the  cell  and  not  connate,  although1  this  may  be  a variable 
character.  The  fore  wings  differ  in  the  two  sexes.  There  is  a 
fold  above  vein  6,  as  illustrated  by  Hampson,  in  both  sexes,  and 
this  fold  appears  much  like  vein  7.  We  cannot  be  sure  if  the  miss- 
ing vein  is  9 or  7.  On  the  female  wing  there  are  three  radials  on 
a stalk.  Vein  11  is  from  the  cell.  The  male  has  a structure  in 
the  radials  of  the  fore  wing  resembling  a fovea,  and  this  appears 
to  be  bounded  above  and  below  by  tubular  veins.  From  the 
costal  side  of  this,  near  its  distal  end,  arises  a single  unbranched 
vein,  and  from  the  distal  end  the  stem  of  a stalked  bifurcate  vein. 
Hampson’s  drawing  shows  a dip  in  the  radial  sector,  which  corre- 
sponds to  the  anal  edge  of  the  fovea-like  structure,  and  the  edge 
which  is  much  thickened,  but  the  drawing  does  not  show  the 
normal  tubular  vein  along  the  costal  edge  of  the  structure.  This 
fovea-like  organ  certainly  looks  much  like  a modified  areole.  If 
it  is  a modified  areole  perhaps  the  fold  above  vein  6 really  repre- 
sents vein  7,  which  would  be  the  missing  vein  instead  of  9. 

The  North  American  Phocnicophanta  bicolor  B.  & McD.  is  so 
identical  in  structure  with  the  Argentine  P.  flavifera  Hamp.,  and 
both  organisms  are  so  very  peculiar,  that  were  it  not  for  the  widely 
different  localities  we  might  be  inclined  to  consider  that  only  race 
of  a single  species  were  involved. 

Afotella  B.  & Benj. 

Type  Hadena  cylindrica  Grt. 

1025,  Barnes  & Benjamin,  Bull.  B’klyn  Ent.  Soc.,  XX,  195, 
cylindrica  sole  species  and  designated  type. 

We  regret  to  say  that  in  our  diagnosis  of  the  genus,  which  is 
Fotella  of  Hampson  but  not  of  Grote,  we  overlooked  the  fact  that 
the  eyes  are  hairy  as  in  Trichoc osmia. 

The  genus  falls  in  Hampson’s  keys  to  the  Hadeninee  between 
Nephelistis  and  Odontestra,  but  obviously  related  to  neither  of 
these.  It  is  close  to  Trichoc  osmia  Grt.,  but  possesses  a pro- 
thoracic  crest.  It  must  be  close  to  the  true  N amangana  Staud.,3 
but  we  are  now  unable  to  make  a direct  comparison.  As  we  re- 
call, cretacea,  the  genotype  of  Namangana , the  frons  was  some- 
what bulged,  but  not  so  strongly,  nor  was  it  roughened,  which  is 


3 See  1926,  B.  & Benj.,  Pan  Pac.  Ent.,  Ill,  64-65. 


172  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


why  Hampson  described  the  frons  as  smooth  and  flattened.  Also 
on  the  only  cretacea  we  ever  saw,  a cotype,  we  could  find  no  pro- 
thoracic  crest.  The  specimen  was,  however,  somewhat  rubbed, 
so  we  are  not  sure  of  the  thoracic  tuftings. 

HadenelLa  Grt. 

Type  Hadenella  pergentilis  Grt. 

1883,  Grote,  Pap.,  Ill,  123,  pergentilis  sole  species  and  there- 
fore type. 

1895,  Grote,  Abh.  Nat.  Ver.  Bremen,  XIV,  81,  type  designated 
pergentilis. 

1909,  Hampson,  Cat.  Lep.  Phal.  B.  M.,  VIII,  231,  type  desig- 
nated pergentilis. 

Has  hairy  eyes  and  belongs  in  the  Hadeninse.  The  peculiar 
frons  completely  separates  it  from  any  other  genus  known  to  us  in 
this  subfamily.  It  appears  rather  closely  related  to  Afotella,  so 
we  place  it  following  that  genus. 

Phalaeninae. 

There  are  a number  of  genera  and  species  placed  by  Hampson, 
(1903,  Cat.  Lep.  Phal.  B.  M.,  IV)  and  authors  in  the  subfamily 
“Agrotinse”  (recte  Phalseninse)  ; and  by  Warren  (1911,  in  Seitz, 
Macrolep.,  Ill),  considered  Heliothids.  These  organisms  possess 
reniform  shaped  eyes;  mid,  hind,  and  often  fore  tibiae  armed 
with  spines,  but  without  claws. 

The  European  Oxytripia  orbiculosa  Esp.  seems  to  have  no  real 
allies  in  North  America.  Neither  does  the  Tibetan  Grumia 
flora  Alph.  Another  group,  possibly  representing  three  distinct 
genera,  is  the  one  termed  Ala  by  Hampson  and  Anartomorpha  by 
Warren.  This  group  differs  from  our  North  American  organ- 
isms by  having  the  fore  tibiae  unspined  and  at  the  same  time  hav- 
ing decidedly  hairy  eyes. 

The  genus  Hampson  calls  <(Agrotiphila,,  is  divisible  into  four 
distinct  genera. 

Schoyenia  Auriv.,  type  arctica  Auriv.,  the  species  presumably 
a synonymy  of  unifasciata  Menetr.,  appears  distinct  by  its  com- 
pressed venation ; small  areole ; 7,  8 and  9 stalked  on  the  fore 
wing;  6 and  7 stalked  on  the  hind  wing;  in  conjunction  with 
spined  fore  tibiae ; hairy  vestiture ; serrate  male  antennae ; and  the 
usual  obsolescent  vein  5 of  the  hind  wing. 


June,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  173 


Barrovia  B.  & McD.  has  similar  tibial  armature,  and  rather 
similar  venation,  but  is  at  once  distinct  by  the  strong  vein  5 of 
the  hind  wing  which  is  only  obsolescent  toward  the  discal  cell, 
by  the  peculiarly  bipectinate-lamellate  male  antennae,  broader 
wings,  and  general  Geometriform  habitus.  The  fore  tibiae  are 
spined,  contrary  to  the  original  description.  Barrovia  seems 
rather  out  of  place  as  a member  of  the  Phalsenidse,  but  we  know 
of  no  better  placement. 

Archanarta  gen.  nov. 

Type  Noctua  quieta  Hbn. 

“Noctua”  quieta  Hbn.  has  been  placed  by  Hampson  in  his 
“Agrotiphila”  {Schoyenia),  and  by  Warren  in  Schoyenia.  It  has 
usually  been  placed  in  Anarta.  The  habitus  is  decidedly  that  of 
an  Anarta;  the  wings  are  broad;  and  the  eyes  are  distinctly  hairy, 
although  the  hair  is  rather  short,  and  somewhat  difficult  to  see 
because  of  the  long  cilia  overhanging  the  eyes.  All  tibiae  are 
spined.  The  vestiture  is  of  hair  only.  The  venation  is  entirely 
normal  in  three  specimens  before  us,  the  only  stalking  of  veins 
being  the  usual  one  of  8 and  9 on  the  fore  wing. 

Epipsiliamorpha  gen.  nov. 

Type  Agrotis  alaskce  Grt. 

“Agrotis”  alaskce  Grt.  has  been  placed  by  Hampson  in  his 
“Agrotiphila”  proper,  on  the  strength  of  the  male  antennae  not 
being  serrate.  We  possessed  a single  male  example  from  St. 
Paul’s  Island,  Alaska;  and  recently  have  acquired  two  fine  pair 
through  the  kindness  of  Mr.  E.  P.  VanDuzee,  the  locality  also  St. 
Paul’s  Island.  The  thoracic  vestiture  is  of  hair  only.  All  tibiae 
are  spined.  The  habitus  is  decidedly  like  an  Epipsilia,  the  male 
with  normal  Epipsilia-like  wing  shape,  the  female  with  the  wings 
aborted  and  narrow.  The  venation  is  the  same  in  both  sexes, 
except  that  because  of  the  aborted  wings,  the  veins  in  the  female 
wings  are  often  rather  waved.  The  venation  of  the  fore  wing  is 
normal ; 6 and  7 of  the  hind  wing  are  stalked.  The  eyes  are  reni- 
form  shaped  and  obsolescently  hairy,  the  hair  sparse  and  rather 
difficult  to  see.  Contrary  to  Hampson,  the  male  antennae  are 
very  heavily  serrate,  almost  bipectinate ; and  the  palpi  are  long  and 
exceed  the  frons. 


174  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


Agrotimorpha  gen.  nov. 

Type  Agrotis  staudgineri  Moesch. 

The  fourth  group  in  Hampson’s  “Agrotiphila'  is  the  one  he 
considers  typical,  citing  staudingeri  as  type,  the  citation  presum- 
ably intended  for  montana  Morr.  which  he  places  in  the  synonymy, 
and  which  is  the  type  of  Agrotiphila  Grt.  Hampson’s  staudingeri 
is  not  true  staudingeri  but  is  probably  Colorado  Sm.  In  his  ad- 
denda, Hampson  removes  montana  from  the  synonymy  of  his 
staudingeri  and  puts  it  into  Orosagrotis  Hamp.  with  priority  over 
rigida  Sm.  This  is  probably  because  of  information  furnished  by 
Smith,  who  published  on  montana  Morr.,  1903,  Trans.  Am.  Ent. 
Soc.,  XXIX,  204.  Smith  is  correct  in  that  Morrison  described 
the  Colorado  species  later  named  rigida  by  Smith,  and  his  descrip- 
tion cannot  possibly  apply  to  staudingeri  or  Colorado.  Smith  is 
probably  incorrect  in  associating  the  so-called  type  of  montana  in 
the  Tepper  Collection  with  staudingeri,  as  we  have  only  seen  the 
latter  from  Labrador.  If  the  Tepper  Collection  specimen  is  from 
Colorado,  Morrison’s  type  locality,  it  is  probably  some  other 
species. 

Grote’s  description  of  Agrotiphila  is  rather  poor,  as  it  omits 
mention  of  the  frons.  It  is  not  unlikely  that  he  may  have  de- 
scribed the  genus  from  a specimen  of  Colorado  erroneously  de- 
termined as  montana,  but  he  makes  montana  sole  species  and 
therefore  genotype  of  Agrotiphila.  Orosagrotis  Hamp.,  there- 
fore, falls  into  the  synonymy  of  Agrotiphila  Grt.,  its  type  being 
rigida  Sm. 

The  bulk  of  the  species  placed  by  Hampson  in  his  “Agrotiphila" 
proper;  i.e.,  staudingeri,  macidata,  and  Colorado,  are  typical 
“Agrotid”  in  habitus,  have  no  more  in  common  with  the  Heliothids 
than  do  other  Agrotids;  all  the  tibiae  are  spined;  the  vestiture 
is  mixed,  scales,  hair-like  scales,  and  hair;  eyes  reniform,  and  we 
can  see  no  hair  on  them;  the  venation  variable  individually  and 
not  specifically,  the  fore  wing  sometimes  with  7 shortly  stalked 
with  8 and  9,  the  hind  wing  sometimes  with  6 and  7 stalked.  The 
male  antennae  are  beaded  and  ciliated,  but  vary  with  the  species. 

These  species  are  rather  closely  allied  to  those  of  the  genus 
Hampson  calls  Orosagrotis  (recte  Agrotiphila ),  but  lack  the 
truncate  frontal  prominence. 

Agrotiphila  Grt.,  type  montana  Morr.,  ( Orosagrotis  Hamp., 
type  + rigida  Sm.  nec  Wlk .z=  montana  Morr.)  has  reniform 
shaped  eyes,  not  visibly  hairy;  vestiture  mixed,  hair,  hair-like 


June,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  175 


scales, .and  scales;  a truncate  conical  frontal  prominence;  all  tibiae 
/Spined;  the  venation  seems  less  variable  than  in  colorado-staud- 
ingeri,  6 and  7 of  the  hind  wings  stalked  in  all  specimens  examined 
of  both  montana  and  incognita,  but  7 of  the  fore  wing  is  variable 
individually,  sometimes  stalked  with  8 and  9 and  sometimes  not 
stalked. 

Parabarrovia  Gibson,  type  Parabarrovia  keelei  Gibson,  is  known 
to  us  only  through  the  literature  ( 1920,  Rept.  Can.  Arct.  Exped., 
Ill,  (1),  33).  Gibson  states  that  the  fore  tibiae  are  unspined,  and 
veins  3 and  4 of  the  hind  wings  are  stalked;  characters  which 
make  a rather  unique  genus.  The  habitus  seems  somewhat  sim- 
ilar to  Barrovia,  and  we  suspect  little  real  relationship  to  the 
normal  “Agrotid”  type. 

We  give  a key  to  the  genera  discussed. 

Phalaenidae  with  Spined  Tibiae  and  Reniform 
Shaped  Eyes. 

I.  All  tibiae  spined 

A.  Frons  with  truncate  conical  prominence.  . . .Agrotiphila 

(—  Orosagrotis) 

B.  Frons  without  truncate  conical  prominence 

a.  Thoracic  vestiture  of  hair  only ; 

a1.  Vein  5 of  hind  wing  strong,  only  obsolescent 
near  cell ; wing  shape  Geometriform ; areole 
short ; 7 stalked  with  8 and  9 on  fore  wing  ; 
6 and  7 stalked  on  hind  wing;  eyes  naked 

Barrovia 

b1.  Not  so;  5 of  hind  wing  obsolescent;  habitus 
not  Geometriform ; eyes  naked  or  hairy 
a2.  Habitus  Anarta-like ; wing  shape  normal, 
broad,  in  both  sexes ; without  stalked  veins 
except  the  usual  stalking  of  8 and  9 on  fore 
wing;  eyes  decidedly  hairy;  male  antennae 

serrate  Archanarta 

b2.  Habitus  Epipsilia-like ; wing  shape  of  male 
normal  but  not  broad;  of  female  aborted; 
venation  normal  except  for  stalking  of  6 
and  7 on  hind  wing ; eyes  obsolescently 
hairy;  male  antennae  heavily  serrate, 

E pipsiliamorpha 

( ? eyes  naked) 

c2.  Wings  very  narrow ; venation  compressed ; 
areole  small ; 7 stalked  with  8 and  9 on  fore 
wing;  6 and  7 stalked  on  hind  wing;  male 
antennae  serrate Schoyenia 


176  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXlv 


d2.  Wings  with  apex  rectangular ; venation  normal 
except  6 and  7 stalked  on  hind  wing;  male 


antennae  bipectinate 


Grumia 


b.  Thoracis  vestiture  mixed : hair,  hair-like  scales 
and  scales 

Habitus  normal  Agrotid ; venation  variable ; 
fore  wing  with  7 sometimes  stalked  with  8 
and  9,  sometimes  not ; 6 and  7 of  hind  wings 
sometimes  stalked ; variation  individual 
only ; male  antennae  beaded  and  ciliated, 


B.  Eyes  naked  (or  hair  not  easily  visible) 

a.  Head  and  thorax  clothed  with  hair  only  and  with- 

out crests ; 3 and  4 of  hind  wing  stalked ; habitus 
somewhat  Geometriform  Parabarrovia 

b.  Head  and  thorax  clothed  with  scales ; with  a small 

prothoracic  and  a large  metathoracic  crest ; 
habitus  of  normal  “Noctuid” Oxytripia 

This  arrangement  of  genera  and  species  leaves  kyune  Barnes 
without  placement.  The  species  was  described  as  a Hadena 
(1904,  Can.  Ent.,  XXXVI,  168)  and  later  placed  by  Barnes  and 
McDunnough  in  Agrotiphila  [1911,  Contrib.,  I,  (4),  16;  and, 
1917,  Check  List,  No.  1224].  The  unique  type,  a female,  has 
only  part  of  one  leg,  fortunately  a fore  leg.  The  fore  tibiae  are 
spined,  without  claws.  The  palpi  are  moderate  in  length.  The 
eyes  are  large  and  rounded,  precluding  association  with  Agroti- 
phila. The  thorax  is  too  rubbed  to  be  sure  of  tuf tings,  but  the 
thoracic  vestiture  seems  rather  mixed,  but  mostly  of  broad  scales. 
The  abdomen  appears  probably  untufted.  The  venation  is  normal 
except  that  6 and  7 of  the  hind  wings  are  stalked.  The  frons  is 
quite  strongly  bulged,  altho  lacking  a truncate  conical  prominence. 
This  bulging  frons  occurs  in  several  “Agrotid”  genera,  the  whole 
of  the  Phalseninse  needing  generic  revision.  We  tentatively  place 
kyune  after  capota,  which  has  a similar  frons,  in  Rhizagrotis. 

Trichosilia  Hamp. 

Type  No  etna  acarnea  Sm. 

1918,  Hampson,  Nov.  Zool.,  XXV,  112,  acarnea  sole  species 
and  designated  type. 


Agrotimorpha 


II.  Fore  tibiae  unspined 

A.  Eyes  decidedly  hairy 


June,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  177 


Proboscis  fully  developed ; palpi  obliquely  upturned,  reach- 
ing beyond  middle  of  frons,  the  second  joint  fringed  with 
long  hair,  the  third  joint  short;  frons  slightly  roughened, 
rather  bulging,  and  with  small  clypeal  plate  below  it;  eyes 
large,  round,  hairy,  overhung  by  long  cilia ; antennae  of  male 
slightly  serrate,  and  fasciculate ; thorax  clothed  with  scales, 
hair-like  scales,  and  hair,  with  a spreading  prothoracic  crest 
tending  to  form  a double  keel  to  the  metathorax  which  has 
loose  hair  from  both  sides  tending  to  form  a dorsal  tuft ; all 
tibiae  spined  and  fringed  with  hair;  abdomen  not  flattened, 
with  considerable  rough  hair  especially  basally,  and  with 
lateral  tufts  of  rough  hair  and  scales  terminally,  but  without 
distinct  dorsal  crests.  Fore  wing  broad,  with  the  apex 
rounded,  the  termen  rather  evenly  curved;  veins  3 and  5 
from  near  angle  of  cell;  6 from  below  upper  angle;  9 from 
10  anastomosing  with  8 to  form  the  areole;  11  from  the  cell. 
Hind  wing  with  veins  3,  4 from  near  angle  of  cell;  5 ob- 
solescent from  somewhat  below  middle  of  discocellulars,  6 
and  7 long  stalked  from  upper  angle;  8 anastomosing  with 
cell  near  base  only. 

Hampson’s  diagnosis  being  faulty  in  some  respects,  we  have 
redescribed  the  genus. 

Trichofeltia  gen.  nov. 

Type  Agrotis  circumdata  Grt. 

Proboscis  fully  developed ; palpi  obliquely  upturned,  reach- 
above  middle  of  frons,  the  second  joint  fringed  with  long 
hair  in  front,  somewhat  shorter  than  usual,  and  the  third  joint 
proportionately  longer;  frons  smooth,  not  bulging,  and  with 
only  a trace  of  a clypeal  plate  below  it;  eyes  large,  round, 
very  hairy,  overhung  by  long  cilia  from  behind,  and  shorter 
cilia  from  in  front  and  from  the  bases  of  the  antennae;  an- 
tennae of  male  strongly  bipectinate ; thorax  clothed  with  hair 
and  hair-like  scales  only  and  without  distinct  crests,  the 
metathorax  with  rough  hair  from  both  sides  tending  to  form 
a tuft;  mid  and  hind  tibiae  spined;  fore  tibia  with  only  a 
single  spine  which  is  on  the  outer  side  near  the  metatarsus ; 
all  tibiae  moderately  fringed  with  hair;  abdomen  dorsally 
flattened,  with  some  rough  hair  especially  basally,  but  without 
distinct  dorsal  crests.  Fore  wing  narrow,  the  apex  rounded, 
the  termen  rather  evenly  curyed,  and  not  crenulate;  veins  3 
and  5 from  near  angle  of  cell ; 6 from  slightly  below  upper 
angle;  9 from  10  anastomosing  with  8 to  form  the  areole,  7 
1 shortly  stalked  with  8 and  9 in  most  specimens,  sometimes 
appearing  practically  connate;  11  from  cell.  Hind  wing 


178  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


with  veins  3,  4 from  angle  of  cell;  5 obsolescent  from  some- 
what below  middle  of  discocellulars ; 6 and  7 shortly  stalked 
from  upper  angle;  8 anastomosing  with  cell  near  base  only. 

For  those  interested  in  genitalic  differences  between  genera, 
we  might  mention  that  there  seems  little  in  common  between 
Trichosilia  and  Trichofeltia. 

III. 

Specific  Notes  (Phauenidjs). 
s*  Triphcena  Ochs. 

Type  PhaUena  pronuba * L. 

Triphcena  plebeia  race  bajoides  nov. 

Similar  to  typical  plebeia,  but  much  smoother  in  general 
appearance,  the  ground  color  darker,  the  ordinary  spots  not 
strongly  disconcolorous. 

While  plebeia  was  described  from  Vancouver  Island,  British 
Columbia,  and  California,  the  single  Californian  type  is  a female 
from  unknown  locality.  The  name  should  be  restricted  to  the 
Vancouver  Island  form  as  the  description  fits  this  in  every  de- 
tail. 

Forty  specimens  are  before  us,  all  much  alike,  and  all  very  con- 
trasty. A single  example  from  Shasta  Retreat,  California,  seems 
like  the  Vancouver  specimens. 

Specimens  from  Hunters,  Washington,  are  strongly  marked, 
but  the  ground  color  seems  somewhat  darker  than  in  the  Van- 
couver examples.  A single  specimen  from  Como  Park,  Colorado, 
agrees  with  the  Washington  examples. 

Material  from  Vineyard  and  Provo,  Utah,  seems  variable,  one 
example  nearly  agreeing  with  the  Washington  lot,  and  varying 
from  this  to  duller  forms. 

Both  the  dull  and  brightly  marked  forms  are  found  at  Yosemite, 
California,  but  Plumas  Co.  material  before  us  seems  all  to  be 
the  dull  form.  The  least  contrasting  of  the  specimens  consider- 
ably resemble  smooth  baja. 

We  are  restrictirg  our  types  to  the  Plumas  Co.  specimens  and 
selecting  as  Holotype  a very  unicolorous  specimen. 

Type  locality:  Plumas  Co.,  Calif.  Number  and  sexes  of  types: 
Holotype  <?,  8-15  Aug.;  Allotype  8-15  Aug.;  3 J',  4 5,  Para- 
types  1-7  and  8-15  Aug. 


June,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  179 


^ Triphcena  hospitalis  Grt. 

Smith,  1898,  Jour.  N.  Y.  Ent.  Soc.,  VI,  100,  pi.  VII,  f.  9, 
figures  the  male  genitalia  in  contrast  to  those  of  jucunda,  pi.  VII, 
f.  4.  These  drawings  by  Smith  are  very  poor.  The  Barnes  Col- 
lection possesses  a specimen  determined  as  hospitalis  and  this 
lacks  a valve.  Smith  was  the  only  one  known  to  us  to  deliberately 
so  mutilate  specimens.  The  example  is  simply  labeled  “New 
York”  and  is  likely  the  specimen  from  that  locality  mentioned  by 
Smith.  We  see  little  to  distinguish  the  specimen  from  true 
jucunda  except  that  the  claviform  is  somewhat  longer.  In  reality 
the  genitalia  of  both  this  example  and  typical  jucunda  seem  about 
half  way  between  Smith’s  two  figures.  We  strongly  suspect  that 
our  single  “ hospitalis ” is  only  a freak  of  jucunda.  The  actual 
type  of  hospitalis  in  Collection  Hill  should  be  reexamined  to  de- 
termined what  the  name  really  represents.  Hampson,  without 
North  American  specimens  and  presumably  upon  the  strength 
of  Smith’s  remarks,  sinks  the  name  to  the  European  brunnea 
D.  & S. 

Triphcena  esurialis  race  uclueleti  nov. 

Similar  to  typical  esurialis,  forewings  bright  luteous 
slightly  tinged  with  rufous,  the  markings  tending  to  be 
washed  out ; no  basal  black  filling  between  or  before  the 
stigmata.  Hind  wings  as  in  the  typical  form  but  tinged,  like 
fore  wings,  with  luteous-rufous. 

Type  locality:  Ucluelet,  B.  C.  Number  and  sexes  of  types: 
Holotype,  24-VIHc>9 ; 1 Paratype,  27-VII-09,  the  paratype  bear- 
ing an  additional  label,  C.  H.  Young,  Ottawa. 

“Ceramic a”  vindemialis  Gn. 

This  name  has  been  omitted  from  recent  North  American  lists 
because  Hampson,  (1905,  Cat.  Lep.  Phal.  B.  M.,  V,  445,  pi.  XCI, 
f.  2)  states  that  the  type  while  labeled  Florida  will  probably  prove 
to  be  from  New  Zealand.  We  have  an  example  exactly  agreeing 
with  Hampson’s  figure  of  the  type,  and  from  Florida.  Tenta- 
tively we  place  this  in  Barathra  Hbn.,  type  Noctua  albicolon  Sepp 
(=  Trichoclea  Grt.) 

Perigrapha  Led. 

We  are  inclined  to  place  the  bulk  of  the  species  put  by  Hamp- 
son in  Perigrapha,  along  with  those  placed  by  him  in  Monima,  in 


180  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


Graphiphora  Hbn.  A specimen  compared  with  the  type  of  prima 
Sm.,  and  agreeing  fairly  well  although  not  exactly,  has  very 
strongly  lashed  eyes  and  will  fall  into  Stretchia.  In  habitus,  also, 
prima  agrees  with  inferior  Sm.  and  plusiaeformis  Hy.  Edw.,  this 
latter  species  the  genotype  of  Stretchia. 

We  have  a long  series  of  the  pulchella  group  of  Graphiphora 
and  all  intergrades  between  pulchella  Harv.,  addenda  Sm.,  palo- 
niarensis  Hill,  and  hepatic  a B.  & McD.  We  now  consider  that 
these  names  represent  only  maculation  forms  of  an  exceptionally 
variable  species.  One  other  name,  orbiculata  Sm.,  (1911,  Jour. 
N.  Y.  Ent.  Soc.,  XIX,  147)  has  been  omitted  from  the  Check 
List,  presumably  because  Smith  states  for  pulchella  that  he  “came 
near”  redescribing  it  as  “ orbiculata  from  a type  in  which  the 
orbicular  is  unusually  contrasty,”  but  this  certainly  publishes  the 
name  and  description.  It  can  also  stand  as  a form  of  pulchella. 
The  name  achsha  Dyar  may  stand  as  a race  of  pulchella,  and 
algula  Sm.  as  a color  form  of  this  race,  pending  further  material. 

The  so-called  Perigrapha  pectinata  Sm.  appears  to  be  con- 
specific  with  Perigonica  punctilinea  Sm.  Pending  further  rna-* 
terial  we  save  the  latter  name,  tentatively,  as  a race,  placing  both 
names  as  a single  species  in  Perigonica. 


Morrisonia  mucens  Hbn. 

We  seem  to  possess  all  intergrades  between  Morrisonia  mucens 
Hbn.  and  sectilis  Gn.,  so  that  we  consider  the  latter  name  repre- 
sents only  a maculation  form. 

Embolcecia  sauzalitce  form  papaipemoides  nov. 

Entirely  similar  to  the  typical  form  except  for  the  lack  of  white 
filling  to  the  stigmata. 

Type  localities  and  number  and  sexes  of  types : Holotype  <$, 
“California,”  “135,”  presumably  originally  a Henry  Edwards 
specimen;  Allotype  §,  San  Francisco^ Calif.,  Sept.  1,  ’00,  F.  X. 
Williams;  1 J'  Paratype,  San  Francisco,  Calif.,  ex  Cirsium. 

Types  in:  Holotype  and  Allotype  in  Barnes  Collection,  Para- 
type in  Collection  Bird. 


Papaipema  inquaesita  form,  wyatti  nov. 

Similar  to  the  typical  form,  but  the  orbicular  and  claviform 
marked  with  white,  the  reniform  marked  with  some  white  especi- 
ally costally. 


June,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  181 


Type  locality:  St.  Therese  Isl.,  St.  Johns  Co.,  Quebec,  IX-15. 
NumEerTmd sexes  of  types:  Holotype  J',  (G.  Chagnon ) Clinique. 

Notes:  Messrs.  Wyatt  and  Beer  of  Chicago,  Illinois,  have 
reared  a series  of  intermediates. 

Apatela  oblinita  form  insolita  Grt. 

1873,  Grote,  Bull.  Buff.  Soc.  Nat.  Sci.,  I,  82,  Acronycta. 

Much  has  been  written  regarding  the  identity  of  this  “species.” 
Mr.  Tams  has  kindly  examined  the  type  for  us  in  comparison  with 
both  lanceolaria  and  oblinita,  and  reports ; t(Eulonche  insolita 
Grote  is  unquestionably  a melanic  oblinita.”  The  type  came  from 
Pennsylvania.  We  have  seen  two  melanic  oblinita  from  Oak  Sta- 
tion, Pa.,  from  Mr.  Fred.  Marloff,  who  kindly  deposited  one  in  the 
Barnes  Collection. 

Elaphria  Hbn. 

Type  Elaphria  grata  Hbn. 

1818?,  Hubner,  Ziitr.  exot.  Schmett.,  I,  16,  No.  36,  ff.  71-72, 
grata  sole  species  and  therefore  type.4 
This  generic  name  has  priority  over  Monodes  Gn.  as  used  in  the 
Barnes  & McDunnough  Check  List  and  in  Hampson,  Cat.  Lep. 
Phal.  B.  M,  VIII. 

Elaphria  ensina  Barnes 

1907,  Barnes,  Can.  Ent.,  XXXIX,  12,  Oligia. 

1917,  Barnes  & McDunnough,  Check  List,  No.  2610,  Monodes. 
obliquirena  Hamp. 

1918,  Hampson,  Nov.  Zook,  XXV,  151,  Calymniodes. 

Specimens  agreeing  with  the  types  of  ensina  were  submitted  to 
Mr.  Tams  of  the  British  Museum  who  labeled  them  Calymniodes 
obliquirena,  “comp,  type,”  “exact.”  We  are  indebted  to  Prof. 
Draudt  for  first  suggesting  the  possibility  of  this  synonymy. 

Micrathetis  triplex  Wlk. 

1857,  Walker,  Cat.  Lep.  Het.  B.  M.,  XI,  721,  Laphygma. 

1909,  Hampson,  Cat.  Lep.  Phal.  B.  M.,  VIII,  443,  f.  123, 
minuscula  B.  & McD.  Micrathetis. 

4 Since  this  page  was  written  we  have  been  informed  by  Dr.  W. 
T.  M.  Forbes  that  this  species  was  probably  published  not  later 
than  1814. 


182  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


1913,  Barnes  & McDunnough,  Contrib.,  II,  (1),  6,  pi.  II,  f.  12, 
Athetis. 

1913,  Barnes  & McDunnough,  Contrib.,  II,  (3),  115,  Athetis. 

“Athetis”  minuscula  was  first  “described”  (March  1913)  by  a 
figure.  A description  was  subsequently  published  (April  1913), 
and  the  previously  figured  specimen  indicated  as  the  “cotype,” 
the  “type”  not  having  the  black  filling  to  the  reniform.  Here 
is  a problem  in  nomenclature.  Is  the  originally  published  speci- 
men the/  actual  type,  or  is  the  type  which  remained  in  manuscript 
until  a month  later  the  true  type  ? However,  it  is  not  our  purpose 
to  go  further  than  the  actual  taxonomy  involved,  and  to  call  at- 
tention to  the  specific  synonymy.  Regardless  which  “type”  be 
selected  to  hold  the  name,  minuscula  is  only  a minor  color  or 
maculation  form  of  triplex.  In  this  regard,  benjamini  Draudt 
(in  Seitz)  is  also  the  same  species.  We  base  this  statement  upon 
paratypes  given  the  Barnes  Collection  by  Professor  Draudt,  these 
being  various  forms  and  practically  covering  the  range  of  varia- 
tion of  the  species.  With  additional  names  applied  by  Professor 
Strand  to  abs.  1 and  3 of  Hampson,  and  with  the  number  of  names 
at  present  listed  in  the  synonymy  (see  Hampson,  1909),  those  who 
may  wish  to  apply  names  to  minor  forms  have  a remarkable  puz- 
zle of  nomenclature  coupled  with  the  necessity  of  careful  com- 
parison with  actual  types. 

Charadra  deridens  Gn. 

1852,  Guenee,  Spec.,  Gen.,  V,  Noct.,  I,  35,  pi.  Ill,  f . 8, 
nigrosuffusa  Strd.  Diphtera. 

1913,  Hampson,  Cat.  Lep.  Phal.  B.  M.,  XIII,  374,  deridens  ab. 
1,  Charadra. 

1916,  Strand,  Archiv.  fur  Naturgesch.,  A,  2,  46,  deridens  ab., 
Charadra. 

Charadra  circulifera'  Wlk. 

1857,  Walker,  Cat.  Lep.  Het.  B.  M.,  XI,  709,  Acronycta. 
contigua  Wlk. 

1865,  Walker,  Cat.  Lep.  Het.  B.  M,  XXXII,  446,  Charadra. 
sudena  Smith. 

1908,  Smith,  Jour.  N.  Y.  Ent.  Soc.,  XVI,  80,  Charadra. 

A considerable  number  of  specimens  of  Charadra  were  sub- 
mitted to  Mr.  Tams  for  comparison  with  the  types  and  series  in 


June,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  183 


the  British  Museum.  The  names  circulifera  and  contigua  appear 
to  be  applicable  to  the  southern  form  or  species  subsequently 
named  sudena  by  Smith.  The  name  nigrosuffusa  Strd.  appears 
to  be  simply  the  northern  species  or  form  now  going  in  all  collec- 
tions as  deridens  Gn.  The  type  of  deridens  is  not  in  the  Barnes 
Collection,  and  according  to  Mr.  Tams  is  not  in  the  British 
Museum.  Until  other  evidence  is  offered  we  would  consider  the 
name  deridens  applicable  to  the  northern  form  or  species  with 
nigrosuffusa  as  a synonym;  and  circulifera  applicable  for  the 
southern  form  or  species  with  synonyms  contigua  and  sudena. 
The  exact  status  of  circulifera  is  difficult  to  state.  It  is  very 
possibly  only  a Gulf  Strip  race  of  deridens.  Tentatively  we  al- 
low two  species  following  Smith  and  Barnes  & McDunnough. 

Catocala  euphemia  Beut. 

1907,  Beutenmuller,  Bull.  A.  M.  N.  H.,  XXIII,  938,  Catocala. 

1913,  Hampson,  Cat.  Lep.  Phal.  B.  M.,  XII,  41  (ignot.), 
Catobapta.  =j=  neogama  Auct.  nec  A.  & S. 

1884,  Hulst,  Bull.  Bklyn  Ent.  Soc.,  VII,  51  (partim),  Catocala. 

1893,  Smith,  Bull.  U.  S.  N.  M.,  XLIV,  349  (partim),  Catocala. 
arizonce  Strd. 

1913,  Hampson,  Cat.  Lep.  Phal.  B.  M.,  XII,  41  (as  neogama 
ab.  3),  Catobapta. 

1914,  Strand,  Archiv  fur  Naturgesch.,  79,  A,  8,  64,  neogama 
ab.,  Catobapta. 

1922,  McDunnough,  Can.  Ent.,  LIV,  101,  euphemia,  Catocala. 

In  an  effort  to  have  specimens  compared  with  the  types  of  the 
Strand  names  in  the  British  Museum  we  submitted  an  example  of 
euphemia  to  Mr.  Tams,  who  informed  us  that  the  Museum  pos- 
sessed no  Arizona  material.  It  is  to  be  noted  that  Hampson 
listed  Arizona  for  neogama  but  did  not  list  the  specimen  as  being 
in  the  Museum.  He  does,  however,  cite  Smith,  1893,  who  in 
turn  cites  Hulst,  1884.  Hulst,  under  heading  neogama  states, 
“The  specimens  from  Arizona  have  the  marginal  border  of  the 
hind  wing  broken.”  Hampson’s  description  for  his  ab.  3 reads, 
“hind  wing  with  the  terminal  band  interrupted.”  We  strongly 
suspect  that  in  reality  Strand’s  description  is  based  upon  ex- 
amples of  euphemia  misdetermined  as  variants  of  neogama  by 
Hulst,  1884. 

In  relation  to  these  Strand  names,  we  have  an  example  com- 
pared with  the  type  of  subnatana  Strd.  This  is  the  normal  male 


184  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


of  subnata,  not  normal  female  as  suggested  by  Dr.  McDunnough 
(1922,  Can.  Ent.,  LIV,  101). 

IV. 

Correction  of  a Generic  Homonym  (Phal^nid^e). 
Eubuchholzia  nom.  nov. 

Type  Arsilonche  Colorado  Sm. 

=j=  Buchholzia  B.  & Benj. 

Type  Arsilonche  Colorado  Sm. 

We  are  informed  by  Messrs.  Embrik  Strand,  Theodore  Frison, 
and  R.  C.  Williams,  Jr.,  that  the  name  Buchholzia  is  preoccupied. 

V. 

Notes  on  Thyatirim:. 

Habrosyne  gloriosa  Gn. 

Guenee,  1852,  Spec.  Gen.,  V,  12,  put  into  print  the  Boisduval 
manuscript  name  gloriosa  as  being  based  upon  a European  speci- 
men of  scripta  ( abrasa ).  We  have  been  unable  to  locate  the  type 
of  gloriosa.  No  European  worker  with  whom  we  have  corre- 
sponded recognizes  the  name,  and  all  agree  that  the  locality  given 
by  Guenee  is  presumably  in  error  unless  by  chance  a single  speci- 
men might  have  been  introduced  as  a pupa  or  larva  and  the  re- 
sulting adult  captured.5 

The  description  is,  however,  good ; and  points  out  the  identical 
differences  between  scripta  ( abrasa ) and  gloriosa  that  exist  be- 
tween scripta  and  rectangulata  Ottol.  This,  coupled  with  the  fact 
that  Boisduval  and  Guenee  obtained  considerable  quantities  of 
material  from  Canada,  New  York,  etc.,  lead  us  to  consider  that 
the  heretofore  unplaced  name  gloriosa  is  a prior  name  for  rec- 
tangulata. 

Habrosyne  scripta  race  abrasoides  nov. 

Colors  less  contrasty  than  in  typical  scripta,  the  s.  t.  whitish 
shade  reduced  in  width,  the  reniform  more  elongate.  A parallel 
to  gloriosa  ( rectangulata ) race  arizonensis  B.  & McD. 

Type  locality:  Redington,  Ariz.  Number  and  sexes  of  types. 
Holotype  5,  unique. 

The  synonymy  of  the  species  of  Habrosyne  Hbn.  found  in 
America  north  of  the  Rio  Grande  is  as  follows : 

5 Della  Torre,  in  Wagner,  Lepid.  Cat.,  1921,  pars  25,  p.  5,  lists 
gloriosa  from  “Kaukasien”  but  cites  no  references  other  than 
Guenee  and  Walker. 


June,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  185 


scripta  ( Gosse ) gloriosa  (Gn.)  ( Bdv . ms.) 

abrasa  (Gn.)  rectangulata  (Ottol.) 

a abrasoides  B.  & Benj.  =f=  rectangula  B.  & McD. 

chatfeldii  Grt.  (lapsus  calami) 

=j=  derasa  (Auct.)  (nec  L.)  a arizonensis  B.  & McD. 

VI. 

Specific  Homonyms  (Phauenid^e). 

“ Polia”  olivacea  (Morr.),  described  in  Mamestra,  is  a “sec- 
ondary” homonym  of  “Polia”  olivacea  Steph.  Under  the  present 
International  Zoological  Code  there  seems  no  differentiation  be- 
tween “primary”  and  “secondary”  homonyms,  and  olivacea  Morr. 
appears  to  be  unavailable. 

“Polia”  olivacea  obscurior  Sm.  was  described  when  Smith  con- 
sidered many  of  the  western  olivacea  races,  which  he  subse- 
quently named,  as  being  typical  olivacea.  Although  his  descrip- 
tion seems  to  restrict  the  type  to  a single  specimen,  he  makes  men- 
tion of  other  eastern  material  being  the  same.  We  have  care- 
fully compared  the  type  of  olivacea  Morr.  (Strecker  Collection) 
with  the  type  of  the  so-called  variety  obscurior,  and  consider  that 
the  type  of  the  latter  is  simply  the  female  of,  the  former. 

If  secondary  homonyms  are  to  be  rejected,  the  name  obscurior 
Sm.  would  appear  available  for  the  species  now  known  as 
olivacea. 

“Polia”  stricta  kappa  B.  & Benj.  seems  preoccupied  by  Noctua 
cappa  Hbn.,  placed  by  Hampson  in  Polia,  under  the  rules  that 
specific  and  subspecific  names  have  the  same  status  as  far  as 
nomenclature  is  concerned,  and  that  c = k.  We  propose  the  ana- 
gram papka  nom.  nov.  for  kappa  B.  & Benj.  nec  cappa  Hbn. 

VII. 

New  Geometrire  (Lepid.). 

Enypia  venata  form  eddyi  nov. 

Markings  similar  to  British  Columbia  venata,  but  with  the  pri- 
maries so  heavily  suffused  with  fuscous  that  with  the  wings 
folded  the  insect  appears  almost  a melanic.  Some  of  the  white 
ground  color  shows  through  the  fuscous  suffusion  mesad  of  the 
intradiscal  and  distad  of  the  extradiscal  lines.  Secondaries  only 
slightly  darker  than  those  of  the  typical  form.  The  present  de- 
scribed form  is  practically  the  opposite  of  form  elaborata  C.  & S. 

Type  localities  and  number  and  sexes  of  types:  Holotype  <$, 


186  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXlV 


Friday  Harbor,  Wash.,  Aug.  2,  1924;  6 $ Paratypes,  Friday  Har- 
bor, Wash.,  Victoria  and  Duncans,  B.  C.,  July  and  August. 

Notes:  the  British  Columbia  specimens  mostly  from  A.  W. 
Hanham;  the  Washington  specimens  from  Samuel  Eddy. 

Hulstina  aridata  sp.  nov. 

Much  like  formosata  in  size  and  maculation,  but  at  once 
easily  differentiated  by  the  practical  lack  of  brownish  shad- 
ings. Genitalia  of  male  not  unlike  formosata  in  general  but 
differing  in  many  details,  especially  in  the  sacculus.  Expanse 
32  mm. 

Type  locality:  Mohave  Co.,  Ariz..  Number  and  sexes  of  types: 
Holbtype  <$\  April ; 19  Paratypes  May  1-7 ; presumably  collected 
by  O.  C.  Poling. 

Note:  the  Barnes  Collection  possesses  other  specimens  from 
Clark  Co.,  Nev. 


June,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  187 


UNDESCRIBED  SPECIES  OF  THE  GENUS  LIMNO- 
PHILA  FROM  EASTERN  NORTH  AMERICA. 

(Tipulidae,  Diptera). 

Part  IV. 

By  Charles  P.  Alexander,  Amherst,  Mass.1 

The  species  of  Limnophila  discussed  at  this  time  are  based 
chiefly  on  collections  made  by  the  writer  in  New  York  and  New 
England.  Additional  material  was  collected  by  my  friends, 
Messrs.  Notman,  Rogers  and  Walley,  to  whom  I express  my 
sincere  thanks  for  this  opportunity  of  studying  the  contained 
novelties. 

Limnophila  Macquart 

Prolimnophila  n.  subgen. 

Antennae  with  the  verticils  elongate,  much  exceeding  the 
segments.  Head  not  narrowed  behind.  Tuberculate  pits 
vestigial,  placed  on  the  extreme  cephalic  margin  of  the 
praescutum.  Pseudosutural  foveae  inconspicuous.  Wings 
with  the  anterior  arculus  lacking  or  barely  evident ; R2+ 3+4  in 
alignment  with  Rs  and  nearly  equalling  it  in  length;  R2+s 
angulated  at  origin ; cell  ist  M2  very  elongate,  its  inner  end 
strongly  arcuated  and  lying  proximad  of  the  other  elements 
of  the  cord;  m-cu  beyond  midlength  of  the  cell. 

Type  of  subgenus. — Limnophila  areolata  Osten  Sacken  (Ne- 
arctic  Region). 

Limnophila  areolata  is  a common  crane-fly  in  Northeastern 
North  America,  being  especially  characteristic  of  hemlock-yel- 
low birch  forests  in  June.  The  character  of  a broken  arculus 
reminds  one  strongly  of  P seudolimno phila  and  it  may  be  that  the 
present  group  is  more  correctly  placed  with  that  genus.  The 
most  conspicuous  venational  feature  is  the  very  large,  arcuated 
cell  ist  M2. 

Limnophila  ( Prionolahis ) walleyi  n.  sp. 

Male. — Length  6.5— 7.5  mm. ; wing  7-8  mm. 

In  its  small  size  and  general  appearance,  resembling  L. 

1 Contribution  from  the  Department  of  Entomology,  Massa- 
chusetts Agricultural  College. 


188  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  V 61.  XXIV 


(P.)  simplex  Alexander,  but  in  the  structure  of  the  male 
hypopygium  more  like  L.  (P.)  rufibasis  Osten  Sacken. 

Mesonotal  praescutum  without  dark  stripes,  the  color  be- 
ing blackish,  dusted  with  yellowish  gray.  Femora  yellow,  the 
tips  narrowly  but  distinctly  infuscated;  tibiae  yellow,  the 
tips  narrowly  blackened ; tarsi  brown,  the  tips  of  the  seg- 
ments darker,  the  outer  segments  uniformly  blackened.  In 
the  paratype,  the  femoral  tips  are  more  gradually  darkened. 
Wings  with  a grayish  yellow  ground-color;  stigma  small  but 
well-defined;  seams  along  the  cord  and  outer  end  of  cell 
ist  M2  narrow  and  inconspicuous ; no  heavy  brown  seam 
along  vein  Cu  in  cell  M.  Male  hypopygium  with  the  outer 
dististyle  only  weakly  pectinate,  the  teeth  small  and  variable. 
Inner  dististyle  bifid,  the  caudal  or  outer  arm  broader,  densely 
set  with  microscopic  appressed  black  teeth ; cephalic  or  inner 
arm  narrower,  blackened,  with  a few  weak  erect  setae. 
Gonapophyses  appearing  as  flattened  blades  that  are  slightly 
dilated  beyond  midlength,  the  apex  narrowed  and  produced 
into  a long  spine. 

The  right  wing  of  the  paratype  has  a weak  adventitious  cross- 
vein in  cell  R3  just  distad  of  vein  R2. 

Habitat:  Northeastern  North  America. 

Holotype : J',  Brookview,  Rensselaer  Co.,  New  York,  June  15, 
1923,  {Alexander) . Paratype i;  , Bothwell,  Ontario,  May  23, 
1925,  (G.  S.  W alley).  Type  in  the  author’s  collection;  paratype 
in  the  Canadian  National  Collection. 

This  interesting  Limnophila  is  named  in  honor  of  Mr.  G.  S. 
Walley,  who  has  added  greatly  to  our  knowledge  of  the  Tipulidae 
of  Ontario  and  Quebec. 

Limnophila  ( Phylidorea ) siouana  n.  sp. 

Male. — Length  about  6-6.5  mm- ; wing  5.8-6. 5 mm. 

Female. — Length  about  6.5  mm. ; wing  about  6.7  mm. 

Closely  allied  and  generally  similar  to  L.  (P.)  novce-anglice 
Alexander,  differing  especially  in  the  structure  of  the  male 
hypopygium. 

Antennae  {$)  elongate,  as  in  novce-anglice,  if  bent  back- 
ward extending  to  opposite  or  beyond  the  base  of  the  ab- 
domen ; scape  obscure  yellow ; flagellum  dark  brown,  the 
bases  of  the  proximal  segments  narrowly  pale.  Head  light 
gray,  the  occipital  region  more  yellowish.  Mesonotum  shiny 
ferruginous,  without  distinct  markings,  the  pleura  more  yel- 


June,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  189 


lowish.  Legs  yellow,  the  femoral  and  tibial  tips  narrowly 
darkened ; tarsi  chiefly  black,  the  proximal  ends  of  the 
basitarsi  obscure  yellow.  Wings  uniformly  pale  yellow,  the 
stigmal  region  only  slightly  darker ; veins  still  darker  yellow. 
Venation:  Rs  angulated  at  origin;  cell  M1  shorter  than  or 
subequal  to  its  petiole ; m-cu  at  near  midlength  of  cell  ist  M2. 
Abdomen  ferruginous  yellow,  in  the  male  the  subterminal 
segments  blackened  to  produce  a conspicuous  ring;  hypopy- 
gium  ferruginous.  In  the  female,  the  abdomen  is  more  uni- 
form in  color.  Male  hypopygium  generally  as  in  novce- 
anglice  in  the  setiferous  median  lobe  on  the  caudal  margin  of 
the  tergite  and  the  general  structure  of  the  dististyles,  differ- 
ing very  notably  in  the  structure  of  the  aedeagus  and  gona- 
pophyses.  Aedeagus  a large,  highly  compressed  blade,  much 
as  in  platyphallus  Alexander  and  others,  the  gonapophyses 
correspondingly  elongated.  In  novce-anglice,  the  aedeagus  is 
almost  linear,  showing  only  the  beginnings  of  compression 
on  the  distal  half ; gonapophyses  relatively  small,  hook-like. 

Habitat:  Iowa. 

Holotype : Grinnell,  Poweshiek  Co.,  May  28,  1920  (/.  S. 

Rogers)  ; Collector’s  No.  38.  Allotopotype,  § ; Collector’s  No.  40. 
Paratopotypes,  5,  with  the  type.  Specimens  in  the  Alexander 
and  Rogers  Collections. 

Limnophila  siouana  has  been  standing  in  my  collection  as  L. 
novce-anglice  Alexander,  to  which  it  bears  a notable  general  re- 
semblance, differing  conspicuously  in  the  phallosomic  structures. 

Limnophila  ( Ephelia ) sabrina  n.  sp. 

Male. — Length  about  5.5  mm.;  wing  5.6  x 1.7  to  6.8  x 1.8 
mm. 

Female—  Length  about  6.5  mm.;  wing  7.5  x 1.8  mm. 

Rostrum  and  palpi  brownish  black.  Antennae  relatively 
elongate,  especially  in  the  male,  where,  if  bent  backward,  it 
extends  some  distance  beyond  the  wing-base ; scapal  segments 
black,  the  flagellar  segments  dark  brown;  all  flagellar  seg- 
ments elongate,  the  basal  three  or  four  more  enlarged. 

Praescutum  yellowish  gray,  with  three  poorly  indicated 
brown  stripes,  the  median  stripe  weakly  divided.  Legs  with 
the  femoral  tips  conspicuously  blackened;  bases  and  tips  of 
tibiae  narrowly  blackened.  Wings  narrow  in  both  sexes,  as 
shown  by  the  above  measurements,  the  entire  central  third 
of  the  wing  being  of  approximate  equal  width ; wing-pattern 
relatively  sparse,  about  as  in  aprilina,  with  the  last  dark  cloud 
at  the  end  of  vein  2nd  A. 


190  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


Abdominal  segments  obscure  brownish  yellow,  the  caudal 
margins  broadly  dark  brown,  the  lateral  margins  more  nar- 
rowly so ; outer  segments  more  uniformly  darkened.  Male 
hypopygium  generally  as  in  aprilina , the  outer  dististyle  with 
a large  lateral  flange  on  the  basal  half ; spinulae  of  the  style 
relatively  weak,  the  apical  spine  small.  Inner  dististyle 
rather  conspicuously  widened,  without  a setiferous  tubercle 
as  in  Irene.  Outer  apical  angle  of  the  basistyle  not  produced 
and  provided  with  long  yellow  setae  as*  is  the  case  in  Irene. 

Habitat:  Northeastern  North  America. 

Holotype:  J',  Stowe,  Lamoille  Co.,  Vermont,  June  29,  1927 
{Alexander) . Allotopotype , §,  June  14,  1927.  Paratopotypes, 
5 c?  5,  with  the  allotype;  paratypes,  Amherst,  Massachusetts, 
June  5,  1924  {Alexander)  ; lCf,  Keene  Valley,  Essex  Co.,  New 
York,  May  26,  1920  {H.  Notman).  Types  in  the  author’s  collec- 
tion. 

Allied  to  L.  {E.)  aprilina  Osten  Sacken  and  L.  {E.)  irene 
Alexander,  differing  especially  in  the  more  elongate  antennae  in 
both  sexes.  From  aprilina,  it  differs  furthermore  in  the  narrow 
wings  of  both  sexes  and  the  uniformly  darkened  antennae,  agree- 
ing in  the  general  structure  of  the  male  hypopygium.  From 
irene,  it  differs  in  the  elongate  antennae  and  structure  of  the  male 
hypopygium,  agreeing  in  the  narrow  wings  of  both  sexes. 

Limnophila  {Dicrano phragma)  angustula  n.  sp. 

Male. — Length  about  4.5-5. 5 mm- 1 wing  4.8  x 1.6  to  7 x 2.2 
mm. 

Female. — Length  about  5-6  mm. ; 5-6  mm. 

Allied  and  generally  similar  to  L.  {D.)  fuscovaria  Osten 
Sacken,  differing  especially  in  the  narrow  wings  of  both 
sexes.  In  fuscovaria,  the  wings  of  the  male  are  unusually 
broad,  widest  opposite  the  level  of  the  termination  of  vein 
2nd  A.  In  angustida,  in  both  sexes,  the  wings  are  more 
uniformly  narrowed,  being  only  slightly  wider  opposite  the 
anal  vein  than  elsewhere  along  the  middle  third  of  the  wing, 
the  condition  being  about  as  in  the  females  of  fuscovaria. 

Habitat:  Northeastern  North  America. 

Holotype:  Amherst,  Massachusetts,  altitude  275  feet,  July 

25,  1928  {Alexander) . Allotopotype,  5,  July  15,  1928  {Alex- 
ander). Paratopotypes,  15  J*  J;  paratypes,  5,  Orono,  Maine, 
July  8,  1913  {Alexander)  ; Mt.  Desert,  Maine,  August  29-Sep- 


June,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  191 


tember  i,  1926  ( Alexander ) ; Woodworth’s  Lake,  Fulton  Co., 
New  York,  July  7,  1916  ( Alexander ) ; Cincinnatus,  New  York, 
July  20,  1916  ( Alexander ) ; Ithaca,  New  York,  August  12,  1910 
{Alexander) . Type  in  the  Alexander  Collection. 

This  species  has  been  confused  in  collections  with  fuscovaria. 
The  latter  species  is  especially  characteristic  of  Canadian  wood- 
land conditions  (yellow  birch  and  beech,  with  hemlock)  in  June 
and  early  July.  L.  angustula  is  a summer  species,  on  the  wing 
from  early  July  into  September.  Mr.  Edwards  has  collected  spec- 
imens of  this  species  while  in  America  in  1928  and  considers 
the  species  to  be  distinct. 


192  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


TWO  MOTHS. 

By  William  Eisenhardt,  Flatbush,  Brooklyn,  N.  Y. 
Argema  mittrei 

This  “Giant-Tailed  Moth  of  Madagascar”  is  the  largest  and 
prettiest  representative  of  the  genus  Argema. 

For  almost  20  years  no  fresh  specimens  have  been  caught  and 
therefore  this  moth  was  considered  to  be  extinct.  Fately,  how- 
ever, a few  fresh  specimens  have  been  caught  again  and  I was 
fortunate  to  receive  a set  of  them. 

In  Arthur  Twidle’s  book  “Beautiful  Butterflies  of  the  Tropics,” 
the  author  says  under  the  heading  of 

“The  Most  Wonderful  Moth  in  the  World” : 

“If  we  turn  to  Plate  VI  we  shall  find  that  the  first  thing  to 
arrest  the  attention  is  the  remarkable  form  of  the  great  moth  with 
the  long-tailed  wings,  Argema  Mittrei.  The  specimen  from 
which  the  drawing  was  made  was  the  second  of  its  kind  to  reach 
Europe.  It  was  taken  by  a missionary,  one  of  that  great  army 
of  pioneers  working  in  far-away  Farafangana  in  S.  E.  Mada- 
gascar. 

“It  came  into  the  present  writer’s  possession  through  an  agent 
in  London  to  whom  it  had  been  consigned.  Some  years  ago  the 
author  took  this  moth  to  Dr.  Alfred  Russel  Wallace  at  Broad- 
stone,  as  he  had  expressed  a wish  to  see  it.  Dr.  Wallace  spoke 
of  it  as  ‘the  most  wonderful  moth  in  the  world.’  When  the 
editor  of  ‘Marvels  of  the  Universe’  required  an  outstanding 
marvel  of  Entomology,  this  moth  was  suggested  to  him  and  it 
figured  in  that  work  as  such.” 

Argema  mittrei  is  a silk-bearing  moth  and  when  found  first  it 
was  tried  to  breed  it  for  commercial  purpose,  but  without  avail. 

Actias  dubernandi 

In  Seitz  Work  vol.  II,  p.  21 1,  this  moth  is  the  first  one  of  the 
palaearctic  Saturnidae.  On  account  of  the  small,  strange  form  of 
the  wings  and  also  of  its  dimorphism — -male  pink,  female  green — 
this  moth  is  considered  the  prettiest  and  most  interesting  repre- 
sentative of  the  palaearctic  Lepidoptera  fauna. 

Father  Dubernand,  the  first  one  to  find  them,  caught  two  males 
and  one  female  in  West  China,  and  these  three  specimens  found 
their  way  into  the  collection  of  Oberthiir  and  were  sold  after- 
wards in  England. 

There  are  very  few  of  this  rare  species  in  existence,  and  on 
account  of  the  present  political  trouble  in  China,  it  is  hard  to  say 
when  we  will  be  able  to  get  any  more. 


June,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  193 


PROCEEDINGS  OF  THE  SOCIETY. 

Meeting  of  November  15,  1928. 

A regular  meeting  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  was 
held  at  the  Brooklyn  Museum  on  Thursday  evening  November  15, 
1928,  at  8.15  p.  m. 

President  Davis  in  the  chair  and  the  following  members  pres- 
ent: Messrs.  Bueno,  Chapin,  Engelhardt,  Hunter,  Nelson,  Not- 
man,  Schaeffer,  Sheridan,  Siepman,  Wallis,  and  two  visitors. 

In  absence  of  the  Secretary,  Mr.  Schaeffer  acted  as  Secretary 
pro  tern. 

Dr.  J.  P.  H.  Marker,  P.  O.  Box  121  Times  Plaza  Station, 
Brooklyn,  N.  Y.,  was  proposed  to  membership  by  Mr.  Engelhardt 
and  being  present  was  duly  elected. 

Mr.  Hunter  was  reinstated  as  active  member  of  the  Society. 

Mr.  Bueno  said  that  for  the  time  this  summer  he  found 
Metrobates  hesperius  in  White  Plains,  Westchester  Co.,  N.  Y. 
Its  most  southern  occurrence  heretofore  noted  by  him  was  in  Put- 
nam Co.  (Lake  Mahopac)  where  it  is  most  abundant  in  company 
with  Trepobates  pictus  and  Rheumatobates  ribleyi. 

Mr.  Davis  announced  the  death  of  Dr.  E.  A.  Schwarz,  Wash- 
ington, D.  C.,  on  October  15  and  Mr.  Engelhardt  offered  the  fol- 
lowing resolution  to  be  published  in  our  minutes  which  was  ac- 
cepted : 

“The  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  hereby  expresses  its 
deep-felt  sorrow  at  the  loss  of  its  Honorary  Member  Dr.  E.  A. 
Schwarz,  respected  and  loved  by  all  who  were  privileged  to  know 
and  to  meet  him  during  his  long  life  devoted  unsparingly  to  the 
cause  and  to  workers  in  Entomology.” 

Mr.  Engelhardt  exhibited  specimens  of  the  European  moth 
Stilpnotia  salicis  L.  including  one  male  collected  by  Mr.  Pollard 
at  Harrison,  Maine,  in  July,  and  two  females  bred  by  Mr.  Engel- 
hardt from  pupae  collected  at  Vancouver,  B.  C.,  in  July.  A 
note  regarding  the  occurrence  of  this  injurious  insect  in  North 
America  has  been  submitted. 

Mr.  Bueno  announced  the  death  of  our  Honorary  Member  Wm. 
H.  Nichols,  Jr.,  a benefactor  of  the  Society  and  Mr.  Bueno  was 
empowered  to  express  the  sentiments  of  the  Society  to  his 
relatives. 

“A  Day  with  John  D.  Ritchie  at  Earl  Grey,  Saskatchewan,” 
was  the  subject  of  a short  paper  by  Mr.  Engelhardt. 

Mr.  Ritchie  a native  of  Ontario  and  an  enthusiastic  entomolo- 
gist, moved  into  Saskatchewan  several  years  ago  to  take  up  wheat 
farming.  His  place  is  seven  miles  from  Earl  Grey,  a small  set- 


194  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


tlement  connected  by  railroad  with  the  county  seat,  Regina,  forty 
miles  away.  But  trains  do  not  connect  on  Sundays  and  a hired 
auto  had  to  serve  instead.  After  a pleasant  sojourn  in  the  Can- 
adian Rockies  the  vast  and  flat  country  of  Saskatchewan  certainly 
appeared  monotonous  as  observed  from  a train  window,  yet  on 
close  acquaintance  it  is  found  to  be  not  lacking  in  diversity  and  in- 
terest. Wides  stretches  of  wheat  fields  alternate  with  extensive 
swamps,  ponds,  lakes  and  occasional  rivers  which  have  cut  deep 
valleys  for  themselves,  supporting  fairly  good  timber  in  an  other- 
wise treeless  country.  The  ponds  and  lakes  fairly  teem  with 
water  fowl  of  all  sorts.  A fox,  a coyote  and  many  rabbits  crossed 
the  road,  muskrat  houses  could  be  seen  all  along  the  swamp 
margins. 

A collection  of  insects  fairly  representative  of  the  region  and 
assembled  by  Mr.  Ritchie  at  spare  moments  in  the  busy  life  on  a 
wheat  farm,  indicated  a fauna  quite  northern  and  in  part  arctic. 
Among  the  Lepidoptera  there  were  specimens  of  Apocheima 
rachelae,  that  early  spring  geometrid  of  the  far  north,  also 
Hepialidae  and  many  Noctuidae  that  appeared  unusual.  Mr. 
Engelhardt’s  interest,  however,  were  concerned  chiefly  with  the 
Aegeriidae  or  clear-winged  moths,  of  which  there  were  a number 
of  specimens,  including  a fine  series  of  Albuna  pyramidalis.  This 
is  a common  species  ranging  across  the  continent  from  East  to 
West  but  its  food  plant  and  habits  were  not  known.  Only  one 
record  based  on  a specimen  recently  received  for  determination 
and  reported  to  have  been  bred  by  Mrs.  Hippisley,  of  Terrace. 
B.  C.,  from  Fireweed,  Epilobium  augustifolium,  served  a clue 
for  another  investigation.  A dense  growth  of  this  plant  nearby 
revealed  several  pupal  shells  protruding  from  the  soil,  but  none 
of  the  plants  showed  signs  of  boring  larvae  until  with  pick  and 
shovel  some  of  the  main  roots,  eight  to  ten  inches  below  the 
ground,  had  been  exposed.  Here  a number  of  larvae  were  found, 
but  more  had  left  their  galleries,  tunnelled  toward  the  surface  and 
pupated  in  silk-lined  tubes,  one  to  two  inches  long.  Thus  the 
mystery  of  a life  history  which  has  baffled  all  efforts  for  many 
years,  finally  was  solved. 

Mr.  Engelhardt  exhibited  a series  of  the  clear-winged  moth 
Albuna  pyrimidalis  showing  its  geographical  races  and  variations 
and  a root  cutting  showing  the  work  of  the  larva. 

Mr.  Davis  then  spoke  on  the  Fourth  International  Congress  of 
Entomologists  held  at  Cornell  University,  Ithaca,  August  12,  and 
following  days.  He  mentioned  the  visit  of  twenty  of  the  foreign 
Entomologists  to  the  Staten  Island  Museum  where  tea  was  served, 


June,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  195 


also  the  field  excursion  on  the  Island  which  was  highly  appreci- 
ated by  those  who  participated.  He  showed  a number  of  photo- 
graphs taken  at  the  Staten  Island  Museum  and  at  Ithaca  and  ex- 
plained them  briefly.  He  also  showed  an  enlarged  group  picture 
of  the  American  and  foreign  delegates  taken  at  Ithaca  and  a box 
of  insects  collected  during  his  stay  at  Ithaca,  representing  two 
species  of  Cicadas  and  one  Diapheromera  femorata. 

Mr.  Bueno  as  acting  secretary  of  the  joint  meeting  of  the 
Brooklyn  and  New  York  Entomological  Societies  held  at  the 
American  Museum  of  Natural  History  on  August  io,  1928,  at 
8.15  p.  m.  in  honor  of  the  foreign  Entomologists  visiting  the 
United  States  for  the  International  Congress  of  Entomology  read 
the  following  minutes  of  the  joint  meeting: 

Minutes. 

Minutes  of  a Joint  Meeting  of  the  Brooklyn  and  the  New  York 
Entomological  Societies,  held  at  the  American  Museum  of  Natural 
History  on  Friday,  August  10,  1928,  at  8.15  p.  m.  in  honor  of 
the  foreign  entomologists  visiting  the  United  States  for  the  In- 
ternational Congress  of  Entomology. 

In  the  chair,  Dr.  Frank  E.  Lutz,  chairman  of  the  Committee  on 
Arrangements  of  the  two  Societies,  assisted  by  Mr.  William  T. 
Davis,  President,  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society,  and  Mr. 
Henry  Bird,  President  New  York  Entomological  Society.  Mr. 
Charles  Leng,  Secretary  of  the  New  York  Society  and  Mr.  J.  R. 
de  la  Torre-Bueno,  Vice  President  of  the  Brooklyn  Society,  acted 
as  joint  secretaries  of  the  meeting. 

Among  the  thirty  visitors  were  Dr.  Waterston,  Mr.  Prout,  Mr. 
Collin,  President  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  London ; M. 
R.  Jeannel,  President  of  the  Societe  Entomologique  de  France, 
M.  Regnier,  Prof.  Silvestri,  Dr.  E.  L.  Bouvier;  Dr.  E.  P.  Felt, 
not  a visitor  but  member  of  N.  Y.  Entomological  Society;  M.  St. 
Claire  Deville,  Dr.  Karl  Jordan,  Dr.  W.  G.  Holland,  Dr.  Ceballos, 
Dr.  Bolivar,  Dr.  Ball,  of  Belgium;  Dr.  Efflatoun  Bey,  of  Egypt; 
Dr.  Muir,  of  Hawaii;  and  among  the  members  of  the  Brooklyn 
Society  were  Messrs.  Olsen,  Engelhardt,  Bromley  and  Chapin; 
and  many  others,  to  the  number  of  30  visitors  and  members  of 
the  Societies. 

Mr.  Bird,  of  the  N.  Y.  Society,  extended  a warm  welcome  as 
cordial  as  sincere,  to  the  visiting  entomologists. 

Mr.  Davis  of  the  Brooklyn  Society,  expressed  welcome  and  ap- 
preciation of  this  great  visit.  He  also  noted  that  our  ancestors 
had  paid  but  little  attention  to  insects,  deeming  them  too  trifling 


196  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


to  merit  the  attention  of  men,  until  their  ravages  made  men  take 
notice,  whence  has  come  the  great  advance  in  our  science. 

Mr.  Collin,  on  behalf  of  the  Fellows  of  the  Entomological  So- 
ciety of  London,  extended  cordial  greetings  to  the  Brooklyn  and 
New  York  Societies.  He  felt  quite  overcome  at  the  hospitalities 
they  had  received  and  would  keep  happy  memories  of  New  York. 
He  said  emphatically  that  entomological  relations  must  become 
more  international  in  character. 

Dr.  E.  L.  Bouvier,  of  the  Paris  Museum,  then  spoke  in  grace- 
ful French.  He  said  he  might  say  things  already  said  by  other 
speakers,  but  they  were  necessary  to  state,  although  all  those 
from  Europe  would  have  the  same  to  say.  Two  things  he  had.  to 
say — the  first,  that  it  was  absolutely  necessary  that  there  should 
be  contacts  between  European  and  American  men  of  Science ; and 
the  second  that  thanks  to  the  men  of  science  of  America,  to  those 
in  the  Museum  of  Natural  History  and  to  the  members  of  both 
societies,  these  contacts  were  being  rapidly  and  cordially  estab- 
lished. He  said  that  due  to  his  unfamiliarity  with  English,  he 
had  not  been  able  to  properly  express  his  gratitude  to  Dr.  Lutz 
for  his  labors  in  behalf  of  the  foreigners.  The  only  way  the 
French  have  to  express  and  show  appreciation  is  by  exclamations 
of  admiration,  which  barely  express  their  feelings.  He  was  happy 
at  the  accident  (of  the  functionless  bus)  which  showed  them  how 
fine  Dr.  Lutz  was.  And  what  an  opportunity  these  delays  af- 
forded all  to  see  our  American  fauna,  the  flora  and  the  beauties  of 
the  American  landscape.  He  would  end  this  piecemeal  talk  by 
again  expressing  his  thanks  to  the  Entomological  Societies  and  to 
the  Director  of  the  Museum. 

Dr.  Ball,  speaking  for  Belgium,  said  he  was  very  glad  his  first 
Congress  was  in  the  United  States,  with  which  there  were  so 
many  ties  of  friendship.  He  had  heard  of  the  many  wonderful 
things  in  this  country;  and  his  expectations  had  not  been  disap- 
pointed. In  Belgium,  science  had  been  having  bad  times  since 
the  war;  and  the  improved  condition  of  the  Belgian  institutions  of 
learning  was  due  to  American  help.  He  expressed  his  apprecia- 
tion of  their  reception  here ; and  particularly  to  Dr.  Lutz  for  so 
kindly  conducting  them  and  for  his  consideration.  He  also 
wished  to  think  Mr.  Davis  for  the  collecting  trip  on  Staten  Island, 
where  he  had  caught  interesting  insects. 

Dr.  Ignacio  Bolivar,  of  the  Madrid  Museum,  said,  in  English, 
that  he  expressed  his  congratulations  to  American  Entomology ; 
and  his  appreciation  of  Dr.  Lutz  and  Mr.  Bueno  for  their  great 


June,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  197 


kindness.  He  extended  to  the  Societies  the  compliments  of  the 
Spanish  entomologists  that  had  come  for  the  Congress. 

Prof.  Silvestri,  speaking  for  Italy,  expressed  in  English  his 
thanks  to  the  Societies  for  the  reception  of  the  evening.  He  had 
had  the  great  fortune  to  visit  this  country  20  years  ago,  so  he  was 
no  stranger  among  us.  He  gave  voice  to  his  great  admiration  of 
the  American  Museum  of  Natural  History,  which  could  serve  as 
a model  for  other  countries.  It  also  gave  him  great  pleasure  to 
meet  personally  many  entomologists,  who  had  heretofore  been 
known  only  by  their  letters. 

Dr.  Efflatoun  Bey,  speaking  for  the  Egyptian  Government  and 
for  the  Egyptian  Entomological  Society,  gave  thanks  for  the 
successful  efforts  of  the  American  Societies  to  make  smooth  the 
way  of  the  foreigners  to  Ithaca,  and  invited  all  to  Egypt. 

Mr.  Muir,  speaking  for  Hawaii,  deemed  himself  a case  of 
mimicry,  because  he  was  passing  himself  off  for  a foreigner, 
while  as  a fact,  he  was  from  a U.  S.  possession.  The  Hawaiian 
Islands  he  said  are  unique  and  well  suited  for  the  study  of  evolu- 
tion, because  the  conditions  of  life  there  are  so  simple.  He  ex- 
tended to  all  an  invitation  to  visit  Hawaii. 

Dr.  Lutz  then  spoke ; and  thanked  the  Societies  for  the  privilege 
they  had  accorded  him  of  representing  them  in  company  with  Mr. 
Bueno.  He  had  missed  many  things,  but  had  hopes  for  another 
time  when  he  would  be  in  everything. 

J.  R.  DE  LA  TORRE-BUENO, 

Secretary  for  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society. 

Mr.  Bueno  as  a Brooklyn  member  of  the  N.  Y.  reception  com- 
mittee of  the  foreign  Entomologists  said  that  he  was  present  when 
the  first  party  of  the  delegates,  consisting  of  the  English,  French, 
Belgian  and  Spanish  entomologists  arrived  on  the  Tuscania;  and 
that  he  and  Dr.  Lutz  assisted  them  in  every  way.  He  participated 
in  the  arranged  outing  to  Bear  Mountain  and  other  places  and 
spoke  of  the  great  delay  caused  by  the  breakdown  of  a bus,  which 
accident,  though  aggravating  to  the  members  of  the  N.  Y.  com- 
mittee, Dr.  Lutz  and  Mr.  Bueno,  was  apparently  greatly  enjoyed 
and  welcomed  by  the  foreign  entomologists,  which  delays,  as  Dr. 
Bouvier  expressed  in  his  speech  at  the  joint  meeting  of  both  So- 
cieties, afforded  all  the  opportunity  to  see  more  closely  our  Ameri- 
can fauna  and  flora  and  the  beauties  of  the  American  landscape. 
After  this  about  forty-five  interesting  pictures  of  groups  of 
American  and  foreign  entomologists  were  shown  on  the  screen 


198  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


with  comments  and  remarks  by  Mr.  Davis.  The  pictures  were 
taken  and  the  slides  loaned  by  Dr.  Harry  Knight. 

Before  adjournment  Mr.  Davis  was  authorized  to  extend  to 
Dr.  Knight  the  thanks  of  the  Society  for  the  loan  of  these  in- 
teresting pictures. 

C.  Schaeffer, 
Secretary  pro  tem. 

Meeting  of  December  13,  1928. 

A regular  meeting  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  was 
held  at  the  Brooklyn  Museum  on  Thursday  evening  December  13, 
1928,  at  8.15  p.  m. 

President  Davis  in  the  chair  and  the  following  members  pres- 
ent: Bueno,  Engelhardt,  Huntington,  Lemmer,  Marker,  Notman, 

Schaeffer,  Sever,  Shoemaker,  Siepman ; also  three  visitors : 
Messrs.  Bigelow  and  Pollard,  and  Dr.  Stuart. 

In  the  absence  of  the  Secretary  Mr.  Schaeffer  acted  as  Secre- 
tary pro  tem. 

The  editor  announced  that  the  December  number  of  the  Bul- 
letin is  in  press  and  said  that  it  takes  a little  more  time  now  than 
before.  He  also  made  an  appeal  for  short  or  brief  notes  for  the 
Bulletin  and  called  attention  to  the  shortage  of  papers  for  Ento- 
mologica  Americana  on  orders  outside  of  Heteroptera  and 
Coleoptra. 

Messrs.  Sheridan,  Shoemaker  and  Lemmer  were  appointed  by 
'the  President  to  serve  as  nominating  committee  for  1929. 

Mr.  Shoemaker  reported  having  taken  a specimen  of  the  bean 
beetle,  Epilachna  corrupta  Muls.  at  Liberty  Street,  N.  Y.  Mr. 
Davis  showed  specimens  of  the  brightly  colored  South  American 
Cicada,  Hemisciera  maculipennis  Lap.,  and  read  an  account  from 
Bates,  “A  Naturalist  on  the  Amazon,’’  on  the  abundance  and 
habits  of  this  insect  on  the  River  Amazon. 

Mr.  Engelhardt  told  of  an  observation  regarding  the  nesting 
habits  and  behavior  of  a large  colony  of  the  predatory  wasp, 
Chlorion  harrisi  Fernald,  which  he  found  on  the  premises  of  Mr. 
H.  P.  Parks,  Apiculturist,  during  April,  1928,  near  San  Antonio, 
Texas. 

This  colony  was  utilizing  the  tube-like  leaves  of  a dead  yucca 
as  nesting  sides  and  at  that  time  was  storing  the  very  young 
nymphs  of  the  spiny  Katydid,  Rehnia  spinosa.  A note  covering 
this  observation  already  has  been  submitted  for  publication  in  the 
December  number  of  the  Bulletin.  Subsequent  reports  received 


June,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  199 


from  Mr.  Parks  show  that  with  the  advancing  season  the  wasps 
resorted  to  spiders  and  in  August  and  September  to  tree  crickets 
as  their  prey.  Yucca  leaves  forwarded  to  the  Brooklyn  Museum 
by  Mr.  Parks  during  October  are  loosely  filled  with  soft,  dry 
grasses  to  a length  of  fifteen  to  eighteen  inches  and  between  this 
packing,  at  regular  intervals,  are  the  wintering  wasp  larvae  pro- 
tected by  a grayish  cocoon,  soft,  yet  strong  in  texture.  Excepting 
tree  crickets,  no  other  insects  could  be  identified  with  certainty 
among  the  fragmentary  remains  of  prey.  Two  Hemiptera 
- / (Anasa  tristis  and  Perillus  hioculatus) , one  flea  beetle  ( Disonycha 
varicornis) , and  one  land  snail  had  found  suitable  hibernating 
quarters  within  the  yucca  leaves. 

This  observation  was  followed  by  remarks  on  food  and  nest- 
ing habits  of  some  Hymenoptera  by  several  members. 

Messrs.  Pollard  and  Schaeffer  showed  some  interesting  or  rare 
insects  from  the  collection  of  the  late  A.  C.  Weeks  which  is  now 
in  the  Brooklyn  Museum.  Both  emphasized  the  fact  that  though 
Mr.  Weeks  had  been  an  active  and  vigorous  collector  and  had 
accumulated  a great  amount  of  material,  there  were  relatively  few 
interesting  or  rare  species  in  the  collection  considering  the  number 
of  years  Mr.  Weeks  collected. 

Among  the  Lepidoptera  shown  by  Mr.  Pollard  were  Remigia 
marcida,  Catocala  serena,  Plagio  mimicus  pityachrous  and  possi- 
bly a new  variety  of  Morrisonia  exicta  and  others. 

Mr.  Schaeffer  exhibited  from  the  Weeks  collection  about 
twenty-six  species  belonging  to  different  orders  which  represented 
either  new  or  additional  records  to  the  lately  published  list  of 
insects  of  New  York  State.  Among  the  Diptera  were  one  speci- 
men of  Volucella  ohesa  Fab.  from  Fort  Wadsworth,  S.  I.,  and 
two  specimens  of  Pterodontia  flavipes  Say  from  Yaphank,  F.  I., 
July  and  August.  Of  Hymenoptera  one  specimen  of  Trogus 
elegans  Cress,  from  Yaphank,  F.  I.,  September,  and  two  speci- 
mens of  Trogus  nubilipenne  Hald.,  Brooklyn,  June.  The  Orthop- 
tera  were  represented  by  two  specimens  of  Phylloscelis  pulchellus 
Uhl.  from  Aqueduct,  F.  I.,  August.  The  rest  of  the  material  ex- 
hibited were  Coleoptera  of  which,  as  well  as  of  the  other  orders, 
a list  will  be  published  in  our  Bulletin  as  soon  as  the  material  is 
more  carefully  worked  up,  together  with  additional  records  and 
corrections  to  the  list  of  insects  of  N.  Y.  State  but  derived  from 
other  sources. 

On  motion,  the  Society  then  adjourned. 

Chas.  Schaeffer, 
Secretary  pro  tem. 


200  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


BOOK  NOTES. 

A Handbook  of  the  Dragonflies  of  North  America.  By  James 
G.  Needham  and  Hortense  Butler  Hey  wood,  assisted  by 
Specialists  in  Certain  Groups.  Charles  C.  Thomas,  Springfield, 
Illinois,  1929,  386  pp.,  149  illustrations,  also  a bibliography  and 
index. 

The  preface  states  that  the  book  is  “ for  collectors  of  dragon- 
flies and  for  students  of  their  natural  history.  It  aims  to  furnish 
a ready  means  of  finding  the  names  of  our  North  American  spe- 
cies, and  to  report  some  observations  on  their  habits.  It  contains 
keys,  and  descriptions  and  figures.  The  keys  are  guides ; the  de- 
scriptions and  figures  are  together  diagnostic.  Both  adult  and 
immature  stages,  so  far  as  known,  are  included.”  The  book  is 
divided  into  two  parts:  Part  I,  General,  devoted  to  the  life,  struc- 
ture, habits,  collecting  and  preservation  of  specimens,  etc.,  and 
Part  II,  from  page  51  on,  devoted  to  a systematic  consideration 
of  species,  with  tables  for  the  determination  of  adults  and  where 
possible,  the  nymphs  as  well.  The  specific  descriptions  are  num- 
bered from  1 to  360,  which  permits  of  a practical  arrangement  of 
the  collection,  except  in  some  of  the  genera,  as,  for  instance, 
Argia > where  they  are  arranged  alphabetically.  The  larger  drag- 
onflies or  Anisoptera,  from  Nos.  1 to  245,  are  first  considered, 
and  then  the  damselflies  or  Zygoptera,  from  Nos.  246  to  360. 
While  the  Catalogue  of  the  Odonata  of  North  America,  by  Mutt- 
kowski,  includes  the  species  known  at  the  time  of  its  publication, 
the  student  will  of  course  find  the  present  handbook  covering  the 
species  of  the  same  area  with  its  detailed  descriptions  and  figures 
added  very  helpful.  However,  we  regret  that  it  will  cost  him 
$7.00  instead  of  $5.00. 

We  do  not  see  how  our  North  American  ants  could  be  ade- 
quately covered  unless  names  are  used  that  express  the  condi- 
tions, such  as  species,  geographic  races,  varieties,  etc.,  and  while 
Odonata  do  not  present  these  complications  to  the  same  degree, 
yet  there  are  certainly  some  geographic  races  and  evident  varie- 
ties, so  “ binomials  only  ” as  used  in  the  book,  does  not  appear,  in 
the  opinion  of  the  writer,  to  give  as  much  information  as  might 
easily  be  told.  Often  practical  and  helpful  common  names  have 
been  introduced,  such  as  “ Black  Wings  ” for  Agrion,  and  “ Ruby 
Spots  ” for  Hetaerina.  In  the  Damselflies,  C.  Frances  Byers  has 
contributed  about  40  pages  to  the  book,  and  so  to  a considerable 
extent  is  one  of  the  authors. 


June,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  201 


As  is  generally  the  case  in  determining  the  species  in  any  group 
the  student  of  Odonata  will  make  better  progress  if  he  has  sev- 
eral books  at  hand ; he  should  consult  the  Handbook  and  then 
check  up  with  the  other  books.  The  Handbook  corvers  such  a 
wide  area,  that  with  its  practical  arrangement,  it  quickly  leads  to 
the  probable  species  in  hand.  Sometimes,  however,  an  error  may 
have  occurred.  We  think,  for  instance,  that  on  page  72  the  fig- 
ures referring  to  Ophiogomphus  occidentis  are  those  of  O.  asper- 
sus,  and  those  marked  aspersus  are  occidentis,  and  on  page  328 
the  figure  for  pollutum  would  seem  to  need  correction.  However, 
as  has  been  stated,  every  student  should  have  the  Handbook, 
start  with  it  on  his  dragonfly,  and  then  check  up  with  some  of  the 
papers  covering  the  Odonata  of  his  state  or  locality,  of  which 
Professor  Needham  himself  has  written  some  excellent  ones  for 
the  Adirondacks.  As  dragonflies  are  such  good  fliers,  they  often 
have  a wide  range. — Wm.  T.  Davis. 


PUBLICATIONS  OF  THE  BROOKLYN  ENTOMO- 
LOGICAL SOCIETY. 

Explanation  of  all  Technical  Terms  Used  in  Entomology. 


By  John  B.  Smith,  Sc.D.  (The  Glossary)  Cloth $3.00 

Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  (un- 
bound), vols.  4-8  (per  vol.) 1.75 

Yols.  9-14  1.50 

Yols.  15  to  21 1.75 

Yols.  22  to  date 2.50 

Entomologica  Americana,  vols.  1-6,  each 4.00 

vols.  7-9,  each 4.00 

Papilio,  vols.  1 and  4,  each 3.00 

Monograph  of  Plusia,  Ottolengui 50 


Orders  for  publications  must  be  sent  with  remittance  to  Li- 
brarian, Brooklyn  Entomological  Society,  c/o  Central  Museum, 
Eastern  Parkway,  Brooklyn,  N.  Y. 


EXCHANGES. 

This  one  page  is  intended  only  for  wants  and  exchanges,  not 
for  advertisements  of  articles  for  sale.  Notices  not  exceeding 
THREE  lines  free  to  subscribers.  Over  lines  charged  for  at 
15  cents  per  line  per  insertion. 

Old  notices  will  be  discontinued  as  space  for  new  ones  is 
needed. 

WE  WISH  to  procure  in  exchange  or  on  cash:  Parnassius  of 
North-America,  with  its  varieties  and  aberrations,  well  labelled, 
spread  or  in  papers  (clodius,  smitheus,  eversmanni).  Dr.  Staud- 
inger  & A.  Bang-Haas,  Dresden-Blasewitz. 

THE  MUSEUM  of  the  Brooklyn  Institute  has  a few  uncolored 
sets  of  the  Calverly,  Weidenmeyer  and  Edwards  plates  of  North 
American  Sphingidae  for  exchange  or  for  sale  at  $5  per  set.  Ad- 
dress, Librarian,  Brooklyn  Museum,  Eastern  Parkway,  Brooklyn, 
N.  Y. 

LEPIDOPTERA  from  the  Mountains  of  Kentucky.  Papilios 
and  other  var.  of  this  section  collected.  Paper  spec,  of  Xylophones 
tersa  and  Catopsilia  eitbule  on  hand.  Also  Cocoons  of  the  larger 
Saturnid  moths.  Ellis  Chandlee,  Barbourville,  Ky. 

BUTTERFLY  COLLECTORS— Have  you  butterflies  which 
look  different  in  color  or  pattern  from  the  average?  (See  adver- 
tisement). Please  write.  Jeane  Gunder,  Pasadena,  Calif. 

CHRY SOMELIDAE,  CRYPTOCEPHALINI.  Wish  beetles 
of  this  group  from  all  over  world.  Will  exchange  local 
Coleoptera  or  purchase  for  cash.  Write  me  before  shipping 
material.  Paul  N.  Musgrave,  514  Mt.  Vernon  Ave.,  Fairmont, 
W.  Va. 

CYNIPIDAE. — Galls  and  bred  wasps  wanted  to  determine  or 
in  exchange.  Alfred  C.  Kinsey,  Indiana  University,  Bloomington, 
Indiana. 

WANTED. — Am  studying  the  bionomics  of  the  corn  billbugs 
and  desire  the  privilege  of  examining  Calendra  ( Sphenophorus ) 
from  all  parts  of  the  world.  A.  F.  Satterthwait,  U.  S.  Entomo- 
logical Laboratory,  Webster  Grove,  Mo. 

DIURNAL  LEPIDOPTERA. — Have  many  desirable  west- 
ern species  to  exchange,  including  Argynnis  at  ossa,  mac  aria,  mor- 
monia,  malcolmi , nokomis;  Melitaea  neumoegeni;  Lycaena  speci- 
osa;  etc.  Send  lists.  Dr.  John  A.  Comstock,  Southwest  Museum, 
4699  Marmion  Way,  Los  Angeles,  Calif. 

WANTED. — Ants  from  all  portions  of  the  United  States  for 
determination  or  exchange.  Will  also  exchange  other  insects  for 
ants.  M.  R.  Smith,  Assistant  Entomologist,  State  Plant  Board, 
A.'  and  M.  College,  Miss. 

CATOPINI:  Catops  ( Choleva ),  Prionochaeta,  Ptomaphagus. 
— Wanted  to  borrow  all  possible  specimens  of  these  genera  from 
North  America  for  a revisional  study.  Correspondence  solicited. 
— Melville  H.  Hatch,  Dept,  of  Zoology,  Univ.  of  Wash.,  Seattle, 
Wash. 


VoLXXlV  OCTOBER,  1929  No.  4 

BULLETIN 

OF  THE 

Brooklyn  Entomological 
Society 


PUBLICATION  COMMITTEE 

J.  R.  de  la  TORRE-BUENO,  Editor 

E.  L.  BELL  GEO.  P.  ENGELHARDT 

Published  for  the  Society  by  the 

Science  Press  Printing  Co., 

Lime  and  Green  Sts.,  Lancaster,  Pa., 

Price,  60  cents  Subscription,  $2.50  per  year 

Mailed  October  26,  1929 


Entered  as  second-class  matter  January  21,  1919,  at  the  post  office  at  Lancaster,  Pa,, 
under  the  Act  of  March  3,  1879 


The  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society 

Meetings  are  held  on  the  second  Thursday  after  the  first  Tuesday  of  each 
month  from  October  to  June,  inclusive,  at  the  Central  Museum,  Eastern 
Parkway  and  Washington  Ave.,  Brooklyn.  The  annual  dues  are  $2.00. 


OFFICEBS,  1929 


Honorary  President 


CHAELES  W.  LENG 


President 

W.  T.  DAVIS 


Treasurer 

G.  P.  ENGELHABDT 


Vice-President 

J.  B.  de  la  TOBBE-BUENO 
Becording  Secretary 
E.  L.  BELL 
Corresponding  Secretary 
HOWABD  NOTMAN 


Central  Museum 
Eastern  Parkway 
Librarian 

DB.  JOSEPH  BEQUAEBT 
Curator 

J.  M.  SHEBIDAN 


Delegate  to  Council  of  New  York 
Academy  of  Sciences 
G.  P.  ENGELHABDT 


CONTENTS 

GENEBIC  STATUS  OF  CATOPSILIA  HuBNEB  AND  PHOEBIS 


HUBNEB,  Klots  203 

FUBTHEB  NOTES  ON  EUBEMA  HUBNEB,  Klots  214 

PHYLLOPHAGA  AUSTBICOLA— A COBBECTION,  Fall  & Bueno 216 

MIBIDAE  FBOM  TEXAS,  Johnston  217 

CICINDELA  TEANQUEBAEICA  HOEICONENSIS  IENG,  C.  A, 

Frost  219 

PODALONIA  VIOLACEIPENNIS,  A DIMOBPHIC  WASP,  Bequaert  220 

LATE  SPBING  BUGS,  Bueno  V; 221 

COLEOPTEBA  FBOM  NOBTHEBN  CALIFOBNIA,  Notman  222 

WINTEB  HOMES  FOB  MOSQUITOES,  Frost  223 

CONTBIBUTION  TO  AM.  THYSANOPTEBA,  Moulton  224 

PAONIAS  EXCAECATUS  IN  COLOBADO,  Cockerell 244 

SOME  COMMON  DIPTEBA,  Bigelow  245 

ISTUBGIA  TBUNCATAEIA  ON  L.  I.,  Latham  246 

A NEW  GYBINUS  FBOM  NOBTHEBN  N.  H.,  Chamberlain  247 

A SYNONYM,  Frost  .. 249 

BOOK  NOTES:  THE  PEINCIPLES  OF  SYSTEMATIC  ENTOMOL- 
OGY, J.  B.  T.  B '. : , 250 

PBOCEEDINGS  OF  THE  SOCIETY,  Bell  254 

INSECTS  ATOP  OF  SKY SCBAPEBS,  Schiffer  i 260 


Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society 

Published  in 

February,  April,  June,  October  and  December  of  each  year 

Subscription  price,  domestic,  $2.50  per  year;  foreign,  $2.75  in  advance; 
single  copies,  60  cents.  Advertising  rates  on  application.  Short  articles, 
notes  and  observations  of  interest  to  entomologists  are  solicited.  Authors 
will  receive  25  reprints  free  if  ordered  in  advance  of  publication.  Address 
subscriptions  and  all '.communications  to 

J.  B.  de  la  TOBBE-BUENO , Editor, 

38  De  Kalb  Avenue,  White  Plains,  N.  Y. 


BULLETIN 

OF  THE 

BROOKLYN  ENTOMOLOGICAL  SOCIETY 


Vol.  XXIV  October,  1929  No.  4 


THE  GENERIC  STATUS  OF  CATOPSILIA  HUBNER 

AND  PHOEBIS  HUBNER,  WITH  A DISCUSSION 
OF  THE  RELATIONSHIPS  OF  THE  SPECIES 
AND  THE  HOMOLOGIES  OF  THE  MALE 
GENITALIA  (LEPIDOPTERA, 

PIERIDAE). 

By  Alexander  B.  Klots,  Ithaca,  N.  Y. 

Introduction. 

Description  and  Homologies  of  Male  Genitalia. 

Interrelations  of  Rhodocerine  Genera. 

Specific  Structures,  Relationships,  etc.  of  Catopsilia. 

Specific  Structures,  Relationships,  etc.  of  Phoebis. 

Summary. 

Bibliography. 

List  of  figures. 

Addendum. 

Introduction. 

Various  authors  have,  from  time  to  time,  attempted  to  place  the 
New  World  species  generally  included  in  Catopsilia  in  a different 
genus  or  in  different  genera,  depending  upon  the  degree  of  “split- 
ting” in  which  each  author  believed,  or  upon  the  thoroughness 
with  which  he  did  his  work.  However,  in  spite  of  this  series  of 
efforts,  which  dates  from  the  time  of  Hubner,  both  Old  and  New 
World  species  are  at  present  usually  “lumped”  together  under 
Catopsilia. 

The  writer,  after  a careful  study  of  the  structures  of  the  species 
involved,  has  reached  the  conclusion  that  not  only  are  the  New 
World  species  worthy  of  being  in  a separate  genus  but  that  the 
two  genera  thus  formed  are  not  even  closely  related.  He  there- 
fore refers  the  New  World  species  to  Phoebis  Hubner  (1)  of 
which  genus  argante  Fabricius  is  the  type. 

203 


204  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXIv 


In  general  the  writer  bases  this  assumption  mainly  upon  a study 
of  the  male  genitalia  and  the  pupae  of  the  various  genera  of  the 
Rhodocerini,  inasmuch  as  the  venation  shows  too  little  variation 
to  be  of  value  in  establishing  generic  relationships.  Inasmuch  as 
the  genitalia  of  the  Pieridae  have  been  little  studied  with  reference 
to  their  homologies,  and  as  the  nomenclature  of  the  genitalia  of 
the  Lepidoptera  is  in  a very  bad  mess,  the  writer  deems  it  advis- 
able to  describe  and  discuss  at  some  length  the  terms  of  which  he 
makes  use.  In  this  work  Eyer’s  excellent  paper  is  of  great 
help  (2). 

Description  and  Homologies  of  Male  Genitalia. 

Vinculum  (v).  In  the  genera  under  consideration  the  vin- 
culum forms  a chitinized  band  which  articulates  with  the  8th 
abdominal  somite.  Normally  in  the  Lepidoptera  the  upper  ends 
of  the  vinculum  articulate  with  the  lateral  margins  of  the  tegumen, 
but  here  these  ends  appear  to  have  extended  up  and  fused  on  the 
mid-dorsal  line  cephalad  of  the  tegumen,  so  that  the  vinculum 
forms  a ring  which  is  closed  at  the  top  and  whose  lower  ends  fuse 
with  the  saccus.  (See  figs.  1,  2 and  10  C.) 

Saccus  (s).  A number  of  writers  have  applied  this  term  in 
different  ways.  The  writer  here  uses  it  to  apply  to  the  sac  which 
extends  cephalad  inside  the  abdomen  from  the  ventral  ends  of  the 
vinculum.  In  previous  papers  the  writer  followed  Pierce  (3) 
in  using  the  term  to  apply  to  the  ventral  portion  of  the  vinculum 
in  fusion  with  the  present  saccus,  and  applied  the  term  “ cephalad 
extension  of  the  saccus”  to  the  structure  which  he  here  calls  the 
saccus.  A flap  extends  caudad  from  the  saccus  and  articulates 
by  a recurved  membrane  with  the  8th  sternite.  (See  figs.  1,  2 and 
10  C.) 

Tegumen  (t.)  In  Catopsilia , Anteos  and  Eurymus  the  tegumen 
bears  on  the  mid-dorsal  line  a short,  caudad-extending  lobe  which 
the  writer  terms  the  “basal  lobe  of  the  tegumen”  (b.  1.  t.).  See 
fig’s.  10-14.  Each  lateral  margin  of  the  tegumen  is  prolonged 
ventrad  into  a tapering  arm  (b.  t.)  to  which  articulates  the  dorso- 
basal  angle  of  the  harpe.  (See  figs.  2 and  10  C.) 

Uncus  (u.)  The  uncus  articulates  with  the  caudal  margin  of 
the  tegumen  and  overhangs  or  lies  between  the  dorsal  margins  of 
the  harpes.  It  shows  considerable  variation  in  size  and  shape. 
In  many  cases  the  articulation  with  the  tegumen  is  very  difficult 
to  see.  (See  figs.  2 and  10-14.) 


Oct.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  205 


Gnathos  (gn.)  The  writer  applies  this  term  to  a pair  of 
rounded,  rather  heavily  chitinized  flaps  which  originate  at  about 
the  base  of  the  uncus  and  extend  ventrad  on  each  side  of  the 
anal  tube.  Inasmuch  as  the  gnathos  is  typically  a structure  aris- 
ing from  the  tegumen  this  structure  may  not  represent  the  true 
gnathos  at  all.  (See  fig.  2.) 

Rectum  (r.)  and  Anus  { a.)  The  anus  opens  beneath  the 
tegumen  and  is  connected  with  it  and  with  the  base  of  the  uncus 
by  a membrane.  (See  figs.  1 and  10  C.) 

Transtilla?  (tr?)  Extending  ventrad  from  the  anus  is  a lightly 
chitinized  fold  of  membrane  which  runs  ventrad  and  cephalad  to 
join  the  anellus.  This  may  possibly  represent  a modification  of 
the  transtilla.  At  least  it  occupies  the  same  position  and  serves 
relatively  the  same  function.  (See  figs.  1 and  10  C.) 

Anellus  (an.)  The  anellus  is  here  a paired  cephalad  fold  sur- 
rounding, in  part  at  least,  the  aedoeagus.  It  connects  dorsally 
with  the  transtilla  part  at  least,  the  aedoeagus.  It  connects 
dorsally  with  the  transtilla  and  with  the  membranous  inner  layer 
of  the  harpe,  and  laterally  and  ventrally  with  the  inner  layer  of  the 
harpe.  Ventrally  it  is  supported  by  the  juxta.  (See  figs.  1 and 
10  C.) 

Juxta  (jux.)  The  juxta  is  here  in  the  form  of  a bar  which 
lies  between  and  articulates  with  the  closely  opposed  inner  edges 
of  the  “ventral  thickenings  of  the  harpes”  and  whose  caudal  end 
gives  out  an  arm  which  runs  sharply  cephalad,  forks  laterally  and 
supports  the  paired  lobes  of  the  anellus.  In  Phoebis  these  arms 
support  the  ventral  wall  of  the  aedoeagus.  (See  figs.  1 and 
10  C.) 

Setiferous  Pad  (s.  p.)  In  P.  trite  occurs  this  curious  struc- 
ture, which  is  also  present  in  P.  eubule  in  a very  rudimentary 
state.  It  consists  of  a pair  of  flattened,  rounded  pads,  bearing  a 
number  of  strong  setae  on  their  caudal  margins,  which  are  located 
at  the  top  of  the  anellus  and  connected  with  the  ventral  edge  of 
the  “dorsal  thickening  of  the  harpe”  by  a strongly  chitinized  fold. 
(See  figs.  1 and  3 B.) 

Harpe  (h.)  and  its  Structures.  The  harpe  is  a flattened  sac, 
closed  and  more  or  less  pointed  caudad  and  broad  and  open 
cephalad.  The  outer  wall  is  bounded  basally  by  a strongly 
chitinized  rod  (b.  h.).  This  is  then  connected  with  the  vinculum 
by  a membrane.  The  inner  wall  extends  cephalad  to  join  the 
“transtilla,”  aedoeagus  and  anellus.  The  inner  wall  is  thickened 


206  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


from  the  margin  inward,  forming  the  “dorsal  thickening  of  the 
harpe”  (d.  t.  h.),  the  “distal  thickening  of  the  harpe”  (dis.  t.  h.) 
and  the  “ventral  thickening  of  the  harpe”  (v.  t.  h.).  Each  of 
these  more  heavily  chitinized  areas  bears  many  fine  setae,  while 
the  “mesal  area  of  the  harpe”  (m.  a.  h.)  is  plain  and  membranous. 
In  Phoebis  along  the  inner  edge  of  the  distal  thickening  of  the 
harpe  the  outer  and  inner  walls  are  fused  together  and  this  line 
is  heavily  chitinized,  forming  the  “ bar  ” which  serves  as  attach- 
ment for  a strong  muscle.  There  is  some  reason  for  suspecting 
that  this  “bar”  is  a remnant  of  the  “clasper”  as  found  in  some 
other  and  more  primitive  genera  of  the  Pieridae  ( Euchloe , 
Anthocharis,  Perrhybrids,  etc.)  In  P.  pliilea,  thalestris  and 
avellanada  a strong  fold  runs  from  the  bar,  or  near  it,  to  the 
anellus,  marking  the  line  of  the  above  mentioned  muscle.  (See 
figs.  4 and  7.) 

Dorsal  lobe  a (d.  1.  a)  occurs  in  Catopsilia  as  a rounded  setifer- 
ous  sac,  projecting  from  the  dorsal  margin  of  the  harpe.  In  most 
species  of  Phoebis  it  is  absent,  occurring  in  trite,  orbis  and 
avellanada  as  a small  rounded  swelling  on  the  inner  face  of  the 
dorsal  thickening.  (See  figs.  1,  6,  7 and  10-14.) 

The  Dorsal  Spine  (d.  s.)  is  a quite  heavily  chitinized  process 
arising  on  the  dorsum  of  the  harpe,  distad  of  dorsal  lobe  a.  In 
Catopsilia  it  is  located  near  the  distal  end  of  the  harpe.  In  C. 
crocale,  pomona,  thauruma  and  florella  it  is  connected  with  the 
dorso-basal  angle  of  the  harpe  by  a chitinized  strip  running  along 
the  outer  surface  just  below  the  dorsum.  In  C.  pyranthe  and 
scylla  this  chitinized  strip  is  absent.  In  Phoebis  the  dorsal  spine 
is  located  more  proximally  and  shows  great  development  in  some 
species. 

The  Inner  Lobe  (i.  1.)  is  absent  in  Catopsilia  but  occurs  in  all 
species  of  Phoebis  except  the  statira  group  as  a long  sac  arising 
from  the  junction  of  the  dorsal  and  distal  thickenings  of  the 
harpe.  It  bears  strong  spines  which  in  P.  eubule  are  flattened 
and  bifurcate.  (See  figs.  1-9.)  The  inner  lobe  is  probably 
homologous  with  the  “ clasper  ” of  Pierce  and  the  “ harpe  ” of 
Gosse  and  later  workers. 

The  Distal  Process  is  short  and  rounded  in  Catopsilia.  In 
Phoebis  it  shows  great  development,  often  being  prolonged  into  a 
long  spine  with  various  dorsal  toothing  at  the  base. 

The  ventral  thickening  of  the  harpe  is  in  Catopsilia  swollen  into 
a rounded  setiferous  sac  which  the  writer  terms  “ventral  lobe  a.” 
In  Phoebis  no  trace  of  this  occurs,  but  the  ventral  thickening 
bears  stronger  setae  than  the  other  areas  of  the  harpe. 


Oct.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  207 


Interrelations  of  Rhodocerine  Genera. 

There  are  evident  in  the  Rhodocerini  two  main  types  of  male 
genitalia.  In  one  of  these,  as  represented  by  Catopsilia , Anteos 
(7),  Meganostoma  and  Eurymus,  the  basal  lobe  of  the  tegumen  is 
present,  there  is  a strongly  chitinized  ventral  basal  prong  of  the 
penis,  the  penis  is  strongly  curved  and  heavily  chitinized  and  often 
bears  strong  teeth  or  spines,  the  anellus  is  located  at  about  the 
middle  of  the  vinculum  in  lateral  aspect,  the  saccus  is  short  and 
thick,  and  the  harpe,  is  short  and  broad  with  lobes  and  distal 
process  usually  rounded.  In  Catopsilia  and  Eurymus  the  pupa 
does  not  show  swollen  wing  cases.  The  writer  has  had  no  op- 
portunity of  examining  a pupa  of  Anteos.  The  raised  line  (7) 
runs  into  the  cell  in  the  vicinity  of  the  base  of  Cu2. 

In  the  other  group  of  genera,  Phoebis,  Eurema,  Gandaca, 
Teriocolias,  Gonepteryx,  Dercas,  Nathalis,  Leucidia  and  Kri- 
cogonia,  the  basal  lobe  of  the  tegumen  is  absent,  the  penis  is  long, 
slender  and  simple  and  bears  no  basal  prong  or  strong  teeth,  the 
anellus  is  generally  located  just  above  the  saccus,  the  saccus  is 
long  and  slender,  and  the  harpe  is  often  much  longer  than  high 
due  to  the  great  development  of  the  distal  process  and  bears 
slender  often  pointed  lobes  rather  than  short,  broad  rounded  ones. 
Of  these  genera  the  writer  knows  only  the  pupae  of  Gonepteryx, 
Phoebis  and  Eurema  (New  World),  but  in  these  the  wing  cases 
are  considerably  swollen,  sometimes  enormously  so.  The  raised 
line  in  most  cases  runs  distad  of  the  cell,  not  cutting  it  at  all  and 
running  up  into  the  apex  of  the  primary,  altho  in  a few  cases  it 
cuts  the  cell  above  M3  but  never  below  Qq. 

Specific  Structures,  Relationships,  etc.,  of  Catopsilia. 

The  genitalia  show  very  few  characters  for  the  differentiation 
of  species,  if  we  consider  the  large  number  of  species  which  have 
been  erected.  The  writer  therefore  thinks  that  there  are  in  reality 
Very  few  valid  species  in  the  genus.  At  present  a lack  of  ade- 
quate material  prevents  him  from  reaching  any  definite  conclusion 
on  this  matter,  but  it  seems  that  not  more  than  five  species  can  be 
held  as  at  all  distinct  structurally.  These  are  shown  in  the  fol- 
lowing key : 

1.  Penis  with  a long  heavily  chitinized  prong,  in  addition  to  the 
basal  prong,  a third  of  the  length  from  apex,  which  bears  a 
heavily  chitinized  tooth  at  base  and  is  bent  to  the  right ; end 
of  basal  prong  of  penis  flattened  and  strongly  bilobed. 

thauruma,  fig.  10 


208  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXIv 


1.  Shaft  of  penis  bearing  only  small  simple  teeth;  end  of  basal 

prong  of  penis  simple 2 

2.  Basal  lobe  of  tegumen  absent ; caudal  margin  of  8th  abdominal 

tergite  bilobed scylla,  fig.  12 

2.  Basal  lobe  of  tegumen  present ; caudal  margin  of  8th 

abdominal  tergite  simple 3 

3.  Basal  lobe  of  tegumen  short,  less  than  1/3  the  length  of  the 

uncus ; no  chitinized  strip  extending  along  outer  surface  of 
harpe  just  below  dorsum  from  “dorsal  spine”  to  dorso- 
basal  angle pyranthe,  fig.  13 

3.  Basal  lobe  of  tegumen  longer,  more  than  1/3  the  length  of  the 

uncus;  chitinized  strip  as  described  above  present 4 

4.  A spine  arising  from  a pit  on  right  side  of  penis  near  tip ; tip 

of  penis  prolonged  ventrally  into  a long  thin  spine ; “dorsal 

spine”  of  harpe  longer,  simple florella,  fig.  11 

4.  A number  of  very  short  curved  teeth  along  distal  half  of  penis ; 
tip  of  penis  not  prolonged  ventrally  into  a long  thin  spine; 
“dorsal  spine”  shorter,  usually  with  one  or  two  toothlike 

dorsal  irregularities crocale  & pomona,  fig.  14 

The  species  are  for  the  most  part  rather  variable  and  produce 
a multitude  of  local  and  seasonal  forms.  Probably  crocale  and 
pomona  are  conspecific,  and  it  is  very  possible  that  florella  is 
merely  an  African  race  of  this  same  species.  Thauruma  may  be 
a more  distinct  race  of  the  same  species  from  Madagascar,  an 
island  which  seems  to  produce  large  numbers  of  distinct  forms. 
The  validity  of  pyranthe  as  a distinct  species  is  also  doubtful. 
Scylla  is  of  course  very  distinct  in  all  its  many  forms. 

Specific  Structures,  Relationships,  etc.,  of  Phoebis. 

The  writer  here  makes  no  attempt  at  any  synonomic  work  on 
Phoebis , inasmuch  as  Mr.  F.  Martin  Brown  is  working  on  the 
genus  from  that  angle  and  will  probably  do  a far  more  complete 
job  than  the  writer  could.  The  problem  here  is  therefore  mainly 
one  of  homologizing  the  various  structures  and  tracing  the  re- 
lationships of  the  species. 

As  opposed  to  Catopsilia  the  species  of  Phoebis  show  excellent 
specific  characters  in  the  male  genitalia,  even  philea  and  thalestris 
and  argante  and  agarithe  being  very  distinct  from  each  other. 

In  structures  other  than  the  harpe  the  species  show  little  varia- 
tion. The  “setiferous  pad”  occurs  only  in  trite  and  eubule  and  is 
very  much  reduced  in  the  latter.  In  the  structures  of  the  harpe, 
however,  there  is  a great  deal  of  variation. 


Oct.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  209 


Dorsal  lobe  a is  practically  absent  in  the  genus.  In  trite, 
avellanada  and  orbis  (See  figs,  i,  6 and  7)  occurs  a small  setifer- 
ous  swelling  in  the  dorsal  thickening  of  the  harpe  which  may 
possibly  represent  a rudiment  of  this  structure.  It  appears  to 
possess  no  particular  significance. 

The  bar  of  the  harpe  occurs  in  nearly  the  same  place  in  all  of 
the  species,  serving  as  a muscle  attachment.  As  previously  stated 
this  may  represent  a remnant  of  the  clasper.  In  neocipris  and 
rurina  there  is  a distinct  fold  in  the  distal  thickening  of  the  harpe 
just  below  the  bar,  and  the  bar  itself  is  rather  more  lightly 
chitinized.  This  fold  also  occurs  to  a lesser  degree  in  most  of 
the  other  species. 

The  inner  lobe  is  present  in  all  species  except  those  of  the 
statira  group.  It  is  a hollow  sac  of  varying  shape  arising  from 
the  junction  of  the  dorsal  and  distal  thickenings.  In  all  species 
except  eubule  it  bears  strong  pointed  setae.  In  eubule  the  setae 
are  flattened  and  bifurcate,  suggestive  of  modified  scales.  In 
trite  the  inner  lobe  is  turned  dorsad  and  projects  above  the  dorsal 
margin  of  the  harpe.  In  all  other  species  it  is  turned  inwards 
and  vent  rad. 

The  distal  process  shows  a great  amount  of  variation,  and  fur- 
nishes excellent  specific  characters  in  most  cases. 

The  dorsal  spine  shows  great  variation.  In  trite  (fig.  2)  it  is 
absent  or  represented  merely  by  a slight  swelling.  It  appears  to 
originate  as  a dorsad  projecting  lobe  which  shows  two  main  lines 
of  development.  In  one,  represented  by  eubule,  (fig.  3)  it  is 
broad  and  blunt.  In  the  other  it  is  sharp  and  heavily  chitinized. 
At  first,  as  in  philea,  thalestris  and  avellanada  it  is  short  (figs.  4 
and  7).  It  then  lengthens  out,  as  in  neocypris,  rurina,  argante 
and  agaritlie  (figs.  5 and  8).  In  occasional  specimens  of  agarithe 
it  is  found  bent  downward  between  the  harpes.  Then,  as  in 
orbis,  (fig.  6)  it  becomes  permanently  curved  downward  between 
the  harpes,  and  begins  to  develop  chitinized  teeth  on  a strongly 
chitinized  base,  coincident  with  the  loss  of  the  inner  lobe.  The 
writer  has  not  had  the  opportunity  of  examining  godartiana  and 
hartonia  but  is  assured  by  Mr.  Brown  that  they  are  related  to 
orbis.  Then  in  statira,  (fig.  9)  neleis,  wallacei,  boisduvalii  and 
etiolata  the  dorsal  spine  develops  into  a heavily  chitinized  struc- 
ture, double  at  the  base  with  the  outer  part  large  and  expanded 
and  bearing  strong  teeth.  These  later  forms  may  all  be  con- 
specific. 


210  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


Forbes’  grouping  of  the  species  of  “Catopsilia”  (4)  appears  to 
be  rather  well  substantiated  by  study  of  the  genitalia,  as  is  shown 
by  the  following  key  to  the  groups  in  which  use  is  made  of  the 
characters  which  he  cites  together  with  genitalic  characters : 

Key  to  Groups  of  Phoebis,  Males. 


1.  No  hair  pencils  or  sex  patches  present 2 

1.  Hair  pencils  or  sex  patches  or  both  present 3 


2.  Mealy  border  abruptly  narrowed  below  cell  Mx  of  primary, 
never  invading  discal  cell ; inner  lobe  of  harpe  present,  bear- 
ing flattened  furcate  setae ; dorsal  spine  of  harpe  simple, 
broad,  blunt;  distal  process  of  harpe  short,  rounded,  bifid; 
setiferous  pad  present,  rudimentary eubule  group 

2.  Mealy  border  wide  and  even,  often  invading  discal  cell  of 

primary,  ending  abruptly  on  secondary  near  Cux ; inner  lobe 
of  harpe  absent;  dorsal  spine  of  harpe  strongly  chitinized, 
either  long,  slender  and  bent  down  between  harpes  or  widely 
expanded  and  bearing  teeth ; distal  process  of  harpe  long, 
bearing  teeth  at  base;  setiferous  pad  absent.  . .statira  group 

3.  No  hair  pencils  present,  sex  patches  present  on  both  wings.  4 

3.  Hair  pencil  present  on  Rs  of  secondary 5 

4.  Mealy  border  abruptly  narrowed  on  primary  below  M2  or  M3, 

then  marginal  from  there  down  until  below  2d  A where  it 
extends  deeply  toward  base  of  wing  along  inner  margin ; 
inner  lobe  of  harpe  present philea  group 

4.  Mealy  border  of  primary  broad,  even,  not  abruptly  narrowed 

below  M2  or  M3 ; inner  lobe  of  harpe  absent,  .statira  group 

5.  Secondary  with  a double  sex  patch  riding  on  vein  R ; dorsal 

spine  of  harpe  absent  or  very  rudimentary;  setiferous  pad 
present,  strongly  developed trite  group 

5.  Secondary  with  no  sex  patch;  dorsal  spine  of  harpe  present, 

well  developed;  setiferous  pad  absent 6 

6.  Mealy  border  all  very  narrow,  especially  on  the  secondary,  not 

approaching  the  cell  even  on  the  costa,  extended  in  on  inner 
margin  of  primary ; wings  rounded ; dorsal  spine  long  and 

rather  narrow  at  base argante  group 

6.  Mealy  border  very  broad  and  even  in  width ; secondary  tailed 
at  anal  angle;  dorsal  spine  long,  broad  at  base. 

neocipris  group 

Between  the  argante  group  and  the  neocipris  group  it  is  exceed- 
ingly difficult  to  find  any  definite  genitalic  difference,  in  spite  of 
the  fact  that  there  are  excellent  specific  characters.  The  two 
groups  are  evidently  very  closely  related. 


Oct.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  211 


Certainly  no  further  splitting  of  Phoebis  into  two  or  more 
genera  seems  warranted.  If  subgenera  should  be  desired  the 
arrangement  would  be  as  follows,  as  based  on  the  genitalia: 

Inner  lobe  present;  dorsal  spine  absent;  setiferous  pad  present, 

well  developed P.  Rhabdodryas  G.  & S.  {trite)  (5) 

Inner  lobe  present ; dorsal  spine  present,  simple ; setiferous  pad 

rudimentary  or  absent P.  Phoebis  Hiibner  {argante)  (1) 

Inner  lobe  absent ; dorsal  spine  present,  highly  developed ; setifer- 
ous pad  absent P.  Aphrissa  Butler  ( statira ) (6) 

Summary. 

1.  The  New  World  species  usually  included  in  Catopsilia 
Hiibner  are  worthy  of  generic  distinction  under  the  name  of 
Phoebis  Hiibner  with  argante  Fabricius  as  genotype. 

2.  The  relationship  of  Catopsilia  is  with  Anteos  and  Eurymus 
rather  than  with  Phoebis  and  the  other  Rhodocerine  genera. 

3.  There  is  in  Catopsilia  a comparatively  small  number  of  spe- 
cies which  are  structurally  not  very  distinct. 

4.  There  is  no  reason  for  further  splitting  of  Phoebis  into 
other  genera.  The  genus  divides  into  a number  of  compact 
groups  or  into  three  sub-genera. 

Bibliography. 

1.  Hiibner.  Verzeichniss  bekannte  Schmettlinge,  98,  18 — ? 

2.  Eyer,  John  R.  The  Comparative  Morphology  of  the  Male 

Genitalia  of  the  Primitive  Lepidoptera,  Ann.  Ent.  Soc. 
Amer.  XVII,  275,  1924. 

3.  Pierce,  F.  N.  The  Genitalia  of  the  Group  Noctuidae  of  the 

Lepidoptera  of  the  British  Islands,  Liverpool,  1914. 

4.  Forbes,  W.  T.  M.  The  American  Catopsilias,  Ann.  Ent.  Soc. 

Amer.  XX,  4,  474,  1927. 

5.  Goodman  & Salvin.  Biol.  Centr.  Amer.  Rhop.  II,  146. 

6.  Butler,  A.  G.  Lep.  Exot.,  155,  1873. 

7.  Klots,  A.  B.  Bui.  Bklyn.  Ent  Soc.,  XXIV,  134. 

List  of  Figures. 

1.  Ental  aspect,  right  side,  genitalia,  Phoebis  trite  L. 
iA.  Lateral  aspect,  setiferous  pad,  P.  trite  <$. 

iB.  Inner  lobe  of  harpe,  Pi  trite  <$. 

2.  Ectal  aspect,  left  side,  J*  genitalia,  Phoebis  trite. 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  Yol.  XXIV 


Plv  XXII 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  Yql.  XXIV 


Pl.  XXIII 


214  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


3B.  Ental  aspect,  right  harpe  with  setiferous  pad  and  part  of 
vinculum,  P.  eubule  L. 

3C.  Inner  lobe  of  harpe,  P.  eubule  <$. 

4.  Ental  aspect,  right  harpe,  P.  philea  L. 

5.  Ental  aspect,  right  harpe,  P.  rurina  Felder 

6.  Ental  aspect,  right  harpe,  P.  orbis  Poey 

7.  Ental  aspect,  right  harpe,  P.  avellanada  Herrich-Schaffer  $ . 

8.  Ental  aspect,  right  harpe,  P.  agarithe  Boisduval 

9.  Ental  aspect,  right  harpe,  P.  statira  Cramer  J'. 

10B.  Left  lateral  aspect,  penis,  Catopsilia  thauruma  Reakirt 
ioC.  Ental  aspect,  right  side,  £ genitalia,  C.  thauruma. 

IIB.  Lateral  aspect,  tip  of  penis,  C.  florella  Fabricius  J'. 

IIC.  Ental  aspect,  right  harpe  and  lateral  aspect,  uncus,  C. 

florella  <$. 

12.  Ental  aspect,  right  harpe  and  lateral  aspect,  uncus,  C.  scylla 

L.<? 

13.  Ental  aspect,  right  harpe  and  lateral  aspect,  uncus,  C. 

pyranthe  L. 

14B.  Ental  aspect,  right  harpe  and  lateral  aspect,  uncus,  C. 

crocale  Cramer 

14C.  Left  lateral  aspect,  penis  C.  crocale 

FURTHER  NOTES  ON  EUREMA  HUBNER 
(PIERIDAE). 

The  author  has  just  received  an  article  by  Ferreira  D’ Almeida, 
from  Ann.  Soc.  Ent.  France,  XCVII,  369-388,  31  Dec.,  1928, 
which  contains  many  notes  and  observations  on  New  World 
Eurema  ( Terias ) and  descriptions  of  several  new  forms. 

M.  D’Almeida  claims  that  there  is  no  reason  for  believing  that 
geographic  races  occur  in  any  of  the  New  World  species  of  Eu- 
rema. In  substantiation  of  this  claim  he  cites  the  fact  that  athalia 
Felder  and  hahneli  Staudinger  are  identical  with  leuce  Boisduval 
and  are  not,  therefore,  valid  races.  He  furthermore  states  that 
variations  of  tenella  Boisduval  (nise  Felder)  are  not  caused  by 
geographical  distribution  but  are  purely  individual.  Both  of  these 
facts  are  undoubtedly  true,  but  have  nothing  to  do  with  geograph- 
ical variations  in  the  other  species  of  the  genus.  I think  that  it  is 
most  evident  to  any  student  of  an  adequate  collection  with  ade- 
quate data  that  geographical  variation  does  indeed  play  a large 
part  in  the  New  World  species  of  Eurema.  One  of  the  most  evi- 
dent geographic  races  in  the  genus,  deva  chilensis  Blanchard, 


Oct.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  215 


from  Chile,  is  placed  by  D’Almeida  as  a simple  synonym  of  deva. 
Many  other  conclusions  are  similarly  most  evidently  based  on  an 
inadequate  study  of  material  or  of  the  literature. 

Several  new  forms  and  aberrations  are  described,  and  one  new 
species.  These  the  present  writer  places  as  follows : 

rubella  D’Alm.  described  as  an  aberration  of  arbela  Hubner;  is  a 
synonym  of  salome  f . salome  Felder,  representing  a variant  too 
minor  to  be  worth  retention  as  a color  form.  Based  on  one  <$, 
from  Venezuela. 

lurida  D’Alm.  described  as  an  aberration  of  arbela  Hubner; 
should  be  placed  as  a synonym  of  arbela  arbela,  representing 
merely  a minor  variant.  Based  on  one  J'  from  Tojujo,  Peru. 
cissa  D’Alm.  described  as  an  aberration  of  tenella  Boisduval. 
Tenella  is  a synonym  of  nise  Cramer.  Cissa  is  merely  another 
minor  variant,  and  so  should  be  placed  as  a synonym  of  nise, 
a species  already  possessing  an  immense  list  of  synonyms,  many 
of  which  were  previously  committed  by  the  same  author.  Type 
locality,  Rio  de  Janeiro  and  Bolivia. 
incana  D’Alm.  described  as  a 2 aberration  of  elathea  Cramer  = J 
elathea  f.  medutina;  based  on  one  § from  S.  Tome,  Argentine. 
gracilis , D’Alm.  described  as  a form  of  elathea  Cramer  is  a 
homonym  of  gracilis  Avinoff,  which  is  a synonym  of  arbela 
graduata  Butler.  The  form  does  not  appear  worth  a name 
anyway,  but  might  be.  Based  on  one  J',  Matto  Grosso,  Brazil. 
raymundoi  D’Alm.  described  as  a new  species,  based  on  one  J 
from  Santo  Tome,  Prov.  de  Corrientes,  Argentine.  It  is  a bit 
hard  to  state  definitely  just  what  this  may  be,  in  the  absence  of 
any  illustration  or  of  any  description  of  structural  characters. 
It  appears  to  the  present  writer  to  be  a somewhat  reduced  § 
of  albula  f.  tapeina  Bates. 

The  writer  wishes  to  repeat  what  he  has  already  stated  regard- 
ing the  naming  of  minor  aberrations,  and  to  emphasize  the  point. 
Our  system  of  classification  must  not  be  made  unwieldy  by  the 
addition  of  numbers  of  useless  names.  As  matters  now  stand  any 
specimen  possessing  a few  misplaced  scales  can  be  named,  and 
either  the  name  will  be  accepted  as  valid  or  will  still  further  bur- 
den an  already  laden  synonomy.  The  presence  of  such  slight  indi- 
vidual variations  is  of  undoubted  interest  to  the  special  student  of 
variation,  but  he  does  not  wish  to  apply  scientific  names  to  each 
one  of  them  any  more  than  the  geneticist  who,  studying  a struc- 
turally homogeneous  species  and  finding  a number  of  strains  in 


216  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXIV 


it,  will  wish  to  apply  scientific  names  to  each  one.  Doubtjess 
the  naming  of  slight  individual  variations  is  of  great  interest  to 
the  person  who  collects  insects  as  he  would  collect  postage  stamps, 
but  the  practice  is  a nuisance  to  the  serious  student. 

There  is  also  a great  deal  too  much  publication  by  persons  who 
are  most  imperfectly  acquainted  with  the  groups  on  which  they 
are  working  and  with  the  literature  on  the  subject.  Surely, 
work  on  nomenclature  should  be  attempted  only  by  students  who 
have  access  to  large  collections  and  good  library  facilities.  There 
'is  plenty  of  other  work,  badly  needed,  for  students  who  have  not 
these  facilities.  In  Eurema,  for  example,  nothing  is  known  about 
the  early  stages  of  most  of  the  species.  The  majority  of  what  is 
known  has  been  contributed  by  M.  D’Almeida,  who  has  done  ex- 
cellent work  in  the  field. — Alex.  B.  Klots. 


PHYLLOPHAGA  AUSTRICOLA— A CORRECTION. 

On  page  no  of  the  April,  1929,  number  of  this  Journal,  the 
specific  name  of  a new  species  of  Phyllophaga — P.  austricola  as 
submitted  in  manuscript — appears  as  austricolia.  This  is  a print- 
er’s error  pure  and  simple,  and  in  direct  opposition  to  positive 
corrections  by  author  and  editor  in  both  galley  and  page  proof. 

The  general  inviolability  of  the  spelling  of  specific  names  as 
originally  published  does  not  hold,  if  I properly  interpret  the 
“code,”  in  cases  of  typographical  errors  which  do  violence  to  the 
manifest  wish  and  intention  of  the  author.  The  species  in  ques- 
tion then  should  be  known  as  Phyllophaga  austricola  Fall. 

H.  C.  Fall. 

Note  : The  problem  presented  by  the  typographical  error  cor- 
rected above  by  Dr.  Fall  has  had  the  consideration  of  Dr.  C.  W. 
Stiles.  He  writes  with  regard  to  it  thus:  “I  would  not  hesitate 

an  instant  to  make  the  change  on  the  basis  of  an  obvious  typo- 
graphical error  under  Article  19  of  the  International  Rules  of 
Zoological  Nomenclature.  This  is  such  an  evident  case  I would 
go  ahead  and  make  the  correction  without  a formal  opinion  of  the 
Commission.”  Obviously,  this  is  not  a formal  ruling ; but  in  case 
of  dissidence  from  the  correction  by  Dr.  Fall,  the  matter  would  be 
referred  to  the  Commission  for  their  final  and  binding  opinion. 
However,  to  question  this  correction  would  be  to  admit  that  in 
practice  the  final  arbiter- in  the  formation  and  spelling  of  zoologi- 
cal names  is  neither  the  author  nor  the  Commission,  but  the  un- 
restrained and  irresponsible  printer’s  devil : which  is  an  absurdity. 

J.  R.  de  la  Torre  Bueno,  Editor 


•Oct.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  217 


A PARTIAL  LIST  OF  MIRIDAE  FROM  TEXAS 
(ORDER  HEMIPTERA). 

By  H.  G.  Johnston,  College  Station,  Texas. 

The  following  is  a partial  list  of  Mirids  collected  principally  by 
the  writer,  in  the  vicinity  of  College  Station,  Texas,  during  the 
spring  and  summer,  1928.  But  little  is  known  of  the  distribution 
of  the  family  Miridae  in  the  southwestern  part  of  the  United 
States,  thus  the  following  notes  might  prove  of  interest.  Speci- 
mens have  been  determined  by  the  writer  and  verified  by  Dr.  H. 
H.  Knight. 

Adelphocoris  rapidus  (Say).  College  Station,  June'2  to  Oct.  17, 
1928. 

Ceratocapsus  fuscosignatus  Knight.  College  Station,  May  12;  to 
Oct.  20,  1928. 

C.  punctulatus  (Reuter).  College  Station  May  12,  to  Oct.  12, 

1928.  This  species  in  company  with  fuscosignatus  Knight 
was  taken  in  large  numbers  at  a trap  light. 

Creontiades debilis  Van  D.  Port  Lavaca,  July  31,  1926.  (K.  P. 

Ewing) . 

Deraeocoris  sayi  (Reuter).  College  Station,  April  5,  to  May  12, 
1928.  Common  on  Quercus  minor. 

D.  sayi  marginatus  Knight.  College  Station,  April  5—1 1,  1928. 
D.  sayi  unicolor  Knight.  College  Station,  April  8-1 1,  1928. 
Heterocordylus  malinus  Reuter.  College  Station,  April  11,  1928. 

On  Crataegus. 

Horcias  dislocatus  gradus  Knight.  College  Station,  April  24,  to 
May  15,  1928.  Apparently  not  recorded  south  of  New  Jer- 
sey. Only  this  variety  was  taken. 

H.  sexmaculatus  (Barber).  College  Station,  May  28,  1920.  (H. 

J.  Reinhard).  Simonton,  May  20,  1928.  Taylor,  May  25- 
30,  1928.  (J.  C.  Gaines  & V.  O.  McCoy).  New  Braunfels, 

June  22,  1927.  (H.  H.  Knight). 

Lygus  apicalis  Fieber.  College  Station,  April  12,  to  Nov.  1,  1928. 
L.  fasciatus  viridiusculus  Knight.  Brownsville,  Jan.  31,  1928. 
(R.  K.  Fletcher). 

L.  pratensis  oblineatus  (Say).  College  Station,  Jan.  17,  to  Nov. 
25,  1928.  Taylor,  May  25,  1928.  (J.  C.  Gains  & V.  O. 

McCoy).  Simonton,  May  20,  1928. 

X.  ( Neolygus ) caryae  Knight.  College  Station,  May  5-15,  1928. 


218  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXlv 


L.  ( Neolygus ) caryae  suhfuscus  Knight.  College  Station,  May 

1-5,  1928. 

Lepidopsallus  rubidus  (Uhler).  College  Station,  April  5-1 1, 
1928. 

Micro phylellus  macidipennis  Knight.  College  Station,  May  1, 
1928. 

M.  mode  stud  Reuter.  College  Station,  May  1,  1928. 

Neocapsus  cuneatus  Distant.  College  Station,  April  5-1 1,  1928. 

This  species  occurred  abundantly  on  Quercus  minor  during 
early  spring  in  1928.  Adults  began  to  appear  about  April  5 
and  had,  completely  disappeared  by  April  15.  This  probably 
acounts  for  the  fact  that  the  species  has  so  rarely  been  col- 
lected. 

Neoborus  adelia  Knight.  College  Station,  April  12-17,  I928- 
Breeding  abundantly  on  Adelia  parvifolia  in  cool  shaded 
situations. 

N.  adustus  Knight.  College  Station,  April  12,  1928.  Taken  in 

company  with  canadensis  Van  D.  on  Fraxinus  americana. 

N.  canadensis  (Van  D.).  College  Station,  April  12,  1928.  Col- 

lected on  Fraxinus  only  in  humid  locations. 

Neurocolpus  nubilus  (Say).  College  Station,  May  1,  to  Nov.  1, 
1928.  Simonton,  July  26,  1928. 

0 pistheuria  clandestina  dorsalis  Knight.  College  Station,  July 
15,  to  Oct.  5,  1928. 

Orthotylus  chlorionis  (Say).  College  Station,  April  11-13,  1928. 

O.  ornatus  Van  D.  College  Station,  April  11,  1928. 

O.  ramus  Knight.  College  Station,  May  5,  1928.  Breeding 

abundantly  on  Cary  a. 

Paracalocoris  scrupeus  scrupeus  (Say).  College  Station,  April 

11,  to  May  5,  1928. 

P.  scrupeus  bidens  McAtee,  College  Station,  May  1,  1928. 

P.  severini  nigriclavus  Knight.  College  Station,  April  17,  to  May 
5,  1928.  Breeding  on  Smilax. 

Phy  toe  oris  tibialis  Reuter.  College  Station,  October  6,  to  Nov.  10, 
1928. 

Pycnoderes  balli  Knight.  College  Station,  Oct.  12,  1928. 
Plagiognathus  albatus  vittiscutis  Knight.  College  Station,  May 

12,  1928.  Breeding  on  Nyssa  sylvatica.  Reported  by 
Blatchley  from  Dunedin,  Fla.,  the  only  record  of  it  occurring 
south  of  the  District  of  Columbia. 


Oct.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  219 


P.  nigrolineatus  Knight.  College  Station,  April  5-1 1,  1928. 
Breeds  abundantly  on  Quercus  minor.  The  most  abundant 
species  ever  seen  by  the  writer  on  any  plant. 

Platytylellus  intercidendus  (Distant).  College  Station,  April  24 
to  Oct.  6,  1928.  Simonton,  July  26,  1928.  Taylor,  June  20, 
1928.  (J.  C.  Gaines  and  V.  O. 'McCoy.) 

P.  rubrovittatus  (Stal).  College  Station,  May  1 to  June  2,  1928. 
Simonton,  July  26,  1928. 

Polymerus  basalts  (Reuter).  College  Station,  April  12  to  Nov. 

10,  1928.  Castolon,  May  25,  1928.  (F.  F.  Bibby.) 

P.  basalts  fuscatus  Knight.  College  Station,  Oct.  6 to  Nov.  1, 
1928. 

Psallus  seriatus  (Reuter).  College  Station,  April  24  to  Oct.  12, 
1928.  Taylor,  May  30,  1928.  (J.  C.  Gaines  & V.  O.  Mc- 

Coy.) Castolon,  May  28,  1928.  (F.  F.  Bibby.) 
Reuteroscopus  ornatus  (Reuter).  College  Station,  May  5,  1928. 
Simonton,  July  1,  1928. 

R.  sulphureus  (Reuter).  College  Station,  Sept.  30  to  Nov.  1, 
1928. 

Rhinacloa  forticornis  Reuter.  College  Station,  Oct.  12,  1928. 
Sericophanes  ocellatus  Reuter.  College  Station,  June  2 to  Oct. 

6,  1928.  Simonton,  July  1,  1928. 

Trigonotylus  brevipes  Jak.  College  Station,  Sept.  30  to  Oct.  6, 
1928. 

T.  pulcher  Reuter.  College  Station,  Oct.  17-21,  1928. 
Tropidosteptes  cardinalis  Uhler.  College  Station,  May  12,  1928. 
Breeding  on  Fraxinus  americana  but  only  in  a cool  shaded 
place.  Collecting  on  the  same  host  in  other  situations  did 
not  produce  additional  specimens. 


Cicindela  Tranquebarica  Horiconensis  Leng. — A nice  series 
of  this  variety  was  taken  on  the  north  sore  of  Minas  Basin  in  the 
Town  of  Fortaupique,  N.  S.,  on  August  25  and  31,  1929.  They 
were  found  in  a recently  mown  clover  field  just  above  tide  water, 
on  small  bare  spots  where  soil  had  been  removed  to  build  a tide 
dyke,  and  on  the  muddy  shore  of  a small  creek  in  which  no  fresh 
water  was  flowing.  The  series  taken  (about  30)  include  nearly 
black  specimens  and  grade  to  decidedly  coppery  individuals. 
With  them  were  taken  two  repanda  and  two  sexguttata. — C.  A. 
Frost,  Framingham,  Mass. 


220  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


PODALONIA  VIOLACEIPENNIS  (LEPELETIER),  A 
DIMORPHIC  FOSSORIAL  WASP 
(HYMENOPTERA). 

By  J.  Bequaert,  Harvard  University  Medical  School. 

While  collecting  at  Granite  Peaks  Camp  (altitude:  9,000  ft.), 
near  Bayfield,  La  Plata  Co.,  Colorado,  in  July  1928,  I captured  a 
mated  pair  of  Podalonia,  the  female  of  which  was  entirely  black, 
while  the  abdomen  of  the  male  was  partly  ferruginous.  Nothing 
much  was  thought  of  it  at  the  time ; but,  having  been  in  the  habit 
of  noting  all  Hymenoptera  found  mating  in  the  field,  I kept  these 
two  insects  on  the  same  pin.  When,  however,  I came  to  study 
them  with  H.  T.  Fernald’s  recent  monograph  of  the  genus 
Podalonia  (19 27,  Proc.  U.  S.  Nat.  Mus.,  LXXI,  Art.  9),  I found 
to  my  surprise  that  the  female  belonged  to  P.  luctuosa  (F.  Smith), 
while  the  male  was  a P.  violaceipennis  (Lepeletier). 

Now  Fernald  states  that  he  saw  in  the  United  States  National 
Museum  a pair  taken  in  Californa  in  which  a female  luctuosa  was 
gripped  by  the  mandibles  of  a male  violaceipennis,  as  in  mating. 
Since  only  one  male  with  the  luctuosa  coloration  could  be  found 
by  him,  while  females  of  both  luctuosa  and  violaceipennis  as  well 
as  males  of  violaceipennis  are  very  common  in  collections,  he 
concluded  “that  the  female  violaceipennis  is  sometimes  dimorphic, 
luctuosa  being  one  of  the  female  forms,  and  that  in  very  rare  in- 
stances the  male  also  becomes  entirely  black.” 

The  pair  which  I obtained  in  Colorado  confirms  this  conjecture. 
Moreover,  Professor  Fernald,  to  whom  I wrote  about  my  observa- 
tion, kindly  informed  me  that  P.  violaceipennis  was  recently  raised 
from  a P.  luctuosa  parent.  There  can  then  be  no  longer  any  doubt 
that  P.  violaceipennis  is  a dimorphic  species.  In  the  typical  and 
more  common  form,  which  occurs  across  the  Continent  over  most 
of  southern  Canada  and  the  United  States,  the  abdomen  is  more 
or  less  extensively  ferruginous  in  both  sexes.  In  the  race 
luctuosa,  the  female  is  entirely  black,  while  the  male*  is  usually 
colored  like  that  of  the  typical  form,  although  very  exceptionally 
it  may  be  colored  like  the  female  luctuosa;  this  race  is  more  lim- 
ited in  its  distribution,  as  it  occurs  together  with  the  typical  form 
in  the  more  northern  and  the  mountainous  portions  of  the  general 
range  of  the  species. 

It  is  of  additional  interest  that  a common  European  species  of 
the  same  genus,  Podalonia  hirsuta  (Scopoli),  exhibits  a similar 


Oct.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  221 


dimorphism,  according  to  F.  F.  Kohl.  Normally  both  sexes  have 
the  abdomen  partly  ferruginous ; but  in  some  localities  the  ab- 
domen of  most  females  is  entirely  black,  while  the  males  are  yet 
almost  all  partly  ferruginous;  entirely  black  males  are  extremely 
rare.  Such  clear-cut  cases  of  color  dimorphism,  apparently  sex- 
linked  within  one  species,  are  by  no  means  rare  among  some  other 
orders,  notably  among  the  Lepidoptera.  They  are,  however,  ex- 
ceptional among  the  Hymenoptera. 


A FEW  LATE  SPRING  BUGS. 

By  J.  R.  de  la  Torre-Bueno,  White  Plains,  N.  Y. 

Insects  found  in  Spring  always  arouse  interest.  Are  they  of  a 
new  brood  ? Are  they  overwintering  adults  ? 

On  Memorial  Day  (May  30),  1924,  I sifted  for  bugs  on  the 
damp  edges  of  the  woodland  surrounding  a small  cattail  and 
bunch  grass  swamp,  near  White  Plains.  Here  were  the  usual 
overwintering  adults  of  Eremocoris  ferus,  Antillocoris  pallidus, 
Euschistus  tristigmus,  and,  naturally,  Cymus  angustatns.  Two  of 
the  captures,  however,  were  of  added  interest.  One  was  the  ex- 
tremely rare  fully  winged  Hypogeocoris  piceus,  found  by  sweep- 
ing close  to  the  ground  in  young  grasses,  but  only  a singleton. 
The  other  was  two  nymphs  of  what  I take  to  be  Aradus  robustus, 
principally  from  the  form  and  structure  of  the  antennae.  These 
were  sifted  from  damp  leaves.  I took  them  home  alive  for  obser- 
vation. The  two  were  placed  on  a piece  of  paper,  where  for  a 
short  time  they  played  ’possum,  stiff  and  motionless,  the  antennae 
held  nearly  parallel,  pointing  straight  ahead.  After  a minute  or 
so,  first  one  antenna  and  then  the  other  moved  apart.  Soon  the 
one  antenna  began  to  tremble,  or  rather,  vibrate  over  the  paper 
with  a touching  motion ; then  the  second  one  came  into  play  and 
the  bug  moved  slightly,  then  staying  quite  still.  Both  remained 
thus  quiet  for  a minute  or  two,  when  they  were  picked  up  to  be 
•put  in  a Stender  dish  with  the  little  wad  of  damp  leaves  in  which 
they  had  been  brought  home.  The  instant  the  forceps  touched 
them,  they  came  to  life  and  attempted  to  run  away  in  lively 
fashion.  As  soon  as  they  found  themselves  on  the  leaves,  they 
walked  freely  and  briskly  about.  Their  color  and  markings  are 
such  as  to  harmonize  perfectly  with  the  color  of  the  dead  dampish 
leaves. 


222  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.  XXIV 


COLEOPTERA  FROM  NORTHERN  CALIFORNIA. 

By  Howard  Notman,  Brooklyn,  N.  Y. 

An  automobile  collecting  trip  during  the  summer  of  1927  pro- 
duced among  other  results  nearly  1000  specimens  of  coleoptera 
from  the  following  localities  in  northern  California;  Trinidad 
and  Areata,  Humboldt  Co.,  Redding,  Shasta  Co.,  Cedar  Pass  and 
Cedarville,  Modoc  Co.  Trinidad  and  Areata  are  in  the  humid  and 
heavily  forested  coast  region.  At  Trinidad  collecting  was  done 
along  the  inner  edge  of  an  ocean  beach ; at  Areata  on  the  gravel 
and  sand  bars  in  the  mouth  of  the  Mad  River.  Redding  is  at  the 
northern  end  of  the  hot  and  semi-arid  central  valley  of  California. 
Collecting  was  done  on  gravel  and  sand  bars  on  the  shore  of  the 
Sacramento  river,  elevation  about  580  ft.  Cedar  Pass  in  the 
Warner  Mountains  has  an  elevation  of  about  6400  ft.  Collecting 
was  done  in  a forested  ravine  on  the  westerly  side.  At  Cedarville 
collecting  was  done  in  a salt  marsh  near  the  eastern  shore  of  the 
Middle  Alkali  Lake,  elevation  about  4700  ft.,  the  latter  being  en- 
tirely dry  at  the  time.  This  is,  a desert  region  east  of  the  Pacific 
divide  which  extends  along  the  crest  of  the  Warner  Mountains. 
Lists  of  the  Carabidae  taken  follow. 


Trinidad,  Humboldt 
Dyschirius  gihhipennis  Lee. 
Bembidion  funereum  Lee. 
Bembidion  iridescens  Lee. 
Bembidion  optalum  Csy. 


Co.,  Cal.,  July  27,  1917. 

Tre chits  ovipennis  Mots. 
Pterostichus  crenicollis  Lee. 
Pterostichus  suffusus  Csy. 
Anchomenus  brunneomargina- 
tus  Mann. 


In  addition  to  the  above  Carabids  Omophron  ovale  Horn  was 
taken  in  considerable  numbers. 

Areata,  Humboldt,  Co.,  Cal.,  July  28,  1927. 


Nebria  eschscholtzii  Men. 
Dyschirius  truncatus  Lee. 
Bembidion  zephyrum  Fall. 
Bembidion  obliquulum  Lee. 
Bembidion  oppressum  Csy. 
Bembidion  vespertinum  Csy. 
Bembidion  adjutor  Csy. 
Bembidion  erosum  Mots. 
Bembidion  tetracolum  Say. 
Bembidion  indistinctum  Dej. 


Bembidion  devisor  Csy. 
Bembidion  ephippigerum  Lee. 
Bembidion  gregale  Csy. 
Bembidion  caseyi  Leng. 
Bembidion  dubitans  Lee. 
Parargutor  lustrans  Lee. 
Anchomenus  funebris  Lee. 
Apristus  laticollis  Lee. 
Stenocellus  sejunctus  Csy. 
Glycerins  nitidus  Dej. 


Oct.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  223 


Redding,  Shasta  Co., 
Dyschirius  analis  Lee. 
Schizogenius  lineolatus  Say. 
Schizo genius  depressus  Lee. 
Bembidion  tritum  Csy. 

Bembidion  recticolle  Lee. 
Bembidion  haplogonum  Chaud. 
Bembidion  flavopictum  Mots. 


Cal.,  August  i,  1927. 

Tachyura  rapax  Lee. 

Tachyura  apacheana  Csy. 
Tachyura  sedula  Csy. 

Tachyura  profuga  Csy. 

Lac  hn  0 p ho  r u s elegantulus 
Mann. 

Apristus  laticollis  Lee. 
Chlaenius  viridifrons  Esch. 
Agonoderus  rugicollis  Lee. 


Cedar  Pass,  Modoc  Co.,  Cal.,  August  3,  1927. 


Bembidion  lubricum  Csy. 
Bembidion  commotum  Csy. 
Bembidion  iridescens  Lee. 
Bembidion  nebraskense  Lee. 
v 


Bembidion  tritum  Csy. 
Bembidion  nevadense  Ulke. 
Bembidion  vile  Lee. 
Bembidion  flavopictum  Mots. 


Also  two  species  of  Bembidion,  a species  of  Anchomenus  and  a 
species  of  Agonoderus  as  yet  unidentified. 


Cedarville,  Modoc  Co., 
Bembidion  ephippigerum  Lee. 
Bembidion  imperitum  Csy. 
Bembidion  provoanum  Csy. 
Bembidion  mormon  Hayw. 
Bembidion  dejectum  Csy. 
Bembidion  diligens  Csy. 


Cal.,  August  3,  1927. 
Bembidion  vile  Csy. 
Bembidion  insulatum  Lee. 
Bembidion  demissum  Csy. 
Bembidion  flavopictum  Mots. 
Bembidion  timidum  Lee. 
Tachys  corax  Lee. 


Winter  Homes  for  Mosquitoes. — On  August  25,  1929,  while 
resting  in  a rather  dense  growth  of  small  oaks  on  a side  hill  run- 
ning down  into  a large  spring-hole  in  Framingham,  I was  much 
interested  to  observe  many  mosquito-like  Diptera  suddenly  fly 
out  of  a woodchuck  burrow  into  which  I had  idly  tossed  a stone. 
It  was  about  noon  after  a cool  night  and  the  dense  growth  had 
prevented  any  appreciable  rise  in  temperature  there.  They  con- 
tinued to  emerge  after  each  stone  until  a very  large  number  had 
come  out.  On  Sept.  15  Dr.  J.  P.  Bill,  of  Wayland,  and  myself 
visited  the  place  and  collected  some  of  the  insects  that  were  routed 
out  of  several  burrows  which  appear  to  be  abandoned.  From  this 
catch  Mr.  C.  W.  Johnson  identified  some  20  males  and  females  of 
Cidex  pipiens  L.,  one  Drosophila  funebris  Fall.,  one  Drosophila 
transversa  Fall,  and  one  small  Tipulid. — C.  A.  Frost,  Framing- 
ham, Mass. 


224  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXIV 


CONTRIBUTION  TO  OUR  KNOWLEDGE  OF 
AMERICAN  THYSANOPTERA. 

By  Dudley  Moulton,  San  Francisco,  California. 

Two  species,  namely  Taeniothrips  diant  hi,  Pr.  and  Thrips  dis- 
color, Halid,  and  the  three  genera,  Lispothrips,  Reut.,  Thory- 
hothrips,  Pr.,  and  Docessissophothrips,  Bagnall  represented  here- 
with by  new  species,  are  now  recorded  from  North  America  for 
the  first  time.  The  distribution  of  five  known  American  species 
is  extended  into  new  territory.  In  all,  twelve  new  species  and 
the  male  of  Thrips  (Micro cephalothrips)  ahdominalis,  Crawford 
are  described  in  this  paper. 

TEREBRANTIA,  1836 
Family  Orothripidae  Bagnall 

Erythrothrips  fasciculatus  n.  sp.  (Fig.  1). 

Female,  holotype.  Body  color  dark  brown  with  red  pig- 
ment. Antenna  uniformly  dark  brown  except  segment  three 
which  shades  gradually  from  brownish  yellow  at  base  to  yel- 
lowish brown  at  tip.  Fore  wings  colored  as  in  arizonae 
Moulton,  whitish  in  anterior  half  with  a dark  brown  longitu- 
dinal band  in  posterior  half.  This  band  extends  from  ex- 
treme base  of  wing  including  scale  and  is  a little  broader 
near  center  of  wing. 

Total  body  length  2.2  mm. ; head,  length  .27  mm.,  width  .19 
mm. ; prothorax,  length  .21  mm.,  width  .22  mm. ; mesothorax, 
width  .36  mm.;  length  of  ninth  abdominal  segment  .18  mm., 
width  at  base  .22  mm.  Segments  of  antennae : length 
(width)  III,  93  (27)  ; IV,  84  (27)  ; V,  57  (27)  ; VI,  54 
(25)  VII,  63  (24)  ; VIII,  24;  IX,  15;  total  length  470  mi- 
crons. Length  of  spines  on  ninth  abdominal  segment  240  pi, 
length  of  spines  on  tenth  abdominal  segment  225  [j.  Sense 
areas  on  antennal  segment  III,  16  [j,  IV,  30  microns. 

Male,  allotype.  Total  body  length  1.5  mm.;  head,  length 
.18  mm.,  width  .18  mm.;  prothorax,  length  .165  mm.,  width 
.20  mm. ; mesothorax,  width  .28  mm.  Length  of  ninth  ab- 
dominal segment  .06  mm.,  width  .12  mm.  Segments  of  an- 
tennae: length  (width)  I,  27  (32)  ; II,  48  (30)  ; III,  87  (24)  ; 
IV,  72  (26) ; V,  57  (24) ; VI,  57  (24) ; VII,  60  (24)  ; VIII, 
24;  IX,  12;  total  length  440  microns.  Spines  on  tenth  ab- 
dominal segment,  outer  120  |j,  inner  82  microns.  Sense  areas 
on  antennal  segments  III,  15,  9 jj  ; IV,  30,  21  microns  of  first 
and  second  paratypes. 


Oct.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  225 


Erythrothrips  fasciculatus. 


Type  Material:  Female  holotype,  male  allotype,  ten  J and  three 
paratypes  taken  on  Adenostoma  fasciculatum , yellow  clover, 
and  California  sage.  Types  in  author’s  collection.  (Moulton, 
Nos.  699,  713,  735,  1744,  2782,  2784  and  2984.) 

Type  Locality:  California. 

This  species  has  the  general  color  and  appearance  of  E.  ari- 
zonae Moulton,  but  may  be  readily  distinguished  from  it  by  the 
following  characters : a gradual  shading  of  the  third  antennal  seg- 
ment rather  than  an  abrupt  change  of  color  in  the  middle  as  in 
arizonae ; the  smaller  third  and  fourth  antennal  segments,  and  the 
much  smaller  sense  area  in  segment  three,  13-16  p,  as  compared 
to  approximately  60  p,  in  arizonae. 

The  most  striking  difference,  however,  is  found  in  the  male.  In 
this  new  species  the  last  three  abdominal  segments  are  much 
shorter  and  broader  and  the  eighth  segment  has  two  spines  at  each 
posterior  angle  and  a series  of  vestigial  hairs  at  the  sides,  and  the 
ninth  segment  has  two  spines  in  the  middle  of  each  side.  In  ari- 
zonae segment  eight  has  an  arrangement  of  ten  to  twelve  long, 
evenly  placed  hairs  extending  almost  the  full  length  of  the  seg- 
ment and  segment  nine  has  three  or  four  long  hairs  at  the  side. 

Erythrothrips  bishoppi  n.  sp. 

Female,  holotype.  Body  color  dark  blackish  brown  except 
third  antennal  segment  which  is  yellow  in  basal  third,  shad- 
ing rather  gradually  to  dark  brown  in  outer  third.  Fore 
wings  whitish  in  anterior  half  and  dark  brown  in  posterior 
half,  extending  to  extreme  base,  including  scale. 


226  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


Total  body  length  2.33  mm.;  head,  length  .18  mm.,  width 
.21  mm. ; prothorax,  length  .21  mm.,  width  .25  mm. ; meso- 
thorax,  width  .54  mm.  Length  of  ninth  abdominal  segment 
.165  mm.,  width  at  base  .21  mm.;  fore  wings,  width  in  mid- 
dle, .165  mm.  Segments  of  antennae:  length  (width)  I,  45 
(42)  ; II,  69  (39)  ; III,  105  (30)  ; IV,  99  (33)  ; V,  69  (30)  ; 
VI,  69  (30);  VII,  60  (27);  VIII,  30  (18);  IX,  15;  total 
length  510  microns.  Length  of  spines:  on  ninth  abdominal 
segment  240  p,  on  tenth  abdominal  segment  255  p.  Number 
of  spines  on  costa  60,  fore  vein  34,  hind  vein  26.  Maxillary 
palpi  with  7,  labial  palpi  with  4 segments.  Sense  areas  on 
antennal  segments  III,  33 ; IV,  66  microns. 

Type  Material:  Female  holotype  taken  on  black  walnut,  April 
13,  1927  (F.  C.  Bishopp),  and  named  in  honor  of  the  collector. 
Types  in  author’s  collection.  (Moulton,  No.  2171.) 

Type  Locality:  Sonora,  Texas. 

This  species  has  the  general  appearance  of  E.  arizonae  Moul- 
ton, but  may  be  separated  from  it  by  the  shorter  and  broader  head. 
In  bishoppi  the  head  is  wider  than  long,  while  in  arizonae  it  is 
noticeably  longer  than  wide,  third  and  fourth  antennal  segments 
are  shorter,  133  p and  120  p in  arizonae  as  compared  with  103  p 
and  100  p in  this  species.  The  colored  band  on  the  fore  wings  is 
of  nearly  uniform  width  along  posterior  half  and  noticeably 
darker  than  in  arizonae.  The  sixth  to  ninth  abdominal  segments 
gradually  decrease  in  size,  while  in  arizonae  the  eighth  abdominal 
segment  is  rather  more  abruptly  narrowed. 

Erythrothrips  keeni  n.  sp. 

Female,  holotype.  Body  color  blackish  brown  except  third 
antennal  segment  which  is  abruptly  yellowish  brown  in  basal 
two-thirds  and  fourth  to  sixth  abdominal  segments  which  are 
somewhat  lighter.  Basal  third  of  fore  wings  whitish  except 
for  the  dark  brown  scale,  distal  two-thirds  with  a dark  lon- 
gitudinal band  along  posterior  margin,  broadening  somewhat 
in  the  middle  and  at  tips. 

Total  body  length  (abdomen  distended)  2.37  mm.;  head, 
length  .25  mm.,  width  .216  mm. ; prothorax,  length  .216  mm., 
width  .266  mm. ; pterothorax,  width  .40  mm. ; length  of  ninth 
abdominal  segment  along  median  dorsal  line  .183  mm.,  of 
tenth  .166  mm.  Segments  of  antennae:  length  (width)  I,  51 
(45)  ; II,  60  (36) ; III,  141  (33) ; IV,  1 12  (33)  ; V,  75  (30)  ; 
VI,  72  (30);  VII,  69  (30);  VIII,  33  (18);  IX,  18;  total 
length  630  microns.  Spines  on  ninth  abdominal  segment 
291  p,  on  tenth  270  p.  Sense  areas  on  antennal  segments  III, 
48-48  p,  IV,  63-69  microns. 


Oct.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  227 


Male  allotype : Colored  as  in  female. 

Total  body  length  (abdomen  normal)  1.66  mm.;  head, 
length  .216  mm.,  width  .183  mm.;  prothorax,  length  .183 
mm.,  width  .20  mm. ; pterothorax,  width  .25  microns.  An- 
tennae broken  off. 

This  species  is  very  similar  to  E.  arizonae  Moulton,  especially 
in  the  color  of  the  third  antennal  segment  but  is  distinctly  differ- 
ent in  the  coloring  of  the  fore  wings,  being  light  colored  in  the 
basal  third  except  for  scale,  while  in  arizonae  the  dark  longitudi- 
nal band  is  continued  from  extreme  base  to  tip  of  wing.  The  dif- 
ference between  the  two  species  is  more  readily  noted  in  the 
arrangement  of  hairs  and  spines  on  the  seventh,  eighth  and  ninth 
abdominal  segments  of  the  <§,  especially  on  the  eighth  and  ninth 
segments.  In  arizonae  the  seventh  segment  has  a group  of  four 
or  five  rather  prominent  spines  at  the  sides  near  the  back  and  on 
the  posterior  angles,  the  longest  of  these  spines  at  the  angles  is 
about  54  p long.  The  eighth  segment  has  a series  of  about  twelve 
long  hairs  (75  p)  along  the  sides  and  distributed  evenly  from 
near  anterior  margin  to  posterior  margin.  In  keeni  Moulton 
there  is  a group  of  about  twelve  hairs  arranged  in  two  or  three 
rows  and  placed  at  the  sides  in  the  third  quarter  of  the  seventh 
abdominal  segment.  There  are  no  spines  at  the  anterior  half  but 
on  either  side  of  the  posterior  angle  there  is  a group  of  about 
twelve  short  dark  spur-like  bristles.  There  is  a similar  group  of 
about  twelve  hairs  on  posterior  third.  In  fasciculatus  Moulton 
there  is  a darker  colored,  slightly  enlarged  swelling  on  either  side 
near  the  posterior  margin  of  segment  seven  which  bears  a group 
of  several  very  short  inconspicuous  hairs,  the  eighth  segment  has 
two  or  three  short  spines  at  each  posterior  angle  but  is  without  the 
conspicuous  series  of  long  hairs  at  the  sides. 

Type  Material:  Female  holotype,  male  allotype  and  one  para- 
type  taken  on  Chrysolamns,  August  15,  1927,  by  F.  P.  Keen  and 
named  in  his  honor.  Types  in  author’s  collection.  (Moulton,  No. 

2515-) 

Type  Locality : Bly,  Oregon. 

I am  also  placing  in  this  species  two  female  specimens,  one 
taken  by  the  writer  on  Mentzelia  laevicaulis,  July  31,  1926,  at 
Markleyville,  and  one  in  blossoms  of  White  Yarrow  at  Everett 
Pass,  Alpine  County,  California,  on  the  same  date.  (Moulton, 
Nos.  963  and  964.) 


228  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXlV 


Family  Heterothripidae  B agnail. 

Heterothrips  aur antic ornis  Watson. 

Two  female  specimens  taken  on  Helianthus  decapetalus,  Sep- 
tember 4,  19 27,  in  Yankton  County,  South  Dakota,  by  Mr.  A.  W. 
Larrabee.  (Moulton,  No.  2629.)  This  extends  the  habitat  of  the 
species  into  the  Rocky  Mountain  States. 

Heterothrips  gillettei  n.  sp. 

Female  holotype : Body  color  dark  chestnut  brown  with 
diffused  orange  pigmentation.  All  femora,  middle  and  hind 
tibiae  uniformly  dark  brown,  fore  tibiae  lighter,  shading  to 
yellowish  in  center  and  at  tips,  fore  tarsi  yellowish,  middle 
and  hind  tarsi  light  brown.  Antennal  segment  two  dark 
brown,  concolorous  with  head,  one  lighter  brown,  three  yel- 
low, colored  brown  in  distal  fourth,  fore  to  nine  brown  with 
four  slightly  lighter  at  tip  where  sensoria  are  placed.  Wings 
uniformly  brown. 

Total  body  length  1.36  mm.;  head,  length  .133  mm.,  width 
.14  mm. ; prothorax,  length  .133  mm.,  width  .216  mm. ; meso- 
thorax,  width  .26  mm.  Antennae:  length  (width)  I,  21 
(30)  ; II,  36  (27)  ; III,  51  (24)  ; IV,  42  (21)  ; V,  30  (18)  ; 
VI,  30  (18);  VII,  22  (12);  VIII,  18  (10);  IX,  21;  total 
length  270  microns.  Median  dorsal  spines  on  seventh  and 
eighth  abdominal  segments  60  p,  on  ninth  and  tenth  51 
microns. 

Head  as  long  as  wide,  with  deep  crescent-shaped  pits  in 
front  which  receive  the  basal  segments  of  antennae.  An- 
terior margin  of  eyes  sharply  protruding.  Antennae  placed 
close  together,  not  over  9 mm.  apart.  Cheeks  very  slightly 
arched,  back  of  head  with  coarse  striations.  All  head  spines 
small.  Eyes  with  coarse  facets.  Anterior  ocellus  small,  di- 
rected forward,  posterior  ocelli  large,  contiguous  with  inner 
margins  of  eyes,  three  to  four  times  greater  in  diameter  than 
facets  of  eyes.  Mouth  cone  short  and  blunt.  Antenna  twice 
as  long  as  head,  segment  two  widest,  three  longest,  three  and 
four  with  bands  of  sensoria  at  distal  ends. 

Prothorax  as  long  as  head,  1.6  wider  than  long,  without 
prominent  spines,  with  broadly  rounded  posterior  angles  and 
margin.  Pronotum  faintly  reticulate,  sculptured  with  fine 
dots  within  the  reticulations.  Setae  scattered.  Mesothorax 
broadest,  metathorax  smaller  with  posterior  angles  rounded 
to  union  with  abdomen.  Legs  fairly  stout.  Wings  fully  de- 
veloped, with  spines  as  follows : costa,  1-32,  fore  vein  23, 
hind  vein  18. 


Oct.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  229 


Abdomen  elongate-ovate  with  a pair  of  closely  placed  me- 
dian dorsal  spines  on  segments  two  to  eight,  posterior  mar- 
gins of  segments  one  to  five  bordered  with  a fringe  of  spines 
at  the  sides  which  are  placed  singly  and  not  joined  into  plates. 
The  posterior  margin  of  segment  one  without  spines  in  the 
center  but  two  to  five  inclusive  with  a center  fringe  of  four 
or  five  spines,  this  fringe  complete  on  segments  six,  seven 
and  eight.  Dorsal  surface  of  all  segments  indistinctly  reticu- 
late and  sparingly  setose  at  the  sides. 

Male  allotype.  Colored  as  in  the  female  but  with  antennal 
segment  four  also  somewhat  lighter,  especially  at  the  tip. 

Total  body  length  1.08  mm. 

Abdominal  sternites  without  ventral  depressions.  Wings 
fully  developed. 

Type  Material:  Female  holotype,  male  allotype,  8 6 

paratypes  taken  on  “rat-tail  weed”  (Moulton,  No.  1037)  and 
yellow  sweet  cloved  (Moulton,  No.  1027),  July  10,  1926  (Prof. 
C.  P.  Gillette),  and  named  in  honor  of  the  collector.  All  types  in 
author’s  collection. 

Type  Locality : Fort  Collins,  Colorado, 

This  species  belongs  in  that  group  in  which  the  abdominal  ter- 
gites  are  fringed  posteriorly  with  hairs  which  are  not  coalesced 
into  plates.  It  is  most  closely  related  to  H.  auranticornis  Watson, 
but  may  be  separated  by  the  following  characters : gillettei  has  all 
femora  and  middle  and  hind  tibiae  uniformly  brown,  antennal 
segments  four,  five  and  six  brown,  with  four  only  a shade  lighter, 
especially  in  the  male.  In  auranticornis  the  tips  of  fore  femora, 
both  ends  of  middle  and  hind  femora  and  tibia  are  brownish  yel- 
low, antennal  segments  three  and  four  are  yellow,  conspicuously 
shaded  with  orange,  five  is  yellow  in  basal  two-thirds  and  six  in 
basal  half. 

Family  Thripidae  Uzel. 

Subfamily  Heliothripinae  Karny. 

Heliothrips  bishoppi  n.  sp. 

Female  holotype:  Color  dark  chestnut  brown.  Antennal 
segments  one,  two  and  six  to  eight  concolorous  with  head, 
three  and  four  brownish  yellow  at  both  ends,  darker  in  the 
middle,  five  brownish  yellow  in  basal  third  shading  to  dark 
brown  in  distal  two-thirds.  Fore  femora  and  tibia  brownish 
yellow  but  darker  in  the  middle,  middle  and  hind  femora  dark 
brown,  middle  and  hind  tibia  yellowish  at  both  ends,  dark 
brown  in  the  middle,  all  tarsi  yellow.  Wings  clear  except  for 
a dark  cross  band  at  forking  of  veins  which  is  continued  into 


230  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


a longitudinal  band  along  posterior  margin  and  broadened 
again  to  form  a dark  band  at  tip. 

Total  body  length  i.  mm. ; head,  length  .10  mm.,  width  .15 
mm.;  prothorax,  length  .116  mm.,  width  .17  mm.;  ptero- 
thorax,  width  .25  mm.  Antennae:  length  (width)  III,  45 
(21);  IV,  48  (22)  ;V,  39  (21);  VI,  27  (18);  VII,  15;  VIII, 
30;  total  length  of  segments  III  to  VIII  240  microns. 

This  species  is  very  similar  to  H.  punctipennis  Hood,  but 
may  be  easily  separated  from  that  species  by  the  color  of  the 
legs  which  are  clear  lemon  yellow,  in  bishoppi  the  middle  and 
hind  legs  are  distinctly  dark  brown  but  brownish  yellow  at 
the  joints. 

Type  Material : Female  holotype  taken  on  Quercus  sp.,  April 

17,  1927  (F.  C.  Bishopp),  and  named  in  honor  of  the  collector. 

Holotype  in  author’s  collection.  (Moulton,  No.  2177.) 

Type  Locality:  Menard,  Texas. 

Subfamily  Sericothripinae  Karny. 

Tribe  Sericothripini  Priesner,  1926. 

Sericothrips  langei  n.  sp. 

Female  holotype.  Color  dark  brown,  pterothorax  some- 
what lighter.  Antennal  segments  one  to  four  whitish  yellow 
with  the  first  segment  slightly  brownish,  five  whitish  yellow 
at  base,  gradually  shading  to  brown  at  tip,  six  to  eight  brown. 
All  femora  brown  but  yellowish  at  base,  all  tibiae  brownish 
in  basal  halves  yellowish  in  distal  halves,  tarsi  yellow.  Fore 
wings  clear  at  base,  middle  and  tip,  with  two  intervening- 
brown  bands.  Crescents  of  ocelli  orange  red. 

Total  body  length  1 mm.;  head,  length  .09  mm.,  width  .165 
mm. ; prothorax,  length  .12  mm.,  width  .18  mm. ; pterothorax, 
width  .24  mm. ; abdomen,  width  .24  mm.  Segments  of  an- 
tennae: length  (width)  I,  15  (24)  ; II,  30  (24)  ; III,  39  (18)  ; 
IV,  36  (17)  ; V,  33  (16) ; VI,  45  (18)  ; VII,  9;  VIII,  12; 
total  length  222  microns.  Length  of  spines : interocellars 
21  p,  on  posterior  angles  of  prothorax  30  (j,  on  posterior 
angles  of  ninth  abdominal  segment  51  |j,  on  tenth  segment  60 
microns. 

Head  1.8  times  wider  than  long,  flattened  in  front;  cheeks 
straight.  Back  of  head  with  conspicuous  transverse,  wavy 
lines,  occipit  line  especially  strong  behind  posterior  ocelli. 
Four  distinct  spines  on  anterior  margin  of  head,  about  as 
long  as  those  in  front  of  posterior  ocelli.  Eyes  large,  with 
coarse  facets.  Ocelli  approximately  as  large  as  facets  of 
eyes.  Mouth  cone  short,  reaching  only  four-fifths  over 
prosternum,  broad  at  base  and  rounded  at  tip. 


Oct.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  231 


Prothorax  with  three  distinct  spines  on  each  posterior 
angle,  the  outer  two  small  and  curved,  the  inner  one  mod- 
erately long,  about  twelve  spines  scattered  over  pronotum. 
Pterothorax  also  with  distinct  lineations.  Wings  normal, 
fore  vein  with  twenty-two  spines,  one  near  center  of  outer 
dark  cross  band  where  second  vein  should  appear.  Micro- 
scopic setae  very  close  and  prominent  on  the  sides  of  ab- 
dominal segments  but  very  faint  in  the  center,  comb-like  ar- 
rangement of  spines  conspicuous  at  sides  along  posterior 
margins  of  segments  one  to  seven,  a complete  comb  on  seg- 
ment eight. 

Type  Material : Female  holotype  and  two  § paratypes  taken  by 
sweeping,  August  30,  1921,  by  Mr.  R.  C.  Lange,  after  whom  the 
species  is  named.  Types  in  author’s  collection.  (Moulton,  No. 
780.) 

Type  Locality:  Fish  Lake,  Illinois. 

This  species  is  clearly  separated  from  other  members  of  the 
genus  by  its  uniform  body  color  and  the  banded  wings  with  trans- 
parent tips. 

Tribe  Dendrothripini  Priesner,  1926. 

Anaphothrips  crassicornis  n.  sp. 

Female  holotype:  Color  clear  yellow  with  thorax  and  mar- 
gins of  femora  and  tibiae  shaded  a little  darker.  First  anten- 
nal segment  whitish,  two  clear  yellow,  three  four  and  five 
yellowish  white  at  base  shading  to  gray  brown  at  tip,  six  gray 
brown  lighter  at  base,  seven  to  nine  gray  brown.  Wings  yel- 
low, prominent  body  and  wing  spines  brown.  Crescents  of 
ocelli  orange. 

Total  body  length  1.  mm.;  head,  length  .09  mm.,  width  .13 
mm. ; prothorax,  length  .10  mm.,  width  .15  mm. ; mesothorax, 
width  .20  mm.;  metathorax,  width  .18  mm.  Antennae: 
length  (width)  I,  18  (21)  ; II,  ? (24)  ; III,  ? (21)  ; IV,  ? 
(21)  ; V,  33  (21)  ; VI,  30  (21)  ; VII,  6 (15)  ; VIII,  9;  IX, 
12;  total  length  180  ( ?)  microns.  Length  of  spines:  a single 
one  on  each  posterior  angle  of  prothorax  30  p,  outer  pair  on 
posterior  angle  of  ninth  abdominal  segment  75  p,  median 
inner  pair  36  p,  median  dorsal  pair  on  tenth  abdominal  seg- 
ment 60  microns. 

Head  transverse,  broadly  flattened  in  front ; cheeks  slightly 
arched,  without  prominent  spines  or  markings.  Eyes  semi- 
spherical.  Ocelli  present  but  not  strongly  developed.  Mouth 
cone  broad  at  base,  angular  at  pit,  reaching  posterior  margin 
of  prosternum.  Antenna  compact,  approximately  twice  as 


232  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXIv 


long  as  head,  clearly  with  nine  segments  having  a 3-seg- 
mented  style. 

Prothorax  1.5  wider  than  long  with  a single  moderately 
stout  spine  at  each  posterior  angle  and  a series  of  four  on 
either  side  along  posterior  margin,  about  twenty  short  brown 
spines  scattered  over  dorsum.  Mesothorax  broadest  with 
sides  strongly  arched,  metathorax  smaller,  especially  where  it 
joins  mesothorax.  Median  dorsal  pair  of  spines  on  meta- 
notum,  placed  well  back  from  anterior  margin.  Legs  normal. 
Wings  fully  developed  with  spines  as  follows : costa  24,  fore 
vein  1-3  at  base  followed  by  a short  intermission,  then  a 
series  of  fifteen  regularly  placed  spines  reaching  to  tip,  hind 
vein  with  13. 

Abdomen  elongate-ovate,  outer  pair  of  spines  on  posterior 
margin  of  ninth  segment  clearly  twice  as  long  as  the  inner 
pair,  spines  on  segment  ten  intermediate  between  the  two. 
Fully  developed  comb  along  posterior  margin  of  segment 
eight. 

Allotype  male:  colored  as  in  female.  Total  body  length  .9 
mm.  Antennae:  length  (width)  I,  15  (15)  ; II,  27  (24)  ; III, 
27  (18) ; IV,  30  (18)  ; V,  30  (18)  ; VI,  27  (61)  ; VII,  VIII 
and  IX,  27.  Spines  on  fore  wings  as  follows : costa  19,  fore 
vein  4— 7—1— 1,  an  intermission,  4 near  tip,  hind  vein  9.  Ninth 
abdominal  segment  with  a median  pair  of  short  spurs  15  p 
long,  and  a single  spine  on  either  side  outward  and  anterior 
to  these  27  p. 

Type  Material:  Female  holotype,  male  allotype  taken  July  5, 
1926  (W.  M.  Shackleford).  Host  plant  unknown.  Type  in 
author’s  collection.  (Moulton,  No.  1647.) 

Type  Locality:  Champagne  County,  Illinois. 

This  species  is  distinct  from  any  previously  described  American 
species  because  of  its  compact  and  clearly  9-segmented  antenna 
and  the  almost  regular  placement  of  spines  on  the  fore-longitudi- 
nal vein  of  fore  wings  in  the  female.  Intermediate  antennal  seg- 
ments are  somewhat  more  slender  in  the  male  and  the  intermis- 
sions in  the  arrangement  of  spines  on  the  fore  veins  of  fore  wings 
are  more  distinct. 

Subfamily  Thripinae  Karny. 

Odontothrips  loti  Haliday. 

Euthrips  ulicis  calif ornicus  Moulton,  1907.  Thysanoptera 

of  California,  U.  S.  Dept,  of  Agric.  Tec.  Ser.,  No.  12,  Pt. 

in,  p.  55  ) 

Odontothrips  calif  ornicus  Moulton,  1927.  (Pan.-Pac.  Ent., 

Vol.  IV,  No.  1,  page  34.) 


Oct.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  233 


I have  been  able  to  compare  our  American  species  with  speci- 
mens of  O.  loti  Hal.,  kindly  sent  to  me  by  Dr.  H.  Priesner  and 
find  the  two  species  identical.  A wider  distribution  is  also  re- 
corded from  the  following  collections  : 

3 55  taken  on  Lupinus  argenteus  at  Stillwater,  Colorado,  July 
18,  1926,  by  Alvah  L.  Pearsall.  (Moulton,  No.  992.) 

1 5 taken  on  Malus  sp.  at  Colorado  Springs,  Colorado,  May  14, 
1926,  by  G.  W.  Goldsmith.  (Moulton,  No.  1158.) 

1 5 taken  on  wild  lucerne  at  Toga,  Virginia,  June  19,  1927,  by 
J.  V.  Gilmore.  (Moulton,  No.  2090.) 

Frankliniella  insularis  Franklin. 

Numerous  specimens  taken  on  legumes  and  other  unnamed 
plants  at  Bear  Camp,  Catalina  Mountains,  Arizona,  on  April  24, 
1926,  by  Messrs.  C.  T.  Vorhies  and  A.  A.  Nichols.  (Moulton, 
Nos.  1856  and  1864.) 

This  record  extends  the  range  of  this  species  to  the  south  west- 
ern states. 

Ctenothrips  frosti  n.  sp. 

(Brachypterous.) 

Female,  holotype.  Color  of  head  and  thorax  blackish 
brown,  abdomen  black,  all  femora  blackish  brown,  light  yel- 
low at  extreme  base,  tibiae  dark  brown,  lighter  along  center, 
tarsi  yellowish  brown.  Antennal  segments  one  and  two 
blackish  brown,  two  lighter  towards  tip,  three  yellowish 
brown,  four  yellowish  brown  in  basal  third,  dark  brown  in 
outer  two-thirds,  five  yellowish  brown  at  extreme  base,  shad- 
ing to  dark  brown  in  outer  half,  six  to  eight  blackish  brown. 

Total  body  length  1.76  mm.;  head,  length  .19  mm.,  width 
across  eyes  .21  mm.;  prothorax,  length  .15  mm.,  width  .27 
mm. ; pterothorax,  width  .36  mm. ; abdomen,  width  .54  mm. 
Segments  of  antennae:  length  (width)  I,  30  (33);  II,  42 
(30) ; III,  87  (24)  ; IV,  69  (24) ; V,  60  (21)  ; VI,  81  (21)  ; 
VII,  12;  VIII,  24;  total  length  405  microns. 

Head  approximately  as  long  as  wide,  constricted  behind 
eyes  but  not  as  deeply  as  in  Ctenothrips  hridwelli  Franklin. 
Back  of  head  with  coarse,  transverse,  anastomosing  stria- 
tions.  All  head  spines  relatively  short,  a pair  anterior  to 
ocelli  and  near  anterior  inner  margins  of  eyes.  Interocellars 
placed  between  posterior  ocelli  with  a series  of  three  or  four 
on  either  side  behind  eyes.  Eyes  large,  protruding,  with 
coarse  facets.  Ocelli  fully  developed;  Antennae  normal  to 
the  genus. 


234  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXlv 


The  anastomosing  transverse  lines  of  prothorax  much  less 
distinct  than  on  head,  entire  surface  stippled  with  light  col- 
ored dots,  mesonotal  plate  more  clearly  lined  than  the  pro- 
notum  and  metanotum,  distinctly  reticulate.  Lines  on  femora 
rather  distinct,  on  tibiae  hardly  visible.  Wings  reduced  to 
very  short  pads. 

Abdomen  broadly  ovate,  much  wider  than  pterothorax, 
first  segment  clearly  reticulated,  eighth  segment  with  fully 
developed,  long-toothed  comb. 

Type  Material:  Female  holotype  taken  by  sifting,  March  24, 
1928,  by  Mr.  C.  A.  Frost  and  named  in  his  honor.  Type  in 
author’s  collection.  (Moulton,  No.  3066.) 

Type  Locality : Sherborn,  Massachusetts. 

This  species  is  clearly  separated  from  reticulatus  Crawford, 
by  the  absence  of  conspicuous  reticulations  on  the  thorax  and  legs 
and  may  be  separated  from  bridwelli  Franklin,  by  the  darker  col- 
ored third,  fourth  and  fifth  antennal  segments.  It  approaches 
florid ensis  Watson  perhaps  most  closely,  but  this  latter  species  is 
described  as  having  the  pronotum  with  deep  polygonal  reticula- 
tions which  are  very  indistinct  on  the  pronotum  in  this  new 
species. 

Taeniothrips  dianthi  Priesner. 

Two  female  specimens  taken  on  Dianthus  plumarius  at  Vernon, 
British  Columbia,  Canada,  June  3,  1927,  by  Mr.  A.  H.  Ruhman 
(Moulton,  No.  2047)  and  two  specimens  taken  from  Dianthus 
sp.,  July  4,  1927,  at  Shenandoah,  Iowa,  by  Mr.  S.  C.  Jones  (Moul- 
ton, No.  2394). 

This  is  the  first  finding  of  this  species  in  North  America,  it  hav- 
ing been  known  previously  only  in  Central  Europe. 

Thrips  discolor  Halid. 

One  female  taken  from  Buttercups,  July  11,  1926,  by  Dr.  W. 
E.  Britton,  Salisbury,  Conn.  (Moulton,  No.  1124),  and  one  speci- 
men taken  from  Buttercups,  July  5,  1926,  by  Mr.  H.  Notman, 
Keene  Valley,  New  York  (Moulton,  No.  1240). 

This  is  the  first  record  for  this  thrips  in  North  America,  pre- 
viously known  only  from  Europe. 

Thrips  gilmorei  n.  sp. 

Female,  holotype.  Body  color  deep  brown  with  much  red 
hypodermal  pigment  in  thorax  and  abdomen.  Segments  one 
and  two  of  antennae  deep  brown  with  red  hypodermal  pig- 
ment, three  to  seven  clear  yellow  with  a shade  of  brown  in 


Oct.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  235 


basal  quarter  of  segment  three,  distal  half  of  six  and  all  of 
seven  light  yellowish  brown.  Legs  uniformly  deep  brown. 
Fore  wings  uniformly  brown  but  clear  in  basal  fifth.  Cres- 
cents of  ocelli  deep  orange  red.  All  prominent  body  spines 
dark  brown. 

Total  body  length  1.5  mm.;  head,  length  .15  mm.,  width 
.15  mm.;  prothorax,  length  .14  mm.,  width  .20  mm.;  ptero- 
thorax,  width  .27  mm. ; abdomen,  width  .28  mm.  Segments 
of  antennae:  length  (width)  I,  24  (30)  ; II,  33  (27)  ; III,  57 
(24)  ; IV,  57  (21) ; V,  28  (18)  ; VI,  60/18) ; VII,  24;  total 
length  300  microns.  Length  of  spines:  interocellars  21  p,  on 
posterior  angles  of  prothorax  72  p,  outer  pair  on  ninth  ab- 
dominal segment  129  p,  inner  100  p,  on  tenth  abdominal  seg- 
ment 105  microns. 

Head  clearly  as  long  as  wide,  constricted  behind  eyes  and 
then  somewhat  swollen,  with  prominent  broken  transverse 
lines  on  back  of  head.  Interocellar  spines  placed  on  a line 
connecting  posterior  ocelli  with  anterior  ocellus.  A series  of 
three  spines  on  either  side  behind  eyes.  Eyes  prominent, 
with  coarse  facets,  conspicuously  pilose.  Ocelli  large.  An- 
tenna slender,  twice  as  long  as  head. 

Prothorax  with  two  long  spines  at  each  posterior  angle  and 
two  on  either  side  along  posterior  margin,  the  innermost 
being  about  twice  as  long  as  the  outer.  A pair  of  well  de- 
veloped spines  near  center  of  metanotum,  placed  well  back 
from  anterior  margin.  Legs  semi-reticulate  and  rather 
densely  clothed  with  short  dark  spines.  Wings  fully  devel- 
oped, anterior  vein  with  3-3  basal  bristles  and  three  distal 
bristles,  posterior  vein  with  14. 

Abdomen  long  and  slender,  comb  along  posterior  margin 
of  eighth  segment  complete  but  weak,  suture  on  tenth  seg- 
ment extending  two-thirds  its  length. 

Male  allotype : Coloring  as  in  the  female.  The  first  two 
antennal  segments  deep  brown  but  showing  more  red  hypo- 
dermal  pigment,  three  to  five  yellowish  but  indistinctly  light 
brown  at  the  tips,  six  lighter  in  basal  fourth,  brownish  yellow 
in  outer  three-fourths. 

Total  body  length  1.2  mm. ; length  .14  mm.,  width  .13  mm. ; 
prothorax,  length  .10  mm.,  width  .16  mm.;  pterothorax, 
width  .21  mm.;  greatest  width  of  abdomen  .15  mm.  Ventral 
depressions  on  sternites  two  and  three  large,  ovoid  in  shape 
and  rather  conspicuous  but  appear  to  be  wanting  on  other 
sternites. 

Type  Material : Female  holotype  and  male  allotype  taken  on 
hickory,  June  22,  1927,  by  Mr.  J.  W.  Gilmore,  and  named  in  his 
honor.  Types  in  author’s  collection.  (Moulton,  No.  2093.) 


236  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Yol.XXIV 


Type  Locality:  Appomatox,  Virginia. 

This  species  would  seem  to  be  most  closely  related  to  T.  physa- 
pus  Linn.,  but  is  easily  separated  from  that  species  by  its  rela- 
tively longer  head,  straighter  cheeks  and  with  little  or  no  con- 
striction at  the  base,  also  uniformly  light  color  of  the  distal  three- 
fourths  of  the  third,  fourth  and  fifth  antennal  segments  in  the 
female.  Gilmorei  is  distinguished  also  by  its  uniformly  dark 
brown  legs,  including  the  tarsi. 

Thrips  ( Micro cephalothrips ) abdominalis  Crawford  (Syn.  Thrips 
gillettei  Moulton). 

Numerous  specimens  of  this  species  were  found  in  a collection 
made  on  Hymenopappus  carolinense  on  March  31,  1927,  at  Bas- 
trop, Texas,  by  Mr.  Hugh  A.  Duval  (Moulton,  No.  1832).  The 
series  included  three  males  heretofore  unknown  so  I am  offering 
a brief  description. 

General  color  as  in  the  female. 

Total  body  length  .7  mm. ; head,  length  .066  mm.,  width 
across  eyes  .093  mm. ; prothorax,  length  .096  mm.,  width  .126 
mm.;  pterothorax,  width  .156  mm.;  abdomen,  width  .15  mm. 
Segments  of  antennae:  length  (width)  I,  15  (18);  II,  21 

(18) ; III,  27  (15) ; IV,  24  (15) ; V,  21  (14) ; VI,  33  (15) ; 

VII,  12;  total  length  170  microns. 

General  shape  of  head  and  thorax  as  in  the  female.  Ab- 
domen more  slender,  segments  with  irregular  comb-like  teeth 
along  posterior  margins,  tergites  faintly  cross  striate,  ventral 
depressions  on  sternites  three  to  seven  very  small,  almost 
round,  10-12  p in  diameter. 

TUBU  LIFERA,  1836. 

Family  Phloeothripidae  Hood. 

Subfamily  Phloeothripinae  Priesner. 

Tribe  Hoplothripini  Priesner. 

Cephalothrips  elegans  n.  sp. 

Female,  holotype.  Color  yellowish  brown,  abdomen  some- 
what lighter,  tube  darker  and  concolorous  with  head,  tips  of 
fore  femora,  all  tibiae  and  tarsi  yellow.  Antenna  uniformly 
brown,  except  tip  of  segment  two  and  basal  half  of  three 
which  are  yellowish.  Body  spines  clear  yellow. 

Total  body  length  1.5  mm.  (abdomen  distended)  ; head, 
length  .15  mm.,  width  .13  mm.;  prothorax,  length  .105  mm., 
width  (including  coxae)  .18  mm.;  tube  length  .108  mm., 
width  at  base  .051  mm.  Segments  of  antennae:  length 


Oct.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  237 


(width)  I,  21  (2 7)  ; II,  39  (25)  ; III,  39  (25)  ; IV,  39  (25)  ; 
V.  39  (24);  VI,  39  (20);  VII,  36  (18);  VIII,  24;  total 
length  276  microns.  Length  of  spines : postoculars  45  p,  on 
anterior  angles  of  prothorax  27  p,  mid-laterals  39  p,  on  poste- 
rior angles,  outer  48  p,  inner  39  p,  on  ninth  abdominal  seg- 
ment 150  p,  at  end  of  tube  160  microns. 

Head  1.2  longer  than  wide  and  1.5  longer  than  prothorax, 
without  conspicuous  markings,  flattened  in  front,  cheeks 
slightly  arched.  Postocular  spines  fully  as  long  as  eyes,  with 
dilated  tips.  Eyes  moderately  small.  Ocelli  present.  Mouth 
cone  short,  extending  two-thirds  over  prosternum.  Antenna 
about  1.5  longer  than  head,  all  segments  rather  compact,  seg- 
ment three  noticeably  “ V ’’-shaped,  three  to  seven  each  with 
a pedicel,  eight  broadly  and  flatly  joined  to  seven. 

Prothorax  only  slightly  wider  than  head,  all  normal  spines, 
including  those  on  anterior  margins  and  mid-laterals  present, 
with  dilated  tips.  Sides  of  pterothorax  narrowed  posteriorly. 
Legs  short,  fore  femora  slightly  thickened,  fore  tarsi  appar- 
ently unarmed.  Wings  reduced  to  short  pads.  Abdomen 
long  and  slender,  wing-holding-spines  completely  wanting. 
Tube  .66  head’s  length.  Spines  on  ninth  and  tenth  segments 
1.5  longer  than  two. 

Type  Material : Female  holotype,  one  female  paratype  taken 
under  Maple  bark,  April  5,  1926,  by  Mr.  J.  W.  Gilmore.  Types 
in  author’s  collection.  (Moulton,  No.  1428.) 

Type  Locality:  Clarksville,  Tennessee. 

This  species  is  closely  related  to  C.  errans  Moulton,  but  may  be 
separated  by  the  lighter  and  more  yellowish  color,  the  shorter  and 
narrower  fourth  and  fifth  antennal  segments  and  the  smaller  fore 
femora. 

Thorybothrips  yuccae  n.  sp. 

Female,  holotype : Body  color  uniformly  dark  brown ; 

Legs  and  all  segments  of  antenna  dark  brown  except  base  of 
third  which  is  lighter.  Wings  transparent,  prominent  body 
spines  whitish. 

Total  body  length  (abdomen  normal)  2.0  mm. ; head, 
length  .266  mm.,  width  behind  eyes  .166  mm.,  at  posterior 
margin  .20  mm. ; prothorax,  length  .133  mm.,  width  includ- 
ing coxae  .383  mm. ; pterothorax,  width  .366  mm. ; tube, 
length  .195  mm.,  width  at  base  .081  mm.,  at  tip  .042  mm. 
Segments  of  antennae:  length  (width)  I,  36  (36);  II,  51 
(36) ; III,  60  (39)  ; IV,  60  (39)  ; V,  54  (33)  ; VI,  51  (30) ; 
VII,  60  (24);  VIII,  54  (15);  total  length  410  microns. 


238  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


Length  of  spines : postoculars  70  p,  on  anterior  angles  of 
prothorax  30  p,  outer  pair  on  posterior  angles,  75  p,  on  ninth 
abdominal  segment  156  p,  on  tip  of  tube  120  microns. 

Head  1.3  longer  than  wide,  narrowest  across  eyes,  cheeks 
straight,  diverging  toward  posterior  margin  where  head  is 
broadest,  without  conspicuous  markings.  Postocular  spines 
long,  with  blunt  tips,  placed  near  sides  and  almost  mid-way 
between  posterior  margin  of  eyes  and  posterior  margin  of 
head,  other  spines  inconspicuous.  Eyes  not  protruding, 
outer  margin  almost  straight  and  joining  cheeks  evenly,  oc- 
cupying about  .3  the  head’s  length.  Ocelli  fully  developed. 
Mouth  cone  short  and  broadly  rounded,  reaching  two-thirds 
over  prosternum.  Antenna  with  eight  segments,  three  to 
seven  each  with  a distinct  pedicel,  three  and  four  broadly 
clavate,  subequal  in  length  and  width  and  broadest  of  all, 
eight  more  than  three  times  as  long  as  greatest  width,  clearly 
separated  from  seven,  narrowed  at  base  but  without  a distinct 
pedicel.  Sense  cones  short  and  strong,  segments  three  and 
four  each  with  three  and  five  and  six  each  with  two. 

Prothorax  .66  as  long  as  head,  clearly  transverse,  without 
conspicous  markings.  Spines  on  anterior  angles  moderately 
developed  with  blunt  tips,  a prominent  pair  at  each  posterior 
angle,  others  vestigial.  Pterothorax  slightly  narrower  than 
prothorax  including  coxae,  broadest  in  front  with  sides 
gradually  converging  toward  the  posterior.  Fore  femora 
greatly  enlarged  with  outer  distal  margin  slightly  curved 
outward  as  in  Chirothrip s manicatus,  Hal.,  fore  tibia  stout, 
each  fore  tarsus  armed  with  a short,  stout  tooth  in  addition 
to  a strong  claw.  Middle  and  hind  legs  moderately  long. 
Wings  fully  developed,  with  parallel  sides,  fore  pair  with 
twenty  double  fringe  hairs  along  posterior  margin. 

Abdomen  normal.  Tube  .7  as  long  as  head  and  twice  as 
broad  at  base  as  at  tip.  Abdominal  spines  well  developed  but 
difficult  to  see  because  of  their  whitish  color. 

Type  Material:  Female  holotype  taken  on  Yucca  rupicola, 
April  25,  1928,  by  Mr.  Hugh  H.  Duval.  Type  in  author’s  collec- 
tion. (Moulton,  No.  3242.) 

Type  Locality:  Bastrop,  Texas. 

This  species  is  interesting  as  it  is  the  first  member  of  the  genus 
to  be  found  in  North  America.  It  is  easily  distinguished  by  its 
uniformly  dark  brown  antennae  and  legs  in  comparison  with  the 
European  T.  graminis,  Priesner,  which  has  the  end  of  the  fore 
tibiae  and  tarsi  and  the  third  antennal  segment  yellowish  to  yel- 
lowish gray. 


Oct.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  239 


Rhynchothrips  versicolor  n.  sp. 

Female,  holotype.  Body  color  dark  chestnut  brown  ex- 
cept all  tarsi  which  are  yellowish,  and  third  antennal  segment 
which  is  yellow  with  a cloud  of  grayish  brown  in  outer  half, 
segments  four  to  six  mottled  with  yellow,  all  prominent  body 
spines  dark  brown.  Wings  transparent  except  for  a light 
brownish  cloud  at  base. 

Total  body  length  2.12  mm. ; head,  length  .266  mm.,  width 
.233  mm. ; prothorax,  length  .216  mm.,  width  (without  coxae) 
•333  mm.,  (including  coxae)  .383  mm.;  pterothorax,  width 
.433  mm. ; abdomen,  width  .433  mm. ; tube,  length  .25  mm., 
width  at  base  .083  mm.  Segments  of  antennaae : length 
(width)  I,  39;  II,  60  (36)  ; III,  81  (36)  ; IV,  81  (39)  ; V, 
69  (39)  ; VI,  60  (33)  ; VII,  48  (30)  ; VIII,  36;  total  length 
510  microns.  Length  of  spines : postoculars  69  p,  on  anterior 
margin  of  prothorax  60  p,  on  anterior  angles  48  p,  mid- 
laterals 75  jj,  on  posterior  angles,  outer  150  jj,  inner  135  p,  on 
ninth  abdominal  segment  210  p,  on  tip  of  tube  210  microns. 

Head  1.3  longer  than  width  behind  eyes,  broadly  flattened 
in  front,  cheeks  slightly  arched,  somewhat  narrowed  toward 
the  posterior,  marked  with  transverse,  wavy,  anastomosing 
lines.  Postocular  spines  stout,  pointed,  somewhat  shorter 
than  length  of  eyes.  Eyes  large  and  round.  Ocelli  well 
developed.  Mouth  cone  stout,  pointed,  reaching  to  anterior 
margin  of  mesosternum.  Antenna  with  segment  eight  clearly 
separated  from  seven  but  broadly  joined.  Sense  area  on  seg- 
ment two  placed  about  one-third  the  segment’s  length  from 
distal  margin. 

Prothorax  transverse,  .7  as  long  as  head,  sculpturing  more 
or  less  distinct  only  at  the  sides.  All  normal  spines  well  de- 
veloped and  with  pointed  tips,  pair  at  posterior  angles  longest. 
Pterothorax  with  evenly  formed  and  slightly  arched  sides. 
Legs  moderately  stout,  fore  femora  somewhat  thickened, 
fore  tarsus  with  the  usual  claw,  otherwise  unarmed.  Wings 
fully  developed  with  parallel  sides,  each  fore  wing  with  16 
double  fringe  hairs  along  the  posterior  margin. 

Abdomen  of  equal  width  with  pterothorax.  Tube  .9  as 
long  as  head. 

Both  larvae  and  pupae  have  much  dark  red  or  purple 
pigment. 

Type  Material : Female  holotype,  one  female  paratype,  three 
large  larvae  and  four  pupae  taken  in  hickory  galls  June  22,  1927, 
by  Mr.  J.  W.  Gilmore.  Types  in  author’s  collection.  (Moulton, 
No.  2093.) 


240  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXlv 


Type  Locality:  Appomatox,  Virginia. 

This  species  most  closely  resembles  R.  ilex,  Moulton,  but  is  dis- 
tinguished by  the  lighter  fourth  and  fifth  antennal  segments  which 
are  mottled  in  effect  rather  than  shading  gradually  from  yellow 
to  yellowish  brown  as  in  ilex.  This  species  also  has  longer  third 
and  fourth  antennal  segments,  81  p as  compared  with  60  p in  ilex 
and  a larger  number  of  double  fringe  hairs  on  fore  wings,  16  as 
compared  with  8-10. 

Lispothrips  varicornis  n.  sp. 

Female,  holotype.  Body  color  black,  legs  black  except 
tarsi  which  are  dark  brown.  Antennal  segments  one,  two  and 
six  to  eight  almost  black,  two  lighter  at  tip,  three  and  four 
yellow  with  four  slightly  brownish  in  distal  third,  segment 
five  deep  brown  with  pedicel  lighter. 

Total  body  length  2.16  mm.  (abdomen  distended)  ; head, 
length  .219  mm.,  width  .18  mm.;  prothorax,  length  .18  mm., 
width  .276  mm. ; pterothorax,  length  .18  mm.,  width  .33  mm.  ; 
abdomen,  width  .48  mm.;  tube,  length  .165  mm.  width  at 
base  .075  mm.  Segments  of  antennae:  length  (width)  I,  30 
(36) ; II,  48  (36)  ; III,  42  (30)  ; IV,  45  (36)  ; V,  42  (33)  ; 
VI,  45  (28)  ; VII,  48  (24)  ; VIII,  36,  total  length  330 
microns.  Length  of  spines:  postoculars  45  p,  on  anterior 
angles  of  prothorax  30  p,  mid-laterals  33  p,  on  posterior 
angles,  outer  60  p,  inner  30  p,  on  ninth  abdominal  segment 
75  p,  at  tip  of  tube  90  microns. 

This  species  is  typical  of  the  genus  with  its  short,  com- 
pact antennae,  segments  three  to  seven  each  having  a broad, 
distinct  pedicel,  segment  three  without  sense  cones,  checks 
roughened  and  with  three  or  four  short,  sharp  transparent 
spines  borne  on  small  warts.  The  regular  body  spines  are 
short,  transparent  and  difficult  to  observe.  Legs  are  short 
and  stout. 

It  is  easily  separated  from  L.  birdi,  Moulton,  by  the  fol- 
lowing characters : Antennal  segments  three  and  four  yel- 

low, head  more  slender,  with  cheeks  almost  parallel  and 
slightly  constricted  at  base,  mouth  cone  distinctly  longer  and 
more  angular  at  tip,  reaching  two-thirds  across  prosternum. 

Type  Material : Female  holotype  taken  on  Black  Willow  ( Salix 
nigra),  April  17,  1927,  by  Mr.  F.  C.  Bishopp.  All  types  in 
author’s  collection.  (Moulton,  No.  2175.) 

Type  Locality:  Menard  Texas. 


Oct.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  241 


Only  two  species  in  this  genus  have  been  recognized  up  to  this 
time  and  both  are  European,  therefore  it  is  interesting  to  record 
one  new  species  in  this  paper  and  two  others  which  are  being 
described  elsewhere,  as  new  North  American  species. 

Gynaikothrips  uzeli  Zimmermann. 

One  female  and  two  male  specimens  taken  on  Red  clover,  Sep- 
tember 3,  1927,  at  Atwater,  Illinois,  by  Miss  L.  Blevins.  (Moul- 
ton, No.  2317.) 

This  is  an  interesting  record  because  it  extends  the  distribu- 
tion of  the  species  much  farther  north  than  it  has  heretofore  been 
known. 

Hoplothrips  kincaidi  n.  sp. 

Female,  holotype.  Color  including  antennae  and  legs  uni- 
formly light  brownish  yellow  except  tube  which  is  more  dis- 
tinctly yellow. 

Total  body  length  2.16  mm.;  head,  length  .233  mm.,  width 
.233  mm.;  prothorax,  length,  .189  mm.,  width  .36  mm.; 
pterothorax,  width  .38  mm. ; abdomen,  width  .466  mm. ; tube, 
length  .183  mm.  Distance  between  basal  segments  of 
antenna  15  m.  Segments  of  antennae:  length  (width)  I,  54 
(48)  ; II,  60  (39)  ; III,  66  (42)  ; IV,  66  (39)  ; V,  66  (42)  ; 
VII,  54  (33)  ; VIII,  69  (24)  ; total  length  486  microns. 
Length  of  spines:  postoculars  105  m.,  on  anterior  angles  of 
prothorax  63  mid-laterals  36  g,  on  posterior  angles,  outer 
150  jj,  inner  69  (j,  on  ninth  abdominal  segment  240  jj,  at  tip 
of  tube  180  microns. 

Head  as  wide  as  long,  cheeks  straight,  slightly  diverging 
posteriorly  and  broadest  near  posterior  margin.  Postocular 
spines  almost  half  as  long  as  head,  sharply  pointed  like  other 
prominent  body  bristles.  Eyes  extremely  small  with  less 
than  ten  facets  and  only  two  on  outer  margin.  Ocelli  want- 
ing. Mouth  cone  broadly  rounded,  labrum  sharply  pointed, 
reaching  posterior  margin  of  prosternum.  Antennae  2.1 
longer  than  head,  segment  eight  with  broad  pedicel  and 
clearly  separated  from  seven. 

Prothorax  .8  as  long  as  head  and  nearly  twice  as  wide  as 
median  dorsal  length  of  pronotum.  Anterior  marginal  spines 
vestigial,  those  at  anterior  angles  about  half  as  long  as  outer 
pair  at  posterior  margins.  Legs  moderately  short,  fore 
femora  slightly  thickened,  each  fore  tarsus  armed  with  a 
small  tooth  in  addition  to  the  usual  claw.  Wings  wanting. 

Abdomen  somewhat  broader  than  thorax.  Tube  .8  as  long 
as  head,  clearly  broader  at  base  and  narrowed  in  distal  fourth. 

Larvae  clear  to  grayish  white  with  tube  somewhat  darker. 


242  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXIV 


Type  Material:  Female  holotype,  5 female  paratypes  and  two 
larvae  taken  under  bark,  November  1,  1927,  by  Mr.  T.  Kincaid 
after  whom  the  species  is  named.  Types  in  author’s  collection. 
(Moulton,  No.  2572.) 

Type  Locality:  Seabeek,  Washington. 

This  species  is  closely  related  to  pedicularis,  Haliday  from 
which  it  may  be  distinguished  by  its  uniformly  lighter  color  and 
by  the  whiter  color  of  larvae.  It  may  also  be  distinguished  from 
pergandei,  Hood  by  the  sharply  pointed  body  bristles.  In  per- 
gandei  these  bristles  have  dilated  tips. 

Tribe  D 0 c essisso phothripini  Priessner,  1927. 

Docessissophothrips*  animus  n.  sp. 

Male  holotype.  Color  dark  brown  with  head  and  tip  of 
abdomen  beyond  seventh  segment  blackish.  All  legs  and 
segments  of  antennae  dark  brown  except  basal  two-thirds  of 
three  which  is  yellowish. 

Total  body  length  3.32  mm. ; head,  length  .54  mm.,  width 
.33  mm.;  prothorax,  length  .12  mm.,  width  including  coxae 
.48  mm. ; pterothorax,  width  .57  mm. ; abdomen,  width  .57 
mm.;  tube,  length  .33  mm.,  width  at  base  .12  mm.,  at  tip  .06 
mm.  Segments  of  antennae:  length  (width)  I,  27  (45)  ; II, 
75  (48-60)  ; III,  135  (42)  ; IV,  105  (45)  ; V,  108  (42)  ; VI, 
87  (45)  ; VII,  51  (36) ; VIII,  63  (24) ; total  length  660 
microns.  Length  of  spines : group  of  ante-  and  postocellar 
spines  99-120  p,  postoculars  9041  ( ?),  on  posterior  angles  of 
prothorax,  outer  120  p,  inner  90  p,  basal  wing  spines  60,  60 
and  120  p respectively,  on  ninth  abdominal  segment  240  p, 
tip  of  tube  180  microns. 

Head  1.7  longer  than  wide,  smaller  in  front,  swollen  and 
elevated  in  the  middle  and  somewhat  reduced  toward  the 
posterior  margin,  with  a pair  of  prominent  spines  on  either 
side  in  front  of  each  posterior  ocellus,  the  inner  one  of  which 
is  almost  in  line  between  the  posterior  ocelli  and  the  anterior 
ocellus  and  the  outer  one  close  to  inner  margin  of  eyes. 
There  is  also  a smaller  pair  almost  immediately  behind  and  a 
little  inward  from  posterior  ocelli.  The  postocular  spines  are 
placed  well  back  from  eyes  with  a similar  pair  near  median 
dorsal  part  of  head,  cheek  spines  small  and  inconspicuous. 
Eyes  semi-crescent  shaped  around  anterior  angles  of  head, 
with  small  facets.  Ocelli  large,  anterior  ocellus  directed  for- 
ward, posterior  ocelli  approximate  to  inner  posterior  angles 


* (Docessissopho  e=  conceited,  referring  to  the  swollen  head.) 


Oct.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  243 


of  eyes.  Mouth  cone  short  and  broadly  rounded.  Maxillary 
palpus  with  two  segments,  the  distal  segment  with  two  short, 
sharp,  spur-like  spines,  one  at  the  extreme  tip  and  one  on  the 
inner  margin  near  tip,  in  addition  there  are  several  longer 
normal  spines.  The  terminal  segments  of  each  labial  palpus 
are  also  tipped  with  a pair  of  prominent  spurs  in  addition 
to  other  normal  spines.  Larger  maxillary  stylus  narrow, 
lanceolate,  pointed  and  grooved.  Antenna  1.16  longer  than 
head,  segment  two  normal  in  dorsal  view  but  in  side  view 
rather  broadly  expanded  on  the  inside  near  the  middle  and 
toward  tip,  segments  six  and  seven  normal  in  dorsal  view  but 
swollen  and  projecting  on  ventral  side  at  tips  and  set  with 
three  or  four  prominent  spines ; segments  six  to  eight  clearly 
separated,  each  with  a distinct  pedicel.  Sense  cones  short 
and  pointed. 

Prothorax  .2  as  long  as  head  and  four  times  as  wide  as 
long,  deeply  concave  in  front.  All  normal  spines  present, 
sharply  pointed  like  other  prominent  head  and  body  spines. 
Pterothorax  with  sides  rather  evenly  formed  and  almost 
parallel.  Fore  femora  only  slightly  larger  than  middle  and 
hind  femora.  Fore  tarsi  unarmed.  Wings  fully  developed, 
broad  with  parallel  sides  but  moderately  short,  extending 
only  to  sixth  abdominal  segment,  fore-pair  with  18  double 
fringe  hairs  along  posterior  margin. 

Abdomen  from  segments  two  to  five  about  as  wide  as 
pterothorax,  reduced  gradually  beyond  the  sixth.  Tube  .6 
as  long  as  head  and  three  times  as  long  as  width  at  base,  ninth 
segment  extends  back  on  either  side,  forming  distinct  scales 
over  basal  third  of  tube.  Sixth  abdominal  segment  with  a 
pair  of  tube-like  inwardly  curved  appendages  which  extend 
to  beyond  middle  of  segment  seven. 

Female  allotype.  Colored  as  in  the  male. 

Total  body  length  2.86  mm.;  head,  length  .60  mm.,  width 
.39  mm.;  prothorax,  length  .15  mm.;  width  .51  mm.;  ptero- 
thorax width  .60  mm. ; abdomen,  width  .69  mm. ; tube,  length 
.45  mm.,  width  at  base  .11  mm.  Segments  of  antennae: 
length  (width)  I,  60  (52)  ; II,  75  (dorsal  view  51,  side  view 
75)  ; HI,  165  (49)  ; IV,  135  (49)  ; V,  120  (45).  Length  of 
spines:  interocellar  spines  120  p,  on  ninth  abdominal  segment 
330  |j,  at  tip  of  tube  240  microns. 

Tube  .7  as  long  as  head. 

Type  Material : Male  holotype  taken  July  11,  1925,  by  the  writer 
while  sweeping  nettles  in  the  hills  above  Mt.  View,  California 
(Moulton,  No.  402),  and  female  paratype  taken  by  Mr.  J.  C. 


244  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


Bridwell  at  Corvallis,  Oregon,  host  plant  and  date  not  given. 
T)rpes  in  author’s  collection.  (Moulton,  No.  249.) 

Type  Locality:  Mt.  View,  California. 

This  species  appears  to  be  most  closely  related  to  D.  adiaphorus 
Karny  but  is  easily  separated  by  its  color,  the  latter  having  all 
tibiae  and  tarsi  clear  yellow.  All  the  species  of  this  genus  have 
heretofore  been  recognized  by  individual  female  specimens  and  the 
finding  of  a male  which  has  tube-like  appendages  on  the  sixth 
abdominal  segment  is  extremely  interesting  because  it  removes 
this  genus  from  the  subfamily  Phloeothripinae,  Tribe  Docessis- 
sophothripini  (according  to  Dr.  H.  Priesner’s  Monograph  of  the 
Thysanoptera  of  Europe,  1926,  p.  478),  and  places  it  clearly  in  the 
subfamily  Megatliripinae,  Tribe  Megathripini.  After  measuring 
the  female  paratype  I demounted  and  dissected  this  specimen  to 
observe  the  mouth  parts  and  found  the  larger  maxillary  stylus 
clearly  grooved,  but  unfortunately  the  second  smaller  organ  was 
lost  in  the  dissection. 

The  species  is  also  close  to  Siphonothrips  elegans  Buffa  but  the 
shape  of  the  head  and  eyes  would  seem  to  place  it  rather  in  the 
genus  Docessissophothrips. 


Paonias  excaecatus  in  Colorado. — During  the  past  summer  a 
fine  female  P.  excaecatus  was  taken  at  Boulder,  Colorado.  I was 
interested  to  see  if  it  could  be  referred  to  the  pale  western  race 
( pecosensis  Ckll.)  which  I described  (Entomologist,  April,  1905) 
from  New  Mexico.  Allowing  for  a reasonable  amount  of  varia- 
tion, I think  it  may  be  considered  pecosensis,  as  it  has  the  upper 
part  of  the  dark  median  area  pale  and  rosy,  with  the  black  spot 
very  conspicuous,  and  the  dark  lines  on  the  basal  field  are  barely 
perceptible.  The  light  post  median  bands  are  suffused  and  very 
obscure.  The  ocellus  on  hind  wing  is  large  and  oblong,  not  cir- 
cular, with  the  pale  blue  pupil  comparatively  large  and  trans- 
verse. In  the  case  of  Automeris  io,  Barnes  and  Benjamin  dis- 
tinguish a Colorado  race,  and  a distinct  one  in  New  Mexico.  It 
is  quite  possible  that  there  are  similarly  two  races  of  P.  excaecatus, 
but  it  would  be  hazardous  to  affirm  this  without  more  material. 
Undoubtedly  these  sphingids  produce  local  races  under  diverse 
climatic  conditions,  but  these  can  only  be  adequately  demonstrated 
by  large  series,  which  will  only  be  obtained  by  breeding. — T.  D.  A. 
Cockerell,  Boulder,  Colo. 


Oct.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  245 


SOME  COMMON  DIPTERA  AND  THEIR  HABITS. 

By  N.  K.  Bigelow,  Staten  Island,  N.  Y. 

The  order  Diptera  is  divided  into  two  groups  or  suborders 
known  as  the  Orthorrhapha  and  Cyclorrhapha.  In  the  members 
of  the  first  group  the  pupa  is  free  but  in  those  of  the  second  it  is 
known  as  a puparium  being  enclosed  in  a hard,  seed-like  capsule 
formed  from  the  larval  skin. 

Many  species  of  Orthorrhapha  are  aquatic  in  their  early  stages 
and  the  structure  of  their  larvae  and  pupae  shows  many  striking 
adaptations  to  their  life  in  an  aquaeus  environment. 

The  larvae  of  a great  many  species  of  Chironomid  midges  live 
in  the  ooze  at  the  bottom  of  ponds,  streams  and  lakes. 

For  creeping  about  through  the  ooze  and  vegetation  they  are 
provided  with  two  pairs  of  pseudopods.  One  pair  is  on  the  under 
side  of  the  thorax  and  the  other  at  the  extremity  of  the  insect’s  ab- 
domen and  these  organs  are  covered  with  numerous  hooks. 

The  species  which  live  in  the  ooze  have  an  abundance  of  the  red 
pigment  haemoglobin  which  is  of  great  use  in  absorbing  oxygen 
but  those  which  live  above  the  ooze  usually  lack  this  pigment. 

The  pupae  of  bottom-living  species  have  two  tufts  of  filament- 
ous gills  while  the  others  bear  respiratory  trumpets  and  must  come 
to  the  surface  for  air.  In  both  instances  the  adult  flies  are  struc- 
turally almost  identical. 

The*  larvae  of  the  Simulium  or  black  fly  is  admirably  fitted  for 
life  in  the  swift  currents  where  they  cling  to  the  under  side  of 
stones  and  logs. 

On  each  side  of  the  head  this  larva  bears  a pair  of  ear-like 
organs  each  of  which  has  about  fifty  long  thread-like  hairs  which 
are  used  as  a net  to  catch  small  organisms  for  food  as  they  float 
by  in  the  current. 

A pair  of  pseudopods  on  the  thorax  and  a pair  on  the  abdomen 
have  been  shortened,  have  united  and  formed  into  the  powerful 
sucking  discs  for  clinging  to  the  rocks. 

The  Simulium  pupae  have  two  tufts  of  filamentous  gills  and 
cling  to  the  rocks.  Upon  emergence  the  imago  reaches  the  sur- 
face enclosed  in  a bubble  of  air  secreted  by  the  pupa. 

The  Corethra  or  ghost  larva  is  a modified  type  of  the  mosquito 
larva,  being  fitted  for  a predaceous  life  in  the  open  water. 

It  is  extremely  transparent.  The  mandibles  are  armed  with 
long  pointed  teeth  while  the  antennae  are  jointed  at  their  base, 


246  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXlv 


armed  with  stiff  bristles  and  used  in  grasping  and  holding  their 
prey. 

For  the  purpose  of  flotation  there  are  two  large  bean-shaped 
air  sacs  in  the  thorax  and  another  pair  in  the  seventh  abdominal 
segment. 

Apart  from  their  biological  interest  these  various  larvae  are  of 
great  economic  importance. 

Chironomid  larvae  are  used  as  food  by  a great  many  species  of 
fishes.  It  has  been  estimated  that  at  Lake  Nipigon  they  occur  in 
such  numbers  that  there  is  at  least  one  hundred  pounds  of  them  to 
every  acre  of  lake  bottom  and  they  form  at  least  35  per  cent,  of 
the  food  of  the  white  fish.  They  are  equally  abundant  in  other 
bodies  of  water. 


ISTURGIA  TRUNCATARIA  IN  LONG  ISLAND. 

By  Roy  Latham,  Orient,  L.  I.,  N.  Y. 

As  Isturgia  truncataria  Walker  is  not  listed  from  Long  Island 
in  “A  List  of  the  Insects  of  New  York,”  I would  like  to  record 
the  collection  by  myself,  in  1928,  of  several  specimens  from  Man- 
orville. 

In  a small  pine  barren  swamp  with  a heavy  low  growth  of  the 
leather-leaf,  Chamaedaphne  calyculata  L.  on  July  4 I saw  eight  of 
these  moths.  It  was  in  the  late  afternoon.  A thunder-storm  was 
passing  on  the  north  and  the  air  was  sultry.  The  bottom  of  the 
depression  contained  no  water  on  that  date.  In  tramping  about 
the  insects  would  leave  the  shelter  of  the  Chamaedaphne  shrubs 
and  fly  strongly  across  the  swamp  about  two  hundred  feet  and 
alight.  Four  were  captured  on  that  date. 

On  July  10  I again  visited  the  locality  and  saw  approximately 
thirty  of  the 'moths  and  took  several.  A week  later  I took  obser- 
vations at  the  swamp  and  several  times  thereafter  during  the  sea- 
son but  no  individuals  of  this  species  were  seen  after  July  10th. 

In  the  dry  sandy  soil  of  the  pine  barrens  above  the  bank  of  the 
swamp  I found  the  locally  rare  plant  Pyrola  clorantha  Sw.  not  un- 
common. It  was  the  second  record  for  this  species  from  Long 
Island.  It  had  been  reported  from  near  Riverhead  many  years 
ago.  Later  in  1928  I also  collected  this  plant  from  the  sandy 
barrens  at  Napeague. 


Oct.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  247 


A NEW  SPECIES  OF  GYRINUS  FROM  NORTHERN 
NEW  HAMPSHIRE. 

By  K.  F.  Chamberlain,  Assistant  Entomologist,  New  York 
State  Museum. 

The  following  species  of  Gyrinus  from  the  Connecticut  Lakes 
region  of  northern  New  Hampshire  is  herewith  described  as  new. 
I take  great  pleasure  in  dedicating  this  species  to  my  friend,  Dr. 
J.  G.  Gehring,  of  Bethel,  Maine. 

Gyrinus  gehringi  n.  sp. 

Form  broadly  oval,  moderately  convex,  color  above  black, 
shining,  with  some  bluish  reflections ; sides  of  the  elytra, 
prothorax  and  head,  the  sutural  margin,  the  labrum  and 
clypeus  conspicuously  bronzed;  the  bronzed  portion  of  the 
elytra  extending  to  and  rather  sharply  limited  by  the  eighth 
stria.  Sutural  stria  consisting  of  a series  of  rather  fine  punc- 
tures ; the  punctures  of  the  succeeding  striae  becoming  pro- 
gressively larger  towards  the  sides  so  that  those  of  the  eighth 
to  eleventh  striae  are  conspicuously  coarser.  Eleventh  stria 
quite  close  to  the  margin,  almost  marginal  at  base  and  to- 
wards the  apex,  slightly  distant  medially;  eighth  and  ninth 
striae  slightly  impressed  at  the  base.  Prothoracic  and 
elytral  margins  broad,  horizontal. 

Elytral  surface  highly  polished  and  with  an  exceedingly 
fine  alutaceous  sculpture  together  with  a very  minute  micro- 
punctulation  which  can  only  be  seen  under  a high  power 
magnification.  The  punctulation  is  somewhat  more  evident 
in  the  female,  becoming  extremely  sparse  and  almost  obsolete 
in  the  male. 

Color  beneath,  including  the  epipleurae  and  hypomera, 
uniformly  rufo-testaceous. 

Male  genitalia — rufo-testaceous  throughout ; median  lobe, 
when  viewed  from  above,  triangular,  one  fifth  broader  at 
the  base  than  the  lateral  lobes,  rather  rapidly,  evenly  and 
arcuately  narrowed  from  base  to  apex  which  is  acute;  there 
is  a broad,  deep,  angular  dorsal  channel  extending  from  the 
base  almost  to  the  extreme  tip  and  the  ventral  surface  is 
angularly  carinate  or  roof-shaped  thus  causing  the  median 
lobe  to  appear  like  the  letter  “V”  in  cross  section.  There  is 
a further  peculiar  modification  in  the  remarkable  lateral 
apical  compression  so  that,  when  viewed  from  the  side,  the 
median  lobe  at  the  tip  is  about  one  half  as  wide  dorso-ven- 
trally  as  its  greatest  lateral  width.  At  some  distance  before 


248  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXIV 


the  apex  the  ventral  carina  becomes  compressed  and  more 
acute  so  that  an  ante-apical  cross  section  would  appear  some- 
what “Y”  shaped. 

The  sexes  are  quite  similar ; the  female  is  somewhat  larger 
and  more  robust  and  has  the  micro-punctulation  of  the  elytra 
more  pronounced  as  noted  above. 

Length,  Male  5.5  mm.  Width,  3.2  mm. 

Length,  Female  6.2  mm.  Width,  3.5  mm. 

Measurements  taken  from  the  anterior  margin  of  the  head 
to  the  elytral  apex. 

Holotype , Male;  Moose  Pond,  Pittsburg,  New  Hampshire, 
August  15th,  1925.  Collected  by  the  author. 

Allotype,  Female ; Collected  with  the  male. 

The  types  are  deposited  in  the  author’s  collection. 

This  species,  having  the  eleventh  elytral  stria  close  to  the  mar- 
gin, larger  size  (exceeding  5 mm.)  highly  polished  surface  and 
uniform  color  beneath,  would  fall  between  the  alternatives  of 
couplet  thirteen  of  Dr.  Fall’s  paper.1  While  the  uniform  colora- 
tion of  the  ventral  surface  would  refer  it  to  the  pulicifer  section, 
all  of  the  other  affinities  of  this  species  are  obviously  of  the 
aquiris-lecontei  type.  From  aquiris  it  may  be  separated  by  its 
larger  size  and  more  robust  form  and  by  the  male  genitalia  which 
are  of  an  entirely  different  type.  The  only  species  with  which  it 
might  easily  be  confused  is  Gyrinus  lecontei  Fall  which  it  most 
closely  resembles  in  general  form  and  appearance.  The  sculp- 
ture of  the  elytra  is  practically  the  same.  The  present  species, 
however,  is  somewhat  larger  than  the  average  specimens  of 
lecontei  and  has  the  lateral  margins  distinctly  more  bronzed  and 
the  punctures  of  the  lateral  striae  somewhat  coarser.  The  most 
striking  difference,  however,  is  exhibited  in  the  structure  of  the 
male  genitalia  which  is  quite  unique  and  not  closely  approached 
by  any  other  species  of  the  genus.  The  rapidly  narrowed,  tri- 
angular form  of  the  middle  lobe  together  with  the  broad,  lateral 
compression  of  the  tip  will  at  once  serve  to  distinguish  it.  This 
lateral  compression  is  also  exhibited  in  the  male  genitalia  of 
lugens  and  maculiventris  but  to  a much  less  degree,  while  in 
lecontei  the  middle  lobe  is  only  very  slightly  compressed  apically. 
Moreover,  in  lecontei  the  male  genitalia  are  distinctly  piceous 


1 Trans.  Am.  Ent.  Soc.  XLVII,  p.  269-306. 


Oct.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  249 


towards  the  apex  while  the  coloration  in  the  present  species  is 
uniform  throughout. 

The  accompanying  figure  gives  a comparison  of  the  male 
genitalia  of  Gyrinus  gehringi  n.  sp.  and  Gyrinus  lecontei  Fall. 


A 


A — Gyrinus  gehringi  n.  sp. 
Upper:  Dorsal  View  of 
Male  Genitalia. 

Lower : Lateral  View  of 
Middle  Lobe. 


B 

B — Gyrinus  lecontei  Fall. 

Upper:  Dorsal  View  of 

Male  Genitalia. 

Lower:  Lateral  View  of 
Middle  Lobe. 


A Synonym. — I very  much  regret  having  to  record  that 
Cantharis  andersoni  Frost  is,  in  all  probability,  a synonym  of  C. 
livida  L.  Before  its  description  specimens  were  sent  to  Europe 
and  a report  received  that  they  were  unknown.  The  occurrence 
of  this  insect  in  increasing  numbers  about  Boston  induced  me  to 
send  some  specimens  to  Mr.  Georg  Ochs  of  Frankfort,  Germany. 
He  very  kindly  submitted  them  to  Mr.  Hubenthal  who  has  re- 
ported that  he  could  find  no  difference  between  them  and  the 
European  species  of  Linne. — C.  A.  Frost,  Framingham,  Mass. 


250  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXIV 


BOOK  NOTES 

The  Principles  of  Systematic  Entomology,  by  Gordon  Floy 
Ferris.  (Stanford  University  Publications.  University  Series. 
Biological  Sciences.  Volume  V,  number  2,  pp.  103-269,  figs.  1- 
11 ) Stanford  University  Press.  (Paper,  $2;  cloth,  $2.75.) 

Entomology  as  a science  has  long  passed  its  embryonic  stage ; 
its  infancy  comes  to  a close;  and  as  it  nears  its  adult  state,  it  is 
taking  stock  of  itself,  defining  its  underlying  principles  and  re- 
making its  practices.  When  it  was  a child,  it  spoke  as  a child; 
now;  it  is  putting  away  childish  things.  Indeed,  my  personal 
sympathy  is  with  that  attitude  of  mind  of  those  entomologists  of 
today  who  would  restrict  the  practice  of  the  science  to  those  tech- 
nically trained.  The  irresponsibility  of  the  adolescent  science  and 
its  unlicked  condition  are  certainly  exasperating.  Dr.  Ferris  is 
numbered  among  those  who  are  making  the  toga  to  clothe  the 
adult  form. 

It  is  within  the  experience  of  every  serious  worker  to  find  him- 
self entirely  at  a loss  before  the  extremely  loose  methods  of  men 
who  have  produced  new  studies,  principally  in  taxonomy.  In- 
deed, it  is  necessary  in  many  instances  to  be  familiar  with  the 
primitive  methods  of  work  in  the  privacy  of  his  cabinet  in  order  to 
arrive  at  an  approximate  idea  of  what  some  authority’s  recondite 
description  is  intended  to  convey.  But  it  is  also  true  that  the 
auctores  vetustiores  did  not  enjoy  the  instruments  of  precision 
now  in  our  hands ; nor  did  they  know  the  refinements  of  technique 
produced  by  secular  trial  and  error  methods  until  only  the  best 
remains.  Yet  the  formative  period  which  produced  a Walker 
also  gave  us  a Say.  So,  perhaps,  the  man  is  more  than  the  instru- 
ment and  the  technique. 

Dr.  Ferris’  work  under  discussion  deserves  an  extended  and 
critical  commentary,  which  our  space  available  does  not  permit. 
The  author  says : “This  volume  is  a frankly  critical  survey  of 

the  existing  conditions  in  systematic  entomology.  ...  It  (ento- 
mology) will  demand  of  its  followers  a training  as  thorough  and 
as  rigid  and  scientific  standards  as  high  as  are  required  in  any 
other  profession.  At  the  present  time,  however,  it  is  a curious 
combination  of  two  things,  a profession  and  a hobby  of  dilet- 
tantes.” This  last  sentence  is,  of  course,  true.  But  we  must  re- 
member that  entomology  is  two  things : an  art  as  well  as  a science. 
As  an  art,  any  one  with  a call  may  practice  it;  as  a science,  the 
scientific  outlook  is  necessary,  with  all  that  that  spirit  implies. 


Oct.,  19$ 9 Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  251 


And  there  is  also  a border-land,  principally  in  ecology  and  other 
field  work,  where  the  two  aspects  blend  in  a curious  manner. 
Without  the  collector,  the  dilettante,  if  you  please,  where  would 
would  we  get  much  of  the  material  objects  of  our  study?  Who 
would  furnish  the  raw  stuff  of  our  biology?  The  sculptor  would 
find  himself  quite  at  a loss  without  the  quarryman  who  gets  out 
the  block  of  marble;  and  who  perhaps  is  the  only  one  capable 
to  get  out  the  flawless  piece  and  to  recognize  it. 

Of  course,  the  remedy  for  crude  work  in  systematic  entomology 
at  bottom  rests  in  the  hands  of  the  editors  of  the  journals  of  — 
entomology.  But  no  known  means  of  control  appears  above  the 
horizon  to  keep  the  commercial  publisher  within  acceptable  tech- 
nical limits.  He  will  publish  anything  that  will  sell ; but  nothing 
not  profitably  marketable,  no  matter  how  high  its  technical  quality 
or  how  important  from  the  scientific  point  of  view.  Here  we 
have  one  source  of  unacceptable  work. 

Now,  in  order  to  enforce  any  standards,  we  must  have  such 
standards  established  as  will  appeal  to  the  consensus  of  informed 
technical  opinion  to  be  reasonable  and  true ; and  there  must  be 
some  body  with  authority  to  define  these  standards  and  to  enforce 
them — and,  of  course,  some  inspired  or  all-powerful  interpreter. 

It  is  feasible  always  to  define  what  shall  constitute  a valid  de- 
scription, under  the  authority  of  some  adequate  commission  ap- 
pointed by  a plenary  zoological  congress.  But  we  must  always 
have  clearly  before  us  that  the  irreducible  limit  and  form  set  for 
one  series  of  categories  may  be  entirely  unfit  for  another.  Need 
we  more  than  mention  that  in  Lepidoptera  color  may  serve  to  de- 
limit a species,  but  not  so  in  Coleoptera  or  in  Heteroptera?  It  is 
also  possible  that  a positive  restriction  be  imposed  as  to  officially 
recognized  technical  organs  in  which  valid — or  rather,  accepted — 
descriptions  may  appear.  These  journals  need  not  be  named,  but 
they  may  be  accurately  defined.  For  example,  no  one  would 
seriously  consider  a daily  newspaper  as  the  place  in  which  to  look 
for,  still  less  to  publish,  a taxonomic  study  of  any  kind.  Neither 
should  one  be  compelled  to  look  for  a new  species  of  insect  in  a 
botanical  treatise  or  journal.  No  difficulty  would  arise  from  re- 
stricting valid  insect  descriptions  to  purely  entomological  journals 
published  under  the  auspices  of  societies ; or  to  similar  journals  on 
general  zoology.  But  all  other  journals  should  be  relentlessly 
barred.  General  treatises  on  entomology,  of  course,  should  be 
available  organs  for  taxonomic  discussion.  Publications  by  insti- 


252  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.  XXIV 


tutions  and  by  various  government  agencies  also  would  be  proper 
places  for  publication  on  taxonomy.  But  there  is  a border  line 
about  which  flit  books  of  travel,  botanical  and  ecological  journals, 
medical  journals,  general  works,  and  general  books  on  zoology  at 
large.  These  should  be  strictly  barred  as  sources  and  all  work 
on  systematic  entomology  appearing  in  them  should  be  invalid 
ab  ovo. 

Naturally,  such  journals  as  indicated  above  to  be  acceptable, 
in  the  normal  order  of  things,  would  be  under  the  direction  of 
competent  men ; and  such  men  could  be  trusted  to  proceed  under 
the  rules.  But  unless  books  of  travel  are  barred,  we  will  be  at 
the  mercy  of  adventitious  taxonomic  work,  such  as  appeared  in 
Whymper’s  “Great  Andes  of  Peru,”  a work  not  known  among 
entomologists ; and  the  very  last  place  one  would  look  in  for  de- 
scriptions of  insects. 

The  entire  twelve  chapters  of  the  “Principles”  deserve  a careful 
critique — in  fact,  the  work  as  a whole  is  so  provocative  of  thought 
that  it  should  be  the  subject  of  a careful  and  thorough  analysis 
and  criticism  (in  the  best  sense  of  that  word).  Chapter  XII, 
on  “The  Training  of  the  Systematise”  we  will  consider  here  more 
at  length,  because  it  is  really  the  fundamental  chapter,  to  which 
all  the  others  lead  up.  Its  opening  paragraph  thus  states  its 
thesis : “The  doing  of  all  these  things  which  are  involved  in  the 

work  of  the  systematist  is  a technical  task  which  should  be  under- 
taken only  by  those  who  are  technically  trained  for  its  accom- 
plishment. The  acquirement  of  this  technical  training  should  be 
considered  essential  for  any  one  who  wishes  to  be  called  a sys- 
tematist.” 

It  is  true,  as  Dr.  Ferris  states,  that  “systematic  work  in  gen- 
eral has  admitted  the  untrained  worker  to  a position  of  parity 
with  others.”  How  could  this  have  been  avoided  in  the  begin- 
ning? Who  was  trained  then?  The  most  honored  in  America, 
beginning  with  Thomas  Say,  were  self-trained;  and  at  the  begin- 
ning, very  untrained.  There  are,  of  course,  contemporaneous  fos- 
sils among  the  entomologists  of  today;  there  are  also  those  whose 
descriptive  work  seems  erudite,  until  you  test  it  in  practice.  And 
some  of  these  latter  are  presumably  trained  men ! 

True  it  is  that  the  technical  worker  should  know  how  to  pre- 
pare his  material ; yet,  there  are  graduates  who  are  incapable  of 
mounting  an  insect  correctly.  He  should  also  know  how  to  use 
his  material  to  the  best  advantage,  and  also  the  technique  of  ade- 


Oct.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  253 


quate  and  proper  examination  of  specimens.  He  should  likewise 
be  fully  alive  to  the  outstanding  fact  that  each  group  is  unique ; 
and  that  the  descriptive  technique  applicable  for  one  may  be  en- 
tirely useless  for  another.  In  other  words,  a set  of  characters 
that  may  adequately  define  species  in  one  group,  large  or  small, 
will  be  absolutely  misleading  or  unavailable  in  another. 

The  principle  of  a thorough  acquaintance  with  the  literature, 
is  so  obvious  that  it  need  not  have  been  mentioned ; but  some  men 
are  unable  to  see  the  woods  for  the  trees,  so  it  is  well  to  speak  of 
it  pointedly. 

And  as  to  the  matter  of  saving  wear  and  tear  of  editorial  brain 
cells  by  proper  preparation  of  papers,  see  this  Bulletin,  vol. 
xxiv,  pp.  15-19;  and  other  papers  by  the  same  author. 

It  is  also  true,  and  must  be  emphasized  again  and  again,  that 
acquaintance  with  one  fauna,  however  extensive  it  may  be,  is 
extremely  inadequate  preparation  for  monographic  work.  What- 
ever the  group,  it  should  be  collected  and  studied  world  wide. 

Yet,  this  chapter  seems  to  me  to  have  a serious  omission.  No- 
where in  it  is  mention  made  of  the  inescapable  necessity  of  a 
good  acquaintance  with  any  language  other  than  English.  Every 
time  I meet  a work  in  Russian,  Japanese,  Czecho-Slovak,  or  any 
other  of  these  languages  so  alien  to  Western  Europe,  I rejoice 
that  the  author  has  been  so  considerate  as  to  put  some  part  of  it 
into  Latin,  German  or  French.  These  last  three  languages  indeed 
are  indispensable  to  the  entomologist  of  English  speech.  How 
can  one  understand  Fabricius  or  Horvath  without  Latin?  Or 
Handlirsch  without  German?  Or  Oberthur  without  French? 
But  Latin  goes  further  than  this : it  is  the  key  to  a great  group 
of  languages — Spanish,  Portuguese,  Italian,  Rumanian.  How 
can  any  entomologist,  no  matter  how  competent  otherwise  he  may 
be,  be  fully  fitted  to  refer  to  the  original  sources  and  fundamental 
works  and  evaluate  their  contents,  if  he  has  not  this  sharpened 
mental  tool  of  languages? 

And  here  we  leave  this  informing  essay,  which  every  ento- 
mologist who  does  original  taxonomic  work,  be  he  an  adept  or  a 
novice,  should  possess,  con,  and  ponder. — J.  R.  T.  B. 

N.  B. — Dr.  Ferris  asks  that  attention  be  drawn  to  the  following 
corrections,  overlooked  in  the  proof : Fig.  8,  L,  should  read  “first 
abdominal,”  not  “ metathoracic  ” spiracle;  on  p.  116  the  formula 
for  the  geometrical  progression  should  have  + signs  throughout 
instead  of  -;  and  in  the  graph,  fig.  11,  the  words  “ Genera”  and 
“ Species  ” should  be  transposed. 


254  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXlv 


PROCEEDINGS  OF  THE  SOCIETY. 

Meeting  of  January  ioth,  1929. 

A regular  meeting  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  was 
held  at  the  Brooklyn  Museum,  on  Thursday  evening,  January 
10,  1929,  at  8.25  p.  m. 

President  Davis  in  the  Chair  and  eleven  members  present,  viz : 
Messrs.  Anderson,  Bell,  Beutenmuller,  Bigelow,  Engelhardt, 
Hunter,  Lemmer,  Notman,  Schaeffer,  Schiffer,  Sheridan,  Siep- 
mann ; one  visitor,  Mr.  C.  L.  Pollard,  and  three  reporters. 

Minutes  of  the  previous  meeting  were  read  and  approved. 

Mr.  Engelhardt  then  presented  the  report  of  the  Treasurer  for 
the  past  year.  He  commented  on  the  very  favorable  financial 
condition  of  the  Society. 

On  account  of  the  illness  of  Mr.  Torre-Bueno,  the  report  of 
the  Publication  Committee  was  postponed  until  the  February 
meeting. 

Mr.  Davis  proposed  for  membership:  Mr.  N.  K.  Bigelow,  c/o 
Staten  Island  Museum,  New  Brighton,  Staten  Island,  New  York. 

As  Mr.  Bigelow  was  present,  it  was  regularly  moved  and  sec- 
onded that  the  By-Laws  be  suspended  and  that  the  Secretary  cast 
one  ballot  in  favor  of  the  election  of  Mr.  Bigelow,  which  was  done 
and  Mr.  Bigelow  was  declared  duly  elected  a member  of  the 
Society. 

Mr.  Sheridan  as  Chairman  of  the  Nominating  Committee, 
presented  the  following  ticket  for  officers  of  the  Society  for  the 
ensuing  year : 

President,  Mr.  W.  T.  Davis. 

Vice-President  and  Editor,  Mr.  J.  R.  de  la  Torre-Bueno. 

Treasurer,  Mr.  Geo.  P.  Engelhardt. 

Secretary,  Mr.  E.  L.  Bell. 

Delegate  to  Academy,  Mr.  G.  P.  Engelhardt. 

Librarian,  Dr.  Jos.  Bequaert. 

Curator,  Mr.  F.  M.  Schott. 

Corresponding  Secretary,  Mr.  H.  Notman. 

{Mr.  J.  R.  de  la  Torre-Bueno 
Mr.  G.  P.  Engelhardt 
Mr.  E.  L.  Bell. 

Mr.  Davis  remarked  that  Mr.  Schott  had  resigned  from  mem- 
bership in  the  Society,  on  account  of  removal  of  his  residence 
from  the  City;  Mr.  J.  M.  Sheridan  was  then  proposed  for 


Oct.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  255 


Curator;  there  being  no  further  nominations,  they  were  declared 
to  be  closed  and  the  Secretary  directed  to  cast  one  ballot  for  the 
ticket  as  amended,  which  was  done  and  they  duly  declared  to  be 
elected. 

Mr.  Bigelow  showed  a box  containing  two  flies  captured  on  a 
window  in  the  Staten  Island  Museum,  on  January  3rd,  1929, 
and  said  that  they  were  species  that  came  under  the  general  term 
of  ‘'house  flies” ; the  larger  one  being  Pollenia  rudis  Fabricius, 
known  as  the  Clusterfly,  a European  species,  introduced  into  this 
country  some  time  ago,  the  exact  date  being  uncertain,  but  it  has 
been  known  to  be  here  since  1864;  it  is  obnoxious  for  the  reason 
that  although  it  is  an  outdoors  fly,  it  hibernates  in  houses  during 
the  fall  and  winter  months  and  congregates  in  numbers  in  out  of 
the  way  places ; it  is  believed  by  some  to  breed  in  decomposed  mat- 
ter, but  the  chief  opinion  is  that  it  is  an  earthworm  parasite ; it  is 
more  annoying  than  dangerous  as  it  does  not  carry  disease;  the 
smaller  fly,  Fannia  scalaris  Fabricius,  is  a dangerous  species  as  it 
flies  from  filth  direct  to  food. 

Mr.  Davis  showed  a remarkable  aberration  of  Junonia  coenia 
and  read  an  account  of  it,  his  paper  on  this  butterfly  will  be  later 
published  in  full.  (See  the  February  number  of  this  Bulletin). 

Mr.  Notman  showed  three  boxes  of  beautifully  prepared  speci- 
mens of  Coleoptera  collected  by  him  in  Northern  California  and 
presented  his  paper  “Coleoptera  from  Northern  California.” 
(Printed  in  this  number). 

Mr.  Torre-Bueno’s  paper,  “The  Editor’s  Joys  and  Woes,”  was 
postponed  until  the  February  meeting. 

Meeting  adjourned  at  10.15  P-  m- 

Meeting  of  February  14,  1929. 

A regular  meeting  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  was 
held  at  the  Brooklyn  Museum,  on  Thursday  evening,  February 
14,  1929,  at  8.20  p.  m. 

President  Davis  in  the  Chair  and  13  members  present,  viz. 
Messrs.  Bell,  Bigelow,  Engelhardt,  Hunter,  Lemmer,  Nelson,  Not- 
man, Schaeffer,  Sever,  Sheridan,  Siepmann,  Willis,  Dr.  Marker, 
and  two  reporters. 

Minutes  of  the  previous  meeting  read  and  approved. 

Mr.  Engelhardt  presented  the  monthly  report  of  the  Treasurer. 

Mr.  Engelhardt  read  a letter  from  Miss  Frances  W.  Calder, 
daughter  of  Prof.  Edwin  E.  Calder,  of  Providence,  R.  I.,  one  of 


256  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  V 61.  XXIV 


the  active  members  of  the  Society  who  died  on  January  16, 
and  said  that  Professor  Calder  was  a specialist  in  tiger-beetles. 
He  also  mentioned  personal  incidents  in  his  acquaintance  with 
Prof.  Calder. 

Mr.  Engelhardt  also  brought  to  the  attention  of  the  Society, 
the  death  of  Mr.  Jacob  Doll,  on  February  io,  at  the  age  of  82. 
At  the  time  of  his  death  Mr.  Doll  was  an  honorary  member  of  the 
Society  but  he  said  that  Mr.  Doll  was  one  of  the  Charter  mem- 
bers of  the  Society,  and  had  been  a Curator  at  the  Brooklyn 
Museum  for  27  years,  retiring  two  years  ago  at  the  age  of  80. 
He  spoke  of  the  skill  with  which  Mr.  Doll  mounted  insects  and 
reviewed  many  interesting  incidents  connected  with  him.  He 
recommended  the  publication  in  the  April  Bulletin,  of  his 
paper  published  in  the  Brooklyn  Museum  Quarterly  ‘‘Chapters 
from  the  Long  Life  of  a Butterfly  Collector”  which  contains  a pic- 
ture of  Mr.  Doll,  and  the  addition  of  further  chapters  to  bring  it 
up  to  date.  The  Secretary  was  directed  to  write  to  Mrs.  Doll  and 
convey  to  her  the  sympathy  of  the  Society. 

Mr.  Engelhardt  also  reported  the  death  of  Mr.  Funk,  a former 
member  of  the  Society,  during  the  fall  of  1928. 

Mr.  Davis  spoke  of  the  death  of  Dr.  Harrison  G.  Dyar  and  his 
important  work  in  the  classification  of  Lepidoptera  and  his  work 
during  later  years  with  mosquitos. 

Mr.  Davis  also  spoke  of  the  death  of  Colonel  Wirt  Robinson,  a 
close  personal  friend;  and  showed  a photograph  album  containing 
pictures  of  the  Colonel  and  many  scenes  about  his  home  at 
Wingina,  Virginia,  and  nearby  places  where  they  had  spent  much 
time  together  in  collecting  during  past  years ; he  read  an  account 
the  achievements  of  Colonel  Robinson  as  a soldier  and  as  a pro- 
fessor at  West  Point  and  other  places.  He  also  showed  a box  of 
wasps  recently  sent  to  him  by  Colonel  Robinson  for  identification. 

Mr.  Bigelow  presented  his  very  interesting  paper  on  “ Some 
Common  Diptera  and  their  Habits.” 

Mr.  Bigelow’s  paper  was  discussed  by  the  members. 

Adjourned  at  10.00  p.  m. 

Meeting  of  March  14,  1929. 

A regular  meeting  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  was 
held  in  the  Brooklyn  Museum,  on  March  14,  1929,  at  8.20  p.  m. 
President  Davis  in  the  Chair  and  8 members  present,  viz.:  Messrs. 
Bell,  Bigelow,  Lemmer,  Nelson,  Schaeffer,  Shoemaker,  Siepman 


Oct.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  257 


and  Torre-Bueno,  also  two  visitors,  Mr.  C.  L.  Pollard  and  Miss 
Blandar. 

Minutes  of  the  previous  meeting  read  and  approved. 

Mr.  Engelhardt  being  absent,  there  was  no  report  of  the  Trea- 
surer. 

Mr.  Torre-Bueno  presented  the  report  of  the  Publication  Com- 
mittee for  1928 ; he  commented  on  the  notable  growth  of  the  Bul- 
letin since  the  resumption  of  its  publication  in  1912,  at  which 
time  there  were  some  80  subscribers,  most  of  whom  were  mem- 
bers, and  the  price  to  non-members  was  75  cents,  while  at  present 
there  are  278  subscribers  and  the  price  to  non-members  is  $2.50. 
At  the  October  meeting  in  1912  the  Treasurer  reported  a cash 
balance  of  $508.70  in  the  combined  Society  and  Bulletin  ac- 
counts, whereas  at  the  October  meeting  in  1928,  these  two  ac- 
counts showed  a balance  of  about  $1,800.00;  the  income  from 
subscriptions  amounts  to  approximately  $675.00,  while  the  cost 
of  publication  is  about  $800.00,  but  the  sale  of  reprints  and  back 
numbers  makes  up  this  shortage.  However,  he  made  his  usual  plea 
that  the  members  endeavor  to  obtain  new  subscribers  who  will 
stick.  He  reported  a net  increase  for  the  year  of  one  subscriber. 
He  also  commented  on  the  high  character  of  the  contributors. 
He  reported  on  Entomologica  Americana  that  the  subscription  list 
still  remained  at  about  130,  and  that  its  publication  was  progress- 
ing favorably. 

Mr.  Davis  commented  on  the  very  favorable  character  of  the 
report  and  thanked  Mr.  Torre-Bueno,  for  the  Society,  on  the 
gratifying  results  due  so  largely  to  his  efforts. 

Mr.  Torre-Bueno  read  communications  from  Prof.  Cockerell 
in  regard  to  “ What  is  an  Editor  for  ?”  and  his  replies  thereto. 

Mr.  Bell  read  a letter  from  Mr.  Geo.  P.  Engelhardt  and  Mr.  J. 
R.  de  la  Torre-Bueno  in  which  they  presented  to  the  Society  for 
election  to  Honorary  Membership  the  following  prominent  ento- 
mologists : 

Professor  M.  N.  Rimsky-Korsakov, 

Forest  Institute,  University  of  Leningrad. 

Professeur  E.  L.  Bouvier, 

Ministere  de  lTnstruction  Publique,  Paris,  France. 

Dr.  Karl  Jordan, 

Zoological  Museum,  Tring,  Herts,  England. 

Dr.  Walther  Horn, 

Deutsches  Entomologisches  Institut,  Berlin-Dahlem, 
Germany. 


258  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXIV 


Dr.  J.  Henry  Comstock, 

Cornell  University,  Ithaca,  N.  Y. 

Dr.  W.  J.  Holland, 

Carnegie  Museum,  Pittsburgh,  Penna. 

Dr.  Samuel  Henshaw, 

Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology,  Cambridge,  Mass. 

On  motion  of  Mr.  Schaeffer,  duly  seconded  and  approved,  the 
above-mentioned  were  unanimously  elected  to  Honorary  Mem- 
bership in  the  Society. 

Mr.  Bigelow  exhibited  three  specimens,  Hyperopherus  puncta- 
tissimus  Rand,  a Carabid  beetle,  collected  by  Mr.  W.  T.  Davis,  on 
White  Face  Mountain,  Mass.,  and  stated  that  he  had  taken  this 
species  in  the  Thunder  Bay  district,  Ontario,  Canada,  where  he 
found  it  under  and  in  logs.  The  logs  had  to  be  of  the  right  con- 
sistency to  find  these  beetles  in  them,  if  either  too  soft  or  too  hard 
none  of  these  beetles  would  be  found  in  them.  He  remarked  on 
the  peculiar  odor  of  this  species,  saying  that  while  many  species 
had  a disagreeable  odor,  the  odor  of  this  species  was  rather  fra- 
grant and  musky. 

Mr.  Lemmer  exhibited  a box  of  moths  containing  two  very 
beautiful  Indo-Australian  specimens,  and  a number  of  melanic 
forms  and  aberrations  of  North  American  species,  among  which 
were  the  following : 

Apantesis  figurata  form  excelsa  Neum.  (female)  ; Apantesis 
figurata  form  excelsa  ab.  lugubris  Hist,  (male)  ; Apantesis  anna 
form  persephone  Grt. ; Melanolophia  canadaria  Gn.,  dark  form, 
unnamed;  Ectropis  crepuscularia  ab.  fumataria  Minot;  Epimecis 
virginaria  form  carbonaria  Haimbach;  Amphidasis  cognataria 
form  swettaria  Barnes  and  McDunnough ; Nacopliora  qner- 
naria  form  atrescens  Hulst.  The  members  then  discussed  Mr. 
Lemmer’s  exhibit. 

Mr.  Bell  related  some  of  his  experiences  during  his  visit  to  the 
Canal  Zone  and  Panama  in  October,  1928. 

Society  adjourned  at  10.25  p.  m. 

Meeting  of  April  ii,  1929. 

A regular  meeting  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  was 
held  at  the  Brooklyn  Museum,  on  April  11,  1929,  at  8.20  p.  m., 
with  President  Davis  in  the  Chair  and  nine  members  present,  viz.: 
Messrs.  Bell,  Bigelow,  Eisenhardt,  Engelhardt,  Hunter,  Lemmer, 
Dr.  Marker,  Mr.  Siepmann  and  Mr.  Sever;  also  six  visitors,  in- 


Oct.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  259 


eluding  Dr.  William  Schaus  and  Br.  Barnes  from  the  National 
Museum,  Washington,  D.  C.,  and  Mr.  C.  L.  Pollard. 

Minutes  of  the  previous  meeting  read  and  approved. 

Mr.  Engelhardt  presented  the  report  of  the  Treasurer. 

Mr.  Engelhardt  proposed  for  membership:  Mr.  William  Eisen- 
hardt,  156  East  8th  Street,  Flatbush,  Brooklyn,  N.  Y.  Mr.  Eisen- 
hardt  being  present,  it  was  regularly  moved  and  seconded  that  the 
By-Laws  be  suspended  and  that  the  Society  proceed  with  the  elec- 
tion of  Mr.  Eisenhardt,  who  was  thereupon  duly  elected  a mem- 
ber of  the  Society. 

Mr.  Engelhardt  called  attention  to  the  death  of  Mr.  O.  C. 
Poling,  in  the  latter  part  of  March,  and  said  that  Mr.  Poling  was 
probably  the  most  successful  professional  collector  in  this  coun- 
try; he  collected  principally  in  Arizona  and  southwestern  Texas 
and  was  well  known  to  a number  of  the  members  of  the  Society. 

Mr.  Pollard  showed  two  specimens,  male  and  female,  of  the 
moth  Argeme  mittrei,  the  giant-tailed  moth  of  Madagascar,  and  a 
male  and  female  of  the  Saturnid  moth  Actias  dubernandi  from 
China.  He  read  an  account  of  these  two  moths,  by  Mr.  Eisen- 
hardt, which  will  later  be  published. 

Mr.  Bigelow  exhibited  specimens  of  beetles  collected  by  him  in 
Iowa,  and  remarked  on  their  habits  and  his  experiences  in  collect- 
ing them. 

Mr.  Davis  exhibited  specimens  of  the  cicada,  Okanagana 
rimosa  Say,  found  in  the  wash-up  at  Rockaway  Beach,  Long 
Island,  by  Mr.  Engelhardt  and  Mr.  Shoemaker,  and  on  Long 
Beach,  by  Mr.  Alfred  J.  Kistler,  and  remarked  on  the  species ; 
his  paper  will  later  be  published.  He  also  stated  that  Mr.  Jeane 
D.  Gunder  had  identified  the  butterfly  from  Virginia  figured  in 
the  February  number  of  the  Bulletin  of  this  Society  as  aberra- 
tion weidenhameri  Polaeck,  figured  and  described  in  the  Mary- 
land Academy  of  Science  Bulletin,  1925,  page  10.  A copy  of 
Miss  Polaeck’s  paper  was  shown.  From  the  fact  that  the  speci- 
men there  described,  the  one  from  Virginia  (which  is  a female 
and  not  a male)  and  also  a third  one  from  Florida  mentioned  as 
in  the  collection  of  the  Carnegie  Museum,  all  closely  agree  it 
would  appear  that  the  form  should  be  considered  a variety  rather 
than  an  aberration.  He  also  called  attention  to  Dr.  Needham’s 
book  on  the  “ Dragon-flies  of  North  America.” 

Mr.  Engelhardt  related  his  experiences  and  observations  on  a 
recent  trip  to  Florida,  where  he  spent  the  month  of  March,  pri- 


260  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


marily  for  the  purpose  of  investigating  the  food  plants  and  life 
histories  of  Aegeriidae  or  Clearwing  moths.  In  his  travels  he  de- 
pended largely  on  bus  routes,  now  organized  to  reach  rapidly  and 
conveniently  almost  any  region  within  the  State.  At  Monticello, 
Gainesville,  Sanford,  Orlando,  Lake  Alfred  and  Okeechobee  City 
he  was  assisted  in  his  field  work  by  men  connected  with  the  agri- 
cultural experiment  stations  and  during  a week’s  visit  at  the 
Royal  State  Park  in  the  extreme  southern  part  of  the  State,  he 
enjoyed  the  company  of  Dr.  W.  S.  Blatchley,  of  Dunedin,  Fla., 
and  Mr.  and  Mrs.  Frank  M.  Jones,  of  Wilmington,  Del.  Weather 
conditions  during  the  month  were  ideal — warm,  sunny  days  and 
cool  nights.  Specimens  or  records  of  20  species  of  Aegeriidae 
were  obtained  in  addition  to  interesting  collections  in  other  fami- 
lies of  insects.  These  will  be  shown  and  discussed  at  another 
meeting. 

Adjourned  at  10.30  p.  m. 

E.  L.  Bell, 
Secretary. 


Insects  Atop  of  Skyscrapers. — On  September  20th,  1929, 
whilst  making  newsreel  photographs  from  atop  of  the  larger  of 
New  York’s  skyscrapers,  I was  continuously  annoyed  by  myriads 
of  insects  alighting  on  my  head,  face,  hands,  and  clothing.  These 
insects,  for  the  most  part  hymenopterous,  were  attracted  by  the 
powerful  beacons  that  illuminate  the  apexes  of  these  immense 
buildings.  My  limited  time  and  the  nature  of  my  work  did  not 
permit  me  to  make  a representative  collection  of  the  species  then 
present  but  the  species  and  specimens  that  evidently  could  be  ob- 
tained in  an  hour  or  so  of  collecting  would  well  be  worthwhile. 

The  structures  visited  were  the  Wool  worth  Bldg.  (60  stories — 
792  feet),  the  Chanin  Tower  (56  stories — 680  feet),  the  Lincoln 
Bldg.  (53  stories — 638  feet),  and  the  Paramount  Building  (35 
stories — 429  feet). 

Employees  of  the  buildings  visited  inform  me  that  numbers  of 
bats,  migrating  birds  and  miscellaneous  insects  are  continuously 
found  killed  there,  for  blinded  by  the  lights,  they  make  their  fatal 
impacts  with  great  force  on  the  sides  of  the  skyscrapers. — Pin- 
ney  Schiffer,  New  York  City. 


Vol.  XXIV  DECEMBER,  1929  No.  5 

BULLETIN 

OF  THE 

Brooklyn  Entomological 
Society 


PUBLICATION  COMMITTEE 

J.  R.  de  la  TORRE-BUENO,  Editor 

E.  L.  BELL  GEO.  P.  ENGELHARDT 

Published  for  the  Society  by  the 
Science  Press  Printing  Co., 

Lime  and  Green  Sts.,  Lancaster,  Pa., 

Price,  60  cents  Subscription,  $2.50  per  year 

Mailed  January  6,  1930 


Entered  as  second-class  matter  January  21,  1919,  at  the  post  office  at  Lancaster,  Pa., 
under  the  Act  of  March  3,  1879 


The  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society 

Meetings  are  held  on  the  second  Thursday  after  the  first  Tuesday  of  each 
month  from  October  to  June,  inclusive,  at  the  Central  Museum,  Eastern 
Parkway  and  Washington  Ave.,  Brooklyn.  The  annual  dues  are  $2.00. 

OFFICERS,  1929 
Honorary  President 
CHARLES  W.  LENG 

President  Treasurer 

W.  T.  DAVIS  G.  P.  ENGELHARDT 


Vice-President 

J.  R.  de  la  TORRE-BUENO 
Recording  Secretary 
E.  L.  BELL 
Corresponding  Secretary 
HOWARD  NOTMAN 


Central  Museum 
Eastern  Parkway 
Librarian 

DR.  JOSEPH  BEQUAERT 

Curator 

J.  M.  SHERIDAN 


Delegate  to  Council  of  New  York 
Academy  of  Sciences 
G.  P.  ENGELHARDT 


CONTENTS 

BIONOMICS  OF  BREMUS  IMPATIENS,  Frison  261 

SPECIES  OF  PHAEDON,  Schaeffer  286 

NEW  GENUS  OF  SEMI-AQUATIC  HEMIPTERA,  Hungerford 288 

NEW  N.  AM.  RII YNCHITES,  Fall  292 

HABITS  OF  HYLEMYIA  TRIVITTATA,  Huckett  294 

CRYPTOCEPHALUS  TINCTUS,  Frost  294 

CRANE  FLIES  OF  NEW  YORK,  Alexander  .' 295 

BEES  OF  THE  SUBFAMILY  OSMIINAE,  Beck  303 

DIKRANE UROI  I)  E A , N.  G.,  Lawson  307 

EURYMUS  INTERIOR,  Rogers  308 

NEW  ENGLAND  HETEROPTERA,  Torre-Bueno  ■.... . 310 

EUREMUS  EURYTHEME,  Rogers  313 

EUROTHRIPIDAE  FROM  FLORIDA,  Hood  314 

NOMENCLATORIAL  NOTE  ON  PHYLLOTOMA  NEMORATA, 

Taylor  323 

NEW  BUTTERFLIES,  AND  NOTES,  Guilder  325 

EURYGENIUS  IN  OUR  FAUNA,  Fall  : 333 

BOOK  NOTES:  ROBERTSON  ON  FLOWERS  AND  INSECTS, 

J.  R.  T.-B p, 335 

EDITORIAL:  ON  AUTHOR’S  CORRECTIONS,  J.  R.  T.-B 338 

PROCEEDINGS  OF  THE  SOCIETY,  Siepman  339 

EXCHANGES  ! 343 


Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society 

Published  in 

February,  April,  June,  October  and  December  of  each  year 

Subscription  price,  domestic,  $2.50  per  year;  foreign,  $2.75  in  advance; 
single  copies,  60  cents.  Advertising  rates  on  application.  Short  articles, 
notes  and  observations  of  interest  to  entomologists  are  solicited.  Authors 
will  receive  25  reprints  free  if  ordered  in  advance  of  publication.  Address 
subscriptions  and  all  communications  to 

J.  R.  de  la  TORRE-BUENO,  Editor, 

38  De  Kalb  Avenue,  White  Plains , N.  Y. 


BULLETIN 

OF  THE 

BROOKLYN  ENTOMOLOGICAL  SOCIETY 


Vol.  XXIV  December,  1929  No.  5 

A CONTRIBUTION  TO  THE  KNOWLEDGE  OF  THE 
BIONOMICS  OF  BREMUS  IMPATIENS 
(CRESSON).  (HYMENOPTERA.) 

By  Theodore  H.  Frison,  Illinois  State  Natural  History  Survey, 

Urbana,  Illinois. 

A.  Introduction. 

The  present  paper  is  the  second  of  a series  of  papers  dealing 
with  the  biology  of  the  North  American  species  of  bumblebees. 
In  the  first  paper  (1928),  the  salient  features  of  the  bionomics  of 
Bremus  bimaculatus  (Cresson)  were  recorded,  detailed  tables 
presented  to  show  the  development  of  the  various  castes  from 
eggs  to  adults,  and  statements  given  regarding  technique  used  in 
securing  data  for  tables  and  other  information.  For  the  sake  of 
brevity  no  tables  are  included  in  this  paper  and  no  introductory 
matter  is  repeated.  The  information  herein  presented  is  based 
upon  experiments  and  observations  made  chiefly  in  1919  and 
1920,  coupled  with  subsequent  observations  and  a survey  of  the 
literature  of  our  subject  up  to  the  present  time. 

During  the  course  of  my  investigations  of  the  biology  of  bum- 
blebees, I have  never  had  the  opportunity  to  study  in  detail  a nest 
of  this  species  established  under  natural  conditions.  In  1919, 
there  was  a fair  prospect  that  such  an  opportunity  would  come 
when  a queen  of  this  species  occupied  one  of  my  domiciles  buried 
near  White  Heath,  Illinois.  On  May  17,  this  domicile  contained 
the  mother  queen  and  a cluster  of  cocoons,  but  two  weeks  later 
when  the  nest  was  removed  a field  mouse  was  in  possession  of  the 
domicile  and  the  comb  had  been  completely  destroyed.  In  the 
laboratory,  however,  five  nests  of  this  species  have  been  under 
close  observation.  Since  the  main  features  of  the  biological  his- 
tories of  bumblebees  have  been  found  to  be  the  same  regardless  of 

261 


262  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXlv 


whether  the  nests  are  started  in  artificial  nests  in  the  laboratory 
or  out-of-doors  under  natural  conditions,  the  data  obtained  by 
their  study  give  a normal  biological  appraisement  of  this  species. 
One  of  these  nests,  or  colonies  (Experiment  6,  1919),  was  studied 
in  considerable  detail,  and  data  concerning  the  development  from 
eggs  to  adults  of  workers  and  males  obtained  almost  daily  by 
methods  reported  in  a recent  article  (1928).  Before  passing  to  a 
study  of  condensed  tabulations  necessary  for  an  understanding  of 
conclusions  regarding  the  developmental  stadia,  a brief  descrip- 
tion should  be  presented  of  the  start  and  growth  of  the  colonies 
under  observation ; particularly  the  colony  studied  in  much  detail 
(Experiment  6,  1919). 

B.  Specific  Life  History  Studies. 

1.  Experiment  6,  1919. 

On  April  18,  1919,  a queen  of  B.  impatiens  was  captured  in  the 
Brownfield  Woods  near  Urbana,  Illinois,  and  brought  back  alive 
to  the  laboratory  in  a small  paper  collapsible  box.  She  was  im- 
mediately placed  in  a small  glass  aquarium  jar,  screened  on  top, 
containing  a supply  of  food.  This  preliminary  procedure  was  in- 
tended to  make  the  queen  become  “ broody,”  a method  previously 
explained  in  the  Biological  Bulletin  (Frison,  1927a).  Four  days 
later  she  was  removed  to  a rearing  box  containing  an  artificial 
nest,  a wax  honey  pot,  and  a lump  of  pollen.  These  artificial 
nests  are  used  to  induce  queens  to  start  colonies  under  controlled 
conditions,  and  have  already  been  described  in  detail  in  the  Bio- 
logical Bulletin  (Frison,  1927a) . The  next  day  after  being  placed 
in  the  artificial  nest  the  queen  began  to  manifest  an  intense  inter- 
est in  the  nest.  On  this  date,  April  23,  she  began  the  construction 
on  the  pollen  lump  of  egg  cells  similar  to  those  described  for  B. 
bimaculatus  (Frison,  1928),  and  slightly  altered  the  artificial 
honey  pot.  On  the  following  day  these  cells  were  capped  over 
and  upon  examination  were  found  to  contain  creamy-white  eggs. 
According  to  my  notes,  these  first  eggs  were  all  laid  in  separate 
wax-pollen  cells,  about  three  millimeters  long,  two  to  three  milli- 
meters wide  and  two  millimeters  deep.  The  pollen  for  their  con- 
struction came  from  the  lump  on  which  the  cells  were  formed. 
The  wax,  however,  had  a different  origin,  for  it  was  produced  by 
the  queen  and  scraped  from  her  body  onto  the  pollen  lump.  On 
April  26,  the  cells  still  contained  eggs,  but  when  next  opened,  on 


Dec.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  263 


May  i,  they  contained  larvae.  These  egg  cells  were  not  opened 
during  the  interim  between  April  26  and  May  1 through  fear  of 
causing  the  queen  to  desert  her  eggs.  The  eggs  probably  hatched 
the  29th  or  30th  of  April. 

In  spite  of  being  disturbed  intermittently  for  about  two  hours 
on  May  2,  when  motion  pictures  were  taken  under  high  power 
lights  of  the  comb  and  queen,  her  majesty  continued  to  show  an 
interest  in  her  brood.  The  stage  of  development  of  the  comb  at 
this  time  is  well  shown  in  figure  1.  By  the  10th  of  May,  the 
larvae  had  progressed  so  far  as  to  spin  cocoons  and  the  queen  had 
laid  more  eggs  in  new  egg  cells  built  on  top  of  the  cocoons.  Each 
of  these  egg  cells  contained  from  two  to  four  eggs,  laid  almost 
horizontally  side  by  side  and  contiguous  to  one  another  in  the  cell. 
Evidently  her  early  habit  of  laying  one  egg  in  a cell,  so  reminis- 
cent of  the  solitary  bees,  had  ceased.  At  this  period  in  the  devel- 
opment of  the  colony,  a broad  shallow  groove  was  in  evidence  on 
the  top  of  the  comb.  This  groove  owed  its  origin  to  a peculiar 
habit  of  the  queen  which  always  assumed  the  same  position  on  her 
incipient  comb  when  incubating  her  first  brood.  The  taking  of 
motion  pictures  of  this  queen  on  the  nest  and  of  still  pictures  with 
the  queen  removed  on  May  9 and  10,  luckily,  once  again  did  not 
cause  the  queen  to  forsake  her  brood.  Figure  2 shows  the  comb 
as  it  appeared  on  May  10,  before  the  wax  and  pollen  was  removed 
from  the  first  cocoons.  This  figure  shows,  also,  the  eggs  in  the 
egg  cells,  and  the  groove  or  “ saddle  ” occupied  by  the  queen 
when  brooding  on  her  first  larval  cells.  On  May  12,  the  honey  pot 
was  again  altered  by  the  queen  so.  that  it  was  capped  on  top  with 
somewhat  of  a recurved  hood.  The  next  day  a new  egg  cell,  much 
larger  than  those  made  first,  was  constructed,  and  on  May  14,  this 
cell  was  capped  and  contained  two  eggs.  The  following  day  the 
first  worker  emerged.  The  fact  that  this  first  worker  was  of  nor- 
mal size  served  not  only  as  an  indication  that  the  queen  was  being 
properly  fed  but  that  the  queen  was  also  properly  feeding  her 
young.  A total  of  five  workers  emerged  by  May  18.  On  this 
date,  more  eggs  were  laid  and  the  presence  of  some  fairly  well- 
developed  larvae  was  noted.  These  larvae  undoubtedly  came 
from  eggs  laid  on  May  10.  Not  content  with  the  single  artificial 
honey  pot,  on  the  19th  of  May  the  workers  made  an  additional 
one  of  wax  and  pollen  adjacent  to  the  artificial  one.  The  29th  of 
May,  disclosed  two  additional  workers ; the  colony  at  this  time 
consisting  of  the  mother  queen,  seven  workers,  larvae  and  eggs. 


264  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXlv 


The  colony  had  now  become  so  large  and  well  established  that  a 
detailed  study  of  the  duration  of  the  various  developmental  stages 
was  begun  of  this  last-mentioned  date. 

The  addition  of  numerous  wax-pollen  honey  pots  accompanied 
the  general  and  gradual  increase  in  size  of  the  comb.  On  May 
25,  there  were  six  of  these  honey  pots,  three  on  each  side  of  the 
artificial  one,  and  all  separate  from  the  comb.  A pillar  of  wax 
and  pollen  had  also  been  constructed  to  connect  the  comb  with 
the  wax-lined  roof  of  the  artificial  nest,  and  as  a support  served 
to  steady  the  comb.  At  this  date  it  was  no  longer  necessary  to 
remove  the  queen  when  examining  the  comb,  because  she  showed 
no  inclination  to  fly  from  the  nest.  Occasionally,  a whiff  of  my 
breath  brought  forth  a protest  in  the  form  of  a vigorous  buzzing, 
but  she  soon  began  brooding  again  over  the  comb  with  her  head 
nestled  down  between  the  cocoons  as  if  to  avoid  the  light.  The 
increase  in  the  development  of  the  comb  since  May  10  is  well 
shown  in  figure  3,  a photograph  taken  on  June  10.  By  June  11, 
the  colony  contained  twenty-two  workers  and  was  sufficiently  ad- 
vanced to  allow  the  bees  their  freedom  for  the  gathering  of  nectar 
and  pollen.  I may  add  that  the  workers  were  becoming  very 
vicious  and  it  required  considerable  time  and  patience  to  remove 
them  one  by  one  each  day  before  examining  the  comb ; a necessary 
procedure  to  avoid  being  stung. 

After  being  allowed  their  liberty  the  workers  speedily  took  ad- 
vantage of  their  privilege  and  were  soon  bringing  in  supplies  of 
honey  and  pollen.  More  wax-pollen  pillars  for  supporting  the 
comb  were  constructed  and  also  honey  pots  of  the  same  material 
on  the  outer  edge  of  the  comb.  As  soon  as  the  full-grown  larvae 
spun  their  cocoons  the  workers  removed  the  wax  and  pollen  cov- 
ering them  and  used  it  to  good  advantage  elsewhere.  At  this 
stage  in  the  development  of  the  colony,  honey  was  being  used  in 
large  quantities  and  scarcely  any  was  to  be  found  in  the  honey 
pots  in  the  morning.  Pollen  was  apparently  less  in  demand  and 
some  of  it  was  stored  in  empty  cocoons.  The  exceedingly  tall 
honey  pots  on  the  outer  edge  of  the  comb  was  a peculiarity  of  this 
nest  during  the  middle  of  June.  By  June  16,  the  average  number 
of  eggs  in  a cell  had  increased  to  five,  and  the  most  favored  place 
for  constructing  the  new  egg  cells  was  on  the  tops  of  newly  spun 
cocoons.  The  comb  continued  to  grow  so  rapidly  that  on  June 
26  it  was  necessary  to  remove  the  colony  to  one  of  my  large  ob- 
servation boxes. 


Dec.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  265 


The  growth  of  the  comb  and  the  increase  in  number  of  work- 
ers did  not  suffer  as  a result  of  allowing  the  bees  their  freedom 
and  the  discontinuance  on  my  part  of  supplying  them  with  food, 
and  by  the  3rd  of  July  I found  myself  obliged  to  remove  more 
than  fifty  workers  every  time  I wished  to  examine  the  comb. 
Several  fairly  hot  days  about  this  time  so  increased  the  tempera- 
ture in  the  nest  that  some  of  the  bees  resorted  to  fanning  the 
comb  with  their  wings ; thus  creating  an  air  movement  for  the 
ventilation  of  the  nest.  This  ventilating  of  the  nest  is  responsible 
for  the  myth  of  the  “ trumpeter  ” bee,  which  according  to  the 
celebrated  Hoffer  (1883)  aroused  its  companions  to  their  work. 
If  I disturbed  the  nest  by  blowing  into  the  entrance  or  jarring 
the  box  containing  the  nest,  the  large  workers  were  the  first  to 
fly  out  in  defense  of  their  home.  A gradual  increase  in  the  size  of 
the  workers  was  evident  as  the  season  advanced,  and  by  July  9, 
many  very  large  workers  appeared.  It  is  also  worth  recording 
that  at  this  time,  for  the  first  time,  a real  surplus  of  honey  existed 
in  the  nest.  This  was  stored  in  specially  made  honey  pots  and  in 
empty  cocoons  in  the  center  of  the  comb.  A surplus  of  pollen 
also  existed  and  continued  to  accumulate  and  to  be  stored  as 
before  in  empty  cocoons.  The  old  mother  queen  now  was  more 
prolific  than  ever  and  scarcely  a day  passed  when  she  did  not  lay 
eggs.  In  fact,  between  July  4 and  the  morning  of  July  7,  ten  new 
egg  cells  were  fashioned  and  an  average  of  six  eggs  laid  in  each 
cell.  This  is  at  the  rate  of  about  twenty  eggs  a day.  The  fact 
that  these  eggs  all  produced  workers  is  proof  that  none  of  them 
were  laid  by  workers. 

During  the  latter  part  of  July,  the  accumulation  of  a surplus 
of  honey  and  pollen  continued  unabated.  The  only  change  in  the 
appearance  of  the  comb,  except  the  increase  in  its  size,  was  the 
development  of  a wax-pollen  sheet  or  thin  wall  on  the  side  of  the 
comb  nearest  the  entrance.  This  was  apparently  built  to  exclude 
light.  By  the  first  of  August,  the  old  mother  queen  began  to 
show,  by  the  loss  of  hair  on  the  dorsum  of  her  abdomen,  the  ef- 
fects of  her  brood  rearing  and  comparative  old  age.  At  nine 
o’clock  on  the  morning  of  August  2,  one  hundred  and  nine  work- 
ers were  in  the  nest  and  additional  ones  were  foraging  in  the  field. 
The  presence  of  so  many  workers  in  the  nest  greatly  increased 
the  amount  of  preliminary  work  necessary  before  the  comb  could 
be  closely  examined,  and  the  increase  in  number  of  egg,  larval 
and  pupal  cells  naturally  lengthened  the  time  required  for  the 


266  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXlv 


taking  of  data  regarding  the  developmental  stadia.  On  August 
ii,  the  nest  contained  116  workers  in  addition  to  an  unknown 
number  foraging  in  the  field.  At.  this  time  the  colony  reached  its 
“ climax  ” of  worker  production  and  from  then  on  the  number  of 
workers  gradually  diminished.  The  gradual  loss  of  hair  on  the 
dorsum  of  the  queen,  first  noticed  about  the  first  of  August,  had 
proceeded  so  far  by  this  time  that  a large  portion  of  the  dorsum 
of  the  thorax  and  nearly  the  entire  dorsum  of  her  abdomen  was 
nude.  Besides  the  workers  and  mother  queen,  the  nest  contained 
on  this  date  29  good  cocoons,  fifty-six  larvae  in  various  stages  of 
development,  and  fourteen  egg  cells  containing  an  average  of 
three  to  four  eggs. 

The  first  males,  twelve  in  number,  were  found  in  the  nest  on 
August  17.  Five  days  later  I found  but  eighty-eight  workers  in 
the  nest,  a smaller  proportion  than  existed  on  August  11.  There 
still  remained  a surplus  of  honey  and  pollen  at  this  time  and  some 
pollen  was  being  stored  in  the  wax-pollen  cells  on  the  edge  of  the 
comb  as  well  as  in  empty  cocoons.  On  this  same  date,  several 
wax-pollen  cells — larger  than  any  egg  cells  thus  far  made  but 
smaller  than  any  of  the  honey  or  pollen  storage  cells — were  built 
on  the  tops  of  cocoons.  A small  quantity  of  loose  pollen  was 
placed  in  the  bottom  of  each  of  these.  Because  of  their  size  I 
was  not  at  first  certain  whether  these  cells  were  for  the  reception 
of  eggs  or  pollen.  Their  position  clearly  indicated  that  they  were 
egg  cells,  but  the  pollen  was  something  I had  never  seen  thus 
placed  in  them  by  this  species.  Furthermore,  their  diameter  of 
about  seven  millimeters  was  unusual  for  the  egg  cells  of  this  spe- 
cies. The  male  population  had  by  now  greatly  increased  and  on 
September  5 sixty-four  of  them  were  found  in  the  nest,  besides  a 
few  additional  ones  which  retreated  so  deeply  into  the  labyrinth 
of  comb  that  they  could  not  be  extricated  without  injuring  the 
comb.  On  this  same  day  eggs  were  discovered  in  the  large  wax- 
pollen  cells  first  noticed  on  August  22.  The  decrease  in  workers 
was  now  very  manifest,  and  at  this  time  but  nineteen  were  found 
in  the  nest.  Figure  4 is  an  illustration  of  the  comb  as  it  looked 
on  September  6 ; a period  of  about  four  months  and  a half  since 
the  mother  queen  first  started  the  nest.  Comparing  figure  4 with 
figure  3,  the  latter  taken  on  June  10,  the  increase  in  the  size  of  the 
comb  is  evident.  Another  view  of  the  comb  as  shown  in  figure  4 
is  given  in  figure  5,  except  that  the  comb  is  shown  in  the  artificial 
nest  and  the  large  observation  box  into  which  it  was  transferred 


Dec.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  267 


on  June  26.  On  September  7,  the  old  queen  died  and  a short  time 
afterwards  she  was  dragged  into  a corner  of  the  nest  by  her 
worker  offspring.  It  was  not  until  after  the  queen  died  that  there 
were  signs  in  this  nest  of  workers  developing  egg-laying  habits. 
On  September  16,  one  of  the  few  remaining  workers  seemed  to 
show  an  interest  in  the  comb  and  certain  cells  containing  eggs. 
These  eggs  were  certainly  laid  by  workers,  for  the  cells  were  built 
after  the  death  of  the  old  mother  queen. 

In  keeping  with  the  gradual  decline  in  numbers  of  bees  in  the 
nest  was  the  increase  in  numbers  of  the  bumblebee  wax-moth 
( Vitula  edmandsii  Packard),  and  due  to  the  work  of  their  larvae 
the  once  large  and  neat-appearing  comb  had  rapidly  deteriorated 
by  the  end  of  September. 

2.  Experiment  11,  1919. 

The  queen  used  in  Experiment  11,  1919,  was  captured  on  April 
16  in  the  Brownfield  Woods,  near  Urbana.  For  several  days  fol- 
lowing her  capture,  she  was  confined  with  several  other  queens  in 
a glass  aquarium  jar  containing  a liberal  food  supply  to  make  her 
become  “ broody.”  Then  on  April  22,  she  was  placed  with  an- 
other queen  of  the  same  species  in  an  artificial  nest.  During  her 
brief  stay  in  the  glass  jar  this  queen  killed  two  other  queens  of 
her  own  species  and  soon  after  being  placed  in  the  artificial  nest 
with  another  queen  she  continued  her  murderous  career  by  killing 
the  other  queen.  Because  she  did  not  exhibit  signs  of  interest  in 
this  artificial  nest,  she  was  confined  once  again  in  the  bell  jar. 
On  May  16  she  was  placed  for  the  second  time  in  an  artificial 
nest,  but  this  time  without  another  queen  to  arouse  her  propensity 
for  killing.  On  May  18,  the  queen  exhibited  a great  interest  in 
the  nest  and  constructed  an  egg  cell  on  the  pollen  lump.  This  was 
similar  in  all  details  to  the  one  first  made  by  the  queen  in  Experi- 
ment 6,  1919.  Thereafter  her  interest  in  the  nest  continued,  and 
on  May  19  there  were  three  egg  cells  on  the  pollen  lumps.  Fear 
of  disturbing  her  was  responsible  for  neglecting  a count  of  the 
number  of  eggs  laid  in  these  first  cells.  Judging  from  the  size  of 
the  cells,  the  number  of  the  eggs  must  have  been  very  small. 
Larvae  were  first  noticed  on  May  24  and  from  then  on  they  grew 
rapidly.  Eight  days  after  the  larvae  were  first  observed  two  of 
them  spun  cocoons  and  a third  did  so  the  following  day.  The 
fact  that  from  the  first  egg  cells  there  were  eventually  produced 


268  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXIv 


but  three  workers  is  further  evidence  that  the  first  three  cells  con- 
tained only  a few  eggs,  and  perhaps  but  one  each.  As  soon  as 
the  first  two  cocoons  were  spun  on  June  i,  the  queen  constructed 
a new  egg  cell  on  one  of  them.  On  June  2,  this  egg  cell  was 
closed  and  contained  four  eggs.  The  same  day  the  third  larva 
spun  its  silken  pupal  case.  Five  days  later,  additional  egg  cells 
were  present  on  the  cocoons. 

The  first  worker  emerged  on  June  io,  one  more  on  June  n, 
and  a third  on  June  13;  all  seemed  normal  in  every  respect.  By 
the  middle  of  June  the  nest  contained  the  mother  queen,  three 
workers,  larvae  and  eggs.  At  this  time,  when  the  colony  was 
progressing  so  nicely,  the  queen  accidentally  lost  a leg  and  this 
seemed  to  have  a bad  effect  on  the  further  development  of  the 
entire  colony.  Nevertheless,  the  queen  with  the  help  of  two 
workers  (one  of  them  escaped  on  June  19  and  never  found  its 
way  back  to  the  nest)  continued  her  work  as  well  as  possible. 
More  eggs  were  laid  on  June  26,  but  the  colony  was  doomed,  as 
the  queen  was  scarcely  able  to  perform  her  duties.  Egg-laying 
continued,  however,  and  the  queen  even  laid  some  eggs  on  July  3 
in  a cell  built  of  honey  bee  wax,  separate  from  the  comb,  on  the 
wax-lined  floor  of  the  nest.  The  first  week  of  July,  after  trans- 
ference of  the  comb  and  bees  to  another  nest,  the  colony  seemed 
to  acquire  a new  lease  on  life.  In  one  egg  cell,  first  discovered  on 
July  6,  I found  six  eggs.  These  were  all  creamy  white  in  color 
and  were  laid  contiguous  to  one  another  in  a horizontal  position 
in  the  cell.  By  the  middle  of  July,  a few  more  larvae  spun  cocoons 
and  on  July  28,  four  more  workers  emerged.  The  appearance  of 
these  new  workers  presented  an  opportunity  of  allowing  the 
bees  the  liberty  of  foraging  for  themselves,  and  so  on  July  30  the 
colony  was  released.  The  workers  immediately  assumed  the  duty 
of  providing  food  for  the  colony,  but  the  death  on  August  4 of 
the  crippled  old  queen  brought  to  a close  its  further  development. 

3.  Experiment  13,  1919. 

Only  that  part  of  this  experiment  relating  to  B.  impatiens  will 
be  presented  here,  since  this  experiment  will  be  more  fully  re- 
viewed in  another  paper  under  the  topic  of  queen  substitution  and 
mixed  colonies.  This  experiment  was  begun  originally  with  a 
queen  of  this  species  taken  at  Dongola,  Illinois,  on  May  5.  Prior 
to  the  time  of  her  introduction  into  an  artificial  nest  on  May  25, 
the  queen  was  kept  in  the  customary  manner  to  make  her  become 


Bee.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  269 


“broody.”  On  May  27,  the  queen  showed  a great  interest  in  the 
nest,  and  two  egg  cells  were  constructed  on  the  pollen  lump.  The 
succeeding  day,  the  cells  contained  eggs  and  were  completely 
capped  over  in  the  usual  manner.  Larvae  were  first  noticed  in 
these  cells  on  June  2,  but  it  is  probable  that  the  eggs  hatched 
before  this  date.  An  additional  egg  cell  was  prepared  on  this 
latter  date  and  the  colony  seemed  destined  to  a normal  develop- 
ment. For  several  days  afterwards,  due  to  my  unavoidable  ab- 
sence, this  nest  was  not  examined  and  when  the  nest  box  was 
next  opened  on  June  7,  I found  the  queen  entangled  in  the 
cloth  top  of  the  artificial  nest  and  almost  dead.  On  being  fed  she 
revived,  but  displayed  no  further  interest  in  the  nest.  In  hope 
of  arousing  her  interest  in  the  comb  by  means  of  the  presence 
of  another  queen,  a queen  of  B.  bimaculatus  (Cresson)  was 
placed  in  the  nest  on  June  8.  At  first  this  ruse  seemed  to  be 
successful,  but  on  June  9 all  trace  of  interest  in  the  nest  had  again 
disappeared.  Realizing  the  folly  of  further  efforts  to  get  the 
mother  queen  to  nourish  her  young,  I decided  to  use  this  comb  for 
experiments  in  queen  substitution.  Accordingly,  a queen  of  B. 
auric omus  (Robertson)  was  added  to  the  assemblage.  Eventu- 
ally the  bimaculatus  and  auricomus  queens  became  interested  in 
the  nest,  but  further  information  concerning  this  colony  is  out  of 
place  here.  It  should  be  added,  however,  that  very  small  work- 
ers of  B.  impatiens  emerged  on  June  26  and  28,  under  the  care  of 
the  B.  auricomus  queen  and  continued  on  the  best  of  terms  with 
their  foster  mother.  Both  workers  were  very  small  and  the  one 
that  emerged  on  June  28  was  crippled,  clearly  showing  the  effects 
of  malnutrition  and  the  lack  of  attention  during  their  infancy — 
the  period  from  June  2 to  June  10.  One  of  these  workers  even 
lived  to  maintain  friendly  relations  with  workers  produced  by  the 
auricomus  queen. 


4.  Experiment  13,  1920 

This  experiment  was  begun  on  May  30  with  a queen  of  B.  im- 
patiens received  on  May  10  from  Dr.  Hugh  Glasgow  of  Geneva, 
New  York.  Previous  to  May  30,  the  queen  had  been  prepared 
in  the  usual  manner  for  colony  production.  Interest  was  im- 
mediately taken  in  the  nest  and  on  June  2 an  egg  cell  containing 
several  eggs  was  found  in  the  nest.  This  cell  was  first  observed 
to  contain  larvae  on  June  7.  The  colony  progressed  nicely  until 
June  22,  when  I had  to  abandon  it  for  various  reasons.  This 


270  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


experiment  was  of  interest  only  in  that  it  demonstrated  that 
queens  of  bumblebees  of  this  species  can  be  transported  from  one 
section  of  the  country  to  another  and  be  made  to  produce  colonies 
under  artificial  conditions. 

5.  Experiment  16,  1920 

In  this  experiment  I used  a queen  of  B.  impatiens  received  on 
May  21  from  Mr.  C.  A.  Frost,  of  Framingham,  Massachusetts. 
After  the  usual  procedure  preparatory  to  nesting  experiments, 
the  queen  was  placed  in  an  artificial  nest  on  June  6.  On  June  7, 
the  queen  manifested  an  interest  in  the  nest  and, on  June  8 the 
nest  contained  an  egg  cell  with  three  eggs.  The  next  day  another 
egg  cell  was  made  and  eggs  deposited  in  it,  and  also  an  additional 
egg  cell  and  eggs  on  June  10.  Larvae  were  first  observed  on 
June  13  and  these  continued  to  develop  until  the  study  of  the  nest 
was  abandoned  on  June  22.  This  experiment  confirmed  the  fact 
(See  Experiment  13,  1920)  that  queens  can  be  shipped  to  various 
localities  without  interfering  with  their  nest  building  instincts. 

C.  Biological  Summary 

j.  Resume  of  Literature 

In  keeping  with  the  general  status  of  our  knowledge  concerning 
the  bumblebees  as  a whole,  very  little  has  been  published  regard- 
ing the  habits  of  this  common  and  widely  distributed  species. 
Cresson  (1863)  was  the  first  entomologist  to  record  the  finding 
of  a nest  of  B.  impatiens.  He  states  that  the  nest  contained 
thirty  queens,  thirty-eight  workers  and  thirty-four  males.  Be- 
sides noting  the  small  size  of  the  workers  as  compared  with  that 
of  the  queens  and  the  lack  of  variation  in  the  coloration  of  the 
different  castes,  he  gives  no  information  concerning  the  comb  or 
habits  of  the  bees.  A year  later  (1864),  Mr.  F.  W.  Putnam 
recorded  finding  a nest  of  B.  virginicus  [ -B . impatiens ] “under 
an  old  stump  in  an  orchard,”  but  gives  us  no  further  details.  He 
mentions,  also,  the  capture  of  three  males  of  this  species  which 
were  “flying  under  a large  tree  on  which  they  frequently  alighted.” 
He  says  further,  “So  much  did  these  bees  resemble  large  flies  in 
their  actions,  that  at  first  I mistook  them  for  those  insects.”  I 
am  quite  sure  this  latter  note  relating  to  the  habits  of  the  males 
refers  to  B.  separatus.  In  1863,  Cresson  described  B.  impatiens 
from  all  three  castes,  but  the  male  he  then  described  as  this  species 


Dec.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  271 


possessed  very  large  eyes  and  differed  in  other  ways  from  the 
female.  Three  months'  after  publishing  the  description  of  B.  im- 
patiens,  Cresson  (1863b)  had  the  opportunity  to  study  a nest  of 
this  species  found  near  Kaign’s  Point,  New  Jersey,  on  October  7, 
1863.  This  led' to  the  discovery  of  the  true  male  of  B.  impatiens 
and  the  assignment  of  the  male  “Described  under  B.  virginicus” 
to  a new  species  which  he  named  B.  separatus.  The  fact  that  the 
males  of  B.  separatus  were  described  in  1863  under  the  name 
B.  virginicus,  explains  Putnam’s  determination  of  the  males  he 
caught  flying  about  trees  in  1864  as  this  species.  Accordingly, 
the  habits  Putnam  recorded  for  the  males  of  B.  impatiens  relate 
to  B.  separatus  and  prove  to  be  in  keeping  with  the  habits  of  the 
males  of  B.  separatus  as  I have  observed  them. 

The  next  published  statements  regarding  the  biology  of  B.  im- 
patiens are  those  of  Riley  (1880)  who  identified  a bumblebee 
caught  robbing  the  “honey  bees  of  their  scanty  stores”  as  this 
species.  Eleven  years  later  Howard  (1891)  reports  finding  large 
numbers  of  these  bees  attracted  to  the  blossoms  of  the  horse- 
chestnut  and  described  their  peculiar  actions  as  probably  being 
due  to  the  toxic  effect  of  the  nectar. 

Franklin  (1913)  reports  having  taken  several  nests  of  this 
species.  He  says  that  “as  far  as  I have  been  able  to  ascertain, 
they  are  invariably  subterranean  and  the  colonies  often  consist  of 
a very  large  number  of  individuals.  The  largest  Bombus  colony 
which  I have  ever  taken  belonged  to  this  species,  and  was  taken 
at  Amherst,  Massachusetts,  August  31,  1904.”  In  this  colony 
he  found  four  queens,  fifteen  males  and  three  hundred  and  thirty- 
six  workers.  One  hundred  and  fifty-four,  of  the  three  hundred 
and  thirty  unbroken  cells  in  the  nest,  “were  queen  cells  and  the 
majority  of  the  young  inside  them  were  still  in  the  larval  state.” 
According  to  Franklin  the  queen  cells  averaged  about  eighteen 
millimeters  in  length,  and,  though  the  remaining  cells  varied  con- 
siderably in  size,  they  were  “on  the  average  a little  more  than 
one-half  as  long  as  the  queen  cells.”  The  nest  itself  was  made 
of  old  grass,  in  an  old  mouse  burrow  two  and  one-half  feet  be- 
low the  surface  of  the  ground. 

Jackson  (1920),  says  that  “In  October  the  males  are  prac- 
tically the  only  representatives  of  the  Bremidae  to  be  found”  and 
that  the  workers  fly  very  late  in  the  fall. 

As  far  as  I am  aware,  the  only  other  contributor  to  a knowl- 
edge of  the  biology  and  habits  of  this  species  is  Plath  (1922). 


272  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXlv 


This  author  records  taking  sixteen  “nests  of  this  species  during 
the  summers  of  1921  and  1922.”  All  of  these  16  nests  were 
subterranean  as  well  as  several  others  which  were  not  dug  up. 
“They  were  from  1 to  3 ft.  below  the  surface,  and  had  tunnels 
varying  from  18  inches  to  5 ft.  in  length.  A number  of  these 
nests  were  situated  in  decayed  stumps.”  Plath  states,  also,  that 
these  colonies  were  very  populous  and  records  one  colony  as 
having  thirty-one  males  and  fifty  workers,  a second  with  about 
one  hundred  and  twenty-five  workers,  and  another  with  more 
than  four  hundred  and  fifty  workers.  The  workers  are  stated  to 
appear  about  the  first  week  in  June  “and  the  majority  of  the 
young  queens  and  males  hatch  in  August  and  September.”  It  is 
interesting  to  note  that  Plath  was  impressed  by  the  bellicose  dis- 
position of  this  bumblebee  for  he  remarks  in  a footnote  that  this 
is  “an  exceedingly  pugnacious  species.”  My  experiences  with  this 
species  agree  with  the  statement  of  Plath.  In  spite  of  many  pre- 
cautions I was  stung  by  the  workers  on  several  occasions.  The 
same  trait  in  behavior  finds  its  expression  in  the  manner  in  which 
the  workers  attack  Psithyrus  queens  introduced  into  their  nests. 
In  one  experiment  of  this  nature  made  by  Plath,  seventeen  work- 
ers surrounded  and  attacked  the  intruding  queen ; so  many  in 
fact,  that  at  least  one  of  them  met  death  through  the  ill-directed 
sting  of  its  fellow  worker. 

2.  Anthophilous  Habits 

The  reader  is  referred  to  the  valuable  paper  of  Lutz  and  Cock- 
erell (1920)  for  a summary  of  most  of  the  records  relating  to  the 
flowers  visited  by  this  polytropic  species  of  bee.  A few  of  Rob- 
ertson’s records  have  been  overlooked  in  this  list  and  these,  to- 
gether with  those  which  have  accumulated  since  then,  are  as 
follows : 

Robertson  (1890-1899)  : Cephalanthus  occidentalis,  Libelia 
syphilitica,  Campanula  americana,  Petalostemon  violaceus, 
Delphinium  tricorne,  Dicentra  cucullaria,  Claytonia  virginica, 
Viola  padata  var.  bicolor,  Dentaria  laciniata,  Impatiens  fulva, 
Impatiens  pallida,  Tradescantia  virginica,  Erythronium  al- 
bidum,  Verbena  stricta,  Dianthera  americana,  Ly thrum 
alatum,  Hypericum  cistifolium,  Clematis  virginiana,  Clematis 
pitcheri,  and  Staphylea  trifolia.  Jackson  (1922)  : Pontederia 


Dec.,  19%9  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  273 


cordata,  Chrysopsis  mariana,  and  Xolisma  ligustrina.  Rau 
(1920)  : Aster  multiflora. 

In  addition  to  the  already  exceedingly  numerous  lists  of  plants 
frequented  for  nectar"  or  pollen  I have  found  this  species  on 
Monarda  fistulosa,  Melilotus  alba,  Trifolium  pratense  and  Ligus- 
trum  vulgare. 

3.  Duration  of  the  Developmental  Stadia 

In  order  to  secure  data  regarding  the  duration  of  the  develop- 
mental stadia  of  B.  impatiens,  one  colony  (Experiment  6,  1919) 
of  this  species  was  closely  studied  from  its  inception  to  its  end. 
During  the  interim  from  May  22  to  September  16,  fifty-four  ex- 
aminations were  made  of  the  contents  of  all  cells  and  cocoons 
comprising  the  comb.  Although  these  examinations  did  not  give 
a complete  record  of  the  development  of  all  the  stages  of  each 
bee  produced  by  the  mother  queen,  they  were  sufficient  to  present 
a good  approximation  of  the  duration  of  the  various  develop- 
mental stadia  for  the  workers  (females)  and  males.  Since  no 
queens  were  produced  in  this  colony,  on  information  regarding 
their  developmental  stadia  can  be  given.  Because  the  tables  giv- 
ing this  data  are  extensive,  only  by  deductions  from  them  are 
presented.  For  a complete  understanding  of  the  nature  of  the 
complete  tables,  and  how  the  essential  data  were  secured,  the 
reader  is  referred  to  a recent  paper  (Frison,  1928). 

It  was  found  that  the  egg  stage  is  the  shortest  and  the  larval 
stage  the  longest  of  the  three  development  stadia  of  the  workers 
and  males.  The  workers  required  between  four  and  five  days  in 
the  egg  stage,  twelve  to  fourteen  days  in  the  larval  stage,  and  six 
to  eight  days  in  the  pupal  stage.  The  males  averaged  between 
four  and  five  days  in  the  egg  stage,  fifteen  days  in  the  larval  stage, 
and  eight  days  in  the  pupal  stage. 

The  total  time  required  for  the  production  of  the  adults  varied. 
It  was  from  twenty-two  to  twenty-seven  days  for  the  workers 
and  twenty-seven  to  twenty-eight  days  for  the  males.  During 
June  some  evidence  was  obtained  which  indicated  a lengthening 
of  the  life  cycle. 

4.  Seasonal  Appearance  of  the  Castes 

There  is  a difference  in  the  time  of  appearance  of  the  three 
castes  of  bumblebees.  This  is  because  only  the  queens  are  able  to 


274  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.  XXIV 


hibernate  and  their  first  progeny  are  ordinarily  workers.  When 
writing  about  the  seasonal  appearance  of  the  castes  I have  adopted 
the  practice  of  considering  first  the  time  of  the  appearance  of  the 
old  queens  in  spring,  second  the  workers  and  lastly  the  males. 
This  is  their  ordinary  sequence  in  a calendar  year.  However, 
since  the  queens  found  in  spring  were  produced  in  the  preceding 
summer  or  fall  another  arrangement  might  be  used.  The  chief 
objections  to  beginning  an  account  of  the  seasonal  succession  of 
the  castes  at  the  time  the  new  queens  emerge  from  cocoons  are 
the  difficulty  of  securing  data  concerning  this  period  unless  colon- 
ies are  reared,  and  the  fact  that  hibernation  must  take  place  be- 
fore any  progeny  can  be  reared. 

The  queens  of  B.  impatiens  are  usually  the  second  species  of 
bumblebee  to  appear  in  spring  in  the  vicinity  of  Urbana,  Illinois. 
The  honor  of  being  first  is  possessed  by  the  queens  of  B.  bimacu- 
latus  (Frison,  1928).  The  earliest  records  I have  for  the  queens 
of  B.  impatiens  in  Champaign  and  Vermillion  Counties  during  a 
period  of  seven  years  are  as  follows:  May  2,  1914,  University 

Woods,  Urbana;  April  23,  1915,  University  Woods,  Urbana; 
May  5,  1916,  University  Woods,  Urbana;  May  14,  1917,  Univer- 
sity Woods,  Urbana;  April  18,  1918,  Brownfield  Woods,  Urbana; 
April  13,  1919,  Mahomet,  Illinois;  and  May  8,  1920,  Oakwood, 
Illinois.  This  list  gives  a very  good  idea  of  the  time  the  queens 
are  first  encountered  in  spring  in  this  locality.  The  time  of  ap- 
pearance is  each  year  directly  correlated  with  the  advance  or 
retardation  of  spring.  The  lateness  of  their  flight  varies  in  direct 
proportion  to  the  time  of  their  first  appearance,  establishment  of  a 
nest,  and  weather  conditions.  In  this  vicinity  the  old  queens  of 
impatiens  are  rarely  encountered  in  the  field  after  the  end  of  June. 

The  workers  are  seldom  seen  out  of  doors  before  six  weeks 
after  the  appearance  of  the  queens.  In  1919,  cocoons  of  workers 
were  found  in  a nest  at  White  Heath,  Illinois,  on  May  17.  This 
place  was  but  a few  miles  from  the  place  where  I first  captured 
the  first  queen  of  B.  impatiens  of  the  season  on  April  13.  Work- 
ers were  caught  in  the  Brownfield  Woods  in  1915,  on  June  6. 
This  latter  capture  was  just  about  seven  weeks  after  the  first 
queen  of  the  season  was  collected  two  miles  away.  Workers  con- 
tinue to  be  encountered  in  the  field  as  late  as  October ; their  late- 
ness depending  on  the  character  of  the  fall  weather.  The  earliest 
record  I have  for  the  appearance  of  the  males  in  this  vicinity  is 
July  26,  1913,  in  the  University  Woods.  Ordinarily  the  males 


Dec.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  275 


appear  much  later,  and  I have  taken  them  at  Champaign,  Illinois, 
in  1911,  as  late  as  October  9. 

The  new  queens  usually  appear  at  about  the  same  time  as  the 
males  but  are  seldom  captured  by  collectors.  This  is  because  they 
speedily  seek  hibernating  quarters  and  spend  little  time  on  flowers. 
Franklin  records  finding  four  queens — three  or  all  of  which  must 
have  been  young  queens — in  a nest  he  opened  on  August  31,  1904, 
at  Amherst,  Massachusetts.  Franklin  states  also  that  the  nest 
contained  “one  hundred  and  fifty-four”  queen  cells  and  “the  ma- 
jority of  the  young  inside  them  were  still  in  the  larval  state.” 
Cresson  found  thirty  queens  in  the  nest  found  at  Kaign’s  Point, 
New  Jersey,  on  October  7,  1863.  These  dates  show  that  the 
queens  are  ordinarily  produced  in  the  late  summer  and  early 
fall. 

In  most  other  parts  of  the  range  of  this  species  in  North 
America  the  same  general  sequence  in  the  appearance  of  the 
castes  takes  place.  I have  records  of  the  queens  taken  in  North 
Carolina  the  31st  of  March  and  in  Georgia  on  March  21.  These 
records  show  the  influence  of  the  warmer  temperatures  prevail- 
ing in  the  southern  part  of  the  range  of  this  species.  The  same 
factors  that  cause  an  earlier  appearance  of  the  queens  in  the 
southern  part  of  their  range  hasten  the  appearance  time  of  the 
workers,  new  queen  and  males.  Plath  says  that  in  Massachusetts 
the  “majority  of  the  young  queens  and  males  hatch  in  August 
and  September.”  This  statement  is  in  agreement  with  my  con- 
clusions regarding  the  usual  time  of  appearance  of  these  castes. 
I have  seen  a male  of  B.  impatiens  from  Miami,  Florida,  which 
was  collected  on  February  6,  1903.  Either  this  specimen  has  been 
erroneously  labeled  as  to  date  or  in  Florida  a modification  of  the 
general  life  history  of  this  species  occurs  which  is  suggestive  of 
bumblebee  life  in  Corsica  as  it  is  pictured  by  Ferton  (1901),  in 
Sardinia  by  Krausse  (1910)  and  in  the  state  of  Sao  Paulo,  Brazil, 
by  von  Ihring  (1903). 


5.  Caste  Ratio 

The  worker  caste  numerically  dominates  in  this  species.  The 
largest  number  of  workers  I ever  found  at  one  time  in  Experi- 
ment 6,  1919,  was  on  August  11  when  there  were  one  hundred 
and  sixteen  of  them  in  the  nest.  According  to  my  records,  ap- 
proximately two  hundred  and  thirty  workers  were  produced  in 
this  nest.  The  difference  in  number  between  the  two  figures  just 


276  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXlv 


cited  is  easily  accounted  for  by  the  fact  that  many  of  the  workers 
were  out  of  the  nest  gathering  nectar  and  pollen  when  the  nest 
was  examined  on  August  n.  Some  died  from  time  to  time,  and 
on  several  occasions  it  was  necessary  to  kill  others.  Approxi- 
mately eighty  males  were  produced  in  this  nest;  making  a ratio 
of  about  one  male  to  three  workers.  The  development  of  queens 
would  undoubtedly  have  changed  this  ratio. 

In  the  nest  examined  by  Franklin  (1913)  on  August  31,  1904, 
at  Amherst,  Masachusetts,  the  number  of  workers,  males  and 
queens  was,  respectively:  three  hundred  and  twenty-one,  fifteen, 
and  four.  Franklin  says  there  were  also  one  hundred  and  fifty- 
four  queen  cells  and  one  hundred  and  seventy-six  other  cells 
probably  destined  to  produced  mainly  males.  Counting  the  cells 
as  well  as  the  adults  the  number  was  about  approximately  three 
hundred  and  twenty-one  workers,  one  hundred  and  ninety-one 
males,  and  one  hundred  and  fifty-eight  queens.  As  the  males 
and  queens  were  apparently  just  emerging,  their  number  is  nearly 
correct.  In  the  case  of  the  workers  I have  no  doubt  that  as  many 
as  four  hundred  were  produced.  If  we  accept  this  latter  estimate 
for  the  number  of  workers,  about  two  workers  were  produced  to 
every  male  and  eight  workers  to  every  queen.  In  the  nest  found 
by  Cresson  (1863)  on  October  7,  1863,  at  Kaign’s  Point,  New 
Jersey,  there  were  thirty-eight  workers,  thirty-four  males,  and 
thirty  queens.  The  small  number  of  workers  in  this  nest  was 
no  doubt  due  to  the  lateness  of  the  season. 

In  one  of  the  nests  found  by  Plath  (1922)  there  were  about 
four  hundred  and  fifty  workers,  but  no  mention  is  made  of  the 
number  of  queens  or  males.  In  another  nest  this  same  author 
found  seventeen  males,  about  seventy-five  workers,  and  several 
inquiline  bees  ( Psithyrus ).  A third  nest  yielded  thirty-one  males, 
about  fifty  workers  and  many  other  insects.  In  these  nests,  it 
is  apparent  that  the  workers  dominated. 

6.  Size  of  Colonies 

The  colonies  of  this  species  attain  considerable  size,  as  evi- 
denced by  the  preceding  records  of  Franklin  (1913)  and  Plath 
(1922)  and  those  of  my  own.  Experiment  6,  1919,  produced 
with  certainty  two  hundred  and  eighty-three  bees,  and  adults 
emerging  from  groups  of  uncounted  cells  must  have  numbered 
fifty  more ; making  a grand  total  of  over  three  hundred  and 
twenty-five  bees.  In  the  nest  Franklin  studied  there  were  three 


Dec.,  1989  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  277 


hundred  and  forty  bees,  besides  three  hundred  and  thirty  cells 
or  cocoons  containing  various  immature  stages.  The  production 
of  adults  by  the  end  of  September  in  this  latter  colony  would  have 
been  nearly  seven  hundred;  truly  a large  colony  of  bees.  Plath 
(1922)  mentions  one  colony  which  consisted  of  four  hundred  and 
fifty  workers  on  August  4,  1921.  When  small  colonies  of  this 
species  are  found  it  is  an  indication  of  the  influence  of  deleterious 
conditions,  rather  than  a low  rate  of  fecundity  on  the  part  of  the 
queens  of  this  species. 

7.  Variation. 

B.  impatiens  is  apparently  not  susceptible  to  marked  color  varia- 
tions. In  contrast  to  certain  other  bumblebees,  too,  the  males  and 
females  are  quite  similarly  colored.  This  is  in  keeping  with  their 
general  color  constancy  or  fidelity  to  design.  The  only  color 
variation  worth  mentioning  occurred  in  the  case  of  three  workers ; 
one  observed  in  a nest  on  July  7,  and  two  others  on  August  22. 
These  workers  had  the  dorsum  of  the  thorax  covered  with  a 
bright  orange-yellow  pubescence  instead  of  the  usual  pale,  whitish- 
yellow  color. 

In  respect  to  variation  in  size,  however,  this  species  is  most 
interesting.  As  is  customary  with  most  species  of  bumblebees, 
the  greatest  range  in  size  is  exhibited  by  the  worker  caste.  The 
variation  in  length  of  the  workers  may  range  anywhere  from  eight 
to  seventeen  millimeters.  The  most  significant  feature  of  this 
aspect  of  variation  in  this  species  is  the  fact  that  one  never  has 
difficulty  in  separating  queens  from  workers  as  is  sometimes  the 
case  with  certain  species.  This  may  not  always  hold  true,  but 
such  has  always  been  the  case  with  the  many  specimens  I have 
collected,  reared  and  studied  in  collections  throughout  the  coun- 
try. Franklin  (1913)  gives  the  length  of  the  queens  as  sixteen 
to  twenty  millimeters,  but  most  of  the  queens  I have  studied 
measured  between  twenty  and  twenty-five  millimeters.  The  sig- 
nificance of  this  isolation  in  size  between  the  queens  and  work- 
ers was  discussed  by  the  author  in  another  paper  (1927b). 
Briefly,  in  that  paper  B.  impatiens  was  considered  as  a species 
with  a high  fecundity  in  the  queen  caste  and  with  a rudimentary 
specialization  of  the  more  highly  developed  caste  system  of  the 
honeybee.  As  a general  rule,  the  males  are  as  large  as,  or  slightly 
larger  than,  the  workers,  but  much  smaller  than  the  queens.  A 
variation,  however,  may  occur  in  the  size  of  the  males  even  from 
the  same  nest;  an  indication  that  trophogeny  plays  an  important 


278  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXlv 


role  in  the  size  of  the  adults.  For  instance,  two  of  the  males 
found  in  Experiment  6,  1919,  on  September  5,  were  only  nine 
millimeters  in  length ; whereas  certain  other  males  were  fifteen 
millimeters. 

In  order  to  get  data  relative  to  the  extent  of  variation  in  the 
male  genitalia  (structural  characters  of  much  importance  in  sys- 
tematic investigations)  of  individuals  from  the  same  nest,  ten 
males  showing  considerable  variation  in  size  were  selected  from 
forty-seven  removed  from  Experiment  6,  1919,  on  September  5. 
The  genitalia  of  these  males  varied  in  size  in  proportion  to  the 
size  of  the  bee,  but  no  noticeable  variation  in  their  form  was  dis- 
cernible. Other  characters  such  as  those  offered  by  the  malar 
space  and  antennal  segments  indicated  the  same  structural  con- 
stancy. Freak  individuals  may  appear,  but  their  crippled  condi- 
tion is  due  to  malnutrition,  injury  to  pupae,  etc. 

8.  Cocoons  and  Food  Storage 

Silken  cocoons  are  spun  by  the  larvae  about  two  days  before 
pupation.  Although  some  silk  is  spun  by  larvae  previous  to  the 
spinning  of  the  cocoons,  it  is  only  for  the  purpose  of  holding  to- 
gether the  elastic  wax -pollen  walls  of  their  cells.  Since  many 
eggs  are  laid  in  a single  cell  it  is  evident  that  at  least  for  a short 
time  after  the  larvae  hatch  that  they  occupy  the  same  wax-pollen 
cell.  After  a short  time  the  larvae  begin  to  separate  from  one 
another  and  strands  of  silk  become  evident  in  the  wax-pollen 
cells  which  surround  them.  As  the  larvae  increase  in  size  the 
silken  threads  become  more  numerous,  and  when  larval  growth 
is  completed  the  cocoon  is  rapidly  spun.  These  cocoons,  dirty 
yellow  in  color,  are  the  most  conspicuous  part  of  a bumblebee 
nest.  They  vary  in  size  just  as  the  adults  do,  some  being  large 
and  others  small.  Three  worker  cocoons  measured  on  July  23 
were  twelve  to  fifteen  millimeters  in  height  and  eight  to  nine  milli- 
meters in  breadth.1  As  is  the  case  with  the  other  species  which  I 
have  studied,  the  wax-pollen  necessarily  coating  the  cocoon  when 
first  spun  is  soon  removed  by  the  bees  and  used  elsewhere. 
When  a worker  is  ready  to  emerge  it  partly  cuts  off  with  its  man- 
dibles the  upper  part  of  the  cocoon.  I have  never  seen  workers 
on  the  comb  assisting  in  this  operation.  After  the  bee  has  emerged 
the  cocoons  are  completely  renovated  and  both  honey  and  pollen 

1 Two  male  cocoons  measured  on  September  16  were,  respec- 
tively, ten  to  twelve  millimeters  in  height  and  four  and  one-half  to 
five  and  one-half  millimeters  in  breadth. 


Bee.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  279 


are  stored  in  them.  Cocoons  so  stocked  with  provisions  are  then 
often  closed  over  on  top  by  the  wax-pollen  used  so  generally  in 
the  comb  construction. 

With  the  gradual  increase  in  size  of  the  comb  and  the  develop- 
ment of  workers,  the  original  honey  pot  made  by  the  queen  be- 
comes insufficient  to  meet  the  needs  of  the  colony  and  others  are 
constructed.  In  Experiment  6,  1919,  the  first  of  these  additional 
honey  pots  (Figure  6)  was  built  alongside  of  the  artificial  one, 
but  later  in  the  season  others  were  erected  around  the  edge  of  the 
comb.  During  the  early  part  of  the  season  most  of  the  surplus 
honey  was  stored  in  the  honey  pots,  but  later  cocoons  were  also 
utilized  for  this  purpose.  Most  of  the  surplus  pollen  was  stored 
in  empty  cocoons  near  the  center  of  the  nest,  but  some  was  also 
stored  in  wax-pollen  cells.  The  habit  of  storing  the  pollen  in  cells 
or  cocoons  apart  from  the  clusters  of  larvae,  caused  Sladen  to 
call  the  English  species  having  this  habit  “ Pollen-storers.”  Plath 
(1927)  has  coined  the  term  “ Amarsipoea  ” as  a substitute  for 
“ Pollen-storers.”  As  recently  pointed  out  (Frison,  1928)  the 
sectional  name  Anodontobombus  Kruger  (1917  and  1920)  can 
probably  be  used  for  biological  and  morphological  classifications. 

p.  Mating. 

I have  never  witnessed  the  mating  of  males  and  females  of  this 
species,  but  a male  and  a queen  of  this  species  captured  in  coitu 
are  in  the  insect  collection  of  Purdue  University  at  Lafayette,  In- 
diana. These  bees  were  taken  at  Lafayette  on  September  25, 
1915.  The  late  production  of  the  queens  and  males  of  impatiens 
makes  late  matings  unavoidable;  a seasonal  adjustment  quite  dif- 
ferent from  bimaculatus  whose  males  and  females  are  produced 
and  mate  in  mid-summer  (Frison,  1928). 

10.  Nesting  situations. 

There  is  very  good  evidence  to  indicate  that  the  queens  of  this 
species  prefer  to  nest  beneath  the  surface  of  the  ground.  All  of 
the  nests  taken  by  Franklin  (1913)  and  Plath  (1922)  were  sub- 
terranean. Plath  says  that  the  nests  he  studied  were  reached  by 
“ tunnels  varying  from  18  inches  to  5 ft.  in  length.”  The  nest 
found  by  Putnam  (1864)  was  located  under  an  old  stump.  The 
colonies  I had  under  observation  were  started  in  artificial  nests 
and  others  occupied  artificial  domiciles  buried  in  the  ground 
(Frison,  1926).  No  doubt  other  nesting  sites  than  those  under 
the  ground  are  occasionally  used  by  the  queens  in  the  cases  of 
necessity. 


280  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXlv 


ii.  Hibernation. 

Thus  far  the  writer  has  never  been  fortunate  enough  to  find 
hibernating  queens  of  this  species  of  bumblebee.  Plath  (1927), 
however,  has  published  some  exceedingly  important  observations 
regarding  this  phase  of  their  biology  and  reports  that  under  nor- 
mal conditions  the  young  queens  of  this  species  hibernate  in  the 
soil  near  the  entrance  to  the  maternal  nest.  He  further  states 
that  from  thirteen  to  forty  queens  hibernated  in  a small  space  near 
the  entrance  of  a former  nest.  These  observations  confirm  a 
story  told  me  by  a young  eastern  entomologist,  whose  name  I have 
forgotten,  that  he  once  found  nearly  a hundred  queens  of  B.  im- 
patiens  hibernating  in  a small  area  in  sandy  soil  near  New  York 
City. 

12.  Domestication. 

This  species  is  well  adapted  for  domestication,  or  semi-domesti- 
cation. Experiments  reported  in  this  paper  and  elsewhere  (Fri- 
son,  1927a)  demonstrate  that  queens  of  B.  impatiens  can  be  in- 
duced to  start  colonies  in  artificial  nests  without  the  aid  of 
workers  and  that  the  queens  can  be  attracted  to  artificial  domi- 
ciles (Frison,  1926).  Additional  evidence  of  the  suitability  of 
this  species  for  domestication  has  been  published  by  Plath  (1923). 

In  contrast  to  B.  bimaculatus  which  is  also  easily  reared  under 
controlled  conditions  (Frison,  1928),  B.  impatiens  is  a most 
promising  species  from  the  standpoint  of  the  possible  economic 
exploitation  of  bumblebees.  The  colonies  of  this  species  are 
started  early  in  the  season  and  continue  until  fall,  the  species  has 
a wide  natural  distribution,  the  colonies  are  large,  and  the  bees 
are  well  suited  for  the  pollination  of  such  valuable  crops  as  red 
clover.  The  species  likewise  offers  exceptional  advantages  to  the 
laboratory  worker. 

D.  Bibliography. 

Cresson,  E.  T. — 1863a.  Fist  of  the  North  American  species 
of  Bombus  and  Apathus.  Proc.  Ent.  Soc.  Phila.,  Vol. 
II,  pp.  164-166. 

1863b.  Written  Communication.  Proc.  Ent.  Soc.  Phila., 
Vol.  II,  pp.  164-166. 

Ferton,  C. — 1901.  Notes  detachees  sur  l’instinct  des  Hymen- 
opteres  melliferes  et  ravisseurs  avec  la  description  de 
quelques  especes.  Ann.  Soc.  Ent.  France,  Vol.  70,  pp. 
84-85. 


Dec.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  281 


Franklin,  H.  J. — 1913.  The  Bombidae  of  the  New  World. 
Trans.  Amer.  Ent.  Soc.,  Vol.  XXXVIII,  pp.  177-486. 

Frison,  T.  H. — 1926.  Experiments  in  Attracting  Queen  Bum- 
blebees to  Artificial  Domiciles.  Journ.  Econ.  Ent.,  Vol. 
19,  No.  1,  pp.  1497155- 

1927a.  Experiments  in  rearing  Colonies  of  Bumblebees  in 
Artificial  Nests.  Biol.  Bull.,  Vol.  LII,  No.  1,  pp.  51-67. 

1927b.  The  Development  of  the  Castes  of  Bumblebees. 
Ann.  Ent.  Soc.  Amer.,  Vol.  XX,  No.  2,  pp.  156-180. 

1928.  A Contribution  to  the  Knowledge  of  the  Life  History 
of  Bremus  bimaculatus  (Cresson).  Ent.  Amer.,  Vol. 
VIII  (n.  s.),  No.  4,  pp.  159-223. 

Hoffer,  E. — 1882.  Die  Hummeln  Steirmarks.  Lebensge- 

schichte  und  Beschreibung  Derselben.  I Halfte.  31st 
Jahresberichte  der  Steirmarkischen  Landes — Oberreal- 
schule  in  Graz,  pp.  1-98. 

Howard,  L.  O. — 1891.  Remarks.  Insect  Life,  Vol.  Ill,  p. 

.431‘ 

v.  Ihering,  R. — 1903.  Biologische  Beobachtungen  an  brasil- 

ianischen  Bombus-Nestern.  Alleg.  Zeitschr.  Ent.,  Bd.  8, 
pp.  447-453- 

Jackson,  L.  O. — 1920.  Bumblebees  of  District  of  Columbia 
and  Vicinity.  Proc.  Ent.  Soc.  Wash.,  Vol.  22,  No.  7, 
pp.  162-168. 

Krausse,  A.  H. — 1910.  Bumblebee  Life  at  Sardinia.  Ent. 

Rundschau,  Jahrg.  27,  pp.  15-17;  Bumblebee  Life  at 
Sardinia  in  Winter.  Ibid.,  pp.  23-24. 

Kruger,  E. — 1917.  Zur  Systematik  der  mittelleuropaischen 
Hummeln.  Ent.  Mittell.,  Band  VI,  Nr.  1-3,  pp.  55-66. 

1920.  Beitrage  zur  Systematik  und  Morphologie  der  mittel- 
europaischen  Hummeln.  Zool.  Jahr.,  Abt.  f.  Syst.  Geog. 
u.  Biol,  der  Tiere,  Bd.  42,  pp.  289-464. 

Lutz,  F.  E.,  and  T.  D.  A.  Cockerell. — 1920.  Notes  on  the  Dis- 
tribution and  Bibliography  of  North  American  Bees  of 
the  Families  Apidae,  Meliponidae,  Bombidae,  Euglos- 
sidae,  and  Anthophoridae.  Bull.  Amer.  Mus.  Nat.  Hist., 
Vol.  42,  Art.  15,  pp.  491-641. 

Plath,  O.  E. — 1922.  Notes  on  the  Nesting  Habits  of  Several 
North  American  Bumblebees.  Psyche,  Vol.  29,  pp.  189- 
202. 


282  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXlv 


1923.  Breeding  Experiments  with  Confined  Bremus  (Bom- 
bus)  Queens.  Biol.  Bull.,  Vol.  XLV,  No.  6,  pp.  325- 
341  • 

1927.  Notes  on  the  Hibernation  of  Several  North  American 
Bumblebees.  Ann.  Ent.  Soc.  Amer.,  Vol.  XX,  No.  2, 
pp.  181-192. 

1927.  Natural  Grouping  of  Bremidae  (Bombidae)  with 
Special  Reference  to  Biological  Characters.  Biol.  Bull., 
Vol.  LII,  No.  5,  pp.  394-410. 

Putnam,  F.  W. — 1864.  Notes  on  the  Habits  of  Some  Species 
of  Humble  Bees.  Proc.  Essex  Inst.,  Salem,  Mass.,  Vol. 
4,  pp.  98-105. 

Rau,  P. — 1922.  Ecological  and  Behavior  Notes  on  Missouri 
Insects.  Trans.  Acad.  Sc.  St.  Louis,  Vol.  XXIV,  No.  7, 

pp.  40-41- 

Riley,  C.  V . — 1880.  Answer  to  Correspondent.  Amer.  Ent., 
Vol.  Ill  (2  ser.),  p.  107. 

Plates  XXIV-XXVI. 

Start  of  the  comb  of  Bremus  impatiens  under  con- 
trolled conditions,  showing:  a,  the  pollen  lump  con- 
taining the  first  egg  cells  and  eggs ; b,  the  artificial 
honey  pot.  May  2 (From  Biol.  Bull.,  1927,  p.  55). 
Comb  of  Bremus  impatiens  of  about  two  weeks’  de- 
velopment, showing : a,  several  eggs  in  the  same  cell ; 
b,  one  of  the  first  larval  cells ; c,  groove  caused  by  the 
queen  brooding  on  the  first  larval  cells.  May  10 
(From  Biol.  Bull.,  1927,  p.  57). 

Comb  of  Bremus  impatiens  of  about  six  weeks’  de- 
velopment, showing:  a,  wax-pollen  pots  for  the  stor- 
age of  honey;  b,  empty  cocoons  used  for  the  storage 
of  honey  and  pollen ; c,  groups  of  various-sized  larvae. 
June  10. 

Comb  of  Bremus  impatiens  after  the  climax  develop- 
ment has  passed,  showing:  a/ empty  cocoons;  b,  larval 
cells ; c,  wax-pollen  pots ; d,  wax-pollen  shield.  Sep- 
tember 6. 

Comb  of  Bremus  impatiens  in  large  observation  box. 
September  6. 

Wax-pollen  honey  pots  of  Bremus  impatiens . One  of 
these  was  the  first  honey  pot  constructed  by  the  queen. 
Enlarged  5 x. 

Queen  of  Bremus  impatiens  “ carding  ” materials  over 
comb. 


Figure  1. 
Figure  2. 

Figure  3. 

Figure  4. 

Figure  5. 
Figure  6. 

Figure  7. 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  XXIV,  No.  5 


Plate  XXIV 


Fig.  1 — Upper  = Fig.  2 — Lower 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  XXIV,  No.  5 


Plate  XXY 


Fig.  3 — Upper  = Fig.  4 — Lower 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  XXIV,  No.  5 


Plate  XXVI 


Fig.  5 — Upper.  Fig.  6 — Lower,  left.  Fig.  7 — Lower,  right 


286  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


ON  SOME  SPECIES  OF  PHAEDON, 

By  Chas.  Schaeffer,  Museum  of  the  Brooklyn  Institute, 
Brooklyn,  N.  Y. 

The  species  of  the  genus  Phaedon  have  never  before  been  thor- 
oughly investigated  and  the  correct  identification  of  some  of  the 
species  was  always  more  or  less  troublesome.  However,  this  has 
been  recently  remedied  by  the  publication  of  three  papers  in  the 
Pan-Pacific  Entomologist,  Vol.  V,  Nos.  i,  2,  and  4.  Two  of  these 
were  published  by  Mr.  Hatch  in  Nos.  1 and  2 in  which  he  de- 
scribed nine  new  species.  These  were  followed  in  No.  4 of  the 
same  publication  by  a paper  of  Mr.  Fall,  reviewing  critically  the 
two  papers  of  Mr.  Hatch  and  placing  eight  of  the  nine  species 
described  by  the  latter  as  new  in  synonymy  of  previously  de- 
scribed species.  Mr.  Fall  in  his  paper  gave  a good  synoptic  table 
for  the  identification  of  the  species  followed  by  notes  on  the  dif- 
ferent species  characterizing  also  the  species  omitted  by  Mr. 
Hatch  as  unknown  to  the  latter,  which  puts  this  formerly  trouble- 
some genus  finally  on  a sound  basis.  However,  the  identification 
of  two  of  our  species  as  the  European  cochleariae  and  armoraciae 
was  a mistake  and  I do  not  believe  that  the  two  occur  here  in 
North  America. 

Phaedon  carri  Hatch. 

Phaedon  cochleariae  Fall  not  Fab. 

This  species  on  comparisan  with  European  specimens  of  coch- 
leariae, with  which  it  has  been  recently  united  by  Mr.  Fall,  shows 
sufficient  differences  to  entitle  it  to  specific  standing. 

The  European  cochleariae  is  larger,  the  punctuation  of  all  the 
elytral  intervals  is  dual,  that  is,  densely  punctate  with  minute 
punctures  and  intermixed  distinctly  with  larger  punctures.  Color 
is  usually  not  of  much  importance,  but  no  typical  cochleariae  nor 
any  of  its  varieties  are  colored  as  carri,  that  is,  dark  bronze. 
Moreover,  the  coloration  of  the  legs  is  variable  in  carri,  the  ex- 
treme of  which,  one  specimen  from  New  York,  has  the  tarsi, 
tibiae,  apex  of  femora  and  the  first  four  antennal  joints  pale  yel- 
lowish, in  cochleariae  no  such  variations  are  known.  The  sides 
of  prothorax  in  carri  are  apparently  also  less  arcuate  and  more 
straight  than  in  cochleariae. 


Bee.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  287 


Phaedon  americanus  n.  sp. 

Phaedon  armoraciae  Hatch,  Fall  not  Linne. 

Oval,  moderately  convex,  color  dark  olive  green,  last  ven- 
tral segment  more  or  less  reddish.  Head  densely  minutely 
punctulate  with  larger  punctures  intermixed,  clypeus  sepa- 
rated from  front  by  an  entire  arcuate  impression.  Prothorax 
closely  minutely  punctulate  with  larger  punctures  intermixed, 
which  are  more  numerous  at  sides  than  on  disk,  where  they 
are  also  slightly  smaller  than  those  at  the  sides.  Elytra 
slightly  wider  at  base  than  the  basal  margin  of  prothorax; 
humeral  callus  prominent,  separated  internally  by  a rather 
deep  impression ; striae  represented  by  rows  of  moderate 
punctures ; intervals  densely  punctulate  with  very  minute 
punctures  with  larger  punctures  intermixed  on  the  first  in- 
terval, which  can  be  seen  also  more  or  less  on  the  other  in- 
tervals but  very  faintly,  ventral  segments  microreticulate  and 
punctate  with  moderately  large  punctures  which  are  irregu- 
larly distributed  over  the  first  segment  but  situated  near  api- 
cal margin  in  a single  transverse  row  on  the  following  seg- 
ments. Length  3.5  to  4 mm. 

Marquette,  Michigan  (type),  and  in  addition  to  the  localities 
mentioned  by  Mr.  Fall  in  his  paper  I have  specimens  from  Coeur 
d’Alene,  Idaho,  and  Kelso,  Washington.  The  color  varies  a little 
in  the  specimens  before  me,  some  are  slightly  less  darkly  colored, 
others  feebly  bluish  but  none  is  so  decidedly  blue  as  most  of  the 
specimens  of  armoraciae. 

This  is  the  species  identified  by  Mr.  Hatch  and  Mr.  Fall  as  the 
European  armoraciae.  While  they  are  closely  allied  the  punctua- 
tion of  the  elytral  intervals  at  once  separates  them.  In  armora- 
ciae all  the  intervals  have  a distinct  dual  punctuation  consisting 
of  very  minute  moderately  closely  placed  punctures  intermixed 
with  numerous  irregularly  placed  larger  punctures  which  some- 
what obscure  the  minute  punctuation.  In  americanus  the  larger 
punctures  when  present  on  the  intervals  are  not  very  distinct  and 
seem  to  form  an  irregular  row  at  middle  of  the  intervals. 


288  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


A NEW  GENUS  OF  SEMI-AQUATIC  HEMIPTERA. 

By  H.  B.  Hungerford,  Department  of  Entomology,  University, 
of  Kansas,  Lawrence. 

For  several  years  I have  had  in  my  possession  a bug  that  was 
collected  for  me  in  Ecuador  by  my  friend  Doctor  F.  X.  Williams. 
This  insect  to  which  I had  assigned  the  manuscript  name  Meso- 
veloidea  williamsi  genus  and  species  new  has  been  most  perplex- 
ing because  it  does  not  fit  satisfactorily  the  diagnosis  of  any  fam- 
ily and  I have  delayed  describing  it  for  that  reason.  Last  year 
I took  one  of  the  specimens  to  Doctor  Horvath  in  Budapest  who 
examined  it  briefly  and  made  the  suggestion  that  it  is  probably 
nearer  the  genus  Mesovelia  than  any  other.  These  two  interest- 
ing specimens  were  packed  in  with  some  Rhagovelias  between 
layers  of  white  velvet  in  a small  pasteboard  pill  box.  When  they 
were  mounted  they  were  found  to  have  lost  some  of  their  ap- 
pendages. A search  in  the  box  was  rewarded  with  the  discovery 
of  some  parts  which  I believe  must  have  belonged  to  these  insects. 
I am  submitting  drawings  of  these  parts.  Fortunately  some  of 
the  limbs  were  still  attached  to  the  insects. 

One  specimen  is  a winged  female  and  is  about  the  general  size 
and  shape  of  Mesovelia  bisignata  Uhler  but  in  our  keys  it  runs 
directly  to  Veliidae  because  of  the  anteapical  position  of  the  tarsal 
claws.  The  short  head  and  venation  of  the  hemelytra  might  place 
it  near  the  Microvelia  but  the  large  scutellum  and  abdomen  fash- 
ioned to  accommodate  an  ovipositor  for  the  insertion  of  the  eggs 
into  plant  tissues  promptly  negate  such  a kinship.  I am  aware, 
of  course,  that  the  ovipositor  may  not  be  sufficient  to  remove  it 
from  the  Veliidae  for  the  Rheumatobates  females  insert  their 
eggs  in  plant  tissues  while  all  the  other  Gerrids  known  to  me  do 
not.  Nevertheless  the  possesion  of  a large  exposed  scutellum  is 
not  a characteristic  of  either  the  Veliidae  or  the  Gerridae  and 
lead  me  to  assign  the  insect  tentatively  to  the  family  Mesoveliidae. 
My  specimens  are  not  entire  and  the  discovery  of  more  indi- 
viduals may  assist  in  determining  its  proper  relationship. 

Mesoveloidea  gen.  n. 

Small  bugs  having  general  shape  of  Mesovelia  but  with 
short  declivent  heads  and  the  antenniferous  tubercles  close 
to  the  eyes.  Beak  long,  slender  and  three  segmented.  Ocelli 


Dec.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  289 


of  winged  form  obsolete  or  lacking.  Scutellum  large,  tri- 
angular and  flat.  A single  median  scent  gland  pore  on  the 
dorsum  of  the  fourth  abdominal  segment  as  in  Mesovelia. 
Female  provided  with  an  ovipositor  for  inserting  eggs  in 
tissues.  Coxae  elongate — middle  pair  midway  between  front 
and  rear,  the  meta-coxae  longest.  Hind  femora  not  attaining 
tip  of  ovipositor  sheath.  Front  tarsi  three-segmented  with 
claws  anteapical.  Hemelytra  membranous  with  three  longi- 
tudinal veins  the  anterior  one  on  the  margin;  three  closed 
cells ; two  long  slender  cells  in  corium  the  second  one  slightly 
longer  than  the  first  and  nearly  divided ; the  distal  cell  reach- 
ing the  middle  of  the  membrane  and  ending  in  a strong  vein 
that  does  not  attain  the  margin  of  the  membrane. 

Mesoveloidea  williamsi  sp.  n. 

Size:  Length  3.8  mm. ; width  across  head  .75  mm. ; width 
across  humeri  1.32  mm. 

Color:  Head  and  anterior  one-fourth  of  the  pronotum  yel- 
low, remainder  of  pronotum  and  scutellum  metallic  bluish 
black  with  a coppery  sheen  in  sunlight.  Hemelytra  smoky 
with  prominent  veins  brown.  Thorax  and  abdominal  venter 
purplish  brown  the  thorax  covered  with  a gray  bloom.  The 
basal  abdominal  segments  smooth  and  shiny  the  genital  seg- 
ments pilose  and  lighter  in  color.  Beak,  antennae,  acetabula 
and  legs  yellow' — the  acetabula  slightly  lighter. 

Structural  characteristics : Head  with  short  vertex  and  de- 
clivent  front,  antennae  arising  close  to  margin  of  eyes.  First 
antennal  segment  fairly  stout,  slightly  curved  and  its  distal 
end  attaining  the  front  of  the  humeri,  as  long  as  the  lateral 
margin  of  the  pronotum.  Antennal  formula:  ist:2nd:3rd: 
4th  : 13  :2.6 13.3  : ? Eyes  small  and  coarsely  facetted.  Beak 
attaining  the  base  of  the  hind  coxae.  Humeri  of  pronotum 
very  slightly  raised,  lateral  margins  of  pronotum  straight, 
diverging  from  head  to  humeri,  the  margins  rounded.  Pro- 
notum nearly  flat.  Scutellum  triangular,  flat — both  clothed 
with  short  depressed  pale  hairs.  Scutellum  one-half  length 
of  pronotum  and  wider  at  base  than  long.  Last  dorsal  ab- 
dominal segment  broad  and  truncate  at  caudal  end.  Front 
legs  short.  Femur  :tibia  :tarsus : 14.5  13.6 : 1.6.  Front  tarsus 
with  terminal  segment  large  and  longer  than  the  other  two 
together.  Hind  femora  in  length  are  to  the  front  femora  as 
7.5 14.5,  and  in  diameter  much  greater.  Limbs  with  some 
hairs  but  few  spines. 

Described  from  two  female  specimens  from  Mera,  Ecuador, 

South  America  and  taken  by  Doctor  F.  X.  Williams  Feburary 


290  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXIv 


3,  1923.  This  species  is  the  type  of  the  new  genus  Mesoveloidea. 
Doctor  O.  M.  Reuter  in  his  “Neue  Beitrage  zur  Phylogenie  der 
Heteropteren  Familien”  removed  the  Mesoveliidae  from  a posi- 
tion with  the  families  of  semi-aquatics  to  one  between  the  Re- 
duviidae  and  Nabidae.  This  position  has  been  followed  by  Van 
Duzee  in  his  splendid  catalog  and  by  others  in  this  country  who 
have  published  manuals  on  the  Hemiptera.  Nevertheless,  I be- 
lieve this  form  to  be  a connecting  link  between  the  Mesoveliidae 
and  the  Veliidae. 

Concerning  the  region  of  Ecuador  in  which  these  most  interest- 
insects  were  found,  I am  pleased  to  quote  from  a letter  from  my 
friend  Doctor  Williams : “ Leaving  Banos  which  is  situated  at 
6000  feet  on  the  east  slope  of  the  Andes,  the  trail  further  east  lies 
along  the  Pastasa  river  as  far  as  Mera,  at  4,000  feet.  At  first  the 
walking  is  pleasant  as  the  path  lies  among  granite  or  granite-like 
rocks.  Here  are  some  very  large  and  beautiful  terrestrial  orchids, 
and  as  one  descends,  the  tropics  are  becoming  more  and  more  ap- 
parent, for  one  can  hardly  call  Banos  tropical.  Mera  is  a village 
of  some  10  houses  perched  high  up  on  the  banks  of  the  more 
or  less  navigable  Pastasa,  and  is  buried  in  virgin  forest.  It  is  an 
exceedingly  wet  region  and  the  walking  is  mainly  execrable.  The 
palms  about  here  have  numerous  rigid  prop  roots  to  meet  the 
moist  conditions.  Little  surface  water  bugs  are  found  every- 
where, even  in  footprints.  Trees  are  loaded  with  epiphytes, 
particularly  Araceae  and  Bromeliaceae.  Some  of  the  palms  are 
100  feet  tall  and  only  8 or  9 inches  thick  at  the  prop  roots.” 

Plate  XXVII. 

A New  Genus  of  Semi-Aquatic  Hemiptera. 


Figure 

I. 

Front  leg  of  Mesoveloidea  williamsi  genus  and  spe- 
cies new. 

Figure 

II. 

Side  view  of  female.  Note  the  insertion  of  antenna 
below  the  eye  and  the  character  of  the  abdomen. 

Figure 

III. 

Middle  leg. 

Figure 

IV. 

Hind  leg. 

Figure 

V. 

Hind  tarsus. 

Figure 

VI. 

Mesoveloidea  williamsi  genus  and  species  new. 
Dorsal  view.  Note  the  short  head,  the  flat 
scutellum,  the  wing  venation  and  the  dorsal  ab- 
dominal scent  gland  pore. 

All  of  the  above  drawings,  except  Figure  V,  are  made  to  the 
same  scale  by  Miss  Kathleen  Doering. 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  XXIV,  No.  5 


Plate  XXYII 


1 Front  leg 


5 Hind  tarsus 


292  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


NEW  NORTH  AMERICAN  SPECIES  OF  RHYNCHITES 
(COLEOPTERA). 

By  H.  C.  Fall,  Tyngsboro,  Mass. 

Rhynchites  quadripennis  n.  sp. 

Form  stout,  the  elytra  nearly  square ; above  shining  green 
with  bronze  or  golden  reflections  ;*  beneath  black,  feebly 
greenish ; beak,  legs  and  antennae  black ; pubescence  black, 
erect. 

Beak  and  head  strongly  punctate  and  channeled,  the  for- 
mer subequal  in  length  to  the  head  and  thorax,  the  head  nar- 
row, subconical,  a deep  furrow  between  the  eyes,  the  latter 
flatly  convex  and  not  prominent,  separated  on  the  front  by 
about  two-thirds  their  longest  diameter. 

Prothorax  as  wide  as  long,  a little  widened  posteriorly,  a 
feeble  apical  constriction,  sides  moderately  arcuate ; disk 
moderately  closely  punctate  and  with  an  abbreviated  median 
impressed  line. 

Elytra  broad,  subquadrate,  twice  as  wide  and  slightly  more 
than  twice  as  long  as  the  prothorax;  strial  punctures  coarse, 
intervals  each  with  a single  series  of  smaller  but  distinct 
punctures.  Length  (exclusive  of  beak)  3-3.5  mm.;  width 
1.75-2  mm. 

Texas.  Described  from  two  examples,  probably  males,  sent 
me  many  years  ago  as  hirtus.  If  my  memory  serves  me  they  were 
collected  by  Rauterberg  and  probably  near  New  Braunfels. 

In  general  appearance  this  species  is  most  like  eximius  and 
hirtus.  It  agrees  nearly  with  the  former  in  color  but  differs  de- 
cisively by  the  very  long  indexed  tooth  of  the  tarsal  claws.  Hirtus 
has  similarly  toothed  claws  but  the  general  form  is  more  elongate, 
the  color  deep  blue,  the  eyes  more  distant,  the  head  without  the 
deep  interocular  channel.  In  quadripennis  the  elytra  are  only 
about  1/10  longer  than  wide;  in  eximius  the  length  is  about 
while  in  hirtus  it  is  2/5  to  1/2  greater  than  the  width. 

Rhynchites  delectus  n.  sp. 

Small,  rather  stout,  conspicuously  widened  posteriorly; 
viridi-  or  cupreoaeneous,  shining,  pubescence  fine,  grayish, 
semirecumbent. 

Beak  1/4  to  1/3  longer  than  the  prothorax  in  the  male, 
nearly  as  long  as  the  elytra  as  a rule  in  the  female ; aeneous 
at  base,  piceous  and  often  purpurescent  beyond  the  antennal 
insertion;  flattened  and  finely  strigate  between  the  antennal 


Bee.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  293 


fossae,  more  coarsely  longitudinally  rugulose  in  apical  two- 
thirds.  Head  coarsely  closely  punctate  without  well  defined 
median  channel  or  fovea  between  the  eyes,  the  latter  sepa- 
rated by  their  own  vertical  diameter  or  slightly  less. 

Prothorax  slightly  longer  than  wide  (as  wide  as  long  in 
some  females),  sides  evenly  arcuate,  base  and  apex  subequal; 
punctures  coarse,  deep  and  densely  placed,  the  narrow  shin- 
ing intervals  devoid  of  finer  punctules. 

Elytra  twice  as  long  as  the  thorax,  distinctly  inflated  poste- 
riorly, where  they  are  nearly  twice  as  wide  as  the  latter ; strial 
punctures  rather  coarse,  intervals  wider  than  the  striae,  each 
with  a series  of  fine  punctures.  Length  1.85-2.5  mm.;  width 
1:1-1.35  mm. 

Southern  California:  Pomona,  Pasadena,  Ojai  Valley,  Feb.— 
April.  The  type  is  a male  from  the  first-named  locality  and  bears 
date  Feb.  22. 

This  little  species  is  most  nearly  allied  to  aureus,  which  occurs 
also  in  the  same  region.  Aureus  is  a rather  larger  and  narrower 
species,  the  eyes  much  more  distant,  the  prothorax  with  numerous 
fine  interstitial  punctures,  the  legs  pale  red. 

Rhynchites  aureus  var.  levirostris  n.  var. 

Agrees  with  aureus  in  form,  size,  pubescence,  eyes  and  dual 
punctuation  of  the  thorax,  but  differs  in  being  of  a deep  blue  color 
with  dark  rufous  legs,  the  beak  polished  and  comparatively 
smooth,  there  being  only  a few  relatively  fine  punctures  and  no 
longitudinal  furrows  or  strigosity.  Length  2.5  mm.;  width  1.25 
mm. 

A single  male  taken  by  the  writer  in  the  San  Bernardino  Mts., 
California,  July  14,  1892.  With  more  material  this  form  may 
prove  to  be  specifically  distinct. 

Rhynchites  insularis  n.  sp. 

Nearly  related  to  aureus  but  apparently  distinct  by  the  fol- 
lowing characters : 

The  form  is  a little  more  elongate,  strikingly  so  in  the 
male  type ; the  beak  is  very  much  shorter  sex  for  sex,  being 
in  the  male  only  as  long  and  in  the  female  but  little  longer 
than  the  thorax ; the  eyes  in  the  male  are  notably  more  con- 
vex and  prominent,  the  prothorax  without  fine  interstitial 
punctuation;  antennae  pale  rufous  with  black  club;  strial 
punctures  of  the  elytra  very  coarse,  the  intervals  almost 
everywhere  narrower  than  the  striae.  In  aureus  the  fine  in- 
terstial  punctures  of  the  prothorax  are  a conspicuous  feature 


294  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.  XXIV 


of  the  sculpture,  the  antennae  are  dark  metallic  and  the  ely- 
tral  interspaces  are  distinctly  wider  than  the  striae.  Length 
(male  type)  2.35  mm.;  width  1 mm. 

Described  from  a single  pair,  the  male  taken  by  myself  on 
Santa  Catalina  Island,  California,  July  11,  1894.  The  female  is 
from  San  Clemente  Island  and  differs  from  the  male  only  in  the 
slightly  longer  beak,  smaller  eyes  and  somewhat  less  slender  form. 
As  in  the  average  aureus  they  are  both  metallic  bronze  with  pale 
legs. 


A Note  on  the  Habits  of  Hylemyia  trivittata  Stein — During 
September  specimens  of  an  anthomyid  fly  collected  at  Elba,  N. 
Y.,  were  forwarded  to  me  for  identification  by  Dr.  Hugh  Glas- 
gow. They  proved  to  be  Hylemyia  trivittata  Stein.  These  flies 
were  reported  by  Mr.  Felix  to  be  laying  their  eggs  on  the  im- 
mature heads  of  wild  lettuce  in  which  the  maggots  fed  on  hatch- 
ing. The  plants  recorded  by  Mr.  Felix  as  infested  were  Lactuca 
canadensis,  L.  spicata,  L.  scariola,  and  L.  scariola  var.  integrata. 
In  the  latter  species  50  per  cent  of  the  seed  heads  was  destroyed 
by  what  is  believed  to  be  injury  by  the  maggot.  Such  informa- 
tion may  be  viewed  with  mingled  feelings  in  the  possibility  it  pos- 
sesses for  good  or  for  evil  for  many  of  us.  All  power  to  the  fly 
if  it  can  help  to  reduce  such  common  weeds  around  our  gardens, 
but  it  will  be  a sad  day  when  it  is  found  that  the  seed  heads  of 
cultivated  lettuce  are  also  attacked.  The  fly  is  recorded  by  Stein 
as  occurring  in  Washington  State,  and  it  is  a common  species  in 
Eastern  North  America. — H.  C.  Huckett,  Riverhead,  N.  Y. 


Cryptocephalus  Tinctus  Lee. — My  second  specimen  of  this 
species  turned  up  at  Acton,  Mass.,  on  Sept.  15,  1929.  It  was 
taken  by  sweeping  and  the  most  conspicuous  plants  were  low 
clusters  of  willow  and  oak.  One  specimen  was  taken  in  Sher- 
born,  Mass.,  on  Sept.  28,  1913,  by  sweeping  bushes. — C.  A.  Frost, 
Framingham,  Mass. 


Dec.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  295 


THE  CRANE-FLIES  OF  NEW  YORK:  FOURTH 
SUPPLEMENTARY  LIST. 

By  Charles  P.  Alexander,  Amherst,  Mass. 

The  third  supplementary  list  of  the  crane-flies  of  New  York 
was  published  in  1929  (Bulletin  Brooklyn  Ent.  Soc.,  24:  22-29). 
Since  that  date,  a number  of  additional  species  have  been  added 
to  the  record.  I wish  here  to  list  these  species,  to  describe  two 
novelties  that  are  based  partly  on  New  York  records,  and  to  give 
a brief  account  of  the  Tipulid  fauna  of  the  Taconic  State  Park. 
The  additions  to  the  list  of  New  York  crane-flies  are  as  follows: 

307  Tipula  mainensis  Alexander  (Proc.  Acad.  Nat.  Sci.  Phila- 

delphia,  1915:  475-476;  1915). 

Hamilton  County : Blue  Mountain  Lake,  August  6,  1929 
(G.  C.  Crampton). 

308  Limonia  ( Dicranomyia ) iowensis  (Rogers)  (Florida  En- 

tomologist, 9:  1 50-1 52;  1926). 

Erie  County:  Hamburg,  October  16,  1910  (M.  C.  Van 
Duzee). 

Columbia  County:  Taconic  State  Park,  dead  in  spider’s 
webs,  August,  1929  (C.  P.  Alexander). 

Orange  County:  Tuxedo  Park,  August  27-28,  1928  (Cur- 
ran and  Edwards). 

309  Limonia  (Dicranomyia)  pudicoides  sp.  n. 

Hamilton  County:  Lake  Piseco,  altitude  1700  feet,  Sep- 
tember 2,  1929  (C.  P.  Alexander). 

310  Limonia  ( Geranomyia ) distincta  Doane. 

Fulton  County:  In  a sphagnum  bog,  near  Canada  Lake, 
altitude  1700  feet,  June  25,  1928  (C.  P.  Alexander). 

31 1 Pedicia  margarita  sp.  n. 

Columbia  County:  Taconic  State  Park,  August  12,  1929 
(C.  P.  Alexander). 

312  Adelphomyia  pleuralis  Dietz  (Trans.  American  Ent. 

Soc.,  47:  251-252;  1921). 

Orange  County:  Tuxedo  Park,  June  30,  1928  (C.  H. 
Curran). 

313  Dactylolabis  sup ernumer aria  Alexander  (Ent.  News, 

40:  46;  1929). 

Essex  County:  Wilmington  Notch,  June  13,  1927  (C.  P. 
Alexander) . 


296  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


314  Limnophila  ( Dicranophragma ) angustula  Alexander 

(Bull.  Brooklyn  Ent.  Soc.,  24:  190-191 ; 1929). 

Columbia  County:  Taconic  State  Park,  August  12,  1929 
(C.  P.  Alexander). 

Cortland  County:  Cincinnatus,  July  20,  1916  (C.  P.  Alex- 
ander) . 

Fulton  County:  Woodworth’s  Lake,  July  7,  1916  (C.  P. 
Alexander) . 

Tompkins  County:  Ithaca,  August  12,  1910  (C.  P.  Alex- 
ander). 

315  Limnophila  ( Ephelia ) sahrina  Alexander  (Bull.  Brook- 

lyn Ent.  Soc.,  24:  189-190;  1929). 

Essex  County:  Keene  Valley,  May  26,  1920  (H.  Not- 
man). 

316  Limnophila  ( Prionolabis ) walleyi  Alexander  (Bull. 

Brooklyn  Ent.  Soc.,  24:  187-188;  1929). 

Rensselaer  County:  Brookview,  June  15,  1923  (C.  P. 
Alexander) . 

317  Erioptera  ( Erioptera ) viridula  Alexander.  (Can.  Ent., 

41  : 20;  1929). 

Fulton  County : ‘Masten’s  Woods,  Gloversville,  altitude 
900  feet,  June  27,  1928  (C.  P.  Alexander). 

Hamilton  County:  Ox-bow  Lake,  altitude  1700  feet,  June 
25,  1928  (C.  P.  Alexander). 

318  Molophilus  laricicola  Alexander  (Journ.  New  York 

Ent.  Soc.,  37:  55-56;  1929). 

Fulton  County:  In, a sphagnum  bog,  near  Canada  Lake, 
altitude  1700  feet,  June  25,  1928  (C.  P.  Alexander). 

Crane-flies  taken  at  the  Taconic  State  Park,  Columbia  County. 

The  Taconic  Mountains  undoubtedly  support  a very  rich  and 
varied  crane-fly  fauna.  On  September  12,  1928,  Dr.  Crampton, 
Mrs.  Alexander  and  myself  spent  part  of  the  day  at  the  Park  and 
at  the  beautiful  Bashbish  Falls  just  over  the  line  in  Massachu- 
setts. At  this  time  we  decided  to  spend  a longer  period  at  the 
Park  in  1929,  a plan  that  was  consummated  in  August,  when  Mrs. 
Alexander  and  I camped  at  the  Park  from  August  9 to  24.  The 
unprecedented  droughts  had  made  the  entire  country  unnaturally 
dry  and  the  number  of  crane-fly  species  was  undoubtedly  much 
reduced.  I have  included  all  records  of  species  available  and 
have  added  a few  supplementary  records  of  species  secured  by 


Bee.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Bi'ooklyn  Entomological  Society  297 


Dr.  Crampton  on  a two-day  trip  to  the  Park  on  May  25th  and 
26th,  1929. 

The  Bashbish  stream  is  a densely  shaded,  rushing  torrent  of 
considerable  size,  plunging  over  tumbled  rocks  and  boulders. 
The  dominant  forest  cover  is  hemlock  and  yellow  birch,  with 
much  mountain  maple  and  striped  maple.  The  steep  mountain 
sides  are  densely  covered  with  yew,  from  which  many  of  the 
species  listed  were  swept.  The  stream  flows  between  Cedar  and 
Bashbish  Mountains,  between  altitudes  of  700  and  900  feet. 
Most  of  the  crane-flies  recorded  were  swept  from  the  steep 
springy  slopes  of  Bashbish  Mountain,  at  or  close  to  the  foot- 
path to  the  Falls. 

Tipula  ( Cinctotipula ) algonquin  Alexander.  Aug.  9;  a few  on 
lower  slopes  of  mountains. 

Tipula  bella  Loew.  Aug.  17,  along  stream. 

Tipula  cine  tic  ornis  Doane.  Sunset  Rock,  altitude  1200-1600 
feet,  Aug.  15. 

Tipula  fragilis  Loew.  Sept.  12,  1928. 

Tipula  hermannia  Alexander.  Common,  August  10-20;  Sun- 
set Rock,  altitude  1000  feet,  Aug.  15. 

Tipula  hebes  Loew.  Common,  August  12;  Sunset  Rock,  alti- 
tude 1000  feet,  Aug.  15. 

Tipula  trivittata  Say.  Aug.  13. 

Tipula  umbrosa  Loew.  Aug.  12. 

N ephrotoma  brevioric  ornis  Doane.  Aug.  13. 

Nephrotoma  ferruginea  Fabricius.  August  10-20. 

N ephrotoma  incurva  Loew.  Aug.  15. 

Oropeza  albipes  Johnson.  In  crannies  of  cliffs,  Aug.  9-20. 

Oropeza  obscura  polita  Johnson.  In.  crannies,  August  10-20. 

Limonia  ( Limonia ) cinctipes  (Say).  Aug.  12. 

Limonia  ( Limonia ) globithorax  (Osten  Sacken).  May  25- 
26,  1929. 

Limonia  ( Limonia ) pubipennis  (Osten  Sacken).  Aug.  12- 
20;  Sept.  1 2,  1928. 

Limonia  ( Limonia ) simulans  (Walker).  Aug.  14. 

Limonia  ( Limonia ) solitaria  (Osten  Sacken).  Aug.  10. 

Limonia  ( Discobola ) argus  (Say).  Sunset  Rock,  altitude  1000 
feet,  Aug.  15. 

Limonia  ( Rhipidia ) maculata  (Meigen).  Aug.  17. 

Limonia  ( Dicranomyia ) humidicola  (Osten  Sacken).  ( badia 
of  authors,  not  Walker).  Aug.  15-20;  Sept.  12,  1928. 


298  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXlv 


Limonia  ( Dicranomyia ) iowensis  (Rogers).  Dead  in  spiders 
webs,  Aug. 

Limonia  ( Dicranomyia ) spinigera  Alexander.  Sept.  12,  1928. 

Limonia  ( Geranomyia ) diversa  (Osten  Sacken).  Aug.  12; 
Sept.  12,  1928. 

Helius  flavipes  (Macquart).  Aug.  9-12. 

Dicranoptycha  septentrionalis  Alexander.  Sunset  Rock,  alti- 
tude 1500  feet,  Aug.  15. 

Pedicia  margarita  sp.  n.  Aug.  12 ; the  conditions  under  which 
this  beautiful  new  species  were  taken  have  been  discussed 
under  its  description. 

Tricyphona  auripennis  (Osten  Sacken).  May  25;  one  male, 
resting  ofi  wet  face  of  cliff  (Crampton)  ; the  left  wing  of  this 
specimen  has  cell  M2  open  by  the  atrophy  of  m,  the  right 
wing  being  normal. 

Tricyphona  inconstans  (Osten  Sacken).  Aug.  20. 

Amalopina  flaveola  (Osten  Sacken).  Aug.  10-15. 

Rhaphidolahis  cayuga  Alexander.  May  25-26,  1929  (Cramp- 
ton)  . 

Rhaphidolahis  rubescens  Alexander.  September  12,  1928. 

Rhaphidolahis  tenuipes  Osten  Sacken.  Very  abundant  along 
streams,  Aug.  9-20;  Sept.  12,  1928. 

Adelpliomyia  americana  Alexander.  Sept.  12,  1928. 

Ula  elegans  Osten  Sacken.  Sunset  Rock,  altitude  1500  feet, 
Aug.  15;  May  25-26,  1929  (Crampton). 

Ula  paupera  Osten  Sacken.  Aug.  9-12. 

Pseudolimnophila  contempta  (Osten  Sacken).  Aug.  10. 

Limnophila  ( Dicrano phragma ) angustula  Osten  Sacken.  Aug. 
12. 

Limnophila  ( Limnophila ) hrevifurca  Osten  Sacken.  May  25- 
26. 

Pilaria  tenuipes  (Say).  Aug.  13. 

Penthoptera  alhitarsis  Osten  Sacken.  Common,  Aug.  13-20. 

Eriocera  brachycera  Osten  Sacken.  Along  stream,  both  sexes, 
Aug.  17. 

Eriocera  spinosa  Osten  Sacken.  Aug.  12. 

Elephantomyia  westwoodi  Osten  Sacken.  Alander  Mt.,  alti- 
tude 1000  feet,  Aug.  16. 

Cladura  flavoferruginea  Osten  Sacken.  Aug. ; dead  in  spider’s 
webs. 

Lipsothrix  sylvia  (Alexander).  May  25-26,  1929  (Cramp- 
ton) . 


Dec.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  299 


Gonomyia  ( Gonomyia ) bidentata  Alexander.  Aug.  12. 

Gonomyia  ( Gonomyia ) subcinerea  (Osten  Sacken).  May 
25-26,  1929. 

Erioptera  ( Hoplolabis ) armata  Osten  Sacken.  Aug.  14-16. 

Erioptera  ( Mesocyphona ) caloptera  (Say).  Aug.  20. 

Erioptera  (Ilisia)  venusta  Osten  Sacken.  Aug.;  dead  in  spid- 
er’s webs. 

Erioptera  ( Erioptera ) septemtrionis  Osten  Sacken.  Aug.  9- 
20. 

Erioptera  ( Empeda ) stigmatica  (Osten  Sacken).  Aug.  9-15; 
May  25-26. 

Ormosia  bilineata  Dietz.  May  25-26,  1929. 

Ormosia  meigenii  (Osten  Sacken).  May  25-26,  1929. 

Ormosia  monticola  (Osten  Sacken).  Aug.  12-20. 

Ormosia  nimbipennis  Alexander.  Aug.  9-20;  Sept.  12,  1928. 

Ormosia  notmani  Alexander.  May  25-26,  1929. 

Ormosia  rubella  (Osten  Sacken).  Sunset  Rock,  altitude  1000 
feet,  Aug.  15. 

Molophilus  hirtipennis  (Osten  Sacken).  Aug.  17. 

Molophilus  pubipennis  (Osten  Sacken).  Aug.  9-15. 

Molophilus  quadrispinosus  Alexander.  May  25,  1929  (Cramp- 
ton). 

Limonia  (Dicranomyia)  pudicoides  sp.  n. 

General  coloration  pale  yellow,  including  the  scapal  seg- 
ments of  antennae ; wings  pale  yellow,  the  stigma  lacking ; 
male  hypopygium  with  the  rostral  prolongation  of  the  ventral 
dististyle  a short  blunt  lobe  that  is  entirely  pale,  shorter  than 
the  rostral  spines. 

Male. — Length  about  6-6.5  mm. ; wing,  6-6.5. 

Rostrum  pale,  the  palpi  only  a little  darker.  Antennae 
with  the  scape  obscure  brownish  yellow,  the  flagellum  a little 
darker.  Head  yellow,  the  anterior  vertex  narrow,  more  or 
less  infuscated. 

Thorax  uniform  reddish  yellow,  the  pleura  slightly  clearer 
yellow.  Halteres  pale.  Legs  yellow,  the  outer  segments 
only  slightly  darkened.  Wings  pale  yellow,  without  stigma ; 
veins  darker  yellow.  Venation:  .SVj  ending  opposite  the 
origin  of  Rs,  Sc2  obsolete ; cell  1st  M2  closed ; m and  the 
basal  deflection  of  M3  pale,  without  macrotrichia. 

Abdominal  tergites  brownish  yellow,  the  hypopygium  and 
sternites  clearer  yellow.  Male  hypopygium  with  the  rostral 
prolongation  of  the  ventral  dististyle  very  short  and  blunt, 


300  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXlv 


entirely  pale,  bearing  two  relatively  long  spines  that  are 
placed  close  together  at  the  summit  of  the  prolongation; 
rostral  spines  exceeding  the  prolongation  in  length.  Dorsal 
dististyle  very  strongly  curved,  the  extreme  apex  a small 
hook.  Gonapophyses  with  the  mesal  apical  angle  produced 
into  a slender  rod,  terminating  in  an  acute  point,  separated 
from  the  main  body  of  the  apophysis  by  a deep  and  narrow 
U-shaped  notch. 

Habitat:  Eastern  North  America. 

Holotype,  Allardt,  Fentress  Co.,  Tennessee,  altitude  1650 
feet,  August  9,  1924  (J.  S.  Rogers)  ; Coll.  No.  1 22. 

Paratopotypes,  $ §,  July  21 — August  9,  1924;  paratypes, 
Clear  Fork,  near  Burrville,  Morgan  Co.,  Tennessee,  altitude  1200 
feet,  June  19,  1924  ( J.  S.  Rogers)  ; Coll.  No.  5 ; 1 Fake  Piseco, 
Hamilton  Co.,  New  York,  altitude  1700  feet,  September  2,  1929 
(C.  P.  Alexander)  ; 1 Fepreau  Harbor,  New  Brunswick,  Sep- 
tember 21,  1929  (Donald  Galbraith).  Type  returned  to  Pro- 
fessor Rogers. 

This  new  species  bears  a conspicuous  superficial  resemblance 
to  the  species  that  has  been  passing  in  collections  as  L.  (L.) 
pudica  (Osten  Sacken),  differing  very  conspicuously  in  the  de- 
tails of  structure  of  the  male  hypopygium. 

Pedicia  margarita  sp.  n. 

Related  to  albivitta  Walker;  size  small;  dark  markings  on 
the  wing  narrow,  the  seam  along  vein  Cu  ending  at  near  mid- 
length of  the  distal  section  of  Cux. 

Male. — Fength  about  20-22  mm. ; wing,  20-22  mm. 

Female. — Fength  about  24  mm.;  wing,  21.5-22  mm. 

Rostrum  gray;  palpi  black.  Antennae  16-segmented, 
brown  throughout;  flagellar  segments  gradually  decreasing 
in  size  outwardly;  verticils  longer  than  the  segments,  uni- 
laterally arranged.  Head  gray,  the  vertical  tubercle  small. 

Mesonotal  praescutum  gray,  with  four  very  pale  reddish 
brown  stripes,  the  intermediate  pair  more  confluent  behind; 
a dusky  point  immediately  behind  the  transverse  suture ; 
scutum  similar,  the  lobes  with  scarcely  indicated  reddish 
brown  areas  ; scutellum  pale  yellow  ; postnotum  gray  with  two 
contiguous  oval  reddish  brown  areas  that  occupy  the  pos- 
terior third.  Pleura  gray,  the  dorso-pleural  region  narrowly 
dark  brown.  Halteres  pale,  the  knobs  dusky.  Fegs  with 
the  coxae  light  gray,  the  outer  ends  and  trochanters  more  or 
less  infuscated ; femora  yellow,  the  tips  conspicuously  black- 


I)ec.;t9~£9  ' Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  EiitOWi'olUgical  Society  301 


ened,  the  amount  subequal  on  all  the  4egs ; tibiae  obscure 
.yellow,  the  bases  very  narrowly,  the  tips  more  broadly  black- 
ened; tarsi  passing  into  brown.  Wings  relatively  narrow, 
whitish  subhyaline,  with  the  usual  dark  .pattern  of  the  genus; 
^costal  margin  brownish  yellow,  milch  .paler  than  the  re- 
mainder of  the  dark  pattern;  seams  along  Cu  and  the  cord 
unusually  narrow,  the  former  ending  at  about  midlength  of 
'the  distal  section  of  Culf  not  attaining  the  wing-margin. 

Abdominal  tergites  gray,  paler  gray  laterally,  darker 
brownish  gray  medially,  the  segments  variegated  with  light 
<orange  castaneous  near  posterior  margin';  median  dark  stripe 
narrowed  outwardly,  becoming  blackened  and  obsolete  on 
fergite  seven;  sternites  chiefly  orange,  gray  laterally,  the 
outer  segments  becoming  more  pruinose.  Male  hypopygium 
with  the  dististyle  elongate,  a little  dilated  at  outer  end,  at 
the  widest  portion  with  a small  group  of  black  setae  on  inner 
face.  Basistyle  produced  dorsad  into  a flattened  black  blade, 
f he  apex  truncate. 

Habitat:  Northeastern  North  America, 

Holotype,  Orient  Springs,  Hampshire  Co.,  Massachusetts, 
.'attitude  375  .feet,  July  29,  1929  (C.  P.  Alexander). 

Allotopotype,  J. 

Paratqpotypes,  2 ; additional  material  in  the  British  Mu- 

seum, collected  in  early  August,  1928,  by  Edwards  and  Rogers ; 
paratypes,  1 Bashbish  Falls,  Berkshire  Co.,  Massachusetts,  al- 
titude about  900  feet,  August  20,  1929  (M.  M.  Alexander)  ; 1 J1, 
Taconic  Park,  Columbia  Co.,  New  York,  altitude  about  750  feet, 
August  1 2,  1929  (C.  P.  Alexander).  Type  in  the  author’s  col- 
lection. 

Pedicia  margarita  is  named  in  honor  of  my  wife,  who  collected 
one  of  the  type  specimens.  The  species  is  quite  distinct  from 
albivitta,  being  smaller  in  both  sexes,  with  the  dark  wing-pattern 
more  restricted  and  with  an  incomplete  darkened  spur  along  vein 
Cu  that  does  not  reach  the  wing-margin.  The  details  of  structure 
of  the  male  hypopygium  are  similarly  distinct.  The  three  species 
of  Pedicia  inhabiting  Northeastern  North  America  may  be  separ- 
ated by  means  of  the  following  key,  based  on  the  pattern  of  the 
wing: 

1.  Dark  seam  along  vein  Cu  not  extending  distad  beyond  the 

approximate  level  of  the  cord contermina  Walker 

Dark  seam  along  vein  Cu  extended  distad  onto  the  outer  sec- 
tion of  vein  C'mx . . . ..........  — ........... 2 


302  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


2.  Dark  seams  along  Cu  and  the  cord  broad,  the  former  extend- 
ing the  entire  length  of  the  vein,  attaining  the  wing-margin. 

alhivitta  Walker 

Dark  seams  along  Cu  and  the  cord  narrow,  the  former  ending 
at  about  midlength  of  the  outer  section  of  vein  Cu1}  not  at- 
taining the  wing-margin margarita  sp.  n. 

The  material  upon  which  this  species  is  based  was  first  recog- 
nized as  being  an  undescribed  species  by  Mr.  Fred  W.  Edwards, 
of  the  British  Museum  of  Natural  History,  who  collected  speci- 
mens at  the  Orient  Springs,  in  company  with  Professor  J.  Speed 
Rogers  and  the  author.  Mr.  Edwards  suspicions  at  the  time  that 
this  smaller,  more  delicate  Pedicia  was  a distinct  species  from 
alhivitta  were  confirmed  upon  comparison  with  the  type-speci- 
men of  the  latter  in  the  British  Museum.  At  the  Orient  Springs, 
the  types  of  margarita  occurred  on  a springy  hillside,  shaded  by 
hemlock  and  yellow  birch.  This  particular  restricted  station  sup- 
ports all  three  of  the  regional  species  of  Pedicia,  contermina  being 
the  earliest,  flying  in  May  and  June.  In  July  and  August,  al- 
hivitta and  the  present  species  are  on  the  wing,  sometimes  being 
found  flying  together.  On  July  29,  1929,  I made  a special  trip 
to  this  station  in  order  to  secure  further  material  of  margarita 
and  hard  collecting  during  the  entire  afternoon  produced  four 
individuals  of  the  new  species  but  no  alhivitta.  At  Taconic  Park, 
along  the  Bashbish  stream,  the  additional  specimens  of  margarita 
here  recorded  were  found  under  conditions  that  were  very  like 
those  obtaining  at  Orient  Springs,  the  stream  being  shaded  chiefly 
by  hemlock  and  yellow  birch  and  fed  by  abundant  springs  from 
the  adjoining  mountain  side.  The  specimen  taken  by  Mrs.  Alex- 
ander was  at  the  great  pool  at  the  foot  of  Bashbish  Falls,  the 
specimen  being  observed  to  fly  lazily  across  the  pool  from  a nearby 
wet  cliff. 


Bee.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  303 


BEES  OF  THE  SUB-FAMILY  OSMINAE  IN  THE  COL- 
LECTION OF  THE  BRIGHAM  YOUNG 
UNIVERSITY.1 

By  D.  Elden  Beck. 

It  is  always  necessary  in  beginning  a study  of  the  fanua  of  a 
region  to  collect  and  determine  the  species  of  the  group  or  groups 
being  considered.  Since  very  little  has  been  published  on  the 
Hymenoptera  of  the  Great  Basin  the  writer  feels  that  the  follow- 
ing list  of  thirty-six  species  of  Osminae  will  be  of  interest  to 
students  of  the  Apoidea.  The  writer  has  under  way  a mor- 
phological study  of  various  species  of  many  genera  of  the 
Apoidea. 

The  species  discussed  in  this  paper  are  specimens  collected 
from  Utah  and  contiguous  states,  most  of  which  are  within  the 
Great  Basin  Region.  So  far  as  the  writer  has  been  able  to  de- 
termine only  fifteen  species  of  Osminae  have  been  reported  from 
Utah,  these  by  Professor  T.  D.  A.  Cockerell  and  Miss  Grace  A. 
Sandhouse  now  at  the  U.  S.  National  Museum.  The  remaining 
twenty-one  species  are  apparently  new  records  for  Utah.  Species 
marked  with  an  asterisk  have  been  previously  reported. 

The  writer  is  indebted  to  Miss  Grace  A.  Sandhouse  and  Dr. 
Vasco  M.  Tanner  who  have  determined  and  verified  many  of  the 
species  of  this  list. 

Sub-family  Osminae. 

1.  Osmia  albolateralis  Cockerell. 

Utah  : i 5 Bryce  Canyon  (Vasco  M.  Tanner)  ; i 2 Bears  Ears, 
San  Juan  Co.  (Tanner). 

2.  Osmia  abnormis  Cresson 

Utah:  i 2 6 J'  Rosevere  Creek,  Raft  River  Mountains  (Tan- 
ner) (D.  Eldon  Beck)  ; i J*  La  Sal  Mountains  (James  Kartch- 
ner) . 

*3.  Osmia  cobaltina  Cresson. 

Utah:  2 2 Zion  National  Park  (Tanner)  ; 1 2 La  Sal  Moun- 

1 Contribution  No.  21  from  the  Zcological  Laboratories  of  the 
Brigham  Young  University,  Provo,  Utah. 


304  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXlv 


tains  (Anson  Call)  ; i g Aspen  Grove,  Mt.  Timpanogos  (Tan- 
ner) ; i g Rosevere  Creek,  Raft  River  Mts.  (Tanner). 

Ariz.  : i 2 Kaibab  Forest  (Anson  Call). 

Wyo.  : i 5 Fort  Bridger  (Clarence  Cottam). 

*4.  Osmia  coloradensis  Cresson. 

Arizona:  1 2 Rim  Grand  Canyon,  Kaibab  Forest  (Tanner). 

*5.  Osmia  fulgida  Cresson. 

Utah:  i g Bears  Ears  (Call). 

6.  Osmia  giliarum  Cockerell. 

Utah:  i g Logan  Canyon  (Tanner)  ; 1 g Glendale  (Tanner). 

7.  Osmia  integra  Cresson. 

Utah  : 7 $ Provo  Bench,  Provo  (D.  Elden  Beck). 

8.  Osmia  inurbana  Cresson. 

Utah:  i Rosevere  Creek,  Raft  River  Mts.  (Beck). 

9.  Osmia  leonis  Cockerell. 

Utah  : 1 g Zion  National  Park  (Tanner)  ; 1 g Dividend, 
Eureka  (Tom  Spalding). 

10.  Osmia  longula  Cresson. 

Utah  : 1 g Woodside  (Kartchner)  * 

Colorado:  1 g Mesa  Verde  National  Park  (Call). 

*11.  Osmia  melanotricha  Lovell  and  Cockerell. 

Wyoming:  3 g Burnt  Fork  (C.  Lynn  Hayward  & Tanner). 

*12.  Osmia  nassa  Cockerell. 

Utah:  i g Summit  Danials  Canyon,  near  Heber  (Hayward). 

*13.  Osmia  mandibidaris  Cresson. 

Utah  : 1 g Sheep  Creek,  Duchense  Co.  (Claudeous  J.  D. 
Brown)  ; 6 g Wandship  (Tanner  & Beck). 

Colorado:  i g Mesa  Verde  National  Park  (Tanner). 

14.  Osmia  bucephala  Cresson. 

Utah  : 1 J1  La  Sal.  Mts.  (Call). 

15.  Osmia  armaticeps  Cresson. 

Utah:  i g Rosevere  Creek,  Raft  River  Mts.  (Tanner)  ; 1 g 
Bears  Ears  (Irvin  Rasmussen). 

Idaho:  i g Lava  Hot  Springs  (Beck). 


Dec.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  305 


16.  Osmia  atrocyanea  Cockerell. 

Utah:  i § Wellsville  Canyon  (Tanner). 

17.  Osmia  kenoyeri  Cockerell. 

Colorado:  i 2 Mesa  Verde  National  Park  (Call). 

18.  Osmia  penstemonis  Cockerell. 

Utah:  i 2 Bryce  Canyon  (Rasmussen). 

19.  Osmia  proposita  Sandhouse. 

Utah:  i 2 Bears  Ears  (Tanner). 

20.  Osmia  texana  Cresson. 

Utah:  i 2 Logan  (Hayward). 

21.  Osmia  cyanella  Cockerell. 

Utah  : 1 2 Logan  Canyon  (Tanner)  ; 1 2 Wellsville  Canyon 
(Tanner). 

*22.  Osmia  wardiana  Cockerell. 

Utah:  8 2 Provo  Bench,  Provo  (Beck)  ; 1 <j>  Bears  Ears,  San 
Juan  Co.  (Tannen)  ; 1 2 Sheep  Creek,  Duchense  Co.  (Tanner)  ; 
1 J Raft  River  Mts.  (Tanner). 

Colorado:  i 2 Mesa  Verde  National  Park  (Tanner). 

Nevada:  3 2 Lehmans  Cave,  Mt.  Wheller  (Tanner). 

23.  Osmia  tristella  Cockerell. 

Utah:  i 2 Rosevere  Creek,  Raft  River  Mts.  (Tanner). 

24.  Osmia  nigrafrons  Cockerell. 

Wyoming:  i 2 Burnt  Lork  (Hayward). 

25.  Osmia  permorata  Cockerell. 

Utah  : 2 2 Provo  Bench,  Provo  (Beck). 

26.  Osmia  pascoensis  Cockerell. 

Utah:  i 2 Sheep  Creek  (Tanner). 

*27.  Osmia  lignaria  Say. 

Utah  : 1 2 1 c?  Zion  National  Park  (Tanner)  ; 1 4 2 Pine 

Valley  Mt.  (Tanner)  ; 9 2 Spanish  Pork  (Beck)  ; 1 £ 13  2 Provo 
(Tanner;  John  Allen  Rowe;  Hayward;  Herman  L.  Thomas;  O. 
Wilford  Olsen;  Call;  Beck)  ; 1 2 Utah  Lake  (Olsen)  ; 1 2 Wells- 
ville Canyon  (Hayward)  ; 1 2 Deep  Creek  Mts.  (Tanner)  ; 2 2 
Rosevere  Creek,  Raft  River  Mts.  (Tanner)  ; 1 2 Bear  Lake  Val- 
ley (Hayward). 


306  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXIv 


Idaho  : i i 5 Lava  Hot  Springs  (Beck)  ; i 5 Driggs  (Kartch- 
ner)  ; i 2 Moscow  (Joseph  Sudweeks). 

The  following  six  species  of  Osmia  were  reported  by  Miss 
Sandhouse  (Calif.  Acad,  of  Sciences,  4th  series,  Vol.  XIII,  No. 
22,  1924)  ; but  are  not  in  the  B.  Y.  University  Collection. 

*28.  Osmia  subpurpurea  Cockerell. 

Utah  : 2 § Salt  Lake  City  (E.  P.  Van  Duzee). 

*29.  Osmia  phaceliae  Cockerell. 

Utah  : 1 2 Park  City  (Van  Duzee)  ; 2 2 Vivian  Park  (Van 
Duzee) . 

*30.  Osmia  cyanosoma  Cockerell. 

Utah:  i 2 Danials  Canyon,  Heber  (Van  Duzee)  ; 1 2 Vivian 
Park  (Van  Duzee). 

*31.  Osmia  subornata  Cockerell. 

Utah  : 1 5 Park  City  (Van  Duzee). 

*32.  Osmia  nifoata  Cockerell. 

Utah  : 1 } Park  City  (Van  Duzee). 

*33.  Osmia  Wilmattae  Cockerell. 

Utah  : 8 J Park  City  (Van  Duzee)  ; 4 2 Vivian  Park  (Van 
Duzee)  ; 1 5 Logan  (Van  Duzee)  ; 2 2 Salt  Lake  City  (Van 
Duzee) . 

34.  Monumetha  albifrons  Kirby. 

Utah  : 5 2 Bryce  Canyon  (Call,  Rasmussen)  ; 2 J Aspen  Grove 
Mt.  Timpanogos  (Tanner)  ; 2 2 Sheep  Creek,  Duchense  Co. 
(Brown  & Tanner)  ; 2 $ Flaming  Gorge  (Tanner)  ; 1 § Deep 
Creek  Mts.  (Tanner)  ; 1 § Rosevere  Creek,  Raft  River  Mts. 
(Tanner)  ; 1 5 Logan  Canyon  (Clarence  Cottam). 

34.  Monumetha  alibifrons  Kirby. 

Colorado:  4 2 Mesa  Verde  National  Park  (Tanner  & Kartch- 
ner). 

Wyoming:  i 5 Burnt  Fork  (Hayward). 

35.  Monumetha  fulgida  Cresson. 

Utah  : 1 § Provo  Bench,  Provo  (Beck). 

New  Mexico:  i 5 Ship  Rock  (Kartchner). 

Colorado:  4 2 Mesa  Verda  National  Park  (Tanner). 

*36.  Alcidamea  hypocrita  Cockerell. 

Utah  : 2 § Wellsville  Canyori  (Tanner). 


Dec.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  307 


GENUS  DIKRANEUROIDEA  GEN.  N.  (HOMOPTERA, 
CICADELLIDAE). 

By  Paul  B.  Lawson,  University  of  Kansas,  Lawrence. 

Dikraneuroidea  gen.  nov. 

Small  leafhoppers  with  head  and  entire  body  strongly  flat- 
tened. Ocelli  lacking.  Tegmina  lacking  anteapical  cells  and 
appendix;  the  second  of  the  four  apical  cells  strongly  pe- 
dunculate; apex  broadly  rounded.  Hind  wing  with  submar- 
ginal vein  distant  from  margin  and  running  into  costal 
margin ; first  and  second  sectors  uniting  so  that  there  is  but 
one  closed  submarginal  cell. 

This  genus  seems  to  be  closer  to  the  genus  Dikraneura  than  to 
any  other.  D.  cockerellii  Gillette,  for  example,  has  much  the  gen- 
eral appearance  of  the  species  described  below  but  has  two  closed 
submarginal  cells  in  the  hind  wing  whereas  this  genus  has  only 
one. 

The  erection  of  this  genus  seems  necessary  to  accommodate 
the  following  species: 

Dikraneuroidea  beameri  sp.  n. 

A milky-white  species  strikingly  marked  with  two  red  par- 
allel lines  and  small  red  dots  on  each  tegmen.  Length  2.5— 
2.75  mm. 

Vertex  slightly  longer  than  broad,  margins  convex  in  front 
of  eyes,  forming  slight  notch  at  junction  with  them.  Pro- 
notum  about  as  long  as  vertex,  distinctly  widened  posteriorly. 
Elytra  greatly  exceeding  abdomen,  rounded  apically,  second 
and  fourth  apical  cells  distinctly  triangular,  third  cell  rectan- 
gular and  parallel-sided,  transverse  veins  practically  in  a 
straight  line. 

Last  ventral  segment  of  female  twice  as  long  as  preceding, 
posterior  margin  sinuate  and  produced,  with  large  rounded 
lobe  on  median  third ; pygofer  long,  sparsely  spined  and  ex- 
ceeded by  ovipositor.  Valve  of  male  hidden;  plates  triangu- 
lar, very  long,  tapering  in  ventral  view  to  very  acute  apices 
which  strongly  exceed  the  pygofer,  lateral  aspect  of  apices 
broadly  rounded. 

Color:  Margins  of  vertex  milky-white,  disc  hyaline  and 
tinged  with  orange  or  yellow.  Pronotum  milky-white  with 
median  orange  or  yellow  stripe.  Scutellum  white,  the  three 
angles  sometimes  yellow.  Elytra  milky-white  nearly  to  cross 


308  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXIv 


veins,  apical  cells  hyaline  and  slightly  fumose,  marked  as  fol- 
lows : An  orange-red,  oblique,  club-shaped  band  near  the 
base,  starting  on  costal  margin  and  nearly  reaching  clavus ; 
an  orange-red  irregular  and  broken  band,  parallel  to  the  first 
band,  and  extending  across  corium  toward  tip  of  clavus ; a 
larger  orange-red  spot  and  a number  of  smaller  bright  red 
spots  on  posterior  half  of  clavus  and  a number  of  small  red 
ones  on  both  sides  of  posterior  orange-red  band ; a red  dot 
at  junction  of  costa  and  first  cross  vein  from  which  extends 
a more  or  less  distinct,  narrow,  smoky  band  along  cross 
veins;  a small  black  dot  just  cephalad  of  the  forked  apical 
vein  and  a smaller  one  near  inner  angle  of  fourth  apical  cell. 
Dorsum  white.  Entire  under  surface  yellowish  white  but 
with  red  line  below  white  margins  of  vertex  and  on  sides  of 
pro-  and  mesothorax. 

Holotype,  female,  allotype  and  numerous  paratypes,  were  all 
taken  by  Doctor  R.  H.  Beamer,  after  whom  the  species  is  named, 
on  the  undergrowth  in  the  palm  forest  about  seven  miles  south- 
east of  Brownsville,  Cameron  County,  Texas,  Aug.  3,  1928.  All 
types  deposited  in  the  Snow  Entomological  Collection. 

Plate  XXVIII. 

Explanation  of  Figures. 

1.  Lateral  view  of  head. 

2.  Dorsal  view  of  head  and  prothorax. 

3.  Tegmen. 

4.  Hind  wing. 

5.  Female  genitalia. 

6.  Male  genitalia. 

7.  Tip  of  male  pygofer  showing  pygofer  hook. 

8.  Dorsal  aspect  male  internal  genitalia. 

9.  Lateral  view  of  oedagus. 


Eurymus  interior  Scud. — A male  E.  interior  Scud.,  was 
taken  on  the  summit  of  Carter  Dome  in  New  Hampshire,  August 
3,  1927.  This  species  does  not  appear  to  be  frequently  reported 
by  New  England  collectors.  The  specimen  was  in  a somewhat 
rubbed  condition,  possibly  due  in  part  to  the  inhospitable  altitude 
in  which  it  existed. — W.  Prescott  Rogers,  Fall  River,  Mass. 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  XXIV,  No.  5 


Plate  XXVIII 


310  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


ON  SOME  NEW  ENGLAND  HETEROPTERA. 

By  J.  R.  de  la  Torre-Bueno,  White  Plains,  N.  Y. 

Mr.  C.  A.  Frost,  of  Framingham,  Mass.,  for  some  years  past 
has  most  kindly  favored  me  with  his  catch  of  Heteroptera  from 
New  England.  Last  year  and  early  this  spring,  he  sent  me  sev- 
eral small  lots,  which  make  up  in  interest  for  what  they  might  ap- 
pear to  lack  in  quantity.  And  lately,  he  sent  me  his  Maine  catch. 

His  specimens  are  always  accompanied  by  data ; and  to  these  I 
add  what  comment  may  appear  necessary  regarding  each  species. 
The  arrangement  of  the  families,  for  convenience  in  reference, 
follows  the  Van  Duzee  Catalogue;  and  that  of  the  genera  and  spe- 
cies follows  Hemiptera  of  Connecticut,  our  standard  manual  for 
the  Heteroptera  of  the  North  Eastern  United  States. 

The  Massachusetts  records  follow : 

Amnestus  spinifrons  Say,  i specimen  from  Southboro,  May  5, 
1928,  a new  Massachusetts  locality. 

Dendrocoris  humeralis  Uhler,  1 specimen  from  Natick,  May  27, 
1928,  another  new  locality  for  the  state. 

Aradus  cinnamomeus  Panzer,  1 specimen  by  sweeping,  Natick, 
July  15,  1928.  This  is  the  first  New  England  record  of  the 
species  from  a definite  locality,  although  Parshley  gives  it  as 
from  “ Mass.”  in  Can.  Ent.,  LIII : 235  (1921).  The  manner 
of  capture  also  is  odd,  as  the  specimen  is  a stenopterous  male. 
Neides  muticus  Say,  1 specimen  from  Middlesex  Fells,  July  31, 
1928,  a new  locality  for  the  state. 

Jalysus  spinosus  Say,  2 from  Nantucket,  September  11,  1928,  an- 
other new  locality. 

Ischnorhynchus  resedae  Panz.,  Framingham,  November  11,  1928; 
sifted. 

Cymus  angustatus  Stal,  Framingham,  March  24,  1928;  sifted. 
Cymus  disc  or  s Horvath,  same  data.  New  locality  for  the  State. 
Hypogeocoris  piceus  Say,  1 from  Natick,  October  12,  1928,  sifted 
from  piles  of  dry  grass  and  weeds.  New  locality. 

Crophius  disconotus  Say,  1 specimen,  sifted,  Natick,  October  14, 
1928.  Another  new  locality. 

Myodochus  serripes  Olivier,  1 specimen,  same  data;  also  a new 
place. 

Orthaea  hasalis  Dallas,  5 specimens,  Natick,  October  12,  1928; 
also  sifted  from  grass  piles ; another  new  locality  for  the 
State. 


Dec.,  19 £9  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  311 


Zeridoneus  costalis  Van  Duzee,  i only  from  Natick,  October  14, 
1928.  Also  a new  locality  for  the  State. 

Antillocoris  pallidus  Uhler,  2 specimens,  sifted,  Framingham, 
March  24,  1928. 

Drymus  unus  Say,  Natick,  October  12,  1928,  1 sifted  from  grass 
piles.  Another  new  State  locality. 

Xestocoris  nitens  Van  Duzee,  same  data;  also  a new  locality. 

Corythucha  mollicula  O.  & D.,  1 from  Middlesex  Fells,  July  31, 
1928 ; a new  locality. 

C.  cydoniae  Fitch,  3 specimens,  same  data ; another  new  locality. 

C.  elegans  Drake,  Natick,  November  12,  1928;  also  sifted  from 
piles  of  grass.  This  appears  to  be  not  only  the  first  Massa- 
chusetts record,  but  also  the  first  New  England  record. 

C.  arcuata  Say,  1 from  Middlesex  Fells,  July  31,  1928,  another 
new  locality  for  the  State. 

C.  pergandei  Heidemann,  8 from  Framingham,  May  5,  1928.  A 
new  place. 

C.  marmorata  Uhler,  1 from  Natick,  July  4,  1928,  which  is  an- 
other new  locality. 

Leptobyrsa  rhododendri  Horvath,  1 from  Cambridge,  Mass.,  col- 
lected by  Dr.  J.  C.  Emerton ; a new  locality. 

Gelchossa  heidemanni  O.  & D.,  Natick,  June  10  and  July  29,  1928 ; 
in  quantity  on  Baptisia  tinctoria,  as  usual ; but  a new  locality. 

Physatocheila  plexa  Say,  1 from  Sherborn,  July  7,  1928.  This  ap- 
pears to  be  a new  record  for  the  State,  for  Parshley,  in  his 
Hemiptera  of  New  England  gives  it  as  found  only  in  Rhode 
Island,  although  Van  Duzee  in  his  Catalogue  lists  it  from 
Maine. 

Ploiariodes  errabundus  Say,  1 from  Nantucket,  September  11, 
1928.  This  is  a new  Massachusetts  locality. 

Metapterus  annulipes  Stal. 

M.  fraternus  Say,  1 each  of  these  species,  both  sifted  at  Natick  on 

October  12,  1928,  from  piles  of  grass  and  weeds.  Both  are 
likewise  new  State  records. 

Rhynocoris  ventralis  Say,  1 specimen  from  Natick,  July  8,  1928; 
the  only  other  record  from  Massachusetts  seems  to  be  the 
original  from  Framingham,  also  a capture  by  Mr.  Frost. 

Nabis  ferus  Linne,  1 from  Cambridge,  collected  by  Dr.  Emerton 
a new  Massachusetts  locality. 

N.  roseipennis  Reuter,  1 from  Sherborn,  November  25,  1928 

sifted;  a new  locality  for  the  State,  and  1 from  Natick,  May 
13,  1928,  another  new  locality,  also  sifted. 


312  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXIv 


Lyctocoris  campestris  Fabricius,  I from  Southboro,  May  16,  1928. 
This  species  does  not  seem  to  have  been  heretofore  recorded 
from  Massachusetts. 

Anthocoris  borealis  Dallas,  2 specimens,  sifted,  Framingham,  No- 
vember 29,  1928.  Apparently  this  species  has  been  recorded 
only  once  from  the  State,  from  Peru. 

Hydrometra  martini  Kirkaldy,  quite  a number  from  a woodland 
pool  at  Natick,  on  May  26,  1928;  a new  locality. 

Gerris  marginatus  Say,  1 sifted  at  Sherborn,  November  25,  1928; 

which  is  another  new  locality  for  the  species. 

Saldula  saltatoria  Linne,  1 from  Framingham,  March  24,  1928, 
sifted.  This  species  is  questioned  by  Parshley  in  Hemiptera 
of  New  England,  although  he  gives  several  records  in  Mas- 
sachusetts, the  present  being  a new  locality.  A number  of 
mirids  came  with  these,  but  they  have  been  reserved  for  study 
by  Dr.  H.  H.  Knight,  who  will  report  on  them  later. 

The  more  interesting  Heteroptera  from  Mr.  Frost,  however, 
are  those  that  he  secured  at  Paris  and  South  Paris,  Maine.  As 
will  be  seen,  not  only  are  some  of  them  new  records  for  the  State, 
but  there  are  also  some  which  enormously  extend  the  distribution 
of  certain  of  the  species. 

Euschistus  tristigmus  Say,  Paris,  June  11,  1929,  a single  speci- 
men from  a new  locality  in  the  State. 

Nysius  calif ornicus  Stal,  2 from  South  Paris,  September  20,  1928, 
and  2 from  Paris,  July  n,  1929.  According  to  Blatchley, 
this  species  extends  from  Connecticut  south;  Parshley,  in 
Hemiptera  of  Connecticut  states  that  it  reaches  its  northern 
limits  in  the  southern  New  England  States.  This,  therefore, 
is  not  only  a new  record  for  New  England,  but  it  also  extends 
to  a great  degree  the  distribution  of  this  species,  which  is 
now  seen  to  occur  from  Mexico  and  Florida  north  to  the 
Dakotas  and  Maine,  from  ocean  to  ocean. 

Nysius  thymi  Wolff,  1 from  Paris,  July  11,  1929,  a new  locality  in 
the  State. 

Drymus  unus  Say,  2 from  South  Paris,  September  26,  1928,  a 
new  locality,  as  is  also  the  following  species. 

Eremocoris  ferns  Linne,  same  data,  1 specimen. 

Scolopostethus  diffidens  Horvath,  1 specimen,  same  data.  This  is 
the  first  definite  locality  in  Maine,  although  Parshley  in 
Fauna  of  New  England  records  it  as  from  “ Maine.” 

Flint  hisus  comp  actus  Uhler,  1 specimen,  same  data  as  above. 
This  appears  to  be  a new  record  not  only  for  the  State,  but 


Dec.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  313 


for  New  England,  as  well.  Parshley  gives  it  as  found  in 
New  Hampshire  and  Massachusetts  only. 

Sphaerobius  insignis  Uhler,  same  data;  a new  State  locality. 
Ranatra  nigra  (H.  S.)  Hungf.,  an  adult  and  a nymph  from  the 
Little  Androscoggin  River,  South  Paris,  September  20,  1928. 
This  is  a new  record  for  New  England.  Parshley  gives  it 
from  Massachusetts,  but  from  no  other  State,  under  the 
name  of  R.  protensa  Montandon. 

These  few  records,  useful  in  advancing  an  adequate  knowledge 
of  our  American  Heteropterous  fauna,  indicate  the  desirability  of 
securing  specimens  from  uncollected  places.  This  coleopterists 
can  well  aid  in,  since  by  the  same  methods  that  Coleoptera  are  se- 
cured, many  Heteroptera  will  be  found.  And  echo  answers  “ Et 
tu  quoque.” 


Eurymus  eurytheme  Bdv. — Stray  specimens  of  E.  eu- 
rytheme  Bdv.,  have  been  noted  occasionally  in  southern  Massa- 
chusetts ,during  the  past  three  seasons,  a male  at  Acoaxet  on 
August  14,  1927,  another  on  the  links  of  the  Fall  River  Country 
Club,  October  16,  1927.  In  1928  at  Acoaxet  on  August  27  a 
high-colored  male  specimen  was  taken.  During  1929  two  speci- 
mens were  noted,  September  5th,  at  Acoaxet  and  on  September 
12th  at  the  Fall  River  Country  Club. — W.  Prescott  Rogers,  Fall 
River,  Mass. 


314  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  v°l • XXIV 


TWO  UROTHRIPIDiE  (THYSANOPTERA)  FROM 
FLORIDA,  WITH  KEYS  TO  THE  KNOWN 
GENERA  AND  THE  NORTH  AMER- 
ICAN SPECIES. 

By  J.  Douglas  Hood,  University  of  Rochester. 

Professor  J.  R.  Watson  has  sent  me  recently  some  very  inter- 
esting Urothripidse  collected  by  several  of  his  associates  at  the 
University  of  Florida  and  the  Florida  Agricultural  Experiment 
Stations.  One  of  the  species  is  represented  by  a considerable 
series  from  various  localities  within  the  state,  and  is  apparently 
generically  as  well  as  specifically  new.  The  other  is  less  numer- 
ous in  the  collections,  and  is  a species  described  in  1925  by  Mr. 
C.  B.  Williams  and  myself  from  the  West  Indies;  its  occurrence 
in  tropical  United  States  had  been  expected.  Both,  then,  are  addi- 
tions to  the  North  American  list ; and  representing  as  they  do  one 
of  the  smallest  and  most  obscure  families  of  the  Thysanoptera — 
a family  unknown  from  the  New  World  until  little  more  than 
four  years  ago — it  has  been  thought  worth  while  to  include  keys 
to  the  genera  of  the  world  and  to  the  three  North  American 
species. 


Superfamily  Urothripoidea. 

1912.  (April  13).  [“A  new  suborder”]  Hood,  Proc.  Biol.  Soc. 

Wash.,  Vol.  XXV,  p.  64. 

1912.  (August).  [Suborder]  Poly  stigmata  Bagnall,  Ann.  Mag. 

Nat.  Hist.,  Ser  8,  Vol.  10,  p.  220. 

1915.  Superfamily  Urothripoidea  Hood,  Proc.  Biol.  Soc.  Wash., 
Vol.  XXVIII,  p.  59. 

1927:  Superfamily.  Urothripoidea  Hood,  Ann.  Ent.  Soc.  Amer., 
Vol.  XX,  p.  2. 

The  Urothripoidea  are  a compact  and  easily  recognizable  group 
of  Thysanoptera.  Two  misobservations  have  led,  however,  to  an 
exaggerated  belief  in  their  distinctness : They  do  not  have  eleven 

stigmata  and  the  maxillary  palpi  are  not  one-segmented.  The 
number  of  stigmata  is  four,  which  is  typical  of  the  entire  order, 
while  the  number  of  segments  in  the  maxillary  palpi  is  the  same 


Dec.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  315 


as  in  all  other  Tubulifera,  i.e.,  two,  as  has  previously,  but  not 
conspicuously,  been  stated.1 

If  we  recognize  the  group  as  a superfamily  or  family,  we  must 
seek  content  in  a meagre  assortment  of  differences,  of  which  only 
one  is  positive  and  possessed  by  no  other  Tubulifera.  Perhaps 
additional  characters  may  in  time  be  found ; but  at  present  the 
only  important  one  is  the  distance  between  the  coxae  of  the  hind 
pair,  this  distance  being  greater  than  that  separating  either  of  the 
others.  In  the  rest  of  the  Tubulifera  the  middle  coxae  are  the 
most  widely  separated,  due  merely  to  the  greater  development  of 
the  mesothorax,  which  bears  in  winged  species  the  larger  and 
more  powerful  fore  wings.  The  apterous  condition  of  the 
urothripids  is  apparently  so  ancient  as  to  have  caused  a great  re- 
duction in  the  size  of  the  thorax,  the  mesothoracic  coxae  inevit- 
ably coming  closer  together,  but  the  hind  coxae  remaining  or  be- 
coming widely  separated  because  of  the  necessity  for  supporting 
the  long  heavy  abdomen,  with  the  particularly  long  hairs  at  its 
tip. 

The  sculpture  of  the  body  surface  is  distinctive,  to  be  sure,  and 
furnishes  a secondary  character  of  real  value ; but  this  difference 
is  not  convincingly  fundamental,  any  more  than  is  the  apparently 
invariable  absence  of  wings  (wings  are  lacking  in  many  other 
Thysanoptera),  or  the  reduction  in  the  number  of  segments  in 
the  antennse  (species  of  other  families  have  as  few  antennal  seg- 
ments as  some  of  the  urothripids),  or  the  longer  hairs  at  the  tip 
of  the  abdomen  ( Karnyothrips , a phlseothripid,  has  hairs  nearly 
as  long). 

In  almost  every  group  of  insects  the  immature  stages  furnish 
valuable  clues  to  relationships;  and  it  must  be  disappointing  to 
those  who  apparently  believe  in  raising  all  of  the  overly  numerous 
families  of  the  order  to  superfamily  rank,  to  find  that  the 
urothripoid  nymph  indicates  a close  relationship,  indeed,  to  the 
phlaeothripoids,  as  a study  of  the  last  three  figures  on  the  plate 
accompanying  this  paper  will  show. 

1 Hood,  Ann.  Ent.  Soc.  Amer.,  Vol.  XX,  p.  2 (line  7 from  bot- 
tom) ; 1927.  See  also  figure  3 of  the  plate  accompanying  the 
present  paper,  in  which  is  shown  the  small  basal  segment  which 
has  quite  generally  been  overlooked. 


316  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXIv 


Family  Urothripidce. 

1909.  Urothripidce,  Bagnall,  Ann.  Mus.  Nat.  Hung.,  Vol.  VII,  p. 
126. 

1910.  Urothripidce,  Bagnall,  Fauna  Hawaiiensis,  Vol.  Ill,  PI.  VI, 
p.  677. 

1911.  Urothripidce,  Bagnall,  Ier  Congs.  Int.  d’Ent.,  p.  283. 

1912.  Urothripidce,  Trybom,  Arkiv  f.  Zook,  Bd.  7,  No.  33,  p.  31. 

1915.  Urothripidce,  Hood,  Proc.  Biol.  Soc.  Wash.,  Vol.  XXVIII, 

PP-  54,  59- . 

1927.  Urothripidce,  Hood,  Ann.  Ent.  Soc.  Amer.,  Vol.  XX,  p.  3. 

Key  to  Genera. 

I — Antennae  7-segmented. 

a.  Vertex  of  head  without  prominent  bristles ; antennal 

segments  3—5  about  as  wide  as  long ; tube  much 
shorter  than  head,  relatively  stout,  three  to  five 
times  as  long  as  greatest  width,  with  six  long  hairs 
at  tip.  Ethiopian Urothrips  Bagnall. 

aa.  Vertex  of  head  with  a pair  of  prominent,  anteriorly- 
directed  bristles ; antennal  segments  3-5  decidedly 
longer  than  wide ; tube  much  longer  than  head,  very 
slender,  fully  ten  times  as  long  as  greatest  width; 
with  four  long  hairs  at  tip.  Neotropical 

Bradythrips  Hood  and  Williams. 

II — Antennae  either  4-  or  5-segmented. 

b.  Antennae  5-segmented. 

c.  Vertex  of  head  without  prominent  bristles  ; anten- 
nal segments  4 and  5 not  closely  united, 
5 pedicellate. 

d.  Head  as  broad  as  long ; fore  tarsi  appar- 
ently unarmed ; tenth  abdominal  segment 
much  longer  than  ninth,  which  is  only 
slightly  longer  than  eighth ; tip  of  ab- 
domen with  four  long  hairs.  Palaearc- 
tic Behelothrips  BufTa. 

dd.  Head  decidedly  longer  than  broad ; fore 
tarsi  with  a prominent,  curved,  claw-like 
structure  on  the  outer  surface ; tenth 
abdominal  segment  subequal  in  length 
to  ninth,  which  is  about  twice  as  long  as 
eighth ; tip  of  abdomen  with  six  long 
hairs.  Nearctic.  . .Trachythrips  Hood. 


Bee.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  317 


cc.  Vertex  of  head  with  4 to  6 prominent  bristles, 
borne  on  conspicuous  tubercles ; antennal 
segments  4 and  5 compactly  united,  5 conical, 
not  at  all  pedicellate;  ninth  abdominal  seg- 
ment fully  twice  as  long  as  eighth ; tip  of  ab- 
domen with  six  long  hairs.  Nearctic,  Neo- 
tropical, and  Ethiopian. 

Stephanothrips  Trybom. 

bb.  Antennae  4-segmented ; tip  of  abdomen  with  four  long 
hairs.  Palaearctic Amphibolothrips  Buffa. 

Trachythrips  gen.  nov. 

( Tpaxvs , rough;  Opip .) 

Antennae  five-segmented ; segments  4 and  5 not  closely 
united,  5 pedicellate.  Head  decidedly  longer  than  broad ; ver- 
tex without  prominent  bristles.  Fore-tarsi  with  a prom- 
inent, curved,  claw-like  structure  on  the  outer  surface.  Ab- 
domen with  tenth  segment  subequal  in  length  to  ninth,  which 
is  about  twice  as  long  as  eighth ; tip  of  abdomen  with  six 
long  hairs. 

Genotype:  Trachythrips  watsoni  sp.  nov.,  from  Florida. 

This  genus  is  no  doubt  closely  related  to  Behelothrips  Buffa, 
to  which  belongs  only  one  species,  known  from  three  specimens 
taken  more  than  twenty  years  ago  on  the  island  of  Giglio,  off  the 
western  cost  of  Italy.  Buffa’s  description  and  figures1  are  of  a 
much  broader  insect,  with  the  tenth  abdominal  segment  much 
longer  than  the  ninth  (which  is  only  slightly  longer  than  the 
eighth)  and  with  four  long  hairs,  instead  of  six,  at  the  tip  of  the 
abdomen. 

Trachythrips  watsoni  sp.  nov.  (PL  XXIX,  figs.  1-9.) 

Female  (apterous).- — Fength  about  1.2  mm.  Color  straw 
yellow,  with  head,  prothorax,  mesothorax,  fore  legs,  and  ex- 
treme tip  of  tube,  dark  brown ; abdominal  segments  2-8  each 
with  a pair  of  round  dorso-lateral  pale-brown  spots  smaller 
than  the  first  antennal  segment ; median  line  of  abdomen 
faintly  indicated  by  a series  of  light  gray  blotches ; antennse 
straw  yellow,  shaded  with  brown  distally ; tarsi  with  the  usual 

1 Boll.  Fab.  Zool.  R.  Scuola  Sup.  Agr.,  Portici,  Vol.  Ill,  pp. 
195  and  196;  1909. 


318  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


darkened  tip ; ninth  segment  of  abdomen  narrowly  darkened 
with  brown  along  lateral  surface ; subhypodermal  pigmenta- 
tion of  two  kinds,  i.e.,  bright  crimson  and  white ; the  former 
generally  distributed  in  the  head  and  thorax  (but  more 
abundant  at  sides  and  along  front  margin  of  prothorax),  un- 
derlying the  dorso-lateral  abdominal  spots,  and  sparsely  dis- 
tributed in  legs  and  beneath  the  faint  median  abdominal 
blotches;  the  white  pigmentation  opaque,  conspicuous  when 
observed  ,by  reflected  light,  forming  a broad  band  across 
metathorax  and  disposed  in  two  series  of  blotches  on  ab- 
dominal segments  i— 6,  one  such  series  lying  along  the  ex- 
treme lateral  margin  external  to  the  brown  spots  and  to  the 
crimson  pigmentation,  the  other  just  laterad  of  the  median 
line. 

Head  about  1.2  times  as  long  as  wide,  broadest  at  about 
one-fourth  from  base;  occiput  somewhat  elevated,  with  an 
intricate  pattern  of  anastomosing  lines;  lateral  surfaces 
and  vertex  strongly  roughened  with  tubercles,  some  of  them 
bearing  short,  pointed  bristles;  ventral  surface  smooth,  ex- 
cept at  sides  where  the  tubercles  of  the  lateral  surfaces  are 
continued  onto  it;  vertex  rounded  in  front  of  eyes  but 
scarcely  overhanging  insertion  of  antennae,  without  long 
bristles;  postocular  bristles  wanting.  Eyes  minute,  consist- 
ing of  nine  facets,  one  of  which  is  situated  close  to  the  base 
of  the  antennae  and  not  visible  from  above,  the  remaining 
eight  forming  a loop  which  curves  downward  to  the  isolated 
facet  and  within  which  are  about  six  bristle-bearing  tubercles. 
Ocelli  absent,  as  in  all  members  of  the  family.  Antennae 
about  1.2  times  as  long  as  head,  5-segmented  (see  Plate 
XXIX,  fig.  2,  for  form  and  chaetotaxy  of  segments)  ; sense 
cones  difficult  to  distinguish  from  setae,  but  apparently  four 
on  segment  3 and  one  on  segment  4. 

Prothorax  slightly  more  than  half  as  long  as  head  and  (in- 
clusive of  coxae)  about  2.2  times  as  wide  as  median  length 
of  pronotum  ; pronotum  broadly  and  shallowly  impressed  each 
side  of  median  line;  surface  roughened  with  anastomosing 
lines  on  disk,  tuberculate  at  sides  (see  Plate  XXIX,  fig.  1)  ; 
no  long  prothoracic  bristles.  Pterothorax  about  1.2  times  as 
wide  as  prothorax,  bearing  a number  of  setigerous  tubercles 
similar  to  those  of  head  and  pronotum ; mesonotum  with  dis- 
tinct anastomosing  lines,  at  sides  with  a few  small  tubercles, 
and  with  a shallow  circular  impression  each  side  of  median 
line.  Legs  moderately  stout;  fore  tarsi  with  a prominent, 
curved,  claw-like  structure  on  the  outer  surface. 


Dec.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  319 


Abdomen  broadest  at  second  segment  and  tapering  evenly 
to  base  of  tube ; surface  with  anastomosing  lines  which  are 
more  distinct  at  sides  of  abdomen  and  which  are  prolonged 
posteriorly  into  minute  setigerous  asperities ; posterior  angles 
of  intermediate  tergites  slightly  produced  and  bearing  a short, 
blunt  bristle  which  is  parallel  to  the  axis  of  the  body;  ninth 
abdominal  segment  more  than  twice  as  long  as  eighth,  surface 
with  setigerous  asperities.  Tube  about  0.7  as  long  as  head 
and  equal  in  length  to  ninth  abdominal  segment,  form  shown 
in  PL  XXIX,  figs.  4 and  5 ; terminal  hairs  six  in  number,  sim- 
ple in  structure,  about  four  times  as  long  as  tube  and  half  the 
total  body  length. 

Measurements  of  holotype  (2)  : Length  1.19  mm.;  head, 
length  0.187  mm.;  greatest  width  0.157  mm.;  prothorax, 
length  of  pronotum  0.099  mm- width  (inclusive  of  coxae) 
0.217  mm.;  pterothorax,  width  0.259  mm.;  interval  between 
fore  coxae  0.119  mm.,  middle  coxae  0.100  mm.,  hind  coxae 
0.123  mm.;  abdomen,  greatest  width  0.281  mm.;  segment  8, 
length  0.060  mm. ; segment  9,  length  0.136  mm. ; segment  10, 
length  0.136  mm.,  width  at  middle  0.036  mm.,  at  apex  0.024 
mm. ; terminal  hairs,  length  0.525  mm. 

Antennal  segments : 1 2345 

Length  (jj) 28  41  81  28  43 

Width  (jj) 28  35  33  20  15 

Total  length  of  antenna  0.220  mm. 

Male  (apterous). — Almost  identical  with  female  in  color 
and  structure,  though  smaller.  Tarsi  armed  as  in  female. 

Measurements  of  allotype  (J1)  : Length  0.90  mm. ; head, 
length  0.146  mm.,  greatest  width  0.121  mm.;  prothorax, 
length  of  pronotum  0.088  mm.,  width  (inclusive  of  coxae) 
0.168  mm. ; pterothorax,  width  0.174  mm. ; abdomen,  greatest 
width  0.203  mm. ; segment  8,  length  0.052  mm. ; segment  9, 
length  0.096  mm. ; segment  10,  length  0.090  mm.,  width  at 
middle  0.029  mm.,  at  apex  0.023  mm. ; terminal  hairs,  length 
0.435  mm. 

Antennal  segments : 1 2 3 

Length  ( p ) 24  36  76 

Width  (jj) 34  30  32 

Total  length  of  antenna  0.204  mm. 

Nymph. — Color  nearly  white,  with  a slight  yellowish  cast 
and  bright  crimson  subhypodermal  pigmentation  disposed  in 


4 5 

24  44 

20  14 


320  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


blotches  along  sides  of  head,  thorax,  and  abdominal  segments 
1-8  and  also  along  the  median  line  from  a little  behind  the 
eyes  to  segment  9 of  abdomen,  the  brain  and  optic  nerves  be- 
ing more  or  less  suffused ; scattered  blotches  of  chalky-white 
pigmentation  (subopaque  by  transmitted  light)  scattered 
through  the  body;  antennae  with  a narrow  ring  at  extreme 
base  of  segment  1,  distal  portion  beyond  middle  of  segment 
4,  and  to  some  extent  the  sides  of  segment  3,  brown ; extreme 
tip  of  tube  likewise  brown. 

Head,  prothorax,  fore  legs,  antennae,  and  tip  of  abdomen 
(with  its  usual  tremendously  long  single  pair  of  hairs)  shown 
in  figures  7-9  on  Plate  XXIX. 

Described  from  a splendid  series  of  24  females,  11  males,  and 
7 nymphs  forwarded  by  Professor  J.  R.  Watson,  all  collected  in 
Florida,  as  follows: 

Florida:  Villa  Tasso  (Okaloosa  Co.),  May  18,  1928.  R. 
W.  Blacklock.  Among  leaves  of  oak,  hickory,  and  magnolia  col- 
lected from  ground.  14  §’s,  9 rf’s,  7 nymphs. 

Bellview,  April,  1928.  E.  F.  Grossman.  Among  dry  pine  and 
oak  leaves.  1 J. 

Gainesville,  Feburary,  1928.  E.  F.  Grossman.  Among  dry, 
fallen  citrus  leaves.  2 §rs. 

Illahaw,  May  11,  1928.  J.  H.  Henderson  and  E.  F.  Grossman. 
Among  dry  leaves.  2 J’s,  1 

Marion  Co.,  April,  1928.  E.  F.  Grossman.  Among  dead  oak 
leaves.  1 J. 

Mayo,  February,  1928.  E.  F.  Grossman.  From  dry  leaves 
of  Live  Oak  along  barren  roadside.  1 §. 

Milligan,  August  1,  1928.  P.  W.  Calhoun.  Among  dead  oak 
leaves.  1 1 J'. 

St.  Augustine,  February,  1928.  E.  F.  Grossman.  Among  dry 
leaves  of  Scrub  Oak  and  Saw  Palmetto.  2 J’s. 

Type  locality:  Villa  Tasso,  Florida. 

Stephanothrips  Trybom. 

1912.  Stephanothrips  Trybom,  Arkiv  f.  Zook,  Bd.  7,  No.  33,  p. 
42. 

1927.  Stephanothrips  Hood,  Ann.  Ent.  Soc.  Amer.,  Vol.  XX,  p.  6. 

Key  to  Species. 

I — Vertex  of  head  with  three  pairs  of  strong,  anteriorly-directed 
bristles  borne  at  the  tips  of  tubercles ; head  distinctly  nar- 


Dec.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  321 


rowed  posteriorly;  first  segment  of  fore  and  hind  tarsi 
with  a strong,  prominent,  curved  claw  on  outer  surface. 
(St.  Croix  and  Trinidad,  West  Indies;  Florida.) 

S.  occidentalis  Hood  and  Williams. 

II — Vertex  of  head  with  two  pairs  of  such  bristles;  fore  and  hind 
tarsi  unarmed ; head  with  cheeks  parallel,  not  at  all  nar- 
rowed posteriorly. 

a — Antennae  slender,  segments  3 and  5 each  about  two 
and  one-half  times  as  long  as  wide;  general  color 
dark  blackish  brown  (nearly  black  to  the  naked 
eye),  head  darkest.  (California). 

S.  bradleyi  Hood. 

aa — Antennae  stouter,  segments  3 and  5 each  about  two 
times  as  long  as  wide ; general  color  grayish  yel- 
low, with  head  and  anterior  portion  of  prothorax 
brown.  (Natal)  S.  buffai  Trybom. 

Stephanothrips  occidentalis  Hood  and  Williams. 

1925.  Stephanothrips  occidentalis  Hood  and  Williams,  Psyche, 
Vol.  XXXII,  p.  69. 

1927.  Stephanothrips  occidentalis  Hood,  Ann.  Ent.  Soc.  Amer., 
Vol.  XX,  p.  6;  PL  I and  PI.  II,  figs.  3^5. 

It  is  of  interest  to  add  to  the  North  American  list  this  distinct 
little  species,  described  originally  from  St.  Croix  and  Trinidad  in 
the  West  Indies.  Professor  Watson  has  sent  me  three  speci- 
mens, all  females,  taken  at  Miami,  Florida,  in  May,  1928,  by  G.  F. 
Weber,  among  “dry  leaves,  mostly  Populus  (?)  and  Ficus , old 
U.  S.  P.  I.  Garden.” 


Plate  XXIX. 

Trachythrips  watsoni  gen.  et  sp.  nov. 

(J.  D.  H.,  camera  lucida.) 

1,  head  and  prothorax,  J,  leg  bristles  omitted;  2,  right  antenna, 
2 ; 3,  right  maxillary  palpus,  2>  ventral  aspect ; 4,  segments  7-10 
of  abdomen,  $;  5,  segments  7-10  of  abdomen,  J';  6,  tip  of  ab- 
domen, £ ; 7,  head  and  prothorax,  nymph,  probably  in  last  instar ; 
8,  right  antenna,  nymph ; 9,  segments  8—10  of  abdomen,  nymph. 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  XXIV,  No.  5 Plate  XXIX 


Dec.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  323 


A NOMENCLATORIAL  NOTE  ON  THE  BIRCH  LEAF- 
MINING SAWFLY,  PHYLLOTOMA  NEMORATA 
(FALLEN). 

By  Raymond  L.  Taylor,  Assistant  Forest  Entomologist,  Maine 
Forest  Service.  In  charge : Entomological  Laboratory, 

Bar  Harbor. 

A list  of  sawflies  living  in  or  on  the  leaves  of  birch  ( Betula  spe- 
cies) compiled  from  the  literature  might  be  impressive.  There  is 
seen,  however,  an  opportunity  for  reducing  this  number  of  species 
by  one  through  the  easy  method  of  pointing  out  an  apparent  case 
of  mistaken  identity,  which,  perhaps,  amounts  to  technical 
synonymy. 

In  Figure  4 of  Plate  3,  which  faces  page  226  of  the  book,  Leaf- 
Mining  Insects,1  is  portrayed  a “Portion  of  a birch  leaf  bearing 
within  a mine  a hibernating  cocoon  of  the  sawfly,  Schizocerus 
mathesoni ? The  lens-like  cocoon  figured  appeared  so  similar 
to  that  formed  between  the  upper  and  lower  epidermis  of  leaves 
of  both  white  and  gray  birch  ( Betula  papyrifera  and  B.  populi- 
folia,  respectively)  by  Phyllotoma  nemorata,  an  important  enemy 
of  birch  in  Maine,  that  the  question  of  a possible  synonymy  arose. 
The  speculation  was  further  encouraged  by  the  identity  of  the 
specific  name,  mathesoni , with  the  specific  name  by  which  Phyllo- 
toma nemorata  was  known  for  the  past  twenty  years,  i.e.,  Phle- 
batrophia  mathesoni  MacGillivray.2 

Correspondence  with  Professor  Matheson  in  regard  to  this 
point  has  resulted  in  positive  proof  that  the  figure  in  the  text- 
book cited  refers  to  the  birch  leaf-mining  sawfly,  Phyllotoma 
nemorata.  Professor  Matheson  kindly  sent  prints  labelled  “Phle- 
batropliia  mathesoni,  1908—09,”  which  were  made  by  him,  and  it 
was  found,  by  a study  of  the  detail,  that  the  illustration  in  Leaf- 
Mining  Insects  was  produced  from  the  same  negative  from  which 
the  prints  had  been  made. 

It  was  believed  at  first  that,  at  some  time  or  other,  the  species 
may  have  been  transferred  to  the  genus  Schizocerus,  but  it  is  now 
believed,  since  there  are  no  records  of  such  a transfer  in  the  Na- 


1 Needham,  J.  G.,  Frost,  S.  W.,  and  Tothill,  B.  H.  1928.  The 
Williams  and  Wilkins  Co.,  Baltimore. 

2 MacGillivray,  A.  D.  1909.  Can.  Ent.,  41  : 345-346. 


324  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXlv 


tional  Museum  at  Washington,  and  since  no  other  species  of 
Schizocerus  (subfamily  Schizocerinae,  while  the  birch  leaf-min- 
ing sawfly  is  in  the  Phyllotominae)  is  known  to  form  a lens- 
shaped cocoon  within  the  leaf,  that  the  wrong  genus  was  given. 
The  interrogation  at  the  end  of  the  specific  name  in  the  caption  is 
perhaps  meant  to  refer  to  an  uncertainty  in  regard  to  the  genus 
Schizocerus  as  well  as  to  the  species. 

It  may  not  be  amiss  to  point  out,  additionally,  that,  on  page  297 
of  this  same  book,  two  sawflies  are  listed  as  “ Phlehatrophia 
mathesoni  MacG.  and  P.  nemorata  Fall.”  In  view  of  Rohwer’s 
recent  paper,3  in  which  the  whole  genus  Phlehatrophia,  more  or 
less  tentatively  erected  by  MacGillivray,  is  transferred  to  Phyllo- 
toma  Fallen  and  where  it  is  found  that  Phlehatrophia  mathesoni 
is  a synonym  of  Phyllotoma  nemorata,  it  is  obvious  that  the  two 
species  listed  on  page  297  are  one  and  the  same. 

3 Rohwer,  S.  A.  1929.  A note  on  the  synonymy  of  a birch  leaf 
miner.  Proc.  Ent.  Soc.  Wash.,  313 : 62-63. 


Dec.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  325 


NEW  BUTTERFLIES  AND  SUNDRY  NOTES. 

(Lepidoptera,  Rhopalocera) 

By  J.  D.  Gunder,  Pasadena,  Calif. 

Basilar chia  ar chip pus  Cram.,  tr.  f.  nivosus  new  tr.  f.  (Fig.  i, 
pi.  XXX.) 

The  ground  color  is  white  on  both  surfaces  instead  of  the 
usual  red-brown  shade.  The  maculation  is  unchanged. 
Classification : albinism-final ; same  kind  of  tr.  f . as  Danaus 
menippe  nivosus  Gun.  and  others. 

Data:  holotype  J*;  expanse  69  mm.;  Mystic,  Conn.,  July;  orig- 
inal collector  unknown ; type  in  author’s  coll. 

Note':  A partial  check  list  revision  of  the  names  under  this  spe- 
cies should  be  made  as  follows : 

Basilar  chia  Scud. 

31 1.  archippus  Cram. 
disip pe  Godt. 

# form  advena  Ellsw. 

cayuga  Naka. 
tr.  f.  pesudodorippus  Stkr. 

lanthanis  Cook  & Wats, 
tr.  f.  nivosus  Gun. 
etc.,  etc. 

A typical  archippus  is  shown  on  pi.  XXX.  To  its  left  are  pic- 
tured gradations  of  tr.  f.  pseudodorippus  Stkr.,  as  lettered  a,  h 
and  c.  Fig.  c illustrates  the  finel  phase  of  which  I know  of  two 
examples,  one  being  in  this  authors  coll,  and  the  other  at  the  Field 
Museum  in  Chicago.  Strecker’s  type  is  similar  to  fig.  a and  also 
so  is  lanthanis  Cook  & Wats,  which  falls  as  a synonym.  Fig.  aa 
shows  advena  Ellsw.  which  should  be  recorded  as  a form,  rather 
than  a tr.  f.  because  of  its  mendelian  characters  atavistic  to  the 
existent  race  ohsoleta  Edw.  which  it  rapidly  approaches.  This 
form  of  the  species  is  not  uncommon. 

Glaucopsyche  lygdamus  Dbldy.,  race  hehri  Edw.,  tr.  f.  sternitzkyi 
new  tr.  f.  (Fig.  2,  pi.  XXXI.) 

Submarginal  rows  of  black  spots  on  the  under  sides  of 
both  wings  tend  to  become  obsolete.  There  remains  a partial 


326  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXIv 


row  on  the  primaries.  The  crescent-shaped  cell  spots  are  un- 
affected. Fig.  b illustrates  a typical  behri.  Classification : 
immaculism — the  final  degree  would  be  a total  lack  of  spots, 
excepting  cell  spots. 

Data:  holotype  J',  fig.  a;  expanse  30  mm. ; Fairfax,  Marin  Co., 
Calif.,  Apr.  9,  1927.  One  paratype  .J',  not  quite  so  immaculate; 
expanse  27  mm.;  Trinity  Co.,  Calif.,  June  2,  1928.  Types  in 
author’s  coll.  Named  after  Mr.  R.  F.  Sternitzky,  of  San  Fran- 
cisco, the  original  collector. 

Plebeius  monticola  Clem.,  tr.  f.  montanus  new  tr.  f.  (Fig.  3,  pi. 
XXXI.) 

Black  spotting  through  discal  areas  on  under  sides  lacking 
on  primaries  and  reduced  on  secondaries.  Cell  marks  un- 
changed. The  two  submarginal  rows  of  spots  at  outer 
margins  also  seem  unaffected.  Upper  sides  quite  typical. 
Fig.  b shows  an  ordinary  monticola.  Classification : im- 
maculism— with  named  example  approaching  final  degree. 

Data:  holotype  J',  fig.  a;  expanse  22  mm.;  Cajon  Pass,  San 
Bernardino  Co.,  Calif.,  May  14,  1922  (Karl  Coolidge)  ; type  in 
author’s  coll,  (montanus^  hilly  region) . * 

Plebeius  acmon  West  & Hew.,  tr.  f.  angelus  new  tr.  f.  (Fig. 

4,  pi.  XXXI.) 

All  black  spots  through  discal  areas  on  under  sides  slightly 
enlarged  and  elongated,  becoming  drop-shaped  and  pointing 
inward.  Cell  spots  form  dumb-bell  design.  The  two  sub- 
marginal rows  of  spots  through  limbal  areas  remain  typical 
in  this  example.  Fig.  b shows  a regular  acmon,  §.  Classi- 
fication : melanifusism — it  remains  to  be  seen  whether  the 
marginal  rows  also  change  in  the  final  phases  of  this  species. 

Data:  holotype  },  fig.  a;  expense  24  mm. ; Los  Angeles,  Calif., 
June  10,  1920.  Type  in  author’s  coll. 

Argynnis  montivaga  Behr.,  tr.  f.  boharti  new  tr.  f.  (Figs.  5,  pi. 
XXXI.) 

The  figures  show  both  upper  and  under  sides  of  this  tr.  f., 
as  well  as  a typical  montivaga  of  the  same  sex  and  from  the 
same  locality.  The  maculation  change  is  similar  to  Arg. 
erinna  cunninghami  Owen  and  nearby  variants.  The  tr.  f. 
cunninghami  is  in  the  Barnes  coll.  Conspicuous  by  less  of 


Dec.,  19 £9  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  327 


usual  Argynnis  design  in  being  almost  black  through  limbal 
areas  on  both  surfaces  with  discal  area  veining  broadly  black 
and  basal  areas  of  under  side  secondaries  retaining  evidence 
of  silver  spots  and  some  original  design.  Classification: 
melanifusism — probably  final  phase  because  of  similarity  to 
related  examples.  Mammothi  Gun.  represents  immaculism 
which  is  the  opposite  reaction  in  this  species  to  melanifusism. 

Data:  Holotype  'J,  expanse  46  mm. ; Mono  Pass  Trail  (Yo- 
semite  to  Mono  Lake),  Calif.;  July  16,  1929.  In  author’s  coll, 
and  named  after  Mr.  R.  M.  Bohart,  of  Berkeley,  Calif.,  who  took 
the  specimen. 

Melitaea  mayi  n.  sp.  Fig.  6,  pi.  XXXI. 

The  figures  show  both  upper  and  under  sides  of  this  inter- 
esting specimen  in  approximately  natural  size.  I believe  that 
this  species  will  be  found  to  be  as  unique  in  comparison  to 
other  American  Melitaeas,  as  is  Euphydryas  gillettii  Barnes 
in  its  relation  to  other  Euphydryas.  In  markings  it  is  related 
to  the  Melitaea  athalia  Rott.  group  of  Europe  and  Asia,  com- 
ing extremely  near  to  race  latefascia  Fixs  which  is  found  in 
Corea  and  illustrated  in  color  by  Seitz,  pi.  661  of  Palearctic 
Butterflies.  The  ground  color  is  brown,  the  maculation  black 
and  the  lighter  markings  of  the  under  side  secondaries,  a 
cream-white  without  silvering  or  a definite  luster.  This 
broad  band  of  light  irregular  shaped  spots  across  the  discal 
area  of  the  under  side  secondaries  is  an  interesting  feature  in 
making  its  comparison  to  other  American  Melitaeas.  Ac- 
cording to  the  Barnes  & Benj.  1926  Check  List  this  species 
would  probably  be  placed  at  the  end  of  the  theona-pola 
group. 

Data:  Holotype  expanse  42  mm. ; small  high  valley  four 
miles  west  of  Ptarmigan  Valley,  Banff,  Alb.,  Canada,  July  28, 
1929.  A single  male  collected  by  Mr.  J.  F.  May,  of  Kelwood, 
Man.,  Canada,  after  whom  it  is  named. 

Note : In  this  locality  Mr.  May  also  took  Melitaea  malcolmi 
Comst.  which  extends  its  range  into  Canada.  A splendid  series 
of  Euphy.  editha  heani  Skin,  was  also  taken. 

Dione  vanillae  L.,  form  normal  incarnata  Riley,  tr.  f.  hewlettae 

tr.  f.  Figs.  7,  pi.  XXXI. 

The  ground  color  is  white  instead  of  the  usual  red-brown 
shade.  Silvering  and  black  maculation  unchanged.  Classifi- 
cation : albinism — final  color  change. 


328  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  V0I.XXIV 


Data:  Holotype  $,  expanse  68  mm. ; Ontario,  Riverside  Co., 
Calif.  Taken  in  the  summer  of  1927  by  Miss  Esther  P.  Hewlett 
after  whom  it  is  named. 

Note:  The  recording  of  this  transition  form  completes  all  the 
names  which  can  be  given  to  this  American  race  of  vanillae  under 
existing  classification.  To  wit:  (A)  Under  change  of  maculation 
comes  comstocki  representing  melanifusism  and  its  opposite  mar- 
gineapertus  representing  immaculism.  (B)  Under  change  of 
color  comes  fumosus  representing  chromatism  and  its  opposite 
hewlettae  representing  albinism.  Examples  of  all  of  these  have 
been  illustrated  at  the  time  of  their  original  description.  It  is  un- 
fortunate that  Mr.  Riley,  of  London,  gave  a name  to  the  Amer- 
ican race  of  vanillae  without  taking  into  consideration  previously 
named  transition  forms  which  goes  to  prove  that  timely  abstract- 
ing of  exotic  literature  is  most  necessary.  I recognize  error  on 
my  part  in  following  some  of  our  own  incorrect  list  names. 

Sundry  Notes  on  Names  and  Naming. 

It  would  be  a foolish  idea  to  try  to  dry  up  the  ocean  in  order  to 
stem  a tide.  A better  plan  would  be  to  properly  regulate  the  tide 
and  let  the  ocean  take  care  of  itself.  Similarly,  it  is  better  to  care- 
fully regulate  the  naming  of  insect  variations,  instead  of  curtail- 
ing, by  anti-evolutionary  sentiment  in  the  Code,  what  might  prove 
to  be  good  entomological  work.  To  achieve  at  least  partial  regu- 
lation give  authors  a modern  system  of  classification  under  which 
to  describe  their  atypical  specimens  and  synonymy  will  be  cut  to 
a minimum.  Eventually  we  will  certainly  do  away  with  the  old 
two-dimensional  scheme  of  classification  and  some  day  with  that 
man-made  unnatural  “ timetable  ” of  priority  and  we  will  adopt  a 
general  sliding  scale  for  classification  which  is  based  entirely  on 
the  natural  “ timetable  ” of  evolution.  We  are  making  a progres- 
sive step  in  that  direction  by  classifying  transition  forms  and  al- 
lowing them  the  recognition  they  deserve.  Their  grade  on  the 
evolutionary  stage  is  no  longer  a matter  of  guess  work.  The  fact 
of  scarcity  is  never  an  excuse  in  scientific  investigation,  though  it 
may  be  a problem. 

Classification  of  variation  requires  study,  as  well  as  a constant 
review  of  new  literature.  But  there  will  always  be  present  authors 
who  follow  the  paths  of  least  resistance.  An  easy  way  to  dodge 
responsibility  and  shift  uncertain  classification  to  others  is  to  use 
the  word  “ variety.”  The  phrase  “ new  variety  ” in  original  de- 


Dec.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  329 


scription  is  a convenient  entomological  cover-all,  having  a differ- 
ent positional  status  in  the  opinion  of  every  one  in  America,  as 
well  as  in  Europe.  It  won’t  hurt  taxonomy  to  stop  using  that 
word,  for  there  are  other  more  logical  terms  to  use  in  its  stead. 
“ Sub-species  ” is  another  word  which  is  going  into  disuse,  be- 
cause “race”  is  more  expressive.  Besides  “sub-species”  is  some- 
times used  to  mean  any  one  thing  under  species.  It  has  been 
used  many  times  to  definitely  suggest  much  lower  steps  on  the 
classification  scale,  than  “ race  ” would  indicate.  For  this  reason 
its  use  as  a positive  fixation  is  not  advised.  I do  not  advocate  the 
use  of  the  words  “aberration  ” or  “ ab  ” for  reasons  as  first  given 
on  p.  265,  vol.  38,  November,  1927,  Entomological  News. 

The  use  of  a term  in  original  description  which  infers  variation 
due  to  malformative  or  uninheritable  causes  suggests  specimens 
unfit  for  classification  on  a natural  development  scale;  therefore, 
to  designate  legitimately  recurrent  variation  of  specific  nature,  I 
have  employed  for  several  years,  the  expression  “ transition 
form,”  or  its  abbreviation — “ tr.  f.”'  If  authors  will  gradually 
come  to  use  this  term  and  acquaint  themselves  with  the  systematic 
arrangement  under  which  their  transition  forms  always  occur, 
they  will  save  themselves  considerable  synonymical  chagrin 
through  duplication.  The  day  is  passing  (in  America  at  least) 
when  an  author  can  slap  on  a “ new  ab.”  without  thought  or  di- 
rect reference  to  similar  nearby  names  and  get  away  with  it. 

Some  notes  on  recently  described  butterflies  follow : 

Minor  Chermock  for  Eury.  philodice  Godt.,  form  § plicaduta 
Naka.  (Bui.  Brook.  Ent.  Soc.,  p.  118,  vol.  XXII,  April,  1927.) 
Type  a dwarf.  See  “ Unnamable  Butterflies,”  July,  1928,  Ent. 
News.  Falls  as  a synonym  under  species  philodice. 

Alha  Chermock  for  Eury.  philodice  Godt.,  form  § plicaduta 
Naka.  (Bui.  Brook.  Ent.  Soc.,  p.  119,  vol.  XXII,  April,  1927.) 
Nakahara’s  name  takes  care  of  both  yellow  and  white  females 
which  have  or  tend  to  have  solid  black  borders.  Falls  as  a syno- 
nym under  plicaduta,  as  does  “albida”  which  was  “A  Correction,” 
as  stated  on  p.  173,  Oct.,  1928,  issue. 

Ehrmani  Chermock  for  Eury.  philodice  Godt.,  form  J plicaduta 
Naka.  (Bui.  Brook.,  p.  118,  vol.  XXII,  April,  1927.)  Reduction 
or  enlargement  of  the  discoidal  spot  or  variance  of  marginal 
width,  without  suffusion,  represents  the  naturally  reciprocal  ten- 
dency within  the  limits  of  the  described  species.  (An  Eskimo 


330  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.  XXIV 


with  big  broad  shoulders  is  an  Eskimo  just  the  same.)  Falls  as 
a synonym  under  plicaduta. 

Boweri  Chermock  for  Saty.  eurydice  Joh.  (Bui.  Brook.  Ent. 
Soc.,  p.  1 19,  vol.  XXII,  April,  1927.)  Number  of  individual 
spots,  gradation  or  lack  of  spots  have  never  been  recognized  as 
namable  characteristics  for  the  Satyridae  groups  which  are  con- 
tinually and  individually  variable  in  this  regard.  Falls  as  syno- 
nym to  the  species. 

Intermedia  Chermock  for  Glau.  xerces  Bdv.  (Bui.  Brook.  Ent. 
Soc.,  p.  20,  vol.  XXIV,  Feb.,  1929.)  An  examination  of  the  illus- 
trations of  the  allied  xerces  figures  pictured  in  Comstock’s  “ But- 
terflies of  California  ” will  show  that  there  are  more  than  enough 
names  applied  near  this  species.  Falls  as  a synonym  possibly 
under  antiacisi  Bdv.  There  is  no  transition  sequence  between 
black  to  grey  in  these  names. 

Borealis  Chermock  for  Cercy.  pegala  Fabr.  (Bui.  Brook.  Ent. 
Soc.,  p.  21,  vol.  XXIV,  Feb.,  1929.)  Only  an  extreme  alope 
nephele  Kirby  under  which  it  falls  as  a synonym.  Ohio  has  been 
too  well  combed  over  to  produce  a constant  new  race. 

Laurae  Chermock  for  Eury.  eurytheme  Bdv.,  form  eryphyle 
Edw.  (Bui.  Brook.  Ent.  Soc.,  p.  21,  vol.  XXIV,  Feb.,  1929.) 
Tr.  f.  alba  Stkr.  takes  care  of  albinism  for  the  species  eurytheme, 
as  well  as  its  seasonal  forms. 

S errata  Chermock  for  Eury.  philodice  Godt.  (Bui.  Brook.  Ent. 
Soc.,  p.  21,  vol.  XXIV,  Feb.,  1929.)  Variation  of  the  contour  of 
the  inner  margin  of  the  marginal  band  of  all  species  within  the 
Eurymus  is  variation  within  the  converging  limits  of  the  species 
itself  and  not  classifiable  under  suffusion.  A synonym  of  phi- 
lodice. 

Fulvus  Rummel  for  Lyc.  hypophlaeus  Bdv. ; also 

Neui  Rummel  for  Lyc.  hypophlaeus  Bdv.  (both  Buh  Brook. 
Ent.  Soc.,  p.  268,  vol.  XXIII,  Dec.,  1928).  Fulvus  represents 
melanifusism,  likewise  does  banksi  Wats.  & Comst.,  both  of  which 
are  synonyms  under  fasciata  Stkr.  Neui  is  a chrysalis  burn  or 
malform  and  synonymous  under  the  species.  Octomaculata  Dean 
is  a form,  a mendelian  form,  atavistic  probably  to  existent  west- 
ern representatives  in  the  genera.  Only  three  transitions  forms 
for  the  species  are  possible,  all  have  been  named.  The  following 
check  list  revision  is  suggested : 


Dec.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  331 


Lycaena  Fabr. 

415.  hypophlaeas  Bdv. 

americana  Harr. 
neui  Rumm. 

form  octomaculata  Dean 
tr.  f.  fulliolus  Elst.  ( chromatism ) 
tr.  f.  obliterata  Scud.  ( immaculism ) 
caeca  Reiff 
obsoleta  B.  & McD. 
tr.  f.  fasciata  Stkr.  ( melanifusism ) 
banksi  Wats.  & Comst. 
fulvus  Rumm. 

Streckeri  Holland  for  Pap.  bairdii  Edw.  (Bui.  Carn.  Mus.,  p 
310,  no.  2,  vol.  17,  April,  1927.)  Asterioides  Reak.  should  be 
placed  as  a synonym  under  bairdii.  In  my  series  of  bairdii  from 
Arizona  in  particular,  New  Mexico,  the  Great  Basin  and  South- 
ern California,  most  of  the  males  have,  on  their  upper  side,  the 
fully  developed  yellow  mesial  band  of  spots  (as  on  Edwards’s 
singly  described  male  type)  ; while  in  others  there  is  a gradual 
loss  of  this  band,  until  in  some  specimens,  it  is  totally  absent. 
Likewise  in  the  females,  this  same  gradation  occurs,  some  having 
this  same  band  of  spots  (an  interesting  notation!),  while  the  ma- 
jority, of  course,  are  always  without  it.  The  yellow  crescent  cell 
spots,  in  both  sexes,  appear  or  increase  in  size  according  to  the  in- 
crease of  yellow  design  elsewhere.  Another  point  of  interest  is 
that  some  examples  have  a visage  of  the  reddish  tinge  within  the 
yellow  on  the  under  side  secondaries  and  some  have  not.  The 
conclusion  is  that  by  this  variability,  our  western  bairdii  shows  its 
mendelian  inheritance,  either  to  or  from,  the  eastern  cousin  Pap. 
ajax  L.  (asterias) . The  named  illustration  of  streckeri  Holland 
is  referable  to  none  of  the  eight  divisions  under  which  tr.  fs.  are 
classified  and  the  name  will  fall,  as  a slight  straight  synonym, 
probably  under  syn.  asterioides  Reak. 

N ebraskensis  Holland  for  Brenthis  myrina  Cram.  (Ann.  Carn. 
Mus.,  p.  36,  no.  1,  vol.  XIX,  Dec.,  1928).  I believe  it  is  conceded 
that  dwarfs  and  giants  find  no  place  in  present  day  classification 
through  the  application  of  specific  names.  Size  alone  counts  for 
nothing  in  a species  having  a considerable  range  where  environ- 
ment produces  largeness  or  smallness  only.  Imperial  Valley  in 
California  develops  the  largest  common  Cynthia  cardui  L.  of  any 
place  in  U.  S.,  but  they  don’t  seem  to  be  worthy.  N ebraskensis 


332  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


which  was  given  under  the  vague  term  “ variety  ” to  four  males 
falls  as  a synonym  under  myrina. 

Pardo psis  Holland  for  Brenthis  bellona  Fabr.  (Ann.  Carn. 
Mus.,  p.  36,  no.  1,  vol.  XIX,  Dec.,  1928).  This  is  a name  where 
illustration  would  be  of  great  help,  but  I trust  it  represents  a show- 
ing towards  immaculism,  that  is  a first  degree  tendency  at  least 
towards  lack  of  design.  Tr.  f.  kleenei  Wats,  which  is  a well  de- 
veloped phase  of  melanifusism  unfortunately  falls  as  a synonym 
to  tr.  f.  fasciata  Ckll.  which  in  a much  lesser  degree  represents  the 
same  thing.  Cockerell’s  poor  description  as  well  as  Maynard’s 
illustration  on  which  he  based  his  name  are  both  terrible  pieces  of 
entomological  reference. 

Biedermanni  Ehrman  for  Eurema  mexicana  Bdv.  (Bui.  Brook. 
Ent.  Soc.,  p.  84,  vol.  XX,  April,  1925).  A male  specimen  from 
Arizona  with  slightly  heavier  black  emargination  on  upper  side 
secondaries  as  well  as  on  primaries.  This  excess  encroachment  of 
the  black  partly  cuts  the  contour  of  the  “jaw  of  the  dog-head” 
design  and  Mr.  Ehrman’s  idea  of  classification  placed  it  as  a new 
species.  Marginal  width  variation  within  either  the  genera 
Eurymus  or  Eurema  are  strains  not  generally  classifiable  under 
transition  forms  unless  the  suffusion  or  immaculation  is  apt  to  be 
entirely  complete  over  the  wing  and  for  certain  well  known 
species,  like  mexicana  for  example,  this  is  doubtful ; therefore, 
the  name  biedermanni  only  represents  variation  within  the  legiti- 
mate alternate  limits  of  the  species  and  falls  as  a synonym  thereof. 
Recta  Klots  (Ent.  Am.,  p.  134,  vol.  IX,  Dec.,  1928)  is  a name  ap- 
plied to  oppositely  marked  specimens  from  biedermanni  or  those 
having  less  heavy  black  emargination.  Most  of  the  foregoing 
synonymical  reference  is  applicable  to  this  name.  See  note  on  the 
above  synonymy  of  serrata  Chermock  for  'additional  reference. 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  XXIV,  No.  5 Plate  XXX 


New  Butterflies  and  Sundry  Notes — Gunder 


New  Butterflies  and  Sundry  Notes- — Guilder 


Bull.  B.  B.  S.,  XXIV,  No.  5 Plate  XXXI 


Dec.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  333 


THE  GENUS  EURYGENIUS  LA  FERTE  (COLE- 
OPTERA)  IN  OUR  FAUNA. 

By  H.  C.  Fall,  Tyngsboro,  Mass. 

Since  1851,  when  Le  Conte  described  his  Eurygenius  constric- 
tus  from  California,  this  genus  has  been  accredited  to  our  fauna. 
In  1895  (Coleop.  Notices,  VI)  Casey  gave  reasons  for  doubting 
the  correctness  of  this  generic  reference  and  erected  the  genus 
Retocomus  for  our  so-called  Eurygenius  species. 

Notwithstanding  the  rejection  of  Retocomus  in  the  Leng  List 
and  the  continuance  of  our  species  under  Eurygenius,  I am  quite 
convinced  after  a careful  study  of  La  Ferte’s  generic  descriptions 
and  figures  that  if  the  characters  on  which  his  Eurygenius  and 
Stereopalpus  are  based  are  accepted  as  of  generic  rank,  then  the 
course  pursued  by  Casey  is  the  only  logical  one. 

In  this  connection  it  is  of  interest  to  say  that  the  two  species 
described  below,  by  the  large  eyes  which  are  not  at  all  emarginate 
in  front  (hence  not  Retocomus) , the  short  oblique  tempora  and 
the  shorter  and  more  triangular  terminal  joint  of  the  maxillary 
palpus  as  compared  with  the  long  cultriform  last  joint  in  Stere- 
opalpus, seem  to  be  definitely  assignable  to  Eurygenius. 

Eurygenius  parvicornis  n.  sp. 

Slender,  convex ; elytra,  body  beneath,  legs  and  antennae 
pale  brown,  thorax  a little  darker,  head  piceous ; vestiture 
ashy  white,  recumbent,  moderately  plentiful  but  not  conceal- 
ing the  color  of  the  derm. 

Eyes  large  and  prominent,  not  at  all  emarginate,  margin 
back  of  the  antennae  barely  perceptibly  flattened,  separated 
on  the  front  by  about  their  own  width ; tempora  short,  ob- 
lique. 

Antennae  short,  slender,  reaching  only  to  the  base  of  the 
thorax,  joints  proportioned  as  in  Stereopalpus. 

Prothorax  not  quite  as  wide  as  the  head,  just  perceptibly 
longer  than  wide,  widest  at  apical  fourth,  rounded  in  front, 
sides  moderately  convergent  and  not  sinuate  to  the  rear; 
sculpture  consisting  of  lunate  ridges  or  incompletely  walled 
punctures,  median  line  not  impressed. 

Elytra  elongate,  nearly  parallel  sided,  y2  wider  than  the 
thorax  and  about  2^2  times  as  long  as  wide;  rather  closely 
moderately  coarsely  punctate. 

Body  beneath  more  finely  punctured  and  more  thinly  pu- 
bescent than  above.  In  the  female  the  fifth  ventral  is  sub- 


334  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


equal  in  length  to  the  fourth,  the  apical  margin  rounded;  in 
the  male  the  fifth  ventral  is  much  longer  than  the  fourth, 
flattened  or  a little  concave  medially  at  apex,  the  concavity 
limited  by  ridges  which  are  produced  posteriorly  to  form 
acute  cusps,  between  which  the  apex  is  roundly  emarginate. 
Length  5.5  to  6 mm. ; width  1.75  to  1.85  mm. 

Described  from  2 J'  and  1 $ from  the  Davis  Mts.,  Texas.  The 
type  Ccf)  bears  label  “ Davis  Mts.,  Texas,  Fort  Davis  Quad, 
Phantom  Lake,  v-25-1916,  F.  M.  Gaige.” 

Eurygenius  perforatus  n.  sp. 

Very  similar  in  all  essential  features  to  the  preceding  spe- 
cies. The  eyes,  tempora  and  antennae  are  nearly  the  same, 
as  is  the  modification  of  the  ventral  apex  in  the  male.  The 
color,  however,  is  more  uniformly  pale  yellowish  brown,  the 
head  not  darker;  the  pubescence  is  less  appressed  and  the 
elytra  are  notably  more  coarsely  deeply  and  closely  punctate, 
the  punctures  not  concealed  by  the  pubescence.  The  size  is 
a little  smaller,  the  length  varying  between  3.75  and  4.75  mm. 
(head  deflexed). 

California  (Palm  Springs,  8-30-23),  4 J',  1 5,  collected  and 
submitted  by  Mr.  A.  C.  Davis,  of  Garden  Grove,  Calif. 

The  type  is  a male  in  my  own  collection ; paratypes  in  Mr. 
Davis’s  collection. 


Bee.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  335 


BOOK  NOTES 

Flowers  and  Insects,  by  Charles  Robertson  (pp.  1-221).  (Pub- 
lished by  the  author,  Carlinville,  111.,  1929.) 

This  is  a voluminous  record  and  certainly  most  useful  in  a 
reference  library.  However,  it  is  not  easy  reading,  for  it  consists, 
except  for  the  Preface,  of  extensive  lists  of  technical  names  of 
plants  and  insects,  arranged  in  the  botanical  order  of  the  plants, 
according  to  Gray,  1908.  What  is  given  in  this  work  are  the  rec- 
ords of  many  years’  observations  reduced  to  a book  and  com- 
pressed within  the  limits  of  220  pages. 

As  is  to  be  expected,  the  greatest  number  of  records  is  of  Hy- 
menoptera,  of  which  664  species  are  named ; the  next  is  of  Dip- 
tera,  recording  446  species.  Equally  naturally,  the  least  number 
(except  for  the  one  Neuropteran)  is  25  Heteroptera.  The  Cole- 
optera  number  153  species,  and  the  Lepidoptera  99.  The  four 
major  orders  are  not  only  numerous  in  species  but  they  also  con- 
tain many  nectar  and  pollen  feeders. 

Naturally,  I cannot  profitably  discuss  any  group  except  the 
Heteroptera.  The  single  Neuropteran  is  absolutely  negligible  in 
every  respect,  being  merely  an  adventitious  visitor.  The  Heterop- 
tera are  practically  in  the  same  case.  Orius  (here  called  Tri- 
phleps)  insidiosus,  Nabis  (here  called  Coriscus)  ferus,  Sinea  dia- 
dema,  Phymata  wolfii  and  Podisus  serieventris  (here  called  by 
the  old  name  spinosus),  are  all  known  predators  and  frequent 
flowers  to  hunt  in  them.  Orius  is  common  on  daisy  ( Chrysan- 
themum leucanthemum)  ; Phymata  is  general  in  panicles  or  um- 
bels, such  as  the  various  golden  rods  ( Solidago ) and  Queen 
Anne’s  Lace  ( Daucus  carota),  where  it  lies  concealed  to  trap,  the 
Diptera  and  Hymenoptera ; and  Sinea  is  another  hidden  hunter, 
found  where  its  chosen  prey  abounds,  principally  on  red  clover 
( Trifolium  pratense),  for  example.  None  of  the  others  is  a 
habitual  flower  feeder.  Indeed,  the  records  of  the  numbers  of 
each  found  on  flowers,  generally  single  individuals,  clearly  shows 
this.  But  in  any  event,  all  are  plant  feeders ; and  the  records  are 
doubtless  new  food  plants  for  some  of  them. 

The  plants  on  which  this  residual  21  species  were  found  follow : 
Plagiognathus  obscurus  Uhler — Oxypolis  rigidior,  Pastinaca  sa- 
tiva,  Zizia  aurea. 

Lopidea  media  Say — Cacalia  reniformis,  Liparis  liliifolia,  Clematis 
virginiana,  Aruncus  Sylvester , Sanicula  marilandica,  Slum 
cicutae folium,  Thaspium  aureum  trifoliatum. 


336  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


Lygus  pratensis  L. — Apocynum  cannabinum,  Asclepias  syriaca, 
Aster  erisoides  villosus,  Boltonia  asteroides,  Erigeron  phila- 
delphicus,  E.  ramosus,  Helianthus  annuus,  H.  laetiflorus,  H. 
tuberosus,  Parthenium  integri folium,  Rudbeckia  hirta,  Soli- 
dago  nemoralis,  S.  idmifolia,  Cassia  chamae crista,  Stropho- 
styles  helvola,  Erythronium  albidum,  Isopyrum  biternatum, 
Ceanothus  americanus,  Salix  cordata,  Staphylea  trifolia,  Eu- 
lophus  americanus,  Osmorrhiza  longistylis,  Oxypolis  rigidior, 
Pastinaca  sativa,  Zizia  aurea. 

C aloe  oris  rapidus  Say  (recte,  Adelphocoris) — Asclepias  sidli- 
vanti,  Erigeron  philadelphicus,  Helianthus  laetiflorus,  H. 
scaberrimus,  Parthenium  integrifolium,  Solidago  canadensis, 
Pycnanthemum  flexuosum,  Petalo sternum  purpureum,  Ceano- 
thus americanus,  Verbena  hastata. 

Phytocoris  schupeus  Say — Heracleum  lanatum,  Pastinaca  sativa. 

Oncopeltus  fasciatus  Dallas — Asclepias  incarnata,  A.  purpurea, 
A.  syriaca,  Pycnanthemum  flexuosum,  Cephalanthus  occi- 
dentalis,  Eryngium  yuccifolium,  Oxypolis  rigidior. 

Lygaeus  turcicus  Fabr.  ( kalmii  Stal?) — Apocynum  cannabinum, 
Asclepias  incarnata,  A.  syriaca,  Stellaria  media,  Aster  anoma- 
lus,  A.  ericoides  villosus,  Cacalia  tuberosa,  Cirsium  pumilum, 
Heliopsis  helianthoides,  Eryngium  yuccifolium,  Eidophus 
americanus,  Cium  cicutaefolium,  Thaspium  aureum  trifolia- 
tum,  Krigia  ample xicaulis,  Solidago  canadensis,  S.  missouri- 
ensis,  S.  nemoralis,  Nepeta  cataria,  Pycnanthemum  flexu- 
osum, P.  virginianum,  Melilotus  alba,  Polygonum  lapathi- 
folium,  Ceanothus  americanus,  Salix  humilis,  Veronica  vir- 
ginica. 

Melanocoryphus  bicrucis  Stal — Cacalia  reniformis. 

Ortholomus  longiceps  Stal  (recte,  scolopax  Say) — Pycnanthe- 
mum flexuosum. 

Cliariesterus  antennator  Fabricius — Euphorbia  corollata. 

Alydus  eurinus  Say — Aster  multi floras,  A.  paniculatus,  Eryngium 
yuccifolium. 

Alydus  pilosulus  ‘Herrich-Schaeffer — Aster  multiflorus,  Solidago 
canadensis,  S.  nemoralis. 

Harmostes  reflexulus  Say — Aster  ericoides  villosus. 

Corizus  lateralis  Say — Erigeron  philadelphicus,  Pastinaca  sativa, 
Polytaenia  nuttalli. 

Euschistus  fissilis  Uhler  (recte,  euschistoides  Vollenhoven)  — 
Helenium  autumnale. 


Dec.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  337 


Euschistus  variolarius  Palisot  de  Beauvois — Asclepias  syriaca, 
Bidens  aristosa , Eupatorium  serotinum,  Helenium  autum- 
nale,  Salix  humilis. 

Euschistus  ictericus  Linnaeus — Pycnanthemum  flexuosum,  Peta- 
lo  sternum  purpureum,  Poly  taenia  nuttalli,  Zizia  aurea. 
Corimelaena  lateralis  Fabricus — Cryptotaenia  canadensis,  Tae- 
nidia  integerrima,  Chaerophyllum  procumbens. 

Corimelaena  pulicaria  Germar — Parthenium  integrifolium,  Sassa- 
fras laurifolium,  Geum  canadense,  Cicuta  maculata,  Chaero- 
phyllum procumbens,  Heracleum  lanatum,  Pastinaca  sativa, 
Sanicula  marilandica,  Sium  cicutae folium. 

Canthophorus  cinctus  Amyot  & Serville  (recte,  Sehirus) — Ceano- 
thus  americanus. 

It  may  be  seen  by  perusing  the  preceding  list  how  slight  is  its 
ecological  significance.  Obviously,  as  pollinators,  these  few  Het- 
eroptera  observed  on  flowers  are  of  negligible  importance.  As  to 
food  plants,  here  too,  we  find  data  which  possibly  extend  the 
known  range  of  food  plants,  but  are  no  indication  of  the  native 
or  preferred  food-plant.  For  example,  take  Lygus  pratensis.  It 
may  or  may  not  be  this  species,  according  to  our  later  understand- 
ing. But  assuming  that  it  is,  this  bug  is  omnivorous,  abundant 
and  widespread ; it  may  be  found  anywhere,  and  its  occasional 
appearance  on  a flower  means  nothing.  The  same  may  be  said  of 
the  Euschisti,  which  are  strong  fliers.  Calocoris  (now  Adelpho- 
coris ) is  in  the  same  situation. 

A curious  fact  presents  itself  in  this  analysis.  The  preferred 
food  of  Corizus  is  the  Polygonums,  yet  none  was  found  on  their 
flowers.  Ortholomus  is  most  abundant  on  Spiraea,  and  I have 
myself  seen  it  on  the  blossoms,  but  Mr.  Robertson  does  not  record 
is  as  so  found.  The  mirid  Lygus  pabulinus  is  abundant  on  its 
foodplant  Impatiens  biflora,  but  it  is  not  recorded  from  its  blos- 
soms, although  I have  taken  it  at  flowering  time.  Ceanothus  har- 
bors during  its  flowering  season  enormous  numbers  of  Gargaphia 
angulata,  yet  it  would  seem  they  shun  its  blooms.  Daisy  heads 
are  the  hunting  ground  of  Orius  preying  on  the  Thrips  that  there 
abound,  but  none  seems  to  have  been  observed  on  them.  Capsella 
bur sapast oris  is  the  foodplant  of  Peribalus  limbolarius,  but  it  was 
not  found  on  the  flowers.  Anasa  repetita  is  found  only  on  Sicyos 
angulatus,  but  seems  to  shun  its  flowers.  In  fact,  one  could  go 
through  the  entire  list  and  record  similar  absences  of  bugs  from 
the  flowers  of  their  known  foodplants. 


338  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxiv 


EDITORIAL. 

ON  AUTHOR’S  CORRECTIONS. 

(Or  Additions,  or  Improvements.) 

Our  editorial  policy  toward  our  valued  contributors  is,  and,  we 
hope,  will  always  be,  liberal.  But  there  are  one  or  two  places  in 
which  we  must  be  careful,  much  as  we  would  prefer  to  be  prodi- 
gal. One  of  these  is  that  which  is  kindly  called  “ author’s  cor- 
rections.” Of  all  costly  details  in  printing,  these  are  among  the 
most  expensive.  Authors,  of  course,  are  not  always  editors, 
wherefore  they  do  not  always  realize  what  it  means  to  add  more 
words  to  an  article  already  in  type;  or  to  take  them  out  in  num- 
ber. So  little  a thing  as  the  substitution  of  an  eight-letter  word 
for  a three-letter  word  in  the  middle  of  a page  may  cause  the  re- 
setting of  a half-page — always  charged  for  in  the  printer’s  bill. 

The  acute  financial  stringency  in  all  our  biological  publications 
forces  all  of  us  editors  to  pinch  the  pennies.  And  if,  unfortu- 
nately, additional  pence  appear  on  the  bill,  we  are  compelled  to 
extract  them  from  the  author  responsible. 

Our  assumption  at  all  times  is  that  a paper  submitted  for  pub- 
lication is  complete  and  perfect.  And  we  accept  it  on  that  basis 
only.  If  later  it  turns  out  that  the  author  omitted  something  he 
should  have  said,  or  made  some  statement  not  quite  acceptable  to 
him  when  he  sees  it  in  cold  type,  we  must  pass  the  charge  for 
such  an  emendation  to  him.  We  do  it  regretfully,  but  we  must 
keep  down  our  costs. 

We  have  mentioned  this  on  other  occasions,  but  it  appears  to 
be  a tonic  that  must  be  administered  again  off  and  on  to  have  it 
strong  in  the  consciousness  of  our  much  appreciated  authors. 

So,  please  remember,  dear  authors,  that  we  charge  back  to  you 
the  cost  of  all  material  changes  you  make  in  your  article,  after  it 
is  in  type. — J.  R.  T.  B. 


Dec.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  339 


PROCEEDINGS  OF  THE  SOCIETY. 

Meeting  of  May  16,  1929. 

A regular  meeting  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  was 
held  in  the  Brooklyn  Museum  on  Thursday  evening,  May  16, 
1929,  at  8.10  p.  m. 

President  Davis  in  the  Chair  and  twelve  members  present,  viz.: 
Messrs.  Ahlund,  Bell,  Bigelow,  Chapin,  Eisenhardt,  Engelhardt, 
Lemmer,  Schaeffer,  Sheridan,  Siepmann,  and  Torre-Bueno ; and 
Dr.  Risch. 

Minutes  of  the  previous  meeting  read  and  approved. 

Mr.  Torre-Bueno  reported  briefly  for  the  Publication  Commit- 
tee. 

Mr.  Engelhardt  presented  the  report  of  the  Treasurer. 

Mr.  Eisenhardt  proposed  the  two  following  gentlemen  for 
membership : 

Dr.  Otto  E.  F.  Risch,  785  Carroll  Street,  Brooklyn,  N.  Y. 

Mr.  Charles  Ahlund,  516  Eleventh  Street,  Brooklyn,  N.  Y. 

Both  Dr.  Risch  and  Mr.  Ahlund  being  present,  it  was  regularly 
moved  and  seconded  that  the  By-Laws  be  suspended  and  that  the 
Secretary  cast  one  ballot  for  the  election  of  both,  which  was  ac- 
cordingly done,  and  Dr.  Risch  and  Mr.  Ahlund  were  elected  to 
membership. 

The  Secretary  read  letters  from  Mrs.  Anna  B.  Comstock,  wife 
of  Dr.  Comstock,  Dr.  Walther  Horn  and  Dr.  Karl  Jordan  ex- 
pressing their  appreciation  of  the  Society’s  action  in  electing 
them  Honorary  Members  of  the  Society. 

Mr.  Torre-Bueno  remarked  on  some  specimens  of  Hemiptera 
brought  by  Mr.  Siepmann.  He  also  showed  the  following  books 
and  commented  on  them : The  Principles  of  Systematic  Ento- 
mology, by  Gordon  Floyd  Ferris,  and  Instinct  and  Intelligence, 
by  Major  R.  W.  G.  Hingston,  M.C.,  published  in  the  Book  League 
Monthly  (also  as  a separate  work  by  the  Macmillan  Co.). 

Mr.  Schaeffer  showed  specimens  of  the  beetles  Oherea  basalis 
Lee.  raised  on  black-topped  aster,  and  Tachymerus  gleditsiae  Lin- 
naeus bred  from  the  seeds  of  Palmetto,  from  Brownsville,  Texas, 
both  of  which  were  collected  by  Mr.  Engelhardt. 

Mr.  Davis  showed  a postal-card  received  from  Mr.  Notman, 
from  Covington,  Louisiana,  and  remarked  on  Mr.  Notman’s  long 
collecting  trips  across  the  continent.  He  also  showed  a specimen 
of  the  Geometrid  moth,  Epelis  truncataria  Walker,  collected  at 


340  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXlv 


Lakehurst,  on  bearberry  and  one  collected  by  Mr.  Roy  Latham 
at  Manorville,  Long  Island,  July  4,  1925.  He  also  showed  speci- 
mens of  the  Saturnid  moth,  Callosamia  promethea  Drury,  two 
males  and  two  females,  which  were  bred  from  cocoons  that  had 
carried  over  one  year,  the  normal  emergence  should  have  been  in 
the  spring  of  1928  but  they  did  not  emerge  until  the  spring  of 
I929’ 

Mr.  Bigelow  exhibited  a specimen  of  the  beetle  Dibolocelus 
ovalis  Ziegl.,  collected  by  Mr.  W.  T.  Davis  on  Staten  Island,  rep- 
resenting the  second  Staten  Island  record  of  the  species  and  taken 
twenty  years  after  the  first  record ; he  remarked  on  the  differences 
between  this  beetle  and  Hydrous  triangularis  Say,  the  common- 
so-called  “electric  light  beetle  ” which  it  resembles.  He  also 
showed  a specimen  of  the  Buprestid  beetle  Buprestis  striata  Fab- 
ricius. 

Mr.  Torre-Bueno  gave  an  account  of  his  experiences  in  Mexico 
in  1910  when  he  was  there  on  a business  trip,  but  found  time  to 
do  some  collecting  also ; he  exhibited  specimens  of  a large  number 
of  species  of  Hemiptera  which  he  collected  there  and  remarked 
on  their  distribution  and  habits. 

Mr.  Engelhardt  exhibited  several  boxes  of  insects  collected 
during  his  trip  to  Florida  during  March  of  this  year  and  remarked 
on  his  experiences  in  getting  them. 

Adjourned  at  10.10  p.  m. 

Meeting  of  October  10,  1929. 

A regular  meeting  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  was 
held  at  the  Brooklyn  Museum  on  Thursday  evening,  October  10, 
1929,  at  8.15  p.  m. 

President  Davis  in  the  chair,  and  ten  members  present,  viz., 
Messrs.  Chapin,  Eisenhardt,  Engelhardt,  Hunter,  Lemmer, 
Schaeffer,  Sheridan,  Shoemacher,  Siepmann,  and  Torre-Bueno; 
and  four  visitors. 

In  the  absence  of  the  Secretary,  Mr.  Siepmann  acted  as  secre- 
tary pro  tern. 

The  minutes  of  the  previous  meeting  were  read  and  approved. 
Mr.  Engelhardt  presented  the  monthly  report  of  the  treasurer,  and 
Mr.  Torre-Bueno  reported  for  the  publication  committee.  , 

Mr.  Schaeffer  proposed  for  membership  Mr.  Kenneth  W. 
Cooper,  40-40  So.  167  St.  Flushing,  N.  Y.  As  Mr.  Cooper  was 
present,  it  was  regularly  moved  and  seconded  that  the  by-laws  be 


Bee.,  1929  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  341 


suspended,  and  the  secretary  cast  one  ballot  for  the  election  of  Mr. 
Cooper,  which  was  accordingly  done. 

Mr.  Engelhardt  brought  to  the  attention  of  the  Society  the 
deaths  of  Dr.  F.  H.  Chittenden,  a life  member  of  the  society ; of 
Mr.  Charles  J.  Martin,  an  honorary  member,  who  died  on  July 
29,  1927,  at  the  age  of  92,  and  of  Mr.  Tom  Spaulding,  of  Provo, 
Utah,  a well-known  collector. 

Mr.  Chapin  gave  some  interesting  observations  on  the  parasitic 
worms  infesting  domesticated  animals. 

Mr.  Sheridan  spoke  of  his  collecting  along  the  Navesink  River 
during  the  past  summer. 

Mr.  Shoemacher  related  his  collecting  experiences  at  Green- 
wood Lake  and  in  the  Pocono  Mountains,  being  chiefly  interested 
in  Buprestidse.  He  also  exhibited  a specimen  of  Physonota  uni- 
punctata  vr.  quinquenotata , a large  cassidinid  beetle,  taken  in  Van 
Cortlandt  Park. 

Mr.  Burke  reported  that  he  obtained  Libellula  vibrans  in 
moderate  members  on  Staten  Island  and  in  Van  Cortlandt  Park. 
This  species  is  generally  scarce,  the  past  summer  being  one  of  the 
years  it  was  common. 

Mr.  Lemmer  spoke  of  the  Lepidoptera  he  collected  at  Lake- 
hurst,  N.  J. 

Mr.  Eisenhardt  told  of  his  collecting  experiences  in  the  Berk- 
shires.  He  observed  large  numbers  of  Colias  philodice  in  the 
meadows,  a male  of  the  variety  alba  being  also  taken. 

Mr.  Cooper  spoke  of  collecting  Anophthalmus , a kind  of  blind 
carabid  beetle,  in  the  Virginia  caverns. 

Mr.  Torre-Bueno  told  of  his  observations  of  a large  wasp, 
Sphecius  speciosus,  which  fills  its  burrows  with  Cicadas.  He  also 
reported  finding  Anthocoris  borealis  common  in  the  curled-up 
leaves  of  beech : a species  which  most  collectors  find  pretty  scarce. 

Mr.  Engelhardt  exhibited  two  male  specimens  of  a rare  hawk 
moth,  Sphinx  elsa  Neumoegen,  collected  in  Estancia  Valley,  New 
Mexico,  in  June,  1929.  He  said  that  the  species  was  at  one  time 
almost  lost  to  collectors,  but  believes  that  it  will  again  be  taken  in 
moderate  numbers. 

Mr.  William  T.  Davis  stated  that  one  of  the  ways  of  noting 
the  interesting  differences  in  the  passing  years  was  by  observing 
the  conspicious  butterflies  that  may  appear  each  summer.  After 
several  years  of  scarcity,  the  Monarch  butterfly,  which  was  very 
common  in  1922,  is  again  gradually  approaching  a period  of  maxi- 


342  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXIV 


mum  numbers  which  will  no  doubt  be  attained  several  years 
hence.  Basilarchia  astyanax  was  very  common  in  Staten  Island 
in  the  summer  of  1923,  and  has  since  been  gradually  decreasing 
in  numbers.  Not  a single  specimen  was  noted  on  the  Island  dur- 
ing the  summer  of  1929.  Apatura  clyton  formerly  not  common, 
has  lately  been  found  in  numbers  about  the  Celtis  trees  at  Rich- 
mond, while  Eurymus  eurytheme  has  become  generally  distributed 
on  the  Island  since  1927.  It  was  a common  species  last  summer. 
Megistias  fusca  Grote  & Robinson,  was  collected  in  some  numbers 
at  Tottenville  in  June,  1897.  On  August  26,  1929,  a single  ex- 
ample was  taken  in  the  filled-in  area  at  the  docks,  Tompkinsville. 

Mr.  Siepmann  spoke  of  his  collecting  trip  to  the  Unaka  Na- 
tional Forest,  Tennessee. 

Adjourned  at  10.15  P-  m- 

Carl  Geo.  Siepmann, 
Secretary,  pro  tem. 


EXCHANGES. 

This  one  page  is  intended  only  for  wants  and  exchanges,  not 
for  advertisements  of  articles  for  sale.  Notices  not  exceeding 
THREE  lines  free  to  subscribers.  Over  lines  charged  for  at 
15  cents  per  line  per  insertion. 

Old  notices  will  be  discontinued  as  space  for  new  ones  is 
needed. 

WE  WISH  to  procure  in  exchange  or  on  cash : Parnassius  of 
North- America,  with  its  varieties  and  aberrations,  well  labelled, 
spread  or  in  papers  (clodius,  smitheus,  eversmanni).  Dr.  Staud- 
inger  & A.  Bang-Haas,  Dresden-Blasewitz. 

THE  MUSEUM  of  the  Brooklyn  Institute  has  a few  uncolored 
sets  of  the  Calverly,  Weidenmeyer  and  Edwards  plates  of  North 
American  Sphingidae  for  exchange  or  for  sale  at  $5  per  set.  Ad- 
dress, Librarian,  Brooklyn  Museum,  Eastern  Parkway,  Brooklyn, 
N.  Y. 

LEPIDOPTERA  from  the  Mountains  of  Kentucky.  Papilios 
and  other  var.  of  this  section  collected.  Paper  spec,  of  Xylophones 
tersa  and  Catopsilia  eubule  on  hand.  Also  Cocoons  of  the  larger 
Saturnid  moths.  Ellis  Chandlee,  Barbourville,  Ky. 

BUTTERFLY  COLLECTORS— Have  you  butterflies  which 
look  different  in  color  or  pattern  from  the  average?  (See  adver- 
tisement). Please  write.  Jeane  Gunder,  Pasadena,  Calif. 

CHRY SOMELIDAE,  CRYPTOCEPHALINI.  Wish  beetles 
of  this  group  from  all  over  world.  Will  exchange  local 
Coleoptera  or  purchase  for  cash.  Write  me  before  shipping 
material.  Paul  N.  Musgrave,  514  Mt.  Vernon  Ave.,  Fairmont, 
W.  Va. 

CYNIPIDAE. — Galls  and  bred  wasps  wanted  to  determine  or 
in  exchange.  Alfred  C.  Kinsey,  Indiana  University,  Bloomington, 
Indiana. 

WANTED. — Am  studying  the  bionomics  of  the  corn  billbugs 
and  desire  the  privilege  of  examining  Calendra  ( Sphenophorus ) 
from  all  parts  of  the  world.  A.  F.  Satterthwait,  U.  S.  Entomo- 
logical Laboratory,  Webster  Grove,  Mo. 

DIURNAL  LEPIDOPTERA. — Have  many  desirable  west- 
ern species  to  exchange,  including  Argynnis  at  ossa,  mac  aria,  mor- 
monia,  malcolmi , nokomis;  Melitaea  neumoegeni;  Lycaena  speci- 
osa;  etc.  Send  lists.  Dr.  John  A.  Comstock,  Southwest  Museum, 
4699  Marmion  Way,  Los  Angeles,  Calif. 

WANTED. — Ants  from  all  portions  of  the  United  States  for 
determination  or  exchange.  Will  also  exchange  other  insects  for 
ants.  M.  R.  Smith,  Assistant  Entomologist,  State  Plant  Board, 
A.  and  M.  College,  Miss. 

CATOPINI:  Catops  ( Choleva ),  Prionochaeta,  Ptomaphagus. 
— Wanted  to  borrow  all  possible  specimens  of  these  genera  from 
North  America  for  a revisional  study.  Correspondence  solicited. 
- — Melville  H.  Hatch,  Dept,  of  Zoology,  Univ.  of  Wash.,  Seattle, 
Wash. 


The  American  Entomological  Company  of  Brooklyn, 
N.  Y.,  has  come  to  Life  again  in  the  shape  of 
CARPOCAPSA,  Pittsburgh,  Pa. 

INSECT  PINS,  ETC. 

CARPOCAPSA 

GEORGE  FRANCK,  JR. 

Write  for  catalogue 

375  Lehigh  Avenue,  East  Liberty  Station 
Pittsburgh,  Penna. 

PUBLICATIONS  OF  THE  BROOKLYN  ENTOMO- 
LOGICAL SOCIETY. 

Explanation  of  all  Technical  Terms  Used  in  Entomology. 


By  John  B.  Smith,  Sc.D.  (The  Glossary)  Cloth $3.00 

Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  (un- 
bound), vols.  4-8  (per  vol.) 1.75 

Vols.  9-14  1.50 

Vols.  15  to  21 1.75 

Vols.  22  to  date 2.50 

Entomologica  Americana,  vols.  1-6,  each 4.00 

“ “ vols.  7-9,  each 4.00 

Papilio,  vols.  1 and  4,  each 3.00 

Monograph  of  Plusia,  Ottolengui 50 


Orders  for  publications  must  be  sent  with  remittance  to  Li- 
brarian, Brooklyn  Entomological  Society,  c/o  Central  Museum, 
Eastern  Parkway,  Brooklyn,  N.  Y. 


INDEX  TO  VOLUME  XXIV. 

(Arranged  alphabetically  throughout.) 
General  Subject. 


Editing,  Editors,  Contributors 
and  Readers,  J.  R.  de  la 
Torre-Bueno,  15. 

Edwin  Eddy  Calder,  Geo.  P. 

Engelhardt,  115. 

Insects  Atop  of  Skyscrapers, 
Pinney  Schiffer,  260. 


Jacob  Doll,  Geo.  P.  Engelhardt, 

Present  Trends  in  Systematic 
Entomology,  J.  Bequaert,  98. 
Proceedings  of  the  Society, 
Charles  L.  Pollard,  Chas. 
Schaeffer,  E.  L.  Bell,  Carl 
Geo.  Siepmann,  47,  193,  254, 
339- 


Book  Notes. 

A Handbook  of  the  Dragon-  Pond  Problems,  J.  R.  T.  B.,  43. 
flies  of  North  America,  Wm.  The  Principles  of  Systematic 
T.  Davis,  200.  Entomology,  J.  R.  T.  B.,  250. 

Flowers  and  Insects,  J.  R.  T. 

B-,  335- 

COLEOPTERA. 


An  Early  Cerambycid,  C.  A. 
Frost,  154. 

A New  Species  of  Gyrinus 
from  Northern  New  Hamp- 
shire, K.  F.  Chamberlain, 
247. 

A Synonym,  C.  A.  Frost,  249. 

Cicindela  tranquebarica  hori- 
conensis  Leng,  C.  A.  Frost, 
219. 

Coleoptera  from  Northern  Cali- 
fornia, Howard  Notman,  222. 

Correction  to  a Revision  of 
Podabrus,  H.  C.  Fall,  103. 

Cryptocephalus  tinctus  Lee.,  C. 
A.  Frost,  294. 

Information  Wanted,  C.  A, 
Frost,  12. 

New  North  American  Species 
of  Rhynchites,  H.  C.  Fall, 
292. 


Notes  on  Gyrinus  marginellus 
Fall,  K.  F.  Chamberlain,  155. 

On  Phyllophaga  debilis  Le- 
conte, with  Descriptions  of 
Three  New  Species,  H.  C. 
Fall,  no. 

On  Some  Species  of  Phaedon, 
Chas.  Schaeffer,  286. 

On  the  Classification  of  Beetles 
According  to  Larval  Charac- 
ters, Adam  G.  Boving,  55. 

On  the  Integument  of  the  Larva 
of  the  Alder  Flea  Beetle, 
William  Colcord  Woods,  116. 

New  Species  of  Meloidae,  Ed- 
win C.  Van  Dyke,  127. 

Pedillus  parvicollis  not  a Den- 
droides,  H.  C.  Fall,  13. 

Phyllophaga  austricola — A Cor- 
rection, H.  C.  Fall,  J.  R.  de 
la  Torre-Bueno,  216. 


345 


346  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vo l-  XXIV 


Rare  Beetle,  Rarer  Luck,  C.  A. 
Frost,  14. 

Rarity  vs.  Secrecy,  C.  A.  Frost, 
156. 

The  Genus  Eurygenius  La- 
Ferte,  in  our  Fauna,  H.  C. 
Fall,  333. 


The  North  American  Species 
of  Parandra,  Chas.  Schaeffer, 

38. 

Uncommon  Coleoptera,  C.  A. 
Frost,  34 

What  Attraction?,  C.  A.  Frost, 
11. 


Diptera. 


A Note  on  the  Habits  oj 
Hylemyia  trivitt  at  a Stein,  H. 
C.  Huckett,  294. 

A Winter  Home  for  Mosqui- 
toes, C.  A.  Frost,  223. 

Some  Common  Diptera  and 
their  Habits,  N.  K.  Bigelow, 
245- 


The  Crane  Flies  of  New  York: 
Third  Supplementary  List, 
Charles  P.  Alexander,  22. 
Fourth  Supplementary  List, 
Charles  P.  Alexander,  295. 

Undescribed  Species  of  the 
Genus  Limnophila  from 
Eastern  North  America, 
Charles  P.  Alexander,  187. 


Editorial. 

“Fit  to  Print,”  J.  R.  T.  B.,  42.  ments),  J.  R.  T.  B.,  42. 

On  Authors  Corrections  (Or  On  Entomologists  and  Ento- 
Additions,  or  Improve-  mology,  J.  R.  T.  B.,  41. 

Heteroptera. 


A Few  Late  Spring  Bugs,  J.  R. 
de  la  Torre-Bueno,  221. 

A New  Genus  of  Semiaquatic 
Hemiptera,  H.  B.  Hunger- 
ford,  288. 

A Partial  List  of  Miridae  from 
Texas,  H.  G.  Johnson,  217. 

Book  Notes:  Flowers  and  In- 
sects, J.  R.  T.  B.,  210. 

New  Species  of  Neoborus  and 
Xenoborus,  Harry  H.  Knight, 
1. 

Observations  on  Metrobates 
hesperius  Uhler,  H.  M. 
Parshley,  157. 


On  some  New  England  Heter- 
optera, J.  R.  de  la  Torre- 
Bueno,  310. 

Protective  Adaptations  among 
Aquatic  Hemiptera,  J.  R.  de 
la  Torre-Bueno,  30. 

Rectifications  for  Blatchley’s 
“Heteroptera,”  with  the  De- 
scription of  a New  Species, 
Harry  H.  Knight,  143. 

Some  Tingitoidea  from  Central 
and  South  America,  Carl  J. 
Drake,  35. 


Homoptera. 

Genus  Dikraneuroidea , gen.  n., 

Paul  B.  Lawson,  307. 


Vol.  XXIV  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  347 


Hymenoptera. 


A Contribution  to  the  Know- 
ledge of  the  Bionomics  of 
Bremus  impatiens  (Cresson), 
Theodore  H.  Frison,  261. 

A Nomenclatorial  Note  on  the 
Birch  Leaf-Mining  Sawfly, 
Phyllotoma  nemorata  (Fal- 
len) ? Raymond  L.  Taylor, 
323- 


Bees  of  the  Subfamily  Osminae 
in  the  Collection  of  the 
Brigham  Young  University, 
D.  Elden  Beck,  303. 

Podalonia  violaceipennvs  (Le- 
peletier),  a Dimorphic  Fos- 
sorial  Wasp,  J.  Bequaert,  220. 

The  Honey  Ant  Myrmecocys- 
tus  melliger  at  San  Antonio, 
Texas,  H.  B.  Parks,  32. 


Lepidoptera. 


An  Aberrant  Butterfly — Jun- 
onia  coena,  Wm.  T.  Davis, 
12. 

Eurymus  eurytheme  Bdv.,  W. 
Prescott  Rogers,  313. 

Eurymus  interior,  W.  Prescott 
Rogers,  308. 

Food  Plant  .of  Chrysophanus 
heloides,  John  D.  Ritchie, 
103. 

Further  Notes  on  Eurema 
Hiibner,  Alex.  B.  Klots,  214. 

Isturgia  truncataria  in  Long 
Island,  Roy  Latham,  246. 

Lepidopterological  Contribu- 
tions, William  Barnes  and 
Foster  H.  Benjamin,  164. 


New  Butterflies  and  Sundry 
Notes,  J.  D.  Gunder,  325. 

Notes  on  North  American 
Lepidoptera,  F.  H.  Cher- 
mock,  20. 

Paonias  excaecatus  in  Colorado, 
T.  D.  A.  Cockerell,  244. 

The  Generic  Status  of  Catop- 
silia  Hiibner  and  Phoebis 
Hubner,  with  a Discussion  of 
the  Relationships  of  the 
Species  and  the  Homologies 
of  the  Male  Genitalia,  Alex. 
B.  Klots,  203. 

The  genus  Anteos  Hiibner, 
Alex.  B.  Klots,  134. 

Two  Moths,  William  Eisen- 
hardt,  192. 


The  Smaller  Orders. 


An  Observation  on  the  Etiology 
of  a Certain  Malformation  in 
the  Earwig  Anisolabis  mari- 
tima,  Waro  Nakahara  and 
Dorothy  Nakahara,  161. 

Contributions  to  our  Knowledge 
of  American  Thysanoptera, 
Dudley  Moulton,  224. 


Two  Urothripidae  (Thysanop- 
tera) from  Florida,  with 
Keys  to  the  Known  Genera 
and  the  North  America  Spe- 
cies, J.  Douglas  Hood,  314. 


INDEX  TO  GENERA  AND  SPECIES  OF  INSECTS, 
OTHER  ANIMALS  AND  PLANTS. 

New  forms  in  bold  face;  valid  genera  and  species  in  Roman; 
synonyms  in  italics;  * indicates  plants ; f Long  Island  records ; 
t other  animals. 


348  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  XXIV 


For  extensive  lists  of  Crane  Flies  of  New  York,  see  pp.  22  and 
295;  for  list  of  mirid  species  and  localities,  see  pp.  148/152;  for 
list  of  Texan  Miridae,  see  pp.  217/219;  for  list  of  California 
Coleoptera,  see  pp.  222/223  1 f°r  list  °f  Osminae  of  the  West,  see 
pp.  303/306;  for  extensive  list  of  flowers  on  which  Bremus  is 
found,  see  pp.  272/273;  for  list  of  New  England  Heteroptera,  see 
pp.  310/313;  for  extensive  list  of  flowers  on  which  Heteroptera 
were  found,  see  pp.  335/337. 


Acronicta,  170 
Acronycta,  170,  181,  182 
Actias  dubernandi,  192,  259 
* Adelia  parvifolia,  3,  218 
Adelphocoris  rapidus,  336,  337 
*Adenostoma  fasciculatum,  224 
Afotella,  1 71,  172 
cylindrica,  171 
Afrida,  169 

Agrotiphila,  172,  173,  174,  175, 
I76 

Colorado,  174 
montana,  174 
standing  eri,  174 
Agrion,  200 

Agrotimorpha,  174,  176 
incognita,  175 
staudingeri,  174 
Agrotis,  165,  173,  177 
Ala,  172,  176 
Albuna  pyramidalis,  194 
Altica  bimarginata,  116  et  seqq. 
Alydus  eurinus,  336 
pilosulus,  336 
Amphibolothrips,  317 
Amphicyrta,  62 

chrysomelina,  58,  73 
Amphidasis  cognataria  form 
swettaria,  258 
Anaphoidea  calendrae,  47 
Anaphothrips  crassicornis,  231 
Anarta,  173 

Anartomorpha,  172,  176 
Anasa  repetita,  337 
tristis,  199 


Anchy tarsus,  60,  61,  62,  67 
bicolor,  60,  75 
Ancyronyx,  67 
variegatus,  76 

Anisolabis  maritima,  161,  162 
annulipes,  62 
Anodontobombus,  279 
Anophthalmus,  341 
Anosia  berenice,  50 
Anteos,  134  et  seqq. ; 204,  207 
clorinde,  134  et  seqq. 
maerula,  134 
menippe,  134  et  seqq. 
Anthocharis,  206 
Anthocoris  borealis,  341 
Antillocoris  pallidus,  221 
Anycteola,  168,  169 
fotelloides,  168 
Apatela,  12 1,  170 
lanceolaria,  181 
oblinita,  form  insolita,  181 
Apantesis  figurata  f.  excelsa  ab. 
lugubris,  258 
anona  f.  persephone,  258 
Apatura  clyton,  342 
Aphrissa,  21 1 
Apocheima  rochellae,  194 
Aradus  robustus,  221 
Archanarta,  173,  175 
quieta,  173 

Argeme  mittrei,  192,  259 
Argynnis  montivaga  tr.  f. 
borarti,  326 

erinna  tr.  f.  cunninghami, 
326 


Voi.  XXIV  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  349 


erinna  tr.  f . mammothi,  326 
Arsilonche,  184 
Athetis,  182 
Automeris  io,  244 

Barathra  albicolon,  179 
vindemialis,  179 
Barberiella  apicalis,  144,  145 
brimleyi,  144,  145 
Barrovia,  173,  175 
Basilarchia  archippus,  325 
tr.  f.  advena,  325 
Cayuga,.  325 
lanthanis,  325 
nivosus,  325 
pseudodorippus, 

325 

astyanax,  342 
disippe,  325 
Bebelothrips,  316,  317 
Belostoma  flumineum,  31 
Belvosia  bifasciata,  51 
* Betula  papyrifera,  323 
* populifolia,  323 
Bidessus  affinis,  155 
Bombus  (see  Bremus) 

Brady  thrips,  316 
Bremus  auricomus,  269 

bimaculatus,  261,  269,  274, 
279,  280 

impatiens,  261/285 
separatus,  270,  271 
virginicus,  270,  271 
Brenthis  bellona,  332 

tr.  f.  fasciata,  332 
kleenei , 332 
myrina,  331 
nehraskensis,  331 
pardopsis,  332 
Brunneria  borealis,  51 
Bucculatrix,  169 
Buchholtzia,  184 
Byrrhus,  58 

fasciatus,  58,  73 


* Cacalia  atriplicifolia,  154 
Calendra,  47 

Callosamia  promethea,  340 
C aloe  oris  (see  Adelphocoris) 
Canthophorus  (see  Sehirus) 

$ Canis  nebrascensis  texensis, 
34 

Canthoris  andersoni,  249 
livida,  249 

* Capsella  bursapastoris,  337 
Capsus  (see  Eustictus) 

* Carya,  218 
Calymniodes , 181 
Catobapta,  183 
Catocala  arizonae,  183 

euphemia,  183 
neogama,  183 
serena,  199 
subnata,  183 
suhnatana,  183 
viduata,  51 

Catopsilia  crocale,  206,  208 
eubule,  50,  51,  134 
florella,  134,  206,  208 
pomona,  106,  208 
pyranthe,  206,  208 
rurina,  134 
scylla,  206,  208 
statira,  134,  135 
thauruma,  206,  207 

* Ceanothus,  14,  337 

* Celtis,  342 

Cephalothrips  elegans,  236 
errans,  237 

Ceramica  vindemialis,  179 
Cercionis  (Satyrus)  pegala, 
race  borealis,  21,  330 
alope  var.  nephele,  21,  330 

* Chaemadaphne  calyculata,  246 
Charadra  circulifera,  182,  183 

contigua,  182,  183 
deridens,  182,  183 
nigrosuffusa,  182,  183 
sudena,  182,  183 
Chariesterus  antennator,  336 


350  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.  XXIV 


Chelonarium,  62,  63,  76 
lecontei,  61 

Chirothrips  manicatus,  238 
Chlorion  harrisi,  198 
*Chrysolamus,  227 
Chrysophanus  helloides,  103 
Cicindela  harrisi,  51 
repanda,  219 
sexguttata,  219 
tranquebarica  horiconensis, 
219 

Cimatlan  (see  Eustictus) 
Citylus,  58 

alternatus,  72 

Clinidium  sculptile,  69,  70,  79 
Colias  philodice,  341 
Colias,  136 

Colopasta  elegans,  132 

subsp.  cyanea,  132 
subsp.  perpulchra,  132 
var.  humeralis,  132 

* Colubrina  texensis,  33 

* Condalia  obovata,  32,  33 
Corethra,  245 
Corimelaena  lateralis,  337 

pulicaria,  337 

Coriscus  (see  Adelphocoris) 
Corizus  lateralis,  336,  337 

* Corticaria  varicolor,  34 
Corythucha  baccharidis,  37 

decens,  37 
fuscomaculata,  37 
mcelfreshi,  37 
palmatis,  37 
Coxelus  guttulatus,  156 

* Crataegus,  2 

Creontiades  (see  Eustictus) 
Cryptocephalus  tinctus,  294 
Ctenopsylla  cheopis,  19 
Ctenothrips  bridwelli,  233,  234 
floridensis,  234 
frosti,  233 
reticulatus,  234 
Culex  pipiens,  223 
Cupes,  71 

concolor,  70,  79 


Cuterebra  buccata,  51 
Cymus  angustatus,  221 
Cynthia  cardui,  331 
Cyphon,  58 

Danaus  menippe  nivosus,  325 
Dascillus,  58,  62,  64,  68 
davidsoni,  63,  77 
Deloyala  clavata,  116 
Dendroides,  13,  14 
Dercas,  136,  207 
Derodontus,  66 
Deronectes  depressus,  145 

* Dianthus  sp.  234 

* plumarius,  234 
Diapheromera  femorata,  195 
Dibolocelus  ovalis,  340 
Dicranomyia  (see  Limonia) 
Dicranoptycha  elsa,  28 
megaphallus,  29 
septemtrionis,  28 
sobrina,  29 
sororcula,  29 

Dicyphus  gracilentus,  146 
notatus,  146 
vestitus,  146 
vestitus,  146 
Dikraneura,  307 
cockerellii,  307 
Dikraneuroidea,  307 
beameri,  307 
Dineutes  vittatus,  156 
Dione  vanillae,  50,  51 

f . incarnata,  tr.  f . hew- 
lettae,  327,  328 
f.  comstocki,  328 
f.  fumosus,  328 
f.  margineapertus,  328 

* Diphthera,  182 
Disonycha  varicornis,  199 
Docessisophotrips,  224 

adiaphorus,  244 
animus,  242 
Drosophila,  161 
funebris,  223 
transversa,  223 
Dryops,  61,  67 


Vol.  XXIV  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  351 


Ectropis  crepuscularia  ab.  fu- 
mataria,  2,  258 
Elaphria,  181 

grata,  18 1 
obliquirema,  181 
Emboloecia  sausalitae  f.  papai- 
pemoides,  180 
Enypia  venata  f.  eddyi,  185 

f.  elaborata,  185 
f Epelis  truncataria,  339 
Ephelia  (see  Limnophila) 
Epicauta  alphonsii,  128 
caviceps,  128,  129 
foxi,  127,  129 
impressifrons,  128,  129 
rileyi,  128,  129 
straba,  128,  129 

* Epibolium  angustifoliums, 
194 

Epilachna  corrupta,  198 
Epimecis  virginaria  f.  carbon- 
aria,  258 
Epipsilia,  173 

f heinrichi,  165 
Epipsiliamorpha,  173,  175 
alaskae,  173 
Erastria,  170 

immista  dissimilaria,  170 
Eremocoris  ferus,  221 
Eryothrips  arizonae,  225,  226, 
227 

bishoppi,  225,  226 
fasciculatus,  224,  227 
keeni,  226,  227 
Eubrianax,  67 

edwardsi,  59,  74 
Eubuchholzia  colarada,  184 
Euchaetias,  121 
Euchloe,  206 
Eucinetus,  56 

meridionalis,  65 
morio,  65,  78 
Eulolonche  insolita,  181 
Euphydryas  editha  beani,  327 
gillettei,  327 


Eurema  albula  f.  tapeina,  215 
arbela,  215 

f.  graduata,  215 
athalia,  214 
biedermanni,  332 
cissa,  215 

deva  chilensis,  214 
elathea  f.  medutina,  215 
gracilis,  215 
hahneli,  214 
incana,  215 
leuce,  214 
lurida,  215 
mexicana,  332 
nise,  214,  215 
raymundoi,  215 
recta,  332 
rubella,  215 
salome  salome,  214 
tenella,  214,  215 

Eurema,  135,  136,  207,  214  et 
seqq. 

Eurygenius  constrictus,  333 
parvicornis,  333 
perforatus,  334 
Eurymus,  136,  204,  207 
eurytheme,  313,  342 
philodice  f.  alba,  329 
alba,  330 
albida,  329 
ehrmanni,  329 
eryphyle,  330 
laurae,  330 
laurae,  330 
minor,  329 
plicaduta,  329 
var.  nigricosta,  21 
ab.  laurae,  21 
var.  plicaduta,  21 
var.  serrata,  21 
f.  serrata,  330,  332 
Eurypogon,  60,  61,  67,  68 
niger,  61,  75 
Euschistus  fissilis,  336 
ictericus,  337 


352  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  XXIV 


Euschistus  tristigmus,  221 
variolarius,  337 
Eustictus  filicornis,  143,  144 
grossus,  143,  144 
Euthrips  ulicis  calif  ornicus,  232 
Eviridemas,  166 
minuta,  166 

Fannia  scalaris,  255 
Feltia  buchholzi,  164 
gravis,  164 

Fentonia  marthesia  ab.  nigra, 
20 

* Ficus,  321 

Forficula  auricularia,  162 
Fotella,  1 71 

Frankliniella  insularis,  233 

* Fraxinus  sp.,  4 

* americana,  4,  218,  219 

* arizonicus,  6 

Gallerucella,  119,  120,  121 
Gandaca,  207 
Gargaphia  angulata,  337 
Gastroidea  polygoni,  122 
Glaucopsyche  antiacis,  330 

lygdamus  race  behri  tr.  f . 

sternitzkyi,  325 
polyphemus,  20 
xerces  var.  intermedia,  20 
intermedia,  330 
Gonepteryx  134  et  seqq.,  207 
Graphiphora,  180 
Graptolitha  lapidea,  165,  166 
lemmeri,  165,  166 
longior,  166 
Grumia  floria,  172 
Gynaikothrips  uzeli,  241 
Gynnis  (see  Phyllophaga) 
Gyrinus  aquiris,  248 
gehringi,  247,  249 
lecontei,  248,  249 
lugens,  248 
maculiventris,  248 
marginellus,  155  et  seqq. 
pulicifer,  248 


Habrosyne  abrasa , 184 
chatfeldii,  185 
derasa,  185 
gloriosa,  184,  185 

race  arizonensis,  184, 

185 

rectangula,  185 
rectangulata,  184,  185 
scripta,  184,  185 

race  abrasoides,  184 
Hadena  (see  Afotella,  171), 
176 

Hadenella,  172 

pergentilis,  172 
Hamadryas  antiopa,  47 
Harmostes  reflexulus,  336 
* Helianthus  decapetalus,  22 
Helichus,  55,  57,  59,  67,  72 
Heliothrips  bishoppi,  229,  230 
punctipennis,  230 
Helmis,  56,  61,  67 
Helotrephes,  31 
Hemerocampa,  12 1 
Hemisciera  maculipennis,  198 
Hemistilbia,  168 
apposita,  168 
Hetaerina,  200 

Heterocerus,  58,  61,  62,  63,  64 
ventralis,  62,  76 
Heterothrips  auranticornis,  228, 
229 

gillettei,  228,  229 
Hoplothrips  kincaidi,  241 
pedicularis,  242 
pergandei,  242 
Hulstina  aridata,  186 
formosata,  186 
Hydrometra,  30 
Hydroporus  mellitus,  155 
spurius,  155 

Hydrous  triangularis,  340 
Hylemyia  trivittata,  294 
Hylotrupes  ligneus,  154 
nicolas,  154 


Vol.  XXIV  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  353 


* Hymenopappus  carolinense, 
236 

Hyperopherus  punctatissimus, 
258 

Hypogeocoris  piceus,  221 

* Impatiens  biflora,  337 
Isturgia  truncataria,  246 

Jimonia  coenia,  12,  50,  51,  255 
ab.  weidenhameri,  259 

Karnyothrips,  315 
Kricogonia,  136,  207 

Labops  hesperius , 144 
hirtus,  144 

* Lactuca  canadensis,  294 

* scariola,  294 

* var.  integrata,  294 

* spicata,  294 
Laphygma,  181 

Lara,  55,  57,  58,  59,  67 
avara  ( ?),  56,  72 
Latelmis,  67 
Leucidia,  207 
Libellula  vibrans,  341 
Limonia  (Dicranomyia)  liberta, 
28 

pudicoides,  295,  299 
uliginosa,  27 

Limnius,  57,  59,  61 
Limnophila,  187  et  seqq. 

(Dicranophragma)  angus- 
tula,  190,  191 
fuscovaria,  190,  191 
(Ephelia)  aprilina,  189, 
190 

irene,  190 
sabrina,  189 

(Phylidorea)  novae  - an- 
gliae,  188,  189 
siouana,  188,  189 
(Prionolabis)  rufib  a s i s, 

. 188 

simplex,  188 
walleyi,  187 


(Prolimnophila)  areolata, 

. i87 

Lina  interrupta,  122 
scripta,  122 
troglodytes,  57,  72 
Lioon,  58 

simplicipes,  73 
Lispothrips,  224 
birdi,  240 
varicornis,  240 
Lopidea  media,  335 
* Lupinus  argenteus,  233 
Lycaena  hypophlaeus,  330,  331 
f.  h an  k si,  330, 
33i 

f.  fasciata,  330, 
33i 

f.  fulvus,  330, 

331 

f.  nem,  330,  331 
f.  o c tomaculata, 
330.  33i 
am  eric  ana , 331 

tr.  f.  caeca,  331 
tr.  f.  fulliolus,  331 
tr.  f . o b 1 i t erata, 
33i 

tr.  f.  obsoleta,  331 
Lygaeus  kalmii,  336 
turcicus,  336 
Lygus  pabulinus,  337 
pratensis,  336,  337 
Lytta  auriculata,  13 1 
cyanipennis,  130 
hoppingi,  13 1 
insperata,  13 1 
lecontei,  13 1 
maculicollis,  130,  13 1 
molesta,  13 1 
nigrocyanea,  129 
nuttalli,  130 
Macrolophus,  147 
longicornis,  147 
tenuicornis,  147 
Macronychus,  67 


354  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  V 0 !>•  XXIV 


* Malus  sp.  233 
Mamestra.,  185 
Matinus,  30 

Megacoelum  (see  Eustictus) 
Meganostoma,  136 
Meganostorma,  207 
caesonia,  50 
Megistias  fusca,  342 
Melanocoryphus  bicrucis,  336 
Melanolophia  canadaria,  258 
Melanoplus  differentials,  52 
Melasoma  lapponica,  122 
Melittaea  athalia,  327 
latefascia,  327 
malcolmi,  327 
mayi,  327 
polia,  327 
theona,  327 

* Mentzelia  laevicaulis,  227 
Mesovelia,  289 

bisignata,  288 
Mesoveloidea,  288 

williamsi,  288  et.  seqq. 
Metrobates  hesperius,  157,  193 
Micrathetis  benjamini,  182 
minus  cula,  181,  182 
triplex,  181,  182 
Microcephalothrips,  224 
Micromalthus  debilis,  71,  80 
Microvelia,  30,  288 
Monanthia  c-nigrum,  35 
monotropidia,  35 
Monima,  179 
mucens,  180 

f.  sectilis,  180 
Monodes  181 
Mononyx,  30 
Morrisonia  exicta,  199 
Myrmecocystus  horti-deorum, 
32 

melliger  subsp.  orbiceps,  34 

Nabis  ferus,  335 
Namagana,  171 
cretacea,  171 
Nathalis,  136,  207 


Necophora  guernaria  f.  atres- 
cens,  258 

Neoborus  adeliae,  2 
adustus,  3,  5 
amoenus,  9,  10 

subsp.  floridanus,  9 
var.  atriscutus,  9 
atratus,  2 
canadensis,  4 
fasciolus,  8,  9 
flaviceps,  9 
geminus,  10 
glaber,  3 
pacificus,  9 
palmeri,  2,  3 
populi,  4 
pubescens,  4 
rufivenosus,  7 
scutellaris,  9 
vittifrons,  5,  6,  8 

var.  umbratus,  6 
wiley ae,  1,  2 
Nepa,  31 
Nephelistes,  171 
Nerthra,  30 

Noctua  (see  Archanarta)  173 
(see  Barathra),  179 
Nosodendron,  58,  64 
californicus,  63,  77 
unicolor,  63,  77 
* Nyssa  sylvatica,  218 

Oberea  basalis,  339 
schaumi,  12 
Ochterus  banksi,  30 
formosanus,  30 
Odontestra,  171 

Odontothrips  californicus,  232 
loti,  232,  233 

f Okanagana  rimosa,  328  (?) 
Oligia,  181 

Oncopeltus  fasciatus,  336 
Ophiogomphus  aspersus,  201 
occidentis,  201 
Orius  insidiosus,  335,  337 


Voi.  XXIV  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  355 


Ormosia  ithacana,  29 
meigenii,  29 
Orosagrotis , 174,  175 
rigid  a,  174 

Ortholomus  longiceps,  336 
scolopax,  336,  337 
Oxytripia  orbiculosa,  172 

Paonias  excaecatus,  244 

race  pecosensis,  244 
Papaipema  inquaesita  f. 

wyatti,  180 
Papilo  ajax,  331 
asterias,  331 
asteroides,  331 
bairdi,  331 
cresphontes,  50 
glaucus,  50 
palamedes,  50 
philenor,  50 
streckeri,  331 
turnus,  50 

Parabarrovia  keelei,  175 
Paracalocoris  breviatus,  154 
heidemanni,  154 
Parandra  ampliceps,  39 
brunnea,  38,  39,  40 
gravidula,  39,  40 
marginicollis,  38,  40 
polita,  38 
punctillata,  38,  40 
Paratenodera  sinensis,  50 
Parnus,  55,  56 

Pedicia  albivitta,  300,  301,  302 
contermina,  301,  302 
margarita,  295,  298,  300, 
301,  302 

Pedillus  crotchi,  13 
flavellatus,  13,  14 
parvicollis,  13,  14 
Pelonomus,  67 
Peltopterus,  30 
Peribalus  limbolarius,  337 
Perigonica  pectinata,  180 

race  punctilinea,  180 


Perigrapha,  179,  180 
Perillus  bioculatus,  199 
Perrhybids,  206 
Phaedon  americanus,  286 
armoraciae,  286,  287 
carri,  286 
cochleariae,  286 
Phalacrocera  tipulina,  28 
Phlebatrophia  mathesoni,  323, 
324. 

Phoebis,  203  et  seqq. 
agarithe,  208,  209 
argante,  203,  208,  209,  210, 
211 

avellanada,  206,  209 
boisduvali,  209 
etiolata,  209 

eubule,  205,  206,  208,  209, 
210 

godartiana,  209 
hartonia,  209 
neleis,  209 
neocipris,  209,  210 
orbis,  206,  209 
philea,  206,  208,  209,  210 
rurina,  209 
statira,  206,  209,  210 
thalestris,  206,  208,  209 
trite,  205,  206,  208,  209, 
210,  211 
wallacei,  209 
Phoenicophanta,  170 
bicolor,  171 
flavifera,  170 
Phalaena,  178 

Phylidorea  (see  Limnophila) 
188 

Phyllodecta  americana,  122 
Phyllophaga  arvidens,  112 
austricola,  no,  216 
debilis,  no 
glabricula,  113 
gracilis,  no 
iroides,  112,  114 
maculicollis,  114 


356  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Voi.  XXIV 


Phyllophaga  mariana,  hi 
microdon,  113,  114 
parvidens,  111,  112 
pygidialis,  112 

var.  hesteropyga,  112 
rubiginosa,  112 
submucida,  112 
Phylloscelis  pulchellus,  199 
Phyllotoma  nemorata,  323,  324 
P h y s o n ota  unipunctata  var. 

quinquenotata,  341 
Phytocoris  scrupeus,  336 
Piesma  cinerea  var.  inornata, 
.35. 

Pilaria  stanwoodae,  28 
Pilophorus  amoenus,  145,  146 
eras  sipes,  145 
strobicola,  145,  146 
Pilophorus  (see  Barberiella) 
Placonycha,  56,  67 
Plagio  mimicus  pityachrous, 

199 

Plagiognathus  obscurus,  335 
Plagiodera  interrupta,  122 
Plebeius  acmon  var.  cotteli  ab. 
labecula,  20 
tr.  f.  angelus,  326 
lupini  ab.  immaculata,  20 
monticola  f.  montanus, 
326 

Podabrus  basilaris,  103 
nothoides,  103 

Podalonia  violaceipennis,  220 
race  luctuosa,  220 
hirsuta,  220 
Polia  ohscurior,  185 
olivacea,  185 
stricta  var.  kappa,  185 
papka,  185 
Pollenia  rudis,  255 

* Polygonum  hartwrighti,  103 

* Populus,  321 

Prionocyphon  discoideus,  64, 

7? 

serricollis,  65 


Prionolabis  (see  Limnophila), 

187 

Prolimnophila,  187 

Promachus  fitchii,  51 
Psephenoides,  67 
gahani,  59 
Psephenus,  67 

lecontei,  59,  74 
Pseudococcus,  121 
Pseudolimnophila,  187 
Psithyrus,  272,  276 
Pseudanaphora  arcanella,  11 
Pterodontia  flavipes,  199 
Ptilodactyla,  64,  67 
serricollis,  60,  75 

* Quercus  minor,  217,  218,  219 
* sp.  230 

Ranatra,  31 
Rehnia  spinosa,  198 
Remigia  marcida,  199 
Retocomus,  233 
Rhabdodryas,  21 1 
Rhaeboscelis,  68 
Rheumatobates,  288 
. rileyi,  193 

Rhizagrotis  capota,  176 
kyune,  176 

Rhynchites  aureus,  293,  294 
var.  levirostris,  293 
delectus,  292 
eximius,  292 
hirtus,  292 
insularis,  293 
quadripennis,  292 
Rhynchothrips  ilex,  240 
versicolor,  239 

* Salix  nigra,  240 
Satyrus  howeri,  330 
eurydice,  330 
Schoyenia,  172,  175 
arctica,  172 
unifasciata,  172 


Voi.  XXIV  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  357 


Schizocerus  mathesoni , 323, 
324 

Sericothrips  langei,  230 

* Sicyos  angulatus,  337 
Simulium,  245 
Siphonothrips  elegans,  244 
Sixeonotus  albicornis,  152,  153 

insignis,  152,  153 
recurvatus,  153 

* Smilax,  218 

* Solidago,  14 
Sphaerocysta  globifera,  35 
Sphecius  speciosus,  341 
Sphinx  elsa,  341 

* Spiraea,  14,  337 
Stenelmis,  67 
Stephanothrips,  317,  320 

bradleyi,  321 
buffai,  321 
occidentalis,  321 
Stereopalpus,  333 
Stilbia,  168,  169 
anomala,  168 
Stilpnotia  salicis,  193 
Strangalia  (Leptura)  deleta,  14 
Stretchia  addenda,  180 
hepatica,  180 
inferior,  180 
palomarensis,  180 
pulsiaeformis,  180 
prima,  180 
pulchella,  180 

f.  achsha,  180 
f.  algula,  180 
f.  orbiculata,  180 

Tachymerus  gleditsiae,  337 
Taeniothrips  dianthi,  224,  234 
Teleonemia  albomarginata,  35 
brevipennis,  35 
lanthana,  35 
prolixa,  35 
validicornis,  35 


Terias,  214 
lisa,  50 
nicippe,  50 
Teriocolias,  136,  207 
Tetraonyx  albipilosa,  127 
femoralis,  127 
frontalis,  127 
fulva,  127 

f Thecla  cecrops,  48 
Thorybothrips  224 
graminis,  238 
yuccae,  237 
Thrips,  337 

discolor,  224,  234 
gilmorei,  234,  236 
(Microcephalothrips)  ab- 
dominalis,  224 
gillettei,  236 
Tibicen  auletes,  51 
Tingis  americana,  37 
colombiana,  35,  36 
corubiana,  37 
Trachythrips,  316,  317 
watsoni,  317 
Trepobates  pictus,  193 
Triaena  tritona,  170 
Trichanarta,  176 
Trichocosma,  171 
Trichofeltia,  177,  178 
circumdata,  177 
Trichosilia,  176,  178 
acarnea,  176 
Triphaena,  178 
baja,  178 
brunnea,  179 

esurialis  race  ucluelti,  179 
hospitalis,  179 
jucunda,  179 

plebeia  race  bajoides,  178 
pronuba,  178 
Triphleps  (see  Orius) 

Trogus  elegans,  199 
nubilipenne,  199 


358  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  FoZ.  XXIV 


Urothrips,  316 
Utetheisa  bella,  51 

Viridemas  (See  Eviridemas), 

pettiti,  10 
selectus,  10 

Xestipyge  geminatum,  34 

166,  167 
galena,  167 

* Yucca  rupicola,  238 

Vitula  edmandsii,  267 
Volucella  obesa,  199 

Xenoborus  neglectus,  10 

Zonitis  arizonica,  132 
longicornis,  133 
megalops,  133 
vittipennis,  133 

New  Genera  in  this  Index,  12. 

New  Species  in  this  Index,  56. 

Other  New  Forms  in  this  Index,  24. 


Vol.  XXV  FEBRUARY.  1930  No.  1 

BULLETIN 


OF  THE 

Brooklyn  Entomological 
Society 


PUBLICATION  COMMITTEE 

J.  R.  de  la  TORRE-BUENO,  Editor 

E.  L.  BELL  GEO.  P.  ENGELHARDT 

Published  for  the  Society  by  the 

Science  Press  Printing  Co., 

Lime  and  Green  Sts.,  Lancaster,  Pa., 

Price,  60  cents  Subscription,  $2.50  per  year 

Mailed  March  8,  1930 


Entered  as  second-class  matter  January  21,  1919,  at  the  post  office  at  Lancaster,  Pa., 
under  the  Act  of  March  3,  1879 


The  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society 

Meetings  are  held  on  the  second  Thursday  after  the  first  Tuesday  of  each 
month  from  October  to  June,  inclusive,  at  the  Central  Museum,  Eastern 
Parkway  and  Washington  Ave.,  Brooklyn.  The  annual  dues  are  $2.00. 

OFFICERS,  1930 
Honorary  President 
CHARLES  W.  LENG 


President 
W.  T.  DAVIS 
Vice-President 

J.  R.  DE  LA  TORRE-BUENO 
Recording  Secretary 
E.  L.  BELL 
Corresponding  Secretary 
HOWARD  NOTMAN 


Treasurer 

G.  P.  ENGELHARDT 
Central  Museum 
Eastern  Parkway 
Librarian 

DR.  JOSEPH  BEQUAERT 

Curator 

J.  M.  SHERIDAN 


Delegate  to  Council  of  New  Yorlc 
Academy  of  Sciences 
G.  P.  ENGELHARDT 


CONTENTS 

A NEW  SPECIES  OF  PSEUDOPSALLUS  VAN  D.  WITH  AN 


ALLIED  NEW  GENUS,  Knight  1 

ENGLISH  SPARROWS  EATING  THE  JAPANESE  BEETLE,  Bell 8 

COPAEODES  MINIMA  FROM  FLORIDA,  Bell  8 

VARIATION  IN  LEPIDOPTERA,  Cockerell  9 

RECORDS  OF  ANTHOCORIDAE  FROM  NEW  YORK,  Torre-Bueno ...  11 

A LIST  OF  COLEOPTERA  AT  FLUSHING,  L.  I Cooper  21 

SOME  TINGITIDAE  FROM  BRAZIL,  Drake  25 

PARADICHLORBENZENE  IN  THE  INSECT  COLLECTION,  Torre- 

Bueno  27 

NESTING  HABITS  OF  EMPHOR  BOMBIFORMIS,  Rau 28 

CATOCALA  JUNCTURA  IN  THE  OZARK  REGION,  Brower 36 

CHARLES  JACOB  MARTIN,  Engelhardt  39 

A PERSONAL  NOTE,  J.  R.  T.-B 39 

ADDITIONS  TO  THE  N.  Y.  STATE  LIST  OF  INSECTS:  THE 

OXYBELINE  WASPS,  Pate  40 

CIS  FROSTI,  Frost 41 

LUDIUS  FULVIPES,  Frost  41 

A NEW  MOTH  FROM  SIAM,  Cockerell  42 

TWO  NEW  ALCONEURA,  Lawson  44 

ADDICTED  TO  STRONG  WATERS,  Frost  46 

NOTES  ON  ANXYLOCYPHA  NITEDULA,  Bell  48 

ON  THE  VALIDITY  OF  CORIXA  GEOFFROY,  Walley  49 

BOOK  NOTES:  PROBLEMS  OF  APPLIED  ENTOMOLOGY,  J.  R. 

T.-B 50 

GENERAL  CATALOGUE  OF  THE  HEMIPTERA— 
FASCICLE  II— FAMILY  MESOVELIIDAE,  J. 

R T -B  52 

EPIPHANIS  CORNUTUS,'  Frost  'ZZ1Z..Z...Z 53 

STENUS  RETRUSUS,  Frost  53 

EDITORIAL : THE  FUNCTION  OF  A DESCRIPTION,  J.  R.  T.-B 54 

PROCEEDINGS  OF  THE  SOCIETY,  Siepman  56 


Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society 

Published  in 

February,  April,  June,  October  and  December  of  each  year 

Subscription  price,  domestic,  $2.50  per  year;  foreign,  $2.75  in  advance;  single 
copies,  60  cents.  Advertising  rates  on  application.  Short  articles,  notes  and 
observations  of  interest  to  entomologists  are  solicited.  Authors  will  receive  25 
reprints  free  if  ordered  in  advance  of  publication.  Address  subscriptions  and 
all  communications  to 

J.  R.  de  la  TORRE-BUENO,  Editor, 

38  De  Kalb  Avenue,  White  Plains,  N.  Y. 


BULLETIN 

OF  THE 

BROOKLYN  ENTOMOLOGICAL  SOCIETY 


Vol.  XXV  February,  1930  No.  1 


NEW  SPECIES  OF  PSEUDOPSALLUS  VAN  D.  WITH 
AN  ALLIED  NEW  GENUS  DESCRIBED 
(HEMIPTERA,  MIRIDAE).1 

By  Harry  H.  Knight,  Ames,  Iowa. 

Bifidungulus  new  genus. 

General  aspect  much  as  in  Pseudopsallus  Van  D.  but  the 
deeply  cleft  claws  require  generic  separation.  Arolia  moder- 
ately slender  and  converging  apically  as  in  Orthotylus;  claws 
sharply  bent,  deeply  cleft  much  as  in  Deraeocoris  ruber  L., 
but  basal  part  or  tooth  more  prominent,  the  slender  apical 
half  of  claw  extending  only  one-fourth  of  its  length  beyond 
the  top  of  basal  tooth.  Genital  structures  indicate  a relation- 
ship with  Pseudopsallus ; postero-dorsal  margin  of  the  genital 
segment  with  chitinous  hooks  or  prongs  which  appear  to  be 
accessory  copulatory  claspers ; genital  claspers  highly  devel- 
oped and  providing  specific  characters.  Pubescence  of  two 
types ; rather  thickly  clothed  with  fine,  erect,  simple  hairs  and 
sparsely  intermixed  with  silvery  sericeous  pubescence.  Re- 
fers to  the  subfamily  Orthotylinae.  Genotype : Bifidungulus 
viridicans  n.  sp. 

Bifidungulus  viridicans  n.  sp. 

Suggestive  of  a small  green  Pseudopsallus  but  readily  dis- 
tinguished by  the  structure  of  the  claws ; genital  structures 
distinctive. 

Length  3.7  mm.,  width  2.8  mm.  Head:  width  .75  mm., 
vertex  .39  mm. ; vertex  with  slight  ridge  across  base  but  not 
carinate,  frons  moderately  convex,  tylus  visible  from  above 
and  arcuate  as  viewed  from  the  side,  facial  angle  nearly  a 
right  angle.  Rostrum,  length  1.25  mm.,  reaching  to  middle 


1 Contribution  from  the  Department  of  Zoology  and  Entomol- 
ogy, Iowa  State  College,  Ames. 


1 


.1 


2 Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


of  hind  coxae.  Antennae : segment  I,  length  .23  mm.,  thick- 
ness .086  mm. ; II,  .87  mm.,  equal  in  thickness  to  segment  I 
but  more  slender  at  base,  thickly  clothed  with  fine  yellowish 
pubescence;  III,  .60  mm.,  more  slender;  IV,  .34  mm.;  green- 
ish yellow,  last  two  segments  dusky.  Pronotum:  length  .65 
mm.,  width  at  base  1.21  mm.,  basal  margin  broadly  arcuate, 
sides  nearly  straight,  disk  moderately  convex,  calli  only 
slightly  swollen.  Scutellum  nearly  triangular,  slightly  con- 
vex, mesoscutum  moderately  exposed. 

General  coloration  green  to  yellowish,  hemelytra  semitrans- 
lucent,  legs  and  ventral  surface  more  yellowish ; tibial  spines 
pale  yellowish,  without  spots  at  base,  claws  and  tips  of  tarsi 
black.  Membrane  pale  to  dusky,  veins  green  or  yellowish. 
Clothed  with  prominent,  erect,  pale  pubescence,  intermixed 
with  more  sparsely  placed,  silvery  sericeous  pubescence. 
Genital  structures  distinctive ; postero-dorsal  margin  of  gen- 
ital segment  with  three  spine-like  processes,  two  of  these 
broadly  joined  at  base,  somewhat  U-shaped  but  with  tips  in- 
curved ; the  third  process  arises  at  the  right  side  of  the  mesal 
line  and  points  distad. 

§.  Length  3.9  mm.,  width  1.4  mm.  Head:  width  .78  mm., 
vertex  .43  mm.  Antennae : segment  I,  length  .22  mm.,  thick- 
ness .10  mm. ; II,  .86  mm.,  more  slender  than  segment  I ; III, 
.56  mm. ; IV,  .34  mm. ; yellowish,  last  two  segments  dusky. 

Holotype:  August  4,  1925,  Wray,  Colorado  (H.  H.  Knight). 

Allotype:  same  data  as  the  type.  Paratypes : 2 §,  taken  with  the 
types.  Arizona — 3 $ 1 5,  “ Ariz.”  (Gillette).  Kansas — 2 
June  27  (Marlatt)  ; 16  § Sept.  Riley  County  (Popenoe). 

Hamilton  County  (F.  H.  Snow).  Texas — 18  ,^'2  June  9,  4<J  1 2 
Aug.  9,  1926,  Port  Lavaca  (E.  P.  Ewing),  taken  on  Gauva  parvi- 
folia. 

Bifidungulus  puberus  (Uhler). 

After  examining  a male  cotype  of  Oncotylus  puberus  Uhler  I 
find  that  it  is  congeneric  with  Bifidungulus  viridicans  n.  sp. 
Puberus  Uhler  has  the  same  type  of  claws  and  arolia  as  viridicans, 
but  size  larger  and  the  genital  structures  different  although  of  the 
same  generic  type.  I have  a male  specimen  taken  April  19,  1924, 
Tucson,  Arizona  (A.  A.  Nichol). 

Pseudopsallus  artemisicola  n.  sp. 

Color  aspect  and  size  of  sericatus  Uhler,  but  differs  in 
structure  of  male  genitalia,  also  more  finely  and  sparsely 
pubescent,  the  dorsum  clothed  with  white  hairs  only. 


Feb.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  3 


J1.  Length  6.3  mm.,  width  2 mm.  Head:  width  .96  mm., 
vertex  .47  mm.  Rostrum,  length  1.52  mm.,  barely  attaining 
hind  margins  of  middle  coxae,  green  to  yellowish,  apex  black, 
Antennae : segment  I,  length  .38  mm.,  green  to  yellowish ; II, 

1.73  mm.,  cylindrical,  only  slightly  more  slender  than  segment 

I,  yellowish  to  brownish,  sometimes  becoming  fuscous, 
thickly  clothed  with  short  brownish  pubescence ; III,  .82  mm., 
more  slender,  fuscous;  IV,  .43  mm.,  fuscous.  Pronotum: 
length  .95  mm.,  width  at  base  1.73  mm. 

General  coloration  pale  bluish  green,  scutellum  paler,  meso- 
scutum  yellowish,  suture  blackish.  Legs  yellowish  green, 
femora  with  setigerous  black  points  on  distal  half  from  which 
black  bristles  arise;  tibial  spines  black,  without  black  points 
at  base  except  three  or  four  basal  spines;  tarsi  yellowish 
brown,  distal  segment  and  claws  black.  Membrane  pale, 
veins  green,  cubitus  bordered  by  a yellow  calloused  line. 
Clothed  with  prominent,  erect,  moderately  abundant  white 
hairs,  intermixed  with  more  thickly  spread,  recumbent,  silver 
white  sericeous  pubescence.  Genital  structures  distinctive, 
postero-dorsal  margin  of  genital  segment  armed  with  three 
ventrally  projecting,  blade-like  chitinous  spines,  much  longer 
and  more  prominent  than  in  sericatus , the  middle  blade  wid- 
est and  sinuate  in  form ; left  clasper  with  a dorsally  project- 
ing lobe,  its  sides  nearly  parallel,  apex  rather  broadly 
rounded,  summit  armed  with  two  short,  inturned  brown 
chitinous  spines ; right  clasper  distinctive  also  but  not  so 
easily  described. 

Length  5.8  mm.,  width  2.12  mm.  Head:  width  1.01 
mm.,  vertex  .56  mm.  Antennae : segment  I,  length  .39  mm.  ; 

II,  1.73  mm.,  more  slender  than  in  the  male,  greenish  yellow; 

III,  1.43  mm.,  yellowish  to  fuscous;  IV,  .46  mm.  More 
robust  than  the  male  but  very  similar  in  pubescence  and  col- 
oration. All  specimens  macropterous,  with  no  indication  of 
the  brachypterous  condition  found  in  sericatus  Uhler. 

Holotype:  J1  August  25,  1925,  Hudson,  Colorado  (H.  H. 
Knight)  ; author’s  collection.  Allotype:  same  data  as  the  type. 
Paratypes:  56  taken  with  the  types  on  sage  brush  ( Artemisia 
filifolia)  where  the  species  was  breeding.  Perhaps  two  hours 
were  consumed  in  sweeping  sage  brush  to  obtain  the  above  speci- 
mens, whereas  at  the  same  time  several  hundred  specimens  of 
Paracalocoris  deleticus  Reut.  were  taken  in  the  net. 

Labopidea  sericata  Uhler  must  be  referred  to  the  genus  Pseu- 
do psallus  Van  D.,  if  the  type  of  genital  structures  are  given  due 
consideration.  The  type  of  pubescence  and  the  antennae  also  con- 


4 Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


firm  this  relationship.  The  blade-like  chitinous  projections  on  the 
postero-dorsal  margin  of  the  male  genital  segment  appear  to  form 
one  good  character  at  least  which  all  members  of  this  genus 
possess. 

Pseudopsallus  anograe  n.  sp. 

Allied  to  artemisicola  but  smaller,  deeper  bluish  green  in 
color;  genital  structures  distinctive. 

Length  5.2  mm.,  width  1.8  mm.  Head:  width  .88  mm., 
vertex  .45  mm.  Rostrum,  length  1.23  mm.,  reaching  to  mid- 
dle of  intermediate  coxae,  greenish,  apex  black.  Antennae : 
segment  I,  length  .30  mm.,  bluish  green;  II,  1*12  mm.,  cylin- 
drical, thickness  nearly  equal  to  segment  I,  more  slender  at 
base,  greenish  to  dusky;  III,  .93  mm.,  fuscous;  IV,  .39  mm., 
fuscous.  Pronotum:  length  .74  mm.,  width  at  base  1.47  mm. 

General  coloration  deep  bluish  green,  mesoscutum  yellow- 
ish. Legs  uniformly  bluish  green,  tibial  spines,  tips  of  tarsi 
and  claws,  .black.  Membrane  pale  or  slightly  dusky,  veins 
green ; cubitus  bordered  by  a yellowish  calloused  line.  Dor- 
sum clothed  with  prominent,  erect,  blackish  hairs,  also  with 
pale  ones  on  embolium  and  margins  of  pronotum,  the  whole 
intermixed  with  sericeous,  silvery  scale-like  pubescence. 
Genital  structures  distinctive ; postero-dorsal  margin  of  gen- 
ital segment  with  four  chitinous  processes,  number  one  on 
the  left  side  small  and  spine-like,  the  second  arising  near 
middle  strongly  sinuate,  curving  to  the  left  side,  apical  half 
slender,  needle-like  and  pointing  distad ; third  process  arising 
to  right  of  median  line,  blade-like;  fourth  process  arising  to 
the  right  of  and  beneath  the  third,  about  the  same  length  but 
more  slender  than  the  third.  Dorsal  lobe  of  left  genital  clas- 
per  terminating  in  a slender  acuminate  spine  which  in  normal 
resting  position  points  cephalad. 

$.  Length  4.8  mm.,  width  1.8  mm.  Head:  width  .91  mm., 
vertex  .43  mm.  Antennae : segment  I,  length  .30  mm.,  yel- 
lowish; II,  1. 01  mm.,  greenish  yellow,  becoming  fuscous 
apically;  III,  .86  mm.,  fuscous;  IV,  .39  mm.,  fuscous.  Pro- 
notum: length  .74  mm.,  width  at  base  1.44  mm. 

Holotype:  $ August  17,  1925,  Gunnison,  Colorado  (H.  H. 
Knight)  ; author’s  collection.  Allotype:  August  25,  1925,  Hud- 
son, Colorado  (H.  H.  Knight).  Paratypes:  6 J1,  taken  with  the 
type  on  Anogra  coronopifolia  (T.  & G.)  where  the  species  was 
breeding.  <j>  August  26,  1925,  Sterling,  Colorado  (H.  H.  Knight), 
taken  on  the  same  host  plant  as  determined  by  Dr.  L.  H.  Pammel. 

June  9,  1920,  Fort  Collins,  Colorado. 


Fe  1.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  5 


Pseudopsallus  abroniae  n.  sp. 

A pale  dusky  form  with  antennae,  calli,  and  arcuate  marks 
on  the  frons  fuscous;  genital  claspers  distinctive. 

Length  5.7  mm.,  width  2.2  mm.  Head:  width  .96  mm., 
vertex  .39  mm. ; eyes  larger  and  tylus  more  prominent  than  in 
sericatus  Uhler.  Rostrum,  length  2 mm.,  attaining  posterior 
margins  of  hind  coxae,  dusky  to  fuscous,  apical  segment 
black.  Antennae:  segment  I,  length  .35  mm.,  dusky,  fuscous 
near  base;  II,  1.51  mm.,  cylindrical,  nearly  the  thickness  of 
segment  I but  more  slender  at  base,  dusky  to  fuscous,  thickly 
clothed  with  rather  short  fuscous  pubescence ; III,  97  mm. 
more  slender,  blackish ; IV,  .32  mm.,  black.  Pronotum : 
length  .91  mm.,  width  at  base  1.77  mm. 

General  coloration  dusky  pale,  with  calli,  arcuate  mark 
each  side  of  frons,  sternum  except  side,  tibial  spines  and  tips 
of  tarsi,  fuscous  to  black.  Legs  dusky,  femora  with  rows  of 
obsolete  fuscous  dots.  Mesoscutum  moderately  exposed,  yel- 
lowish to  orange  colored.  Membrane  uniformly  dusky  or 
pale  fuscous,  veins  paler.  Clothed  with  prominent,  erect, 
simple  brownish  hairs  and  rather  sparsely  intermixed  with 
fine,  recumbent,  pale  to  yellowish  sericeous  pubescence, 
thicker  on  sides  of  abdomen.  Genital  structures  distinctive, 
left  clasper  with  dorsal  lobe  bluntly  acuminate,  apex  armed 
with  a pair  of  small  spines ; postero-dorsal  margin  of  genital 
segment  armed  with  three  ventrally  projecting  chitinous 
spines,  the  right  hand  one  blade-like,  its  apex  widened  and 
finely  dentate. 

5.  Length  5.9  mm.,  width  2.5  mm.  Head : width  .99  mm., 
vertex  .48  mm.  Antennae : segment  I,  length  .38  mm. ; II,  1.6 
mm.,  cylindrical,  more  slender  than  segment  I ; III,  .95  mm. ; 
IV,  .32  mm.  Pronotum:  length  .97  mm.,  width  at  base  1.94 
mm.  More  robust  than  the  male  but  very  similar  in  pubes- 
cence and  coloration. 

Holotype : $ August  25,  1925,  Hudson,  Colorado  (H.  H. 
Knight)  ; author’s  collection.  Allotype:  same  data  as  the  type. 
Paratypes:  24  taken  with  the  types  on  Abronia  elliptica 

where  the  Species  was  breeding.  2 ^ 1 J June  10,  1900,  Ft.  Lup- 
ton,  Colorado  (E.  D.  Ball).  J'  April  26,  1903,  Phoenix,  Arizona. 

Pseudopsallus  tanneri  n.  sp. 

Allied  to  sericatus  Uhler,  but  distinguished  by  the  longer 
and  more  slender  black  antennae,  and  in  structure  of  the  male 
genital  claspers. 

J1.  Length  5.9  mm.,  width  2.9  mm.  Head:  width  1.03 
mm.,  vertex  .59  mm. ; frons  and  base  of  tylus  more  prominent 


6 Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


than  in  sericatus.  Rostrum,  length  1.2  mm.,  just  attaining 
hind  margin  of  sternum,  green,  last  two  segments  black.  An- 
tennae : segment  I,  length  .44  mm.,  fuscous  to  black,  green  at 
base;  II,  1.66  mm.,  black,  distinctly  more  slender  than  in 
sericatus;  III,  broken.  Pronotum : length  .78  mm.,  width  at 
base  1.54  mm. 

General  coloration  bluish  green,  basal  line  of  scutellum,  an- 
tennae, apical  half  of  rostrum,  tibial  spines  and  tarsi,  black. 
Membrane  pale  to  dusky,  veins  bluish  green.  Clothed  with 
prominent,  erect,  simple  pale  hairs  and  thickly  intermixed 
with  silvery  white,  sericeous  to  scale-like  pubescence,  being 
very  much  like  sericatus  in  this  respect.  Genital  claspers 
distinctive,  left  clasper  with  dorsal  half  vertical,  sides  par- 
allel, not  at  all  acuminate,  dorsal  edge  curved  slightly  inward, 
broadly  and  rather  deeply  notched,  leaving  the  dorsal  angles 
acuminate  and  curved  slightly  cephalad;  postero-dorsal  mar- 
gin of  genital  segment  set  with  four  prominent  blade-like, 
chitinous  projections,  whereas  sericatus  has  only  two  blades 
and  a small  spine. 

J.  Length  5 mm.,  width  2 mm.  Head:  width  1.15  mm., 
vertex  .74  mm.  Antennae : segment  I,  length  .44  mm. ; II, 
1.69  mm.;  Ill,  1.35  mm.;  IV,  .47  mm.;  greenish  to  fuscous, 
last  two  segments  darker.  Pronotum : length  .80  mm.,  width 
at  base  1.58  mm.  More  robust  and  hemelytra  shorter  than 
in  the  male,  but  very  similar  in  pubescence  and  coloration. 

Holotype:  June,  1927,  Mesa  Verde  National  Park,  Colorado 

(Vasco  M.  Tanner)  ; author's  collection.  Allotype;  June  11, 
1915,  beyond  Jacumba,  San  Diego  Co.,  California  (Harold  Mor- 
rison), from  sage-brush;  author’s  collection.  Paratypes:  3 
2 §,  taken  with  the  allotype ; unfortunately  poorly  preserved,  but 
the  male  claspers  are  very  distinctive  and  undoubtedly  belong 
here.  Utah — 2 June  23,  1913,  Kanab  (E.  D.  Ball).  ^ , La 

Sal  (Vasco  M.  Tanner).  § Aug.  4,  1921,  Butte,  Montana  (F.  M. 
Sallee).  Named  in  honor  of  Dr.  Vasco  M.  Tanner  who  collected 
and  preserved  the  best  male  specimen. 

Pseudopsallus  davisi  n.  sp. 

Distinguished  from  allied  species  by  the  prominent,  erect, 
black  hairs  on  the  dorsum ; probably  more  closely  allied  to 
tanneri  as  shown  by  form  of  left  genital  clasper,  but  the  black 
bristle-like  hairs  and  other  characters  separate  it  easily. 

Length  5.4  mm.,  width  1.7  mm.  Head:  width  .93  mm., 
vertex  .476  mm.  Rostrum,  length  1.17  mm.,  reaching  to  base 
of  hind  coxae,  green,  apex  black.  Antennae : segment  I, 


Fel.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  7 


length  .30  mm.,  green,  set  with  four  or  five  black  setose  hairs ; 
II,  1.  1 7 mm.,  distinctly  more  slender  than  segment  I,  green 
to  dusky,  set  with  rather  prominent  black  hairs  and  inter- 
mixed with  some  finer,  paler  pubescence ; III,  .82  mm.,  fus- 
cous ; IV,  broken.  Pronotum : length  .74  mm.,  width  at  base 
1.38  mm. 

Color  rather  uniformly  deep  bluish  green ; femora  with 
many  setigerous  fuscous  points  from  which  black  hairs  arise, 
tibia  with  prominent  black  spines  but  not  arising  from  dis- 
tinct spots,  base  and  apex  of  tarsi  blackish.  Membrane  uni- 
formly pale  dusky,  veins  pale  to  green,  a calloused  line  bor- 
dering larger  areole.  Clothed  with  erect,  black,  bristle-like 
hairs  on  dorsum,  vertex  and  apical  half  of  venter,  also  a few 
white  hairs  on  pronotum,  head  and  embolium,  the  whole 
closely  intermixed  with  sericeous  to  scale-like,  silvery  white 
pubescence.  Genital  structure  distinctive ; left  clasper  much 
as  in  tanneri,  the  dorsal  lobe  broadly  notched  above ; postero- 
dorsal  margin  of  genital  segment  with  a pair  of  chitinous 
processes  on  left  of  mesal  line,  much  as  in  tanneri,  but  right 
side  with  a single,  broad,  flat  process  which  terminates  as  a 
sharp  spine  at  outer  or  ventral  margin. 

Holotype:  J'  July  15,  1929,  Richfield,  Utah  (E.  W.  Davis), 
taken  at  light  trap;  author’s  collection.  Named  in  honor  of  Mr. 
Edgar  W.  Davis  who  has  favored  the  author  with  several  inter- 
esting species  of  Miridae. 

Pseudopsallus  nicholi  n.  sp. 

'Allied  to  demensus  Van  D.,  but  genital  structures  show 
distinctions ; smaller  and  more  delicate  than  demensus,  pale 
to  bluish  green;  dorsal  lobe  of  left  clasper  more  rounded  at 
apex,  whereas  in  demensus  the  apex  is  acute. 

<$.  Length  4.4  mm.,  width  1.5  mm.  Head : width  .87  mm., 
vertex  .41  mm.  Rostrum,  length  .97  mm.,  scarcely  attaining 
hind  margin  of  sternum,  yellowish,  apex  black.  Antennae: 
segment  I,  length  .30  mm.,  greenish  yellow;  II,  1.3  mm.,  cy- 
lindrical, scarcely  equal  to  thickness  of  segment  I,  yellowish 
to  green,  becoming  fuscous  apically;  III,  1.1  mm.,  fuscous; 
IV,  .41  mm.,  fuscous.  Pronotum : length  .68  mm.,  width  at 
base  1.3  mm. 

Color  pale  to  bluish  green,  legs  yellowish,  pronotum,  heme- 
lytra  and  venter  more  greenish.  Membrane  pale  to  slightly 
dusky,  veins  pale  to  greenish,  an  opaque  calloused  spot  bor- 
dering apex  of  larger  areole.  Clothed  with  moderately  prom- 
inent, simple,  white  pubescent  hairs  and  intermixed  with  sil- 


8 Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


very  white,  sericeous  to  scale-like  pubescence.  Genital  struc- 
tures distinctive ; dorsal  lobe  of  left  clasper  with  sides  nearly 
parallel,  dorsal  extremity  rounded  off  and  not  acute  as  viewed 
from  the  side,  although  viewed  from  above  the  inner  edge 
with  a slight  projection ; postero-dorsal  margin  of  genital  seg- 
ment with  two  flat  blade-like  chitinous  projections,  one  aris- 
ing each  side  of  mesal  line,  curving  mesad,  their  tips  nearly 
touching. 

J.  Length  4.3  mm.,  width  1.6  mm.  Head:  width  .87  mm., 
vertex  .47  mm.  Antennae : segment  I,  length  .30  mm. ; II, 
1.34  mm.,  distinctly  more  slender  than  segment  I;  III,  1.08 
mm. ; IV,  .39  mm. ; yellowish  green,  last  two  segments  becom- 
ing fuscous.  Pronotum:  length  .69  mm.,  width  at  base  1.34 
mm.  Form  slightly  more  robust  than  the  male,  but  very 
similar  in  pubescence  and  coloration. 

Holotype:  $ June  14,  1928,  alt.  6000  ft.,  Huachuca  Mts.  (A.  A. 
Nichol).  Allotype:  same  data  as  the  type.  Paratype:  §,  taken 
with  the  types. 

Pseudopsallus  demensus  (Van  D.). 

I have  a male  paratype  of  Orthotylus  demensus  Van  D.  and  find 
that  the  male  claspers  and  other  characters  refer  this  species  to 
the  genus  Pseudopsallus.  I have  taken  the  species  on  Gaura  coc- 
cinea  Pursh.  where  it  was  breeding  July  31,  1927,  Moorecroft, 
Wyoming,  also  July  30,  Sundance,  Wyo.,  and  Aug.  19,  1927, 
Custer,  South  Dakota.  Also  have  a specimen  labeled  June  24, 
1920,  Fort  Collins,  Colorado  (G.  M.  List). 


English  Sparrows  Eating  the  Japanese  Beetle. — On  Sunday, 
July  7th,  the  writer  observed  several  English  sparrows  capturing 
Japanese  beetles  on  a rose  bush  in  the  yard  of  a neighbor.  The 
sparrows  hovered  over  the  bush  and  when  they  located  a beetle, 
deftly  removed  it  from  the  leaf  upon  which  it  was  feeding,  took 
it  to  the  sidewalk  or  a bare  patch  of  ground,  where  it  was  quickly 
killed  and  eaten.  Apparently  this  despised  sparrow  has  some 
good  traits. — E.  L.  Bell,  Flushing,  N.  Y.  J 


Copaeodes  minima  Edwards  from  Florida. — Several  speci- 
mens of  this  diminutive  Hesperid  butterfly  were  collected  by  Mr. 
George  P.  Engelhardt,  at  Gainesville,  Florida,  on  March  8th  and 
30th,  1929.  This  seems  to  be  the  first  recorded  occurrence  of 
minima  from  Florida. — E.  L.  Bell,  Flushing,  N.  Y. 


Feb.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  9 


VARIATION  IN  LEPIDOPTERA. 

By  T.  D.  A.  Cockerell,  Boulder,  Colo. 

Mr.  Gunder’s  interesting'  article  in  the  December  Bulletin 
suggests  a few  comments.  Names  exist  to  facilitate  reference  to 
objects  which  interest  us.  We  name  every  individual  of  Homo 
sapiens.  In  recent  years  there  has  been  a great  development  of 
interest  in  various  aspects  of  evolution,  genetics  and  geographical 
distribution,  and  Lepidoptera  are  found  to  be  very  useful  for  such 
studies.  Hence  it  has  come  about  that  for  some  people  and  for 
some  purposes  varieties  and  races  are  more  interesting  than  spe- 
cies, because  they  throw  more  light  on  the  workings  of  the  evolu- 
tionary mechanism.  It  does  not  seem  possible  to  say  in  advance 
what  complexities  of  nomenclature  are  desirable,  but  naming  goes 
too  far  when  it  involves  differences  which  for  our  purposes  are 
not  significant. 

It  seems  simple  to  say  that  we  will  name  significant  variations 
from  the  type  which  are  due  to  germinal  modifications,  but  will 
not  name  those  which  are  the  direct  result  of  environmental  fac- 
tors. Thus,  on  this  basis,  Mr.  Gunder  logically  rejects  various 
“minor”  varieties,  which  may  be  supposed  to  be  due,  at  least 
frequently,  to  lack  of  sufficient  food  in  the  larva  state.  But  the 
difficulty  we  meet  is  this,  that  objectively,  upon  inspection,  it  is 
often  impossible  to  distinguish  between  the  effects  of  environment 
and  true  mutation.  Any  study  of  species  teaches  us  that  size  is 
very  frequently  a specific  character,  and  it  must  also  be,  in  num- 
erous instances,  of  racial  significance.  We  already  know  much 
about  chromosome,  changes  in  relation  to  size  among  plants.  But 
again,  Mr.  Gunder  fully  recognizes  melanism  in  his  system  of 
named  varieties  or  forms,  but  has  he  inspected  the  remarkable 
figures  of  Vanessa  ( urticae , io,  polyckoros  and  antiopa)  in 
Schroder’s  Handbuch  der  Entomologie,  Bd.  2,  pp.  476-477 
(1926)?  We  are  there  shown  (1)  the  normal  form,  (2)  the 
effects  of  moderate  cold,  (3)  the  effects  of  extreme  cold,  (4)  the 
effects  of  warmth,  and  (5)  the  variation  due  to  extreme  heat. 
The  striking  aberrations  produced  by  extremes  of  heat  and  cold 
are  practically  the  same,  and  are  given  the  same  names,  viz.  V. 
urticae  ab.  ichnusoides  Selys.,  V.  io  ab.  antigone  Fisch.,  V.  poly- 
chloros  ab.  testudo  Esp.,  V.  antiopa  v.  hygiaea  Hdrch.  V.  cardui 
ab.  elymi  Rbr.  is  another  modification  of  the  same  sort.  It  is  not 


10  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


therefore  to  be  inferred  that  melanism  is  always  due  to  heat  or 
cold,  but  the  point  is  that  we  cannot  determine  the  cause  on  mere 
inspection  of  the  specimens.  We  are  apparently  obliged  to  record 
these  variations  by  name — and  the  records  are  of  value — but  to 
leave  it  to  the  future  to  determine  how  they  are  caused.  Yet,  as 
experimental  evidence  accumulates,  we  are  more  and  more  able 
to  make  reasonably  correct  inferences. 

There  are  certain  kinds  of  variation  which  are  worth  critical 
study,  but  are  not  covered  by  Mr.  Gunder’s  rather  artificial 
scheme. 

(i.)  Any  one  who  inspects  a good  series  of  a large  genus,  such 
as  Papiiio,  can  see  that  there  are  various  progressive  tendencies  in 
shape,  markings  and  color  which  culminate  in  series  of  diverse 
species.  Now  it  should  be  of  interest  to  seek  the  beginnings  of 
these  changes,  or  to  record  the  variations  of  one  species  which 
are  in  the  direction  of  the  normal  form  of  a related  one.  Thus  it 
may  well  happen  that  very  slight  modifications  may  sometimes  be 
worth  noting,  when  making  an  evolutionary  study  of  a group. 

(2.)  There  are  races  which  appear  nearly  alike,  and  yet  cer- 
tainly, or  almost  certainly,  arose  independently.  When  we  sus- 
pect independent  origin,  we  may  be  guided  by  very  small  peculiar- 
ities, which  tell  the  story.  (Collectors  of  postage  stamps  know 
this  well!)  In  practice,  it  is  doubtless  best  to  retain  the  same 
name  for  races  appearing  identical,  but  existing  in  different  re- 
gions, until  it  is  possible  to  prove  diversity  of  origin. 

From  the  standpoint  of  nomenclature,  I think  the  races  or  sub- 
species, though  expressed  by  trinomials,  should  rank  with  species. 
That  is,  the  racial  name  should  not  be  repeated  within  the  genus 
and  the  first  published  name  takes  precedence,  whether  published 
as  a species  or  as  a subspecies.  The  intermediates  found  where 
the  ranges  of  subspecies  meet  are  presumably  nearly  always  due 
to  crossing. 

The  mutation,  aberration  or  form  should  I think  stand  in  a dif- 
ferent category.  For  various  reasons,  which  I need  not  discuss, 
it  seems  better  ( 1 ) not  to  give  priority  as  a specific  name,  when  a 
named  aberration  has  been  found  to  belong  to  a species  not  hith- 
erto separated;  and  (2)  the  use  of  the  same  term  for  parallel  aber- 
rations within  the  genus,  or  in  races  of  one  species,  should  be  per- 
mitted and  encouraged. 


Fel.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  11 


RECORDS  OF  ANTHOCORIDAE,  PARTICULARLY 
FROM  NEW  YORK. 

J.  R.  de  la  Torre-Bueno,  White  Plains,  N.  Y. 

This,  like  many  other  notes,  started  to  be  a mere  listing  of 
localities  and  biological  facts  out  of  my  collection  and  field 
journals.  But  in  its  course,  it  became  necessary  to  check  up  many 
determinations.  Hemiptera  of  Connecticut,  while  eminently 
usable  and  entirely  accurate,  did  not  go  far  enough ; and  it  was 
necessary  to  have  recourse  to  the  original  sources  for  the  study  of 
anthocorids — Reuter’s  masterly  monograph  of  1884,  46  years  old, 
but  still  the  standard  work ; and  Poppius’  Beitrage  of  1909.  Re- 
stricted keys  for  the  species  of  the  Eastern  States  were  drawn  up 
from  the  literature;  and  they  are  here  offered  as  an  aid  to  the 
identification  of  our  own  northern  forms  without  the  injection 
of  tropical  and  subtropical  species  not  as  yet  found  with  us  and 
unlikely  to  occur  so  far  North.  One  genus  and  its  species 
(Xenotrachelliella  inimica  D.  & H.)  are  not  included  because  none 
of  the  key  characters  used  by  Reuter  appears  in  the  descriptions, 
which  are  largely  by  color,  following  the  European  obsolescent 
practice.  While  these  keys  are  at  times  similar  to  those  in  Blatch- 
ley,  it  is  because  they  are  drawn  from  the  same  sources.  Where 
they  differ  (and  where  names  also  differ)  it  is  because  Reuter 
has  been  followed  closely. 

In  keying  the  subfamilies  I endeavored  to  find  from  the  litera- 
ture some  stable  yet  visible  character  other  than  the  hamus  of  the 
cell  of  the  second  pair  of  wings — but  all  the  authors  consulted 
offered  no  other.  This,  of.  course,  is  a perfectly  valid  character, 
but  it  calls  for  the  practical  destruction  of  a delicate  specimen 
before  it  can  be  seen.  A monograph  of  the  family  is  now  in 
progress  at  Ames,  Iowa,  so  it  is  hardly  worth  while  to  go  to  the 
pains  and  research  required,  when  my  present  purpose  is  merely 
to  offer  practicable  and  practical  keys  to  supplement  the  eminently 
usable  ones  in  Hemiptera  of  Connecticut. 

Key  to  the  Family  Anthocoridae. 

1.  Third  and  fourth  segments  of  antennae  slender,  linear,  beset 

with  long  hairs 2 

Third  and  fourth  segments  of  the  antennae  fusiform,  with 
short  hairs  Subfamily  anthocorinae 


12  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


2.  Cell  of  the  second  pair  of  wings  with  a hamus  or  hook-like  in- 
terior vein Subfamily  lyctocorinae 

Cell  without  a hamus Subfamily  dufouriellinae 

Key  to  Genera  of  Lyctocorinae. 

(From  Hemiptera  of  Connecticut.) 

1.  Channel  of  metasternal  orifices  curved  forward,  or  backward, 

with  rounded  angle,  fine  carina  lacking 2 

Channel  of  metasternal  orifices  nearly  straight,  joining  at  a 
sharp  right  angle  a very  fine  carina  which  extends  to  the 
anterior  pleural  margin Lyctocoris  Hahn 

2.  Channel  curved  forward ; pronotal  margins  not  distinctly 

ciliate  3 

Channel  curved  backward,  toward  apex;  pronotal  margins 

ciliate Lasiochilus  Reuter 

3.  Channel  long,  curved  at  middle,  and  almost,  or  quite,  reaching 

the  margin  of  the  metapleura Xylocoris  Dufour 

Channel  shorter,  curved  near  apex,  not  nearly  reaching  margin 
of  metapleura Asthenidea  Reuter 

While  Hemiptera  of  Connecticut  gives  only  one  of  the  genera — 
Xylocoris,  with  one  species — as  found  up  to  that  time  in  the 
State,  all  four  genera  are  found  in  New  York  or  the  neighboring 
states,  so  their  occurrence  in  Connecticut  is  only  a matter  of 
finding  the  specimens. 

Key  to  Lyctocoris  Hahn. 

(Adapted  from  Reuter.) 

1.  Membrane  with  only  one  (the  external)  vein  quite  distinct; 

(first  segment  of  rostrum  not  shorter  than  head,  extending 
slightly  beyond  base  of  eyes)  ; 3.5  to  3.8  mm.  long. 

campestris  Fab. 

Membrane  with  four  veins,  all,  or  nearly  all,  equally  distinct, 
raised  2 

2.  Rostrum  extending  scarcely  beyond  the  intermediate  coxae, 

first  segment  extending  to  the  middle  of  the  eye. 

(subgenus  Metriosteles  Reut.) 
Rostrum  reaching  hind  coxae;  first  segment  at  least  as  long 
as  head 3 

3.  First  segment  of  rostrum  as  long  as  head ; second  segment  of 

antennae  but  little  longer  than  the  width  of  the  head  in- 
cluding the  eyes ; 4 mm.  long stdlii  Reut. 


Feb.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  13 


First  segment  of  rostrum  nearly  reaching  apex  of  prosternum ; 
second  joint  of  antennae  1/3  longer  than  the  width  of  the 
head;  4.5  mm.  long elongatus  Reut. 

Lyc  toe  oris  campestris  Fabr.,  1794. 

This  widespread  European  form  is  recorded  from  Quebec  to 
Texas  and  Colorado.  It  is  listed  from  the  State  in  the  New 
York  list,  but  not  from  Connecticut  in  Hemiptera  of  Connecticut. 
All  the  following  records  are  new. 

Indian  Lake,  Sabael,  N.  Y.,  August  31,  1921  (Notman)  : White 
Plains,  N.  Y.,  June  19,  1915,  and  October  17,  1908,  on  glass  pane 
of  door  (J.  R.  T.  B.).  Cornwall,  Conn.,  July  22,  1924  (Frost). 
Buffalo  Lake,  Minn.  (No  other  data). 

Lyctocoris  stdlii  Reut.,  1871. 

Southern  Pines,  N.  C.,  Jan.,  1911  (A.  H.  Manee).  Lyctocoris 
canadensis  Prov.  is  not  keyed  because  no  key  characters  are  given 
in  the  description.  Blatchley  records  L.  elongatus  from  Lake- 
hurst,  N.  J. — probably  taken  by  Mr.  Wm.  T.  Davis.  L.  stdlii 
figures  in  the  New  York  List  from  the  State. 

Key  to  Lasiochilus  Reuter. 

(Adapted  from  Reuter.) 

Pale  or  fuscescent  testaceous ; entire  clavus  most  distinctly  sub- 
seriately  punctate,  a series  of  piliferous  punctures  on  the 
corium  parallel  to  the  claval  suture.  (Apex  of  embolium  as 
wide  as  the  apex  of  the  corium ; margin  of  pronotum  and  of 
embolium  with  long  cilia,  first  joint  of  rostrum  scarcely 
reaching  apex  of  head.)  2.5  to  3.33  mm.  long. 

pallidulus  Reuter 

Obscure  fuscous;  clavus  hardly  or  obsoletely  punctate:  (Margin 
of  pronotum  with  short  cilia ; margin  of  hemielytra  with  long 
cilia;  rostrum  reaching  intermediate  coxae;  apex  of  first 
joint  of  rostrum  nearly  reaching  eyes).  2.75  mm.  long. 

fusculus  Reuter 

Lasiochilus  pallidulus  Reuter  is  known  from  South  Carolina, 
Florida  and  Texas  southwest.  It  may  at  some  time  be  found  in 
the  pine  barrens  of  Long  Island;  and  is  therefore  noted  here. 


14  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


Lasiochilus  fusculus  Reuter. 

This  species  has  an  extensive  range — from  New  York  south 
and  west  into  New  Jersey,  Indiana,  South  Carolina,  Tennessee, 
Mississippi,  Florida  and  Texas.  The  New  York  State  List 
records  it  from  Hamburg. 

Key  to  Xylocoris  Dufour. 

(=  Piezostethus  Fieber.) 

(Adapted  from  Reuter.) 

1.  Channel  of  metasternal  orifices  long,  margins  even,  the  in- 

ternal scarcely  expanded  into  a wide  smooth  area 2 

Channel  of  the  metasternal  orifices  transverse,  scarcely  curved, 
prolonged  into  a curved  shining  area.  (Entire  hemielytra 
very  shining).  2 mm.  long vicarius  Reuter 

2.  Channel  of  the  metasternal  orifices  extremely  long,  prolonged 

into  a carinate-acuminate  apex,  which  reaches  the  basal 
margins  of  the  pleura.  Hemielytra  somewhat  shining,  al- 
ways at  least  as  long  as  the  abdomen  or  hardly  shorter. 
(Hind  tibiae  finely  pilose,  devoid  of  long  hairs)  ; larger 

species,  at  least  2.5  mm.  long 3 

Channel  of  the  metasternal  orifices  prolonged  in  a carina,  not 
much  acuminate  toward  apex  and  most  distinctly  abrupt  a 
little  below  the  basal  margin  of  the  pleura;  2.25  to  2.5  mm. 
long cursitans  Fabricius 

3.  Hemielytra  whitish;  apex  of  the  clavus  and  the  cuneus,  the 

suture  of  the  membrane  only  and  sometimes  its  exterior 
margin,  narrowly  fuscous ; channel  of  the  metasternal  ori- 
fices curved  in  an  obtuse  angle;  2.3  to  3 mm.  long. 

galactinus  Fieber 

Hemielytra  sordid  white  or  greyish ; commissure  and  clavus 
and  frequently  its  scutellar  edge  and  the  embolium  black  or 
piceous,  the  blackening  sometimes  quite  extensive;  channel 
of  metasternal  orifices  curved  in  a very  obtuse  arc ; 2.75 
mm.  long sordidus  Reuter 

There  are  actually  five  species  of  this  genus  in  the  Eastern  part 
of  this  country,  but  the  fifth— Xylocoris  betulinus  D.  & H. — could 
not  be  fitted  into  this  key  because  of  the  absence  in  its  description 
of  the  characters  herein  used.  The  genus  figures  in  most  of  our 
lists  as  Piezostethus  Fieber. 


Felt.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  15 


Xyl.ocoris  galactinus  Fieber. 

This  species  has  heretofore  been  recorded  from  this  country 
from  New  York,  Illinois,  Georgia  and  Florida;  the  New  York 
List  gives  it  from  Lake  Placid  (in  the  Adirondacks)  ; and  Blatch- 
ley  adds  Roselle  Park,  N.  J. — now  Roselle — probably  from  the 
collections  of  Mr.  H.  G.  Barber.  I have  taken  it  in  White  Plains 
(September  2,  1916)  by  sweeping,  this  being  another  New  York 
record. 

Xylocoris  sordidus  Reuter. 

Van  Duzee  gives  its  range  as  New  York,  Pennsylvania  and 
Texas;  Blatchley  records  it  from  Florida;  and  the  New  York 
List  gives  it  from  White  Plains.  This  last  record,  however,  may 
be  based  on  a misidentification  of  X.  vicarms. 

Xylocoris  vicarius  Reuter. 

This  is  the  species  that  has  frequently  been  reported  as 
Piezostethus  sordidus  by  myself  and  by  others.  It  has  also  gone 
under  the  name  of  cursitans.  Careful  checking  with  Blatchley’s 
keys  led  this  species  to  this  name.  My  own  key  preceding  re- 
peatedly gave  the  same  result.  According  to  Blatchley  this  is  a 
Floridian  species.  Reuter  described  it  from  “Am.  Sept.”  The 
form  of  the  metasternal  channel  is  distinctive.  This  species  is  the 
common  dark  brown  or  piceous,  apterous  species  to  be  found 
nearly  at  all  times  of  the  year  in  dampish  spots,  under  the  bark 
of  dead  trees,  running  about  with  Scolopendrella  and  sundry  small 
beetles,  principally  Staphylinids.  The  nymphs  are  bright  red,  but 
otherwise  superficially  resemble  the  apterous  full  grown  bug. 
Records  of  this  species  are  as  follows: 

New  York — McLean,  Tompkins  Co.,  July  14,  1919,  under  bark 
of  recently  cut  white  pine ; L.  I.,  Cold  Spring  Harbor,  August  3, 
1920;  Westchester  Co.,  White  Plains,  (years  omitted),  March 
11  and  21,  March  22  (under  bark  of  dead  apple  tree),  March  31 
(under  bark  of  dead  tulip  tree),  April  12,  (these  specimens  also 
were  found  under  the  bark  of  a dead  and  fallen  apple  tree,  in 
the  moist,  dark  spots,  together  with  various  Collembola,  and  a 
couple  of  bright  red  nymphs  were  also  noted,  probably  in  the  last 
instar),  May  22,  June  2,  July  4 (in  flight),  September  26. 

Leeds,  Massachusetts,  April  6,  1919 ; Ridgefield,  Conn.,  Septem- 
ber 1,  common  under  damp  bark;  Westfield,  N.  J.,  June  19,  1904; 


16  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


Lakehurst,  N.  J.,  July  7.  (This  specimen  was  determined  by  the 
late  Otto  Heidemann  as  Xylocoris  americanus  Dallas). 

Xylocoris  cursitans  Fallen. 

This  species,  heretofore  recorded  from  New  York  and  else- 
where is  probably  a misidentification  of  the  preceding.  However, 
the  following  records  appear  to  be  of  the  true  species.  White 
Plains,  N.  Y.,  August  24,  1907.  Westfield,  N.  J.,  August  14,  and 
September  4,  1904. 


Asthenidea  Reuter. 

In  this  genus  there  is  only  one  species  in  our  limits — 

Asthenidea  temnostethoides  Reuter. 

It  is  recorded  from  Illinois  by  Blatchley ; is  reported  in  the  New 
York  List  from  Cranberry  Lake;  and  by  Drake  and  Hottes.  from 
Batavia- — both  localities  in  the  northern  part  of  the  State. 

Key  to  Genera  of  Anthocorinae. 

(From  Hemiptera  of  Connecticut.) 

1.  Pronotum  trapezoidal,  its  outline  not  continuous  with  that  of 

the  head;  membrane  with  three  or  four  veins 2 

Pronotum  conical,  becoming  cylindrical  anteriorly  and  forming 
a continuous  outline  with  the  elongate  head ; membrane  with 
one  vein .Macrotrachelliella  Champion 

2.  Collar  of  pronotum  distinct;  membrane  with  four  veins 3 

Collar  obsolete;  membrane  with  three  veins Onus  Wolff 

3.  Sides  of  pronotum  not  explanate ; corium  not  or  obsoletely 

punctate ; metasternal  canals  not  elevated  at  lateral  ends. 

Anthocoris  Fallen 

Sides  of  pronotum  explanate,  extending  anteriorly  more  or  less 
beyond  base  of  collar ; corium  distinctly  punctate ; canals 
prominent  laterally Tetraphleps  Fieber 

The  genus , Anthocoris  contains  only  one  species  within  our 
limits,  which  is  that  heretofore  named  A.  borealis  Dallas,  but 
Anthocoris  musculus  Say  appears  to  be  its  proper  name.  This 
was  adumbrated  in  Hemiptera  of  Connecticut  by  Parshley  and 
adopted  as  the  correct  name  by  Blatchley.  An  independent  check- 
ing by  myself  to  establish  which  was  right  led  to  this  result.  A 
comparison  of  Say’s  description  of  Reduvius  musculus  from  the 


Fel.,1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  17 


Northwest  Territory  and  Dallas’s  Anthocoris  borealis  from  Hud- 
son Bay  Region  might  lead  to  the  idea  that  they  are  doubtfully 
the  same.  However,  a checking  of  the  same  specimens  with  the 
two  original  descriptions  leads  to  the  certainty  of  their  identity. 
We  may  regard  the  synonymy  to  be  now  definitely  established. 
Nevertheless,  it  may  be  that  the  descriptions  refer  to  some  West- 
ern and  Northern  form ; and  thus  ours  may  be  without  a name. 

Parenthetically,  here  are  two  descriptions  which  for  their  time 
are  relatively  full.  Yet,  judging  by  the  descriptions  alone,  it 
might  seem  that  we  had  two  different  species.  But  with  a suf- 
ficiency of  specimens  in  hand,  we  can  find  that  the  two  descrip- 
tions fall  within  the  limits  of  variation  of  the  species.  In  meas- 
uring specimens,  I found  the  smallest  to  be  3 mm.  long  and  the 
largest  3.75  mm.  All  the  specimens  were  from  within  a range 
of  5 miles  from  White  Plains  in  Westchester  County,  N.  Y. 

Wherever  there  are  beeches  is  the  place  to  look  for  Anthocoris. 
These  little  bugs  are  to  be  found  in  the  curled  over  edges  of  cer- 
tain of  the  bleached  leaves,  in  abundance.  Each  leaf  will  harbor 
generally  three  or  four,  sometimes  more,  sometimes  fewer.  My 
notes  of  August  4 of  this  year,  when  I found  them  in  numbers  on 
Petra  Island  in  Lake  Mahopac,  Putnam  County,  N.  Y.,  are  rather 
full  and  follow  here : 

The  beeches  showed  the  usual  bleached  and  curled-edged  leaves. 
Inspection  of  these  showed  concealed  in  them  the  usual  Antho- 
coris musculus,  mostly  adults,  but  here  and  there  a nymph.  How- 
ever, not  every  curled  leaf  is  tenanted.  The  abundant  curled 
leaves  of  one  small  sapling — -almost  bush-like — did  not  yield  a 
single  specimen.  But  here  and  there,  in  the  scattered  bleached 
leaves  within  reach,  of  the  larger  trees,  and  quite  frequently  in 
those  of  the  larger  saplings,  the  bug  was  to  be  found. 

The  undersides  of  these  bleached  and  dried  leaves  were  cov- 
ered with  dry  cast  skins  of  a white,  colorless  aphid  and  a mite ; 
and  the  curled  over  edges  shelter  small  pale  spiders  and  their 
webs  in  the  hidden  channels  or  leafy  tunnels.  It  is  in  these  tubes 
or  channels  that  Anthocoris  hides.  These  channels  are  more  or 
less  filled  with  a sticky  dirt,  remnants  of  cast  skins,  threads  like 
micelia  of  fungi,  etc.,  and  here  the  1 mm.  long  young  aphids  are 
hidden. 

Light  on  the  preceding  is  cast  by  a recent  article  in  the  Ento- 
mologists’ monthly  magazine  (LXV,  pp.  103-4),  by  W.  Stern, 
on  the  fauna  of  Rubus  sp.  He  notes  Anthocoris  nemorum  as  at- 


18  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


tacking  the  aphid  Amphorophora  rubi,  various  jassids  and  two 
mites,  one  being  the  universal  Tetrany chits  telarius  L.,  which  also 
appear  to  be  its  diet  in  the  trees  it  frequents.  The  species  hiber- 
nates as  an  adult. 

The  species  is  recorded  extensively  in  the  New  York  List 
under  both  names.  To  these  records  from  New  York  may  be 
added  the  following,  heretofore  unpublished.  Westchester 
County:  Armonk,  May  5,  1924;  June  14,  1914.  Wampus  Lake 
(vicinity),  June  6,  1923,  swept.  Valhalla,  August  18,  1923;  “a 
beech  with  bleached  and  curled  leaves  when  beaten  yielded  with 
little  effort  many”  and  “there  flew  out  from  it  numbers  of  a white 
aphid.”  White  Plains,  June  5,  1924,  from  alder;  June  22,  1919, 
1 nestling  in  terminal  bud  of  black  alder;  July  1,  1923,  1 on  aspen ; 
July  5 and  6,  1924,  from  beech,  as  usual;  July  29,  1922,  “about 
30  from  Beech;”  August  10,  1921;  September  4,  1921,  “on  the 
beech  leaves  as  before.”  Hartsdale,  July  5,  1924.  Putnam 
County  : Lake  Mahopac,  August  2,  1929.  Long  Island  : Cold 
Spring  Harbor,  July  30,  1920;  August  21,  1924. 

Outside  of  New  York,  I have  the  species  from  Parry  Sound 
District  Ontario,  Canada,  July  26,  1915,  H.  S.  Parrish  Collector; 
from  Portland,  Maine,  one  specimen,  May  13,  determined  by 
Ashmead  as  Anthocoris  antevolens  B.  White;  from  Framingham, 
Mass.,  taken  by  A.  C.  Frost,  1 May  29  and  another  September  29, 
1929. 

Key  to  Tetraphleps  Fieber. 


1. 


2. 


(Adapted  from  Blatchley  and  the  Original  Descriptions.) 
Length  of  antennae  equal  to  width  of  head  including  eyes.  .2 
Length  of  antenna  greater  than  width  of  head  including  eyes. 

uniformis  Parshley 

Beak  reaching  between  middle  coxae .osborni  Drake 

Beak  not  reaching  middle  coxae americana  Parshley 


This  key  has  been  checked  systematically  with  the  original  de- 
scriptions; and  with  the  descriptions  in  Blatchley.  There  is  a 
sigular  lack  of  consistency  and  symmetry  in  all  of  them.  The 
characters  on  which  the  specific  differentiation  is  made  are  not 
similarly  stated  for  each  species — that  is,  they  are  not  strictly 
comparable  one  with  the  same  in  another  species.  For  example, 
Blatchley,  taking  his  characters  from  the  descriptions,  thus  char- 
acterizes the  first  segment  of  the  antennae:  americana — segment 
I reaching  the  middle  of  cheeks;  osborni — segment  I equal  to  3/5 


Feb.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  19 


of  III ; uniformis — not  mentioned.  It  may  readily  be  seen  that 
there  is  here  no  common  denominator  for  this  character,  which 
accordingly  becomes  vague  in  use.  This  is  true  of  practically 
all  the  other  characters  employed.  I have  argued  elsewhere  that 
a description  is  not  an  elegant  exercise  for  those  that  know  all 
about  a species,  but  that  it  is  for  the  very  practical  purpose  of  in- 
forming some  one  who  knows  nothing  about  it ; or  for  the  purpose 
of  affording  a foundation  for  a critical  study  on  the  part  of  one 
who  does.  Tetraphleps  canadensis  Prov.,  not  keyed  or  referred 
to  elsewhere  here,  is  obviously  a Tetraphleps , according  to  Van 
Duzee,  but  so  vaguely  described  that  it  is  impossible  to  place  it 
specifically  in  the  absence  of  the  type.  It  is  conceivable  that  some 
cognate  species  to  those  mentioned  may  some  day  be  discovered, 
which  it  may  not  be  possible  to  recognize  as  different  from  any 
description  published,  because  of  the  absence  of  the  true  critical 
character. 

Tetraphelps  americana  Parshley. 

This  species  is  recorded  from  New  York;  from  Maine,  whence 
it  was  described ; and  from  Ottawa,  Canada,  by  Dr.  Blatchley.  I 
have  a specimen  from  Claremont,  N.  H.,  collected  by  Mr.  G.  P. 
Engelhardt,  a new  distributional  record. 

The  other  two  species  are  recorded  from  New  York  in  the 
State  List,  although  both  seem  northern. 

Macrotracheliella  Champion. 

Of  this  genus  there  appears  to  be  only  one  northern  species, 
Macrotracheliella  nigra  Parshley. 

The  species  is  known  from  Massachusetts  and  Rhode  Island; 
and  is  recorded  from  Staten  Island,  N.  Y.,  in  the  State  List.  I 
beat  it  in  numbers  from  scrub  pine  in  company  with  Aradus  cin- 
namomeus,  at  Lakehurst,  N.  J.,  June  29,  1911.  This  record  ex- 
tends the  distribution  of  the  species  further  south.  Likewise,  it 
might  appear  that  it  should  be  found  in  the  pine  barrens  of  Long 
Island  and  of  Connecticut  if  sought  for  at  the  proper  time. 

Key  to  Orius  Wolff. 

(=  Triphleps  Lieber.) 

Basal  half  of  clavus  blackish  brown insidiosus  Say 

Clavus  entirely  black var.  tristicolor  B.  White 

Orius  insidiosus  is  our  widespread  American  species.  It  occurs 
throughout  the  State  of  New  York;  and  is,  of  course,  common 


20  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  V 61.  XXV 


about  White  Plains  and  in  Westchester  County  in  general.  I also 
have  it  from  Southern  Pines,  N.  C.  (A.  H.  Manee),  May  and 
September,  1911.  From  Woodgate,  I received  it  from  Jemez 
Springs,  New  Mexico,  dated  May  25,  1915. 

The  var.  tristicolor — a mere  color  form,  scarcely  worthy  of  a 
name — has  been  taken  at  Ithaca  on  July  16,  1919,  sweeping  and 
at  White  Plains,  May  31,  1924,  also  sweeping,  in  a damp  meadow. 

The  last  of  the  subfamilies,  the  Dufouriellinae,  is  not  mentioned 
in  Hemiptera  of  Connecticut,  but  Blatchley  records  it  in  his  Man- 
ual, giving  and  keying  six  genera,  of  which  three  by  their  general 
distribution  should  be  found  in  the  Northeastern  States,  one  of 
them  being  already  recorded  from  New  York  in  the  State  List. 

Key  to  Genera  of  Dufouriellinae. 

(Adapted  from  Reuter.) 

1.  Anterior  femora  unarmed . 2 

Anterior  femora  incrassate,  dentate  beneath. 

Scoloposcelis  Fieber 

2.  Base  of  pronotum  quite  deeply  sinuate  (first  segment  of  an- 

tennae hardly  reaching  apex  of  the  head;  anterior  femora 
hardly  thicker  than  posterior). 

Dufouriellus  Kirkaldy  (=  Xylocoris  Westwood) 
Base  of  pronotum  slightly  sinuate  (femora  elongate). 

Cardiastethus  Fieber 

Key  to  Cardiastethus  Fieber. 

Membrane  unicolorous  or  with  only  a narrow  hyaline  line  next  to 
the  apex  of  the  membranal  suture  (head  transverse;  base  of 
pronotum  more  than  twice  its  length)  ; veins  free,  interior 

weak;  length,  1.75  mm pergandei  Reut. 

Membrane  fusco-fumate,  a vittula  in  the  interior  angle  and  a sub- 
triangular  spot  at  the  exterior  basal  angle ; only  first  and 
fourth  veins  of  the  membrane  distinguishable,  the  second  and 
third  quite  obsolete;  length  2.4  mm luridellus  Fieber 

Cardiastethus  pergandei  Reuter  appears  to  be  known  only  from 
the  District  of  Columbia.  Cardiastethus  luridellus  was  described 
originally  from  Pennsylvania,  and  that  remains  its  sole  record. 

Dufouriellus  Kirkaldy  is  represented  in  our  northeastern  fauna 
by  only  one  species,  D.  ater , Dufour,  a Palaearctic  species  re- 
corded in  the  New  York  State  List  from  Hamburg,  N.  Y. 

The  genus  Scoloposcelis  likewise  has  only  one  representative 
with  us,  S.  flame ornis  Reuter,  described  from  Texas,  and  since 
recorded  from  Pennsylvania,  Florida  and  Indiana. 


Feb.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  21 


A LIST  OF  COLEOPTERA  FOUND  AT  FLUSHING 
AND  NEW  TO  LONG  ISLAND. 

By  Kenneth  W.  Cooper,  Flushing,  New  York. 

The  following  species  of  Coleoptera,  collected  by  the  writer  at 
Flushing,  are  new  additions  to  the  Long  Island  records  of  the 
New  York  State  List  of  Insects.  Although,  by  their  normal  dis- 
tribution, a great  number  of  the  species  in  this  list  would  naturally 
occur  upon  the  Island,  there  are  a few  in  the  list  that  one  would 
not  ordinarily  expect  to  find  here.  Among  the  latter  there  are  two 
species  new  to  the  United  States,  and  two  species  new  to  New 
York  State,  as  far  as  the  author  could  determine.  The  specimens 
were  all  taken  during  the  past  three  years. 

The  numbers  preceding  the  species  are  those  of  the  Leng  Cata- 
logue. Letters  in  parentheses  indicate  the  determiner  of  the  spe- 
cies, i.e.y  (B) — Mr.  H.  S.  Barber,  (F) — Mr.  W.  S.  Fisher,  (L) — 
Mr.  Chas.  W.  Leng,  (M) — Mr.  Mutchler,  (N) — Mr.  H.  Notman, 
and  (S) — Mr.  Chas.  Schaeffer.  Lack  of  initials  after  the  date  of 
capture  means  that  the  writer  has  determined  the  species. 

Family  Carabidae. 

....  Asaphidion  flavipes  L.  May  (N).  A number  of  speci- 
mens were  found  under  a shingle  in  an  open  field. 
New  to  the  U.  S. 

1097  Euferonia  lachrymosa  Newm.  June. 

Family  Hydrophilidae. 

2854  Laccohius  agilis  Rand.  September  (S).  Found  in  damp 
sand  at  stream  edge. 

2893  Cercyon  analis  Payk.  September  (S). 

Family  Orthoperidae. 

3252  Sericoderus  lateralis  Gyll.  September-December  (S). 

Found  by  sifting  leaves,  grass  and  debris  at  base  of 
trees. 

Family  Staphylinidae. 

4526  Staphylinus  badipes  Lee.  July. 

4666  Tachinus  picipes  Er.  August. 

Family  Histeridae. 

6565  Hister  laevipes.  September  (S).  Three  specimens.  New 
to  New  York  State. 

6571  H . interruptus  Beauv.  September  (S). 

6586  H.  foedatus  Lee.  September  (S). 

6606  H.  depurator  Say.  September  (S). 


22  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  V 61.  XXV 


6723  Paromalus  aequalis  Say.  November.  Found  in  great 

numbers  under  bark  of  dead  oaks. 

6724  Isolomalus  histriatus  Er.  September  (S).  Two  speci- 

mens were  found  under  moist  bark  of  dead  oak. 
6790  Acritus  exiguus  Er.  November  (S).  Under  moist  bark, 
and  in  fungi  ilnder  bark. 

Family  Lampyridae. 

6979  Lucid ota  decipiens  Harr.  June. 

Family  Cantharidae. 

7061  Podahrus  diadema  Fab.  June. 

7062a  P.  modestus  var.  flavicollis  Lee.  March  (M).  Found, 
alive,  under  bark. 

Family  Melyridae. 

7238  Malachius  aeneus  L.  May. 

Family  Meloidae. 

8158  Zonites  bilineata  Say.  July  (B).  Mr.  Ballou  has  taken 
this  species  in  Westchester  Co.,  New  York.  (This  is 
a new  record  for  New  York  State.) 

Family  Anthicidae. 

8359  Anthicus  sturmi  Laf.  December.  Found  under  bark, 
with  Derodontus  maculatus,  in  rotted  fungi. 

Family  Elateridae. 

8853  Melanactes  piceus  DeG.  June. 

8936  Elater  sellatus  Dej.  March  (S). 

9036  Melanotus  fissilis  Say.  March. 

Family  Buprestidae. 

9408  Chrysobothris  lecontei  Lg.  June.  Found  running  along 
the  branches  of  a dead  oak. 

9522  Agrilus  cephalicus  Lee.  June  (F).  Beaten  from  oak. 
....  A.  frosti  Knull.  June  (F).  Beaten  from  oak. 

Family  Byrrhidae. 

9893  Porcinolus  undatus  Melsh.  January-September.  Taken, 
in  January,  hibernating  in  rotten  log.  From  June  till 
September  specimens  were  taken  from  about  the 
roots  of  grasses  growing  in  a sandy  locality. 

Family  Nitidulidae. 

10078  Epurea  rufida  Melsh.  November.  On  grape-fruit  rind. 
Family  Rhizophagidae. 

10144  Rhizophagus  bipunctatus  Say.  October-November  (S). 
Under  the  bark  of  hickory  and  oak. 


Feb.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  23 


IOI59 

10225 

10292 

10292a 

10334 

10353 

10360 

10488 


10576 

10580 

10646 

10998 

11202a 

11178 


Family  Monotomidae. 

Monotonia  picipes  Hbst.  October  (M).  Sifted  from  the 
nest  of  a mouse  in  large  numbers. 

Family  Cucujidae. 

Laemophloeus  fasciatus  Melsh.  November.  From  under 
the  bark  of  cherry. 

Family  Erotylidae. 

Acropteroxys  gracilis  Newn.  July.  This  species  has 
also  been  taken  at  Roslyn,  L.  I.,  by  Mr.  Ballou. 

A.  gracilis  var.  inornata  Rand.  May. 

Triplax  thoracic  a Say.  January  (S).  A number  of 
specimens  from  a hardened  fungus. 

Family  Derodontidae. 

Derodontus  'maculatus  Melsh.  December.  From  fungi 
under  loose  bark. 

Family  Cryptophagidae. 

Telmatophilus  americanus  Lee.  September  (S). 

Ephistemus  apicalis  Lee.  September  (S).  Both  adults 
and  newly  emerged  imagos  sifted  from  the  nest  of  a 
field-mouse  along  with  Monotoma  picipes. 

Family  Colydiidae. 

Bitoma  crenata  Fab.  May-November  (S).  A European 
species  which  has  been  found  in  numbers  under  the 
bark  of  willow,  oak  and  cherry.  New  to  the  U.  S. 

Aulonium  parallelopipedum  Say.  January  (M).  Two 
specimens  from  oak. 

Colydium  lineola  Say.  December  15.  Under  the  bark 
of  a Scolytid-infested  oak. 

Family  Lathridiidae. 

Enicmus  aterrimus  Mots.  December  (S).  On  oak-in- 
festing bracket-fungi. 

Family  Coccinellidae. 

Stethorus  punctum  Lee.  December  (S).  Two  specimens 
in  fungi  inhabited  by  Ennearthron  thoracicorne 

Zieg1-. 

Anatis  quindecimpunctata  var.  mali  Say.  July.  It  has 
also  been  taken  by  Mr.  Arthur  Killen  at  Long  Beach. 

N eoharmonia  venusta  Melsh.  September  (B).  Found 
upon  an  aquatic  plant  at  Kissena  Lake,  Flushing. 
New  to  New  York  State. 


24  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


Family  Tenebrionidae. 

12308  Hoplocephala  viridipennis  Fab.  September-November. 

Often  found  in  association  with  H.  bicornis  Fab.  un- 
der bark. 

12323  Platydema  americanum  Cast.  & Bril.  September  (S). 
Found  under  bark  with  the  following  species. 

12327  P.  picilabrum  Melsh.  September  (S). 

12377  Hypophloeus  thoracicus  Melsh.  December  (S).  Two 
specimens  from  under  oak  bark. 

Family  Anobiidae. 

12695  Trichodesma  gibbosa  Say. 

Family  Cisidae. 

12979  Cis  creberrima  Mell.  November  (S).  From  bracket- 
fungi. 

12992  Orthocis  punctata  Mell.  December  (L).  From  bracket- 
fungi. 

Family  Scarabeidae. 

14022  Trichiotinus  assimilis  Kby.  August  (S). 

Family  Cerambycidae. 

14532  Leptura  mutabilis  Newn.  May. 

15003  Lepturges  facetus  Say.  June. 

Family  Chrysomelidae. 

15210  } Donacia  rufa  Say.  August.  On  water  plants. 

1 5^55a  Zygogramma  suturalis  var.  casta  Rogers.  June  (S). 
Found  with  Z.  suturalis. 

15699  Phaedon  viridis  Melsh.  January.  Found  under  loose 
bark. 

1:5993  Mantura  floridana  Cr.  May-November  (S).  Found 
during  the  summer  on  rag-weed.  In  the  winter  it  is 
found  by  sifting. 

16130  Microrhopala  xerene  Newn.  July. 

Family  Curculionidae. 

16348  Rhynchites  bicolor  Fab.  July  (M). 

16369  Attelabus  rhois  Boh.  August. 

16392  Apion  pennsylvanicum  Boh.  June. 

16679  Brachyrhinus  rugifrons  Gyll.  June. 

18020  Cossonus  platalea  Say.  July  (M). 

18087  Rhodobaenus  tredecimpunctatus  111.  June. 

Family  Scolytidae. 

18475  Ips  pi™  Say.  June  (F). 


Feb.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  25 


SOME  TINGITIDAE  FROM  BRAZIL  (HEMIPTERA). 

By  Carl  J.  Drake,  Ames,  Iowa. 

The  present  paper  deals  with  a small  collection  of  lace  bugs 
from  Bahia,  Brazil,  kindly  sent  to  the  writer  by  Dr.  Gregorio 
Bondar  for  study.  The  collection  is  represented  by  eleven  species 
and  a variety,  two  of  which  are  described  below  as  new. 

Monanthia  parmata  Distant. 

Teleonemia  aterrima  Stal. 

Teleonemia  morio  Stal. 

Teleonemia  scrupulosa  Stal. 

Sphaerocysta  globifera  Stal. 

Amblystira  silvicola  Drake. 

Corythucha  fuscomaculata  Stal. 

Leptopharsa  illudens  Drake. 

Not  recorded  heretofore  from  South  America. 

Leptopharsa  illudens  variantis  n.  var. 

Differs  from  the  typical  illudens  in  having  the  costal  area 
of  the  elytra  composed  of  one  complete  and  about  or  little 
over  a half  of  an  additional  row  of  areolae  along  its  distal 
half.  Color,  size  and  other  characters  very  similar  to  illu- 
dens. In  illudens,  the  type  and  paratypes  from  Porto  Rico 
and  Jamaica  are  before  me,  the  costal  area  is  entirely  bi- 
seriate. 

Holotype  (male)  and  allotype  (female),  Bahia,  Brazil,  in  my 
collection.  Paratypes  in  collections  of  Bondar  and  Drake. 

Tigava  bondari  Drake. 

This  species  is  most  closely  allied  to  T.  mollicula  Drake  from 
Brazil.  It  differs  from  mollicula  in  having  a little  shorter  ros- 
trum, slenderer  and  shorter  spines  on  the  head.  The  head  is  also 
distinctly  less  tumid  above.  Color,  size  and  general  appearance 
are  very  similar  to  T.  mollicula. 

Gargaphia  concursa  n.  sp. 

Allied  to  G.  trichoptera  Stal,  but  differing  from  a cotype 
before  me  in  having  a larger  hood,  the  paranota  more  sharply 
angulate,  shorter  discoidal  area,  and  the  median  carina  quite 
sharply  raised  a little  behind  the  hood.  Length,  4.30  mm.  ; 
width,  2.01  mm. 

Head  black,  with  five  rather  long  sharp  spines,  the  median 
longest  and  considerably  longer  than  the  others.  Rostrum 


26  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  V 61.  XXV 


reaching  to  the  transverse  laminae.  Ostiolar  canal  promi- 
nent and  wider  than  in  G.  trichoptera.  Pronotum  black,  con- 
siderably swollen,  the  posterior  process  testaceous  and  reticu- 
late. Carinae  considerably  raised,  testaceous,  each  composed 
of  a single  row  of  rather  large  areolae;  lateral  carinae  par- 
allel, extending  anteriorly  to  base  of  hood  but  widely  sepa- 
rated from  it;  median  carina  sharply  raised  a little  behind 
the  hood.  Hood  testaceous,  about  twice  as  large  as  in  G. 
trichoptera,  strongly  compressed  laterally.  Paranota  testa- 
ceous, broad,  mostly  triseriate,  quite  sharply  angulate  oppo- 
site humeri.  Antennae  long,  brown  to  ferrugineous,  the 
apical  segment  black ; segment  I shorter  and  two  and  a half 
times  as  long  as  two ; III  very  long,  three  times  as  long  as 
four,  the  latter  distinctly  longer  than  first  two  conjoined. 

Elytra  broad,  the  apices  rather  widely  separated,  costal 
area  broad,  with  five  rows  of  areolae  at  its  widest  part,  with 
three  or  four  transverse  or  oblique,  fuscous,  enlarged  ner- 
vures ; subcostal  area  narrow,  biseriate ; discoidal  area  mod- 
erately larger,  narrower  in  male  than  in  female,  narrowed  at 
base  and  at  apex,  with  a brown  spot  (nervelets)  at  base,  with 
four  or  five  areolae  at  its  widest  part.  Wings  about  as  long 
or  a little  longer  than  abdomen.  Legs  long,  slender,  brownish 
testaceous,  the  tarsi  darker.  Claspers  in  male  large,  strongly 
curved. 

Holotype  (male)  and  allotype  (female),  Bahia,  Brazil,  collected 
by  Dr.  Gregorio  Bondar,  in  my  collection.  Paratypes,  taken  with 
type,  in  collections  of  Bondar,  Drake  and  Iowa  State  College. 


Feb.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  27 


THE  USE  OF  PARADICHLORBENZENE  IN  THE 
INSECT  COLLECTION. 

J.  R.  de  la  Torre-Bueno,  White  Plains,  N.  Y. 

Insect  collections  have  three  foes — grease,  mould,  and  destruc- 
tive insects.  The  first  problem  is  solved  by  putting  the  greased 
insect,  according  to  its  kind,  in  some  efficient  grease  solvent- 
chloroform,  ether,  benzene,  gasoline,  or  carbon  tetrachloride. 
Mould  is  fought  by  means  of  abundant  naphthalene  in  the  boxes. 
This  treatment  also  keeps  out  and  to  some  extent  destroys 
Anthrenus.  At  times,  however,  the  tightest  fitting  boxes  become 
infested,  either  through  some  oversight,  or  by  the  introduction  of 
some  new  specimens  without  fumigation.  The  usual  practice  has 
been  to  treat  infested  boxes  or  collections  with  carbon  bisulphide, 
which,  of  course,  killed  the  Anthrenus  ; but  which,  on  the  other 
hand,  has  a most  vile  odor,  is  poisonous  to  human  beings,  highly 
explosive,  and  potent  only  for  a short  time. 

Paradichlorbenzene  may  be  used  in  place  of  the  bisulphide  with 
marked  advantage.  It  is  a slower,  (in  minutes)  killing  agent  but 
just  as  sure  as  the  bisulphide.  And  this  very  slowness  causes  it 
to  remain  active  in  the  boxes  for  months,  at  least.  It  is  also  much 
cleaner  and  more  easily  handled,  as  it  comes  in  the  form  of  small 
crystals  (the  commercial  grade  used  for  the  peach-tree  borer). 
And  further  it  is  much  safer  than  die  bisulphide  because  neither 
explosive  nor  inflammable.  It  is  also  as  economical  as  the 
bisulphide. 

In  my  practice,  I combine  three  treatments  in  one — naphthalene, 
paradichlorbenzene  and  carbon  tetrachloride.  In  one  corner  of 
the  box  I put,  in  a small  heap,  one  teaspoonful  (heaping)  of 
the  paradichlorbenzene  and  the  naphthalene,  and  pour  on  a little 
carbon  tetrachloride,  about  i teaspoon,  also.  This  last  dissolves 
the  other  two  crystalline  chemicals  and  consolidates  them  in  one 
place,  so  they  cannot  slide  about  the  box  when  it  is  moved.  It 
also  provides  the  quick  killing  agent  for  any  pests  that  might  have 
got  in. 

As  the  two  solids  are  now  in  a mass,  instead  of  in  crstals 
strewed  all  over  the  bottom  of  the  box,  evaporation  is  slower,  but 
enough  to  keep  the  air  in  the  box  saturated  with  their  vapor. 
Such  a treatment  will  last  in  full  activity  six  months — or  even 
longer. 


28  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


THE  NESTING  HABITS  OF  EMPHOR  BOMBIFORMIS 

CRESSON. 

By  Phil  Rau,  Kirkwood,  Mo. 

The  striking  similarity  between  the  nesting  habits  of  certain 
bees  and  those  of  certain  wasps  often  arrests  the  attention  of  the 
observer.  Seldom,  however,  is  the  resemblance  more  perfect  than 
in  the  case  of  the  mining  bee,  Emphor  bombiformis,  and  the  two 
species  of  Odynerus  wasps,  O.  dorsalis  and  O.  geminus.  All 
three  of  these  species  carry  water  to  moisten  the  hard  earth  and 
thus  facilitate  their  mining  and  plastering  activities ; likewise  they 
all  strew  the  pellets  of  mud  around  their  nests.  Some  of  them 
practice  the  quaint  and  conspicuous  habit  of  building  a chimney 
over  the  opening  and  later  moistening  the  chimney  and  using  the 
mud  thus  formed  for  sealing  the  burrow.  Any  effort  to  explain 
just  how  such  a precise  parallelism  could  have  developed  in  sep- 
arate groups  so  distantly  related  and  occurring  in  different  places 
leads  one  into  fascinating  flights  of  speculation. 

When  one  morning  I saw  an  open  burrow  surrounded  by  a ring 
of  clay  pellets  which  distinctly  showed  the  mandible  marks,  I was 
certain  that  it  was  the  nest  of  0.  dorsalis.  I was  fully  surprised 
at  finding  a bee  at  the  bottom,  and  so  sure  was  I that  this  nest 
belonged  to  the  wasp  that  I concluded  that  the  bee  had  crept  into 
the  hole  merely  in  quest  of  a night’s  shelter.  Later  evidence 
showed  that  this  was  the  normal  nest  of  E.  bombiformis. 

The  bees  live  in  more  or  less  scattered  colonies,  in  which  each 
mother  makes  and  maintains  her  own  nest.  Colonies  of  these 
bees  were  discovered  in  1922  in  four  distinct  localities  near  St. 
Louis;  they  were  nesting  at  North  Newstead  Avenue,  St.  Louis, 
at  Fish  Lake,  Illinois,  Creve  Coeur  Lake,  Missouri,  and  the  south- 
west part  of  St.  Louis.  They  were  seen  in  the  height  of  their 
activity  between  August  8 and  September  20. 

While  all  of  the  nests  of  this  species  had  the  same  exterior  ap- 
pearance (Fig  1),  with  their  chimneys  and  the  scattered  pellets, 
as  do  likewise  have  the  completed  nests  with  their  saucer-like  de- 
pressions in  the  mud  plugs,  the  inside  of  the  nests  of  these  differ- 
ent groups  presented  some  differences  in  shape  and  size. 

The  channel  between  the  sealing  plug  and  the  brood  cell  is 
treated  differently  from  those  of  either  of  the  two  wasps  men- 
tioned. In  the  nests  of  O.  dorsalis,  this  channel  is  clear  and  free. 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  XXV,  No.  1 


Plate  I 


The  resting  site  of  Emphor  bombiformis. 


30  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


a sort  of  air  chamber;  in  O.  geminus,  it  is  solidly  packed  with  wet 
mud.  In  the  nest  of  this  bee,  we  find  this  space  filled  in  loosely 
with  bits  of  dry  dirt.  I had  the  good  fortune  to  observe  closely 
one  mother  filling  the  burrow  and  closing  the  top.  At  n a.  m. 
she  came  home  and  entered  the  chimney  head  first  but  soon  came 
out  backwards,  stopped  for  an  instant  inside  the  chimney,  turned 
about  and  backed  down  into  her  hole  until  her  head  was  level  with 
the  surface  of  the  earth,  and  at  a point  where  the  chimney  was 
attached ; then  after  wetting  it  she  began  vigorously  gnawing  away 
the  mud  and  carrying  it  down  below,  thereby  demolishing  a good 
portion  of  the  chimney.  With  seven  of  these  mud  balls  (for 
which  she  fetched  water  once),  she  completed  the  partition  over 
the  top  cell.  With  this  finished,  she  changed  her  technique,  and 
with  her  forelegs,  began  to  kick  the  loose  soil  near  the  nest  into 
the  hollow  channel  until  the  hole  was  full  to  the  top.  At  this 
point  she  once  more  resorted  to  the  use  of  water  to  mix  her 
mortar.  Moistening  the  earth  surrounding  the  opening,  she  bit 
out  large  chunks  and  sealed  the  mouth  of  the  burrow,  using  her 
abdomen  as  a trowel.  In  this  way  she  made  a solid  plug  (fig.  2) 
as  large  as  a dime  and  smoothed  down  to  precise  saucer  shape, 
and  depressed  just  a little  below  the  surface  of  the  earth. 

The  turrets  are  low,  (fig.  5)  never  more  than  one-half  inch 
above  the  surface  of  the  soil.  They  are  made  of  the  first  mouth- 
fuls of  mud  taken  from  the  burrow.  The  products  of  further 
excavation  are  not  carried  out,  but  are  kicked  out  in  a very  pretty 
fashion.  The  bee  backs  up  to  the  top  of  the  turret,  and  just  as 
her  hind  legs  reach  the  top,  kicks  out  the  pellet  with  a flip  and 
quick  as  a flash  the  mother  is  down  in  the  hole  again,  biting  out 
another  ball.  These  pellets  are  often  shot  out  with  such  force 
that  they  travel  horizontally  for  a distance  of  from  three  to  five 
inches.  Thus  the  little  bee  appears  a quaint  living  shot-gun,  as 
one  after  another  the  pellets  are  catapulted  from  the  burrow.  By 
watching  closely,  one  may  see  the  tip  of  the  abdomen  as  the  bee 
slowly  creeps  upward  until  it  is  flush  with  the  surface ; then  as  if 
ejected  by  a trigger  the  pellet  is  suddenly  shot  out,  and  while  one’s 
eye  momentarily  follows  the  pellet  the  bee  quickly  slides  down 
and  is  out  of  sight.  When  there  is  no  turret  over  the  nest  (nests 
without  turrets  are  often  seen),  the  pellets  ejected  often  accumu- 
late close  to  the  door-way,  as  seen  in  figure  3.  She  then  clears 
these  away  in  a very  practical  manner,  and  by  this  method  she 
forms  the  “fairy  ring”  of  pellets  as  seen  in  center  of  figure  1.  She 


Feb.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  31 


proceeds  by  holding  onto  the  inside  rim  of  her  burrow  with  her 
forelegs,  and  while  she  stands  horizontally  on  her  middle  legs  on 
top  of  the  ground,  she  rapidly  runs  (while  her  front  legs  still  cling 
10  the  orifice)  around  and  around  in  “merry-go-round”  fashion, 
rapidly  sweeping  the  pellets  away  with  the  hind  legs  as  she  makes 
the  circles.  Since  the  strength  of  her  kick  is  fairly  uniform,  the 
pellets  are  thrown  to  about  the  same  distance ; this  results  in  the 
pretty  fairy  ring  of  pellets  already  referred  to. 

The  mothers  leave  their  work  at  intervals  to  fill  their  gullets 
with  water.  In  this  case  their  supply  could  not  have  been  far 
away,  because  each  trip  required  only  from  two  and  one-half  to 
three  and  one-half  minutes.  The  amount  of  water  required  varies 
according  to  the  nature  of'  the  soil ; in  some  places  the  bees  could 
make  six  or  seven  loads  of  mud  from  one  gulletful  of  water,  and 
in  other  dry  situations,  only  three  or  four. 

The  St.  Louis  bees  made  distinct  brood  cups  which  could  be 
separated  from  the  nest;  those  in  the  gumbo  at  Fish  Lake,  and 
those  in  the  sandy  soil  at  Creve  Coeur  Lake  did  not  make  inde- 
pendent cups,  but  merely  widened  the  lower  portion  of  the  tun- 
nel into  a cup-shaped  cell,  which  probably  served  all  practical  pur- 
poses. The  lining  wall  was  wonderfully  smooth  and  glossy,  as 
though  finished  with  some  water  resisting  varnish.  But  this  cell 
was  only  the  well  finished  burrow,  and  not  a separate  cup  within 
the  burrow.  Those  in  the  yellow  clay  were  separate  and  distinct 
from  the  tunnel,  and  were  built  in  true  pottery  fashion.  This 
difference  in  the  method  of  nesting  of  bees  of  the  same  species 
in  two  localities  (and  they  were  actually  the  same  species,  because 
specimens  of  both  groups  were  submitted  to  Mr.  S.  A.  Rohwer 
for  identification),  is  probably  due  to  the  two  kinds  of  soil  in 
which  they  must  dig.  While  this  small  detail  is  likely  to  be  taken 
lightly  as  a matter  of  course,  yet  it  is  significant  in  that  it  shows 
that  the  bees  actually  can  or  do  modify  their  behavior  in  ac- 
cordance with  environmental  conditions. 

When  a bee  emerges  from  her  burrow  to  go  for  water,  her  man- 
ner of  exit,  either  tail  first  or  head  first,  depends  upon  whether 
she  is  only  excavating  the  gallery  or  has  nearly  finished  the  cell ; 
when  the  cell  is  far  advanced,  she  has  room  enough  to  turn  around 
and  emerges  head  first;  otherwise  she  must  back  out. 

A few  nests  that  were  opened  showed  the  following  details 
of  structure  and  dimensions : One  nest  had  a total  length  of  five 

inches,  which  comprised  the  cell  at  the  bottom,  the  mud  plug  at 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  XXV,  No.  1 


Plate  II 


Fig.  2. — The  nesting  site  of  Emphor  bombiformis  at  the  end  of  the  season ; thousands  of 
mud  pellets  are  strewn  about  and  wherever  a chimney  once  stood  there  is  now  a depression. 


Feb.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  33 


the  top  of  this  cell,  and  a filling  of  loose  dirt  up  to  the  surface  plug 
of  mud.  One  nest  was  sealed  with  a top  plug  34  inch  thick ; a 
i34  inch  tunnel  below  this  was  filled  with  dry  bits  of  earth,  and  be- 
low this  were  two  mud  plugs  at  intervals  of  34  and  34  inch ; these 
made  two  additional  chambers  and,  like  the  first,  contained  loose 
bits  of  earth.  Below  this  was  the  brood  chamber,  fa  inch  in 
depth.  The  total  length  of  the  nest  was  only  2fa  inches.  I have 
no  explanation  to  offer  for  the  extra  partitions.  In  one  nest  the 
mother  was  discovered  at  the  bottom  of  the  gallery  1^2  inches 
deep;  below  this  was  a mud  plug  and  the  brood  cell,  filled  with 
bee  bread.  Whether  or  not  she  was  at  work  building  a second 
cell  in  the  gallery  I do  not  know. 

Another  nest  had  a total  depth  of  3 inches ; at  the  bottom  were 
two  cells,  one  above  the  other  and  marked  off  by  mud  plugs,  and 
above  these  was  a widening  of  the  gallery  which  gave  the  appear- 
ance of  a cell  fa  inch  deep,  but  this  contained  no  separate  brood- 
cup,  as  did  the  others,  but  was  sealed  up  empty  with  a heavy  sur- 
face plug.  Four  other  nests  in  a group  were  dug  up  at  Fish  Lake. 
All  were  about  fa  inch  in  diameter,  and  about  234  inches  in  total 
depth.  The  brood  chamber  at  the  bottom  of  each  measured  fa\ 
by  34  inch,  and  was  packed  full  of  pollen,  either  yellowish-green 
or  rose-colored.  These  variations  probably  were  due  to  the  dif- 
ferences in  soil.  The  St.  Louis  colony  worked  in  yellow  clay,  the 
Fish  Lake  colony  mined  in  a heavy  gumbo  soil  and  the  Creve 
Coeur  Lake  bees  nested  in  hard-packed  sandy  earth  near  the  lake. 

The  greater  portion  of  the  study  was  devoted  to  the  Newstead 
Ave.  group.  This  colony  was  on  a hilltop  in  a vacant  lot,  and 
really  comprised  two  groups  ten  feet  apart.  Each  half  covered 
an  area  about  three  by  four  feet,  and  contained  a few  open  bur- 
rows in  the  ground,  with  chimneys  on  top,  a dozen  holes  without 
chimneys  and  about  eighteen  closed  burrows,  easily  distinguish- 
able by  their  saucer-like  depressions  (see  fig.  1),  and  all  over  the 
place  the  pellets  were  strewn  about.  The  pellets  are  always  inter- 
esting because  the  mandible  marks  on  each  furnish  a clear  record 
of  the  very  definite  manner  in  which  the  balls  of  moistened  earth 
have  been  manipulated  by  the  jaws. 

Not  all  of  the  pellets  are  scattered  about,  but  those  which  are 
brought  out  first,  while  they  are  still  wet  and  plastic,  are  used  in 
making  the  chimney.  This  area  of„yellow  clay  was  covered  with 
a top  layer  of  dark  soil.  Often  the  nests  were  very  conspicuous 


34  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


by  virtue  of  a scattering  of  bright  yellow  pellets  (dug  from  the 
subsoil)  on  the  dark  gray  surface. 

In  the  heavy  gumbo  soil  at  Fish  Lake,  each  nest  was  found  to 
contain  only  one  cell.  In  the  clay  region  in  St.  Louis,  the  nests 
had  from  one  to  three  cells  each.  We  know  that  many  digging 
bees  and  wasps  mine  a shaft  and  use  the  bottom  of  the  tunnel  for 
a nest ; but  this  bee  is  truly  a mason,  as  well  as  a digger.  The 
plugs  on  top  are  solid  pieces  of  mud  masonry ; the  partitions  when 
she  has  more  than  one  cell  are  walls  of  made  mud  (fig.  4),  and 
the  brood  cups  when  present  are  distinct  and  separately  fashioned, 
and  show  the  work  of  a fully  qualified  mason.  Imbedded  in  the 
bottom  of  these  masses  of  bee  bread  was  the  egg,  as  though  it 
had  been  deposited  first  and  the  food  packed  on  top  of  it.  The 
eggs  were  white,  and  about  J4  by  1/32  inch  in  size. 

Grossbeck1  has  made  notes  on  this  species  found  in  New  Jersey. 
He  found  them  nesting  in  colonies  near  a cattail  marsh,  and  says 
they  seem  to  prefer  hard,  shaly  soil  in  which  to  nest.  He  also  saw 
the  bees  forcibly  kick  the  pellets  over  the  brim  of  the  turrets, 
sometimes  as  far  as  four  inches.  The  New  Jersey  E.  bombi- 
formis  probably  make  but  one  cell  to  the  nest,  for  while  Grossbeck 
mentions  nothing  about  the  number  of  cells,  his  figures  show  but 
one. 

Some  observations  on  the  nesting  habits  of  a species  closely 
akin  to  E.  bombiformis  were  published  by  M.  Louise  Nichols.2 
This  bee,  E.  fuscojubatus,  was  discovered  nesting  in  a mixture  of 
sand,  clay  and  pebbles;  it  builds  turrets,  carries  water,  jerks  out 
the  pellets  with  considerable  force,  tears  down  the  turret  and  uses 
the  material  for  filling  in  and  closing  the  nest,  and  finishes  the 
nest  with  a circular  depression  to  mark  the  site.  Thus  the  nest- 
ing habits  of  this  species  observed  at  Cape  May,  New  Jersey,  dif- 
fer in  no  wise  from  what  has  been  recorded  for  E.  bombiformis 
by  either  Grossbeck  or  myself,  and  since  fuscojubatus  is  so  nearly 
related  to  bombiformis  that  the  distinguishing  feature  is  only  one 
of  color  of  pubescence  and  size  of  third  submarginal  cell,3  it  does 
seem  that  the  bee  is  changing  its  taxonomy  before  or  without 
changing  its  habits. 

1 Journ.  N.  Y.  Ent.  Soc.  19:  283-244.  1911. 

2 Psyche,  1913,  p.  107-112. 

3 Cockerell,  Psyche,  1913,  p.  107. 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  XXV,  No.  1 


Plate  III 


Fig.  3 (upper). — A single  nest  of  Emphor  bombiformis  show- 
ing the  accumulation  of  pellets  about  the  chimney;  later  they  are 
packed  away. 

Fig.  4 (lower  left). — The  mud  partitions  in  a burrow  of  Em- 
phor bombiformis. 

Fig-  5 (lower  right). — Two  views  of  the  turret  over  the  nest  of 
Emphor  bombiformis. 


36  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


CATOCALA  JUNCTURA  IN  THE  OZARK  REGION. 

By  Auburn  E.  Brower,  Willard,  Mo. 

Of  all  the  species  of  Catocalae  in  Eastern  North  America,. 
Catocala  junctura  is  in  some  ways  the  most  interesting.  Unlike 
its  congeners  of  the  East  but  like  some  forms  of  the  West,  it  seeks 
caves,  cliffs,  ledges,  banks,  and  buildings  in  which  to  pass  the  day, 
only  rarely  being  found  upon  tree  trunks.  Its  nearest  relatives 
are  all  found  in  the  Southwest  or  West,  and  Illinois  seems  to  mark 
its  eastward  extension  as  the  only  records  from  east  of  the  Mis- 
sissippi River  are  from  that  state.  The  locality  (near  Willard, 
in  Southwest  Missouri)  where  Catocala  junctura  has  been  most 
commonly  found,  has  an  elevation  of  1100-1345  feet.  The  rolling 
upland  prairies  of  that  section  are  now  farmlands,  but  the  broken 
hilly  regions  are  largely  covered  with  oak  and  hickory  timber,  with 
a great  variety  of  trees  in  the  bottoms. 

One  of  the  earliest  of  the  larger  species  of  Catocalae,  junctura 
has  been  taken  as  early  as  June  19th  (1918),  and  it  is  regularly 
expected  by  June  25.  Emergence  continues  over  a considerable 
period  of  time,  fresh  specimens  being  taken  in  the  latter  part  of 
July.  The  latest  record  is  September  14  (1919).  The  first  spec- 
imens each  summer  are  found  about  buildings.  As  soon  as  it  ap- 
pears, the  first  thing  to  be  done  upon  arising  is  to  make  a round 
of  the  porches,  cellar-house,  and  woodshed.  Over  the  doors, 
sometimes  upon  the  wire-screen  of  screen  doors,  upon  the  ceiling 
of  the  porches,  and  the  stone  walls  of  the  cellar-house,  they  are 
to  be  found,  this  is  especially  true  after  a stormy  night.  In  the 
woods  they  seek  shallow  caves  in  the  rock,  cliffs,  ledges,  banks, 
and  trees.  It  is  most  often  found  upon  trees  in  rainy  weather, 
which  fact  suggests  that  possibly  they  are  driven  out  of  the  higher 
parts  of  trees  or  elsewhere  by  the  rain.  When  frightened  from 
favored  resting  places,  they  often  fly  to  nearby  trees,  and  as  a rule 
are  rather  easily  captured  with  the  cyanide  jar.  They  are  very 
rarely  attracted  by  light,  only  some  two  or  three  specimens  have 
been  so  taken. 

Caves,  buildings,  and  some  ledges,  yield  most  of  the  specimens, 
especially  in  the  latter  part  of  the  season.  One  group  of  shallow 
caves  or  large  holes  in  the  rock  cliff  beside  a spring-fed  stream 
has  always  been  by  far  the  most  productive  locality  for  the  spe- 
cies. Ranging  from  niches  in  the  rocks  to  holes  four  feet  high 
and  extending  inward  for  thirty  feet,  these  holes  in  the  dark  gray, 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  XXV,  No.  1 


Plate  IV 


No.  I.  This  is  a view  of  a ledge  formed  by  a very  fine  grained  buffy  gray  sandstone.  Water 
flows  over  it  only  during  wet  weather,  but  it  is  always  moist  beneath.  Nos.  2 and  3 show  two  caves 
in  the  grayish,  dolomitic  limestone  cliffs  by  a stream. 


38  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


dolomitic  limestone  have  always  been  the  most  desired  resting 
places.  Most  of  the  moths  are  found  resting  in  a horizontal 
position  on  the  top  but  the  position  in  which  they  orient  themselves 
seems  to  be  of  no  moment.  The  remarkable  thing  about  the  insect 
in  connection  with  these  caves  is  that  it  is  found  most  commonly 
in  them  after  the  period  of  emergence  is  over.  All  of  the  insects 
may  be  captured  one  day  and  on  the  next  none  may  be  found  but 
sometimes  six  to  eight  will  be  found  especially  if  it  is  stormy 
weather.  The  caves  continue  to  be  productive  for  a considerable 
period  despite  the  fact  that  the  supply  of  moths  must  constantly 
be  replenished  from  some  unknown  source. 

A search  of  the  country  for  miles  around  has  not  resulted  in 
the  finding  of  any  similarly  attractive  caves.  Twenty-five  miles 
away,  at  Graydon  Springs,  are  purplish-red  sandstone  cliffs  whose 
dark  weathered  surface  forms  a fairly  attractive  resting  place. 
Whether  the  moths  in  the  caves  represent  the  strays  from  the  sur- 
rounding country  or  inse.cts  which  have  flown  in  from  unknown 
distances  is  a mystery. 

The  early  stages  are  wholly  unknown.  It  is  presumed  to  be  a 
poplar  and  willow  feeder  like  its  nearest  relatives.  In  this  lo- 
cality poplar  is  very  rare  except  the  scattering  trees  under  culti- 
vation and  willow  is  confined  to  the  streams,  being  almost  wholly 
black  willow  and  smaller  species  on  the  sandbars.  Many  females 
have  been  confined  in  an  effort  to  secure  eggs,  but  no  moths  have 
ever  deposited  in  captivity.  A significant  fact  has  been  discovered 
in  this  connection — nearly  every  female  taken  in  the  latter  part  of 
the  season  is  completely  devoid  of  eggs,  apparently  all  have  been 
deposited.  Females  of  some  other  species  of  Catocala  seem  never 
to  deposit  all  of  their  ova.  It  seems  highly  probable  that  the 
females  deposit  all  of  their  eggs  and  afterwards  roam  about 
widely,  which  will  account  for  the  fact  that  the  caves  continue  to 
be  so  productive.  Catocala  junctura  is  an  interesting  species  in 
so  many  ways,  yet  little  is  known  about  it. 


Feb.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  39 


CHARLES  JACOB  MARTIN. 

1835-1929. 

The  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  records  with  deepest 
regret  the  death  of  its  oldest  active  member,  Charles  Jacob  Mar- 
tin, who  was  born  at  Alzey,  Rhenish  Hesse,  Germany,  on  October 
15,  1835.  Mr.  Martin  immigrated  to  the  United  States  in  1854, 
following  with  success  his  calling  of  confectioner  and  caterer. 
He  served  with  distinction  throughout  the  Civil  War.  Retiring 
from  active  work  about  1900,  he  devoted  most  of  his  leisure  to 
his  life-long  hobby — the  collecting  and  study  of  insects.  He  be- 
came a member  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  at  that 
time.  His  collections,  for  the  greater  part  obtained  by  personal 
field  work  on  Long  Island  and  in  Sullivan  County,  N.  Y.,  are  note- 
worthy for  the  fine  representation  of  Lepidoptera  and  Coleoptera, 
all  carefully  labeled  with  locality  and  dates. 

Good-natured,  jolly,  the  picture  of  health,  Mr.  Martin  made 
friends  wherever  he  went.  Receiving  and  dispensing  the  joy  of 
living  was  his  particular  mission.  Up  to  recent  years  he  attended 
meetings  regularly,  usually  prepared  with  specimens  and  observa- 
tions of  interest.  In  1928  the  Society  honored  its  patriarch  by 
electing  him  an  honorary  member. 

Proud  of  his  citizenship  and  his  standing  as  a veteran  of  the 
Grand  Army,  Mr.  Martin’s  love  for  the  Fatherland  never  dimin- 
shed.  Twenty-six  times  he  crossed  the  Atlantic  to  visit  the  old 
home  in  Alzey.  While  there  he  sickened  and  died  on  July  27, 
1929.  Thus  to  the  old  town  in  the  Rhineland,  which  had  given 
him  birth,  he  returned  for  eternal  rest. — G.  P.  E. 


A PERSONAL  NOTE. 

In  this  number  we  publish  the  first  article  of  a new  student  of 
the  Coleoptera.  We  draw  attention  to  it  not  alone  because  it  adds 
to  our  knowledge  of  the  distribution  of  beetles,  with  a number  of 
species  new  to  the  American  Fauna,  but  because  its  author,  Mr. 
Kenneth  Cooper,  is  still  a young  high  school  student.  Our  Society 
is  glad  to  number  him  in  its  membership,  and  looks  to  him  to  be 
one  of  those  to  carry  on  its  traditions  in  the  years  to  come. — J.  R. 
T.  B. 


40  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


ADDITIONS  TO  THE  NEW  YORK  STATE  LIST  OF 
INSECTS.  THE  OXYBELINE  WASPS 
(SPHECIDAE,  HYMEN.). 

By  V.  S.  L.  Pate,  Ithaca,  N.  Y. 

In  going  over  material  of  this  group  preparatory  to  monograph- 
ing the  forms  known  to  occur  in  the  New  World,  a number  of 
unrecorded  species  and  localities  not  included  in  the  recent  New 
York  State  List  of  Insects  has  come  to  hand.  These  wasps,  usu- 
ally found  upon  umbellifers  or  composites,  nest  in  the  sand  and 
provision  their  burrows  with  muscoid  flies.  They  are  frequently 
parasitized  by  various  species  of  Miltogrammine  flies.  Wherever 
data  relative  to  prey,  parasites  or  flower  records  have  been  avail- 
able they  have  been  incorporated  in  the  following  list. 

I am  greatly  indebted  to  Drs.  O.  A.  Johannsen  and  J.  M. 
Aldrich  for  identification  of  the  flies. 

Tribe  OXYBELINI. 

Oxybelus  Latreille. 

O.  emarginatus  Say.  Ithaca,  J1  io-Sep  16,  Rand ; Orient,  Aug 

19,  Zab  (AMNH)  ; Mosholu,  Aug  30  (AMNH)  ; Little 
France,  Aug  19  (Pate-C U)  ; Spring  Lake,  J1  22,  Beq ; White 
Plains,  Aug  20,  Beq ; S I,  Aug  3,  Beq ; L I : Long  Beach,  Je 

20,  Beq ; Cold  Spring  Harbor,  J1  20  (AMNH)  ; Gardiners  I., 
Aug  17-23,  Beq.  Taken  on  flowers  of  Daucus  carota  and 
Aego podium  podagraria.  Provisions  its  nest  with  Toxomerus 
geminatus  Say. 

O.  intermedins  Baker.  Ithaca,  J1  29,  Babiy ; Fishers  I.  Aug. 

(AMNH).  Taken  on  flowers  of  Daucus  carota. 

O.  niger  Robtn.  Ithaca,  J1  24-27,  Babiy)  Memphis,  J1  3 (CU)  ; 

S I,  J1  23,  Beq.  Taken  on  flowers  of  Daucus  carota. 

O.  quadrinotatus  Say.  Ithaca,  Je-Oct,  Babiy)  Memphis,  J1  3 
(CU)  ; Rhinebeck,  J1  27,  Cy ; White  Plains,  J1  20,  Beq ; Pots- 
dam, J1  11  (CU)  ; Wilmington,  Aug  20  (CU)  ; Michigan 
Swamp,  J1  11  (CU)  ; Spencer  Lake,  Je  30  (CU)  ; S I,  May 
15-Sep  21,  Beq)  L I : Gardiners  I.,  Aug.  17-23,  Beq.  Taker 
on  flowers  of  Daucus  carota,  Aego  podium  podagraria,  Achil- 
lea millefolium  and  A.  millefolium  var.  roseum.  Provisions 
its  nest  with  Musca  domestica.  Parasitized  by  Phrosinella 
fulvicornis  (Coq.).  The  commonest  species  of  the  genus 
throughout  the  Austral  and  especially  the  Transition  zone, 
reaching  northward  into  Canada. 


F eb. ,1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  41 


O.  sericeus  Robtn.  L I:  Long  Beach,  Je  20,  Beq ; Sea  Cliff,  Jl, 
Bks;  Gardiners  I.,  Aug  17-23,  Beq.  Provisions  its  nest  with 
Chaetopsis  aenea  Wied. 

O.  subulatus  Robtn.  L I:  Cold  Spring  Harbor,  Je  14,  Beq. 

Banks  has  captured  O.  quadrinotatus  at  Falls  Church,  Virginia, 
preying  upon  Musca  domestica  L.,  Ophyra  leucostoma  Wied.,  and 
Sarcophaga  sp. ; Parker,  at  Washington,  has  also  noticed  that 
Musca  domestica  is  stored  by  this  wasp,  while  Sladen,  at  Ottawa, 
Canada,  has  found  Hylemyia  cilicrura  Rond,  in  their  burrows. 
At  Washington,  Parker  has  found  Senotainia  trilineata  VdW., 
and  S.  rubriventris  Macq.,  parasitic  upon  0.  quadrinotatus.  Since 
all  these  flies  occur  in  New  York  it  is  not  unlikely  that  upon 
further  observation  and  investigation  they  may  be  discovered  in 
the  wasp’s  burrows  either  as  prey  or  parasites. 


Cis  frosti  Dury. — A series  of  15  or  more  specimens  were 
taken  in  a rotten  fungus  ( Polyporus  betulinus)  at  Portaupique, 
N.  S.  on  July  25,  1929.  These  were  submitted  to  Mr.  Charles 
Dury  who  made  comparisons  with  the  unique  type,  which  he  stated 
was  from  Orono,  Me.,  and  not  from  Mass,  as  given  in  the  Leng 
list.  Specimens  from  this  series  will  be  distributed  to  different 
museums  in  this  country  and  Canada. — C.  A.  Frost,  Framingham, 
Mass. 


Ludius  fulvipes  Bland. — Some  15  years  ago  I sent  a box  of 
specimens  to  Dr.  Schwarz  at  the  U.  S.  National  Museum  for 
names ; I was  then  very  ignorant  of  the  amount  of  such  work  with 
which  he  had  to  contend.  They  were  recently  returned  with  part 
of  the  material  labelled  by  the  hand  of  the  good  coleopterist.  In 
this  lot  I found  a specimen  of  the  above  species  which  I had  taken 
in  Sherborn  on  Amelanchier  flowers  on  May  3,  1913.  It  was  de- 
scribed from  Virginia.  Specimens  have  been  taken  at  Nahant, 
Mass.,  on  May  19,  1926,  by  my  friend  Mr.  P.  J.  Darlington,  Jr. 
It  is  certainly  not  a very  common  visitor  to  my  hunting  grounds  in 
this  vicinity. — C.  A.  Frost,  Framingham,  Mass. 


42  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 

A NEW  MOTH  FROM  SIAM. 

By  T.  D.  A.  Cockerell,  Boulder,  Colo. 

Among  the  numerous  insects  sent  by  Mrs.  Laura  McKean  from 
the  vicinity  of  Chiengmai,  Siam,  is  a moth  of  unusual  beauty, 
allied  to  a Chinese  species,  but  quite  distinct. 

Daseochaeta  mckeanae  n.  sp. 

$.  Expanse  about  33  mm. ; general  characters  as  usual  in 
the  genus  (Warren  says,  abdomen  without  crests,  but  there 
are  small  crests,  as  figured  by  Hampson  for  the  genotype)  ; 
front  and  occiput  with  pale  yellowish  scales,  vertex  with  yel- 
lowish green;  the  rough  vestiture  of  thorax  above  pale  yel- 
lowish green,  flecked  with  yellowish;  abdomen  mainly  pale 
yellowish,  the  dorsal  crests  light  green,  tipped  posteriorly 
with  white ; a black  band  across  the  whitish  caudal  tuft ; pri- 
maries broad  (apical  margin  about  7.5  mm.),  pale  green  mot- 
tled with  whitish ; basal  part  of  costa  pale  yellowish,  inter- 
rupted by  a double  black  subbasal  band,  and  about  1.7  mm. 
beyond  by  a black  spot,  the  first  of  five  evenly  spaced  along 
the  costa  before  the  broad  subterminal  band ; the  branches  of 
the  subbasal  band  uniting,  the  oblique  downward  extension 
meets  a brown  patch  which  is  joined  above  by  a black  one 
beyond  (above)  which  is  a small  black  spot,  the  whole  nar- 
rowly margined  outwardly  with  white ; if  the  outer  part  of 
this  more  or  less  V-like  pattern  were  continuous  above,  it 
would  join  the  first  of  the  five  costal  spots  cited  above;  the 
second  of  the  ‘five  costal  spots  has  below  it  two  small  black 
spots,  and  the  third  is  continuous  with  a large  dusky  shade 
extending  downward,  and  then  outward  to  the  margin  of  the 
reniform  stigma,  which  is  outlined  in  pure  white;  below  the 
dusky  shade  is  a small  spot,  and  both  it  and  the  lower  part  of 
the  shade  are  bordered  on  the  inner  side  by  white ; below  the 
reniform  is  a black  spot ; the  subterminal  band  is  broad, 
nearly  as  in  D.  marmorea  Leech,  fuliginous,  shaded  with 
black  and  green,  irregularly  bordered  with  white  scales,  end- 
ing abruptly  before  the  lower  margin,  except  for  a small  band 
from  the  outer  corner ; fringes  with  black  spots  at  intervals ; 
hind  wings  yellowish,  with  a broad  dusky  apical  suffusion, 
and  a dark  spot  on  the  fringe  near  the  outer  angle;  tibiae  on 
outer  side  banded  with  green  and  black. 

Doi  Sutep,  Siam,  April,  1929  {Mrs.  L.  McKean).  This  beau- 
tiful species  appears  to  be  nearest  to  the  Chinese  D.  marmorea 


Feb.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  43 


Leech,  but  distinguished  especially  by  the  broad  white  outline  of 
the  reniform  stigma.  It  is  also  a smaller  insect. 

Warren  in  1907  established  the  genus  Daseochaeta  for  Agriopis 
viridis  Leech,  a Japanese  species,  occurring  at  Yokohama.  At  the 
same  time,  he  proposed  a genus  Diphtherocoma  for  Diphtera 1 pal- 
lida Moore,  found  from  China  to  the  Himalayas.  These  insects 
are  closely  allied,  D.  viridis  differing  by  the  male  antennae  being 
bipectinate  with  long  branches  almost  to  the  apex.  Hampson 
(1909)  united  Warren’s  genera  under  Daseochaeta , describing 
fourteen  species,  and  including  the  well-known  European  alpium 
Osbeck  ( orion  Esper),  known  to  British  entomologists  as  Diph- 
thera  orion,  “The  scarce  marvel-du-jour.”  This  beautiful  spe- 
cies occurs  in  the  New  Forest,  and  other  parts  of  the  south  of 
England,  and  ranges  eastward  to  the  Ussuri  district  in  Siberia, 
Japan  and  China.  The  genus  as  limited  and  defined  by  Hampson 
appears  to  be  a very  compact  and  easily  recognizable  group,  un- 
like anything  else,  and  remarkable  for  the  delicate  shades  of  green 
and  irregular  dark  markings  on  the  anterior  wings.  The  range  is 
right  across  the  Palaearctic  region,  southward  into  the  Oriental 
region  as  far  as  Formosa  (Z).  pulchra  Wileman)  and  Madras  (D. 
muscosa  Hampson),  and  in  the  Ethiopian  region  to  the  Transvaal 
(D.  verbenata  Distant)  and  Madagascar  (D.  malgassica  Ken- 
rick),  while  one  species  ( D . beryllodes  Turner)  occurs  in  Queens- 
land. Species  may  be  expected  to  occur  in  central  Africa  and  the 
Malay  Archipelago. 

The  genus  is  new  to  Siam. 


1 Diphtera  was  the  original  spelling  (1816);  altered  later  to 
Diphthera,  which  was  regarded  as  more  correct.  Warren  placed 
D.  alpium  in  this  genus,  which  would  then  take  precedence  over 
Daseochaeta;  but  Hampson  takes  as  the  type  of  Diphthera  the 
rather  similarly  marked  though  very  different  Agriopis  aprilina 
(Linnaeus).  Tutt  placed  aprilina  in  the  genus  Dichonia  Hb.,  and 
orion  ( alpium ) in  Moma  Hb. 


44  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


TWO  NEW  ALCONEURA  (HOMOPTERA,  CICADEL- 
LIDAE)  WITH  NOTES  ON  OTHER  SPECIES. 

By  Paul  B.  Lawson,  Lawrence,  Kans.1 

There  seems  to,  be  some  doubt  whether  the  members  of  this 
group  should  be  placed  in  a distinct  genus,  as  was  done  by  Ball 
and  DeLong,  or  whether  they  simply  constitute  a subgenus  of  Di- 
kraneura.  The  writer  is  inclined  to  feel  that  they  make  up  a 
quite  definite  genus  for  not  only  does  the  wing  venation  appear 
to  be  quite  characteristic  and  constant,  but  in  all  the  known  spe- 
cies there  is  also  a very  definite  black  spot  in  either  the  third  or 
fourth  apical  cell  of  the  elytra. 

Alconeura  fulminea  n.  sp.  (Figs.  1-4.) 

A beautiful  green  and  brown  species,  perhaps  allied  to  A. 
planata  more  closely  than  to  anything  else  in  the  genus. 
Length  2.25-2.5  mm. 

Form:  Head  as  wide  as  pronotum.  Vertex  about  as  wide 

as  long,  scarcely  twice  as  long  at  middle  as  next  the  eye,  an- 
terior margin  obtusely  angulate.  Pronotum  a little  longer 
than  vertex,  twice  as  wide  as  long,  lateral  margins  fairly  long, 
posterior  margin  shallowly  concave.  Scutellum  moderately 
large.  Elytra  distinctly  exceeding  pygofer;  first  and  second 
apical  cells  short,  third  decidedly  longer,  fourth  longest.  Sec- 
ond closed  submarginal  cell  of  hind  wing  fully  as  long  as 
first. 

Genitalia:  Last  ventral  segment  of  female  long,  posterior 

margin  strongly  produced  medially.  Last  ventral  segment  of 
male  large ; valve  small,  posterior  margin  practically  straight ; 
plates  tapering  to  acute  apices  when  viewed  ventrally,  but 
when  viewed  laterally  ending  in  blunt  upturned  apices  which 
distinctly  exceed  the  pygofer. 

Color:  Vertex,  pronotum  and  scutellum  rich  golden  brown. 
Vertex  with  narrow  brown  submarginal  line  and  broad  white 
marginal  band  which  extends  backward  across  eyes,  sides  of 
pronotum,  and  along  length  of  claval  suture.  Elytra  olive 
green  with  distinct  black  spot  in  fourth  apical  cell  opposite 
third  cross  vein.  Underside  for  the  most  part  greenish  yel- 
low. Abdomen  sometimes  largely  fuscous. 

Described  from  a male  and  female,  holotype  and  allotype  re- 
spectively, taken  in  Cameron  County,  Texas,  August  3,  1928,  by 

1 Contribution  from  the  Department  of  Entomology,  University 
of  Kansas. 


F eb. ,1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  45 


Dr.  R.  H.  Beamer.  A female  and  two  male  paratypes  bear  the 
same  data. 

Types  deposited  in  Snow  Entomological  Collection. 

Alconeura  quadrimaculata  n.  sp.  (Figs.  5-8.) 

A milky- white  species,  allied  to  A.  unipuncta  but  recognized 
by  the  four  bright  orange-red  spots  on  clavus.  Length  2.75- 
3 mm. 

Form:  Head  as  wide  as  pronotum.  Vertex  about  as  wide 
as  long,  one-half  longer  at  middle  than  next  the  eye,  anterior 
margin  broadly  rounded.  Pronotum  distinctly  longer  than 
vertex,  scarcely  twice  as  wide  as  long,  lateral  margins  long, 
posterior  margin  very  shallowly  concave.  Scutellum  moder- 
ately large.  Elytra  greatly  exceeding  abdomen;  first  two 
apical  cells  quite  short,  third  and  fourth  subequal.  Second 
closed  submarginal  cell  of  hind  wing  triangular  and  nearly 
as  long  as  first  submarginal  cell. 

Genitalia:  Last  ventral  segment  of  female  quite  long,  pos- 
terior margin  sinuately  produced  to  large  pointed  median 
lobe.  Last  ventral  segment  of  male  very  large,  posterior 
margin  slightly  emarginate,  showing  none  or  but  little  of  the 
valve;  plates,  when  viewed  laterally,  with  rather  large  up- 
turned apices  which  exceed  the  pygofer. 

Color:  Vertex,  pronotum  and  scutellum  milky  white,  with 
traces  of  four  yellow  or  orange-red  lines  on  pronotum  and 
hints  of  color  in  basal  angles  of  scutellum.  Elytra  with  two 
bright,  well-separated,  orange-red  spots  on  each  clavus,  a yel- 
low line  between  first  and  second  sectors  and  sometimes  a 
suggestion  of  yellow  laterad  of  this  near  the  costal  margin ; 
some  of  apical  veins  margined  with  fuscous,  particularly 
along  costal  margin ; a small  but  distinct  black  spot  near  mid- 
dle of  third  apical  vein.  Underside  pale  except  for  black 
tarsal  claws  and  tip  of  ovipositor. 

Described  from  a female  and  a male,  holotype  and  allotype 
respectively,  and  a series  of  paratypes  taken  in  Pima  County, 
Arizona,  July  27,  1927,  by  Dr.  R.  H.  Beamer.  A single  paratype 
is  at  hand  also  from  Gila  County,  Arizona,  taken  by  Dr.  Beamer, 
August  6,  1927. 

Types  deposited  in  Snow  Entomological  Collection. 

Alconeura  unipuncta  (Gillette). 

A large  series  of  this  species  is  at  hand  from  Gila  County, 
Arizona,  and  a specimen  from  the  San  Jacinto  Mountains,  Cali- 
fornia. 


46  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


Var.  dorsalis.  A specimen  of  this  variety  from  the  Huachuca 
Mountains,  Arizona,  shows  its  very  close  relationship  with  the 
typical  form.  The  writer  cannot  find  the  differences  in  genitalia 
which  McAtee  describes  and  which  led  him  to  raise  it  to  specific 
rank.  While  the  color  markings  are  strikingly  distinct,  as  de- 
scribed by  DeLong,  it  seems,  nevertheless,  to  be  clearly  a darker 
variety  of  the  typical  species  described  by  Gillette. 

Alconeura  rotundata  Ball  & DeLong. 

In  addition  to  a specimen  taken  in  Douglas  County,  Kansas, 
the  writer  has  before  him  a series  of  specimens  of  this  species 
from  the  Huachuca  Mountains,  Arizona,  and  from  the  San  Jacinto 
Mountains,  California.  All  these  specimens  agree  with  the  de- 
scription of  the  species  as  given  by  Ball  & DeLong,  except  that  the 
black  spot  on  the  elytra  is  situated  on  the  third  apical  vein  instead 
of  in  the  inner  angle  of  the  fourth  apical  cell. 


Addicted  to  Strong-Waters. — It  may  be  of  interest  to  record 
the  capture  of  my  third  specimen  of  Agabus  erythropterus  Say  in 
this  locality  in  the  outlet  of  a drain  from  the  cattle  barn  of  a large 
dairy  in  Acton,  Mass.,  on  October  20,  1929.  This  small  trickling 
stream  was  highly  impregnated  with  cattle  urine  and  manure 
seepage.  It  is  probably  only  a coincidence  that  four  specimens  of 
this  species  were  taken  in  Penobsquis,  N.  B.,  on  July  20,  1929,  by 
treading  about  in  a springy,  muddy  area  on  the  bank  of  a brook 
which  is  here  sunk  10  or  12  feet  in  a gully  below  the  rest  of  the 
pasture  land.  This  place  was  kept  saturated  by  springs  from  the 
higher  land  and  was  covered  with  enlarged  cattle  tracks  filled 
with  water  and  there  were  more  or  less  droppings  scattered  about. 

At  Acton  a number  of  Cere  yon  quisquilius  L.  were  taken  flying 
about  the  dairy  drain  in  late  afternoon  and  many  S phaeridium 
bipustulatum  Fabr.  were  found  beneath  the  wet  debris  along  it. — 
C.  A.  Frost,  Framingham,  Mass. 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  XXV,  No.  1 


Plate  Y 


/ 


48  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


NOTES  ON  ANCYLOXYPHA  NITEDULA  BUR- 
MEISTER. 

By  E.  L.  Bell,  Flushing,  N.  Y. 

This  small  Argentine  Ancyloxypha,  of  which  the  writer  has  a 
number  of  specimens,  collected  at  Cordova,  by  Mr.  Eugenio 
Giacomelli,  of  La  Rioja,  Argentine,  seems  to  have  been  omitted 
from  recent  works  dealing  generally  with  the  American  Hesperi- 
idae. 

It  was  first  described  by  Burmeister,  Descrip,  phys.  de  la  Rep. 
Argentina,  vol.  5,  p.  247,  1878,  as  Thymelicus  premnas  Wallen- 
gren,  through  his  misidentification  of  that  species,  and  in  his  de- 
scription is  included  the  statement  that  it  is  “nitedula  Berg  in  lit- 
teris.”  Later,  in  the  Atlas  Section  of  the  same  work,  pp.  55-56, 
1880,  he  admits  his  error  in  identification  of  premnas  Wallengren 
and  states  that  the  species  he  described  as  premnas  and  the  true 
premnas  of  Wallengren  are  distinct  and  not  even  congeneric,  and 
to  avoid  the  use  of  two  like  names,  proposes  Berg’s  name  nitedula 
for  the  species.  This  course  seems  quite  proper  and  justified, 
for  in  using  either  name  it  must  be  accredited  to  Burmeister,  and 
there  can  be  little  point  in  applying  the  name  premnas  to  the  spe- 
cies, particularly  as  its  original  use  was  through  error. 

Berg,  in  Anales  del  Museo  Nacional  de  Buenos  Aires,  Tomo  V, 
p.  253,  1896-1897,  mentions  the  species  as  “ Ancyloxypha  nitedula 
(Burm.)  Berg.”  and  places  as  synonym  tucumanus  Plotz.  Plotz 
described  Thymelicus  tucumanus,  from  Cordova,  in  Stett.  Ent. 
Zeit.,  p.  284,  1884,  and  figured  it  in  his  Hesperid  plates,  number 
1503.  Godman,  in  Annals  and  Magazine  of  Natural  History, 
vol.  XX,  1907,  p.  153,  correctly  refers  tucumanus  to  the  genus 
Ancyloxypha  with  the  statement  that  it  probably  equals  the  female 
of  arene  Edwards,  however,  an  examination  of  the  male  genitalia 
proves  that  nitedula  and  arene  are  quite  distinct. 

Thymelicus  tucumanus  Plotz  must  not  be  confused  with 
Nisoniades  tucumanus  Plotz,  described  in  Jahrb.  d.  Nass.  Ver.  f. 
Nat.,  XXXVII,  p.  37,  1884,  and  also  from  Cordova,  and  figure 
number  1568  of  his  Hesperid  plates;  Godman,  in  the  paper  above 
referred  to,  p.  154,  says  “Belongs  to  Staphylus  or  Bolla.  Male 
has  a costal  fold.” 

In  size  nitedula  averages  somewhat  smaller  than  arene  Ed- 
wards, the  veins,  on  the  upperside  of  both  wings,  are  dark,  either 
entirely  or  on  the  outer  half,  beneath,  the  upper  half  of  the 


Feb.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  49 


primaries  is  fulvous  with  dark  veins,  the  lower  half,  black  which 
does  not  quite  reach  the  outer  margin  except  at  the  anal  angle, 
this  black  area  is  more  extensive  than  that  of  arene ; the  secondar- 
ies are  fulvous.  The  male  genitalia  differs  from  that  of  arene 
in  that  the  valvae  terminate  in  a rather  slender,  upcurved  arm 
with  a pointed  tip. 

NOTE  ON  THE  VALIDITY  OF  CORIXA  GEOFFROY 
(1762)  (HEMIP.  CORIXIDAE).1 

By  G.  Stuart  Walley,  Ottawa,  Ont. 

The  contention  of  Schumacher  (Deutsch.  Ent.  Zeit.,  337,  1924) 
that  Sigara  Fabr.  (1775)  obtains  precedence  over  Corixa  Geoff, 
because  the  latter  name  was  not  validated  in  the  original  diagnosis 
(Hist.  Abreg.  des  Ins.,  1,  447,  1762)  but  only  in  the  year  1785  (in 
Fourcroy,  Ent.  Paris,  I,  221)  is  based  on  the  premises  that 
Geoff roy  did  not  employ  binary  nomenclature  in  the  1762  in- 
stance. The  facts  involved  are  these — 

Geoffroy  (1762)  erected  the  genus  Corixa  giving  diagnostic 
characters  and  below  the  generic  description  he  appends  the  de- 
scription of  a single  species  to  which  must  be  applied  the  name 
striata  L.  by  virtue  of  the  inclusion  of  the  citation  “Linn.  Syst.  nat. 
edit.  10,  p.  439,  n.  2.  Notonecta  striata,”  in  the  bibliography  im- 
mediately preceding  the  description.  His  procedure  is  almost 
paralleled  by  present  day  nomenclatorial  practise;  and  that  he 
recognized  two  distinct  categories,  genera  and  species,  is  clearly 
indicated  when  following  the  generic  description  he  remarks 
“Nous  ne  connoissons  qu’une  seule  espece  de  ce  genre.  . . .”  In 
this  instance  he  was  most  certainly  “binary”  if  not  strictly 
“binomial.”  The  application  of  Articles  2 and  25  of  the  “Inter- 
national Rules”  clearly  validate  the  generic  name  Corixa  Geoff., 
1762.  Since  only  one  species  is  mentioned  the  genotype  becomes 
C.  striata^  Notonecta  striata  L.  Sigara  Fabr.  (Syst.  Ent.,  691, 
1 775 ) a monobasic  genus  with  the  same  genotype  ( i.e .,  S.  striata - 
Notonecta  striata  L.)  remains  a synonym. 

A comparable  case  is  found  in  Opinion  20  rendered  by  the  In- 
ternational Commission,  in  which  the  validity  of  Gronow’s  genera 
is  established. 

1 Contribution  from  the  Division  of  Systematic  Entomology, 
Entomological  Branch,  Dept,  of  Agric.,  Ottawa. 


50  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  ToZ.  XXV 


BOOK  NOTES. 

The  Problems  of  Applied  Entomology,  by  Robert  A.  Wardle, 

M.  Sc.  Pp.  i-xii  + 1-587,  1 plate  and  31  figs.  (McGraw-Hill 

Book  Co.,  New  York,  1929.  $5.) 

Once  in  a while  an  entomological  work  appears  which  is  a true 
compendium  of  some  branch  of  the  science.  Such  is  Wardle’s 
Problems.  His  modest  title  would  lead  one  to  believe  that  it 
merely  posits  the  problems  and  envisages  them.  But  he  does  far 
more  than  that : he  studies  into  the  proposed  solutions  and  sets 
forth  the  best  modern  practice.  Of  course,  in  view  of  the  vast- 
ness of  the  subject,  the  matter  is  compressed  to  the  last  degree; 
and  so,  it  does  not  have  the  easy-reading  quality  of  the  much- 
words-about-nothing  school  of  readily  read  popularizers.  Never- 
theless, it  is  full  of  facts,  with  adequate  references.  Anyone  who 
needs  to  know  the  minute  details  can  from  this  book  readily  refer 
to  the  sources. 

The  work  is  divided  into  three  parts,  containing  twenty  chap- 
ters and  three  sections.  Part  I treats  of  General  Problems ; Part 
II  of  Area  Problems;  and  Part  III  contains  the  43-page  Bibliog- 
raphy, and  the  Indices  by  author  ancl  subject.  The  ten  chapters 
(1-10)  in  Part  I cover  host  resistance,  climatic  resistance,  tropic 
behavior,  disease,  parasites  and  predators,  theory  of  insecticides, 
stomach  poisons,  contact  insecticides,  fumigants  and  combination 
insecticides,  and  cultural  influence.  In  Part  II,  the  chapters  (11- 
20)  take  up  each  a definite  area,  largely  on  a climatological  basis. 
These  areas  are  divided  into  South  Eastern  Asia,  Mediterranean 
area,  West  Africa  and  Central  America,  North  Western  Europe, 
Euro-Asiatic  Plains,  North  America  (this  chapter  excludes  Mex- 
ico, even  though  it  is  a part  of  continental  North  America,  and 
allied  in  its  general  problems  with  our  Southwestern  States,  and 
considers  it  later  with  that  geographical  expression,  Central 
America)  ; South  America,  South  Africa,  Central  and  East 
Africa,  Hawaii  and  Australasia.  The  two  concluding  chapters 
generalize  on  locality  disinfection  and  locality  protection,  for 
smaller  units  with  what  might  be  termed  unified  problems. 

We  may  take  as  an  example  of  the  thoroughness  of  treatment 
of  the  matters  in  this  book,  Chapter  6,  The  Theory  of  Insecticides. 
The  thought  behind  the  entire  chapter  is  “ that  it  becomes  increas- 
ingly evident  that  the  economic  entomologist  should  possess  as  an 
important  part  of  his  professional  equipment  a fairly  compre- 
hensive grasp  of  chemical  priciples,  especially  of  those  which  con- 


Feb.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  51 


cern  colloid  chemistry,”  which  argument  Dr.  Wardle  proceeds  to 
elaborate  for  a couple  of  pages.  From  this  point  on  he  discusses 
the  ideal  insecticide,  cost  and  complexity  (including  here  govern- 
ment standards  of  efficiency  and  purity),  toxicity  (with  abstruse 
mathematical  formulae),  miscibility,  emulsions,  cold  mixed  emul- 
sions, adhesivity.  All  this  is  basic,  but  one  thing  is  forgotten : the 
entomologist  as  visualized  by  Dr.  Wardle  should  also  be  a toxicol- 
ogist of  parts.  For  instance,  Dr.  Wardle  would  substitute  fluo- 
rides for  arsenicals,  but  fluorides  are  quite  as  toxic  to  higher  ani- 
mals as  arsenicals,  which  your  new  entomologist  should  know. 
But  the  fact  remains  that  the  whole  subject  of  the  preparation 
and  reactions  of  insecticides  stays  what  it  always  was — a chemical 
problem  per  se,  to  be  solved  by  chemists  who  are  also  entomolo- 
gists. My  view  may  be  wrong,  but  twenty-five  years’  service  in 
one  of  the  great  chemical  companies  of  the  United  States  has 
shown  me  that  only  a life-time  and  a thorough-going  acquaintance 
with  factory  and  use  problems  and  with  the  literature  of  a par- 
ticular branch  of  chemistry,  is  of  any  great  avail.  Dr.  Wardle 
proposes  a counsel  of  perfection,  because  I fail  to  see  how  a har- 
assed economic  entomologist  is  going  to  partition  off  a good  half- 
section of  his  mind  to  dedicate  to  the  contemplative  pursuit  of 
theoretic  chemistry.  Nevertheless,  the  day  of  rule-of-thumb  in 
insecticides  is  assuredly  gone  by;  and  I agree  heartily  with  Dr. 
Wardle  that  the  economic  entomologist  should  know  the  chem- 
istry of  the  materials  he  handles,  at  least  in  its  elements.  All  eco- 
nomic entomologists  should  read  this  chapter  attentively;  and  de- 
cide whether  they  are  going  to  be  entomologists  or  biological 
chemists. 

Of  course,  the  problem  of  insecticides  is  fundamentally  biolog- 
ical, for  what  an  insecticide  does  is  to  derange  drastically  the 
regularity  of  biological  processes,  to  the  detriment  of  the  insect 
victims.  But  insecticides  barely  touch  one  edge  of  the  vast  field 
of  biological  control  of  living  beings.  We  have  abolished  verte- 
brates by  the  simple  process  of  hunting  them  and  eating  them, 
which  is  not  quite  possible  with  the  vast  hordes  of  insects. 

Fundamentally,  the  economic  entomologist  is  a biologist  work- 
ing in  a restricted  field,  whose  function  it  is  to  discover  the  weak- 
nesses of  insect  pests  and  use  them  to  their  destruction. 

But  all  these  considerations  apart,  which  are  indeed  the  per- 
sonal reactions  of  the  reviewer,  this  work  of  Dr.  Wardle’s  should 
be  not  only  in  the  hands  of  every  economic  entomologist  as  a book 


52  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


for  constant  reference,  but  also  in  the  laboratory  of  every  chemist 
and  chemical  plant  concerned  with  the  manufacture  of  insecti- 
cides. Out  of  personal  knowledge  I may  say  that  the  second  half 
of  this  antithesis  needs  this  book,  if  for  no  other  purpose  than  to 
bring  home  to  them  that  chemists  don’t  know  everything. — J.  R. 
T.  B. 

General  Catalogue  of  the  Hemiptera — Fascicle  II — Mesoveli- 
idae,  by  G.  Horvath.  Published  by  Smith  College,  Northamp- 
ton, Mass.,  1929.  [Pp.  8 not  numbered  (title  pages  and  Intro- 
duction)-)- 1-15.] 

The  second  Fascicle  of  what  promises  to  be  one  day  the  finest 
general  catalogue  of  the  Hemiptera  was  published  in  December, 
1929. 

As  might  be  expected  in  so  small  a family  as  the  Mesoveliidae, 
the  species  are  few,  the  genera  only  two ; and  the  generic  synon- 
ymy uncomplicated.  This  is  doubtless  due  to  the  general  neglect 
of  the  group  because  of  the  very  scant  collections  in  it  and  the  un- 
striking nature  of  these  little  insects,  all  of  which  look  much  alike 
in  general  aspect;  and  indeed,  until  a very  recent  time,  were 
scarcely  distinguished  from  each  other. 

It  seems  hardly  necessary  to  do  more  than  to  note  this  funda- 
mental work.  The  generic  and  specific  synonymies  are  full ; and 
the  bibliography  of  129  titles  is  nearly  complete.  However,  the 
present  writer  (perhaps  through  amour  propre)  notes  the  absence 
in  the  Bibliography  of  his  extensive  paper  in  1925,  in  Spolia  Zey- 
lanica,  vol.  XIII,  part  2,  pp.  223  to  234.  On  page  225  of  this 
paper  an  analysis  is  made  of  the  characters  that  distinguish  Me  so- 
velia  orientalis  Kirk,  from  M.  mulsanti  (B.  White)  Dist.,  [-M. 
bisignata  (Uhl.)  Dist.],  to  which  Distant  synonymized  the  former 
in  Fauna  of  British  India,  Rhynchota,  vol.  I,  p.  169. 

But  be  this  omission  as  it  may,  this  remains  the  first  authorita- 
tive and  adequate  catalogue  of  this  small  family,  since  Lethierry 
and  Severin  in  1893.  It  should  be  made  the  basis  for  a thorough- 
going revision  of  the  family. 

Incidentally,  it  is  to  be  hoped  that  other  hemipterists  may  take 
heart  of  grace 'and  clear  up  some  of  the  other  groups  very  soon. 
The  Editorial  Board,  of  course,  is  anxious  to  go  forward  as  fast 
as  possible  and  to  complete  the  whole  work  in  a relatively  short 
time.  But  it  cannot  do  this  without  the  cooperation  of  all  hemip- 
terists, each  doing  his  immediate  share.  A catalogue  from  its 


Feb.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  53 


nature  can  never  be  a closed  book — as  soon  as  it  is  out  changes 
begin  to  be  made.  It  can  only  hold  up  the  mirror  to  the  expres- 
sion of  the  moment,  as  it  were ; and  let  what  comes  after  take 
care  of  itself.  If  cataloguers-presumptive  wait  till  all  the  possible 
forms  are  described  before  setting  forth  what  is  known,  then  their 
Ka  will  have  to  do  the  job. 

(N.  B. — No  price  is  given  for  this  fascicle.) 

P.  S. — As  we  go  to  press  we  learn  (officially)  that  the  parts 
already  published  are  as  follows : 

Fasc.  I.  Membracidae,  by  W.  D.  Funkhouser,  1927,  581  pp. 

Price  $3.50.  Published  June  29,  1927. 

Fasc.  II.  Mesoveliidae,  by  G.  Horvath,  1929,  [4]+  15  pp.  Price 
$0.50.  Published  December  4,  1929. 

Fasc.  III.  Pyrrhocoridae,  by  R.  F.  Hussey  and  E.  Sherman,  1929, 
144  pp.  Price  $1.50.  Published  December  30,  1929. 


Epiphanis  cornutus  Esch. — A specimen  of  this  apparently 
rare  beetle  was  taken  at  South  Paris,  Maine,  on  July  11,  1929, 
while  sweeping  bushes  and  weeds.  My  other  two  specimens  were 
also  taken  in  the  month  of  July:  one  at  Mt.  Washington,  N.  H.,  by 
Mr.  C.  W.  Johnson  on  the  28th  of  the  month  and  the  other  at 
Springville,  Erie  Co.,  N.  Y.,  on  the  12th  of  July;  collector  un- 
known.— C.  A.  Frost,  Framingham,  Mass. 


Stenus  retrusus  Casey.— Two  female  specimens  of  this  dis- 
tinctly characterized  species  were  taken  at  Westchester  Lake, 
near  the  Londonderry  Mines  in  Nova  Scotia,  on  July  26,  1929. 
These  ran  down  very  nicely  to  this  name  in  Col.  Casey’s  mono- 
graph of  the  genus  though  it  was  described  from  a single  female 
specimen  said  to  be  from  Vancouver  Island,  B.  C.  In  the  re- 
marks it  is  stated  that  the  species  approaches  the  European 
planatus  Er.  and  comparison  might  prove  interesting. — C.  A. 
Frost,  Framingham,  Mass. 


54  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


EDITORIAL. 

THE  FUNCTION  OF  A DESCRIPTION. 

A specific  description  is,  briefly,  the  setting  forth  in  words  of 
the  structural  and  differential  characteristics  that  serve  to  sepa- 
rate one  entity  from  others  that  resemble  it,  together  with  those 
that  show  its  affinities,  in  order  than  any  person  without  previous 
knowledge  of  the  unit  may  be  able  to  readily  recognize  it  should 
he  meet  with  it. 

A description  is  certainly  not  a means  to  furnish  the  cabinet 
with  types,  nor  an  exercise  in  verbosity,  nor  a vehicle  to  exhibit 
outstanding  erudition.  Neither  is  it  an  introduction  to  crypto- 
grams, nor  an  example  of  the  art  of  concealing  thought. 

The  outstanding  characteristics  of  far  too  many  current  de- 
scriptions might  appear  to  be  a vagueness  of  purpose,  and  a hazy 
idea  of  the  end  to  be  attained. 

A description  has  one  primary  purpose : to  make  a category 
known  to  those  to  whom  it  is  unknown;  to  ticket  it  for  future 
reference.  A modern  description,  of  course,  has  other  purposes 
also,  such  as  indicating  the  biological  facts  of  the  category  and 
establishing  its  taxonomic  position.  But  from  the  very  beginning, 
its  purpose  has  been  to  acquaint  others  with  what  the  describer 
had  under  his  eyes  and  in  his  mind. 

Now,  describers,  as  a class,  seem  unable  to  exteriorize  them- 
selves ; and  to  understand  that  what  to  them,  because  of  intense 
study,  is  obvious  and  elementary,  is  quite  obscure  or  unapparent 
to  another  unfamiliar  with  the  group  or  with  its  specific  forms, 
and  with  the  methods  of  work  of  the  describer. 

Descriptions  range  from  one  or  two  lines,  such  as  “ similis 
alba , sed  nigrior,  alis  pedibusque  rufotestaceis,”  to  voluminous 
and  minute  examinations  of  the  most  evanescent,  variable  and  re- 
condite structures — in  short,  a word  picture  of  a unique  individual 
— and  the  more  sesquipedalian  the  language  and  the  less  its  sub- 
stance, the  better;  or  perhaps  “resembles  form  quinta  ab.  naso- 
pollifer,  but  primaries  more  suffused  with  melanic  undertones.” 
“ Ab.  nasopollifer  ” is  represented  by  the  unique  type  in  Nome, 
Alaska,  snow  fifteen  feet  deep,  and  Rin-Tin-Tin  gathered  to  his 
fathers.  How  is  the  student  going  to  get  it  for  comparison  ? And 
is  it  anything  anyhow? 


Feb.,  1980  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  55 


The  three  great  desiderata  of  a good  description  are : clear  un- 
derstanding of  the  end  to  be  attained,  lucidity  and  exactness.  The 
end  to  be  attained  is  indeed  the  basis,  but  to  make  a description 
lucid  the  describer  must  have  understanding  and  must  put  in 
everything  (in  moderation),  not  alone  the  things  obvious  to  the 
eye,  but  also  the  things  latent  in  his  mind.  His  fellow-workers 
have  not  attained  that  nice  discrimination  his  own  intensive  study 
has  given  him,  and  they  must  be  told  what  to  him  is  the  trite  detail. 
For,  if  the  readers  know  the  form  itself,  the  description  to  them 
would  be  superfluous  as  a means  to  attain  knowledge.  The  de- 
scriber must  not  alone  tell  what  is  present ; he  should  also  point 
out  what  is  absent,  so  long  as  it  is  a characteristic  of  some  other 
form  in  the  aggregation.  Each  and  every  description  should  stand 
by  itself ; that  is,  no  other  descriptions  nor  specimens  should  be 
required  in  order  to  understand  it  and  apply  it.  Nevertheless,  no 
description  is  complete  without  due  reference  to  neighboring 
forms ; and  direct  statements  of  wherein  the  novelty  resembles 
and  wherein  it  differs  from  its  neighbors  or  from  any  other  form 
for  which  it  might  be  mistaken.  All  these  elements  make  for 
lucidity  and  hence  for  comprehensibility. 

Exactness  is  the  third  indispensable  ingredient  of  a good  de- 
scription. The  day  of  vague  comparatives,  such  as  “ broad,’’ 
“ long,”  or,  “ longer  than  2d  but  shorter  than  4th  ” is  past.  How 
much  easier  and  .more  exact  to  say  “ 3 mm.  long  and  2 mm.  wide”  ! 
If  the  general  run  of  the  group  is  in  the  proportion  of  2 : 1 in 
length  and  breadth,  then  this  of  course,  is  broad.  But  an  actual 
number  is  concrete  and  definite  and  leaves  nothing  to  the  imagina- 
tion or  judgment.  It  is  a fact  stated  factually!  Why  say  “a 
smaller  form  than  the  average  in  the  group,”  when  it  may  just  as 
easily  be  put:  “ the  general  run  of  the  group  exceed  10  mm.  in 
length,  but  this  species  averages  less  than  8 mm.”  ? 

In  all  this  that  precedes  I am  not  overlooking  the  morphological 
or  taxonomic  implications  of  a description,  because  a good  de- 
scription must  be  both  in  its  essence.  For  while  its  utilitarian  end 
is  the  foundation  of  a description,  morphology  and  taxonomy  are 
certainly  the  superstructure. — J.  R.  T.  B. 


56  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  V 61.  XXV 


PROCEEDINGS  OF  THE  SOCIETY. 

Meeting  of  November  14,  1929. 

A regular  meeting  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  was 
held  at  the  Brooklyn  Museum  on  Thursday  evening,  November 
14,  1929,  at  8.10  p.  m. 

President  Davis  in  the  chair,  and  ten  members  present,  viz., 
Messrs.  Ballou,  Chapin,  Cooper,  Engelhardt,  Notman,  Pollard, 
Schaeffer,  Sheridan,  Siepmann  and  Torre-Bueno,  and  three  vis- 
itors. 

In  the  absence  of  the  secretary,  Mr.  Siepmann  acted  as  secre- 
tary pro  tern. 

The  minutes  of  the  previous  meeting  were  read  and  approved. 
Mr.  Engelhardt  presented  the  monthly  report  of  the  treasurer, 
and  Mr.  Torre-Bueno  briefly  reported  progress  for  the  publica- 
tion committee. 

Mr.  Engelhardt  proposed  for  membership  Dr.  Adam  Boving, 
U.  S.  National  Museum,  Washington,  D.  C.,  and  Mr.  Davis  pro- 
posed Mr.  Herbert  E.  Wilford,  1747  E.  26th  St.,  Brooklyn,  N.  Y., 
who  was  present.  It  was  regularly  moved  and  seconded  that  the 
by-laws  be  suspended,  and  the  secretary  cast  one  ballot  for  their 
election,  which  was  accordingly  done. 

Mr.  Torre-Bueno  reported  that  he  received  a communication 
from  Mr.  Pinney  Schiffer,  a member  of  the  society,  who  was  pre- 
paring for  a trip  to  the  Guianas.  He  also  commented  upon  and 
exhibited  a copy  of  the  book  “Flowers  and  Insects'’  by  Charles 
Robertson,  which  gives  tables  of  our  various  wild  flowers  and  the 
species  of  insects  recorded  on  each. 

Mr.  Notman  reported  that  the  past  summer  had  been  the  best 
collecting  season  he  ever  experienced.  He  made  a trip  to  the 
Rocky  Mountains  and  California,  stopping  at  the  Adirondacks 
on  his  return.  Several  thousand  specimens  of  Carabidae  and 
other  beetles  were  obtained. 

Mr.  Cooper  exhibited  a number  of  specimens  of  an  European 
colydid  beetle,  Bitoma  crenata,  taken  beneath  bark  at  Flushing,  L. 
I.,  on  Nov.  9.  According  to  Mr.  Schaeffer  this  is  a new  record 
not  only  for  Long  Island,  but  for  North  America  as  well.  From 
the  number  of  specimens  Mr.  Cooper  obtained  it  is  evident  that 
the  species  is  well  established  here.  The  beetle  is  a small, 
elongate,  black  species,  readily  recognized  by  the  two  bright  red 
spots  on  each  elytron. 


Fed.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  57 


Mr.  Engelhardt  spoke  of  the  last  years  in  the  life  of  Franz.  G. 
Schaupp,  also  known  as  the  father  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological 
Society. 

In  884  Mr.  Schaupp  left  for  Texas  where  he  remained  until  his 
death  in  1904.  About  the  first  half  of  his  residence  in  Texas  lit- 
tle is  known.  Happy-go-lucky  by  nature,  he  moved  about  more 
or  less,  easily  making  friends  and  a living  by  tutoring  and  by  col- 
lecting insects.  A file  of  letters  kindly  submitted  by  Dr.  J.  G. 
Needham,  discloses  that  he  lived  at  Shovel  Mount,  Burnett 
County  from  1897  to  1900  and  that  he  proved  himself  while  there 
an  excellent  and  resourceful  collector  and  breeder  of  Odonata. 
He  mentions  trips  to  the  Rio  Grande,  to  Galveston  and  a three 
weeks  vacation  to  Minnesota  and  also  refers  to  collections  made 
for  Professor  Hagen  and  Dr.  Calvert.  In  substance  the  letters 
received  by  Dr.  Needham  deal  with  the  breeding  and  the  habits 
of  Odonata,  carefully  observed  and  interestingly  recorded  by  Mr. 
Schaupp. 

Mr.  Torre-Bueno  spoke  of  the  great  services  rendered  to  ento- 
mology by  amateurs,  and  commented  that  although  the  science 
was  tending  to  become  a closed  profession,  open  only  to  pro- 
fessional men,  the  amateur  alone  has  the  time  and  independence 
necessary  for  extensive  collecting  and  the  careful  gathering  to- 
gether of  entomological  information.  The  professional  and 
specialized  entomologist  will  always  depend  upon  the  work  of  the 
amateur  for  the  materials  of  his  studies,  and  as  long  as  this  de- 
pendence exists,  the  amateur  will  continue  to  hold  his  place  in 
entomology. 

Mr.  Schaeffer  supported  his  statements,  remarking  that  some  of 
the  best  American  coleopterists,  including  Dr.  Le  Conte  and  Dr. 
Horn  were  not  professionals. 

Mr.  Davis  exhibited  a box  of  Cicadas  collected  by  Mr.  Engel- 
hardt during  the  past  summer  in  Missouri,  New  Mexico,  and 
Texas. 

Adjourned  at  10. 10  p.  m. 

Carl  Geo.  Siepmann 
Secretary  pro  tem. 

Meeting  of  December  12,  1929. 

A regular  meeting  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  was 
held  at  the  Brooklyn  Museum  on  December  12,  1929,  at  8.10  p.  m. 


58  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


President  Davis  in  the  chair,  and  io  members  present,  viz.,. 
Messrs.  Anderson,  Ballou,  Cooper,  Engelhardt,  Lemmer,  Schaef- 
fer, Shoemaker,  Siepmann,  Torre-Bueno  and  Wilford. 

In  the  absence  of  the  secretary,  Mr.  Siepmann  acted  as  secre- 
tary pro  tern. 

The  minutes  of  the  previous  meeting  were  read  and  approved, 
and  Mr.  Engelhardt  presented  the  monthly  report  of  the  treasurer. 

Mr.  Torre-Bueno  reported  for  the  publication  committee,  stat- 
ing that _the  next  issue  of  the  Bulletin  would  be  mailed  shortly 
after  Christmas. 

Mr.  Davis  proposed  for  membership  Mr.  Joseph  F.  Burke,  194 
Clinton  Street,  Brooklyn,  N.  Y.,  and  Mr.  Cooper  proposed  Mr. 
Howard  Black,  26  South  27th  Street,  Flushing,  N.  Y.  Both  Mr. 
Burke  and  Mr.  Black  being  present,  it  was  regularly  moved  and 
seconded  that  the  by-laws  be  suspended,  and  that  the  secretary 
cast  one  ballot  for  their  election,  which  was  accordingly  done. 

Mr.  Davis  brought  to  the  attention  of  the  society  the  death  of 
Mr.  George  Notman,  the  father  of  Howard  Notman,  a member 
of  the  society. 

Mr.  Torre-Bueno  read  a communication  from  the  Zoological 
Society  of  London,  concerning  the  Zoological  Record , a publica- 
tion giving  a complete  record  of  all  the  writings  pertaining  to  the 
various  branches  of  Zoology  published  during  the  calendar  year. 

Mr.  Davis  appointed  Messrs.  Sheridan,  Shoemaker  and  Lemmer 
as  a nominating  committee. 

Mr.  Shoemaker  exhibited  specimens  of  Carabidae  taken  at  the 
edge  of  the  swamp  at  Piermont,  N.  Y.,  26  miles  up  the  Hudson. 
Among  the  interesting  species  obtained  were  Casnonia  ludoviciana, 
Leptotrachelus  dorsalis,  Rembus  laticollis,  Chlaenius  niger, 
Chlaenius  laticollis,  and  Oodes  armericana. 

Mr.  Schaeffer  spoke  of  165  species  of  Coleoptera  new  to  Long 
Island  or  to  New  York,  of  which  he  exhibited  specimens.  A list 
of  the  species  will  be  published  in  the  Bulletin. 

Mr.  Cooper  exhibited  specimens  of  Coleoptera  new  to  Long 
Island.  He  will  continue  his  paper  at  the  January  meeting. 

Adjourned  at  10. 10  p.  m. 

Carl  Geo.  Siepmann, 

Secretary  pro  tem. 


Vol.  XXV 


APRIL.  1930 

BULLETIN 


No.  2 


OF  THE 


Brooklyn  Entomol 
Society 


NEW  SERIES 


PUBLICATION  COMMITTEE 

J.  R.  de  la  T ORRE-BUEN O,  Editor 

E.  L.  BELL  GEO.  P.  ENGELHARDT 

Published  for  the  Society  by  the 

Science  Press  Printing  Co., 

Lime  and  Green  Sts.,  Lancaster,  Pa., 

Price,  60  cents  Subscription,  $2.50  per  year 

Mailed  May  10,  1930 


Entered  as  second-class  matter  January  21,  1919,  at  the  post  office  at  Lancaster,  Pa., 
under  the  Act  of  March  3,  1879 


The  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society 

Meetings  are  held  on  the  second  Thursday  after  the  first  Tuesday  of  each 
month  from  October  to  June,  inclusive,  at  the  Central  Museum,  Eastern 
Parkway  and  Washington  Ave.,  Brooklyn.  The  annual  dues  are  $2.00. 

OFFICERS,  1930 


Honorary  President 


CHARLES  W.  LEJSTG 


President 

W.  T.  DAVIS 


Treasurer 

G.  P.  ENGELHARDT 


Vice-President 

J.  R.  de  LA  TORRE-BUENO 


Central  Museum 
Eastern  Parkway 


Recording  Secretary 
E.  L.  BELL 
Corresponding  Secretary 
HOWARD  NOTMAN 


Librarian 

DR.  JOSEPH  BEQUAERT 

Curator 

J.  M.  SHERIDAN 


Delegate  to  Council  of  New  York 
Academy  of  Sciences 

G.  P.  ENGELHARDT 


CONTENTS 

GENERIC  AND  SUBGENERIC  DIVISIONS  OP  VESPINAE, 


Bequaert  59 

NEW  OR  INSUFFICIENTLY  KNOWN  CRANE-FLIES  FROM  THE 

NEARCTIC  REGION,  Alexander  71 

ON  THE  NEST  OF  APHAENOGASTER  FULVA.  SUBSP.  A QUIA, 

Hendrickson  . 78 

ERRATUM,  Rau  79 

GENERIC  REVISION  OF  EUCHLOINI,  Klots  80 

JAPANESE  BEETLE  ON  STATEN  ISLAND,  Davis  95 

POSITION  OF  STREPSIPTERA  ON  HOSTS,  Robertson  96 

ORCHESTES  TESTACEUS,  Frost  97 

EARLY  REFERENCES  TO  THE  BEHAVIOR  OF  AMERICAN 

SOLITARY  WASPS,  Dow  98 

ULOMA  IMBERBIS,  Frost  101 

BUGS  AT  LIGHT,  Torre-Bueno  101 

GENUS  VIVIANIA,  AND  TWO  NEW  SPECIES,  Reinhard  102 

HETEROPTERA  COLLECTED  BY  ENGELHARDT,  Torre-Bueno 107 

BIONOMICS  OF  BREMUS  VAGANS,  Frison  109 

NESTING  HABITS  OF  ISODONTIA,  Bequaert  122 

BOOK  NOTES:  GENERAL  CATALOGUE  OF  THE  HEMIPTERA— 

FASCICLE  III — PYRRHOCORRDAE,  J.  R.  T.-B 124 


Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society 

Published  in 

February,  April,  June,  October  and  December  of  each  year 

Subscription  price,  domestic,  $2.50  per  year;  foreign,  $2.75  in  advance;  single 
copies,  60  cents.  Advertising  rates  on  application.  Short  articles,  notes  and 
observations  of  interest  to  entomologists  are  solicited.  Authors  will  receive  25 
reprints  free  if  ordered  in  advance  of  publication.  Address  subscriptions  and 
all  communications  to 

J.  R.  de  la  TORRE-BUENO,  Editor, 

38  De  Kalb  Avenue,  White  Plains,  N.  Y. 


BULLETIN 

OF  THE 

BROOKLYN  ENTOMOLOGICAL  SOCIETY 


Vol.  XXV  April,  1930  No.  2 


ON  THE  GENERIC  AND  SUBGENERIC  DIVISIONS 
OF  THE  VESPINAE  (HYMENOPTERA). 

By  J.  Bequaert,  Harvard  University  Medical  School,  Boston, 

Mass. 

The  present  paper  is  an  outgrowth  of  a revision,  which  I am 
now  preparing  for  publication,  of  the  North  American  species  of 
Vespa.  When  I came  to  consider  the  proper  generic  and  sub- 
generic names  to  use  for  these  wasps,  I found  that  no  serious  at- 
tempt had  been  made  to  define  or  delimit  the  superspecific  groups. 
To  do  this  involved  a study  of  as  many  species  as  possible  from 
all  over  the  world,  for,  in  my  opinion,  genera  and  subgenera  can- 
not be  properly  defined  with  only  the  species  of  a limited  geo- 
graphical area.  On  the  other  hand,  a taxonomic  discussion  of  the 
Vespinae  as  a whole  would  be  out  of  place  in  a strictly  faunistic 
paper,  so  that  I have  decided  to  publish  it  separately. 

The  subfamily  Vespinae,  as  here  accepted,  is  a group  of  social, 
monogynous  wasps,  which  may  be  defined  as  follows  (J.  Be- 
quaert, 1918,  Bull.  Amer.  Mus.  Nat.  Hist.,  XXXIX,  p.  17)  : Cly- 
peus  broadly  truncate  at  the  apical  margin,  which  is,  as  a rule, 
slightly  emarginate  or  ends  in  two  rounded  lateral  teeth.  Man- 
dibles short  and  broad,  folded  over  each  other  beneath  the  ante- 
rior margin  of  the  clypeus,  with  a broad,  sharply  toothed,  apical 
cutting  edge.  Labial  palpi  of  4,  and  maxillary  palpi  of  6 seg- 
ments. Antennae  with  12  segments  in  female  and  worker;  with 
13  segments  in  the  male,  the  apical  one  normal.  Tarsal  claws 
simple.  Middle  tibiae  with  two  apical  spurs.  Wing  venation  of 
the  usual  diplopterous  type : three  closed  cubital  cells ; both  recur- 
rent nervures  received  by  the  second  cubital  cell ; radial  cell  elon- 
gate, pointed  toward  the  apex  which  lies  close  to  the  costal  mar- 
gin ; hind  wings  entire  and  narrow  at  the  base,  without  anal  or 
posterior  lobe,  but  the  preaxillary  excision  very  deep ; fore  wings 

59 


60  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


distinctly  plaited  longitudinally.  Mesonotum  without  traces  of 
notauli  (parapsidal  furrows  of  authors).  Mesepimerum  com- 
pletely separated  by  a suture  from  the  mesepisternum ; but  the 
mesepisternum  never  subdivided  by  a median,  oblique  suture  into 
an  upper  and  a lower  plate  and  never  with  a prepectal  suture. 
Hind  margin  of  postscutellum  produced  in  the  middle,  forming  a 
long,  triangular  lobe  wedged  in  the  upper  part  of  the  propodeum. 
First  abdominal  segment  subsessile,  not  forming  a podeon;  the 
tergite,  as  a rule,  with  a distinct  edge  or  rounded  angle  between 
the  anterior,  vertical  and  the  posterior,  horizontal  face.  Exten- 
sory  muscle  of  the  abdomen  inserted  in  a broad,  oval  valvula  be- 
tween the  apical  scales  of  the  propodeum. 

According  to  Bordas  (1895,  Ann.  Sci.  Nat.,  Zool.  (7),  XX,  p. 
165),  the  internal  male  genital  organs  or  testes  of  Vespa  each 
consist  of  numerous  (200  to  350)  tubular  glands,  whereas  in  all 
other  social  and  solitary  Diploptera  they  comprise  each  3 or  4 
tubes  only.  This  striking  difference  induced  H.  v.  Ihering  (1896, 
Zool.  Anzeiger,  XIX,  p.  453)  to  separate  Vespa  into  a distinct 
family,  equivalent  to  the  remainder  of  the  social  wasps.  But  the 
whole  morphology  of  Vespa  agrees  so  perfectly  with  that  of  the 
other  Diploptera,  that  this  extreme  course  seems  hardly  correct. 

The  Vespinae  are  defined  by  a combination  of  characters, 
rather  than  by  one  or  more  peculiarities  which  they  alone  exhibit. 
Their  most  exclusive  features  appear  to  be  the  absence  of  the  anal 
lobe  and  the  deep  preaxillary  excision  of  the  hind  wing.  Never- 
theless, this  subfamily  is  unusually  well  delimited  and  there  are 
no  transitions  whatsoever  to  any  of  the  other  living  Diploptera. 
As  a distinct  group  it  is  probably  very  ancient  geologically  speak- 
ing, although  we  have  no  positive  paleontological  proof  of  this. 
Of  course,  I am  well  aware  that  a number  of  fossil  insects  have 
been  described  as  primitive  Vespae,  and  I shall  discuss  them  in 
the  appendix;  but  an  examination  of  some  of  these  fossils  has 
convinced  me  that  their  vespine  nature  is  too  problematical  to  be 
used  as  a valid  argument  in  support  of  the  antiquity  of  the  genus 
Vespa. 

At  the  present  time  the  Vespinae  are  almost  limited  in  their 
distribution  to  the  Holarctic  and  Oriental  Regions.  No  spe- 
cies are  indigenous  in  the  Neotropical  and  Ethiopian  Regions, 
Australia,  New  Zealand  or  Polynesia,  although  from  time  to 
time  specimens  have  been  recorded  from  those  parts  of  the 
world.  Where  these  records  were  based  upon  actual  captures 


April,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  61 


(and  not  upon  wrong  labelling),  they  were  due  to  accidental  in- 
troduction by  man.  In  some  cases  such  introductions  have  re- 
sulted in  the  species  becoming  naturalized  outside  its  original 
range : thus,  V.  crahro  Linnaeus  has  become  established  in  the 
eastern  United  States,  V.  vulgaris  Linnaeus  in  New  Zealand,  and 
V.  occidentalis  Cresson  in  the  Hawaiian  Islands. 

Linnaeus’s  genus  Vespa  (1758),  although  the  type  of  the  sub- 
family, did  not  originally  correspond  to  the  Vespinae  as  defined 
above.  Of  the  17  species  included,  3 have  not  been  recognized,  3 
are  Sphegoidea,  and  8 are  now  placed  in  Odynerus,  Eumenes  and 
Polistes.  This  leaves  only  3 species  in  the  Vespinae,  viz.,  V.  cra- 
bro  (the  first  species  listed),  V.  vidgaris,  and  V.  rufa.  There  has 
been  some  difference  of  opinion  as  to  which  of  these  three  spe- 
cies should  be  taken  as  the  genotype  of  Vespa.  Apparently  the 
first  selection  was  made  by  Lamarck  in  1801  (Systeme  des  Ani- 
maux  sans  Vertebres,  I,  p.  271)  , who  designated  V.  crabro  as  the 
type.  Latreille  evidently  accepted  this  selection  in  1804  (Nouv. 
Diet.  Hist.  Nat.,  XXIV,  p.  181)  and  in  1810  (Consider.  Gen. 
Crust.  Ins.,  pp.  330  and  438).  Unfortunately  in  1802  (Hist.  Nat. 
Crust.  Ins.,  Ill,  p.  364),  Latreille  cited  V.  vulgaris  as  the  type  of 
Vespa,  perhaps  because  he  was  not  yet  aware  of  Lamarck’s  desig- 
nation of  a year  before.  Bingham  (1897)  and  Ashmead  (1902) 
have  followed  Latreille’s  designation  of  1802,  which  would  make 
Vespula  Thomson  a synonym  of  Vespa  Linnaeus,  while  Macro- 
vespa  Dalla  Torre  (1904)  would  have  to  be  used  for  the  group  of 
V.  crabro.  There  is,  however,  no  need  for  these  disturbing 
changes,  since  I am  entirely  in  agreement  with  Morice  and  Dur- 
rant  [1915,  Trans.  Ent.  Soc.  London  (1914),  3-4,  pp.  399-400] 
that  Lamarck’s  type  selection  was  valid  and  must  be  regarded  as 
binding. 

The  first  attempt  at  subdividing  Vespa  was  made  by  C.  G. 
Thomson  in  1869:  he  restricted  Vespa , proper,  to  the  species  with 
the  head  dilated  behind  the  eyes ; he  knew  only  one  species  of  this 
group,  viz.,  V.  crabro  Linnaeus.  With  the  species  with  short  ver- 
tex and  posterior  orbits,  Thomson  formed  his  subgenus  Vespula, 
containing  V.  media  Retzius,  V.  saxonica  Fabricius,  V.  norwegica 
Fabricius,  V.  holsatica  Fabricius,  V.  vulgaris  Linnaeus,  V.  ger- 
manica  Fabricius,  V.  austriaca  Panzer,  and  V.  rufa  Linnaeus ; no 
subgenotype  was  selected.  The  first  valid  type  designation  for 
Vespula  appears  to  have  been  made  by  Ashmead  in  1902  (Canad. 
Entom.,  XXXIV,  p.  164)  : he  raised  it  to  generic  rank  and  se- 


62  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


lected  as  type  Vespa  austriaca  Panzer,  which  automatically  makes 
Pseudovespa  Schmiedeknecht  (1881)  a synonym  of  Vespula 
Thomson.  Ashmead’s  designation  must  be  accepted,  even  though 
the  characters  he  attributes  to  Vespa  and  Vespula  are  erroneous. 
Both  V.  vulgaris  (which  he  gives  as  the  type  of  Vespa)  and  V. 
austriaca  (which  he  makes  the  type  of  Vespula)  agree  in  having 
“ the  eyes  extending  to  the  base  of  the  mandibles,  or  very  nearly.” 
Moreover,  Rohwer  in  1916  confirmed  Ashmead’s  designation  of 
V.  austriaca  as  the  genotype  of  Vespula.  I conclude  that  Birula’s 
recent  (1927)  designation  of  V.  media  Retzius  as  the  type  of 
Vespida  is  invalid. 

In  1903,  Ashmead  proposed  the  genus  Prove  spa  for  a species 
of  the  Oriental  Region,  V.  anomala  de  Saussure.  Dalla  Torre’s 
new  name  Macrovespa  (1904)  covers  the  group  of  species  with 
the  head  swollen  behind  the  eyes  and  corresponds  to  Thomson’s 
Vespa,  proper. 

In  1916,  Rohwer  subdivided  Vespula  Thomson  further:  the 
species  with  a long  oculo-malar  space  he  segregated  in  a subgenus 
Dolichovespula,  with  V.  maculata  Linnaeus  as  the  type,  and  left 
those  with  a short  oculo-malar  space  in  Vespula,  proper  (type: 
V.  austriaca  Panzer).1 

I have  been  able,  to  study  forty-one  of  the  described  species  of 
Vespinae.  Of  the  twenty  odd  so-called  “ species  ” which  I have 
not  seen,  about  one-half  are  probably  either  synonyms  or  slight 
color  variations.  At  first  I was  inclined  to  regard  all  these  wasps 
as  forming  only  one  genus ; but  a more  prolonged  study  has 
brought  me  to  recognize  three  natural  groups  that  appear  suffi- 
ciently well  circumscribed  to  deserve  generic  rank.  My  final  de- 
cision has  been  especially  influenced  by  zoogeographical  consid- 
erations. Provespa  is  strictly  Oriental;  Vespa,  proper,  is  dis- 
tributed over  the  Palaearctic  and  Oriental  Regions;  while  Ves- 
pula is  Holarctic.  A number  of  sub-groups  may  be  defined  in 
both  Vespa  and  Vespula,  but  they  seem  to  intergrade  and,  more- 
over, are  based  on  rather  artificial  combinations  of  characters,  so 
that  I cannot  regard  them  as  of  more  than  subgeneric  value. 

1.  Provespa  Ashmead,  1903,  Entom.  News,  XIV,  p.  182. 
Type  by  monotypy:  Vespa  dorylloides  H.  de  Saussure,  1853 
= V.  anomala  H.  de  Saussure,  1853. 

1 Paravespa  Radoszkowsky  (1886),  placed  by  Ashmead  (1902) 
in  the  Vespinae,  solely  from  the  description,  is  one  of  the  Eu- 
meninae  and  a synonym  of  Odynerus  subgenus  Rygchium  Spi- 
nola. 


April,  1930-  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  63 


Head  relatively  small,  with  narrow  outer  orbits  and  very 
short  vertex,  the  posterior  ocelli  placed  near  the  supraorbital 
line  of  the  eyes  and  only  a little  farther  from  the  margin  of 
the  occiput  than  from  the  eyes.  Inner  margins  of  the  eyes 
distinctly  farther  apart  at  the  clypeus  than  on  the  vertex, 
which  is  unusually  narrow.  Outer  orbits  rounded  off  be- 
hind, not  separated  by  a carina  from  the  occiput.  Ocelli 
very  large  and  close  together,  the  posterior  ones  closer  to  the 
inner  orbits  than  to  each  other.  Oculo-malar  space  very 
short,  almost  absent.  Third  segment  of  labial  palpi  with  a 
strong,  stiff  seta  on  the  inner  side,  before  the  apex.  All 
tibiae  with  long,  erect  hairs  on  the  upper  face.  Sides  of  pro- 
notum  completely  rounded  off  anteriorly  in  the  upper  part, 
with  a slight  trace  of  a vertical  carina  in  the  lower  part ; 
humeral  calli  not  separated  from  the  sides  by  a carina  or 
suture.  First  abdominal  segment  cup-shaped,  the  tergite 
bluntly  rounded  off  between  the  horizontal,  posterior  and 
vertical,  anterior  face.  Basal  vein  reaching  the  subcosta 
close  to  the  stigma  (the  distance  about  equal  to  the  length  of 
the  stigma,  or  a little  more)  ; first  cubital  cell  very  long,  as 
long  as  the  distance  of  its  apex  to  the  tip  of  the  wing;  sec- 
ond and  third  cubital  cells  short  and  high ; apex  of  first  dis- 
coidal  cell  vertically  truncate,  the  second  section  of  the  cubi- 
tus forming  a straight  line  with  the  first  intercubitus ; stigma 
large.  Hamuli  (or  hooklets)  of  hind  wing  beginning  close 
to  the  tip  of  the  subcostella. 

This  genus  contains  only  two  species  of  the  Oriental  Region : 
P.  anomala  (H.  de  Saussure)  (Syn. : Vespa  dorylloides  H.  de 
Saussure),  of  Sikkim,  Burma,  Tenasserim,  Malacca,  Java,  Su- 
matra, Borneo,  and  the  Philippines  ( ?)  ; and  P.  barthelemyi  (R. 
du  Buysson),  of  Bhutan,  Burma,  Siam,  Cambodia,  and  Cochin- 
china.  Both  species,  of  which  I have  seen  specimens,  are  strictly 
nocturnal. 

The  nearest  approach  to  the  enlarged  ocelli  of  Provespa  is 
found  in  Vespa  binghami  R.  du  Buysson,  of  Tenasserim  and  Yun- 
nan. In  a female  of  V.  binghami,  from  near  Shanghai,  kindly 
given  to  me  by  Father  Octave  Piel,  the  ocelli  are  decidedly  larger 
than  usual  and  slightly  closer  to  the  inner  orbits  than  to  each 
other;  in  addition,  the  inner  margins  of  the  eyes  are  decidedly 
closer  on  the  vertex  than  at  the  clypeus.  In  all  other  characters, 
however,  this  species  is  a typical  Vespa,  proper.  I suspect,  from 
the  pale  brownish,  slender  appearance  and  the  swollen  ocelli,  that 
V.  binghami  also  is  a nocturnal  or  crepuscular  wasp. 


64  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


2.  Vespa  Linnaeus,  1758,  ‘ Syst.  Nat.’,  10th  Ed.,  I,  pp.  343  and 
572.  C.  G.  Thomson,  1869,  f Opuscula  Entom.’,  I,  p.  79;  1874, 

‘ Skandinaviens  Hymenoptera ’,  III,  1,  Vespa  Lin.,  p.  8.  Birula, 
1925,  Arch.  f.  Naturgesch.,  XC  (1924),  Abt.  A,  Heft  12,  pp.  88 
and  89.  Type  by  designation  of  Lamarck  (1801)  : Vespa  crabro 
Linnaeus,  1758. 

Macrovespa  Dalla  Torre,  1904,  ‘ Gen.  Insect.,  Vespidae/  p.  64. 
Type  by  present  designation:  Vespa  crabro  Linnaeus,  1758. 

Vespa,  groupe  des  Frelons,  R.  du  Buysson,  1905,  Ann.  Soc. 
Ent.  France,  LXXIII,  3 (1904),  pp.  487  and  501. 

Head  very  large,  swollen  behind  the  eyes,  with  very  wide 
outer  orbits  and  long  vertex ; posterior  ocelli  placed  close  to 
the  middle  of  the  upper  lobes  of  the  eyes  and  3 to  6 times  as 
far  from  the  occipital  margin  as  from  the  eyes.  Outer  orbits 
separated  from  the  occiput  by  a carina,  which,  however,  does 
not  run  behind  the  vertex.  Ocelli  as  a rule  small,  exception- 
ally somewhat  swollen,  the  posterior  ones  usually  closer  to 
each  other  than  to  the  eyes.  Oculo-malar  space  either  long 
or  short.  Third  segment  of  labial  palpi  (at  least  in  the  fe- 
male and  worker)  with  one  or  two  strong,  stiff  setae  on  the 
Inner  side,  before  the  apex.  All  tibiae  with  long,  erect  hairs 
on  the  upper  face.  Sides  of  pronotum  with  a vertical  carina, 
running  over  the  entire  upper  portion ; humeral  calli  sepa- 
rated from  the  sides  of  the  pronotum  by  a suture  or  carina. 
First  abdominal  segment  truncate  anteriorly,  the . tergite 
more  or  less  angular  between  the  horizontal,  posterior  and 
the  vertical,  anterior  face.  Basal  vein  reaching  the  subcosta 
very  far  from  the  stigma,  the  distance  nearly  three  times  the 
length  of  the  stigma  and  twice  or  more  the  length  of  the  last 
section  of  the  basal  vein;  first  cubital  cell  shorter  than  the 
distance  between  its  apex  and  the  tip  of  the  wing;  second 
cubital  cell  broad ; the  third  high  and  narrow ; apex  of  first 
discoidal  cell  oblique,  the  second  section  of  the  cubitus  form- 
ing an  angle  with  the  first  intercubitus ; stigma  small,  often 
inconspicuous.  Hamuli  of  hind  wing  beginning  before  the 
tip  of  the  subcostella. 

Vespa,  as  here  delimited,  is  restricted  to  the  Palaearctic  and 
Oriental  Regions  (including  Malaysia  as  far  as  New  Guinea). 
One  species  was  introduced  into  the  Nearctic  Region,  some  75 
years  ago.  The  several  species  exhibit  many,  rather  striking  dif- 
ferences in  structure,  on  the  strength  of  which  it  is  possible  to 
arrange  them  into  a number  of  groups  as  indicated  below.  If  one 
studies  only  a few  of  the  extreme  types,  he  might  readily  be 


April,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  65 


tempted  to  apply  subgeneric  names  to  these  groups,  and  I do  not 
doubt  that  some  entomologist  will  promptly  rush  in  and  do  so. 
In  my  opinion,  however,  these  groups  are  highly  artificial  and  not 
of  subgeneric  value. 

I have  examined  specimens  of  the  following  species : 

Group  i.  Clypeus  (of  female  and  worker)  with  a small,  more 
or  less  distinct  tooth  in  the  middle  of  the  apical  emargination. 
Oculo-malar  space  short  but  distinct.  Ocelli  small,  the  posterior 
ones  much  closer  to  each  other  than  to  the  eyes.  In  the  male 
(which  I have  not  seen),  the  median  tooth  of  the  clypeus  is  said 
to  be  either  indistinct  or  replaced  by  a slight  median  carina  run- 
ning halfway  up  the  clypeus.  V.  analis  Fabricius,  V.  parallela 
Andre,  and  V.  nigrans  R.  du  Buysson. 

Group  2.  Clypeus  without  median  tooth  in  the  apical  emar- 
gination. Oculo-malar  space  very  short.  Ocelli  distinctly  swol- 
len, the  posterior  ones  a little  nearer  the  eyes  than  to  each  other. 
V.  hinghami  R.  du  Buysson. 

Group  3.  Clypeus  without  median  tooth  in  the  apical  emargi- 
nation. Oculo-malar  space  long,  in  the  female  and  worker  about 
the  length  of  the  penultimate  antennal  segment  or  longer.  Ocelli 
small,  the  posterior  ones  much  closer  to  each  other  than  to  the 
eyes.  V.  tropica  Linnaeus  (=  V.  cincta  Fabricius  and  its  var. 
affinis  Fabricius),  V.  deusta  Lepeletier,  V.  basalis  F.  Smith,  V. 
magnifica  F.  Smith,  V.  ducalis  F.  Smith,  and  V.  mandarinia  F. 
Smith. 

Group  4.  Clypeus  and  ocelli  as  in  Group  3.  Oculo-malar 
space  short,  in  the  female  and  worker  shorter  than  the  penultimate 
antennal  segment.  V.  crabro  Linnaeus,  V.  orientalis  Linnaeus, 
V.  mongolica  Andre,  V.  bicolor  Fabricius,  V.  fervida  F.  Smith, 
V.  velutina  Lepeletier,  V.  auraria  F.  Smith,  V.  bellicosa  H.  de 
Saussure,  V.  luctuosa  H.  de  Saussure,  and  V.  oberthuri  R.  du 
Buysson. 

In  the  genus  Vespa  the  relative  length  of  the  oculo-malar  space 
shows  a gradual  passage  from  the  extreme  case  of  V.  mandarinia , 
where  it  is  much  longer  than  the  penultimate  antennal  segment,  to 
that  of  V.  bellicosa,  where  the  eyes  nearly  touch  the  base  of  the 
mandibles.  The  condition  in  V.  crabro  is  just  about  midway  and 
that  species  could  be  placed  equally  well  in  Group  3.  Moreover, 
the  oculo-malar  space  varies  within  the  same  species  and  is  usu- 
ally longer  in  the  female  and  male  than  in  the  worker. 


66  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


The  following  species,  which  I have  not  seen,  also  belong  in  the 
genus  Vespa,  as  here  restricted:  V.  dyhowskii  Andre,  V.  eule- 
moides  R.  du  Buysson,  V.  indosinensis  ].  Perez  (1910,  Actes  Soc. 
Linn.  Bordeaux,  LXIV,  p.  8. — Oriental  Region),  V.  micado  P. 
Cameron,  V.  mocsaryana  R.  du  Buysson,  V.  multimaculata  J. 
Perez  (1910,  loc.  cit.,  p.  14. — Java),F.  nigripennis  H.  de  Saussure, 
V.  philip pine nsis  H.  de  Saussure,  V.  ruhricans  J.  Perez  (1910, 
loc.  cit.,  p.  10. — Supposedly  from  East  Africa;  probably  based 
upon  introduced  specimens  of  V.  tropica),  V.  suprunenkoi  Birula 
[1925,  Arch.  f.  Naturgesch.,  XC  (1924),  Abt.  A,  Heft  12,  p.  89. — 
Sakhalin  and  Korea],  V.  tyrannica  F.  Smith,  V.  unicolor  F. 
Smith,  V.  variabilis  R.  du  Buysson,  and  V.  wilemani  Meade- 
Waldo  [1911,  Ann.  Mag.  Nat.  Hist.  (8),  VII,  p.  104. — Formosa]. 

3.  Vespula  C.  G.  Thomson.  Ashmead,  1902,  Canad.  Entom., 
XXXIV,  p.  164.  Rohwer,  1916,  ‘ The  Hymenoptera,  or  Wasp- 
like Insects,  of  Connecticut  ’,  p.  642. 

Vespa  subgenus  Vespula  C.  G.  Thomson,  1869,  ‘ Opuscula 
Entom.,’  I,  p.  79;  1874,  ‘ Skandinaviens  Hymenoptera,’  III,  1, 
Vespa  Lin.,  p.  10.  Type  by  designation  of  Ashmead  (1902)  : 
Vespa  austriaca  Panzer,  1799. 

Pseudovespa  Schmiedeknecht,  1881,  Entom.  Nachrichten,  VII, 
pp.  314,  317  and  318.  Monotypic  for  Vespa  austriaca  Panzer, 
1799- 

Head  of  moderate  size,  not  swollen  behind  the  eyes,  with 
the  outer  orbits  of  normal  width  and  the  vertex  short ; poste- 
rior ocelli  placed  close  to  or  tangent  with  the  supraorbital 
line  and  at  most  as  far  from  the  occipital  margin  as  from  the 
eyes  (usually  closer  to  the  occipital  margin).  Outer  orbits 
with  or  without  carina  separating  them  from  the  occiput. 
Ocelli  small,  the  posterior  ocelli  closer  to  each  other  than  to 
the  eyes.  Oculo-malar  space  either  long  or  short.  Third 
segment  of  labial  palpi  without  a strong,  stiff  seta,  sometimes 
with  a small  hair.  Tibiae  with  or  without  long  hairs  on  the 
upper  face.  Vertical  carina  on  the  sides  of  the  pronotum 
either  complete,  or  indicated  in  the  lower  portion  only,  or 
obsolete ; humeral  calli  not  separated  from  the  sides  of  the 
pronotum.  First  abdominal  segment  truncate  anteriorly,  the 
tergite  more  or  less  angular  between  the  horizontal,  posterior 
and  the  vertical,  anterior  face.  Distance  between  tip  of  basal 
vein  and  stigma  less  than  twice  the  length  of  the  stigma  and 
about  equal  to  the  last  section  of  the  basal  vein ; first  cubital 
cell  shorter  than  the  distance  between  its  apex  and  the  tip  of 
the  wing;  second  cubital  cell  broad;  the  third  high  and  nar- 


April,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  67 


row;  apex  of  the  first  discoidal  cell  vertically  truncate  or 
slightly  oblique,  the  second  section  of  the  cubitus  hardly 
forming  an  angle  with  the  first  intercubitus ; stigma  well-de- 
veloped. Hamuli  of  hind  wing  beginning  at  the  tip  of  the 
subcostella. 

Vespula  is  a Holarctic  genus.  In  the  Old  World  it  is  found  all 
over  Europe,  in  Northern  Africa,  in  the  Canary  Islands,  and  in 
the  Palaearrtic  portion  of  Asia.  It  barely  enters  the  Oriental  Re- 
gion in  the  mountains  of.  Assam,  Sikkim  and  Tenasserim.  In 
North  America  it  occurs  throughout  the  Nearctic  Region  (north- 
ward in  Alaska  to  70  ° N.  lat.),  but  is  very  rare  in  Mexico.  Two 
species  occur  near  Mexico  City  and  one  of  these  has  even  been 
taken  at  Puerto  Barrios,  Guatemala. 

As  may  be  gathered  from  the  generic  description,  the  species  of 
Vespula  are  much  less  uniform  in  some  of  their  characters  than 
those  of  Vespa,  so  that  it  is  relatively  easy  to  arrange  them  into  a 
number  of  groups.  Rohwer  (1916)  has  proposed  a subgenus 
Dolichovespula  for  the  species  with  a long  oculo-malar  space. 
Although  this  character  in  itself  appears  to  be  of  little  value,  it  is 
to  some  extent  correlated  with  other,  more  fundamental  peculiari- 
ties; so  that  Dolichovespula  probably  represents  a natural  group 
of  species,  equivalent  to  the  remainder  of  the  Vespulae.  Both 
subgenera  have  the  same  general  distribution. 

1.  Subgenus  Vespula,  proper.  In  a subgeneric  sense  the  name 
Vespula  must  be  retained  for  any  group  of  species  containing  the 
genotype,  Vespa  austriaca  Panzer.  It  therefore  corresponds  to 
Schmiedeknecht’s  Pseudovespa. 

Oculo-malar  space  short,  at  most  half  the  length  of  the 
penultimate  antennal  segment  (in  female  and  worker)  ; often 
absent,  the  eye  touching  the  mandible.  Tibiae  as  a rule  with 
long  hairs  on  the  upper  face  (except  in  V.  austriaca) . Ver- 
tical carina  of  the  sides  of  pronotum  obsolete  or  faintly 
marked  in  the  lower  portion  only. 

I have  examined  the  following  species  of  this  subgenus  d 

V.  austriaca  (Panzer),  V.  squamosa  (Drury),  V.  consobrina 
(H.  de  Saussure),  V.  germanica  (Fabricius),  V.  maculifrons  (R. 
du  Buysson)  (=V.  communis  H.  de  Saussure),  V.  occidentals 
(Cresson),  V.  rufa  (Linnaeus),  V.  saussurei  (W.  A.  Schulz) 


1 The  nomenclature  of  the  North  American  species  of  Vespula, 
used  in  the  present  paper,  is  provisional,  pending  a critical  study 
of  these  names. 


68  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxr 


(=  V.  japonica  H.  de  Saussure),  V.  sulphur ea  (H.  de  Saussure), 
V.  vidua  (H.  de  Saussure),  and  V.  vulgaris  (Linnaeus). 

V.  koreensis  (Radoszkowsky),  - V.  orbata  (R.  du  Buysson), 
and  V.  structor  (F.  Smith),  which  I have  not  seen,  also  belong  in 
the  subgenus  Vespula,  proper. 

2.  Subgenus  Dolichovespula  Rohwer,  1916,  ‘ The  Hymenop- 
tera,  or  Wasp-like  Insects,  of  Connecticut,’  p.  642.  Type  by  orig- 
inal designation:  Vespa  maculata  Linnaeus,  1763. 

Oculo-malar  space  long,  nearly  as  long  as  the  penultimate 
antennal  segment  or  longer  (in  female  and  worker).  Tibiae 
always  with  long,  erect  hairs  on  the  upper  face,  especially 
noticeable  on  the  hind  legs.  Vertical  carina  of  the  sides  of 
pronotum  complete,  well-developed  in  the  upper  portion. 

I have  seen  the  following  species  of  the  subgenus  Dolichoves- 
pula: V.  arctica  Rohwer  (=  V.  borealis  Lewis,  not  of  Kirby),  V. 
arenaria  (Fabricius)  (=  V.  diabolica  H.  de  Saussure),  V.  macu- 
lata (Linnaeus),  V.  media  (Retzius),  V.  norwegica  (Fabricius), 
and  V.  sylvestris  (Scopoli). 

V.  lama  (R.  du  Buysson),  which  is  unknown  to  me,  also  ap- 
pears to  be  a Dolichovespula. 

The  following  three  species  of  Vespinae  I am  unable  to  place 
in  the  proper  genus:  Vespa  formosana  Sonan  (1927,  Trans.  Nat. 
Hist.  Soc.  Formosa,  XVII,  p.  121. — Formosa),  Vespa  jurinei  H. 
de  Saussure  (probably  a variety  of  V.  crabro),  and  Vespa  minuta 
Dover  [1925,  Jl.  Proc.  Asiatic  Soc.  Bengal,  N.  S.,  XX  (1924), 
No.  6,  p.  304. — Tenasserim;  this  is  possibly  not  one  of  the  Ves- 
pinae] . 

In  the  foregoing  definitions  of  genera  and  subgenera  I have  not 
used  secondary  sexual  characters  of  the  males,  mainly  because  I 
have  not  been  able  to  examine  that  sex  for  the  majority  of  the 
species.  In  my  experience,  the  structure  of  the  male  antenna 
affords  excellent  specific  characters,  but  whether  it  is  of  generic 
or  subgeneric  value  is  open  to  question.  Thus,  both  species  of 
Provespa  have  the  thirteenth  segment  squarely  truncate ; but, 
whereas  the  flagellum  of  P.  anomalo  is  without  “tyloides,”  that  of 
P.  barthelemyi  shows  them  very  distinctly  as  raised  longitudinal 
ridges  (although  R.  du  Buysson  does  not  mention  them). 

Of  Vespa  I have  seen  males  of  V.  ducalis , V.  crabro,  and  V. 
tropica  only,  all  of  which  bear  tyloides  on  the  flagellum.  Accord- 
ing to  R.  du  Buysson,  they  also  occur  in  V.  orientalis,  V.  man- 
darinia,  V . magnifica,  V.  nigrans , V.  analis,  V.  walkeri,  V.  belli- 
cosa,  V.  bicolor,  V.  basalis,  V.  velutina,  V.  auraria,  and  V.  mon- 


April,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  69 


golica;  but  the  males  of  the  other  species  are  either  undescribed 
or  have  not  been  examined. 

The  males  of  Vespula  may  be  with  or  without  tyloides.  These 
structures  are  absent  in  all  the  species  of  the  subgenus  Vespula, 
proper,  so  far  as  known.  The  subgenus  Dolichovespula,  how- 
ever, contains  a few  species  with  very  distinct  tyloides  (V. 
maculata  and  V.  media),  while  in  the  majority  these  structures  are 
either  small  or  obsolete. 

Appendix:  Supposed  Fossil  Vespinae. 

In  view  of  the  evident  antiquity  of  the  Vespinae,  as  a group 
distinct  from  the  remainder  of  the  Diploptera,  any  paleontologi- 
cal data  bearing  on  this  subject  would  be  of  unusual  interest.  A 
number  of  fossil  insects  have  been  either  referred  to  “Vespa”  or 
described  as  closely  allied  to  that  genus.  The  following  is  a brief 
discussion  of  these  fossils. 

The  first  mention  of  the  occurrence  of  Vespa  in  the  Baltic 
amber  (probably  of  Oligocene  age)  seems  to  be  by  Gravenhorst 
(1835,  Uebersicht  Arb.  Schlesis.  Ges.  Vaterl.  Cult,  im  J.  1834,  p. 
92)  in  a mere  list  of  amber  insects.  Menge  (1856,  Programm  d. 
Petrischule,  Danzig,  p.  26)  later  described  a Vespa  dasy podia 
from  the  amber;  but  it  is  evident  that  this  insect  was  not  a diplop- 
terous  wasp ; more  likely  it  was  a bee. 

Cockerell  [1910,  Schrift.  Phys.-Oekon.  Ges.  Konigsberg,  L,  1, 
(1909),  p.  5]  referred  an  amber  insect  to  his  genus  Palaeovespa 
(based  upon  Miocene  species  of  North  America)  and  called  it 
P.  baltica.  Cockerell’s  description  shows  that  this  fossil  is  un- 
doubtedly one  of  the  social  Diploptera,  and  most  probably  one  of 
the  Vespinae,  although  the  figure  of  the  second  submarginal  cell 
rather  suggests  certain  Polistinae  or  Polybiinae.  It  is  un- 
fortunate that  the  shape  of  the  clypeus  is  unknown. 

In  a list  of  the  genera  recognized  in  a collection  of  fossil  in- 
sects from  Aix  in  Provence  (Lower  Oligocene),  F.  W.  Hope 
(1847,  Trans.  Ent.  Soc.  London,  IV,  p.  252)  mentions  “a  Vespa, 
if  not  a Polistes,”  but  this  fossil  has  never  been  described. 

O.  Heer’s  Vespa  attavina  (1849,  Neue  Denkschr.  Schweiz.  Ges. 
Naturwiss.,  XI,  1,  p.  101,  PI.  VII,  figs.  8 and  8b),  from  the  Mio- 
cene of  Parschlug,  in  Steiermark,  was  based  upon  a fore  wing, 
apparently  plaited  lengthwise.  Although  the  author  compares  it 
with  V.  vulgaris,  his  description  and  figure  hardly  bear  this  out ; 
they  are  much  more  like  the  fore  wing  of  certain  Polistes, 


70  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


especially  in  the  basal  vein  ending  close  to  or  at  the  stigma.  The 
lengthened  first  discoidal  cell  makes  probable  the  diplopterous 
nature  of  this  fossil. 

Vespa  crabroniformis  O.  Heer  (1867,  Neue  Denkschr.  Schweiz. 
Ges.  Naturwiss.,  XXII,  4,  p.  6;  PI.  Ill,  fig.  15a),  from  the  Lower 
Miocene  of  Radoboj,  Croatia,  is  very  superficially  described;  the 
body  was  badly  crushed  and  the  drawing  of  the  wings  is  certainly 
unreliable.  Most  probably  this  fossil  was  one  of  the  Diploptera, 
but  to  place  it  in  one  of  the  modern  subfamilies  would  be  a mere 
guess. 

Schoberlin  (1888,  Societas  Entomologica,  III,  p.  61)  mentions 
the  occurrence  of  Vespa  in  the  Upper  Miocene  deposits  of 
Oeningen,  in  Baden;  but  this  fossil  has  not  yet  been  described. 

Cockerell  has  proposed  the  generic  name  Palaeovespa  (1906, 
Bull.  Mus.  Comp.  Zook,  L,  2,  p.  54.  Type  by  original  designa- 
tion: Palaeovespa  florissantia  Cockerell)  for  a series  of  fossil 

insects  from  the  (supposedly)  Miocene  shales  of  Florissant, 
Colorado.  In  all  he  has  described  five  species : P.  florissantia 
(1906,  loc.  cit.,  p.  54),  P.  scudderi  (1906,  loc.  cit.,  p.  55),  P. 
gillettei  (1906,  loc . cit.,  p.  55),  P.  wilsoni  [1915,  Proc.  Ac.  Nat. 
Sci.  Philadelphia,  (1914),  p.  640],  and  P.  relecta  (1923,  Ent. 
News,  XXXIV,  p.  270).  I have  recently  examined  some  of  these 
fossils  and  reached  the  conclusion  that  they  are  probably 
Diploptera,  but  that  it  is  impossible  to  decide  whether  they  belong 
to  the  Vespinae  rather  than  to  one  of  the  other  subfamilies  of 
social  wasps  [See  Psyche,  1930,  XXXVI,  (1929)  p.  367]. 

I conclude  that,  with  the  possible  exception  of  Palaeovespa 
baltica,  none  of  these  fossils  can  be  regarded  as  belonging  to  the 
Vespinae  or  as  ancestral  to  the  living  genera  of  this  subfamily. 


April,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  71 


NEW  OR  INSUFFICIENTLY-KNOWN  CRANE-FLIES 
FROM  THE  NEARCTIC  REGION. 

(Tipulidae,  Diptera.) 

Part  I. 

By  Charles  P.  Alexander,  Amherst,  Mass.1 

The  new  species  discussed  at  this  time  were  for  the  most  part 
included  in  interesting  collections  sent  to  me  for  identification  by 
Dr.  Mortimer  D.  Leonard  and  Mr.  Millard  C.  Van  Duzee.  A 
further  addition  to  the  paper  was  contained  in  the  Canadian  Na- 
tional Collection,  sent  to  me  through  the  kind  interest  of  Dr. 
James  McDunnough.  I wish  to  express  my  thanks  and  apprecia- 
tion to  the  above-named  entomologists  for  their  continued  co- 
operation in  studying  the  Tipulid  flies. 

Limonia  (Dicranomyia)  erostrata  n.  sp. 

General  coloration  ochreous ; rostrum  and  first  segment  of 
antennae  yellow ; mesonotal  praescutum  with  a median  brown 
stripe ; male  hypopygium  with  the  dorsal  dististyle  a stout 
pale  rod  that  narrows  gradually  to  an  acute  blackened  tip ; 
ventral  dististyle  a fleshy  lobe  that  lacks  a rostral  prolonga- 
tion. 

Male. — Length  about  6.5  mm. ; wing  6.6  mm. 

Rostrum  light  yellow ; basal  segments  of  palpi  yellow,  the 
outer  segments  infuscated.  Antennae  with  the  basal  seg- 
ment and  sometimes  the  second  light  yellow ; flagellum  dark 
brown ; flagellar  segments  oval,  outer  segments  narrower. 
Head  ochreous,  the  vertex  more  infuscated. 

Mesonotum  ochreous,  with  a brown  median  stripe  that  is 
subobsolete  and  more  or  less  bifid  behind,  the  lateral  stripes 
less  evident;  scutal  lobes  brownish  gray.  Pleura  ochreous 
yellow.  Halteres  destroyed  by  pests.  Legs  with  the  coxae 
and  trochanters  yellow ; femora  yellow,  the  tips  slightly 
darkened ; tibiae  obscure  yellow,  darkened  at  tips ; tarsi  pass- 
ing into  dark  brown.  Wings  light  yellow,  the  stigma  lack- 
ing; veins  darker  yellow.  Venation:  Sc1  ending  opposite 
origin  of  Rs,  Sc2  some  distance  from  its  tip ; m-cu  very 
oblique,  at  the  fork  of  M , subequal  to  the  distal  section  of 
Cu x. 


1 Contribution  from  the  Department  of  Entomology,  Massa- 
chusetts Agricultural  College. 


72  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  V 61.  XXV 


Abdomen,  including  the  hypopygium,  ochreous.  Male 
hypopygium  with  the  caudal  margin  of  the  tergite  deeply 
notched,  the  lateral  lobes  conspicuously  setiferous.  Basistyle 
with  the  ventro-mesal  lobe  relatively  small,  placed  near  the 
base  of  the  style.  Dorsal  dististyle  a very  stout,  broad-based 
rod,  pale  at  base,  gradually  narrowed  to  an  acute  blackened 
tip.  Ventral  dististyle  without  a rostral  prolongation,  ap- 
pearing as  a pale,  gently  arcuated  lobe  that  is  a little  longer 
than  the  dorsal  dististyle,  the  surface  with  numerous  scattered 
setae  that  are  longer  and  more  abundant  at  apex  of  style. 

Habitat:  Utah. 

Holotype:  Saltair,  May  21,  1926  (M.  C.  Van  Duzee). 

Paratopotypes,  1 male,  1 sex?,  broken.  Type  returned  to  Mr. 
Van  Duzee. 

I cannot  identify  this  species  with  any  of  those  described  by 
Doane.  The  male  hypopygium  has  the  same  peculiar  structure 
found  in  L.  (D.)  signipennis  (Coq.). 

Tricyphona  simplicistyla  n.  sp. 

Male. — Length  about  14  mm. ; wing  13.5  mm. 

Close  to  T.  constans  (Doane),  differing  especially  in  the 
structure  of  the  male  hypopygium. 

Antennal  scape  dark  brown,  the  flagellum  yellowish  brown. 
Head  pale,  the  vertex  with  a dusky  area  on  either  side  of  the 
median  line.  Praescutum  almost  uniform  ochreous,  the 
scutum  conspicuously  darker;  scutellum  pale;  postnotal 
mediotergite  pale,  margined  laterally  with  brown.  Legs  yel- 
low, only  the  terminal  tarsal  segments  a little  darkened. 
Wings  with  the  pattern  quite  as  in  constans.  Venation:  Rs 
in  alignment  with  R5 ; a supernumerary  crossvein  in  cell  Rz, 
placed  about  its  own  length  before  R2 ; cell  1st  M2  closed. 
Male  hypopygium  with  the  outer  dististyle  broad,  the  apex 
with  abundant  spinous  setae.  Inner  dististyle  a slender  sim- 
ple rod.  Interbasal  processes  appearing  as  elongate,  nearly 
straight  rods,  the  tips  acute,  before  apex  with  a small  lateral 
spine. 

T.  constans  has  the  outer  dististyle  very  narrow  at  apex, 
with  relatively  few  spines.  Inner  dististyle  conspicuously 
bifid,  the  outer  arm  set  with  two  powerful  black  spines. 

It  is  possible  that  the  supernumerary  crossvein  in  cell  R%  is 
not  a constant  character  but  it  is  identical  in  both  wings  of 
the  type. 


April,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  73- 


Habitat:  California.  Holotype:  J1,  Mill  Valley,  Marin  Co. 
March  13,  1926  ( M . C.  Van  Duzee).  Type  in  the  author’s  col- 
lection. 

Rhaphidolabis  (Rhaphidolabis)  vanduzeei  n.  sp. 

General  coloration  gray,  the  praescutum  with  three  dark 
brown  stripes;  antennae  black  throughout;  wings  whitish 
subhyaline,  with  a conspicuous  dark  brown  stigma;  caudal 
margins  of  abdominal  segments  narrowly  pale;  male 
hypopygium  with  the  dorsal  interbase  bifid  at  apex. 

Male. — Length  about  5.5  mm. ; wing  7.2  mm. 

Rostrum  and  palpi  black.  Antennae  black  throughout,  13- 
segmented ; flagellar  segments  short-oval,  gradually  decreas- 
ing in  diameter  outwardly.  Head  gray,  the  center  of  the 
vertex  slightly  infuscated. 

Mesonotum  light  gray,  the  praescutum  with  three  con- 
spicuous dark  brown  stripes ; posterior  sclerites  of  mesonotum 
more  nearly  immaculate.  Pleura  gray,  the  dorso-pleural 
region  more  ochreous.  Halteres  pale,  with  darkened  knobs. 
Legs  with  the  coxae  gray;  trochanters  brown;  remainder  of 
legs  dark  brown,  the  tarsi  passing  into  black.  Wings  whitish 
subhyaline,  the  stigma  conspicuous,  dark  brown;  a weak 
dusky  clouding  along  the  cord;  veins  dark  brown.  Vena- 
tion: Rs  short,  angulated  at  near  midlength;  R4+5  subequal 
to  the  basal  section  of  R5 ; R2  oblique,  joined  to  R1  near  outer 
end ; cell  Mx  present ; m^cu  shortly  beyond  fork  of  M. 

Abdominal  segments  dark  brown,  the  extreme  caudal 
margins  of  the  segments  pale;  hypopygium  dark.  Male 
hypopygium  much  as  in  cayuga;  dististyle  more  slender; 
dorsal  interbase  wider  than  in  cayuga  but  narrower  than  in. 
rubescens. 

Habitat:  California.  Holotype:  Mt.  St.  Helena,  May  12, 

1926  (M.  C.  Van  Duzee).  Type  returned  to  Mr.  Van  Duzee. 

I take  great  pleasure  in  dedicating  this  species  to  Mr.  Millard 
C.  Van  Duzee,  to  whom  I am  indebted  for  many  kindly  favors 
in  the  past.  Rhaphidolabis  vanduzeei  much  resembles  R.  stigma 
Alexander  but  is  really  more  closely  allied  to  R.  cayuga  Alex- 
ander, from  which  it  is  told  most  readily  by  the  conspicuous  dark 
brown  stigmal  spot. 

Eriocera  alberta  n.  sp. 

General  coloration  black,  light  gray  pruinose ; antennae 
(5)  7-segmented,  black;  knobs  of  halteres  white;  wings. 


74  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


white,  with  grayish  brown  seams  to  the  veins ; Rs  angulated 
and  spurred  at  origin;  cell  R3  deep,  parallel-sided  for  more 
than  two-thirds  the  length ; cell  ist  M2  rectangular ; m-cu  at 
or  close  to  the  fork  of  M;  m-cu  shorter  than  the  distal  sec- 
tion of  Cu1 ; ovipositor  with  fleshy  valves. 

Female. — Length  about  7 mm. ; wing  9.2  mm. 

Rostrum  black,  sparsely  pruinose.  Antennae  7-segmented, 
black,  the  scapal  segments  slightly  pruinose ; first  flagellar 
segment  longer  than  the  succeeding  two  taken  together; 
terminal  segment  oval,  about  one-half  the  length  of  the 
penultimate.  Head  broad,  the  vertical  tubercle  low ; front 
and  sides  of  anterior  vertex  light  gray,  the  remainder  of  head 
dark  gray. 

Mesonotal  praescutum  light  gray,  with  four  blackish 
stripes,  the  intermediate  pair  only  narrowly  separated ; 
scutum  gray,  the  centers  of  the  lobes  darkened ; scutellum 
and  postnotum  dark,  gray  pruinose.  Pleura  gray.  Halteres 
dusky,  the  knobs  white.  Legs  with  the  coxae  and  trochanters 
black,  pruinose ; femora  brown,  the  tips  broadly  blackened, 
most  extensively  so  on  the  short  fore  legs ; remainder  of 
legs  black.  Wings  white,  with  a distinct  grayish  brown  pat- 
tern that  appears  as  narrow  seams  along  the  veins,  including 
the  origin  of  Rs,  Sc2,  cord  and  outer  end  of  cell  ist.  M2 ; 
stigma  and  fork  of  i?2+3+4;  small  paler  circular. clouds  at  ends 
of  longitudinal  veins ; a circular  cloud  near  center  of  cell 
2nd  M2 ; basal  longitudinal  veins  with  dark  seams,  most  evi- 
dent on  vein  2nd  A;  veins  brown.  Venation:  Sc1  ending 
shortly  beyond  the  fork  of  Rs,  Sc2  a short  distance  from  its 
tip ; Rs  relatively  short,  angulated  and  spurred  at  origin ; 
Rz+3+4  more  than  one-half  longer  than  i^2+3 ; R1+2  a little  longer 
than  R2+ 3 ; cell  R3  relatively  deep,  the  enclosing  veins  parallel 
for  about  three-fourths  their  length : cell  ist  M2  rectangular ; 
m-cu  at  or  just  before  the  fork  of  M ; m-cu  considerably 
shorter  than  the  distal  section  of  Cux. 

Abdomen  black,  sparsely  pruinose,  the  sternites  more 
heavily  so ; subterminal  tergites  polished  black ; ovipositor 
with  fleshy  valves.  Tergal  plate  pruinose,  with  a V-shaped 
notch ; sternal  valves  sheathing,  dusky  at  base,  the  tips 
broadly  light  yellow. 

Habitat:  Alberta.  Holotype:  5,  Lethbridge,  June  24,  1929  (/. 
H.  Pepper).  Type  in  the  Canadian  National  Collection. 

Eriocera  alberta  is  readily  told  from  E.  longicornis  (Walker), 
the  only  other  described  Nearctic  species  with  the  fleshy  type  of 
ovipositor  above  described,  by  the  number  of  antennal  segments 


April,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  75 


(the  female  of  longicornis  with  n segments),  coloration  of  the 
wings  and  the  venation.  It  seems  highly  probable  that  the  male 
of  the  present  species  will  be  found  to  have  short  antennae. 

Rhabdomastix  (Sacandaga)  leonardi  n.  sp. 

General  coloration  light  yellow,  handsomely  patterned 
with  black,  including  three  conspicuous  stripes  on  the 
praescutum ; vertex  with  a conspicuous  blackened  area. 

Female. — Length  about  7.5  mm. ; wing  6.5  mm. 

Described  from  an  alcoholic  specimen. 

Rostrum  yellow,  slightly  darkened  above ; palpi  very  re- 
duced. Antennae  with  the  basal  segment  light  yellow,  the 
second  and  third  segments  black ; remaining  segments  broken ; 
first  flagellar  segment  smaller  and  scarcely  longer  than  the 
second  scapal.  Head  light  yellow,  the  vertex  with  a broad 
black  mark  extending  to  the  posterior  margin,  bordered  on 
the  posterior  vertex  by  more  reddish. 

Mesonotal  praescutum  light  yellow  with  three  conspicuous 
black  stripes,  the  median  stripe  weakly  bifid  behind  and  end- 
ing far  before  the  suture ; lateral  stripes  crossing  the  suture 
onto  the  scutal  lobes;  pseudosutural  foveae  black;  median 
region  of  scutum  blackened ; scutellum  yellow ; postnotal 
mediotergite  yellow,  weakly  darkened  medially,  the  posterior 
portion  with  two  approximated  black  oval  areas.  Pleura 
yellow,  handsomely  variegated  with  small  dark  marks,  includ- 
ing the  propleura,  anepisternum,  ventral  sternopleurite  and 
meron,  and  ventral  pleurotergite.  Halteres  pale,  the  knobs 
light  yellow.  Legs  with  the  coxae  yellowish  brown ; tro- 
chanters pale ; remainder  of  legs  broken.  Wings  grayish 
subhyaline,  the  stigma  barely  indicated ; veins  black,  the 
prearcular,  costal,  subcostal  and  radial  veins  light  brown. 
Venation:  Sc1  ending  about  opposite  two-thirds  the  length 
of  Rs , Sc2  far  from  its  tip,  Sc1  alone  about  one-third  Rs;  R3 
short  and  nearly  perpendicular;  distance  on  costa  between 
R1+2  and  R3  a little  longer  than  the  latter ; R4  gently  arcuated, 
a little  shorter  than  the  petiole  of  cell  R3. 

Abdomen  light  brown,  the  tergites  vaguely  darkened 
basally,  the  genital  segment  more  darkened  medially. 

Habitat:  Montana.  Holotype : alcoholic  5>  Bozeman,  July  19, 
1929  ( M . D.  Leonard).  Type  in  the  author’s  collection. 

Rhabdomastix  leonardi  is  named  in  honor  of  my  old  friend  and 
co-worker  on  the  Tipulidae,  Dr.  Mortimer  D.  Leonard.  The 
species  is  very  distinct  from  the  other  described  American  species 


76  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


of  the  genus.  The  highly  contrasting  yellow  and  black  pattern  of 
the  head  and  thorax  is  somewhat  suggestive  of  that  found  in 
many  species  of  the  Tipuline  genus  Nephrotoma.  It  is  possible 
that  in  fresh  specimens  the  colors  as  above  described  may  be 
somewhat  dulled  by  a pollinosity  or  pruinosity  not  evident  in  the 
alcoholic  type. 

Erioptera  (Ilisia)  bispinigera  n.  sp. 

General  coloration  obscure  yellow,  the  praescutum  with 
three  nearly  confluent  dark  brown  stripes ; pleura  dark, 
striped  longitudinally  with  pale ; halteres  pale  yellow ; wings 
with  cell  M2  open,  vein  2nd  A short  and  straight;  male 
hypopygium  with  the  inner  dististyle  bidentate  on  lateral 
margin ; gonapophyses  entirely  blackened,  very  unequally 
bifid. 

Male.- — Length  about  4.5  mm. ; wing  about  4.5  mm. 

Described  from  an  alcoholic  specimen. 

Rostrum  and  palpi  brownish  black.  Antennae  with  the 
scapal  segments  dark  brown,  the  flagellum  paler;  flagellar 
segments  oval.  Head  chiefly  dark  brown. 

Mesonotal  praescutum  yellow  with  three  nearly  confluent 
dark  brown  stripes;  pseudosutural  foveae  dark;  scutum  ob- 
cure  yellow,  each  lobe  with  the  center  dark  brown ; scutellum 
obscure  yellow;  postnotal  mediotergite  dark  brown  medially, 
the  lateral  margins  narrowly  pale  yellow.  Pleura  chiefly 
dark  brown,  with  a broad  conspicuous  yellowish  longitudinal 
stripe  extending  from  behind  the  fore  coxae  to  the  base  of 
the  abdomen ; dorso-pleural  region  pale.  Halteres  relatively 
elongate,  pale  yellow  throughout.  Legs  with  the  fore  coxae 
brownish  yellow,  the  other  coxae  pale  yellow;  trochanters 
pale  yellow;  remainder  of  legs  broken.  Wings  grayish  sub- 
hyaline, the  diffuse  stigma  vaguely  darker;  veins  brown. 
Venation:  veins  beyond  the  cord  entirely  as  in  the  subgenus 
Erioptera;  cell  M2  open ; vein  2nd  A short  and  straight,  as  in 
Ilisia. 

Abdomen  dark  brown,  the  pleural  region  pale ; hypopygium 
obscure  brownish  yellow.  Male  hypopygium  with  the  outer 
dististyle  an  expanded  black  structure,  the  dilated  apical 
portion  with  microscopic  denticles.  Inner  dististyle  shorter, 
blackened,  the  outer  or  lateral  margin  with  two  conspicuous 
black  spines,  one  at  near  midlength,  the  second  nearly  apical 
in  position.  Gonapophyses  appearing  as  entirely  blackened 
plates,  the  basal  half  dilated,  very  unequally  bifid,  the  outer 
arm  produced  into  a slender  rod,  the  tip  acute,  with  three  or 


April,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  77 


four  small  appressed  lateral  teeth ; inner  arm  short  and 
stocky,  set  with  conspicuous  teeth. 

Habitat:  Montana.  Holotype:  alcoholic  Bozeman,  July  19, 
1929  ( M . D.  Leonard) . Type  in  the  author’s  collection. 

Erioptera  bispinigera  is  very  doubtfully  a member  of  Ilisia,  in 
which  subgenus  I am  placing  it  merely  on  the  course  of  vein  2nd 
A.  It  may  be  remarked  that  all  of  the  subgenera  of  Erioptera  are 
highly  artificial  and  becoming  more  so  with  the  constant  accession 
of  new  material. 

Erioptera  (Ilisia)  laevis  n.  sp. 

Male. — Length  about  ZI-.2-4.5  mm. ; wing  5-5.5  mm. 

Very  similar  in  the  pattern  of  the  wings  and  legs  to  E. 
armillaris,  differing  especially  in  the  structure  of  the  male 
hypopygium. 

General  coloration  of  body  darker,  especially  the  thoracic 
notum  which  is  dark  grayish  brown  instead  of  yellowish 
brown.  Male  hypopygium  with  the  outer  dististyle  relatively 
small,  the  apex  simply  clavate,  not  emarginate  on  outer 
margin.  Gonapophyses  appearing  as  simple  black  horns 
that  are  slender,  nearly  straight,  the  margins  quite  smooth. 

E.  (I.)  armillaris  Osten  Sacken  has  the  outer  dististyle 
very  large,  the  head  with  the  outer  margin  conspicuously 
emarginate  to  produce  an  obtuse  lateral  point.  Gonapophyses 
stout,  abruptly  narrowed  to  an  acute  point,  the  outer  margin 
before  this  apex  microscopically  spinulose. 

E.  (I.)  indianensis  Alexander  has  the  outer  dististyle  small 
and  slender,  the  apex  only  feebly  dilated,  entire.  Gonapo- 
physes appearing  as  curved  slender  hooks,  the  long  tips 
acute,  the  margins  entirely  smooth. 

Habitat:  Northeastern  North  America.  Holotype:  J',  Chester- 
field Gorge,  Massachusetts,  altitude  850  feet,  August  2,  1928  (C. 
P.  Alexander) . Paratypes , J1,  Amherst,  Massachusetts,  July  18, 
1928  (C.  F.  Clagg)  ; J1,  Hazleton,  Pennsylvania,  June  29-July  18, 
1910  (IV.  G.  Dietz).  Type  in  the  author’s  collection. 

There  can  be  no  doubt  but  that  there  are  three  distinct  species 
confused  under  the  name  of  armillaris.  The  wing-pattern  is  al- 
most identical  in  all  three  but  the  structure  of  the  male  hypopy- 
gium is  very  different  in  the  various  species. 


78  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


OBSERVATIONS  ON  THE  NEST  OF  APHAENO- 
GASTER  FULVA  SUBSP.  AQUIA  BUCK. 

(FORMICIDAE,  HYMENOPTERA.)1 

George  O.  Hendrickson,  Ames,  Iowa. 

While  collecting  insects  along  a roadside  five  miles  south  of 
Cedar  Falls,  Iowa,  July  17,  1926,  the  author  came  across  a nest 
of  the  ant,  Aphaenogaster  fulva  subsp.  aquia  Buck.  Here  a 
strip  of  upland  prairie  vegetation  about  one  rod  wide  and  rela- 
tively undisturbed  was  noticed  at  the  south  side  of  the  road.  The 
narrow  tract  showed  the  typical  aspect  of  a Stipa  spartea-Andro- 
pogon  scoparius  (needle  grass-beard  grass)  association,  and  the 
soil  was  a well-drained,  brown,  sandy  loam  occurring  well  toward 
the  top  of  a low  hill.  Because  such  prairie  is  very  scarce  in 
Iowa  at  this  date  in  her  history  our  party  of  collectors  decided 
to  sweep  this  vegetation  thoroughly  for  typical  insects. 

Soon  after  he  had  begun  to  sweep  the  author’s  attention  was 
drawn  to  a piece  of  rusted  tin  about  ten  inches  wide  and  two  feet 
long  lying  on  the  ground  among  the  grasses  and  about  ten  feet 
from  the  wheel  tracks.  Because  such  an  object  might  harbor  a 
desired  insect  or  two  the  author  felt  prompted  to  turn  the  tin 
over.  Several  large  jawed  ants  met  the  approach  of  the  author’s 
hand  and  their  pinches  were  not  tokens  of  welcome ; but  thereby 
the  observer’s  curiosity  was  incited  further.  Beneath  the  tin  a 
colony  of  ants  had  excavated  several  shallow  rooms  that  were 
connected  by  runways.  Three  or  four  holes  led  from  the  rooms 
of  the  north  end  deeper  into  the  ground.  At  that  end  in  a nursery 
about  six  inches  in  diameter  were  seen  approximately  one  hun- 
dred larger  larvae  and  pupae.  Almost  immediately  the  nurses 
began  to  carry  their  charges  out  of  sight  into  the  holes  which  led 
to  a lower  nursery.  At  the  end  of  thirty  minutes  the  larvae  and 
pupae  were  all  out  of  the  observer’s  reach  and  sheltered  from 
the  hot  rays  of  the  midday  sun. 

Toward  the  south  end  of  the  nest  a granary  four  inches  in 
diameter  contained  a few  seed  coats  and  partially  eaten  achenes 
of  panic  grass  ( Panicum  Scribnerianum  Nash.).  In  a second 
room  of  the  same  size  as  the  granary  occurred  a small  pile  of  the 


1 Contribution  from  department  of  Zoology  and  Entomology, 
Iowa  State  College. 


April,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  79’ 


exoskeletons  and  appendages  of  some  ants.  The  colors  and 
sizes  of  the  remains  suggested  the  species  Formica  fusca  L.  to  the 
author.  This  is  a somewhat  larger  ant  than  A.  fulva  aquia,  the 
living  inhabitants  of  the  nest. 

During  these  observations  an  open  salve  box  containing  a few 
small  dead  insects  was  placed  rather  absentmindedly  near  the  nest 
of  ants.  Later  when  the  box  was  noticed  three  members  of  the 
colony  were  seen  vigorously  tugging  at  the  fortunately  located 
food  supply.  Interference  on  the  part  of  the  author  and  owner 
met  with  an  attack  by  one  of  the  foragers  which  stood  up  and 
fought  for  the  spoils.  A second  foraging  ant  could  not  be 
persuaded  to  loosen  its  hold  upon  a small  leafhopper.  Hence 
it  went  into  a cyanide  bottle  as  a specimen  of  the  colony,  but  kept 
its  hold  on  the  prey  until  death.  After  collecting  several  more 
individuals  the  observer  felt  compelled  to  go  on  about  other  in- 
sect business.  The  tin  roof  was  placed  back  into  its  former 
position  in  order  that  the  ants  might  continue  about  their  business. 

The  author  is  indebted  to  Dr.  M.  R.  Smith  for  the  identification 
of  the  species. 


Erratum. — On  Plate  III,  fig.  3,  the  last  line  of  legend  should 
read  “ swept  away.” — Phil  Rau. 


80  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


A GENERIC  REVISION  OF  THE  EUCHLOINI 
(LEPIDOPTERA,  PIERIDAE). 

By  Alexander  B.  Klots,  Ithaca,  N.  Y. 

Introduction. 

Explanation  of  terms. 

Generic  synonymy  and  characters — Species  lists. 

Phylogeny. 

Bibliography. 

Explanation  of  figures. 

Introduction. 

Ever  since  entomologists  first  began  to  study  the  Euchloini  with 
the  generic  classification  of  the  group  in  mind,  there  has  been 
much  discussion  on  the  subject,  and  there  have  been  nearly  as 
many  different  combinations  of  the  species  into  different  genera 
as  there  have  been  papers  published.  To  one  viewing  all  of  this 
in  retrospect  the  reason  is  evident,  namely  that  most  of  the  work- 
ers have  placed  their  main  reliance  on  the  wing  venation  as  a 
guide  in  determining  the  limits  and  relationships  of  the  genera. 
Other  workers  in  turn  have  realized  that  the  venation  was  so 
variable  that  it  was  not  at  all  suitable  as  a character  for  generic 
work,  and  these  adopted  the  procedure  of  grouping  all  or  nearly 
all  of  the  species  into  one  or  two  large  genera,  discounting  not 
only  the  venation  but  also  almost  all  other  characters. 

The  writer  undertook  the  study  of  the  Euchloini  in  the  hope 
that  a study  of  the  male  genitalia  might  bring  to  light  reliable 
generic  characters.  This  has  proved  to  be  the  case.  These 
structures  show  none  of  the  individual  variation  that  makes  the 
venation  so  untrustworthy.  They  furnish  excellent  grouping 
characters  and  appear,  in  most  cases,  to  show  excellent  though 
never  very  great  specific  characters.  The  writer  feels  that  in 
view  of  this  lack  of  variation  more  confidence  is  to  be  placed  in 
the  structures  of  the  genitalia  than  in  the  extremely  variable  vena- 
tion, and  has  accordingly  placed  his  main  reliance  in  them.  Other 
characters,  however,  have  been  by  no  means  excluded. 

Considerable  use  has  been  made  of  subgenera  in  an  attempt  to 
produce  a system  of  classification  which  will  seem  in  some  degree 
natural,  and  to  do  away  with  that  bane  of  most  taxonomists,  the 
long  list  of  very  small  genera.  Such  use  of  subgenera  can  itself 


April,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  81 


be  carried  too  far,  of  course,  but  when  used  in  moderation  it  ap- 
pears to  offer  undoubted  advantages  which  are  too  obvious  to 
need  discussion. 

Explanation  of  Terms. 

(See  figures.) 

In  the  structure  of  the  male  genitalia  the  Euchloini  differ  from 
most  of  the  other  Pieridae  in  possessing  a flat  curved  clasp er  (cl) 
located  on  the  inner  face  of  the  harpe  (h).  The  harpe  is  com- 
paratively simple,  and  has  a smooth  rounded  termination.  In 
many  of  the  species  its  dorsal  margin  bears,  at  about  the  middle, 
a dorsal  spine  (d.  s.)  which  may  extend  dorsad  or  may  be  curved 
inward  and  down  between  the  harpes.  The  line  of  separation  be- 
tween the  tegumen  (t)  and  the  uncus  (u)  is  quite  distinct.  The 
uncus  is  sometimes  distinctly  swollen  laterally  at  the  base.  The 
tegumen  is  occasionally  swollen  laterally  just  cephalad  of  the  base 
of  the  uncus  (fig.  6).  The  vinculum  (v)  is  dorsally  entire, 
though  considerably  narrowed.  The  saccus  (sac)  is  in  some 
cases  fairly  long  and  slender  (fig.  4),  but  in  others  is  very  short 
and  thick  (figs.  7,  9).  A small  shield-shaped  juxta  (jux)  is  al- 
ways present,  although  in  some  species  very  small.  The  penis 
(p)  is  rather  short  and  is  basally  curved,  sometimes  strongly  so 
(fig.  9).  It  bears  near  the  base  an  area  of  heavier  chitinization, 
and  may  in  addition  have  a small  rounded  basal  prong  (b.  p.  p. — 
figs.  8-9) . 

Generic  Synonymy  and  Characters — Species  Lists. 

In  the  lists  of  species  included  in  the  various  groups  those 
names  preceded  by  a question  mark  are  species  which  the  writer 
has  not  had  the  opportunity  of  examining,  but  which  have  been 
included  on  the  basis  of  similarity  in  color  and  pattern  to  species 
which  he  has  examined.  No  attempt  has  been  made  at  revising 
the  synonymy  of  the  species.  The  synonymy  of  Rober  (1906, 
1910)  has  been  followed  in  this  respect,  even  though  changes  in 
synonymy  have  more  recently  been  advocated,  since  his  is  the 
most  recent  work  treating  of  the  entire  group.  Races  have  been 
included  in  the  list  where  there  seems  to  be  a possibility  of  their 
constituting  distinct  species. 

Bibliographic  references  will  be  found  at  the  end  of  the  article. 
To  avoid  repetition  none  have  been  given  in  full  in  either  the  text 
or  the  lists.  Only  the  most  important  and  complete  revisions 


82  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


have  been  included,  since  most  of  the  local  or  fragmentary  lists 
published  have  no  significance  in  a study  of  the  group  as  a whole. 

Anthocharis  Boisduval  1832,  type  cardamines  L. 

Generic  characters:  Males  with  apex  of  primary  with  an 
orange  patch  (except  lanceolata  Boisd.)  ; R2  arising  from 
cell ; dorsal  margin  of  harpe  evenly  curved,  bearing  no  struc- 
tures ; clasper  simple,  rounded ; uncus  slender,  slightly  if  at 
all  swollen  at  base,  with  no  dorsal  prominences ; saccus  more 
than  twice  as  long  as  thick. 

Subgenus  Anthocharis  Boisd.  1832,  type  cardamines  L. 

< Papilio  Linnaeus  1761 

< Euchloe  Hubner  1816 

< Anthocharis  Boisduval  1832 

< Anthocharis  de  Villiers  & Guenee  1835 

< Anthocharis  Boisduval  1836 

< Anthocharis  sect.  II  Doubleday  1846 

< Euchloe  Butler  1870 
=s  Euchloe  Kirby  1873 
===  Euchloe  Scudder  1875 

< Euchloe  Kirby  1875 

< Anthocharis  Schatz  1892 

< Euchloe  Beutenmuller  1898 
> Euchloe  Grote  1898 

< Euchloe  Butler  1898a 

< Eu chlo]e  Butler  1898b 

< Euchloe  Grote  1900 

< Euchloe  Verity  1905 

< Anthocharis  Rober  1906  & 1910 

Subgeneric  characters : Apex  of  primary  rounded,  never  fal- 
cate. 

Species  included : 
cardamines  L. 

? hambusarum  Oberthiir 
gruneri  Herrich-Schaffer 
damone  Boisduval 
eupheno  L. 

euphenoides  Staudinger 
sara  Boisduval 
cethura  Felder 
pima  Edwards 


April,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  83 


Subgenus  Falcapica,  nomen  nov.,  type  genutia  Fabricius. 

< Papilio  Fabricius  1793 

< Euchloe  Hiibner  1816 

< Anthocharis  Boisduval  1836 

< Anthocharis  sect.  II  Doubleday  1846 

> Midea  Herrich-Schaffer  1867  (nee  Midea  Bruzelius  1854) 

< Euchloe  Butler  1870 
= Euchloe  Scudder  1872 

= Anthocharis  Scudder  1875 

— Midea  Scudder  1875 

> Midea  Kirby  1875 
=3  Midea  Schatz  1892 

< Euchloe  Beutenmiiller  1898 

< Euchloe  Holland  1898 

< Euchloe  Grote  1898 

< Euchloe  Butler  1899  a & b 
= Midea  Grote  1900 

< Euchloe  Staudinger  & Rebel  1901 

< Sync  hide  Dyar  1902 

< Euchloe  Verity  1905 

— Midea  Rober  1906-10 

Subgeneric  characters : Apex  of  primary  falcate,  sometimes 
strongly  so. 

Species  included: 
genutia  Fabricius 
lanceolata  Boisduval 
bieti  Oberthur 
scolymus  Butler 

Anthocharis  Boisduval  was  first  proposed  in  1832  with  car- 
damines  as  the  sole  species  included,  so  that  cardamines  automati- 
cally became  the  genotype.  The  genus  was  first  based  on  larval 
characters,  which  is  possibly  the  reason  for  the  fact  that  it  has 
been  almost  universally  attributed  to  Boisduval  in  the  “Species 
General  ” of  1836.  In  this  latter  work  it  includes  a long  list  of 
species  of  which  genutia  Fabr.  is  one.  From  this  probably  arose 
Scudder’s  belief  that  genutia  was  available  for  the  genotype. 

Midea  Herrich-Schaffer  was  proposed  with  genutia  as  the  sole 
species  included,  so  that  genutia  automatically  became  the  geno- 
type. Midea  Herrich-Schaffer  is,  however,  a homonym  of  Midea 
Bruzelius  1854.  See  also  Midea  Walker  1863. 

The  species  here  included  in  the  genus  Anthocharis  are  all  very 
similar  to  each  other  in  the  structure  of  the  genitalia.  Specific 


84  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


differences  are  present,  but  are  slight.  Previous  authors  who 
have  grouped  these  species  into  two  or  more  genera  or  subgenera 
have  usually  based  their  action  on  the  venation.  As  pointed  out 
by  Butler  (1899b)  and  as  a careful  study  of  an  adequate  series 
of  specimens  will  show,  such  a proceeding  is  extremely  unwise, 
due  to  the  great  amount  of  individual  variation  found  in  the  vena- 
tion of  a number  of  the  species.  The  writer  has  therefore  made 
use  of  the  falcate  apex  of  the  primary  as  being  the  only  major 
character  not  subject  to  variation  and  giving  reasonable  results. 

Of  the  species  here  placed  in  the  subgenus  Ant  hoc  haris,  the 
females  of  cardamines,  gruneri  and  damone  lack  orange  on  the 
apex  of  the  primary  above,  while  the  females  of  the  other  species 
possess  orange  in  this  area.  Obviously  the  use  of  this  character, 
which  would  separate  gruneri  and  damone  from  eupheno  and 
euphenoides , is  not  to  be  considered. 

Nor  can  use  be  made  of  the  number  of  radials  in  the  primary, 
for  in  this  respect  sara  is  quite  variable  (Butler  1899b),  cethura 
and  pima  constantly  possess  four,  and  the  other  species  five.  Of 
the  species  here  placed  in  Falcapica , lanceolata  varies  considerably 
in  the  number  of  the  radials.  About  half  of  the  specimens  of  this 
species  which  the  writer  has  examined  possess  five  radials  on 
either  one  or  both  wings,  although  R5  is  always  very  short.  This 
variation  in  lanceolata  was  also  noticed  and  commented  upon  by 
Butler  (1899b). 

Zegris  Rambur  1836,  type  eupheme  Esper. 

Generic  characters:  Apex  of  primary  of  male  with  an 
orange  patch,  usually  very  narrow;  apical  markings  of  pri- 
mary extending  never  more  than  slightly  over  halfway  from 
apex  to  end  of  cell ; dorsal  margin  of  harpe  at  about  middle 
produced  dorsad  in  the  form  of  a triangular  flap  or  tooth ; 
saccus  never  twice  as  long  as  thick,  sometimes  as  thick  as 
long ; penis  lightly  bent  near  base,  with  a basal  heavier  chiti- 
nization  but  no  basal  prong. 

Subgenus  Zegris  Rambur  1836,  type  eupheme  Esp. 

< Papilio  Esper  1805 

< Anthoc haris  de  Villiers  & Guenee  1835 

> Zegris  Rambur  1836 

> Zegris  Boisduval  1836 

> Zegris  Doubleday  1846 

> Zegris  Butler  1870 
= Zegris  Scudder  1875 


April,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  85 


> Zegris  Kirby  1875 
#3  Zegris  Schatz  1892 

< Zegris  Butler  1899a 

< Zegris  Butler  1899b 
===  Zegris  Grote  1900 

— Zegris  Staudinger  & Rebel  1901 
=3  Zegris  Verity  1905 

< Zegris  Rober  1906 

Subgeneric  characters : Primary  with  5 radials,  stalked 
on  Rs  usually  more  than  halfway  from  cell  to  base  of  R3 ; R2 
usually  stalked  on  Rs,  very  seldom  arising  from  end  of  cell; 
dorsal  margin  of  harpe  at  middle  produced  to  form  a larger 
flap  than  in  subgenus  Microzegris ; clasper  somewhat  nar- 
rowed at  middle ; saccus  very  short,  little  if  any  longer  than 
thick. 

Species  included : 
eupheme  Esper 
fausti  Christoph 

Subgenus  Microzegris  Alpheraky  1913,  type  pyrothoe  Evers- 
mann. 

< Pontia  Eversmann  1832 

< Anthocharis  De  Villiers  & Guenee  1835 

< Zegris  Boisduval  1836 

< Zegris  Doubleday  1846 

< Euchloe  Butler  1870 

< Euchloe  Kirby  1875 

< Anthocharis  Schatz  1892 

< Euchloe  Staudinger  & Rebel  1901 

< Euchloe  Verity  1905 

< Euchloe  Rober  1906  & 1910 
= Microzegris  Alpheraky  1913 

— Pyrothoia  Verity  1929 

Subgeneric  characters : Primary  with  4 radials,  R5  miss- 
ing; M1  stalked  on  Rs  usually  less  than  halfway  from  cell  to 
base  of  R3 ; R2  usually  arising  from  end  of  cell ; dorsal  mar- 
gin of  harpe  at  middle  bearing  a very  small  tooth ; clasper 
very  slightly  narrowed  at  middle ; saccus  considerably  longer 
than  thick. 

Species  included : 

pyrothoe  Eversmann 

Zegris  has  been  almost  constantly  held  as  a distinct  genus,  per- 
haps more  because  of  the  peculiar  structure  of  the  pupa  and  ex- 
traordinary method  of  pupation  as  described  by  Rambur  (1836) 


86  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


than  because  of  any  other  characters.  Recently  some  doubt  has 
arisen  as  to  the  accuracy  of  Rambur’s  statements  (Riley  1926), 
although  the  writer  is  not  aware  of  any  definite  proof  one  way  or 
the  other.  For  this  reason  the  pupal  characters  have  been  omitted 
from  the  above  list  of  subgeneric  characters.  The  writer  con- 
siders that  even  should  the  pupation  of  Zegris  be  proven  to  be 
normal  the  species  would  still  be  worthy  of  generic  separation  on 
other  grounds. 

The  shorter,  more  abruptly  clubbed  antennae,  bushier  palpi  and 
heavier  vestiture  have  been  also  frequently  cited  as  generic  char- 
acters for  Zegris.  These  characters  do  not  appear  very  distinct, 
although  worth  passing  mention.  Butler  (1899a)  placed  cethura 
and  pima  in  Zegris  on  the  antennal  character  and  (1899b)  placed 
olympia  in  Zegris  for  the  same  reason  in  addition  to  pattern  simi- 
larities. In  his  placing  of  olympia  he  has  been  followed  by  subse- 
quent authors.  Except  in  the  matter  of  the  antennae  cethura  and 
pima  are  evidently  closely  related  to  the  species  of  Anthocharis , 
where  the  present  author  has  placed  them.  Olympia  shows  close 
relationship  to  the  species  of  Euchloe  and  accordingly  has  been 
placed  there  for  the  present.  It  does,  however,  seem  to  be  more 
closely  related  to  Zegris  than  are  the  other  species  of  Euchloe , 
and  probably  represents  somewhat  of  a transitional  form.  The 
life  history  of  olympia  is  perfectly  normal,  showing  none  of  the 
peculiarities  described  by  Rambur  for  Zegris  (Shull  1907). 

Pyrothoe  shows  distinct  differences  from  eupheme  and  fausti 
as  cited  in  the  subgeneric  characters.  The  writer  accordingly 
feels  that  Microzegris  is  worth  retaining  as  a subgenus,  although 
it  is  certainly  not  to  be  regarded  as  a distinct  genus.  The  original 
proposal  of  Microzegris  is,  incidentally,  very  obscure,  and  ap- 
pears to  have  been  missed  by  all  reviewers.  It  constitutes  a beau- 
tiful example  of  the  fact  that  when  new  names  are  proposed  the 
author  should  emphasize  the  fact  in  every  way  possible. 

Euchloe  Hiibner  1816,  type  helia  Cramer. 

Generic  characters : Apex  of  primaries  never  with  orange 
patch ; primary  normally  with  five  radials ; M1  normally  aris- 
ing halfway  from  cell  to  base  of  R3 ; middle  discocellular  of 
primary  normally  short;  dorsal  margin  of  harpe  at  about 
middle  produced  to  form  a strong  pointed  flap  or  tooth ; penis 
strongly  curved  near  base ; saccus  always  longer  than  thick. 
Subgenus  Euchloe  Hiibner  1816,  type  helia  Cramer. 

< Papilio  Cramer  1782 

< Euchloe  Hiibner  1816 


April,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  87 


< Anthocharis  de  Villiers  & Guenee  1835 

< Anthocharis  Boisduval  1836 

< Anthocharis  sect.  II  Doubleday  1846 

< Euchloe  Butler  1870 

< Euchloe  Kirby  1875 

< Phyllo charts  Schatz  1892 

< Euchloe  Beutenmiiller  1898 

< Euchloe  Holland  1898 

< Anthocharis  Grote  1898 

< Euchloe  Butler  1899a 

< Euchloe  Butler  1899b 

< Anthocharis  Grote  1900 

< Euchloe  Staudinger  & Rebel  1901 

< Synchloe  Dyar  1902 

< Euchloe  Verity  1905 

< Euchloe  Rober  1906-10 

Subgeneric  characters : Ground  color  of  wings  always 
white  (creamy  white  in  some  female  forms)  ; dark  markings 
of  secondaries  beneath  not  normally  so  heavy  as  to  cover 
practically  all  of  wing;  pointed  flap  of  dorsal  margin  of 
harpe  long,  heavily  chitinized,  projecting  dorsad,  then  bent 
mesad  and  ventrad  with  termination  between  harpes;  penis 
not  so  strongly  bent  basally  as  in  subgenus  Elphinstonia , with 
no  basal  prong;  larva  apparently  not  so  strongly  tuberculate 
as  larva  of  Elphinstonia. 

Species  included: 
belia  Cramer 
orientalis  Bremer 
daphalis  Moore 
? venosa  Boisduval 
ausonides  Boisduval 
creusa  Doubleday  & Hewitson 
olympia  Edwards 
belemia  Esper 
? seitzi  Rober 
falloui  Allard 

Subgenus  nov.  Elphinstonia,  type  charlonia  Donzel. 

= Anthocharis  Donzel  1842 

< Anthocharis  sect.  II  Doubleday  1846 

< Euchloe  Kirby  1875 

< Phyllo charts  Schatz  1892 

< Euchloe  Staudinger  & Rebel  1901 


88  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


< Euchloe  Verity  1905 

< Anthocharis  Rober  1906-10 

Subgeneric  characters : Ground  color  of  wings  white  or 
yellow;  dark  markings  of  secondaries  beneath  heavy,  often 
covering  practically  all  of  wing;  pointed  flap  of  dorsal  mar 
gin  of  harpe  shorter  and  less  heavily  chitinized  than  in  sub< 
genus  Euchloe , extending  above  dorsal  margin  of  harpe,  not 
bent  mesad  and  ventrad ; penis  very  strongly  bent  basally, 
with  a short  blunt  basal  prong;  larva  apparently  somewhat 
more  heavily  tuberculate  than  larva  of  Euchloe. 

Species  included : 
charlonia  Donzel 
? c.  tomyris  Christoph 
? c.  pechi  Staudinger 
tagis  Hiibner 
? lucilla  Butler 

The  first  type  specification  for  Euchloe  which  the  writer  has 
been  able  to  find  is  of  belia  Cramer  by  Butler  (1870).  Accord- 
ingly belia  is  here  placed  as  the  genotype.  The  fact  that  previous 
to  this  date  various  authors  had  used  Euchloe  to  include  carda- 
mines  alone  in  local  lists  does  not  fix  cardamines  as  the  genotype, 
as  was  claimed  by  Kirby  (1872)  and  Scudder  (1875). 

Schatz  (1892)  erected  Phyllocharis  with  tagis  as  the  genotype 
to  contain  all  of  the  species  here  placed  in  the  genus  Euchloe. 
This  genus  is  a homonym  of  Phyllocharis  Dalman  (1824).  The 
species  here  included  in  Elphinstonia  appear  to  the  writer  well 
worthy  of  subgeneric  distinction  from  the  other  members  of 
Euchloe,  because  of  the  characters  cited  in  the  subgeneric  de- 
scription. 

The  male  genitalia  show  very  distinct  specific  differences  be- 
tween tagis  and  charlonia.  Between  the  species  of  the  subgenus 
Euchloe  these  structures  show  less  marked  specific  differences, 
with  the  exception  of  belemia  (figs.  10-12).  The  venation  is 
often  exceedingly  variable,  and  studied  by  itself  would  mean 
little.  As  an  example  of  this  fact  the  writer  has  a very  large 
series  of  E.  ausonides  coloradensis,  all  of  which  were  taken  in  one 
field  within  a period  of  four  days.  From  this  series  he  can  pick 
out  specimens  which,  under  previous  systems  of  classifying  the 
Euchloine  genera  by  venation  alone,  would  belong  in  at  least  three 
genera.  Several  of  these  specimens  have  only  four  radials,  and 
one  has  five  on  one  side  and  four  on  the  other,  with  no  other  evi- 
dence of  distortion.  Surely  so  variable  a character  is  not  worthy 


April,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  89 


of  use  for  generic  classification,  especially  when  contrasted  with 
characters  as  constant  as  those  shown  by  the  genitalia. 

Phylogeny  of  Genera. 

It  is  evident  that  phylogenetic  work  based  on  the  venation  of 
the  Euchloini  is  not  to  be  taken  very  seriously.  Attempts  at  such 
work  have  indeed  produced  strange  results,  as  for  example  when 
Tutt  (1894b)  postulated  a rather  close  relationship  between  the 
Euchloini  and  Leucophasia,  a genus  which  undoubtedly  belongs 
in  the  Dismorphiinae.  In  this  respect  the  work  of  Cockerell 
(1889),  Dyar  (1894)  and  Tutt  (1894a)  is  also  to  be  noted. 

The  great  amount  of  variation  found  in  the  venation  does,  how- 
ever, point  to  the  fact  that  the  Euchloini  must  occupy  more  or 
less  of  an  intermediate  position  between  groups  which  have  a rela- 
tively stable  primitive  venation  and  other  groups  which  possess  a 
stable  specialized  venation. 

The  possession  of  a clasper  in  the  male  genitalia  may  be  safely 
regarded  as  primitive.  In  this  respect  the  Euchloini,  together 
with  the  genera  Cathaemia,  Mylothris,  Hehomoia,  Hesperocharis 
and  Eroessa,  differ  from  the  rest  of  the  Pieridae.  Of  these  five 
genera,  Cathaemia,  Hehomoia  and  Hesperocharis  possess  a 
scaphium,  or  scaphium-like  structure,  which  is  very  much  like  a 
structure  found  in  many  Papilionidae  and  Nymphalidae.  Eroessa 
shows  the  closest  relationship  to  the  Euchloini  in  every  respect. 
The  pupa  of  Hehomoia  appears  to  be  very  similar  to  the  Euchloine 
pupa.  That  of  Mylothris  is  entirely  different,  and  shows  a rela- 
tionship to  Pieris.  The  writer  considers  that  Eroessa,  Hespero- 
charis and  Hehomoia  are  closely  related  to  the  Euchloini,  but  that 
the  similarity  of  Mylothris  and  Cathaemia  in  possessing  a clasper 
is  not  to  be  regarded  as  evidence  of  any  close  relationship. 

The  pupa  of  the  Euchloini,  as  pointed  out  by  Tutt  (1894),  must 
be  considered  as  highly  specialized  because  of  its  extreme  rigidity. 

Within  the  Euchloini  a fairly  close  correlation  is  evident  be- 
tween reduction  in  venation  and  reduction  in  genitalia.  The  spe- 
cies of  Euchloe  which  have  the  most  complicated  genitalia  all 
possess  five  radials  except  in  abnormal  cases.  The  species  of 
Elphinstonia  likewise  possess  five  radials,  but  the  genitalia  show  a 
certain  amount  of  reduction  in  the  dorsal  spine  of  the  harpe.  The 
species  of  Zegris  possess  five  radials,  but  the  dorsal  spine  is  still 
further  reduced.  In  Microzegris  pyrothoe  only  four  radials  oc- 
cur, and  the  dorsal  spine  is  greatly  reduced  so  that  the  genitalia  ap- 


90  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


proximate  those  of  Falcapica  and  Antho charts.  In  these  two  latter 
genera  the  genitalia  are  very  simple,  a simplicity  often  correlated 
with  the  loss  of  R5.  The  writer  therefore  believes  that  the  trend 
of  development  in  the  Euchloini  has  been  from  a more  compli- 
cated genitalic  structure  to  a simpler  one,  and  from  the  posses- 
sion of  five  radials  to  the  possession  of  only  four.  One  would,  of 
course,  expect  the  groups  to  show  evidence  of  sidewise  develop- 
ment from  the  main  line  of  the  development  of  the  group,  and  as 
such  may  be  regarded  the  basal  prong  of  the  penis  of  Elphin- 
stonia,  the  extremely  short  saccus  of  Zegris,  the  falcate  apex  of 
the  primary  of  Falcapica,  and  many  minor  structures.  If  Hebo- 
moia  and  Eroessa  are  postulated  as  ancestral  forms  then  the  loss 
of  the  orange  patch  on  the  primary  in  Euchloe  and  Elphinstonia 
must  represent  a “ sidewise  specialization  ” in  those  groups,  as 
must  the  development  of  the  yellow  ground  color  in  charlonia  and 
its  allies.  It  is  all  pure  speculation,  in  which  one  author’s  guess  is 
quite  as  good  as  another’s. 

Bibliography. 

Alpheraky,  S.  1913.  Ouelques  donnees  sur  les  races  de  la 
Zegris  eupheme  Esper.  Etudes  Lep.  Comp.  . . . 1913. 
7:221-234.  pi.  cxciv. 

Beutenmiiller,  William.  1898.  Revision  of  the  species  of 
Euchloe  inhabiting  America  north  of  Mexico.  Bull.  Amer. 
Mus.  Nat.  Hist.  New  York,  June  24,  1898.  10:  235-248.  pi. 
. I3“I4- 

Boisduval,  J.  A.  1832.  Collection  iconographique  et  histor- 
ique  des  chenilles  d’Europe  . . . [with  Rambur  & Graslin]. 
Paris,  Roret,  1832-1843.  2e  livraison,  pi.  5,  fig.  6 & 7. 

1836*  Histoire  naturelle  des  insectes — species 

general  des  Lepidopteres.  Paris,  Roret,  1836.  1 : 552-584. 

Bruzelius,  R.  M.  1854.  Beskrifnung  ofver  Hydrachniden,  som 
forekomma  inom  Skane.  Akad.  Abhandl.  Lund.  p.  35. 
Butler,  A.  G.  1870.  A revision  of  the  genera  of  the  subfamily 
Pierinae.  Cist.  Ent.  Sept.  12,  1870.  1 : 33-58.  4 pi. 

. 1899a.  Notes  on  the  genus  Euchloe,  Hubner  a 

genus  of  the  Pierinae.  Entomologist.  Jan.  1899.  32:1-3. 

. 1899b.  Notes  on  the  American  forms  of  Euchloe, 

Hiibn.  Can.  Ent.  Jan.  1899.  31 : J9- 
Chretien,  P.  1902.  Note  sur  les  premiers  etats  de  trois 
Euchloe  ( Anthocharis ) [Lep.  Pieridae]  de  Mauretanie. 
Bull.  Soc.  ent.  France.  July,  1912.  302-304. 

Cockerell,  T.  D.  A.  1889.  On  the  origin  of  the  genus  An- 
thocharis Bdv.  (=  Euchloe,  Hb.).  Entomol.  Amer.  Feb. 

1889-  5:33-35- 


April,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  91 


Cramer,  P.  1782.  Pap.  Exot.  IV.  t.  39 7,  A,  B. 

Donzel,  H.  F.  1842.  Description  de  deux  Lepidopteres  nou- 
veaux  recuellis  en  Barbarie  par  le  Capt.  Charlon.  Ann.  Soc. 
ent.  France.  1842.  11:197-199.  icol.pl. 

Doubleday,  E.  1846.  The  genera  of  Diurnal  Lepidoptera. 
[with  O.  Westwood.]  1846-50  London,  Longman.  Vol.  1. 
Zegris  p.  52-53,  March,  1847.  Anthocharis  p.  55-58,  April, 
i847- 

Dyar,  H.  G.  1894.  Notes  on  Pieris  and  Anthocharis.  Can. 
Ent.  April,  1894.  26:  100.  fig’s. 

. 1902.  A list  of  North  American  Lepidoptera.  . . . 

Bull.  U.  S.  Nat.  Mus.  no.  52.  1902.  p.  7. 

Esper,  E.  J.  C.  1805.  Die  Schmetterlinge  in  Abbildungen 
nach  der  Natur  mit  Beschriebungen.  Erlangen,  Walther, 
Teil  I.  Tagvogel.  Bd.  2.  taf.  113,  fig.  2,  3.  (1805.) 
Eversmann,  E.  von.  1832.  Lepidoptorum  species  nonnullae 
novae  Gubernium  Orenburgense  incolentes.  Nouv.  Mem. 
Soc.  Nat.  Moscou.  1832.  .2:  347-354.  col.  pi. 

Fabricius,  T.  C.  1793.  Entomologia  Systematica.  ...  V.  3, 
Pt.  1,  1793.  p.  193,  no.  601. 

Grote,  A.  R.  1898.  Specialization  of  the  Lepidopterous  wing, 
the  Pieri-Nymphalidae.  Proc.  Amer.  Philos.  Soc.  1898. 
37: 17-44.  3 pi. 

. 1900.  The  descent  of  the  Pieridae.  Proc.  Amer. 

Philos.  Soc.  Jan.  1900.  39:  4-67. 

Herrich-Schaffer,  G.  A.  W.  1867.  Prodr.  Syst.  Lep.  1867. 
2 : 6. 

Holland,  W.  L.  1898.  The  Butterfly  Book.  . . . Garden  City, 
Doubleday  Page,  1898.  Euchloe.  p.  282-285.  col.  pi. 
Hiibner,  J.  1816.  Verzeich.  bek.  Schmett.  1816-  . p.  94. 

Kirby,  W.  F.  1871.  A synonomic  catalogue  of  Diurnal  Lepi- 
doptera. . . . London,  1871.  Zegris,  p.  505;  Euchloe,  p. 
505-508;  Midea,  p.  508-509. 

. 1873.  Zool.  Record  1872  : 339. 

Linnaeus,  C.  1761.  Faun.  Suec.  p.  271,  no.  1039. 

Rambur,  J.  1836.  Notice  sur  plusieurs  Lepidopteres  du  midi 
de  l’Espagne,  parmi  lesquels  se  trouve  le  Papillon  eupheme 
d’Esper.  Ann.  Soc.  ent.  France.  1836.  5 : 573. 

Riley,  N.  D.  1926.  Pupation  of  Zegris  eupheme.  Proc.  Ent. 
Soc.  Lond.  1926.  1 : 26. 

Rober,  J.  1906.  [in]  Seitz,  Adalbert.  The  Macrolepidoptera 
of  the  World.  Sect.  1,  Vol.  1.  Euchloe  p.  51-53,  Antho- 
charis  p.  53-55,  Midea  p.  55,  Zegris  p.  55. 

1 — . 1910.  [in]  Seitz,  Adalbert.  The  Macrolepidoptera 

of  the  World.  Sect.  2,  Vol.  5.  Euchloe  p.  95,  Anthocharis 
p.  95-96,  Midea  p.  96,  Zegris  p.  96. 


92  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


Rothschild,  W.  1914.  A preliminary  account  of  the  Lepi- 
dopterous  fauna  of  Guelt-es-stel,  Central  Algeria.  Nov. 
Zool.  1914.  21 : 301-305. 

Schatz,  E.  1892.  Die  familien  und  gattungen  der  tagfalter. 

. . . Exotische  Schmetterlinge.'  2 Theil.  Furth,  1892.  An- 
thocharis p.  70,  Midea  p.  70,  Phyllo charts  p.  71,  Zegris  p.  71. 
plates. 

Scudder,  S.  H.  1872.  Systematic  revision  of  North  American 
Butterflies.  Rep’t.  Peabody  Acad.  Science.  1872. 

. 1875.  Historical  Sketch  of  the  generic  names  pro- 
posed for  butterflies.  Proc.  Amer.,  Acad.  Arts  & Sciences. 
Boston,  1875.  10:  91-293.  Anthocharis  p.  113,  Euchloe  p. 

169,  Midea  p.  218,  Zegris  p.  290. 

Shull,  C.  A.  1907.  Life  history  and  habits  of  Anthocharis 
(Synchloe)  olympia  Edw.  Ent.  News.  March,  1907.  18: 

73- 

Staudinger,  O.,  & Rebel,  H.  1901.  Catalog  der  Lepidopteren 
der  Palearctischen  faunengebietes.  Berlin,  May  1901.  3d 
ed.  Euchloe  p.  12-14,  Zegris  p.  14. 

Tutt,  J.  W.  1894a.  The  genera  Pieris  Schrk.,  and  Euchloe, 
Hb.  Can.  Ent.  Feb.  1894.  26:  47. 

. 1894b.  Notes  on  the  neuration  and  relationships 

of  Pieridi  and  Anthocharidi.  Can.  Ent.  June  1894.  26: 

166-169.  fig’s. 

Verity,  Roger.  1905.  Rhopalocera  Palearctica.  Papilionidae 
& Pieridae.  Florence,  Verity,  1905-11.  Zegris  p.  168-70, 
Euchloe  p.  170-195. 

* — . 1929.  Essai  sur  les  origens  des  Rhopaloceres 

Europeens  et  Mediterraneens  et  particulierement  des  Antho- 
charidi et  des  Lycaenidi  du  groupe  d’Agestis  Schiff.  Ann. 
Soc.  Ent.  France.  98 : 348. 

Villiers,  F.  de,  & Guenee,  A.  1835.  Tableaux  Synoptiques 
des  Lepidopteres  d’Europe.  Paris,  1835.  p.  8-14  & 128- 
130. 

Walker,  F.  1863.  List  of  the  specimens  of  Lepidopterous  in- 
sects in  the  collections  of  the  British  Museum.  Part  27. 
Crambites  and  Tortrices.  London,  1863.  p.  21. 

Plate  VI. 

Explanation  of  Figures. 

Fig.  1.  Lateral  aspect,  male  genitalia,  Anthocharis  ( Antho- 
charis) cardamines  L.  with  left  harpe  removed,  lateral  aspect 
of  penis  below,  caudal  aspect  of  juxta  at  left. 

Fig.  2.  Lateral  aspect  of  male  genitalia  of  Anthocharis  ( An- 
thocharis) eupheno  L.  with  left  harpe  removed,  lateral  aspect 
of  penis  below,  caudal  aspect  of  juxta  at  left. 


April,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  93 


Fig.  3.  Lateral  aspect  of  male  genitalia  of  Anthocharis  (An- 
thocharis)  cethura  Felder  with  left  harpe  removed,  lateral 
aspect  of  penis  below. 

Fig.  4.  Lateral  aspect  of  male  genitalia  of  Anthocharis  ( Falca - 
pica ) genutia  Fabr.  with  left  harpe  removed,  lateral  aspect  of 
penis  below,  caudal  aspect  of  juxta  at  left. 

Fig.  5.  Lateral  aspect  of  male  genitalia  of  Anthocharis  ( Falca - 
pica)  scolymus  Butler  with  left  harpe  removed,  Lateral  aspect 
of  penis  below,  caudal  aspect  of  juxta  at  left. 

Fig.  6.  Lateral  aspect  of  male  genitalia  of  Zegris  ( Microzegris ) 
pyrothoe  Eversm.  with  left  harpe  removed,  lateral  aspect  of 
penis  below,  lateral  aspect,  enlarged,  of  dorsal  spine  (above) 
and  caudal  aspect  of  juxta  (below)  at  left. 

Fig.  7.  Lateral  aspect  of  male  genitalia  of  Zegris  ( Zegris ) 
eupheme  Esper  with  left  harpe  removed,  lateral  aspect  of 
penis  below,  lateral  aspect,  enlarged,  of  dorsal  spine  (above) 
and  caudal  aspect  of  juxta  (below)  at  left. 

Fig.  8.  Lateral  aspect  of  male  genitalia  of  Euchloe  ( Elphin - 
stonia)  tagis  belle  zina  Boisd.  with  left  harpe  removed,  lateral 
aspect  of  penis  below. 

Fig.  9.  Lateral  aspect  of(  male  genitalia  of  Euchloe  ( Elphin - 
stonia)  charlonia  Donzel  with  left  harpe  removed,  lateral 
aspect  of  penis  below,  lateral  aspect,  enlarged,  of  dorsal  spine 
(above)  and  caudal  aspect  of  juxta  (below)  at  left. 

Fig.  10.  Lateral  aspect  of  male  genitalia  of  Euchloe  ( Euchloe ) 
belemia  Esper  with  left  harpe  removed,  lateral  aspect  of 
penis  below,  lateral  aspect,  enlarged,  of  dorsal  spine  straight- 
ened dorsad  (above)  and  caudal  aspect  of  juxta  (below)  at 
left. 

Fig.  11.  Lateral  aspect  of  male  genitalia  of  Euchloe  ( Euchloe ) 
belia  Cramer  with  left  harpe  removed,  lateral  aspect  of  penis 
below,  caudal  aspect  of  juxta  at  left. 

Fig.  1 2.  Lateral  aspect  of  male  genitalia  of  Euchloe  ( Euchloe ) 
olympia  Edwards  with  left  harpe  removed,  lateral  aspect  of 
penis  below. 

Explanation  of  Abbreviations. 

b.p.p.  s=  basal  prong  of  penis 
cl.  — clasper 

d.s.  s=  dorsal  spine  of  harpe 

h.  = harpe 

jux.  t=  juxta 

p.  t=  penis 

sac.  ==  saccus 

1. 1=  tegumen 


BULL.  B.  E.  S.,  Yol.  XXV,  No.  2 


Plate  YI 


April,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  95 


u.  — uncus 

v.  — vinculum 

In  preparing  genitalia  and  drawing  them  with  a projection  ap- 
paratus a certain  amount  of  distortion  cannot  be  avoided.  The 
efforts  of  the  author  have  been  firstly  to  have  as  little  distortion 
as  possible,  and  secondly  to  have  what  distortion  is  present  affect 
the  specimens  in  the  same  manner.  For  the  sake  of  simplicity  the 
setae,  hairs  and  scales  on  the  harpes  have  been  omitted.  In  some 
cases  these  appear  to  offer  specific  characters. 


THE  JAPANESE  BEETLE  ON  STATEN  ISLAND. 

By  Wm.  T.  Davis,  Staten  Island,  N.  Y. 

On  the  31st  of  August,  1928,  Mr.  Charles  W.  Leng  found  a 
Japanese  beetle  ( Popillia  japonica  Newman)  in  the  Museum  of 
the  Staten  Island  Institute  of  Arts  and  Sciences,  that  had  some 
time  previously  flown  to  one  of  the  windows  and  died  on  the  ledge 
where  the  upper  and  lower  sashes  come  together.  This  specimen 
is  recorded  in  the  Proceedings  of  the  Staten  Island  Nature  Club 
for  September  22,  1928. 

In  1929  Carol  Baumann,  378  St.  Mark’s  Place,  brought  two  of 
the  beetles  to  the  Museum;  one  collected  July  30  and  the  other 
on  September  5. 

On  August  26,  1929,  K.  Kessig  brought  another  specimen  to 
the  Museum,  collected  this  time  at  406  St.  Mark’s  Place.  As  three 
living  individuals  came  from  that  general  locality  in  Tompkins- 
ville,  it  would  appear  that  the  beetle  was  not  uncommon  some- 
where in  the  vicinity. 

A fifth  specimen  which  may,  however,  have  been  imported  in 
fruit  or  vegetables,  was  found  in  a grocery  store  in  Tompkins- 
ville  on  August  29,  1929. 


96  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


POSITION  OF  STREPSIPTERA  ON  HOSTS. 

By  Charles  Robertson,  Carlinville,  Illinois. 

In  3 it  is  stated  that  in  Odynerus  usually  one  set  of  parasites 
falls  under  the  3rd  segment  and  the  other  under  the  4th ; in 
Polistes  usually  the  males  are  under  3 and  4,  the  females  under  5 ; 
in  Chloralistus  and  Andrena  the  normal  position  is  under  4.  Sim- 
ilar statements  about  Odynerus  and  Polistes  are  repeated  in  4, 
275  and  credited  to  Salt  (3). 

These  observations  are  not  new.  In  2, which  relates  exclusively 
to  this  subject,  I tabulated  100  parasites  occurring  on  18  species 
of  bees  and  38  occurring  on  17  species  of  wasps.  In  30  cases 
parasites  of  Odynerus  fell  into  two  sets,  14  under  3,  and  10  under 
4.  Of  36  parasites  of  Chloralictus,  34  were  under  4.  Of  55  of 
Andrenidae,  all  fell  under  4.  Of  8 of  Panurgidae,  7 were  under 
4.  My  tables  show  that  special  mention  of  Chloralictus  and  An- 
drenidae is  irrelevant,  for  96  out  of  100  parasites  of  the  short- 
tongued  bees  in  general  fell  under  4. 

I also  tabulated  467  cases  of  parasites  of  Polistes,  given  by 
Pierce.  Of  306  males,  146  were  under  3,  and  101  under  4.  Of 
161  females,  115  were  under  5. 

In  4 all  account  of  2 is  avoided  and  it  is  excluded  from  the 
“ References,”  but  mention  is  made  of  “ Odynerus  ziziae  mss.” 
This  is  the  same  insect  as  Leionotus  pedistris  listed  in  1. 

To  the  dates  of  hosts  mentioned  in  1,  add  after  Ptilandrena 
erigeniae  May  9;  after  Sphex  vulgaris,  add  Inverness,  Florida, 
Nov.  18;  after  Odynerus  erinnys,  add  Nov.  11,  13,  21. 

Specimens  of  Proterospliex  ichneumoneus,  Leionotus  forami- 
natus , fundatus  and  Odynerus  erinnys  from  me  were  not  deter- 
mined by  Salt  and  Bequaert,  as  said  in  3.  These  statements 
cover  up  the  fact  that  these  cases  were  determined  and  recorded 
by  me  in  1 and  2.  Mr.  Salt  was  instructed  to  turn  over  the  speci- 
mens loaned  by  me  to  the  Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology.  The 
specimens  still  show  these  determinations  in  my  handwriting,  ex- 
cept L.  foraminatus,  the  label  of  which  was  removed  by  Salt. 

Papers  Cited. 

1.  Robertson,  C.  1910(10)  . Hosts  of  Strepsiptera.  Can.  Ent. 

42:  323"3°- 

2.  . 1918(10).  Bees  and  Strepsiptera.  Bull.  Brook. 

E.  S.  13:83-5. 


April,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  97 


3.  Salt,  G.  1927(10).  Strepsiptera  & hymenopterous  hosts. 

Psyche  34 : 182-92. 

4.  Salt  & Bequaert.  .1929.  Stylopized  Vespidae.  Psyche  36: 

249-282. 

ORCHESTES  TESTACEUS  MUL. 

By  C.  A.  Frost,  Framingham,  Mass. 

Four  specimens  of  this  beautiful  little  weevil  have  turned  up 
in  recent  years;  one  at  South  Paris,  Maine,  on  June  11,  1925,  one 
at  Westchester  Lake,  N.  S.  (near  the  old  Londonderry  Mines)  on 
July  29,  1927,  and  two  at  Portaupique,  N.  S.,  on  July  22,  1929; 
I once  had  a specimen  from  Ontario  but  this  has  been  sacrificed 
on  the  altar  of  science.  I have  not  been  able  to  compare  my  speci- 
mens with  European  examples  of  the  species  and  have  accepted 
the  determination  of  a correspondent. 

These  specimens  have  the  size  and  shape  of  pallicornis  Say  and 
are  of  a brick-red  color  all  over  excepting  the  metasternum  which 
is  black.  On  each  elytron  a denuded  vitta  runs  from  the  humerus 
obliquely  back  to  the  suture  slightly  behind  the  middle  and  there 
is  a denuded  spot  adjacent  to  the  juncture  and  extending  almost 
or  quite  to  the  elyt'ral  margin.  The  rest  of  the  elytra  is  covered 
with  a spare  vestiture  of  silvery  pubescence. 

I have  often  wondered  whether  these  designs  on  so  many  of 
the  small  Coleoptera  are  caused  by  the  fugacious  nature  of  the 
pubescence  on  these  particular  areas  or  by  abrasion  in  some  pecu- 
liar manner,  possibly  in  emerging  from  their  breeding  places  or 
the  pupal  skin.  Occasional  examples  of  other  species  have  been 
taken  without  denuded  areas,  and  I recall  specimens  of  Elleschus 
bipunctatus  L.  which  were  taken  the  past  summer  with  the  typi- 
cally decorated  forms. 


98  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxr 


EARLY  REFERENCES  TO  THE  BEHAVIOR  OF 
AMERICAN  SOLITARY  WASPS.* 

By  Richard  Dow,  Cambridge,  Mass. 

Among  the  early  observers  of  natural  history  in  North  Amer- 
ica, John  Bartram  was  the  first  to  write  about  the  solitary  wasps. 
His  observations  were  recorded  in  letters  to  Peter  Collinson,  of 
London,  who  presented  them  before  the  Royal  Society  in  1745, 
1749,  and  1763.  Each  paper  subsequently  appeared  in  the  worthy 
Philosophical  Transactions. 

The  first  paper  on  “ Some  very  curious  Wasps  Nests  made  of 
Clay  ” describes  the  nests  of  what  are  probably  Sceliphron  cae- 
mentarium  (Drury)  and  Trypoxylon  politum  Say.  “The  plait} 
Clay-Nest  is  fabricated  by  a small  black  Wasp,  of  the  same  Spe- 
cies of  that  in  Tab.  III.  Fig.  1.  but  less,  that  has  a Speck  or 
Stripe  of  Yellow  in  its  Tail;  and  the  Cells  are  made  four  or  five 
together,  joining  Side  by  Side  to  each  other.  But  the  Clay-Nests 
that  are  so  elegantly  wrought  are  built  by  a purplish  black  Wasp, 
such  as  is  figured  Tab.  III.  Fig.  2. : After  one  Cell  is  formed, 
they  stop  it  up,  and  join  another  to  its  End,  and  then  add  another 
to  that ; which  makes  these  wrought  Clay  Fabrics  longer  than  the 
plain  ones.”  Curiously  enough,  both  of  the  figures  referred  to 
seem  to  represent  the  same  wasp  (a  member  of  the  Sphecinae* 1). 
The  identification  of  the  two  species  depends  largely  on  the  nests, 
which  are  also  figured  and  more  carefully  described. 

The  second  paper  of  John  Bartram  is  on  the  life  history  of  the 
Great  Black  Wasp  from  Pennsylvania,  which  stores  its  burrows 
with  “ a large  Green  Grasshopper.”  Reinhard  has  quoted  this 
article  in  his  recent  book,  The  Witchery  of  Wasps,  showing  that 
the  wasp  Bartram  observed  was  Chlorion  ( Ammohia ) pennsyl- 
vanicum  (Linn.). 

The  third  and  last  paper  describes  the  habits  of  the  Yellowish 
Wasp  of  Pennsylvania  which  feeds  the  larva  from  day  to  day, 
until  it  is  full-grown.  This  is  one  of  the  first  accounts  of  pro- 
gressive provisioning  by  a solitary  wasp,  and  was  discredited  by 


* Contributions  from  the  Entomological  Laboratory  of  the  Bus- 
sey Institution,  Harvard  University,  No.  327. 

1 As  used  by  Kohl. 


April,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  99 


Westwood  in  his  Introduction.2 3  Since  the  wasp  is  neither  de- 
scribed nor  figured,  it  has  to  be  determined  from  its  behavior. 
Ashmead  thought  it  was  a Bembicid,  Parker  included  it  in  the 
Bembicini,  and  according  to  Dr.  Bequaert,  it  is  probably  Bemhix 
spinolae  Lep. 

A second  early  observer  was  Mark  Catesby,  a friend  of  both 
Bartram  and  Collinson.  In  1731  and  1743,  he  published  the  first 
and  second  volumes  of  The  Natural  History  of  Carolina,  Florida 
and  the  Bahama  Islands.  An  appendix  printed  in  1748  contains 
figures  and  descriptions  of  two  mud-daubers,  Vespa  Ichneumon 
and  Vespa  Ichneumon  coerulea.  In  the  “Linnaean  Index  of  the 
Animals  and  Plants”  which  appeared  in  the  third  edition  of  1771 
and  was  presumably  written  by  George  Edwards,  the  editor, 
Vespa  Ichneumon  is  not  determined,  but  from  the  colored  figure 
and  the  fact  that  it  provisions  a clay  nest  with  spiders,  it  can  be 
identified  as  Sceliphron  caementarium. 

Vespa  Ichneumon  coerulea  is  probably  Chalyhion  caeruleum 
(Linn.),  since  it  is  determined  in  the  Linnaean  Index  as  Sphex 
coerulea.  Although  Linnaeus  described  two  different  species 
under  that  name,  the  index  must  refer  to  the  second  since  the  first 
was  described  as  a species  with  subsessile  abdomen.  Linnaeus 
comments  on  the  second  Sphex  caerulea  as  follows  :3  <(Catesh. 
car.  3.  p.  5.  t.  5?  sed  punctum  nullum  in  alarum  apice.”  The 
spots  on  the  tips  of  the  wings  are  very  conspicuous  in  Catesby’s 
figure,  but  cannot  be  explained  unless  Catesby  confused  the  mud- 
dauber  with  some  other  wasp,  and  drew,  for  example,  a species 
of  Podium.  Catesby  says  that  coerulea  builds  clay  nests  which 
he  describes  with  sufficient  detail  to  classify  as  those  of  Try- 
poxylon  politum.  Although  Chalybion  does  not  build  its  own 
nests,  there  is  no  record  of  its  ever  nesting  in  the  cells  of  Try- 
poxylon.  Thus  Catesby  was  not  only  the  first  to  say  that  Chaly- 
bion was  a true  mud-dauber,  but  he  even  associated  it  with  the 
wrong  type  of  nest. 

Over  fifty  years  later,  Benjamin  Henry  Latrobe,  a prominent 
architect  of  Philadelphia  and  Washington,  also  figured  and  de- 
scribed two  mud-daubers.  His  paper  was  read  before  the  Ameri- 
can Philosophical  Society  in  1803,  and  published  in  the  Trans- 
actions (1809).  The  same  article  was  also  published  in  England 


2 Introduction  to  the  Modern  Classification  of  Insects  2 : 207. 

3 Sy sterna  Naturae  (12th  edition)  1 (2)  : 941.  1767. 


100  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


in  the  Philosophical  Magazine  (1806),  but  the  text  was  different 
and  without  figures.  The  observations  on  which  Latrobe  based 
his  contribution  were  made  while  he  was  in  Virginia,  and  recorded 
in  his  journal  along  with  brief  notes  on  one  or  two  other  solitary 
wasps,  four  social  wasps,  and  one  or  two  bees. 

The  mud-dauber  which  Latrobe  calls  Sphex  pennsylvanica 
Linn.,  is  probably  Sceliphron  caementarium.  The  figure  is  rea- 
sonably good  and  the  yellow  markings  are  described  in  the  text. 
The  other  mud-dauber  which  is  classified  as  Sphex  caerulea  Linn., 
is  obviously  Trypoxylon  politum.  Part  of  the  description  reads 
as  follows:  “From  the  scutum  attached  to  the  petiole,  is  ex- 

tended a strong  hook,  which  is  very  serviceable  to  him  in  secur- 
ing his  prey.  His  sting  is  not  very  painful,  and  soon  ceases  to 
be  troublesome.”  Latrobe  failed  to  notice  any  sexual  differences 
in  the  specimens  he  observed,  or  he  would  have  found  that  the 
wasp  which  captures  the  prey  has  no  hook  on  the  petiole,  and  that 
the  wasp  with  a hook  on  the  petiole  cannot  sting.  He  would  also 
have  discovered  the  presence  of  both  sexes  about  the  nest,  a situa- 
tion peculiar  to  the  genus  Trypoxylon. 

In  reviewing  the  contributions  of  these  early  naturalists,  I have 
attempted  only  to  classify  their  material  according  to  our  present 
nomenclature  and  bring  their  observations  up  to  date.  As  a re- 
sult, I have  largely  obscured  both  the  scientific  and  historical  im- 
portance of  their  work. 

Bibliography. 

Bartram,  J.  1745.  An  Account  of  some  very  curious  Wasps 
Nests  made  of  Clay  in  Pensilvania;  by  Mr.  John  Bartram: 
Communicated  by  Mr.  Peter  Collinson,  F.  R.  S.  Philos. 
Trans.  43  : 363-366.  PI.  3,  figs.  1-8. 

. 1750.  A Description  of  the  Great  Black  Wasp, 

from  Pensylvania,  as  communicated  from  Mr.  John  Bar- 
tram to  Mr.  Peter  Collinson,  F.  R.  S.  Philos.  Trans.  46: 
278-279.  PI.  4,  figs.  20-21. 

. 1763.  Observations  made  by  Mr.  John  Bartram, 

at  Pensilvania,  on  the  Yellowish  Wasp  of  that  Country:  In  a 
Letter  to  Mr.  Peter  Collinson,  F.  R.  S.  Philos.  Trans.  53: 

37-38. 

Catesby,  M.  1748.  The  Natural  History  of  Carolina,  Florida 
and  the  Bahama  Islands,  etc.  Appendix:  5 and  13.  Pis.  5 
and  13. 


April,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  101 


Latrobe,  B.  H.  1806.  On  two  Species  of  the  Sphex  or  Wasp, 
found  in  Virginia  and  Pennsylvania,  and  probably  existing 
through  all  the  United  States.  Philos.  Mag.  25:  236-241. 

. 1809.  On  two  species  of  Sphex,  inhabiting  Vir- 
ginia and  Pennsylvania,  and  probably  extending  through  the 
United  States.  Trans.  Amer.  Philos.  Soc.  Philadelphia  6: 
73-78.  PL  1. 

— . 1905.  The  Journal  of  Latrobe,  Being  the  Notes 

and  Sketches  of  an  Architect,  Naturalist  and  Traveler  in  the 
United  States  from  1796  to  1820.  With  an  introduction  by 
J.  H.  B.  Latrobe.  New  York,  D.  Appleton  and  Company. 


Uloma  imberbis  Lee. — This  seems  to  be  a very  scarce  in- 
habitant of  this  part  of  the  country  if  my  luck  in  their  capture  is 
any  criterion.  One  specimen  from  Framingham,  April  12,  1905, 
and  one  from  Monterey,  August  1,  1920,  are  all  I have  to  record 
for  about  30  years  of  intensive  collecting  about  here.  Mr.  H.  C. 
Fall  writes  me  that  he  has  no  specimens  from  New  England  and 
there  is  only  one  specimen  in  the  collection  of  the  Boston  Society 
of  Natural  History,  which  bears  no  locality  and  the  date  of  Au- 
gust 25,  1875. — C.  A.  Frost,  Framingham,  Mass. 


Bugs  at  Light. — During  the  summer  of  1929,  the  following 
Heteroptera  flew  into  my  house  at  night,  attracted  to  light: 
Myodochus  serripes  Oliv.,  Heraeus  plehejus  Uhler,  Ligyrocoris 
diffusus  Uhler,  Trigonotylus  ruficornis  Fall.,  Tr.  brevipes  Jak., 
Deraecoris  ruber  segusinus  Reut.,  Adelphocoris  rapidus  Say.  My 
house  is  set  almost  at  the  top  of  a hill  in  the  City  of  White  Plains, 
overlooking  a damp  meadow  and  a pond,  in  the  grounds  of  Bloom- 
ingdale,  on  Westchester  Avenue.  Doubtless  this  situation  ex- 
plains the  coming  of  these  Heteroptera. — J.  R.  de  la  Torre- 
Bueno,  White  Plains,  N.  Y. 


102  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


ON  THE  GENUS  VIVIANIA  WITH  THE  DESCRIP- 
TION OF  TWO  NEW  SPECIES  FROM  TEXAS. 

(TACHINIDAE,  DIPTERA.) 

By  H.  J.  Reinhard,  College  Station,  Texas. 

The  genus  Viviania  Rondani  ( Biomyia  Rondani)  includes 
about  nine  described  North  American  species.  These  constitute 
a rather  homogeneous  and  difficult  group  of  muscoid  flies,  al- 
though the  three  species  from  Texas,  here  under  consideration, 
are  distinct  and  readily  separable  forms.  I am  indebted  to  Dr. 
J.  M.  Aldrich  for  the  determination  of  the  new  species  described 
herein  as  angustifrons  and  for  pointing  out  that  the  not  uncom- 
mon lachnosternae  Townsend  is  a synonym  of  georgiae  Brauer 
and  Bergenstamm  originally  described  from  Georgia.  The  third 
local  species,  which  I have  represented  by  only  three  female 
specimens,  is  congeneric  with  Viciania  but  apparently  is  not  as- 
signable to  any  described  form.  It  is  herein  described  as  noc- 
turnalis  new  species. 

Since  the  original  description  of  georgiae  Brauer  and  Bergen- 
stamm is  not  easily  accessible,  and  that  of  lachnosternae  Town- 
send is  based  upon  a single  female  specimen,  it  appears  desirable 
to  include  a redescription  of  this  species. 

Viviania  georgiae  Brauer  and  Bergenstamm. 

Viviania  georgiae  BB.  Zweifl.  d.  Kaiserl.  Mus.,  V,  1891,  p. 

3I2\ 

Viviania  lachnosternae  Tns.  Tax.  Mus.  Flies,  Smith.  Misc. 
Coll.,  LI,  1908,  p.  106. 

Male:  Eyes  bare;  front  narrow  and  prominent  below,  at 
narrowest  (before  ocelli)  0.17  of  the  head  width,  (average 
of  three,  0.18,  0.16,  0.16)  ; one  pair  of  verticals  (inner) 
moderately  strong;  orbitals  none;  ocellars  present,  strongly 
proclinate,  hardly  at  all  divergent ; frontals  in  a single  row  on 
either  side,  lowest  ones  below  middle  of  second  antennal 
joint,  uppermost  two  reclinate;  parafrontals  gray  pollinose, 
with  scattered  short  black  hairs  extending  below  the  frontals ; 
parafacials  bare,  covered  with  thick  dull  gray  pollen,  nearly 
twice  the  width  of  third  antennal  joint;  face  not  receding 
much,  long  and  narrow,  ridges  rather  prominent,  bare  except 
shortly  above  vibrissae ; the  latter  situated  the  length  of  sec- 
ond antennal  joint  or  more  above  the  oral  margin;  antennae 
not  reaching  the  lowest  third  of  face,  wholly  reddish-yellow, 


April,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  103 


third  joint  rather  slender,  straight  or  slightly  concave  on 
anterior  edge,  about  twice  the  length  of  second;  arista  yel- 
low, long  and  very  thin  on  apical  half,  slightly  thickened 
above  base,  penultimate  joint  hardly  longer  than  broad; 
cheeks  about  one-third  the  eye  height,  gray  pollinose,  the  yel- 
low ground  color  apparent  above;  proboscis  short,  fleshy, 
labella  large;  palpi  yellow,  slender  to  tip,  with  black  bristly 
hairs  below  on  apical  half ; posterior  orbits  broad  below  and 
greatly  narrowed  toward  the  vertex,  covered  with  dense  gray 
pollen ; occiput  with  sparse  pale  gray  hairs. 

Thorax  and  scutellum  black,  densely  gray  pollinose,  pleura 
tinged  with  yellow  along  sutures ; mesonotum  with  five  black 
stripes ; the  outer  broad  and  interrupted  at  suture ; the  in- 
termediate ones  ending  shortly  behind  suture ; the  middle  one 
narrow  and  less  distinct,  extending  from  base  of  scutellum 
hardly  to  the  suture.  Chaetotaxy : humeral  3 ; posthumeral 

2 (posterior  one  small)  ; acrostichal  3,  3 (variable)  ; dorso- 
central  3,  3 (variable)  ; notopleural  2;  presutural  2;  intraalar 

3 ; supraalar  3 ; postalar  2 ; sternoplural  2,  1 ; pteropleural  1 to 
3;  scutellum  with  4 or  5 laterals  (normal  4),  apicals  none  or 
reduced  to  fine  hairs;  a preapical  and  a discal  pair  usually 
present  though  often  asymmetrical ; postscutellum  normal ; 
infrasquamal  hairs  black;  calypters  white  with  a faint  yel- 
low tinge,  semitransparent. 

Abdomen  black,  entirely  covered  with  dull  dense  gray 
pollen  which  is  tinged  with  brown  on  the  hind  margins  of  the 
intermediate  segments ; a dark  median  stripe  and  an  irregular 
blackish  spot  on  either  side  of  third  segment  above  apparent 
in  rear  view ; first  and  second  segments  with  one  smallish 
erect  median  marginal  pair  of  bristles ; third  with  a marginal 
row  of  somewhat  larger  bristles ; fourth  with  irregular  discal 
and  marginal  rows;  intermediate  segments  without  discals, 
the  hairs  on  the  upper  surface  rather  coarse  evenly  placed 
and  depressed;  venter  of  segments  three  and  four  without 
any  modified  vestiture;  genital  segments  black,  ordinary  in 
size ; fifth  sternite  with  a deep  U-shaped  incision,  the  narrow 
inner  margins  of  the  lobes  slightly  reflexed,  shining  black. 

Legs  stout,  blackish  except  the  basal  joints  and  knees  which 
are  yellow;  claws  and  pulvilli  moderately  elongated;  middle 
tibia  with  one  bristle  on  the  outer  front  side ; hind  tibia  not 
ciliated. 

Wings  normal,  hyaline ; first  posterior  cell  rather  narrowly 
closed  well  before  wing  tip ; all  veins  including  costa  yellow ; 
third  with  two  to  four  setules  near  base,  others  bare ; costal 
spine  short ; epaulets  yellow. 


104  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


Female : Similar  to  male  except  as  follows : front  wider, 

at  narrowest  (vertex)  0.25  of  head  width  (average  of  six, 
0.23,  0.26,  0.25,  0.25,  0.23,  0.28)  ; the  usu^l  two  pairs  of  pro- 
clinate  orbitals  present ; outer  verticals  nearly  half  as  large  as 
inner  ones ; claws  and  pulvilli  shorter,  etc.  Ovipositor  short 
and  blunt,  fitted  for  depositing  macrotype  eggs. 

Length  of  male,  7 to  8.5  mm. ; of  female,  8.5  to  10  mm. 

Described  from  three  males  and  six  females  collected  at  Col- 
lege Station,  Texas,  June  and  July,  1917-1919,  (H.  J.  Reinhard). 

The  type  locality  of  this  species  is  Georgia.  It  also  appears  to 
be  correctly  reported  from  Mississippi,  New  Mexico,  Illinois, 
Washington,  D.  C.,  and  New  York.  The  host  relationships  are, 
so  far  as  known,  with  adults  of  the  genus  Phyllophaga. 

Viviania  nocturnalis  n.  sp. 

Female:  Like  georgiae,  but  much  smaller  and  with  black 
epaulets.  Front  not  noticeably  prominent  below,  0.22  of 
head  width  (average  of  three,  0.23,  0.20,  0.24)  ; antennae 
fully  two-thirds  the  length  of  face,  third  joint  black;  arista 
of  moderate  length,  black ; thorax  and  scutellum  as  in 
georgiae,  but  with  thinner  pollen  and  the  pleura  wholly  black 
in  ground  color;  chaetotaxy  as  in  georgiae , but  the  posterior 
posthumeral  is  absent,  only  one  pteropleural  developed  and 
no  preapicals  present  on  scutellum ; abdomen  black,  dorsum 
with  thinner  gray  pollen,  subshining  in  certain  lights,  a nar- 
row interrupted  median  stripe  visible  in  a flat  rear  view; 
ovipositor  blunt,  retracted  in  tip  of  abdomen,  in  one  specimen 
with  a large  flat  whitish  egg  attached;  legs  wholly  black, 
otherwise  as  in  georgiae ; wings  as  in  georgiae. 

Length,  4.5  to  5 mm. 

Type:  Female,  Cat.  No.  42,882,  U.  S.  N.  M. 

Described  from  two  females  collected  at  College  Station,  Texas, 
April  15,  1927,  June  26,  1929,  at  night  (H.  J.  Reinhard)  ; and  one 
female  captured  May  8,  1929,  in  light  trap  by  S.  E.  Jones  at  Col- 
lege Station,  Texas. 

This  species  is  nocturnal  in  habit  and  has  been  taken  in  close 
association  with  infestations  of  Phyllophaga  spp.  These  observa- 
tions may  indicate  the  same  general  host  relations  as  for  georgiae. 
It  resembles  the  latter  species  closely  except  in  size. 

Viviania  angustifrons  n.  sp. 

Male:  Front  at  narrowest  (before  ocelli)  0.14  of  head 
width,  (average  of  four,  0.13,  0.15,  0.14,  0.14)  ; parafrontals 


April,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  105 


narrow  at  vertex  widening  rapidly  to  base  of  antennae, 
densely  gray  pollinose,  with  a few  short  black  inconspicuous 
hairs  outside  and  extending  below  the  frontal  rows ; median 
stripe  reddish-brown,  but  slightly  narrowed  in  front  of  tri- 
angle extending  on  either  side  to  vertex;  inner  verticals 
moderately  developed,  outer  ones  hairlike;  frontal  bristles 
short  and  rather  weak,  arranged  in  two  rows  extending  to 
middle  of  second  antennal  joint,  the  uppermost  pair  reclinate 
and  situated  about  on  level  with  anterior  ocellus ; ocellars 
small,  strongly  proclinate  and  hardly  at  all  divergent ; orbitals 
none;  parafacials  bare,  covered  with  dense  gray  pollen,  at 
narrowest  only  slightly  wider  than  third  antennal  joint;  face 
gray  pollinose,  the  yellow  ground  color  apparent  at  vibrissal 
angles;  ridges  somewhat  rounded  or  flattened  below,  bare 
except  three  or  four  short  hairs  above  vibrissae;  the  latter 
situated  hardly  the  length  of  second  antennal  joint  above  the 
level  of  oral  margin ; antennae  about  three-fourths  the  length 
of  face,  yellow,  third  joint  sometimes  slightly  infuscated  on 
outer  side,  about  two  and  one-half  times  the  length  of  second 
joint;  arista  of  moderate  length  and  distinctly  pubescent, 
thickened  near  base  which  is  yellow,  apical  three-fourths 
slender  and  blackish,  penultimate  joint  short;  proboscis  short, 
labella  fleshy;  palpi  yellow,  rather  slender,  with  a few  black 
hairs  beneath  and  shorter  bristles  at  tips ; cheeks  about  one- 
third  the  eye  height,  covered  with  thin  pollen  above  through 
which  the  yellow  ground  color  is  distinctly  apparent,  below 
with  denser  gray  pollen  and  numerous  black  hairs ; occiput 
sparsely  clothed  with  short  black  bristles  which  are  inter- 
mixed with  longer  pale  hairs  on  lower  extremity;  eyes  bare. 

Thorax  gray  pollinose,  mesonotum  with  four  distinct  black 
stripes  interrupted  at  suture,  the  outer  thickened  to  triangular 
spots  in  front  and  extending  postsuturally  for  three-fourths 
the  distance  to  base  of  scutellum,  inner  ones  narrower  joined 
by  a transverse  stripe  just  behind  suture  and  obsolete  shortly 
posterior  to  anterior  dorsocentral  bristles ; scutellum  black 
(yellow  in  one  specimen)  covered  with  rather  dense  gray 
pollen  which  becomes  thinner  towards  base.  Chaetotaxy: 
acrostichal  2,  3 (anterior  one  small);  dorsocentral  2,  3; 
humeral  2;  posthumeral  1;  presutural  1;  notopleural  2;  in- 
traalar  3;  supraalar  3;  postalar  2;  sternopleural  2,  1 (lower 
anterior  one  small)  ; pteropleural  1 ; scutellum  with  three 
lateral  and  one  discal  pair,  apicals  reduced  to  fine  hairs; 
calypters  transparent,  tawny,  the  rims  whitish;  infrasquamal 
setules  black,  small  and  inconspicuous ; postscutellum  normal. 

Abdomen  yellow,  the  narrow  hind  margin  of  segments  one 


106  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXF 


and  two,  apical  half  of  third,  and  all  of  fourth  darker  in 
color;  last  three  segments  entirely  covered  with  whitish 
pollen  above  except  on  an  interrupted  dark  median  stripe, 
on  the  intermediate  segments  the  pollen  fades  at  the  sides  and 
toward  the  posterior  margins  which  are  subshining;  bristles 
on  all  segments  rather  weak;  first  with  a median  marginal 
pair;  second  and  third  each  with  marginal  rows,  no  discals; 
fourth  with  a discal  and  marginal  row ; venter  of  segments 
three  and  four  on  each  side  with  patches  of  pale,  soft,  very 
short  hairs ; genitalia  small,  inner  forceps  deeply  divided  but 
not  divergent,  tips  not  narrowed,  shining  black ; outer  forceps 
very  thin,  pale-yellow,  tips  broadly  rounded  and  slightly 
bowed  backward;  penis  short,  the  thickened  distal  portion 
with  a small  recurved  hook  at  apex;  fifth  sternite  yellow, 
deeply  divided  with  a U-shaped  incision,  the  lobes  with  black 
hairs  on  the  darker  inner  margins. 

Legs  slender,  without  any  strong  bristles,  tarsi  black,  other 
joints  yellow,  more  or  less  infuscated;  middle  tibia  with  one 
bristle  on  outer  front  side,  hind  tibia  with  three  or  four  short 
bristles  on  outer  posterior  side ; claws  and  pulvilli  elongated. 

Wings  ordinary  in  form ; costa  and  all  veins  yellow ; fourth 
with  a rounded  oblique  bend,  slightly  concave  near  the  tip 
so  that  the  first  posterior  cell  is  narrowly  open  about  the 
length  of  small  cross  vein  before  the  exact  wing  tip;  hind 
cross  vein  slightly  nearer  bend  than  to  small  cross  vein ; first 
vein  bare,  third  with  two  or  three  small  hairs  near  base ; 
costal  spine  inconspicuous ; epaulets  black. 

Female:  Front  narrowed  before  ocelli  as  in  male,  0.16  of 
head  width  (average  of  five,  0.16,  0.16,  0.15,  0.15,  0.16)  ; 
abdomen  distinctly  darker  and  but  little  or  hardly  at  all  yel- 
low in  ground  color,  the  tip  concealing  a blunt  egg-laying 
organ;  without  the  usual  orbital  bristles  and  only  one  pair 
(inner)  verticals  developed;  palpi  larger  and  thickened 
apically;  calypters  white;  puvilli  less  elongated,  otherwise 
as  in  male. 

Length  of  male,  5 to  7 mm. ; of  female,  5.5  to  7 mm. 

Type:  Male,  Cat.  No.  42,881,  U.  S.  N.  M.  One  male  and 
four  female  paratypes  also  deposited  in  U.  S.  National 
Museum. 

Described  from  6 males  and  10  females  including  type  collected 
at  College  Station,  Texas,  April  to  July,  191 7-1929,  (H.  J.  Rein- 
hard)  ; and  2 males  collected  at  Havana,  Cuba,  (Baker)  received 
from  Dr.  J.  M.  Aldrich  to  whom  they  are  returned. 


April,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  107 


The  distinctly  pubescent  arista,  greatly  narrowed  front  in  both 
sexes,  absence  of  orbitals  in  the  female,  and  modified  vestiture 
on  venter  of  third  and  fourth  abdominal  segments  in  the  male  are 
the  principal  characters  in  which  the  species  differs  from  both 
georgiae  and  nocturnalis.  The  two  males  from  Havana  are  some- 
what larger  and  show  less  yellow  on  the  abdomen  but  agree  closely 
in  other  details  with  the  remainder  of  the  type  series.  The  host 
relations  are  unknown. 


ON  THE  HETEROPTERA  COLLECTED  BY  GEORGE 
P.  ENGELHARDT  IN  THE  SOUTH  AND  WEST. 

By  J.  R.  de  la  Torre-Bueno,  White  Plains,  N.  Y. 

What  few  Heteroptera  Mr.  George  P.  Engelhardt  has  collected 
in  his  various  trips  through  the  South  and  West  during  the  last 
three  years,  he  has  very  amiably  handed  to  me  for  study.  The 
records  here  given  either  extend  the  known  distribution  or  con- 
firm previous  records. 

In  May,  1927,  Mr.  Engelhardt  was  in  Texas,  at  College  Station. 
On  the  19th  of  the  month  he  secured  there  4 Brochymena  cariosa 
Stal;  one  Hymenarcys  nervosa  Say;  3 Mezira  lobata  Say.  At 
Brownsville  he  took  4 Jadera  haematoloma  H.  S.  and  16  /.  san- 
guinolenta  Fabr.  According  to  Blatchley,  sanguinolenta  F.  and 
aeola  Dallas  are  the  same.  At  any  rate,  this  appears  to  be  quite 
abundant  at  Brownsville.  At  San  Antonio,  he  secured  one  Ly- 
gaeus  kalmii  Stal,  typical;  and  a couple  of  Solubea  pugnax  Fabr. 

While  in  Florida,  he  visited  Lake  Okeechobee  on  March  28, 
and  secured  1 Mormidea  lugens  Fabr.,  2 Solubea  pugnax  Fabr., 
3 Euthochtha  galeator  Fabr.,  1 Namacus  annulicornis  Stal  and  1 
Oncocephalus  geniculatus  Stal.  At  Royal  Palm  Park,  Dr.  Blatch- 
ley’s  own  preserve,  Mr.  Engelhardt  collected  on  February  23, 
1929,  3 Proxys  punctulatus  P.  B.,  1 Euschistus  bifibulus  P.  B.,  2 
Edessa  bifida  Say,  3 Phthia  picta  Drury,  3 Triatoma  sanguisuga 
Lee.,  and  one  Zelus  bilobus  Say.  At  Marianna,  on  the  31st  of 
March,  he  secured  one  Thyanta  calceata  Say,  one  Leptoglossus 
phyllopus  and  one  Zelus  exsanguis  Stal. 

Of  these  22  records,  those  for  Florida  give  new  localities,  as 
follows:  Thyanta  calceata,  Solubea  pugnax,  Proxys  punctulatus, 
Euschistus  bifibulus,  Leptoglossus  phyllopus,  Phthia  picta,  Na- 


108  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


macus  annulicornis,  Oncocephalus  geniculatus,  Zelus  bilobus. 
The  record  of  Zelus  ex  sanguis  (a  female,  more  or  less  teneral) 
merits  special  mention.  Dr.  Blatchley  states  that  the  only  Florida 
record  is  that  of  Uhler,  without  any  definite  station.  Here  is  one. 

In  general,  these  bugs  are  typically  southern — in  fact — Neo- 
tropical— and  distinctly  American.  Six,  however,  are  very  widely 
spread — Mormidea  lugens,  Hymenarcys  nervosa,  Solubea  pug- 
nax,  Euthochtha  galeator,  Lygaeus  kalmii  and  Zelus  exsanguis. 

I sometimes  wonder  that  more  attention  is  not  paid  to  insects  as 
key-forms  in  the  theory  of  evolution.  It  is  true  that  an  elephant 
has  more  bulk  and  is  not  so  likely  to  get  lost  or  lose  a leg,  but  ele- 
phants are  not  so  abundant  in  numbers  or  in  individuals  as  in- 
sects. On  the  other  hand,  a sufficiently  large  series  of  species  of 
insects  shows  more  variation;  and,  perhaps  better,  the  course  of 
variation.  By  their  distribution,  also,  one  may  come  to  some  con- 
firmatory evidence  in  regard  to  the  ancient  land-masses  and  their 
connections.  On  the  other  hand,  it  may  be  urged  that  insects 
migrate  great  distances  in  the  upper  air;  or  on  bits  of  wood  float- 
ing on  the  ocean.  But  surely,  the  variation  of  species  and  their 
abundance  in  given  regions  can  clearly  show  what  is  their  me- 
tropolis and  probably  their  point  of  origin. 

At  any  rate,  it  would  seem  as  though  in  insects  one  has  keys  to 
faunal  affinities,  on  the  one  hand ; and  on  the  other,  the  evidences 
of  nascent  and  vanishing  species. 


April,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  1091 


A CONTRIBUTION  TO  THE  KNOWLEDGE  OF  THE 
BIONOMICS  OF  BREMUS  VAGANS  (F.  SM.) 

(HYMENOPTERA). 

By  Theodore  H.  Frison,  Illinois  State  Natural  History  Survey, 

Urbana,  Illinois. 

A.  Introduction. 

The  present  paper  is  the  fourth  of  a series  of  papers  dealing 
with  the  biology  of  species  of  bumblebees  found  in  Illinois.  In 
the  first  paper  (1928),  the  prominent  facts  in  the  life  history  of 
Bremus  bimaculatus  (Cress.)  were  recorded  in  detail.  In  a sec- 
ond paper  (1929b)  similar  information  was  published  relating  to 
B.  impatiens  (Cress.),  and  a third  paper  concerning  B.  ameri- 
canorum  (Fabr.)  is  now  in  press.  For  details  regarding  how 
much  of  the  data  used  in  this  paper  were  obtained,  the  reader 
should  consult  my  previous  papers,  particularly  that  relating  to 
B.  bimaculatus. 

B.  Systematic  Notes. 

Bremus  vagans  (F.  Sm.)  belongs  to  the  subgenus  Pratobombus 
Vogt  (1911);  a subgenus  of  bumblebees  ranging  through  the 
Palaearctic,  Oriental,  Nearctic  and  northern  part  of  the  Neotrop- 
ical faunal  realms.  In  addition  to  being  the  most  widely  dis- 
tributed subgenus  of  bumblebees,  this  subgenus  contains  more 
species  than  any  other  subgenus  and  is  readily,  divisible  into  sev- 
eral subordinate  complexes.  In  North  America,  B.  vagans  is 
most  closely  related  to  such  species  as  flavifrons  (Cress.)  and  cen- 
tralis (Cress.)  which  have  the  tips  of  the  sagittae  of  the  genitalia 
conspicuously  dilated,  the  hypopygium  somewhat  carinate,  and 
with  a long  malar  space.  Pratobombus,  together  with  the  sub- 
genus Terrestribombus  Vogt  (1911),  form  a section  of  bumble- 
bees designated  by  Kruger  (1917)  as  Anodontobombus. 

This  study  of  the  biology  of  B.  vagans  conclusively  shows  that 
the  forms  of  Pratobombus  occurring  in  Illinois,  and  recognized 
as  species  by  the  writer,  are  biologically  distinct  unities ; thus, 
confirming  their  separation  into  species  on  the  basis  of  certain 
structural  characters. 

In  Illinois,  B.  vagans  is  abundant  in  the  northern  part  of  the 
state,  less  common  in  the  central  part,  and  virtually  absent  in 
southern  Illinois.  It  ranges  in  North  America  through  the  lower 
limits  of  the  boreal  zone  of  Merriam  from  British  Columbia  to 


110  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


Maine,  throughout  the  transitional  zone,  and  in  the  central  and 
eastern  portions  of  the  upper  austral  zone. 

C.  Specific  Life  History  Studies. 

The  writer  has  examined  two  nests  of  this  species  started  by 
queens  under  natural  conditions  and  studied  in  detail  one  colony 
which  was  founded  by  a queen  in  an  artificial  nest. 

i.  Experiment  19,  1919. 

This  experiment,  was  started  on  June  8,  1919,  with  two  queens 
of  B.  vagans  which  were  collected  at  Antioch,  Illinois,  on  June  4, 
1919.  Previous  to  placing  the  queens  in  an  artificial  nest,  they 
were  kept  under  conditions  intended  to  cause  them  to  become 
“ broody.”  The  next  day  after  placing  the  queens  in  the  nest  I 
found  one  of  them  dead ; presumably  killed  by  the  living  queen. 
Another  queen  of  the  same  species  was  introduced  into  the  nest- 
box  on  June  10,  and  on  the  following  day  one  of  them  showed  a 
special  interest  in  the  pollen  lump.  Egg  cells  were  constructed  on 
June  11  and  eggs  laid  during  the  next  few  days.  On  June  18, 
there  was  every  indication  that  larvae  were  now  in  the  cells,  and 
on  June  19,  I actually  saw  them.  The  larvae  grew  very  rapidly 
and  by  the  twenty-first  of  June  several  of  them  had  attained  con- 
siderable size. 

During  this  early  period  in  the  development  of  the  comb,  both 
of  the  queens  took  a great  interest  in  the  comb,  but  it  was  evident 
that  one  of  them — the  largest  queen — “ruled”  supreme.  The  col- 
ony had  progressed  so  nicely  by  June  22  that  a record  of  the  de- 
velopmental stages  was  begun.  On  this  date  several  new  egg  cells 
were  found  on  the  tops  of  recently  spun  cocoons.  An  examina- 
tion of  these  cells  showed  that  there  were  not  more  than  two  eggs 
in  each  of  them.  On  July  1,  normal  workers  emerged  and  three 
more  came  out  during  the  next  few  days.  On  July  5,  the  smaller 
queen  was  removed  from  the  box  and  the  nest  left'  to  the  care  of 
the  larger  queen. 

The  comb  continued  to  grow  and  on  July  20  two  more  workers 
emerged.  Previous  to  this  date,  new  egg  cells  were  laid  from  time 
to  time.  Two  of  the  cells  examined  on  July  16  contained  four 
eggs  each.  These  cells  were  laid  contiguous  to  one  another  in  a 
horizontal  position.  The  workers  were  allowed  the  privilege  of 
foraging  for  nectar  and  pollen  on  July  21.  As  the  nest  grew  in 
size  additional  honey-pots  were  constructed  of  wax  and  pollen  on 


April,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  111 


the  edge  of  the  comb.  Several  of  these  cells  averaged  fifteen  mil- 
limeters in  height  by  eight  millimeters  in  breadth. 

By  August  i the  number  of  workers  in  the  nest  had  increased 
to  twelve.  At  this  date  there  was  some  surplus  of  pollen  which 
was  stored  in  empty  cocoons.  No  surplus  of  honey,  however,  was 
found  in  the  nest.  It  is  interesting  to  note  that  the  queen  had  now 
become  so  interested  in  the  comb  that  she  could  not  be  induced  to 
leave  the  comb  while  I examined  the  cells.  Such  was  not  the  case, 
however,  with  the  workers  which  were  ready  to  use  their  stings  at 
every  opportunity.  On  August  9,  another  worker  emerged  and 
it  was  noted  that  nearly  twenty-four  hours  were  required  for  her 
pubescence  to  attain  its  normal  color.  On  this  same  date  many 
egg  cells  were  in  evidence  on  the  tops  of  cocoons  and  in  the  de- 
pressions between  them.  The  egg  cells  were  made  as  usual  from 
wax  and  pollen.  On  the  side  of  the  comb  nearest  the  entrance  to 
the  nest-box,  the  bees  had  built  up  a protecting  shield  of  wax-pol- 
len composition.  Another  one  of  their  performances  during  the 
early  part  of  August  was  the  dragging  into  the  nest-box  from  the 
outside  a large  amount  of  oat-chaff. 

During  the  remainder  of  August,  the  comb  continued  to  grow 
unretarded  and  the  colony  attained  considerable  size.  On  August 
1 7,  there  were  fourteen  cocoons  in  the  nest,  about  sixty  larvae  in 
various  stages  of  development,  and  many  eggs.  The  number  of 
eggs  in  a cell  varied  from  three  to  six.  For  the  first  time,  too,  in 
the  history  of  this  colony,  a surplus  of  honey  was  found  in  the 
nest  on  this  latter  date.  This  was  stored  in  large  wax-pollen 
honey-pots  on  the  outer  margin  of  the  comb,  whereas  most  of  the 
pollen  was  stored  in  renovated  cocoons  from  which  workers  had 
emerged.  The  old  mother  queen  was  still  producing  wax  and  I 
frequently  saw  her  scraping  it  from  the  dorsum  of  her  abdomen. 
Only  ten  workers  were  in  the  nest  when  it  was  examined  on  Au- 
gust 17,  but  many  others  were  foraging  in  the  field.  The  first 
males  were  found  in  the  nest  on  September  4 and  emerged  from 
cocoons  which  contained  pupae  on  August  22.  Workers  were 
also  found  in  the  nest  on  September  4,  which  had  but  recently 
emerged.  When  the  nest  was  next  examined  on  September  16, 
two  young  queens,  fourteen  workers  and  ten  males  were  found. 
The  old  mother  queen  was  still  active  and  looked  almost  as  sleek 
and  trim  as  when  her  first  eggs  were  laid.  Two  new  egg  cells 
were  present  on  cocoons,  one  of  which  contained  eight  eggs  and 
the  other  nine.  These  eggs  were  contiguous  and  horizontal  as 


112  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


before,  but  overlapped  one  another  at  one  end.  A queer  find  was 
an  old  sealed-over  male  cocoon,  partially  filled  with  pollen.  This 
contained  seven  eggs  which  had  been  laid  in  an  irregular  manner. 

I am  quite  certain  that  these  eggs  were  laid  by  workers.  Many 
of  the  large  larval  cells  plainly  showed  the  presence  of  the  small 
hole  through  which  food  was  supplied  them  by  the  workers.  Fig- 
ure i shows  the  nest  as  it  appeared  on  September  16. 

On  September  21,  the  old  queen  was  alive  and  active  as  ever. 
The  two  young  queens  were  still  in  the  nest,  besides  fifteen  males 
and  ten  workers.  One  worker  was  found  dead  in  the  nest  box,, 
but  no  trace  of  parasitism  was  found.  Additional  egg  cells  had 
been  constructed  and  one  of  them  contained  seven  eggs.  The  last  * 
week  of  September  the  old  mother  queen  died.  At  this  time  there 
still  remained  in  the  nest  about  fifteen  male  and  four  queen 
cocoons  from  which  the  adults  had  not  emerged.  Because  of  the 
lateness  of  the  season  and  cool  nights,  I moved  the  colony  indoors 
so  that  other  adults  might  emerge.  From  these  cocoons  two 
queens  and  four  males  emerged  indoors  as  late  as  October  4.  The 
males  and  queens  produced  by  this  colony  were  used  in  mating 
experiments  (Frison,  1927a). 

2.  Nest  23,  ip  16. 

At  Hermon,  New  York,  in  1916,  I found  a colony  of  B.  vagans 
in  the  loft  of  a barn.  The  nest  itself  was  in  a cavity  in  a roof- 
joist,  at  a point  where  a side  brace  was  joined  to  it.  Evidently, 
the  joint  was  so  poorly  constructed  that  mice  had  been  able  to 
enter  the  joist  and  gnaw  out  a cavity  large  enough  for  their  nest. 
This  place  had  then  been  found  by  a searching  queen  and  adopted 
for  her  future  home.  The  interesting  feature  of  this  nest  was 
that  a queen  had  been  able  to  find  this  desirable  location.  In  order 
for  her  to  do  so,  it  was  necessary  for  her  to  enter  the  hay-loft  of 
the  barn  through  a small  door.  When  once  in  the  hay-loft,  it 
must  have  required  considerable  searching  on  the  part  of  the 
queen  to  find  this  nesting  site,  unless  she  was  instinctively  guided 
to  the  mouse  nest  by  an  olfactory  sense. 

When  the  nest  was  opened  on  August  18,  it  contained  the  old 
queen,  twenty-eight  workers,  twenty  males,  four  young  queens, 
fifty-three  cocoons  containing  pupae,  six  cocoons  containing 
larvae,  thirty-four  empty  cocoons,  twenty-seven  larvae  in  various 
stages  of  development,  and  five  egg  cells.  Honey  was  stored  both 
in  large  wax-pollen  cells  and  in  sixty-four  renovated  cocoons. 


April,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  113 


Pollen  was  found  in  four  cocoons  and  in  several  of  the  large  wax- 
pollen  cells.  One  of  these  wax-pollen  cells  was  three-fourths  of 
an  inch  in  height.  The  egg  cells  contained  from  six  to  fifteen 
eggs,  the  average  number  being'  over  eleven.  Two  dead  workers 
were  found  in  the  nest  debris,  but  neither  of  them  showed  evi- 
dence of  insect  parasitism. 

3.  Nest  1,  1920. 

This  nest  was  found  near  Grand  Marsh,  Wisconsin,  on  August 
2 1,  1920.  The  colony  was  located  in  a mouse  nest  at  the  base  of  a 
young  cherry  tree  in  a small  orchard.  The  nest  contained  the  old 
queen,  four  young  queens,  fourteen  males,  twelve  workers,  about 
fifty  cocoons,  nearly  forty  larvae  in  various  stages  of  develop- 
ment and  two  egg  cells.  Honey  was  stored  in  empty  cocoons  and 
in  special  wax-pollen  cells.  Pollen  was  observed  only  in  the  reno- 
vated cocoons.  No  parasites  or  inquilines  were  found  in  this  nest. 

, D.  Biological  Summary. 

1.  Resume  of  literature. 

The  first  record  of  the  occurrence  of  a nest  of  this  species  of 
which  I am  aware  is  one  by  Putnam  (1864),  who  mentions  find- 
ing a nest  of  B.  vagans  at  Warwick,  Massachusetts,  in  the  summer 
of  1862.  This  author  says  nothing  concerning  the  habits  of  these 
bees  or  the  contents  of  the  nest,  except  that  the  nest  was  made  in 
a deserted  mouse  nest.  Packard  (1864)  says  that  the  nest  dis- 
covered by  Putnam  in  1862  contained  thirty  workers  and  that  no 
special  variation  occurred  among  them  except  in  the  different 
shades  of  yellow. 

Franklin  (1913),  the  next  to  report  the  finding  of  a nest  of  B. 
vagans,  records  one  situated  on  the  surface  of  the  ground  in  an 
open  field  in  what  apparently  was  originally  a mouse  nest.  “ It 
contained  two  queens,  eight  workers  and  two  males  and  was  taken 
in  the  day  time  of  July  20,  1904.  The  workers  of  this  nest  were 
the  most  vicious  and  ready  to  sting  of  any  with  which  I have  had 
any  experience.”  In  the  collection  of  the  American  Museum  of 
Natural  History,  New  York,  is  a nest  of  this  species  which  Frank- 
lin says  “ was  taken  by  Mr.  Wm.  Beutenmuller  at  Potato  Knob 
in  the  Black  Mountains  of  North  Carolina  (elevation  6,420  feet) 
about  July  1,  1902.  This  nest  was  located  in  the  hollow  trunk  of 
a standing  mountain  ash  and  it  contained  two  queens  and  eight 
workers,  but  many  bees  escaped  as  it  was  taken  in  the  day  time.” 


114  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


This  nest,  also,  was  apparently  originally  a mouse  nest  and  was 
made  from  dried  grass. 

The  next  reference  of  a biological  nature  concerning  this  spe- 
cies is  by  Jackson  (1920),  who  gives  data  regarding  the  time  of 
appearance  of  the  various  castes  in  the  vicinity  of  Washington, 
D.  C.,  and  plants  they  were  observed  to  visit.  Beginning  in  1922, 
Plath  has  published  several  papers  of  special  importance.  In  the 
first  of  these  (1922a),  this  writer  records  the  finding  of  nests  of 
B.  vagans  near  Boston.  “ Two  of  these  were  surface  nests,  while 
the  remaining  four  were  subterrean.”  This  same  author  says 
the  largest  nest  that  he  examined  contained  the  old  queen,  over 
seventy  workers  and  many  brood  cells.  Another  colony  con- 
tained the  “ old  queen,  about  fifty  workers,  and  several  males  ” 
and  a queen  of  Psithyrus  laboriosus.  Shortly  after  this  (1922b) 
the  presence  of  the  social  parasite,  Psithyrus  laboriosus  (Fabr.) 
in  the  nests  of  B.  vagans  is  mentioned  again  in  greater  detail  and 
the  behavior  of  its  host  under  such  conditions  discussed. 

In  a third  paper  (1923),  the  successful  rearing  of  the  colonies 
of  this  species  in  artificial  nests  is  recorded.  The  fact  that  queens 
of  B.  vagans  do  not  enter  hibernating  quarters  until  August  is 
mentioned  by  Plath  (1924).  At  a later  date  (1925),  the  same 
author  presents  some  evidence  in  support  of  the  fact  that  the 
variety  citrinus  (F.  Sm.)  of  Psithyrus  laboriosus  (Fabr.)  is  par- 
tial to  the  nests  of  B.  vagans  rather  than  the  typical  form  of  this 
social  parasite.  In  two  still  more  recent  papers  B.  vagans  is  re- 
corded as  a non-pocket  maker  (1927a)  and  that  the  queens  are  the 
latest  of  the  Pratorum  group  (=  Pratobombus)  of  species  to  ap- 
pear in  spring  in  New  England  (1927b). 

In  several  papers  the  writer  has  published  facts  regarding  the 
biology  of  B.  vagans.  In  one  paper  (1927a)  was  recorded  the 
fact  that  queens  and  males  of  this  species  would  mate  under  con- 
trolled conditions,  in  a second  paper  (1927b)  reference  was  made 
to  the  variation  in  size  of  bumblebees  of  this  species  and  explained 
upon  the  basis  of  trophogeny,  and  in  a third  paper  (1927c)  evi- 
dence was  presented  to  show  that  B.  vagans  could  be  readily  semi- 
domesticated. 

2.  Anthophilous  habits. 

This  bumblebee  has  been  recorded  as  frequenting  a large  num- 
ber of  flowers  and  like  all  others  thus  far  studied  is  polytropic. 
Most  of  the  records  of  the  flowers  visited  by  this  bumblebee  have 


April,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  115 


been  listed  by  Lutz  and  Cockerell  (1920),  with  the  exception  of 
those  of  Jackson  (1920)  which  are  as  follows:  Pentstemon  hir- 
suta , Arctium  minus,  Monarda  fistulosa  and  Brassica  juncea. 

3.  Duration  of  the  developmental  stadia. 

These  deductions  concerning  the  developmental  stadia  are  based 
upon  a tabulated  record  of  forty-two  detailed  examinations  of  the 
comb  in  Experiment  19,  1919,  between  June  22  and  October  4. 
The  data  were  secured  by  methods  described  in  a previous  article 
(Frison,  1928).  It  should  be  mentioned  here  that  my  conclusions 
regarding  the  length  of  time  required  for  the  three  developmental 
stadia  are  essentially  in  agreement  with  data  presented  for  other 
species  ( B . himacidatus,  B.  impatiens  and  B.  americanorum) . 

The  egg  stage  was  found  to  be  the  shortest  of  the  three  develop- 
mental stadia  and  lasts  approximately  four  and  one-half  days  for 
queens,  workers  or  males.  The  larval  stage  is  variable  within 
certain  limits  even  in  the  same  caste.  Larvae  which  produced 
workers  required  between  fourteen  and  nineteen  days  to  complete 
their  development.  The  workers  produced  the  latter  part  of  Au- 
gust required  more  time  in  the  larval  stage  than  those  produced  in 
July  and  correlated  with  this  lengthening  of  this  stage  of  develop- 
ment was  an  increase  in  the  size  of  the  workers.  Queen  larvae 
required  a longer  time  to  complete  their  development  than  did 
worker  larvae  and  the  males  required  at  least  as  long  a time  as  the 
workers  and  sometimes  longer. 

The  pupal  period  of  the  workers  varied  between  six  and  eight 
days.  That  of  the  queens  was  at  least  this  long  and  there  were 
some  data  indicating  it  might  be  longer.  The  male  pupal  period 
was  not  accurately  determined,  but  available  data  show  that  it 
could  not  have  been  less  than  that  of  the  workers  and  in  all  prob- 
ability was  longer. 

My  data  show  that  the  first  workers  which  emerged  in  Experi- 
ment 19,  1919,  required  between  nineteen  and  twenty-two  days  to 
complete  their  development.  Workers  which  emerged  in  August 
required  more  than  this  amount  of  time  and  most  of  the  records 
indicate  a period  of  about  thirty  days.  The  queens  certainly  re- 
quired a month  or  possibly  more.  The  males  required  less  time 
than  did  the  queens  to  complete  their  immature  development.  Al- 
though my  records  for  this  species  are  much  less  complete  than 
for  B.  bimaculatus  (Frison,  1928),  they  are  sufficient,  however, 
to  permit  of  the  above  approximations  and  clearly  show  that  B. 


116  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


vagans  does  not  present  any  great  deviation  in  regard  to  the  dura- 
tion of  the  developmental  stages  from  impatiens,  bimaculatus,  and 
americanorum. 

4.  Seasonal  appearance  of  the  castes. 

B.  vagans  is  not  sufficiently  common  in  the  vicinity  of  Urbana, 
Illinois,  to  permit  of  a close  study  of  the  appearance  of  the  over- 
wintering queens  in  spring.  The  species,  however,  appears  much 
later  than  either  B.  bimaculatus  or  B.  impatiens.  At  Antioch,  in 
northern  Illinois,  on  June  3,  1919,  queens  of  this  species  were 
very  abundant. 

Data  on  pinned  queens  in  various  collections  corroborates  a late 
appearance  of  the  queens  in  spring  in  all  parts  of  their  range. 
Most  of  the  queens  from  New  Jersey  and  Pennsylvania  in  the 
collection  of  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia 
and  of  the  American  Entomological  Society  were  collected  in  the 
months  of  May  and  June.  I have  seen  many  queens  in  the  same 
collection,  collected  in  Northern  Michigan  (Barago  County)  by 
Mr.  Morgan  Hebard,  which  were  captured  from  July  4 to  July 
20.  I am  certain,  too,  that  these  latter  queens  'were  ones  that  had 
over-wintered.  There  are  a large  number  of  queens  of  this  spe- 
cies in  the  Nason  Collection  belonging  to  the  Illinois  State  Nat- 
ural History  Survey  which  were  collected  at  Algonquin,  Illinois, 
in  May  and  June.  In  Champaign  County,  Illinois,  I have  cap- 
tured the  queens  in  the  latter  part  of  June.  The  earliest  record 
I have  seen  for  a queen  of  this  species  is  May  1,  1915.  This  spec- 
imen was  collected  by  Mr.  C.  A.  Frost  at  Sherborn,  Massachu- 
setts. No  doubt  in  certain  years  the  queens  appear  earlier  than 
these  records  indicate,  but  it  is  quite  evident  that  as  a rule  the 
queens  appear  considerably  later  than  most,  if  not  all,  other  queens 
of  Pratobombus  in  central  and  eastern  North  America.  Data  by 
Plath  (1927b)  and  Jackson  (1920)  confirm  my  conclusions  about 
the  seasonal  adjustments  of  the  queens  of  this  species. 

Because  of  the  late  appearance  of  the  queens,  the  workers  are 
encountered  much  later  than  those  of  certain  other  species.  In 
Experiment  19,  1919,  the  first  workers  emerged  on  July  1.  In  the 
collection  of  the  Illinois  State  Natural  History  Survey  are  two 
workers  captured  on  July  9 and  13  at  Urbana,  Illinois.  A study 
of  a large  series  of  specimens  of  this  caste  from  various  parts  of 
its  range  shows  that  the  workers  are  most  commonly  collected 
from  the  middle  of  July  to  the  middle  of  September.  I have  seen 


April,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  117 


workers  collected  in  Maryland  as  late  as  October  6.  Of  course 
the  appearance  of  the  workers  varies  somewhat  according  to  the 
lateness  or  earliness  of  the  season  and  according  to  locality,  but  it 
is  most  influenced  by  the  late  appearance  of  the  queens  in  spring. 

The  first  males  to  appear  in  Experiment  19,  1919,  emerged  be- 
tween the  last  of  August  and  first  of  September.  Males  continued 
to  emerge  in  this  nest  until  the  first  part  of  October.  The  data 
obtained  from  the  study  of  a very  large  series  of  males  from  vari- 
ous parts  of  the  country  show  that  the  males  are  captured  as  a 
rule  in  August  and  September.  Males  occur  much  earlier  than 
this,  however,  and  I have  taken  them  in  1920  as  early  as  July  11, 
at  New  London,  Wisconsin.  Such  early  males  may  be  the  product 
of  worker  eggs  in  a nest  which  has  lost  its  queen. 

5.  Caste  ratio. 

According  to  my  studies  and  the  figures  given  by  Franklin  and 
Plath,  the  workers  outnumbered  the  young  queens  anywhere  from 
three  or  seven  to  one.  Apparently,  as  a rule,  more  males  are  pro- 
duced than  queens.  In  Experiment  19,  1919,  nearly  seven  males 
were  produced  for  every  queen,  and  nearly  as  many  males  as 
workers.  There  are  so  many  factors  governing  the  numerical 
abundance  of  the  various  castes,  that  at  the  best  these  figures  are 
but  indications  of  what  is  generally  encountered. 

6.  Size  of  colonies. 

Judging  by  the  records  just  given  the  colonies  of  this  species 
never  attain  very  large  size  compared  with  species  such  as  B.  im- 
patiens  or  B.  americanorum.  Nest  23,  1916,  is  undoubtedly  a 
good  example  of  the  colony  of  this  species.  Only  seventy-three 
adults  were  found  in  the  nest.  Adding  to  this  figure  the  number 
of  workers  probably  foraging  in  the  field  when  this  nest  was  re- 
moved, and  the  adults  that  might  have  emerged  later  in  the  season 
(as  indicated  by  cocoons  and  larvae),  the  colony  could  probably 
not  have  produced  more  than  one  hundred  and  seventy-five  adults. 
If  the  colonies  studied  by  Plath,  Franklin  and  myself  are  truly 
representative,  few  colonies  of  B.  vagans  produce  over  one  hun- 
dred and  fifty  adults. 

7.  Variation. 

Franklin  (1913)  gives  a table  showing  the  variation  in  the 
length  of  the  malar  space  of  this  species  which  represents  con- 


118  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


siderable  variation.  In  a recent  paper  (1929a)  I have  shown 
that  the  vagans  and  subspecies  sandersoni  of  Franklin  was  a mix- 
ture of  two  species ; vagans  with  a comparative  long  malar  space 
and  frigidus  with  a shorter  malar  space.  Polymorphism  in  size, 
particularly  in  the  females,  is  considerable  and  is  due  to  trophog- 
eny  (Frison,  1927b).  Although  this  species  is  fairly  constant  in 
color  characters  there  are  variations  which  merit  recognition. 
Males  were  produced  in  Experiment  19,  1919,  which  had  some 
ferruginous  pubescence  at  the  apex  of  the  abdomen  and  specimens 
about  like  these  have  been  named  by  Bequaert  and  Plath  (1925) 
as  variety  coctus.  Specimens  with  the  apical  abdominal  segments 
yellowish  instead  of  black  are  common  and  have  been  assigned 
the  varietal  name  of  helenae  by  the  writer  (1929).  Both  the  vari- 
eties coctus  and  helenae  occur  in  the  same  nest  with  typical  speci- 
mens of  vagans  and  hence  are  merely  color  varieties.  Recently 
the  writer  (1929a)  has  reduced  the  form  bolsteri  Franklin  from 
specific  rank  to  the  status  of  a subspecies  of  vagans.  This  is  be- 
cause no  structural  characters  exist  for  the  separation  of  bolsteri 
from  vagans  and  it  seems  that  bolsteri  is  a color  form  of  vagans 
“ farther  along  nature’s  path  to  species  than  a form  differing  but 
slightly  in  color  characters  from  the  typical  species.”  Bolsteri 
seems  to  be  endemic  to  Newfoundland  where  typical  vagans  is  not 
known  to  occur. 

8.  Cocoons  and  food  storage. 

It  was  found  that  both  pollen  and  honey  were  stored  in  cocoons 
from  which  the  adults  have  emerged.  Special  wax-pollen  cells 
are  also  constructed,  usually  on  the  edge  of  the  comb,  for  the 
storage  of  honey  and  pollen  and  in  Experiment  19,  1919,  most  of 
the  honey  was  stored  in  these  wax-pollen  cells.  In  Nest  23,  1916, 
however,  which  contained  a large  honey  surplus,  it  was  mostly 
stored  in  renovated  cocoons.  Several  wax-pollen  storage  pots  in 
Experiment  19,  1919,  were  fifteen  millimeters  in  height  by  seven 
millimeters  in  breadth.  The  cocoons  when  freed  of  wax  and  pol- 
len usually  have  a pale  yellow  appearance  and  are  thin  in  compari- 
son with  those  of  certain  other  species  such  as  B.  americanorum. 
One  worker  cocoon  was  ten  millimeters  in  height  and  eight  mil- 
limeters at  its  greatest  diameter. 

In  agreement  with  B.  bimaculatus  and  B.  impatiens,  both  mem- 
bers of  the  subgenus  Pratobombus,  this  species  belongs  to  the 
“ Pollen-storer  ” section  in  the  terminology  of  Sladen  (1912) 


April,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  119 


which  is  equivalent  to  the  Anodontobomhus  Kruger  as  now  re- 
stricted. 

9.  Mating. 

There  are  no  records  in  the  literature  concerning  the  mating 
habits  of  this  species.  Young  queens  produced  in  Experiment  19, 
1919,  readily  mated  with  males  from  the  same  colony  under  con- 
trolled conditions  during  the  last  of  September  and  early  part  of 
October  (Frison,  1927a).  Undoubtedly  under  natural  conditions 
copulation  takes  place  in  late  summer  and  fall. 

10.  Nest  situations. 

The  queens  of  B.  vagans  will  apparently  nest  almost  any  place 
where  a suitable  protected  situation  can  be  found,  either  below  or 
above  the  surface  of  the  ground.  The  nests  of  mice  offer  both 
desirable  nesting  materials  and  favorable  nesting  sites  and  hence 
are  usually  utilized  by  the  queens  in  spring.  Reference  has  al- 
ready been  made  in  this  article  under  a heading  of  “ Resume  of 
literature  ” to  locations  of  nests  reported  by  Franklin,  Putnam 
and  Plath  and  will  not  be  repeated  here. 

11.  Miscellaneous. 

The  workers  of  this  species  are  aggressive  and  this  species  must 
be  listed  as  vicious  compared  with  such  a docile  species  as  B. 
auricomus  (Frison,  1918). 

Records  have  already  been  published  by  the  writer  (1926) 
showing  that  the  larvae  of  B.  vagans  are  subject  to  the  attacks  of 
Brachycoma  sarcophagina  (Townsend),  that  the  adult  queens  are 
sometimes  infested  with  the  nematode  S pherularia  bombi  Dufour, 
the  nest  damaged  by  larvae  of  Vitula  edmandsii  (Packard),  and 
that  various  scavengers  may  lodge  within  the  nests.  No  doubt 
other  parasites,  such  as  Physocephala  will  be  found  to  attack  B. 
vagans.  Among  the  social-parasites,  or  Psithyrus,  Plath  (1922b) 
has  found  that  B.  vagans  is  victimized  by  P.  labdriosus. 

12.  Domestication. 

Experiments  of  Plath  (1923)  and  those  of  my  own  performed 
in  1919  demonstrate  that  queens  of  this  species  may  be  readily  in- 
duced to  start  colonies  under  controlled  conditions.  Since  the 
males  and  females  mate  under  controlled  conditions  (Frison, 
1927a),  this  species  may  be  semi-domesticated.  Because  vagans 


120  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


has  a wide  distribution,  a long  malar  space  permitting  the  workers 
legitimate  access  to  many  flowers,  a fairly  long  seasonal  adjust- 
ment, and  may  be  semi-domesticated,  this  species  opens  up  possi- 
bilities to  the  laboratory  worker  and  is  a fit  subject  for  economic 
exploitation. 


Figure  i.  Comb  of  Bremus  vagans  in  a small  observation  box, 
showing  chaff  “ carded  ” into  box  by  the  adults  in  order 
to  cover  comb,  and  mother  queen.  September  16. 


E.  Bibliography. 

In  order  to  conserve  space,  references  in  this  article  identical 
with  those  cited  in  my  paper  relating  to  Bremus  impatiens , pub- 
lished in  a recent  number  of  this  same  journal,  are  not  repeated 
and  readers  interested  are  referred  to  this  recent  paper  for  ad- 
ditional bibliographic  material. 

Bequaert,  J.,  and  Plath,  O.  E. — 1925 — Description  of  a New 
Psithyrusf  with  an  Account  of  Psithyrus  laboriosus,  and  notes 
on  Bumblebees.  Bull.  Mus.  Comp.  Zook,  Vol.  LXVII,  No. 
6,  July,  pp.  265-288. 


April,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  121 


Frison,  T.  H. — 1918 — -Additional  Notes  on  the  Life  History  of 
Bombus  auricomus  Robt.  Ann.  Ent.  Soc.  Amer.,  Vol.  11, 
pp.  43-48- 

1926 — Contribution  to  the  Knowledge  of  the  Interrela- 
tions of  the  Bumblebees  of  Illinois  with  their 
Animate  Environment.  Annals  Ent.  Soc.  Amer., 
Vol.  XIX,  No.  2,  June,  pp.  203-235,  pi.  XVII. 

1927a — The  Fertilization  and  Hibernation  of  Queen 
Bumblebees  under  Controlled  Conditions.  (Brem- 
idae : Hym.).  Journ.  Econ.  Ent.,  Vol.  XX,  No.  3, 
June,  pp.  522-526,  Table  1. 

1927b — The  Development  of  the  Castes  of  Bumblebees 
(Bremidae:  Hym.).  Ann.  Ent.  Soc.  Amer.,  Vol. 
XX,  No.  2,  June,  pp.  156-180,  pis.  IX  and  X. 

1927c — Experiments  in  Rearing  Colonies  of  Bumblebees 
(Bremidae)  in  Artificial  Nests.  Biol.  Bull.,  Vol. 
LII,  No.  1,  January,  pp.  51-67,  figs.  1-4,  Table  1. 

1929a — Additional  Descriptions,  Synonymy  and  Records 
of  North  American  Bumblebees  ( Hym. -Bremidae) . 
Trans.  Amer.  Ent.  Soc.  Vol.  LV,  No.  926,  May  7, 
pp.  103-118. 

1929b — A Contribution  to  the  Knowledge  of  the  Bionom- 
ics of  Bremns  impatiens  (Cress.).  (Hym.).  Bull. 
Brook.  Ent.  Soc.,  XXIV,  No.  5,  Dec.,  pp.  261-285, 
pis.  24-26,  figs.  1-7. 

Packard,  A.  S. — 1864 — The  Humble  Bees  of  New  England  and 
their  Parasites.  Proc.  Essex  Inst.,  Vol.  4,  pp.  107-133. 

Plath,  O.  E. — 1922a — Notes  on  the  Nestihg  Habits  of  Several 
North  American  Bumblebees.  Psyche,  Vol.  XXIX,  Nos.  5- 
6,  pp.  189-202. 

1922b — Notes  on  Psithyrus,  with  Records  of  Two  New 
American  Hosts.  Biol.  Bull.,  Vol.  XLIII,  No.  1, 
July,  pp.  23-44. 

1924 — Miscellaneous  Biological  Observations  on  Bum- 
blebees. Biol.  Bull.,  Vol.  XLVII,  No.  2,  August, 
pp.  65-78. 

1927a — The  Natural  Grouping  of  the  Bremidae  (Bom- 
bidae)  with  Special  Reference  to  Biological  Char- 
acters. Biol.  Bull.,  Vol.  LII,  No.  5,  May,  pp.  394- 
410. 


122  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


1927b — Notes  on  the  Hibernation  of  Several  North 
American  Bumblebees.  Annals  Ent.  Soc.  Amer., 
Vol.  XX,  No.  2,  June,  pp.  181-192. 

Sladen,  F.  W.  L. — 1912 — The  Humblebee,  Macmillan  & Co.,  Lon- 
don, p.  283. 

Vogt,  O 1911 — Studien  uber  das  Artproblem.  Teil  2.  Ueber 

das  Variieren  der  Hummeln.  Sitzungsber.  Gesellsch.  Na- 
turforsch.  Freunde  Berlin,  (1),  pp.  31-74. 


Nesting  habits  of  Isodontia,  a subgenus  of  Chlorion  (Hy- 
menoptera). — In  the  December,  1928,  issue  of  this  Bulletin, 
Mr.  Geo.  P.  Engelhardt  has  an  interesting  account  of  the  breeding 
habits  of  Chlorion  harrisi  Fernald,  which  he  observed  in  Texas 
with  Mr.  H.  B.  Parks.  Their  observations  show  that  the  nesting 
of  this  wasp  is  unlike  that  of  the  majority  of  Chlorion,  which  dig 
their  own  burrows  in  the  soil.  It  is,  however,  similar  to  that  of 
Chlorion  anripes  Fernald  ( tibialis  Lepeletier),  as  observed  in  the 
eastern  United  States  by  Angus  and,  more  recently,  by  Phil  and 
Nellie  Rau ; to  that  of  Chlorion  elegans  (Smith),  as  described  by 
Davidson  in  California,  by  C.  N.  Ainslie  in  North  Dakota,  and  by 
S.  A.  Johnson  in  Colorado;  and  to  that  of  the  European  Chlorion 
splendidulum  (Costa),  according  to  P.  Marchal  and  H.  Nicolas. 
These  four  species  all  agree  in  selecting  pre-existing  cavities  for 
the  storing  of  their  prey,  which  consists  of  tree-crickets  or  katy- 
dids. The  cavities  may  be  old  galleries  made  by  carpenter-bees  in 
wood,  abandoned  burrows  of  Anthophora  in  adobe,  hollow  reeds 
or  plant  stalks,  or  rolled  up  dry  leaves.  Inside  the  hollow,  the 
several  cells  are  separated  by  plugs  of  dry  grass  or  other  plant 
material.  Chlorion  harrisi  has  also  been  recorded  by  H,  G.  Hub- 
bard and  by  F.  M.  Jones  (under  the  name  Isodontia  Philadel- 
phia) as  nesting  in  the  pitchers  of  Sarracenia  flava.  Moreover, 
the  four  species  mentioned  belong,  within  the  genus  Chlorion,  to 
a peculiar  group,  or  subgenus,  Isodontia,  characterized  inter  alia 
by  the  absence  of  a tarsal  comb  of  long  spines  on  the  fore  legs  of 
the  female.  The  lack  of  a comb  is  evidently  correlated  with  the 
aberrant  nesting  habits ; for  in  the  other  groups  of  Chlorion, 
which  dig  burrows  in  the  soil,  the  comb  is  strongly  developed  in 
the  female. 

From  these  considerations  one  is  naturally  led  to  the  conclusion 
that  all  the  fossorial  wasps  of  the  subgenus  Isodontia  will  prove 


April,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  123 


to  have  nesting  habits  similar  to  those  of  the  four  species  dis- 
cussed above.  I am  therefore  pleased  to  record  one  more  species 
of  this  group  that  strengthens  this  surmise.  A short  time  ago  I 
received  from  Mr.  G.  B.  Fairchild  a female  of  Chlorion  ( Iso - 
dontia ) exornatum  Fernald,  obtained  in  Royal  Palm  State  Park, 
southern  Florida,  during  December,  1920.  As  Mr.  Fairchild  tells 
me,  this  wasp  was  captured  while  entering  the  hollow,  broken 
stalk  of  a tall  herbaceous  plant,  probably  one  of  the  Umbelliferae. 
— J.  Bequaert,  Boston,  Massachusetts. 


124  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


BOOK  NOTES. 

General  Catalogue  of  the  Hemiptera— -Fascicle  III — Pyrrho- 

coridae,  by  R.  F.  Hussey,  with  Bibliography  by  Elizabeth 

Shermam — pp.  1-144.  (Published  by  Smith  College,  $1.50). 

This  Fascicle  III  reached  our  desk  just  as  we  had  gone  to  press 
for  our  February  number,  too  late  for  inclusion  in  our  com- 
mentary on  Fascicle  II. 

Dr.  Hussey  has  produced  in  this  what  is  probably  the  most 
complete  and  finished  catalogue  of  any  Family  of  the  Heterop- 
tera,  whatever  we  may  think  of  the  form  in  which  it  appears.  It 
is  an  invaluable  work  of  reference ; and  no  serious  student  of  the 
Heteroptera  can  consider  his  library  adequate  without  it. 

In  the  present  state  of  knowledge  of  the  family  (we  trust  soon 
to  be  enlarged  and  improved  by  Dr.  Hussey),  the  arrangement 
of  genera  in  the  Fascicle  is  in  systematic  order  as  near  as  may 
be,  within  the  subfamilies  and  tribes ; but  the  order  of  the  species 
is  strictly  alphabetical.  Accordingly,  collections  of  Pyrrhocoridae 
will  have  to  be  arranged  specifically  according  to  the  latest  mono- 
graphs (if  any)  ; or  to  the  owner’s  best  critical  knowledge.  The 
tribes — Euryophthalmini  and  Physopelltini — are  new;  and  three 
new  names  are  proposed — a remarkable  self-restraint  in  an  author 
working  with  a group  so  little  known.  Dr.  Hussey’s  study  of  the 
Family  shows  that  the  subfamily  Euryophthalminae  genitalically 
is  near  the  Family  Lygaeidae ; while  the  subfamily  Pyrrhocorinae 
shows  distinct  evidence  of  relationship  with  the  Coreidae.  These 
findings  set  the  Family  Pyrrhocoridae  definitely  between  the 
Lygaeidae  and  the  Coreidae. 

Forty-three  genera  containing  361  species  are  in  the  family. 
Lethierry  and  Severin,  in  1894,  gave  a total  of  33  genera  and 
272  species.  This  is  an  increase  of  over  1/3  in  both  categories 
in  the  intervening  36  years. 

All  references  and  citations  are  arranged  according  to  date, 
under  family,  subfamilies,  genera  and  species.  Within  the 
genera,  all  synonyms  are  arranged  alphabetically  in  the  same 
series  as  the  valid  species,  in  addition  to  the  complete  synonymy 
under  each  species,  in  its  proper  place. 

There  are  three  appendices : A — genera  wrongly  included  in 

the  Pyrrhocoridae ; B — list  of  pyrrhocorid  species  described  under 
generic  names  now  assigned  to  other  families  and  their  present 
nomenclature ; and  C — list  of  species  transferred  by  various  au- 


April,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  125 


thors  to  genera  other  than  those  in  which  they  appear  in  the 
Catalogue. 

The  Bibliography,  which  is  very  extensive,  was  prepared  by 
Miss  Elizabeth  Sherman.  It  covers  pp.  1 14-137.  The  Index 
is  arranged  according  to  genera  and  higher  groups;  and  species. 

The  editorial  eye  brings  realization  that  proof-reading  of 
foreign  languages  as  set  by  American  typesetters,  is  a ticklish, 
unchancy  and  unsatisfactory  business  at  best.  Meantime,  one 
also  remembers  the  vengeful  wish  “Would  that  mine  enemy  would 
write  a book,”  against  the  day  of  requital. 

All  in  all,  this  fascicle  continues  the  high  standard  set  by  the 
first  to  appear;  and  despite  any  minor  shortcomings  which  might 
reveal  themselves  on  a critical  survey,  it  is  at  this  writing  easily 
the  best  general  catalogue  of  any  family  of  the  Heteroptera.  No 
institutional  library  of  biology  can  afford  to  be  without  it ; and  it 
is  indispensable  to  the  serious  worker  in  Heteroptera,  however 
restricted  his  specialty.  J.  R.  T.-B. 

N.  B. — These  remarks  are  dissociated  from  the  reviewer’s  func- 
tion as  one  of  the  Board  of  Editors;  and  are  completely  realistic 
and  objective. 


The  American  Entomological  Company  of  Brooklyn, 
N.  Y.,  has  come  to  Life  again  in  the  shape  of 
CARPOCAPSA,  Pittsburgh,  Pa. 

INSECT  PINS,  ETC. 

CARPOCAPSA 

GEORGE  FRANCK,  JR. 

Write  for  catalogue 

375  Lehigh  Avenue,  East  Liberty  Station 
Pittsburgh,  Penna. 


PUBLICATIONS  OF  THE  BROOKLYN  ENTOMO- 
LOGICAL SOCIETY. 

Explanation  of  all  Technical  Terms  Used  in  Entomology. 


By  John  B.  Smith,  Se.D.  (The  Glossary)  Cloth $3.00 

Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  (un- 
bound), vols.  4-8  (per  vol.) 2.00 

Vols.  9 to  date 2.50 

Entomologica  Americana,  vols.  1-6,  each 4.00 

“ “ vols.  7-10,  each 4.00 

Papilio,  vols.  1 and  4,  each 3.00 

Monograph  of  Plusia,  Ottolengui 50 


Reprints 

A Revision  of  the  Genus  Eurema  Hubner — Part  II — Alexander 
B.  Klots,  64  pp.,  4 pts.  $1.50. 

A Review  of  the  North  American  Species  of  Podabrus — H.  C. 
Fall,  48  pp.  $1.25. 

A Contribution  to  the  Knowledge  of  the  Life  History  of  Bremus 
bimacidatus  (Cresson) — T.  H.  Frison,  64  pp.,  4 pis.  $1.50. 
The  Biology  of  the  White  Pine  Weevil,  Pissodes  strobi  (Peck) — 
Raymond  L.  Taylor,  pp.  168,  10  pis.  $3.50. 

Orders  for  publications  must  be  sent  with  remittance  to  Li- 
brarian, Brooklyn  Entomological  Society,  c/o  Central  Museum, 
Eastern  Parkway,  Brooklyn,  N.  Y. 


Vol.  XXV 


No.  3 


JUNE.  1930 

BULLETIN 

OF  THE 

Brooklyn  Entomological 
Society 

NEW  SERIES 


PUBLICATION  COMMITTEE 

J.  R.  de  la  TORRE-BUENO,  Editor 

E.  L.  BELL  GEO.  P.  ENGELHARDT 

Published  for  the  Society  by  the 

Science  Press  Printing  Co., 

Lime  and  Green  Sts.,  Lancaster,  Pa., 

Price,  60  cents  Subscription,  $2.50  per  year 

Mailed  August  4,  1930 


Entered  as  second-class  matter  January  21,  1919,  at  the  post  office  at  Lancaster,  Pa., 
under  the  Act  of  March  3,  1879 


The  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society 

Meetings  are  held  on  the  second  Thursday  after  the  first  Tuesday  of  each 
month  from  October  to  June,  inclusive,  at  the  Central  Museum,  Eastern 
Parkway  and  Washington  Ave.,  Brooklyn.  The  annual  dues  are  $2.00. 

OFFICERS,  1930 
Honorary  President 
CHARLES  W.  LENG 

President  Treasurer 

W.  T.  DAVIS  G.  P.  ENGELHARDT 


Vice-President 

J.  R.  de  la  TORRE-BUENO 
Recording  Secretary 
E.  L.  BELL 
Corresponding  Secretary 
HOWARD  NOTMAN 


Central  Museum 
Eastern  Parkway 
Librarian 

DR.  JOSEPH  BEQUAERT 

Curator 

J.  M.  SHERIDAN 


Delegate  to  Council  of  New  York 
Academy  of  Sciences 
G.  P.  ENGELHARDT 


CONTENTS 

TRICHOPTERA  FROM  CAPE  BRETON,  Banks  127 

PAPILIO  MONUSTE  LINNAEUS  (A  CRITIQUE),  Holland 133 

, NOMENCLATURE  OF  NEOTROPICAL  NOTONECTA,  WITH  N. 

SP.,  Hungerford  138 

DR.  WILLIAM  BARNES,  Engelhardt  * 143 

CERATOCOMBUS  VAGANS,  Torre-Bueno  144 

WRONGLY  IDENTIFIED  WATERS TRIDER)  Drake  145 

ANTHOXIA  AENEOGASTER,  Frost  -. 146 

SEEKING  A BETTER  CLIMATE,  Frost  146 

DIURNAL  LEPIDOPTERA  FROM  WYOMING  AND  COLORADO, 

Klots  S 147 

NEW  SPECIES  OF  TENAGOBIA,  Deay  171 

BOOK  NOTES:  A HANDBOOK  OF  THE  MOSQUITOES  OF  N.  A. 

Bequaert  182 

GALL  WASPS  OF  THE  GENUS  CYNIPS,  J.  R. 

T.  B 184 

PROCEEDINGS  OF  THE  SOCIETY,  Bell  185 


Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society 

Published  in 

February,  April,  June,  October  and  December  of  each  year 

Subscription  price,  domestic,  $2.50  per  year;  foreign,  $2.75  in  advance;  single 
copies,  60  cents.  Advertising  rates  on  application.  Short  articles,  notes  and 
observations  of  interest  to  entomologists  are  solicited.  Authors  will  receive  25 
reprints  free  if  ordered  in  advance  of  publication.  Address  subscriptions  and 
all  communications  to 

J.  R.  de  la  TORRE-BUENO , Editor, 

38  De  Kalb  Avenue,  White  Plains,  N.  Y. 


BULLETIN 

OF  THE 

BROOKLYN  ENTOMOLOGICAL  SOCIETY 


Vol.  XXV  June,  1930  No.  3 


TRICHOPTERA  FROM  CAPE  BRETON,  NOVA 
SCOTIA. 

By  Nathan  Banks,  Cambridge,  Mass. 

During  the  past  two  summers  Mr.  Graham  Fairchild  has  col- 
lected a number  of  caddice  flies  on  Cape  Breton,  Nova  Scotia. 
Among  them  are  several  that  are  new,  and  others  of  which  I have 
rarely  received  specimens.  Most  of  the  species  were  described  by 
Francis  Walker,  who  had  material  from  the  southern  part  of 
Nova  Scotia. 

Besides  the  31  species  recorded,  there  is  a female  of  the  genus 
Lype,  a genus  not  before  recorded  from  America,  but  well  known 
in  Europe. 


Phryganeidae. 

Neuroma,  postica  Walk. 

Two  from  Baddeck,  4,  8 July. 

Neuronia  pardalis  Walk. 

One  from  Baddeck,  7 July.  A rather  small  light-colored  speci- 
men, the  hind  wings  partly  light  on  basal  portion ; we  have  a simi- 
lar specimen  from  Anticosti. 

Neuronia  concatenata  Walk. 

Several  specimens  from  Baddeck,  12,  apd  29  July,  and  Pt. 
Bevis,  10  July. 

Phryganea  cinerea  Walk. 

From  Pt.  Bevis,  10  July. 

Limnephilidae. 

Arctoecia  consocia  Walk. 

One  from  Baddeck,  9 Aug. 

Glyphotaelius  hostilis  Hag. 

From  Baddeck,  14,  15,  and  24  July. 


128  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


Anabolia  bimaculata  Walk. 

One  from  Baddeck,  July. 

Limnephilus  combinatus  Walk. 

Several  from  Baddeck,  8,  17  July,  9 Aug. 

Limnephilus  ornatus  Bks. 

From  Baddeck,  21  July,  1,  9,  13  Aug.,  and  Ingonish,  7 Aug. 
Limnephilus  moestus  Bks. 

From  Baddeck,  8,  10,  11,  12  July;  Pt.  Bevis,  10  July. 
Limnephilus  submonilifer  Walk. 

Many  from  Baddeck,  1,  3,  and  14  Sept. 

Platycentropus  maculipennis  Kol. 

From  Baddeck,  3 Sept. 

Pycnopsyche  scabripennis  Rbr. 

From  Cape  North,  1 Aug.,  also  Englishtown. 

Pycnopsyche  guttifer  Hag. 

Two  from  Baddeck,  20  July,  14  Sept. 

Caborius  punctatissimus  Walk. 

From  Baddeck,  3 Sept. 

Anisogamus  modestus  Bks. 

Four  from  Baddeck,  8 July. 

Anisogamus  diver  gens  Walk. 

Many  from  Baddeck,  11  Aug.,  4 Sept. 

Drusus  sparsus  Bks. 

Several  from  Baddeck,  5,  8 July. 

Hyle psyche  indistinctus  Walk. 

One  from  Baddeck,  18  July;  a very  pale  specimen  14  Sept.; 
both  males  with  inner  apical  spur  of  hind  tibia  enlarged.  A fe- 
male from  N.  Sidney  (Noble  coll.)  also  has  the  spurs  enlarged, 
but  genitalia  appear  different. 

N eophylax  ornatus  Bks. 

A female  from  Baddeck,  8 July;  a male  from  Middle  River,  11 
July.  The  male  is  marked  much  as  female,  but  the  pale  is  more 
broken  by  dark,  so  that  in  some  of  the  pale  cells  or  forks  there 
are  dark  cross-bands. 

Sericostomatidae. 

Alepomyia  bryanti  Bks. 

A number  of  specimens  from  Pt.  Bevis,  10  July,  agree  with 
types  from  Grand  Lake,  Newfoundland. 

Mormomyia  vernalis  Bks. 

One  male  from  Baddeck,  4 Sept.,  with  the  characteristic  long 
tufts  of  hair  overhanging  the  genitalia. 


June,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  129 


Arcadopsyche  gen.  nov. 

A Sericostomatid  in  the  section  of  Crunoecia.  Antennae 
widely  separate  at  base,  basal  joint  greatly  elongate  and  en- 
larged, near  tip  curved  downward,  densely  clothed  with 
mostly  erect,  long  hair.  Vertex  with  a tuft  of  long  hair  each 
side  from  a tubercle  near  the  eye;  palpi  (of  male)  recurved, 
densely  clothed  with  long-stalked  scales,  forming  a great 
mask  over  face ; spurs  2,  4,  4.  In  fore  wings  the  costal  area 
is  very  broad,  the  discal  cell  slender,  forks  1,  2,  and  5,  fifth 
connected  beyond  the  forking  to  branch  of  medius ; anal  vein 
does  not  connect  out  to  fork  5 ; the  second  anal  (or  axillary) 
runs  into  anal  long  before  tip.  In  hind-wings  the  venation  is 
similar  to  Crunoecia,  but  discal  cell  closed  and  smaller,  and 
the  apparent  fork  3 not  as  wide  at  tip. 

Related  to  Olemira  by  palpi  and  antennae,  and  with  very  simi- 
lar venation  in  both  wings,  but  lacks  scales  on  fore  wings,  and  the 
reflexed  costal  area. 

Arcadopsyche  prominens  sp.  nov. 

Scales  of  palpi  gray,  iridescent  and  rather  bluish  at  tips; 
hair  on  basal  joint  of  antennae  mostly  deep  black,  but  some 
white,  beyond  the  antenna  is  pale,  narrowly  annulate  with 
dark ; vertex  with  mostly  gray,  but  some  black  hair ; thorax 
with  mostly  black  hair;  abdomen  black  toward  tip,  pale  on 
base  and  beneath;  legs  pale,  tibiae  and  tarsi  darker  outside. 
Wings  fumose,  with  darker  veins ; short  hair  mostly  yellow- 
ish, but  some  dark,  large  black  patch  just  behind  end  of  dis- 
cal cell,  smaller  patches  in  area  beyond,  and  some  along  anal 
margin ; outer  fringe  largely  black,  but  some  patches  of  pale 
hair.  Hind  wings  fumose,  with  darker  fringe.  Discal  cell 
nearly  as  long  as  pedicel,  lower  branch  of  medius  and  fork  5 
equally  far  basad,  long  cross-vein  from  fork  5 to  branch  of 
medius,  very  short  cross-vein  from  anal  to  cubitus,  and  placed 
much  before  base  of  discal  cell.  Expanse  19  mm. 

From  Cape  North,  Cape  Breton,  Nova  Scotia,  7 August. 

Leptoceridae. 

(Ecetina  micans  Hag. 

From  Pt.  Bevis,  10  July;  also  darker  specimens  from  Baddeck, 
20  July.  Probably  the  same  as  inconspicua  Walk.  Walker’s  type 
is  rather  larger,  and  I have  not  seen  specimens  from  as  far  south. 


130  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxr 


Rhyacophilidae. 

Rhyacophila  atrata  Bks. 

From  Middle  River,  n July. 

Rhyacophila  luctuosa  Bks. 

From  Baddeck,  6 July,  and  North  River,  13  July.  Probably 
the  same  as  Walker’s  invaria.  From  what  I could  see  of  the  type 
the  venation  was  the  same,  and  the  broad,  emarginate  superior 
process  the  same,  but  I could  not  see  the  shape  of  the  apical  part 
of  the  inferior  appendage,  but  the  length  and  size  of  inferior  ap- 
pendage was  about  the  same  as  luctuosa. 

Rhyacophila  fairchildi  sp.  nov. 

Head  brown,  with  yellow  and  black  hair;  antennae  mostly 
pale  on  basal  part,  beyond  dark ; palpi  dark  on  apical  part ; 
lateral  ocelli  only  about  three  diameters  from  the  eyes  ; 
thorax  with  mostly  yellow  hair;  legs  pale,  darker  on  front 
tibiae  and  tarsi,  spurs  dark;  abdomen  dark  above,  pale  be- 
neath, on  upper  sides  with  rather  short,  erect,  pale  hairs. 
Wings  fuscous,  stigma  darker,  clothed  with  short  black  hair, 
and  many  patches  of  golden  hair,  two  large  spots  on  anal 
margin ; in  apical  half  of  wing  the  golden  occupies  most  of 
the  space ; veins  with  long,  erect  black  hair,  some  here  and 
there  golden.  In  fore-wings  fork  2 is  a little  before  fork  1, 
fork  3 scarcely  as  far  basad  as  fork  1,  cross-vein  to  radius 
close  to  fork  1 ; a rounded  hyaline  spot  over  forking  of  me- 
dian vein.  Expanse  14  mm. 

From  Baddeck,  Cape  Breton,  Nova  Scotia,  4 Sept. 

Hydropsychidae. 

Hydropsyche  indecisa  Walk. 

From  Pt.  Bevis,  10  July,  and  Baddeck,  31  July. 

Dolophilus  hreviatus  Bks. 

One  from  Pt.  Bevis,  10  July. 

Plectrocnemia  aureola  sp.  nov. 

Face  with  dark  hair  below  antennae,  above  mostly  yellow- 
ish, but  a tuft  of  black  each  side  near  eye;  antennae  pale, 
faintly  annulate  with  brown;  thorax  with  mostly  yellow  hair; 
abdomen  dark  above,  pale  beneath ; legs  pale  yellowish,  front 
tibiae  and  tarsi  darker  on  outer  side,  spurs  pale.  Fore-wings 
with  mostly  golden  or  yellowish  hair,  some  patches  of  dark, 
mostly  along  the  veins  and  at  their  ends,  larger  dark  spots 
near  end  of  anal,  and  over  connection  from  anal  to  cubitus. 


June,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  131 


Fore-wings  fairly  broad;  fork  i a little  longer  than  its 
pedicel,  fork  2 a trifle  back  on  discal  cell,  fork  3 and  4 sub- 
equal, not  near  as  far  basad  as  fork,  2,  fork  5 broad,  as  wide 
before  middle  as  at  tip.  In  the  hind-wings  fork  1 shorter 
than  pedicel,  fork  2 back  a little  on  discal  cell,  fork  5 very 
broad,  broader  before  middle  than  at  tip.  Male  appendages 
show  a very  broad  ventral  plate,  emarginate  in  middle.  Ex- 
panse 16  mm. 

From  Baddeck,  Cape  Breton,  Nova  Scotia,  20  July,  and  Hamp- 
ton, N.  H.,  1 July  (S.  A.  Shaw). 

Plectrocnemia  albipuncta  sp.  nov. 

Below  antennae  mostly  black  hair,  above  mostly  white,  a 
large  patch  of  black  on  each  side  on  vertex,  thorax  with 
mostly  black,  but  some  patches  of  white  hair;  antennae 
brown,  annulate  with  pale ; legs  pale,  outer  side  of  tibiae  and 
mostly  beyond  dark,  spurs  dark  on  outer  side,  pale  beneath  ; 
abdomen  dark  above,  paler  beneath. 

Fore- wings  black,  with  many  white  spots,  largely  grouped, 
some  near  base,  others  tending  to  form  band  near  middle, 
others  near  stigma  and  below,  a few  near  tip,  but  marginal 
fringe  black,  close  to  base  of  wing  is  some  erect,  black  hair ; 
hind-wings  slightly  fumose,  darker  on  tips.  Fore-wings 
rather  narrow  for  the  genus ; fork  1 longer  than  its  pedicel, 
fork  2 back  to  cross-vein,  forks  3 and  4 subequal,  but  not  as 
far  basad  as  fork  2.  In  hind-wing  discal  cell  faintly  closed 
(except  in  one  specimen),  fork  1 three  times  as  long  as  ped- 
icel, fork  2 scarcely  back  on  cell ; male  appendages  show  a 
large  curved  plate  each  side.  Expanse  15  mm. 

From  Pt.  Bevis,  10  Aug.,  and  Baddeck,  9 Aug.,  Cape  Breton, 
Nova  Scotia. 


Explanation  of  Plate. 

Fig.  1.  Arcadopsyche  prominens,  fore  wing. 

Fig.  2.  Plectrocnemia  aureola,  genitalia,  top. 
Fig.  3.  Plectrocnemia  aureola,  genitalia,  side. 
Fig.  4.  Rhyacophila  fairchildi,  genitalia,  side. 
Fig.  5.  Plectrocnemia  aureola,  ventral  plate. 

Fig.  6.  Plectrocnemia  albipuncta,  genitalia,  top. 
Fig.  7.  Rhyacophila  fairchildi,  genitalia,  top. 
Fig.  8.  Arcadopsyche  prominens,  head  and  hair. 
Fig.  9.  Plectrocnemia  albipuncta,  genitalia,  side. 
Fig.  10.  Arcadopsyche  prominens,  genitalia,  side. 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  Vol.  XXV,  No.  3 


Plate  VII 


June,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  133 


PAPILIO  MONUSTE  LINNAEUS  (A  CRITIQUE). 

By  W.  J.  Holland,  Pittsburgh,  Pa. 

I have  been  much  interested  in  an  article  published  in  the  Bul- 
letin of  the  Hill  Museum,  Vol.  Ill,  No.  i,  pp.  52-56,  entitled: 
“The  Identity  of  Papilio  monuste  Linne,”  presumably  from  the 
pen  of  Messrs.  Joicey  and  Talbot.  The  authors  identify  Pieris 
monuste  (Linne)  with  Pieris  cynis  Hewitson,  consistently  mis- 
spelling the  specific  name  throughout  their  article  as  “cycnis” 
Hewitson.  There  is  no  Pierid  bearing  the  specific  name  “ cycnis,” 
so  far  as  I can  ascertain.  The  article  is  prompted  by  the  query 
raised  in  1879  by  W.  F.  Kirby  as  to  whether  monuste  has  hitherto 
been  correctly  identified. 

After  a careful  examination  of  all  the  literature  and  all  the 
figures  cited  in  the  article  I cannot  agree  with  the  conclusion  that 
Pieris  monuste  (L.)  was  misidentified  by  Fabricius,  the  pupil  of 
Linnaeus,  and  that  it  is  identical  with  the  insect  named  P.  cynis 
by  Hewitson. 

I have  critically  compared  the  figure  given  by  Kleemann  with 
that  given  by  Cramer  and  see  no  material  difference  between  the 
two,  except  that  the  figure  of  the  upper  side  of  the  insect  given  by 
Kleemann  is  decidedly  better  than  the  figure  given  by  Cramer. 
Kleemann  was  a miniature  painter  of  renown  and  his  figures  are 
exceedingly  accurate,  which  cannot  always  be  said  for  those  of 
Cramer. 

Cramer  cites  Kleemann’s  figure  as  being  that  of  the  same  insect 
which  he  himself  depicts  as  monuste.  After  a careful  examina- 
tion of  the  two  figures  and  several  hundreds  of  male  specimens 
of  what  is  known  as  P.  monuste,  I see  no  reason  for  thinking  that 
Cramer  was  wrong  in  identifying  the  insect,  which  he  figures,  as 
being  the  same  as  that  figured  by  Kleemann.  I have  hundreds  of 
specimens  of  what  are  undoubtedly  P.  monuste  df,  some  of  which 
match  Kleemann’s  figure,  and  many  of  which  match  neither  of 
them.  Even  in  these  plain  white  things  marked  with  black  bor- 
ders there  is  variety.  Butler’s  statement  (C/.  Cat.  Fabr.  Diurnal 
Lepidoptera,  1869,  p.  199)  puts  the  matter  quite  too  strongly.  In 
this  I agree  with  the  authors  of  the  article  I am  reviewing. 

The  line  of  argument  followed  by  my  friends  in  seeking  to 
reach  their  conclusion  does  not  commend  itself  to  my  mind  as 
being  logical  or  even  just. 


134  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


They  begin  by  attacking  the  competency  of  Fabricius  as  a wit- 
ness in  the  case,  when  he  under  monuste  cites  Kleemann’s  figure. 
They  say  that  Fabricius  “obviously  was  writing  from  what  he 
saw  in  Kleemann,  and  did  not  know  the  insect  himself.  There  is 
therefore  no  question  as  to  what  Fabricius  meant  by  his  use  of  the 
name.  He  founded  it  on  a figure  without  any  proof  that  this 
figure  represented  the  Linnaean  insect,  and  no  one  can  prove  that 
this  was  not  a misidentification.  His  whole  conception  of  the 
Linnaean  insect  was  obviously  based  on  the  Kleemann  figure.” 
To  this  statement  I take  exception  as  involving  a petitio  principii. 
Fabricius  was  a pupil  of  Linnaeus.  He  gives  abundant  evidence 
throughout  his  writings  of  thorough  familiarity  with  the  work  of 
his  teacher  and  friend.  He  knew  the  collections  of  Linnaeus,  and 
was  in  a far  better  position  to  decide  what  Linnaeus  intended 
under  the  name  monuste  than  any  one  at  the  present  day.  His 
citation  of  Kleemann’s  figure  does  not  by  any  necessity  imply 
that  he  <( obviously  was  writing  from  what  he  saw  in  Kleemann, 
and  did  not  know  the  insect  himself.”  This  statement  is  a purely 
arbitrary  assumption  made  by  the  writers,  I fear  without  due  re- 
spect for  the  learning  and  accomplishments  of  Fabricius. 

I object  even  more  strongly  to  the  next  point  made  in  the  argu- 
ment of  the  writers.  They  say:  “Cramer  . . . figures  an  insect 
from  a specimen,  which  thus  becomes  the  type  of  his  monuste. 
His  reference  to  Kleemann  was  apparently  copied  from  Fabricius. 
As  the  Cramer  figure  agrees  much  better  with  the  Linnaean  de- 
scription than  does  the  figure  of  Kleemann  (note  underside),  we 
consider  he  has  proved  that  the  Fabricius  determination  was 
erroneous.” 

Cramer  was  not  unacquainted  with  the  literature  of  the  subject 
upon  which  he  wrote  and  published.  In  the  Introduction  to  his 
great  work  he  cites  Kleemann  among  other  authors,  with  whose 
writings  he  was  familiar,  and  informs  us  that  Kleemann  was  the 
son-in-law  of  M.  August  J.  Rosel  von  Rosenhof,  who  after  the 
death  of  his  celebrated  father-in-law  took  up  and  continued  the 
work  of  illustrating  the  more  beautiful  exotic  butterflies.  The 
assertion  made  by  the  writers  of  the  article  that  Cramer’s  “refer- 
ence to  Kleemann  was  apparently  copied  from  Fabricius,”  is  un- 
just to  Cramer.  Cramer  knew  his  subject  and  ke  knew  the  entire 
literature  extant  in  his  day.  Any  one  who  is  careful  to  examine 
will  see  that  he  constantly  makes  reference  to  Kleemann’s  work 


June,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  135 


throughout  his  own.  In  Vol.  I of  the  Papilio  Exot.,  p.  35,  he  cites 
Kleemann’s  figure  of  P.  oenone;  on  p.  86  under  P.  amphinome  he 
cites  Kleemann’s  figure,  and  so  on  passim  throughout  his  entire 
great  work.  He  was  not  “copying  Fabricius”  and  had  no  need  to 
copy  Fabricius.  There  is  not  a shadow  of  doubt  that  he  was 
familiar  with  Kleemann’s  work  and  that  it  was  before  him,  while 
he  was  carrying  on  his  own.  Cramer  himself  identifies  the  but- 
terfly which  he  figures  as  being  the  same  which  was  figured  by 
Kleemann.  Both  representations  particularly  that  of  Kleemann 
are  recognizable  figures  of  the  American  insect  monuste. 

Linnaeus  when  describing  monuste  simply  says  “ Habitat  in 
exteris  terris,”  which  means  that  the  specimen  came  to  him  from 
parts  unknown.  Kleemann’s  figure  of  course  was  that  of  an  in- 
sect from  Dutch  Guiana,  where  monuste  abounds.  Cramer  says 
that  the  insect  is  found  in  China,  but  Pieris  ( Phrissura ) cynis 
Hewitson,  which  Joicey  and  Talbot  try  to  make  out  to  be  what 
Cramer  figured,  does  not  occur  in  China,  but  in  regions  further 
south,  Sumatra,  Borneo,  and  the  Malay  Peninsula.  Cramer  was 
undoubtedly  mistaken  in  assigning  China  as  the  habitat  of  his 
insect. 

It  is  difficult  to  conceive  how  the  learned  gentlemen,  who  have 
recently  favored  us  with  their  views  upon  this  subject,  can  by  any 
possibility  have  confounded  the  monuste  of  Fabricius,  Kleemann, 
and  Cramer,  with  Phrissura  cynis  (Hewitson),  or  how  they  can 
imagine  that  Linnaeus’'  description  fits  the  latter  species.  P. 
cynis  is  well  figured  by  Hewitson,  Exot.  Butt.,  Pieris,  PI.  VIII, 
fig.  54,  (not  P.  VII  as  cited  by  Joicey  and  Talbot),  by  Butler, 
Trans.  Ent.  Soc.  London,  1871,  PI.  VII,  fig.  1,  and  by  Distant, 
Rhop.  Malayana,  PL  XXVI,  figs.  5 and  6.  It  is  also  well  figured 
by  Seitz,  Vol.  9,  PI.  62.  c.  We  have  an  abundance  of  material  rep- 
resenting the  species  from  Sumatra,  the  type-locality,  and  from 
the  Malay  Peninsula.  The  argument  given  by  the  learned  au- 
thors of  the  article,  which  I am  reveiwing,  strikes  me  as  extremely 
labored  and  the  conclusion  pre-eminently  unsatisfactory. 

I shall  persist  in  applying  the  specific  name  monuste  to  the  well 
known  neotropical  species,  and  the  name  cynis  to  the  equally  well 
known  oriental  insect.  They  are  wholly  distinct.  The  Sumatran 
insect  may  at  once  readily  be  distinguished  from  the  American 
monuste  by  the  different  form  of  the  wings,  its  smaller  size,  the 
wide  black  costal  margin  and  the  broad  black  apical  area  and  by 
the  entire  dissimilarity  of  the  female  from  any  form  of  monuste, 


136  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vo l-  XXV 


ij,  ever  found.  The  two  insects  are  totally  different,  and  I can- 
not imagine  how  the  singular  conclusion  has  been  reached  by  my 
learned  friends,  that  Linnaeus’  description  fits  the  Sumatran  in- 
sect. It  fits  the  American  insect  far  better  than  the  Sumatran. 
With  all  due  respect  to  the  “Father  of  Natural  History,”  his 
descriptions  of  butterflies  in  many  cases  are  hardly  worth  the 
paper  upon  which  they  are  printed.  We  honor  him  for  starting 
the  good  work  of  classification,  and  pointing  out  the  lines  along 
which  it  should  be  carried ; but  a great  deal  of  paper  and  time  is 
being  wasted  in  recent  years  in  attempting  laboriously  to  decide 
that  what  he  named  was  something  else  than  what  all  his  follow- 
ers have  up  to  the  present  time  accepted  as  being  the  species  in- 
dicated by  him. 

The  name  proposed  for  the  American  insect  by  Messrs.  Joicey 
and  Talbot,  phileta  Fabricius,  is  that  of  a melanic  variety,  common 
in  American  collections,  in  which  the  upper  surface  is  pale  brown- 
ish gray. 

I am  sorry  to  differ  from  friends,  but  in  this  case  I cannot  fail 
to  do  so,  having  regard  to  what  I think  is  the  truth  of  things. 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  Yol.  XXY,  No.  3 


Plate  VIII 


138  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xXV 


A REPORT  ON  THE  NOMENCLATURE  OF  SOME 
NEOTROPICAL  NOTONECTA  WITH  THE 
DESCRIPTION  OF  SOME  NEW  SPECIES. 

By  H.  B.  Hungerford,  Department  of  Entomology,  University 

of  Kansas. 

An  examination  of  the  types  and  historical  materials  in  various 
European  Museums  makes  necessary  certain  changes  in  the 
nomenclature  of  some  of  the  American  Notonecta.  The  confu- 
sion of  species  in  the  past  has  led  to  errors  in  synonomy  and  to  a 
misconception  of  the  faunal  distribution  of  certain  species.  Thus 
in  Kirkaldy  and  Torre-Bueno’s  Catalogue  of  American  Aquatic 
and  Semi-aquatic  Hemiptera  (1909)  we  find  the  distribution  of 
Notonecta  undulata  Say  which  is  a North  American  species  given 
as  “^Vll  over  Canada  and  the  United  States;  Mexico;  Cuba;  Ja- 
maica ; Columbia ; Peru  ; Chile.”'  The  above  was  based,  doubtless, 
on  the  conception  of  the  species  by  the  senior  author  who  had 
monographed  the  Notonecta  of  the  world  (1897).  In  the  above 
named  catalogue  we  find  the  following  statement  of  synonymy: 
Notonecta  undulata  Say  1832. 

= americana  Gmelin  1789. 

— scutellaris  Fieb.  (in  part)  1852. 

= punctata  Fieb.  (in  part)  1852. 

= variabilis  Fieb.  (in  part)  1852. 

— pallipes  Fieb.  1852. 

= maculata  Fieb.  1852. 

==  unicolor  Fieb.  1852. 

= virescens  Blanchard  1852. 

= pallipes  Lethierry  1881. 

Mr.  Kirkaldy’s  conception  of  this  species  was  just  as  confused 
as  his  treatment  of  Notonecta  glauca  Linn,  has  been  shown  to  be 
by  Delcourt  and  others  or  his  inexplainable  inclusion  of  his  Noto- 
necta kiangsis  as  a variety  of  Notonecta  chinensis  Fallou ! The 
assumption  that  Kirkaldy  had  a reasonable  understanding  of  spe- 
cific identity  led  to  the  description  of  this  Notonecta  kiangsis 
Kirkaldy  erroneously  as  new  by  both  Professor  Esaki  and  me. 
We  described  it  almost  simultaneously  under  the  names  Noto- 
necta bergrothi  Esaki  and  Notonecta  suensoni  Hungerford  from 
specimens  from  China  which  had  come  into  our  hands.  Both  of 


June,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  139 


us  have  since  seen  the  specimens  in  the  'Paris  Museum  bearing  the 
locality  labels  as  published  by  Kirkaldy  and  treated  by  him  as  a 
variety  of  Notonecta  chinensis  and  recognized  the  synonymy  of 
our  names.  For  my  part,  however,  I was  unable  to  explain  how 
any  one  of  Kirkaldy’s  experience  could  have  done  it  until  I saw 
the  type  of  Notonecta  virescens  Blanchard  and  recalled  that 
Kirkaldy  considered  it  under  Notonecta  undulata  Say.  Notonecta 
virescens  Blanchard  is  a small  species  described  from  Chile,  South 
America,  and  belongs  to  that  group  of  small  South  American 
Notonecta  in  which  I have  described  several  species.  There  is  a 
larger  species  in  Chile,  of  which  I have  several  hundred  speci- 
mens, that  in  Kirkaldy’s  day,  might  with  some  justification  have 
..  been  confused  with  Notonecta  undulata  Say  merely  because  of 
its  size.  From  the  description  and  drawing  of  Notonecta  fazi  sp. 
n.  given  below  it  will  be  seen  that  it  is  specifically  distinct  from 
Notonecta  undulata  Say.  I have  not  seen  any  South  American 
specimen  of  Say’s  species.  Neither  have  I seen  it  from  the 
Antilles.  It  occurs  throughout  North  America  but  is  replaced 
more  and  more  as  one  goes  south1  by  a species  with  a broad  black 
band  across  the  hemelytra  which  has  been  known  to  us  in  recent 
years,  as  Notonecta  howardii  Bueno.  This  is  the  species  which 
comes  to  our  collections  in  such  numbers  from  the  Islands  of  the 
Antilles.  It  is  Notonecta  indica  Linnaeus.  Sometimes  one  finds 
specimens  with  the  scutellum  margined  with  yellow — such,  un- 
fortunately, is  the  specimen  in  the  Linnean  collection  in  London. 
This  had  resulted  in  confusing  this  species  with  another  which 
has  a flavous  margin  on  the  scutellum  and  a similar  black  band 
across  the  hemelytra,  the  species  to  which  we  have  been  giving  the 
name  Notonecta  indica  and  which  is  common  in  the  Southwestern 
part  of  the  United  States  and  in  Mexico.  It  is  readily  separated 
from  the  true  Notonecta  indica  Linn,  by  the  shape  of  the  mesotro- 
chanter  which  is  angulate.  (In  Notonecta  indica  Linn.  t= 
Notonecta  howardii  Bueno  the  mesotrochanter  is  rounded).  It 
is  Notonecta  unifasciata  Guerin — the  type  of  which  I have  seen  in 
the  Paris  Museum.  The  three  species  of  black  and  white 
Notonecta  in  the  United  States  should  therefore  be  known  by  the 
following  names : 

1 I have  it  from  North  Carolina,  S.  Carolina,  Tennessee,  Florida, 
Georgia,  Mississippi,  Louisiana,  Texas,  Arizona,  New  Mexico, 
California,  Mexico,  Colombia  in  South  America,  Cuba,  Jamaica, 
St.  Thomas,  St.  Croix  and  Porto  Rica. 


140  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vo l-  XXV 


Notonecta  undulata  Say  widely  distributed  and  varying  from 
nearly  white  forms  to  some  that  are  very  dark. 

Notonecta  indica  Linn.  1771. 

= Notonecta  americana  Fabr.  1775. 
t=  Notonecta  howardii  Bueno  1905  et  al.  including  my- 
self— Southern  U.  S.,  insular  America,  Mexico 
and  Columbia. 

N otonecta  unifasciata  Guerin. 

= Notonecta  indica  of  Kirkaldy  et  al.  including  myself 
— Southwestern  U.  S.  and  Mexico. 

One  sometimes  finds  pale  forms  of  any  of  the  above  labeled 
Notonecta  variabilis  Fieb.  This  species  does  not  occur  in  North 
America  but  until  recent  years  Notonecta  raleighii  Bueno  and  . 
Notonecta  lunata  Hungerford  have  gone  by  that  name. 

Doctor  Kirkaldy  in  his  first  paper  on  the  “ Revision  of  the 
Notonectidae”  1897  treated  Notonecta  bifasciata  Guerin  as  a 
valid  species  but  in  his  “Ueber  Notonectiden”  1904  unfortunately 
reported  that  Notonecta  bifasciata  Guerin  and  Notonecta  vari- 
abilis Fieb.  were  only  varieties  of  Notonecta  undidata  Say. 
Neither  is  related  to  Say’s  species. 

An  examination  of  the  type  of  Notonecta  bifasciata  Guerin 
shows  it  to  be  a different  species  from  the  one  I figured  in  Psyche 
Vol.  XXXIII,  Plate  2,  Figure  5,  1926,  which  is  probably 
N otonecta  sellata  Fieb.  In  the  above  named  paper  I figured  two 
species  which  I then  supposed  had  been  described  that  I now  know 
to  be  new. 

Notonecta  confusa  sp.  n. 

(See  Psyche  Vol.  XXXIII,  Plate  2,  Figure  6). 

Size:  Length  12.  mm. ; width  of  head  2.8  mm. ; greatest 
width  of  thorax  4 mm. 

Color:  The  color  of  this  solitary  specimen  is  pale  yellow 
throughout.  It  may  be  the  leucochromatic  form  of  a dark 
species  or  merely  teneral  of  a form  colored  as  in  N.  undulata 
Say. 

Structural  characteristics:  Size  and  general  appearance 
might  confuse  this  species  with  any  of  the  Notonecta  undulata 
Say  group.  Vertex : synthlipsis ::  2 : 1.  The  head  and 
thorax  shorter  than  in  N.  indica  Linn.  ( N . howardii  Bueno). 
The  lateral  margins  of  pronotum  are  straight.  Trochanter 
hook  on  front  leg  of  male  about  as  in  N.  undulata  Say. 
Mesotrochanter  feebly  angulate.  Male  genital  clasper  (as 


June,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  141 


shown  in  citation  above)  readily  separates  this  species  from 
N.  undulata  Say.  Described  from  a single  male  specimen 
from  “S..  Amer.”  Type  in  the  P.  R.  Uhler  collection  in  U.  S. 
National  Museum,  Washington,  D.  C. 

Notonecta  distinctoidea  sp.  n. 

(See  Psyche  Vol.  XXXIII,  Plate  2,  Fig.  8). 

Size:  10.8  to  12.  mm.  long;  width  of  head  2.9  mm.;  great- 
est width  of  thorax  4.35  mm. 

Color:  General  facies  dark.  Head,  anterior  part  of  pro- 
notum  and  legs  pale  yellow  to  horn.  Face,  legs  and  lateral 
margin  of  abdominal  venter  more  or  less  marked  with  paris 
green.  Scutellum  black.  Hemelytra  purplish  black  save 
two  oblique  tan  streaks  near  base  of  corium  and  clavus,  and 
tip  of  membrane  which  is  pale. 

Structural  characteristics:  While  the  color  description 
might  apply  to  Notonecta  indicoidea  Hungerford  this  is  a 
plumper  species — both  deeper  in  body  and  broader  across  the 
humeri,  with  a male  genital  clasper  of  quite  different  shape. 
Head  not  prominent.  Vertex:  synthlipsis:  : 13  : 6.  Prono- 
tum  strongly  convex,  rear  margin  and  scutellum  much  higher 
than  the  head.  Mesotrochanter  rounded.  Male  genital  cap- 
sule and  clasper  as  shown  in  citation  above. 

Described  from  three  specimens,  all  males  from  Mexico 
labeled  as  follows:  1st.  specimen;  “Mexique”  “Museum 

Paris”  coll.  Noualhier  1898.  2nd.  specimen,  “Museum  Paris, 
Mexique  Etat  de  Jalisco,  L.  Diguet  1900.”  3rd.  specimen, 
“Mexique  W.  H.  Ashm.”  “Corixa  mexican  N.  S.”  <(Notonecta 
americana  Fab.  var.  det.  Kkldy.  ’97.”  This  also  bears  my 
labels  “H.  B.  H.  No.  226  Genitalia”  and  “Europ.  trip  1928 
H.  B.  Hungerford.” 

This  third  specimen  is  stained  and  misshappen  and  I therefore 
make  the  first  named  specimen  the  type  and  Paris  Museum  its 
depository. 

Comparative  notes:  In  comparing  this  species  with  Notonecta 
indicoidea  it  may  be  noted  that  the  species  is  plumper  of  body, 
more  like  my  Notonecta  distincta,  from  which  it  differs  in  shape 
of  head  and  in  lacking  the  basal  protuberance  of  the  anterior  tro- 
chanter of  the  male. 

Notonecta  fazi  sp.  n. 

Size:  Length  12  mm.;  width  of  head  3.3  mm.;  greatest 
width  of  thorax  4 mm.  Males  a little  smaller. 


142  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


Color:  'General  facies  dark.  Head,  anterior  part  of  pro- 
notum  and  legs  pale  yellow.  Scutellum  black.  Hemelytra, 
reddish  brown  to  black  marked  with  tan.  Membrane  dark 
sometimes  with  a pale  spot  in  distal  half,  sometimes  with  the 
tips  pale  instead.  The  tan  markings  are  variable,  typically 
as  follows  s=%  on  base  of  clavus  and  extending  as  indefinite 
streak  near  the  outer  margin  to  near  its  tip.  A small  area 
near  base  of  corium  sometimes  lacking — another  of  various 
form  in  outer  half  of  corium  sometimes  but  not  usually  reach- 
ing membrane. 

Structural  characteristics:  The  short  truncate  head  and  the 
shape  of  the  male  genital  claspers  distinguish  this  species 
structurally  from  others  of  the  same  size.  Anterior  and 
mesotrochanters  as  in  N.  undulata.  The  male  genital  clasper 
shaped  like  a boot  with  the  heel  to  the  rear.  Capsule  rather 
elongate. 

Described  from  several  hundred  specimens  from  Chile, 
South  America,  and  were  most  kindly  presented  to  me  by 
Doctor  Alfredo  Faz,  in  whose  honor  I name  the  species. 
Some  are  labeled  “ Limache,”  some  “ Santiago  ” and  others 
“Termas  Cauquenes.”  The  holotypes,  allotype  and  para- 
types  are  in  the  University  of  Kansas  Collection.  Some  para- 
types  will  be  sent  to  U.  S.  National  Museum  and  to  Mr.  J.  R. 
de  la  Torre-Bueno.  I was  quite  surprised  to  find  so  few  ex- 
amples of  this  species  in  the  European  Museums. 

In  the  Deutsches  Entomologische  Museum,  Berlin-Dahlem : 
i $ “Peru”  “Cpll.  Breddin.” 

i $ “Valdevia,  Chamelcha.”  “Coll.  Breddin.”  This  was  det. 

N.  undulata  Say  by  Kirkaldy  1899. 

In  the  Paris  Museum : 

1 $ “Museum  Paris  Chili  Valparaiso  R.  Martin  1922.” 

In  the  Berlin  Museum:  13  spec.  “Fundort.” 


Genital  capsules  of  males. 


June,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  143 


Fortunately  it  has  been  possible  to  recognize  the  specimens  that 
Doctor  Kirkaldy  studied  and  even  where  his  conception  of  a spe- 
cies had  been  very  vague  it  will  be  possible  to  reassign  his  insects 
to  their  proper  species,  thus  correcting  misconceptions  of  distribu- 
tion and  relationships.  This  work  has  been  accomplished  and 
will  be  reported  in  my  review  of  the  genus  Notonecta. 


DR.  WILLIAM  BARNES. 

By  George  P.  Engelhardt,  Brooklyn,  N.  Y. 

The  death  of  Dr.  William  Barnes,  of  Decatur,  111.,  on  May  ist, 
at  the  age  of  seventy,  was  announced  at  the  meeting  of  the  Brook- 
lyn Entomological  Society  on  May  15  and  received  with  deepfelt 
regret.  A life  member  of  long  standing,  Dr.  Barnes  often  timed 
his  visits  to  the  east  so  as  to  connect  with  the  entomological  ses- 
sions in  Brooklyn,  where  he  was  assured  of  a hearty  welcome  by 
his  many  friends  and  the  members  one  and  all.  His  presence  al- 
ways gave  rise  to  intense  enthusiastic  discussions,  mainly  on  the 
North  American  Lepidoptera,  a subject  on  which  he  was  an  inter- 
nationally recognized  authority. 

Only  those  who  have  been  privileged  to  visit  Dr.  Barnes  at  De- 
catur, 111.,  can  have  an  adequate  idea  of  the  size,  composition  and 
scientific  importance  of  his  collection.  Housed  in  a separate 
building  of  fire-proof  construction,  the  main  collection  is  placed 
in  oak  cabinets  of  some  1200  drawers,  while  reserve  and  ex- 
change material  is  contained  in  2000  or  more  so-called  “Schmidt” 
boxes  arranged  on  shelves  on  the  wall.  Type  specimens,  includ- 
ing Holotypes,  Paratypes,  Homotypes,  etc.,  are  represented  to  the 
number  of  nearly  7000.  Five  hundred  thousand  would  seem  a 
conservative  estimate  as  to  the  total  number  of  specimens  in  the 
Barnes  collection.  To  assemble  such  a collection  has  been  the 
work  of  a life  time  of  indefatigable  labor  and  unstinted  expense. 
Himself  an  enthusiastic  worker  in  the  field,  Dr.  Barnes  also  sup- 
ported most  liberally  experienced  collectors  and  dealers  in  Lepi- 
doptera in  all  parts  of  the  country  and  usually  on  terms  which 
gave  him  the  first  choice  on  the  seasons  captures  or  receipts. 
Nearly  every  species  in  the  Barnes  collection  has  been  finally  de- 
termined by  comparison  with  the  original  type  wherever  located, 


144  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


over  here  or  abroad.  By  purchase  he  acquired  in  toto  or  in  part 
the  collections  of  Taylor,  Doll,  Kearfott,  Field,  Merrick,  Poling, 
Hill,  Longley,  Spaulding,  and  many  others.  Of  the  famous 
Oberthuer  collection  he  secured  all  the  North  American  Lepidop- 
tera  excepting  the  Sphingidae,  Parnassius  and  Hesperidae. 

As  assistants  in  the  upkeep  and  development  of  his  collection, 
Dr.  Barnes  employed  for  a number  of  years,  successively,  Dr.  J. 
H.  McDunnough,  Dr.  F.  H.  Lindsey  and  Mr.  F.  H.  Benjamin,  all 
trained  entomologists  of  outstanding  ability  and  accomplish- 
ments. The  Barnes  Library,  particularly  as  it  applies  to  North 
American  Lepidoptera,  is  excelled  hardly  by  any  other  in  this 
country. 

To  the  fame  of  Dr.  Barnes  as  the  owner  of  the  largest  and  most 
important  private  collection  of  North  American  Lepidoptera  must 
be  added  his  renown  as  one  of  the  foremost  surgeons  in  the  state 
of  Illinois.  His  graduation  from  the  Harvard  Medical  School  in 
1886  was  followed  by  a several  years’  sojourn  in  Europe  resulting 
in  post-graduate  courses  at  the  Universities  of  Heidelberg  and 
Paris  and  a proficiency  in  the  German  and  French  languages.  Re- 
turning to  Decatur,  111.,  he  became  one  of  the  founders  and  prime 
associates  of  the  famous  Decatur  and  Macon  County  Hospital,  an 
institution  to  which  in  1920  he  deeded  the  proceeds  to  be  derived 
from  the  sale  of  his  collection  upon  his  death. 

The  Barnes  collection  and  Library  are  now  for  sale.  It  is  in- 
conceivable that  they  should  be  allowed  to  leave  this  country.  Let 
every  entomologist  join  in  the  effort  to  secure  it  for  a leading 
home  institution  where  it  will  be  in  safe-keeping,  accessible  to  all 
and  stand  as  a lasting  monument  to  the  man  who  made  it,  Dr.  Wil- 
liam Barnes. 


Ceratocombus  vagans  Me  A.  & Mall,  in  Westchester  County, 

N.  Y. — The  sole  record  for  the  State  of  New  York  of  this  minute 
hemipteron  is  that  in  List  of  Insects  of  New  York,  from  Keene 
Valley.  On  May  31st  last  Mr.  H.  G.  Barber  and  myself  col- 
lected the  little  species  in  the  White  Plains  city  watershed.  In  a 
woodland  by  a swamp  he  sifted  some  12  specimens  in  the  course 
of  about  one  hour,  both  long  and  short  winged  individuals.  They 
were  secured  as  usual  in  the  upper  layer  of  leaf  mold  below  the 
undecayed  dried  leaves.  This  is  the  second  record  from  the 
State ; and  goes  to  show  that  the  bug  has  a quite  extensive  dis- 
tribution.— J.  R.  de  la  Torre-Bueno,  White  Plains,  N.  Y. 


June,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  145 


A WRONGLY  IDENTIFIED  AMERICAN  WATER- 

STRIDER. 

By  C.  J.  Drake  and  H.  M.  Harris,  Ames,  Iowa. 

Through  the  kindness  of  Mr.  J.  R.  de  la  Torre-Bueno  the  writ- 
ers have  received  European  specimens  of  Gerris  rufoscutellatus 
Latreille,  some  of  which  were  determined  as  such  by  the  late  Dr. 
A.  L.  Montandon.  A comparison  of  these  specimens  with  ex- 
amples of  our  common  eastern  gerrid  determined  heretofore  as 
G.  rufoscutellatus  shows  our  species  to  be  quite  distinct  and  un- 
named. The  writers  propose  the  name  of  Gerris  dissortis  for  this 
common  American  water-strider.  Published  records  of  G. 
rufoscutellatus  in  this  country  should  be  referred  to  G.  notabilis 
Drake  and  Hottes  and  G.  dissortis,  n.  sp.  In  general  the  dis- 
tribution of  these  two  insects  is  throughout  the  northern  portion 
of  the  United  States  and  extends  into  Canada.  In  the  case  of 
the  former  the  range  is  largely  western,  the  species  occurring  as 
far  eastward  as  Iowa.  On  the  other  hand  G.  dissortis  is  an  east- 
ern species  whose  habitat  reaches  west  to  the  Rocky  Mountain 
region,  the  range  of  the  two  species  thus  overlapping  in  the  mid- 
western  states  west  of  the  Mississippi  River. 

Gerris  dissortis  n.  sp. 

Size,  form,  color  and  markings  very  similar  to  G.  rufoscutel- 
latus Latr.  but  readily  separated  from  it  by  the  plump  first 
genital  segment  of  the  male  which  lacks  a distinct  keel.  In 
G.  rufoscutellatus  the  first  genital  segment  is  strongly,  trans- 
versely, depressed  at  the  base  and  possesses  a prominent 
median  keel  on  the  apical  portion,  on  each  side  of  which  there 
is  a strongly  depressed  area  giving  the  terminal  portion  of 
the  segment  a somewhat  pinched  appearance.  The  first 
genital  of  the  male  of  notabilis  is  quite  similar  to  that  of  dis- 
sortis but  differs  in  having  the  apex  almost  truncate  (Ohio 
Jl.  Sci.  Vol.  28,  1928,  p.  271,  fig.  1,  f and  d.). 

Legs  much  shorter  than  in  G.  notabilis;  body  as  a rule  con- 
siderably shorter  and  less  robust,  spines  at  the  end  of  con- 
nexivum  slenderer  than  in  that  species.  Male  genital  seg- 
ment slenderer;  antennae  proportionally  shorter.  Female 
generally  slightly  larger  than  male  with  a little  shorter  legs. 

Length,  12-14  mm.;  width,  1.6-2.00  mm. 

Holotype,  male,  Tiffin,  Ohio,  Aug.  26,  1916,  C.  J.  Drake,  col- 
lector and  allotype,  female,  taken  with  type,  both  in  Drake  collec- 


146  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


tion.  Paratypes,  thirty  specimens  from  Ohio,  Illinois,  Iowa,  New 
York  and  Eastern  Canada,  in  the  collections  of  Iowa  State  Col- 
lege, U.  S.  National  Museum,  Canadian  National  Collection,  J.  R. 
de  la  Torre-Bueno  and  the  writers. 

This  species  in  its  western  limits  closely  approaches  G.  notabilis 
in  size  of  body,  length  of  legs,  and  general  appearance,  but  as 
pointed  out  by  Drake  and  Hottes  (Ohio  Journal  Science,  25:  p. 
46,  1923)  it  seems  best  to  treat  the  two  forms  as  distinct.  Both 
species  are  known  to  occur  only  in  the  macropterous  form.  The 
writers  have  not  seen  specimens  of  the  true  G.  rufoscutellatus 
from  America. 


Anthaxia  aeneogaster  Cast. — The  first  specimen  of  this  spe- 
cies I have  ever  taken  in  this  locality  was  found  on  the  flowers  of 
Amelanchier  on  May  4,  1930,  in  Acton,  Mass.  Near  by  was  a 
stand  of  white  pines. — C.  A.  Frost,  Framingham,  Mass. 


Seeking  a Better  Climate.- — An  example  of  the  transporta- 
tion of  insects  by  interstate  commerce  is  probably  presented  by 
the  appearance  of  a fresh  specimen  of  Myochrous  longulus  Lee. 
on  the  floor  of  our  front  room  the  other  evening;  April  15,  1930. 
So  far  as  I know  it  is  a native  of  Arizona  and  Southern  Cali- 
fornia and  I have  three  specimens  labelled  “Yuma,  Cal.”  It 
may  have  made  the  journey  here  in  lettuce,  shipments  of  which 
are  said  to  come  from  that  region  at  this  time  of  the  year.. 

While  I would  not  go  so  far  as  to  assert  that  the  insect  was 
seeking  a better  climate,  we  may,  perhaps,  expect  deductions  along 
this  line  by  some  future  expert  on  insect  psychology. — C.  A. 
Frost,  Framingham,  Mass. 


June,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  147 


DIURNAL  LEPIDOPTERA  FROM  WYOMING  AND 
COLORADO. 

Distribution,  Life  Zone  and  Habitat  Notes — New  Subspecies. 

By  Alexander  B.  Klots,  Ithaca,  N.  Y. 

Introduction. 

Localities — descriptions  and  abbreviations  used. 

List  of  species  and  data. 

List  of  Life  Zones  with  characteristic  species. 

Figures. 

Introduction. 

The  present  paper  represents  an  effort  to  make  available  some 
data  gathered  by  the  author  on  collecting  trips  in  Wyoming  and 
Colorado.  These  data  are  rather  heterogeneous,  but  of  a kind 
which  will  probably  prove  of  value  to  taxonomic  and  ecological 
workers. 

To  the  field  naturalist  and  the  ecologist  a mere  knowledge  of  the 
name  of  the  food-plant  and  the  appearance  of  the  early  stages  of  a 
species  represent  only  a part  of  what  should  be  known  about  the 
life  history  of  that  species.  In  the  case  of  a large  proportion  of 
the  species  of  Rocky  Mountain  diurnals  even  this  little,  however, 
is  still  unknown.  The  author  has  therefore  considered  it  worth 
while  to  include  many  notes  on  habitat  and  local  distribution,  al- 
though such  information  will  be  of  little  value  to  the  majority 
of  present-day  collectors.  The  student  of  the  future,  however, 
who  cannot  spend  all  his  time  in  frantically  searching  for  some- 
thing to  name  because  everything  that  possibly  could  be  named  will 
have  been  by  that  time,  and  who  therefore  will  probably  concen- 
trate on  biology  and  ecology  just  as  mammalogists  are  doing  now, 
will  probably  find  such  information  valuable. 

It  is  surprising  how  few  published  records  are  available  for  de- 
termining accurately  the  exact  ranges  of  most  of  our  insects.  For 
Wyoming  especially  the  writer  has  been  able  to  find  practically 
no  data  of  this  kind,  yet  Wyoming  presents  far  more  interesting 
distributional  problems  than  most  of  the  States.  In  the  East  the 
Great  Plains  area  enters  the  state ; in  the  Southeast  the  Medicine 
Bow  Range  of  Colorado  extends  as  far  north  as  Elk  Mountian, 
bringing  with  it  a distinct  fauna;  in  the  Southwest  the  Great  Basin 
fauna  enters,  both  along  the  Uinta  Mountains  and  in  the  Red 
Desert;  and  in  the  North  a very  distinct  fauna  extends  down  from 


148  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


Montana.  Yet  with  all  these  very  different  faunas  entering  the 
state  and  mingling,  Wyoming  is  entomologically  one  of  the  least 
known  areas  in  the  country. 

Very  little  work  has  been  done  in  the  Rocky  Mountains  in 
checking  insect  distribution  with  the  Life  Zone  work  done  by  the 
Biological  Survey.  In  an  attempt  to  do  something  of  this  sort 
the  writer  has  tried  to  analyze  the  different  localities  collected  and 
thus  to  gain  some  idea  of  the  Life  Zone  ranges  of  the  species 
taken.  The  records  here  included  must,  of  course,  be  regarded 
as  merely  a small  beginning  of  such  a study,  and  are  not  intended 
to  be  in  any  way  conclusive.  It  is  hoped  that  they  may  prove 
suggestive  of  what  can  be  done  in  this  field,  and  be  of  use  in  the 
future  as  well. 

In  Life  Zone  Work  it  is,  of  course,  almost  impossible  to  estab- 
lish hard  and  fast  boundaries  between  the  Zones.  There  is  much 
overlapping  of  Zones,  for  reasons  that  vary  with  each  locality. 
In  the  mountains  a study  of  Life  Zones  is  largely  a study  of 
“vertical  distribution,”  but  many  other  very  important  elements 
must  be  considered.  Steepness  of  the  mountains,  quality  of  soil, 
amount  of  water  available,  exposure  to  sunlight  and  prevailing 
winds,  early  or  late  melting  of  snow,  and  many  other  such  factors 
must  be  considered  both  individually  and  together. 

The  occurrence  of  the  food-plant  is  of  course  the  most  essential 
factor  in  determining  the  distribution  of  Lepidoptera.  Many 
other  factors  undoubtedly  play  a large  part,  and  can  be  learned 
only  by  careful  and  detailed  study  of  habitat  and  local  distribu- 
tion data. 

The  Life  Zones  of  Colorado  and  Wyoming  and  their  flora  and 
vertebrate  fauna  have  been  extensively  studied  by  the  Biological 
Survey.  The  fundamental  works  on  this  subject  are:  Cary, 

Merritt.  Life  Zone  Investigations  in  Wyoming.  North  Ameri- 
can Fauna  No.  42,  1917;  and,  a Biological  survey  of  Colorado. 
North  American  Fauna  No.  33,  1911.  In  these  will  be  found 
detailed  information  which  it  would  be  superfluous  to  repeat  here. 

Localities. 

The  following  are  localities  where  collections  were  made.  To 
avoid  much  useless  repetition  abbreviations  have  been  used  for 
these  in  giving  records  in  the  species  list,  as  shown  below. 

Bellevue  = Bellevue,  Larimer  Cy.,  Colo.  Alt.  5200  ft.  Collecting 
in  arid  grassy  fields,  in  a few  irrigated  fields,  and  along  a 


June,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  149 


small  creek  bottom.  Upper  Sonoran  Zone,  with  Transition 
Zone  elements. 

Brooklyn  = Brooklyn  Lake,  Snowy  Range  west  of  Centennial, 
Wyo.  Alt.  10500  to  1 1000  ft.  Barren,  windswept  upland 
plateau  with  many  small  lakes,  stunted  spruces  in  irregular 
patches  and  low  Alpine  vegetation.  Typical  Hudsonian 
Zone. 

Centennial  .—Centennial,  Wyo.  Alt.  8000  ft.  Collecting  in  arid 
sagebrush  flats  east  of  town  and  in  marshy  bottom  of  Little 
Laramie  River.  Transition  Zone. 

Foxpark=  Foxpark,  Wyo.  Alt.  8500  ft.  Collecting  in  grassy 
meadows,  along  roads  and  on  sagebrush  flats  at  lower  edge 
of  coniferous  forest.  Lower  Canadian  Zone  with  Transition 
Zone  elements. 

Libby  — Libby  Lodge  about  2 miles  west  of  Centennial,  Wyo. 
Alt.  8500  ft.  Collecting  in  grassy  meadows  and  along  road 
in  lower  portion  of  Canadian  Zone  coniferous  forest.  Lower 
Canadian  Zone  with  a few  Transition  Zone  elements. 

Moose  = Moose  P.  O.,  Jackson  Hole,  Wyo.  A considerable  area 
was  intensively  collected,  containing  a number  of  very  differ- 
ent habitat  zones.  The  vertical  distribution  is  very  marked, 
three  Life  Zones  being  noted  within  a horizontal  distance  of 
six  miles. 

Transition  Zon<e. 

Bottoms.  In  the  Snake  River  bottom  (alt.  6600  ft.)  and  ex- 
tending up  the  bottom  of  its  tributary  Cottonwood  Creek  the 
fauna  and  flora  are  dominantly  Transition.  Thick  growths 
of  Salix  are  found  on  the  gravel  bars.  Heavy  groves  of  nar- 
row leaved  cottonwood  ( Populus  angustifolia)  occur,  shad- 
ing a luxuriant  undergrowth.  There  are  occasional  areas  of 
grassy  marsh,  and  a few  grassy  meadows,  where  homestead- 
ers have  irrigated  fields.  Even  in  the  bottoms,  however, 
Canadian  Zone  elements  are  found,  mostly  plainly  marked  by 
growths  of  quaking  aspen  ( Populus  tremuloides) . 

Flats.  The  floor  of  the  valley  (alt.  6600-6800  ft.)  is  mostly 
level,  arid  flats,  where  sagebrush  ( Artemisia  tridentata  and 
trifida)  are  the  dominant  plants.  The  flats  are  dominantly 
Transition  Zone,  but  there  is  a considerable  mixture  of  Can- 
adian Zone  species,  especially  in  the  more  grassy  areas  along 
the  border  of  the  coniferous  forest.  The  steep  slopes  by 


150  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


which  the  flats  descend  to  the  river  and  creek  bottoms  show 
not  only  a marked  concentration  of  the  normal  flats  species 
but  also  a few  species  that  are  not  found  elsewhere  in  nearly 
such  abundance. 

Canadian  Zone. 

Forest.  The  most  typical  Canadian  Zone  area  is  the  broad 
belt  of  coniferous  forest  which  extends  from  the  sagebrush 
flats  up  the  mountains  to  an  elevation  of  9,500-10,000  ft. 
Along  its  lower  edge  the  forest  fauna  is  considerably  diluted 
with  Transition  species,  especially  in  grassy  meadows.  A 
few  species  appear  to  be  characteristic  of  the  forest  proper. 
Along  its  upper  edge  the  forest  is  much  broken  up  by  grassy 
meadows,  growths  of  quaking  aspen,  and  steep  slopes  un- 
suited for  tree  growth.  The  lower  portion  of  the  forest  is 
dominantly  Lodgepole  Pine  ( Pinus  murrayana)  with  a mix- 
ture of  blue  spruce  ( Picea  parryana),  while  in  the  upper 
portion  Engelmann  spruce  ( Picea  engelmanni)  becomes 
dominant.  The  upper  border  of  the  Zone  is  much  obscured 
and  mixed  with  Hudsonian  Zone  elements,  owing  to  peculiar 
features  of  the  landscape  such  as  the  steepness  of  the  moun- 
tains, the  occurrence  of  heavy  “slides”  in  the  Spring,  and 
the  scanty  soil  on  many  rocks  buttresses.  As  an  example  of 
this  mixture,  the  writer  has  taken  the  Pika  ( Ochotona  sp.), 
a typical  Hudsonian  Zone  mammal,  in  Bradley  Canyon  at 
9000  ft.  elevation,  in  the  same  place  as  Pleheius  icarioides 
and  Papilio  rutulus,  normal  Transition-Canadian  Zone  but- 
terflies. In  many  places  the  Hudsonian  Zone  is  almost  en- 
tirely obliterated  by  the  presence  of  perpendicular  cliffs  or 
extensive  rock  “slides.” 

Most  of  the  Moose  records  can  be  taken  as  fairly  indica- 
tive of  the  dates  of  emergence  and  periods  of  flight  of  the 
species.  No  attempt  has  been  made  to  collect  in  other  parts 
of  Jackson  Hole,  although  the  writer  is  aware  of  the  oc- 
currence in  the  valley  of  species  which  he  has  not  taken  at 
Moose. 

Poudre  = 23  miles  up  Little  South  Poudre  River  Canyon  from 
“The  Forks.”  Alt.  about  6500  ft.  Collecting  in  grassy 
meadows  and  arid  flats  and  along  river  banks.  Transition 
Zone  with  Canadian  Zone  elements. 


June,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  151 


Red  Desert  = Red  Desert,  Wyo.,  on  the  Union  Pacific  R.  R.  west 
of  Wamsutter.  Arid  Upper  Sonoran  Zone. 

Red  Feathers  Red  Feather  Lakes,  Larimer  Cy.,  Colo.  Alt.  82- 
8400  ft.  Collecting  in  grassy  meadows  and  fields  along 
streams  and  roadsides.  Scattered  growth  of  Pinus  scopu- 
lorum  and  Pinus  murrayana.  Lower  Canadian  Zone  with 
strong  Transition  Zone  elements. 

Spring— Spring  Canyon,  west  of  Forth  Collins,  Colo.  Alt.  52- 
5500  ft.  Collecting  in  arid  grassy  foothills,  with  a few  irri- 
gated fields.  Upper  Sonoran  Zone  with  Transition  elements. 
Univ.  Camp.  — University  of  Wyoming  Summer  Camp,  Snowy 
Range  west  of  Centennial,  Wyo.  Alt.  9600  ft.  Grassy  mea- 
dows at  the  upper  edge  of  the  Canadian  Zone  coniferous  for- 
est. Canadian  Zone  with  Hudsonian  Zone  strays. 

Virginia  Dale  — Virginia  Dale,  Larimer  Cy.,  Colo.  Grassy  mead- 
ows with  scattered  Pinus  scopulorum.  Transition  Zone. 

List  of  Species  and  Data. 

In  recording  the  Life  Zone  records  the  occurrence  of  a Zone 
name  in  parentheses  signifies  that  only  weak  elements  of  that 
zone  were  present  in  the  locality  where  the  specimens  were  taken. 

The  synonomy  used  throughout  is  that  of  Barnes  and  Benjamin, 
List  of  the  Diurnal  Lepidoptera  of  Boreal  America  north  of 
Mexico.  Bull.  S.  Cal.  Acad.  Sci.  Jan.  1926.  25 : 3 -27.  Num- 

bers are  prefixed  to  names  as  in  this  list. 

7 Papilio  zelicaon  Luc.  Foxpark  vi-28— ’29 ; Univ.  Camp  vii- 
1,  2,  5— "29.  The  specimen  vii-5-’29  may  be  P.  hairdii  Luc. 
Found  in  open  meadows  and  fields,  and  along  roads. 

Zones:  (Upper  Transition)  Canadian  (Lower  Hudsonian) . 

15  -P.  r.  rutulus  Luc.  Libby  vi-26-’29,  Foxpark  vi-28-’29, 
Univ.  Camp  vii-2-J29,  Moose  v-20-’24  to  middle  of  August 
or  later.  Within  its  range  found  almost  everywhere  except 
in  thick  coniferous  forest.  Often  found  sucking  up  moisture 
at  muddy  places. 

Zones:  Upper  Transition,  entire  Canadian. 

16  P.  multicaudata  Kirby.  Moose  vii- 14— ’29  to  middle  of  Au- 
gust or  later.  In  river  bottoms  and  along  edges  of  flats.  I 
have  never  taken  it  in  pure  Canadian  Zone. 

Zones:  Transition,  (lower  Canadian). 


152  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxr 


17  P.  eurymedon  Luc.  Libby  vi-26- 29,  Foxpark  vi-28-’29, 
Moose  vi-i2-’29  to  middle  of  August  or  later.  Mostly  taken 
along  trails  and  in  meadows  in  coniferous  forest,  less  fre- 
quently in  river  bottoms  and  along  edges  of  flats.  A female, 
Moose  xii-12-29  is  of  a yellow  ground  color,  fully  as  deep 
as  many  rutulus  males. 

Zones:  Upper  Transition,  entire  Canadian. 

25  Parnassius  clodius  Men.  Moose  vi — 23^24  to  latter  part  of 
July.  Moose  specimens  are  a bit  difficult  to  determine. 
They  appear  to  be  somewhat  intermediate  between  baldur 
Edw.  and  gallatinus  Stichel.  One  male  matches  perfectly 
with  gallatinus  as  figured  in  Elrod,  M.  J.,  The  butterflies  of 
Montana,  fig.  15,  the  plate  from  which  Stichel  described  gal- 
latinus. The  species  was  taken  mainly  on  the  edges  of  the 
flats  along  the  edges  of  the  bottoms.  It  appears  either  to 
emerge  earlier  than  smintheus  or  to  become  worn  much  more 
easily,  for  by  the  end  of  the  first  week  in  July  only  very  much 
worn  specimens  of  clodius  are  obtainable,  while  fresh 
smintheus  continue  to  emerge  until  well  into  August. 

Zones:  Upper  Transition,  Canadian. 

26  P.  smintheus  Dbldy.  &;  Etew.  Red  Feather  vi-i9~’29,  Poudre 
vU20-’29,  Foxpark  vi-27  & 28-^29,  Univ.  Camp  vii-6-’29, 
Moose  vi-i2-’24  to  end  of  August.  Specimens  from  Red 
Feather  are  most  like  hermodur  F[y.  Edw.  but  the  female  is 
lighter.  Specimens  from  Poudre  are  much  like  sayii  Edw. 
having  a very  light  female  and  being  larger.  Only  one  speci- 
men, a small  dark  male,  was  taken  at  Univ.  Camp  (alt.  9600 
ft.).  This  agrees  well  with  hermodur.  The  specimens  from 
Foxpark  and  Moose  appear  to  be  intermediate  between  sayii 
and  magnus  Wright.  The  species  swarms  at  Moose  along  the 
edges  of  the  flats,  favoring  flowers  of  Sedum  and  Saxifraga 
(the  food-plants)  and  paying  little  attention  to  the  flowers  of 
Apocynum  and  Epilobium  which  most  of  the  other  butterflies 
visit  most  eagerly. 

Zones:  Upper  Transition,  entire  Canadian,  lower  Hudson- 
ian. 

33  Ascia  sisymbrii  (Bdv.)  Moose  v— 16— *24 -to  middle  of  June. 
Appears  to  have  only  this  early  Spring  brood,  as  I have  never 
taken  it  later  in  the  summer  when  the  second  brood  of  A. 
occidentals  is  very  common.  On  edges  of  the  flats  along 
the  bottoms. 


June,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  153 


Zones:  Upper  Transition,  lower  Canadian. 

34  A.  occidentalis  (Reak.)  Bellevue  vi-i8-’29,  Univ.  Camp  vi- 
29~,29  to  vii-6-’29,  Brooklyn  vii-7  & 8-29,  Moose  v-18-24 
(first  brood),  vi-29~r24,  flies  through  August.  First  brood 
specimens  at  Moose  are  uniformly  very  dark  beneath  as  in 
calyce  (Edw.).  Specimens  of  the  second  average  much 
larger  and  lighter  in  coloring.  In  all  the  localities  collected 
during  July  and  August  calyce — like  specimens  occurred  con- 
stantly, although  toward  the  end  of  the  season  the  lighter 
forms  predominated.  These  dark  summer  specimens,  al- 
though often  as  deeply  colored  as  first  brood  calyce,  average 
larger.  Conversely  occasional  specimens  occur  which 
strongly  resemble  typical  protodice.  In  view  of  the  dom- 
inance in  numbers  of  typical  occidentalis,  with  frequent  in- 
tergrades to  these  protodice-Yike  specimens,  these  specimens 
must  be  considered  as  merely  light  occidentalis.  The  species 
appears  to  favor  flowers  of  Saxifraga.  At  Moose  it  was 
taken  most  commonly  along  the  edges  of  the  flats  along  the 
bottoms,  but  was  found  in  small  numbers  almost  everywhere. 
The  species  always  prefers  large  open  spaces. 

Zones:  Transition,  Canadian,  Hudsonian. 

36  A.  napi  (L.)  Libby  vi-26-’29,  Foxpark  vi-27  & 28-^29, 
Univ.  Camp  vi-29  to  vii-6-’29.  Moose  v-i— *24  (first  brood) 
vii-9-24  (summer  brood)  to  ix-2^24  (incomplete  third 
brood).  All  specimens  taken  appear  to  belong  to  race  napi 
pseudonapi  (B.  & McD.)  Summer  specimens  are  much 
lighter  beneath  than  specimens  of  the  Spring  brood,  but  are 
not  nearly  all  as  immaculate  as  pallidissima  (B.  & McD.) 
which  appears  to  represent  merely  immaculate  specimens  of 
this  brood,  and  not  the  entire  brood.  Often  taken  in  shaded 
Cottonwood  groves  in  the  bottoms.  Prefers  damp  environ- 
ments. 

* Zones:  Upper  Transition,  Canadian,  lower  Hudsonian. 

40  Euchloe  creusa  (Dbldy.  & Hew.)  Moose  v-20-’24  (one 
female).  This  is  the  only  specimen  I have  taken  in  Colorado 
or  Wyoming  that  can  by  appearance  be  referred  to  creusa. 
It  is  perfectly  typical.  All  other  specimens,  many  of  them 
taken  flying  with  this  one,  are  ausonides  coloradensis,  al- 
though many  of  these  show  intergradation  to  the  creusa  con- 
dition. A definite  means  of  separating  creusa  and  ausonides 


154  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  v ol • ZXV 


is  badly  needed.  Moreover  the  life  history  differences  be- 
tween the  two  forms  should  be  very  carefully  checked.  I 
personally  consider  that  they  represent  no  more  than  color 
varieties  within  one  species. 

41  E.  ausonides  coloradensis  (Hy.  Edw.)  Red  Feather  vi-19- 
’29,  Libby  vi-26^29,  Foxpark  vi-28-29,  Univ.  Camp  vi-26  to 
vii^6-’29,  Moose  v-16-24  to  end  of  June.  The  species  ap- 
pears to  prefer  the  flowers  of  Saxifraga,  The  majority  of 
females  show  a marked  yellow  suffusion  on  the  secondaries 
above.  There  is  much  variation  in  the  extent  of  the  black 
and  green  markings  and  the  intensity  of  the  pearly  white 
ground  color  on  the  secondaries  beneath.  Early  Spring 
specimens  average  considerably  smaller  in  size  than  those 
emerging  later  in  the  year,  and  in  every  way  strongly  resem- 
ble creusa.  At  the  University  Camp  this  species  fairly 
swarmed  in  large  open  meadows  at  the  upper  edge  of  the 
coniferous  forest,  but  was  never  taken  a short  distance  higher 
up  in  typical  Hudsonian  Zone. 

Zones:  Upper  Transition,  entire  Canadian. 

47  Anthocharis  sara  julia  Edw.  Red  Feather  vi-i9-’29,  Libby 
vi-26-’29,  Foxpark  vi-27  & 28-  29,  Univ.  Camp  vii— 3 & 6- 
’29,  Moose  v— 20-’24  to  vii-29-29.  I have  found  this  spe- 
cies, unlike  ausonides,  preferring  small  shaded  glades  in  the 
forest.  In  Colorado  and  Wyoming  all  the  females  taken 
were  the  yellow  form  to  which  Stella  Edw.  is  probably  appli- 
cable. Efigh  altitude  specimens  (Univ.  Camp  9600  ft.)  are 
quite  constantly  smaller  than  those  from  lower  altitudes,  and 
have  the  orange  of  the  apex  of  the  primaries  lighter  and  the 
subapical  black  bar  more  or  less  diffused  and  often  not 
broken.  Some  hair-splitters  may  consider  this  form  worth  a 
name.  I do  not,  especially  as  all  intergrades  to  the  condition 
appear  with  ascending  altitude.  A male  at  Moose  vii-29-’29 
had  evidently  just  emerged.  Aside  from  this  one  specimen  I 
have  never  seen  any  other  evidence  of  a second  brood  there. 

Zones:  Upper  Transition,  Canadian. 

58  Eurymus  m.  meadii  (Edw.)  Univ.  Camp  viU5— ’29  (one 
male),  Brooklyn  vii-6  to  8-29.  Very  definitely  a Hudsonian 
Zone  species.  The  single  male  taken  at  the  University  Camp 
was  evidently  a windblown  stray.  I have  not  found  this 
species  so  difficult  to  collect  as  some  published  accounts  would 


June,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  155 


lead  one  to  believe.  It  occurs  in  barren  windswept  areas  at 
and  above  timberline.  In  a strong  wind,  which  is  usually 
present,  the  butterflies  alight  on  the  ground  and  invariably 
sit  sidewise  to  the  wind,  which  blows  them  so  that  they  are 
nearly  resting  on  their  sides.  They  may  then  be  easily 
stalked. 

Zones:  (Upper  Canadian),  Hudsonian. 

61  E.  eury theme  (Bdv.) 

f . amphidusa  (Bdv.)  Red  Feather  vi-19  & 22-U9,  Univ. 
Camp  vii-2  to  6-’29. 

f.  eriphyle  (Edw.)  Moose  vii-29-’29  & viii-2-29. 

gen.  vern.  autumnalis  (Ckll.)  Poudre  vi-20-,29,  Libby 
vi-26-’29,  Centennial  vi~27-’29,  Foxpark  vi-27  & 28-’29, 
Spring  vi-i8-T29,  Univ.  Camp  vii-i  to  vii-6-29,  Brooklyn 
viU7~’29,  Moose  viii-9-’24. 

The  great  amount  of  variation  shown  by  the  yellow  forms 
of  this  species  makes  accurate  identification  somewhat  dif- 
ficult. Specimens  of  the  Spring  autumnalis  brood  intergrade 
freely  to  eriphyle  and  f.  eury  theme.  It  is  also  practically 
impossible  to  lay  down  any  hard  and  fast  rules  for  separating 
autumnalis  and  eriphyle  from  philodice  (Godt.).  Speci- 
mens of  autumnalis  also  frequently  approach  scudderii 
(Reak.)  in  appearance.  The  species  favors  large  open 
spaces,  being  very  seldom  found  in  small  glades  in  the  for- 
est. At  the  University  Camp  many  females  were  taken  ovi- 
positing on  Astragalus  alpinus,  in  the  large  open  meadows 
above  the  forest  belt.  At  Moose  there  is  a very  definite 
Autumn  brood  of  autumnalis. 

Zones:  Upper  Sonoran,  Transition,  Canadian,  lower  Hud- 
sonian. 

67  E.  alexandra  (Edw.)  Foxpark  vi-27  & 28-29.  Quite  com- 
mon in  open  fields  at  the  lower  edge  of  the  forest.  Very 
fond  of  puddles  along  roads.  One  white  female  ( hatui  B.  & 
Benj  . ?)  was  taken  vi-27. 

Zones:  Upper  Transition,  lower  Canadian. 

68  E.  scudderii  (Reak.)  Univ.  Camp  vii-6-’29,  Moose  vii-25 
& 30^29.  The  University  Camp  specimens  appear  to  be 
typical  scudderii.  The  Moose  specimens  are  quite  different. 
In  both  sexes  the  under  side  of  the  secondaries  lacks  the 


156  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


greenish  suffusion  characteristic  of  scudderii,  resembling 
rather  that  of  pelidne.  The  female  is  fully  as  yellow  above 
as  the  male,  and  strongly  resembles  a female  interior.  These 
specimens  probably  represent  a form  more  or  less  inter- 
mediate between  scudderii,  pelidne  and  interior,  which  three 
forms  are  probably  all  conspecific.  This  may  be  pelidne  skin- 
neri  Barnes. 

85  Danaus  menippe  (Hbn.)  Moose  vi-i2~’24.  One  specimen 
only. 

106  Coenonympha  ochracea  Edw.  Spring  vi-i8-’29,  Red 
Feather  vi-i9-’29,  Poudre  vi~20-’29,  Libby  vi-26-,29,  Fox- 
park  vi-27  & 28-29,  Univ.  Camp  vii-2-’29,  Moose  vi-17-24 
to  middle  of  August.  Prefers  large  open  spaces. 

Zones:  Upper  Sonoran,  Transition,  Canadian. 

108  C.  haydenii  (Edw.)  Moose  vii-25  to  viii— 2— *29.  Taken 
only  in  open  meadows  and  hillsides  above  the  main  forest 
belt.  A specimen  was  taken  at  10,000  ft.  up  Bradley  Canyon 
in  Lower  Hudsonian.  The  Moose  specimens  show  consider- 
able tendency  to  reduction  of  the  submarginal  ocelli  on  the 
secondaries  beneath.  In  this  they  agree  with  specimens  from 
Yellowstone  Park,  the  type  locality,  but  differ  from  speci- 
mens from  further  north  in  Montana. 

Zones:  Canadian,  lower  Hudsonian. 

1 17  Cercyonis  oetus  (Bdv.)  Moose  vii-12^29  to  end  of  August, 
Red  Desert  viiR6-’29,  Virginia  Dale  viii-7- 29.  The  species 
is  very  common  on  sagebrush  flats,  where  it  is  somewhat  dif- 
ficult to  catch  owing  to  its  habit  of  flying  close  to  the  ground 
between  clumps  of  brush.  It  also  occurs  in  open  spaces 
above  the  main  forest  belt. 

Zones:  Upper  Sonoran,  Transition,  Canadian. 

122  Oeneis  uhleri  (Reak.)  Poudre  vi-20-’29,  one  very  poor 
specimen.  This  was  in  Upper  Transition  Zone  with  Cana- 
dian elements. 

140  Erebia  epipsodea  Butl.  Foxpark  vi-28-29,  Univ.  Camp 
vi-29-’29  to  vii-6-’29.  Only  one  specimen  was  taken  at 
Foxpark.  At  University  Camp  the  species  did  not  become  at 
all  common  until  vii-3,  so  that  these  dates  may  be  taken  as 
fairly  indicative  of  the  time  of  emergence.  Found  in  small 
glades  in  the  forest,  but  most  abundant  in  open  meadows 
above  the  forest  belt. 

Zones:  Canadian  (lower  Hudsonian). 


June,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  157 


149  Euptoieta  claudia  (Cram.)  Brooklyn  vii-2^29.  A very 
much  worn  specimen  in  typical  Hudsonian  Zone. 

157  Dry  as  aphrodite  cypris  (Edw.)  Spring  vi-23~’29  (2  fresh 
males),  Virginia  Dale  viii— 7— *29  (2  fresh  females). 

Zones:  Upper  Sonoran,  Transition. 

161  D.  hesperis  (Edw.)  Moose  vii-9-24  to  end  of  August. 
Most  of  the  specimens  taken  were  either  along  the  edges  of 
shaded  bottoms  or  else  along  trails  in  the  coniferous  forest. 
The  adults  appear  to  favor  the  flowers  of  a large  Mint 
(Monarda?) . There  is  a great  deal  of  variation  in  the 
amount  of  silver  on  the  underside,  with  all  intergrades  be- 
tween unsilvered  and  fully  silvered  specimens. 

Zones:  Upper  Transition,  Canadian. 

167  D.  hydaspe  (Bdv.)  Moose  vii-8-29  and  vii-27-’ 29,  all 
worn  specimens.  All  were  along  trails  in  the  forest  and  in 
small  open  glades  and  favored  flowers  of  Mint.  The  speci- 
mens appear  to  be  most  like  h.  hydaspe,  but  are  not  typical. 
In  the  present  state  of  North  American  Argynnis  no  more 
can  safely  be  said. 

Zones:  Canadian. 

170  D.  nevadensis  (Edw.)  Foxpark  Moose  vi-25- 

’24  through  August,  f.  meadii  (Edw.)  Poudre  V-20-U9. 
Many  specimens  taken  at  Moose  are  very  much  like  meadii, 
which  here  evidently  is  no  more  than  a color  form.  Many 
other  Moose  specimens  are  very  much  like  gallatini  McDun- 
nough,  some  females  being  almost  a pale  cream  color.  Very 
common  on  open  flats  and  meadows.  Shows  a strong 
partiality  for  the  flowers  of  Dogbane  (Apocynum) . At 
Moose  also  occurs  in  open  meadows  above  the  forest. 

Zones:  Upper  Transition,  entire  Canadian. 

1 71  D.  edwardsii  (Reak.)  Spring  vi-23-^9,  Foxpark  vi-28-’29, 
Univ.  Camp,  vii-2  to  4U29. 

Zones:  Upper  Upper  Sonoran,  Transition,  Canadian. 

172  D.  platina  (Skin.)  Moose  \n-12-2g  to  end  of  August. 
Swarms  along  the  edges  of  the  flats,  being  very  fond  of  Dog- 
bane flowers.  It  also  occurs  in  open  meadows  above  the 
main  forest. 

Zones:  Upper  Transition,  entire  Canadian. 

173  D.  holey  one  (Edw.)  Bellevue  vi-18  & 21-29,  Spring  vi- 
18  & 23-29. 

Zones:  Upper  Upper  Sonoran,  (lower  Transition). 


158  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


182  D.  montivaga  (Behr.)  Moose  vii-i4-’29.  One  specimen, 
a fresh  male,  is  possibly  referable  to  this  species.  The  basal 
portion  of  the  secondary  beneath  is,  however,  a deeper  more 
chocolate  brown. 

185  D.  eurynome  (Edw.)  Univ.  Camp  vi-’29  to  vii-6-’29. 
Brooklyn  vii-7~’29,  Moose  vii-i2-’29  to  end  of  August. 

f.  clio  (Edw.)  Univ.  Camp  vii-1-29,  Moose,  vii-17  & 
vii~23-’29. 

Clio  is  here  evidently  a rare  color  form.  One  specimen  has 
the  silver  only  about  half  gone.  Like  nevadensis  and 
platina  the  species  is  found  very  commonly  on  sagebrush 
flats  and  meadows,  and  prefers  the  flowers  of  Dogbane.  Of 
the  Argynnis  taken  at  Moose  hesperis  and  hydaspe  may  be 
said  to  form  one  group  in  similarity  of  habitat  and  action, 
while  nevadensis,  platina  and  eurynome  form  another  and 
are  almost  always  associated  together. 

Zones:  Upper  Transition,  Canadian,  Lower  Hudsonian. 

186  Brent  his  myrina  (Cram.)  Moose  vi— 25— ’24,  vii— 17-’29,  viii- 
2— ’29.  Taken  both  in  bottoms  in  the  valley  proper,  and  in 
the  marsh  at  the  head  of  Bradley  Lake. 

Zones:  Upper  Transition,  Canadian. 

194  B.  freija  (Thun.)  Univ.  Camp  vi-26-r29  to  vii-3-29, 
Brooklyn,  vii-7  & 8-2g.  Uncommon  in  the  meadows  just 
above  the  main  forest.  Comparatively  common  in  typical 
Hudsonian  Zone.  One  specimen  was  contentedly  sitting  on 
a snowbank. 

Zones:  Upper  Canadian,  Hudsonian. 

212  Euphydryas  editha  (Bdv.)  Univ.  Camp  vi-29  to  vii~5-’29. 
I cannot  tell  to  what  subspecies  the  specimens  belong.  Ac- 
cording to  Gunder  (Pan-Pac.  Ent.  July  1929,  6:  1-8)  they 
should  be  nearest  to  montanus  McD.  They  do  not  appear  to 
be  so.  Identification  to  species  was  made  by  examination  of 
the  male  genitalia.  I am  unable  to  separate  the  females  from 
those  of  the  anicia  form  which  was  taken  in  the  same  local- 
ity. Very  common  in  open  meadows  above  the  forest  belt. 

Zones:  Upper  Canadian. 

221  E.  anicia  (Dbldy.  & Hew.)  Eoxpark  vi-27  & 28-U9,  Univ. 
Camp  vii-2  to  6-U9,  Moose  V-24P24,  vi-12-24,  vii-i8-’29, 
\m-2-2g.  These  records  are  for  males  only,  as  explained 
above.  The  Moose  specimens  represent  a distinct  race  from 
those  from  southeastern  Wyoming.  The  Moose  specimen 


June,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  159 


viii-2-’29  was  a very  fresh  male  that  had  evidently  just 
emerged.  The  species  appears  to  occur  in  much  the  same  sort 
of  habitat  as  editha,  although  it  is  worthy  of  note  that  no 
specimens  of  editha  were  taken  at  either  Foxpark  or  Moose 
in  Lower  Canadian  or  Transition  Zone. 

Zones:  Upper  Transition,  Canadian. 

222  E.  gillettii  (Barnes).  Moose  vii-i9~’29.  In  creek  bottom. 

Zones:  Upper  Transition. 

227  Lemonias  acastus  (Edw.).  Moose  vii-i-’24  to  end  of  July 
or  later.  Specimens  were  taken  along  the  edges  of  creek  bot- 
toms in  strong  Transition  localities,  and  also  in  small  glades 
of  the  purely  Canadian  Zone  forest. 

Zones:  Upper  Transition,  Canadian. 

243  L.  pola  (Bdv.).  Virginia  Dale  viii— 7— ’29.  Common  in 
grassy  fields. 

Zones:  Transition. 

251  Phyciodes  tharos  pascoensis  Wright.  Poudre  vi-29^’29, 
Foxpark  vi-27  & 28^29,  Moose  vi-4-24  (first  brood),  vii- 
9-24  (second  brood.)  Tharos  does  not  appear  to  extend  as 
far  up  the  mountains  at  Moose  as  does  camillus,  never  being 
taken  in  any  numbers  in  the  purely  Canadian  Zone  area. 
Especially  common  on  flats  along  edges  of  bottoms,  prefer- 
ring flowers  of  Apocynum  and  Epilohium. 

Zones:  Transition,  Lower  Canadian. 

254  P.  camillus  Edw.  Red  Feather  vi-19- 29,  Poudre  vi-20-’29, 
Foxpark  vi-27  & 28-29,  Univ.  Camp  vi-29  to  vii-5-29, 
Moose  vii-i2-J29  through  August.  Found  throughout  the 
entire  Canadian  Zone. 

Zones:  Transition,  Canadian,  possibly  lower  Hudsonian. 

245  P.  ismeria  (Bdv.  & Lee.).  Poudre  vi-20-’29,  Bellevue  vi- 
21— ’29. 

Zones:  Upper  Sonoran,  Transition. 

274  Polygonia  satyrus  (Edw.).  Moose  v-1-24  (appearance  of 
hibernators)  viii-3-24  (year’s  brood).  Females  show  con- 
siderable tendency  to  a reduction  of  the  subterminal  markings 
as  in  f.  chrysoptera  Wright.  A female  was  observed  at 
Moose  ovipositing  on  Ribes,  v-20-’24.  The  egg  hatched  v- 
29.  Most  commonly  taken  in  bottoms,  but  also  occurs  in 
coniferous  forest. 

Zones:  Upper  Transition,  Canadian. 

276  P.  hylas  (Edw.).  Foxpark  VD28-29  (hibernator)  Moose 
vii-9~’24  (fresh  specimen  of  year’s  brood?). 


160  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


Zones:  Upper  Transition,  Canadian. 

277  P.  zephyrus  (Edw.).  Red  Feather  vi-i9-’29,  Libby  vi-26- 
’29,  Univ.  Camp  vii-2-’29,  Moose  iv-22-24.  All  the  preced- 
ing records  apply  to  hibernators. 

Zones:  Transition,  Canadian. 

280  P.  oreas  f.  oreas  (Edw.).  Moose  v-20-’24. 

Zones:  Upper  Transition,  Lower  Canadian. 

284  Hamadryas  milherti  (Godt.).  Bellevue  vi-2i-’29,  Univ. 
Camp  vii-i-’29,  Moose  iv-7~’24  (appearance  of  hibernators), 
vii-i2-’29  (year’s  brood).  Specimens  may  be  referred  to  f. 
sub pallida  Ckll.  but  are  not  all  typical.  Most  common  in 
bottoms,  but  occurs  throughout  entire  Canadian. 

Zones:  Upper  Sonoran,  Transition,  Canadian. 

285  H.  antiopa  (L.).  Moose  iv-9-24  (hibernators),  viii-2-24 
(year’s  brood).  Pupae  may  be  found  under  the  eaves  and 
window  casings  of  almost  every  cabin  in  the  valley  that  is 
located  near  willows.  Most  common  in  bottoms,  but  occurs 
throughout  entire  Canadian. 

Zones:  Upper  Transition,  Canadian. 

288  Cynthia  cardui  (L.).  Univ.  Camp  vii-i  to  5-^9,  Moose  v- 
i~’24.  Relatively  uncommon  at  Moose. 

Zones:  Upper  Transition,  Canadian. 

289  C.  carye  (Hbn.).  Moose  vii-12  & vii-i8-’29.  Both  are 
worn  specimens  and  are  the  only  records  I have  for  the 
region. 

Zones:  Upper  Transition,  lower  Canadian. 

309  Basilarchia  weidemeyerii  (Edw.).  Bellevue  \1-21-2g, 
Spring  vi-23~’29,  Moose  vii-i-’24  to  end  of  August.  Pre- 
fers shaded  woods.  Most  common  in  bottoms,  but  often 
found  in  coniferous  forest.  An  individual  often  has  a num- 
ber of  definitely  preferred  perches  and  when  frightened  flies 
regularly  from  one  of  these  to  another.  The  Colorado  speci- 
mens show  a reduction  in  width  of  the  white  band,  represent- 
ing a transitional  stage  to  angustifascia  B.  & McD. 

Zones:  Upper  Sonoran,  Transition,  Canadian. 

357  Strymon  melinus  Hbn.  Poudre  vi-20-’29. 

Zones:  Transition. 

363  S.  titus  (Fabr.).  Moose  vii-23~’29  to  middle  of  August  or 
later.  Both  on  flats  along  edges  of  bottoms  and  in  forest 


June,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  161 


glades.  Shows  a strong  preference  for  flowers  of  Apocynum 
and  Epilobium. 

t Zones:  Upper  Transition,  Canadian. 

364  S.  acadica  (Edw.).  Moose  vii-29-29  to  middle  of  August. 
Both  on  flats  along  edges  of  bottoms  and  in  forest  glades. 

Zones:  Upper  Transition,  Canadian. 

367  S.  sylvinus  (Bdv.).  Moose  vii-20-’29  to  middle  of  August. 
In  bottoms,  on  flats  along  edges  of  bottoms,  and  in  forest 
glades. 

Zones:  Upper  Transition,  Canadian. 

377  Mitoura  spinetorum  (Hew.).  Libby  vi-26-’29  (one  female). 
In  a grassy  marsh  surrounded  by  coniferous  forest. 

Zones:  Lower  Canadian. 

384  Incisalia  augustinus  (Westw.).  Poudre  vi-20-,29.  Two 
specimens  very  much  worn. 

Zones:  Upper  Transition. 

392  I.  eryphon  (Bdv.).  Red  Leather  vi-19-129,  Loxpark  vi-27- 
’29,  Moose  V-12— ’24.  In  small  glades  and  along  roadsides. 
Both  the  Red  Leather  and  the  Loxpark  specimens  showed  a 
distinct  preference  for  perching  on  gooseberry  bushes. 

Zones:  Upper  Transition,  lower  Canadian. 

396  Callophrys  sheridani  (Edw.).  Red  Leather  vi-20-’29  (very 
worn),  Moose  iv-30-’24  to  middle  of  July.  At  Moose  this 
species  is  exceedingly  common  in  the  early  Spring,  on  the 
sagebrush  flats.  Moose  specimens  show  more  reduction  of 
the  markings  beneath  than  in  typical  sheridani,  but  less  than 
in  neoperplexa  B.  & Benj. 

Zones:  Upper  Transition,  lower  Canadian. 

397  C.  apama  homoperplexa  B.  & Benj.  Loxpark  xi-2j-2C), 
Centennial  vi-28-’29,  Moose  v-2 0A24  to  end  of  July.  On 
sagebrush  flats. 

Zones:  Transition,  lower  Canadian. 

400  Satyrium  fuliginosa  semiluna  new  subspecies  (See  Ligs.  5 

&,6). 

Differs  from  /.  fuligiinosa  from  California,  the  type  locality, 
as  follows : 

Male  (1)  Upper  side  of  wings  grey  tinged  with  brown; 
stigma  light  grey,  conspicuous ; fringes  wide,  very  light  grey 
tigned  with  brown. 

(2)  Under  side  of  wings  light  brownish  grey;  spots  at  ends 


162  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


of  discal  cells  light  grey,  conspicuous;  postmedial  rows  of 
spots  large,  well  defined;  all  spots  definitely  pupiled  with 
black  except  in  some  cases  the  two  immediately  below  costa 
of  the  secondary;  submarginal  row  of  spots  distinct  on  both 
wings. 

Female  ( i ) Upper  side  of  both  wings  light  greyish  brown ; 
fringes  wide,  very  light  grey  faintly  tinged  with  brown. 

(2)  Under  side  of  wings  as  in  male,  somewhat  lighter  grey 
in  color,  especially  on  secondaries. 

The  race  is  characterized  in  general  by  the  much  greyer  ground 
color  of  the  wings  above,  and  the  greater  development  of  the 
markings  below.  In  this  latter  respect  it  may  be  considered  as 
more  primitive  than  /.  fuliginosa,  showing  the  ancestral  pattern 
more  distinctly.  Females  of  semiluna,  though  greyer  than  males, 
are  still  distinctly  less  brown  above  than  males  of  /.  fuliginosa. 

Holotype  male — Half  Moon  Ranch,  Moose  P.  O.  Jackson  Hole, 
Wyo.  vii-23~’29  deposited  in  American  Museum  of  Natural  His- 
tory. 

Allotype  female — Half  Moon  Ranch,  Moose  P.  O.  Jackson 
Hole,  Wyo.  vii-22-29  deposited  in  American  Museum  of  Natural 
History. 

Paratype  no.  1,  male — Half  Moon  Ranch,  Moose  P.  O.  Jackr 
son  Hole,  Wyo.  vii-31— ’29  deposited  in  Carnegie  Museum. 

Paratype  no.  2,  female — Half  Moon  Ranch,  Moose  P.  O. 
Jackson  Hole,  Wyo.  vii-23~’29  deposited  in  Carnegie  Museum. 

Paratype  no.  3,  male — Half  Moon  Ranch,  Moose  P.  O.  Jackson 
Hole,  Wyo.  \n-2y-2g  in  author’s  collection. 

Paratype  no.  4,  female — Half  Moon  Ranch,  Moose  P.  O.  Jack- 
son  Hole,  Wyo.  vii-27-’29  in  author’s  collection. 

I am  much  indebted  to  Mr.  E.  Irving  Huntington  and  the 
American  Museum  of  Natural  History  for  the  loan  of  California 
fuliginosa  for  comparison  with  semiluna. 

Specimens  were  taken  in  irrigated  fields  and  along  the  edge 
of  the  flats,  just  below  the  lower  border  of  coniferous  forest. 

Zones:  Upper  Transition,  lower  Canadian. 

408  Lycaena  editha  (Mead).  Moose  VU-6A24  to  middle  of 
August.  Common  on  sagebrush  flats,  especially  along  edges 
of  bottoms. 

Zones:  Upper  Transition,  lower  Canadian. 


June,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  163 


/ 

409  L.  thoe  (Guer.).  Spring  vi-23-29.  In  irrigated  field. 

Zones : Upper  Sonoran. 

410  L.  mariposa  (Reak.).  Moose  vii-25~’29  to  end  of  August. 
Taken  only  in  small  shaded  glades  in  coniferous  forest. 

Zones:  Canadian. 

41 1 L.  nivalis  (Bdv.).  Moose  vi-25-24  to  middle  of  August. 
Mostly  on  flats,  one  specimen  in  meadow  at  Taggart  Lake. 

Zones:  Upper  Transition,  Canadian. 

412  L.  helloides  (Bdv.).  Centennial  vi-28-,29.  Wet  meadows 
in  river  bottom. 

f.  florus  (Edw.).  Moose  vii-6-’24  through  August.  The 
great  majority  of  the  specimens  are  typical  florus,  but  a num- 
ber are  very  nearly  as  light  in  color  as  typical  helloides. 
Mostly  in  shaded  areas  in  creek  and  river  bottoms. 

Zones:  Transition,  (lower  Canadian). 

418  L.  rubidus  (Behr).  Moose  vii-29-,29.  One  male  in  wet 
meadow. 

Zones:  Upper  Transition  (Lower  Canadian). 

419  L.  heteronea  Bdv.  Moose  v— 20-’ 24  through  August.  Very 
common  on  flats.  More  pugnacious  than  other  species  of  the 
genus. 

Zones:  Upper  Transition,  lower  Canadian. 

L.  heteronea  gravenotata  new  subspecies  (see  Figs.  1-4). 

Differs  from  h.  heteronea  from  California,  the  type  locality,  as 

follows : 

Size:  Larger,  the  average  wing-spread  (sum  of  length  of 
primaries  from  base  to  apex)  of  holotype,  allotype  and  18 
paratypes  being  34  mm.  as  opposed  to  an  average  of  30  mm. 
for  the  specimens  of  h.  heteronea  examined. 

Markings  beneath:  heavier  and  more  distinct;  the  sub- 
marginal row  of  spots  on  both  primaries  and  secondaries  is 
nearly  always  complete,  while  in  h.  heteronea  the  spots  below 
veins  R5  and  M±  of  the  primaries  and  nearly  all  of  those  of 
the  secondaries  are  almost  always  absent ; postmedial  row  of 
spots  of  both  primaries  and  secondaries  heavy,  while  in  h. 
heteronea  these  spots  are  usually  very  small  on  the  primaries 
and  only  faintly  if  at  all  indicated  on  the  secondaries ; dis- 
cocellular  and  basal  spots  of  both  wings  always  present  as 
shown  in  figures,  clearly  marked,  while  in  h.  heteronea  these 
spots  are  much  smaller,  the  basal  ones  of  the  secondaries  be- 
ing often  absent. 


164  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


Gunder  (Ent.  News.  July  1925.  36:  194.  PI.  V,  fig.  1.)  has 

applied  the  name  coloradensis  to  an  aberration  of  this  race  which 
is  characterized  by  the  fusion  of  the  black  spots  beneath.  If 
names  applied  to  aberrations  are  considered  as  having  any  status 
in  nomenclature  coloradensis  will  have  to  be  used  as  the  race 
name  and  gravenotata  for  the  normal  form  of  this  race.  If  aber- 
rational names  are  considered  as  having  no  status  in  nomenclature 
gravenotata  will  be  used  as  the  race  name.  The  subject  of  the 
status  of  sub-subspecific  names  will  in  the  near  future,  it  is  hoped, 
be  considered  by  the  International  Commission  on  Zoological 
Nomenclature  and  perhaps  be  ultimately  settled. 

Gravenotata  appears  to  be  limited  to  the  Great  Plains  side  of  the 
Front  Range  in  Colorado.  Specimens  from  Fort  Collins  and 
Estes  Park  in  Farimer  County,  and  from  Plainview  in  Jefferson 
County  are  all  gravenotata.  Those  from  Fort  Collins  and  Estes 
Park  are  the  most  extreme.  Specimens  from  Grant,  Park  County, 
and  Tolland,  Gilpin  County,  are  more  or  less  intermediate  between 
h.  heteronea  and  h.  gravenotata.  Specimens  from  Granby,  Sul- 
phur Springs,  Tennessee  Pass,  Aspen,  Cimarron  and  Ridgway 
are  h.  heteronea  with  light  specimens  resembling  h.  clara. 

Of  a series  of  4 males  and  2 females  from  Glenwood  Springs, 
Garfield  County,  3 males  are  h.  heteronea  while  the  other  male  and 
the  2 females  are  distinct.  In  the  more  distinct  spotting  beneath 
these  specimens  strongly  resemble  gravenotata,  but  the  primaries 
appear  to  be  relatively  shorter,  and  the  females  possess  a very 
distinct  marginal  row  of  orange  brown  lunules  on  the  secondaries 
above.  I am  inclined  to  think  that  they  may  represent  a distinct 
local  form,  but  have  insufficient  data. 

It  is  to  be  expected,  in  the  case  of  a race  as  limited  in  range  as 
gravenotata  that  not  only  will  a certain  amount  of  intergrada- 
tion occur  around  the  borders  of  the  race’s  territory  but  also  oc- 
casional specimens  will  be  found  even  in  the  center  of  distribution 
which  will  not  conform  to  type.  It  is  only  where  extreme  isola- 
tion is  possible  that  a race  may  become  so  distinct  that  it  will  show 
no  grading  back  to  the  ancestral  form.  In  all  other  cases  there 
will  be  found  intergrades,  so  that  the  race  must  be  considered  as 
based,  not  on  the  characters  as  shown  by  one  or  two  chance  speci- 
mens, but  upon  the  average  of  a series  of  specimens.  It  is  certain 
that  gravenotata  is  far  from  being  completely  isolated  from 
heteronea,  and  so  the  occasional  atypical  specimens  which  occur 
even  in  the  center  of  gravenotata  territory  (I  have  one  perfectly 


June,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  165 


typical  h.  heteronea  from  Fort  Collins)  need  not  be  taken  too 
seriously. 

Holotype  male  and  allotype  female,  Plainview,  Jefferson 
County,  Colo.  alt.  6783  ft.  vii-9-27  and  vii-12-27  respectively,. 
Collection  E.  I.  Huntington  No.  87,  deposited  by  Mr.  Huntington 
in  American  Museum  of  Natural  History. 

Paratype,  males  1-9,  Plainview,  Colo,  as  above,  Collection  E.  I. 
Huntington  No.  87,  vii-6  to  I3~’27,  in  collection  Mr.  Huntington. 

Paratype  male  10,  Spring  Canyon,  west  of  Fort  Collins,  Colo, 
alt.  52-5500  ft.  vi-23~’29,  in  author’s  collection. 

Paratype  male  11,  Estes  Park,  Colo,  vii-15-97,  coll,  by  Emma 
Gillette,  No.  2684  in  collection  Dep’t.  Entomology  and  Zoology, 
State  Agricultural  College,  Fort  Collins,  Colo. 

Paratype  male  L2,  Estes  Park,  Colo.  vii-20-’i3,  Acc.  4260  in 
coll.  American  Museum  of  Natural  History. 

Paratype  females  13-15,  Plainview,  Colo,  vii-10  to  12-27, 
Coll.  E.  I.  Huntington  No.  87,  in  collection  Mr.  Huntington. 

Paratype  female  16,  Plainview,  Colo,  vii-9  to  14D22,  alt.  7- 
8000  ft.  Coll.  E.  I.  Huntington  No.  39,  in  coll.  Mr.  Huntington. 

Paratype  female  17,  Estes  Park,  Colo.  vii-i6-’94,  coll,  by  C.  P. 
Gillette,  No.  1734  in  coll.  Dep’t.  of  Entomology  and  Zoology,  State 
Agricultural  College,  Fort  Collins,  Colo. 

Paratype  female  18,  Fort  Collins,  Colo.  iv-25~’92,  coll,  by  C.  F. 
Baker,  No.  317  in  coll.  Dep’t.  of  Entomology  and  Zoology,  State 
Agricultural  College,  Fort  Collins,  Colo. 

The  only  specimen  of  gravenotata  taken  by  the  author,  para- 
type 10,  was  in  Upper  Upper  Sonoran  Zone. 

430  Everes  amyntula  (Bdv.).  Bellevue  vi-21-29,  Foxpark  vi- 

27-’29. 

Zones:  Upper  Upper  Sonoran,  Transition,  lower  Canadian. 
432  Pleheius  melissa  (Edw.).  Spring  vi-18  & 23-^9,  Poudre 

vi- 20-’29,  Bellevue  vi-2i~’29,  Foxpark  vi-27  & 28-’29, 
Moose  vi-20-’24  to  end  of  July.  Dry  meadows  and  flats. 

Zones:  Upper  Upper  Sonoran,  Transition,  lower  Canadian. 
434  P.  aquilo  rustica  (Edw.).  Red  Feather  vi-19  & 22- 29, 
Poudre  vi-20-’29,  Libby  vi-26-’29,  Foxpark  vi-27  & 28-’29, 
Univ.  Camp  vi-30  to  vii-6-’29,  Brooklyn  vii-8-’29,  Moose 

vii- i5~’29.  In  grassy  meadows  and  fields. 

Zones:  Upper  Transition,  Canadian,  Hudsonian. 


166  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


435  P-  s-  saepiolus  (Bdv.).  Spring  vi-i8-’29,  Red  Feather  vi-19- 
’29,  Libby  vi-26-’29,  Univ.  Camp  vi-29  to  vii-6-’29,  Brooklyn 
vii-8-’29,  Moose  vii-12  to  vii-29^’29.  In  open  grassy 
meadows  and  fields. 

Zones:  Upper  Upper  Sonoran,  Transition,  Canadian,  Hud- 
sonian. 

438  P.  icarioides  (Bdv.).  Spring  vi-18-29,  Poudre  vi-20-’29, 
Bellevue  vi-21- 29,  Red  Feather  vi-22-29,  Foxpark  vi-27- 
’29,  Univ.  Camp  vii-2  to  6^29,  Moose  vii-6-’24  to  middle  of 
August.  In  grassy  fields  and  meadows.  Specimens  from 
Colorado  are  referrable  to  race  lycea.  (Edw.).  Those  from 
Wyoming  are  nearest  to  race  pemhina  (Edw.)  but  do  not  ap- 
pear to  be  quite  typical.  Those  from  Moose  are  most  like 
pemhina,  while  those  from  Foxpark  and  yniv.  Camp  appear 
almost  like  transitionals  between  pemhina  and  ardea  (Edw.) 

Zones:  Upper  Upper  Sonoran,  Transition,  Canadian. 

442  P.  a.  acmon  (West  & Hew.).  Spring  vi-i8-’29,  Poudre  vi- 
20— *29,  Foxpark  Moose  vi-20-’24  to  the  middle  of 

August.  Grassy  meadows  and  sagebrush  fiats. 

Zones:  Upper  Upper  Sonoran,  Transition,  lower  Canadian. 

450  P.  enoptes  ancilla  B.  & McD.  Spring  vi-18-29,  Poudre  vi- 
27-29,  Moose  vii-12  to  viii-2-29.  Identification  to  species 
was  by  examination  of  the  male  genitalia.  The  male  speci- 
mens show  a great  deal  of  variation  in  size,  width  of  the 
black  border  above,  amount  of  orange  at  the  anal  angle  of  the 
secondaries  above,  and  in  the  markings  beneath. 

Zones:  Upper  Upper  Sonoran,  Transition,  (lower  Ca- 
nadian) . 

455  Phaedrotes  piasus  (Bdv.).  Spring  vi-18  & 23-29. 

Zones:  Upper  Upper  Sonoran. 

456  Glaucopsyche  lygdamus  (Dbldy.).  Spring  vi-18  & 23-29, 
Red  Feather  vi-19-29,  Poudre  vi-20-’29,  Bellevue  \i-21-2g, 
Libby  vi-26^’29,  Foxpark  vi-27  & 28-29,  Univ.  Camp  vi-29 
to  vii-6-J29,  Moose  v-20-’24  to  middle  of  July. 

Zones:  Upper  Upper  Sonoran,  Transition,  Canadian, 
(lower  Hudsonian). 

458  Lycaenopsis  pseudargiolus  (Bdv.  & Lee.).  Univ.  Camp  vi— 
26  to  vii-2-’29,  Moose  v-io-’24  to  end  of  June.  These 
specimens  all  appear  to  belong  to  p.  pseudargiolus.  Two 
females,  Univ.  Camp  vi-26  & vii-2-’29  are  f.  lucia  (Kirby). 


June,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  167 


The  latter  of  these  has  the  dark  discal  patch  of  the  seconda- 
ries beneath  very  large,  and  the  border  of  the  same  wing  very 
heavily  and  broadly  fuscous. 

Zones:  Upper  Transition,  Canadian. 

For  the  identification  of  the  following  Hesperiidae  I am  in- 
debted to  the  kindness  of  Messrs.  F.  E.  Watson  and  E.  L.  Bell. 

467  Epargyreus  tityrus  (Fabr.).  Spring  vi-i8-’29. 

Zones:  Upper  Upper  Sonoran. 

498  Urhanus  ruralis  (Bdv.).  Red  Feather  vi-i9~’29,  Foxpark 
vi-27— ’29.  In  dry  grassy  fields. 

Zones:  Upper  Transition,  lower  Canadian. 

503  U.  tessellata  (Scud.).  Bellevue  vi-18  & 21- 2g,  Spring  vi- 
i8-’29.  In  arid  grassy  fields. 

Zones:  Upper  Upper  Sonoran,  (Transition). 

513  Pholisora  catullus  (Fabr.).  Bellevue  vi-18  & 2i-’29.  Dry 
grassy  fields. 

Zones:  Upper  Upper  Sonoran,  (lower  Transition). 

523  Erynnis  icelus  (Scud.  & Burg.).  Moose  v-24-24  to  end  of 
June. 

Zones:  Upper  Transition,  (lower  Canadian). 

528  E.  p.  persius  (Scud.).  Red  Feather  vi-i9~’29,  Bellevue 
vi— 21— ’29,  Libby  vi-26-’29,  Foxpark  vi-27  & 28-29,  Univ. 
Camp  vii— 5 & 6-29,  Moose  vi-7-24  to  end  of  July.  Grassy 
fields  and  meadows. 

Zones:  Upper  Upper  Sonoran,  Transition,  Canadian, 
(lower  Hudsonian). 

548  Oarisma  garita  (Reak.).  Bellevue  vi-18  & 21-29,  Spring 
vi-18  & 23-29.  Dry  grassy  fields. 

Zones:, Upper  Upper  Sonoran,  (lower  Transition). 

560  Hesperia  uncas  Edw.  Cheyenne  Wells,  Colo,  viii-9-29. 
Arid  grassy  prairie. 

Zones:  Upper  Sonoran. 

568  H.  comma  Colorado  (S cud.).  Moose  vii-9-’24  to  end  of 
August.  Virginia  Dale  viii— 7-U9.  At  Moose  very  abundant 
on  sagebrush  flats,  also  occurring,  though  uncommon,  in 
meadows  of  Canadian  Zone  areas. 

Zones:  Transition,  Canadian. 

571  H.  viridis  (Edw.).  Spring  vi-18  & 23-29.  Arid  grassy 
fields. 


168  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


Zones:  Upper  Upper  Sonoran,  (lower  Transition). 

572  H.  nevada  (Scud.).  Red  Feather  vi-i9-’29,  Foxpark  vi-27 
to  28-^9,  grassy  fields. 

Zones:  Upper  Transition,  lower  Canadian. 

583  Ochlodes  sylvanoides  napa  (Edw.).  Moose  viii-3-’29. 
Common  in  grassy  fields  in  river  bottom,  to  which  area  it 
appears  to  be  restricted. 

Zones:  Upper  Transition,  (lower  Canadian). 

589  Polites  manataaqua  rhena  (Edw.).  Bellevue  vi-2i-’29, 
Spring  vi-23~’29.  In  arid  grassy  fields. 

Zones:  Upper  Upper  Sonoran,  (lower  Transition). 

593  P.  mystic  dacotah  (Edw.).  Bellevue  vi-21-29.  In  grassy 
bottom  of  small  creek. 

Zones:  Upper  Upper  Sonoran,  (lower  Transition). 

595  P.  coras  (Cram.).  Moose  vii-15-29  to  middle  of  August. 
Found  only  in  wet  grassy  marsh  in  river  bottom,  where  it  is 
very  common. 

Zones:  Upper  Transition,  (lower  Canadian). 

597  P.  draco  (Edw.).  Red  Feather  vi-i9~’29,  Libby  vi-26-’29, 
Foxpark  vi-27  & 28-29,  Univ.  Camp  vii-i  to  5-29,  Moose 
vi-i3~,24  (one  female,  only  record).  Grassy  fields  and  road- 
sides. 

Zones:  Upper  Transition,  Canadian. 

605  A trytone  vestris  (Bdv.).  Bellevue  vi-21— 29.  Grassy  fields. 
Zones:  Upper  Upper  Sonoran,  (lower  Transition). 

List  of  Life  Zones  With  Characteristic  Species. 

In  the  following  lists  an  attempt  has  been  made  to  list  those 
species  which  appear  to  the  writer  to  be  sufficiently  limited  to  one 
Life  Zone  so  that  they  may  be  considered  as  characteristic  of  that 
zone.  In  the  case  of  the  majority  of  species  this  listing  is  not  in 
the  least  conclusive  in  view  of  the  extremely  small  amount  of  data 
available,  and  will  probably  not  prove  at  all  permanent.  In  the 
case  of  a few  species,  however,  the  listing  is  undoubtedly  accurate. 
When  a species  has  been  taken  in  a zone  or  in  zones  other  than 
the  one  which  is  considered  to  be  its  main  center  of  distribution 
the  initial  letter  or  letters  of  the  secondary  zones  are  placed  after 
the  species  name. 

The  placing  of  a zone  in  parentheses  signifies  that  the  occur- 
rence of  the  species  in  that  zone  is  comparatively  uncommon  or 
rare. 


June,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  169 


Many  species  have  been  omitted  from  the  list,  either  because 
their  zonal  range  is  too  great,  or  because  the  writer  has  insufficient 
data  about  them. 


Urbanus  tessellata  T. 
Oarisma  garita 
Hesperia  uncas 


multicaudata 


Upper  Sonoran. 

Hesperia  viridis 
Dryas  halcyone 


Papilio 
(C.) 

Dryas  aphrodite  cypris  U.  S. 
Dryas  nevadensis  C. 

Dryas  platina  C. 

Brent  his  myrina  C. 

Euphydryas  gillettii 
Phyciodes  tharos  pascoensis  C. 
Phyciodes  ismeria  U.  S. 
Basilarchia  weidemeyeri  U.  S., 
C. 

Strymon  melinus 
Strymon  titus  C. 

Strymon  acadica  C. 

Strymon  sylvinus  C. 

Incisalia  augustinus 

Papilio  zelicaon  (T.,  H.) 
Papilio  rutulus  T. 

Papilio  eurymedon  (T.) 
Parnassius  clodius  (T.) 
Parnassius  smintheus  T.,  (H.) 
Ascia  sisymbrii  T. 

Ascia  occidentalis  U.  S.,  T.,  H. 
Ascia  napi  T.,  H. 

Euchloe  ausonides  (T). 
Anthocharis  sara  julia  T. 
Eurymus  alexandra  (T.) 
Eurymus  scudderii  (T.) 
Coenonympha  ochracea  (U.  S.) 
T. 


T ransition. 

U.  S.,  Incisalia  eryphon  C. 

Callophrys  sheridani 
Callophrys  apama  homoper- 
plexa 

Lycaena  editha  C. 

Lycaena  nivalis  C. 

Lycaena  helloides  (C.) 
Lycaena  heteronea  U.  S.,  (C.) 
Plebeius  melissa  U.  S.,  (C.) 
Plebeius  acmon  U.  S.,  C. 
Philotes  enoptes  U.  S.,  (C.) 
Urbanus  ruralis  C. 

Hesperia  comma  Colorado  C. 
Hesperia  nevada  (C.) 

Ochlodes  sylvanoides  napa  (C.) 
Polite s coras  (C.) 

Canadian. 

Coenonympha  haydenii  (H.) 
Erebia  epipsodea 
Dryas  he s peris  T. 

Dryas  hydaspe 
Dryas  eurynome  (T.) 
Euphydryas  editha 
Euphydryas  anicia  (T.) 
Polygonia  satyrus  T. 

Polygonia  hylas  T. 

Polygonia  zephyrus  T. 

Lycaena  mariposa 
Plebeius  aquilo  rustica  T.,  H. 
Plebeius  icarioides  U.  S.,  T. 
Plebeius  saepiolus  U.  S.,  T.,  H. 


170  Bulletin  of  the  BrooMlyn  'Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


Approximately  x 3/4. 

Fig.  1.  Under  side,  holotype  male,  Lycaena  heteronea  graveno- 
tata  Kots. 

Fig.  2.  Under  side,  allotype,  female,  L.  heteronea  gravenotata 
Klots. 

Fig.  3.  Under  side,  paratype  male  10,  L.  heteronea  gravenotata 
Klots. 

Fig.  4.  Under  side,  paratype  female  17,  L.  heteronea  gravenotata 
Klots. 

Fig.  5.  Upper  side,  holotype  male,  Satyrium  fuliginosa  semiluna 
Klots. 

Fig.  6.  Under  side,  holotype  male,  Satyrium  fuliginosa  semiluna 
Klots. 

For  data  on  specimens  figured  see  text. 


Glaucopsyche  lygdamus  U.  S.,  Lycaenopsis  pseudargiolus  T. 
T.,  H.  Polite s draco  (T.) 

Hudsonian. 

Eurymus  meadii  (C.)  Brenthis  freija  C. 


June,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  171 


SIX  NEW  SPECIES  OF  TENAGOBIA  BERGROTH 
(HEMIPTERA,  CORIXIDAE). 

By  Howard  O.  Deay,  Lafayette,  Indiana. 

In  working  over  the  Tenagobia  material  in  the  University  of 
Kansas  Entomological  collection,  the  writer  found  six  species, 
whose  descriptions  follow,  which  are  new  to  science. 

Tenagobia  minuta  sp.  nov.  (PI.  I,  figs,  i,  4,  10,  14.) 

Size:  Length,  male  1.8  mm.;  female  1.8-2.0  mm.  Width 
of  head,  male  0.75.;  female  0.78  mm. 

Color:  Above  brownish  yellow,  marked  with  indistinct 
fuscous  irrorations ; eyes  darker,  sometimes  crossed  with  light 
bands ; front  transparent  yellowish  grey  with  dark  irrora- 
tions ; scutellum  sometimes  with  indistinct,  broken,  longi- 
tudinal reddish  stripes ; costal  margins  of  hemelytra  each 
bearing  three  fuscous  maculations.  Underside  of  thorax  and 
legs  uniformly  yellowish  grey;  abdomen  darker,  sometimes 
fuscous. 

Structural  characteristics:  Head:  Posterior  margin  of  ver- 
tex with  median  tubercle,  caudo-lateral  angles  but  little  pro- 
duced laterally;  an  eye  about  3/4  as  wide  as  interocular 
space;  posterior  margin  of  eyes  approximate  the  posterior 
margin  of  head.  Prothorax:  No  moustache-like  bristles  on 
lateral  margins,  cephalic  aspect ; pronotum  5 times  wider  than 
its  median  length,  2^2  times  wider  than  posterior  margin  of 
vertex,  2 times  wider  than  base  of  scutellum,  anterior  margin 
angulate,  posterior  margin  truncate  in  front  of  bases  of 
hemelytra  and  concavely  arcuate  in  front  of  scutellum. 
Scutellum:  Relatively  large,  approximately  twice  as  long  as 
median  length  of  pronotum,  i1/^  times  wider  than  long,  apex 
very  acutely  angled.  Hemelytra:  Exceed  abdomen  about  0.2 
mm.  in  male,  slightly  in  female ; membranal  suture  distinct  in 
left  hemelytron  but  not  in  right ; minute  peg-like  setae  scat- 
tered irregularly  over  hemelytra,  more  on  posterior  half  of 
right,  distinct  longitudinal  impression  along  each  costal  mar- 
gin. Ratio  of  lengths  (dorsal  aspect)  of  head,  pronotum, 
scutellum,  and  from  apex  of  scutellum  to  apex  of  clavus  is  as 
22:  21:  40:  70.  Wings:  present.  Abdomen:  5th  segment 
with  one  spine-like  seta  on  either  side;  6th  segment  with  2 
spine-like  setae  on  either  side  ; 7th  segment  with  4 spine-like 
setae  on  either  side,  a circular  patch  of  minute  setae  in  dextro- 
cephalic  angle  of  tergum;  8th  segment  with  3 lateral  and  1 


172  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


terminal  spine-like  setae  on  either  side,  the  tergite-tongue 
with  12  hair-like  setae,  the  right  half  of  segment  with  a hump- 
like projection  on  mesal  margin  near  caudal  end  which  bears 
a tuft  of  short  bristle-like  setae.  Claspers:  The  left  with  a 
membranous,  club-shaped,  weak  distal  end  beset  with  papillae, 
the  basal  and  connective  parts  much  stronger;  the  right  the 
same  texture  throughout,  apex  pointed,  the  dorsal  margin 
flattened  in  front  of  the  apex  and  then  curves  down  to  join 
the  base,  5 short  spinelike  setae  on  right  side.  Legs:  Front, 
with  2 spine-like  setae  on  inner  underneath  side  of  femur, 
tarsus  proportionately  large,  as  long  as  tibia,  13  bristle-like 
setae  on  lower  edge,  setae  of  inner  row,  except  terminal  ones, 
very  minute,  5 long  hair-like  setae  in  upper  row ; tarsal-claw 
large,  disc-shaped,  constricted  into  neck  at  base.  Middle, 
ratio  of  lengths  of  femur,  tibia,  tarsus  and  tarsal  claws  is  as 
32:  12:  15:  11. 

Described  from  a series  of  4 males  and  3 females  bearing  the 
label : Boqueron  river,  Panama,  May,  1907.  August  Busck. 

The  Boqueron  river  is  an  inland  stream  east  of  the  Canal  Zone. 
It  flows  into  the  Pequeni  river  which  in  turn  empties  into  Rio 
Chagres. 

Holotype  male.  All  types  in  the  University  of  Kansas  Ento- 
mological collection. 

Comparative  notes : T.  minuta  is  the  smallest  of  the  known  spe- 
cies of  Tenagobia.  It  belongs  to  the  group  which  has  the  pro- 
notum  truncate  in  front  of  the  bases  of  the  hemelytra.  Four  spe- 
cies compose  this  group  at  present ; marmorata  Bergroth,  pulchra 
Hungerford,  minuta  sp.  nov.  and  truncata  sp.  nov.  T.  minuta 
can  be  distinguished  from  marmorata  by  the  fact  that  the  scutel- 
lum  is  twice  as  long  as  the  pronotum  instead  of  “ little  longer.” 
It  can  be  distinguished  from  pulchra  by  the  shape  of  the  claspers 
and  the  tergite-tongue  of  the  8th  abdominal  segment,  and  by  the 
fore-tarsus  in  pulchra  being  shorter  than  the  tibia.  The  distin- 
guishing characteristic  of  T.  truncata  sp.  nov.  will  be  given  under 
the  discussion  of  that  species. 

Tenagobia  truncata  sp.  nov.  (PI.  I,  figs.  5,  7,  8,  11.) 

Size:  Length,  male  2.17  mm.;  female  2.3  mm.  Width 
across  head,  male  0.8  mm. ; female  0.9  mm. 

Color:  Uniformly  brownish  to  fuscous  above;  front 
lighter;  no  maculations  on  lateral  margins  of  hemelytra; 
bases  of  clavi  lighter;  scutellum  sometimes  with  lighter  lon- 
gitudinal lines.  Venter  fuscous;  legs  uniformly  greyish 
yellow. 


June,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  173 


Structural  characteristics:  Head : Posterior  margin  of  ver- 
tex with  minute  median  tubercle,  caudo-lateral  angles  but 
little  produced  laterally;  an  eye  about  4/5  as  wide  as  inter- 
ocular space ; posterior  margin  of  eyes  narrowly  separated 
from  the  posterior  margin  of  head.  Prothorax : No  mous- 
tache-like bristles  on  lateral  margins,  cephalic  aspect ; pro- 
notum  5 times  wider  than  median  length,  maximum  width  a 
little  more  than  base  of  head,  nearly  3 times  wider  than  pos- 
terior margin  of  vertex,  2j4  times  wider  than  base  of  scutel- 
lum,  anterior  margin  angulate,  posterior  margin  truncate  in 
front  of  bases  of  hemelytra  and  concavely  arcuate  in  front  of 
scutellum.  Scutellum : Approximately  twice  as  long  as  me- 
dian length  of  pronotum,  about  1 1/6  times  wider  than  long, 
apex  very  acutely  angled.  Hemelytra:  Exceeds  abdomen 
about  0.2  mm.  in  male,  slightly  in  female ; membranal  suture 
distinct  in  left  hemelytron  but  not  in  right ; minute  peg-like 
setae  scattered  irregularly  over  the  hemelytra,  rather  numer- 
ous along  the  lateral  margins.  Ratio  of  lengths  (dorsal  as- 
pect) of  head,  pronotum,  scutellum,  and  from  apex  of  scutel- 
lum to  apex  of  clavus  is  as  28:28:55:  80.  Wings:  Present. 
Abdomen:  5th  segment  with  3 short  spine-like  setae  on  either 
side ; 6th  segment  with  4 short  spine-like  setae  on  either  side ; 
7th  segment  with  4 short  spine-like  setae  on  either  side,  cir- 
cular patch  of  minute  setae  in  dextro-cephalic  angle  of  ter- 
gum  as  in  minuta ; 8th  segment  with  3 lateral  and  1 terminal 
short  spine-like  setae.  Claspers:  the  left  membranous  and 
spoon-shaped  distally  (the  drawing  is  of  the  lateral  aspect), 
the  basal  and  connective  parts  much  stronger ; the  right  re- 
sembles that  of  minuta,  the. 6 minute  spine-like  setae  are  more 
distad  than  in  minuta,  it  differs  in  shape  in  that  it  tapers 
gradually  from  the  apex  to  the  base  dorsally.  Legs:  Front 
rather  slender,  femur  with  two  spines  on  inner  underneath 
side,  tarsus  noticeably  shorter  than  tibia,  14  bristle-like  setae 
on  lower  edge,  1 1 hairs  in  inner  row,  4 long  hair-like  setae  in 
upper  row;  tarsal  claw  large.  Ratio  of  lengths  of  femur, 
tibia,  tarsus  and  tarsal  claws  of  middle  leg  is  as  32 : 10 : 15:9. 

Described  from  a series  of  2 males  and  4 females  bearing  the 
label:  F.  X.  Williams,  Tena,  near  Oriente,  Ecuador,  March  29- 
April  10,  1923. 

Holotype  male.  All  types  in  the  University  of  Kansas  Ento- 
mological collection. 

Comparative  notes:  This  species  as  the  preceding  belongs  to  the 
group  with  the  pronotum  truncate  in  front  of  the  bases  of  the 
hemelytra.  It  is  distinguished  from  marmorata  Bergroth  in  that 


174  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


the  scutellum  is  twice  as  long  as  the  pronotum  instead  of  “ little 
longer.”  It  differs  from  minuta  in  the  shape  of  claspers,  in  that 
the  5th  abdominal  segment  bears  3 short  spine-like  setae  on  either 
side  while  in  minuta  it  bears  only  one,  6th  abdominal  segment  in 
truncata  bears  4 short  spine-like  setae,  in  minuta  two,  fore-tarsus 
in'  truncata  shorter  than  tibia,  in  minuta  the  fore-tarsus  is  as  long 
as  tibia,  the  eighth  abdominal  segment  in  truncata  is  proportion- 
ally much  smaller  than  in  minuta.  T.  truncata  can  be  distin- 
guished from  pulchra  by  the  shape  of  the  claspers  and  the  tergite- 
tongue,  and  in  the  fact  that  pulchra  has  no  circular  patch  of  mi- 
nute setae  in  the  dextro-cephalic  angle  of  the  7th  abdominal 
tergum. 

Tenagobia  mexicana  sp.  nov.  (PI.  I,  figs,  2,  3,  12,  13.) 

Size:  Length,  male  2.55-2.7  mm.;  female  2.85-3.0  mm. 
Width  of  head,  male  0.97-1.  mm.;  female  1.12-1.17  mm. 

Color:  Brownish  fuscous  above;  front  and  vertex  usually 
yellowish  transparent ; lateral  margins  of  hemelytra  each  with 
4 dark  maculations,  transparent  V-shaped  figure  near  base  of 
each  clavus,  slender  longitudinal  transparent  line  in  right 
hemelytron  caudad  to  claval  suture.  Venter  yellowish,  base 
of  abdomen  a little  darker;  legs  and  antennae  yellowish. 

Structural  characteristics : Head:  Posterior  margin  of  ver- 
tex with  a minute  median  tubercle,  caudo-lateral  angles  pro- 
duced laterally;  an  eye  4/5  as  wide  as  interocular  space;  dis- 
tinct, though  narrow,  space  between  the  posterior  margin  of 
the  eyes  and  posterior  margin  of  head.  Prothorax : No 

moustache-like  bristles  on  lateral  margins,  cephalic  aspect ; 
pronotum  6 times  wider  than  median  length,  2^  times  wider 
than  posterior  margin  of  vertex,  about  1 6/10  times  wider 
than  base  of  scutellum,  posterior  margin  not  truncate  in  front 
of  bases  of  hemelytra,  narrowed  at  ends.  Scutellum:  3 times 
longer  than  median  length  of  pronotum,  1 1/3  times  wider 
than  long.  Hemelytra:  Exceeds  abdomen  about  0.3  mm.  in 
male,  slightly  in  female;  membranal  suture  distinct  in  left 
hemelytron,  but  not  in  right;  minute  peg-like  setae  scattered 
over  the  outer  half  of  corium,  those  on  lateral  margins  ar- 
ranged in  a row.  Ratio  of  lengths  (dorsal  aspect)  of  head, 
pronotum,  scutellum,  and  from  apex  of  scutellum  to  apex  of 
clavus  is  as  2:2:6:11.  Wings:  Present.  Abdomen:  5th, 
6th,  and  7th  segments  each  with  2 short  spine-like  setae  on 
either  side;  8th  segment  with  1 terminal  and  3 lateral  spine- 
like setae  on  either  side,  the  tergite-tongue  with  a few  very 
weak  hair-like  setae,  the  right  half  of  segment  with  a hump- 
like projection  on  mesal  margin  near  caudal  end  which  bears 


June,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  175 


a tuft  of  short  bristles.  Claspers:  The  right  not  serrate  ven- 
trally,  heel  acute,  but  little  produced,  slight  excavation  an- 
terior to  it  on  ventral  margin,  caudal  margin  deeply  exca- 
vated, toe  much  produced  and  rounded  at  apex ; the  left  very 
striking,  caudal  part  somewhat  hammer  shaped,  the  heel  much 
produced,  the  toe  acutely  angled  and  much  produced.  Legs: 
Front,  femur  with  a stiff  spur  which  arises  from  a papilla- 
like projection  on  lower  side,  above  this  on  inner  side  is  a row 
of  4 spine-like  setae;  tarsus  shorter  than  tibia,  14-15  bristle- 
like setae  in  lower  row,  15-17  hairs  in  inner  row,  8 long  hair- 
like setae  in  upper  row.  Ratio  of  lengths  of  femur,  tibia* 
tarsus,  and  tarsal  claws  of  middle  leg  is  as  13 : 4:  5 : 4.2. 

Described  from  a long  series  of  males  and  females  (about  250) 
which  bear  the  label:  House  of  General  Obregon,  Naimari,  So- 
nora, Mexico,  Aug.  8,  1927.  Taken  at  light.  A.  Dampf. 

Holotype  male.  All  types  in  the  University  of  Kansas  Ento- 
mological collection. 

Comparative  notes:  This  species,  as  well  as  the  following  one, 
serrata  sp.  nov.,  belongs  to  the  signata  (White)  group.  This 
group  of  Tenagobia  is  characterized  by  having  a large  spur  on  the 
ventral  side  of  the  fore-femur.  Up  to  the  present  three  species, 
signata  and  socialis  (White),  and  incerta  Lundblad,  have  com- 
posed this  group.  To  these  the  writer  adds  mexicana  and  serrata 
sp.  nov.  These  five  species  are  very  close  to  each  other  and  can 
be  separately  definitely  only  by  examining  the  genital  claspers  of 
the  males.  Fortunately  the  shape  of  the  claspers  is  constant 
within  the  species  as  well  as  being  characteristic  of  the  species. 
Among  the  other  characters  which  enable  one  to  differentiate 
among  these  species  is  the  number  of  hair-like  setae  in  the  upper 
row  of  the  fore-tarsus  and  the  bristle-like  setae  in  the  lower  row. 
T.  mexicana  is  readily  separated  from  the  other  species  in  this 
group  by  the  shapes  of  the  right  and  left  claspers. 

Tenagobia  serrata  sp.  nov.  (PL  I,  figs.  6,  9.) 

Size:  Length,  male  2.55  mm.;  female  3.-3. 1 mm.  Width 
of  head,  male  1.  mm. ; female  1.2  mm. 

Color:  Varies  from  uniform  light  brown  to  variegated  dark 
brown ; transparent  V-shaped  figure  near  base  of  each  clavus  ; 
lateral  margins  of  hemelytra  each  with  4 dark  maculations; 
slender,  transparent,  longitudinal  line  in  right  hemelytron 
caudad  to  claval  suture.  Venter  and  legs  uniformly  yellow. 

Structural  characteristics:  Head:  The  same  as  in  mexicana 
except  that  caudo-lateral  angles  of  vertex  are  more  acute. 


176  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


Prothorax : The  same  as  mexicana.  Scutellum:  2^2  times 
wider  than  long.  Hemelytra : The  same  as  mexicana.  Ratio 
of  lengths  (dorsal  aspect)  of  head,  pronotum,  scutellum,  and 
from  apex  of  scutellum  to  apex  of  clavus  is  as  6:6:  15:  30. 
Wings:  Present.  Abdomen:  The  shape  of  tergites  and  loca- 
tion of  the  spine-like  setae  the  same  as  in  mexicana.  Clasp- 
ers:  The  right  with  a double  row  of  serratures  ventrally,  the 
heel  very  acute,  a deep  excavation  immediately  proximad  to 
it,  the  toe  somewhat  produced  and  rounded.  The  left  rather 
simple,  heel  not  developed,  toe  pointed,  resembles  that  of 
signata  (White)  rather  closely.  Legs:  Fore-leg  is  identical 
with  that  of  mexicana  in  shape  and  in  the  peg  and  row  of 
spine-like  setae  on  femur,  the  number  of  setae  on  the  tarsus 
differs,  however,  there  being  10  long  hair-like  setae  in  the 
upper  row  in  this  species  and  but  8 in  mexicana. 

Described  from  a series  of  1 male  and  8 females  bearing  the 
label:  Lower  Mamore  River,  December,  1913.  Steinbach. 

The  Lower  Mamore  River  is  in  central  Bolivia  north  of  Santa 
Cruz. 

Holotype  male.  All  types  in  the  University  of  Kansas  Ento- 
logical  collection. 

Comparative  notes:  This  species,  as  was  stated  under  the  dis- 
cussion of  mexicana,  belongs  to  the  signata  group.  It  is  readily 
distinguished  from  the  other  members  of  this  group  by  the  double 
row  of  serratures  on  the  ventral  side  and  the  shape  of  the  right 
clasper. 

Tenagobia  constricta  sp.  nov.  (PI.  II,  figs.  1,  4,  6,  7,  10,  11.) 

Size:  Length,  male  2.80  mm.;  female  3.0  mm.  Width  of 
head,  male  1.05  mm.;  female  1.20  mm. 

Color:  Uniformly  fuscous  brown  above;  front  and  vertex 
transparent  yellowish  grey,  posterior  margin  of  vertex 
darker;  lateral*  margins  of  hemelytra  lighter,  each  with  two 
fuscous  maculations.  Ventral  aspect  of  thorax  yellowish, 
abdomen  darker ; legs  yellowish,  slightly  darker  at  distal  ends. 

Structural  characteristics:  Head:  Posterior  margin  of  ver- 
tex sinuate,  caudo-lateral  angles  not  produced  laterally;  an 
eye  i1/^  times  wider  than  interocular  space;  posterior  margin 
of  eyes  distinctly  separated  from  the;  posterior  margin  of  the 
head.  Prothorax : Moustache-like  bristles  on  lateral  margins, 
cephalic  aspect ; pronotum  a little  narrower  than  head,  W/2 
times  wider  than  median  length,  2 times  wider  than  base  of 
scutellum ; posterior  margin  not  truncate  in  front  of  bases  of 
hemelytra,  narrowed  at  ends.  Scutellum:  Approximately 


June,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  177 


23/2  times  longer  than  median  length  of  pronotum,  i 1/5  times 
wider  than  long.  Hemelytra:  Same  shape  as  those  of  T. 
romani  Lundblad ; exceed  abdomen  about  0.2  mm.  in  male, 
slightly  in  female ; membranal  sutures  both  distinct ; minute 
peg-like  setae  scattered  irregularly  over  the  hemelytra;  very 
fine  hair-like  setae  distally;  distinct  longitudinal  impressions 
on  each  lateral  margin  anteriorly,  many  bristle-like  setae  in 
the  impressions.  Ratio  of  lengths  (dorsal  aspect)  of  head, 
pronotum,  scutellum  and  from  apex  of  scutellum  to  apex  of 
clavus  is  as  50 : 21 : 50:  135.  Wings:  Present.  Abdomen:  5th 
and  6th  segments  each  with  two  short  spine-like  setae  on  each 
side;  7th  segment  relatively  long,  with  2 spine-like  setae  on 
each  side;  8th  segment  with  1 lateral  and  1 terminal  spine- 
like setae  on  either  side,  tergite-tongue  rather  truncate  at  end, 
bearing  15  long  hair-like  setae;  Claspers:  The  right  has  a 
membranous  basal  portion,  the  distal  part  shaped  somewhat 
like1  a sled-runner  with  a notch  about  mid-way  of  dorsal  sur- 
face ; the  left  with  a membranous,  hairy  cap  set  on  the  up- 
turned distal  end.  Legs:  Front  long  and  slender,  femur  with 
2 weak  spine-like  setae  on  inner  underneath  side,  13  bristle- 
like setae  in  lower  row,  about  14  hairs  in  inner  row,  5 long 
hair-like  setae  in  upper  row ; tarsal  claw  very  slender.  Ratio 
of  lengths  of  femur,  tibia,  tarsus  and  tarsal  claws  of  middle 
leg  is  as  62 : 18 : 25  : 15. 

Described  from  a series  of  2 males  and  14  females  bearing  the 
label:  F.  X.  Williams,  Tena,  Ecuador,  Feb.  28,  1923. 

Holotype  male.  All  types  in  the  University  of  Kansas  Ento- 
mological collection. 

Comparative  notes:  This  species  is  very  closely  related  to  T. 
romani  Lundblad.  They  agree  in  being  the  only  two  known  spe- 
cies of  Tenagobia  that  have  such  narrow  interocular  spaces,  in  the 
shape  of  fore-legs,  in  the  number  of  spine-like  setae  on  fore- 
femur, in  shape  of  hemelytra,  and  the  dorsal  aspect  of  abdomen. 
They  can  be  readily  distinguished  by  the  shape  of  the  claspers, 
both  of  which  are  distinct ; by  the  fact  that  constricta  is  uniformly 
colored  and  romani  is  not ; by  the  number  of  bristle-like  setae  on 
the  lower  edge  of  the  fore-tarsus,  romani  has  about  22,  constricta 
only  13;  and  in  romani  there  are  2 lateral  spine-like  setae  on  8th 
abdominal  segment,  in  constricta  only  1. 

Tenagobia  hungerfordi  sp.  nov.  (PI.  II,  figs.  2,  3,  5,  8,  9.) 

Size:  Length,  male  2.85  mm.;  female  3-3.15  mm.  Width 
of  head,  male  1.05  mm.;  female  1.2  mm. 


178  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


Color:  Brownish  fuscous  above;  eyes  dark;  vertex  and 
front  greyish  transparent;  hemelytra  with  lateral  margins 
lighter  and  four  dark  maculations  on  each;  the  usual  trans- 
parent V-shaped  figure  at  base  of  each  clavus.  Yellowish 
beneath,  hind  legs  darker  distally. 

Structural  characteristics:  Head:  Posterior  margin  of  ver- 
tex without  median  tubercle,  caudo-lateral  angles  obtuse ; an 
eye  slightly  narrower  than  interocular  space ; posterior  mar- 
gin of  eyes  widely  separated  from  the  posterior  margin  of 
head.  Prothorax : Moustache-like  bristles  present  on  lateral 
margins,  cephalic  aspect ; pronotum  about  7 times  wider  than 
median  length,  4 times  wider  than  posterior  margin  of  ver- 
tex, 2 times  wider  than  base  of  scutellum,  posterior  margin 
not  truncate  in  front  of  bases  of  hemelytra,  narrowed  at  ends. 
Scutellum:  2^4  times  as  long  as  median  length  of  pronotum, 
1 J4  times  wider  than  long,  apex  very  acutely  angled.  Heme- 
lytra: Membranes  well  developed,  the  left  transparent;  many 
minute  peg-like  setae  scattered  irregularly  over  entire  heme- 
lytra, numerous  fine  hair-like  setae  distally ; deep  longitudinal 
impression  near  each  lateral  margin  in  which  there  is  a row 
of  larger  setae.  Ratio  of  lengths  (dorsal  aspect)  of  head, 
pronotum,  scutellum,  and  from  apex  of  scutellum  to  apex  of 
clavus  is  as  55:20:50:120.  Wings:  Present.  Abdomen: 
5th,  6th,  and  7th  segments  each  with  2 spine-like  setae  on 
either  side,  the  5th  and  6th  tergites  excavated  on  right  side 
and  projected  on  left;  8th  segment  with  1 lateral  and  1 ter- 
minal spine-like  setae  on  either  side,  tergite-tongue  bears  11 
weak  hair-line  setae,  mesal  margin  sinuate,  right  half  of  seg- 
ment with  a tuft  of  short  bristle-like  setae  on  mesal  margin 
near  the  caudal  end.  Claspers:  The  left  with  a brown  pointed 
projection  near  the  base  somewhat  as  in  melini  and  schadei 
Lundblad  but  is  more  pointed,  the  distal  end  is  upturned ; in 
the  right  the  distal  end  is  bent  up  nearly  at  right  angles  to  the 
basal  part,  ventrally  there  is  a papilla-like  projection.  Legs: 
Fore-leg  with  a row  of  6 spine-like  setae  on  inner  under- 
neath side  of  femur;  tarsus  large,  longer  than  tibia,  12  bris- 
tle-like setae  in  lower  row,  13  hairs  in  inner  row,  6 long  hair- 
like setae  in  upper  row.  Middle  leg,  ratio  of  lengths  of 
femur,  tibia,  tarsus,  and  tarsal  claws  is  as  155  : 55 : 60:  45. 

Described  from  a series  of  1 male  and  9 females  bearing  the 
label:  Corumba,  Matto  Grosso,  Brazil,  Dec.  14-22,  1919.  R.  G. 
Harris. 

Holotype  male.  All  types  in  the  University  of  Kansas  Ento- 
mological collection. 


June’  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  179 


Comparative  notes:  This  species  is  close  to  melini  and  schadei 
Lundblad.  It  differs  from  melini  in  the  shape  of  claspers,  in  that 
it  has  but  12  bristle-like  setae  in  lower  row  on  fore-tarsus  while 
melini  has  18,  and  in  that  it  has  2 spine-like  setae  on  each  lateral 
margin  of  6th  abdominal  segment  instead  of  1 as  melini  has.  It 
is  at  once  distinguished  from  schadei  by  the  fact  that  schadei  has 
no  minute  peg-like  setae  on  the  hemelytra.  The  two  species  are 
further  distinguished  by  the  shape  of  the  claspers,  and  in  that 
schadei  has  but  5 hair-like  setae  in  the  upper  row  on  the  fore- 
tarsus while  hungerfordi  has  6. 

This  species  is  named  for  Dr.  H.  B.  Hungerford,  of  the  Univer- 
sity of  Kansas. 

Plate  IX. 

1.  Left  clasper,  Tenagobia  minuta  sp.  nov. 

2.  Left  clasper,  T.  mexicana  sp.  nov. 

3.  Right  clasper,  T.  mexicana. 

4.  Right  clasper,  T.  minuta. 

5.  Left  clasper,  T.  truncata  sp.  nov. 

6.  Left  clasper,  T.  serrata  sp.  nov. 

7.  Left  part  of  8th  abdominal  segment,  T.  truncata. 

8.  Head  and  pronotum,  T.  truncata. 

9.  Right  clasper,  T.  serrata. 

10.  Left  part'  of  8th  abdominal  segment,  T.  minuta. 

11.  Inner  side  of  right  fore-leg,  T.  truncata. 

12.  Inner  side  of  left  fore-leg,  T.  mexicana. 

13.  Left  part  of  8th  abdominal  segment,  T.  mexicana. 

14.  Inner  side  of  left  fore-leg,  T.  minuta. 

Plate  X. 

1.  Left  clasper,  Tenagobia  constricta  sp.  nov. 

2.  Right  clasper,  T.  hungerfordi  sp.  nov. 

3.  Left  clasper,  T.  hungerfordi. 

4.  Right  clasper,  T.  constricta. 

5.  Head,  T.  hungerfordi. 

6.  Left  part  of  8th  abdominal  segment,  T.  constricta. 

7.  Head,  pronotum  and  scutellum,  T.  constricta. 

8.  Left  part  of  8th  abdominal  segment,  T.  hungerfordi. 

9.  Inner  side  of  right  fore-leg,  T.  hungerfordi. 

10.  Inner  side  of  left  fore-leg,  T.  constricta. 

11.  Tarsal  claw,  T.  constricta. 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  Vol.  XXV,  No.  3 


Plate  IX 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  Vol.  XXY,  No.  3 


Plate  X 


182  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


BOOK  NOTES. 

A Handbook  of  the  Mosquitoes  of  North  America.  Their 
Structure.  How  they  Live.  How  they  Carry  Disease.  How 
they  may  be  Studied.  How  they  may  be  Controlled.  How 
they  may  be  Identified.  By  Robert  Matheson.  Charles  C. 
Thomas,  Springfield,  111.,  and  Baltimore,  Md.,  1929,  xvii  -J-  268 
pp.,  frontispiece,  25  plates  and  23  text  figures.  (Price,  $5.50.) 
This  new  manual  of  the  mosquitoes  seems  to  differ  from  some 
of  the  similar  previous  attempts,  mainly  in  being  written  from  the 
entomologist’s  point  of  view  and  consequently  with  a better  un- 
derstanding of  the  beginners’  real  needs.  The  hope,  however,  ex- 
pressed in  the  Preface,  that  even  “ the  average  citizen  ” may  be 
able  to  identify  with  it  our  common  species,  must  have  surged 
from  the  heart  of  an  optimist. 

The  general  chapters  dealing  with  the  characteristics  of  mos- 
quitoes, their  biology,  their  relation  to  human  welfare,  their  con- 
trol, and  the  methods  of  their  study,  are  excellent.  They  present 
the  fundamentals  in  a concise,  yet  clear,  style,  and  are  unusually 
free  from  disputed  and  unnecessary  technicalities,  as  well  as  from 
dubious  statements.  The  text  illustrations  that  go  with  these 
chapters  are  much  better  than  the  average  and  are  worthy  models 
for  the  novice  to  follow.  The  same  is  true  of  the  drawings  shown 
in  the  plates ; although  it  seems  a pity  that  in  a manual  the  line 
drawings  of  the  male  genitalia  should  be  crowded  together  in  the 
back  of  the  book,  instead  of  scattered  for  handy  reference  in  the 
text  under  the  respective  species.  It  is  also  rather  unfortunate 
that  the  elegant  colored  frontispiece  bears  no  caption  whatsoever 
and  is  not  even  mentioned  in  the  explanation  of  the  plates.  In- 
deed, the  reader  will  have  to  reach  p.  83  before  learning  that  it 
represents  an  anopheline,  and  p.  87  before  being  told  that  it  is 
Anopheles  quadrimaculatus.  In  the  captions  of  Plates  III  to  VII, 
which  show  breeding  places  of  certain  common  mosquitoes,  we 
miss  a reference  to  the  localities  illustrated ; presumably  the 
photographs  were  taken  in  central  New  York. 

The  taxonomic  part  purports  to  cover  the  Culicinae  of  North 
America ; at  least  we  are  told  so  in  the  Preface,  p.  vi.  This  is, 
however,  not  strictly  true.  For,  quite  apart  from  any  reduction  in 
the  number  of  species  due  to  synonymy,  some  twenty  southern 
and  western  species  have  not  been  included.  A few  of  these  have 
nevertheless  been  mentioned  in  the  keys  and  it  would  seem  that 


June,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  183 


very  little  additional  labor  could  have  managed  a place  there  for 
the  remainder  too.  This  would  certainly  have  increased  the  value 
of  the  book  to  the  student  in  the  Southern  States  and  in  Cali- 
fornia. The  handbook  seems  to  cover  very  fully  the  fauna  of 
northeastern  America,  as  far  south  as  Georgia  and  as  far  west  as 
the  Rockies.  I have  noticed  the  absence  of  only  one  species 
which  is  occasionally  taken  in  Arkansas  and  Missouri.  The  key 
to  the  genera  covers  all  the  forms  known  north  of  Mexico,  includ- 
ing even  Deinocerites,  which  is  not  mentioned  elsewhere  in  the 
book. 

The  descriptions  of  the  adults  and  larvae  of  the  several  species 
appear  quite  adequate  and  are  evidently  based  upon  an  original 
study  of  actual  specimens.  In  relatively  few  exceptions  they  have 
been  quoted  from  Dyar’s  publications,  as  is  clearly  indicated  in 
each  case.  The  diligent  new  descriptions  of  the  older  species  are 
most  commendable.  Obviously  in  Entomology  we  need  more  of 
this  type  of  critical  and  synthetic  work  and  less  of  the  perpetual 
pursuit  of  supposed  “ new  species.”  Perhaps  a fuller  characteri- 
zation of  the  genera  would  have  been  welcome,  since  the  only 
characters  given  of  these  groups  are  contained  in  a very  short  key. 
The  beginner  might  thus  get  the  erroneous  idea  that  no  other  valid 
differences  separate  the  genera. 

In  a taxonomic  handbook  special  care  should,  of  course,  be 
given  to  the  drawing  up  of  workable  keys ; for,  if  they  are  unduly 
intricate  or  unreliable,  they  will  only  too  often  discourage  the 
novice.  I have  tested  Professor  Matheson’s  keys  with  a number 
of  common  species  and  was  pleased  to  find  them  more  serviceable 
than  some  other  published  dichotomies.  My  only  criticism  would 
be  that  in  the  key  to  the  genera  rather  undue  and,  I believe,  un- 
necessary prominence  is  given  to  peculiarities  of  the  thoracic 
chaetotaxy.  I do  not  wish  to  dispute  the  value  of  these  charac- 
ters, even  though  in  some  cases  the  very  same  condition  is  given 
generic  value,  which  in  others  serves  only  to  separate  the  species 
within  one  genus.  I also  realize  the  author’s  obvious  desire  to 
bring  these  characters  to  the  foreground.  Yet  the  addition  of 
more  readily  accessible  characters  could  have  given  the  student 
an  added  sense  of  security  in  his  identifications. 

The  book  lacks  the  customary  and  seemingly  unavoidable  Er- 
rata, which  does  not  mean  that  it  is  free  from  printer’s  errors. 
The  most  unfortunate  occurs  on  p.  204,  where  Megarhinus  is  mis- 
spelled five  times  “ Megharinus although  it  is  correctly  spelled 


184  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


on  several  other  occasions,  as  well  as  in  the  Index.  I was  glad  to 
see  that  the  author  has  taken  pains  to  make  the  specific  adjectives 
agree  in  gender  with  their  generic  names,  thus  sparing  us  such 
philological  horrors  as  “ Me garhinus  rutila”  and  ((  Psorophora 
horridus.” 

The  typographical  presentation  and  the  binding  set  better  stand- 
ards than  those  we  have  endured  in  some  post-war  manuals.  I 
fear,  however,  that  the  cost  of  the  book  will  not  make  the  study 
of  mosquitoes  more  popular  than  it  has  been  heretofore. — J.  Be- 
quaert,  Department  of  Tropical  Medicine,  Harvard  Medical 
School. 


The  Gall  Wasps  of  the  Genus  Cynips — A Study  in  the  Origin 
of  Species — by  Alfred  C.  Kinsey.  Indiana  University  Studies, 
vol.  xvi,  Studies  nos.  84,  85,  86,  pp.  1-577,  figs.  1-429. 
(Waterman  Institute  Publication,  no.  42,  price  $2.50.) 

Here  we  have  a study  on  one  of  the  great  principles  of  evolution 
which  has  the  validity  of  research  and  experimentation  on  a fixed 
group  by  planned  and  controlled  methods  and  means.  The  group 
in  itself  is  small  enough  in  number  of  species  and  great  enough 
in  number  of  individuals  to  make  it  possible  to  examine  such  large 
numbers  that  the  coefficient  of  error  is  diminished  to  so  great  a 
degree  as  to  become  negligible.  The  author  has  examined  no  less 
than  54,000  galls  and  17,000  individuals  in  the  course  of  his  in- 
quiry into  “the  nature  of  species,  individual  variation,  mutation 
and  hybridization  in  nature,  and  the  factors  affecting  the  origin  of 
species.” 

The  nature  of  this  work  and  its  extensive  character  make  it  un- 
wise to  do  more  than  strongly  draw  the  attention  of  biologists 
to  it.  Doubtless  in  time  careful  analyses  and  evaluations  of  the 
results  will  appear,  but  this  is  no  place  for  them. 

From  the  point  of  view  of  the  Hymenopterist,  this  is  an  excel- 
lent piece  of  biological  work,  which  puts  the  genus  on  an  absolute 
working  basis.  In  addition  to  all  the  biological  and  genetical  data, 
there  is  a study  of  the  systematics  of  Cynips,  with  descriptions  of 
48  heretofore  unknown  or  unrecognized  species. 

At  a later  date  we  shall  hope  to  publish  a more  extensive  cri- 
tique by  a hymenopterist  of  standing.  Meantime,  as  a serious 
study  of  what  species  are  and  how  they  evolve,  every  biologist 
should  become  acquainted  with  this  work  of  Dr.  Kinsey’s. — J. 
R.  T.-B. 


June,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  185 


PROCEEDINGS  OF  THE  SOCIETY. 


Meeting  of  January  16,  1930. 

A regular  meeting  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  was 
held  at  the  Brooklyn  Museum,  o'n  January  16,  1930,  at  8.20  p.  m. 
President  Davis  in  the  Chair  and ’18  members  present,  viz.: 


Messrs.  Anderson, 
Ballou, 

Bell, 

Black, 

Burke, 

Chapin, 

Cooper, 

Eisenhardt, 

Engelhart, 


Lemmer, 

Risch, 

Schaeffer, 

Sever, 

Sheridan, 

Siepmann, 

Torre-Bueno, 

Wilford  and 

Lersch;  and  several  visitors. 

Minutes  of  the  previous  meeting  read  and  approved. 

Mr.  Engelhardt  presented  a detailed  annual  report  of  the 
Treasurer,  showing  the  Society  to  be  in  a very  sound  financial 
condition,  which  is  particularly  gratifying  in  view  of  there  having 
been  no  donations  from  private  sources  or  other  outside  help,  the 
only  revenue  other  than  that  from  dues,  subscriptions  and  sales 
of  the  Society’s  publications  being  the  receipt  of  $100  from  the 
sale  of  the  excess  material  in  the  Weeks  Collection. 

Mr.  Torre-Bueno  stated  that  he  would  not  make  the  formal 
annual  report  of  the  Publication  Committee  at  this  time  but  would 
present  it  at  the  February  meeting. 

Mr.  Sheridan,  as  Chairman  of  the  Nominating  Committee, 
presented  for  re-election  the  present  officers  of  the  Society,  to 
serve  for  the  year  1930;  and  it  was  regularly  moved,  and  seconded 
and  carried,  that  they  be  elected. 

Mr.  Englehardt  proposed  for  membership : 

Mr.  Everett  Lersch, 

227  Union  Avenue, 

Mt.  Vernon,  N.  Y. 

As  Mr.  Lersch  was  present,  it  was  regularly  moved  and  seconded 
that  the  by-laws  be  suspended  and  Mr.  Lersch  be  elected  to  mem- 
bership ; this  was  unanimously  carried. 

Mr.  Engelhardt  reported  that  he  had  been  looking  over  the  file 
of  Bulletins  vols.  5 and  6 with  the  object  in  view  of  having  the 
missing  numbers  in  these  volumes  reprinted  in  order  to  have 


186  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society 


Vol,  xxv 


about  50  complete  volumes  on  hand  to  fill  orders  for  them  and 
that  he  would  get  quotations  as  to  the  cost  of  having  this  done. 

Mr.  Cooper  read  a paper  entitled  “A  List  of  Coleoptera  Found 
at  Flushing,  New  to  Long  Island,”  which  will  be  published  in  full. 

Mr.  Eisenhardt  presented  his  paper  “Colias  of  the  World” ; he 
stated  that  there  are  51  species  and  193  variations  from  the  typi- 
cal form,  known  from  the  various  regions  of  the  World,  except 
the  Torrid  Zone;  of  these  33  species  are  found  in  the  Palaearctic 
Region ; 6 in  the  Indo-Australian  Region,  which  are  also  included 
in  the  33  from  the  Palaearctic  Region;  17  in  North  America,  of 
which  4 are  included  in  those  from  the  Palaearctic  Region ; 4 from 
South  America ; and  1 from  Africa.  He  exhibited  two  boxes  of 
specimens  representing  32  species  and  a number  of  forms  and 
remarked  at  length  on  their  habitat,  color  and  variations.  He 
stated  that  most  of  the  species  are  clover  feeders  and  that  there 
are  from  one  to  three  generations  each  year.  A list  of  the  species 
and  variations  exhibited,  giving  their  habitat,  is  attached.  Mr. 
Eisenhardt’s  paper  was  discussed  at  length  by  the  members. 

Mr.  Davis  remarked  on  some  cocoons  of  Callosamia  promethea 
Drury  and  Philosamia  walkeri  Felder,  more  familiarly  known  as 
cynthia  Drury  from  which  the  moths  had  failed  to  emerge  at  the 
usual  time  and  had  carried  over  until  the  next  year ; he  exhibited 
the  specimens  and  remarked  on  their  apparently  normal  appear- 
ance in  size  and  maculation  and  gave  in  detail  the  date  of  their 
emergence.  He  will  publish  his  paper  in  full. 

Mr.  Davis  also  read  from  a letter  from  Mr.  Austin  H.  Clark 
giving  a list  of  the  female  forms  of  Papilio  glaucus  Linnaeus ; 
there  being  six  forms  in  the  list  instead  of  two  usually  recognized. 

Adjourned  at  10.15  P-  m- 

E.  L.  Bell, 
Secretary. 


Vol.  XXV 


OCTOBER,  1930 

BULLETIN 


No.  4 


OF  THE 

Brooklyn  Entomological 


PUBLICATION  COMMITTEE 

J.  R.  de  la  TORRE-BUENO,  Editor 

E.  L.  BELL  GEO.  P.  ENGELHARDT 

Published  for  the  Society  by  the 

Science  Press  Printing  Co., 

Lime  and  Green  Sts.,  Lancaster,  Pa., 

Price,  60  cents  Subscription,  $2.50  per  year 

Mailed  October  25,  1930 


Entered  as  second-class  matter  January  21,  1919,  at  the  post  office  at  Lancaster,  Pa., 
under  the  Act  of  March  3,  1879 


The  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society 


Meetings  are  held  on  the  second  Thursday  after  the  first  Tuesday  of  each 
month  from  October  to  June,  inclusive,  at  the  Central  Museum,  Eastern 
Parkway  and  Washington  Ave.,  Brooklyn.  The  annual  dues  are  $2.00. 

OFFICERS,  1930 
Honorary  President 
CHARLES  W.  LENG 


President 
W.  T.  DAYIS 
Vice-President 

J.  R.  de  la  TORRE-BUENO 
Recording  Secretary 
E.  L.  BELL 
Corresponding  Secretary 
HOWARD  NOTMAN 


Treasurer 

G.  P.  ENGELHARDT 

28  Club  way 
Hartsdale,  N.  Y. 
Librarian 

DR.  JOSEPH  BEQUAERT 
Curator 

J.  M.  SHERIDAN 


Delegate  to  Council  of  New  YorTc 
Academy  of  Sciences 
G.  P.  ENGELHARDT 


CONTENTS 


NEW  SPECIES  OF  CERATOCAPSUS,  Knight  187 

t TWO  NEW  N.  AM.  MUSCOID  FLIES,  Reinhard  199 

A NEW  ARCTOCORIXA  WITH  A NOTE  ON  SYNONYMY,  Walley...  203 

NEW  MOTH  COLLECTING  GUN,  Gunder  208 

SYNONYMIES  OF  ANTILLEAN  CHRYSOMELIDAE,  WITH  DE- 
SCRIPTIONS OF  NEW  SPECIES,  Blake  209 

COLLECTING  CONTAINER  FOR  BUTTERFLIES,  Gunder  225 

POSTSCRIPT  TO  1 1 STYLOPIZED  YESPIDAE,  ’ ’ Salt  and  Bequaert..  226 

EDITORIAL:  WHAT  IS  A SPECIES,  J.  R.  T.  B 229 

ENTOMOLOGICA  AMERICANA,  J.  R.  T.  B 230 

CHANGE  OF  ADDRESS  OF  TREASURER  230 

BOOK  NOTES:  A MANUAL  FOR  THE  STUDY  OF  INSECTS 231 

STUDIES  ON  THE  INSECT  FAUNA  OF  IOWA 

PRAIRIES  231 

PROCEEDINGS  OF  THE  SOCIETY,  Bell  and  Siepman  232 

EXCHANGES  236 


Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society 

Published  in 

February,  April,  June,  October  and  December  of  each  year 

Subscription  price,  domestic,  $2.50  per  year;  foreign,  $2.75  in  advance;  single 
copies,  60  cents.  Advertising  rates  on  application.  Short  articles,  notes  and 
observations  of  interest  to  entomologists  are  solicited.  Authors  will  receive  25 
reprints  free  if  ordered  in  advance  of  publication.  Address  subscriptions  and 
all  communications  to 

J.  R.  de  la  TORRE-BUENO,  Editor, 

38  De  Kalb  Avenue,  White  Plains,  N.  Y. 


BULLETIN 

OF  THE 

BROOKLYN  ENTOMOLOGICAL  SOCIETY 


Vol.  XXV  October,  1930  No.  4 


NEW  SPECIES  OF  CERATOCAPSUS  (HEMIPTERA, 

MXRIDAE).1 

By  Harry  H.  Knight,  Ames,  Iowa. 

Ceratocapsus  camelus  n.  sp. 

Distinguished  by  the  slender  form  of  the  male,  dark  brown- 
ish black  in  color  with  a silvery,  sericeous,  pubescent  band 
across  middle  of  hemelytra ; female  brachypterous,  hemelytra 
only  extending  to  middle  of  abdomen,  each  corium  strongly, 
tumidly  convex  on  middle. 

Length  3.8  mm.,  width  1.08  mm.  Head:  width  .73 
mm.,  vertex  .38  mm. ; vertex  convexly  rounded,  basal  edge 
thin,  slightly  overlapping  the  collar;  surface  of  the  eyes  con- 
forming to  the  same  surface  plane  as  the  frons  and  vertex ; 
basal  margin  of  vertex  with  four  and  frons  with  several  erect, 
pale,  bristle-like  hairs.  Rostrum,  length  1.34  mm.,  reaching 
to  base  of  hind  coxae.  Antennae : segment  I,  length  .23  mm.  ; 
II,  .75  mm.,  cylindrical,  more  slender  at  base,  .apical  half 
slightly  exceeding  thickness  of  segment  I ; III,  .47  mm.,  equal 
to  thickness  of  segment  I but  more  slender  at  base;  IV, 
.47  mm.,  equal  to  thickness  of  segment  ClII ; clothed  with 
short,  fine,  pale  pubescence.  Pronotum:  length  .82  mm., 
width  at  base  1.08  mm.;  nearly  campanulate  in  form,  lateral 
margins  sulcate,  coxal  clefts  visible  from  above ; disk  strongly 
convex,  smooth,  shining,  calli  scarcely  evident,  collar  flat  and 
overlapped  by  the  vertex. 

Color  dark  brown  to  blackish,  more  black  on  pronotal  disk 
and  cuneus,  shining ; ostiolar  peritreme  white,  somewhat  pro- 
truding laterally.  Hemelytra  dark  brown,  translucent, 
strongly  shining,  embolar  margins  sinuate ; with  a silvery  seri- 
ceous pubescent  band  across  middle  of  corium  and  crossing 


1 Contribution  from  the  Department  of  Zoology  and  Entomol- 
ogy, Iowa  State  College,  Ames,  Iowa. 


188  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


the  clavus  near  apex,  also  with  similar  sericeous  pubescence 
at  base  of  clavus  and  across  middle  of  scutellum;  beset  with 
several  erect,  moderately  long,  yellowish,  bristle-like  hairs  on 
scutellum,  clavus  and  inner  angles  of  corium,  also  intermixed 
with  fine,  short,  simple  pubescent  hairs;  cuneus  scarcely  de- 
flexed,  uniformly  brownish  black,  slightly  paler  at  fracture. 
Membrane  uniformly  dark  fuscous,  bordering  the  cuneus, 
between  and  within  the  larger  areoles  except  narrowly 
bordering  the  paracuneus,  pale.  Legs  dark  brown,  tips  of 
femora  and  the  tarsi  somewhat  paler;  coxae  pale,  darker  on 
base,  front  pair  reddish  brown  on  apical  half ; hind  femora 
decurved  on  apical  half.  Genital  structures  distinctive,  right 
clasper  bifurcate,  each  half  curving  in  a semicircle,  the  tips 
nearly  in  contact ; left  clasper  forked  at  base,  dorsal  prong 
projecting  distad,  apex  acuminate,  curved  like  a claw,  also 
with  a small  spine  beneath  at  base  of  claw,  ventral  half  flat- 
tened, broad,  then  narrowing  to  acuminate  apex ; also  third 
prong  arising  from  left  clasper  at  inner  side  of  base,  slender, 
sinuate,  projecting  distad,  apical  half  curving  to  the  right 
side. 

Length  2.8  mm. ; brachypterous,  width  across  abdomen 
1. 1 2 mm.  Head  : width  .80  mm.,  vertex  .52  mm. ; head  large, 
eyes  rather  small,  frons,  vertex  and  tylus  forming  an  arcuate 
line  as  viewed  from  the  side.  Rostrum,  length  1.3  mm.  ex- 
tending slightly  beyond  middle  of  hind  coxae.  Antennae : 
segment  I,  length  .22  mm.,  pale  brownish;  II,  1.77  mm., 
slightly  tapering  from  base  to  larger  at  apex,  brownish  black ; 
III,  broken.  The  other  antenna  apparently  deformed,  seg- 
ment II  only  1.6  mm.  in  length.  Pronotum : length  .65  mm., 
width  at  base  .67  mm. ; disk  strongly  convex,  base  strongly 
depressed  to  a point  below  level  of  anterior  margin,  sides 
rounded  and  slightly  sinuate,  coxal  clefts  visible  from  above. 
Scutellum  depressed,  small,  triangular,  the  mesoscutum  visi- 
ble, sharply  declivent.  Hemelytra  brachypterous,  reaching 
to  middle  of  abdomen,  depressed  on  base,  corium  tumidly 
convex  on  apical  area,  shining,  apical  and  inner  margins 
thickly  clothed  with  silvery,  sericeous  pubescence,  also  beset 
with  several  erect,  fine  long  hairs,  also  with  similar  hairs  on 
the  abdomen ; cuneus  and  membrane  absent.  Base  of  venter 
with  a frosted  spot  each  side  behind  the  coxa. 

Holotype:  $ August  21,  1926,  Urbana,  Illinois  (Vera  Smith)  ; 
author’s  collection.  Allotype:  same  data  as  the  type. 


Oct.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  189 


Ceratocapsus  fascipennis  n.  sp. 

Allied  to  camelus  and  having  much  the  same  color  aspect 
but  differs  distinctly  in  structure  of  the  genital  structures ; 
scutellum  more  convex,  ostiolar  peritreme  with  a reddish 
brown,  laterally  projecting  tubercle. 

Length  4.3  mm.,  width  1.2  mm.  Head:  width  .80 
mm.,  vertex  .37  mm.;  form  very  similar  to  that  of  camelus. 
Rostrum,  length  1.43  mm.,  extending  to  middle  of  meta- 
sternum. Antennae:  segment  I,  length  .28  mm.,  pale  brown- 
ish, a reddish  mark  on  ventral  aspect ; II,  .86  mm.,  cylindrical, 
more  slender  at  base,  apical  half  slightly  exceeding  thickness 
of  segment  I ; III,  .47  mm.,  slightly  exceeding  thickness  of 
first  segment ; IV,  .47  mm.,  equal  in  thickness  to  segment  III ; 
dark  brown  to  blackish;  clothed  with  short,  fine,  pale 
pubescence.  Pronotum:  length  .95  mm.,  width  at  base  1.21 
mm. ; form  nearly  as  in  camelus,  but  disk  somewhat  more 
strongly  convex.  Scutellum  small,  triangular,  only  very 
slightly  convex,  with  silvery,  sericeous  pubescence  across 
middle ; mesoscutum  prominent,  strongly  declivent  to  base  of 
scutellum. 

Color  dark  brown  to  blackish,  shining,  paler  brown  on 
clavus  and  basal  half  of  corium;  ostiolar  peritreme  white, 
with  a reddish  brown,  laterally  projecting  tubercle;  a silvery, 
sericeous  pubescent  band  across  clavus  at  about  half  way 
between  apex  and  tip  of  scutellum,  angling  obliquely  for- 
ward across  corium ; also  with  a similar  but  narrower  serice- 
ous band  running  obliquely  across  base  of  clavus  and  join- 
ing with  similar  pubescence  on  middle  of  scutellum.  Scutel- 
lum with  about  eight,  erect,  pale  bristles,  and  clavus  with 
about  as  many  but  less  prominent  bristles ; the  whole  dorsum 
also  clothed  with  rather  fine,  short,  simple  pubescence.  Mem- 
brane uniformly  dark  fuscous,  areoles  and  narrowly  border- 
ing apex  of  cuneus,  pale.  Cuneus  scarcely  deflexed,  embolar 
margins  sinuate.  Legs  dark  brown,  coxae  and  trochanters 
pale,  tarsi  yellowish ; hind  femora  decurved  apically,  tips 
pale;  hind  tibiae  distinctly  bowed. 

Genital  structures  distinctive,  base  of  left  clasper  with  a 
slender,  dorsally  projecting  prong,  and  decurved  apically; 
right  clasper  with  a simple,  distally  projecting  process, 
slightly  curved  and  thicker  on  basal  half,  with  a small  spine 
on  inner  side  near  base. 

Holotype:  June  20,  1928,  alt.  6200  ft.,  Chiricahua  Mts., 

Arizona  (A.  A.  Nichol)  ; author’s  collection.  Paratype : J'  July 
8,  1905,  Huachuca  Mts.,  Arizona  (H.  G.  Barber). 


190  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  V 61.  XXV 


Ceratocapsus  barberi  n.  sp. 

Suggestive  of  fascipennis  in  having  two  transverse,  silvery 
pubescent  bands  across  hemelytra,  but  differs  in  the  scarcely 
arched  mesoscutum,  flatter  frons  and  vertex,  straight  femora, 
and  very  different  genital  structures. 

Length  4 mm.,  width  1.25  mm.  Head:  width  .84  mm., 
vertex  .30  mm. ; vertex  and  frons  flat,  dorsal  extremity  of 
eyes  extending  very  little  above  level  of  vertex.  Rostrum 
extending  to  near  hind  margins  of  posterior  coxae  (im- 
bedded in  glue.)  Antennae:  segment  I,  length  .25  mm.;  II, 
.99  mm.,  slightly  more  slender  on  basal  half ; III,  .56  mm., 
equal  in  thickness  to  apex  of  segment  II ; IV,  .56  mm.  equal 
in  thickness  to  segment  III ; uniformly  dark  reddish  brown, 
segment  I paler  and  marked  with  dark  red.  Pronotum: 
length  .69  mm.,  width  at  base  1.1 2 mm. ; disk  moderately  and 
evenly  convex,  lateral  margins  slightly  sulcate.  Scutellum 
only  very  slightly  convex,  mesoscutum  normal,  nearly  cov- 
ered by  pronotal  disk. 

Color  rather  uniformly  dark  reddish  brown,  disk  of  pro- 
notum somewhat  darker,  entire  surface  strongly  shining. 
Hemelytra  with  costal  margins  very  slightly  sulcate,  with 
silvery,  sericeous  pubescent  band  cross  base  of  clavus  and 
middle  of  scutellum,  also  a second  band  crossing  the  corium 
and  apical  third  of  clavus.  Cuneus  scarcely  deflexed,  red- 
dish brown  like  the  clavus.  Membrane  uniformly  pale 
fuscous,  pale  at  base  between  larger  areoles  and  bordering 
tip  of  cuneus.  Clothed  with  fine,  simple,  pale  yellowish 
pubescence,  scutellum  and  clavus  with  several  erect,  bristle- 
like hairs.  Ostiolar  peritreme  white,  reddish  on  the  protrud- 
ing tubercle.  Legs  uniformly  reddish  brown,  tarsi  pale 
brownish.  Genital  claspers  distinctive,  right  clasper  short, 
slightly  thickened,  dorsal  margin  extending  as  a long  slender 
hook,  attaining  dorsal  median  line  of  genital  segment  where 
it  is  sharply  decurved  and  slenderly  acuminate  at  tip. 

Holotype:  J'  July  12,  1905,  Huachuca  Mts.,  Arizona  (H.  G. 
Barber),  collected  at  light;  author’s  collection.  Named  for  my 
friend,  Mr.  H.  G.  Barber,  who  collected  and  presented  the  unique 
specimen. 

Ceratocapsus  oculatus  n.  sp. 

Runs  in  my  key  (Hemiptera  Connecticut,  1923,  p.  525)  to 
fuscinus  Kngt.,  but  differs  from  this  and  allied  species  by  the 


Oct.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  191 


small  size  and  short  antennal  segments ; the  male  differs  in 
the  large  eyes,  narrow  vertex  and  nearly  obsolete  genae,  also 
by  the  simple  form  of  the  genital  claspers. 

Length  2.6  mm.,  width  1.14  mm.  Head:  width  .78 
mm.,  vertex  .17  mm. ; eyes  large,  raised  somewhat  above  level 
of  vertex,  extending  below  to  near  the  rostrum,  the  genae 
reduced  to  a mere  trace.  Rostrum,  length  .91  mm.,  reaching 
to  near  hind  margins  of  middle  coxae.  Antennae : segment 
I,  length  ,20  mm.;  II,  .65  mm.,  nearly  cylindrical,  tapering 
slightly  on  basal  half ; III,  .39  mm. ; IV,  .35  mm. ; segments 
of  nearly  equal  thickness,  yellowish  brown,  last  two  segments 
dark  brown.  Pronotum:  length  .54  mm.,  width  at  base  1.01 
mm. 

Color  rather  uniformly  yellowish  brown,  cuneus  reddish 
brown.  Membrane  and  veins  fuscous,  paler  within  the 
areoles.  Dorsum  distinctly  punctate,  punctures  infuscated. 
Clothed  with  simple  yellowish  pubescence  and  intermixed 
with  silvery,  sericeous  pubescence,  the  latter  less  abundant. 
Genital  claspers  distinctive;  right  clasper  in  the  form  of  a 
small  rounded  knob ; left  clasper  thickened  at  the  base  but 
without  dorsal  process,  terminal  portion  curving  about  the 
aedeagus,  blade-like,  acuminate  at  tip. 

J.  Length  2.8  mm.,  width  1.25  mm.  Head:  width  .69 
mm.,  vertex  .30  mm. ; eyes  much  smaller  and  vertex  broader 
than  in  the  male.  Antennae:  segment  I,  length  .17  mm.;  II, 
.60  mm. ; III,  .39  mm. ; IV,  .38  mm.  Pronotum : length  .54 
mm.,  width  at  base  1.05  mm.  Pubescence  and  puncturation 
very  similar  to  that  of  the  male. 

Holotype:  $ August  1,  1906,  Brownsville,  Texas,  (A.  B.  Wol- 
cott), “on  Ebony  at  Old  Fort  Brown;”  author’s  collection.  Allo- 
type: same  data  as  the  type.  Paratypes:  taken  with  types.  2 

Nov.  19,  c?  2 5 Dec.  7,  1910,  Brownsville,  Texas. 

Ceratocapsus  fanseriae  n.  sp. 

Allied  to  biformis  Kngt.  but  size  smaller  and  color  more 
brownish;  differs  in  the  more  rounded  curve  of  the  ventral 
hook  of  right  genital  clasper. 

Length  4.1  mm.,  width  1.3  mm.  Head:  width  .65 
mm.,  vertex  .24  mm. ; eyes  moderate  in  size,  vertex  slightly 
wider  than  dorsal  width  of  an  eye,  with  three  or  four  fine 
punctures  on  middle.  Rostrum,  length  1.22  mm.,  reaching  to 
near  middle  of  hind  coxae,  pale  to  brownish.  Antennae: 
segment  I,  length  .35  mm.;  II,  1.25  mm.;  Ill,  .69  mm.;  IV, 


192  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


.39  mm. ; all  segments  of  nearly  equal  thickness,  length  of 
segment  II  greater  than  combined  length  of  segments  III 
and  IV.  Pronotum:  length  .60  mm.,  width  at  base  1.04  mm. 

Dorsum  rather  closely  and  evenly  punctate,  each  puncture 
infuscated ; clothed  with  both  simple  and  sericeous  pu- 
bescence and  intermixed  with  more  sparsely  placed,  long, 
erect  hairs.  Color  pale  yellowish  to  brownish,  scutellum, 
calli  and  cuneus  dark  brown  to  fuscous,  the  latter  frequently 
with  reddish  brown  tinge.  Membrane  fuscous,  areoles  and 
bordering  cuneus  pale.  Legs  fuscous  brown,  coxae  and 
basal  half  of  femora  pale.  Sternum  dark  brown,  shining; 
ostiolar  peritreme  white,  projecting  as  a blunt  tubercle  above 
opening  of  the  canal.  Genital  claspers  distinctive,  rather 
similar  to  those  of  biformis,  but  ventral  hook  or  right  clasper 
more  rounded,  not  angulate,  the  dorsal  hook  nearly  touching 
the  tip  of  the  ventral  hook. 

Length  3.6  mm.,  width  1.3  mm.  Head:  width  .67 
mm.,  vertex  .30  mm.  Antennae : segment  I,  length  .34  mm. ; 
II,  1.21  mm. ; III,  .69  mm. ; IV,  .43  mm.  Pronotum : length 
.62  mm.,  width  at  base  1.08  mm.  Slightly  more  robust  than 
the  male  but  very  similar  in  puncturation,  pubescence  and 
coloration. 

Holotype:  February  12,  1928,  alt.  3000  ft.,  Santa  Catalina 

Mts.,  Arizona  (A.  A.  Nichol).  Allotype:  same  data  as  type. 
Paratypes:  22  J,  taken  with  the  types  on  Fanseria  xanthofolia 
where  the  species  was  breeding  as  reported  by  Mr.  Nichol. 
July  1 2,  1917,  Mesilla  Park,  New  Mexico  (H.  H.  Knight).  2 <£ 
July  20,  1917,  Texas  Pass,  Arizona  (H.  H.  Knight).  J'  June  7, 
1924,  Tucson;  Oct.  21,  1928,  Santa  Cruz  Co. ; Sept.  25,  1924, 
Santa  Catalina  Mts.,  Arizona  (A.  A.  Nichol). 

Ceratocapsus  geminatus  n.  sp. 

Allied  to  tricolor  Kngt.,  but  size  smaller ; differs  distinctly 
in  structure  of  the  ostiolar  peritreme  and  genital  claspers. 

<?.  Length  3.9  mm.,  width  1.25  mm.  Head:  width  .69 
mm.,  vertex  .32  mm. ; vertex  convex,  slightly  higher  than 
dorsal  margin  of  eyes.  Rostrum  (imbedded)  apparently 
reaching  upon  hind  coxae.  Antennae : segment  I,  length  .28 
mm.,  yellowish,  fuscous  on  base;  II,  1.2  mm.,  cylindrical, 
more  slender  than  I,  brownish  black,  paler  at  base;  III,  .73 
mm.,  black;  IV,  .56  mm.,  black.  Pronotum:  length  .52  mm., 
width  at  base  .97  mm. 


Oct.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  193 


Head  and  body  uniformly  dark  brownish  black,  shining; 
hemelytra  fuscous  black,  outer  half  of  clavus,  inner  half  of 
corium,  and  embolium  except  apically,  pale;  cuneus  blackish, 
but  with  reddish  tinge.  Membrane  uniformly  pale  fuscous, 
within  areoles  and  bordering  cuneus,  pale.  Legs  dark  red- 
dish, tibiae  pale  reddish,  tarsi  pale,  apices  fuscous.  Ostiolar 
peritreme  distinctive,  broad  and  flat  as  compared  with  tri- 
color. Clothed  with  fine,  short  pale  yellowish  pubescence, 
but  punctures  not  evident  on  hemelytra  as  in  tricolor. 
Genital  structures  distinctive;  right  clasper  semicircular  as 
in  tricolor,  but  ventral  hook  shorter  and  broader,  the  dorsal 
hook  with  notch  at  tip  forming  two  short  spines  which  point 
mesad. 

Holotype I:  J'  July  21,  1898,  Little  Beaver,  near  Fort  Collins,  ’ 
Colorado  (E.  D.  Ball)  ; author’s  collection.  Paratypes:  <§  July 
14,  £ July  21,  type  locality  (E.  D.  Ball). 

Ceratocapsus  juglandis  n.  sp. 

Allied  to  denticulatus  Kngt.,  but  differs  in  the  thicker 
antennal  segments,  more  prominent  eyes,  darker  scutellum 
but  paler  pronotum. 

Length  3.4  mm.,  width  1.25  mm.  Head:  width  .78 
mm.,  vertex  .19  mm.;  eyes  prominent,  projecting  above  level 
of  vertex.  Rostrum,  length  .99  mm.,  reaching  upon  inter- 
mediate coxae.  Antennae : segment  I,  length  .26  mm.,  pale 
to  dusky,  with  red  mark  an  anterior  aspect  near  base ; II,  .95 
mm.,  thickness  .13  mm.,  nearly  cylindrical,  yellowish  to 
fuscous;  III,  .60  mm.,  thickness  .10  mm.,  fuscous;  IV,  .52 
mm.,  fuscous.  Pronotum:  length  .56  mm.,  width  at  base  1.08 
mm. 

Color  pale  yellowish,  scutellum,  cuneus,  oblique  band 
across  apical  half  of  corium  and  joining  with  inner  angles  of 
cuneus,  dark  fuscous ; head  and  pronotum  pale  dusky  brown. 
Membrane  pale,  apical  area  pale  fuscous.  Legs  pale,  hind 
tibiae  fuscous  brown.  Clothed  with  fine,  recumbent,  yellow- 
ish pubescence,  with  slight  tendency  to  fine  sericeous  hairs  on 
clavus ; also  a row  of  four  or  five  erect  hairs  on  clavus. 
Genital  claspers  very  similar  to  those  of  denticulatus,  but 
right  clasper  terminating  as  two  short  spines  of  about  equal 
length. 

J.  Length  3.7  mm.,  width  1.4  mm.  Head:  width  .71 
mm.,  vertex  .34  mm.  Antennae : segment  I,  length  .27  mm. ; 
II,  .99  mm. ; III,  .60  mm. ; IV,  .53  mm.  Pronotum : length 


194  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.ZXV 


.58  mm.,  width  at  base  1.1 7 mm.  Very  similar  to  the  male 
in  coloration  and  pubescence. 

Holotype : £ June  20,  1928,  alt.  6200  ft.,  Chiricahua  Mts., 
Arizona  (A.  A.  Nichol).  Allotype:  same  data  as  the  type.  Para- 
types:  14  $ 5,  taken  with  the  types  on  Juglans  major  by  Mr. 
Nichol.  4 c?  ? May  16,  1928,  alt.  4000  ft.,  Santa  Rita  Mts. ; 3 ? 
May  27,  1928,  alt.  3300  ft.,  Rincon  Mts.,  Arizona  (A.  A.  Nichol), 
all  taken  on  Juglans  major.  ? July  23,  5 Aug.  3,  1905,  Huachuca 
Mts.,  Arizona  (H.  G.  Barber). 

With  the  series  of  material  at  hand  I am  now  able  to  determine 
that  the  specimen  I described  as  the  allotype  of  denticulatus  is  in 
reality  a female  of  juglandis.  This  illutration  should  emphasize 
the  importance  of  describing  and  labeling  the  allotype  of  all 
species. 

Ceratocapsus  decurvatus  n.  sp. 

Allied  to  pumilus  Uhler  but  with  stronger  pubescence;  dif- 
fers in  the  absence  of  any  tubercle  on  dorsal  margin  of  genital 
segment ; also  the  basal  prong  of  right  genital  clasper  strongly 
decurved  ventrally. 

c?.  Length  3.7  mm.,  width  1.64  mm.  Head:  width  .79 
mm.,  vertex  .216  mm.;  eyes  slightly  larger  and  more  promi- 
nent than  in  pumilus.  Rostrum,  length  1.21  mm.,  only  attain- 
ing hind  margins  of  middle  coxae.  Antennae : segment  I, 
length  .30  mm.;  II,  1.04  mm.;  Ill,  .52  mm.;  IV,  .39  mm.; 
pale  yellowish,  segment  I with  the  usual  red  mark  near  base, 
segments  III  and  IV  reddish.  Pronotum : length  .67  mm., 
width  at  base  1.31  mm. 

Yellowish  to  reddish  brown,  calli  and  propleura  fuscous 
brown,  cuneus  except  outer  margin  reddish,  legs  uniformly 
yellowish.  Membrane  pale  fuscous  with  brownish  tinge, 
slightly  paler  across  areoles  and  bordering  tip  of  cuneus. 
Clothed  with  prominent,  nearly  erect,  yellowish  pubescence 
and  intermixed  on  dorsum  with  silvery  sericeous  pubescence ; 
more  strongly  pubescent  than  in  pumilus  although  the 
fuscous  punctures  on  dorsum  very  similar.  Genital  struc- 
tures distinctive ; basal  prong  of  right  clasper  strongly  de- 
curved ventrally;  without  tubercle  on  dorsal  margin  of  genital 
segment. 

'?.  Length  3.8  mm.,  width  .88  mm.  Head : width  .73 
mm.,  vertex  .32  mm.  Antennae : segment  I,  length  .30  mm. ; 
II,  1.04  mm.;  Ill,  .52  mm.;  IV,  broken.  Pronotum:  length 


Oct.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  195 


.67  mm.,  width  at  base  1.32  mm.  Very  similar  to  the  male  in 
color,  pubescence  and  puncturation. 

Holotype : July  23,  1909,  Saugerties,  New  York  (H.  G.  Bar- 

ber) ; author’s  collection.  Allotype:  same  data  as  the  type. 
Paratype : July  6,  1919,  Dauphin,  Pennsylvania  (T.  L.  Guy- 

ton). Aug.  14,  1914,  Beltsville,  Maryland  (W.  L.  McAtee). 

Ceratocapsus  truncatus  n.  sp. 

Runs  to  pumilus  Uhler  in  my  key  (Hemiptera  Connecticut, 
1923,  p.  525),  but  differs  structurally  in  the  truncate  tip  on 
basal  process  of  the  right  genital  clasper. 

lCf.  Length  3.7  mm.,  width  1.56  mm.  Head:  width  .75 
mm.,  vertex  .24  mm.  Rostrum,  length  1.25  mm.,  attaining 
posterior  margins  of  hind  coxae.  Antennae : segment  I, 
length  .30  mm.,  yellowish,  with  red  mark  near  base  on  an- 
terior aspect;  II,  1.03  mm.,  yellowish  to  brownish;  III,  .56 
mm.,  brown ; IV,  .43  mm,  brown.  Pronotum : length  .67 
mm.,  width  at  base  1.25  mm. 

Color  rather  uniformly  brownish  black,  legs*  except  hind 
femora,  yellowish  to  brownish ; cuneus  with  reddish  evident 
on  disk.  Membrane  uniformly  fuscous,  paler  within  areoles 
and  bordering  tip  of  cuneus.  Dorsum  with  fuscous  punc- 
tures as  in  pumilus;  clothed  with  simple  yellowish  hairs  and 
closely  intermixed  with  silvery  to  golden,  sericeous  pubes- 
cence. Genital  structures  distinctive;  basal  process  of  right 
clasper  about  as  broad  as  long,  truncate  apically,  the  lower 
apical  angle  produced  slightly  ventrally  to  a sharp  point; 
middle  process  of  right  clasper  shorter  and  broader  than  in 
pumilus,  the  terminal  process  also  broader  and  irregularly 
serrate;  tubercle  on  the  left  side  of  dorsal  margin  of  genital 
segment  large  and  more  flattened  than  in  pumilus. 

J.  Length  3.77  mm.,  width  1.7  mm.  Head:  width  .71 
mm.,  vertex  .30  mm.  Antennae : segment  I,  length  .28  mm. ; 
II,  1.04  mm.;  Ill,  .54  mm.;  IV,  .41  mm.  Pronotum:  length 
.69  mm.,  width  at  base  1.29  mm.  Very  similar  to  the  male  in 
color,  puncturation  and  pubescence. 

Holotype:  J'  May  23,  1918,  Gainesville,  Florida  (C.  J.  Drake)  ; 
author’s  collection.  Allotype:  same  data  as  the  type.  Paratype: 
<£,  taken  with  the  types  “on  Cephalanthus.” 


196  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


Ceratocapsus  husseyi  n.  sp. 

Allied  to  serious  Kngt.,  but  differs  distinctly  in  the  struc- 
ture of  the  genital  claspers ; perhaps  can  be  separated  by  the 
fuscous  apex  of  the  second  antennal  segment. 

J1.  Length  4 mm.,  width  1.57  mm.  Head:  width  .79  mm., 
vertex  .32  mm.  Rostrum,  length  1.43  mm.,  reaching  to  mid- 
dle of  hind  coxae.  Antennae : segment  I,  length  .36  mm. ; II, 
1.28  mm.,  yellowish,  fuscous  on  apical  one-third;  III,  .67 
mm.,  fuscous,  narrowly  yellowish  at  base;  IV,  (broken); 
second  segment  with  slightly  longer  and  more  prominent  pu- 
bescence than  in  serious.  Pronotum : length  .78  mm.,  width 
at  base  1.3  mm. 

Color  dark  brownish  black,  inner  half  of  clavus,  narrow 
base  of  corium,  embolium,  and  base  of  pronotum,  more  yel- 
lowish ; legs  uniformly  pale  yellowish.  Membrane  uniformly 
fuscous,  paler  within  areoles  and  bordering  cuneus.  Clothed 
with  two  types  of  pubescence,  dorsum  set  with  rather  long 
erect  hairs,  scutellum,  clavus,  and  corium  also  bearing  closely 
appressed,  silvery  scale-like  pubescence.  Genital  claspers 
distinctive;  left  clasper  with  an  erect,  incurved  acuminate 
hook  at 'base;  middle  hook  projecting  distally,  the  apical  half 
curved  upward,  semicircular,  tapering  gradually  to  a sharp 
point ; the  third  and  ventral  hook  follows  edge  of  genital  seg- 
ment and  in  form  very  similar  to  that  in  serious.  Right 
clasper  differs  very  little  from  that  found  in  serious. 

Holotype:  June  27,  1921,  Ann  Arbor,  Michigan  (R.  F.  Hus- 

sey) ; author’s  collection.  This  is  the  specimen  that  the  writer 
described  as  allotype  of  Ceratocapsus  serious  Kngt.,  but  with  the 
study  of  more  material  I am  convinced  that  the  male  of  sericus  is 
the  form  described  below. 

Ceratocapsus  sericus  Knight,  Hemiptera  Conn.,  1923,  p.  530. 

The  male  allotype  is  described  as  follows : 

Length  3.85  mm.,  width  1.6  mm.  Head:  width  .78 
mm.,  vertex  .30  mm.  Antennae : segment  I,  length  .34  mm., 
pale  yellowish;  II,  1.29  mm.,  pale  yellowish  brown;  III,  .69 
mm.,  reddish  brown,  pale  at  base ; IV,  .60  mm.,  dark  reddish 
brown.  Pronotum:  length  .73  mm.,  width  at  base  1.3  mm. 
Color,  pubescence,  and  puncturation  very  similar  to  that  of 
female.  Genital  claspers  distinctive ; left  clasper  with  three 
prongs,  the  middle  and  dorsal  prongs  arising  some  distance 
from  base,  taking  the  form  of  a chela  or  pincer-like  claw  of 
crustaceans,  the  tips  of  each  fork  acuminate  and  curved 


Oct.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  197 


slightly  upward.  Right  clasper  in  the  form  of  a simple  hook, 
without  branches  but  curved  on  apical  half. 

Allotype:  July  26,  1925,  Huntington,  Long  Island,  New  York 

(F.  M.  Schott)  ; author’s  collection. 

Ceratocapsus  pilophoroides  n.  sp. 

Suggestive  of  Pilophorus  in  form  of  head  and  prothorax, 
but  differs  from  that  genus  in  the  thickened  antennal  seg- 
ments and  absence  of  scale-like  bands. 

J.  Length  3.4  mm,  width  1.38  mm.  Head:  width  .80 
mm.,  vertex  .86  mm. ; eyes  and  form  of  head  very  suggestive 
of  the  genus  Pilophorus.  Rostrum,  length  1.34  mm.,  reach- 
ing upon  hind  coxae.  Antennae : segment  I,  length  .26  mm., 
yellowish  brown;  II,  1.04  mm.,  tapering  to  slightly  thicker 
apically,  brown,  slightly  paler  at  base;  III,  .67  mm.,  brown; 
IV,  .60  mm.,  dark  brown.  Pronotum : length  .69  mm., 
width  at  base  .97  mm. ; disk  convex  and  sides  strongly  sul- 
cate  as  in  Pilophorus. 

Color  yellowish  brown  to  dark  brown,  hemelytra  paler,  dull 
to  slightly  pruinose,  apical  area  of  corium  and  the  cuneus 
dark  brown  and  shining ; a moderately  distinct  pruinose  band 
across  middle  of  clavus  and  basal  angle  of  corium,  but  with- 
out scales.  Membrane  pale  or  whitish,  veins  brown.  Em- 
bolar  margins  sinuate,  broader  on  apical  area.  Mesoscutum 
broadly  exposed,  declivent  behind,  scutellum  small,  convex 
apically;  ostiolar  peritreme  white,  size  moderate.  Venter 
dark  brown,  strongly  shining.  Clothed  with  simple,  erect 
pubescent  hairs,  a few  hairs  longer  than  others,  but  without 
trace  of  scale-like  pubescence. 

Holotype:  J,  Topeka,  Kansas  (Popenoe)  ; author’s  collection. 

This  form  is  so  distinct  it  may  be  recognized  from  the  female  sex. 

Ceratocapsus  neoboroides  n.  sp. 

Resembles  Neohorus  in  several  respects,  but  distinguished 
by  the  thickened  antennal  segments  and  converging  type  of 
arolia. 

Length  3.2  mm.,  width  1.56  mm.  Head:  width  .73 
mm.,  vertex  .35  mm. ; frons  granulate  and  finely  punctate, 
median  line  impressed,  the  whole  closely  matted  with  silvery 
sericeous  pubescence.  Rostrum,  length  1.08  mm.,  just  attain- 
ing posterior  margins  of  middle  coxae.  Antennae : segment 


198  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


I,  length  .25  mm. ; II,  .67  mm.,  not  equal  to  width  of  head ; 
III,  .39  mm. ; IV,  .36  mm. ; yellowish  to  brownish.  Pro- 
notum:  length  .62  mm.,  width  at  base  1.25  mm. ; calli  distinct, 
granulate,  darker  in  color  than  disk ; lateral  margins  distinct, 
in  fact  the  whole  pronotum  is  very  similar  to  that  found  in 
Neoborus. 

Dorsum  rather  finely  and  closely  fusco-punctate,  vertex 
and  calli  granulate.  Clothed  with  semi-erect,  simple  yellow- 
ish pubescence  and  closely  intermixed  with  more  recumbent, 
silvery,  scale-like  pubescence.  Color  yellowish  to  brown, 
calli  brownish  black,  margins  of  scutellum  and  clavus,  and  the 
embolium  paler.  Legs  yellowish,  tibiae  more  brownish. 
Membrane  and  veins  pale  fuscous  brown,  paler  on  central 
area. 

Holotype:  5 April  20,  1926,  Santa  Cruz  river,  Pima  County, 
Arizona  (A.  A.  Nichol). 

This  species  is  so  different  from  the  known  species  of  Cerato- 
capsus  that  it  may  be  easily  recognized  from  the  female  characters. 

Ceratocapsus  pilosulus  n.  n. 

A new  name  to  replace  Ceratocapsus  pilosus  Knight  (Hemip- 
tera  Conn.,  1923,  p.  526)  which  is  preoccupied  by  Ceratocapsus 
pilosus  Reuter  (Ofversikt  af  Finska  Vet.-Soc.  Forhandlingar, 
xlvii,  1905,  no.  20,  p.  34),  a species  described  from  Venezuela. 


Oct.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  199 


TWO  NEW  NORTH  AMERICAN  SPECIES  OF  MUS- 
COID  FLIES  (TACHINIDAE,  DIPTERA). 

By  H.  J.  Reinhard,  College  Station,  Texas. 

The  two  new  species  of  Tachinidae  described  in  the  present 
paper  are  provisionally  referred  to  the  genus  Masicera  to  which 
they  trace  in  most  available  keys.  Although  Coquillett’s  inter- 
pretation of  Masicera  apparently  is  a complex,  no  satisfactory  re- 
vision of  the  related  North  American  genera  has  been  made  since 
his  treatment  of  the  subject  in  1897.1  The  allocation  of  species 
belonging  in  this  group  remains  uncertain  until  all  of  the  geno- 
types concerned  are  studied  and  the  genera  adequately  redefined. 

Masicera  unispinosa  n.  sp. 

Male:  Front  at  narrowest  (before  ocelli)  0.25  of  head 

width  (average  of  four,  0.26,  0.25,  0.25,  0.25)  ; paraf rentals 
gray  pollinose,  with  fine  black  hairs  outside  of  frontal  rows ; 
median  stripe  narrow  above  widening  below  to  about  one- 
half  the  parafrontal  width,  brownish-black;  frontal  bristles 
ten  to  twelve,  the  two  (three  in  two  specimens)  uppermost 
large,  reclinate,  the  lower  ones  diverging  toward  the  eyes  and 
extending  nearly  to  middle  of  face ; no  orbitals ; only  one  pair 
verticals  (inner)  developed;  ocellars  large,  proclinate;  face 
strongly  receding,  sides  bare,  densely  gray  pollinose,  greatly 
narrowed  below ; antennae  almost  reaching  oral  margin, 
black,  second  joint  sometimes  faintly  reddish  at  apex,  hardly 
one-fourth  the  length  of  third;  arista  of  moderate  length, 
slender,  slightly  thickened  beyond  the  short  basal  joints,  in- 
distinctly short  pubescent ; facial  ridges  strongly  divergent, 
bare  except  close  to  vibrissae  which  are  situated  at  the  oral 
margin ; facial  depression  gray  pollinose  reflecting  blackish ; 
proboscis  short,  fleshy;  palpi  ordinary,  yellow  usually  infus- 
cated  basally,  with  long  black  hairs  beneath  and  short  bristles 
near  apex  above;  cheeks  gray  pollinose  on  reddish  ground 
color,  with  numerous  black  hairs,  about  one-fifth  the  eye 
height;  occiput  bearing  fine  pale  hairs  and  black  bristles  on 
lower  outer  margins ; eyes  bare. 

Thorax  black,  with  gray  pollen  which  has  a slight  yellow- 
ish tinge  on  mesonotum;  with  four  distinct  dark  stripes,  the 


1 Revision  of  the  Tachinidae,  Technical  Series  Bulletin,  No.  7, 
U.  S.  D.  A.,  1897, ’p.  1 13. 


200  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


outer  ones  interrupted  at  suture;  scutellum  black,  densely 
gray  pollinose  except  on  basal  third.  Chaetotaxy:  humeral, 
3 ; posthumeral,  2 ; presutural,  2 ; notopleural,  2 ; acrostichal, 
3,  2 to  4 (variable)  ; dorsocentral,  3,  4;  intraalar,  3;  supra- 
alar,  3 ; postalar,  3 (inner  one  small)  ; pteropleural,  1 ; sterno- 
pleural,  2,  1;  scutellum  with  1 discal,  3 lateral  (anterior  and 
posterior  ones  large)  and  1 small  decussate  horizontal  apical 
pair;  halteres  yellow,  knobs  pale  above;  calypters  semitrans- 
parent, white  with  a pale  yellowish  tinge. 

Abdomen  black,  broad  at  base  but  distinctly  narrowed 
toward  apex ; segments  two  to  four  gray  pollinose  except  on 
the  shining  hind  margins  and  on  a narrow  but  very  distinct 
dark  median  stripe ; second  segment  with  the  pollen  extending 
down  the  sides  and  across  the  venter,  which  is  highly  polished 
posteriorly  with  dense  patches  of  short  black  appressed  hairs 
on  last  two  segments ; first  segment  wholly  black,  without 
median  marginals ; second  with  a median  marginal  pair ; third 
with  a marginal  row  of  about  ten ; fourth  with  a marginal  and 
irregular  rows  of  shorter  discals ; genital  segments  small, 
yellowish,  inner  forceps  shining  black,  slender  with  blunt  tips, 
deeply  divided  but  not  divergent,  base  with  long  black  hairs 
directed  posteriorly;  outer  forceps  lobelike  with  a broad  yel- 
low base,  tapering  beyond  middle,  tips  black,  broadly  rounded, 
bearing  very  minute  short  stubby  spines ; fifth  sternite  yellow, 
widely  and  deeply  incised,  the  lobes  with  a few  long  black 
hairs  on  the  inner  margins. 

Legs  black,  claws  and  pulvilli  elongated ; middle  tibia  with 
one  strong  bristle  on  outer  front  side  near  the  middle ; hind 
tibia  subciliate  on  outer  posterior  side  with  one  long  bristle 
slightly  beyond  the  middle. 

Wings  slightly  darkened  along  the  costal  border;  costal 
spine  indistinct ; third  vein  with  one  large  bristle  near  base, 
all  others  bare;  fourth  vein  curving  slightly  inward  beyond 
bend,  which  is  obliquely  rounded ; first  posterior  cell  narrowly 
open  a short  distance  before  the  wing  tip ; hind  cross  vein 
sinuous,  oblique  to  fourth,  tip  nearer  bend  than  to  small  cross 
vein. 

Length,  4.5  to  7.5  mm. 

Described  from  nine  males  collected  at  College  Station,  Texas, 
April  and  May,  1920-1929,  (H.  J.  Reinhard).  Type  and  two 
paratypes  deposited  in  the  U.  S.  National  Museum. 

Masicera  seticauda  n.  sp. 

Male : Front  0.21  of  head  width,  rather  prominent  below; 

parafrontals  gray  pollinose,  blackish  and  subshining  before 


Oct.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  201 


vertex ; median  stripe  broad,  black,  slightly  narrowed  in  front 
of  ocellar  triangle  extending  as  a line  on  either  side  to  inner 
vertical;  frontal  bristles  in  two  rows  which  diverge  on  the 
parafacials  to  a level  with  apex  of  second  antennal  joint,  the 
uppermost  pair  smaller  than  the  two  preceding  reclinate 
ones ; inner  verticals  rather  weak,  the  outer  short  and  hair- 
like ; ocellars  large,  proclinate ; orbitals  absent ; eyes  bare ; 
parafacials  gray  pollinose,  bare,  strongly  divergent,  not  nar- 
rowed below,  distinctly  wider  than  third  antennal  joint;  face 
concolorous  with  parafacials,  the  ridges  rather  high,  with  a 
few  bristles  above  the  vibrissae,  which  are  situated  on  the 
oral  margin ; antennae  three-fourths  the  length  of  face,  black 
except  near  the  base  of  third  and  at  apex  of  second  joints 
which  are  yellowish;  third  joint  slightly  more  than  twice  the 
length  of  second ; arista  bulbous  at  base,  very  slender  beyond, 
basal  joints  short  but  distinct;  proboscis  very  short,  fleshy; 
palpi  yellow,  rather  short  and  slender,  with  long  black  hairs 
beneath  on  apical  half ; cheeks  about  one-fourth  the  eye 
height;  occiput  subshining  with  thin  gray  pollen  and  sparse 
pale  hairs  intermixed  with  a few  black  bristles  above  and  be- 
low. 

Thorax  black,  dorsum  subshining,  with  two  wide  pollinose 
stripes  extending  from  a roundish  spot  at  the  anterior  dorso- 
central  bristle  to  the  base  of  the  scutellum,  the  inner  and 
outer  stripes  less  distinctly  defined,  humeri  densely  gray 
pollinose;  scutellum  black,  with  reflecting  thin  gray  pollen 
except  on  narrow  base.  Chaetotaxy : humeral,  3 ; posthu- 
meral,  2 (outer  one  hairlike)  ; presutural,  1 ; acrostichal,  3,  ? 
3 (obscured  by  pin)  ; dorsocentral,  3,  3;  intraalar,  3;  supra- 
alar,  3 ; postalar,  2 ; notopleural,  2 ; pteropleural,  1 ; sterno- 
pleural,  2,  1 ; scutellum  with  three  pairs  of  lateral  bristles, 
the  posterior  largest,  divaricate,  situated  almost  at  apex,  with 
fine  hairs  between  them ; disk  pilose,  with  a pair  of  weak 
hairlike  bristles  shortly  in  front  of  the  posterior  marginals; 
halteres  brownish-yellow ; calypters  white. 

Abdomen  slender,  black  tinged  faintly  with  brown  on  the 
sides  and  venter;  basal  two-thirds  of  segments  two  to  four 
with  gray  pollen,  which  on  the  intermediate  segments  extends 
broadly  on  the  venter ; an  obscure  median  vitta  present ; hairs 
and  bristles  long  and  erect  on  dorsum;  first  segment  with  a 
median  marginal  pair;  second  with  a discal  and  marginal 
pair;  thiixi  with  a discal  pair  and  marginal  row;  fourth  with 
a discal  and  a marginal  row,  and  a dense  series  of  long  spiny 
bristles  underneath  on  each  side  of  the  genitalia ; in  addition 


202  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


to  the  usual  marginal  laterals  each  segment  has  a single 
bristle  in  the  middle  forming  a complete  row  on  the  sides 
of  the  abdomen;  genital  segments  black;  fifth  sternite  with 
a U-shaped  incision,  the  lobes  converging  behind,  black, 
bearing  short  black  hair  on  the  margins. 

Legs  slender,  black,  tarsi  brownish  beneath ; claws  and 
pulvilli  elongated ; middle  tibia  with  one  bristle  on  outer  front 
side ; hind  tibia  with  a sparse  row  of  short  bristles  on  outer 
posterior  side  with  one  long  near  the  basal  third,  the  middle, 
and  the  apex. 

Wings  normal,  slightly  infuscated ; third  vein  with  three 
setules  at  base;  fourth  vein  with  a rounded  obtuse  bend, 
straight  beyond  curving  slightly  outward  near  tip  so  that  the 
first  posterior  cell  is  narrowly  open  about  half  the  length  of 
hind  cross  vein  before  exact  wing  tip  ; hind  cross  vein  sinuous, 
tip  nearer  bend  than  to  small  cross  vein;  costal  spine  short 
and  indistinct. 

Length,  6 mm. 

Described  from  one  male  collected  at  College  Station,  Texas, 
April  9,  1918,  (H.  J.  Reinhard).  Type  deposited  in  the  U.  S. 
National  Museum. 

The  species  is  related  to  Masicera  polita  Coq.  from  which  it 
differs  in  having  yellow  palpi,  facial  ridges  bristly  on  less  than 
lower  fourth,  three  anterior  acrostichals,  etc.  The  dense  row  of 
bristles  on  each  side  of  the  fourth  segment  below  makes  it  easily 
recognizable. 


Oct.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  203 


A NEW  ARCTOCORIXA  WITH  A NOTE  ON 
SYNONYMY  (HEMIPT.,  CORIXIDAE)  * 

By  G.  Stuart  Walley,  Ottawa,  Ont. 

There  appear  to  be  two  known  species  of  Arctorcorixa  in 
Northeastern  America  having  the  elytra  conspicuously  marked  by 
three  longitudinal  blackish  lines.  Both  have  been  commonly  re- 
ferred to  as  A.  trilineata  Prov.,  but  the  writer  recently  pointed 
out  (Can.  Ent.,  LXI,  34,  1929)  that  the  true  trilineata  is  re- 
stricted to  the  form  having  the  elongate  male  pala  with  the  “pegs” 
in  a single  row.  The  form  with  the  shorter  more  rectangular 
pala  with  the  “pegs”  in  two  rows  is  a distinct  species  and  examples 
studied  by  the  writer  differ  in  several  important  structural  details 
from  the  species  described  by  Provancher. 

In  1771  (Novae  Species  Insectorum,  Cent.  I,  p.  70)  Forster 
described  under  the  name  Notonecta  lineata  a species  of  Arcto- 
corixa having  three  longitudinal  fuscous  lines  on  the  elytra.  The 
locality  data  given  by  Forster,  “in  aquis  provinciae  Noveboracen- 
sis  in  America  Septententrionali”  is  sufficiently  vague  to  include 
the  range  of  both  the  above  forms.  A study  of  the  essential  char- 
acters contained  in  Forster’s  description  has  led  the  writer  to  be- 
lieve that  Provancher’s  species  is  identical  with  A.  lineata 
(Forst.).  Beyond  the  fact  that  specimens  of  trilineata  are 
slightly  larger  and  strictly  speaking  have  four  to  six  instead 
of  three  transverse  pronotal  black  bands  there  are  apparently  no 
distinguishing  characters.  Moreover  the  number  of  lines  on  the 
prothorax  has  been  shown  to  vary  slightly  in  Arctocorixa,  thus 
in  some  specimens  there  are  three  broad  median  bands  with  nar- 
rower and  shorter  anterior  and  posterior  bands  so  that  the  general 
aspect  is  distinctly  three  banded.  The  following  synonymy  is 
therefore  proposed. 

• 

Arctocorixa  lineata  (Forst.) 

Notonecta  lineata  Forster,  Nov.  Spec.  Ins.  Cent.  I,  70,  1771. 

Notonecta  noveboracensis  Gmelin  in  Linnaeus,  Syst.  Nat., 
edn.  13,  1,  pt.  4,  p.  2119,  1788  (unnecessary  n.  n.  for 
lineata  Forst.). 

Turton,  Linnaeus,  Syst.  Nat.  edn.  13,  II,  p.  60s, 
1806.  Engl.  tr. 


* Contribution  from  the  Division  of  Systematic  Entomology, 
Entomological  Branch,  Dept,  of  Agric.,  Ottawa. 


204  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


Corisa  trilineata  Provancher,  Nat.  Can,  IV,  p.  108,  1872 
(New  Synonymy). 

Corisa  trivittata  Provancher,  Pet.  Faune  Ent.  Can.,  Ill,  p. 

203,  1888  (unnecessary  change  of  name). 

Arctocorixa  trilineata  (Prov.),  Walley,  Can.  Ent.  LXI,  34, 
1929. 

The  three  lined  form  with  the  short  pala  with  the  “pegs”  in 
two  rows  is  a closely  allied  species  but  can  scarcely  be  lineata 
since  the  pronotum  bears  six  or  seven  regular  transverse  blackish 
bars  and  the  yellow  on  the  elytra  is  reduced  so  that  the  three 
longitudinal  blackish  marks  are  less  stripe-like  and  the  general 
aspect  is  scarcely  pale  flavous  as  stated  by  Forster.  Since  this 
species  is  apparently  without  a valid  name  it  is  described  as  fol- 
lows : 

Arctocorixa  impersonata  n.  sp.  (Figs.  1,  2,  3,  4,  5.) 

Male.- — Length  5.75  mm.  Head  from  above  broadly 
rounded  in  front.  Vertex  from  above  slightly  longer  than 
shortest  distance  between  eyes.  Inner  posterior  angles  of 
eyes  remote  from  occipital  margin.  Front  with  median 
oval  depression  almost  as  in  lineata,  just  surpassing  lower 
margin  of  eyes,  in  width  as  broad  as  greatest  interocular 
space.  Vertex  smooth,  shining,  a few  punctures  as  in 
lineata.  Apical  antennal  segment  slender,  three-fifths  as 
long  as  the  much  stouter  sub-apical  segment.  Lateral  lobe 
of  prothorax  as  in  fig.  5.  Exposed  disk  of  pronotum  twice 
as  wide  as  long,  a short  very  faint  carina  at  middle  in  front ; 
posterior  margin  rather  evenly  curved  with  only  a faint  broad 
angulation  at  middle,  surface  shining,  with  fine  shallow 
rastrations.  Metaxyphus  as  in  fig.  3,  small,  rather  short  with 
apex  forming  an  angle  of  almost  90  degrees.  Front  femora 
oval  in  cr^ss-section,  stridular  area  large,  extending  well  be- 
yond middle  beyond  which  is  a dispersed  patch  of  short 
stouter  sub-erect  setae.  Tibiae  about  twice  as  long  as  broad, 
only  bluntly  carinate  above.  Palae  as  in  fig.  1,  rather  short, 
sub-rectangular,  thinner  than  tarsi  without  strong  carina  on 
outer  face  and  with  pegs  on  inner  face  in  two  rows,  about 
eighteen  in  a row  which  begins  near  inner  basal  angle  and  runs 
outward  and  gradually  upward  in  an  almost  straight  line  to 
end  sub-marginally  at  about  apical  third  of  pala;  a shorter 
marginal  row  of  six  or  seven  slightly  longer  pegs  beginning 
on  upper  margin  above  and  close  to  end  of  former  row,  con- 
tinuing along  curve  of  margin  terminating  distinctly  before 


Oct.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  205 


apex.  Clavus  distinctly  and  evenly  rastrate  throughout ; 
corium  with  finer  more  confused  rastrations  becoming  only 
obscurely  roughened  toward  apex;  corium  with  very  fine 
sparse  appressed  yellowish  hairs.  Strigil  small  with  three 
striae.  Right  clasper  slender  gradually  curved,  very  slightly 
broader  before  the  short  pointed  apex. 

Color  pattern  simulating  A.  lineata  but  with  black  mark- 
ings predominant.  Head,  legs,  thoracic  pleura  and  venter 
(except  for  brown  mesosternum),  dull  yellow.  Pronotum 
with  ground  color  dull  yellow,  disk  narrowly  blackish 
margined  behind  and  with  six  or  seven  almost  regular  trans- 
verse blackish  bars  which  are  slightly  broader  than  the  yel- 
lowish interspaces.  Clavus  predominantly  blackish  with  the 
yellowish  intervals  narrower  than  the  transverse  blackish 
bars,  the  latter  extending  transversely  from  outer  to  inner 
margins  with  their  bases  fused  along  inner  margin.  Corium 
with  three  broad  longitudinal  blackish  stripes  separated  by 
narrower  more  broken  series  of  vermiculate  yellowish  flecks. 
Embolar  margin  broadly  fuscous  yellow;  a yellow  dash  sep- 
arating corium  from  membrane  area,  the  latter  with  a circum- 
ferential row  of  blackish  flecks  which  fuse  outwardly,  also 
a rather  broad  median  longitudinal  vermiculate  blackish 
patch  joined  in  places  with  the  marginal  flecks.  Venter  of 
abdomen  yellowish  brown  with  basal  three  and  lobes  of  last 
ventral  darker  brownish,  pale  margined. 

Female. — Slightly  more  robust  than  the  male.  Palae  stout, 
not  more  than  two  and  one-half  times  as  long  as  broad. 
Color  pattern  as  in  fig.  2. 

Holotype. — J1,  Fairy  Lake,  Que.,  Sept.  11,  1928,  (G.  S.  Wal- 
ley)  ; No.  3180  in  the  Canadian  National  Collection,  Ottawa,  Ont. 

Allotype. — §,  same  data  as  holotype. 

Paratypes. — 3 c?  4 ? ?>  Fairy  Lake,  Que.,  May  17,  1927, 

(Walley)  ; J1,  Fairy  Lake,  Oct.  2,  1927,  (Walley)  ; 6 2 $ §, 

Fairy  Lake,  Sept.  9-1 1,  1928,  (Walley  and  Brown)  ; 3 .J1  2 j $, 

Rideau  River,  Ottawa,  Ont.,  Apr.  16,  1927,  (Walley)  ; 5 c ? 2 

5 2,  Rideau  River,  Ottawa,  Nov.  15,  1928,  (Walley)  ; 6 J $, 
Merivale,  Ont.,  May  9,  14,  1930,  (Walley)  ; <$,  <j>,  Orono,  Maine, 
Apr.  20,  1912,  (H.  M.  Parshley)  ; 2 J },  Orono,  May  6,  1914, 
(Parshley)  ; J)  Ithaca,  N.  Y.,  July  18,  1919. 

Holotype,  Allotype  and  Paratype  in  Canadian  National  Collec- 
tion, Ottawa.  Paratypes  in  collection  of  Mr.  J.  R.  de  la  Torre- 
Bueno,  White  Plains,  N.  Y. 


206  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


Notes. — Traces  to  A.  trilineata  (Prov.)  = lineata  (Forst.)  in 
keys  to  species  of  Arctocorixa.  Differs  from  lineata  in  arrange- 
ment of  palar  pegs ; the  interocular  space  on  vertex  is  noticeably 
narrower  in  impersonata ; the  apical  antennal  is  three-fifths  as 
long  as  sub-apical  not  half  as  long  as  in  lineata.  The  lateral 
prothoracic  lobe  in  lineata  (fig.  7)  is  slightly  narrower  and  more 
elongate  and  the  metaxyphus  while  not  large  in  either  species  is 
distinctly  more  acutely  pointed  in  lineata  (fig.  6).  The  front 
femur  of  the  male  is  broader  basally  and  somewhat  flattened  on 
inner  basal  area  in  lineata,  in  impersonata  it  is  more  ovate  in  cross- 
section.  The  female  pala  of  lineata  is  at  least  three  times  as 
long  as  broad  compared  with  two  and  one-half  times  in  im- 
personata. The  male  strigil  of  the  latter  has  only  three  striae,  in 
lineata  five.  The  male  clasper  (fig.  4)  differs  slightly  and  has 
the  apex  broader  than  in  Forster’s  species  which  is  usually  as  in 
fig.  6 (Can.  Ent.  LXI,  35,  1929)  though  in  some  specimens  of 
lineata  the  small  curved  apex  is  less  pronounced.  The  elytra  of 
lineata  are  a little  more  heavily  rastrate  and  the  blackish  pronotal 
bars  a little  less  regular  and  slightly  narrower.  The  elytral  pat- 
tern of  impersonata  differs  in  having  the  yellow  markings  much 
less  pronounced  so  that  the  three  corial  black  stripes  are  not  as 
sharply  delimited  as  in  lineata.  In  impersonata  the  yellow  is 
reduced  to  longitudinal  series  of  flecks  not  entire  stripes  as  in 
lineata.  The  mid  tarsus  also  lacks  the  narrow  brown  apex  found 
in  lineata. 

Explanation  of  Figures. 

Arctocorixa  impersonata  n.  sp.  1.  pala  of  male;  2.  dorsal  view 
showing  color  pattern;  3.  metaxyphus;  4.  right  clasper  of  male, 
5.  lateral  lobe  of  prothorax.  Arctocorixa  lineata  (Forst.)  6. 
metaxyphus ; 7.  lateral  lobe  of  prothorax. 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  Vol.  XXV,  No.  4 


Plate  XI 


208  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


A NEW  MOTH  COLLECTING  GUN. 

By  J.  D.  Gunder,  Pasadena,  California. 

The  illustration  shows  the  general  principle  and  mechanical  con- 
struction of  this  moth  collecting  device  probably  better  than  a lot 
of  description.  I have  termed  it  a “gun”  because  of  its  suggestive 
shape  and  single-handed  operation.  There  is  every  reason  to  be- 
lieve that  it  can  be  used  for  capturing  specimens  in  certain  other 
orders  of  insects  as  well  as  Lepidoptera. 

When  a desired  moth  is  seen  resting  on  a lamp-post,  wall  or 
lighted  sheet,  you  simply  put  the  mouth  of  the  gun  over  the 
specimen,  having  pressed  the  trigger  which  opens  the  trap-door  of 
the  bottle  and  the  insect  flies  inside.  With  the  pressure  on  the 
trigger  a small  electric  bulb  illuminates  the  object  and  the  interior 
of  the  bottle.  The  release  of  the  trigger  prevents  the  escape  of 
the  catch.  The  object  of  the  light  is  to  view  any  individual  be- 
fore capture  to  see  if  you  really  want  it  and  also  to  cause  it  to 
flutter  back  into  the  gun  and  down  into  the  bottle  where  it  can  be 
seen  in  time  for  the  release  of  the  trigger.  The  electric  lighting 
feature  is  not  intended  to  lure  distant  moths  to  a collector,  but  is 
simply  a great  help  in  finding  and  examining  specimens  in  dark 
corners  and  in  getting  them  unharmed  into  the  killing  jar.  The 
old  way  of  bottling  moths  was  to  rapidly  remove  a big  cork  stop- 
per and  put  the  opening  of  the  container  sideways  over  a specimen 
and  then  by  a sleight-of-hand  performance,  get  the  cork  back  in 
before  the  captive  flew  out.  This  operation  required  both  hands 
and  sometimes  valuable  specimens  escaped  or  were  otherwise 
damaged.  The  single-handed  operation  of  this  gun  can  be  ap- 
preciated because  it  leaves  the  left  hand  free  for  self  support  or 
otherwise  climbing  around.  Cyanide,  ether  or  any  killing  agency 
can  be  used  in  the  bottle  which  readily  unscrews  from  the  base 
of  the  gun.  All  metal  parts  are  well  constructed  of  light  material 
and  lacquered  black.  Two  standard  dry  cells  are  required  and 
are  as  easily  replaceable  as  those  in  a flash  light. 

This  gun  will  be  found  very  useful  to  all  collectors  and  especi- 
ally to  those  going  into  the  tropics  or  making  short  summer  trips 
to  distant  points  where  time  is  valuable  and  the  best  kind  of  an 
entomological  equipment  required. 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  Vol.  XXV^  No.  4 


Plate  XII 


* 


wm 


vXI  iAp;  £, 


m i 


' 


^SMwM 

■I 

! 


B/eclric  LiyA  A Bulb 
Trap  Door  Closed 


Door  Open 


- Dry  Cells 


Bnyp 


er 


-/Candle 


Cyanide  Boll l e 


A New  Moth  Collecting  Gun— Gander 

[patent  pending] 


Oct.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  209 


SYNONYMIES  OF  ANTILLEAN  CHRYSOMELIDAE, 
WITH  DESCRIPTIONS  OF  NEW  SPECIES. 

By  Doris  H.  Blake,  Bureau  of  Entomology,  United  States  De- 
partment of  Agriculture. 

I. 

The  Species  of  Disonycha  now  included  under 

D.  PENSYLVANICA. 

While  identifying  material  of  Cuban  Chrysomelidae  collected 
by  Mr.  S.  C.  Bruner  of  Santiago  de  las  Vegas,  Cuba,  I was  struck 
by  the  resemblance  of  Disonycha  costipennis  to  the  Florida  form, 
Disonycha  pensylvanica  var.  conjugata.  Mr.  H.  S.  Barber,  to 
whom  I showed  the  specimens,  informed  me  that  he  had  long 
thought  the  two  were  identical.  The  notes  here  presented  are  the 
result  of  an  attempt  to  dispel  the  confusion  that  has  existed  among 
the  species  allied  to  D.  pensylvanica,  and  at  present  wrongly 
synonymized  with  it.  The  writer  wishes  to  express  her  grati- 
tude to  Mr.  K.  G.  Blair  for  searching  for  types  of  Disonycha  in 
the  British  Museum. 

The  present  status  of  Disonycha  pensylvanica  as  given  in  Leng’s 
catalogue  is  that  six  names  are  listed  as  synonyms  or  varieties  un- 
der “ pennsylvanica.”  Pensylvanica,  as  it  was  originally  spelled 
by  Illiger,1  was  described  in  1807,  and  conjugata,  included  as  a 
variety,  was  described  by  Fabricius  in  1801. 2 If  the  two  were 
only  varietally  distinct,  conjugata  would,  of  course,  be  the  valid 
name.  The  other  names  in  the  order  of  their  publication  are : 
uniguttata  Say  1825, 3 vicina  Kirby  1837, 4 limbicollis  LeConte 
!857,5  pallipes  Crotch  1875, 6 and  procera  Casey  1884.7 


1 Illiger,  Mag.  f.  Insek.,  vol.  6,  1807,  p.  146.  In  the  18th  cen- 
tury the  name  Pennsylvania  was  ordinarily  spelled  “Pensylvania.” 

2 Fabricius,  Syst.  Eleu,  vol.  1,  1801,  p.  405. 

3 Say,  Journ.  Acad.  Philadelphia,  vol.  4,  1825,  p.  88. 

4 Kirby,  Fauna  Boreali  Amer.  vol.  4,  1837,  p.  217. 

5 LeConte,  Rept.  of  Exp.  & Surv.  Miss,  to  Pac.,  vol.  12,  pt.  3, 
i860  (printed  in  June  1857),  p.  67. 

6 Crotch,  Proc.  Acad.  Philadelphia,  vol.  25,  1875,  P-  64. 

7 Casey,  Cont.  to  Descr.  and  Syst.  Coleop.  of  N.  A.,  pt.  2,  1884, 
p.  182. 


210  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


These  names  were  originally  grouped  under  one  species  (pen- 
sylvanica)  by  Horn,  who  has  been  followed  by  subsequent  work- 
ers, probably  because  the  group  as  a whole  possesses  a single 
rather  striking  feature,  the  costate,  parallel-sided  elytra.  As 
shown  by  the  shape  and  structure  of  the  aedeagus,  as  well  as  by 
external  characters,  there  are  at  least  four  distinct  species  besides 
conjugata.  The  following  key  will  assist  in  their  identification. 

Key  to  Species  of  Disonycha  Formerly  Included  Under 
Pensylvanica. 

1.  Elytra  pale  yellowish  or  reddish  brown  with  paler  yellow 

vittae,  often  indistinct.  “Carolina,”  Florida,  Cuba. 

conjugata 

Elytra  black  with  pale  yellow  vittae 2 

2.  Front  of  head,  with  exception  of  socket  of  basal  antennal 

joint,  black  (in  limbic ollis  sometimes  a narrow  pale  line  at 
base  of  front  on  clypeus)  ; ventral  surface,  except  for  tip 

of  abdomen,  and  legs  entirely  black 3 

Lower  part  of  front  of  head,  usually  femora  and  margin  of 
abdomen  pale  or  reddish 4 

3.  Small  (4-6  mm.),  elytra  very  finely  punctate,  sometimes  al- 

most impunctate,  in  female  distinctly  costate ; black  vittae 
usually  joined  at  apex.  East  of  Mississippi,  frequent  in 

southern  Atlantic  States pensylvanica 

Larger  (6-7.5  mm-)>  elytra  distinctly  punctate,  in  female  not 
costate  or  only  very  indistinctly  so ; black  vittae  rarely  joined 
at  apex.  California limbic  ollis 

4.  Prothorax  usually  with  large  median  spot  considerably  wider 

anteriorly,  and  two  generally  less  pigmented  lateral  spots, 
the  two  lateral  spots  on  well-marked  knobby  callosities; 
elytra  distinctly  punctate,  only  faint  trace  of  eltyral  costae 
in  female;  aedeagus  broad,  not  acutely  tipped  (see  fig.  7)  ; 
larger  (6-8  mm.).  United  States  east  of  Rockies. 

uniguttata 

Prothorax  usually  with  only  faint  traces  of  five  small  spots, 
these  occasionally  darker  and  sometimes  banded  together; 
only  indistinct  traces  of  callosities;  elytra  indistinctly 
punctate,  in  female  costae  well  marked;  aedeagus  acutely 
tipped  (see  fig.  6);  smaller  (5-7.5  mm.).  United  States 
east  of  Rockies pallipes 

Pensylvanica,  as  described  by  Illiger,  stands  out  as  a distinct 
species.  He  described  it  as  2 lines  long,  of  the  build  of  glabrata, 
shining,  black  with  the  roots  of  the  antennae,  or  its  small  sunken 


Oct.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  211 


base,  and  the  last  ventral  segment  pale ; the  prothorax  pale  with  a 
black  median  spot,  rounded  in  front,  narrowed  behind.  The 
elytra  were  unpunctured,  black  with  two  narrow  pale  vittae  join- 
ing at  apex,  the  legs  black.  Although  said  to  have  been  taken  in 
Pennsylvania,  it  was  sent  by  Bose  from  Carolina  with  other 
specimens.  This  description  fits  perfectly  the  small  southern 
Disonycha,  specimens  of  which  are  in  the  National  Museum  from 
Texas,  Louisiana,  Florida,  Virginia  and  Maryland.  The  distinc- 
tive characters  separating  it  from  other  costate  species  in  the 
East  are : The  small  size,  the  head  entirely  black  except  for  the 

pale  circle  about  the  base  of  the  antenna,  the  median  black  spot 
on  pronotum,  somewhat  variable  in  size,  the  wide  black  elytral 
vittae  joining  at  the  apex,  the  black  ventral  surface  except  for 
the  last  ventral  segment,  and  the  black  legs,  and  lastly  the  puncta- 
tion,  which  is  extremely  fine,  giving  the  insect  the  shiny  appear- 
• ance  of  glahrata.  The  aedeagus  (see  fig.  5)  is  unlike  that  of  con- 
jugata.  This  is  probably  the  species  mentioned  by  Horn  as  a 
form  of  pensylvanica  occurring  in  Florida  and  Louisiana.  It  is 
probably  also  what  Blatchley  has  described  as  var.  parvap  al- 
though I have  seen  no  specimens  from  as  far  north  and  inland  as 
Knox  Co.,  Indiana. 

D.  conjugata  Fabricius,  described  from  “Carolina,  Mus.  Bose,” 
is  the  most  readily  recognized  species  of  the  group  on  account  of 
its  pale  coloring.  Fabricius  described  it  as  having  the  head, 
thorax  and  elytra  ferrugineous  with  two  pale  yellow  elytral  vittae 
joined  at  the  apex,  and  the  antennae,  metasternum  and  tibiae 
black.  Fabricius  does  not  mention  the  costate  elytra,  but  since 
the  costation  is  most  marked  in  the  female  and  in  the  male  is 
indistinct  or  obsolete,  this  omission  is  of  slight  significance. 
Olivier's  figure8 9  shows  it  to  be  what  is  commonly  labelled  con- 
jugata in  collections. 

The  Cuban  D.  costipennis , described  by  Duval  under  the  genus 
Monomacra10  is  unquestionably  identical  with  conjugata. 
Duval’s  description  differs  from  that  of  Fabricius  in  that  there 
is  no  mention  of  the  pale  elytral  vittae,  and  the  color  of  the 
antennae  and  tibiae  is  given  as  fuscous.  Examination  of  a series 
of  specimens  shows  that  the  paler  vittae  are  sometimes  indis- 


8 Blatchley,  Journ.  N.  Y.  Ent.  Soc.,  vol.  29,  1921,  p.  16. 

9 Olivier,  Ent.,  vol.  6,  1808,  pi.  2,  fig.  30,  p.  686. 

10  Ramon  de  la  Sagra,  Hist,  de  la  Isla  de  Cuba,  vol.  7,  1856,  p. 
129. 


212  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


tinguishable  on  the  pale  reddish  brown  elytra,  particularly  in 
darker  or  more  greasy  specimens,  and  that  the  darker  coloring  of 
the  antennae,  metasternum,  and  tibiae  is  a matter  of  individual 
variation.  Dissection  shows  the  aedeagi  to  be  the  same  in  both 
(see  fig.  4).  The  species  has  been  collected  by  E.  A.  Schwarz 
on  Polygonum,  and  is  definitely  known  from  Florida  and  Cuba, 
in  addition  to  Fabricius’  “ Carolina  ” record. 

Disonycha  pallipes  Crotch  was  briefly  described  as  having  the 
elytra  yellow  with  black  vittae,  the  head  black,  and  the  “hind 
femora  at  least  and  part  of  the  body  red.”  No  types  seem  to  have 
been  labelled  as  such  and  no  type  locality  was  recorded.  Mr. 
Nathan  Banks,  of  the  Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology,  reports 
that  there  is  no  specimen  under  this  name  in  the  LeConte  collec- 
tion, and  Mr.  K.  G.  Blair,  who  has  kindly  searched  through  the 
collection  at  the  British  Museum,  reports  that  there  is  none  there 
or  at  Cambridge,  England,  where  the  Crotch  collection  is  pre- 
served. Dr.  E.  A.  Schwarz,  with  whom  Crotch  was  working  at 
the  time  he  wrote  his  key  to  Disonycha,  has  labelled  as  var. 
pallipes  specimens  in  the  National  Museum  from  Michigan  which 
agree  with  Crotch’s  brief  key  description,  and  Mr.  Charles  Schaef- 
fer has  labelled  similar  specimens  as  pallipes  in  the  Brooklyn 
Museum  collection.  The  specimens  so  labelled  are  slightly  larger 
than  pensylvanica  (5-7  mm.),  and  the  head  is  dark  with  a pale 
lower  front.  The  prothorax  is  often  immaculate  or  with  only 
faint  traces  of  five  small  spots,  two  lateral  and  three  forming  a 
triangle  medially,  the  middle  lower  one  being  elongate.  Occasion- 
ally all  of  these  spots  are  well  marked  and  sometimes  even 
coalesce.  The  elytra  are  very  finely  punctate,  and  in  the  female 
the  costae  are  well  marked ; the  black  elytral  vittae  are  not 
ordinarily  united  at  the  apex  as  in  pensylvanica.  The  femora  and 
margin  of  the  abdomen  are  almost  invariably  pale  or  reddish. 
The  aedeagus  (see  fig.  6)  resembles  somewhat  that  of  conjugata, 
although  quite  distinct.  This  species  occurs  from  Massachusetts 
and  New  York  southward  to  Florida  and  Texas  and  westward 
through  Indiana,  Wisconsin  and  North  Dakota,  even  to  Nevada. 
I have  found  it  in  Washington,  D.  C.,  feeding  on  Polygonum. 

Disonycha  procera  Casey,  described  from  Delaware,  is  identical 
with  pallipes. 

Disonycha  uniguttata  was  described  by  Say  in  a publication  on 
the  insects  collected  on  an  expedition  to  the  Rocky  Mountains, 
and  the  type  locality  is  given  as  the  “United  States.”  It  is  prob- 


Oct.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  213 


able  that  the  specimens  were  collected  somewhere  between  the 
Mississippi  and  Colorado,  possibly  along  the  Platte  River.11  Say 
described  the  species  as  more  than  a quarter  of  an  inch  long,  black, 
with  the  front  of  the  head  and  thorax  rufous,  the  latter  with  a 
large  central  spot  sometimes  connected  with  a smaller  yellowish 
or  pale  spot  on  each  side ; the  elytra  obsoletely  punctate  with  two 
vittae  joining  at  the  tip,  the  femora  and  margin  of  the  abdomen 
rufous.  This  is  the  largest  of  the  group  (6-8  mm.),  and  the 
elytral  punctation,  while  not  conspicuous,  is  very  much  more  pro- 
nounced than  in  any  of  the  others  except  limbicollis  Lee.  Like 
limbicollis,  the  prothorax  has  a distinct  lateral  callosity  on  either 
side.  The  pale  elytral  vittae  are  wider  than  in  pensylvanica,  and 
there  is  little  indication  of  costae,  even  in  the  females.  The 
aedeagus  (see  fig.  7)  is  quite  unlike  that  of  conjugata , pensyl- 
vanica or  pallipes.  In  fact  the  aedeagus  resembles  closely  that  of 
limbicollis,  although  differing  in  minor  details  from  that  species. 
This  species  is  widespread,  occurring  from  Canada  to  Virginia 
along  the  Atlantic  coast,  and  west  through  Indiana,  Illinois  and 
Michigan.  It  has  been  collected  by  C.  A.  Frost  on  Polygonum. 

Disonycha  vicina  Kirby  may  from  description  be  either  uni- 
guttata  or  pallipes,  but  must  remain  a doubtful  species,  since  the 
single  specimen  from  which  it  was  described  is  not  to  be  found. 
Mr.  K.  G.  Blair  of  the  British  Museum  writes  as  follows : 

“Of  this  we  should  have  the  type,  and  we  have  a specimen 
bearing  the  original  registration  label  of  the  type,  but  without 
any  determination  label.  It  does  not  agree  with  the  descrip- 
tion by  Kirby,  but  is  a normal  specimen  of  D.  caroliniana  F. 
It  would  appear  that  there  has  been  some  transference  of  the 
registration  label  in  the  past,  and  that  the  type  is  now  lost.” 

Limbicollis  LeConte  was  described  (from  Sacramento,  Cali- 
fornia) as  black  with  pale  margin,  and  with  two  pale  elytral  vit- 
tae wider  than  in  pensylvanica , and  with  the  elytra  not  sulcate. 
This  description  corresponds  with  specimens  in  the  National 
Museum  collected  in  California.  The  head  is  entirely  dark 
(sometimes  a narrow  pale  line  extends  along  the  clypeus  at  the 
base  of  the  front),  a wide  band  leaving  only  a pale  margin  ex- 
tends across  the  prothorax,  and  the  ventral  surface  and  legs  are 
black.  The  punctation  is  similar  to  that  of  uniguttata.  The 


11  Barber,  Ent.  News,  vol.  39,  1928,  p.  15. 


214  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


aedeagus  (see  fig.  8),  however,  while  similar,  differs  in  several 
details.  It  is  probably  a distinct  race,  although  closely  allied  to 
the  eastern  uniguttata.  Limbicollis  and  uniguttata  belong  to  a 
totally  distinct  group  from  the  others  listed  under  pensylvanica. 

On  other  species,  the  Central  American  species  D.  recticollis 
Jacoby,12  belongs  to  this  group  with  costate  elytra.  It  is  very 
similar  in  size,  coloring  and  punctation  to  D.  pallipes , but  usually 
paler.  The  head  has  only  a dark  basal  band  across  the  occiput, 
connecting  narrowly  with  the  eye  on  either  side.  The  prothorax 
is  usually  immaculate  or  with  traces  of  two  darker  spots  an- 
teriorly, and  occasionally  vestiges  of  the  other  two  lateral  spots 
and  the  median  streak.  The  dark  elytral  vittae  are  narrower 
than  in  pallipes , and  in  the  male  there  is  little  or  no  trace  of  costae, 
while  in  the  female  there  is  only  one  ridge,  and  that  on  the  median 
black  vitta,  in  contrast  to  the  several  costae  of  pallipes.  The 
antennal  joints  are  also  different  from  those  of  pallipes.  Like 
conjugata,  uniguttata , and  pallipes,  it  has  been  collected  on  Poly- 
gonum, specimens  in  the  U.  S.  N.  M.  collection  being  labelled  as 
so  found  at  Porto  Bello,  Panama,  by  E.  A.  Schwarz. 

II. 

New  West  Indian  Chrysomelidae. 

The  present  paper  is  mainly  the  result  of  an  attempt  to  identify 
a box  of  miscellaneous  Chrysomelidae  sent  to  me  by  Mr.  S.  C. 
Bruner,  of  Santiago  de  las  Vegas,  Cuba.  Mr.  Bruner  collected 
most  of  the  new  species  here  described  in  the  Sierra  Maestra 
in  the  Province  of  Oriente,  Cuba,  a region  in  which  little  or  no 
entomological  collecting  had  been  done  before.  The  writer 
wishes  to  express  her  gratitude  to  him  for  the  generosity  with 
which  he  has  supplied  specimens  and  geographic  data. 

Metachroma  adustum  Suffrian. 

Metachroma  terminale  Horn,  Trans.  Amer.  Ent.  Soc.,  vol. 

19,  July,  1892,  p.  215. 

Specimens  collected  by  E.  A.  Schwarz  at  Biscayne  Bay  and  Key 
West,  Florida,  were  described  by  Horn  as  Metachroma  terminale. 
The  substance  of  his  short  description  differs  in  no  way  from  the 
long  and  detailed  one  of  Suffrian,* 1  based  on  Cuban  material,  ex- 


12  Jacoby,  Biol.  Centr.-Amer.  Coleopt.,  vol.  6,  pt.  1,  1884,  p.  313. 

1 Suffrian,  Archiv.  f.  Naturg.,  vol.  32,  1866,  p.  339. 


Oct.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  215 


cept  that  Horn  described  the  head  as  “sparsely  punctate,  slightly 
opaque,”  and  Suffrian  as  thickly  and  finely  punctate.  Both  the 
Cuban  and  Floridan  specimens  have  the  head  moderately  densely 
punctate,  with  an  alutaceous  surface  more  pronounced  on  the 
lower  half  of  the  front.  The  species  apparently  is  known  from 
the  mainland  only  at  the  very  tip  of  Florida.  Since  working  out 
the  identity  of  the  two  I have  found  that  Dr.  Schwarz  had  previ- 
ously noted  it  on  pinned  labels  in  the  collection.  Specimens  sent 
by  Mr.  Bruner  were  collected  at  Hershey  and  Santiago,  Cuba. 

Chalcosicya  new  genus. 

Oval,  convex,  with  thin,  usually  coarse  and  appressed  pale 
pubescence  and  with  coppery  body  luster.  Head  inserted 
well  into  the  prothorax,  and  eyes  partially  covered  below  by 
thoracic  episternum ; no  supraorbital  grooves ; eyes  somewhat 
emarginate.  Antennae  slender,  gradually  thickened  apically, 
about  half  the  length  of  body,  second  joint  not  noticeably 
shorter  than  third.  Prothorax  not  quite  twice  as  broad  as 
long,  not  contracted  at  the  base,  distinctly  margined  and  not 
dentate ; episternum  with  anterior  margin  usually  a little  pro- 
duced, although  sometimes  nearly  straight,  but  never  emargi- 
nate. Elytra  broadly  ovate,  with  lateral  ridges  behind  humeri 
in  the  female  of  some  species,  confusedly  punctate,  sometimes 
obsoletely  striate.  Femora  not  toothed,  tibiae  not  emargi- 
nate, the  claws  acutely  denticulate  at  base. 

Type  of  genus : Chalcosicya  maestrensis  new  species. 

Because  of  its  coarse,  almost  squamulose  pubescence,  its  dis- 
tinctly margined  but  not  denticulate  prothorax,  and  its  produced 
prothoracic  episternum,  this  genus  is  most  closely  related  to 
Glyptoscelis.  It  differs  from  that  genus  by  its  much  smaller  size 
and  oval  shape,  its  sparser  pubescence,  its  wider  prothorax,  which 
is  not  contracted  at  the  base,  its  broader,  more  oval  elytra,  and 
its  differently  shaped  aedeagus.  It  is  more  like  Colas pidea  in 
size,  but  differs  from  that  genus  in  shape  in  the  same  way  as  from 
Glyptoscelis.  In  both  size  and  shape  it  resembles  superficially  the 
genus  Nodonota , but  the  deeply  inserted  head,  the  long  second 
antennal  joint,  and  the  pubescence,  as  well  as  other  characters, 
separate  it  from  this  genus.  It  is  distinct  from  Graphops  and 
Metachroma  on  account  of  the  lack  of  supraorbital  grooves.  The 
South  American  genus  Sphaeropis  has  an  entirely  differently 


216  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


shaped  episternum  which  does  not  at  all  cover  the  lower  part  of 
the  eyes. 

Chalcosicya  maestrensis  new  species  (Fig.  i.) 

Oval,  shining,  coppery,  head  and  prothorax  with  sparse 
coarse  pubescence,  elytra  less  conspicuously  pubescent,  pro- 
notum  and  elytra  rather  coarsely  and  thickly  punctate.  Head 
without  callosities,  a rather  indistinct  vertical  fovea  ending  in 
a slight  depression  above  clypeus ; pronouncedly  alutaceous 
with  coarse  punctation  tending  to  become  elongate  and  form 
wrinkles  on  occiput ; with  long  coarse  gray  pubescence,  not 
dense.  Antennae  slender  and  extending  about  half  length 
of  body,  gradually  thickened  apically,  the  first  three  joints 
pale,  next  four  becoming  darker  brown,  eighth  and  ninth 
pale,  and  last  two  joints  dark,  second  joint  not  noticeably 
shorter  than  third.  Prothorax  not  quite  twice  as  broad  as 
long,  with  arcuate  sides,  not  constricted  at  base,  coarsely  and 
moderately  densely  punctate,  distinctly  alutaceous,  yet  shin- 
ing; with  scattered  long  pale  pubescence,  thicker  at  the  sides 
yet  nowhere  dense.  Scutellum  small,  half  elliptic.  Elytra 
convex,  broadly  oval,  with  lateral  ridges  behind  the  humeri 
in  female ; surface  shining,  coarsely  and  rather  closely  and 
confusedly  punctate,  tending  towards  striation  apically  ; not 
at  all  alutaceous ; with  very  short,  pale,  coarse  pubescence 
scarcely  apparent  on  basal  part  of  elytra,  and  becoming 
slightly  longer  apically;  longer  closely  appressed  pale  hairs 
along  lateral  and  basal  margin  and  humeral  depression,  never 
dense.  Body  beneath  reddish  brown  with  coppery  glints  on 
femora  and  metasternum,  metasternum  coarsely  punctate, 
ventral  surface  and  legs  with  long  appressed  pale,  not  dense, 
pubescence.  Claws  with  sharp  basal  tooth. 

Length,  3.5  to  4.5  mm. ; width,  2 to  2.5  mm. 

Type-locality. — Summit  of  Pico  Turquino,  Sierra  Maestra, 
altitude  1,375  to  1,525  m.,  Province  of  Oriente,  Cuba,  collected  by 
S.  C.  Bruner  and  C.  H.  Ballou,  July,  1922. 

Type  (J)  and  5 paratypes  (2  §,  3 J').- — Cat.  No.  431 14,  U.  S. 
N.  M.  1 paratype  in  collection  of  S.  C.  Bruner. 

This  is  one  of  the  largest  of  a group  of  several  small  species, 
apparently  confined  to  the  West  Indies,  of  which  nana,  hereby 
assigned  to  the  same  genus,  is  the  only  one  hitherto  described. 
Nana  was  placed  by  Suffrian  under  Heteraspis  of  LeConte.  Le- 
Conte  afterwards,  discovering  the  earlier  use  of  the  name  Heter- 
aspis by  Blanchard  for  an  oriental  genus,  replaced  it  by  the  name 


Oct.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  217 


Graphops.  Nana  can  not  be  referred  to  LeConte’s  genus  Graph- 
ops  on  account  of  the  lack  of  any  supraorbital  sulcus  on  the 
head,  and  Clavareau  in  Coleoptorum  Catalogus  has  referred  it  to 
the  genus  Glyptoscelis.  The  North  American  species  of  Glyptos- 
celis  and  the  Venezuelan  G.  aeneipennis , which  also  extends  to 
Trinidad  and  Grenada,  are  much  larger  insects,  and  in  habitus 
bear  little  resemblance  to  the  small  West  Indian  species.  Neither 
does  the  West  Indian  group  resemble  the  small  southwestern 
genus  which  Horn  has  referred  to  the  Mediterranean  genus 
Colaspidea.  The  prothorax  is  differently  shaped  from  that  of 
either  Colaspidea  or  Glyptoscelis.  It  is  nearly  twice  as  broad  as 
long,  much  wider  than  in  typical  Glyptoscelis,  with  lateral  margins 
broadly  arcuate,  and  not  contracted  at  the  base,  and  the  elytra 
are  wider  and  more  oval,  thus  producing  a more  oval  and  less 
oblong  shaped  insect. 

Galerucella  maculipes  new  species  (Fig.  9.) 

Elongate,  subparallel,  rather  coarsely  punctate  and  finely 
pubescent,  elytra  with  callosities  at  base,  postmedianly  and 
anteapically ; pale  yellow  brown  with  dark  antennae,  head 
with  median  dark  line,  pronotum  7-spotted,  elytra  with  ten 
narrow  dark  brown  vittae,  third  and  submarginal  vittae  more 
or  less  evanescent,  and  all  obscure  at  apex,  femora  and  often 
tibiae  with  dark  median  spot.  Head  densely  and  coarsely 
punctate,  with  fine  appressed  pubescence,  pale  with  darker 
mouthparts,  and  with  a median  dark  line  down  front,  and 
often  a black  spot  behind  the  eye  at  base  of  head.  Antennae 
extending  nearly  to  middle  of  elytra,  dark  brown,  third  joint 
longer  than  the  others.  Prothorax  barely  twice  as  broad  as 
long,  obtusely  angulate  on  lateral  margin ; densely  and 
coarsely  punctate,  with  fine  appressed  pubescence ; spots 
dark  brown  or  piceous,  small  and  usually  seven  in  number, 
often  contingent,  these  probably  representing  three  large 
spots,  one  median,  and  two  lateral,  broken  up.  Scutellum 
pale,  truncate.  Elytra  subparallel,  narrowed  in  apical  fourth, 
with  blunt  apex,  a distinct  basal  callosity  near  scutellum  on 
each  elytron,  another  slightly  below  middle  near  suture,  and 
the  third  at.,  apical  fourth,  the  last  the  most  pronounced ; sur- 
face densely  and  coarsely  punctate  and  densely  pubescent 
with  short  appressed  hairs  becoming  very  dense  at  apex ; pale, 
with  five  narrow  dark  brown  vittae  on  each  elytron,  suture 
and  margin  pale,  the  third  and  submarginal  vittae  frequently 
interrupted  and  all  disappearing  before  apex,  leaving  apex 


218  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


pale.  Body  beneath  pale,  the  femora  and  often  the  tibiae 
with  a median  dark  spot. 

Length,  5.2  to  6 mm. ; width,  2 to  2.3  mm. 

Type-locality. — Summit  of  Pico  Turquino,  1,100-1,300  m.  alti- 
tude, Sierra  Maestra,  Province  of  Oriente,  Cuba,  collected  by  S. 
C.  Bruner  and  C.  H.  Ballou,  July,  1922. 

Type  (J1)  and  3 paratypes  (2  5,  1 J').  Cat.  No.  43115,  U.  S. 
N.  M.  1 other  paratype  in  collection  of  S.  C.  Bruner. 

In  shape,  elytral  callosities  and  markings  this  species  is  very 
similar  to  Trirhabda  obscurovittata  Jacoby2  of  Central  America, 
which  was  placed  in  the  genus  Trirhabda  probably  because  the 
third  antennal  joint  was  shorter  than  the  fourth,  although  other 
characters,  among  them  the  shape  of  the  aedeagus,  clearly  indi- 
cate that  it  does  not  belong  to  that  genus.  It  is  considerably 
larger  (8  mm.  or  more)  and  also  has  wider  and  fewer  vittae  than 
the  Cuban  species.  Maculipes  has  the  third  antennal  joint  dis- 
tinctly longer  than  the  fourth,  and  so  for  the  present  must  be 
referred  to  the  genus  Galerucella.  It  differs  from  other  species 
of  Galerucella  described  from  tropical  America  by  the  rather  un- 
usual maculation  of  the  femora  and  tibiae. 

Stoiba  indivisa  new  species  (Fig.  2.) 

Oval,  faintly  shining;  head,  prothorax,  antennae  and  legs 
pale  yellow,  elytra  deep  blue,  ventral  surface  black.  Head 
usually  visible  from  above,  pale  yellow  with  darker  mouth- 
parts,  surface  alutaceous,  with  a few  coarse  punctures,  a fine 
median  line  down  vertex.  Antennae  not  longer  than  pro- 
thorax, pale  yellow,  first  four  basal  joints  subglabrous  and 
slender,  remaining  joints  gradually  thickened  and  pubescent. 
Prothorax  somewhat  emarginate  anteriorly,  sides  not  arcuate, 
but  much  widened  in  a straight  line  three-quarters  their 
length,  thence  slightly  narrowed  to  base,  twice  as  broad  as 
long  at  widest  point;  explanate  margin  wide,  basal  margin 
sinuate,  disk  slightly  convex  with  fine  median  line;  surface 
alutaceous,  with  fine  scattered  punctures.  Scutellum  black, 
polished.  Elytra  convex,  rounded,  widest  before  middle, 
with  prominent  humeri  but  lacking  the  lateral  sulcus  and 
margin  characteristic  of  flavicollis;  surface  alutaceous,  dimly 
shining,  with  moderately  coarse,  dense  punctation.  Wings 


2 Biol.  Centr.-Amer.  Coleopt.,  vol.  VI,  Pt.  1,  1886,  p.  486. 


Oct.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  219 


fully  developed,  body  beneath  black,  shining,  legs  except  at 
base  entirely  pale  yellow,  claws  with  distinct  but  short  basal 
tooth. 

Length,  6 to  8 mm. ; width,  5 to  6 mm. 

Type  (5).— Cat.  No.  43116,  U.  S.  N.  M.  Paratype  (J'),  also 
collected  at  Guantanamo,  in  collection  of  American  Museum  of 
Natural  History,  New  York. 

Type  locality. — Guantanamo,  Cuba,  collected  by  W.  M.  Mann. 

This  species,  while  closely  related  to  flavicollis,  differs  from  it 
by  its  deep  blue  elytra,  its  coarser  punctation,  and  by  its  lack  of 
elytral  sulcus,  which  in  flavicollis  distinctly  divides  the  rounded 
arch  of  the  elytra  from  the  margin. 

Stoiba  bruneri  new  species.  (Fig.  3.) 

Head,  prothorax,  antennae  except  for  the  last  joint,  which 
is  deep  brown,  and  legs  reddish  yellow,  elytra  deep  purplish 
blue,  body  beneath  black ; not  shining,  prothorax  and  elytra 
with  broad  rounded  margin,  elytra  strongly  convex.  Head 
barely  perceptible  from  above  in  shallow  emargination  of  an- 
terior prothorax,  pale  reddish  with  dark  mouthparts,  aluta- 
ceous  with  a few  punctures  bearing  fine  hairs,  a median 
vertical  line  and  a supraorbital  depression  across  vertex,  eyes 
widely  set.  Antennae  slender,  apical  joints  gradually  thick- 
ened, first  and  third  joints  longest,  fourth  shorter  and  a little 
longer  than  fifth,  these  first  five  basal  joints  not  heavily 
pubescent,  remaining  joints  broader  and  densely  pubescent. 
Prothorax  over  twice  as  broad  as  long,  widest  in  the  middle, 
very  slightly  emarginate  anteriorly  with  wide  arcuate  ex- 
planate  lateral  margins,  broadly  curving  upwards,  disk 
slightly  convex  with  fine  median  line,  basal  margin  sinuate, 
pointing  down  at  basal  angles  and  at  scutellum.  Scutellum 
shining  black.  Elytra  strongly  convex,  with  rounded  ex- 
planate  margin  widest  before  middle,  diminishing  to  apex ; 
surface  alutaceous  with  fine  not  dense  punctation;  entirely 
deep  purplish  blue.  Wings  vestigial.  Body  beneath  dark 
and  shining,  legs  entirely  pale  except  at  base,  claws  with  a 
strongly  marked  basal  tooth. 

Length,  7.5  to  9 mm. ; width,  6 to  7.8  mm. 

Type  and  6 Paratypes. — Cat.  No.  43117,  U.  S.  N.  M.  2 other 
paratypes  in  collection  of  S.  C.  Bruner. 

Type  locality. — Sierra  Maestra,  altitude  1,380  m.,  Province  of 


220  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


Oriente,  Cuba,  collected  by  S.  C.  Bruner  and  C.  H.  Ballou,  July, 
1922. 

The  identity  of  Klug’s  Cassida  flavicollis  ( Himatidium  nigri - 
penne  Sturm  Catal.),3  the  type  of  Spaeth’s  genus  Stoiha,  is  doubt- 
ful. There  are  several  very  similar  species  of  this  group  occur- 
ring in  Cuba.  Suffrian,  in  his  description  of  Chelymorpha  flavi- 
collis, mentioned  another  form,  without  naming  it.  Spaeth,  in 
describing  the  genus  Stoiha  from  specimens  of  “flavicollis,”  prob- 
ably had  in  hand  the  small  rounded  species  with  very  dark  elytra 
and  pale  yellow  antennae,  which  is  represented  in  the  National 
Museum  collection  by  specimens  from  Havana  and  Pinar  del  Rio, 
on  the  northwestern  end  of  the  island.  It  is  quite  probable  that 
this  was  the  species  originally  described  by  Klug.  Taking  this  to 
be  the  case,  the  present  species,  while  usually  larger  and  not  so 
rounded,  and  with  more  angular  elytral  side  margins,  resembles 
flavicollis  somewhat  in  coloring,  although  the  elytra  are  deep  pur- 
plish blue  as  contrasted  with  Klug’s  description  of  black  elytra, 
and  the  color  of  the  head,  prothorax,  antennae  and  legs  is  not  pale 
yellow  but  distinctly  reddish.  The  shape  of  the  prothorax  is  very 
different  also  from  that  of  flavicollis,  in  which  the  lateral  margin 
is  not  rounded  anteriorly,  and  is  widest  near  the  base.  Spaeth,  in 
the  key  in  which  he  described  the  genus  Stoiha  distinguished  the 
genus  by  having  the  fifth  antennal  joint  like  the  apical  joints  and 
not  slender  and  subglabrous  like  the  basal  joints.  In  Stoiha 
hruneri  the  basal  joints  are  longer  and  more  slender  than  the 
corresponding  ones  of  flavicollis , and  the  fifth  joint  is  not  so  thick 
or  so  densely  pubescent  as  the  apical  joints.  The  last  joint  is  deep 
brown.  Neither  hruneri  nor  the  following  species,  decemmacu- 
lata,  if  the  genus  is  based  entirely  on  the  length  and  shape  of  the 
antennal  joints  belongs  to  the  genus  Stoiha  as  Spaeth  originally 
described  it.  In  his  original  description4  he  stated  that  he  had  no 
material  of  Cassida  swartzii  Thun,  of  Jamaica,  or  of  Chelymorpha 
angusticollis  Suff.  of  Cuba,  and  he  then  included  them  somewhat 
doubtfully,  but  later  in  Coleoptorum  Catalogus  he  put  them  with- 
out question  in  the  genus  Stoiha.  Swartzii  and  flavicollis  are  sim- 
ilar in  having  the  fifth  antennal  joint  short  and  pubescent  and 
more  like  the  apical  joints,  but  angusticollis,  hruneri  and  the  fol- 

3 Klug  included  this  name  in  his  original  description,  but  no 
mention  of  its  synonymy  is  found  in  Spaeth’s  treatment  of  the 
Cassidae  in  the  Junk  Catalogue. 

4 Spaeth,  Deut.  Ent.  Zeitschr.,  1909,  p.  720. 


Oct.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Bi'ooklyn  Entomological  Society  221 


lowing  species,  decemmaculata,  have  the  fifth  antennal  joint  in- 
termediate in  character  between  the  basal  and  apical  joints,  and 
neither  as  pubescent  nor  as  thick  as  the  apical  joints.  In  all  three 
species,  too,  the  wings  are  only  vestigial,  which  is  not  true  of  all 
the  specimens  of  flavicollis.  Two  specimens  doubtfully  referred 
to  flavicollis  in  the  National  Museum  collection  with  very  bright 
blue  elytra  are  also  wingless. 

Stoiba  decemmaculata  new  species.  (Fig.  n.) 

Prothorax  and  elytra  with  wide  lateral  margin,  elytra 
strongly  convex;  not  shining,  pale  yellow,  each  elytron  with 
two  lateral-marginal  and  three  median  black  spots,  antennae, 
mouthparts,  coxae,  trochanters,  joints  of  legs,  tarsi  and  last 
ventral  segment  dark.  Head  somewhat  apparent  from  above 
in  slight  emargination  of  anterior  prothorax,  but  the  widely 
separate  eyes  nearly  concealed ; a distinct  median  groove 
down  front,  and  a supraorbital  depression  across  vertex ; sur- 
face alutaceous  with  a few  coarse  punctures,  each  one  bear- 
ing a pale  silky  hair.  Antennae  not  longer  than  prothorax, 
dark  brown,  basal  joints  slender,  first  and  third  joints  about 
equal  and  longest,  fourth,  fifth  and  sixth  shorter  and  dimin- 
ishing gradually  in  length,  fifth  and  sixth  becoming  wider 
and  more  pubescent, and  remaining  joints  wider  and  densely 
pubescent.  Prothorax  barely  twice  as  broad  as  long,  widest 
in  the  middle,  with  broad  lateral  upward  curving  explanate 
margin,  anteriorly  shallowly  emarginate  over  occiput  of  head, 
broadly  arcuate  on  sides,  and  constricted  somewhat  at  base, 
forming  a sharp  basal  angle,  basal  margin  sinuate ; disk  feebly 
convex,  an  indistinct  median  line  more  evident  in  middle; 
surface  alutaceous  with  scattered,  very  fine  punctation. 
Scutellum  small,  polished.  Elytra  strongly  convex  with 
broad  explanate  margin,  widest  behind  basal  angle,  diminish- 
ing to  apex ; surface  alutaceous  with  coarse  dense  punctation ; 
each  elytron  marked  by  five  black  spots,  the  first  elongate  and 
in  middle  of  base,  the  second  median  on  height  of  elytron,  and 
third  on  downward  curve  behind  middle;  the  first  lateral 
extending  from  margin  half  up  the  arched  side  of  elytron, 
and  second  lateral  near  apex,  also  extending  somewhat  up  the 
side.  Wings  vestigial.  Body  beneath  more  shining  and 
lightly  pubescent,  the  darkened  coxae,  joints,  tarsi  and  last 
ventral  segment  giving  a spotted  appearance  to  the  lower  sur- 
face. Tarsal  claws  with  a broad,  blunt  and  short  basal  tooth, 
not  at  all  conspicuous. 

Length,  7 to  8.5  mm. ; width,  6 to  7 mm. 


222  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


Type  (5)  and  2 paratypes  (J',  '§). — Cat.  No.  431 18,  U.  S.  N.  M. 
1 paratype  in  collection  of  American  Museum  of  Natural  History, 
New  York. 

Type-locality. — Sierra  Maestra,  altitude  1,070  to  1,350  m., 
Province  of  Oriente,  Cuba,  collected  by  S.  C.  Bruner  and  C.  H. 
Ballou,  July,  1922. 

Other  localities. — Pico  Turquino,  Cuba,  altitude  1,525  m. 

Like  the  preceding  species,  S.  hruneri,  this  species  does  not  fit 
into  the  key  in  which  Spaeth  originally  described  the  genus 
Stoiba,  because  the  fifth  antennal  joint  is  intermediate  in  character 
between  the  basal  and  the  apical  joints.  On  the  other  hand,  while 
hruneri  resembles  flavicollis  in  coloration  and  sculpture,  decem- 
maculata  and  angusticollis  are  both  pale  yellow  species  with  sim- 
ilar coarse,  dense  elytral  punctation,  and  both  have  the  elytra 
widest  near  the  basal  angle.  There  is  one  other  closely  related 
genus,  also  confined  to  the  West  Indies,  Elytrogona,  of  which  de- 
cemmaculata  is  suggestive  in  the  pattern  of  its  elytral  spotting  and 
coarse  punctation,  although  it  is  not  nearly  so  coarsely  punctate 
as  the  species  of  Elytrogona.  No  spotted  species  of  Stoiba  has 
previously  been  described.  One  is  struck  by  the  apparent  inter- 
gradation between  these  two  genera  as  illustrated  by  decemmacu- 
lata  and  the  following  species,  Elytrogona  gemmata. 

This  species  has  been  doubtfully  determined  in  the  collection 
of  the  American  Museum  of  Natural  History  as  Elytrogona  bulla 
Boh.,  but  it  can  not  very  well  be  that  since  that  species  is  described 
as  being  red,  with  the  elytra  most  coarsely  punctate  (“cribrose”), 
and  the  elytral  spots  are  differently  placed  from  those  of  decem- 
maculata. 

Elytrogona  gemmata  new  species.  Fig.  10. 

Red  with  pale  yellow  antennae,  elytra  with  eight  black 
spots,  somewhat  shining;  prothorax  and  elytra  widely  mar- 
gined, elytra  coarsely  punctate,  very  convex,  and  with  apices 
produced.  Head  not  visible  from  above,  red  with  darker 
mouthparts ; a median  line  down  vertex ; surface  alutaceous 
with  a few  punctures.  Antennae  not  longer  than  prothorax, 
first  five  basal  joints  slender,  subglabrous,  first  and  third 
joints  longest,  fourth  and  fifth  subequal,  the  following  joints 
somewhat  thickened  but  all  longer  than  broad  and  pubescent. 
Prothorax  barely  twice  as  broad  as  long  at  its  widest  point, 
the  middle;  the  anterior  margin  not  at  all  emarginate,  but 


Oct.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  223 


straight  over  the  head,  the  sides  explanate  and  broadly  arcu- 
ate, constricted  at  the  base  in  a sharp  basal  angle,  basal 
margin  lightly  sinuate ; disk  with  fine  median  line ; surface 
alutaceous,  indistinctly  punctulate.  Scutellum  very  incon- 
spicuous. Elytra  strongly  convex,  with  broad  explanate 
margin  widest  before  middle  and  tapering  to  apex,  apices 
produced;  surface  shining  with  extremely  coarse  punctures 
as  in  other  species  of  Elytrogona;  each  elytron  with  four 
large  black  spots,  two  placed  near  suture  on  arch  of  elytron 
and  two  lateral,  the  one  near  the  middle  anteriorly  extending 
onto  explanate  margin.  Wings  vestigial  ? Body  beneath  en- 
tirely red.  Claws  with  broad  blunt  basal  tooth. 

Length,  8.5  mm. ; width,  7 mm. 

Type  (<?).— Cat.  No.  431 19,  U.  S.  N.  M. 

Type-locality. — Haiti,  collected  by  Emery  C.  Leonard  in  1920. 

This  species,  like  Stoiha  decemmaculata,  presents  an  interesting 
intergradation  between  the  genera  Stoiha  and  Elytrogona,  but  in 
its  bright  red  coloring,  elytral  spotting  and  very  coarse  punctation 
it  bears  a closer  relationship  to  Elytrogona.  It  resembles  Stoiha 
more  in  the  shape  of  the  prothorax  and  wider  elytral  wing.  The 
shape  of  the  last  six  antennal  joints  is  not  like  that  of  the  other 
species  of  Elytrogona,  the  joints  being  longer  and  more  cylindrical. 
Although  in  his  description  of  Elytrogona  Boheman  distinctly 
states  that  the  elytral  apices  are  not  produced,  there  is  a strong 
indication  of  it  in  some  specimens  of  E.  quatuordecimmaculata 
Latr.  and  E.  bacca  Boh.  (?  the  males),  and  in  the  one  specimen 
of  gemmata  known  this  character  is  developed  to  a marked  degree. 
Possibly  the  female  has  less  produced  apices.  The  expansion  of 
the  lateral  margin  in  the  elytra  is  also  much  greater  in  the  present 
species  as  contrasted  with  other  species  of  Elytrogona.  Except 
for  one  which  is  reported  from  Cuba,  all  the  species  of  Elytro- 
gona have  thus  far  been  taken  only  in  Haiti. 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  Yol.  XXV,  No.  4 


Plate  XIII 


A.  Disonycha  coniudata 


5.  D.  pensijl  vanica 


7.  D.  uni  guttata 


Plate  XIY 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  Vol.  XXV,  No.  4 


A Convenient  Collecting  Container  for  Butterflies— Gunder 


Oct.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  225 


A CONVENIENT  COLLECTING  CONTAINER  FOR 
BUTTERFLIES. 

By  J.  D.  Gunder,  Pasadena,  California. 

Various  ways  are  in  vogue  for  handling  and  caring  for  freshly 
caught  butterflies  while  in  the  field.  Some  collecters  use  pretty 
clumsy  methods,  such  as  stuffing  extra  cyanide  bottles  full  or 
patiently  laying  each  catch  in  little  pill  boxes  after  killing  or  tedi- 
ously pinning  every  newly  caught  individual  in  a voluminous  con- 
tainer which  is  difficult  to  keep  in  contact  with  if  there  is  fast  net- 
ting over  a wide  area.  Probably  the  prevalent  fashion  through- 
out Eastern  United  States  at  the  present  time  is  to  carry  one 
pocket  full  of  empty  envelopes  and  have  the  other  ready  to  cram 
full  of  filled  ones.  All  these  methods  seem  to  me  to  be  rather  hard 
on  the  collector  and  equally  hard  on  his  specimens,  in  addition  to 
taking  up  much  time  which  could  otherwise  be  employed  in 
search,  etc.  So,  it  is  the  object  of  this  paper  to  explain  a simple, 
inexpensive  and  very  satisfactory  scheme  which  has  been  in  use 
for  sometime  on  the  Pacific  Coast. 

About  ten  years  ago  Mr.  Hal  Newcomb,  of  Los  Angeles,  con- 
ceived the  idea  of  hanging  an  empty  Baker’s  Cocoa  tin  on  his 
belt  as  a receptacle  for  butterfly  specimens  while  collecting.  The 
bottom  of  the  tin  was  filled  with  cyanide  (see  illustration)  and 
the  rest  with  one,  long,  narrow,  folded-back-and-forth,  strip  of 
paper.  The  secret  of  success  lay  in  the  fact  that  the  folds  kept 
the  newly  caught  specimens  in  perfect  shape  (wings  folded  cor- 
rectly), while  they  were  being  killed  by  the  fumes  and  also  after- 
wards. As  many  as  ioo  specimens  could  be  kept  in  the  tin  and 
put  in  one  at  a time  and  there  was  never  any  rubbing;  in  other 
words,  a day’s  catch  in  the  field  could  be  kept  this  way  and  later 
sorted  out  upon  returning  home.  The  lid  of  the  tin,  being  hinged 
on  the  outer  side,  allowed  the  container  to  be  opened  and  closed 
at  will  with  one  hand  which  added  to  its  convenience  and  also 
kept  the  cyanide  weak  enough  to  prevent  discoloration  of  speci- 
mens. To  save  rusting  the  outside  of  the  tin  was  painted  black. 
A pair  of  Denton  forceps  hung  on  a string  around  the  neck  was 
found  to  be  a necessary  adjunct  to  this  method  of  collecting.  Be- 
ing hung  there,  they  could  not  get  lost  and  were  in  immediate 
reach  to  transfer  the  living  butterflies  directly  from  the  net  to  the 
tin.  This  little  tin  box  hung  on  your  belt  is  a splendid  idea  and 
will  keep  your  specimens  in  good  shape  until  papered  or  mounted. 


226  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


POSTSCRIPT  TO  “STYLOPIZED  VESPIDAE,”  IN 
PSYCHE,  VOL.  36,  1929,  PP.  249-282. 

By  George  Salt,  Farnham  Royal,  Bucks.,  England, 
and  Joseph  Bequaert,  Boston  Mass. 

A note  in  the  April , 1930,  issue  of  this  Bulletin,  entitled 
“Position  of  Strepsiptera  on  hosts,”  tends  to  convey  the  idea  that, 
in  the  preparation  of  our  joint  paper  on  “Stylopized  Vespidae,” 
we  overlooked  some  important  data.  The  following  remarks  will 
show  how  far  this  criticism  is  justified. 

1.  Our  list  of  “References”  was  not  intended  to  be  a “bibliog- 
raphy” of  the  subject.  It  lacks  many  other  papers  besides  the 
one  selected  by  our  critic.  These,  papers,  in  so  far  as  they  con- 
tain records  of  stylopized  wasps,  are  quoted  directly  in  the  text  by 
the  abbreviated  title  of  the  periodical.  The  “References”  are 
only  to  papers  so  often  quoted  as  to  make  worth  while  some 
shorter  method  of  citation. 

2.  The  statement : “In  4 all  account  of  2 is  avoided  and  it  is 

excluded  from  the  References,  but  mention  is  made  of  Odynerus 
zizice  mss.,”  is  partly  answered  by  the  foregoing  paragraph. 
Moreover,  so  far  as  we  could  see,  all  the  species  of  Vespidae  listed 
in  our  critic’s  “2”  (except  Leionotus  zizice)  were  included  in  his 
earlier  “1,”  from  which  we  had  faithfully  quoted  them  in  our 
account. 

3.  In  the  absence  of  any  explanatory  remark,  we  believed  that 
our  critic’s  record  of  “Leionotus  zizice”  was  based  upon  a speci- 
men not  mentioned  previously  by  him.  We  are  now  (1930)  told 
for  the  first  time  that  “This  is  the  same  insect  as  Leionotus 
pedestris  listed  in  “1.”  However  grateful  we  must  feel  for  this 
bit  of  information,  we  regret  to  say  that  it  is  sadly  inadequate. 
Must  we  conclude  that  “Leionotus  zizice”  is  a synonym  pure  and 
simple  of  Odynerus  pedestris  H.  de  Saussure,  or  does  the  author 
regard  it  as  a distinct  species?  In  the  latter  case  a description 
would  be  welcome  or  at  least  some  indication  of  how  “zizice”  is 
to  be  told  apart  from  pedestris  and  the  other  related  species  of  this 
difficult  group  of  Odynerus.  Meanwhile,  zizice,  if  not  a synonym, 
is  a manuscript  name,  without  standing  in  nomenclature. 

4.  On  p.  274  of  our  paper  we  wrote:  “In  these  and  the  fol- 

lowing figures  we  have  not  thought  it  necessary  to  incorporate  the 


Oct.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  227 


data  so  admirably  summarized  by  Pierce,  and  have  confined  our- 
selves to  those  in  the  above  list.”  It  would  seem  that  this  state- 
ment would  preclude  any  claim  to  “priority”  on  our  part  with 
regard  to  the  several  topics  of  general  interest  discussed  at  the  end 
of  our  article.  At  this  late  date,  when  so  much  has  been  written 
on  every  conceivable  subject,  it  is  always  a ticklish  business  to 
claim  “priority.”  Thus  our  critic  was  by  no  means  “the  first”  to 
study  the  “position  of  Strepsiptera  on  hosts.”  In  his  classic 
paper  on  the  effects  of  stylopization  (1886),  J.  Perez  devoted 
several  paragraphs  to  this  topic.  We  beg  leave  to  quote  two  pas- 
sages only : “C’est  d’ordinaire  entre  le  quatrieme  et  le  cinquieme 

segment  de  l’abdomen  de  l’Andrene,  qu’est  fixe  le  Stylops,  c’est-a- 
dire  sous  le  bord  du  quatrieme,  que  Ton  voit  saillir  la  tete  de  ce 
dernier.  La  est  son  lieu  d’election.  Le  parasite  se  voit  quelque- 
fois  aussi  sous  le  bord  du  troisieme  segment,  moins  souvent  sous 
le  cinquieme.  Mais  ce  sont  la  des  cas  fort  rares,  car  je  ne  les 
ai  pas  observes  plus  de  deux  ou  trois  fois  sur  cent.”  And  later  he 
noted:  “ Chez  les  Vespides,  le  nombre  des  Xenos  que  peut  porter 
le  meme  hote  est  plus  considerable,  et  leur  distribution  sur  l’ab- 
domen  de  la  guepe  est  loin  de  presenter  la  regularite  qui  se  voit 
chez  les  Andrenes.” 

Moreover,  as  early  as  1842  (Stettiner  Ent.  Zeitg.,  Ill,  pp.  53- 
57),  Rosenhauer  published  a table  essentially  similar  to  that  of  our 
critic.  He  tabulated  77  stylopized  Polistes  gallicus,  caught  near 
Erlangen,  Germany,  and  showed  conclusively  that  the  male  para- 
sites usually  lie  before,  under  the  third  or  fourth  segments  (of  82 
males,  1 was  under  2,  17  were  under  3,  57  under  4,  and  7 under  5), 
and  the  females  usually  lie  behind,  under  the  fourth  or  fifth  (of 
38  females,  1 was  under  3,  14  were  under  4,  and  23  under  5). 
Our  critic’s  observations  on  Polistes  were  therefore  no  more 
“new”  than  our  own.  The  senior  author’s  observation,  published 
in  1927,  that  in  Odynerus  the  female  parasites  lie  before  and  the 
males  lie  behind,  the  opposite  to  the  condition  in  Polistes,  was  not 
previously  published  by  our  critic.  He  merely  showed  that  “in 
30  cases  parasites  of  Odynerus  fell  into  two  sets,  14  under  3,  and 
10  under  4 but  he  did  not  say  anything  about  the  sex  of  the  para- 
sites or  what  he  meant  by  “set.”  Nor  did  he  contrast  the  condi- 
tion in  Odynerus  with  that  in  Polistes. 

5.  The  origin  of  our  material  was  clearly  stated  in  the  intro- 
duction to  our  paper  as  well  as  in  the  text.  Every  specimen,  how- 
ever, listed  under  “New  records,”  regardless  of  whether  or  not  it 


228  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


bore  a species  label,  was  identified  by  one  of  us  (J.  B.),  and  he 
assumes  full  responsibility  for  the  names.  That  in  the  four  cases 
mentioned  by  our  critic,  our  identifications  agree  with  his  is  not 
surprising,  since  these  species  are  readily  recognizable.  The  fact 
should  please,  rather  than  disturb  him.  How  the  label  of  “L. 
foraminatus”  became  detached  is  a deep  mystery,  but  we  may  as- 
sure our  critic  that  it  was  not  “removed  by  Salt”  for  some  dark 
motive.  More  likely,  the  other  member  of  our  partnership  was  at 
least  an  accessory  to  the  crime. 


Oct.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  229 


EDITORIAL. 

WHAT  IS  A SPECIES? 

The  question  of  biological  categories  lower  than  species  is  al- 
ways with  students  of  living  forms ; and  particularly  presses  upon 
entomologists.  Now,  it  might  seem  as  though  any  form  suffi- 
ciently distinct  structurally  from  others  allied  thereto,  should 
automatically  be  regarded  as  a species.  What  the  ultimate  de- 
finitive structures  to  be  considered  are,  is  in  many  instances  a pure 
matter  of  opinion,  of  which  opinions  the  best,  because  the  more 
carefully  reasoned,  is  that  of  a monographer.  With  the  discrimi- 
nation born  of  intensive  study  and  evaluation  of  morphological 
and  taxonomic  characteristics  of  all  'sorts,  such  a monographer  is 
the  one  best  fitted  to  have  a valid  opinion  on  what  constitutes  a 
species  in  the  group  so  monographed,  and  on  what  may  be  re- 
garded as  incipient  or  nascent  species,  or,  at  least,  stable  differen- 
tiated categories,  sufficiently  distinct  among  themselves  but  agree- 
ing in  possessing  the  critical  characters  of  the  valid  species. 

Predicating  these  conditions,  it  may  reasonably  be  deduced  that 
the  publication  of  marooned  two-  or  three-line  characterizations 
of  subsp.,  vars.,  abs.,  forms,  races,  etc.,  is  scarcely  convincing  in 
the  absence  of  a general  discussion  of  the  relationship  and  factors 
of  the  category,  which  ought  to  be  fully  described. 

Now,  what  is  an  incipient  species?  Undeniably,  not  a sport  of 
the  moment,  which  is  seen  once  and  never  again.  If  a species  has 
a certain  variability  or  instability  and  gives  rise  to  variations 
from  the  norm  in  sufficient  numbers  and  with  sufficient  differ- 
ences, we  may  reasonably  conclude  that  such  a species  is  in  a con- 
dition of  flux.  We  may  also  conclude  that  any  one  (or  all)  of 
these  differentiations  is  potent  to  perpetuate  itself,  if  the  evolu- 
tionary factors  operating  to  cause  the  sport  to  appear  should  be 
stabilized,  continuous  and  active ; or  if  the  change  is  of  biological 
value  to  the  new  form  of  the  old  species. 

The  basic  question,  however,  is,  “ What  is  a species  ? ” Is  it  a 
stable  biological  unit?  Or  is  it  a group  of  forms  about  a norm? 
And  further,  can  we  consider  a species  to  be  a fixed  and  un- 
changeable entity,  or  is  it  but  a distinct,  recognizable  and  describ- 
able  static  moment  in  the  ceaseless  flow  of  life  ? 

In  a proper  and  adequate  discussion  of  all  these  factors,  the 
description  and  discussion  of  such  sub-specific  categories  is  not 
alone  logical,  but  it  is  likewise  imperative. 

But  the  description  of  isolated  minor  forms  from  unique  speci- 
mens does  not  present  itself  as  being  logical ; and,  far  less,  as  im- 
perative.— J.  R.  T.-B. 


230  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


Entomologica  Americana. 

Subscribers  to  our  monographic  journal  are  well  aware  that,  of 
late,  its  appearance  has  been  irregular  and  is  now  much  delayed. 
We  believe  they  should  know  why  this  is  so. 

As  originally  planned,  Entomologica  Americana  was  de- 
signed to  carry  papers  between  40  and  80  pages  in  length — that 
is,  those  papers  too  long  for  the  regular  journals  and  too  short 
for  individual  publication.  Our  difficulty  has  been,  and  is,  to 
secure  such  papers.  They  are  being  written,  but  we  do  not  get 
them — neither,  seemingly,  does  any  other  publication. 

We  have  had  at  times  under  consideration  lengthy  and  heavily 
illustrated  works  of  importance,  but  unfortunately,  our  small  in- 
come from  this  publication  has  put  the  expense  of  publishing  them 
out  of  the  question. 

It  has  been  and  is  our  purpose  to  make  this  publication  self- 
supporting.  Our  Society  has  neither  income-producing  endow- 
ment nor  legacies  with  which  to  finance  its  publications.  It  de- 
pends entirely  on  the  support  of  its  subscribers.  If  this  be  lack- 
ing, then  no  amount  of  good-will  on  our  part  will  enable  us  to 
meet  expenses,  for  which  cash  is  the  indispensable  requisite. 

Neither  can  we  publish  with  any  degree  of  regularity  unless  we 
have  the  material. 

We  hope  that  our  Bulletin  readers  will  give  serious  attention  to 
this  matter,  because  without  adequate  cooperation  it  is  not  pos- 
sible to  achieve. — J.  R.  T.-B. 


Change  of  Address. — The  attention  of  our  readers,  particularly 
of  our  Society  members  and  subscribers,  is  directed  to  the  perma- 
nent new  address  of  our  Treasurer,  Mr.  Geo.  P.  Engelhardt. 
This  is  28  Clubway,  Hartsdale,  N.  Y. 


'Oct.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  231 


BOOK  NOTES. 

A Manual  for  the  Study  of  Insects — Revised  Edition — by  John 

Henry  Comstock  and  Anna  Botsford  Comstock  and  Glenn  W. 

Herrick.  19th  Edition,  pp.  i-xiii-1-401,  plates  I— III,  figs. 

i-633.  (Comstock  Publishing  Co.,  1930.  $4.00.) 

The  appearance  of  the  standard  American  Manual  is  always  an 
event  in  our  entomological  history.  In  this  instance,  the  Manual 
has  been  brought  down  to  date  and  in  accord  with  the  latest  ad- 
vances in  entomology  by  Dr.  Herrick,  one  of  Dr.  Comstock’s  old- 
time  students  and  now  one  of  his  colleagues  at  Cornell.  No  more 
need  be  said  to  establish  its  authoritative  characters. 

No  better  note  on  this  book  can  be  found  than  these  words  from 
the  Introduction  to  this  new  edition:  “The  aim  of  this  revision 

has  been  to  keep  the  Manual  in  form  and  arrangement  practically 
as  it  was  first  written.  The  attempt  has  been  made  to  bring  the 
subject-matter  down  to  date,  to  simplify  it  and  to  condense  it 
somewhat  in  order  to  bring  it  within  the  horizon  of  the  beginning 
student.” 

Studies  in  the  Insect  Fauna  of  Iowa  Prairies,  by  George  O. 

Hendrickson.  Iowa  State  Journal  of  Science,  vol.  iv,  no.  2,  pp. 

49-179.  1930. 

This  interesting  essay  is  well-worth  careful  reading.  It  is  an 
intensive  study  in  insect  ecology,  which  should  help  entomologists 
in  the  study  of  insect  and  plant  associations,  especially  those  en- 
tomologists making  their  debut  in  the  science.  Naturally,  this 
work  is  rich  in  date  of  occurrence  and  food  plants  of  the  species 
collected. 

Necessarily,  some  of  the  occurrences  noted  are  quite  adventi- 
tious, as  where  normally  tree-inhabiting  species,  such  as  Chlor - 
ochroa  uhleri  or  Banasa  dimidiata  is  swept  from  grasses.  The 
bulk  of  the  other  Heteroptera  taken  are  such  species  as  are  nor- 
mally found  in  grasses. 

In  general,  as  regards  the  Heteroptera,  this  study  points  to  the 
use  of  the  sweeping  net  in  grasses  as  the  best  means  to  secure 
extensive  collections  of  representative  species  fast  and  in  abun- 
dance. No  less  than  121  species  were  taken  in  the  course  of  this 
study.  Of  these,  at  least  42  are  characteristic  grass  species.— J. 
R.  T.-B. 


232  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


PROCEEDINGS  OF  THE  SOCIETY. 

Meeting  of  February  13,  1930. 

A regular  meeting  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  held 
at  the  Brooklyn  Museum,  Eastern  Parkway,  Brooklyn,  N.  Y.,  on 
Thursday  evening,  February  13,  1930,  at  8.22  p.  m. 

President  Davis  in  the  Chair  and  14  members  present,  viz. : 
Messrs.  Bell,  Black,  Burke,  Chapin,  Cooper,  Lemmer,  Lersch, 
Notman,  Rau,  Schaeffer,  Sheridan,  Siepmann,  Torre-Bueno  and 
Wilford. 

Minutes  of  the  previous  meeting  read  and  approved. 

In  the  absence  of  Mr.  Engelhardt,  the  report  of  the  Treasurer 
was  presented  by  Mr.  Torre-Bueno. 

Mr.  Torre-Bueno  reported  for  the  Publication  Committee,  that 
the  annual  report  was  deferred  until  next  meeting  on  account  of 
the  lack  of  complete  data. 

The  Secretary  read  reprints  from  the  Daily  Argosy , a Guiana 
publication,  under  dates  of  December  31,  1929,  and  January  1, 
1930,  concerning  the  expedition  of  Pinney  Schiffer,  one  of  the 
members  of  the  Society,  to  French  Guiana;  the  Secretary  also 
read  a letter  from  Mr.  Raymond  H.  Torrey  with  reference  to  joint 
field  excursions  of  the  Torrey  Botanical  Club  and  the  Brooklyn 
Entomological  Society;  on  motion  duly  seconded,  Mr.  Sheridan 
was  appointed  the  representative  of  the  Society  to  confer  with  Mr. 
Torrey  and  make  whatever  arrangements  are  necessary  in  this 
respect. 

Mr.  Davis  read  a card  from  Mr.  Engelhardt,  sent  from  Cali- 
fornia on  the  eve  of  his  departure  for  Central  America,  on  the 
expedition  to  explore  Mayan  ruins. 

Mr.  Lemmer  exhibited  a branch  of  pitch-pine  from  Lakehurst, 
N.  J.,  showing  the  workings  of  Callidium  antennatum  Newn.,  a 
Cerambycid  beetle. 

Mr.  Torre-Bueno  presented  his  paper  “Heteroptera  Collected 
by  George  P.  Engelhardt  on  His  Western  Trips,”  published  in  full 
in  the  Bulletin.  Mr.  Torre-Bueno’s  paper  was  discussed  by  the 
members. 

Mr.  Schaeffer  exhibited  and  remarked  on  specimens  of  Calli- 
grapha  lunata  Fabricius,  a Chrysomelid  beetle,  and  the  forms 
hybrida  Say,  latevittata  Ach.,  bowditchi  Ach.,  medisrupta  Ach., 
these  being  arranged  to  show  the  variation  from  typical  lunata 
in  more  extensive  or  reduced  maculation  and  color. 


Oct.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  233 


Mr.  Davis  exhibited  and  remarked  on  specimens  of  the  Jap- 
anese beetle  from  Staten  Island,  and  will  publish  his  notes. 

Adjourned  9.30  p.  m. 

E.  L.  Bell, 
Secretary. 

Meeting  of  March  13,  1930. 

A regular  meeting  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  was 
held  in  the  Brooklyn  Museum,  on  Thursday  evening,  March  13, 
1930,  at  8.22  p.  m. 

President  Davis  in  the  Chair,  and  twelve  members  present,  viz. ; 
Messrs.  Bell,  Bowdoin,  Burke,  Cooper,  Lemmer,  Lersch,  Mann, 
Rau,  Schaeffer,  Sheridan,  Siepmann,  and  Torre-Bueno. 

Minutes  of  the  previous  meeting  read  and  approved. 

Mr.  Torre-Bueno  reported  for  the  Publication  Committee  that 
the  Annual  Report  was  postponed  until  the  April  meeting  on  ac- 
count of  the  complete  data  not  being  at  hand. 

Mr.  Torre-Bueno  presented  the  Report  of  the  Treasurer,  in  the 
absence  of  Mr.  Engelhardt. 

Mr.  Cooper  proposed  for  membership  Mr.  Lawrence  Bowdoin, 
of  149-31  19th  Avenue,  Whitestone,  N.  Y. 

It  was  reguarly  moved  and  seconded,  and  passed,  that  the  by- 
laws be  suspended  and  that  Mr.  Bowdoin  be  elected  a member  of 
the  Society. 

The  Secretary  read  letters  from  Dr.  Rimsky  Korsakow,  Dr. 
Karl  Jordan,  Dr.  Walther  Horn  and  Dr.  E.  L.  Bouvier  express- 
ing their  appreciation  on  being  elected  Honorary  Members  of  the 
Society. 

Mr.  William  T.  Davis  showed  the  walking-stick  insect  'Mano- 
mera  atlantica  Davis  collected  at  Greenport,  Long  Island,  N.  Y., 
September  11,  1929,  and  Sag  Harbor,  Long  Island,  September  21, 
1929,  by  Mr.  Roy  Latham;  also  a map  of  Long  Island  in  which 
eleven  other  localities  were  marked  where  the  insect  has  been 
found.  It  is  well  distributed  over  the  Island  from  Brooklyn  to 
the  eastern  part,  and  so  far  only  females  have  been  discovered. 

Mr.  Davis  also  showed  the  book  “ The  Gall  Wasp  Genus 
Cynips,  a Study  in  the  Origin  of  Species,”  by  Alfred  C.  Kinsey, 
Professor  of  Zoology,  Indiana  University;  and  also  a box  con- 
taining specimens  of  the  galls  of  Cynips  centricola  Osten-Sacken, 
which  he  had  collected  at  Larmingdale,  Long  Island,  N.  Y.,  on 
post-oak,  the  record  of  which  was  in  Prof.  Kinsey’s  book.  Mr. 
Davis  also  exhibited  galls  of  Amphiholips  inanis  Osten-Sacken,  a 


234  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


smaller  gall  but  of  similar  appearance  to  the  one  mentioned.  Mr. 
Davis’s  remarks  were  discussed  by  the  members. 

Mr.  Davis  showed  a circular  by  Henry  Fox,  published  by  the 
Dept,  of  Agriculture  of  the  State  of  New  Jersey,  on  “ A Revised 
Annotated  List  of  the  Dermaptera  and  Orthoptera  of  New  Jer- 
sey,” in  connection  with  the  walking-stick  insect. 

Mr.  Torre-Bueno  presented  his  paper  on  “ Life  History  of 
Trepobates,”  which  will  be  published. 

Mr.  Lemmer  exhibited  a box  containing  a series  of  twenty 
specimens  of  the  moth  Anticarsia  gemmatilis  Hubner,  collected 
by  him  at  Lakehurst,  N.  J.,  in  October,  1929,  and  which  showed  a 
wide  range  of  variation  in  maculation. 

Adjourned,  9.25  p.  m. 

E.  L.  Bell, 
Secretary. 

Meeting  of  April  10,  1930. 

A regular  meeting  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  was 
held  at  the  Brooklyn  Museum  on  Thursday  evening,  April  10, 
1930,  at  8.10  p.  m. 

President  Davis  in  the  chair  and  nine  members  present,  vis., 
Messrs.  Ballou,  Black,  Cooper,  Lemmer,  Lersch,  Schaeffer,  Shoe- 
maker, Siepmann,  Torre-Bueno,  and  Wilford,  and  three  visitors. 

In  the  absence  of  the  secretary,  Mr.  Siepmann  acted  as  secre- 
tary pro  tern. 

The  minutes  of  the  previous  meeting  were  read  and  approved. 
Mr.  Torre-Bueno  reported  for  the  treasurer  and  for  the  publica- 
tion committee. 

Mr.  Davis  read  a letter  from  Mr.  Bell,  reporting  the  death  on 
Tuesday,  April  1,  of  Mr.  Frank  Haimbach,  who  was  connected 
with  the  staff  of  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  in  Philadelphia. 

Mr.  Torre-Bueno  proposed  for  membership  Dr.  J.  D.  Hood, 
whose  election  was  referred  to  the  next  meeting. 

Mr.  Davis  read  a communication  from  Mr.  D.  K.  Duncan,  of 
Globe,  Arizona,  who  is  interested  in  selling  or  exchanging  Arizona 
Coleoptera. 

Mr.  Wurster  exhibited  a melanic  specimen  of  the  moth  Telea 
polyphemus. 


Oct.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  235 


Mr.  Cooper  exhibited  specimens  of  Baeocera  picea  Csy.  and 
Scaphisoma  repanda  Csy.  obtained  by  sifting  at  Flushing,  L.  I. 
Both  species  are  new  to  New  York. 

Mr.  Lemmer  exhibited  specimens  of  the  following  new  Lepi- 
doptera  collected  by  him  at  Lakehurst,  N.  J. : 

Eriopyga  lindseyi  Benjamin. 

Graptolitha  lemmeri  Barnes  & Benjamin. 

Chytonix  sensilis  form  macdonaldi  Benjamin. 

Catocala  gracilis  form  cinerea  Mayfield. 

Catocala  gracilis  form  lemmeri  Mayfield. 

Catocala  sordida  form  metalomus  Mayfield. 

Zanclognotha  martha  Barnes. 

Olene  aridensis  Benjamin. 

Olene  lemmeri  Barnes  & Benjamin. 

Paraphia  esther  Barnes. 

Paraphia  esther  form  lemmeri  Barnes. 

Mr.  Schaeffer  presented  a paper  on  the  North  American  species 
of  Calligrapha,  of  which  he  exhibited  specimens.  He  stated  that 
the  genus  has  not  yet  been  properly  studied,  and  that  the  earlier 
authors,  as  Crotch  and  G.  W.  J.  Angell  underestimated  the  num- 
ber of  species,  the  latter  figuring  scalaris,  philadelphica,  amelia, 
and  rowena  all  as  varieties  of  the  same  species.  Judging  by  the 
color  pattern  alone,  one  would  suppose  them  to  be  mere  color 
varieties,  but  there  are  also  differences  in  size,  form,  and  struc- 
ture, which  are  constant  with  each  species. 

Mr.  Torre-Bueno  commented  on  the  damage  done  to  wild  life 
of  all  kinds  by  forest  and  field  fires,  and  by  unthinking  people 
whose  chief  interest  in  nature  is  to  kill  the  birds,  tear  up  the 
flowers,  and  in  general  destroy  and  disfigure  every  object  of 
nature.  His  discussion  was  continued  by  the  other  members. 

Adjourned  at  10.10  p.  m. 

Carl  Geo.  Siepmann, 
Secretary  pro  tern. 


236  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


EXCHANGES 

This  one  page  is  intended  only  for  wants  and  exchanges,  not 
for  advertisements  of  articles  for  sale.  Notices  not  exceeding 
THREE  lines  free  to  subscribers.  Over  lines  charged  for  at 
15  cents  per  line  per  insertion. 

Old  notices  will  be  discontinued  as  space  for  new  ones  is 
needed. 

PHOTOGRAPHS  WANTED. — Entomologists,  Naturalists, 
and  other  Scientists  are  cordially  invited  to  send  us  their  photo- 
graphs for  publication  purposes.  Pinney  Science  Photos,  20  Girst 
Avenue,  New  York,  N.  Y. 

WE  WISH  to  procure  in  exchange  or  on  cash : Parnassius  of 
North- America,  with  its  varieties  and  aberrations,  well  labelled, 
spread  or  in  papers  (clodius,  smitheus,  eversmanni).  Dr.  Staud- 
inger  & A.  Bang-Haas,  Dresden-Blasewitz. 

THE  MUSEUM  of  the  Brooklyn  Institute  has  a few  uncolored 
sets  of  the  Calverly,  Weidenmeyer  and  Edwards  plates  of  North 
American  Sphingidae  for  exchange  or  for  sale  at  $5  per  set.  Ad- 
dress, Librarian,  Brooklyn  Museum,  Eastern  Parkway,  Brooklyn, 
N.  Y. 

LEPIDOPTERA  from  the  Mountains  of  Kentucky.  Papilios 
and  other  var.  of  this  section  collected.  Paper  spec,  of  Xylophones 
tersa  and  Catopsilia  eubule  on  hand.  Also  Cocoons  of  the  larger 
Saturnid  moths.  Ellis  Chandlee,  Barbourville,  Ky. 

BUTTERFLY  COLLECTORS— Have  you  butterflies  which 
look  different  in  color  or  pattern  from  the  average?  (See  adver- 
tisement). Please  write.  Jeane  Gunder,  Pasadena,  Calif. 

CHRYSOMELID AE,  CRYPTOCEPHALINI.  Wish  beetles 
of  this  group  from  all  over  world.  Will  exchange  local 
Coleoptera  or  purchase  for  cash.  Write  me  before  shipping 
material.  Paul  N.  Musgrave,  514  Mt.  Vernon  Ave.,  Fairmont, 
W.  Va. 

COLEOPTERA.- — Am  interested  in  exchanging  Coleoptera. 
Carl  G.  Siepmann,  R.  F.  D.  No.  1,  Box  92,  Rahway,  N.  J. 

WANTED. — Am  studying  the  bionomics  of  the  corn  billbugs 
and  desire  the  privilege  of  examining  Calendra  ( Sphenophorus ) 
from  all  parts  of  the  world.  A.  F.  Satterthwait,  U.  S.  Entomo- 
logical Laboratory,  Webster  Grove,  Mo. 


VoLXXV  DECEMBER,  1930  No.  5 

BULLETIN 

OF  THE 

Brooklyn  Entomological 
Society 


PUBLICATION  COMMITTEE 

J.  R.  de  la  T ORRE-BUEN O,  Editor 

E.  L.  BELL  * GEO.  P.  ENGELHARDT 

Published  for  the  Society  by  the 

Science  Press  Printing  Co., 

Lime  and  Green  Sts.,  Lancaster,  Pa., 

Price,  60  cents  Subscription,  $2.50  per  year 

Mailed  January  6,  1931 


Entered  as  second-class  matter  January  21,  1919,  at  the  post  office  at  Lancaster,  Pa., 
under  the  Act  of  March  3,  1879 


The  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society 

Meetings  are  held  on  the  second  Thursday  after  the  first  Tuesday  of  each 
month  from  October  to  June,  inclusive,  at  the  Central  Museum,  Eastern 
Parkway  and  Washington  Ave.,  Brooklyn.  The  annual  dues  are  $2.00. 


OFFICERS,  1930 
Honorary  President 


CHARLES  W.  LENG 


President 
W.  T.  DAVIS 
Vice-President 

J.  R.  DE  LA  TORRE-BUENO 
Recording  Secretary 
E.  L.  BELL 


Treasurer 

G.  P.  ENGELHARD  T 
28  Club  way 
Hartsdale,  N.  Y. 
Librarian 

DR.  JOSEPH  BEQUAERT 


Corresponding  Secretary  Curator 

HOWARD  NOTMAN  J.  M.  SHERIDAN 


Delegate  to  Council  of  New  Yorlc 
Academy  of  Sciences 
G.  P.  ENGELHARDT 


CONTENTS 

STRUCTURAL  DETAILS  OP  THE  LARVA  OF  PROTOPLASA, 


Crampton  239 

THE  NAMES  OF  CERTAIN  RI1YNCHOPHORA,  Bradley  259 

NOTICE:  ENTOMOLOGICA  AMERICANA  262 

TEXAS  BEES,  Parks  . 263 

AMERICAN  TINGITIDAE,  Drake  268 

A MELANIC  TELEA  POLYPHEMUS,  Wurster  ...'.  273 

CRANE  FLIES  FROM  THE  NE ARCTIC  REGION,  Alexander  276 

NEW  ROBBER  FLIES  FROM  MADAGASCAR,  Bromley  283 

/DISTRIBUTION  NOTES  ON  CULICIDAE,  Matheson  291 

, NEW  MIRIDAE  FROM  TEXAS,  Johnston  295 

EURYMUS  EURYTHEME  AUTUMNALIS,  Cockerell  300 

BOOK  NOTES:  FIELD  BOOK  OF  PONDS  AND  STREAMS,  J.  R. 

T.-B 301 

BLATCHLEYANA,  J.  R.  T.-B 302 

PROCEEDINGS  OF  THE  SOCIETY,  Bell  and  Siepmann  304 

EXCHANGES  .♦. 308 


Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society 

Published  in 

February,  April,  June,  October  and  December  of  each  year 

Subscription  price,  domestic,  $2.50  per  year;  foreign,  $2.75  in  advance;  single 
copies,  60  cents.  Advertising  rates  on  application.  Short  articles,  notes  and 
observations  of  interest  to  entomologists  are  solicited.  Authors  will  receive  25 
reprints  free  if  ordered  in  advance  of  publication.  Address  subscriptions  and 
all  communications  to 

J.  R.  de  la  TORRE-BUENO,  Editor, 

38  De  Kalb  Avenue,  White  Plains,  N.  Y. 


BULLETIN 

OF  THE 

BROOKLYN  ENTOMOLOGICAL  SOCIETY 


Vol.  XXV  December,  1930  No.  5 


A COMPARISON  OF  THE  MORE  IMPORTANT  STRUC- 
TURAL DETAILS  OF  THE  LARVA  OF  THE 
ARCHAIC  TANYDERID  DIPTERON  PROTO- 
PLASA  FITCHII  WITH  OTHER  HOLO- 
METABOLA  FROM  THE  STAND- 
POINT OF  PHYLOGENY. 

By  G.  C.  Crampton,  Ph.D.,  Massachusetts  Agricultural  College, 

Amherst,  Mass. 

In  Vol.  55,  p.  221,  of  the  Proceedings  of  the  Linnean  Society  of 
New  South  Wales,  for  1930,  Dr.  C.  P.  Alexander  has  given  an 
excellent  general  account  of  the  immature  stages  of  the  Tanyderid 
Dipteron  Protoplasa  fitchii  O.  S.,  and  to  his  general  description  of 
the  larva,  I would  add  the  following  details  from  a Protoplasa 1 
larva  captured  by  me  during  an  expedition  to  the  Gaspe  Penin- 
sula, Quebec,  undertaken  by  Dr.  Alexander  and  myself,  in  the 
hope  of  obtaining  the  hitherto  unknown  immature  stages  of  the 
Tanyderidae  in  the  region  where  I had  formerly  encountered: 
swarms  of  the  rare  and  primitive  Protoplasa  (Can.  Ent.,  1929,, 
Vol.  61,  p.  70). 

We  had  expected  that  the  larva  of  Protoplasa  would  be  an  ex- 
traordinary looking  creature  like  the  supposed  larva  of  this  insect 
figured  in  Dr.  Alexander’s  “ Craneflies  of  New  York”;  but  when 
we  finally  found  the  larvae  of  Protoplasa  on  June  19,  1929,  in 
the  shallow  waters  of  the  west  branch  of  the  Pabos  River,  two  or 
three  miles  west  of  the  town  of  Chandler,  Quebec,  they  turned  out: 
to  be  very  Chironomus-V\ke,  small,  slender  creatures,  about  17  mm. 
long  and  1.5  mm.  broad,  eucephalous,  with  brown  heads  and  pale 
bodies,  amphipneustic  (but  with  the  posterior  spiracles  on  the 
sides  of  the  eighth  abdominal  segment),  with  a pair  of  posterior 
“ pseudopods,”  and  with  slender  posterior  gills  instead  of  an  anal 
breathing  tube  (like  that  of  the  supposed  larva  of  Protoplasa) . 

239 


240  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


The  larvae  were  found  in  the  sand  and  gravel  of  the  shallower 
waters  (a  few  inches  deep)  a couple  of  feet  from  the  shores  of 
the  west  bank  of  the  Pabos  River,  a few  yards-  above  the  old 
wooden  bridge  over  the  West  Pabos  River,  which  is  about  120  feet 
wide  at  this  point.  The  stream  was  very  sluggish,  and  workmen 
who  were  repairing  the  old  wooden  bridge  which  had  been  broken 
by  the  weight  of  a heavy  automobile,  informed  us  that  the  water 
of  the  river  was  affected  by  the  tides  of  the  Bay  of  Chaleur,  a few 
miles  away,  but  the  river  water  was  perfectly  fresh  to  the  taste, 
and  I could  detect  no  difference  in  the  level  of  the  water  of  the 
river  during  the  hours  we  spent  in  searching  for  the  larvae  of 
Protoplasa. 

The  Protoplasa  larvae  were  so  extremely  small  and  difficult  to 
detect,  that  as  soon  as  I had  captured  one  specimen  for  study, 
after  hours  of  back-breaking  work  under  a broiling  sun,  and  amid 
swarms  of  pestilential  “ black  flies  ” and  “ punkies  ” which  gave 
us  no  peace,  I gave  up  the  discouraging  search  for  more  speci- 
mens ; but  Dr.  Alexander  persisted  in  the  search  until  he  had  ob- 
tained about  eight  larvae,  two  of  which  were  allowed  to  pupate 
(see  description  of  the  pupae  by  Alexander,  1930,  1.  c.,  with 
added  details  given  by  me  in  Vol.  32,  p.  83,  of  the  Proceedings  of 
the  Entomological  Society  of  Washington  for  1930).  Before  dis- 
tributing his  material  to  various  museums,  etc.,  Dr.  Alexander 
gave  me  two  more  larvae  for  comparison  with  my  specimen,  and 
very  kindly  allowed  me  to  make  the  sketches  of  a very  large  and 
well  sclerotized  larva  from  which  Figures  6,  13  and  21  were 
made,  before  this  specimen  was  sent  away.  Unfortunately,  all  of 
the  specimens  in  my  possession  have  the  body  so  bent  that  the 
under  surface  of  the  head  capsule  is  not  visible  for  study,  and 
since  I do  not  wish  to  injure  the  valuable  specimens  by  dissecting 
them  at  this  time,  I shall  confine  my  remarks  to  such  of  the  struc- 
tural details  as  were  visible  in  the  larva  from  which  the  sketches 
were  made. 

In  its  general  features,  the  type  of  head-capsule  exhibited  by 
Protoplasa  (see  Fig.  13)  is  the  most  primitive  one  that  I have 
been  able  to  find  among  the  larvae  of  the  Diptera,  although  in  some 
respects  the  head  of  a larval  Bibionid  (see  Fig.  31)  is  extremely 
primitive  also,  and  in  such  features  as  the  occurrence  of  perip- 
neustic  spiracles,  etc.,  a Bibionid  larva  is  even  more  primitive  than 
an  amphipneustic  Protoplasa  larva.  The  Bibionid  larva,  however 
(Fig.  31),  has  reduced  antennae  (like  those  of  some  Trichop- 


Dec.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  241 


terous  larvae)  a short  coronal  suture  and  other  features  indicat- 
ing a greater  degree  of  specialization  than  the  larval  Protoplasa 
exhibits  in  its  head  structures,  and  there  is  no  doubt  that  Proto- 
plasa is  very  much  more  primitive  than  any  Bibionid ; but  none 
the  less,  a larval  Bibionid  is  of  great  interest  in  attempting  to  de- 
termine the  character  of  the  primitive  Dipterous  head,  and  cannot 
be  ignored  in  such  a study. 

When  the  larvae  of  the  Dipteron-like  Mecopteron  Nanno- 
chorista  are  discovered,  they  will  doubtless  be  extremely  similar 
to  th,e  larva  of  Protoplasa,  particularly  in  the  head  region,  but 
until  these  larvae  have  been  found,  we  must  do  the  best  we  can 
with  the  Mecopterous  larvae  available  for  study.  Of  these,  the 
larva  of  the  Mecopteron  Panorpa  shown  in  Fig.  30  furnishes  the 
best  prototype  from  which  the  dorsal  structures  of  the  larval 
head-capsule  of  primitive  Diptera  could  be  derived,  while  the 
larva  of  the  Mecopteron  Boreus  shown  in  Fig.  32,  will  serve  some- 
what better  for  deriving  the  ventral  structures  of  the  head  cap- 
sule of  the  primitive  Diptera.  A study  of  the  mouthparts  of  lar- 
val Trichoptera  is  likewise  very  instructive  in  this  connection, 
while  features  encountered  in  the  head  capsule  of  larval  Lepidop- 
tera  and  Neuroptera  are  also  of  value  (particularly  in  the  ar- 
rangement of  the  setae,  etc.).  The  head-structures  of  larval  Me- 
coptera  and  Trichoptera  are  so  suggestive  of  the  prototypes  of 
the  Dipterous  structures  that  we  must  assume  that  the  common 
ancestors  of  the  Mecoptera  and  Trichoptera  were  the  forms  from 
which  the  Diptera  were  derived,  instead  of  assuming  that  the 
Mecoptera  alone  are  the  nearest  representatives  of  the  ancestors 
of  the  Diptera. 

Within  the  order  Diptera,  the  larvae  of  the  Chironomidae  are 
as  much  like  the  larvae  of  Protoplasa  as  any  I have  seen,  in  the 
general  appearance  of  the  body,  with  its  pair  of  posterior  “pseudo- 
pods,”  etc.,  and  this  might  be  interpreted  as  lending  some  support 
to  the  views  of  Lameere,  who  grouped  together  the  Culicoids 
(including  the  Chironomids)  and  Psychodoids  (which  include 
the  Tanyderids),  or  the  view  of  Edwards  who  maintains  that  the 
Psychodoids  (including  the  Tanyderids)  gave  rise  to  the  Culi- 
coids (including  the  Chironomids)  ; but  the  details  of  the  head 
structures,  etc.,  of  the  larva  of  Protoplasa  are  not  sufficiently 
similar  to  those  of  a Chironomid  larva  to  demonstrate  this  satis- 
factorily. On  the  other  hand,  the  larval  structures  do  not  seem 


242  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


to  lend  much  support  to  the  evidence  of  rather  close  relationship 
between  the  Ptychopteridae,  Tanyderidae  and  Psychodidae  (with 
Nemopalpus  and  Bruchomyia)  indicated  by  the  thoracic  sclerites 
(see  Vol.  37,  p.  33,  of  the  Entomological  News  for  1926),  nor  do 
the  larvae  lend  much  support  to  the  view  of  Edwards  that  the 
Blepharocerids  were  descended  from  Tanyderid  forebears  (see 
also  thoracic  resemblances  between  the  adults  mentioned  on  p.  63 
of  Vol.  19  of  the  Annals  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  America 
for  1925),  and  it  is  a question  as  to  which  stages  we  shall  con- 
sider the  most  important,  in  grouping  insects  according  to  their 
larval,  pupal  or  adult  characters. 

While  I would  emphasize  the  fact  that  no  source  of  information 
should  be  ignored  in  attempting  to  arrange  the  orders  and  fam- 
ilies, etc.,  of  insects  according  to  their  natural  affinities  (i.  e., 
phylogenetically  or  genealogically)  I am  inclined  to  give  greater 
weight  to  the  evidence  of  relationship  furnished  by  the  structures 
of  the  adult  insects  in  such  a study,  for  the  following  reasons. 
The  larval  stages  are  usually  very  plastic  and  are  evidently  pro- 
foundly modified  in  adaptation  to  their  own  individual  (specific) 
environmental  conditions,  becoming  in  this  process  extremely 
modified  away  from  the  main  evolutionary  trends  which  are  fol- 
lowed more  conservatively  by  the  adults.  In  other  words,  the 
larvae  present  many  “ sidewise  ” developments  or  caenogenic 
modifications  having  no  real  evolutionary  significance  and  fre- 
quently representing  individual  (specific)  adaptations  each  to  its 
own  peculiar  environmental  conditions.  They  thus  frequently 
present  broken  series  of  isolated  types  not  intergrading  through 
closely  connected  intermediates  as  is  more  frequently  the  case 
when  the  adults  are  studied,  and  because  of  this  fact,  the  evidence 
of  the  adult  structures  is  much  more  satisfactory  for  arranging 
the  groups  according  to  their  natural  affinities.  I realize  that  in 
some  cases,  such  as  the  classification  of  Culicids  on  the  basis  of 
larval  structures,  the  study  of  the  larvae  pointed  the  way  for  a 
better  arrangement  of  the  groups  than  had  been  employed  in  ar- 
ranging them  according  to  the  trivial  characters  used  in  the  clas- 
sification based  upon  the  adults  alone.  In  this  case,  however,  the 
details  of  structure  had  been  better  studied  in  the  larvae,  while 
the  structures  of  the  adults  were  practically  unknown  to  the  stu- 
dents of  the  group  who  fastened  their  attention  upon  such  trivial 
characters  as  the  hairs  and  setae  and  what  not,  to  the  neglect 


Dec.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  243 


of  the  really  fundamental  features,  upon  which  any  real  knowl- 
edge of  relationships  is  based.  In  fact  it  is  usually  the  case  that 
a student  of  one  group  of  insects  does  not  know  the  entire  anat- 
omy (external)  of  any  insect  in  that  group  and  knows  but  little 
of  the  comparative  anatomy  of  the  general  features  of  the  adults, 
with  the  result  that  he  frequently  does  not  know  what  is  funda- 
mental or  really  important  in  contrast  to  the  trivial  features  hav- 
ing but  little  significance  for  indicating  true  relationships.  On  the 
other  hand,  some  of  the  accepted  views  regarding  the  arrangement 
of  the  families,  orders,  etc.,  are  quite  superficial  or  erroneous,  and 
there  is  a great  need  of  a thorough  study  of  the  comparative  anat- 
omy of  adult  insects  as  well  as  the  comparative  anatomy  of  the 
immature  forms  to  serve  as  a check  on  the  findings  based  upon 
the  study  of  adults  alone. 

A phylogenetic  or  genealogical  study  of  insects  should  not  be 
limited  to  the  study  of  the  relationships  of  the  families  within  an 
order  of  insects,  but  should  be  of  such  a character  that  it  can 
likewise  be  applied  to  the  grouping  of  the  orders  themselves  ac- 
cording to  their  natural  affinities,  and  the  same  kind  of  evidence 
should  be  used  in  both  cases,  the  evidence  for  the  grouping  of  the 
orders  being  merely  more  comprehensive  or  inclusive,  instead  of 
being  of  a wholly  different  character  from  that  used  in  grouping 
the  families.  When  we  adopt  this  broader  viewpoint  in  grouping 
insects  in  the  general  scheme,  it  at  once  becomes  apparent  that  the 
larval  characters  are  of  much  less  value  than  the  adult  ones. 
Thus,  for  example,  we  are  unable  to  compare  the  larvae  of  even 
the  lowest  Holometabola  (which  are  still  very  different  from  the 
corresponding  adults)  with  the  immature  stages  of  the  Psocoid 
and  Orthopteroid  forms  (which  were  like  the  forebears  of  the 
Holometabola)  since  the  immature  stages  of  the  Orthopteroids, 
etc.,  are  essentially  like  the  adults ; and  it  is  therefore  necessary  to 
compare  the  adult  Holometabola  with  the  mature  Orthopteroids 
in  order  to  get  the  intermediate  stages  indicating  the  paths  of  de- 
velopment followed  in  deriving  the  Holometabola  from  their 
Orthopteroid  precursors.  Thus  when  we  work  up  from  a com- 
parison of  the  orders  of  Orthopteroid  insects  to  a comparison  of 
the  orders  of  Holometabolous  insects  and  from  this  to  a com- 
parison of  the  families  within  these  orders  (using  the  same  kind 
of  evidence)  it  is  impractical  to  use  larval  characters,  and  the  real 
importance  of  the  adult  characters  is  impressed  upon  the  student 


244  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


having  the  wider  viewpoint  (and  supposedly  with  a better  back- 
ground to  enable  him  to  determine  what  is  really  primitive  or  fun- 
damental when  he  attempts  to  apply  his  knowledge  to  the  smaller 
groups  also). 

While  giving  greater  weight  to  the  adult  characters,  it  would 
be  folly  to  ignore  the  evidence  of  relationship  available  from  any 
other  source  (even  palaeontology,  embryology,  ecology  and  be- 
havior, etc.,  should  be  called  upon  for  testing  the  views  based 
upon  the  study  of  one  type  of  evidence)  but  when  the  structures 
of  the  larvae  confirm  the  evidence  of  relationship  indicated  by  the 
structures  of  the  adult  insects  we  should  feel  that  the  views  based 
upon  this  wider  study  are  more  sound.  On  the  other  hand  when 
the  larval  structures  offer  no  definite  evidence  of  relationship,  it 
is  preferable  to  depend  upon  that  furnished  by  the  adult  struc- 
tures. The  larva  of  Protoplasa  is  of  such  an  isolated  type  that 
until  we  know  more  about  the  larvae  of  such  forms  as  the  primi- 
tive Psychodoids  (e.  g.,  Nemo  palpus  or  Bruchomyia,  etc.)  we 
cannot  definitely  determine  the  closest  relatives  of  the  Tanyderids 
from  the  larval  characters  as  well  as  we  can  from  the  adult  fea- 
tures, such  as  the  venation,  etc.,  and  in  the  present  state  of  our 
knowledge  it  is  not  possible  to  do  more  than  to  indicate  wherein 
the  larval  structures  of  Protoplasa  confirm  the  evidence  of  rela- 
tionship indicated  by  the  structures  of  the  adults. 

Taking  the  dorsal  view  of  the  head  of  the  larva  of  Panorpa 
shown  in  Fig.  30  as  the  prototype  from  which  the  larval  head  cap- 
sule of  the  Diptera  was  derived,  we  note  that  the  coronal  suture  c 
is  proportionately  quite  long  (i.  e.,  the  stem  of  the  Y-shaped  epi- 
cranial suture  is  well  developed),  and  the  fact  that  the  coronal 
suture  c of  Protoplasa  (Fig.  13)  is  longer  than  that  of  the  Bibionid 
larva  shown  in  Fig.  31  indicates  that  the  head  capsule  of  the  Pro- 
toplasa larva  is  more  primitive  in  this  respect.  On  the  other  hand, 
the  frontal  sutures  fs  of  the  Bibionid  larva  (Fig.  31)  are  more 
specialized  in  being  much  longer  proportionately  than  the  frontal 
sutures  of  Protoplasa  (Fig.  13,  fs)  and  those  of  the  larva  of 
Panorpa  (Fig.  30,  fs).  In  the  Culicid  larva  shown  in  Fig.  33,  the 
frontal  sutures  fs  are  greatly  developed,  and  this  likewise  may  be 
taken  as  a specialized  feature,  although  the  eyes  e of  the  Culicid 
larva  are  compound,  like  those  of  Panorpa  (Fig.  30,  e)  and  are 
therefore  more  primitive  than  are  the  eye  spots  e of  Protoplasa 

(Fig-  J3)- 


Dec.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  245 


The  antennae  a of  Protoplasa  (Fig.  13)  are  three-segmented 
and  the  proportions  of  the  component  segments  are  strikingly  like 
those  of  the  three-segmented  antennae  a of  Panorpa  (Fig.  30), 
and  in  this  respect,  the  antennae  of  Protoplasa  (Fig.  13)  are  much 
more  primitive  than  those  of  the  Culicid  shown  in  Fig.  33,  despite 
the  fact  that  the  antennae  of  this  Culicid  larva  are  very  well  devel- 
oped. For  some  unknown  reason,  the  antennae  a of  the  Bibionid 
larva  shown  in  Fig.  31  are  reduced  to  the  merest  rudiments  (as  in 
some  Trichopterous  larvae)  despite  the  fact  that  the  head  capsule 
of  the  Bibionid  larva  is  quite  primitive,  and  its  mouthparts  are 
very  primitive  for  those  of  a Dipterous  larva ; but  this  feature  of 
heterospecialization,  or  unequal  specialization  in  different  features 
of  the  body,  is  a very  common  phenomenon  among  insects,  and  in 
reconstructing  the  archetype  or  original  condition  of  any  body 
part,  we  have  to  combine  the  primitive  features  retained  by  sev- 
eral different  insects  instead  of  depending  upon  any  one  insect  to 
present  all  of  the  primitive  features  in  a condition  approaching 
the  original  one. 

The  character  of  the  labrum,  Ir,  anteclypeus,  ac,  and  post- 
clypeus,  poc,  in  the  larva  of  Panorpa  shown  in  Fig.  30  may  be 
taken  as  representing  the  original  condition  from  which  these 
sclerites  were  derived  in  the  Diptera,  and  in  these  features  the 
Bibionid  larva  shown  in  Fig.  31  and  Fig.  12  is  fairly  primitive, 
although  the  labrum  Ir  is  not  clearly  demarked  in  the  Bibionid. 
The  larva  of  Protoplasa  shown  in  Figs.  8 and  13  is  disappointingly 
specialized  in  this  region  of  the  head,  since  the  labrum  Ir  in  more 
membranous  than  one  would  expect  to  be  the  case  in  such  a primi- 
tive Dipteron.  The  epipharyngeal  brushes  or  labrobrustia 
labelled  es  in  Fig.  13,  are  borne  on  the  epipharyngeal  surface  of 
the  labrum  and  doubtless  are  used  to  brush  the  food  into  the 
mouth  as  the  larva  feeds.  The  posterior  limits  of  the  labrum  in 
the  Protoplasa  larva  are  indicated  by  the  tormae  labelled  t in 
Figs.  6 and  21  as  in  Orthopteroid  insects,  and  there  is  also  an 
“ intertorma  ” or  small  median  transverse  sclerite  resembling  the 
“ intertorma  ” described  in  Stenopelmatus  (Pan-Pacific  Entomol- 
ogist, Vol.  6,  p.  97,  for  1930),  since  it  lies  just  behind  and  between 
the  tormae.  The  “ clypeites  ” cl  or  sclerites  in  the  anteclypeal 
region  ac  in  the  larva  of  Protoplasa  (Fig.  8 and  Fig.  13)  are 
other  Orthopteroid  structures  resembling  those  described  in  Gryl- 
lotalpa  and  Cylindracheta  (Entomologische  Mitteilungen,  Vol.  17, 


246  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


p.  252,  for  1928)  and  I think  that  these  “ clypeites  ” form  the  an- 
terior sclerites  incorrectly  called  the  “ tormae  ” in  the  frontal 
views  of  the  head  capsule  of  adult  Diptera  by  Peterson,  1916  (Illi- 
nois Biol.  Monographs  No.  2,  Vol.  3,  p.  177),  because  the  tormae 
are  always  borne  on  the  buccal  surface  (or  “roof  of  the  mouth”), 
while  the  “ clypeites  ” are  borne  on  the  frontal  surface  of  the 
head,  and  I think  that  this  distinction  is  not  a purely  academic 
one,  since  the  two  types  of  structures  are  not  actually  homologous. 
The  postclypeus  poc  in  Protoplasa  and  the  other  larvae  shown  in 
Figs.  8,  13,  31,  30,  etc.,  extends  as  far  back  as  the  imaginary  line 
across  from  one  frontal  pit  (or  frontocava)  fp  to  the  other,  and 
this  postclypeus  corresponds  in  a general  way  to  the  region  called 
the  epistoma  in  Coleopterous  larvae,  and  may  be  used  as  a syno- 
nym for  the  latter  term.  Behind  the  postclypeus  or  epistoma  poc 
of  the  larvae  shown  in  Figs.  30,  31,  13,  etc.,  is  the  frontal  region 
/.  Snodgrass,  1928  (Smithsonian  Misc.  Collections,  Vol.  81,  No. 
3,  p.  1)  is  inclined  to  use  the  muscle  attachments  for  delimiting 
the  posterior  boundaries  of  the  clypeus  (or  its  posterior  region  the 
postclypeus),  but  I have  followed  Peterson,  1916  (l.c.),  in  using 
the  frontal  pits  to  demark  the  posterior  limits  of  the  clypeus,  and 
have  regarded  the  region  behind  the  frontal  pits  fp  (and  bounded 
posteriorly  by  the  frontal  sutures  fs)  in  Figs.  30,  31,  13,  etc.,  as 
the  frons.  The  curve  in  the  frontal  sutures  fs  near  the  frontal 
pits  fp  in  the  Bibionid  and  Tanyderid  larvae  shown  in  Figs.  31 
and  13  is  very  like  that  of  the  frontal  sutures  fs  in  the  larva  of 
Panorpa  shown  in  Fig.  30. 

The  nature  of  the  thoracic  sclerites  of  adult  Ptychopteridae, 
Tanyderidae  and  Psychodidae  (including  Nemopalpus  and 
Bruchomyia ) indicates  that  these  insects  are  quite  closely  related 
(see  Ent.  News  for  1926,  Vol.  37,  p.  33)  ; but  the  larvae  that  I 
have  been  able  to  examine  do  not  bear  out  the  relationship  indi- 
cated by  the  adults,  possibly  due  to  the  fact  that  such  primitive 
Psychodids  as  Nemopalpus  and  Bruchomyia  are  known  only  from 
the  adults,  and  if  their  larvae  were  found,  they  might  furnish  evi- 
dences of  relationships  not  indicated  by  the  specialized  larvae  I 
have  seen.  At  any  rate,  the  character  of  the  anterior  regions  of 
the  heads  of  the  Psychodid  and  Ptychopterid  larvae  shown  in 
Figs.  9 and  10  is  no  more  suggestive  of  a Tanyderid  larva  (e.g., 
Figs.  8 and  13)  than  a Bibionid,  for  example  (see  Fig.  12),  and 
until  the  more  primitive  larvae  of  these  Diptera  are  found,  we 


Dec.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  247 


must  depend  largely  upon  the  adult  characters  for  determining  the 
closest  affinities  of  the  Ptychopteridae,  Tanyderidae  and  Psy- 
chodidae. 

While  the  dorsal  or  frontal  region  of  the  head  of  a Protoplasa 
larva  (Fig.  13)  is  more  like  that  of  a larval  Panorpa  (Fig.  30), 
the  under  or  ventral  surface  of  the  head  of  Protoplasa  (Fig.  6) 
with  its  peculiar  labial  plate  gm  and  paragular  sclerites  pg,  is  more 
like  the  under  side  of  the  head  of  a larval  Boreus  (Fig.  32).  On 
the  other  hand,  the  mandible  of  a larval  Protoplasa  (Fig.  3)  with 
its  mandibular  brush  b,  and  the  mandible  of  the  larval  Bibionid 
shown  in  Fig.  5,  with  its  mandibular  brush  b,  are  much  more  like 
the  mandible  of  the  Trichopterous  larva  shown  in  Fig.  7,  with  its 
mandibular  brush  b (see  also  certain  Coleopterous  larvae)  than 
the  mandibles  of  these  Dipterous  larvae  resemble  that  of  a 
Panorpa  larva,  for  example  (see  Fig.  1).  Why  the  mandibles  of 
these  primitive  Dipterous  larvae  should  resemble  the  mandibles  of 
a Trichopteron  rather  than  a Mecopteron  is  not  clear  (though  if 
we  had  the  larvae  of  the  Dipteron-like  Mecopteron  Nannochorista 
its  mandibles  would  doubtless  be  more  like  those  of  the  Diptera  in 
question). 

As  was  mentioned  above,  the  under  side  of  the  head  of  a Pro- 
toplasa larva  (Fig.  6),  with  its  broad  labial  sclerite  gm,  apparently 
homologous  with  the  gular  and  submental  regions  (with  the  men- 
tum  also?)  and  its  paragular  sclerite  pg,  is  more  like  the  under 
side  of  the  head  of  the  larva  of  the  Mecopteron  Boreus,  shown 
in  Fig.  32  than  it  is  like  the  head  of  the  larval  Panorpa  shown  in 
Fig.  19,  because  the  larva  of  Panorpa  has  no  demarked  paragular 
sclerite  and  instead  of  having  the  typical  labial  plate  gm  of  Fig.  6, 
the  ventral  halves  of  the  head  are  approximated  to  form  the  suture 
mg  (which  was  referred  to  as  the  “ midgular  suture  ” in  the  figure 
of  a larval  Panorpa  shown  in  Fig.  19,  Plate  3,  of  Vol.  14  of  the 
Annals  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  America  for  1921 — but 
see  discussion  of  this  region  in  Vol.  20,  p.  1 of  the  Journal  of  En- 
tomology and  Zoology,  Claremont,  Cal.,  for  1928,  where  the  single 
median  suture  is  interpreted  as  an  epigular  suture,  since  it  is 
formed  by  the  meeting  of  the  lips  of  the  folds  lying  upon  the  in- 
folded gular  region).  The  larva  of  the  Psychodid  shown  in  Fig. 
23  has  such  a median  gular  suture,  and  is  therefore  not  very  like 
the  larva  of  the  Ptychopterid  shown  in  Fig.  17,  which  is  more  like 
the  Tanyderid  larva  (Fig.  6)  in  having  a distinct  basal  labial  scle- 


248  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


rite.  Some  larval  Leptocerid  Trichoptera  have  a distinct  basal 
labial  sclerite,  while  other  rather  closely  related  larvae  have  an 
overgrowth  of  this  region  resulting  in  the  formation  of  a single 
suture  in  this  region  (somewhat  as  in  the  larva  shown  in  Fig.  22), 
and  in  some  species  of  the  genus  Hydropsyche , for  example,  there 
are  two  gular  sutures  (with  a broader  sclerite  between)  while  in 
other  species  of  the  same  genus,  there  occurs  an  overgrowth  of 
the  gular  region  resulting  in  the  formation  of  a single  suture  in 
this  region,  so  that  this  feature  is  not  one  of  importance  in  indi- 
cating the  relationships,  or  lack  thereof,  between  the  Trichop- 
terous  larvae,  and  consequently  should  not  be  given  much  weight 
in  studying  the  affinities  of  Dipterous  larvae  either. 

The  paragular  region  pg  of  Figs.  6,  21,  and  15,  of  the  larva  of 
Protoplasa,  is  a very  unusual  structure,  and  resembles  the  sclerite 
I have  referred  to  as  the  paragula  in  a Hepialid  larva  (Fig.  31, 
PI.  4,  Vol.  19,  of  the  Annals  Entomological  Society  of  America 
for  1921)  though  the  region  labelled  pg  in  the  Protoplasa  larva 
may  possibly  be  connected  with  the  cardo.  The  region  labelled  st 
in  the  maxilla  of  Protoplasa  (Fig.  15)  is  probably  the  stipes, 
though  it  may  represent  the  distal  portion  of  the  stipes  ds  of  a 
Trichopteron  larva  (Fig.  22)  if  the  basal  region  of  the  stipes  is 
fused  with  the  sclerite  pg  in  Fig.  15.  The  lobe  labelled  m in  the 
maxilla  of  Protoplasa  (Fig.  15)  is  probably  largely  the  galea,  since 
the  galea  is  the  maxillary  lobe  best  developed  in  the  adult  Diptera, 
but  for  the  sake  of  convenience,  I shall  refer  to  it  simply  as  the 
“ mala,”  borrowing  this  usage  from  the  Coleopterists. 

In  the  Bibionid  larva  shown  in  Fig.  18,  both  the  “ mala  ” m and 
the  maxillary  palp  mp  are  borne  on  a region  traversed  by  a nar- 
row sclerite  labelled  ^ in  Fig.  18.  This  sclerite  may  be  a part  of 
the  cardo  (i.e.,  like  the  slender  cardine  sclerite  labelled  ca  in  the 
Neuropteron  larva  shown  in  Fig.  20),  but  I am  inclined  to  con- 
sider that  the  slender  sclerites  labelled  ^ in  the  Bibonid  larva  (Fig. 
18)  and  in  the  larva  of  Panorpa  also  (Fig.  19)  represent  the  slen- 
der sclerite  of  the  stipes  region  labelled  s in  the  Trichopteron  larva 
shown  in  Fig.  22 ; and  if  this  is  the  case,  the  cardo  is  obsolete  in 
the  larvae  shown  in  Figs.  18  and  19.  The  composition  of  the 
maxilla  of  the  Ptychopterid  larva  shown  in  Fig.  17  is  more  like 
that  of  the  Bibionid  larva  shown  in  Fig.  18,  than  it  is  like  the 
maxilla  of  Protoplasa  (Fig.  15)  or  a Psychodid  larva  either,  and 
the  maxillae  are  rather  disappointing  structures  for  studying  the 
affinities  of  Dipterous  larvae.  In  fact  the  mouthparts  in  general 


Dec.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  249 


do  not  furnish  the  clews  to  the  relationships  of  the  lower  Diptera, 
or  to  their  nearest  relatives  among  the  other  Holometabola,  that  I 
had  hoped  might  be  the  case.  I simply  cannot  understand  why  the 
mandibles  of  Proto plasa  (Fig.  3)  should  be  more  like  those  of  a 
Bibionid  (Fig.  5)  and  both  of  these  like  a Trichopteron  larva 
(Fig.  7)  when  by  all  the  adult  indications,  the  Bibionid  larva 
should  lead  back  to  an  Anisopodid  and  thence  back  to  a Tricho- 
cerid,  and  from  this  type  to  a Mecopteron,  but  the  Bibionid  man- 
dible (Fig.  5)  is  not  suggestive  of  that  of  a Trichocerid  (Fig.  4), 
though  the  Trichocerid  has  tufts  of  hair  suggestive  of  the  proto- 
type of  the  brush  h of  the  Bibionid  (but  not  in  the  right  position 
to  be  the  precursors  of  the  brush  b of  the  Bibionid),  and  the  Pro- 
to plasa  mandible  (Fig.  3)  is  not  like  the  Panorpa  mandible  shown 
in  Fig.  1.  In  referring  to  the  mandible  of  the  larva  of  Protoplasa 
(Fig.  3)  it  should  be  noted  that  one  of  the  seta  labelled  /,  has  be- 
come very  scale-like  (see  / of  Figs.  21  and  6 also),  and  is  a promi- 
nent feature  of  the  mandibular  surface  that  may  prove  to  be  of 
some  interest.  The  basal  labial  sclerite  gm  (Fig.  16)  is  rather 
peculiar,  and  the  narrow  transverse  sclerites  behind  it  appear  to 
be  connected  with  it  beneath  the  membranous  integument,  so  that 
although  at  first  sight  these  narrow  transverse  sclerites  appear  to 
represent  cervical  sclerites,  I am  more  inclined  to  regard  them  as 
portions  of  the  basal  labial  plate  gm  in  Protoplasa  (Figs.  16,  21 
and  6).  It  is  disappointing  that  the  true  labial  portion  of  the 
underlip,  bearing  the  labial  palpi,  etc.,  is  not  sufficiently  developed 
to  be  readily  detected  in  Protoplasa  since  I had  hoped  that  the 
larva  would  give  some  indication  of  the  development  of  the  labial 
palpi,  which  are  the  main  features  of  the  pupal  underlip  in  Proto- 
plasa. The  larva  of  the  Ptychopterid  shown  in  Fig.  17,  exhibits 
some  indications  of  the  development  of  the  labial  palpi  in  a rudi- 
mentary condition  (i.e.,  like  those  of  some  Trichopterous  larvae, 
such  as  the  one  shown  in  Fig.  22),  and  the  larval  Anisopodoids 
show  traces  of  the  labial  palpi,  but  none  of  the  Diptera  have  them 
as  well  developed  as  they  are  in  the  larva  of  Panorpa  (Fig.  19) 
or  in  certain  Trichopterous  larvae,  and  those  of  other  Holometa- 
bola. The  labium  of  the  Bibionid  larva  shown  in  Fig.  18,  bears 
latero-dorsal  extensions  ( le  of  Fig.  18)  which  are  directed  “ me- 
sad  ” and  are  hence  not  seen  from  the  exterior.  These  appear  to 
be  of  some  interest  for  the  interpretation  of  the  parts  of  the 
labium  in  lower  Diptera,  but  I have  not  as  yet  determined  their 
homologies  definitely,  since  I have  not  as  yet  been  able  to  obtain 


250  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


the  Trichopterous  larval  types  which  will  probably  aid  in  the  iden- 
tification of  these  structures  in  the  Diptera. 

In  examining  the  distribution  of  the  head  setae  in  the  larvae  of 
lower  Diptera  and  related  Holometabola,  it  is  noteworthy  that  in 
Protoplasa  (Fig.  13)  the  setae  near  the  frontal  sutures  fs  seem  to 
lie  laterad  of  these  sutures,  while  in  the  Bibionid  larva  shown  in 
Fig.  31,  and  in  the  larva  of  Panorpa  shown  in  Fig.  30,  the  setae 
near  the  frontal  sutures  fs  are  situated  within  (mesad  of)  these 
sutures,  and  in  the  larval  Trichoptera  this  seems  to  be  the  case 
also.  There  is  some  dispute  as  to  which  sclerites  of  the  larval  head 
represent  the  clypeal  region,  the  frontal  region,  etc.  (the  so-called 
adfrons  of  Lepidopterous  larvae  is  considered  by  Snodgrass  as  a 
frontal  region,  while  the  so-called  frons  of  these  larvae  is  inter- 
preted as  the  clypeus  by  him)  and  until  the  muscle  attachment  in 
these  regions  has  been  more  thoroughly  investigated  in  the  larvae 
of  lower  Diptera,  Mecoptera,  Trichoptera,  etc.,  and  until  more 
intermediate  types  of  larvae  have  been  compared  together,  it  will 
not  be  possible  to  determine  definitely  the  real  homologies  of  the 
sclerites  of  this  region  of  the  head,  so  that  a comparison  of  the 
setae  of  the  head  of  Protoplasa  with  those  of  other  larvae  (par- 
ticularly with  those  of  the  Lepidoptera)  can  be  more  advanta- 
geously studied  later.  I would  point  out  the  fact  that  the  “ fron- 
tal-pit setae  ” or  “ frontocaval  setae  ” [i.e., those  in  the  neighbor- 
hood of  the  frontal  pits  fp  (Figs.  13,  14,  12,  etc.)]  are  very  con- 
stant, and  may  be  of  especial  interest  in  a comparative  study  of 
the  setae  of  the  various  larvae.  The  setae  of  the  thoracic  region 
of  Protoplasa  will  be  compared  with  those  of  other  larvae  in  a 
later  paper,  but  I would  mention  at  this  time  the  pair  of  setae  in 
the  neck  or  presternal  area  just  behind  the  transverse  sclerites 
belonging  to  the  basal  labial  plate  (gm  of  Fig.  6),  and  also  the 
groups  of  ventral  setae  labelled  as  in  Fig.  6.  The  ambulatory 
setae  as  (usually  in  groups  of  three — occasionally  four)  may  mark 
the  region  homologous  with  the  legs  of  the  pupal  Protoplasa,  but 
this  is  mere  conjecture,  and  the  interpretation  of  the  areas  about 
these  setae  must  await  further  investigation. 

The  “ pseudopods  ” or  posterior,  leg-like  structures  of  the  lar- 
val Protoplasa  shown  in  Figs.  24  and  27  are  of  interest  because 
they  are  very  similar  to  those  of  a Chironomid  larva.  These 
posterior  “ pseudopods  ” of  Protoplasa  bear  gills,  labelled  gi  in 
Figs.  24  and  27,  but  the  most  interesting  features  are  the  sixteen 
lateral  setae  labelled  ^ in  Figs.  24  and  27,  and  the  seven  hooks 


Dec.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  251 


labelled  h in  Fig.  27.  When  the  muscles  attached  to  the  central 
region  (represented  by  a central  depression  near  the  tip  of  the 
pseudopod  in  Fig.  24)  contract,  the  lateral  setae  ^ are  drawn  to- 
gether, and  the  hooks  h of  Fig.  27  come  into  play.  I think  that 
these  hooks  and  setae  are  for  creeping  about,  although  the  fan- 
like arrangement  of  the  long  setae  (when  expanded)  suggests  a 
swimming  function  or  a structure  for  leaping  backward.  In  the 
two  types  of  Chironomid  larvae  shown  in  Figs.  25  and  26,  the 
hooks  h of  Fig.  25  are  replaced  by  the  seta-like  structures  s of 
Fig.  26  (all  of  these  setae  were  not  drawn),  and  this  suggests  that 
the  hooks  are  modified  setae  (or  vice  versa).  The  pseudopods  of 
the  larvae  of  Protoplasa  and  the  Chironomids  are  more  nearly 
alike  than  is  the  case  in  any  other  Dipterous  larvae  I have  seen, 
and  this  may  be  taken  to  indicate  that  the  Chironomids  were  de- 
rived from  Protoplasa- like  forebears,  but  I am  not  yet  ready  to 
give  up  the  idea  that  most  of  the  Nematocerous  Diptera  (other 
than  the  Psychodoids — Ptychopterids,  Tanyderids  and  Psychodids 
— and  the  Tipulids)  were  derived  from  Anisopus-like  ancestors 
leading  back  to  the  Tanyderidae,  although  it  must  be  admitted 
that  this  derivation  is  based  for  the  most  part  on  adult  characters 
alone  (but  a comparative  study  of  the  more  inclusive  groups,  such 
as  the  orders,  etc.,  has  indicated  that  the  adult  characters  are  the 
most  reliable  and  important). 

I have  not  been  able  to  determine  the  homologies  of  the  “ pseu- 
dopods ” of  Protoplasa  (Figs.  24  and  27)  although  Dr.  Alexander 
has  suggested  to  me  that  they  are  homodynamous  (serially  ho- 
mologous) with  the  crochet-bearing  abdominal  “ pseudopods  ” 
borne  on  abdominal  segments  three  to  seven  (inclusive)  in  the 
larva  of  the  Tipulid  Dicranota  described  by  Miall,  1893,  on  page 
235  of  the  Transactions  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  London 
for  1893.  These  “ pseudopods  ” are  strikingly  similar  to  those  of 
Lepidopterous  larvae,  and  are  probably  homologous  with  them, 
and  if  the  posterior  “ pseudopods  ” of  Protoplasa  are  homologous 
with  these,  the  posterior  “ pseudopods  ” of  Protoplasa  doubtless 
represent  the  larval  “ postpedes  ” of  caterpillars.  In  examining 
the  terminal  structures  of  a larval  Tipulid  such  as  Eriocera 
(Fig.  29)  it  occurred  to  me  that  the  ventral  pair  of  posterior 
processes,  which  bear  long  setae  as  shown  in  Fig.  29,  might  be 
homologous  with  the  posterior  “pseudopods  ” of  Protoplasa , and 
this  possibility  should  be  further  investigated  with  a view  to  bring- 
ing these  ventral  processes  with  their  setae,  into  line  with  the 


252  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  vol.  XXV 


posterior  “ pseudopods  ” of  Protoplasa  and  the  abdominal  “ pseu- 
dopods ” of  Dicranota.  There  are  also  protrusile,  seta-bearing 
structures  borne  at  the  end  of  the  abdomen  in  Psychodid  larvae, 
but  I do  not  think  that  these  can  be  brought  into  line  with  the 
other  structures  mentioned  above.  On  the  other  hand,  a sys- 
tematic study  of  the  terminal  abdominal  structures  of  larval  Dip- 
tera  should  lead  to  some  interesting  results,  and  would  apparently 
lend  support  to  the  view  that  Psychodid  larvae  (with  their  cylin- 
drical posterior  structures)  are  like  the  prototypes  of  the  larvae 
of  Dixids,  Culicids,  etc.,  and  on  this  account  would  be  of  consid- 
erable importance  from  the  standpoint  of  the  phylogenetic  ar- 
rangement of  the  Dipterous  families.  I am  hoping  to  be  able  to 
complete  my  series  of  larvae  illustrating  the  comparative  anatomy 
of  the  terminal  abdominal  structures  in  the  near  future. 

Abbreviations. 

a.  . . .Antenna. 

ac.  . .Anteclypeus  (anterior  region  of  clypeus). 
as.  . .Ambulatory  or  podal  setae. 

b.  . . .Brustia  or  gnathobrustia  (homologous  with  prostheca?). 

c.  . . .Coronal  suture  (stem  of  epicranial  suture), 
ca.  . .Cardo. 

ce.  . .Condyle  of  mandible  (gnathocondyle). 

cl.  . . Clypeal  sclerites  (clypeites). 

ds.  . .Dististipes  (distal  region  of  stipes). 

e.  . . .Eye,  larval  eyes. 

es. . . Epipharyngeal  brushes  (labrobrustia). 
ex.  . .Extensor  tendon  of  mandible. 

f . . . .Frons  or  front. 

fl.  . . .Flexor  tendon  of  mandible. 

fp... Frontal  pits  (frontocavae)  marking  position  of  anterior 
arms  of  tentorium. 

fs.  . . Frontal  sutures  (arms  of  epicranial  suture). 

g.  . . .Ginglymus. 
gi.  . . Gill. 

gm.  . Labial  sclerite  (gulamentum  or  postlabium), 
gu . . .Gula. 

h.  . . .Hooks  of  pseudopod. 

i.  . . . Incisors  of  mandible. 

1.  . . . Mandibular  scale  (gnatholepis). 
le.  . . Dorso-lateral  extension  of  labium. 

Ir.  . . Labrum. 

Ip.  . . Labial  palpi. 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  Vol.  XXV,  No.  5 


Plate  XV 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  Yol.  XXV,  No.  5 Plate  XYI 


Dec.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  255 


m.  . . Maxillary  mala  (galea), 
md.  . Mandible. 

mg.  . Midgular  or  epigular  suture. 

mp.  . Maxillary  palpus. 

pg.  . .Paragula  (postgena?). 

poc.  .Postclypeus  (posterior  region  of  clypeus). 

s.  . . .In  maxillary  region  denotes  stipital  sclerite  (transtipes). 

s.  . . .In  pseudopod  denotes  long  setae  (longisetae) . 
sm.  . Submentum. 

sp.  . . Spiracle, 
st.  . . Stipes. 

t.  . . . Tormae. 


Fig- 

I. 

Fig. 

2. 

Fig. 

3- 

Fig. 

4- 

Fig. 

5- 

Fig. 

6. 

Fig. 

7- 

Fig. 

8. 

Fig. 

9- 

Fig. 

IO. 

Fig. 

ii. 

Fig. 

12. 

Fig. 

13- 

Fig. 

14- 

Fig. 

i5- 

Fig. 

16. 

Fig. 

i7- 

Fig. 

18. 

Fig. 

19. 

Fig. 

20. 

Fig. 

21. 

Explanation  of  Plates  XV-XVIII. 

Anterior  view  of  sinistral  mandible  of  a larva  of  the 
Mecopteron  Panorpa. 

Posterior  view  of,  the  sinistral  mandible  of  the  larva  of 
Protoplasa. 

Anterior  view  of  same. 

Mandible  of  larval  Trichocerid. 

Mandible  of  larval  Bibionid. 

Ventral  view  of  head,  prothorax  and  mesothorax  of  a 
larval  Protoplasa. 

Mandible  of  larva  of  Phryganid  (Trichopteron) . 

Dorsal  view  of  anterior  region  of  head  of  Protoplasa , 
larva. 

Same  of  Psychodid  larva. 

Same  of  Ptychopterid  larva. 

Same  of  caddice  fly  larva. 

Same  of  Bibionid  larva. 

Dorsal  view  of  head,  prothorax  and  mesothorax  of 
Protoplasa  larva. 

Dorsal  view  of  anterior  region  of  head  of  Panorpa 
larva. 

Ventral  view  of  dextral  maxilla  of  Protoplasa  larva. 

Ventral  view  of  labial  sclerite  of  Protoplasa  larva. 

Ventral  view  of  dextral  maxilla  and  labium  of  Ptychop- 
terid larva. 

Ventral  view  of  dextral  maxilla,  labium  and  portion  of 
ventral  region  of  head  capsule  of  Bibionid  larva. 

Same  of  larval  Panorpa. 

Same  of  larval  Rhapidia  (Neuropteron) . 

Lateral  view  of  head,  prothorax  and  mesothorax  of 
larval  Protoplasa. 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  Vol.  XXV,  No.  5 


Plate  XVII 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  Yol.  XXV,  No.  5 


Plate  XYIII 


258  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


Fig. 

22. 

Fig. 

23- 

Fig. 

24. 

Fig. 

25- 

Fig. 

26. 

Fig. 

27. 

Fig. 

28. 

Fig. 

29. 

Fig. 

30. 

Fig. 

31- 

Fig. 

32. 

Fig. 

33- 

Ventral  view  of  dextral  maxilla,  labium  and  portion  of 
ventral  region  of  head  capsule  of  larval  caddice  fly. 

Ventral  view  of  median  portion  of  head  and  basal  por- 
tion of  labium  of  larval  Psychodid. 

Lateral  view  of  sinistral  “ pseudopod  ” (one  of  the 
“ postpedes  ”)  of  larval  Protoplasa. 

Pseudopod  of  one  type  of  Chironomid  larva. 

Pseudopod  of  another  type  of  Chironomid  larva. 

Mesal  view  of  sinistral  “ pseudopod  ” of  larval  Proto- 
plasa. 

Protrusile,  seta-bearing  posterior  appendage  of  Psy- 
chodid larva. 

A ventral  posterior  process  of  a larval  Eriocera. 

Frontal  view  of  head  of  larval  Panorpa. 

Frontal  view  of  dextral  half  of  head  of  larval  Bibionid. 

Ventral  view  of  dextral  maxilla  and  labium  of  larval 
Mecopteron  Boreus. 

Frontal  view  of  dextral  half  of  head  of  larval  Culicid. 


Dec.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  259 


THE  NAMES  OF  CERTAIN  RHYNCHOPHORA. 

By  J.  Chester  Bradley,  Cornell  University,  Ithaca,  N.  Y. 

Among  other  nomenclatorial  changes  that  it  has  seemed  neces- 
sary to  make  in  connection  with  the  preparation  of  a forthcoming 
Manual  of  the  genera  of  beetles  known  to  occur  in  America  north 
of  Mexico,  there  are  some  which  require  explanation.  These  are 
the  cases  which  I here  wish  to  discuss. 

The  Family  and  Subfamily  Names  of  the  Broad-nosed 

Weevils. 

Billberg,  1820,  by  the  use  of  the  name  Anthribides,  intended  to 
constitute  A nthrihus  the  type  genus  of  the  broad-nosed  weevils. 
But  Pierce,  T6,  has  shown  that  Anthrihus  Geoff roy,  1762,  is  not 
identifiable  as  a rhynchophorid  genus.  Consequently  it  is  not  avail- 
able as  type  genus  of  a family  of  weevils,  and  the  designation  of 
Billberg,  1820,  will  not  apply  to  the  beetles  under  consideration. 
So  far  as  I am  aware,  the  next  type  designation  was  by  Thomson 
in  1859.  This  author  divided  the  family  Anthrihidae  as  follows: 

I.  Subfamily  Urodontides. 

II.  Subfamily  Anthribides. 

a.  Tribe  Choragina. 

b.  Tribe  Brachytarsina. 

c.  Tribe  Anthribina. 

Although  Urodon  is  retained  in  the  family  “ Anthribidae  ” by 
Wolf  rum,  ’29  (Coleopterorum  Catalogus),  Dr.  Carl  Jordan,  ’24, 
has  shown  abundant  and  conclusive  evidence  for  removing  it  to 
the  Mylabridae.  It  therefore  may  be  ruled  out  as  a possible  type 
genus  for  the  broad-nosed  weevils. 

There  remain  the  Brachytarsina  of  which  the  type  genus  is 
Brachytarsus  Schonherr,  1826,  and  the  Choragina  of  which  the 
type  genus  is  Choragus  Kirby,  1818.  Each  of  these  genera  are 
to-day  recognized  as  valid  and  within  the  family.  Each  in  fact 
represents  a distinct  subfamily.  As  they  are  of  the  same  date,  the 
only  choice  between  them  is  by  page  precedence,  and  thereby  falls 
on  Choragus  and  the  family  name  will  be  Choragidae.  This  has 
the  advantage  of  not  being  an  unfamiliar  group  name,  Choragina 
having  been  used  after  Thomson  by  Fowler,  1890,  and  Choragini 
by  Bedel,  1882,  and  Reitter,  1916,  as  subtribe,  tribe  or  subfamily 
names. 


260  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


Doctor  Jordan,  ’06,  has  been  followed  by  Wolfrum,  ’29,  in 
using  Pleurocerinae  and  Anocerinae  for  the  names  of  the  two 
subfamilies.  But  these  are  descriptive  names,  not  based  on  a con- 
tained genus,  and  hence  unavailable  under  the  code.  On  basis  of 
the  facts  stated  in  the  preceding  paragraph,  Choraginae  becomes 
available  and  must  be  used  in  lieu  of  “ Anocerinae  ” and  Brachy- 
tarsinae  in  lieu  of  “ Pleurocerinae.” 

CHORAGIDAE. 

(Anthribidae  auctt.) 

( Platyrrhinidae  Bedel,  ’82;  Fowler,  1891,  1892;  Everts, 
’°3) 

( Platystomidae  and  Choragidae  Pierce,  T6) 

(Platystomidae  Leng,  ’19) 

a.  Subfamily  Brachytarsinae. 

(Tribe  Brachytarsina  Thomson,  ’59) 

(Pleurocerinae  Jordan,  ’06;  Wolfrum,  ’29) 

(Anthribides  pleuroceres  Lacordaire,  ’66) 

(Anthribini  Seidlitz,  ’91  ; Reitter,  T6) 

(Tropiderini  and  Anthribini  Leng,  T9) 

b.  Subfamily  Choraginae 

(Tribe  Choragina  Thomson,  ’59) 

(Anocerinae  Jordan,  ’06;  Wolfrum,  ’29) 

(Anthribides  anoceres  Lacordaire,  T>6) 

(Choragini  Bedel,  ’82;  Reitter,  T6) 

(Araeocerini  Seidlitz,  ’91) 

(Araeocerini  and  Xenorchestini  Leng,  T9) 

The  Rhinomacerinae,  Rhynchitinae  and  Attelabinae. 

Voss,  ’22,  has  united  the  first  two  subfamilies  under  the  name 
of  Rhynchitinae.  This  subfamily  he  divides  into  four  tribes:  1. 
Rhinomacerini,  2.  Allocorynini,  3.  Auletini,  4.  Rhynchitini. 

Des  Gozis  (Bull.  Soc.  Ent.  de  France,  1881,  p.  cxii)  drew  at- 
tention to  the  fact  that  Rhinomacer  Fabr.,  1787,  is  a homonyn  of 
Rhinomacer  Geoffroy,  1762,  and  proposed  Cimheris  as  a substi- 
tute name.  Pierce,  T6,  accepts  Cimheris  as  the  valid  name  of  the 
genus.  But  in  dealing  with  the  higher  group  names  based  on 
Rhinomacer , he  has  without  warrant  changed  the  type  genus  from 
Rhinomacer  Fabr.,  1787,  to  Doydirhynchus  Dejean,  1821.  It  is, 
however,  necessary  to  retain  the  original  type  genus,  and  under 
Art.  5 of  the  Code,  to  change  the  higher  group  names  to  corre- 
spond to  the  change  in  the  genus  name  (which  is  a very  different 


Dec.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  261 


matter  from  changing  the  genus).  Rhinomacerini  thus  becomes 
Cimberini,  and  Rhinomacerinae  becomes  Cimberinae. 

If  we  unite  the  two  subfamilies,  as  Voss  has  done,  then  we 
must  do  so  under  the  name  Cimberinae,  because  the  group  dates 
back  to  Leach,  1817  (Rhinomaceridae),  whereas  Rhynchites  was 
not  made  type  of  a higher  group  until  by  Thomson  in  1859. 

CURCULIONIDAE. 

Subfamily  Cimberinae. 

(Rhinomacerinae  auctt.) 

(Doydirhynchoidea  Pierce,  T6,  and  Attelaboidea, 
in  part,  Pierce,  T6) 

Tribe  Cimberini. 

(Rhinomacerini  auctt.) 

Doydirhynchoidea,  in  part,  Pierce,  T6) 

The  Tribes  Ceutorhynchini  and  Cryptorhynchini. 

Pierce,  T9,  has  shown  that  Cryptorhynchus  Schonherr,  1826, 
is  preoccupied  by  Cryptorhynchus  Illiger,  1807.  The  latter  is  the 
genus  of  the  tribe  Ceutorhynchini  called  Rhinoncus  in  Leng’s 
Catalogue.  On  this  account,  and  since  Cryptorhynchus  Illiger, 
1807,  is  the  oldest  genus  in  the  tribe,  Pierce  instead  of  using  the 
name  Ceutorhynchidae  for  the  including  group,  which  he  terms 
family,  uses  Cryptorhynchidae.  This  course  seems  to  be  unneces- 
sary. The  genus  contained  within  the  limits  that  we  assign  to  the 
tribe  which  was  first  made  a type  genus  for  a tribe  or  higher  group 
was,  so  far  as  I am  aware,  Ceutorhynchus,  which  was  used  by 
Thomson  in  1859  for  his  group  Ceutorhynchides.  Ceutorhynchini 
is  therefore,  in  my  view,  the  acceptable  tribal  name. 

Since  the  type  genus  of  Cryptorhynchini  (in  the  sense  used  in 
Leng’s  Catalog)  is  a homonym,  under  Art.  5 of  the  Code  we  must 
change  the  name  of  that  tribe.  The  type  genus  remains  the  same, 
and  the  tribe  changes  its  name  to  correspond  to  the  new  name  of 
the  type  genus — in  this  case  Cryptorhynchidius  Pierce. 

Ceutorhynchini  auctt.  remains  Ceutorhynchini. 
Cryptorhynchini  auctt.  becomes  Cryptorhynchidiini,  type 
Cryptorhynchidius  Pierce  = Cryptorhynchus  Schonherr, 
1826,  nec  Illiger,  1807. 

The  Correct  Generic  Name  of  Pantomorus  godmani  Crotch. 

On  page  47  to  the  Supplement  to  Leng’s  Catalogue  of  the  Cole- 
optera  of  America  north  of  Mexico,  Pantomorus  godmani  Crotch 


262  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxr 


is  transferred  to  Asynonychus  which  is  there  ascribed  to  Cham- 
pion, Entomologists’  Monthly  Magazine,  vol.  58,  p.  162,  1922. 

Asynonychus  was  described  by  Crotch,  ’67,  not  by  Champion. 
Champion  used  Pantomorus  and  meant  to  refer  to  Asynonychus 
Crotch  as  a synonym.  Leng’s  number  16659,  godmani  Crotch, 
must  therefore  be  restored  to  Pantomorus. 


NOTICE. 

Entomologica  Americana. 

As  volume  XI  of  Entomologica  Americana  we  are  publish- 
ing a very  full  monograph  by  Dr.  A.  G.  Boving  and  Dr.  F.  C. 
Craighead,  on  certain  beetle  larvae,  under  the  title  “ An  Illustrated 
Synopsis  of  the  Principal  Larval  Forms  of  the  Order  Coleoptera.” 
It  will  consist  of  125  (more  or  less)  line  plates  of  the  larvae  and 
their  structural  details,  with  complete  explanations.  It  is  without 
doubt  a very  extensive,  and,  we  believe,  very  full  work  on  these 
immature  forms.  The  names  of  the  authors  are  a guarantee  of 
this.  It  represents  the  accumulated  labors  of  years  of  Dr.  Boving 
and  Dr.  Craighead,  dating  from  1915. 

This  volume  of  Entomologica  Americana  will  not  be  sold  as 
a single  volume,  but  only  to  subscribers  to  the  whole  series  of  our 
publication,  at  our  stated  subscription  price  of  $4  per  volume. 

However,  to  meet  any  outside  demand  that  may  arise  for  this 
important  work,  we  will  have  on  hand  a limited  supply  of  reprints 
which  will  be  for  sale  separately.  For  advance  orders  before  pub- 
lication, we  have  fixed  a price  of  $5  per  copy,  unbound;  and  $6 
per  copy,  bound ; postpaid.  Orders  will  be  filled  at  prepublication 
prices  up  to  the  date  of  issue  for  March,  1931 — no.  4,  volume  XI 
— of  Entomologica  Americana,  which  will  contain  the  conclud- 
ing part  of  the  monograph  and  also  the  index.  Deliveries  of  the 
complete  work  will  be  made  shortly  after  the  issue  of  no.  4,  vol. 
XI. 

Those  interested  in  this  important  work  should  send  in  their 
orders  promptly  to 

Librarian,  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society, 

28  Clubway,  Hartsdale,  N.  Y., 
accompanied  by  Check  in  full. 


Dec.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  263 


NOTES  ON  TEXAS  BEES 

By  H.  B.  Parks,  San  Antonio,  Texas. 

Lithurgus. 

During  the  spring  of  1928  Mr.  Geo.  P.  Engelhardt,  of  the 
Brooklyn  Museum,  visited  this  Laboratory.  While  here  he  ex- 
amined the  local  collection  of  Hymenoptera  and  suggested  that  he 
take  a selection  from  the  group  to  Dr.  Herbert  F.  Schwarz,  of  the 
American  Museum  of  Natural  History,  for  identification.  Under 
the  date  of  Dec.  11,  1928,  Dr.  Schwarz  writes,  that  among  the 
bees  sent  is  one  male  of  Lithurgus  bruesi  Mitchell,  a bee  just  de- 
scribed by  Dr.  Theo.  B.  Mitchell,  and  as  the  female  is  unknown  it 
would  be  well  to  collect  all  of  the  species  seen. 

On  the  advice  of  Dr.  Schwarz,  the  Megachile  in  the  collection 
here  were  sent  to  Dr.  Mitchell  for  determination.  In  giving  the 
names  of  the  bees  sent,  he  writes  on  February  5,  1930: 

“ The  most  interesting  specimen  in  the  lot  is  the  male  of 
Lithurgus.  It  so  happens  that  there  was  also  a single  male  of  this 
same  species  in  the  lot  which  you  sent  me  previously,  and  these 
two  are  the  only  specimens  other  than  the  type  which  I have  seen. 
The  type  was  collected  at  Austin  by  Professor  Brues  for  whom  I 
named  it.  This  may  possibly  be  the  long-tongued  Megachilid  you 
mentioned  seeing  among  your  specimens,  as  the  tongue  of  Lithur- 
gus is  extremely  long/’ 

Accompanying  Dr.  Mitchell’s  original  description  of  L.  bruesi 
M.  is  this  note. 

“Type:  Male  (Type  No.  15710,  Mus.  Com.  Zook);  Austin, 
Texas  (C.  T.  Brues  collector).” 

According  to  this  information  there  were  on  February  5,  1930, 
the  followwing  known  specimens  of  L.  bruesi: 

1.  The  type. 

2.  A specimen  collected  at  the  Laboratory,  but  in  the  collection 
of  Dr.  Mitchell. 

3.  Two  specimens,  one  identified  by  Schwarz  and  one  by 
Mitchell  in  the  collection  here.  The  type  and  the  two  specimens 
here  bear  no  date,  the  one  in  the  Mitchell  collection  has  a date  of 
April  27,  1929.  All  specimens  are  males. 

This  information  was  the  incentive  for  an  intensive,  prolonged, 
but  successful  search.  The  local  collections  of  insects  as  well  as 


264  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


those  at  the  University  of  Texas  and  A.  & M.  College  furnished 
no  other  specimens.  Dr.  Mitchell  suggested  that  as  Lithurgus 
gibhosus  was  found  on  cactus  flowers,  L.  bruesi  also  might  be 
found  there.  A review  of  the  literature  showed  that  Cresson  re- 
ported three  species,  Lithurgus  gibbosus  Sm.,  L.  compressus  Sm., 
and  L.  apicalis  Cress,  from  Texas,  yet  no  species  of  Lithurgus  is 
listed  in  “Hymenoptera  Texana,”  the  bulk  of  whose  mentioned 
species  were  collected  in  this  part  of  Texas.  It  was  therefore  ap- 
parent that  there  were  two  species  to  look  for. 

The  first  of  the  cacti  comes  into  bloom  here  about  March  ist, 
and  a succession  of  species  furnish  continued  bloom  until  June 
15th.  Preparation  was  made  to  collect  specimens  of  all  insects 
visiting  the  cacti  blooms  during  the  spring  of  1930.  The  spring 
was  backward.  The  weather  report  shows  that  the  temperature 
was  much  below  normal  and  the  number  of  cloudy  days  as  well  as 
the  number  on  which  rain  fell  much  above  normal.  Nevertheless, 
the  rainfall  was  far  below  normal.  All  these  conditions  were  ad- 
verse to  bees  and  cacti,  both  of  which  like  hot  sunshine  and  lots 
of  it. 

Although  many  bees  were  captured  Lithurgus  was  not  found 
until  May  12th,  when  Opuntia  lindheimeri,  our  most  numerous 
cactus,  was  at  the  end  of  its  bloom.  The  final  count  of  its  insect 
visitors  was  being  made  to  get  the  per  cent,  of  Apis  mellifca  L., 
when  late  in  the  afternoon  a number  of  specimens  of  Lithurgus 
were  captured.  The  next  day  no  0.  lindheimeri  flowers  opened, 
but  Lithurgus  was  discovered  collecting  pollen  on  Opuntia  ellisi- 
ana,  the  cultivated  spineless  cactus.  The  afternoon  of  the  same 
day  this  bee  was  caught  sucking  nectar  from  Monarda  and  Vitex. 
All  species  of  plants  in  bloom  were  watched  and  all-day  observa- 
tions made.  No  new  food  plants  were  found.  The  last  Lithurgus 
was  seen  on  June  4th,  the  same  day  O.  ellisiana  dropped  its  last 
bloom. 

Table  1 gives  the  list  of  plants  observed,  their  blooming  dates, 
and  number  of  species  of  insect  visitors. 

Table  2 the  dates  of  capture  of  Lithurgus  and  the  numbers  of 
each  sex. 

Table  3 the  dates  of  blooming  and  capture  of  Lithurgus. 

As  soon  as  a series  of  Lithurgus  was  collected  it  was  easily  seen 
that  there  were  at  least  two  and  perhaps  more  species  or  forms 


Dec.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  265 


present.  A selection  sent  to  Dr.  Mitchell  confirmed  this  belief,  as 
L.  gibbosus  composed  about  half  the  material  and  L.  bruesi  the 
remainder.  L.  compressus  was  thought  to  be  present  and  was,  as 
Dr.  Mitchell  writes  that  this  is  a synonym  for  the  male  of  gib- 
bosus. Thus  in  this  intensive  search  two  species,  one  not  taken 
before,  at  this  Laboratory,  and  the  unknown  female  of  bruesi  have 
been  found. 

The  general  appearance  of  the  two  species  is  so  close  that  it  is 
impossible  to  tell  them  apart  on  the  flowers.  The  female  on  alight- 
ing in  a cactus  flower  rests  on  the  stamens  for  an  interval  then 
pushes  her  head  against  the  pistil  column  and  goes  down  to  the 
nectary  at  the  base.  While  in  this  position  the  legs  and  plates  of 
the  abdomen  are  worked  combing  out  the  pollen.  While  thus  oc- 
cupied the  bees  are  easily  captured  by  placing  the  killing  bottle 
over  the  flower.  In  the  series  secured  this  spring  the  net  was 
never  used  on  cactus  flowers.  The  male  will  alight  on  the  cactus 
flowers,  go  around  the  pistil  looking  for  a female,  and  if  none  is 
present  will  clasp  the  pistil  column,  head  up  and  remain  motion- 
less for  several  minutes.  They  too  are  most  easily  taken  by  plac- 
ing the  bottle  over  them.  The  pollen  of  cactus  is  mostly  gone  by 
noon  and  the  flowers  close  early.  None  or  very  few  Lithurgus 
were  taken  on  cactus  after  12 : 00  noon. 

In  the  afternoon  both  males  and  females  collected  nectar  on 
Monarda  and  Vitex.  On  these  plants  they  were  very  wild  and 
hard  to  catch.  From  the  large  amount  of  pollen  collected,  nests 
must  have  occurred  in  the  vicinity  but  a detailed  search  failed  to 
find  them.  These  bees  fly  very  rapidly  and  could  not  be  “coursed” 
like  honey  bees. 

Owing  to  the  fact  that  seven  years  of  collecting  here  produced 
only  four  males  of  this  genus  and  that  no  specimens  could  be 
found  in  nearby  Texas  collections,  and  that  this  year,  in  three 
weeks’  time,  one  hundred  and  twenty-nine  specimens  representing 
two  species  including  the  undescribed  female  of  L.  bruesi  Mitchell 
were  taken,  leads  to  the  conclusion,  supported  by  other  evidence, 
that  certain  insects  are  governed  in  their  life  activities  by  peculiar 
optimum  weather  conditions,  so  that  when  this  condition  exists 
they  are  present.  When  the  condition  does  not  exist  they  continue 
in  the  pupal  stage  until  the  reoccurrence  of  this  condition,  be  it 
one  or  many  years. 


266  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  V61.XXV 


TABLE  I. 


List  of  Plants  Observed,  Blooming  Dates  and  Insect  Visitors. 


•pi , In  Bloom — 

riant  Out  of  Bloom 

No.  Species  of 
Insect  Visitors 

Mamillaria  heyderi  Muhleuff  . . March  25- April  10 
Echino cactus  texensis  Hoepf.  . . . April  10-April  17 
Echino cactus  caespitosus  Engl. 

and  Gray  April  10-April  16 

Opuntia  macrorhiza  Engelm.  . . . April  25^May  10 
Opuntia  lindheimeri  Engelm.  . . . April  15-May  12 

Opuntia  leptocaulis  D.  C Mayi4-Junei5 

Opuntia  ellisiana  Griff Mayi3-June4 

Echinocactus  setispinus  Engelm.  Junei-June4 

Monarda  punctata  L April  iG-May  23 

Monarda  citriodora  Cerv April  16-May  23 

Vitex  negundo  incisa April  20-June  5 

5 

6 

2 

8 

8 including  Lithurgus 

5. 

7 including  Lithurgus 

4 

10 

10 

18 

TABLE  II. 

Distribution,  Percent  of  Sex,  and  Weather  Relation. 


Lithurgus  gibbosus  Sm. 

Lithurgus  bruesi  Mitchell 

Date 

$ 

$ 

$ 

5 

Total 

Weather 

May  12 

1 

7 

2 

3 

13 

Cloudy 

13 

2 

2 

1 

5 

Cloudy 

14 

2 

5 

2 

9 

Cloudy 

15 

6 

5 

1 

1 

13 

Part  Cloudy 

16 

1 

4 

5 

Cloudy 

1 7 

Cloudy,  Rain 

18 

Part  Cloudy,  Rain 

19 

1 

4 

3 

8 

Clear 

20 

4 

9 

13 

Clear 

21 

Part  Cloudy 

22 

5 

1 

12 

2 

20 

Clear 

23 

2 

2 

Part  Cloudy 

24 

2 

1 

3 

Part  Cloudy 

25 

1 

1 

Clear 

26 

11 

1 

1 

13 

Clear 

27 

6 

4 

10 

Part  Cloudy 

28 

Rain,  Cloudy 

29 

1 

1 

2 

Cloudy 

30 

2 

2 

Part  Cloudy 

3i 

4 

3 

7 

Cloudy 

June  1 

1 

1 

2 

Clear 

2 

Part  Cloudy 

3 

Clear 

4 

1 

1 

Part  Cloudy 

129 

Dec.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  267 


s 


*-> 

3 s. 

HO 


a>  d 

M 6 

o 


n? 
aJ  oS 


53  y=j  , 


O 


Oh  V 

o 


3 

-g 

E aP 


03 

rt  "tj  O 

-S  i3  £ 

u o . 
c 3 Cj_J 

e 

o q, 


a 

u 

£> 
.2  & 
hU 


Vitex 

negundo  j? 

incisa 

No.  Lithurgus  ...  i i 2 i i 

* Opuntia  leptocaules  D.  C.  is  carried  in  this  table  because  it  was  in  bloom  during  the  flight  of  Lithurgus,  but  no  specimens 
were  seen  on  this  plant. 


268  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


NOTES  ON  AMERICAN  TINGITIDAE  (HEMIPTERA). 

By  Carl  J.  Drake,  Ames,  Iowa. 

Further  study  of  collections  of  American  Tingitidae  has  made 
it  necessary  to  erect  two  new  genera,  describe  two  new  species, 
rename  one  species,  and  suppress  two  species  as  synonyms.  The 
descriptions  and  notes  on  the  homonym  and  synonyms  are  given 
below. 

Acalypta  duryi  n.  name. 

This  name  is  proposed  for  Acalypta  (—  Drakella  Bergroth 
= Fenestrella  Osborn  and  Drake)  ovata  Osborn  and  Drake,  the 
specific  name  of  ovata  being  preoccupied  and  a homonym  in  the 
genus  Acalypta  Stab  As  yet  this  species  has  been  recorded  only 
from  the  type  locality,  Cincinnati,  Ohio ; it  is  represented  by  three 
brachypterous.  specimens,  collected  by  Mr.  Chas.  Dury. 

Acalypta  saundersi  (Downes). 

Many  brachypterous  examples,  Puyallup,  Washington,  March, 
1929,  collected  on  moss,  by  Mr.  Wm.  W.  Baker.  Up  to  the  pres- 
ent time  this  remarkable  species  has  been  known  only  from  a 
brachypterous  female,  holotype,  Goldstream,  B.  C.,  collected  in  a 
low  marsh  area  by  Mr.  L.  G.  Saunders.  Male  a little  more  slen- 
der than  the  female ; claspers  large  and  strongly  curved ; other 
characters  very  similar  to  female.  It  is  most  closely  allied  to  the 
foregoing  species,  A.  duryi  Drake,  but  very  distinct  as  pointed  out 
by  Downes  in  his  original  description.  Allotype,  brachypterous 
male,  Puyallup,  Wash.,  in  writer’s  collection.  The  long-winged 
form  is  unknown. 

Corythaica  bellula  Bueno. 

Corythaica  bellula  Bueno,  Bull.  Brookl.  Ent.  Soc.,  XII,  1917, 
p.  19. 

Corythaica  bellula  Blatchley,  Heter.  East.  N.  A.,  1926,  p.  471. 

Corythaica  floridana  Blatchley,  Heter.  East.  N.  A.,  p.  471. 

The  holotype  (brachypterous)  in  Blatchley’s  collection  has  been 
examined.  It  is  identical  with  similar  winged  forms  of  bellula 
from  New  York  and  should  be  treated  as  a synonym  of  Bueno’s 
species.  Bellula,  as  represented  by  brachypterous  and  macrop- 
terous  specimens,  shows  a considerable  variation  in  size  and  color. 
Through  the  kindness  of  J.  R.  de  la  Torre-Bueno  and  Chris. 


Dec.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  269 


Olsen  many  specimens,  including  the  types  of  hellula,  have  been 
studied.  The  species  of  Corythaica  are  greatly  confused  in  the 
literature,  especially  the  species  occurring  in  the  West  Indies  and 
South  America. 

Melanorhopala  clavata  Sta. 

Melanorhopala  clavata  Stal,  Enum.  Hemip.,- in,  1873,  p.  130. 

Melanorhopala  lurida  Stal,  Enum.  Hemip.,  111,  1873,  p.  13 1. 

Melanorhopala  uniformis  Stal,  Enum.  Hemip.,  111,  1873,  p. 
I3i- 

Melanorhopala  obscura  Parshley,  Psyche,  XXIII,  1916,  p. 
167. 

Melanorhopala  reflexa  Blatchley,  Heter.  East.  N.  A.,  1924, 
p.  492. 

Melanorhopala  clavata  Blatchley,  Heter.  East.  N.  A.,  1926, 
p.  492. 

Melanorhopala  clavata  Drake,  Ann.  Carn.  Mus.,  XVI,  1926, 
p.  377,  pi.  XXIV,  figs,  a,  b , c. 

The  holotype  of  reflexa  in  the  Blatchley  collection  has  been  ex- 
amined, and  without  a doubt  it  represents  an  extremely  long- 
winged form  of  clavata.  Sexual  dimorphism  of  the  antennae  and 
pterygopolymorphism  cause  marked  changes  in  general  appear- 
ance, size  and  modification  of  certain  structures.  Macropterous 
individuals  are  represented  by  long-winged  and  extremely  long- 
winged individuals,  the  latter  being  very  rare  in  collections  and 
identical  with  the  form  described  by  Blatchley  as  reflexa.  The 
three  different  types  of  wings  are  represented  in  a long  series  of 
specimens  collected  on  weeds  near  Chicago,  Illinois,  by  Mr.  Wil- 
liam J.  Gerhard.  The  writer  has  also  collected  this  form  in  the 
prairies  at  Ames,  Iowa.  However,  most  series  of  specimens  con- 
tain but  two  forms,  either  the  short-  or  the  usual  type  of  long- 
winged individuals.  The  third  segment  of  the  antennae  is  slightly 
clavate  in  the  male  and  strongly  clavate  in  the  female.  In  the 
latter  the  fourth  segment  is  also  thicker  at  the  base.  In  the 
brachypterous  specimens  the  elytra  are  acute  posteriorly  with  their 
tips  distinctly  separated. 

Allotingis  n.  gen. 

Head  short,  distinctly  tumid  above,  with  the  three  frontal 

spines  arranged  as  in  related  genera.  Bucculae  broad,  long, 

contiguous  in  front,  extending  anteriorly  in  front  of  head. 


270  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


Coxae  widely  separated;  rostral  laminae  not  strongly  devel- 
oped, almost  cariniform;  rostral  channel  broad,  uninter- 
rupted ; rostrum  extending  on  the  mesosternum.  Antennae 
long,  slender,  widely  separated  at  base ; segment  I very  long, 
longer  than  head,  a little  stouter  than  II ; III  very  slender, 
rather  long.  Antenniferous  tubercles  very  long,  slender. 

Pronotum  moderatly  swollen,  finely  and  closely  pitted,  uni- 
carinate;  posterior  projection  short  and  rounded;  collum 
long,  conspicuous;  paranota  reticulate,  expanded  laterally, 
projecting  anteriorly  beyond  collum.  Elytra  about  one-third 
longer  than  abdomen ; not  overlapping,  meeting  in  an  almost 
straight  (very  slightly  rounded)  line  along  the  median  line  of 
abdomen ; areolae  moderately  large,  hyaline ; discoidal  and 
sutural  areas  not  very  clearly  differentiated;  costal  and  sub- 
costal distinct.  Wings  greatly  reduced  or  wanting. 

Type  of  genus,  Leptobyrsa  binotata  Drake  and  Bruner,  from 
Cuba.  This  genus  is  most  closely  allied  to  Leptobyrsa  Stal,  but 
differs  from  it  in  the  characters  of  bucculae,  collum,  pronotum, 
shorter  and  more  closely  reticulated  elytra,  and  longer  basal  seg- 
ment of  antennae.  The  bucculae  project  very  strongly  obliquely 
forward  and  downward  from  the  base  of  the  tylus,  thus  extend- 
ing considerably  in  front  of  the  head.  The  male  genital  characters 
are  also  quite  different. 


Liotingis  n.  gen. 

Pronotum  closely  and  finely  pitted,  slightly  swollen, 
strongly  narrowed  in  front,  tricarinate.  Collum  very  large, 
distinctly  marked  off,  finely  reticulate.  Paranota  projecting 
almost  laterally,  scarcely  reflexed,  extending  anteriorly  a little 
beyond  collum.  Antennae  long,  slender ; segment  I long,  con- 
siderably thickened,  longer  than  head,  the  second  segment 
very  short;  III  very  long,  slender;  IV  long  and  slender.  An- 
tenniferous tubercles  very  long,  slender,  straight ; divaricat- 
ing, spine-like  in  appearance.  Head  short,  with  five  spines. 
Bucculae  large,  closed  in  front  not  extending  anteriorly  in 
front  of  head ; rostral  channel  uninterrupted,  open  behind, 
the  laminae  widely  separated  on  mesosternum.  Orifice  indis- 
tinct. Legs  long  and  slender.  Elytra  considerably  longer 
than  abdomen,  overlapping,  the  areas  distinctly  marked  off ; 
discoidal  area  reaching  to  middle  of  elytra.  Wings  present. 

Genotype,  Liotingis  evidentis  n.  sp.,  from  Brazil.  This  genus 
belongs  to  the  distinctly  lacy  group  of  Tingitidae.  It  is  perhaps 


Dec.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  271 


most  closely  related  to  the  genus  Allotingis  Drake,  but  readily 
separated  from  it  by  the  extremely  long,  divaricating,  spine-like 
antenniferous  tubercles,  the  overlapping  elytra,  and  character  of 
the  bucculae.  The  antenniferous  tubercles  separate  Liotingis 
from  Leptopharsa  Stal  and  other  closely  related  genera. 

Liotingis  evidentis  n.  sp. 

Moderately  large,  almost  flat  in  appearance,  testaceous,  the 
head  and  body  brown.  Antennae  very  long,  slender,  with 
long  bristle-like  hairs ; segment  I very  long,  brown,  moder- 
ately swollen,  thickest  near  the  middle,  between  four  and  five 
times  as  long  as  two ; III  long,  slender,  slightly  curved,  testa- 
ceous, about  three  and  one-half  times  as  long  as  four;  IV 
very  long,  slightly  enlarged,  mostly  black.  Rostrum  extending 
to  middle  of  mesosternum.  Antenniferous  tubercles  very  long, 
rather  sharp,  spine-like,  divergent.  Head  with  five  sharp 
spines;  anterior  pair  long,  directed  anteriorly,  contiguous  at 
apex ; median  short,  slender,  not  prominent ; posterior  pair 
longest,  directed  forward,  contiguous  with  head,  extending 
to  base  of  anterior  pair.  Eyes  small,  transverse,  brown. 

Collum  very  large,  reticulate,  subtruncate  in  front,  slightly 
raised  in  the  middle.  Paranota  moderately  broad,  almost  rec- 
tilinear, uniseriate  along  humeri,  bi-triseriate  in  front,  acutely 
produced  in  front  and  extending  to  middle  of  eyes ; outer 
margins  almost  straight,  converging  anteriorly.  Carinae  in- 
distinctly areolate;  median  slightly  more  elevated  and  more 
strongly  raised  on  collum ; lateral  ending  anteriorly  at  collum, 
parallel.  Elytra  about  one-third  longer  than  abdomen, 
broadly  rounded  behind,  the  tips  separated;  discoidal  and 
sutural  area  slightly  and  jointly  elevated;  costal  area  broad, 
biseriate  at  base,  triseriate  at  widest  part,  the  areolae  not  very 
regularly  arranged;  subcostal  area  rather  narrow,  uniseriate, 
strongly  sloping  obliquely  downward;  discoidal  area  large, 
almost  elongate-elliptical,  narrow  at  both  ends,  with  four  rows 
of  areolae  at  its  widest  part,  with  a black-fuscous  spot  a little 
behind  the  middle  on  the  costate  nervure  forming  outer 
boundary.  The  margins  of  elytra,  paranota,  carinae,  and  en- 
larged nervures  marking  off  areas  of  elytra  indistinctly  ser- 
rate. Wings  a little  longer  than  abdomen,  faintly  clouded. 
Legs  long,  slender,  testaceous.  Length  2.97  mm.;  width  1.29 
mm. 

Holotype,  female,  Minas  Geraes,  Brazil,  in  collection  of  writer. 


272  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


Leptopharsa  lenatis  n.  sp. 

Elongate,  fuscous-black.  Antennae  and  legs  dark  fuscous- 
black,  somewhat  polished ; areolae  of  hood  and  sutural  and 
discoidal  areas  clouded  with  fuscous;  those  of  paranota, 
carinae,  and  costal  and  subcostal  areas  translucent.  Head 
black,  with  five  rather  long,  slender,  dark  brown  spines,  the 
median  longest.  Antennae  long,  slender,  indistinctly  pilose; 
segment  I rather  long,  slightly  curved,  considerably  swollen, 
two  and  a half  times  as  long  as  two,  the  latter  shorter  and 
slenderer;  III  very  long,  three  times  as  long  as  four;  IV 
long,  slightly  swollen,  pilose,  considerably  longer  than  one 
and  two  taken  together.  Bucculae  black,  margined  with  tes- 
taceous, closed  in  front.  Rostrum  long,  brownish,  extending 
to  the  end  of  metasternum.  Rostral  laminae  strongly  devel- 
oped, reticulate,  mostly  testaceous,  open  at  apex.  Body  be- 
neath black. 

Pronotum  strongly  narrowed  anteriorly,  coarsely  pitted, 
reticulate  behind,  tricarinate.  Carinae  strongly  foliaceous, 
each  composed  of  one  row  of  large  areolae ; lateral  carinae 
parallel,  rounded  above,  long,  not  touching  sides  of  hood ; 
median  more  strongly  elevated,  abruptly  raised  a little  behind 
the  hood.  Paranota  moderately  broad,  biseriate,  strongly  re- 
curved, the  areolae  rather  large.  Hood  moderately  large, 
projecting  slightly  over  base  of  head,  sub-globose.  Elytra 
considerably  longer  than  abdomen,  rounded  behind,  widest  a 
little  behind  the  base ; their  tips  not  separated  when  at  rest ; 
costal  area  rather  broad,  mostly  biseriate,  triseriate  at  widest 
part ; subcostal  area  broad,  almost  vertical,  bi-triseriate ; dis- 
coidal area  large,  widest  near  middle,  the  outer  nervure  cos- 
tate and  strongly  raised,  narrowed  behind.  Wings  longer 
than  abdomen,  somewhat  clouded.  Legs  long,  slender,  pol- 
ished. Length,  4.24  mm.;  width,  1.41  mm. 

Holotype,  female,  Peru,  S.  A.,  in  writer’s  collection.  Paratype, 
female,  Santarem,  Brazil,  Carnegie  Museum;  is  a little  lighter  in 
color  than  the  type.  Differs  from  L.  peruensis  Drake  and  dis- 
tinconis  Drake  in  color,  position  of  elytra  when  at  rest  and  several 
structural  characters  as  noted  in  descriptions. 


Dec.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  273 


A MELANIC  FORM  OF  TELEA  POLYPHEMUS. 

By  C.  Wm.  Wurster,  New  York,  N.  Y. 

The  specimen  of  Telea  polyphemus  (Cramer),  described  here 
as  a new  aberration,  differs  from  the  normal  in  having  a large 
portion  of  the  ground  color  of  all  the  wings,  above  and  below, 
black  or  blackish. 

Telea  polyphemus  ab.  fumosus  n.  ab.  (PL  XIX.) 

Primaries,  upperside : costal  area  and  area,  except  as  noted, 
between  the  subbasal  and  submarginal  bands,  black,  most  in- 
tense in  costal  and  subapical  areas.  The  distal  portion  of 
veins  basad  of  submarginal  band  are  deeper  black  than 
ground  color.  Area  between  subbasal  and  submarginal  bands 
from  inner  margin  to  Cu2,  base  of  cellule  Cu2  - Cu^  and  in 
the  cell  between  subbasal  band  and  ocellus  buff,  this  color 
weakening  distad  between  A2  and  Cu2  and  in  the  cell.  The 
pink  subbasal  line  normal,  its  outer  black  band  more  intense 
than  in  normal  individuals.  Pink  submarginal  band  distinct, 
but  thin,  its  inner  black  band  nearly  lost  in  the  black  ground 
color.  The  two  subapical  black  spots  fused  with  the  ground 
color.  Ocellus  normal.  Marginal  area  warm  ochre-clay 
color. 

Secondaries,  upperside:  the  black  ground  color  extends 
from  the  subbasal  band  to  the  submarginal  band,  but  does  not 
include  the  cell  nor  the  area  behind  the  anal  vein.  The  latter 
and  the  basal  areas  are  buff.  The  black  area  is  weaker  than 
in  the  primaries,  and  very  weak  in  the  costal  area.  The  veins 
stand  out  blacker  than  the  ground  color  as  described  above  in 
the  primaries.  The  pink  submarginal  band  somewhat  nar- 
rower than  normal,  its  inner  black  band  being  more  distinct 
than  in  primaries.  Ocellus  and  cell  spot  normal.  Marginal 
area  as  in  primaries. 

Underside,  primaries : the  dark  area  is  not  so  intensely 
black  as  on  the  upper  side,  and  extends  from  the  subbasal 
band  to  the  second  submarginal  band,  and  also  includes  the 
cell.  Inner  marginal  area  pale.  Costal  area  narrowly  black- 
ish. Veins  with  buff  scaling,  causing  them  to  show  distinctly 
on  the  blackish  ground  color.  Submarginal  band  blackish, 
more  distinct  than  in  normal  individuals.  Ocellus  normal,  its 
black  outer  ring  lost  in  the  ground  color.  Marginal  area 
brownish-buff. 


274  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


Secondaries,  underside:  the  blackish  area  as  in  primaries, 
but  more  intense.  Costal  area  black.  Area  behind  anal  vein 
blackish.  Basal  area  brownish,  due  to  a dusting  of  black 
scales.  Veins  less  distinct  than  in  primaries.  Ocellus,  mar- 
ginal band,  and  marginal  area  as  in  primaries. 

Thorax  and  abdomen  above  buff.  Collar  black,  narrowly 
interrupted  on  the  dorsal  line  with  buff  hairs.  Thorax  below, 
about  normal.  Abdomen  blackish,  sutures  outlined  with  buff 
hairs,  terminal  segment  buff. 

Holotype:  One  female  from  central  western  United  States,  in 
author’s  collection.  Emerged  March  22,  1930. 

This  is  but  the  second  or  third  melanic  polyphemus  of  which  I 
have  knowledge.  Dr.  W.  J.  Holland,  in  his  “ Moth  Book,”  page 
89,  makes  the  following  statement : “ I have  one  or  two  fine  me- 
lanic specimens,  in  which  the  wings  are  almost  wholly  black  on 
the  upper  side.”  As  this  aberration  is  apparently  without  a name, 
the  above,  fumosus,  is  proposed. 

This  species,  as  is  well  known,  is  exceedingly  variable,  the 
ground  color  being  various  shades  of  tan,  yellow  and  gray.  How- 
ever, the  characteristic  light  gray  stripes  along  the  costa  and  the 
collar  are  always  present,  but  in  fumosus  they  are  of  the  deepest 
black. 

This  beautiful  female  emerged  from  a large  consignment  of 
cocoons  received  from  the  central  west.  It  is  to  be  hoped  that  it 
will  be  placed  eventually  in  one  of  our  large  museums,  where 
those  who  appreciate  a radical  deviation  from  the  normal,  may  be 
able  to  study  it,  and  where  it  will  be  accessible  to  future  students. 


Bull.  B.  E.  S.,  Vol.  XXV,  No.  5 


Plate  XIX 


276  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


NEW  OR  INSUFFICIENTLY-KNOWN  CRANE-FLIES 
FROM  THE  NEARTIC  REGION  (TIPULIDAE, 
DIPTERA). 

PART  II. 

By  Charles  P.  Alexander,  Amherst,  Mass.* 

The  new  species  described  at  the  present  time  were  included  in 
material  sent  to  me  for  identification  by  Miss  Helen  E.  Sweet, 
taken  at  and  near  Claremont,  California,  and  discussed  in  detail 
in  her  study  on  Artemisia  and  its  ecological  relationships  (Journal 
of  Entomology  and  Zoology,  Pomona  College,  1930)  ; in  a large 
and  important  collection  of  crane-flies  taken  in  the  highest  moun- 
tains of  Colorado  by  Mr.  Charles  F.  Clagg;  and  in  a small  but 
highly  interesting  series  of  Tipulidae  sent  to  me  by  Mr.  Charles 
W.  Johnson.  The  types  of  the  species,  with  the  exception  of  Oro- 
peza  johnsonella,  are  preserved  in  the  author’s  collection. 

Mr.  Fred  W.  Edwards,  of  the  British  Museum  of  Natural  His- 
tory, has  made  a critical  study  of  the  hitherto  unrecognizable  spe- 
cies of  Nearctic  Tipula  described  by  Francis  Walker  in  1848  and 
1856  and  as  a result  the  identity  and  synonymy  of  almost  all  of 
these  species  has  been  settled.  This  study  has  resulted  in  the 
changing  of  name  of  several  of  our  best-known  species  of  the 
genus.  I am  very  deeply  indebted  to  Mr.  Edwards  for  the  oppor- 
tunity of  publishing  these  changes  of  names  at  this  time.  In  the 
following  list,  the  earliest  name  is  the  correct  one  in  all  instances : 

albilatus  Walker  (1848)  = ahdominalis  (Say)  (1823). 

borealis  Walker  (1848)  =hebes  Loew  (1863). 
disjuncta  Walker  (1856)  = taughannock  Alexander  (1915). 

dorsimacula  Walker  (1848)  — angustipennis  Loew  (1863). 
duplex  Walker  (1848)  = cine  tic  ornis  Doane  (1901), 

mingwe  Alexander  (1915). 
furca  Walker  (1848)  =bella  Loew  (1863). 

glomerata  Walker  (1848)  =arctica  Curtis  (1831). 
platymera  Walker  (1856)  =tesselata  Loew  (1863), 

labradorica  Alexander  (1915). 


* Contribution  from  the  Entomological  Laboratory,  Massachu- 
setts Agricultural  College. 


Dec.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  277 


simulata  Walker  (1856)  = trivittata  Say  (1823). 

triplex  Walker  (1848)  = inermis  Doane  (1901), 

( ?umbrosa  Loew,  1863). 

In  addition  to  the  above,  Tipula  resurgens  Walker  (1848)  is 
almost  certainly  T.  latipennis  Loew  (1864). 

Tipula  jacobus  n.  n. 

In  1848,  Walker  described  Tipula  filipes  as  new.  In  1909, 
Johnson  identified  filipes  as  being  one  of  the  larger  and  com- 
moner species  in  Eastern  North  America  and  the  name  being  pre- 
occupied by  Tipula  filipes  Fabricius  (1805),  he  renamed  the  spe- 
cies Tipula  perlongipes.  Mr.  Edwards  now  informs  me  that  the 
crane-fly  described  by  Walker  and  renamed  by  Johnson  is  an  en- 
tirely different  species  from  the  Eastern  American  species  that  has 
been  passing  under  the  name  of  perlongipes.  I therefore  name 
this  well-known  fly  as  above,  the  species  being  dedicated  to  my 
friend  and  co-worker,  Professor  James  Speed  Rogers.  The  pres- 
ent species  has  been  earlier  discussed  and  figured  (Alexander, 
Crane-flies  of  New  York,  I,  p.  952,  fig.  268;  1919). 

Tipula  mesotergata  n.  sp. 

General  coloration  reddish  brown,  gray  pruinose;  male 
hypopygium  of  moderate  size;  ninth  tergite  large,  the  lateral 
angles  produced  caudad  into  short  broad  bispinous  plates; 
caudal  margin  of  tergite  between  the  lateral  lobes  nearly 
transverse ; eighth  sternite  with  the  lateral  lobes  low. 

Male. — Length  about  16  mm. ; wing  14.5  mm. 

Frontal  prolongation  of  head  long,  yellow ; nasus  small ; 
palpi  with  the  basal  segment  yellow,  the  remainder  passing 
into  dark  brown.  Antennae  with  the  scape  yellow ; flagellum 
broken.  Head  reddish  brown,  dusted  with  gray;  a narrow 
median  brown  vitta  on  anterior  portion  of  vertex. 

Mesonotum  reddish  brown,  with  a gray  pruinosity ; median 
region  of  scutum  behind  the  suture  with  a semicircular  yel- 
low area ; postnotum  yellowish  gray.  Pleura  yellowish  gray, 
the  dorsopleural  region  more  yellowish.  Halteres  yellow, 
the  knobs  infuscated.  Legs  with  the  coxae  yellowish  gray; 
trochanters  yellow ; femora  yellow,  the  tips  narrowly  and 
vaguely  darkened ; terminal  tarsal  segments  blackened. 
Wings  yellowish  gray,  the  base  and  costal  region  more  yel- 
lowish ; stigma  yellowish  brown ; antestigmal  obliterative 
areas  narrow  but  extensive,  extending  from  before  the  stigma, 
across  cell  1st  M2  into  cell  M3. 


278  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


Abdominal  tergites  yellow,  with  indications  of  three 
darker  longitudinal  stripes,  the  caudal  margins  of  the  seg- 
ments narrowly  yellow,  becoming  broader  and  more  conspic- 
uous on  the  subterminal  segments;  hypopygium  of  moderate 
size,  reddish.  Male  hypopygium  with  the  tergite  large,  the 
lateral  angles  produced  caudad  into  short  broad  plates,  the 
apices  of  which  are  obliquely  truncated  and  unequally  bi- 
spinous,  the  outer  spine  stouter;  caudal  margin  of  tergite 
between  nearly  transverse,  the  median  portion  elevated  into 
two  barely  evident  yellow  tubercles.  Basistyle  entire,  the 
dorsal  portion  greatly  narrowed.  Outer  dististyle  small  and 
slender.  Inner  dististyle  with  the  basal  portion  separated 
from  the  main  body  of  the  style  by  a deep  notch,  the  apex  of 
this  slender  basal  portion  terminating  in  two  or  three  spinous 
points.  Ninth  sternite  with  a quadrate  median  notch.  Eighth 
sternite  with  the  caudal  margin  subtransverse  to  broadly  and 
weakly  emarginate,  the  lateral  angles  produced  into  low  lobes 
that  are  directed  mesad  and  caudad;  on  either  side  of  the 
median  line  of  the  sternite  a small  brush  of  golden-yellow 
setae,  these  decussate  across  the  midline. 

Habitat:  California. 

Holotype:  lCf,  Claremont,  on  Artemisia  tridentata  ( H . E. 
Sweet)  ; Collector’s  No.  28. 

Tipula  mesotergata  is  apparently  most  closely  related  to  T.  ster- 
nata  Doane,  differing  in  the  structure  of  the  male  hypopygium. 

Tipula  sweetae  n.  sp. 

Male. — Length  about  13  mm.;  wing  10-11  mm. 

Female: — Length  about  14  mm.;  wing  11.5  mm. 

Allied  and  generally  similar  to  Tipida  californica  (Doane) 
( Pachyrhina  californica  Doane,  1908),  differing  very  con- 
spicuously in  the  structure  of  the  male  hypopygium. 

Size  smaller.  First  flagellar  segment  entirely  black.  Head, 
thorax,  abdomen  and  wings  almost  exactly  as  in  californica. 

Male  hypopygium  with  the  tergite  large,  the  caudal  margin 
with  a narrow  U-shaped  median  notch,  the  lateral  angles  of 
each  lobe  further  produced  into  an  acute  spine.  Basistyle 
entire.  Lower  dististyle  conspicuously  hairy,  the  distal  third 
narrowed  into  a spine.  Eighth  sternite  produced  medially 
into  two  lobes  that  are  separated  by  a deep  V-shaped  median 
notch,  the  mesal  edges  of  the  lobes  conspicuously  fringed  with 
long  yellow  setae.  T.  californica  has  the  hypopygium  con- 
spicuously larger,  the  tergite  with  a very  broad  U-shaped 
notch,  the  lateral  lobes  thus  formed  blunt,  on  ventral  margin 


Dec.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  279 


before  apex  with  a small  black  spinous  point.  Lower  disti- 
style  much  longer,  glabrous. 

Habitat:  California. 

Holotype:  J',  Claremont,  1929  ( H . E.  Sweet ) ; Collector’s  No. 
42.  Allotopotype : 5,  Paratopotypes , 4 J'-J';  Collector’s  No.  32. 

I take  great  pleasure  in  naming  this  species  in  honor  of  the  col- 
lector, Miss  Helen  E.  Sweet. 

Oropeza  johnsonella  n.  sp. 

Size  small  (wing,  J)  under  10  mm.)  ; mesonotum  reddish 
brown,  the  brown  praescutal  stripes  relatively  indistinct ; 
halteres  dusky;  legs  pale  brown,  the  tarsi  a little  paler;  male 
hypopygium  with  the  inner  dististyle  a flattened  blade,  the 
apex  subtruncate,  on  outer  margin  near  base  with  a small 
setiferous  tubercle ; gonapophyses  recurved,  tipped  with 
acute  spines. 

Male. — Length  about  8 mm. ; wing  9.8  mm. 

Frontal  prolongation  of  head  and  palpi  dark  brown.  An- 
tennae (J1)  relatively  elongate,  if  bent  backward  extending 
to  beyond  the  base  of  abdomen;  scape  honey-yellow;  first 
flagellar  segment  short,  the  remaining  segments  passing  into 
brown.  Head  dark  brown. 

Mesonotum  reddish  brown,  the  praescutum  with  three  in- 
distinct darker  brown  stripes.  Pleura  light  brown,  with 
vaguely  indicated  darker  areas  on  anepisternum,  ventral  ster- 
nopleurite  and  ventral  pleurotergite.  Halteres  dusky,  the 
base  of  stem  yellow.  Legs  with  the  coxae  yellow,  infuscated 
at  base;  trochanters  yellow;  a single  (posterior)  leg  remains, 
pale  brown,  the  tarsi  a trifle  paler,  more  yellowish  brown. 
Wings  tinged  with  brown,  the  stigma  darker  brown;  veins 
brown.  Venation:  Cell  M1  about  one-half  longer  than  its 
petiole. 

Abdominal  segments  ringed  with  brown  and  yellow,  the 
apices  of  the  segments  paler  than  the  bases.  Male  hypo- 
pygium with  the  lateral  portions  of  the  tergite  produced  into 
conspicuous  setiferous  shoulders,  the  intermediate  margin 
very  gently  crenulate ; ventro-lateral  arms  of  tergite  strongly 
curved,  slender,  not  expanded  outwardly,  the  apex  acute  or 
subacute.  Outer  dististyle  a little  longer  than  the  inner  dis- 
tistyle, cylindrical,  not  dilated  at  base.  Inner  dististyle  a flat- 
tened blade,  near  base  on  outer  margin  with  a small  tubercle 
set  with  conspicuous  setae ; apex  of  style  subtruncate.  Gona- 
pophyses recurved,  setiferous,  the  tips  set  with  several  acute 
spines. 


280  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


Habitat:  Eastern  North  America. 

Holotype:  J1,  Riverton,  New  Jersey,  August,  1911  (C.  W.  John- 
son). Type  returned  to  Mr.  Johnson. 

This  interesting  Oropeza  is  named  in  honor  of  Mr.  C.  W.  John- 
son, distinguished  authority  on  the  American  species  of  the  genus. 
In  its  small  size  and  general  appearance,  Oropeza  johnsonella 
agrees  most  closely  with  0.  rogersi  Alexander,  differing  in  the 
structure  of  the  male  hypopygium,  especially  the  inner  dististyle, 
which  bears  a setiferous  tubercle  on  outer  margin  beyond  base. 

This  type  of  structure  is  found  in  the  Nearctic  species  only  in 
O.  subalbipes  Johnson,  an  otherwise  very  different  fly. 

Cylindrotoma  pallescens  n.  sp. 

General  coloration  pale  yellow,  the  usual  black  areas  en- 
tirely replaced  by  very  pale  rufous,  scarcely  evident  against 
the  ground-color;  antennae  pale  yellow. 

Female. — Length  11  mm.;  wing  10  mm. 

Antennae  pale  yellow,  the  terminal  segment  darkened; 
flagellar  segments  a little  shorter  than  in  splendens.  Head 
brownish  gray,  more  yellowish  behind. 

Thorax  pale  yellow,  the  very  pale  rufous  areas  scarcely  in- 
dicated against  the  ground-color.  Halteres  pale  yellow. 
Legs  pale  yellow,  the  femoral  tips  a little  darkened ; last  tar- 
sal segment  darkened.  Wings  yellow,  stigma  barely  evident  ; 
veins  pale  brown,  those  in  the  prearcular  and  costal  regions 
clearer  yellow.  Venation:  Rs  relatively  short,  about  one- 
fifth  longer  than  R3,  arcuated  at  origin ; m at  fork  of  M1  + 2 
or  beyond  on  M2. 

Abdomen  yellow. 

Habitat:  Colorado. 

Holotype:  §,  Ute  Pass,  Williams  Lork  Range,  Grand  Co.,  alti- 
tude 10,500  feet,  July  16,  1929  (C.  F.  Clagg ). 

Cylindrotoma  pallescens  is  apparently  most  closely  allied  to  C. 
splendens  Doane,  being  distinguished  by  the  almost  uniformly  pale 
yellow  coloration,  the  dark  areas  being  replaced  by  very  pale 
rufous.  The  wings  are  fully  colored  and  the  fly  is  apparently  not  , 
a teneral  individual.  The  left  wing  of  the  type  shows  a weak 
trace  of  an  adventitious  crossvein  in  cell  R5,  in  alignment  with  m, 
thus  suggesting  the  condition  found  in  Cyttaromyia. 

Tricyphona  claggi  n.  sp. 

Belongs  to  the  diaphana  group ; general  coloration  gray, 
the  praescutum  with  four  brown  stripes ; antennae  12-seg- 


Dec.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  281 


merited ; wings  cream-colored,  with  a restricted  brown  pat- 
tern ; cell  Mx  lacking ; cell  ist  M2  closed. 

Male.— Length  about  7 mm. ; wing  7.5  mm. 

Rostrum  gray;  palpi  brownish  black.  Antennae  12-seg- 
mented,  black  throughout ; flagellar  segments  nearly  globu- 
lar, gradually  decreasing  in  size  outwardly,  the  terminal  seg- 
ment smallest.  Head  light  gray. 

Pronotum  gray,  the  anterior  notum  infuscated.  . Meso- 
notal  praescutum  light  gray,  with  four  conspicuous  brown 
stripes,  the  intermediate  pair  ending  some  distance  before  the 
suture ; lateral  stripes  narrower,  reaching  the  suture ; scutum 
gray,  the  lobes  with  barely  indicated  dark  markings ; posterior 
sclerites  of  mesonotum  gray,  the  parascutella  darker.  Pleura 
gray.  Halteres  pale,  the  knobs  infuscated.  Legs  with  the 
coxae  pruinose;  trochanters  obscure  yellow;  femora  obscure 
yellow,  passing  into  brown  at  tips ; tibiae  and  tarsi  dark 
brown,  the  outer  segments  of  the  latter  blackened.  Wings 
cream-colored,  with  a restricted  brown  pattern,  including  a 
cloud  at  origin  of  Rs,  the  stigma  and  anterior  cord,  narrower 
seams  on  posterior  cord  and  outer  end  of  cell  ist  M2 ; radial 
field  beyond  cord  vaguely  suffused  with  brown;  veins  much 
darker  than  the  ground-color,  especially  those  beyond  the 
cord.  Venation:  R4  + 5 distinct;  cell  M1  lacking;  cell  ist  M2 
closed;  m-cu  just  before  midlength  of  cell  ist  M2. 

Abdomen  gray,  the  hypopygium  somewhat  brighter.  Male 
hypopygium  with  the  lateral  appendages  of  the  tergite  ap- 
pearing as  conspicuous  curved  flattened  blades,  the  tips  acute. 
Interbasal  spines  about  one-half  the  length,  slender,  strongly 
curved. 

Habitat:  Colorado. 

Holotype:  <£,  Bobtail  Creek,  Grand  Co.,  altitude  11,000  feet, 
July  20,  1929  (C.  F.  Clagg). 

Tricyphona  claggi  is  named  in  honor  of  the  collector,  Mr. 
Charles  F.  Clagg,  to  whom  I am  greatly  indebted  for  numerous 
crane-flies  from  Colorado  and  the  Philippines.  The  species  is  ob- 
viously allied  to  T.  diaphana  (Doane),  T.  frigida  Alexander,  and 
T.  exoloma  (Doane),  differing  conspicuously  from  all  allied  forms 
by  the  lack  of  cell  Mx  of  the  wings. 

Limnophila  claggi  n.  sp. 

Coloration  of  mesonotal  praescutum  and  scutal  lobes  pol- 
ished black;  antennae  of  male  elongate;  thoracic  pleura 


282  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


heavily  pruinose;  male  hypopygium  with  the  outer  dististyle 
slender,  the  apex  bidentate. 

Male. — Length  about  6 mm. ; wing  6.2  mm. 

Rostrum  and  palpi  black.  Antennae  ( £)  black  throughout, 
elongate,  if  bent  backward  extending  about  to  the  base  of  ab- 
domen ; intermediate  flagellar  segments  with  the  ventral  face 
protuberant;  flagellar  segments  gradually  decreasing  in  size 
outwardly,  the  last  segment  small.  Head  black,  pruinose. 

Interspaces  of  mesonotal  praescutum  and  the  scutal  lobes 
polished  black,  the  lateral  margins  of  the  former  and  median 
area  of  the  latter  pruinose ; remainder  of  mesonotum  black, 
sparsely  pruinose.  Pleura  black,  heavily  pruinose.  Halteres 
pale  yellow.  Legs  with  the  coxae  gray  pruinose ; trochanters 
black;  femora  yellow,  the  tips  blackened,  most  extensive  on 
the  fore  legs  where  a little  more  than  the  outer  third  is  in- 
cluded, narrower  on  the  middle  and  hind  femora;  tibiae 
brownish  bl^ck ; tarsi  black.  Wings  whitish  subhyaline,  the 
base  and  costal  region  more  yellowish;  stigma  oval,  pale 
brown ; vague  brown  clouds  along  vein  Cu  and  the  cord ; 
veins  brown.  Venation:  Sc±  ending  just  before  the  fork  of 
Rs,  Sc2  at  its  tip ; Rs  angulated  at  origin ; veins  R3  and  R4 
strongly  divergent,  cell  R3  at  margin  wider  than  cell  R4 ; cell 
M1  about  twice  its  petiole ; m-cu  at  midlength  of  cell  1st  M2. 

Abdomen  black,  pruinose ; hypopygium  black.  Male  hypo- 
pygium with  the  outer  dististyle  a slender  blackened  rod,  the 
base  wider,  the  apex  bidentate,  the  lower  tooth  slightly 
larger.  Gonapophyses  appearing  as  large  flattened  plates,  the 
margin  with  conspicuous  appressed  teeth.  Aedeagus  elongate. 

Habitat:  Colorado. 

Holotype:  J',  Bobtail  Creek,  Grand  Co.,  altitude  11,000  feet, 
July  20,  1929  (C.  F.  Clagg).  Paratopotype : lCJ. 

Limnophila  claggi  is  dedicated  to  the  collector  of  the  type  ma- 
terial, Mr.  Charles  F.  Clagg.  The  species  differs  from  the  small 
polished  black  species  resembling  munda  Osten  Sacken  by  the 
elongate  antennae  of  the  male  and  the  structure  of  the  hypo- 
pygium. The  fly  is  doubtfully  referable  to  the  subgenus  Prio- 
nolabis  Osten  Sacken. 


Dec.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  283 


NEW  ROBBER  FLIES  FROM  MADAGASCAR. 

(Diptera,  Asilidae.) 

By  S.  W.  Bromley,  M.Sc.,  Bartlett  Tree  Research  Laboratories, 

Stamford,  Conn. 

The  following  new  species  were  in  a collection  obtained  from 
Prof.  Charles  Lamberton,  Academie  Malgache,  Tananarive,  Mad- 
agascar. 

The  types  of  the  species  described  are  in  the  writer’s  collection. 

Dasypogoninae. 

Microstylum  Macquart. 

This  genus  is  abundant  in  Madagascar  and  in  the  material  at 
hand  were  discovered  5 new  species. 

Microstylum  cinctum  n.  sp. 

Length,  34  to  44  mm.  (exclusive  of  the  rostrum  which  is 
3.5  to  5 mm.  in  length).  A large,  handsome  species  with  the 
wings  extending  nearly  to  or  in  some  cases  surpassing  the 
length  of  the  abdomen.  The  species  is  largely  black  with  a 
band  of  yellow  pile  near  the  base  of  the  abdomen.  The 
femora  black  and  the  tarsi  and  tibiae  reddish. 

Female.  Antennae,  palpi,  rostrum  and  eyes  black.  Mystax 
composed  of  golden  yellow  bristles  confined  to  the  oral  mar- 
gin with  a few  small,  fine,  black  hairs  intermingled.  Palpal 
hairs  reddish  gold  toward  the  tip,  yellowish  at  the  base.  A 
few  black  hairs  intermingled  towards  the  tip  of  the  palpi. 
Hairs  on  antennae  and  vertex  black,  on  occiput  golden. 
Beard  thick,  golden  yellow.  Face  golden  pruinose.  Thorax 
black  with  a brownish  bloom.  Hairs  on  pronotum  and  an- 
terior portion  of  thorax  blackish.  On  the  posterior  portion 
of  the  mesonotum,  these  are  intermingled  with  fine,  golden 
hairs.  Scutellum  with  fine  golden  hairs  and  bristles.  Coxae 
with  long  golden  pile.  The  posterior  coxa  with  a few  black 
hairs.  Hairs  in  front  of  the  wings  black ; under  wings  golden. 
Wings  dark  brown  with  a purplish  tinge.  Halteres  pale  yel- 
lowish brown.  Femora  black  with  black  hairs.  A few  yel- 
lowish brown  bristles  on  the  posterior  femora.  Tibiae  red- 
dish with  reddish  gold  hairs  and  bristles.  The  anterior  tibia 
is  darker  on  the  inner  distal  portion.  The  middle  tibia  has 
several  stout,  reddish  spines  at  the  ventral  apex,  but  no  en- 
larged tubercle.  The  tarsi  are  reddish  with  reddish  bristles. 


284  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  vol.  xxv 


The  ungues  are  black  at  the  tips,  reddish  at  the  base.  The 
pulvilli  are  pale  brownish  yellow.  The  abdomen  is  black 
with  a light  pollinose  band  around  the  middle  of  the  second 
segment.  This  band  bears  long,  golden  pile.  Similar  colored 
pile  occurs  in  lesser  quantities  on  the  first  segment ; the  first 
four  segments  are  velvety  black,  having  very  fine  short,  dark 
hairs;  the  succeeding  segments  are  black,  shiny.  The  ovi- 
positor is  black  with  black  bristles  and  fine  black  hairs. 

Holotype. — $,  Tananarive,  Madagascar.  4 Paratopotypes.  §¥• 

Microstylum  lambertoni  n.  sp. 

Length,  40  to  47  mm.  (exclusive  of  the  rostrum  which  is 
4 mm.  in  length).  A large,  black  species  with  the  thorax  and 
a large  part  of  the  abdomen  covered  with  a grayish  “bloom  ” 
and  fine,  grayish  yellow  pile.  The  beard  is  golden,  the  wings 
almost  hyaline  with  a black  costal  border.  The  femora  and 
most  of  the  tibiae  reddish ; the  tarsi  and  tips  of  the  tibiae 
black. 

Female.  Eyes,  palpi,  rostrum  black.  The  antennae  are 
broken,  but  the  first  two  segments  which  remain  are  black 
with  blackish  bristles.  The  face  is  silvery  pruinose.  The 
hairs  on  the  vertex  are  black.  The  occiput  is  thickly  beset 
with  pale  golden  hairs.  The  beard  is  thick  and  composed  of 
similarly  colored  hairs.  The  palpal  hairs  are  mostly  black 
with  some  pale  hairs  intermingled.  The;  mystax  is  composed 
of  black  bristles  and  white  bristles.  In  one  specimen  the  black 
predominates;  in  the  other  white.  Thorax  black  with  a 
bluish  gray  bloom.  Hairs  on  lateral  portion  of  the  cervical 
region  thick  golden.  Coxae  with  long,  white  pile.  Fine  hairs 
of  mesonotum  black,  with  longer  yellow  ones  on  the  posterior 
portion  and  on  the  scutellum.  Wings  very  light  brownish, 
nearly  hyaline,  with  the  costal  border  blackish.  Halteres 
dark  brown.  Femora  reddish  with  short,  fine,  black  and 
whitish  or  yellowish  hairs  intermingled.  Tibiae  reddish, 
darker,  almost  black,  toward  the  extreme  tip,  thickly  set  with 
black  hairs  and  bristles.  The  tibiae  are  slightly  enlarged 
towards  the  tip,  and  the  hairs  become  more  thickly  set  in  the 
distal  portion  also.  The  ventral  apex  of  the  middle  tibiae 
bears  several  stout  spurs,  but  there  is  no  enlarged  tubercle. 
The  tarsi  are  large  and  broad,  thickly  covered  with  black 
hairs  and  bristles.  The  ungues  are  black  and  the  pulvilli  yel- 
lowish. The  abdomen  is  black.  The  first  four  segments  cov- 
ered with  a thin,  grayish  bloom,  while  the  remainder  are  shin- 
ing black.  The  lateral  anterior  portions  of  the  third  and 


Dec.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  285 


fourth  segments  are  shiny  black  also.  The  venter  of  the  ab- 
domen bears  fine  pile  out  to  the  very  tip,  while  the  sides  of 
the  first  two  and  the  dorsum  of  a band  on  the  second  bears 
quite  thick,  white  pile.  The  ovipositor  is  shining  black  with 
black  bristles. 

Holotype. — $,  Tananarive,  Madagascar,  i Paratopotype.  $. 

Microstylum  lucifer  n.  sp. 

Length  33  mm.  (exclusive  of  the  rostrum  which  is  6 mm. 
in  length).  A slender,  black  species  with  two  reddish  lines 
on  the  dorsum  of  the  thorax,  an  extremely  long,  black  ros- 
trum, and  the  face,  vertex  and  occiput,  golden  pruinose.  The 
wings  black  with  a yellowish  area  medio-basally. 

Female.  Rostrum,  eyes,  palpi,  antennae  black.  Base  of 
palpi  somewhat  yellowish.  Face,  vertex  and  sides  of  occiput 
golden.  The  upper  portion  of  the  occiput  back  of  the  upper 
portion  of  each  eye  without  this  bloom,  giving  the  appearance 
of  two  black  spots.  Vestiture  of  head  black.  Thorax  black, 
vestiture  black.  On  each  side  of  the  mesonotum  is  a reddish 
line,  extending  from  the  humeral  callus  backward  to  three- 
fourths  the  length  of  the  mesonotum.  There  is  a reddish 
spot  in  the  humeral  callus  and  dorsally  at  the  base  of  the 
wing  is  another  very  pale  area.  The  legs  are  black  with 
black  bristles,  the  pulvilli  yellowish  brown,  the  middle  tibiae 
bear  three  stout,  black  spines,  ventrally  at  the  apex.  Halteres 
black ; wings  black  with  a yellowish  area  medio-basally.  Ab- 
domen black.  First  three  segments  dull  black,  the  remainder 
shiny  black.  The  ovipositor  black  with  black  spines. 

Holotype. — J,  Tananarive,  Madagascar. 

Microstylum  umbrosum  n.  sp. 

Length,  25  to  32  mm.  A black  species  with  the  mesonotum 
brownish  pollinose.  Four  anterior  tibiae  and  tarsi  brownish 
and  the  wings  yellowish  brown  in  the  male,  whitish  towards 
the  base. 

Male.  Head  and  vestiture  black.  The  third  joints  of  the 
antennae  are  missing.  Vertex  and  face  deep  bronze  pruinose. 
Occiput  reddish  brown  pruinose.  Thorax  deep  black ; ves- 
titure black.  Mesonotum  brownish  pruinose  with  two  median 
lines  where  the  pruinosity  appears  lighter.  Femora  black, 
the  extreme  tip  of  the  anterior  femora  yellowish.  The  four 
anterior  tibiae  and  tarsi  yellowish  with  black  bristles,  and 
some  fine  yellowish  hairs.  The  middle  tibiae  has  a decided 
spur-like  tubercle  which  bears  two  very  short,  black  spurs. 


286  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


The  posterior  tibiae  and  tarsi  are  reddish  brown,  with  black 
hairs  and  bristles.  The  ungues  are  black,  yellowish  at  the 
base,  the  pulvilli  yellowish  brown.  'Wings  brown  distally  with 
brown  veins,  the  basal  half  whitish.  Halteres  pale  yellowish 
brown.  Abdomen  black.  Third  and  fourth  segments  brown- 
ish pollinose,  remaining  segments  shiny  black.  Genitalia 
black  with  blackish  and  pale  reddish  hairs  intermingled. 

Female.  Similar,  but  the  tarsi  and  tibiae  more  reddish. 
The  mesonotum  is  more  broadly  brownish  pruinose  with  a 
mid-dorsal  blackish  line.  The  wings  are  light  reddish,  brown, 
becoming  darker  towards  the  tips.  The  abdomen  is  black. 
The  first  three  segments  blackish  pollinose  and  the  remainder 
shiny  black.  The  sixth  and  seventh  especially  shining,  and 
the  eighth  segment  is  deep  reddish  with  reddish  and  black 
hairs  intermingled.  The  spines  on  the  ovipositor  piceous. 

Holotype. — J',  Tananarive,  Madagascar.  Allotopotype  §. 
Paratopotype  5 §$. 

Microstylum  tananarivensis  n.  sp. 

Length,  25  to  31  mm.  (exclusive  of  rostrum,  which  is  2.5 
mm.  in  length).  A slender,  reddish  species  with  abdomen  ex- 
tending beyond  the  wings  when  folded,  the  thorax  with  three 
broad  dark  lines,  the  median  divided  by  a narrow,  light-col- 
ored line,  and  the  legs  reddish  yellow  with  darker  lines  on  the 
anterior  portions  of  the  femora  and  tibiae. 

Male.  Rostrum  black  above,  reddish  beneath.  All  vesti- 
ture  of  the  head  pale  yellow,  that  of  the  vertex  with  a more 
reddish  tint.  Occiput,  vertex  and  face  pale  yellow  pruinose. 
Palpi  reddish-yellow.  Antennae  reddish-yellow,  third  seg- 
ment darkest.  Vestiture  of  thorax  and  coxae  yellowish,  the 
bristles  on  the  posterior  portion  of  mesonotum  and  on  scu- 
tellum  pale  reddish.  Pleura  pale  yellow  pruinose.  Dorsum 
pale  reddish-yellow  pruinose.  Three  broad  black  lines  on 
disc  of  mesonotum,  the  median  divided  into  two  by  a very 
thin,  pale  yellow  line.  Wings  light  brown;  halteres  yellow- 
ish-brown. Legs  light  reddish-yellow  with  concolorous  hairs 
and  bristles.  The  front  and  middle  femora  have  a blackish 
line  on  the  anterior  portion.  The  posterior  femora  is  darker 
distally.  Ungues  black  with  bases  reddish-yellow.  Pulvilli 
reddish-yellow.  Abdomen  reddish-yellow  with  minute,  con- 
colorous hairs.  A few  bristles  on  the  sides  of  the  first  seg- 
ment, the  same  color.  The  anterior  portion  of  the  first  seg- 
ment is  darker,  nearly  black.  The  genitalia  from  about  the 
same  width  as  the  seventh  segment,  reddish  with  lighter  hairs. 

Female.  Differs  in  the  following  respects : wings  are 
lighter;  the  posterior  femora  has  a dark  anterior  line  similar 


Dec.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  287 


to  that  on  the  first  and  second,  while  all  the  tibiae  are  darker 
on  the  anterior  portion,  and  the  abdomen  bears  blackish  spots 
along  the  sides.  The  ovipositor  is  reddish  dorsally,  black 
laterally,  spines  reddish-brown. 

Holotype. — Tananarive.  Allotopotype  §.  Paratopo- 
types  4 jy1;  9 ??• 

Laphriinae. 

Laphria  Meigen. 

One  species  is  placed  here  on  the  basis  of  the  venation  and  the 
structure  of  the  palpi  and  the  ovipositor.  The  species  approaches 
both  Andrenosoma  Rondani  and  Nusa  Walker  ( Dasythrix  Loew) 
in  that  the  thoracic  markings  resemble  those  of  the  first,  while  the 
habitus  in  general  is  suggestive  of  the  latter.  The  proboscis  is  not 
truncate  as  in  typical  Laphria,  but  is  slightly  pointed  in  profile  as 
in  Andrenosoma,  not,  however,  upturned  at  the  tip  as  is  common 
in  that  genus.  On  the  contrary,  it  is  very  slightly  downturned  as 
in  Nusa.  Not  wishing  to  propose  a new  genus  until  a further 
study  of  relationships  may  be  made,  I have  referred  it  to  the  com- 
mon repository  for  species  of  this  sub-family — the  genus  Laphria. 

Laphria  nusoides  n.  sp. 

Length,  n to  18  mm.  A dark,  metallic  blue  species  with 
coxae  and  lower  pleura  whitish  pruinose;  wings  nearly  hya- 
line, smoky  at  the  tips ; face  and  spots  on  mesonotum  yellow- 
ish-brown pruinose. 

Male.  Head  black.  Antennal  bristles,  those  of  vertex,  oc- 
ciput and  mystax  black.  Face  and  bristles  below  antennae 
and  those  on  upper  portions  of  mystax  golden.  Beard,  palpal 
hairs  and  some  of  the  bristles  of  the  mystax  near  the  base  of 
the  palpi  nearly  white.  Antennae  black,  the  third  segment 
somewhat  longer  than  the  first  two  together.  Thorax  blue- 
black.  Mesonotum  with  two  small,  pale  yellow,  pruinose 
spots  on  the  wing  and  the  posterior  margin  with  a golden- 
brown  line.  Hairs  on  dorsum,  fine,  black.  Scutellum  blue- 
black  with  black  hairs  and  four  or  five  black  bristles  on  mar- 
gin directed  backwards.  Wings  hyaline,  smoky  towards  tips, 
the  first  posterior  cell  open.  Halteres  pale  brown.  Legs  blue- 
black  with  whitish  hairs  and  a few  black  bristles.  Abdomen 
blue-black,  linear,  gradually  pointed  toward  tip.  Genitalia 
from  above  narrower  than  seventh  segment;  very  suggestive 
of  Andrenosoma.  The  posterior  lateral  margins  of  the  ab- 
dominal segments  bear  small  whitish  pruinose  spots.  There 


288  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  VoI.XXV 


is  a small  amount  of  fine  white,  scattered  pile  along  the  sides. 
Genitalia  blue-black  with  black  hairs,  a few  fine  white  hairs 
toward  the  tip. 

Female.  Similar.  Ovipositor  short  as  in  Laphria.  Black 
hairs  at  tip. 

Holotype. — Tananarive.  Allotopotype  §.  Paratopo- 
types  2 

Asilinae. 

Promachus  Loew. 

Promachus  lemur  n.  sp. 

Length,  25  to  29  mm.  A black  species  with  black  legs ; the 
thorax  pale  grayish-yellow  pruinose  with  a broad  velvety 
black  median  line,  widening  anteriorly,  and  two  large  spots 
on  each  side,  on  the  mesonotum.  There  is  an  area  of  long, 
pale  pile  on  the  sides  of  the  first  three  abdominal  segments. 

Male.  Rostrum,  palpi,  antennae  (third  segment  missing), 
hairs  of  vertex,  occiput,  antennae,  palpi  and  upper  portion  of 
mystax  black.  Face  and  occiput,  pale  yellow-gray  pollinose. 
Beard  and  most  of  mystax  pale  yellowish,  mystax  more 
golden.  Thorax  black  with  markings  as  described  above. 
Hairs  and  bristles  of  dorsum  black.  A tuft  of  golden  hairs 
below  and  in  back  of  base  of  wings  and  a patch  of  black 
bristles  below  this  tuft.  Wings  light  brown;  a large  dark 
shadow  in  the  first  submarginal  cell.  Halteres  pale  yellowish- 
brown.  Scutellum  yellowish  pruinose  with  pale,  yellow,  up- 
turned hairs  and  a few  black  bristles  at  margin.  Front  coxae 
with  yellowish  bristles,  second  with  black  and  yellow  inter- 
mingled and  third  with  mostly  black.  Legs  black,  with  scat- 
tered yellowish  hairs  and  black  bristles.  Ungues  black,  pul- 
villi  yellowish.  First  four  segments  of  front  tarsi  with  short, 
thick  silvery  pile  above.  Abdomen  black  with  a tuft  of  black 
bristles  on  the  sides  of  the  first  segment.  There  is  a patch  of 
long  whitish  pile  on  the  sides  of  the  first  three  segments. 
Genitalia  rather  small  and  narrow  for  a Promachus,  black 
with  black  hairs. 

Female.  Similar  in  coloration,  but  lacking  the  silvery  hairs 
on  the  front  tarsi.  Segments  six  to  eight  laterally  compressed 
to  form  the  ovipositor. 

. Holotype. — Tananarive.  Allotopotype  J.  Paratopo - 
type  5. 

Promachus  clavigerus  n.  sp. 

Length,  28  to  31  mm.  A whitish  pruinose  species  with  hy- 
aline wings.  A faint  shadow  in  the  first  sub-marginal  cell. 


Bee.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  289 


The  legs  with  femora  black  and  tibiae  reddish  with  short,  fine, 
whitish  pubescence.  The  genitalia  broader  than  any  segment 
of  the  abdomen,  except  the  first. 

i Male.  Antennae  black  with  fine,  black  bristles.  Palpi 
black  with  black  hairs  at  tip,  whitish  at  base.  A few  bristles 
on  the  occiput  blackish ; rest  of  head  thickly  covered  with 
fine,  pale  hair.  The  beard  whitish,  the  hairs  of  the  mystax 
with  a pale  yellowish  tint.  Thorax  whitish  pollinose  on  sides, 
pale  yellowish  pollinose  above.  Vestiture  whitish,  except  the 
fine  black  hairs  and  some  of  the  bristles  on  the  dorsum  black. 
Scutellum  with  whitish  bristles  and  hairs.  Two  brownish 
median  lines  and  two  lateral  spots  of  the  same  color  on  the 
mesonotum.  Humeral  callus  reddish-brown.  Legs  covered 
with  fine,  white  pubescence.  Bristles  black.  Femora  black 
with  the  posterior  portion  of  the  first  and  the  base  of  the  last 
reddish.  Tibiae  reddish,  blackish  towards  the  tips.  Tarsi 
black  with  black  bristles.  The  anterior  thickly  covered  with 
fine,  yellowish-white  hairs  above.  Ungues  black.  Pulvilli 
pale  yellowish-brown.  Abdomen  black,  thickly,  pale  yellow- 
ish pruinose,  except  the  seventh  segment.  Fine  hairs  along 
the  sides  and  on  the  first  segment  whitish.  The  sixth  and 
seventh  segments  bear  black  appressed  hairs  on  the  sides  and 
there  are  similarly  colored  hairs  at  the  extreme  margin  of  the 
sides  of  the  fifth  segment,  the  seventh  segment  and  genitalia 
velvety  black  with  blackish  hairs  on  the  sides  and  basal  por- 
tion of  the  latter,  but  the  tips  of  the  claspers  with  long,  fine, 
thickly  set,  white  pile. 

Female.  Female  similar  in  color,  except  the  middle  femora 
bears  a reddish  line  posteriorly.  The  abdomen  long  and  slen- 
der, projecting  a considerable  distance  beyond  the  wings;  the 
ovipositor  is  only  slightly  compressed. 

Holotype.—^,  Tananarive.  Allotopotype  §.  Paratopo- 
type 

Promachus  parvus  n.  sp. 

Length,  17  to  21  mm.  A small,  pale  brownish  pollinose 
species  with  hyaline  wings,  slender,  elongate  abdomen  and 
reddish  legs. 

Female.  Vestiture  of  head  whitish,  except  mystax  which 
is  pale  straw-colored.  A few  bristles  on  the  vertex,  occiput 
are  blackish  and  the  palpal  hairs  are  blackish.  Antennae, 
proboscis,  palpi  black.  Thorax  pale  brown  pollinose  above. 
Whitish  pollinose  on  the  sides.  Mesonotum  with  a broad 
median  line,  and  two  lateral  blackish  spots  on  each  side.  Hu- 
meral callus  reddish.  Vestiture  of  thorax  mostly  white  with 


290  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


a few  fine  black  hairs  and  black  bristles  on  the  dorsum.  Pos- 
terior calli  reddish,  but  covered  with  a pale  brownish  pollen. 
Scutellum  black,  pale  brownish  pollinose.  White  bristles  at 
the  margin.  Wings  hyaline,  a very  faint  shadow,  merely  a 
streak,  in  the  sub-marginal  cell.  Halteres  very  pale  brown- 
ish. Veins  black,  yellowish  at  their  bases.  Legs  reddish  with 
fine  white  pubescence,  and  black  bristles.  Tarsi  black,  middle 
femora  black  on  the  upper  side.  Posterior  femora  and  tibiae 
blackish  towards  their  tips.  Ungues  black.  Pulvilli  pale 
yellowish.  Abdomen  pale  brownish  pollinose  with  brownish 
dorsal  triangular  streaks  and  lateral  spots  on  the  second, 
third  and  fourth  segments.  The  remaining  segments  nar- 
rower, blackish. 

Holotype. — §,  Tananarive.  Paratopotype  4 

H eligmoneura  Bigot. 

One  species  is  referred  to  this  genus. 

Heligmoneura  medianus  n.  sp. 

Total  length,  13  to  18  mm.  A bare  slender,  pale  yellowish, 
gray  pollinose  species  with  a broad  velvety,  black  median  line 
on  the  dorsum  of  the  thorax,  and  three  small  black  spots  on 
each  side. 

Male.  Antennae  brownish,  third  segment,  occipital  bristles 
brownish.  Mystax  whitish  with  two  or  three  darker  bristles, 
thin,  confined  to  the  slight  prominence  on  oral  margin.  Palpi 
very  small,  blackish  with  pale  hairs.  Head  pale  yellowish, 
white  pollinose.  Thorax  pale  yellowish  pollinose  above,  white 
pollinose  on  sides.  Posterior  portion  of  mesonotum  and  mar- 
gin of  scutellum  with  a few  black  bristles,  the  latter  with  two. 
Coxae  with  white  hairs.  Mesonotum  with  broad  black 
median  line  and  three  small  blackish  spots  on  each  side. 
Wings  hyaline,  pale  yellowish  toward  tips.  Legs  yellow 
with  pale  hairs  and  black  bristles.  Tarsi  darker,  a spot  on 
the  median  upper  portion  of  the  femora,  and  the  apices  of 
the  second  and  third  femora  and  tibiae  blackish.  Ungues 
black,  brownish  at  base.  Abdomen  black,  pale  brownish  pol- 
linose, posterior  margins  of  the  segments  paler.  Genitalia 
black,  very  slightly  wider  than  seventh  segment  from  above. 

Female.  Similar,  ovipositor  black,  shorter  than  seventh 
segment,  the  oviduct  slender  resembling  a short  spine. 

Holotype. — -J1,  Tananarive.  Allotopotype  §.  Paratopo- 
types  4 3 jj. 


Dec.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  291 


DISTRIBUTION  NOTES  ON  CULICIDAE 
(MOSQUITOES). 

By  Robert  Matheson,  Ithaca,  N.  Y. 

During  the  summer  of  1929  I had  the  opportunity  of  identifying 
some  2,300  specimens  of  Culicidae  (except  the  Anophelini)  from 
the  museum  of  the  Illinois  State  Natural  History  Survey.  As 
the  data  on  mosquitoes  from  Illinois  is  very  meagre  it  seems  wise 
to  record  some  of  the  more  interesting  distribution  notes.  Fur- 
thermore, a few  interesting  species  from  various  parts  of  the 
world  were  included  and  notes  on  some  of  these  are  also  appended. 

Chaoborinae. 

Chaoborus  albatus  Johnson.  4 males  from  Clear  Lake,  Ind., 
July  17,  1914.  The  only  other  American  records  are  by  Johnson 
— Mt.  Tom  and  Brookline,  Mass. 

Chaoborus  punctipennis  Say.  Males  and  females,  Grand  Junc- 
tion, Mich.,  July  15,  1914,  and  Cedar  Lake,  Ind.,  July  17,  1914. 
Females,  Peoria,  111.,  June  15  and  Dubois,  April  24,  1914. 

CULICIN  AE. 

Culex  apicalis  Adams.  There  seem  to  be  very  few  definite  rec- 
ords of  this  common  mosquito  from  Illinois.  Males  and  females 
from  White  Heath,  1906 ; Carbondale,  May  30  and  July  3,  1919  ; 
Lake  Villa,  August  9,  1906;  Vienna,  August  16,  1905;  Herrin, 
September  27,  1920,  and  Algonquin,  May,  June  and  August  are  in 
the  collection. 

Culex  inhibitator  Dyar  and  Knab.  Dyar  records  this  species 
as  extending  from  the  Mississippi  Valley  and  the  southern  states 
south  through  Mexico  and  Central  America  to  South  America. 
He  gives  only  one  record  from  Illinois  (Herrin).  The  museum 
collection  contains  males  and  females  from  Havana,  August  and 
September;  Herrin,  August  27  and  July  20,  1925;  Pike,  June  25, 
1906,  and  Algonquin,  September  10,  1914.  Very  little  seems  to  be 
known  regarding  the  habits  of  this  species.  Coad  took  four 
females  at  Havana  at  night  (August  6 and  15,  1911)  while  in  the 
act  of  biting  him. 

Culex  pipiens  L.  The  distribution  of  this  common  house  mos- 
quito can  only  be  definitely  determined  from  an  examination  of 


292  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  V ol-  XXV 


the  males  and  the  larvae.  (It  is  very  difficult  to  separate  the  larva 
of  this  species  from  that  of  Culex  quinquefasciatus).  Males  are 
recorded  from  Herrin,  August;  Carbondale,  October,  and  Mt. 
Carmel,  June.  The  Museum  has  also  a long  series  of  this  species 
collected  in  a school  in  Seoul,  Korea  (October  and  November, 
I9l8)- 

Culex  quinquefasciatus  Say  ( fatigans  Wied.).  Males  of  this 
species  are  recorded  from  Havana,  July,  September  and  October; 
Carbondale,  May  30,  1919,  and  Forest  Glen,  October  2,  1915. 
There  is  a wide  range  of  variation  in  the  hypopygia  of  this  and 
the  preceding  species.  In  a region  where  the  two  species  occur 
there  appears  to  be  all  sorts  of  gradations  and  the  possibility  of 
interbreeding  is  indicated. 

Culex  salinarius  Coq.,  Culex  territans  Walker,  and  Culex  tar- 
salis  Coq.  are  widely  distributed  in  Illinois. 

Aedes  campestris  Dyar  and  Knab.  The  most  eastern  record  of 
this  species  is  Minnesota.  Four  females  were  taken  by  Davis 
along  a railroad  at  Riverdale,  111.,  on  April  9,  1910. 

Aedes  cataphylla  Dyar.  This  species,  according  to  Dyar,  is 
restricted  to  the  Rocky  Mountains,  from  Colorado  north  to  the 
Yukon.  In  the  collection  there  is  one  male  taken  at  Mt.  Carmel, 
111.,  on  June  30,  1906.  This  would  indicate  a much  wider  range 
for  the  species  than  that  given  by  Dyar. 

Aedes  excrucians  Walker.  There  appears  to  be  no  records  of 
this  species  from  Illinois.  I can  record  it  from  Ravinia,  June  8, 
1926;  Glencoe,  June  9,  1926;  Urbana,  October  29,  1926,  and  Al- 
gonquin, May  and  June. 

Aedes  fitchii  Felt  and  Young.  New  records  are  Urbana,  May 
12,  1887  (one  male)  ; Algonquin,  June  (3  males). 

Aedes  flavescens  Muller.  The  most  eastern  record  for  this  spe- 
cies in  the  United  States  is  Minnesota.  In  this  collection  there 
are  4 males  and  3 females  from  Algonquin,  111.  (May  and  June). 

Aedes  hirsuteron  Theobald.  We  have  no  records  of  this  spe- 
cies from  Illinois.  The  following  are  new:  Urbana,  May  and 
June,  1906;  Bishop,  June  23,  1906;  Prophetstown,  July  19,  1927; 
East  St.  Louis,  July  18,  1906;  Ravinia,  July  9,  1926;  Homer,  May 
14,  1906;  Pike,  May  26,  1906;  Golconda,  April  18,  1914;  Pulaski, 
April  21,  1909,  and  Havana,  August  and  October,  1912. 

Aedes  sollicitans  Walker.  Dyar  has  always  recorded  this  spe- 
cies from  the  coastal  areas  from  Maine  to  Florida  and  the  Gulf 


Dec.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  293 


Coast.  I have  a long  series  collected  at  Syracuse,  N.  Y.  In  the 
Illinois  material  there  are  2 males  and  3 females  collected  at  Her- 
rin, 111.,  by  Chandler  on  May  21,  1925.  This  species  certainly 
occurs  inland  breeding  in  salt  areas. 

Aedes  stimulans  Walker.  New  records : Glencoe,  June  9,  1926 ; 
Ravinia,  June  8,  1926;  Bishop,  June  23,  1906;  Muncie,  June  13, 
1906;  Algonquin,  May,  1905;  River  Forest,  July  11,  1913;  North- 
moor  Woods,  June  9,  1926.  (All  records  are  from  Illinois.) 

Aedes  triseriatus  Say.  This  species  is  widespread  throughout 
the  state,  being  represented  by  123  females.  An  interesting  obser- 
vation by  Frison  is  worth  recording.  On  June  30,  1927,  while  col- 
lecting at  a light  he  captured  27  females  in  the  act  of  biting. 

Aedes  vexans  Meig.  This  is  undoubtedly  the  most  abundant 
‘and  widespread  species  in  the  Illinois  area.  Out  of  2,300  speci- 
mens 900  proved  to  be  this  species. 

Aedes  canadensis  Theo.  is  quite  widely  distributed  in  Illinois.  I 
can  record  it  from  Urbana,  May  and  June;  Mascoutah,  July  17, 
1906;  Antioch,  August  1,  1924;  Danville,  July  7,  1906;  Golconda, 
April  18,  1914;  Scott  Field,  May  10,  1918;  Carbondale,  May  4, 
1918,  and  Thebes. 

Aedes  dorsalis  Meig.  is  represented  by  only  three  females  from 
Oak  Park,  May  22,  1909,  and  September  6,  1906. 

Aedes  trivittatus  Coq.  One  female  from  Urbana,  111.,  Septem- 
ber 29,  1929.  Mr.  J.  Lyell  Clarke  records  this  species  as  rather 
abundant  and  annoying  around  Ravinia  Park,  about  twenty  miles 
north  of  Chicago  along  the  shores  of  Lake  Michigan. 

Aedes  nearcticus  Dyar.  This  species  is  recorded  from  the 
Arctic  coast  of  the  Canadian  North  West  Territory,  the  Rocky 
Mountains  south  to  Montana  (Glacier  National  Park).  In  the 
Illinois  collection  are  four  perfect  males  taken  at  Cranbrook, 
B.  C.,  on  May  5,  1921.  I have  also  one  male  taken  at  Alamosa, 
Colorado,  by  S.  C.  Bishop  on  June  17,  1930. 

Aedes  japonicus  Theo.  In  the  Museum  collection  there  are  6 
females  and  5 males  of  this  species  collected  at  Seoul,  Korea,  on 
October  18  and  November  4,  1915.  Edwards  (Bull.  Ent.  Res.,  7, 
p.  212,  1917)  described  Aedes  koreicus  from  a male  and  a female 
collected  in  Korea.  He  states  that  this  species  is  closely  allied  to 
A.  japonicus  Theo.,  differing  only  in  that  the  last  two  hind  tarsal 
joints  are  ringed  with  white.  In  the  material  before  me  there  are 
specimens  with  all  the  hind  tarsal  joints  showing  white  rings  (the 
last  one  very  faint),  and  the  last  joint  without  any  white.  The 


294  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


markings  of  the  other  legs  agree  with  Edwards’  description  of  A. 
koreicus.  As  basal  white  bands  on  the  tarsi  are  rather  variable, 
even  in  reared  specimens  of  the  same  species,  it  would  seem  in- 
advisable to  maintain  A.  koreicus  as  a distinct  species  or  even  as 
a variety. 

Theobaldia  impatiens  Walker.  In  this  collection  there  are  sev- 
eral records  of  interest : i female  from  Lake  Delavan,  Wis.,  col- 
lected on  a hotel  porch  on  April  7,  1892 ; 2 females  from  Minoc- 
cus,  Wis.,  August,  1929 ; 1 male  from  Carbondale,  111.,  October  3, 
1918;  one  female  from  Arrowhead  Lake,  B.  C.,  Canada. 

Theobaldia  inornata  Williston.  This  species  appears  to  be 
common  and  widespread  in  Illinois.  The  following  records  may 
be  noted:  Muncie,  June  8,  1916;  Havana,  April  3 and  October  2; 
Algonquin,  April,  May,  June  and  October  27,  1903 ; Urbana,  Sep- 
tember 29,  1928;  Makanda,  April  16,  1927;  Carbondale,  Septem- 
ber 1,  1918. 

Psorophora  columbiae  Dyar  and  Knab.  Males  and  females  are 
recorded  from  Grand  Tower,  July,  1906;  Oak  Park,  July  28, 
1900,  and  Carbondale,  October  15,  1918. 

Psorophora  ciliata  Labr.  Only  a single  female  taken  by  Lrison 
at  light  at  Homer  Park  on  July  6,  1927,  is  in  the  collection. 

Psorophora  posticata  Wied.  This  species  can  be  recorded  from 
White  Heath,  April  7,  1915;  Mascoutah,  July  17,  1906;  East  St. 
Louis,  July  18,  1906,  and  Havana,  September  18,  1895.  (All 
records  from  Illinois.) 

Orthopodomyia  signifer  Coq.  One  male  and  one  female  col- 
lected at  Urbana,  111.,  on  September  2 and  July  31,  1916. 

Mansonia  ( Taeniorhynchus ) perturbans  Walker.  This  species 
may  be  recorded  from  Roxana,  June  20,  1927;  Danville,  July  7, 
1906,  and  Algonquin,  June  and  July.  These  are  the  first  known 
records  from  Illinois.  There  were  27  specimens  in  the  collection. 

Uranotaenia  sapphirina  O.  S.  One  female  from  Herrin,  111., 
August  26,  1920. 


Dec.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  295 


FOUR  NEW  SPECIES  OF  MIRIDAE  FROM  TEXAS 
(HEMIPTERA).* 

By  H.  G.  Johnston,  Ames,  Iowa. 

Phytocoris  conspicuus  n.  sp. 

This  species  is  readily  distinguished  from  other  related 
species  by  its  conspicuous  red  markings  and  male  genital 
claspers. 

Length  5.58  mm.,  width  1.93  mm.  Head:  width  .96 
mm.,  vertex  .37  mm.,  clothed  with  silvery  simple  hairs  and 
sericeous  pubescence ; yellow,  frons  marked  with  bright  red 
oblique  lines ; tylus  yellow,  apical  third  bright  red,  basal  two- 
thirds  with  irregular  red  lines ; juga  and  lora  more  red  than 
yellow.  In  one  dark  specimen  the  head  becomes  uniformly 
dark  reddish  brown,  the  oblique  lines  on  frons  nearly  obso- 
lete. Rostrum,  length  2.31  mm.,  reaching  upon  third  ventral 
segment,  yellowish,  apical  segment  brownish  to  black.  An- 
tennae: segment  I,  length  1.21  mm.,  red,  broad  pale  band  an- 
terior to  middle,  clothed  with  many  pale  yellowish  bristles 
which  in  length  are  equal  to  more  than  thickness  of  segment ; 

II,  2.2  mm.,  reddish  brown,  with  broad  pale  band  at  base,  a 
broader  pale  band  anterior  to  middle  but  sometimes  obscure ; 

III,  1.5  mm.,  fuscous,  pale  at  base;  IV,  1.13  mm.,  uniformly 
fuscous.  Pronotum:  length  .92  mm.,  width  at  base  1.59  mm. 

Dorsum  clothed  with  simple  brownish  pubescence  and  in- 
termixed with  white  sericeous  pubescence,  the  latter  more 
abundant  on  mesoscutum,  base  of  scutellum,  transverse  band 
across  middle  of  hemelytra  and  a rounded  patch  near  apex 
of  corium.  Dorsum  yellowish  and  darkened  with  fuscous ; 
pronotal  disk  slightly  fuscous,  an  irregular  darker  area  ex- 
tending along  lateral  margins  posterior  to  calli  and  across 
posterior  margin,  interrupted  by  pale  areas  near  humeral 
angles  and  on  middle  of  posterior  margin ; calli  and  collar 
uniformly  yellow.  Scutellum  uniformly  yellow,  a dusky  to 
fuscous  point  on  each  margin  near  apex;  mesoscutum  be- 
coming fuscous  in  dark  specimens.  Hemelytra  yellowish, 
clavus,  inner  margin  of  corium  and  obscure  transverse  band 
near  apex  fuscous,  base  of  cuneus  reddish  yellow,  apex  with 
red  extending  along  both  margins  nearly  to  base.  In  darker 
specimens  the  apex  becomes  reddish  brown  and  the  base  yel- 


* Contribution  from  the  Zoology  and  Entomology  Department, 
Iowa  State  College,  Ames,  Iowa. 


296  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


lowish  brown.  Membrane  dark  fuscous,  conspurcate  with 
irregular  white  spots,  a white  angular  spot  on  margin  at  apex 
of  cuneus  and  a second  somewhat  smaller  one  about  middle 
of  lateral  margin;  veins  fuscous,  pale  around  apices  of 
areoles.  Ventral  surface  uniformly  yellow;  legs  yellow,  api- 
cal half  of  femora  red,  marked  with  irregular  yellow  spots; 
tibiae  pale,  annulate  with  broad  unequal  red  bands ; tarsi  pale, 
base  and  apex  fuscous.  In  darker  specimens  the  red  on  the 
legs  becomes  reddish  brown. 

J1.  Length  5.46  mm.,  width  1.76  mm.  Head:  width  .96 
mm.,  vertex  .33  mm.  Rostrum,  length  2.18  mm.,  reaching 
upon  the  fourth  ventral  segment,  reddish  brown,  apical  seg- 
ment black.  Antennae : segment  I,  length  1.15  mm.,  color  and 
pubescence  as  in  female;  II,  2.12  mm.,  pale  brownish,  pale 
bands,  as  in  female,  obscure;  III,  1.38  mm.,  fuscous,  pale  at 
base;  IV,  1.09  mm.,  uniformly  fuscous.  Pronotum:  length 
.84  mm.,  width  at  base  1.55  mm.,  coloration  and  pubescence 
similar  to  female ; pronotal  disk  fuscous,  collar,  calli,  line 
along  middle  and  irregular  line  on  posterior  margin  pale. 
Genital  claspers  distinctive  as  shown  by  drawing.  (Fig.  1.) 


Fig.  1.  Phytocoris  conspicuus  n.  sp.  A,  left  postero-lateral 
view  of  genital  segment  showing  left  clasper  and  flattened 
tubercle  a;  B,  right  postero-lateral  view  showing  right  clas- 
per and  outline  of  inner  margin  of  genital  segment. 


Dec.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  297 


Holotype:  5,  October  12,  1928,  College  Station,  Texas  (S.  E. 
Jones)  ; author’s  collection. 

Allotype:  October  6,  1928,  College  Station,  Texas  (S.  E. 

Jones). 

Paratypes : 2 J,  October  5,  2 5 October  6,  October  12,  1928, 
topotypic  (S.  E.  Jones).  All  the  specimens  were  taken  at  a light 
trap.  5 $,  “ Colo.”  (C.  F.  Baker)  ; U.  S.  National  Museum 
collection. 

Three  of  the  paratypes  are  in  Dr.  H.  H.  Knight’s  collection, 
five  of  them  in  U.  S.  N.  M.  collection  and  the  others  in  the 
author’s  collection. 

Eustictus  knighti  n.  sp. 

Closely  allied  to  albocuneatus  Knight,  but  differs  in  being 
larger,  having  longer  membrane,  and  cuneus  and  antennal 
segment  I being  devoid  of  long  erect  hairs. 

J'.  Length  6.7  mm.,  width  2.35  mm.  Head:  width  1.3 
mm. ; vertex  .21  mm.,  reddish  brown;  frons  black.  Rostrum: 
length  .31  mm.,  reaching  slightly  beyond  posterior  margins  of 
hind  coxae.  Antennae:  segment  I,  length  .96  mm.,  reddish 
brown,  marked  with  pale,  irregular  transverse  bands,  sparsely 
covered  with  very  short,  fine,  pale  pubescence ; II,  2.64  mm., 
densely  covered  with  very  short,  fine,  pale  pubescence,  the 
pale  markings  as  in  I,  but  somewhat  obscure  except  in  dark 
colored  specimens;  III,  1.38  mm.,  markings  and  pubescence 
as  in  II;  IV,  1.13  mm.,  reddish  brown,  pubescence  less  dense 
than  on  other  segments.  Pronotum:  length  1.21  mm.,  width 
at  base  2.05  mm.,  black,  the  basal  third  often  dark  reddish 
brown,  very  narrow  white  line  extending  across  basal  margin. 

Dorsum  with  many  rather  uniformly  spaced,  long,  erect 
hairs  on  pronotum,  scutellum,  and  hemelytra  excepting 
cuneus  and  embolium.  Ground  color  reddish  yellow  to 
brownish,  head,  except  vertex,  pronotum,  scutellum,  and  in- 
ner apical  area  of  corium,  dark  brownish  to  black,  apical 
fourth  of  embolium  reddish  brown,  its  extreme  edge  black, 
basal  half  of  cuneus  opaque  white,  apex  dark  brown.  Legs 
red,  apex  of  femora  and  tibiae  dark  reddish  brown.  Venter 
uniformly  red  except  genital  segment  which  is  reddish  brown. 
Hind  tibiae  covered  with  very  long  erect  hairs,  also  a few 
long  erect  hairs  on  apex  of  hind  femora. 

5.  Length  7.1  mm.,  width  2.6  mm.  Head:  width  1.26 
mm.,  vertex  .42  mm.  Antennae : segment  I,  length  1.13  mm.  ; 
II,  2.89  mm.;  Ill,  1.51  mm.;  IV,  1.13  mm.  Pronotum:  length 


298  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


1.34  mm.,  width  at  base  2.26  mm.  Slightly  larger  but  other- 
wise very  similar  to  the  male. 

Holotype:  J',  May  9,  1929,  College  Station,  Texas  (H.  G. 
Johnston)  ; author’s  collection. 

Allotype:  2,  May  22,  1930,  College  Station,  Texas  (H.  G. 
Johnston). 

Paratypes >:  10  taken  with  the  holotype.  3 J',  taken  with  al- 

lotype. J,  October  6;  J1,  October  7;  October  21,  1928,  topo- 
typic  (S.  E.  Jones).  lCJ,  May  16,  1929;  2 May  7,  1930,  topo- 

typic  (H.  G.  Johnston).  All  the  specimens  were  taken  at  light 
traps.  2>  Texas  (Belfrage)  ; U.  S.  N.  M.  collection. 

This  beautiful  species  is  named  in  honor  of  Dr.  H.  H.  Knight, 
who  has  so  willingly  given  his  time  to  make  possible  the  correct 
determination  of  the  author’s  collection  of  Miridae. 

Labopidea  geminata  n.  sp. 

Allied  to  planifrons  Knight,  but  readily  distinguished  by 
longer  antennal  segments  II  and  III,  narrower  vertex,  longer 
and  more  erect  pubescence,  and  in  the  pale  yellowish  green 
color ; male  genitalia  distinctive. 

Length  3.9  mm.,  width  1.17  mm.  Head:  width  .79 
mm.,  vertex  .44  mm. ; vertex  and  frons  distinctly  elevated, 
not  as  flat  as  in  planifrons.  Rostrum,  length  .71  mm.,  reach- 
ing well  beyond  the  hind  margins  of  front  coxae.  Antennae : 
segment  I,  length  .31  mm.;  II,  1.13  mm.;  Ill,  1 mm.;  IV,  .42 
mm.,  very  slender ; segments  I and  II  uniformly  pale  yellow- 
ish, covered  with  conspicuous,  brownish  hairs,  segments  III 
and  IV  uniformly  brown.  Pronotum : length  .37  mm.,  width 
at  base  .92  mm. ; disk  distinctly  elevated. 

Color  pale  yellowish  green,  head,  pronotum,  scutellum  and 
venter  paler;  membrane  uniformly  dusky  brown.  Clothed 
with  simple  erect  pubescence  which  is  longer  and  coarser 
than  in  planifrons.  Male  claspers  distinctive,  similar  to 
those  of  planifrons,  but  the  lower  margin  of  left  clasper 
forming  a rather  broadly  curved  hook  (not  tightly  com- 
pressed as  in  planifrons) , the  extreme  tip  reaching  back  to  a 
point  almost  opposite  the  middle  of  clasper;  right  clasper 
more  slender  than  in  planifrons,  the  distal  margin  forming  an 
acuminate  spine  which  curves  downward.  Aedeagus  very 
short,  scarcely  extending  beyond  posterior  margin  of  left 
clasper. 

2 (Macropterous) . Length  3.52  mm.,  width  1.33  mm. 
Head:  width  .79  mm.,  vertex  .48  mm.  Rostrum,  length  .71 


Dec.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  299 


mm.,  reaching  beyond  posterior  margins  of  front  coxae.  An- 
tennae : segment  I,  length  .29  mm. ; II,  .92  mm. ; III,  .79  mm. ; 
IV,  .42  mm.  Pronotum:  length  .37  mm.,  width  at  base  .96 
mm.  Shorter  and  broader  than  male  but  otherwise  very  sim- 
ilar. 

5 (Brachypterous) . Length  3.15  mm.,  width  1.34  mm. 
Head:  width  .84  mm.,  vertex  .52  mm.  Rostrum,  length  .79 
mm.  Antennae : segment  I,  length  .29  mm. ; II,  .96  mm. ; 
III,  .84  mm. ; IV,  .42  mm.  Pronotum : length  .37  mm.,  width 
at  base  .94  mm.  Coloration  and  pubescence  as  in  macrop- 
terous  form ; form  somewhat  shorter  and  broader ; hemelytra 
covering  a little  more  than  half  the  abdomen,  completely  de- 
veloped excepting  membrane  which  is  practically  absent,  the 
cuneus  round  at  apex.  This  form  occurs  much  more  abun- 
dantly than  the  macropterous  form. 

Holotype:  <£,  April  4,  1928,  Huntsville,  Texas  (H.  G.  John- 
ston) ; author’s  collection. 

Allotype:  §,  taken  with  the  holotype. 

Morphotype:  J,  taken  with  the  holotype. 

Paratypes:  31  J'J,  taken  with  the  types  on  wild  garlic,  Allium 
canadense,  where  the  species  was  breeding  in  abundance. 

This  species  is  another  example  of  geminate  species,  geminata 
being  a southern  twin  of  planifrons  Knight  which  is  known  to 
occur  from  Iowa  westward  to  South  Dakota. 

Lepidopsallus  nyssae  n.  sp. 

Closely  allied  to  miniatus  Knight  but  distinguished  by  pale 
brownish  color  and  the  relative  lengths  of  antennal  segments 
I and  II. 

Length  3.02  mm.,  width  1.42  mm.  Head:  width  .75 
mm.,  vertex  .31  mm.  Rostrum,  length  1.05  mm.,  just  attain- 
ing posterior  margins  of  middle  coxae.  Antennae:  segment 
I,  length  .14  mm.;  II,  .79  mm.;  Ill,  .33  mm.;  IV,  .23  mm.  ; 
uniformly  pale  yellowish,  two  apical  segments  sometimes 
dusky.  Pronotum:  length  .63  mm.,  width  at  base  1.15  mm. 

Color  pale  brown  to  fuscous,  never  reddish  as  in  miniatus, 
head,  pronotum  and  scutellum  dark  fuscous  to  black,  heme- 
lytra pale  brownish,  sometimes  becoming  dark  brownish,  lat- 
eral apical  half  of  corium  fuscous,  cuneus  uniformly  pale 
brownish,  translucent,  membrane  fuscous,  veins  pale. 
Clothed  with  silvery  scale-like  pubescence  and  intermixed 
with  pale  yellowish  to  fuscous  simple  pubescence.  Legs  dark 
brown,  apex  of  femora,  tibiae  and  tarsi  pale;  tibial  spines 


300  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


black,  arising  from  brown  spots  which  become  obscure  api- 
cally.  Ventral  surface  uniformly  dark  brownish. 

$.  Length  2.98  mm.,  width  1.59  mm.  Head:  width  .79 
mm.,  vertex  .37  mm.  Rostrum,  length  .96  mm.,  scarcely  at- 
taining posterior  margins  of  middle  coxae.  Antennae : seg- 
ment I,  length  .14  mm.;  II,  .67  mm.;  Ill,  .29  mm.;  IV,  .22 
mm. ; uniformly  pale  yellowish.  Pronotum,  length  .67  mm.,, 
width  at  base  1.26  mm. 

Color  much  paler  than  in  male,  dorsum  uniformly  pale 
brownish  except  anterior  half  of  pronotum  and  head  which 
are  fuscous  to  black.  Ventral  surface  pale  brownish,  meso- 
sternum  and  genital  segment  brown,  shining.  Legs  uniformly 
pale,  bases  of  fore  coxae  brown,  shining.  Pubescence  as  in 
male. 

Holotype:  lCf,  May  12,  1928,  College  Station,  Texas  (H.  G. 
Johnston)  ; author’s  collection. 

Allotype:  taken  with  the  holotype. 

Paratypes : 52  taken  with  the  types  on  black  gum,  Nyssa 
sylvatica , where  the  species  was  breeding. 

The  writer  has  taken  a large  series  of  Lepidopsallus  miniatus 
Knight  at  College  Station,  Texas,  where  the  species  breeds  on  post 
oak,  Quercus  stellata.  L.  nyssae  n.  sp.,  although  closely  related, 
is  readily  separated  from  miniatus  Knight,  the  distinguishing  char- 
acteristics being  very  constant. 


Note  on  Eurymus  eurytheme  autumnalis. — In  Comstock’s 
fine  book  on  the  Butterflies  of  California,  p.  51,  it  is  stated  that 
autumnalis  is  an  early  spring  form,  but  is  occasionally  taken  in 
the  fall,  “probably  as  a result  of  an  early  cold  spell  influencing 
the  pupa.”  However,  it  occurs  quite  regularly  and  commonly  in 
the  fall  at  Boulder,  Colorado.  This  year  we  are  having  a very 
warm  fall,  and  autumnalis,  in  quite  characteristic  form,  is  very 
abundant,  but  by  no  means  to  the  exclusion  of  true  eurytheme . — 
T.  D.  A.  Cockerell,  Boulder,  Colo. 


Dec.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  301 


BOOK  NOTES. 

Field  Book  of  Ponds  and  Streams.  An  Introduction  to  the 

Life  of  Fresh  Water,  by  Ann  Haven  Morgan,  Ph.D.  (G.  P. 

Putnam’s  Sons,  New  York.  $3.50.) 

It  was  a great  pleasure  to  the  reviewer  to  read  Dr.  Morgan’s 
book.  It  is  one  of  those  publications  rare  in  our  country,  that  es- 
capes, on  the  one  hand,  the  depths  of  professional  terms ; and  on 
the  other,  the  shallows  of  science  and  language,  both  so  simplified 
as  to  become  inane.  On  occasion  we  have  drawn  attention  to  the 
popular  nature  books  published  in  England.  These  books,  while 
scientifically  correct,  are  yet  set  forth  in  simple  language  and  free 
from  a condensation  that  depends  on  the  liberal  use  of  portman- 
teau words  or  of  many-syllabled  technicisms.  These  English 
books  adhere  closely  to  demonstrated  facts  and  are  designed  to 
inform  persons  with  an  intelligent  although  non-technical  interest 
in  the  workings  of  nature.  Dr.  Morgan  has  achieved  the  same  re- 
sult signally  well ; and  sets  a difficult  standard  for  other  authors 
to  follow. 

The  subject-matter  embraces  all  the  components  of  life  in  pond 
and  stream,  from  their  water  and  pebbles  to  their  vertebrate  deni- 
zens, through  plants  and  protozoans  to  mollusks,  fishes  and  rep- 
tiles. There  are  300  line  cuts,  15  plates  in  black  and  white  and  8 
in  color,  all  excellent  and  many  in  the  most  artistic  spirit.  The 
correctness  of  these  figures  makes  it  easy  to  recognize  the  things 
they  represent. 

Naturally,  in  such  a work  it  is  not  possible,  nor  even  wise  or 
desirable,  to  go  at  length  into  any  one  topic  when  (at  a rough  esti- 
mate) nearly  400  forms  are  mentioned  in  a field  book  limited  to 
45°  pages.  Insects  occupy  about  one-fourth  of  the  book ; and  of 
these,  Dr.  Morgan’s  favorite  forms  are  referred  to  more  in  detail 
than  the  others,  which  does  not  detract  from  the  book.  The  re- 
viewer’s own  favorites,  he  feels,  might  have  had  a more  extensive 
treatment.  Much  that  is  known  about  waterbugs  and  their  habits 
is  not  mentioned,  as,  e.g.,  that  the  genus  Buenoa  is  one  among  the 
limited  number  of  insects  that  have  haemoglobin  in  their  blood, 
as  shown  by  Dr.  Hungerford;  or  the  growth  and  development  of 
the  tiny  Microveliae ; or  that  the  surface  bugs  have  winged  and 
wingless  forms  in  the  adults  of  the  same  species.  But  this  is  al- 
most captiousness,  to  point  out  these  absences  in  a work  which  as 
a whole  is  the  best  thing  done  in  a popular  way  in  this  country  on 
the  life  of  ponds  and  streams. 


302  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


The  bibliography  is  helpful,  but  uneven  in  its  references.  Un- 
der some  heads  highly  technical  papers  are  listed,  while  under 
others  only  one  or  two  general  works  are  mentioned,  the  aquatic 
Heteroptera  being  among  the  sufferers.  Since  the  date  of  Hun- 
gerford’s  Biology  of  Aquatic  Hemiptera,  numerous  works  on  this 
group  have  been  published  by  him,  which  might  well  have  been 
included. 

However,  this  work  is  to  be  judged  as  a fine  whole;  as  such,  it 
is  a credit  to  the  author  and  to  the  publisher.  In  fact,  no  general 
student  of  insects  can  well  neglect  it  as  a condensed  source  book 
on  habits  and  ecology  of  the  aquatic  forms. 

The  price  may  seem  high,  but  unfortunately,  the  cost  of  print- 
ing is  heavy;  and  all  the  details  that  go  to  the  making  of  a book 
are  so  costly  that  publishers  must  set  their  values  up  to  be  able  to 
present  such  fine  works  as  this  to  the  public.  Even  so,  it  costs  no 
more  than  the  price  of  one  theatre  ticket,  which,  strange  to  say,  is 
ungrudgingly  bought  to  achieve  an  ephemeral  and  frequently 
worthless  pleasure. 

J.  R.  T.-B. 

Blatchleyana.  A List  of  the  Published  Writings  of  W.  S. 
Blatchley,  A.B.,  A.M.,  LL.D.,  of  Indianapolis,  Indiana,  and 
Dunedin,  Florida.  Together  with  a chronology  of  his  life;  the 
fixation  of  types  of  new  genera  and  species  described  by  him,, 
etc.,  etc.  (Nature  Publishing  Co.,  Indianapolis.  $1.10.) 

The  Editor  has  received  from  his  friend,  Dr.  W.  S.  Blatchley,, 
this  brochure  on  his  public  life  and  labors — prepared,  as  he  says, 
“mainly  as  a time  saver  for  posterity.”  It  contains  in  narrative 
form  the  principal  public  events  of  his  busy  life,  and  a complete 
list  of  all  his  publications. 

Speaking  as  one  of  Dr.  Blatchley’s  contemporaries,  his  mar- 
velous industry  and  single-hearted  devotion  to  the  sciences  he 
loves  so  well  and  has  served  so  long,  have  made  his  fellows  in 
many  fields  his  debtors.  These  labors  have  assuredly  opened  to 
many  vast  horizons  of  the  wonderful  phenomena  of  nature  and 
the  mind  back  of  it  all. 

Beginning  his  productivity  in  1885,  he  has  maintained  it  with 
scarce  an  interruption  to  this  very  day ; and  in  this  long  period  he 
has  written  six  volumes  and  over  190  articles  on  Mollusca,  geol- 
ogy and  entomology  in  its  various  phrases.  Dr.  Blatchley  obviously 
has  put  Indiana  on  the  map  of  science  because,  from  whatever 


Bee.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  303 


point,  he  has  taught  the  love  and  appreciation  of  nature  at  all 
times.  His  is  surely  an  enviable  record ; and  these  words  are  a 
personal  tribute  to  him  from  the  writer,  who  believes  that  appre- 
ciation in  life  is  far  better  than  posthumous  eulogy. 

Dr.  Blatchley  might  well  say,  “ Si  monumentum  requires,  'cir- 
cumspice.” 

Meantime,  he  has  produced  something  of  great  present  use,  for 
which  his  fellows  should  be  grateful ; and  he  has  set  an  example 
which  might  well  be  followed  by  some  of  our  high-pressure  pro- 
ducers (including  this  one). 


J.  R.  T.-B. 


304  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


PROCEEDINGS  OF  THE  SOCIETY. 

Meeting  of  May  15,  1930. 

A regular  meeting  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  was 
held  at  the  Brooklyn  Museum  on  Thursday  evening,  May  15, 
1930.  President  Davis  in  the  chair,  and  twelve  members  present, 
viz.,  Messrs.  Anderson,  Bowdoin,  Burke,  Chapin,  Cooper,  Engel- 
hardt,  Lemmer,  Lerch,  Shoemaker,  Sheridan,  Siepmann  and 
Torre-Bueno,  and  five  visitors. 

In  the  absence  of  the  secretary,  Mr.  Siepmann  acted  as  secre- 
tary pro  tern. 

The  minutes  of  the  previous  meeting  were  read  and  approved, 
and  Mr.  Engelhardt  presented  the  monthly  report  of' the  treasurer. 

Mr.  Torre-Bueno  reported  for  the  publication  committee  and 
announced  that  the  next  issue  of  the  Bulletin  would  be  out  in 
two  weeks. 

Mr.  Engelhardt  moved  that  Dr.  J.  Douglas  Hood,  University 
of  Rochester,  Rochester,  New  York,  be  elected  a member  of  the 
society,  which  was  accordingly  done. 

He  also1  read  a communication  concerning  the  death  on  May  1, 
1930,  of  Dr.  Barnes,  of  Decatur,  Illinois,  a member  of  the  society 
since  its  reorganization,  and  an  outstanding  collector  of  Lepidop- 
tera.  Mr.  Engelhardt  said  that  the  Barnes  collection  contained 
several  thousand  types  of  American  species,  and  that  it  would  be 
highly  desirable  that  the  collection  remain  in  the  United  States. 

A clipping  from  a Danish  newspaper  was  exhibited  acknowl- 
edging the  bequest  of  a collection  of  Lepidoptera  and  Coleoptera 
to  the  Danish  Zoological  Museum  by  the  late  Dr.  Herman  Maeske, 
of  Brooklyn,  N.  Y. 

Mr.  Cooper  exhibited  a large  number  of  specimens  of  salt  marsh 
Pselaphidae  collected  by  him  at  Flushing,  L.  I.  He  also  reported 
that  he  found  Isolomalus  histriatus  (Histeridae)  common  beneath 
oak  bark  at  the  same  locality. 

Mr.  Davis  exhibited  a specimen  of  a hook  tip  moth,  Drepana 
arcuata  Walker  collected  by  Burke  and  Davis  near  Richmond  Val- 
ley, S.  I.,  on  April  20,  1930.  This  is  an  early  date,  other  local 
records  being  in  May  and  June. 

Mr.  Engelhardt  spoke  of  his  trip  aboard  the  yacht  Peary. 
Leaving  San  Francisco  the  first  stop  was  Socorro,  a small,  rocky 
volcanic  island  five  hundred  miles  off  the  west  coast  of  Mexico. 
The  island  is  uninhabited  and  occasional  whalers  are  the  only  vis- 


Dec.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  305 


itors,  the  blue  whale  being  common  in  these  waters.  An  attempt 
had  once  been  made  to  raise  sheep  there,  with  the  result  that  the 
island  is  overrun  with  them.  Owing  to  the  lack  of  human  beings 
and  predaceous  animals  on  the  island,  the  sheep  are  quite  tame  and 
barely  alarmed  by  the  approach  of  man. 

Insects  were  rather  sparse  on  the  island,  but  some  Cicindelidae 
and  other  insects  were  obtained.  An  attempt  was  made  to  ascend 
Mt.  Everman,  a high  peak  in  the  center  of  the  island,  but  consid- 
erable difficulty  was  experienced  due  to  lack  of  sufficient  drinking 
water. 

Proceeding  toward  the  Panama  Canal,  large  numbers  of  marine 
water  striders  of  the  genus  Helobates  were  observed  five  to  ten 
miles  from  land.  The  striders  were  very  active,  and  only  one 
specimen  could  be  obtained.  Flying  fish  were  also  common  in 
these  waters,  some  of  them  flying  a hundred  or  more  feet  before 
touching  the  water.  Thousands  of  Brentids,  Brentus  anchorago, 
were  found  beneath  bark  at  Balboa,  Panama.  Mr.  Engelhardt  ex- 
hibited a large  series  of  specimens  which  showed  great  variation 
in  size. 

After  passing  through  the  canal,  Mr.  Engelhardt  visited  his 
brother’s  coffee  plantation  in  Guatemala.  Enormous  oak  trees 
grow  in  this  region,  and  he  exhibited  a large  gall  taken  from  one 
of  them,  from  which  were  bred  some  clearwinged  moths  ( Aegeri - 
idae). 

The  meeting  adjourned  at  10.15  p.  m. 

Carl  Geo.  Siepmann, 
Secretary  pro  tem. 

Meeting  of  October  16,  1930. 

A regular  meeting  of  the  Brooklyn  Enomological  Society  was 
held  at  the  Brooklyn  Museum,  on  Thursday  evening,  October  16, 
1930,  at  8.10  p.  m. 

President  Davis  in  the  Chair  and  17  members  present,  viz.: 
Messrs.  Ballou,  Bell,  Bowdoin,  Cooper,  Engelhardt,  Lemmer, 
Lerch,  Ruckes,  Schaeffer,  Sheridan,  Shoemaker,  Siepmann, 
Torre-Bueno,  Wilford,  Wurster,  Glanz,  Dr.  Risch,  and  10  visitors. 

Minutes  of  the  previous  meeting  read  and  approved. 

The  report  of  the  Treasurer  was  not  presented. 

Mr.  Torre-Bueno  reported  briefly  for  the  Publication  Com- 
mittee. 


306  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.xxv 


Mr.  Schaeffer  proposed  for  membership:  Mr.  A.  Glanz,  1593 
Bedford  Avenue,  Brooklyn,  N.  Y. 

Mr.  Glanz  being  present,  it  was  regularly  moved  and  seconded 
that  the  By-laws  be  suspended  and  the  Secretary  cast  one  ballot 
for  the  election  of  Mr.  Glanz.  The  motion  being  carried  the  Sec- 
retary cast  the  ballot  electing  Mr.  Glanz  to  membership. 

Mr.  C.  W.  Wurster,  15  West  nth  Street,  New  York  City,  was 
next  proposed  for  membership,  and  as  he  was  also  present  the 
same  procedure  was  followed  as  with  Mr.  Glanz  and  Mr.  Wurster 
was  duly  elected  to  membership. 

Mr.  Cooper  exhibited  21  species  of  Coleoptera,  which  he  had 
collected  on  Long  Island,  and  which  are  new  to  the  New  York 
State  List.  Mr.  Cooper  expects  to  later  publish  a paper  record- 
ing these  species  in  detail. 

Mr.  Schaeffer  exhibited  specimens  of  the  following  species  of 
Coleoptera : 

Dermestes  peruvianus  Cast. — A number  of  specimens  taken  on 
dried  caribou  skins  at  the  Brooklyn  Museum;  also  a specimen 
taken  some  years  ago  in  Prospect  Park,  Brooklyn,  by  Mr.  Schif- 
fer.  New  to  the  United  States. 

Dermestes  cadaverinus  F. — A specimen  was  found  in  lower 
Manhattan  by  Mr.  Siepmann.  New  to  the  New  York  State  List. 

Gibhium  psylloides  Czemp. — A specimen  on  dried  caribou  hide ; 
Mr.  Cooper  found  a specimen  at  Flushing  on  seaweed.  New  to 
Long  Island. 

Mezium  americanum  Lap. — Several  specimens  taken  by  Mrs 
Blenderman  in  one  of  her  rooms  in  Brooklyn.  New  to  Long 
Island. 

Ptinus  raptor  Sturm. — Six  specimens,  2 males  and  4 females, 
were  found  in  one  of  the  school  loan  collection  boxes  of  the  Chil- 
dren’s Museum  containing  a very  small  nest  of  Vespa  maculata  L. 
A European  species  new  to  the  United  States. 

Mr.  Pollard  presented  his  paper  “Collecting  Insects  on  the 
Amazon.”  Mr.  Pollard,  as  usual,  gave  a very  interesting  account 
of  his  recent  trip  up  the  Amazon  River  as  far  as  Iquitos,  Peru. 
He  spoke  particularly  of  his  experiences  collecting  in  the  tropical 
forest,  and  of  the  insects  which  came  aboard  the  boat,  and  also 
of  his  meeting  the  Rev.  A.  Miles  Moss,  of  Para,  Brazil,  a keen 
entomologist  who  is  doing  a great  deal  of  work  in  the  life-history 
of  the  butterflies  of  that  locality.  Mr.  Pollard  is  going  to  publish 


Bee.,  1930  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  307 


in  detail  the  story  of  his  trip.  He  exhibited  a number  of  speci- 
mens from  his  captures. 

At  the  conclusion  of  Mr.  Pollard’s  remarks,  Mr.  Wm.  T.  Davis 
exhibited  the  following  named  four  species  of  Cicadas,  all  of 
which  had  been  attracted  by  the  light  at  night  on  the  boat  on  which 
Mr.  Pollard  proceeded  on  his  journey  on  the  Amazon : Proarna 
insignis  Distant,  one  specimen;  Fidicina  viridis  Oliv.,  two  speci- 
mens ; F.  bogotana  Distant,  ten  speemens,  and  Fidicina  mannifera 
Fabr.  two  specimens.  He  further  stated  that  the  Cicada  figured 
by  Madam  Merian  in  1705,  and  named  tibicen  by  Linne  in  1758 
from  the  figure,  was  evidently  quite  closely  related  to  mannifera, 
and  he  showed  a specimen  from  South  America  which  he  regarded 
as  Fidicina  tibicen.  The  name  tibicen  was  for  many  years  applied 
to  several  of  our  own  native  green  and  black  species,  and  so  has 
a particular  interest  to  us. 

Mr.  Wilford  exhibited  a male  specimen  of  Celtiphaga  celtis 
Boisduval  & LeConte,  collected  at  Richmond,  Staten  Island,  N.  Y., 
on  August  13,  1930.  Celtis  is  locally  of  much  less  frequent  oc- 
currence than  the  allied  species  Celtiphaga  clyton  Boisduval  & 
LeConte. 

Mr.  Davis  exhibited  a dragon-fly  which  had  been  placed  on  a 
thorn  by  a shrike.  The  specimen  came  from  Florida. 

Mr.  Cooper  remarked  on  a Cecropia  larva  which  he  had  found 
at  Flushing,  N.  Y.,  impaled  on  a thorn,  presumably  by  a shrike. 

Mr.  Torre-Bueno  exhibited  living  specimens  of  Barce  uhleri 
Banks  which  he  had  obtained  on  October  13,  1930,  while  sifting  at 
White  Plains,  N.  Y.  This  small  species  of  Hemiptera  catches 
other  small  insects  after  the  manner  of  a mantid. 

Mr.  Glanz  reported  having  received  a shipment  of  about  4,000 
specimens  of  insects  from  Assam,  India,  a number  of  which  he 
exhibited. 

Mr.  Torre-Bueno  exhibited  a copy  of  “Field  Book  of  Ponds  and 
Streams”  by  Ann  Haven  Morgan,  published  by  G.  P.  Putnam’s 
Sons,  and  remarked  on  the  excellence  of  its  treatment  of  the  fauna 
and  flora  of  these  places. 

Adjourned:  10.30  p.  m. 

E.  L.  Bell, 
Secretary. 


TABLE  OF  CONTENTS  TO  VOLUME  XXV. 


(Arranged  alphabetically  throughout.) 
Book  Notes. 


A Manual  for  the  Study  of  In- 
sects, J.  R.  T.-B.,  231 
Blatchleyana,  J.  R.  T.-B.,  302 
Field  Book  of  Ponds  and 
Streams,  J.  R.  T.-B.,  361 
Gall  Wasps  of  the  Genus  Cy- 
nips,  J.  R.  T.-B.,  184 
General  Catalogue  of  the  He- 
miptera:  Fascicle  II,  Meso- 
veliidae,  J.  R.  T.-B.,  52 


General  Catalogue  of  the  He- 
miptera:  Fascicle  III,  Pyr- 
rhocoridae,  J.  R.  T.-B.,  124 
Studies  of  the  Insect  Fauna  of 
Iowa  Prairies,  J.  R.  T.-B., 
231 

The  Mosquitoes  of  North 
America,  J.  Bequaert,  183 
The  Problems  of  Applied  En- 
tomology, J.  R.  T.-B.,  50 


COLEOPTERA. 


Addicted  to  Strong  Waters,  C. 
A.  Frost,  41 

Anthaxia  aeneogaster,  C.  A. 
Frost,  146 

Cis  frosti,  C.  A.  Frost,  41 
English  Sparrows  Eating  the 
Japanese  Beetle,  E.  L.  Bell,  8 
Epiphanis  cornutus  Esch.,  C.  A. 
Frost,  53 

Ludius  fidvipes  Bland,  C.  A. 
Frost,  41 

Orchestes  testaceus  Mul.,  C.  A. 
Frost,  97 


Seeking  a Better  Climate,  C.  A. 
Frost,  146 

S terms  retrusus  Casey,  C.  A. 
Frost,  53 

Synonymies  of  Antillean  Chry- 
somelidae,  with  Descriptions 
of  New  Species,  Doris  H. 
Blake,  209 

The  Japanese  Beetle  on  Staten 
Island,  Wm.  T.  Davis,  95 
The  Names  of  Certain  Rhyn- 
chopora,  J.  Chester  Bradley, 
259 


Diptera. 


A Comparison  of  the  More  Im- 
portant Structural  Details  of 
the  Larva  of  the  Archaic 
Tanyderid  Dipteron  Proto- 
plasa  fitchii  with  other  Holo- 
metabola  from  the  Stand- 
point of  Phylogeny,  G.  C. 
Crampton,  239 

Distribution  Notes  on  Culi- 
cidae,  Robert  Matheson,  291 
New  or  Insufficiently-known 
Craneflies  from  the  Nearctic 


Region,  C.  P.  Alexander,  Pt. 
I,  71 ; pt.  2,  276 

New  Robber  Flies  from  Mada- 
gascar, S.  W.  Bromley,  283 
On  the  Genus  Viviania  with 
the  Description  of  Two  New 
Species  from  Texas,  H . J. 
Reinhard,  102 

Two  New  North  American 
Muscoid  Flies,  H.  J.  Rein- 
hard,  199 


309 


310  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


General  Subject. 


A New  Moth  Collecting  Jar, 
J.  D.  Gunder,  208 
A Convenient  Collecting  Con- 
tainer for  Butterflies,  J.  D. 
Gunder,  225 

A Personal  Note,  J.  R.  T.-B., 
39 

Charles  Jacob  Martin,  1935- 
1929,  G.  P.  E.,  39 
Change  of  Address,  G.  P. 
Engelhardt,  143 

Editorials : Entomologica 
Americana,  J.  R. 
T.-B.,  230 


The  Function  of  a 
Description,  J.  R. 
T.-B.,  54 

What  is  a Species? 
J.  R.  T.  B.,  230 

Notice : Entomologica  Ameri- 
cana, 262 

Proceedings  of  the  Society,  E. 
L.  Bell,  Carl  Geo.  Siepmann, 
56, 185, 232, 304 

The  Use  of  Paradichlorben- 
zene  in  the  Insect  Collection, 
J.  R.  de  la  Torre-Bueno,  27 


Heteroptera. 


A New  Arctocorixa,  with  a 
Note  on  Synonymy,  A.  Stuart 
Walley,  203 

A Report  on  the  Nomenclature 
of  Some  Neotropical  Noto- 
necta  with  the  Description  of 
Some  New  Species,  H.  B. 
Hungerford,  138 

A Wrongly  Identified  American 
Water  Strider,  Carl  J.  Drake 
and  H.  M.  Harris,  145 

Bugs  at  Light,  J.  R.  de  la  Torre- 
Bueno,  101 

Ceratocombus  vagans  McA.  & 
Mall,  in  Westchester  County, 
N.  Y.,  J.  R.  de  la  Torre- 
Bueno,  144 

Four  New  Species  of  Miridae 
from  Texas,  H.  G.  Johnston, 
295 

New  Species  of  Ceratocapsus , 
Harry  H.  Knight,  187 


New  Species  of  Pseudo  psallus 
Van  D.  with  an  Allied  New 
Genus  Described,  Harry  H. 
Knight,  1 

Notes  on  American  Tingitidae, 
Carl  J.  Drake,  268 
Note  on  the  Validity  of  Corixa 
Geoffroy  (1762),  G.  Stuart 
Walley,  49 

On  the  Heteroptera  Collected 
by  G.  P.  Engelhardt  in  the 
South  and  West,  J.  R.  de  la 
Torre-Bueno,  107 
Records  of  Anthocoridae,  par- 
ticularly from  New  York,  J. 
R.  de  la  Torre-Bueno,  11 
Six  New  Species  of  Tenagobia 
Bergroth,  G.  Stuart  Walley, 

U1  * 

Some  Tingitidae  from  Brazil, 
Carl  J.  Drake,  25 


Homoptera 

Two  New  Alconeura  with  Notes  on  the  Species,  Paul  B.  Law- 
son,  44 


Vol.  XXV  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  311 


Hymenoptera. 


A Contribution  to  the  Bionom- 
ics of  Bremus  vagans  (F. 
Sm.),  Theodore  A.  Frison, 
109 

Additions  to  the  New  York 
State  List  of  Insects.  The 
Oxybeline  Wasps,  V.  S.  L. 
Pate,  40 

Early  References  to  the  Be- 
havior of  American  Solitary 
Wasps,  Richard  Dow,  98 
Erratum,  Phil  Rau,  79 
Nesting  Habits  of  Isodontia,  a 
Subgenus  of  Chlorion,  J.  Be- 
quaert,  122 


Notes  on  Texas  Bees,  H.  B. 
Parks,  263 

On  the  Generic  and  Subgeneric 
Divisions  of  the  Vespinae,  J. 
Bequaert,  59 

Position  of  Strepsiptera  on 
Hosts,  Charles  Robertson,  96 
Postscript  to  “ Stylopized  Ves- 
pidae  ” in  Psyche,  vol.  36, 
1929,  pp.  249-282,  George 
Salt  and  J.  Bequaert,  226 
The  Nesting  Habits  of  Emphor 
B ombiformis  Cresson,  Phil 
Rau,  28 


Lepidoptera. 


A Convenient  Collecting  Con- 
tainer for  Butterflies,  J.  D. 
Gunder,  225 

A Generic  Revision  of  the 
Euchloini,  Alex  B.  Klots,  80 
A New  Melanie  Form  of  Telea 
polyphemus,  C.  Wm.  Wurs- 
ter,  273 

A New  Moth  Collecting  Gun, 
T.  D.  Gunder,  208 
A New  Moth  from  Siam,  T.  D. 

A.  Cockerell,  42 
Catocala  junctura  in  the  Ozark 
Region,  Auburn  E.  Brower, 
36 


Copaeodes  minima  Edwards 
from  Florida,  E.  L.  Bell,  8 
Diurnal  Lepidoptera  from  Wy- 
oming and  Colorado,  Alex- 
ander B.  Klots,  147 
Note  on  Eurymus  eurytheme 
autumnalis,  T.  D.  A.  Cocke- 
rell, 9 

Notes  on  Anxyloxypha  nitedula 
Burmeister,  E.  L.  Bell,  48 
Papilio  monuste,  Linnaeus,  W. 
J.  Holland,  133 

Variation  in  Lepidoptera,  T.  D. 
A.  Cockerell,  9 


The  Smaller  Orders. 

Position  of  Strepsiptera  on  Postscript  to  “ Stylopized  Ves- 
Hosts,  Charles  Robertson,  96  pidae  ” in  Psyche,  vol.  36, 

1929,  pp.  249-282,  George 
Salt  and  J.  Bequaert,  226 


INDEX  TO  GENERA  AND  SPECIES  OF  INSECTS, 
OTHER  ANIMALS  AND  PLANTS. 

New  forms  in  bold  face;  valid  genera  and  species  in  Roman; 
synonyms  in  italics ; * indicates  plants ; f Long  Island  records ; 
$ other  animals.  For  extensive  list  of  Coleoptera  from  Long 
Island,  see  pp.  21-24;  for  Diurnal  Lepidoptera  from  Wyoming 
and  Colorado,  see  pp.  147-170;  for  mosquitoes  from  Illinois,  see 
pp.  291-294.  Species  named  in  these  articles  not  included  in  the 
alphabetical  index  following. 


* Abronia  elliptica,  5 
Acalypta  duryi,  268 

ovata,  268 
saundersi,  268 

* Achillea  millefolium,  40 

var.  roseum,  40 
Adelphocoris  rapidus,  101 

* Aegopodium  podagraria,  40 
Agabus  erythropterus,  46 
Alconeura  fulminae,  44 

quadrimaculata,  45 
rotundata,  46 
unipuncta,  45 

var.  dorsalis,  46 

* Allium  canadense,  299 
Allotingis,  269,  271 

binotata,  278 
Alepomyia  bryanti,  128 

* Amelanchier,  41,  146 
Amphibolips  inanis,  233 
Amphorophora  rubi,  18 
Anabolia  bimaculata,  128 
Andrena,  96 
Andrenosoma,  287 

* Andropogon  scoparius,  78 
Anisogamus  modestus,  128 
Anisops,  251 

Anopheles  quadrimaculatus,  182 
Anodontobombus  (see  Bremus) 

* Anogra  coronopifolia,  4 
Anthaxia  aeneogaster,  146 
Anthocharis,  82,  83,  84,  85,  87, 

88,  90 

?bambusarum,  82 


cardamines,  82,  83,  84,  88 
cethura,  82,  84,  86 
damone,  82,  84 
eupheno,  82,  84 
euphenoides,  82,  84 
gruneri,  82,  84 
pima,  82,  84,  86 
sara,  82,  84 

(s.  g.  Falcapica),  83,  84,  90 
bieti,  83 
genutia,  83 
lanceolata,  82,  83,  84 
scolymus,  83 
Anthocoris,  16 

antevolens,  18 
borealis,  16,  17 
musculus,  16,  17 
nemorum,  17 
Anthophora,  122 
Anthrenus,  27 
Anthribus,  259 
Anticarsia  gemmatilis,  234 
Anxyloxypha  arene,  48 
nitedula,  48 
premnas,  48 
tucumanus,  48 

Aphaenogaster  fulva  subsp. 

aquia,  78,  79 
Apis  mellifica,  264 

* Apocynum,  152,  157,  159 
Aradus  cinnamomeus,  19 
Arcadopsyche,  129 

prominens,  129 

* Arctium  minus,  115 
312 


Vol.XXV  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  313 


Arctocorixa  impersonata,  204, 
206 

lineata,  203,  204,  205,  206 
noveboracensis,  203 
trilineata,  203,  204 
Arctoecia  consocia,  127 

* Artemisia,  276 

filifolia,  3 
tridentata,  149,  278 
trifida,  149 
Asthenidea,  12,  16 

temnostethoides,  16 

* Astragalus  alpinus,  155 
Asynonychus,  262 

Baeocera  picea,  235 
Banasa  dimidiata,  231 
Barce  uhleri,  307 
Bifidungulus,  1 
puberus,  2 
viridicans,  1,  2 
Biomyia,  102 
Bitoma  crenata,  56 
Bella,  48 
Boreus,  241,  247 
Brachycoma  sarcophagina,  119 
Brachytarsus,  259 

* Brassica  juncea,  115 
Bremus  americanorum,  109,  115 

bimaculatus,  109,  115,  116, 
X17 

centralis,  109 
flavifrons,  109 
frigidus,  116 

impatiens,  109,  115,  116, 
117 

vagans,  109  et  seqq. 

subsp.  bolsteri,  118 

saudersoni,  118 
var.  coctus,  118 
helenae,  118 
Brentus  anchorago,  305 
Brochymena  cariosa,  107 
Bruchomyia,  242,  244,  246 
Buenoa,  301 


Caborius  punctatissimus,  128 
Callidium  antennatus,  232 
Calligrapha  amelia,  235 
lunata,  232 

f.  bowditchi,  232 
hybrida,  232 
latevittata,  232 
medisrupta,  232 
philadelphica,  235 
rowena,  235 
scalaris,  235 

Callosamia  promethea,  186 
Cardiastethus,  20 
luridellus,  20 
pergandei,  20 

Cassida  flavicollis,  220,  221 
swartzii,  220 
Cathaemia,  89 

Catocala  gracilis  f.  cinerea,  235 
f.  lemmeri,  235 
junctura,  36,  38 
sordida  f.  metalomus,  235 
f Cecropia,  307 
Celtiphaga  celtis,  307 
clyton,  307 
* Cephalanthus,  195 
Ceratocapsus  barberi,  190 
biformis,  191 
camelus,  187,  189 
denticulatus,  193 
denticulatus,  194 
decurvatus,  194 
fanseriae,  191 
fascipennis,  189,  190 
geminatus,  192 
husseyi,  196 
juglandis,  193 
neoboroides,  197 
oculatus,  190 
pilophoroides,  197 
pilosus,  198 
pilosus,  198 
pilosulus,  198 
pumilus,  194,  195 
sericus,  196 


314  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vo l- 


tricolor,  192,  193 
truncatus,  195 
Ceratocombus  vagans,  144 
Cercyon  quisquilius,  46 
Ceutorhynchus,  261 
Chalcosicya,  215 

maestrensis,  215,  216 
nana,  216 

Chalibion  coeruleum,  99 
Chelymorpha  angusticollis,  220 
Chironomus,  239 
Chitonix  sensilis  f.  macdonaldi, 
235 

Chlaenius  laticollis,  58 
niger,  58 
Chloralictus,  96 
Chlorion  (Isodonta),  122 
auripes,  122 
elegans,  122 
exornatum,  123 
harrisi,  122 
splendidulum,  122 
tibialis,  122 

Chlorochroa  uhleri,  231 
Choragus,  259 
Cimberis,  260 
Cis  frosti,  41 
Colaspidea,  215,  217 
Copaeodes  minima,  8 
Corisa  trilineata,  204 
trivittata,  204 
Corixa  striata,  49 
Corythaica  bellula,  268,  269 
floridana,  268 

Corythucha  fuscomaculata,  25 
Crumoecia,  129 
Cryptorhynchidius , 261 
Cryptorhynchus,  261 
Cylindracheta,  245 
Cylindrotoma  pallescens,  280 
splendens,  280 
Cynips,  184 

centricola,  233 
fCyttaromyia,  280 


Daseochaeta  alpium,  43 
beryllodes,  43 
malgassica,  43 
marmorata,  43 
mckeanae,  43 
muscosa,  43 
orion,  43 
pallida,  43 
pulchra,  43 
verbenata,  43 
viridis,  43 
Dasythrix,  2Sy 
* Daucus  carota,  40 
Deinocerites,  183 
Deraecoris  ruber,  1 

var.  segusinus,  101 
Dermestes  cadaverinus,  306 
f peruvianus,  306 
Dichonia,  43 

Dicranomyia  (see  Limonia) 
Dicranota,  251,  252 
Dikraneura,  44 
Diphtera,  43 
Diphthera,  43 
aprilina,  43 
Diphtherocorna , 43 
Disonycha  caroliniana,  2x3 
conjugata,  209,  210,  21 1 
212 

costipennis,  209,  21  x 
glabrata,  210,  21 1 
limbicollis,  209,  210,  2x3 
pallipes,  209,  210,  213 
“ pennsylvanica,”  209 
pensylvanica,  209,  2x0,  2x2 
213 

var.  parva,  21 1 
procera,  209,  212 
recticollis,  214 
uniguttata,  210,  2x2,  2x3 
Dolichovespula,  62,  67 
arctica,  68 
arenaria,  68 
borealis,  68 


Vol.XXV  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  315 


diabolica,  68 
lama,  58 

maculata,  62,  68,  69 
media,  68,  69 
norvegica,  68 
sylvestris,  68 
Dolophilus  breviatus,  130 
Doydirhynchus,  260 
Drakella,  268 
Drepana  arcuata,  304 
Drusus  sparsus,  128 
Dufouriellus,  20 
ater,  20 

* Echinocactus  caespitosus,  266 

setispinus,  266 
texensis,  266 
Edessa  bifida,  107 
Elleschus  bipunctatus,  97 
Elytrogona,  222 
bacca,  223 
gemmata,  222,  223 
quatuordecimmaculata,  223 
Emphor  bombiformis,  28  et 
seqq. 

fuscojubatus,  34 

* Epilobium,  152,  159 
Epiphanis  cornutus,  53 
Eriocera,  251 

alberta,  73,  74 
longicornis,  74,  75 
Erioptera  (Ilisia)  armillaris,  77 
bispinigera,  76 
indianensis,  77 
laevis,  77 

Eriopya  lindseyi,  235 
Eroessa,  89,  90 
Euchloe,  86,  87 
ausonides,  87 

coloradensis,  88 
belemia,  87,  88 
belia,  86,  87,  88 
creusa,  87 
daphalis,  87 
falloui,  87 
olympia,  86,  87 


orientalis,  87 
? seitzi,  87 
? venosa,  87 
Euchloe,  82,  83,  85,  90 

(subg.  Elphinstonia),  87, 
88,  89,  90 
charlonia,  87,  88 
c.  pechi,  88 
c.  tomyris,  88 
? lucilla,  88 
tagis,  88 
Eumenes,  61 

Eurymus  eurytheme  autum- 
nalis,  300 

Euschistus  bifibulus,  107 
Eustictus  albocuneatus,  297 

knighti,  297 

Euthochtha  galeator,  107,  108 

Falcapica  (see  Anthocharis) 

* Fanseria  xanthofolia,  192 
Fenestrella,  268 
Fidicina  bogotana,  307 

mannifera,  307 
tibicen,  307 
viridis,  307 
Formica  fusca,  79 

Galerucella  maculipes,  217 
Gargaphia  concursa,  25 
trichoptera,  25,  26 

* Gauva  coccinea,  8 

parvifolia,  2 
Gerris  dissortis,  145 
notabilis,  145,  146 
rufoscutellatus,  145,  146 
f Gibbium  psylloides,  306 
Glyphosaelius  hostilis,  127 
Glyptoscelis,  215,  217 
aeneipennis,  217 
Graphops,  215,  217 
Graptolitha  lemmeri,  235 
Gryllotalpa,  245 

Halobates,  305 
Hebomoia,  89,  90 


316  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vol.XXV 


Heligmoneura  medianus,  290 
Heraeus  plebejus,  101 
Hesperocharis,  89 
Heteraspis,  216 
Heteraspis,  216 
Himatidium  nigripenne,  220 
J Homo  sapiens,  9 
Hydropsyche,  248 
indecisa,  128 
Hylemyia  cilicrura,  41 
Hylopsyche  indistinctus,  128 
Hymenarcys  nervosa,  107,  108 

Ilisia  (see  Erioptera) 

Isodontia,  122 

philadelphica , 122 
f Isolomalus  bistriatus, 

Jadera  aeola,  107 

haematoloma,  107 
sanguinolenta,  107 
* Juglans  major,  194 

Labopidea  geminata,  298,  299 
planifrons,  298,  299 
sericata,  3 

Laphria  nusoides,  287 
Lasiochilus,  12 

fusculus,  13,  14 
pallidulus,  13 

Leionotus  foraminatus,  96,  226 
fundatus,  96 
pedestris,  96,  226 
ziziae,  226 

Lepidopsallus  miniatus,  299, 
300 

nyssae,  299 
Leptobyrsa,  270 
Leptoglossus  phyllopus,  107 
Leptopharsa,  271 
distinconis,  272 
illudens,  25 

var.  variantis,  25 
lenatis,  272 
peruensis,  272 


Leptotrachelus  dorsalis,  58 
Leucophasia,  89 
Ligyrocoris  diffusus,  101 
Limnophila  claggi,  281 
munda,  282 

Limonia  (Dicranomyia)  ero- 
strata,  71 
signipennis,  71 
Liotingis,  270 

evidentis,  270 
Lithurgus  apicalis,  264 
bruesi,  263  et  seqq. 
compressus,  264,  265 
gibbosus,  264  et  seqq. 
Ligyrocoris  diffusus,  101 
Ludius  fulvipes,  41 
Lycaena  heteronea  graveno- 
tata,  163 

Lyctocoris  campestris,  12,  13 
canadensis,  13 
elongatus,  13 
stali,  12,  13 

Lygaeus  kalmii,  107,  108 
Lymnephilus  combinatus,  128 
moestus,  128 
ornatus,  128 
submonilifer,  128 
Lype,  127 

Macrotrachelliella,  16,  19 
nigra,  19 

Macrovespa,  61,  62,  64 
Mamillaria  heydeni,  266 
f Manomera  atlantica,  233 
Masicera  polita,  202 
seticauda,  200 
unispinosa,  199 
Megarhinus,  183 
Mesovelia  bisignata,  52 
mnlsanti,  52 
orientalis,  52 

Melanorhopala  clavata,  269 
lurida,  269 
obscura,  269 
reflexa,  269 


VoI.XXV  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  317 


Metachroma,  215 
adustum,  214 
terminalis,  214 
Metriosteles,  12 
Mezira  lobata,  107 
f Mezium  americanum,  306 
Microstylum  cinctum,  283 
lambertoni,  284 
lucifer,  285 
tananarivensis,  286 
umbrosus,  285 
Microvelia,  301 
Microzegris,  85,  86 

pyrothoe,  85,  86,  89 
Microzegris,  85 
Midea,  83 

genutia,  83 
Moma,  43 

Monanthia  parmata,  25 
* Monarda,  264,  265 
citriodora,  266,  267 
fistulosa,  1 1 5,  157 
punctata,  266,  267 
Monomacra,  21 1 
Mormidea  lugens,  107,  108 
Mormomyia  vernalis,  128 
Musca  domestica,  40,  41 
Mylothris,  89 
Myochrous  longulus,  146 
Myodochus  serripes,  101 

Namacus  annulicornis,  107 
Nannochorista,  241,  247 
Nemopalpus,  242,  244,  246 
Neoborus,  197 
Neophylax  ornatus,  128 
Nephrotoma,  76 
Neuronia  concatenata,  127 
pardalis,  127 
postica,  127 

Nisoniades  tucumanus,  48 
Nodonota,  215 

Notonecta  americana,  138,  141 
bergrothi,  138 
bifasciata,  140 
chinensis,  138,  139 


confusa,  140 

distincta,  141 
distinctoidea,  141 
fazi,  139,  141 
glauca,  138 
howardii,  139,  140 
indica,  139,  140 
indie  a,  140 
indicoidea,  141 
kiangsis,  138 
lunata,  140 
maculata,  138 
pallipes,  138 
punctata,  138 
raleighi,  140 
scutellaris,  138 
sellata,  140 
suensoni,  138 
unicolor,  138 
unifasciata,  139 
undulata,  138,  139,  140, 

141,142 
variabilis,  140 
virescens,  138,  139 
Notonecta  (see  Corixa) 
lineata,  203 
. noveboracensis,  203 
striata,  49 
Nusa,  287 

* Nyssa  sylvatica,  300 

X Ochotoma  sp.,  150 
Odynerus,  61,  96,  227 
dorsalis,  28 
erinnys,  96 
geminus,  28 
pedestris,  221 
“ ziziae  mss.,”  96,  226 
Oecetina  inconspicua,  129 
micans,  129 
Olemira,  129 
Olene  aridensis,  235 
lemmeri,  235 

Oncocephalus  geniculatus,  107, 
108 

Oncotylus  puberus,  2 


318  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  Vo l- 


Oodes  americana,  58 

* Opuntia  ellisiana,  264,  266, 

267 

leptocaulis,  266,  267 
lindheimeri,  264,  266,  267 
macrorhiza,  266 
Ophyra  leucostoma,  41 
Orchestes  pallicornis,  97 
testaceus,  97 
Onus,  16,  19 

insidiosus,  19 

var.  tristicolor,  19,  20 
Oropeza  johnsonella,  276,  279 
rogersi,  280 
subalbipes,  280 
Orthotylus,  1 

demensus,  8 

Oxybelus  emarginatus,  40 
intermedius,  40 
niger,  40 

quadrinotatus,  40,  41 
sericeus,  41 
subulatus,  41 

Pachyrhina  californica,  278 
Palaeovespa  baltica,  69 
florissantia,  70 
gillettei,  70 
relecta,  70 
scudderi,  70 
wilsoni,  70 

* Panicum  scribnerianum,  78 
Panorpa,  24  et  seqq. 
Pantomorus  godmani,  261,  262 
Papilio,  10 

amphinome,  135 
cynis,  133 
glaucus,  186 
monuste,  133  et  seqq. 
oenone,  135 
phileta,  136 
Papilio,  82,  83,  86 
Paracalocoris  deleticus,  3 
Paraphia  esther,  235 

f.  lemmeri,  235 


Paravespa,  62 

* Penstemon  hirsutum,  115 
Philosamia  cynthia,  186 

walkeri,  186 
Phrissura  cynis,  135 
Phrosinella  fulvicornis,  40 
Phryganea  cinerea,  127 
Phthia  picta,  107 
Phyllocharis,  87,  88 
tagis,  88 

Phyllophaga,  104 
Physocephala,  119 
Phytocoris  conspicuus,  295, 
296 

* Picea  engelmanni,  150 

parryana,  150 
Pieris,  89 

“ cycnis,”  133 
cynis,  133 
monuste,  133 
Piezostethus,  14 
Pilophorus,  197 

* Pinus  murrayana,  150,  151 

scopulorum,  151 
Platycentropus  maculipennis, 
128 

Plectrocnemia  albipuncta,  131 
aureola,  130 

Polistes,  69,  96 
gallicus,  227 

* Polyporus  betulinus,  41 

* Polygonum,  212,  214 
Polystes,  61 

Popillia  japonica,  95 

* Populus  angustifolia,  149 

tremuloides,  149 
Pontia,  85 

Pratobombus  (see  Bremus) 
Prionolabis,  282 
Proarna  insignis,  307 
Promachus  clavigerus,  288 
lemur,  288 
parvus,  288 

Proterosphex  ichneumoneus,  96 
Protoplasa  fitchii,  239  et  seqq. 


Vol.XXV  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  319 


Provespa,  62,  63 

anomala,  62,  63,  68 
barthelemyi,  63,  68 
dorylloides,  62,  63 
Proxy s punctulatus,  107 
Pseudopsallus,  1 
abroniae,  5 
anograe,  4 
artemisicola,  2,  4 
davisi,  6 
demensus,  7,  8 
nicholi,  7 

sericatus,  2,  3,  5,  6 
tanneri,  5,  6,  7 

Pseudovespa,  62,  66 
Psithyrus  laboriosus,  114,  119 
var.  citrinus,  114 
“ Psorophora  horridus,”  184 
Ptilandrena  erigeniae,  96 
f Ptinus  raptor,  306 
Pycnopsyche  guttifer,  128 
scabripennis,  128 
Pyrothoia,  85 

*Quercus  stellata,  300 

Rembus  laticollis,  58 
Reduvius  musculus,  16 
Rhabdomastix  (Sacandaga) 
leonardi,  75 

Rhaphidolabis  (R.)  cayuga,  73 
rubescens,  73 
stigma,  73 
vanduzeei,  73 
Rhinomacer,  260 
Rhyacophila  atrata,  130 
fairchildi,  130 
invaria,  130 
luctuosa,  130 

* Rubus  sp.,  17 

Sacandaga  (see  Rhabdomastix) 

* Salix,  149 

* Sarracenia  flava,  122 


Sarcophaga  sp.,  41 
Satyrium  fuliginosa  semiluna, 
161 

* Saxifraga,  152,  153 

f Scaphisoma  repanda,  235 
Sceliphron  cementarium,  98,  99, 
100 

i Scolopendrella,  15 
Scoloposcelis,  20 
flavicornis,  20 

* Sedum,  1 52 

Senotainia  rubriventris,  41 
trilineata,  41 
Sigara  striata,  49 
Solubea  pugnax,  107,  108 
Sphaeridium  bipustulatum,  46 
Sphaerocysta  globifera,  25 
Sphaeropis,  215 
Sphaerularia  bombi,  119 
Sphex  caendea,  99,  100 
pennsylvanica,  100 
vulgaris,  96 
Staphylus,  48 
Stenopelmatus,  245 
Stenus  planatus,  53 
retrusus,  53 

* Stipa  spartea,  78 
Stoiba  bruneri,  219,  220 

decemmaculata,  220,  221, 
223 

flavicollis,  219,  220 
indivisa,  218 

Synchloe,  83 
Synchloe,  87 

Telea  polyphemus,  234 

ab.  fumosus,  273 
Teleonemia  aterrima,  25 
morio,  25 
scrupulosa,  25 

Tenagobia  constricta,  176,  1 77 
hunger  fordi,  177,  179 
incerta,  175 
marmorata,  172,  173 
melini,  177 


320  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  v ol . XXV 


mexicana,  174,  175,  176 
minuta,  171,  172,  173 
pulchra,  172,  174 
romani,  177 
schadei,  177 
serrata,  175 
signata,  175,  176 
socialis,  175 
truncata,  172,  174 
Terrestribombus  (see  Bremus) 
f Tetranychus  telarius,  18 
Tetraphleps,  16 

americana,  18,  19 
canadensis,  19 
osborni,  18 
uniformis,  18,  19 
Thyanta  calceata,  107 
Thymelicus  premnas,  48 
tucumanus,  48 
Tigava  bondari,  25 
mollicula,  25 
Tipula  abdominalis,  276 
alhilatus,  276 
angustipennis,  276 
arctica,  276 
hella,  276 
borealis,  276 
californica,  278 
cincticornis,  276 
disjuncta,  276 
dorsimacula,  276 
duplex,  276 
filipes,  277 
furca,  276 
glomerata,  276 
hehes,  276 
inermis,  277 
jacobus,  277 
labradorica,  276 
latipennis,  277 
mesotergata,  277,  278 
mingwe,  276 
perlongipes,  277 
platymera,  276 
resurgens,  277 
simulata,  277 


sternata,  278 
sweetae,  278 
taughannock,  276 
tesselata , 276 
triplex,  277 
trivittata,  277 
?umbrosa,  277 
Triatoma  sanguisuga,  107 
Tricyphona  claggi,  280 
constans,  72 
diaphana,  280,  281 
exoloma,  281 
frigida,  281 
simplistyla,  72 
Trigonotylus  brevipes,  101 
ruficornis,  101 

Trirhabda  obscurivittata,  218 
Trypoxylum  politum,  98,  99, 
IOO 

Uloma  imberbis,  101 
Urodon,  259 

Vanessa  antiopa,  9 

var.  hygiaea,  9 
cardui,  9 

var.  elymi,  9 

io,  9 

ab.  antigone,  9 
polychoros,  9 

ab.  testudo.  9 
urticae,  9 

ab.  ichnusoides,  9 
Vespa,  pp.  59  et  seqq. 
analis,  65,  68 
anomala,  62 
auraria,  65,  68 
austriaca,  61,  62 
basalis,  65,  68 
bellicosa,  65,  68 
bicolor,  65,  68 
binghami,  63,  65 
cincta,  65 

var.  affinis,  65 
crabro,  61,  65,  68 
crabroniformis,  70 


Vol.  XXV  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomological  Society  321 


dasy podia,  69 
deusta,  65 
ducalis,  65,  68 
dybowskii,  66 
eulemoides,  66 
fervida,  65 
formosana,  68 
germanica,  61 
holsatica,  61 
indosinensis,  66 
jurinei,  68 
luctuosa,  65 
maculata,  62 
magnifica,  65,  68 
mandarina,  65,  68 
media,  61,  62 
micado,  66 
minuta,  68 
mocsaryana,  66 
mongolica,  65,  68 
multimaculata,  66 
nigrans,  65,  68 
norwegica,  61 
nigripennis,  66 
oberthuri,  65 
occidentalis,  61 
orientalis,  65,  68 
parallela,  65 
philipinnensis,  66 
rufa,  61 
rubricans,  66 
saxonica,  61 
suprunenkoi,  66 
tropica,  65,  66 
tyrannica,  66 
unicolor,  66 
variabilis,  66 
velutina,  65,  68 
vulgaris,  61,  62,  69 
wilemani,  66 
Vespa  coerulea,  99 
ichneumon,  99 

New  Genera  in 


Vespula,  61,  62,  66,  67 
austriaca,  66,  67 
communis,  67 
consobrina,  67 
germanica,  67 
japonica,  68 
koreensis,  68 
maculifrons,  67 
occidentalis,  67 
orbata,  68 
rufa,  67 
saussurei,  67 
squamosa,  67 
structor,  68 
sulphurea,  68 
vidua,  68 
vulgaris,  68 
* Vitex,  264,  265 
negundo,  266 
incisa,  267 
Vitula  edmansii,  119 
Viviania,  102 

angustifrons,  102,  104 
georgiae,  102,  104,  107 
lachnosternae,  102 
nocturnalis,  102,  104,  107 

Xenotrachelliella  inimica,  11 
Xylocoris,  12,  14 
americanus,  16 
betulinus,  14 
cursitans,  14,  16 
galactinus,  14,  15 
sordidus,  14,  15 
vicarius,  14,  15 
Xylocoris,  20 

Zanclognotha  martha,  235 
Zegris,  84,  85,  86,  89,  90 
eupheme,  84,  86 
fausti,  84,  86 
Zelus  bilobus,  107,  108 
exsanguis,  107,  108 
this  Index,  6 


New  Species  in  this  Index,  72 
Other  New  Forms  in  this  Index,  4 


* 


I 

I 

' 


i 


3 9088  01262  6651